Quoting Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Okay, you'll never get acceptable performance. Tough.
Yeah! Get a proper operating system use schedule.
-todd
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscri
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:31:23PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>
> Toad wrote:
> | On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> |
> | Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node
> | responds in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
| Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node
| responds in a reasonable time nowadays... of course if your browser is
| set to only use 2 connections
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
> > Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
> > the crypto required for even simple connections.
>
> Which is why we need to use native BigInt a
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 09:58:52PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Good luck (and I don't mean that sarcastically). I've never gotten
> Kaffe to run a Hello World program.
Kaffe runs loads of stuff, big stuff like JBoss. GCJ runs ECLIPSE!
Seriously,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>
> Toad wrote:
>
> | On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?
>
> I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable.
Hmm. In what sense?
On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:58 pm, David Masover wrote:
> | not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for
> | choosing Java should be obvious; platform independence and a
> | rich API that comes standard with the language.
>
> As a purely academic argument, Parrot and .NET both do tho
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly:
> Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
> the crypto required for even simple connections.
Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC encoders to get
something approaching reasonable performance. Fas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?
I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable. Don't
know RNF or DNF from Dionsaur. 5-10 connections, 2 or 3 loaded before
the browser timed out (guess).
| H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Oliveri wrote:
[...]
| days. Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it
uses
| for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)?
Yes. It's on the "firewall" machine, which really only does NAT anyway.
| I have an 2.5G Ath
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> >helping matters much. It's hoped this will change when one of the Free
> >Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt
> >Freenet.
> >
> I lost the meaning in the last sentence. What was intended by "wrt"?
with-respect-to
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:15:50PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?
I'm not sure. It depends on various factors. For example, which branch
you are running.
> I'm getting lots of
> pages ta
All this aside, when routing doesn't work in Freenet it can't be blamed on
the language it was implemented in. Broken routing can easily be coded in
C, Python, assembler or whatever language you desire. On the other hand
being tied to a proprietary language like Java under Sun's control isn't
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul wrote:
> Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
> the crypto required for even simple connections.
No. Well... okay, asymmetric crypto is a good deal slower than it should
be because Sun can't use gmp. We have code to fix
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:15:50 -0500, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
For the record, I have never, ever seen a java program load quickly, run
... most probably because you've never seen _just_ a java program load.
What you see is a complete virtual machine load and _then_ the applicati
On Friday 09 July 2004 12:15 am, David Masover wrote:
> What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm getting lots of
> pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
> using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
> though the browser is on
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45250";>Java vs C++
Java vs C++ "Shootout" Revisited
June 15, 2004
Summary
"I was sick of hearing people say Java was slow," says K
17 matches
Mail list logo