On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >wicket:link doesnt touch components afaik
>
> :( I need it to be a component. My code is basically this:
>
> add(new WebMarkupContainer("img"));
Why do you need it to be a component? Are you contr
I have a table in our application that uses colspans for certain
cells. The AbstractDataGridView (and DataGridView subclass) uses the
concept of an ICellPopulator. This assumes that there will be m x n
table cells (m = number cols, n = number rows) since it manufactures
each cell's Item and then
Well, if you're using WicketFilter, then you can just write your own
servlet. If WicketFilter doesn't think it's responsible for the
request, it'll let it flow through. So, you could just code this
using Servlets anyway.
Wouldn't extending WebResource and using ResourceLink be the way to do
this
Doesn't the code remember what it has already taken care of during
serialization? I seem to remember something like that in the code.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that method is only called when you have page references inside your page
> that is g
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SPEED!
Can it use a special session store that serializes stuff in-memory
just to make sure the serialization is checked? Would that be fast
enough?
-
Have you tried using around your tag for your CSS?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Michael Laccetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For some reason the CSS links that I have embedded in my HTML are not
> working. The HTML validates perfectly, the CSS URL is available as I can
> browse to it,
extend it
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Broderick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I customize the markup for the stock SignInPanel?
>
> Thanks
>
> ___
>
> The information in this email or in any file attached
> hereto i
There should be only one SessionFactory created during your
application's lifecycle (assuming you're using only one database).
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:31 AM, tbt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm using a static block to save resources so that hibernate does not have
> to initialize a
I've never really cared for this whole idea of requiring subclassing
to get your work done. Is there no way to make things more pluggable?
Perhaps use the decorator design pattern?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Martijn Lindhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I remember well, Wasp/Swarm needs
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM, John Krasnay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This indeed works, but the problem is I'm gonna forget to do it and
> spend another half day banging my head against my desk wondering where
> my data went. I think I'll go back to an explicit form...it's not too
> onero
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your not very helpful email, but unfortunately, you're wrong. In
> that other email, I did say "But, most don't (have jsessionid) because
> almost all of my links are bookmarkable." I don't strip out jsess
You can use the servlet API to do that. Request.getContextPath() or
something like that.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:37 AM, unka_hahrry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Is there a possibility to get the context root which I defined in my context
> descriptor for Tomcat?
> --
> View th
In Hibernate, couldn't you just use get(Class entityClass,
Serializable id) rather than doing the whole uniqueResult() stuff?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using jpa you can do it this way:
>
>private BaseEntity findById(Str
Concat the elements of the "array" yourself before you add it as a parameter?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:17 AM, i ii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is way to add StringResourceModel with array of unknown size?
>
> .properties
> attendees.names=All attendees include: {0}
>
> webpage
> // examp
I like for my entities to always be serializable. Is there some
special requirement to have a non-serializable field on your entity
class?
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Fernando Wermus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am finishing my first app for production in wicket. As any newbie I try to
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:42 AM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a usecase where the current proposed generic Interface for
> IDataProvider with upcoming v1.4 of Wicket would break the implementation
> concept working with Wicket 1.3. The usecase needs different types f
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi I have the following, and its resulting in 2x calls to the load on my
> model - which confuses me.
>
> My panel has the following in its constructor.
>
> setModel(new CompoundPropertyModel(new LoadableDetachableMode
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 6:56 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi I have the following, and its resulting in 2x calls to the load on my
> > model - which confuse
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you need to surround your code with something like ths:
>
>
> PlatformTransactionManager ptm = (PlatformTransactionManager)ctx
>.getBean("transactionManager");
>
> TransactionStatus txn = ptm.getTransaction(n
Try using markup inheritance. It's way easier than borders.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Joel Halbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to work out the best way to use borders within my app.
>
> After looking at the following docs:
> http://wicket.apache.org/examplenavomatic.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Joel Halbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Markup inheritance (http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/markup-inheritance.html)
> certainly looks more straight forward, I'll move over to using it.
>
> Is there any situation where borders might be preferable though?
Not in m
Can't you just put setters on your page/components that take the
dependencies? Then, during testing, you can just inject mock objects.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Sarkast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> I have a question which came up when trying to test my wicket pages.
>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, enable cookies in your browser.
The JSESSIONID will still appear at least one time even if cookies are
enabled, correct? Once a link/submit happens and the server sees that
cookie come in, it knows not to append
ionid iirc from the
> previous discussion.
>
> Martijn
>
>
>
> On 4/25/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Martijn Dashorst
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, enable cookies in your browser.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm I've seen the same a couple of times after restarting the server.
> However it seems to "disapear" after the server is "warmed"...
>
Yes, once it knows that cookies are working, it doesn't appen
Why are you using the Spring injector to inject your dependencies?
Can you not manually inject your dependencies? Adding stuff manually
to a Spring context and then having the Spring injector inject it
doesn't really test what's going to be going on "in production"
anyway. If it were me, I'd prov
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> James Carman wrote:
>
> > Why are you using the Spring injector to inject your dependencies?
> > Can you not manually inject your dependencies? Adding stuff manual
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:57 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Such an initialize method can easily be done by users them self with a
> > simple factory pattern. So why bloat
2008/4/28 Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> James Carman schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Or, perhaps Wicket could add in some lifecycle method annotations?
> >
>
> pleeease don´t!
>
> using annotations for this kind of lifecycle methods is a simple abuse of
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Such an initialize method can easily be done by users them self with a
> simple factory pattern. So why bloat our api with it?
Could one come up with their own interface which means they want
delayed intialization and
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 6:27 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this would involve making up some rules about the order in which
> the parent class' initializer methods are invoked. A couple that come
> to mind:
>
> 1. There should only be one initi
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How well did you test this?
Only whipped it up very quickly (based on obviously wrong assumptions :).
> Because i think the biggest problem here is that the
> IComponentInstantiationListener is invoked in the construc
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Oh! Nasty. I thought you guys were somehow waiting until the
> > Component was fully instantiated for this notification to occur. If
>
> Nope. One of the places where this is used, is for security
> (i
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/4/28 Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > James Carman schrieb:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Or, perhaps Wicket could add in some lifecycle method annotations?
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can roll that, just use the beforerenderlistener you can install
> in the application subclass.
We just have to make sure we only initialize an instance one time.
The IComponentOnBeforeRenderListeners are called ever
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes of course. you have to keep a boolean in the metadata to mark if
> the handler has been called already.
>
Ok, gotcha! I need to keep that metadata stuff in my head. That's a
nifty little trick for adding ad-hoc pro
And, when does the base page do the adding? In the constructor?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Scott Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have done this by creating an abstract base page with an abstract
> factory methods getFooPanel() or getBarPanel(). Then the base page
> add()s the result
t Swank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, in the constructor.
>
> - Scott
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And, when does the base page do the adding? In the constructor?
> >
> >
> >
&
Would you like me to add something like this to the wiki?
// The interface...
public interface IBeforeFirstRenderListener
{
public void onBeforeFirstRender();
}
// The invoking listener...
public class BeforeFirstRenderListenerInvoker implements
IComponentOnBeforeRenderListener
{
public s
Sorry, type given to meta data key should be Boolean, not
IBeforeFirstRenderListener.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:55 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you like me to add something like this to the wiki?
>
> // The interface...
> public interface IBeforeF
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:24 AM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This approach breaks a components encapsulation because the listener must be
> installed in the application. Even if IInitializers can be used to do this
> once it ads an extra complication to creating reusable comp
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First i dont want a boolen in the components that onFirstRender() is called.
> I want a boolean that it is not called. So in the constructor of
> component we set the flag and clear it when first rendered.
>
Are we thi
Is this gone now that 1.4 is JDK5+? Is this stuff just bundled in
with wicket-spring?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, thanks. That makes sense.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Leszek Gawron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
>
> > Is this gone now that 1.4 is JDK5+? Is this stuff just bundled in
> > with wicket-spring?
> >
>
> yes
>
> --
>
Are you behind a firewall of some sort? Or, perhaps an HTTP proxy server?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote in earlier about a problem I had in less-old releases of Wicket
> 1.2. Since no more work is being done on that version, I thought I'd
I don't usually mock the actual models. If I'm using a
LoadableDetachableModel, I'll mock the DAO or "repository" that the
model is using to find its data, but I never actually mock the model
itself.
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Per Newgro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> i try to test
Can you just mark it as required?
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead of submit, pop up a dialog telling the user to choose a file to
> upload? As is now, the UploadProgressBar show up, form submit ,
> getFileUpload returns null and error handling
Frank Silbermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course I am. Who isn't, these days? /Frank
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 4:16 PM
> To: u
I came up with the following class that I find very useful in our application:
public abstract class FragmentColumn extends AbstractColumn
{
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
protected FragmentColumn( IModel displayModel )
{
super(displayModel);
}
prote
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I will check out the Object that was posted thanks!
>
> Yes I put the opensessioninview filter before.
>
> I think the problem is this.
>
> Lets say I list all of my items in one page.
>
> Name, Descrip
We use Acegi/Wicket in our current project at work. The main thing
you need to worry about is the session implementation. Here's a
snippet from ours:
private AuthenticationManager getAuthenticationManager()
{
return (( MyWebApplication )
getApplication()).getAuthenticationManager
Of course, that means your WebSession class must extend AuthenticatedWebSession.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:49 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We use Acegi/Wicket in our current project at work. The main thing
> you need to worry about is the session implementatio
Does anyone have a grid/table component that allows you to have one
cell span multiple rows? Also, I would prefer it to be stateless if
possible. I don't need sorting and paging.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
wicketstuff-automount?
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Matthijs Wensveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Donohoe wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to announce the 1.0 release of wicketstuff-annotation.
> >
> >
>
> Nice. But the name 'wicketstuff-annotation' does not say anything about
> what it does,
Yes, but should we globalize the "annotations" namespace to mean that
anyone who wants to do anything with annotations should put it inside
this project? Perhaps keeping things smaller is a better idea. That
way, if I want to use automount, but I don't want all of the other
annotation-based goodi
on comes along that requires hibernate jars to be on the
> classpath, that definitely should be it's own project. otherwise, it makes
> sense to lump all annotations together.
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
&
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Hoover, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Would it be better if there were a core wicket-annotation project that
> > provides the basics (such as the scanner) and another project cal
Have you tried using the other constructor for
RestartResponsAtInterceptPageException (the one that takes a page
instance)?
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Fernando Wermus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I've used the authentication and authorization examples and I need to
> add some easy
I did something like this for Hibernate back in the day. I wrote an
APT processor that checked for all classes annotated with @Entity and
added those to a hibernate.cfg.xml file.
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if the scanning of the classpath is expen
Maven comes with an Eclipse "plugin" that allows you to generate
eclipse project files based on the pom.xml file of your project. In
the eclipse project files, they refer to an M2_REPO (the Maven2
Repository) directory as a classpath variable. You have to make sure
your Eclipse instance is config
When we finally get commons-functor generified, I'm going to create an
IModel implementation that takes a UnaryFunction and wraps another
IModel. This would probably be a read-only model, though (unless you
supply the UnaryFunction's inverse also I guess). This would be
reusable so that you can s
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Doug Donohoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know if this is intentional or not, but pages seem to load much
> faster in development mode in Wicket 1.4-m1.
>
Did you get a new computer since 1.3.x? ;)
---
Why do you need it "detached all the way"?
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have some questions on detached models for Wicket
>
> Let's say I create a detached model like this
>
> IModel detachedModel = new LoadableDetachableModel(){
> protecte
I typically don't like to have my UI code directly interact with the
ORM implementation (hibernate in this case). For my applications, I
pass a Repository (think DAO) object and the object's id into the
LoadableDetachableModel.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
t; thats just me :)
>
> -igor
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I typically don't like to have my UI code directly interact with the
>> ORM implementation (hibernate in this case). For my applications, I
Yes, but that URL isn't obvious. Is there a link on the main site
anywhere to that Javadoc? I couldn't find it. I always have to
hand-type it (or bookmark it of course :)
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wic
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is under the section labeled Documentation called JavaDocs ;)
>
Those Javadocs don't contain the wicket-extensions classes. That's
only the Javadoc for the "core" Wicket stuff.
> Incidentally should it not point to 1
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Jan Kriesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi martijn,
>
>
>
> > md5sum for the concatenated string? Though the calculation may be
> > costly and there could be false cache hits.
> >
>
> looking at the length of the strings and their composition... i doubt that
>
Have you looked at the Recaptcha Java plugin? It might give you an
example of how to create a Recaptcha component. I'm actually thinking
about playing around with this myself. Recaptcha seems pretty cool.
I'll let you know if I come up with anything.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dan Kaplan
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Dan Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do use that. This has nothing to do with ReCaptcha, this is a "How do
> I do x in Wicket" question that someone asked, "Why would you want to do
> that?" so I used ReCaptcha as an answer.
Ok, gotcha. So, we're not talking
Have you tried surrounding that stylesheet link with a ?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:25 AM, danielepiras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm developing an application that run on www.myserver.com/myapplication/
> In my Index.html page, I include a css:
>
>
> The problem is that wicket t
Have you looked into using Spring's JPA support?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:29 AM, David Nedrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a data "driver" package built around JPA and an Entity Manager
> Factory (javax.persistence.EntityManagerFactory). This is currently used by
> a couple of standalone
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Wouter Huijnink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am planning to use quartz, but before starting to integrate it in my
>> wicket's app i would like to know if anybody have used it or another
>> scheduler with
>> wicket.
>>
>
> we used Quartz, works like a charm. I w
java.util.UUID.randomUUID().toString()
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Matthew Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to implement the usual account activation via email function. Can
> anyone point me to some example of how this is implemented? If in Wicket
> even better but anything would h
A directory where? On the client machine? What will you do with that
directory when you've selected it?
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Oncle Zebulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I am a newbie with wicket and i would like to know if there is a way to
> select a directory in a
If you were to add in pooling, you'd have to either provide a new hook
(new lifecycle method) or a warning to the user (as you mentioned)
that they have to rollback the state themselves after rendering using
onAfterRender() or something.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PR
@SpringBean only works on Components, since it uses a
ComponentInstantiationListener.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Stephan Koch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to use the @SpringBean annotation in a class derived from
> LoadableDetachableModel. For whatever reason, the bean is n
And, this injection stuff could be yet another aspect that would be in
wicket-aspects! It would be annotation-based, of course.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/08, Stephan Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have to admit that I don't know
It may even re-use the actual session object instance for another
person's session (by filling it with their stuff).
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accessing pages in other threads then the request thread is very bad idea.
> Because http session objec
Martin did all the help. I just pointed out why it doesn't work! :)
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Stephan Koch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> martijn, james: thanks for the help!
>
> works like a charm now...
>
> -stephan
>
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>> On 5/18/08, Stephan Koch <[EMAIL PROT
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you have a benchmark that shows that pooling is indeed faster?
>
> servlets are pooled because they may require heavy initialization.
> wicket pages are much more lightweight in comparison.
And, the more heavyweight you
So, what do you plan to do with that directory once you collect it?
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Oncle Zebulon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> On a form, i have a field that represents a directory (c:\mydirectory for
> example) and then store the information. It's a local directory.
>
>
>
stateless != static, though
If you cache the results of a stateless page, you could show stale
information from the database, correct?
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it would probably make more sense to cache the /result/ of statel
Make sure you use some "salt", though.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use hash you do not need to store the "random" part into the
> db. Saves you some persistence trouble.
>
> 2008/5/19 Michael Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Sam Stainsby wrote:
ally have pizza)!
James Carman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have a look at the java.util.ResourceBundle class (which is
essentially what Wicket uses).
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Blackbird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My question isn't about i18n.
> Wicket has its own very nice system of properties (MyApplication.properties,
> MyWebPage.properties)
nnati, OH area, I'm giving an "Advanced
>> Wicket" talk tonight at our Cincinnati Java Users Group
>> (www.cinjug.org) meeting tonight. Meeting information (when, where,
>> etc.) is on our website. Hope to see you there (membership is free
>> and we usually have pizza)!
>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Michael Mehrle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm not sure how you've set up the project, but I remember that
> you sometimes had to copy the JDBC driver into the tomcat lib directory.
> Haven't touched tomcat in a while, but there are project specific libs
> an
One company here in Cincinnati is currently
evaluating web technologies and they had someone there last night.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:48 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll a
How are you spitting out the contents of the mail? Are you using a
stream of some sort? Are you forgetting to flush/close the stream?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Davidoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> wonderful...the problem now is that some mail do not render completely...i
> don't see an
Yes, I was thinking of this yesterday. I'd love to have a big orange
t-shirt with the Wicket logo on it! :)
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the 'official' Apache line is at
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/contributing.html - the Apache Swag!
> at
All,
I was looking at the structure of the wicketstuff.org SVN repository
today and I came up with an idea. Currently, the
wicket-persistence-template project is located at:
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-persistence-template/
So, all subprojects sort of hang o
ase with
> our new teamcity), so maintenance on each project would in most cases
> require ensuring api compatibility.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:59 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I was looking at the structure of the w
gher release schedule is also nice, but lower seems to indicate a
> bit of a dead end imo.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:13 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, is the philosophy of wicket-stuff that all of the projects kind of
>> mirror
Does the panel ever use its model? Do you have any subcomponents that
try to access their parent's (the panel's model)?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:19 AM, msmall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a panel that has a LoadableDetachableModel as its model (i.e. I'm
> calling this.setModel(new Load
If it doesn't need the object (nothing's using it), then why would it
call load()?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, msmall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, I'm just wiring up the panel so it does not have any subcomponents yet.
> Regardless, I'm confused as to why Panel, as a Component, would n
Do you *need* it to load?
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:45 AM, msmall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And thanks for the help.
>
>
> jwcarman wrote:
>>
>> If it doesn't need the object (nothing's using it), then why would it
>> call load()?
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, msmall <[EMAIL PROTEC
I think maybe you're using models incorrectly, then. If you need the
model object, call panel.getModelObject() and that will, in turn, call
the load() method.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, msmall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes. I'm just invoking the load method directly in my overriding
If you are creating a "product", why do you need to be able to plugin
a different IoC container (Guice vs. Spring for example)? Do you
think a site admin will honestly care which container you use (or ORM
API for that matter)?
2008/5/20 Uwe Schäfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hi
>
> i remember someone
gt;> Fortran or Algol 68 as well :-)
>>
>> Am 20.05.2008 um 22:15 schrieb James Carman:
>>
>>
>> If you are creating a "product", why do you need to be able to plugin
>>> a different IoC container (Guice vs. Spring for example)? Do you
>>
1 - 100 of 1919 matches
Mail list logo
