On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Rob Arends wrote:
> Or is it that Xmail forces all addresses to lowercase before going to the
> FS.
What do you think? :-)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the l
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, A.Schleipen wrote:
> sure :)
>
> I fetch mails from isp with fetchmail for a local linux-user-account
> alx. fetchmail routes the mail to xmail.
> this is the fetchmailrc
> poll pop.xxx.de
> protocol pop3
> user username with pass password is alx here
> smtphost localhost
>
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Sergio Casagrande wrote:
> Hi all.
> A signalling: in linux box cmdaliases files are case sensitive. Is this
> one wanted?
> I have
> Mailroot/cmdaliases/domain/ADDRESS.txt
> If I send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it will not arrive.
> If I send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, A.Schleipen wrote:
> reason 1: I want to fetch mails from ssl-servers
> reason 2: I want to keep the mails also on the isp-servers
>
> afaik this isn't possible with xmail?
>
> the problem for now is, that the mails for the local account are not
> routed to the xmailuser-ac
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> PS: Who is it, that scumbles the messages with these quoted-printable=20
> characters? Is it the ML-software or my User Agent or ...?=20
I think it is Ecartis, but I'm not sure. It could be my Pine too, even if=
=20
I doubt.
- Davide
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Eric Garnice wrote:
> Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you mentio=
> ned a=20
> single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude MailRoot from=
> =20
> the memory-resident virus scanner. I excluded MailRoot and all mail=20
> instan
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a message once that was sitting in the
> queue, sent the CPU usage to 100% and stopped all mail delivery until i
> cleared out the spool. I may actually still have it sitting around here
> somewhere if you want it
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I
> > find=3D =3D20
> > also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since
> > there=3D =3D20
> > are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=3DCET],
> Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=20
> > One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished
> > committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear alon
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Dario wrote:
> Don't know, but...
> there is a flag (aex).
> Check "Smtp message filters" in the readme for usage.
That does not work ATM because POP3 before SMTP does not fill the logon
token ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote:
>
> > Hi all -
> >
> > Xmail 1.21 is running along smoothly on a FreeBSD 5.3 platform with
> > about 60 or so users. Thanks for the great update, Davide!
> >
> > I
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Jeff Buehler wrote:
> Hi all -
>
> Xmail 1.21 is running along smoothly on a FreeBSD 5.3 platform with
> about 60 or so users. Thanks for the great update, Davide!
>
> I am interested in implementing greylisting. When I do so (using glst)
> I get the rejmsg as a valid us
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
>
> Maybe I am just tired, but where do I find this?
A shell on the server machine while hang.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the lin
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
> I am running xmail 1.21 on RH 9.0. I have three filters one on "in" and
> "out" for f-prot antivirus and 2 on "pre-data" glst and spf.
>
> I have this setup on both my primary and secondary. Everyone is able to
> check email and both servers are r
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Jaques Metz wrote:
> Hello people...
> Xmail have mailbox quota per user, but I want to use a mailbox limit per
> domain, for example, a domain called "xyzdomain.com" has 10 user accounts
> that could only use 100 MB of disk space...
>
> Note: the accounts doesn't have a sp
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, NOTA Postmaster wrote:
> I'm building a Fedora box to run Xmail among other things. I want X on
> this machine, though I know of the security risks. Once I install XMail
> via RPM, the machine hangs on sendmail during startup. Also note that I
> have done the removing sendm
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Luca Giuranna wrote:
> >>it would be useful to have some admin commands to deal with messages
> >>scheduled for resend (those in the rsnd folders in the spool tree), the
> >>same way xmail has commands to deal with frozen messages.
> >>They could be "rsndlist", "rsndgetlog"
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Charles Frolick wrote:
> Hello Davide,
>
> Monday, January 10, 2005, 12:37:27 PM, you wrote:
>
> DL> Why would we need them? I mean, message are already rescheduled for
> DL> delivery.
>
> I know on some other servers they allow you to browse and force resend
> messages, th
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Luca Giuranna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working heavily on XMail logging features for a demanding customer
> and I have some ideas on possible improvements.
> I've not yet thinked enough about these improvements, so, for now, I
> save you from reading about them.
>
> One thing,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Francesco Vertova wrote:
> It isn't Italian, but Latin, and (with a leading "h") means "We have the
> Pope" (the Vatican's ritual formula to announce that the new Pope has been
> elected) ...
Ouch, true! I wish I wouldn't have skipped that Latin lesson to go at
the beach .
1.21 it is, at the end:
http://www.xmailserver.org
* Sun Jan 9 2005 Davide Libenzi
Added a fix for 64 bits porting compatibility.
Added the ability to exclude filters from execution in case of
authenticated user.
By pre-pending the filter command token with a token containing
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Luca Giuranna wrote:
> Next week I'll start collecting those smtp logs on a very very heavy
> traffic server.
> This server is used mainly for large message (pdf attachement), will the
> logs be useful to you?
No need, thank you. I already got enough logs from XMail users, t
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> One more question... want it all in one massive file, broken apart by month,
> or broken apart by day? :-D
I collected my data in a single file, it is fine.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
>
> > Okay I'm going crazy... why isn't the filesize listed in my SMPT logs?
>
> Here you go:
>
> --
&g
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Okay I'm going crazy... why isn't the filesize listed in my SMPT logs?
Here you go:
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
while (<>) {
my @ar;
my $size;
chomp;
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> How many months worth do you want :P
I think three should be fine, thx! I am collecting all mine also, but mine
are biased. The top of my traffic comes from mailing lists, where message
sizes are typically small (and plain-text).
- Davide
-
To un
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Dario wrote:
> I do.
> Is the log format changing in 1.21?
Nope. There is a new filter log, but this is a new thing of 1.21 ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Theo Rosbag wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > Does anyone of you keep stats about message sizes? They are inside logs,
> > but dunno if you collected them ...
> >
> >
>
> I use it in my mrtg page , to show how much mail in MB where receive
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> | How many of you on the list is using the GLST and what kind=20
> | of success=20
> | do you think it has? What is your initial delay and what is=20
> | recomended value?
>
> I am using the GLST module. Number of spam mails dropped f
Does anyone of you keep stats about message sizes? They are inside logs,
but dunno if you collected them ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Postmaster wrote:
> Just a question for my failing memory... Was a graylisting option added to
> this version or nixed? I haven't had the chance to try out the new version.
There is no specific greylisting option. GLST is just a filter. There is
though, an option to exclude f
Since I plan to make 1.21 this weekend, are there any bad reports about
1.21-pre04? Running fine on @xmailserver.org ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Vijay Doshi wrote:
> This is the type of error we intermittently see that I described below. Any
> help is appreciated.
>
> One thing I don't get is the discrepency in the "from" address
>
> [PeekTime] 1104963969 : Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:26:09 -0800
> <<
> ErrCode = -82
> ErrSt
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Dale Qualls wrote:
> I'm seeing this error (filter error (-5)) in the /var/log/messages log
> on many messages. When this happens the server locks up and we have to
> reboot it, quickly ssh into it, kill xmail and spamd.
Yesterday, while implementing the new filter features,
Here we go:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre04.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre04.win32bin.zip
Now we have USERAUTH everywhere, and filters execution can be skipped, if
the user authenticated by having the first filter tab file token equal to
"!aex". Hopefully will be
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
> Over half of my users connect through the internet (83 different IP address
> just from yesterday) and I am not good enough with C++ to make the edits.
>
> Does anyone have a script out there?
Since a couple of changes came up, I decided to add a fe
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
> When I use that file my server rejects everything including what I am trying
> to send.
You need to add xnet entries to whitelist your nets. Take a look at the doc.
I also need to add a feature in XMail, so that certain filters execution
can be skip
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>=20
> if I try to execute:
>=20
> sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=20
> it is getting bounced by Xmail 1.21:
>=20
> [<01>] Error sending message [...].
>=20
> ID:
> Mail From: <...>
> Rcpt To: <[EMAIL PR
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
>
> After reading the documentation I got the impression that if you are running
> Xmail you don't even need glst.conf
Nope. Just use the glst.conf file that you can find inside the cfg
directory of the tarbal.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Gideon So wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> What is supposed to be in glst.conf. I have no idea about it. Please
> give me some hints. Thanks.
Did you read the GLST man page, and look inside the tarbal?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> >
> >> Davide,
> >>
> >> Will 1.21 final fix the problem with the POP3 links in the CTRL client?
> >> If
> >> not I'll just stick my code in an archive folder for now and call it
> >> good.
> >
> > Nope. T
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Davide,
>
> Will 1.21 final fix the problem with the POP3 links in the CTRL client? If
> not I'll just stick my code in an archive folder for now and call it good.
Nope. That'd go in 1.22
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
I made an 1.21-pre03 release:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre03.win32bin.zip
This will be the last 1.21 pre-release, and I plan 1.21 for next week.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> How much does xmail keep an entry in it's dnscache ?
>
> I have a domain who's MX was changed 2 days ago, and xmail still
> had the old entry in it's cache. I had to remove it by hand.
XMail uses the TTL value.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, January 03, 2005 7:01 PM:
>=20
> > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=3D3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
> >=3D20
> >> Second: Could you implement my request that bounce messages
> > can generate =3D3D
> > =3D3D3D
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Gideon So wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Finally, I compiled the glst modules by adding Davide's mkdep
> scripts and a .depend file.
>
> Then I run it by adding this line
>
> "/var/MailRoot/bin/glst" "--mfile" "@@FILE"
>
> into the filters.pre-data.tab.
>
> Th
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Dario wrote:
> That's true, I want to know how Davide will use them...
Still not sure. Just keep GLST log them in the lame-db ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Dario wrote:
> You are right Davide, it would make senese only if next
> generation of spamming software will use that trick.
>
> BTW, are you planning to share those lame IPs in a client/
> server environment? Am I right?
I still don't do anything with them, just log them i
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Dan Porter wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am having a problem where the IP Address I specify at the command line
> when starting up xmail is not the same as the IP address showing up in
> mail headers under Received.
>
> /I'm making the #s up for simplification:/
> The servers main IP
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Dario wrote:
> Very usefull filter, thanks Davide!
>
> Just a few words on a possible improvement.
> It would be nice to have something like the
> embargo policy implemented in DCC greylist.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong, but it would just need the md5
> checksum algorithm of the mes
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> Second: Could you implement my request that bounce messages can generate =
=3D
> an
> empty MAIL_FROM? I get sick of returning bogus bounces (~300 per day) =3D
> and I
> have to go through them because it's our Postmaster address.
Did you
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 27, 2004 9:47 PM:
>=20
> > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> >=3D20
> >> Been running nicely on my server since its release.
> >=3D20
> > I plan to make a pre03 in a few days, and rel
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Gideon So wrote:
> Hello,
>
>When I try to compile the new glst module. I get the following error:
>
> # make -f Makefile.unx
>
> Makefile.unx:81: .depend: No such file or directory
> mkdep -f .depend -I. -DUNIX -DLINUX ./glst.c ./dbdump.c ./dbload.c
> make: mkdep: Comma
On Sat, 1 Jan 2005, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after running glst --cleanup file named 'glst-lame.dbm' appeared. What the
> heck it is?
>
> According to dump it contains 'triplets' withount user address - IPs only,
> which I feel that should not happen. Am I supposed to do somethi
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Okay sorry... one more thing
>
> When trying to add a POP3Link through the CTRL protocol that uses "@" or "?"
> or "&" it always seems to return the error:
>
> -00061 POP3 domain not handled
That would be a bug ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Davide, et. all. I have another question about the POP3 Links (so sorry)...
>
> If a POP3 link is setup like:
>
> "@somedomain.com" [tab] "someuser" [tab] "mailserver.org:110" [tab]
> "username" [tab] "password" [tab] "CLR"
>
> Does "[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Sergio Perrone wrote:
> Hi !
> I have a Xmail 1.20 production server over W2000 with poblems since 2
> days ago.
> It was running nicely during 8 months without any problem.
> Now, it receives messages but does not deliver them to the mailboxes.
> Event viewer shows a few ev
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Luca Giuranna wrote:
> If I'm not wrong, I noticed that if I send a message telnetting to port
> 25 and add a "Message_Id:" header to the message I'm sending, this
> header is retained by xmail: when I then receive the message, it
> contains the same Message_Id header I ins
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> >Try 0.21 and the new --mnet option ...
> >
> >http://www.xmailserver.org/glst-mod.html
> >
>
> Very cool. BTW, did you get a chance to add any options for SMTP AUTH
> users? I need an option to whitelist the SMTP AUTH users.
I do not plan to put t
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started using new greylisting module (Thanks! I almost managed to write my
> own). But I quickly fell into one caveat described even in Greylisting
> whitepaper at http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html (is
> disc
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Ana Paula Fernandes wrote:
> Hi Davide
>
> I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
> pass to my filter application.
> It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
> (@@REMOTESERVERADDR for example) ?
Is there s
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Mitch Costilow wrote:
> When our internet goes down we cant send any mails locally to each other.
> Why is that?
> We have a dns server in house and it forwards to the isp what it cant lookup
> locally using forwarders.
> I tried to modify the xmail dnsroots file to put our ip
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Been running nicely on my server since its release.
I plan to make a pre03 in a few days, and release 1.21 before Jan 15 2005.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The @@REMOTEADDR is returning the IP of client, i need the IP of smtp server
> of client, or i don't right?
??!?? [EMAIL PROTECTED](^@(!
There are two IPs in a TCP/IP connection. One if the peer IP (remote host)
and the other one is the host IP
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Davide
>
> I has creating a inbound message filter, but i need the IP OF SMTP SERVER to
> pass to my filter application.
> It's fast, easy and possible to add this argument in the XMail filters
> (@@REMOTESERVERADDR for example) ?
And what @@RE
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> Dictionary attack detection is something I really wish XMail could =
> natively
> do. ModusMail was a package we used prior to XMail. It could detect =
> and
> temporarily ban an IP address for a set period of time. It actually =
> helped
> a lot.
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Davide,
>
> I know people have asked for this before, but if it's not too much trouble,
> do you think you could add in LastLoginTimeDate or something similar into
> the userstat information. I know you can parse through the POP3 log files
> for this
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> >- Changed the logic used to treat domain and user MAILPROC.TAB files.
> > Before, a user's MAILPROC.TAB was overriding the domain one, while now
> > the rules are merged together, with dom
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Two questions on 1.21:
>
> 1) I'm assuming external aliases are on a 1 to 1 basis (one external alias
> per mailbox). Is this correct? If not, how would having multiple external
> aliases for a single mailbox work?
Yes, but I noticed that currently
I made 1.21-pre02 with Windows binaries also:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre02.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre02.win32bin.zip
Here's the change-log:
- Added external aliases support in the CTRL protocol.
- The MESSAGE.ID file is now automatically created, if missin
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> No, in < 1.20 you could simply remove the MaxMBSize variable to get an
> "unlimited" mailbox size (As far as I understood it). I was wondering if
> this still held true in 1.21, or if you had to specifically set it to "0"
> now.
Both works with the s
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I understand the whitelisting options now within =
> the
> xnet tag. I'll still need to wait to deploy it until after we have a
> solution for automatically whitelisting the SMTP AUTH connections as =
> well.
> I like your idea
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Will not having a the MaxMBSize user variable still allow an unlimited
> mailbox size, or does it now only occur when you set it to "0" ?
It is already done in the latest 1.21
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xma
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> Wow, thanks. I have two quick questions about the greylisting pluggin. =
> How
> does that handle customers connecting with SMTP AUTH to send email? =
This needs to be added, since we have the USERAUTH macro. But, actually,
more than in the GLST f
I made a snapshot of 1.21 available on xmailserver.org:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.21-pre01.tar.gz
Sorry, but I did not have time to prepare Windows binaries for it. Also, I
implemeted a module for SMTP greylisting to be plugged on XMail (or any
other MTA):
http://www.xmailserver.org/
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Vijay Doshi wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have been using XMAIL Server for sometime now and have recently had several
> complaints from end users regarding 550 errors.
>
> In a nutshell, the users sent an email (with 2 word attachments) out to a
> distribution list of about 20 pe
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
> The [IP]:PORT change may break SpamAssassin. It took a bit to get the
> SpamAssassin team to check the current XMail format, so be patient everyone
> if it takes a while to get the new format added to SpamAssassin.
I think qmail already output tcp
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> You love screwing with me every time I'm about to release a new Beta don't
> you? Thanks for the heads up Davide. Any other changes to take into
> consideration that you know of yet?
This is the stuff that is done on the lingering 1.21:
- Fixed XM
In the upcoming XMail releases, the IP:PORT address format inside the
spool files info line, and inside Received: header line will be changed
to [IP]:PORT. If you have filters that expect the IP:PORT format, you
better make them able to parse the new format (or better, both).
- Davide
-
To
Today, my server setup has been kinda screwed with me testing over it. As
result, today's posts might have been lost. Whooops :=)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Swen Lansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After using Xmail for more than one year, I would like to know how to
> tunes it to have optimal bandwidth setting for SMTP and SMAIL.
> I've searching and found my average message size is 15kb.
>
> I have 1 gigabyte local area network and 2 meg
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Davide:
>
> Should I try going up to 1.20? Could something have gotten hosed in my
> xMail?
When you said that telnet output changed, that kinda scared me a little
bit. Especially if you;re doing it from inside the LAN where the server is
connected.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> Davide:
>
> Thank goodness you're on.
>
> The .txt files are attached.
It seems everything normal. You system is basically idle and XMail
connections are there. Also, there's no unsual overload of connections.
Does the system have a slow feeling eve
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Dale Qualls wrote:
> RH8
> Xmail 1.17 (I know it's old but it's always ran beautifully)
> bsa_filter.pl
> Pete's av filter
>
> The server began running seriously slow today. I think the xfs (font
> services for x) is hosed as after a reboot from an ssh session the gui
> won
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> Ok. Then maybe it will be more useful than I was originally thinking it
> would be. I still think it is going to cause customers to complain about
> email delays, though.
Delays (usually 300 seconds) only happens when the IP:RCPT:SENDER tripplet
is
How many of you ever employed this?
http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/whitepaper.html
This would be a pretty easy pre-data filter to write ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: se
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
> Maybe the problem is how McAfee proxy handles the transfer with xMail,
> it might be very slow for some reason.
>
> Someone should look into how well McAfee and xMail talk to each
> other. h who could we ask to do that, Davide?? ;)
Heh
Dunno w
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Davide,
> Is there any chance you can bring us all up to date on what the status is of
> XMail 2.0 and native support for IMAP? I know you are rather busy, but it
> would be great to know how things are progressing and when a beta might be
> released.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> IIRC, when a messages didn't match the *domains* I specified (The ?
> syntax), it went to the Pop3SyncErrorAccount and got a bounce, but when
> it matched the domains on the list but didn't match a specific mailbox,
> AFAIR it wet to the mailbox I set
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> Davide et. all,
>
> For the POP3 Links that start with "?" or "&" there is a "matching domain
> list" after them. Is this required, or is it optional? Also, if a message
> does not match that domain, is it still downloaded and removed off the
> serv
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, lascjr wrote:
> Hi,
> I have the XMail 1.20 + W2K Server working fine, but i don't have
> success with the install of SPF Filter (xm-spf.pl).
What steps did you follow to instal xm-spf.pl in XMail?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> After a brief read to rfc 821 I saw two specific messages for this =
> specific
> 'smtp command syntax error' :
>
> RFC 821 says :
>
> 500 Syntax error, command unrecognized
> [This may include errors such as command line too lon
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Shawn Anderson wrote:
> Anyone have suggestions on how to setup server wide aliases? I am looking
> for a way to set up a serve wide alias that doesn't require me to do
> something every time I add a new user and/or domain. For example, for every
> domain I have, I would like "
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Mike Harrington wrote:
> I was wondering, without completely stopping the server, how do you modify
> the extaliases.tab file? There doesn't seem to be any sort of interface for
> it in the Admin protocol, or am I missing something?
There's no way currently, yes. I'll queue t
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> Hmm, even with that, it still doesn't work. Same error about moving a
> file, even as root
Do you have spool/temp and spool/local mounted of two different points?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> chmod u+s /usr/sbin/sendmail.xmail
> If what you say is true, shouldn't that solve the problem? I still get
> the same error.
a+s
Also, be sure you do not have one of those neat daemons that rescan mount
to enforce permissions, otherwise you will be
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Kevin Williams wrote:
> I was able to accomplish it with this:
> --- snip -
> newargs=`echo "$*" | sed -e 's/ \-odi//' | sed -e 's/ \-oem//' | sed -e
> 's/ \-oi//'`
> /usr/sbin/sendmail.xmail $newargs
> --- snip -
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> I put that in my /usr/sbin/sendmail script, but now it returns:
> cannot move file: /etc/xmail/spool/temp/110217090.18439.omikron.xmail
>
> The directory /etc/xmail is my MailRoot and /etc/xmail/spool symlinks to
> /var/spool/xmail, in which resid
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Kevin Williams wrote:
> $ sendmail -FCronDaemon -i -t < cronmsg.txt
>
> is successful, but
Then, you use this in your wrapper script.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Kevin Williams wrote:
> I'm not really concerned with the options it should be dropping. I'm
> concerned that when cron calls sendmail *nothing* happens. I tried:
> --- snip --
> #!/bin/sh
>
>
> if [ -z $MAIL_ROOT ]; then
> e
1201 - 1300 of 2919 matches
Mail list logo
