I couldn't have remembered if my life depended on it. It was very good.
Down here right now Wisers Canadian Whiskey is a fantastic buy, 10 years
old, and the smoothest, slowest sipping variety I've had.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Sub
It's like it woke up during an operation because you didn't give it enough
anaesthetic!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:38 AM
Subject: Don't need no stinkin lens..
> Shot wit
--- Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pentax have been making pro cameras from about 1968, regardless of what
> definition
> you choose for pro-level, so I cannot see why they should stop now. Pentax
> have
> labeled at least six different bodies as "pro-grade" since 1968 and they have
> s
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you write something, I always make a point of reading it. I don't
> know what you mean by line-up, but to me (as an observer) the biggest
> drawback that Pentax has at the moment as an option is that it does
> not offer a complete system. E
To me this exudes lack of commitment.
More likely a lack of budget. It is obvious to me that Pentax simply can't
afford to put out everything that us enthusiasts would like to see. I think
this is why they've pretty much dropped film cameras altogether: they know
they have to focus on digital,
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
N... I know you gave me some very nice wine you made. This was
a bourbon or Scotch. You rationed it out.
Ah yes.
That was Basil Hayden's Kentucky Bourbon.
b..
Nice thing about being that high is you don't really need a PC lens to get
nice verticals. Would have been much better with a lower ISO- the details of
the background isn't great. Good framing though.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML
Some of us on the list are scanning old negatives. Some old film only had
numbers along the edges, and there's no reference to the name of the film
as there is on newer emulsions. This site may be helpful. It references
edge numbers to the film name and type.
http://www.taphilo.com/photo/kodakf
Wonderful shot Juan. I like how in photographs like these, it seems that the
subject has been captured a split second before they become camera
conscious.
Excellent work as usual, keep it up!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Juan Buhler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday,
Hello Ryan,
Thanks for the comments and thanks for not hating me .
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 9:24:31 PM, you wrote:
RL> Excellent shot Bruce. Good combination of two subjects one wouldn't normally
RL> put together. I love it!
RL> Cheers,
RL> Ryan
RL> - Original
Lookin' through that lens had the same effect on me.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> Hello John,
>
> I won't go to loathe, but extremely jealous comes to mind. It was
> your A* 200/2.8 that started it all for me back at Muir Woods.
Ok, I missed the original set of posts. Whats going on here? Someone
pulling someone else's leg? Very funny Bill.
rg
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:38:28 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shot with the Pentax 6x7, with no lens attached.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wro
N... I know you gave me some very nice wine you made. This was a
bourbon or Scotch. You rationed it out.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: GFM correction
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:19:49 -0600
- Original Message - From
Excellent shot Bruce. Good combination of two subjects one wouldn't normally
put together. I love it!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 2:57 PM
Subject: PESO - Jet Trail
> Where I live (Sacramento, Californ
I agree with Bruce- the lighting makes this shot for me. Nice feel to the
shot, and nice DOF too. Good frame Rob.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:07 AM
Subject: PESO Country hotel
> Hi Team,
>
> Stil
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
I don't mind looking stupid... it comes naturally. What was it?
Mighta been wine.
b...
Hello John,
I won't go to loathe, but extremely jealous comes to mind. It was
your A* 200/2.8 that started it all for me back at Muir Woods. That
is one sweet lens - not to mention that huge zoom. I think Peter
should really loathe you.
Bruce
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 8:40:18 PM, you wrote:
I don't mind looking stupid... it comes naturally. What was it?
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: GFM correction
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:37:33 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
William R
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:02:08PM -0500, frank theriault wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:54:54 -0800, Bruce Dayton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now hate is a very strong word . Maybe we could go with loathe
> > or something like that.
> >
> > Guess I shouldn't say that I picked up the K 200/2
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
William Robb wrote:
I hate beer. Ask Tom how many beers I drink in an average weekend.
Umm, to my recollection it was two. BTW, what was that other stuff
you gave me?
Rohypnol.
Did ya like it?
WW
Sue is the dinosaur's first name. It was named after the Indian Jones
type who organized the dig that discovered it.
It's a nice friendly name for a dinosaur, but you'd need an RPG if you
ever met Sue in person...otherwise, you be lunch!
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:50:13 -0500, frank
I apologize Marnie for digging up dead old threads on you. :(
I found the thread a fascinating read and your point of view was the
most fascinating of all. It just took me a long time to get on the top
of my to do list. Now its taken a whole life of its own again.
Including an excursion into t
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:40:51PM -0500, frank theriault wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:57:03 -0500, Peter J. Alling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think I've told you, I hate you, before haven't I?
> > Talent and that lens too.
>
> Oh, I believe we've both told him on more than one occasion
Alright, so now I loath you even more...
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Now hate is a very strong word . Maybe we could go with loathe
or something like that.
Guess I shouldn't say that I picked up the K 200/2.5 from KEH in
bargain condition for about $250. When it showed up I had to grab it
quick.
Bruce
Tu
*Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
-- *Benjamin Franklin (Though it's been quoted differently here in
the past).
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:21:55 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm srrry. Come here big fella and get a hug.
Tom
frank theriault mused:
>
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:29:31 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He's a pretty good kid overall, just reaching
> > that age where he *perceives* himself to be almost as smart as dear old dad.
>
> What was that Don Martin strip in the old Mad Magazines? I can't
>
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:54:54 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now hate is a very strong word . Maybe we could go with loathe
> or something like that.
>
> Guess I shouldn't say that I picked up the K 200/2.5 from KEH in
> bargain condition for about $250. When it showed up I had t
Now hate is a very strong word . Maybe we could go with loathe
or something like that.
Guess I shouldn't say that I picked up the K 200/2.5 from KEH in
bargain condition for about $250. When it showed up I had to grab it
quick.
Bruce
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 6:40:51 PM, you wrote:
ft> On T
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:21:55 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm srrry. Come here big fella and get a hug.
>
> Tom C.
Hugs won't do it. I'm not one of these SNAGs (Sensitive New Age Guys).
Beer is a good start, however.
You should come down to GFM and give me beer. If you do
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:00:55 -0700, Joseph Tainter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3342/display/2543597
>
> Comments welcome, of course.
>
> Thanks to whichever list member made me aware of fotocommunity.
>
> Joe
>
I'm still catching up on some of the weeken
I'm srrry. Come here big fella and get a hug.
Tom C.
Until I read Tom's snide post, I was going to comment that bokeh is so
important to Pentax, that even their bodies do it well.
But now I think I'll just go in a corner and sulk.
-frank, taking his toys and going home now.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:26:04 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "cbwaters"
> > Jeez Dave,
> > Judging by the number of towns listed, there just may be more
> > ghosts in Ontario than LIVING people...
> >
>
> Must not say it..
> WW
>
G
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:27:00 -0800, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier today, I've got a handfull of photos taken with the
> Fisheye-Takumar 18mm F11.
>
> The first eight photos were shot with my MX and a roll of Tri-X 400. They
> were scanned with my Minolta Dimage Sca
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:09:33 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very, nice the shot in the air is spectacular, but the one on the ground
> has "personality".
>
>
Well put, Peter!
Both are wonderful photos.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Br
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:38:28 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shot with the Pentax 6x7, with no lens attached.
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/nolens.html
>
> The floating head at the top is my friend Kim, who owns the studio I
> work out of when I need a studio, the fell
I suppose if you win the suite you'll collect quite a large nest egg...
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:41:56 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got some rather nice shots when using your 15mm when we saw the "Sue the
Dinosaur" exhibit
"Sue the Dinosaur".
Is tha
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 19:34:02 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank could have saved some money in the long run.
Hey!
I'm right here!
I can hear every word you're saying, you know.
Sheesh...
-frank (you could at least whisper, and ~pretend~ not to insult me)
--
"Sharpness is a bo
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 10:41:56 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got some rather nice shots when using your 15mm when we saw the "Sue the
> Dinosaur" exhibit
"Sue the Dinosaur".
Is that a sentence or a phrase?
Or to put it another way, is "Sue" a verb (as in what lawyers do?) or
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:57:03 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I've told you, I hate you, before haven't I?
> Talent and that lens too.
Oh, I believe we've both told him on more than one occasion.
I like this new concept, though. Hating the photographer ~and~ their
gear
Frank could have saved some money in the long run.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: William Robb
Subject: Re: Don't need no stinkin lens..
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:10:36 -0800
Very cool! I knew the 67 was a great body, but not even needi
Very cool! I knew the 67 was a great body, but not even needing a
lens...go figure.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 5:38:28 PM, you wrote:
WR> Shot with the Pentax 6x7, with no lens attached.
WR> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/nolens.html
WR> The floating head at th
William Robb wrote:
I hate beer. Ask Tom how many beers I drink in an average weekend.
Umm, to my recollection it was two. BTW, what was that other stuff you gave
me?
Tom C.
I'm thinking of coming, although I'm not going to register. If I do show, I'll
bring a large supply of rotgut whiskey for the serious drinkers.
Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter J. Alling"
> Subject: Re: GFM correction
>
>
> > Now you've done it Robb is gonna show up!
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
Now you've done it Robb is gonna show up!
I hate beer. Ask Tom how many beers I drink in an average weekend.
William Robb
I think I've told you, I hate you, before haven't I?
Talent and that lens too.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is the other shot I took last night along with "Jet Trail" that I
liked - slightly different than the previous PESO.
Pentax *istD, K 200/2.5, HandHeld, ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f4
http://www.dayton
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Purely medicinal...
BTW, was I drooling too?
b...
Very nice shot.
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
Still busy lately however I've another PESO shot last weekend at the end of a
2.5hr journey:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0489.jpg (~170kB)
Tech: *ist D, ISO800, 1/60s, Prog, Multi-seg metering, 77LTD @ f2.5, hand held
All comments and
Now you've done it Robb is gonna show up!
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
If me, you and Brooksie are left alone at PDML Central during the
seminars, there ain't gonna be no beer left when the others get back!
There's beer
W
Shot with the Pentax 6x7, with no lens attached.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/nolens.html
The floating head at the top is my friend Kim, who owns the studio I
work out of when I need a studio, the fellow on the bottom is Todd,
who was having trouble getting his head around a peice of fil
If me, you and Brooksie are left alone at PDML Central during the
seminars, there ain't gonna be no beer left when the others get
back!
There's beer
William Robb
Is the Pope a Catholic?
Bill
I never saw the original post of this. Glad you wrote something
Frank.
The lighting is what really makes this for me. It's not blown out
through the curtains and is just the right level her face. It has a
very snap shot look to it, but yet, the image is much, much better
technically than that.
Purely medicinal...
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:16:44 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is
allowed?
What? I don't have any re
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:16:44 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C"
> Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
>
> > What? I don't have any recollection.
> >
>
> I can well believe that...
> b...
>
I think you guys should take your s
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:15:10 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OH sure, knarF finds out I'm going to enter the competition and he can't
> stand the heat!
>
If it makes you feel better to think that, Kenneth, that's fine. You
can just remain in your little fantasy-wo
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: GFM correction
If me, you and Brooksie are left alone at PDML Central during the
seminars, there ain't gonna be no beer left when the others get
back!
There's beer
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New LX Owner
I've found the LX autoexposure extremely accurate. Of course in
situations that aren't neutral, exposure compensation must be
applied. That's true of any exposure system.
I've found it to be either very accurate,
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:17:46 -0800, Norman Baugher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't worry Frank, you can hang out with me and photograph rare beer
> bottles from all around the globe during the classes.
> Norm
>
Norm,
If me, you and Brooksie are left alone at PDML Central during the
seminars,
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:07:31 +1000, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Still busy lately however I've another PESO shot last weekend at the end of a
> 2.5hr journey:
>
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0489.jpg (~170kB)
>
> Tech: *ist D, ISO800, 1/60s, Prog, M
Don't worry Frank, you can hang out with me and photograph rare beer
bottles from all around the globe during the classes.
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
Well, that's it for me, then. I'll be a socializing spectator then.
I won't be able to get my reservation in until next pay, and it looks
like b
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
What? I don't have any recollection.
I can well believe that...
b...
OH sure, knarF finds out I'm going to enter the competition and he can't stand
the heat!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 8, 2005 8:08 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GFM correction
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:02 -0500, Bil
What? I don't have any recollection.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:18:59 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Yeah... we
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:03:06 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why be sorry...
Because I'm Canadian. Apologizing is what we do...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Yeah... well during the Super Bowl party at a neighbor's house, my
13-year old son decided to pull the chair out from under me when I
returned from refeshing my wine glass. I consequently sat on the
floor dri
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 01:05:51 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This thread reminds me of a junior college philosophy class.
Hell, it's not nearly up to ~that~ level!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:53:02 -0500, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of today, Feb 8, 161 of 165 seats are sold.
>
> Bill
>
Well, that's it for me, then. I'll be a socializing spectator then.
I won't be able to get my reservation in until next pay, and it looks
like by then all the se
This thread reminds me of a junior college philosophy class.
> Hey Marnie... I was just yanking your chain... that's why there was a
> smiley.
>
> I still don't believe ALL truths are subjective however...
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> >T
Aw Frank, you were supposed to keep it quiet. Now I'll have to kill you or at
least buy you a beer.
Can't wait.
Kenneth Waler
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 8, 2005 7:45 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GFM is quickly selling out
On T
The F 80-200 is supposed to be built better than the FA. If you can get
either new then I'd go for the F.
Larry Levy wrote:
I've got a chance to buy either a new FA 80-200 4.7-5.6 or a new F
80-200 4.7-5.6 lens for $100. Other than the obvious color and feel,
which should I consider and why?
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:01:18 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the other shot I took last night along with "Jet Trail" that I
> liked - slightly different than the previous PESO.
>
> Pentax *istD, K 200/2.5, HandHeld, ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f4
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PA
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:31:43 +1300, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2005, at 3:20 AM, frank theriault wrote:
>
> > "Out-of-focus" is a "problem"?
>
> You missed the context... I meant that not being out of focus is the
> problem (ie being drunk affects your vision).
Dave,
I did
Hey Marnie... I was just yanking your chain... that's why there was a
smiley.
I still don't believe ALL truths are subjective however...
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:47:48 -0500, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like to shoot landscapes, bugs, and birds - but hey, the occasional
> bi-pedal amphibious hominid is also fair game!
>
> http://www.markcassino.com/temp/IMGP7042.jpg
>
> Shot with the *ist-D and Sigma 70-200. It's not
I wouldn't put a nail in film's coffin.. but that particular scanner needs
to be put 6ft under from all the reviews I've seen ..
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:39 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject:
As of today, Feb 8, 161 of 165 seats are sold.
Bill
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:38:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've found the LX autoexposure extremely accurate. Of course in situations
> that aren't neutral, exposure compensation must be applied. That's true of
> any exposure system.
> Paul
Maybe it's my sample, then.
I'
As of yesterday, Feb 07, 158 of 165 seats are sold.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: GFM is quickly selling out
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:37:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:21:55 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's a damn PC :-P
Sorry :-(
-frank
Why be sorry...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners
Sounds like you have a sticky aperture on your lens. My 35mm has
developed this problem. All the other lenses seem to be working fine.
You should try a different lens on the camera.
Nick Clark wrote:
Yep! You've got me sussed! I put a roll of XP2 through it yesterday.
I discovered why the aut
In a message dated 2/8/2005 2:54:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
>
>> 7.) I don't debate (at least anymore and at least not on the Net).
>> I've been
>> involved in too many k
It's funny, but last year I went to a museum where they wanted me to
check my "tripod", as they weren't allowed in.
I pointed out it was a monopod and they let me take it in. (I don't
think they knew what a monopod was).
Cotty wrote:
On 8/2/05, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW many
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:37:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00), Kenneth Waller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to Catherine, on 2/4 -
> I'm in - along with my brother in law (Cannon) and my wife, ex sherpa (as
> guest).
>
> Kenneth Waller
Waller finds out I may not be competing in the Nature Photography
C
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:29:31 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He's a pretty good kid overall, just reaching
> that age where he *perceives* himself to be almost as smart as dear old dad.
What was that Don Martin strip in the old Mad Magazines? I can't
remember it's name, but I do remember
I've found the LX autoexposure extremely accurate. Of course in situations that
aren't neutral, exposure compensation must be applied. That's true of any
exposure system.
Paul
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:20:31 -, Nick Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep! You've got me sussed! I put a rol
According to Catherine, on 2/4 -
I'm in - along with my brother in law (Cannon) and my wife, ex sherpa (as
guest).
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Feb 8, 2005 6:31 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GFM is quickly selling out
In a message dated 2/8/2005 3:21:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, but if you steadfastly hold to the viewpoint that nothing is real,
what is there to debate? :) Sorry Marnie, being a smart***.
Tom C.
=
Another thing I never said.
I said that believe all TRUT
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the comments (thanks all, btw)
No, I don't use AF. Just manual, and try to focus on the viewfinder,
sometimes trusting the focus indication LEDs.
The FA35/2 was already one of my favorite lenses, even though 50mm is
my preferred FL. With the istD it becomes about a 52.5mm, s
Sorry Frank, it's just you...
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:53:14 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took my daughter, Erin, out shooting Saturday afternoon. We went
somewhere that neither of us had been before. Quite a pretty area and
we had a good time. I'll try
Funny... I think he was equally embarrassed by the result. He knew he had
gone too far. Not wanting to experience angst like that again, I doubt
he'll repeat *that* trick. He's a pretty good kid overall, just reaching
that age where he *perceives* himself to be almost as smart as dear old da
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:27:05 -0800, Rolling Red <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No I don't know Panama Red, but now that you tipped me off, I'll give
> his work a listen. Rolling Red as in Rolling Redknuckles...thanks for
> demystifying my alias ;)
>
I didn't mean to blow your cover.
I ha
the L teleconverters work on a very limited number of lenses. the 2X-L
protrudes almost an inch in front of the mount and the 1.4X-L a little more.
my tests on the Sigma AF converts show them to be very good.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "jta
Nuff said...
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
But Costco is running a special on film and slide scanners:
http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=10039838&whse=&topnav=&cat=&s=1
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buil
On 8 Feb 2005 at 23:20, Nick Clark wrote:
> Great feel to it, but I might look out for a grip, or perhaps make one if I
> can
> find a screw of the right guage. I'll need to find some strap lugs too.
I used to carry around my LX all day using just my fingers tucked under the
grip, it's pretty g
it also fits very few lenses. i have one where it fits properly, the A*
400/2.8, and one where it fits if you use it carefully, the FA* 400/5.6. the
latter isn't on the supported list, and i see why.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, F
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:03:55 -0700, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah... well during the Super Bowl party at a neighbor's house, my 13-year
> old son decided to pull the chair out from under me when I returned from
> refeshing my wine glass. I consequently sat on the floor dribbling my w
i reread the NIKKEI release and a couple of others. Nov-Jan sales of the D70
was about 300K units. this is about the same as Canon's Digital Rebel sales.
the two of them dominate the DSLR sales. Pentax is a distant third, but i
don't know how far behind. the *istDS introduction made that possibl
knarF,
the only problem I have with it photographically is the blown out screen.
It's amazing how much oof exists between the in focus screen and the viewer.
As far as a non hoovering title - how about "Frankie likes it"
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PR
What about them? Tell them it is a walking stick and you just happen to be
resting your camera on it. Actually, I no of no laws that specifically mention
monopods.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Cotty wrote:
On 8/2/05,
Hi Team,
Still busy lately however I've another PESO shot last weekend at the end of a
2.5hr journey:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/IMGP0489.jpg (~170kB)
Tech: *ist D, ISO800, 1/60s, Prog, Multi-seg metering, 77LTD @ f2.5, hand held
All comments and questions welcome.
Cheers,
R
Frank wrote:
BTW, WRT to all this "is reality really real?" discussion, I remember
reading somewhere (but I'll be damned if I can remember ~where~) that
for all his talk about being and nothingness, when Heidegger walked in
a room and saw a chair, he knew damned well that the chair really was
~ther
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
