John wrote:
>Maujean,
>What you did here, publishing a private communication on a list, is a
>gross faux-pas. I suggest that after having posted the two nice
>messager in this digest you gently crawl back under the stone. The
>disruptive after-kicking of an opponent divulges more of your character
K Barrett wrote: ...No sooner do you read a well written article from
Rebecca
Northen on orchid culture than you turn the page and read an equally well
writen article by Robert Scully stating the exact opposite of everything
stated in the previous article.
So go figure.
What?? You mean that the
on 8/19/04 7:38 PM, Peter wrote:
> From: "peter croezen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "OGD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [OGD] I can share this with you
>
> Andy called me a "slimy woofter" in his private e-mail to me.
>
> I don't know what a woofter is, but how eloquent a name!
>
> Leave i
In Vol. 6, Issue 336, Kenneth asked about a publication called "Orchid Lore,"
ostensibly published by the Houston Orchid Society.
Well... there may be a mistake as to which organization published this. We don't think
it came from Houston. Our newsletter, since 1973, has been called "Houston
Happ
Hello everyone,
There's an idea for an article i'd like to submit to the IPA
(International Phalaenopsis Alliance) Journal, and i'd like to ask everyone
if they could answer a few questions for me. This survey is for people who
grow phalaenopsis species. The article may appear in the last issue o
Andy called me a "slimy woofter" in his private e-mail to me.
I don't know what a woofter is, but how eloquent a name!
Leave it to Andy, he knows how to do things right!!
We are going to miss him.
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just want to thank Andy publicly for the
very "Andy like" private e-mail he sent me
in response to my post in OGD Vol 6 Issue 340.
The flattering names he calls me make me
swell with pride.
So nice to receive a private thank you from Andy, who appreciates
every bit of advice he gets, and then
Michael wrote:
Here's a question: many of my plants have started to put out new leads.
Generally, I like to have my fertillizing schedule coordinate with the
seasons, which means I'm due for a slow down soon, but since so many of my
plants seem to starting another active growth phase...I donno...
Andy,
You are more convincing when you make your arguments based on issues
like as you have with David Grove. You are less convincing when you
include attacks that are personal like whether someone has other
interests then orchids, one of your more benign personal attack
arguments. Of course yo
, *b and such happen because you write your post in word, copy and paste into
your e-mail send
message, and then your e-mail program converts it to plain text to send after you
press the send button. Before you press the send button everything looks good, then it
shows up on the OGD with
Volunteers are treasures handed to us, who work for FREE
and can quit anytime they feel like it.
WE NEVER EVER criticize volunteers the way Andy Easton criticized Harvey
Brenneise,
a former AOS volunteer. We may re-assign volunteers to tasks they are better
at, but
we always PRAISE THEM. Any true
I know, I know, you've never forgiven me for not using that pathetic little
article on growing under lights you sent to the AOS when I worked there.
Maybe you should send it to the Orchid Digest? The Orchid Digest magazine
is very good and so it should be, coming out only quarterly for the rather
InterestingI love coconut husk chips, and most orchids thrive in it...I
have found that phals are one of the few exceptions (along with phrags and
pleurothallids) that do not do as well with cch as in other mediaTake
care, Eric Muehlbauer in damp Queens NY.paphs micranthum, delanatii, a
Quickie number one: Although "Orchids" is a niche publication. I can say
that magazine sales have steadily declined over the last 12 years I've
worked in the industrly. To rally an organization around a publication
would be a very difficult thing to do. I'd vote for a top drawer web site.
Quic
In a message dated 8/19/04 4:29:17 AM, Cynthia Hill writes:
> Our 2004 special issue of Orchid Digest, due out in early October, will
> focus on the CATTLEYA ALLIANCE.
>
How do they do this without an elaborate building, tourists, inaccurate
terminology, and promoting mythological humidity trays
When you cease to be a predictable mouthpiece for Eric people might be
willing to listen to you. Do you think we should all sit back and let the
alternate slate lies go unchallenged. Birds of a feather indeed. I see your
good buddy, that leading Canadian orchid conservationist Croezen,
predictably
Hello Horacio;
>Hello I have a question:
>Actually my plants grown very well with foliar
fertilizers(Wuxal, Nitrofoska), but these fertilizers
do not contain calcium. it is necessary to apply
calcium to the orchids? The calcium is associate to
the flowering?<
Both calcium and magnesium are nec
At 10:53 18/08/04 +, you wrote:
and nothing less than blowing up the internet would fix it...Magazines are
simply not up to the task of beating the internet back...
In the case of Lindleyana I happen to disagree. I still much regret that
the AOS has decided to stop this publication, which was a
Marni who said:
>Unfortunately, I have deleted the OGD with the letter from Harvey
>Brenneise with comments about the AOS, so can't read it again.
Fortunately you can Marni!!!
Just click on this link
http://www.potto-webdesign.com/mailman/public/orchids/
When there, click on Authors in the Aug
The AOS had expenses over revenues to the tune of
$915,912 in 2001. This is the most recent year for
which the Form 990 is available. Anyone who wants to
see the .pdf of the Form 990 for any of the years from
1998 to 2002 inclusive may e-mail me and I will send
them. They are also available throu
I still like the AOS. However I interact with the volunteers rather than
the power people. It does bother me that there isn't a library at the
headquarters or a Director of Education or Conservation. There have been a
few pictures posted on the Usenet newsgroup alt.pictures.binaries.orchids
21 matches
Mail list logo
