Re: (no subject)

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:26:21PM -0700 or thereabouts, Dave Crocker wrote: > H... On the other hand, maybe I AM suggesting a change: Once a message > has been Read, it is no longer New, even if the Age Limits algorithm says > otherwise.) HI Dave, > The Ticker already implements the New c

Re: (no subject)

Thomas, Tuesday, October 22, 2002, 8:08:32 PM, you wrote: Thomas> This is a long-standing wish. It resulted in Ritlabs giving us the the Thomas> possibility of "flagging" messages (ctrl-G). Flagging solves a problem with other systems, where I've wanted to mark a message for further attention. T

Re: (no subject)

Hello Dave, On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:28:58 -0700 GMT (23/10/02, 01:28 +0700 GMT), Dave Crocker wrote: > The banner is great if you do not get much mail. As a slow, serial > display mechanism, it does not work well if it needs to show very > much or show it quickly. When there are lots of new messag

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In , Dave Crocker [DC] wrote:' DC> I wonder whether anyone besides me would find it useful to have DC> new messages indicated in more than the banner. For example, DC> what if there were a third choice for

(no subject)

Folks, TB currently does some distinctive things, to note "unread" messages in a folder and to note "new" messages. A folder with unread messages is highlighted in the "account tree" pane, in bold, and the folder icon is blue, rather than gold. In the pane that lists messages in a folder, unread

(no subject)

Hello Ladies and Gents, What does this mean WARNING: there were no compatible authentication mechanisms detected I send mail through a authentcated system (SMTP Auth). I am having some doubts about where my email is coming from though, due to some weird headers(Previous Post long

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Ladies and Gents, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 21:23:15 [GMT +0200] (which was 20:23 in my TimeZone) you wrote: DH> Hello wenewcomb! DH> On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 6:46:00 PM you wrote: >> I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to >enable or to d

RE: (no subject)

Thanks - I overlooked this. -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of "Alexander Cicovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:35:10 +0300 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: (no subject)

Hello wenewcomb! On Thursday, October 3, 2002 at 6:46:00 PM you wrote: > I mean this is an AVG function. I find no option in the FREE version either to >enable or to disable this. In fact, I was unaware of the software's ability to do >this. Did anybody already mentioned the words "conversa

BugBear - was Re[3]: (no subject)

Michael- Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:43:11 AM, you wrote: MT> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] While the BugBear virus will indeed search through .tbb files (and others) looking for email addresses, you still have to launch the damn thing yourself. Very explicitly, too, after having been warned by TB th

Re: (no subject)

Hello there, Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:46:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wcn> Where can I disable this response? First, run The Bat! Then go to Options, virus protection. Select the AVG Plugin. Untick the "Send notification to the sender" option. That should do it. -- Best regards,

RE: (no subject)

Where can I disable this response? -Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of "Alexander Cicovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:28:43 +0300 To: "Jan Rifkinson" <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: (no subject)

uot;Jan Rifkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:14:13 -0400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re:(no subject) At 11:47 AM on Thursday, October 03, 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [wcn] wrote the following about [(no subject)]: wcn> [...

Re:(no subject)

Hi Alexander. At 12:28 PM on Thursday, October 03, 2002 you [AC] wrote the following about '(no subject)': AC> The AVG plugin automates the response, AC> and there is a user option to turn this AC> on/off. That's what I thought... Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridg

Re: (no subject)

Hello there, Thursday, October 3, 2002, 7:14:13 PM, Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR> Do you mean that AVG automates the response JR> & there is no user option to turn this JR> on/off? [Sorry, I don't use AVG] The AVG plugin automates the response, and there is a user option to turn this on/off.

Re:(no subject)

At 11:47 AM on Thursday, October 03, 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [wcn] wrote the following about [(no subject)]: wcn> [...] The notification was created wcn> automatically by AVG in conjunction with wcn> TB!. I had nothing to do with it, as my wcn> original post clearly indicates. I agr

RE: (no subject)

-Original Message- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on behalf of "Jonathan Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:57:28 -0500 To: "Walt Newcomb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:Re: (no s

Re: (no subject)

I received a copy of Bugbear last night. It had changed the sender's address (at least, from the fact that the email address wasn't valid, and someone else has seen a copy with a morph of his address, I think that is the case). Sorry not to be linear in my reply, but the url below states "The

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Ladies and Gents, On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, at 15:44:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 14:44 in my TimeZone) you wrote: MO> On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 15:07, Michael Thompson wrote: >> I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for >> email addresses. Am I correct or is

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, October 03, 2002, Walt Newcomb wrote... > Hard to know whether this worm targets TB!, but I got an email this > morning that was flagged as containing it. AVG detected it and > deleted it, even sending an email to the alleged sender sayi

Re: (no subject)

On Thursday, October 3, 2002, 15:07, Michael Thompson wrote: > I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for > email addresses. Am I correct or is the first virsus that targets > The Bat! message files for email harvests?? Not to question you, but how do you know th

Re: (no subject)

Hello Michael Re your message: (no subject) Original Attachments: Hard to know whether this worm targets TB!, but I got an email this morning that was flagged as containing it. AVG detected it and deleted it, even sending an email to the alleged sender saying the sender should "take approp

(no subject)

Hello Ladies and Gents, I have just noticed that the new virus, BugBear looks into *.tbb for email addresses. Am I correct or is the first virsus that targets The Bat! message files for email harvests?? I think we may be seeing how popular the bat is if viruses are going for tbb files.

Folder templates (was: (no subject))

Hello Paula, On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:14:31 -0400 GMT (30/09/02, 01:14 +0700 GMT), pmf wrote: p> Long live folder templates. This was the first time that I learned about a very good use for folder templates. Due to your needs, you have arranged the folders in TB different from the rest (or at lea

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Paula, > Since I would much prefer to consolidate email and newsgroups > in a single client, I doubt I would be using the TB if not for its > folder templates. I use TB for both e-mail and newsgroups. If you are interested in knowing how, look for subject "Newsgroups with The Bat! and Mail

Re: (no subject)

I know this is a late reply, but I feel I have to defend folder templates, lest the TB developers take the "danger" too much to heart. M> M> I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named "Folder Templates". In M> 150 folders I have two and only two that have folder templates. They M> are for t

Re: Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:' SP> Yes. And while using AB templates, and if you use multiple SP> accounts, its a good idea to add %Account macro to your new SP> message templates. This way your messages are

Re: Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

Hi Allie, On Sunday, September 22, 2002 06:52 your local time, (17:37 my local time), you wrote: > If you use address book templates it doesn't matter where the > recipients message resides or which folder is currently selected. > The correct template will always be used. Yes. And while using A

Re: Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ravi [R] wrote:' R> Can anyone think of anything else that can go wrong with it? Just remember the folder templates basic weakness being that it needs to be selected for the templates to be used. If yo

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ravi [R] wrote:' R> Right. I agree, and I'm going to start using AB templates. The R> thing is ... to a relatively new user like myself ... folder R> templates seem like the most logical and easy to use.

Re: Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Leif Gregory [LG] wrote:' LG> No, I do agree with you Marck. Taking a stock folder and just LG> dumping a %TO macro in it seems like the logical thing to do, LG> and that's where the problem lies. But as

Re: Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

> %IF:"%TOLIST%CCLIST%BCCLIST"="":"%TO='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" > But I would imagine that since they haven't defined a recipient > yet, they'll notice the list address in the TO field when they > go to add one. This seems like an idea (nice one Leif) that will solve the problems I've had so far. C

Re: (no subject)

> There is nothing else for which folder templates can be used > that can't be covered and even improved upon using Address Book > templates. There are "dangers" in using Folder Templates that > are not there when you use AB templates. Thanks for the kind lecture Marck. Right after that last erro

Folder Templates - was Re: (no subject)

Hello Marck, On Sun, 22 Sep 2002 at 01:43:28 [GMT +0100], you wrote: MDP> If, at the instant you start a new message you happen to be MDP> focused on the wrong folder, the message gets given the wrong MDP> address. This happens when you click a mailto without changing MDP> folders. The results v

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ravi, @21-Sep-2002, 15:40 Ravi [R] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have a pet hate in TB. That pet hate is named "Folder Templates". In 150 folders I have two and only two that have folder templates. They are for two specific

(no subject)

-- Ravi TB! v1.62/Beta5 on Windows XP icq: 196180805.1.2600 Service Pack 1 aim/msn/yim: r2maharaon a Pentium 233 MHz http://shell-shocked.tk with 128 MB RAM. "Hold a hard drive to your ear -- listen to the C:" __

Re: Re: (no subject)

Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12.09.2002, 03:49:43: > > Aha! Not so weird after all. It's S/MIME signed. I'll bet you have > MSCryptoAPI selected for S/MIME. The S/MIME signature verification > is calling the MSCryptoAPI which in turn is hitting HTTP on port 80. > Switch to Inte

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, @11-Sep-2002, 18:57 Michael Thompson [MT] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MT> Sorry, That was the wrong message. It is this one. ... MT> How weird is this??? Aha! Not so weird after all. It's S/MIME signed. I'll be

Re: (no subject)

Dear Thomas, Going back 19:50 11.09.2002... > Now I'm baffled. Let's think of a scenario: Because you don't have the > root certificate in your AB, TB tries to connect and download it (I > don't think TB does that, but let's humour the idea). For some reason, > the windowsupdate file is trigged

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Thomas, On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, at 00:50:05 [GMT +0700] (which was 18:50 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF> Now I'm baffled. Let's think of a scenario: Because you don't have the TF> root certificate in your AB, TB tries to connect and download it (I TF> don't think TB does that, but let's humour

Re[4]: (no subject)

Hello People! Sorry, That was the wrong message. It is this one. Interesting note: When I allow access to Port 80 on opening this message, it dos'nt open this message. (Hence the earlier mistake of posting the wrong message!) It infact opens something completly different each time...If I deny ac

Re: (no subject)

Hello Michael, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:39:07 +0100 GMT (12/09/02, 00:39 +0700 GMT), Michael Thompson wrote: MT> It appears to be this message in tbbeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] MT> Every time I open it it trys to connect...any one know why??? Now I'm baffled. Let's think of a scenario: Because you do

Re[3]: (no subject)

Hello Michael, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 18:39:07 [GMT +0100] (which was 18:39 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF>> Does Outpost use MD5 verification for the apps? MT> It appears to be this message in tbbeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] MT> Every time I open it it trys to connect...any one know why??? --

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Thomas, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 23:46:10 [GMT +0700] (which was 17:46 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF> Does Outpost use MD5 verification for the apps? It appears to be this message in tbbeta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Every time I open it it trys to connect...any one know why??? -- Best regard

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Thomas, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 23:46:10 [GMT +0700] (which was 17:46 in my TimeZone) you wrote: TF> Wild guess: a trojan disguises itself as The Bat!, and maybe it's part TF> of a DDoS attack on the windowsupdate site. TF> Does Outpost use MD5 verification for the apps? Yes it does, a

Re: (no subject)

Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:48:57 +0100 GMT (11/09/02, 22:48 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MT>> Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to MT>> www.download.windowsupdate.com on port 80? MDP> Nah... Outpost has the wrong app. TB just plain wouldn't do it.

Re[2]: (no subject)

Hello Marck, On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, at 16:48:57 [GMT +0100] (which was 16:48 in my TimeZone) you wrote: MDP> Hi Michael, MDP> @11-Sep-2002, 14:16 Michael Thompson [MT] in MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MT>> Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, @11-Sep-2002, 14:16 Michael Thompson [MT] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MT> Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to MT> www.download.windowsupdate.com on port 80? Nah... Outpost has the wro

Re: TB! connecting to windowsupdate.com (was: (no subject))

Hi Marcus, On Wednesday, September 11, 2002 15:28 your local time, (19:13 my local time), you [MO] wrote: MO> Are you using ZA (I'm not familiar with ZA under XP but to me it MO> looks like ZA)? >From the screenshot, looks like he's using Agnitum Outpost. ??!! I've used Outpost in the past, an

Re: TB! connecting to windowsupdate.com (was: (no subject))

On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, 15:16, Michael Thompson wrote: > Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to > www.download.windowsupdate.com on port 80? Are you using ZA (I'm not familiar with ZA under XP but to me it looks like ZA)? If so, it's probably ZA mixing ap

(no subject)

Hello , Hey People, why did my copy of the Bat! just try to connect to www.download.windowsupdate.com on port 80? -- Best regards, Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it. http://.thompsonmike.co.uk/ PGP KeyID := 0x3CC985

Re: Browsing by first letter was: Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carsten Thönges [CT] wrote: ... M>> Btw, there is a very annoying bug in versions 1.60x: you cannot M>> browse folders/accounts anymore by first letter of their names. I M>> have ~350 folders in 20+ accounts with specific character(s) at M>> the begin

Re: Browsing by first letter was: Re: (no subject)

Hi Mandara, hi list, * Mandara (M) writes: M> Btw, there is a very annoying bug in versions 1.60x: you cannot M> browse folders/accounts anymore by first letter of their names. I M> have ~350 folders in 20+ accounts with specific character(s) at the M> beginning of name of each account (#) and m

Browsing by first letter was: Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, at 05:41:57 -0500 Allie wrote: <...> ACM> Only the user can tell if he has a need for such a tool. <...> Btw, there is a very annoying bug in versions 1.60x: you cannot browse folders/accounts anymore by first letter of their n

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Geir Bækholt [GB] wrote: ... GB> [+] Tools|SmartPad GB> I cannot find this item documented anywhere.. Can anyone tell me what GB> i does. GB> I can run it , and it seems kinda like a multipart-clipboard / GB> textaeditor-thingie.. GB> Can anyone te

(no subject)

What's new in The Bat! 1.60? [+] Tools|SmartPad I cannot find this item documented anywhere.. Can anyone tell me what i does. I can run it , and it seems kinda like a multipart-clipboard / textaeditor-thingie.. Can anyone tell me more about it ? -- Geir Bækholt web-

(no subject)

Hi TBUDL, Is it available to have Russian speller in the Bat? Please help. Thank you. Best regards, Igor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mail

(no subject)

Hi, all! -- Regards, Konstantin Volenbovsky TB 1.54 Beta/30mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Notes folder (was: no subject)

Friday, January 18, 2002, 10:32:45 PM, Alexander Balakersky wrote: > Does anybody know how do I setup The Bat so I can email messages > into a folder instead of them going out to smtp server. Maybe there > is a way to specify a folder as an email address in Address Book? > Or something li

Re: (no subject)

Alexander, On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, at 17:32:45 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:02 AM where I live) you wrote: AB> Does anybody know how do I setup The Bat so I can email messages AB> into a folder instead of them going out to smtp server. Maybe there AB> is a way to specify a folder as an email addres

(no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello, Does anybody know how do I setup The Bat so I can email messages into a folder instead of them going out to smtp server. Maybe there is a way to specify a folder as an email address in Address Book? Or something like that. The idea i

(no subject)

-=approved by the list owner=- Hello tbudl, i want to take a print out of entire HELP documentation available in HELP menu.. without annotating of course can anyone help ? Best regards, pkroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http:/

Mailing List Problem (was: (no subject))

Hi Fred, On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 19:23:42 -0400GMT (04/10/2001, 07:23 +0800GMT), Fred Werner wrote: FW> Here's my problem.. I attempt to send a New mail to the list. The macro FW> properly loads the list name in the BCC header and the list name/address is FW> loaded in the To header. I am not quite

Re: Mailing List Problem (was Re: (no subject)

my message was "[flammer]: (no subject)" Please ignore. A mistake on my part. I accidentally used a test regex macro for someone trying to refine his mailing list. Ironic that the over site is committed with a reply to someone having a mailing list problem. :-) - -- ©Allie C Martin

[flammer]: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 19:23:42 -0400, Fred Werner [FW] graced us with these comments: ... FW> Here's my problem.. I attempt to send a New mail to the list. The FW> macro properly loads the list name in the BCC header and the list FW> name/address is load

(no subject)

Hello All, I am attempting to create a discussion list for a private group. I went to the FAQ that Lief Gregory put together, downloaded and imported the set up he so graciously offered, made the changes to reflect my group, etc. I created a seperate email address through my @home account to us

(no subject)

This is a test. This is only a test... please do not reply. This is a test of the emergency Angel email system. B ee e

No SUbject Tag [ was Re: [tbudl] Re: Test]

Hi All, On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 at 10:41:46 GMT -0700 (8/29/2001 12:41 AM GMT +0700 where you think I live) "Nick Andriash"=[NA]typed the following : >> Others opinion ? > I've found that adding Subject tags such as "tbudl" tag is redundant, > and only adds length to the Subject line. In my

(No Subject)

Hello Co-Batties, Best regards, Jörg mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Der TLC/NT FIDO-Node arbeitet seit 1 Tag(en), 01:22 Stunde(n). -- Tuesday, August 14, 2001 at 07:43 using The Bat! v1.53bis -- __ Archives : http://

(No Subject)

Hello Tbudl, Thanks, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a bag of Fritos: 'You could be a winner! No purchase necessary. Details inside'. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[

(No Subject)

Hello Tbudl, Thanks, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Put knot yore trust inn spel chequers -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PR

No Subject

Hi, everyone. I just changed ISPs and created a new account. I would like to use the same configuration I used with the old account, but am not sure which files I would need to copy. (Marck, I am unable to access your Web page to view the FAQ. Are you having problems?) I have the fo

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, On Wednesday, June 13, 2001 at 19:39:57 +0200, Nick Foster [NF] wrote concerning '(No Subject)': NF> Unsubsribe please Please have a look at the footer of every mail you receive from this mailinglist. - -- Best re

(No Subject)

Hello Tbudl, Unsubsribe please -- Best regards, Nick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: U

Re: (No Subject)

Hello Marck, On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 at 2:59:16 AM you wrote: MDP> While my supportive side urges me to agree with you wholeheartedly MDP> (mostly for liking your style), my argumentative nature leads me to MDP> state the opposing view (for the health inherent in debate) yet the MDP> moderato

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karin, On 30 May 2001 at 02:12:20 +0200 (which was 01:12 where I live) Karin Spaink wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: KS> I beg to differ. Because the moment there would be a follow-up - KS> as we see right now - the blank subjec

Re: (No Subject)

gt; *HAD* to do it, I'd use letters and punctuation. Also, "(No Subject)" > doesn't give us any indication of what the topic might be. The > appropriate thing to do in this case would have been to simply leave > the subject blank. I beg to differ. Because the moment

Re: (No Subject)

Hi Peter, @ 6:11:59 PM on 5/29/2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote: --(snip)-- PP> %QUOTE="" PP> *G* ... who would have thought THIS? *grin* I know, same here. Personally, I wouldn't do it that way though. If I *HAD* to do it, I'd use letters and punctuation. Also, &

Re: (No Subject)

Hello Gerietiss, On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 at 8:42:42 PM you wrote: %QUOTE="" *G* ... who would have thought THIS? *grin* -- Regards Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53 Beta/11 on Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000 (WindowsME) --

(No Subject)

-- Gerietiss mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe: Y

Re: (No Subject)

Hi Sven, @ 8:06:58 PM on 5/19/01, Sven Reichelt wrote: Sometimes I feel that way, too. -- -Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8 [SB! 1.53 Beta/8/iKey1000, Windows 98 (SE) 4.10 Build A] -- __ Archives :

(No Subject)

-- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Unsubscribe: You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: (No Subject)

Hello Marck, Friday, May 04, 2001, 1:56:54 PM, you wrote: MDP> You have to use the "Account specific network settings" in each of the MDP> Account .. Properties .. Network configuration screens to separate the MDP> way each account operates. Doesn't work. MEM>> I get mail from both accounts (p

Fwd: Re[2]: (No Subject)

This is a forwarded message From: Mark E. Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Marck D. Pearlstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, May 04, 2001, 3:52:09 PM Subject: (No Subject) ===8<==Original message text=== Marck, Right. I do that. Thanks.

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 04 May 2001 at 15:33:01 -0700 (which was 23:33 where I live) Mark E. Mark wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: MEM> I am using this option while I evaluate The Bat. I download MEM> messages from both Eudora and The Bat so

Re: (No Subject)

I am using this option while I evaluate The Bat. I download messages from both Eudora and The Bat so I need to leave them on the server until both programs download them. > Out of interest why leave them on the >MDP> server? I have never quite understood that "Delete messages from >MDP> serv

Re: (No Subject)

Hi, Marck, On Friday, May 04, 2001 you wrote: [massive snip] MEM>> The Bat seems determined to reload most of these messages from MEM>> the server so obviously they are not being deleted. MDP> I don't know why that would happen. I have always found the "leave on MDP> server" option works fine. O

Re[2]: (No Subject)

On Friday, May 04, 2001, 3:56:54 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MEM>> The Bat seems determined to reload most of these messages from MEM>> the server so obviously they are not being deleted. > I don't know why that would happen. I have always found the "leave on > server" option works fine. Out

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mark, On 04 May 2001 at 12:46:02 -0700 (which was 20:46 where I live) Mark E. Mark wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these points: MEM> I am having problems that I don't know how to solve (Win 2000 MEM> opsys). I have two email accounts. No m

(No Subject)

Hola, I liked The Bat so much I switched from Eudora...however: I am having problems that I don't know how to solve (Win 2000 opsys). I have two email accounts. No matter how many times I set the one account to my cable provider and the second

(No Subject)

In some *other* email packages I use, there are options to set multiple colors for the different levels of quotes in a message, i.e., > this quote would be one color >> this quote would be another color >>> yet another color etc. etc. Would it be possible to consider adding multiple color quote

No Subject

Dear Ron, A Curtis, & Dierck, Thanks to all of you for your responses.  I'm pleasantly surprised to hear from you so quickly.  It's nice to know that you want to help me, & I hope that you can.  I think that I have a series of problems, based on what you've all written about & what I" ve just not

Re: (No Subject)

Hi Deniz, You wrote: > How can I use another font which is NOT listed on Options/Editor > Prefs/Display/Font ? The Bat! uses fixed width fonts. The five fonts listed are the only five fixed width fonts that are installed in your Windows OS. You can find more fixed width fonts on http://home.bsu.

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Deniz, On 06 March 2001 at 13:04:14 +0200 (which was 11:04 where I live) Deniz Baygan wrote and made these points: DB> How can I use another font which is NOT listed on Options/Editor DB> Prefs/Display/Font ? DB> Only five or few more fonts ar

Re: (No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:04:14 +0200, Deniz graced us with these comments: DB> How can I use another font which is NOT listed on Options/Editor DB> Prefs/Display/Font ? DB> Only five or few more fonts are listed there! TB! editor supports using only f

(No Subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello TheBat'ers, How can I use another font which is NOT listed on Options/Editor Prefs/Display/Font ? Only five or few more fonts are listed there! - -- Digitally yours, Deniz [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ring to rule them all.. ---

Re: (No Subject)

On 19-02-2001 at 20:20, áÎÄÒÅÊ òÑÂËÏ× kindly wrote: > ÍÏÖÎÏ ÌÉ ÉÓÐÏÌØÚÙ×ÁÔØ THE BAT ÎÁ macentosh? Nope, not for the Mac. - K - -- At last official count nearly 500 gay and lesbian couples had been united in civil unions this summer in Vermont. There were flowers, champagne, brides and b

(No Subject)

Hello TBUDL, ÍÏÖÎÏ ÌÉ ÉÓÐÏÌØÚÙ×ÁÔØ THE BAT ÎÁ macentosh? -- Best regards, áÎÄÒÅÊ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: <

(No Subject)

Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Minggu, 08:29 -- "Squeal Boy, squeal" solid snake © mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List: Un

Re: (No Subject) (None at all?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Sunday, January 21, 2001 at 5:21:09 PM you wrote: > I think someone reported before that if the password is not correct, > TB will not show an error. Or something like that. It being after > midnight here and all, I am not going to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >