Re: external links

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:28:40 PM, you wrote: > Bummer. I thought that might solve your problem. As Chris suggests, > I'd search around in the Preferences dialog in Netscape. I don't use > it either or I'd help you search. Can anyone using Netscape point Jim > in the right direction

Re: external links

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:08:44 PM, you wrote: > All of the above it "in theory." Any technology can be abused. > However, I have seen a lot of good come out of the .NET Framework. I > suggest that the next time you visit WindowsUpdate.com, you download > the .NET Framework. > NB: You might alr

Re: Turn off auto address book entries?

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 @ 6:40:29 AM [-0700], Rick Friedman wrote: > Have you actually seen these addresses in your address book? Or are you > assuming they are there because they are auto-completed when you start > entering them in the address line of an e-mail? They are definitely in the ad

Re: LDIF errors

Plan9 @ 2004-Aug-24 11:23:16 PM "LDIF errors" >>> The 3 homePostalAddress lines looked like this: >>> homePostalAddress:: NjgyNSBIaWxscyBEci4NCg== >>> homePostalAddress:: MVM2ODYgR3JlZW5icmlhciBEci4NCg== >>> homePostalAddress:: >>> MTU5IEluZGlhIFN0cmVldCwgIEFwdCAzTCANCkJyb

Re: LDIF errors

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 10:43:02 PM, Chris wrote: >> The 3 homePostalAddress lines looked like this: >> homePostalAddress:: NjgyNSBIaWxscyBEci4NCg== >> homePostalAddress:: MVM2ODYgR3JlZW5icmlhciBEci4NCg== >> homePostalAddress:: >> MTU5IEluZGlhIFN0cmVldCwgIEFwdCAzTCANCkJyb29rbHluLCBOWSAgMTEyMjItM

Re: LDIF errors

Plan9 @ 2004-Aug-24 10:29:43 PM "LDIF errors" > I have been using LDIF export from the address book as a backup > mechanism and to transfer info to other programs. Tonight I looked > very closely at the LDIF file after I began to get strange results > in a reporting progra

LDIF errors

I have been using LDIF export from the address book as a backup mechanism and to transfer info to other programs. Tonight I looked very closely at the LDIF file after I began to get strange results in a reporting program. Out of 135 entries 3 had gibberish for the street address (homePostalAddress)

Re[2]: BayesIt download?

Hello Andre, Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 5:59:29 PM, you wrote: AW> Hello Peter, AW> On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote: PK>> Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download? PK>> The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab. PK>> T

Re: Can I access Usenet (nntp) groups using TBat!?

Hello subscriber2list, > I found nothing in the Help section and read a few emails in the > Archives, but most of the emails dealt with Gmane list activity. Yes, you can access Usenet with TB using MyGate, which you can find at: http://en.barin.com.ua/soft/mygate/ I've been using it for almost

Re: Can I access Usenet (nntp) groups using TBat!?

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that subscriber2list wrote the following in regards to "Can I access Usenet (nntp) groups using TBat!?": s> [snip] what news reader software (preferably on the free side, but s> ... ) do you folks use/recommend? [/snip] Xnews http://xnews.newsguy.com/

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Andre Wichartz wrote the following in reply to my comments re: to "BayeIT Macros": AW> [snip] If BayesIT filters see msgs AW> JR> before TB! filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I AW> JR> can't get a definite answer to this question y

Re:external links

Hi Jim, Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:09:44 PM, you wrote: >> Go to Control Panel / Internet Options / Advanced / Browsing etc... JK> Seems to be already checked. Bummer. I thought that might solve your problem. As Chris suggests, I'd search around in the Preferences dialog in Netscape.

Re: external links

Jim Kling @ 2004-Aug-24 6:09:44 PM "external links" > RSS seem like they could be really useful, but aren't they limited > to sites that set themselves up to provide RSS feeds? There are some sites that will generate a RSS feed from a HTML page. I have never used one, but

Re: external links

Perry Nelson @ 2004-Aug-24 5:53:30 PM "external links" > Go to Control Panel / Internet Options / Advanced / Browsing and put > a check mark beside "reuse Windows for launching shortcuts" and see > if that doesn't do what you want. I don't remember if that works for Netsca

Re: external links

Jim Kling @ 2004-Aug-24 3:16:36 PM "external links" > Hmm...well, the first problem is I'm not that technical, so .NET Framework went way > over my head. Well, I'm a programmer (just look at my bug reports). The .NET Framework is a 25 MB download that lets you run certain

Re: external links

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 5:53:30 PM, you wrote: JK>> But a new problem has developed. Whenever I click on a url in TB, a JK>> new Netscape window opens rather than using the same one. Is there a JK>> way to fix this? > Go to Control Panel / Internet Options / Advanced / Browsing and put a >

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Zonnet, On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:52:57 +0200 GMT [21:52 CEST] you wrote: Z> ,- [ ] Z> | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48) Z> | Spam traffic: %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(48) Z> | Stat no spam leters: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(48) Z> | Stat no spam Trafic: %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(48) Z> | Stat spam letters: %STA

Re: BayesIt download?

Hello Peter, On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote: PK> Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download? PK> The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab. PK> TIA http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit0511.rar -- Cheers, An

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan, On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:01:13 -0400 GMT [22:01 CEST] you wrote: JR> Yes, of course you are right about your second poing but, just to JR> be stubborn for one more moment, If BayesIT filters see msgs JR> before TB! filters then this would not be necessary, right? And I JR> can't ge

Re:external links

Hi Jim, Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 12:04:51 PM, you wrote: JK> But a new problem has developed. Whenever I click on a url in TB, a JK> new Netscape window opens rather than using the same one. Is there a JK> way to fix this? Go to Control Panel / Internet Options / Advanced / Browsing and put a

Re: Upgrading from 1.62 to v2

Hallo Östen, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:29:46 +0200GMT (24-8-2004, 22:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> But the recommendation is valid sH> OK thanks. I'll try it tomorrow if no one has any further sH> objections... :-) Don't wait for any objections. It's always been Ritlabs preferred update p

Can't Install BayesIT! 0.5.9

Decided to start all over again. Deleted all evidences of Bayesit! files and downloaded 0.5.9 from savagenews.com UnRARred it to a subdirectory of TheBat!, opened TheBat! and added it as a plug-in. It said was successful, that it had created some initial files and told me to click OK I did. G

BayesIt download?

Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download? The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab. TIA -- Best regards, Peter Kerekes (Toronto, Canada) "A synonym is a word you use when you can't spell the word you first thought of." -- Burt Bachara

Re: Upgrading from 1.62 to v2

Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > But the recommendation is valid OK thanks. I'll try it tomorrow if no one has any further objections... :-) -- Regards, Östen Häggmark mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TB! 1.62r S/N A7AB7B03, Windows 98 4.10 __

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros": ASK> If I were you, I'd disable your own filters that catch spam temporarily, and ASK> only train BayesIt for a while. After all, it is a *learning* filter that ASK> increases in precis

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros": Z> ,- [ ] Z> | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48) Z> | Spam traffic: %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(48) Z> | Stat no spam leters: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(48) Z> | Stat no spam Trafic: %STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(48) Z>

Re: Upgrading from 1.62 to v2

Hello Östen Häggmark, 24-Aug-2004 21:34, you wrote: > What's the proper routine for upgrading? I seem to remember I > read something on the Ritlabs site about just installing v2 > over the old version, in the same folder? Can't find that > recommendation now, though. But the recommendation is va

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan Rifkinson, 24-Aug-2004 21:09, you wrote: Z>> I am not sure how BayesIT calculates the "guessed right" statistic but Z>> I would assume that it looks at how many Spam or Ham msg you correct by Z>> using the "mark as (NOT) junk " function. > Geez, why would I do that? I'd be busy most of

Re: BayeIT Macros

ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 9:09:51 PM, you wrote: JR> And I don't know what wrong function you refer to? What do you JR> mean? Hi Jan, I have been playing with BayesIT functions myself. Here is a list I known is available: ,- [ ] | Spam Letters:%STATSPAMLETTERS(48) | Spam traffic: %S

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan Rifkinson, 24-Aug-2004 19:25, you wrote: > Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) > Total Spam Emails: 2 > Total Clean Emails: 186 > BayesIT guessed right 99.5% of the time > My email is 1.06383% spam > Now what? Apparently, something is pretty wrong with the Bayesit stats. :-}

BayesIt not working???

I just did Options > Preferences > Plugins. selected BayesIt! and clicked on Information. All my statistics show "0" as their values! What's going on here? Thanks. -- Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverst

Upgrading from 1.62 to v2

Hello tbudl, I've been using the Bat for years but haven't yet upgraded to v2. What's the proper routine for upgrading? I seem to remember I read something on the Ritlabs site about just installing v2 over the old version, in the same folder? Can't find that recommendation now, though. -- Best

Re[2]: BayeIT Macros

On Tue 24 August 2004, 12:30:49 +1000, Drago wrote: >> if my total spam is 270 and total clean is 246, shouldn't my spam percentage >> be 51% - 52% since my overall spam percentage is greater than clean or is the >> 270 my complete mails, 246 clean and the 24 left over spam Might be a newbie que

Re: external links

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 2:02:54 PM, you wrote: > Let me offer a different solution. Investigate an RSS client. It will > let you manage your news feed easily. Most of the have built in > browsers (or IE host controls) so reading the full articles is easy. > My favorite RSS reader is built into O

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros": Z> ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:25:53 PM, you wrote: Z> JR> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) Z> JR> Total Spam Emails: 2 Z> JR> Total Clean Emails: 186 Z> JR> BayesIT guessed right 99

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Michael, On 24 Aug 2004 at 20:47:10 -0700 GMT [05:47 CEST] you wrote: MLW> My current macro set is MLW> = MLW> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) MLW> Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) MLW> Total Clean Emails: %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(2

Re: BayesIT scoring

Hello Jan, On 24 Aug 2004 at 08:14:15 -0400 GMT [14:14 CEST] you wrote: JR> Are you saying that the black/white list rules are basically +/- 99 No, I wasn't speaking about blacklists at all. I think whitlisted mails get a score of 0, blacklisted of 100 and the rest is 1..99. -- Cheers, Andre

Re: BayeIT Macros

ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:25:53 PM, you wrote: JR> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (BayesIt! 0.5.11) JR> Total Spam Emails: 2 JR> Total Clean Emails: 186 JR> BayesIT guessed right 99.5% of the time JR> My email is 1.06383% spam JR> Now what? Well, (2/(186+2))*100%= 1.0638% so that is correct.

Re: external links

Jim Kling @ 2004-Aug-24 1:22:03 PM "external links" > I forgot a rather obvious point. The *reason* that I want the > articles to open in a different browser than the one I use for most > purposes (Firefox) is to keep news articles separate and easy to > find. I just go to

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Alexander S. Kunz wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros": ASK> 24-Aug-2004 18:33, you wrote: >> Hi Gerard. If that's the case, then do you have any ideas to explain >> the difference between the BayesIT stats & the # of junk em

Re: external links

Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 12:04:51 PM, you wrote: > Here's why I want it this way (in the hopes that someone can offer an alternative > solution if they think of > it). I've just switched to TB from Netscape's mail client. I read my news from email > alerts that have links, > so when I click on

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan Rifkinson, 24-Aug-2004 18:33, you wrote: > Hi Gerard. If that's the case, then do you have any ideas to explain > the difference between the BayesIT stats & the # of junk emails I > have in my current file? Do you have your own filters that deal with junk email, too? If those aren't c

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Michael L. Wilson, can you please cut down the size of your signature? 3 lines of your text: > I let BayesIT filter everything that is spam. I use no external > notifier, and no internal spam filters. Therefore, that could be the > problem followed by 20 lines of signature is a bit out o

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Zonnet wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros": Z> JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder, Z> JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the Z> JR> difference between the real #s

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros": MLW> I let BayesIT filter everything that is spam. I use no external MLW> notifier, and no internal spam filters. Therefore, that could be the MLW> problem And I see from your stats

Re: BayeIT Macros

ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 6:10:24 PM, you wrote: JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder, JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the JR> difference between the real #s & the reported #s? Hi Jan, I don't think you are bypassing BasesIT. Bas

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in part): JR> I do use other filters to move obvious spam to my spam folder, JR> thereby bypassing the BayesIT filter. Could that explain the JR> difference between the real #s & the reported #s? I let BayesIT f

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros": MLW> There is no filter action, except the filters built into BayesIT. As MLW> BayesIT works, it is constantly updating its records and database to MLW> be current. At a

Re: external links

Monday, August 23, 2004, 5:57:12 PM, you wrote: JK>> I've just started using TB and I like it, but I have an issue with JK>> external links (clicking on a url in a message). One problem is that JK>> it opens the browser twice instead of just once. > First, welcome to the list, Jim. > The pro

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in part): JR> Understand that. But what I'm trying to find out is what is the JR> macro looking at? Incoming mail? Is it part of a filter action? JR> Thanks for taking the time to reply to my question(s). There is

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson wrote the following in reply to my comments re: "BayeIT Macros": MLW> JR> Michael, Sorry to be dense but what does this QT macro look at & how MLW> JR> do you use it -- as an "run an external" -- & if so where do you place MLW> JR> it?

Re: BayeIT Macros

Hello Jan, On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jan mused about "BayeIT Macros" (at least in part): JR> Michael, Sorry to be dense but what does this QT macro look at & how JR> do you use it -- as an "run an external" -- & if so where do you place JR> it? TIA . This QT macro shows the current status of BayesIT

Re: BayeIT Macros

On Monday, August 23, 2004 it appears that Michael L. Wilson wrote the following in regards to "BayeIT Macros": MLW> My current macro set is MLW> = MLW> Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) MLW> Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) MLW> Total

Re: Turn off auto address book entries?

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 1:38:22 AM, Matt wrote: MT> On Monday, August 23, 2004 @ 12:25:18 PM [-0700], Zonnet wrote: >> That is not a feature of TB! but can be achieved by creating a special >> filter. You either have done this yourself (by axident ?) or someone is >> playing a trick on you.

Re: BayeIT Macros

As Drago walked through cyberspace, he tripped on this message from Robin Anson which was posted on 24/08/2004 04:53:47 in gmane.mail.the-bat.user > > Then the correct calculations are: >Percentage BayesIT guessed wrong = 100*%e/(%s+%n) >Percentage BayesIT guessed right = 100*(1-%e/(%s+%n

Re: BayeIT Macros

As Drago walked through cyberspace, he tripped on this message from Michael L. Wilson which was posted on 24/08/2004 04:47:10 in gmane.mail.the-bat.user > > = > Spam Stats, last 24 hours (%BAYESITVERSION) > Total Spam Emails: %STATSPAMLETTERS(24) > Tota

Re: BayesIT scoring

On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Andre Wichartz wrote the following in regards to "BayesIT scoring": AW> Graham: 1 AW> Spam-grade: 1 AW> That's the spam probability (don't ask me for the difference of the AW> two) AW> Value for The Bat!: 99 AW> That's the score that's given two tb!

Re: Turn off auto address book entries?

Matt Thoene, [MT] wrote: > How do I turn off the feature that automatically adds addresses to > my address book? There's no such switch in TB!. I see that you wrote that you have no filter defined that auto-adds addresses. This makes me wonder if you're using an anti-spam plugin that uses white

Re: Turn off auto address book entries?

Zonnet, [Z] wrote: MT>> ... Does TB add the address histories to the address book? No. > I am not sure what you mean by "address histories". Can you explain? When you enter addresses in the To: field, they're stored for auto-matching. Select one of the address fields in the editor and then clic

Re: IMAP Delete

Kovacs P., Gabor, [KPG] wrote: > I have no chance to check 'till tonight, but what happens if I > exit The Bat! without changing folder? I don't know. Compression/expunging on exit is an explicit command that TB! doesn't have a switch for. I don't know if it's done automatically. You'd have to te

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Default templates)

Hi Marck, MDP> Dear David, MDP> @24-Aug-2004, 10:42 +0200 (24-Aug 09:42 UK time) David Earl said to MDP> Marek: MDP> This is a fourth time of asking. Please re-read the list rules. >> Let me fiddle a bit with BeginUpdateResource() (on my own DLL's, >> natch). If I can resolve this for myself, I

Re: BayesIT scoring

Hello Michael, On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:48:35 -0700 GMT [06:48 CEST] you wrote: MLW> How can I tell the score of individual messages using BayesIT 5.11? I MLW> have looked in BayesIT.log and cannot figure it out. Any assistance MLW> would be appreciated. Graham: 1 Spam-grade: 1 That's the spam

Re: Turn off auto address book entries?

ON Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7:38:22 AM, you wrote: MT> Checked the above, I have no ticks next to "add addresses to address MT> book" in any of my filters. Does TB add the address histories to the MT> address book? Hi Matt, I am not sure what you mean by "address histories". Can you explain? A

Re[4]: Default templates

Hi Marek, Let me fiddle a bit with BeginUpdateResource() (on my own DLL's, natch). If I can resolve this for myself, I think that's better. Willing to share, but the code/runtime will be Visual Objects/xBase. -- Thanks, David Win][k sp4 TheBat 2.11 MM> Hello all, MM>>> only way is prepare temp

RE: IMAP Delete

I have no chance to check 'till tonight, but what happens if I exit The Bat! without changing folder? Gabor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allie Martin Sent: 2004. augusztus 24. 0:42 To: Kovács P. Gábor on TBUDL Subject: Re: IMAP Delete