see http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Using+RadioGroups
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mehrle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:49 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Default selection in radio group?
I created a RadioGroup with three radios
see http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-radiogroups.html
-Original Message-
From: Sathish Gopal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 6:07 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RadioButton inside DataTable
Hi all,
I'm trying to build DataTable using the Wickets Defa
Does anyone know how close we are to a release of wicket-minis?
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-minis/
shows 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
that many bugs open, it's just a matter of demand :)
>
> Maurice
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know how close we are to a release of wicket-minis?
> http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/
I'm not sure why the built-in Wicket component doesn't support this feature
out-of-the-box, but here is a simple fix/solution:
==
I'm not sure why the built-in Wicket component doesn't support this feature
out-of-the-box, but here is a simple fix/solution:
==
// It solves your problem because the call to load will be made each
time your view renders
final LoadableDetachableModel articlesLoadableModel = new
LoadableDetachableModel() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
@O
Does anyone have an ETA when wicketstuff.org will be back up?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are looking for the examples, install them on your own box.
They're only a download away.
Martijn
On 5/2/08, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have an ETA when wicketstuff.org will be back up?
>
>
>
Is there a reason why StringResourceModel is not using
StringResourceModel ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank Bille
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@wicket.apache.org; Apache Wicket De
It's fixed in trunk (hardcoded to
String)
Frank
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is there a reason why StringResourceModel is not using
> StringResourceModel ?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PR
Also, looks like most of the models are not generic typed
(BoundCompoundPropertyModel, CompoundPropertyModel, etc.) are these
fixed in trunk as well?
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 12:15 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
I think he is referring to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1504
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 6:52 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: AutoComplete functionality for Wicket 1.4-m1 in IE
Which jira issue
I tested this fix and it seems to be fixed. Ricky, make sure that you
cleared your browser cache and try again.
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:33 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: AutoComplete functionality for
fired. I have yet to pinpoint a solid use case when this occurs
consecutively.
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 8:43 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: AutoComplete functionality for Wicket 1.4-m1 in IE
I tested this fix and
Would it be better if there were a core wicket-annotation project that
provides the basics (such as the scanner) and another project called
wicket-automount (with wicket-annotation dependency)? That way other
"future" projects can utilize the core capabilities without reinventing
the wheel. This wo
bject: Re: [announce] wicketstuff-annotation 1.0 released
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Would it be better if there were a core wicket-annotation project
&g
Although, it still has some issues when dealing with mouseover and
keyboard events combo ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:23 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: AutoCompleteTextField "type mismatch" in line 227
it
in line 227
in case you mean [0], that's going to be dealt with probably tomorrow ;)
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1595
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Although, it still has some issues when dealing with mouseover an
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public final List findCultures() {
final List cultures = new ArrayList();
final Iterator items =
ratingScalesView.getItems();
if (items != null) {
while (items.hasNext()) {
imho, that seems like that adds a lot of unnecessary code. One of the
nice things about Wicket is that it keeps the bloat to a minimum.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Donohoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:21 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using gene
For consistency sake, wouldn't it be wise to use IChoiceRenderer for
RadioGroup and CheckBoxMultipleChoice? Seems like a natural solution to
override IChoiceRenderer#getIdValue(...) to infer IDs for selection
comparison the same way that it is being done in DropDownChoice.
Otherwise, how else can y
renderer is required.
-igor
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For consistency sake, wouldn't it be wise to use IChoiceRenderer for
> RadioGroup and CheckBoxMultipleChoice? Seems like a natural solution
> to override IChoiceRendere
ing a choice renderer would be inconvenient.
you can always roll your own subclass, i just dont think something like
that would belong in core, its just one more parallel way of doing
something.
-igor
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> yes... so
o: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: IChoiceRenderer: RadioGroup CheckBoxMultipleChoice
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's strange that that kind of functionality is provided when multiple
> selections is needed (i.e. CheckBoxMultipleC
dont you just implement equals/hashcode on MyObjectOption???
-igor
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is an example of what I'm referring to:
>
> class MyObject {
>private Long id;
>private MyO
i see it as a reasonable enough requirement that objects
properly implement equals and hashcode.
-igor
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> yes, that will work in my example, but what if MyObjectOption is not
> part of my namespace?
>
AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I agree, but there are some cases where it will not be possible to
> implement equals/hashcode on the model object.
>
> I would be more of a proponent to have as much consistency across
> components as possible- which would mea
16, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It could be left as is and use the display value as expected (i.e.
> ).
>
> Another option would be to have an identifier renderer:
>
> public interface IChoiceRenderer extends IIdentifierRenderer {
>
n" if checkedand no
requestparam at all if its not.
at least thats what i remember from the "dark ages"
-igor
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Isnt the value used by us already??
> To know what checkbox/radio is selected?
What does everyone think about updating the Wicket core validators to
contain an optional IModel?
Simple Use Case:
# properties file
label.myminimum=My Object at row: {0} with value '${input}' must be
smaller than ${minimum}
...
final RefreshingView myView = new RefreshingView("tr-my-object-view
sers@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Providing IModel to Validators
that is why formcomponents have a setLabel(IModel) whose text is
then available via ${label} place holder.
-igor
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> What does everyone think ab
tor.minimum(5, srm)).add(new
MyUsernameValidator());
results in- 'first name' with value 'abc' at row 10 is shorter than the
minimum of 5 characters.
results in- 'first name' with value 'abc' at row 10 is not unique.
==
-Orig
happens when someone wants ${label} at row {0} column {1} is
required? do we start passing in arrays, lists, or maps for imodels to
validators?
why not just do
textfield.setlabel(new model("first name at row "+row));
-igor
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL
can refactor this stuff for 1.4/1.5
-igor
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> A "column" attribute, or any other attribute for that matter, would
> not make a difference because if would all be encapsulated within the
> model
Why not do:
final Image logoImg = new Image("logoimg");
logoImg.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier("src", chemin));
or:
final Image logoImg = new Image("logoimg");
logoImg.add(new AttributeModifier("src", true, new
AbstractReadOnlyModel() {
public final Object getObject() {
+1
This seems to be the best option so far. It's confusing to see a bunch
of subclasses whose only purpose is to avoid generic type definitions. A
separate dependency makes sense. If anyone is that concerned with having
to define void generic types they can add the dependency.
-Original Messa
1) Generifying* Wicket
[X] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified models and components give Wicket.
Verbose VS Clarity, Clarity wins hands down.
2) How strongly d
Goes to show you that people have a tendency to reject things that they
do not understand rather than put in the effort :o)
-Original Message-
From: richardwilko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:21 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: users, please give us y
+1
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 10:49 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on
generics with Wicket
I don't know, I think the discussion is going *toward* generics.
+1
I would like to see what the major issues are as to why people are
rejecting model/component generics. None that I have seen so far are
that convincing- especially the complaints of verbosity.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of James Carman
inion: what is your take on
generics with Wicket
yes thats why i am against Referendums (politically) :)
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Goes to show you that people have a tendency to reject things that
> they do not understand rather than
7;t see here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generics.html
I just don't see the problem with the current direction.
Cheers,
Scott
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1
> I would like to see what the major issues are as to why people a
generics with Wicket
Why don't we use the Wiki page to list our *specific* "gotchas" we
encounter and try to come up with a solution for them. My guess is that
we can do so.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1
> I would like t
Good question... I would add to that and say:
how many of those users actually use generified wicket on day-to-day
basis?
how many of those users actually implement generics on day-to-day basis
(not just using them- like List)?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
If you use more than one type of model for a given component I would
hardly say that it is only a fraction of the time. Do you use only one
type of model on all your components? :o)
The use of Void is not an obscure workaround. Why do you think they have
it? I think it's intent is very clear if yo
I read it, but I think most people will be using models more frequently
than 30% of the time. Personally, I use them 99% of the time.
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kriesten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:54 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: users, please
Enlighten me with an example
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kriesten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 12:23 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: users, please give us your opinion: what is your take on
generics with Wicket
hi william,
> Wouldn't that infer tha
Then we are on the same page with one thing... some level in the
component hierarchy would have to be generic.
Your original example specified "T getModel()" - you must have meant "T
getModelObject()" ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kriesten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June
Wouldn't that infer that the component has to have generics, or am I
missing something here?
Something like...
public abstract class Component, T> implements
IClusterable, IConverterLocator {
...
public final M getModel(){
...
}
...
public f
, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:59:09AM -0400, Hoover, William wrote:
> I read it, but I think most people will be using models more
> frequently than 30% of the time. Personally, I use them 99% of the
time.
Really? Haven't you heard of CompoundPropert
children typically do not
reference models explicitly.
Thus you typically use an explicit model on < 30% of your components if
you have a form-heavy web-app; the other components use the implicit
model provided by the parent's CompoundPropertyModel.
Regards,
Al
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at
In java 1.7 it will allow: TextField tf = new TextField("id");
So, at least one of your wishes will come true ;o)
I like the default idea.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 4:15 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: user
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In java 1.7 it will allow: TextField tf = new TextField("id");
> So, at least one of your wishes will come true ;o)
>
> I like the default idea.
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
It would be better if ContextImage was a behavior rather than an actual
component. For instance, if you have an html input of type=image (or a
link for that matter) you can still utilize the behavior whereas a
component you cannot ;o)
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL P
, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It would be better if ContextImage was a behavior rather than an
> actual component. For instance, if you have an html input of
> type=image (or a link for that matter) you can still utilize the
> behavior whereas a compo
I didn't see any methods in FeedbackMessages for:
pageContext.getErrorData().getStatusCode();
pageContext.getErrorData().getThrowable();
...
Am I missing something?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 12:43 PM
To: users@wicket.
erride
requestcycle.onruntimeexception(runtimeexception e)
-igor
On Jan 8, 2008 10:07 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't see any methods in FeedbackMessages for:
>
> pageContext.getErrorData().getStatusCode();
> pageContext.getErrorData().getThrowa
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/siEB
-Original Message-
From: Gerolf Seitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:26 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: calling javascript function on wicket component's onclick
something like:
new
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sCEB
-Original Message-
From: thomas jaeckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:13 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How can I validate required formComponents after page load?
igor.vaynberg w
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/3CIB
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:07 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to write Json response in the
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.response(ajaxtarget)
Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ime do that please?
>
> Gerolf
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 2:25 PM, Hoover, William < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
> > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
> >
> >
> >
ime do that please?
>
> Gerolf
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 2:25 PM, Hoover, William < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know when the links will be fixed for
> > http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/ (Internet Exploder 6)
> >
> >
> > ---
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FSMB
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:06 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to logout and redirect
almost but not quiet
onclick() { getsession().i
In your WebApplication...
getApplicationSettings().setPageExpiredErrorPage(PageExpiredErrorPage.class);
getApplicationSettings().setAccessDeniedPage(AccessDeniedPage.class);
getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(InternalErrorPage.class);
// show internal error page rather than default dev
On 1/16/08, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, i checked the wrong window (running the examples on my machine).
>
> what version of examples are deployed. anything >= 1.3.0-final should work.
>
> gerolf
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 3:39 PM, Hoover, Wil
or even http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia.html
-Original Message-
From: Florian Sperber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:36 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket + CMS
Hi Igor,
have you seen: http://cocoondev.org/daisy/index.html ?
Maybe thei
Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sGw
-Original Message-
From: Boon Aik Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:33 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to get page URL
It worked! Thanks!
On Jan 18, 2008 9:07 PM, Martin Makundi
, 2008 10:02 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add/Edit if necessary http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sGw
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Boon Aik Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:33 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache
very nice!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Swank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:57 PM
To: Wicket User List
Subject: CompoundModel based on proxies
One of our more clever developers created a CompoundPropertyModel that
uses a cglib proxy to strongly bind th
integration comming along?
Like i said then, i don't have a solution ready for how you would do
such a thing, and frankly it doesn't bother me enough if sometimes i
have to implement ISecurePage myself.
But i welcome a contribution that could do it :)
Maurice
On Feb 12, 2008 1:29 PM, Hoove
I still think that a more elegant and non-obtrusive solution would be
mountSecurePage(MySecureWebPage.class)
discussed previously in:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg09129.html
That way you could have one basepage because they would not have to extend
SecureWebPage
If you would like to have custom Http error pages you can update the wicket
filter-mapping in your web.xml to the following (notice the dispatchers):
WicketFilter
/*
REQUEST
ERROR
404
Add getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true); to your WebApplication class
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:25 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Strict XHTML validation
I am trying to validate my page using ht
What about using the CryptedUrlWebRequestCodingStrategy? In your WebApplication:
@Override
protected IRequestCycleProcessor newRequestCycleProcessor() {
return new WebRequestCycleProcessor() {
protected IRequestCodingStrategy
newRequestCodi
public abstract class BasePage extends WebPage {
public BasePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
// If the title is not set in any sub-pages this will be the
default
setTitle(new StringResourceModel("base.page.title", this,
null));
}
pro
According to the
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
they should reside in src/main/webapp
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Czerwonka
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:43 AM
To: users@wicket.
Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html
> they should reside in src/main/webapp
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
&
It looks like the datetime component has major issues of its own that make it
virtually unusable (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1412).
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:13 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subj
Anyone know of a good kitchen sink application for Wicket (preferably one
application)? We need something robust enough to test most of the Wicket
features in our current environment.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you add this to the wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice-examples.html)? It seems like a
commonly asked question :o)
-Original Message-
From: Erik van Oosten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 9:35 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:13 AM
To: Wicket Development; Wicket Users
Subject: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
yo
Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
(non-svn)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
Hoover, William schrieb:
> Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
> (non-svn)?
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:59 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
Hoover, William schrieb:
> Thanks, but I was looking for a way
#x27;s had a release yet. It's at 1.0-SNAPSHOT still.
On 3/17/08, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sen
FYI...
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/repeater/
OrderedRepeatingView, RefreshingView, and Contacts Editor all throw Internal
errors
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Try the following:
if (!continueToOriginalDestination()) {
setResponsePage(getApplication().getHomePage());
}
-Original Message-
From: Jörn Zaefferer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:13 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mounting and inte
I was looking into providing a List in a ISortState/IClusterable
(multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the list
within the sort state need to be IClusterable?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
rializable
should be fine.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Hoover, William wrote:
> I was looking into providing a List in a ISortState/IClusterable
> (multiple version of SingleSortState) for a SortableDataProvider. Does the
> list within the sort state need
It seems as though this would be a good candidate for a replacement for
SingleSortState/SortableDataProvider. We really don't need the single sort
version if we have a multiple sort version (reduce bloat ;o)?
-Original Message-
From: Hoover, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem is that it is an incompatible change and a hassle for the
implementors of sortable data providers, because suddenly they need to
take into account many sorts instead of only 1.
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Hoover, William wrote:
> It seems as though this would be a good candidate for
When using DataView/IDataProvider size() is called before iterator(int first,
int count) causing calls to DAOs to be duplicated. Our current framework that
is internally using Hibernate allows one call to be made to a DAO that returns
both the total result size and the actual records (based off
m all ears.
-igor
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When using DataView/IDataProvider size() is called before iterator(int first,
> int count) causing calls to DAOs to be duplicated. Our current framework that
> is internally using Hibern
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1449
-Original Message-
From: Toto Laricot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 3:29 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: './' appended to the main page url
Hi all,
Here is the situation I've been banging my head on all
defined in the data provider
interface to query/set the results.
* often users do:
new dataview() { isvisible() { return dataprovider.size()>0; }
once again, datawindow size is not known.
[Will]: This would be accommodated by the above solution.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Hoover, Will
issue
yes you can cache those values
IDataProvider does extends IDetachable
and in detach() you can clear those values.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> see below...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PR
reused across the request.
johan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more flexible if this were the default behavior? The size()
> method is called (sometimes multiple times- such is the case with pagination
> or the
me..
You as a developer can know that but we as a framework, dont know about
that.
I thought the size was already cached in specific places
But you can easily make a wrapper ofcourse..
CachingDataProvider implements IDataProvider
{
IDataProvider delegate;
}
johan
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ho
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
