:06:50 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the comment, I've just bought one and really like the zoom
head,
> > should work well with the 28-105 FAp and the MZ-3. I've y
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
> Thanks for the comment, I've just bought one and really like the zoom head,
> should work well with the 28-105 FAp and the MZ-3. I've yet to test the AF
> assist infrared thingie :)
That rocks too. I have managed to get focused pictures with the 500
]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:25:30 + (GMT)
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
>
> > That all sounds very reassuring, I think I might just look into getting
the
> > AF400FTZ
>
> I
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
> That all sounds very reassuring, I think I might just look into getting the
> AF400FTZ
It is a very nice flash and can be bought for a song. There is also an
optional W/A adapter (24mm coverage on 35mm) for it, for which I have
no opinion.
Kostas
Thanks Giao
That all sounds very reassuring, I think I might just look into getting the
AF400FTZ
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:34:31 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 d
Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
> >> >> It is totally useless in this regard.
>
> Out of curiosity, even with the P-TTL (preflash) ?
>
> I found that preflash TTL does decent results with digital,
and I saw
> some nice ones from Gianfra
John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have
been
> > problems reported with the *ist-d.
>
> Hi Peter
>
> Ever tried the MZ-3 ZX-5n with the AF400FTZ, would you care to
comment on
> performance?
John,
According to my experience, the perf
- Original Message -
From: "David Zaninovic"
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
I am sorry if you understood it like that, it was not my
intention. I was asking about TTL flash as I never used it and was
hoping that it would work correctly on
- Original Message -
From: "Frantisek"
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
>> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
>> It is totally useless in this regard.
Out of curiosity, even with the P-TTL (preflash) ?
I'm not that technolog
--
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:03:47 -0500
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
> Actually no, I use old AF280T flashes. Since the MZ-3 and ZX5n
> don't seem to be capable of higher
: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:54:24 -0500
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have been
problems reported with the *ist-d.
David Zaninovic wrote:
I
>> >> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
>> >> It is totally useless in this regard.
Out of curiosity, even with the P-TTL (preflash) ?
I found that preflash TTL does decent results with digital, and I saw
some nice ones from Gianfranco's new 360FGZ (just few frames when you
bought
some situations it can make a mistake as
it does not know all the facts that TTL flash would
know.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: how does the Z
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:54:24 -0500
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
> It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have been
> problems reported with the *ist-d.
>
> David Zaninovic wrote:
>
> >>I have giv
My guess is that the programming for the TTL flash was lifted directly
from the ZX series of cameras, and doesn't
take into account the difference in reflectance of the digital sensor
(and it's smaller size), compared to film. It should
by all rights be more consistent, since the reflectance nev
It is in the LX, MZ-3 ZX5n in my experience. There have been problems
reported with the *ist-d.
David Zaninovic wrote:
I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
It is totally useless in this regard.
Shouldn't the TTL flash be more precise than auto flash ?
--
I can understand wh
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis"
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
I'm not going to get into another theoretical pissing contest.
Good idea!
This is not to imply not ever again.
Just to be clear.
William Robb
William Robb mused:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Zaninovic"
> Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
>
>
> >> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
> >> It is totally useless in this regard.
>
- Original Message -
From: "David Zaninovic"
Subject: Re: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
It is totally useless in this regard.
Shouldn't the TTL flash be more precise than auto flash ?
I'm not going
> I understand it like this: An auto flash will have its own built-in quench
> circuit. As long as you follow the ISO/aperture/distance guide, you're okay.
>
> TTL relies on the camera to quench the flash, and if the camera can't get it
> right, then...
... the camera is defective and needs servic
I understand it like this: An auto flash will have its own built-in quench
circuit. As long as you follow the ISO/aperture/distance guide, you're okay.
TTL relies on the camera to quench the flash, and if the camera can't get it
right, then...
t
On 11/8/04 14:06, David Zaninovic wrote:
>> I
> I have given up on using the istD with TTL flash.
> It is totally useless in this regard.
Shouldn't the TTL flash be more precise than auto flash ?
- Original Message -
From: "Amita Guha"
Subject: how does the ZX-50 do with ttl flash?
I'm bringing a couple of film bodies with me this week, and I was
wondering
if I would save myself some headaches by using the ZX-50 with my
flash
instead of the *istD. I'll
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Amita Guha wrote:
> I'm bringing a couple of film bodies with me this week, and I was wondering
> if I would save myself some headaches by using the ZX-50 with my flash
> instead of the *istD. I'll use the ZX-50 at the wedding if it makes my life
> easier. I have a bunch of fil
I'm bringing a couple of film bodies with me this week, and I was wondering
if I would save myself some headaches by using the ZX-50 with my flash
instead of the *istD. I'll use the ZX-50 at the wedding if it makes my life
easier. I have a bunch of film that I should probably use up anyway.
Thanks
25 matches
Mail list logo