Re: Urgent help required - TSM 5.1.6.1 TESTING
Hi, I think you shouldnt test anything on 5.1.6.1. We had some problems on it like crashes randomly. Regards, Burak Demircan Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S CEO / ITT Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) Fax :+90 212 481 11 54
5.1.6.2 attention
hi, yesterday night one of my 5.1.6.2 tsm server crashed (i mean only the tsm software) ibm is looking for the causes. by the way i am using 5.1.6.2 on 2 servers since it had been released without any problem except this one. just for your info. Burak Demircan Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S CEO / ITT Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) Fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Re: TSM ISSUE
is it on windows nt. i get rarely this kind of error on windows nt. it is usually caused by nt itself. so please check file system. you will probably not able to access file as an administrator too. Burak Demircan Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S CEO / ITT Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) Fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03.02.2003 17:29 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TSM ISSUE I receive the following errors referring to the WMI Databse. WMI directory has been excluded in the options file... Anyone else have this problem and maybe a resolution? 2/03/2003 01:14:51 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hyperion\c$\ADSM.SYS\WMI\WMIDBFILE' failed 02/03/2003 01:14:51 ANS1448E An error occurred accessing NTFS security information 02/03/2003 01:14:51 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'WMI Database' finished with 2097152 failure Thanks, Laura [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/03 12:21PM Thomas, Agree support is not all it could be but I think your management could be usefully employed in talking to IBM management, to get your unacceptable support improved. Unfortunately my experience is that should you switch to a different solution, you will just end up with different issues and probably the same complaints about the support. That said I am in a pretty similar environment running OS390 2,10 and TSM server 4.2 2 and our performance is reasonable. So if you were having your severe memory leak problems back when you were at 4.2.2 the problem may be more site specific. John Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/31/2003 04:51:35 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: TSM support issues We have a 4.2.3.2 TSM server running under OS/390. We expect to add more TSM clients, and the workloads on two other mainframe applicatios are increasing. The mainframe is already short of real memory, and is heading rapidly for shortages of CPU capacity and network bandwidth. One of the options being discussed is moving the TSM server to AIX. At least one manager has argued that we should consider migrating to a different enterprise backup solution. One of his arguments is that we are getting poor quality code and poor support. We have been struggling with one or more memory leaks for a couple of months. Patch level upgrades have improved performance somewhat, but have not fixed the problem. We are still finding it necessary to restart the TSM server twice a day to maintain acceptable performance. Back when we decided to upgrade to the 4.2.3.2 level I went to the anonymous FTP server and found a text file referring me to the TSM server README for information on a password protected FTP server. The information was not in the README file, so I sent out a query on this list and opened a severity 2 incident with IBM/Tivoli. I started getting responses from the list in a couple of hours. IBM/Tivoli finally saw fit to contact me after five days. We have since opened another serverity 2 incident for the apparent memory leak. It has typically taken days of repeated calls to get administrative responses, such as confirmation that dumps were received. It took weeks to get a substantive technical response. We were recently told that our symptoms match open APAR PQ69840. I got a copy of the APAR description. The alleged match is so poor that I am struggling to convince myself that the claim was a mistake and not a deliberate lie. I welcome any suggestions for rebutting the argument that it is time to look for a product with better code and better support. ** The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern Energy plc. It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of the error in transmission. Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group. **
Re: Why so many Filling tapes?
do these tapes belong to copy pools? they are not waited in the library and sent immediately offsite after the backup of your primary stg regards Burak Demircan Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S CEO / ITT Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) Fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.02.2003 13:14 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Why so many Filling tapes? I have a non-collocated sequential (tape) storage pool. Why should there ever be more than one tape in Filling status? I have four. Why can't it fill one up and then start another? These are Super-DLT tapes, so each one means something - 200gb compressed. I understand why I have lots of Filling tapes in a collocated tape pool - that's the whole idea of collocation. But this is happening in a non-collocated tape pool. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTED] == Sometimes it pays to stay in bed on Monday, rather than spending === = the rest of the week debugging Monday's code. -Dan Salomon ==
backupset management
Dear TSMers, I am using backupsets for remote archiving purposes. As you already now we state retention period while creating them. Is there a method to put them pending state and delete them under my control after this retention period? Because i feel that they will expire automatically (after the period) and it is difficult to watch expire inventory results and check the expired backupsets and return them back. Any help appreciated... Best Regards, Burak Demircan Mercedes-Benz Turk A.S CEO / ITT Phone: +90 - 212 4823500 (ext .4676) Fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Re: recovery log filling up rapidly: Please help: EMERGENCY!!!!!
no when you do not expiration you db grows but the log may grow with un-backed up databasr. try to backup your database more frequently or increase your db. or you may change your log type. Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.01.2003 14:07 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: recovery log filling up rapidly: Please help: EMERGENCY! My recovery log is filling up at a rapid rate. I am running TSM at 4.1.3 on the mainframe. It is 4.6 GB and my DB is 48 GB with 46 GB in use. I am not running expiration of the inventory yet due to a previous deletion of a nodes data, could that be the cause? I noticed that the log is reaching about 95% full before I run another full backup. I usually run a full DB backup every day at 4:30. What can I do? I can't increase the recovery log because I guess on this version it can only go to 5 GB? What version is this no longer true for? I really need help and I can't find anyone from IBM to return my calls. My previous problem with the recovery log is no longer true. It does now reset back to 0% after a full backup, but I am running out of space. I do have the log fully extended and with the 5 GB limit I am stuck. Also, I can't set up a DB backup trigger because I am on the mainframe and that feature of TSM is not available. Thank you in advance for any help you can give me Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
5.1.6.0
hi, today, my 5.1.6.0 server crashed unexpectedly. have you every seen something like that on that version? regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Re: 5.1.6.0
hi, i have space for both db and log. they are in %50 usage sorry but i do not have too much clue regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08.01.2003 17:40 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: 5.1.6.0 Hi Burak! You need to send more information. But one idea who pop up in my head was that. Maybe the logfiles/Databas was out of space? Do you have a space trigger activeted on the TSM server? Med Vänliga Hälsningar/Best Regards Christian Svensson --- Cristie Nordic AB Box 2 SE-131 06 Nacka Sweden Phone : +46-(0)8-641 96 30 Mobil : +46-(0)70-325 15 77 eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Burak Demircan burak. demircan@DAIMLERCHRYSLER. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: 5.1.6.0 Manager ADSM-L@VM. MARIST.EDU 2003-01-08 16:29 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager hi, today, my 5.1.6.0 server crashed unexpectedly. have you every seen something like that on that version? regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 - graycol.gif - ecblank.gif - pic14622.gif graycol.gif Description: Binary data ecblank.gif Description: Binary data pic14622.gif Description: Binary data
restores
hi, how can i disable restores under normal conditions and allow some node to restore at any time i want? but this shouldn't prevent daily backup schedules. regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Re: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE
i also suffer from the same problem. any help appreciated ? regards Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17.12.2002 14:21 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Dr. Watson On DSMCSVC.EXE Hi All, I have a client NT 4 SP6 running TSM 5.1.5.4 When I login to this client immediately I get a Dr. Watson Error on DSMCSVC.EXE Access Violation (0Xc05) Address (0x004a5cb5)... This is the only client out of our 80 clients that I get this message. Any idea. Thanks Mehdi Amini LAN/WAN Engineer ValueOptions 12369 Sunrise Valley Drive Suite C Reston, VA 20191 Phone: 703-390-6855 Fax: 703-390-2581 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by email, delete and destroy this message and its attachments. **
managed services
hi, i use managed services to start my schedules. before using that method i was using standard schedule services and restart the service after changing dsm.opt file what can i do to change dsm.opt and apply new changes to my schedules if i am using Acceptor service? Should i restart acceptor service or will it apply changes before it starting my scheduler? Regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Re: Upgrading firmware on 3583 library and 3580 drives
no it is not necessary. i just halt TSM server (not machine just tivoli storage server ,server) then i restart after upgrade regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.12.2002 12:29 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Upgrading firmware on 3583 library and 3580 drives Hello everybody, When you upgrade the firmware in your drive and/or library, is it necessary to (under AIX) 'rmdev -dl' the library and drives and (in TSM) 'delete drive' and 'delete library' after updating the firmware? The drives went from 22T4 to 25D4 and the library went from 2.72.0012 to 2.80.0041. Thanks, -- Jurjen Oskam PGP Key available at http://www.stupendous.org/
Re: Upgrading firmware on 3583 library and 3580 drives
most of those problems we had on 3583 library were due to magazines. after firmware upgrade and changing of magazines to Revision B everything went ok. regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.12.2002 13:48 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading firmware on 3583 library and 3580 drives On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:23:44PM +0200, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote: [rmdev/delete drive/delete library on firmware update] It ought to be not necessary. Do you have any problem? We are currently doing an initial DR-test, and received an RS/6000 and 3584 library with four drives to do the test with. However, we are having quite a few problems with the library and/or drives. *Many* I/O errors, and last night the library gave a -= PERM ERROR! =- and after that - TOO MANY ERRORS! - in its display. The RS/6000 that the 3584 is connected to was installed with an mksysb of a different type RS/6000. The TSM database was restored from a backup of our production server. The IBM representative said that it could be a problem that the drive and library firmware versions of our production system are different from the firmware versions of the test system, and that this could be the cause of all the errors. -- Jurjen Oskam PGP Key available at http://www.stupendous.org/
Re: Moving from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 5.1
no but got a 3.1 -- 4.1 -- 5.1 migration without any trouble. if you are doubt go through a tried pattern. regards, Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27.11.2002 15:23 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Moving from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 5.1 Hi guys and girls, anyone of you ever migrated from ADSM 3.1 straight to TSM 5.1?? Any hints, tips or possible caveats? Will the upgradedb just work out of the box? Thnx Lars
Re: AW: tape become full in 21 percent.
it can be because you fill very little part of the tape every day and as the days pass, other files on the tape is expired. regards, burak Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25.11.2002 15:25 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: AW: tape become full in 21 percent. have you defined capacity in the device config parameter? greets joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Sudheer Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. November 2002 13:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: tape become full in 21 percent. Hi I am using LTO 3580 tape drive. but my tape capacity is 100/200GB but never got more than 31% utilization. When it reaches 25 to 31percent it become Full.Can anybody tell me what could be the reason. Regards Sudhir
Re: random I/O errors since repairs
upgrade to the latest Atape driver. this is what get as a recommendation from IBM. regards, the latest version is 7.1.5.0 check yours with: lslpp -l |grep Atape Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07.11.2002 15:39 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: random I/O errors since repairs Hi *SM-ers! We have a 3575-L32 library. About a week ago the library was unavailable due to a broken drive (drive 1 which is also the library control path). The power board was replaced and everything looked fine afterwards. Since then, every now and then drives go offline after the following error: ANR8300E I/O error on library 3575LIB-R1 (OP=6C03, CC=207, KEY=05, ASC=2C, ASCQ=00, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00.00.0A.00.00.00.00.2C.00.00.00.00.00., Description=Device is not in a state capable of performing request). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. ANR8446I Manual intervention required for library 3575LIB-R1. Unrecoverable drive failures on drive RMT5 (/dev/rmt5); drive is now taken offline. I tried everything. Deleting the drives from AIX, purging the SAN Data Gateway device database and rescan the SCSI interface, nothing seems to work. I checked Appendix D for ASC=2C, ASCQ=00. The only line I can find is: 0x2C 0x00 Command sequence error. I'm lost Any help will be VERY much appreciated! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: Upgrading from 4.2.2.3 to 4.2.3
yes today i upgraded from 4.2.2.13 to 4.2.3.0 i am having problems with backupsets. ibm will look for the cause the activity log was: 04-11-2002 16:03:12 ANR0106E imarqry.c(4325): Unexpected error 2 fetching row in table Archive.Objects. Burak Demircan CEO / ITT MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676) fax :+90 212 481 11 54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.11.2002 16:16 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Upgrading from 4.2.2.3 to 4.2.3 I'm upgrading to 4.2.3 today. Anyone had any problems upgrading to 4.2.3 or with 4.2.3 itself? Please let me know if there are any horror stories out there. This E-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended only for the use of the Individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us at (865) 374-4900 or notify us by E-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help!!!!!!
Hi, This seems that an unexpected thing occured to your server. I would try to increase my maintenance level 4.2.2.x Or at least check 4.2.1.0 patch level if something close to it is there. One of my server is 4.2.2.13 for enough time and there is no problem. By the way your DB usage percent is high. I would increase it not the be in urgent situations. And i also suspect that your DB is full now or in a situation that even a small new data to it crashes it. Try to add 10-20 mbs to your DB and log volumes (CHECK your log also) Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 24.10.2002 17:18 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Help!! Hi TSM Guru's, I have a TSM Server 4.2 Level 1.0 running on AIX. with 512MB RAM Paging Space - 1.6GB. DB allocated - 11.7GB. Used - 10.8GB I run a schedule in the morning for a backup, which has been running without any problems for the past one month. Today morning when the schedule started the server stopped with the error below. 10/24/2002 07:58:17 ANR7838S Server operation terminated. 10/24/2002 07:58:17 ANR7837S Internal error TXNLOCK16 detected. The server is starting ok when i start it again. But when i started a GUI backup the server stopped with the follwoing error. ANRD pkthread.c(539): ThreadId19 Run-time assertion failed: waitP-txn- P-waitingForLock == lockP, Thread 19, File tmlock.c, Line 1919. ANR7838S Server operation terminated. ANR7837S Internal error TXNLOCK16 detected. 0x00019414 pkLogicAbort 0x0001000336bc SignalCompatibleWaiters 0x000100033a10 UngrantLock 0x000100034bdc TmReleaseTxnLocks 0x00010007ad3c tmEnd 0x0001002fe654 SmNodeSession 0x000100305668 HandleNodeSession 0x00010030a9c0 smExecuteSession 0x0001003e8ecc SessionThread 0x00017e3c StartThread 0x0922dfe4 _pthread_body ANR7833S Server thread 1 terminated in response to program abort. Could somebody help me with this error please. Thanks in advance murhy V S Murthy Gongala Hursley Dedicated Development Centre IBM Software Labs Bangalore, INDIA Tel : 91-80-5094232
Re: Help!!!!!!
check this also ..very close to your problem IC31884: V4.2.1 SERVER CORE DUMPING, ANR7837S ON LOCKCYCLE02 [IMAGE] Abstract V4.2.1 SERVER CORE DUMPING, ANR7837S ON LOCKCYCLE02 [IMAGE] Error description TSM Server V4.2.1 core dumps with ANR7837S Internal error LOCKCYCLE02 detected. The error messages are in the dsmserv.err Trace back in dsmserv.err: ANR7838S Server operation terminated. ANR7837S Internal error LOCKCYCLE02 detected. 0x100085A4 pkLogicAbort 0x100303F0 CheckLockCycles 0x100324C0 TmFindDeadlock 0x100322A4 TmDeadlockDetector 0x10006DB4 StartThread 0xD00081FC _pthread_body ANR7833S Server thread 1 terminated in response to program abort ANR7833S Server thread 2 terminated in response to program abort . The LOCKCYCLE02 indicates that the problem is related to transactions between the storage agent and TSM server. TSM set a waiter flag in the lock request. Situations can occur where the lock request is aborted. The abort causes a LOCKCYCLE02 problem because the deadlock detector woke up and went looking for waiters. Since there is a small window between when the abort code signals the lock waiter (because the mutex is released to allow the receiver to respond), this allowed the deadlock detector to start looking for deadlocks. Since the request had been satisfied by being aborted, there were no locks being waited on (but the flag was still set). Hence, TSM aborted because there was a waiter not waiting on anything. Local fix Set the RESOURCETIMEOUT value in dsmserv.opt to a higher timeout value. (See the administrator reference for more information.) Higher timeout value should allow the locke waiter flag to clear. . Apply fixtest 4.2.1.6 to resolve this problem. Problem summary * USERS AFFECTED: This effect users of Tivoli Storage * * Manager version 4.2.1 and above on AIX, * * NT, SUN, HP and MVS. * * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: The TSM server aborts with the * * following * * abort codes: TMLOCK011, TXNLOCK16 and * * LOCKCYCLE02 * * RECOMMENDATION: Install PTF or PATCH when available. * The problem is that the a lock request is aborted by the resource manager. The resource manager does not remove the waiter from the list of waiters. When the transaction is aborted (TXNLOCK16), deadlock detector looks for a deadlock (LOCKCYCLE02) or a the next waiter is being granted the lock (TMLOCK011), the server abends. Problem conclusion This problem has been corrected. Circumvention The current workaround this problem is to prevent the resource manager from aborting lock requests. This can be done by setting the RESOURCETIMEOUT in the DSMSERV.OPT file to a higher value like 100. The option applies to all TSM servers and storage agents even though it is documented only for Windows. APAR/Component information: APAR number: IC31884 Component name: TSM AIX SERVER Component number: 5698TSMAX Reported release: 420 Fixed component: 5698TSMAX Fixed component name: TSM AIX SERVER Status information: [IMAGE] Status: CLOSED PER Close date: 2001-10-18 Last changed: 2001-10-29
drm operator scripts
Hi, Do you have some small scripts for operator to take tapes in and out easily? Please sen me directly if you have them. Regards, Burak
what is the problem in the command?
Hi, I am trying to checkin a volume from BULK on 3583. I was getting no error before. I am using 5.1.1.6 Regards, Burak tsm: TSM01.MBTcheckin libvolume 3583lib 162ACF checklabel=barcode status=pri ANR2020E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Invalid parameter - BARCODE. ANS8001I Return code 3.
Re: what is the problem in the command?
Hi, Thank you for your reply. It solves my problem. Do you know why I can not give a specific volume name within my BULK volumes? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.10.2002 10:20 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: what is the problem in the command? Try this: checkin libvolume 3583lib search=bulk checklabel=barcode status=pri remember reply. Rgds. Geirr G. Halvorsen -Original Message- From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11. oktober 2002 09:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what is the problem in the command? Hi, I am trying to checkin a volume from BULK on 3583. I was getting no error before. I am using 5.1.1.6 Regards, Burak tsm: TSM01.MBTcheckin libvolume 3583lib 162ACF checklabel=barcode status=pri ANR2020E CHECKIN LIBVOLUME: Invalid parameter - BARCODE. ANS8001I Return code 3.
Re: Backing up machines through the fire wall (In the DMZ)
hi, I am tsm and firewall admin so I did it without reading too much but watching the logs. Just Allow following Connections: Clients - TSM Server on Port 1500 (tcpport on dsm.opt) TSM Server - Clients on Port 1501 This is for schedmode promted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.10.2002 17:26 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Backing up machines through the fire wall (In the DMZ) We use Server prompted on all backups, with the SCHEDMODE PROMPTED in the dsm.sys, or dsm.opt files depending on the OS. I don't think this will help with the DMZ though. Thank You, Bill Rosette Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International WWJD Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UK cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Backing up machines through the fire wall (In the DMZ) Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 10/09/2002 07:26 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi TSMers We have six Solaris machines that are in the DMZ that we need to backup with our internal TSM server. At present, as far as I'm aware the clients poll the server. This is of course a security risk. I'm sure this may have been touched on in other discussions, but it's something I'm new to. Can anyone tell me how make it so that the Server polls the clients. Is this a simple procedure or something more complex. Many thanks in advance for any help Farren Minns - TSM and Solaris System Admin - John Wiley Sons Our Chichester based offices have amalgamated and relocated to a new address John Wiley Sons Ltd The Atrium Southern Gate Chichester West Sussex PO19 8SQ Main phone and fax numbers remain the same: Phone +44 (0)1243 779777 Fax +44 (0)1243 775878 Direct dial numbers are unchanged Address, phone and fax nos. for all other Wiley UK locations are unchanged **
Re: Event Status mail
i get e-mail from my server but it is a aix one. if you want i can send this little script that using sendmail. regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03.10.2002 12:51 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Event Status mail Hi Is there a way to mail the result of server backups.I can always check with q event command but i like to have a mail to my e-mail ID after the completion of each schedule.Need help on this. Regards Raghu S Nivas Consultant - TSM DCM Data Systems Ltd New Delhi India. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Event Status mail
here is the simple aix shell script. it parses (?) and (progressive) states, too. then it simply mailx the result to any admin you like. DONT FORGET to change /etc/sendmail.cf file to use mailx. You need to change like beginning DS. (It is for relaying your mails) mine is: DSmail1.mbturk.mercedes-benz.com Cheers Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03.10.2002 14:17 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Event Status mail I am exactly looking for the same.Please send me the script Thanks in advance Regards Raghu S Nivas Consultant - TSM DCM Data Systems Ltd New Delhi India. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: Event Status mail Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/03/2002 02:58 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager i get e-mail from my server but it is a aix one. if you want i can send this little script that using sendmail. regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03.10.2002 12:51 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Event Status mail Hi Is there a way to mail the result of server backups.I can always check with q event command but i like to have a mail to my e-mail ID after the completion of each schedule.Need help on this. Regards Raghu S Nivas Consultant - TSM DCM Data Systems Ltd New Delhi India. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - adminslog adminslog Description: Binary data
aix scirpt for result
do not forget to edit password part of the script. You will see XX's there. Regards, Burak
Re: Antwort: TSM Scheduler on WinNT and Win2K
solution yoksa ne oyaliyon kardesim milleti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20.09.2002 14:39 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Antwort: TSM Scheduler on WinNT and Win2K Hi, We have same problem on our environment. I'm still searching real solution, but I solved some of nodes wich are still working as regular. Many problemly node occured after TSM client update (v4.x to 5.1.1.0). my way as follows; - remove the scheduler service - uninstall complete old TSM client, - clean the registry entries - install the new TSM client - recreate the service with dsmcutil command. - also check the environment settings for DSM_CONFIG and DSM_DIR. this is not a solution but sometimes it works :) MfG Zafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU am 09/19/2002 09:46:53 PM Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie: Thema: TSM Scheduler on WinNT and Win2K Hi all, The TSM Scheduler Service on most of my Win2k and NT4.0 boxes will not start up after a reboot. When I go in and start the service manually it starts up fine. I can't seem to find any errors in the Event Log. Any help you can provide will be appreciated. Thanks, Matt
Re: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
the high and low tresholds of any stg pool determines when the data is moved to the next pool. see below options are from my disk pool which goes to a tape pool when it is 90 % full until it is 50 % full High Mig Pct: 90 this is the percent where your data starts to go next pool Low Mig Pct: 50 until this percent NExt Storage Pool The pool where data goes in these limits tsm: TSM01.MBTq stg backuppool Storage Device Estimated Pct Pct High Low Next Stora- Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Migr Mig Mig ge Pool (MB) Pct Pct --- -- -- - - --- --- BACKUPPOOL DISK 26 000.0 0.0 0.0 90 50 3583POOL [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21.08.2002 15:47 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible think this also: this volume may be full and next storage which is most probably a tapepool need a mount point? Which parameter controls how long a backup session will wait for a mount of a secondary storage pool volume after the primary storage pool fills?
Re: reusedelay causing DB problems?
A volume can not be scratch before it spends the reusedelay period after it is logically empty. Private Volume=Empty but Pending Volume for passing of reusedelay=Scratch Volume Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21.08.2002 01:18 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: reusedelay causing DB problems? A couple of weeks ago, I set reusedelay to 1 (had been 0) for several very good reasons, one of which was we run logmode normal. Now, periodicaly, when the 24 hours is up on a tape that has been reclaimed, we get ANR1343I Unable to delete scratch volume volser and then it is set to READONLY and left in the tape pool. The following morning, when I come in and read the reports and pick up the pieces, I am always able to do a manual DELETE VOL without any problems. I am wondering what is going on. Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
think this also: this volume may be full and next storage which is most probably a tapepool need a mount point?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21.08.2002 07:44 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible Hi Check the status of volumes q vol Use vary on command to make offline volumes online. Regards Raghu S Nivas Consultant - TSM DCM Data Systems Ltd New Delhi India. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] David E Ehresman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] deehre01@LOUIS cc: VILLE.EDU Subject: ANS1312E Server media mount not Sent by: ADSM: possible Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ST.EDU 08/20/2002 09:42 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I assume that ANS1312E Server media mount not possible Explanation: Server media mount not possible. The server timed out waiting for a mount of an offline volume. refers to mounting a sequential acess media? If my assumption is correct, under what conditions should a backup process request a server media mount? I am getting ANS1312E for a node which goes to a disk storage pool which has a max size threshold of NOLIMIT. I would not expect it ever to request a server media mount. Any ideas? David EHresman
strange state
Hi, Today after 4 years I have met an interesting state in client schedules. Normally live connections and their schedules seem as Started in events but today I saw In Progress. What does it really mean? Thank you very much Burak
link to node
Hi, I defined my second TSM server as Other Server with proper definition attributes. But when I click link to node shortcut on WEB interface I see following message: Your login has timed out. Please login again. Administrator Login - this is a button Any idea what causes this? I have same administrator with same password on both servers and I get no error when using ping server inside TSM. ping server tsm02 ANR1706I Ping for server 'TSM02' was able to establish a connection. Regards, Burak
tsm help format
Hi, I have strange output on TSM on my new tsm install (TSM 5.1.1.2) I have installed it on AIX and didn't forget US fileset like others do. Please see the attached gif files. Regards, Burak - tsm_error.gif tsm_error.gif Description: Binary data
move drmedia
Hi, How can I prevent my 3583 library to check barcode labels when using move drmedia command. I could not find checklabel option in the command help. Regards, Burak
move drmedia
Hi, I found my question's answer: I would need to set it in drm options like SET DRMCHECKLABEL NO Regards, Burak
odbc ?
Hi, What is the purpose of ODBC files like (IP22519_ODBC.EXE) in the same folder with clients like (IP22519..EXE)? Does not the client installation set include everything we need? (i mean why is it seperate?) Regards, Burak
Re: Antwort: odbc ?
Merhaba Tsm, Then why is API is included in the client installation set? (it gives us the option to install or not) Thanks Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.07.2002 14:06 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Antwort: odbc ? Merhaba Burak An ODBC driver allows you to use a relational database product such as SQL to query the database and display the results. Client installation does not set include everything we need. You have to install API and ODBC separately. selamlar...
[no subject]
yes, you may change the accesses to readwrite and then reclaim but you should normally use offsite not unavailable access regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.07.2002 16:23 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Hi TSM Guys, I have a customer who moves volumes from a primary storage pool to an offsite location by setting the volumes to UNAVAILABLE. The storage pool's migration threshold is set to 100% for spacerclamation to be prevented. What do I have to consider if I want to manually start space reclamation on the unavailable volumes? Will it be enough to just check-in the volumes, change their access to ReadWrite, and then start the space reclamation by lowering the reclamation threshhold gradually? Thanx a lot Lars
Re: Upgrade from 4.1.2.0 to 4.2.2.3
you do not need to install 4.2.1 to install 4.2.2 . am i wrong? normally you should be able to upgrade to 4.2.2 just after the 4.2 insallation regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13.06.2002 08:27 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Upgrade from 4.1.2.0 to 4.2.2.3 I would like to upgrade from 4.1.2.0 to 4.2.2.3 (and eventually to 5.1 when we can get all the clients off 4.1). I have a 4.2.0 install CD for the server which will run on AIX 4.3. From what I can tell I must install the 4.2 CD (do I need to put 4.1 maintenance on too before doing this?), then install 4.2.1, then 4.2.2 then the patch for 4.2.2.3. I can't find the 4.2.1 code out on the web to download it, only the 4.2.2. Everything I read seems to point to the fact that 4.2.1 would be installed before install 4.2.2. Can anyone verify this or tell me where I can download 4.2.1. Thank you, Diana
tsm 5.1
Hi, I am using tsm 4.2.2 and I wonder what changes are there in web GUI side on version 5.1 Best Regards, Burak
Re: Can't do reclamation
bring all empty cart. to online and run the following command? do i miss something? update vol * acc=readwrite WHERESTGpool=FILE_PTPOOL whereaccess=offsite wherestat=full update vol * stg=file_ptpool whereacc=offsite [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06.06.2002 13:33 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Can't do reclamation Hi eric, This is not the all volumes in file_ptpool storage pool. There has a scratch tapes availabe in the storage pool. The followings is the all volume list. FP0001 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0002 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 13,711.1 100.0 Filling FP0003 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0004 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0005 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0006 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0007 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,371.3 24.8 Full FP0008 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0009 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0010 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0011 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0012 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 19,780.6 31.2 Full FP0013 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0014 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,829.2 36.8 Full FP0015 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,920.5 100.0 Full FP0016 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,898.5 13.1 Full FP0017 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,942.4 100.0 Full FP0018 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,271.1 0.1 Full FP0019 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,923.3 100.0 Full FP0020 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 17,175.6 100.0 Filling FP0021 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,526.0 5.6 Full FP0022 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 0.0 0.0 Empty FP0023 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 20,056.0 7.9 Full FP0024 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,177.2 0.0 Full FP0025 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 22,015.4 0.0 Full FP0026 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,700.4 0.0 Full FP0027 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,324.9 4.3 Full FP0028 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,091.5 0.0 Full FP0029 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,160.0 0.0 Full FP0030 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,141.0 0.0 Full FP0031 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,185.0 0.0 Full Thanks for your reply. Regards, Max Eric Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/06/2002 11:36:16 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Max LH KWONG/LCSD/HKSARG) Subject: Re: Can't do reclamation Hi Max, Is this all the volumes in this storage pool? At first glance it would seem that you have no scratch tapes available to perform reclamation with. Yours Truly, Eric -Original Message- From: Max Kwong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Can't do reclamation Hi all, Thanks for all reply. Here is the details of the storage pool that can't perform reclamatoin. Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - FP0018 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,271.1 0.1 Full FP0024 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,177.2 0.0 Full FP0025 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 22,015.4 0.0 Full FP0026 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,700.4 0.0 Full FP0027 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,324.9 4.3 Full FP0028 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,091.5 0.0 Full FP0029 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,160.0 0.0 Full FP0030 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,141.0 0.0 Full FP0031 FILE_PTPOOL 3590CLASS2 21,185.0 0.0 Full The followin is the result of q stgp file_ptpool f=d Storage Pool Name: FILE_PTPOOL Storage Pool Type: Primary Device Class Name: 3590CLASS2
Re: Latest PTF Level for OS/390 TSM 4.2
your files are password protected says the usual ftp sites. I just wanted to mention this kind of things in the e-mail i sent today with subject tsm ftp server my previous e-mail: Hi Everybody, Why is the following web site is always behind ftp servers? Does anybody can answer it? All development stuff in IBM does good job and releases maintenances and patches but the web stuff does not need to update the htmls immediately. I am bored to surf inside the ftp archive to find whether there is a new release or patch etc. Regards, Burak http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/adsercli.htm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06.06.2002 16:05 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Latest PTF Level for OS/390 TSM 4.2 We are planning to upgrade from the ADSM 3.1 server to TSM 4.2 this weekend on OS/390. I have been trying to find out what the latest PTF level is for this product, but so far without success. Does anyone have any information about that or any information about any problems found in the 4.2 server code? Our install tape is from early January. Thanks.
Re: LTO don't need clean up?
I am also reading and writing 150GB of data veryday to 3 drives for about 6 months. I havent seen any cleaning cartd. is used. regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.06.2002 17:09 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: LTO don't need clean up? Got to admit I've been wondering about this myself. I've a 3584 library with 10 LTO drives that has been in service since September of last year. I've got three cleaning tapes in the library, I move 130 GB of data per day -- and I haven't seen a cleaning tape used yet. I know the drives and tapes are supposed to be self-cleaning, but this is almost to good to be true. OTOH, I haven't run into any errors that indicate dirty drives. . . Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: Mark Stapleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LTO don't need clean up? From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tomá? Hrouda one of LTO 3583 (2 drives) we take care of still didn't clean drives. It is operate from january 2002 and there is about 10-20 GB daily data flow through each drive, 3-5 daily tape-mounts. Both drives are set to ASNEEDED cleaning frequency, but no clean occured from january (!!), no dirty drive signalized on display ... is it possible? LTO box is placed in climatized dust-free environment, but .??? Has anyone some similar experience with LTO clean frequency? IBM LTO libraries clean themselves; you shouldn't be using TSM to schedule cleanings. Set your tape drives to CLEANFREQ=NONE and RTM at http://www-1.ibm.com/support/manager.wss?rt=4org=ssgdoc=5700 01038aid=1 The trick is that you have to insert the cleaner cartridge into the library through the I/O station on the door of the library by using the MOVE MEDIA command that you run from the front panel of the library. (Not to be confused with TSM's MOVE MEDIA command.) -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Certified TSM consultant Certified AIX system engineer MSCE
Re: q actlog
use SET ACTLOGRETENTION command [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30.05.2002 09:11 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: q actlog Simple question: if I do q actlog and give date 14th may it gets me actlog from 20th may so it's keeping only 2 weeks old. Where do I have to look if I need 4 weeks old log - a flat file may be ! can someone help me. WIth regards CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify AMCOR immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of AMCOR.
Re: AW: about DRM
So you mean that FILLING carts can be reclaimed when they are offsite? regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29.05.2002 11:50 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: AW: about DRM Burak, As far as I understand it, the reclamation of offsite copy pool carts is not a DRM function, reclamation is a standard part of TSM where a new tape is produced locally that consolidates the carts offsite that are partly full. The thing that DRM does for you is to manage the movement of which carts to send offsite and which ones to bring back because they have been reclaimed. I think that's right. John. Hi, I am trying to understand DRM concept especially the reclamation part. As the volumes become FULL they will be reclaimed when the data is low (define in pool's RECLAIM value) even if they are offsite copies. The primary pool volumes onsite will be used and reclaimed EMPTY copy pool volumes will be returned. Now my point comes. I have a schedule to backup primary pool every day to copy pool. I have one FILLING volume everyday to send to offsite. Then, there will be 20 volumes offsite (with FILLING status, and very little data on it) What is the DRM's solution to reclaim such volumes? Is it to bring them onsite and use MOVE DATA command?
Re: about DRM
Hi Alex, This is the answer what I am looking for. I also noticed the admin's guide reclamation pages. Thank you very much Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30.05.2002 02:06 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: about DRM Hi, Burak. The Admin Guide, in Chapter 9, Managing Storage Pools and Volumes, the section Reclaiming Space in Sequential Access Storage Pools Reclamation for Copy Storage Pools Reclamation for Offsite Volumes explains what happens. It's on page 156 of my Admin Guide 4.2 for AIX. It basically says that for onsite volumes, reclamation usually happens when status=FULL and when the percent reclaimable is greater than the stgpool's reclamation percentalge. For volumes with access=OFFSITE, it doesn't bother with the Full part, it just compares the pct_reclaim. I hope this answers your question. Alex Paschal Storage Administrator Freightliner, LLC (503) 745-6850 phone/vmail -Original Message- From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: about DRM Hi, I am trying to understand DRM concept especially the reclamation part. As the volumes become FULL they will be reclaimed when the data is low (define in pool's RECLAIM value) even if they are offsite copies. The primary pool volumes onsite will be used and reclaimed EMPTY copy pool volumes will be returned. Now my point comes. I have a schedule to backup primary pool every day to copy pool. I have one FILLING volume everyday to send to offsite. Then, there will be 20 volumes offsite (with FILLING status, and very little data on it) What is the DRM's solution to reclaim such volumes? Is it to bring them onsite and use MOVE DATA command? Regards, Burak
about DRM
Hi, I am trying to understand DRM concept especially the reclamation part. As the volumes become FULL they will be reclaimed when the data is low (define in pool's RECLAIM value) even if they are offsite copies. The primary pool volumes onsite will be used and reclaimed EMPTY copy pool volumes will be returned. Now my point comes. I have a schedule to backup primary pool every day to copy pool. I have one FILLING volume everyday to send to offsite. Then, there will be 20 volumes offsite (with FILLING status, and very little data on it) What is the DRM's solution to reclaim such volumes? Is it to bring them onsite and use MOVE DATA command? Regards, Burak
big data pool volumes
Hi, Last friday I created a large file enable journaled file system on AIX 4.3.3 and put a 10 gb single file on it. It was my backup disk pool volume. But I recieved following messages on TSM and AIX. Any idea? Actlong from TSM 4.2.2.0 24-05-2002 21:22:38 ANRD dsrtrv.c(538): ThreadId62 Error on volume /tsmpoolfs/nomirrordata1.dsm: execRc=-1, summaryRc=-1. 24-05-2002 22:05:28 ANRD blkdisk.c(1496): ThreadId41 Error -1 reading from disk /tsmpoolfs/nomirrordata1.dsm, errno=5 (There is an input or output error.). errpt from AIX 4.3.3.0_09ML 21F54B38 0525000902 P H hdisk2 DISK OPERATION ERROR 21F54B38 0525000902 P H hdisk2 DISK OPERATION ERROR 21F54B38 0525000902 P H hdisk2 DISK OPERATION ERROR
Re: Please help me ------ ANR9999D ANR2121W alert?
what is your tsm version? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23.05.2002 15:40 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Please help me -- ANRD ANR2121W alert? Hi, All I rebooted TSM server around 3 pm as the servers were dead with some reason. But unusally I've to 4 unavailable drives as soon as rebooted, which I've never seen before. And I tried to update all the unavailable drives.then q dr command hung up and makes netcool alerts continuously. I know is critical message but in this case I don't know how to respond. The set of messages below has been repeating since the reboot.worriedT_T ANR2017I Administrator QUERY issued command: QUERY DRIVE ANRD mmstxn.c(219): ThreadId104 Lock acquisition (sLock) failed for MMS universe lock. ANR2033E QUERY DRIVE: Command failed - lock conflict. Could it have a bad impact on backup process tonight? Also this attention alert is also my concern. Does that mean backup db schedule finished with failure and I need to run it manually now? tsm: SM057q act search='ATTENTION' begint=-04:00 Date/Time Message -- 05/23/02 16:58:12 ANR2121W ATTENTION: More than 1553.95 MB of the database has changed and the last database backup was more than 24 hours ago. Use the BACKUP DB command to provide for database recovery. 05/23/02 17:58:12 ANR2121W ATTENTION: More than 1553.95 MB of the database has changed and the last database backup was more than 24 hours ago. Use the BACKUP DB command to provide for database recovery. 05/23/02 18:58:12 ANR2121W ATTENTION: More than 1553.95 MB of the database has changed and the last database backup was more than 24 hours ago. Use the BACKUP DB command to provide for database recovery. 05/23/02 19:58:12 ANR2121W ATTENTION: More than 1554.08 MB of the database has changed and the last database backup was more than 24 hours ago. Use the BACKUP DB command to provide for database recovery. Thanks in advance, Meensun -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
3570 drive
Hi, I have an old 3570 library with 2 drives. I am having following errors on AIX. There is no problem yet I see at the moment yet but I want to learn possible causes. Any help appreciated. Regards, Burak # errpt IDENTIFIER TIMESTAMP T C RESOURCE_NAME DESCRIPTION 0F78A011 0521094202 T H rmt2 RECOVERY LOGIC INITIATED BY DEVICE 0F78A011 0521092902 T H rmt1 RECOVERY LOGIC INITIATED BY DEVICE A7AB4C8F 0521073102 I H rmt1 TAPE SIM/MIM RECORD 4865FA9B 0521073002 P H rmt1 TAPE OPERATION ERROR 4865FA9B 0521073002 P H rmt1 TAPE OPERATION ERROR 4865FA9B 0521072902 P H rmt0 TAPE OPERATION ERROR 4865FA9B 0521072902 P H rmt0 TAPE OPERATION ERROR 4865FA9B 0521072902 P H rmt0 TAPE OPERATION ERROR A7AB4C8F 0521072702 I H rmt1 TAPE SIM/MIM RECORD E507DCF9 0520224802 I H rmt1 TAPE DRIVE NEEDS CLEANING A7AB4C8F 0520224802 I H rmt1 TAPE SIM/MIM RECORD 0F78A011 0520211102 T H rmt2 RECOVERY LOGIC INITIATED BY DEVICE 0F78A011 0520193202 T H rmt1 RECOVERY LOGIC INITIATED BY DEVICE
unwanted restores
Hi, My copy pool operation continues during the day and if a server administrator starts the restore without informing me, the backup stg operation stops. How can I get an environment that all backup schedules are not affected but all restore operation are permitted by me? Regards, Burak
Re: v4.2.2.2 - problems with expire inventory
Hi Everybody, I am very disappointed with 4.2.2 patch levels. I upgraded to 4.2.2.1 and saw the worst version I have ever seen. I think we all should stick to 4.2.2.0 for a time or upgrade 5.1.x.x Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.05.2002 17:24 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: v4.2.2.2 - problems with expire inventory On our well-behaved and moderately loaded system, I am not seeing a problem with anything in v4.2.2.2 (AIX 4.3.3). However, on the more 'abused' systems, ones that are constantly migrating and have users on them all the time, the expiration hangs whenever there is a migration, reclamation or move data going on. Simultaneous expiration and migration wasn't a problem on the well-behaved server. I am letting one run with a migration right now to see if it eventually resolves itself (deadlock?). Right now, it's going on 15 minutes and has locked up the other migration process. I'm not sure if backups to the disk pool are affected yet. At 30 minutes or so, I'll halt the server, restart and call the problen in. Gretchen Thiele Princeton University
ADSMV3.DLL
Hi, Can anybody send me this DLL - ADSMV3.DLL for version 3.1.0.6 or 3.1.0.7 client version? Regards, Burak
private volumes
Hi, How can I determine expired volumes to check-in or private volumes that has no data in them? I ask this because I sometimes can not follow-up expired volumes so I can not easily find which ones were expired and should be check-ed in to my library. This also includes check-ed in private volumes that no data in them (can be changed to scracth) Any ideas to automize these things other than DRM? Regards, Burak
client acceptor
Hi, After changing an option on dsm.opt I used to restart my scheduler service and everything could work. What should I do if I use client acceptor and it starts the scheduler. Regards, Burak
tdp for domino
Hi, Due to low bandwidth to a location we think of buying TDP for Domino (for e-mail) We have 10 GB total NFS size on the server and every NSF is just e-mail database. How should I expect transferred data after TDP comes? Now 10 GB transferred every night which kills all other applications during night? Regards, Burak
Re: client acceptor problem
Hi, I do not know if it was the problem but my problem is resolved. I installed the client from scratch including API. I hadn't installed the API on my previous attempt. Is API required for client acceptor to start scheduler? (I dont this so) Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10.05.2002 16:37 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: client acceptor problem The Scheduler service should be set to MANUAL startup. You should change it to /autostart:no /startnow:no. The CAD service should be the only one running. When a schedule request comes in, the CAD service will start the /CADSCHEDNAME: service. Just like it does for the Web client interface requests..it starts the TSM Agent REMOTE service. Bill Boyer DSS, Inc. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Burak Demircan Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: client acceptor problem Hi, Do you remember my question about scheduler, client acceptor and remote agent services. I install service in the following way and I got following error.log message. I start the TSM Acceptor service and wait for the schedule to start backup and nothing happens?? Any help appreciated dsmcutil install /name:TSM Scheduler /node:KT_FILESRV1 /password:X /autostart:yes dsmcutil install CAD /name:TSM Acceptor /node:KT_FILESRV1 /autostart:yes /password:X /CADSCHEDNAME:TSM Acceptor dsmcutil install REMOTE /name:TSM Agent /node:KT_FILESRV1 /partnername:TSM Acceptor /password:X 10-05-2002 07:39:39 ANS0299E Scheduler cannot be started manually because the value of MANAGEDSERVICES option is SCHEDULE Regards, Burak =
Re: question about sched log info
You are right. Those files are not there anymore so the client sends this info to server and they are expired according to files' policy settings, regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/2002 05:05 PM CEDT Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: bcc: Subject: Re: question about sched log info They are being expired. Depends on your retention policies as to how long this file will remain inactive before it is actually deleted from TSM. The Sent, I believe means that the info has ben sent. Look at the timestamp. All this happens in one second. Could you send 3 GB in one second? The size is the size of the last file of this name that was deleted, is the way I think it works. David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/02 10:44AM 04/28/02 15:13:24 Expiring-- 1,026,580,480 /EPSQ01/export/HRMZ0419.dmp.Z [Sent] 04/28/02 15:13:24 Expiring-- 0 /EPSQ01/export/HRMZ0420.dmp.Z [Sent] 04/28/02 15:13:24 Expiring-- 348,291,072 /EPSQ01/export/HRMZ0421.dmp.Z [Sent] 04/28/02 15:13:24 Expiring-- 1,655,425,787 /EPSQ01/export/HRMZ0422.dmp.Z [Sent] In the previous example is it telling me that files are being sent as backup or expiring? MMS health-first.org made the following annotations on 05/09/02 11:10:06 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ==
client acceptor question
Hi, Sorry if this is a stupid question. I am using scheduler service for my clients for a long time and I do not have too much trouble with them. Today I read that Tivoli recommends to use client acceptor. Some of my clients have limited memory so using it can help me. (or at least I want to use it) I tried to use it on my client and installed the service (client acceptor with managedservices schedule option) but the backup never started. Now I am confused with this 3 services: scheduler, client acceptor and remote agent. Can anybody tell me simply what are their purposes briefly? Regards, Burak
client acceptor problem
Hi, Do you remember my question about scheduler, client acceptor and remote agent services. I install service in the following way and I got following error.log message. I start the TSM Acceptor service and wait for the schedule to start backup and nothing happens?? Any help appreciated dsmcutil install /name:TSM Scheduler /node:KT_FILESRV1 /password:X /autostart:yes dsmcutil install CAD /name:TSM Acceptor /node:KT_FILESRV1 /autostart:yes /password:X /CADSCHEDNAME:TSM Acceptor dsmcutil install REMOTE /name:TSM Agent /node:KT_FILESRV1 /partnername:TSM Acceptor /password:X 10-05-2002 07:39:39 ANS0299E Scheduler cannot be started manually because the value of MANAGEDSERVICES option is SCHEDULE Regards, Burak
Re: Migration Question
Hi,
I think IBM wants you to have at least 2 copies of backups on tape media.
So, I would also recommend that.
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.05.2002 16:13
Please respond to ADSM-L
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Migration Question
Hi Guys,
I have a quick question for you
I am about to delete all of the promary disk storage pools for a
resizing and re-placement exercise.
IBM have given me their recommendations as:-
1. Backup stgpool.
2. Update lo mig and Hi mig to 0 to migrate everything to tape.
Now, am I right in saying that option 2 is un-necessary, as this data
should already reside on tape anyway (as it would have been backup up
sometime when a backup stgpool was taken)?.
Kind Regards,
Roy Lake
RS/6000 TSM Systems Administration Team
Tibbett Britten European I.T.
Judd House
Ripple Road
Barking
Essex IG11 0TU
0208 526 8853
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail message has been scanned using Sophos Sweep http://www.sophos.com
**
--- IMPORTANT INFORMATION -
This message is intended only for the use of the Person(s) ('the
intended recipient') to whom it was addressed. It may contain
information which is privileged confidential within the meaning
of applicable law. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or other use of this message, or any of its contents,
by any person other than the intended recipient may constitute
a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited.
If you are NOT the intended recipient please contact the sender
and dispose of this email as soon as possible. If in doubt please
contact European IT on 0870 607 6777 (+44 20 85 26 88 88).
This message has been sent via the Public Internet.
**
tdp for domino
Hi, Does anybody have a quick installation guide for TDP for Domino? Regards, Burak
subfile question
Hi, I am using subfile on my windows nt clients but I am confused with include.subfile option. Isn't the following options enough for subfile or should I explicitly define every path to subfile? subfileb yes subfilecachep d:\cache (of course i exclude this path from backup) subfilecaches 1024 Now, should I add such definitions even though I put those paths to my include list? subfile.include c:\...\* NTCLASS regards, burak
4.2.2.0 garbage help problem
Hi, My problem with garbage help problem on 4.2.2.0 is resolved. The problem is due to my lack of AIX knowledge. I installed TSM 4.2.2.0 from smitty from menu Install and Update from LATEST Available Software but I missed to upgrade current tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server fileset. I chose: Install and Update from ALL Available Software from smitty and installed this fileset for version 4.2.2.0 (mine was 4.2.1.13) and problem solved. Hope this helps everybody. Regards, Burak
Re: unloaddb problem
I have just labelled a tape with this devclass. Can I say that there is no problem on the conf? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19.04.2002 13:14 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: unloaddb problem This error is probably device class related or there is an error in your library configuration. Make sure you can use the device class you are referring to. Try using the drive for other use, backup, copy storage pool e.g. Kvedja/Regards Petur Eythorsson Taeknimadur/Technician IBM Certified Specialist - AIX Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional Microsoft Certified System Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nyherji Hf Simi TEL: +354-569-7700 Borgartun 37 105 Iceland URL: http://www.nyherji.is -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Burak Demircan Sent: 19. apríl 2002 09:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unloaddb problem Hi, I am trying to unload db to 8mm external drive. I have properly defined it as manul library and labelled my tape. But I can not use unloaddb. What could be the problem? root@adsm01 [/adsm/server_recovery] cd /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin root@adsm01 [/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin] ./dsmserv UNLOADDB dev=8MMCLASS ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 14:57:27 on Apr 5 2002. Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000 Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5698-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2001. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. ANR0900I Processing options file /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv.opt. ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress. ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 200 megabytes. ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 1400 megabytes. ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress. ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress. ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress. ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress. ANR0352I Transaction recovery complete. ANR1305I Disk volume /adsm_data/backup.dsm varied online. ANR0610I UNLOADDB started by ADMINISTRATOR as process 0. ANR0796E UNLOADDB: Error encountered in accessing data storage - insufficient number of mount points available for removable media. ANR4005E UNLOADDB: Database load process terminated due to error (-13).
unloaddb problem
Hi, I am trying to unload db to 8mm external drive. I have properly defined it as manul library and labelled my tape. But I can not use unloaddb. What could be the problem? root@adsm01 [/adsm/server_recovery] cd /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin root@adsm01 [/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin] ./dsmserv UNLOADDB dev=8MMCLASS ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 14:57:27 on Apr 5 2002. Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX-RS/6000 Version 4, Release 2, Level 2.0 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM 5698-TSM (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999,2001. All rights reserved. U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation. ANR0900I Processing options file /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv.opt. ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress. ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 200 megabytes. ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 1400 megabytes. ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress. ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress. ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress. ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress. ANR0352I Transaction recovery complete. ANR1305I Disk volume /adsm_data/backup.dsm varied online. ANR0610I UNLOADDB started by ADMINISTRATOR as process 0. ANR0796E UNLOADDB: Error encountered in accessing data storage - insufficient number of mount points available for removable media. ANR4005E UNLOADDB: Database load process terminated due to error (-13).
dsmserv.opt
Hi, Does anybody have original dsmserv.opt file for version 4.2? If yes could you send it to me. Regards, Burak
Re: dsmserv.opt
I got it from list friends thank you. By the way I am on AIX. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19.04.2002 17:00 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: dsmserv.opt What platform are you on? AIX? Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 04/19/2002 06:15:17 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Brian Dade/DutyFreeAmericas) Subject: dsmserv.opt Hi, Does anybody have original dsmserv.opt file for version 4.2? If yes could you send it to me. Regards, Burak
database problem (resolved)
Hi Everybody, I solved my problem about TSM database which seems small but occupies big size. The solution was following: I create /dev/mt0 device for my 8mm external tape (DO NOT USE things like /dev/rmt0 like you see on AIX--- lsdev -Cc tape ). Because people said that manual libraries are defined just in this way (I didnt know because I see automated ones) Later I used the following commands: ./dsmserv unloaddb dev=8mmclass scratch=yes ./dsmserv loadformat 1 /adsm/recovery_log/reclog.dsm 3 /adsm/database/datafull1_m /adsm/database/datafull2_m /adsm/database/adsm_db09 ./dsmserv loaddb dev=8mmclass vol=mbt2 Now my database is defragmented. And the utiliy I see on q db result is just as I expected. Regards, Burak
tsm database problem
Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full as follows. --- tsm: ADSM01.MBTq db Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension Reduction Size Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1 396 1 396 0 60 4 096 357 376 82 509 23.1 23.4 I have 7 volumes that build up the database which are consists of 200MB;100MB and xxxMB volumes. Today I tried to delete some of my volumes but I could not and it says there is not enough space. But I have ~900 MB free space on my database and it can not move the volume to other volumes. Do I miss something here? Regards, Burak
Re: tsm database problem
I have 1 x 500mb,2 x 200MB and 2x100MB and 1x 96MB db volumes but I can not reduce even a 96MB dbvol Is it logical? It think the database seems to be used more that it shows me? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 15:55 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem In your case the assigned db space is equal to te available space, therefore you need to reduce the db before you delete the db volume. For example, if you are going to delete 200MB db volume: reduce db 200 del dbvol full path and volume name Best regards, Kolbeinn Josepsson NYHERJI HF. BORGARTUN 37 IS-105 REYKJAVIK ICELAND Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 11:51 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full as follows. --- tsm: ADSM01.MBTq db Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension Reduction Size Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1 396 1 396 0 60 4 096 357 376 82 509 23.1 23.4 I have 7 volumes that build up the database which are consists of 200MB;100MB and xxxMB volumes. Today I tried to delete some of my volumes but I could not and it says there is not enough space. But I have ~900 MB free space on my database and it can not move the volume to other volumes. Do I miss something here? Regards, Burak
Re: tsm database problem
But I can reduce it only 60 MBs although it is only 23 percent used? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 15:26 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Burak, You have assigned all the database space available to the TSM Server. You have to reduce the database size at least up to the size of the volume you want to delete. When you use Delete dbvolume volume_name command the data already existing in that volume then automatically get moved to the other volume. The bottom line is that you have to reduce equivalent size of the assigned database space before deleting the volume. Reduce the Database volume using this command, REDUCE DB SIZE_IN_MEGABYTE Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Limited New Delhi, India Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2002 05:21 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full as follows. --- tsm: ADSM01.MBTq db Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension Reduction Size Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1 396 1 396 0 60 4 096 357 376 82 509 23.1 23.4 I have 7 volumes that build up the database which are consists of 200MB;100MB and xxxMB volumes. Today I tried to delete some of my volumes but I could not and it says there is not enough space. But I have ~900 MB free space on my database and it can not move the volume to other volumes. Do I miss something here? Regards, Burak
tsm 4.2.2.0 help menu
Hi, A few minutes ago I noticed the buggy help system. When I enter something like help q vol It prints the help like garbage. Have you noticed it also? Regards, Burak
Re: tsm database problem
Hi, The TSM documentation says that I can do unloaddb with only a manual library. How can i do it with a 3583 LTO library? Is it possible to use my external 8mm tape drive? Thank you very much to all Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 16:07 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Burak, In that case, you have to unload the database and then reload it using dsmserv unloaddb and dsmserv loaddb commands. So that your database is reorganized and takes minimum space to distribute itself. I hope, after doing unload and load database you will enough database space to reduce and then delete the database volume as per your wish. Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Limited New Delhi, India Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2002 06:00 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager But I can reduce it only 60 MBs although it is only 23 percent used? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 15:26 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Burak, You have assigned all the database space available to the TSM Server. You have to reduce the database size at least up to the size of the volume you want to delete. When you use Delete dbvolume volume_name command the data already existing in that volume then automatically get moved to the other volume. The bottom line is that you have to reduce equivalent size of the assigned database space before deleting the volume. Reduce the Database volume using this command, REDUCE DB SIZE_IN_MEGABYTE Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Limited New Delhi, India Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2002 05:21 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full as follows. --- tsm: ADSM01.MBTq db Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension Reduction Size Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes) Pages Util - - - --- - - - - 1 396 1 396 0 60 4 096 357 376 82 509 23.1 23.4 I have 7 volumes that build up the database which are consists of 200MB;100MB and xxxMB volumes. Today I tried to delete some of my volumes but I could not and it says there is not enough space. But I have ~900 MB free space on my database and it can not move the volume to other volumes. Do I miss something here? Regards, Burak
Re: tsm database problem
Hi, I achieved to define my external 8mm tape drive as a drive and manual library. Now the point is: How risky is unloading the db and loading again? Does anybody have experience about troubles I may have? Best Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 16:26 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Hi You don't have to use a manual library, a 3583 library will work. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 HÄGERNÄS Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-04-18 15:19 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Hi, The TSM documentation says that I can do unloaddb with only a manual library. How can i do it with a 3583 LTO library? Is it possible to use my external 8mm tape drive? Thank you very much to all Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 16:07 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Burak, In that case, you have to unload the database and then reload it using dsmserv unloaddb and dsmserv loaddb commands. So that your database is reorganized and takes minimum space to distribute itself. I hope, after doing unload and load database you will enough database space to reduce and then delete the database volume as per your wish. Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Limited New Delhi, India Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Re: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2002 06:00 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager But I can reduce it only 60 MBs although it is only 23 percent used? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 15:26 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: tsm database problem Burak, You have assigned all the database space available to the TSM Server. You have to reduce the database size at least up to the size of the volume you want to delete. When you use Delete dbvolume volume_name command the data already existing in that volume then automatically get moved to the other volume. The bottom line is that you have to reduce equivalent size of the assigned database space before deleting the volume. Reduce the Database volume using this command, REDUCE DB SIZE_IN_MEGABYTE Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Limited New Delhi, India Burak Demircan burak.demircan@DAIMLERCHR To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] YSLER.COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: tsm database problem Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/2002 05:21 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full
Re: AW: lock all client nodes
I havent tried it but i should have thought it. thank you very much regardsi burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16.04.2002 13:24 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: AW: lock all client nodes lock node * , doesn't work --- Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-PROD-ZH [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribis: lock node * ?? -Urspr|ngliche Nachricht- Von: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. April 2002 11:53 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: lock all client nodes Hi, How can I lock all client nodes and prevent them accessing to server (not locking them one by one) and unlock again one at a time. Regards, Burak ___ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger Comunicacisn instantanea gratis con tu gente. http://messenger.yahoo.es
lock all client nodes
Hi, How can I lock all client nodes and prevent them accessing to server (not locking them one by one) and unlock again one at a time. Regards, Burak
Re: Monthly Backups, ...again!
Hi, Why dont you think of backupsets? They do not require database usage and easy to use? Just create backupset at the end each of period (year or month) and send them to offsite with the volume history file. What else could be missing in that senario? I think : nothing. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16.04.2002 15:53 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Monthly Backups, ...again! I only wish I had a way to assign different retentions to active files, I don't actually have one. While I'm wishing...I wish I could pick an historical point in time, and reset the retention for the versions corresponding to that point in time to an arbitrary value. _ William Mansfield Senior Consultant Solution Technology, Inc Don France (TSMnews) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/13/2002 03:58 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Monthly Backups, ...again! Bill, Your arguments are excellent, and I have one large client dealing with the health records issue --- they need to save patient records for 32 years; we are liking the export solution, once a year, for those nodes (in order to control TSM db size) -- and, continue storing their data in archive storage so we have access to all versions generated, then (AFTER THE FACT) deleting extra versions from each month --- save 2 or 3, delete the rest from archive storage, using a smart script in concert with the dba's technique of naming the files being stored. However I only know ONE (simple) way to accomplish the desired, stated results --- month-end snapshot kept for X months or years; ie, a backupset of the desired file systems on specific nodes. The limitation of this solution is it only captures files in backup storage; you need a different answer for database backups stored in archive storage -- my DBA's love using archive storage, and I have no argument against it, as they only care about time (have no need or interest in counting versions, etc), and they must save daily backups for 4-14 days, weekly's for 6 weeks, monthly's for 6-15 months, etc. If you have a method that allows you mark the currently active versions of backup files with a different retention than others, I think it would be new news to most of us... please share. Thanks, Don Don France Technical Architect - Tivoli Certified Consultant Professional Association of Contract Employees (P.A.C.E.) San Jose, CA (408) 257-3037 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Bill Mansfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:55 AM Subject: Re: Monthly Backups, ...again! There is a good reason it keeps coming up: legitimate business requirements. The suits (auditors, IRS, corp counsel, HIPAA, etc) demand to be able to be able to reproduce any datum at given intervals for given durations. Most often, that translates to restoring files that may change every day to month end state for somewhere between 1 and 7 years. Sometime they can identify the kinds of data they want, but it is expensive to accurately identify the list of all files/directories required, so usually you get a vague wave to save everything. And of course, it's their data, not yours, they have a right to keep as much as they want. Telling them that TSM doesn't support their requirement just invites other software vendors in the door since *they* handle this particular requirement with ease (on paper). The number of days you can reasonably keep in an incremental backup usually doesn't extend to forever. Archives sometimes don't cut it, either in their traditional form or the instant form. You can't stand to move that much data or use that many tapes - that's why you went incremental forever in the first place. I really just to do some operation that marks the current active version with a longer guaranteed retention, without changing the retention of anything else. I don't want to restart the perennial discussion of truly long term archival storage. It's reasonable to expect a backup system to maintain internal compatibility for 7 years, and there are techniques for migrating the data to newer media. Just my 5 cents worth (inflation). _ William Mansfield Senior Consultant Solution Technology, Inc Mr. Lindsay Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/2002 10:04 AM Please respond to lmorris To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Monthly Backups, ...again! This keeps coming up. It's the hardest thing about TSM, to sell users on
Re: Daily Backup Report
Does anybody have a bash or ksh script for it?
Regards,
Burak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16.04.2002 17:45
Please respond to ADSM-L
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Daily Backup Report
Be very carefull with the EX=YES. There is a status of an event of '(?)'
that doesn't show as an exception. This condition can occur when a backup
schedule starts for a node, and then due to either the client crashing or a
networking issue the connection is dropped and never re-established within
the DURATION of the event. The status is '(?)'. There is an APAR open to
have meaningful status's instead of the '(?)', but for now this doesn't show
as an EXCEPTION.
We got bit big-time at a client of our where they out-sourced the entire TSM
operation to us. They were having failures, but they were not showing on our
EX=YES report. They were not happy campers! I'm still having a hard time
sitting! :-)
We ended up writing some PERL code to parse the Q EV client events and
reporting on anything that isn't COMPLETED.
This behavior started somewhere in the 4.1.x patch levels. So, just be
careful relying on the EX=YES to give you everything that failed.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Williams, Tim P {PBSG}
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Daily Backup Report
we generally run a q event command ex=yes
you can use begindate begintime parms, etc
help q event
fYI
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Daily Backup Report
What are some good ways to get an automated daily report on which clients
were or were no backed up successfully?
TIA,
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
Port of Houston Authority
(Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (713)670-2443
Fax: (713)670-2457
TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html
ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
I sometimes get the following error message in client schedule logs. I am using copying data to my tape pools only from a migration from my disk pool. Now, I suspect a node option :MAXNUMMP This option is 1 for all of my nodes (35 nodes) Can it be due to MAXNUMMP option? Is it logical to make this value zero (0) and forbid any node to acquire a drive. I am using TSM 4.2.1.15 on AIX 4.3.3 on F80 Clients are Windows NT/2000 and version is 4.2.1.32 I have 3583 LTO library with 3 drives. Regards, Burak 12-04-2002 19:53:37 Data transfer time: 266.04 sec 12-04-2002 19:53:37 Network data transfer rate: 133.33 KB/sec 12-04-2002 19:53:37 Aggregate data transfer rate: 9.69 KB/sec 12-04-2002 19:53:37 Objects compressed by: 0% 12-04-2002 19:53:37 Elapsed processing time: 01:01:00 12-04-2002 19:53:37 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 12-04-2002 19:53:37 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
Re: File length too long
You should upgrade to 4.x serious to support Unicode that has no such problems. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09.04.2002 15:08 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: File length too long Hi, Can someone tell me the maximum file length for that ? 04/09/2002 12:30:43 ANE4018E (Session: 2011, Node: SPRINZ_PC) Error processing '\\lt18\c$\Documents\Teaching_University\Inte- rnational Environmental Policy\Sem Advanced IEnvPol\Sem Climate Policy.SS2001\Student Simulations Presentations\Germany Simulations\Germany.National ER Goal.Additional Measures.1997-8\RG_Graichen.Simulation.d- oc': file name too long NT 4.0 TSM CLient 3.1 Thanks Achim Joachim Glauer Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK) P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany Phone: +49 (0)331 288 2608 Fax: +49 (0)331 288 2600 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.pik-potsdam.de - Note: If you need to send attachements to me, PLEASE! Avoid sending MS-Word.doc files (send *.rtf / *.pdf instead) -
Re: Audit db
We have worked about this problem with IBM. They said it will be resolved with version 4.2.2.x Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08.04.2002 16:09 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Audit db Eric, I'm running TSM 4.2.1.9 on AIX and I recently removed and added a couple of storage pools. Now I'm seeing the famous messages: ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. We see those messages from the beginning we upgraded to 4.2.1.x when we start the server (and we still see them on 4.2.1.11): 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -14 not found. 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -11 not found. 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -4 not found. Tivoli never good give us any clue about these messages. So I tried to run an online database audit, but the (I know, it's an undocumented one) command AUDIT DB FIX=YES gives me the following response: ANR2000E Unknown command - AUDIT DB. ANS8001I Return code 2. Has the online audit been removed from the 4.2 code It's better to remove command's that won't work...;-) Cheers, Henk ten Have.
Re: Audit db
it is still working but your shoud it as a parameter to dsmserv [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08.04.2002 16:09 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Audit db Eric, I'm running TSM 4.2.1.9 on AIX and I recently removed and added a couple of storage pools. Now I'm seeing the famous messages: ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -2 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id 15 not found. We see those messages from the beginning we upgraded to 4.2.1.x when we start the server (and we still see them on 4.2.1.11): 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -14 not found. 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -11 not found. 12/17/01 16:41:36 ANRD asutil.c(225): ThreadId0 Pool id -4 not found. Tivoli never good give us any clue about these messages. So I tried to run an online database audit, but the (I know, it's an undocumented one) command AUDIT DB FIX=YES gives me the following response: ANR2000E Unknown command - AUDIT DB. ANS8001I Return code 2. Has the online audit been removed from the 4.2 code It's better to remove command's that won't work...;-) Cheers, Henk ten Have.
Re: Library
I am using 22u0 since it was released. It works fine. Just install it. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05.04.2002 15:04 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Library Keith, May I ask why did you upgrade to 22U0? I am asking this because IBM wants us to upgrade to 22U0 as well and they have told us that it is at engineering code level so we were reluctant to go anyway. We are and have been experiencing problems that opened a critsys ticket that initiated IBM want to try 22U0. Just wondering if anyone else has tried and experiencing 22U0. Mark B. -Original Message- From: Keith Gourd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Library I have a 3583 library connected through SCSI to a 4500R IBM server. I recently updated the firmware (22U0 on the drives and V2_72_12.lif) on the drives and the library. When I finished the library would not accept commands. I can query the drives and they are on-line and I can query the library. Does anyone have any suggestion on what the problem could be? TSM only sees two of my 6 drives, I have checked my connections. Thanks,
Re: Checking in an vol with no label
just use checkin checkin libv Name_Of_The_Library Name_Of_The_Volume status=scr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04.04.2002 17:17 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Checking in an vol with no label Is there any command available which will allow me to checkin a volume in to a 3494 library which has been previously labelled but now has no barcode label on it? Marc.
Re: Client Message - size estimate exceeded
add an option to your node's opt file: compressalways yes regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02.04.2002 14:17 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Client Message - size estimate exceeded Hi TSMers TSM server 3.7.3.8 running on Solaris 2.7 machine. Getting the following message for one of our NT client nodes. 04/01/02 22:14:20 ANR0534W Transaction failed for session 43012 for node PUBEARLY (WinNT) - size estimate exceeded and server is unable to obtain additional space in storage pool BACKUPPOOL. I have looked at the help for the message and from what I can see there are a number of possible reasons. But I have never seen it before for any client and was wondering is anyone out there had had dealings with this and what remedies they used to solve it. The backup eventually completes OK with just one failed file. Unfortunately, I cannot see which one as the person in charge of the NT machines is away on holiday at the moment. I would like to gather some more inf. before I next speak to him. Can anyone help with this one. Many thanks in advance All the best Farren Minns - Trainee Solaris TSM system admin. John Wiley Sons Ltd
Re: Volume Problem
try audit vol command with fix=yes option then upgrade your TSM server to avoid further problems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02.04.2002 16:07 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Volume Problem Hi! I am running reclamation for a copy pool and there are two tapes in the pool that have reclaimed all of the data except for the last 1%. Reclamation runs and pulls these volumes in about every hour(I don't have reclamation jobs set to run at certain times). 04/01/2002 00:56:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 491674, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 12). 04/01/2002 00:56:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 483401, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 12). 04/01/2002 01:31:38 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 491674, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 16). 04/01/2002 01:31:38 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 483401, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 16). 04/01/2002 01:32:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 491674, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 17). 04/01/2002 01:32:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 483401, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 17). 04/01/2002 01:56:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 491674, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 18). 04/01/2002 01:56:46 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 483401, storage pool TAPECOPYSPMGNT (process number 18). I brought the tapes back from the vault and tried to do a MOVE DATA, but when I try this I get the message: ANR2209W Volume 483401 contains no data. When I do a q vol I get the following: Volume Name Storage Device Estimated Pct Volume Pool Name Class Name Capacity Util Status (MB) --- -- - - 483401 TAPECOPYS- TAPEOFF3- 11,427.6 1.0 Full PMGNT 590 Which leads me to believe that there is information on the tape. I have even also tried to delete the information off of the tape and that doesn't work either. I don't know what else to do to get these tapes to scratch. Any suggestions?? Thanks!!! Joni Moyer Associate Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338
renaming volumes
Hi, I have about 40 cartridges (3570) volumed in a strange naming convention and they all contain data. Now I like to rename all of them with barcode labels. Is it possible to rename a FULL volume without interfering the data or do I have to move the data and use label libv command? Regards, Burak
3583 LTO library
Hi, I have a 3583 LTO library with 60 cartridges capacity plus 12 I/O slots. Today, when I try to check-in 6 new cartridges to my library that has 54 cartridges currently in it, TSM responded that the library is FULL. But when i go to library screen and look at system info, it says that 6 slots are empty. The 6 slots are in the same magazine under the the 2 I/O magazines. What could be the problem? Any help appreciated. Regards, Burak
Re: 3583 LTO library
Hi, Today IBM guy solved the problem by changing barcode label of magazine. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.04.2002 17:37 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: 3583 LTO library We also have a 3583 LTO with 60 cartridges (advertised) capacity plus 12 I/O slots and have seen this multiple times before. If you call Tivoli or IBM hardware support, their answer is to shut everything down and restart. On initialization the system will correct itself, and it does. The problem is, as you use the system it tends to loose slots. We have been running our 3583 for almost a year and I can count on one hand the times that we have been able to use all 60 slots. Since we are reaching capacity and need all 60 slots, plus some other issues (See results of adsm.org search results for 3583) we have opened a crit sys ticket which has resulted in a firmware upgrade for the changer, library, and all drives in our system in addition to a complete cartridge holder change for each internal 6 pack cartridge holder to a slightly bigger slot type. The new cartridge holders were developed to accept a wider range of LTO manufacture's tapes. We will see if this helps. Mark B. -Original Message- From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3583 LTO library Hi, I have a 3583 LTO library with 60 cartridges capacity plus 12 I/O slots. Today, when I try to check-in 6 new cartridges to my library that has 54 cartridges currently in it, TSM responded that the library is FULL. But when i go to library screen and look at system info, it says that 6 slots are empty. The 6 slots are in the same magazine under the the 2 I/O magazines. What could be the problem? Any help appreciated. Regards, Burak
Re: win2k tsm client 4.2.1.30 bug
Hi, Client Version: Windows 2000, 4.2.1.30 Server Version: on AIX, 4.2.1.13 1) Open Control Panel 2) Open Administrative Tools 3) Open Computer Management 4) Open Disk Management 5) Select a drive with right click 6) Choose Change drive Letter and Path 7) Choose add and select somewhere in a NTFS drive to mount with this, you have accomplished to create a mount point from one of your drives to another drive in your local disks. 8) Now try to backup the drive that has a mount point to another drive The TSM client crashes immediately. Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 27.03.2002 18:11 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: win2k tsm client 4.2.1.30 bug I am not sure what you mean by drive shortcut. How do you create this? I am not aware of this problem. Can you please provide a step-by-step recreate scenario, i.e. how to create the drive shortcut, and how to reproduce the problem? In addtion, please provide a drwtsn32.log file showing the crash. To do this, you will need to: a) Configure Dr. Watson. Run drwtsn32.exe. In the configuration dialog, make sure the following items are checked: - Dump Symbol Table - Dump all Thread Contexts - Append To Existing Log File - Visual Notification Also make sure that Number of Instructions is set to at least 20. After verifying these settings, click OK. b) Configure Dr. Watson as the default debugger. To do this, run the following from an OS prompt: drwtsn32 -i Recreate the problem. When the crash occurs, make sure to record the information in the pop-up, including the error type (i.e. access violation) and, most important, the address. Be sure to provide support the Send the pop-up information, drwtsn32.log file, and recreate scenario to me, and I will see what I can see. Please be aware that I will probably ask you to also open a problem report with IBM support, as the diagnosis may be beyond the scope of what I can do on this informal support basis. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/27/2002 08:20 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: win2k tsm client 4.2.1.30 bug Hi, The tsm client for windows 2000 4.2.1.30 is crashing when i try to backup a folder or volume that has drive shortcuts example D: Are you having the same problem? Is there a cure for it? Regards, Burak
backupset
Hi, Do you also suffer from very very slow generate backupset command? Regards, Burak
win2k tsm client 4.2.1.30 bug
Hi, The tsm client for windows 2000 4.2.1.30 is crashing when i try to backup a folder or volume that has drive shortcuts example D: Are you having the same problem? Is there a cure for it? Regards, Burak
Re: Delete filespace issue with Server v4.2.1.6?
i had same progmlem use web admin client to delete or you can delete with command delete files nodename * to delete all file spaces of node [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14.03.2002 17:17 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Delete filespace issue with Server v4.2.1.6? Have you tried dele filespace WINNODE \\WINNODE\e$ ? -Original Message- From: Dale Jolliff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delete filespace issue with Server v4.2.1.6? Has anyone seen this on 4.2.1.6, or am I just sleep-deprived? Server is on AIX 4.3 ... Neither query nor delete will match a file system name tsm:ADSMq filespace WINNODE Node Name Filespace FSID Platform Filespace Is Files- Capacity Pct Name Type pace (MB) Util Unicode? --- --- - - - WINNODE \\WINNODE\c$ 1 WinNT NTFS Yes 17,233.8 19.6 WINNODE \\WINNODE\d$ 2 WinNT NTFS Yes 184,260. 22.2 9 WINNODE \\WINNODE\e$ 3 WinNT NTFS Yes 17,273.0 62.6 WINNODE \\WINNODE\f$ 4 WinNT NTFS Yes 17,273.0 17.1 WINNODE SYSTEM 5 WinNT SYSTEM Yes 0.0 0.0 OBJECT tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE \\WINNODE\e* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE \\WINNODE\e$* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE \\WINNODE\e ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE WINNODE\e* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE WINNODE\e$* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE WINNODE\e ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE e* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE e$* ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11. tsm: ADSMdele filespace WINNODE e ANR0852E DELETE FILESPACE: No matching file spaces found for node WINNODE. ANS8001I Return code 11.
offsite backup
Hi, How can you manage offsite backups without DRM? I have just ideas in mind but I have lack of experience. Is the following right way first day 1) backup the nodes 2) backup copy pools to offsite copy pools 3) backup the database 4) take database backup and copy pools to offsite 5) expire the database backups previous than x days. (for example x=7) next day 1) backup the nodes 2) return some copy copy pool volumes that are not filled as FULL 3) return expired old database volume of the day x+1 as scratch volume 3) backup copy pools to offsite copy pools 4)backup the database 5) take database backup and copy pools to offsite 6) expire the database backups previous than x days. (for example x=7) .etc.
Re: IP change
search for the dsm.opt and dsm.sys in your system incase you are using different option files other than you believe to be right one regards, burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07.03.2002 16:14 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: IP change Hi all, we have changed our IP for the AIX/TSM server. We back up 38 Novell/Unix nodes and all of them are fine. We also back up the AIX/TSM server as well. It is not working. I have changed the IP in the dsm.sys file to the new IP address. Below is the error message we receive from TSM. Thanks for the help! 03/07/02 06:35:41 ANR0422W Session 5925 for node 10.16.8.54 (AIX) refused - node name not registered. 03/07/02 06:35:41 ANR0403I Session 5925 ended for node 10.16.8.54 (AIX). 03/07/02 06:35:45 ANR0406I Session 5926 started for node 10.16.8.54 (AIX) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(33426)). 03/07/02 06:35:45 ANR0422W Session 5926 for node 10.16.8.54 (AIX) refused - node name not registered. Thanks, Mark Hayden Network Administrator E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TSM 4.2.1.14 on AIX 4.3.3
Where do you download just versions like 4.2.1.14? Although we have soft. subs. with IBM on whole tivoli products I do not know where to find the latest version other than 4.2.1.11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06.03.2002 05:24 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: TSM 4.2.1.14 on AIX 4.3.3 Hi guys I had installed TSM 4.2.1.14 on AIX 4.3.3 . By nightly incremental backups were fine till they stopped doing anything and reports sucess Error is self explanatory . Please advise 06-03-2002 06:02:18 TCP/IP accepted connection from server. 06-03-2002 06:02:18 Querying server for next scheduled event. 06-03-2002 06:02:18 Node Name: Test 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server date/time: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Last access: 05-03-2002 06:02:55 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Next operation scheduled: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Schedule Name: STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Action: Incremental 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Objects: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Options: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Server Window Start: 06:00:00 on 06-03-2002 06-03-2002 06:02:19 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Executing scheduled command now. 06-03-2002 06:02:19 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:00:00 06-03-2002 06:02:23 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 06-03-2002 06:02:23 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END STLPROD2 06-03-2002 06:00:00 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Scheduled event 'STLPROD2' completed successfully. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Sending results for scheduled event 'STLPROD2'. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'STLPROD2'. 06-03-2002 06:02:23 ANS1483I Schedule log pruning started. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Schedule Log Prune: 27 lines processed. 0 lines pruned. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 ANS1484I Schedule log pruning finished successfully. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Querying server for next scheduled event. 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Node Name: test 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Session established with server TSM: AIX-RS/6000 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 4.0 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Server date/time: 06-03-2002 06:02:24 Last access: 06-03-2002 06:02:19 Regards Chandra Subash Unix/ Oracle Database Administrator Teletech International 154 Pacific Highway, St Leonards NSW 2065 Tel 02 -99301569 Sydney, Australia E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
include/exclude for Windows NT
Hi, I want to backup registry of Windows NT but nothing else in drive c: I am using following options but it also backups the directory structure (not files) How can I only backup registry (c:\adsm.sys directory) and nothing else? Regards, Burak Domain c: d: Exclude *\...\* Include c:\adsm.sys\...\* NTCLASS Include d:\...\* NTCLASS
Re: include/exclude for Windows NT
Bu this does not prevent tsm client to process all directories in drive C:? What can be the solution? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.03.2002 14:43 Please respond to ADSM-L To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: include/exclude for Windows NT Hi Burak! Remember that TSM reads the exclude and include statements from the bottom up, so change it into: Include c:\adsm.sys\...\* NTCLASS Include d:\...\* NTCLASS Exclude *\...\* Domain c: d: Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 13:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: include/exclude for Windows NT Hi, I want to backup registry of Windows NT but nothing else in drive c: I am using following options but it also backups the directory structure (not files) How can I only backup registry (c:\adsm.sys directory) and nothing else? Regards, Burak Domain c: d: Exclude *\...\* Include c:\adsm.sys\...\* NTCLASS Include d:\...\* NTCLASS ** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. **
Re: 3583 LTO library
Hi, I solved my problem with 3583 LTO library and cleaning cartdridge problem by checking-in the cartdridges to library with following command. regards, burak checkin libvolume 3583lib status=cleaner cleanings=45 search=bulk checklabel=barcode
