+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 19 Mag 2023, 04:27 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
>
> Rene.
>
> On 19/05/2023 09:23, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.8.0 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> > You can find:
> >
> > - The maven release staged in reposi
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 24 Mar 2023, 03:56 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Rene.
>
> On 24/03/2023 00:21, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.4 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> > You can find:
> >
> > - The maven release staged in reposi
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 11:21 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.3 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1072:
> https://repository.apache.org/cont
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:19 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.9 release of the Apache James
> MIME4J library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1070:
> https://repository.apache.
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 30 Dic 2022, 08:24 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.3 release of the Apache James
> JSPF library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1071:
> https://repository.apache.or
+1
Vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:28 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.8 release of the Apache James
> MIME4J library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1067:
> https://repository.apache
+1
Vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:13 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> I would like to propose a new vote for 1.0.2 release of the Apache James
> JSPF library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1069:
> https://repository.apache.org/conte
+1
vincenzo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 5:48 AM Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8 release of the Apache James
> JSieve library.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1068:
> https://repository.apache.org/conte
+1
Vincenzo
Il Lun 10 Ott 2022, 03:14 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James
> JDKIM library.
>
> You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the
> artifact #1065:
> https://repository.apache.org/conten
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 7 Ott 2022, 09:26 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.2 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1066:
> https://repository.apache.org/cont
+1
Vincenzo
Il Dom 2 Ott 2022, 11:06 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> +1
>
> On 02/10/2022 16:06, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James
> > JDKIM library.
> >
> > You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org
+1
Vincenzo
Il Lun 29 Ago 2022, 04:30 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
> Rene.
>
> On 26/08/2022 18:12, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > |Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.1 release of the Apache
> > James server. You can find: - The maven release staged in
> > repository.apache.org as t
+1
Vincenzo
___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Il Ven 1 Apr 2022, 12:35 Rene Cordier ha scritto:
> +1,
> Rene.
>
> On 01/04/2022 12:04, Benoit TELLIER wrote:
> > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.7 release of
> >
+1
Vincenzo
___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Il Mer 2 Mar 2022, 04:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.7.0 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The
+1
Vincenzo
Il Gio 27 Gen 2022, 08:08 Benoit TELLIER ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for the bad formatting.
>
> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.2 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> You can find:
>
> - The maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the artifact
> #1061:
+1
Vincenzo
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:44 AM Antoine Duprat wrote:
> +1
>
> Antoine
>
> Le jeu. 16 déc. 2021 à 08:27, btell...@apache.org a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> > This time, as discussed on the JI
+1
Vincenzo

___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l
Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI)
Cel. +39-3939837493
fax: +39-02-25514302
https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari
http
+1
Vincenzo
Il Ven 17 Set 2021, 13:01 btell...@apache.org ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> On 17/09/2021 17:59, btell...@apache.org wrote:
> > |Subject: Hi, I would like to propose a new vote for 0.8.6 release of
> > the Apache MIME4J library. You can find: - The maven release staged in
> > repository
+1
Vincenzo
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:09 AM Tellier Benoit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following a user request (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-297
> ),
>
> I would like to propose a vote for 0.8.4 release of the MIME4J library.
>
> You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache
+1
Vincenzo
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:28 AM Rémi Kowalski <
remi.florian.kowal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit
> :
>
> > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James
> > server.
> >
> > After an initial mistake (sorry), a
+1
Vincenzo

Il Gio 16 Lug 2020, 08:44 Tellier Benoit ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new vote 3.5.0 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> I fixes Matthieu remarks since last proposal.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release on th
+1

___
Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Liquidatore - GoCloud S.r.l
Sede legale: Via Larga 15, 20122 Milano (MI)
Cel. +39-3939837493
fax: +39-02-25514302
https://google.com/+VincenzoGianferrariPiniGoCloud
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vgianferrari
http
+1 for all components
Vincenzo
Il Gio 28 Mar 2019, 09:27 Benoit Tellier ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> In order to improve overall James development experience, I propose to
> do a bit of post 3.3.0 cleanup.
>
> The proposal is to mark the given components as deprecated now, then, if
> no contributor
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno gio 14 mar 2019 alle ore 10:54 Benoit Tellier <
btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 0.8.3 release of the Apache MIME4J library.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release, as well as communication
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno lun 18 mar 2019 alle ore 10:01 Antoine Duprat
ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 3.3.0 release of the Apache James server.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release, as well as communication on this GitHub pull
>
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il giorno dom 11 giu 2017 alle ore 07:35 Manuel Carrasco Moñino <
man...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, 6:06 AM aduprat wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Le 09/06/2017 à 05:09, Benoit Tellier a écrit :
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to call
+1
Vincenzo
Il giorno gio 11 mag 2017 alle ore 04:10 Benoit Tellier <
btell...@linagora.com> ha scritto:
> +1
>
> Le 11/05/2017 à 01:25, aduprat a écrit :
> > Hello every one,
> >
> > I'm very happy to announce the vote for the upcoming 3.0.0-RC1 version
> > of our beloved james server.
> >
> >
+1
Great job,
Vincenzo
Il Ven 21 Apr 2017, 13:07 Tellier Benoit ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> After a one week feedback period, as discussed in a previous email, I
> would like to trigger a one week voting period for release of the new
> version of the website.
>
> The changes includes:
>
> - A new
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il Gio 3 Nov 2016, 09:25 Manuel Carrasco Moñino ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> - Manolo
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:00 AM, aduprat wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello every one,
> >>
> >> I'm very happy to announce the vote for the upcoming 3.0.0-beta5 ver
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il Sab 15 Ott 2016, 06:34 Manuel Carrasco Moñino ha
scritto:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> - Manolo
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016, 15:13 Matthieu Baechler wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthieu Baechler
> >
> > On 10/12/2016 01:15 PM, Tellier Benoit wrote:
> > > Hello every one,
> > >
t; > Regards,
> >
> > Laura
> >
> >
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
> -
ames.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
> --
*Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini*
un for 72h.
>
> You have my +1.
>
> p.s. One thing to have in mind is that we need to we need to take care
> of the site publishing also. But it's doable.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
*Ing. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini*
Chairman & CTO - GoCloud
Sede legale: Via Larga 15,
[X] +1 Please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
--
Il presente messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono confidenziali in ragione
della loro natura professionale e, in ogni caso, non accessibili al
pubblico. Nel caso in cui il presente messaggio sia ricevuto da soggetto
diverso dal suo diretto destinatario, si
[X] +1 Please release
Vincenzo
2012/3/22 Eric Charles
> (resending, the mail didn't appear in the mailing lists)
>
> Hi Jamers,
>
> Please review and cast your VOTE for James server application 3.0-beta4
> release. NOTICE and template configuration files have been fixed further to
> your last r
[X] +0 No time to review
Sorry guys, but currently I'm unable to follow it. I hope in the future to
be more helpful.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2012/3/2 Eric Charles
> Hi there,
>
> We are ready to vote for James server application 3.0-beta4 based on the
> latest and greatest Protocols 1.6.2, Mailbox 0.3,
[X] +0 No time to review
Vincenzo
2012/1/19 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> after a defect in starttls was found in Apache James Protocols 1.6.0
> its time to release a bugfix release for it asap.
>
> So please cast your vote...
>
> Artifacts to review:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
[ x] +0 No time to review
Vincenzo
2012/1/8 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> its time again for a new release of Apache James Mime4j 0.7.2.
>
> Changelog:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MIME4J+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.7.2%22+AND+status+
[X] +1 Please release
I'm too busy around to review, but I agree with Stefano.
Vincenzo
2011/10/18 Stefano Bagnara
> 2011/10/18 Felix Knecht :
> > Hi
> >
> > A list of changes/fixes:
> > - Logos for James modules added (when existing)
> > - Fancybox utility for image zooms under MIT licence ad
[X] +1 Release Apache James 3.0-beta3
Great job Robert!
Vincenzo
Inviato dal dispositivo wireless BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Robert Burrell Donkin
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:33:32
To: James Developers List
Reply-To: "James Developers List"
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache James
[x] +1 Go ahead
Vincenzo
2011/6/12 Eric Charles
> [x] +1 Go ahead
> - Eric
>
>
> On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
>> need the new mailbox api changes.
>>
>> This release does not need any api changes
[X] +1 Yes please release
Vincenzo
2011/5/21 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> here is the VOTE for version 0.2 of Apache James IMAP. This will be
> used for the upcomming beta release of Apache James Server.
>
> So please review and cast our vote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori
[X] + 0 No time to review
Sorry, I'm not able now to examine the whole thing ...
If my vote becomes crucial, let me know.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2011/5/10 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> this is the VOTE for release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1.
> Both releases are needed for james-server 3.
[X] +1 Yes please go ahead
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2011/4/23 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> this is a VOTE to move the minimum java version to java6 for
> james-server, imap, mailbox.
>
> So please VOTE...
>
> [ ] +1 Yes please go ahead
> [ ] +0 No real preference
> [ ] - 1 No... We need to at least sup
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
[X] +1 Yes, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2010/11/27 Norman Maurer
> Hi there,
>
> its time again to cut a release for protocols. This release will be
> included in the upcomming james server release. So please review and
> cut your VOTE:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
[X] +1 Yes please release
2010/11/10 Norman Maurer
> Hi all,
>
> after fixing a major bug with leaking files on windows I want to start
> the VOTE for M2 again.
>
> Here are the artifacts for review:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-056/
>
> So please cast your
[X] +1 Yes please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
2010/11/6 Norman Maurer
> Hi all,
>
> its time to start a VOTE for the second milestone of the
> upcomming major version of JAMES Server (3.0). I know its not long
> since the last milestone
> but we fixed a bunch of bugs, and you know.. Release often;Re
[X] +1 Looks good, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Il giorno 15 ottobre 2010 21.22.44 UTC+2, Norman Maurer
ha scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut the first
> milestone of JAMES server. For doing so we need a new release of IMAP.
> I think after fixi
[X] +1 Looks good, please release
Ciao,
Vincenzo
--Messaggio originale--
Da: Norman
A:James Developers List
Rispondi a:James Developers List
Oggetto: [VOTE] Release of protocols-1.2-M1
Inviato: 15 Ott 2010 07:16
Hi there,
we are currently doing the last steps to get ready for cut the f
[X] +1 Please release the artifacts
Vincenzo
P.S. Thanks for your continuous commitment.
2010/7/4 Norman Maurer
> Hi all,
>
> to be able to release James Server 3.0-M1 we need to cut a release of
> the protocols subproject, to remove SNAPSHOT dependencies. The protocols
> release
> contains s
[X] +0 No time for review
Vincenzo
>
> [X] +1 Please release the artifacts
>
> Vincenzo
>
[X] +1 Please release the artifacts
Vincenzo
[X] +0 No time for review
Sorry for not being helpful.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Great!
I'm unable to review, so
[X] +0 No time for review
But otherwise I would +1, as it's a long awaited thing!
Vincenzo
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think its time to cut the first milestone of IMAP.
>
> This Milestone will prolly be used for the f
>
> [+0] No time to review
>
>
Great Norman!
> [X] +0 I trust you enough but had not the energie to review the changes
>
>
Sorry, but I won't be able to test it. But it would be a very important
thing to give back fuel to James.
Ciao,
Vincenzo
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just for to be safe I would start a VOTE about adding Hupa[1] as
> subproject to JAMES. So here we go..
>
> [X] +1 Yeah I would like to Hupa included it
>
Vincenzo
>
> Thx,
> Norman
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/labs
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i've uploaded an FC to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/james/
>
> please review, test and then vote. all are encouraged to express their
> opinions but only PMC votes are binding on apache.
>
> note
I agree with Steve.
Vincenzo
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Steve Brewin wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldon...@gmail.com] wrote on: 12
> June 2009 14:06
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Stefano
> > Bagnara wrote:
> > > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > >> i'd like
I didn't get too much acquainted with JSieve, unfortunately.
[ ] +1 Release Apache JSieve 0.3
[X] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not release Apache JSieve 0.3
Cheers,
Vincenzo
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i think we're still need another
[x] +1Release apache-mailet-base 1.0
Bye,
Vincenzo
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> after three release candidates, i think it's time to call the work.
> the release can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/apache-mailet-
X] +/-0, I don't care
Same as Stefano :)
Ciao,
Vincenzo
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Development of mime4j has considerably gained speed, with added
> > committers and successful releases.
> >
> > Mime4j discussions comp
>
>
> [X] +1 Release Mailet API 2.4
Vincenzo
+1
Vincenzo
>
>
> [x] +1 Create mailet-base
Vincenzo
[x] +0 Cool to see the release
Vincenzo
+0
BTW, below it looks like the vote has already been closed on Sunday 23 ...
;-)
Vincenzo
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi dev-team,
>
> I finally found the time to prepare for next jSPF
> release...
>
> Fixed bugs and improvements can be found at
>
>
> [x] +1 Create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not create product standard-mailets in mailet subproject
>
> -
>
>
> --8<--
>
>
> [x] +1 Move Mailets to Mailet subproject
>
>
Vincenzo
[X] +1 I agree that Jukka should be allowed to commit anywhere in James codebase
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Vincenzo
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As proposed in a previous mail, we should make the spring-deployment
> part of trunk.
> As a consequence, we would be able to release a Spring-container-based
> Server runtime besides our regular Avalon-based.
>
> Please cast your vote to execute
>
+1
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1 Great!
Vincenzo
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the code in trunk has a ton of new features
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-server-dev/200707.mbox/browser)
i think that the upcoming spring integration might be a good excuse to
cut a milestone from trunk and christen
+1
Vincenzo
Danny Angus wrote:
On 5/14/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.
+1.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Vincenzo
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jukka Zitting, JackRabbit Committer & PMC Chair, has volunteered to help
work on a Proof of Concept related to the use of JCR as our unified data
store. The proof of concept will start by focusing on the modelling of the
data in JCR, and will build from the J
+1
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
its me again :-P
If we want to get JAMES 2.3.1 out of the door before ApacheCon EU we
have to VOTE now. So here it is...
You can grab the builds from:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads
Please test and review ;-)
This VOTE will be clos
+1
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
after noone replied to my question about 2.3.1rc1 I dediced to moved
forward to start a vote (to much time allready lost). So please
download,test and vote ;-)
A list of changes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.j
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
You should do this in trunk. Trunk is where development is done.
After you have done this in trunk we can discuss wether to backport
it to some branch.
And I will do it that way. But then I need to immediately backport to
2.3 (or 2.4
to trunk! This
would look like an old story that we "old guys" remember.
Vincenzo
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 21.12.2006, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Vincenzo Gianferrari
Pini:
- New Features into Trunk
- Bugfixes into the Release Branch of 2.3
- ported Features of Trunk th
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Vincenzo,
see inline...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 16:04
An: James Developers List
Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Using of 2.3 branch
*We* comitters should be wise
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Agree, but at the same time having three branches is hard to mantain
(we know that from the past history of James), so what I think is
worth is to all of us be more *flexible and pragmatic*.
Imho mantainability depends on how much
treet. You might introduce features that are not well-tested, and
that must be released with the critical bugfix that has to be fixed and
released.
I hope I was able to bring my point across...
Kind regards
Juergen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL P
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
i start this vote because i want to get an idea what other developers
think about this. Here are the possible solutions:
1) Commit fixes and new "minor" features to 2.3 branch:
+1.
My point is: we need fixes plus minor features applied to code branch
that we
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
as you (hopefully) all know the current Quota code is very ineffectiv
and can cause many problems when using JDBC based mailrepository.
See:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-717
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-718
For me there are 2 possible
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-712?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini reopened JAMES-712:
-
The fix applied to RemoteDelivery does not compile under JDK 1.4 because uses
"replace(CharSequence target, CharSeq
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-616?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini updated JAMES-616:
Fix Version/s: Next Major
Gary Robinson gave a first answer with some clarifications/links and promised
to come back, but didn't
It seems to be a reasonable set of choices.
I will try to have james-616 in time for the next checkpoint.
Vincenzo
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Hi all,
Norman and I made today an IM session to review current JIRA issue. We:
1. moved to "Trunk" every issue having an assignee and no fix version
2. mo
is delivering a "552 No such user" Can we
really be sure that there really is no such user, or that the administrator
may have mis-configured his Mailserver. ;)
Kind regards
Juergen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Monta
Hi Norman,
IMHO the point is: are we sure of that? Will dnsjava return
Lookup.TRY_AGAIN even if all *my nameservers* are reachable but they are
isolated from the rest of the world?
And do you agree that the above is the right discriminator?
Ciao,
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi Vincenzo,
Hi Jürgen and Norman,
I agree with you *if* I can be sure that at least one of *my*
nameservers (the ones queried by my James server) is able to reach the
net and doesn't resolve the target domain (no target nameservers found),
and anwers NXDOMAIN. But is it possible to figure it out? And does
Adding my 2c to Norman's example:
Because of the scenario he described, I changed my config.xml long time
ago to one day instead of 5 days of retry before giving up.
I was planning to code in RemoteDelivery (and never did it) a kind of
"warning bounce" feature to trigger after a few hours, wh
+1
Vincenzo
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
Hi guys,
sorry if my last 2 E-Mails were shot before reading all Mails, but I am on a
GPRS Link at the moment, and using it is really a PITA.
Anyways, just to sum it up. It seems we all have the same view now, and can
agree with consent. Everyone is fine wit
So what you mean is that the right thing to do is, if someone plans to
have something fixed/working for next-major is to *add* the next-major
fix version *without removing* the trunk label, right? Sounds correct.
Vincenzo
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jürgen Hoffmann wrote:
All he is doing is t
Hi everybody,
Juergen said it exactly: what Stefano and Norman are doing is just proactively judging
what they think could and should be fixed/developed for "next-major", and
documenting it through jira labels, without any change to our subversion repository. All
the committers are free to hav
:-)
Vincenzo
Joachim Draeger wrote:
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
BTW: I have often seen NPE *bugs* in debug messages, that appeared
magically when the costumer has turned on *de*bugging. :-) This could
avoided by putting a try/catch block around...
Im against this.. Even if the
Norman Maurer wrote:
Joachim Draeger schrieb:
...
BTW: I have often seen NPE *bugs* in debug messages, that appeared
magically when the costumer has turned on *de*bugging. :-) This could
avoided by putting a try/catch block around...
Joachim
Im against this.. Even if the N
Some notes on how to develop, run, debug and profile James using
NetBeans can now be found in
http://wiki.apache.org/james/NetBeansNotes
Vincenzo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo