.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
___
users mailing list
use
TE capability so that "su" would work. However, I figured it
> would be good to know why privileged kept getting overridden by "restricted"
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joel
> _______
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshif
its registry,
> etc? More importantly, if I want to use one of those unbound pv's for
> applications, can I?
>
> Regards,
> Marvin
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.opens
; users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Xorg.conf(5)
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
to the crc
> device, so I think I've met the pre-requisites. Whats the step that I'm
> missing?
>
> Regards,
> Marvin
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/open
(2%) 0 (0%) 16m
> Allocated resources:
> (Total limits may be over 100 percent, i.e., overcommitted.)
> ResourceRequests Limits
> --
> cpu 1390m (92%) 300m (20%)
>
master nodes,
> but the other two are c5-xlarge machines. But here is maybe a relevant
> observation. As soon as I log into the cluster, I see this on my main
> dashboard.
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> Is there perhaps a problem with the CPU resource monitoring that is
> cau
gestions to NFS?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> --
> Benjamin Guillon
> CNRS/IN2P3 Computing Center
> 21 Avenue Pierre de Coubertin, CS70202
> 69627 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
&
_
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} 2011
"Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ..."
Look at the ConfigMaps in project openshift-node.
Change the mtu param in there first.
Restart the node (origin-node / atomic-openshift-node) service on all nodes.
If all goes well, you should be able to then reconfigure your network
interfaces.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 6:32 PM Tim Dudgeon wrote:
>
crio'
>
>
> 1.
> https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.11/install/example_inventories.html#single-master-multi-node-ai
>
> _______
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/opensh
>
>
>
>
> *From:* users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com <
> users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com> *On Behalf Of *Samuel Martín
> Moro
> *Sent:* Freitag, 31. Mai 2019 20:43
> *To:* bjoern.baertsc...@swisscom.com
> *Cc:* OpenShift Users List
> *Subject:* Re: I
The requested memory is the only sure thing you would get. If it differ
from your memory limit, you should know that this limit is optional and not
guaranteed.
Try setting your requested memory to 1gb
If you want openshit scheduler and/or oom to priorize that container,
consider setting your Pod
ml leaving the Provider ca: field empty… and all works
> perfectly.
>
> I have tried multiple combinations to have this field empty reading from
> inventory file… do you have a suggestion?
>
>
>
> I also feel this is poorly documented, and I am a little surprised because
>
_install_logging=true
>
> openshift_logging_es_nodeselector={'infra':'true'}
>
>
>
> I am out of ideas and I think my google is broken cause I can’t seem to
> find a suitable option that works… and each deploy_cluster takes over half
> an hour…
>
>
>
To you too, have fun ;)
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 8:33 PM Ricardo Mendes wrote:
> Awe man, amazing, thanks!
>
> Totally had the wrong idea. Have a great weekend!
>
> Ricardo Mendes
> ------
> *From:* Samuel Martín Moro
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 20
e_group_name='node-config-compute'
> openshift_schedulable=True
> ```
>
> Should I point to infra instead?
>
> Kind regards,
> Ricardo Mendes
>
>
> --
> *From:* Samuel Martín Moro
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 1, 2019 19:03
> *
Hi
That sounds like an issue with your DNS records
Could you confirm *.apps points to the infra node(s)?
Regards.
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019, 8:00 PM Ricardo Mendes wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a 3 server setup with 1 master 1 infra 1 node.
>
> I have finished the setup with deploy_cluster.yml all
tion, but within 3.9.
>
>
>
>
> https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.9/install_config/install/advanced_install.html#configuring-host-variables
>
>
>
> regards, Björn
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* users-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com <
> u
watching *v1.PersistentVolumeClaim from
> k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:130\n
> <http://k8s.io/client-go/informers/factory.go:130/n>
> ","stream":"stderr","time":"2019-05-24T12:19:13.74773138Z"}
> {"log":"I0524 14:19:
x27;HTPasswdPasswordIdentityProvider'}]
> # Defining htpasswd users
> openshift_master_htpasswd_users={'admin':
> '$apr1$Ky/ZY39n$Z8/t3xJsnxGANzypVTtmD0', 'developer':
> '$apr1$MdVAOTmy$8nB.ANU4OeciLjDeU68w/1'}
>
> # Option B - Ext
The offending line appears to be:
>
> tasks:
> - name: set currently installed version
>^ here
>
> Any idea about that error ?
>
> --
> Hyde Stevenson
>
> Don't guess -- check your security regulatio
u admin
>
> on the master instead, then it seems there is no way to assign
> the cluster-admin role anymore.
>
>
> ???
>
> Every helpful hint is highly appreciated
> Harri
>
> ___
> users mail
hank’s in advice..
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> *Best,*
>
> *Alexander Kozhemyakin*
> _______
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
Samue
g similar applications, .. snapshots, try
and try again, ...
Regards.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:26 PM Ahmed Ossama wrote:
> Hello Samuel,
>
> Assuming a production cluster; is running the upgrade_cluster sufficient?
>
> On 02/25/2019 11:40 AM, Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
>
&
figure the
> inventory in all my nodes, is there any ansible-playbook to run?
>
> Cheers,
> Iago.
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
--
bidden",
>"details": {
>
>},
>"code": 403
>}
>
> Does anyone know of a way to allow the "system:anonymous" user to post
> to that path?
>
> Thanks
>
> Sean
>
> ___
> users m
eb 4, 2019 at 9:47 PM Samuel Martín Moro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Define "after the deployment is nearly finished". Did it succeed? Or where
> did it fail?
>
> Can you tell us more about your network?
> - what is the subnet your openshift instances are located into?
> - wh
issing or malconfigured, maybe someone can give me a hint what I
> am doing wrong or give me an example of an working inventory? I would very
> thanksful because at the moment I have no idea why this don't work
> best regards
> Dan
>
>
> [1] https://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=
___
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
> http:
entos.noarch.rpm
>>>>>> [3] http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos
>>>>>> -release-ansible26-1-3.el7.centos.noarch.rpm
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-November/017033.html
>&
31 matches
Mail list logo
