Re: [AFMUG] Sharing Amazon Prime
Go to your Amazon "My Account" page, go to "Prime" and at the bottom you should see "Share your Prime benefits" You can only share it with 4 other people, however you can add/revoke at any time. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 5/5/2017 11:55 AM, Josh Baird wrote: No idea - but I'm actually on someone else's Prime account, so I know it works. I think it's called 'Household.' On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote: That's exactly what I want. Where do you set that? On 5/5/2017 11:00 AM, Josh Baird wrote: You can share accounts with family/friends. Only the main account holder gets access to Amazon Prime Video/Music, though. All friends/family receive other Prime benefits with their own logins. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com <mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote: I don't think I'm trying to cheat Amazon, but does anyone have amazon setup to be able to share the prime shipping perk between multiple people. Like the boss and I and the wife can all order things and get free shipping? We've done it before with just sharing the login, but now with 2 step authentication and the extra security, it's just a pain. Not to mention, it skews the search and recommended results since we all search for different things. I tried setting up Amazon business, but it doesn't let the Prime shipping flow down to users other than the primary. Amazon household looks like it only allows 2 users. Is this just the nature of Amazon?
Re: [AFMUG] Searching for a simple Desktop PC
With HP most of their systems will have VGA and either a displayport or HDMI connection but they natively support dual monitors. On the refurbished HP side you may want to look at the ProDesk line. I've been a big fan of the ProDesk Mini because it's the size of a thin client, most come with SSD, at least an i5 processor, and have dual displayports for dual monitors. You'll need to up your budget a bit though. I don't know if you'll find anything in that range that has dual HDMI specifically, but you could get any off the shelf desktop and add discrete graphics. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 2/17/2017 4:36 PM, Nate Burke wrote: The Wife is looking for a new Desktop, She doesn't need anything fancy (i3, i5 is fine), but want's to have 2 monitors hooked up to it (HDMI Inputs) I really don't feel like building one. Oh, and she want's it cheap. Looking at the Dell, HP, and Lenovo sites, cheap PC's are really easy to find, but I can't seem to find any that have dual monitor support. Newegg will let you filter desktops by Videocard model, but not by Output options. It seems almost all corporate offices now have dual display setups, so I'd imagine there should be a ton of these things on the refurb market. Any ideas what I should be looking for? I'd like to find something in the $200-$300 range.
[AFMUG] Juniper SRX Platform
Anyone out there used the SRX series firewalls/UTM appliances from Juniper? I'm moving away from Mikrotik and wanted to go with something on the "known compatible" list with AWS. Never been a fan of Cisco and have heard generally good things about Juniper. Just curious if their UTM compares well to others on the market (like Fortinet, Watchguard, etc) or if it's a crapshoot? -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] OT: Apple abandoning development of wireless routers
The thing I like most about them is the network extender functionality.
I can daisy chain them with Cat5 and properly extend my wireless network
without having 1000 different SSIDs or killing performance with a
wireless extender. I've done this with an Airport extreme in my house
and an Airport express in my detached garage and it works seamlessly.
I haven't been able to find another product (other than Mikrotik) that
can do this that either doesn't cost a fortune or doesn't require a
separate controller to manage wireless clients and roaming.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 11/28/2016 10:13 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I know some WISP's beef with them was because the WISP wasn't properly
IPing their network. What other concerns are there?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
*From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
*To: *"Motorola III" <af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Monday, November 28, 2016 10:07:21 AM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] OT: Apple abandoning development of wireless routers
Finally! There routers have caused more than their fair share of support
calls. I say good riddance.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-21/apple-said-to-abandon-development-of-wireless-routers-ivs0ssec
--
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
Re: [AFMUG] Serial over IP
I've used both Lantronix and Antaira Serial to IP devices. Both should allow you to either install virtual com port software or connect in pairs to extend a serial connection. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 11/23/2016 9:50 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: Ah...I see. -- Original Message -- From: "Trey Scarborough" <t...@3dsc.co <mailto:t...@3dsc.co>> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/23/2016 10:38:43 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Serial over IP YEs you can if you have the model of mikrotiks with serial interfaces. If not you can find a compatable USB to serial adapter as well. I have done this serial->mikrotik->IP_>linux->IP->Mikrotik->Serial before with a linux box connecting the different ip sessions using a raspberry pi/Beagleboard. This could theoretically be done with an openwrt image running on one of the Mikrotiks. all that would need to be done is for it to initiate the telnet/ssh sessions and bridge them. On 11/22/2016 5:06 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: Could I somehow tunnel the serial connection from the device to the control panel with Mikrotik? There's no PC in the mix, just a serial DCE to a DTE. If a pair of Mikrotiks could do this, that would save me the trouble of buying something. -- Original Message -- From: "Trey Scarborough" <t...@3dsc.co <mailto:t...@3dsc.co>> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: 11/22/2016 6:01:21 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Serial over IP You can always use to mikrotik boards with serial interfaces or usb serial. Works quite well. On 11/22/2016 1:16 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: If I want to extend an RS232 connection over IP, what sort of options do I have? It's for an LCD control panel for a piece of equipment. Google shows me lots of serial-IP servers where it bridges a telnet session to the serial port, but that's not what I'm looking for. I know you industrial control guys do this, so I'm sure there's a way.
[AFMUG] PMP100 VLAN question
I have an AP/SM I'm using as a feed to another building. If I leave all of the VLAN settings disabled on both the AP and SM, will it still transparently pass all VLAN traffic or will it strip the VLAN header? -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download
Is it like on South Park where it's a big blue Linksys router? Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 1/15/2016 12:19 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Reboot the whole fucking Internet... bet it fixes lots of issues. On Jan 15, 2016 6:37 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote: The #1 thing I learned at NANOG was that the big vendors are just as full of shit as the little vendors. Cisco, Juniper, AlcaLu, etc. are all just as likely to ignore problems and create bugs as Mikrotik, Ubiquiti, etc. When sitting at a table at about 1 AM one night with a head engineer with one international operator and one national operator I said something to the effect of, "I've just largely been listening to you guys comparing notes on different products and issues you've had. I use Mikrotik routers in my network and people often say they are junk and that Cisco, Juniper, etc. are the way to go. Those vendors are exactly who you guys use and yet here you are with the same type of complaints as we have with our vendors." The one at the international vendor chimed in, "and we pay 10x more for that right." Don't lose sight of that. For example, Cisco is known for having Ethernet chipset incompatibility issues which is exactly what this sub-topic has been about. To think otherwise is simply blind arrogance. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>> *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Sent: *Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:49:12 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download This is sort of an illustration of why I am still very wary of Mikrotik for routers. There's a myriad of Cisco routers available with 12 to 20 SFP-based GbE interfacess (used/refurb) that are just as capable, if somewhat bigger and hotter, that run very stable versions of IOS. It's totally unacceptable for Cisco to break basic functionality for $HUGE_ISP and $HUGE_ENTERPRISE_CUSTOMER , which are usually using the same IOS trains I use for service provider functions. Mikrotik OS software support is pretty much "hey go over to this forum and hope somebody answers your question", if something is broken you are just supposed to wait for a new version release in a month or two. If something is fundamentally broken in a version of IOS used by a mature (6+ year old) Cisco platform it's almost certain that somebody much bigger and more important than yourself has already run into the issue, escalated it with Cisco, and a new build fixing the bug is available. If the space and power are available I would much rather have a 6503E with dual supervisor than a CCR On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: This just gets even better. Worked 24 hours, then breaks again. Up to Level 4 tech support. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway *Sent:* Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:56 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download We are taking it to the Mikrotik forum. This makes no sense since we have 12 of the already running with no issues. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Glen Waldrop *Sent:* Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:54 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download I’m not terribly happy with ROS since 6.29. Maybe it’s just still not 100% yet. *From:*Rory Conaway <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> *Sent:*Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:36 PM *To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download Replaced the Mikrotik routers with an Airrouter, it works. Replaced with an Edgerouter, still works. This goes under the category of WTF. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun.
[AFMUG] Wi-Fi "HaLow" 802.11ah
Not sure if this has been discussed here yet or not: http://www.wi-fi.org/news-events/newsroom/wi-fi-alliance-introduces-low-power-long-range-wi-fi-halow New Wi-Fi standard using 900MHz. Can't imagine anyone serving customers using that band being excited about this one. -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] OT - Captilism (was Martin Shkreli)
I wish I could find the article, but it basically said that the reason there aren't other mfgr's of the drug has to do with the costs of getting it FDA approved. Since the average person who needs the drug only uses a few doses, it's very hard to reach ROI at $13/pill or whatever it was. The fact that he drove the price up 5000% was just him being an asshole and trying to make a bunch of money off of his purchase. At one point, another company did make a non-FDA approved generic they were selling for like $1/pill, but you couldn't get it through normal medical channels or something (it classified as one of those "experimental" drugs even though it was the same formula). Long and the short of it is that regardless of your views on capitalism and supply and demand, this guy is just a douche bag. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 12/18/2015 10:23 AM, Jay Weekley wrote: I have to ask myself why a drug that is 69 years old is manufactured by one entity in the US and other global manufacturers don't have access to our market. More research would probably give me the answer or a bunch of conspiracy theories. Lewis Bergman wrote: I loophole created by the government from the regulatory environment the government setup which now needs to be fixed by Whom? The government. Not saying there should be no regulation of drugs. I don't want to go back to the tapeworm diet pill. But the pharma industry is an excellent example of why everything the government gets involved in will eventually be so broken it needs to be trashed and restarted from scratch. On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:06 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote: The guy isn’t “brash”, any of the adjectives I think of are inappropriate for a public forum. Read this interview, or just skip to the end: http://hiphopdx.com/interviews/id.2825/title.martin-shkreli-plans-to-bail-out-bobby-shmurda Or watch his live stream. As far as capitalism, the approach is to find something that is inexpensive to make and has been around forever and there is only one supplier because there isn’t enough demand for multiple suppliers. So you buy that supplier and jack the price up to ridiculous levels until a competitor can go through getting government approval to compete, which can take a year or more. Meanwhile, you make a bazillion percent profit, because of a temporary market failure. That isn’t really capitalism. It’s exploiting a loophole. Capitalism assumes an efficient market, where competition drives prices down to cost plus a reasonable profit. The pharma market is different for two reasons. First, there is a lengthy government approval process. Second, the payer is usually an insurance company, pharmacy benefit manager, or Medicare. *From:* Lewis Bergman <mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com> *Sent:* Friday, December 18, 2015 8:47 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Captilism (was Martin Shkreli) I can't defend his brashness, but the fact remains that pure capitalism is the best way demonstrated to date to innovate and health care or pharma is not exempt. Big rewards encourage big effort yielding big results. These pharma companies have something like 7 years until the exclusivity period expires. That can be a pretty short time to recover investments. This particular case may be a bit extreme but to say that capitalism is broken in America is simply ludicrous. I recently attended my sons graduation from Texas Tech on a Friday. Thursday night at the hotel was $159 and Friday was $269. I don't think that is price gouging. I think it is a reflection of the simple fact that there are fewer rooms available on that particular night than are demanded at $159. The equilibrium was found at $259 where supply and demand come closer to being equal. At that price I still witnessed people turned away wanting a room due to their poor planning. I don't think that is price gouging. Their hotel was full at $269 a night. The next day was $159 again. Since the hotel was full they probably could have been even higher. I really don't understand what people have such a huge issue with the fundamental theory of supply and demand. Yes I understand that it is a potentially life saving drug. There are other cheaper treatments. Maybe they aren't as good, which is why they are cheaper. When did we stop rewarding people for the value they provide? I know this jerk didn't invent it but he obviously was willing to reward those who did with a price they thought fair. Sales over the next few years will prove if he made a mistake. Why not force Chuck to sell a unique mount he made for 5% over cost? Heck, why not only cover his cost? Why not less than cost
Re: [AFMUG] New Office, Cat5e or 6?
We've been wiring our new facilities with Cat5e. We just can't get enough bandwidth to our outside locations to ever need greater than 1Gbps. When we build our new main office I'll do Cat6, but that's a different set of circumstances too. I just make sure to have more runs than I think I'll ever need. If there are any TV/AV locations, run them there as well. The labor costs are the same regardless if it is 1 drop or 4. I do have to agree with Faisal though - a remodel isn't necessarily something people like to do more than once a decade at the most. If you have a chance to gut and start over, nothing wrong with future-proofing things a bit. I can't think of many situations where people regret going with higher quality solutions (unless of course the costs outweigh the benefits). Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 12/15/2015 9:19 PM, Paul McCall wrote: Fiber ? -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:01 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New Office, Cat5e or 6? Myself, I am in-different.. However, having said that, most folks who are building or doing office renovation are typically doing it for the next 10-15-20 years.. having said that, if the cost difference is 10%-20% I would do the Cat6, would be / could be worth it in the future... but if it is going to break the bank, then nothing wrong with Cat5e, plenty of networks out there running cat5/cat5e (doing gigabit). my 2 cents ! Regards Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net - Original Message - From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:53:22 PM Subject: [AFMUG] New Office, Cat5e or 6? I'm working on the network side of an office remodel at my Church. The cabling job will be contracted out, so I have no horse in the race other than trying to save money. Is there a benefit in running Cat6 over Cat5e? They're on a 100mb network now, and it's running just fine. Very little file sharing, mainly internet surfing and Word Docs. Probably looking at around 30-50 ports, half are VoIP Phones. Everyone is recommending Cat6, but I'm wondering if it's worth it. Isn't cable and terminations for Cat6 about 30% more than Equivalent Cat5e? I can't see the office needing over gig ethernet for the foreseeable future. Does Cat6 bring any other benefits? Nate
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
You can't do a lot of things on this "new" version right now, hence why I'd wait. Looks like they posted early this AM the list of bugs and fixes they *plan* to implement. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 12/9/2015 8:11 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: You can't import on the current version... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Dec 9, 2015 9:11 AM, "Rory McCann" <rmm.li...@gmail.com <mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: Too bad they killed the Windows Server option. Hoping I can export/import on to an x86 MT image when they actually start to add/fix things in the new versions. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net> On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote: A grin came across my face this morning following a Mikrotik announcement. "We are happy to announce that a new version of The Dude has been released, marking the restart of development of our free network monitoring utility.” Cheers, Andreas Wiatowski, CEO Silo Wireless Inc. 519-449-5656 x-600 <tel:519-449-5656%20x-600>
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option. Hoping I can export/import on to an x86 MT image when they actually start to add/fix things in the new versions. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote: A grin came across my face this morning following a Mikrotik announcement. "We are happy to announce that a new version of The Dude has been released, marking the restart of development of our free network monitoring utility.” Cheers, Andreas Wiatowski, CEO Silo Wireless Inc. 519-449-5656 x-600
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
I'm certainly not holding my breath! I can't complain as the old 4.3
beta does everything I need it to. Certainly not perfect, but it gives
me a general "finger on the pulse" of my critical infrastructure and
wasn't hard to set up.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 8:20 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Watch that take another decade :P
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 9, 2015 9:14 AM, "Rory McCann" <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You can't do a lot of things on this "new" version right now,
hence why I'd wait.
Looks like they posted early this AM the list of bugs and fixes
they *plan* to implement.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 8:11 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
You can't import on the current version...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 9, 2015 9:11 AM, "Rory McCann" <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option. Hoping I can
export/import on to an x86 MT image when they actually start
to add/fix things in the new versions.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
A grin came across my face this morning following a Mikrotik
announcement.
"We are happy to announce that a new version of The Dude has
been released, marking the restart of development of our
free network monitoring utility.”
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
519-449-5656 x-600 <tel:519-449-5656%20x-600>
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
The reason I switched to the Windows server install was because RouterOS
and Dude always gave me problems reliably reading SNMP for multiple
devices. I was often left with elements/links that had either useless or
no information on them.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 9:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
They make a vmdk sepcifically for vmware now. You can't downgrade it
to v4.11 FYI =(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists
<lis...@joshaven.com <mailto:lis...@joshaven.com>> wrote:
You can always run The Dude in RouterOS on a virtual server like
VMWare, Virtual Box or such. I am not sure running on RouterOS
only is a bad thing.
Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA
Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com <mailto:yourt...@gmail.com>
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com <mailto:supp...@joshaven.com>
On Dec 9, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com
<mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote:
It seems like it's likely to be only developed for ROS x86
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=8=102772
They announced it on the 4th.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net
<mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:
I’ll buy a CCR just to run it once it is usable. There is an
export/import function.
Did not try if it works between versions.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Rory McCann
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 15:11
*An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option. Hoping I can
export/import on to an x86 MT image when they actually start
to add/fix things in the new versions.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net/>
On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
A grin came across my face this morning following a
Mikrotik announcement.
"We are happy to announce that a new version of The Dude
has been released, marking the restart of development of
our free network monitoring utility.”
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
519-449-5656 x-600 <tel:519-449-5656%20x-600>
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
I'm thinking it was the PPC package on an RB1000.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 10:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Were you using a mipsle or something older?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Rory McCann <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The reason I switched to the Windows server install was because
RouterOS and Dude always gave me problems reliably reading SNMP
for multiple devices. I was often left with elements/links that
had either useless or no information on them.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 9:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
They make a vmdk sepcifically for vmware now. You can't
downgrade it to v4.11 FYI =(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists
<lis...@joshaven.com <mailto:lis...@joshaven.com>> wrote:
You can always run The Dude in RouterOS on a virtual server
like VMWare, Virtual Box or such. I am not sure running on
RouterOS only is a bad thing.
Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA
Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com <mailto:yourt...@gmail.com>
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com <mailto:supp...@joshaven.com>
On Dec 9, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com
<mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote:
It seems like it's likely to be only developed for ROS x86
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=8=102772
They announced it on the 4th.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Englhardt
<s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:
I’ll buy a CCR just to run it once it is usable. There
is an export/import function.
Did not try if it works between versions.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Rory McCann
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 15:11
*An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option. Hoping I
can export/import on to an x86 MT image when they
actually start to add/fix things in the new versions.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net/>
On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
A grin came across my face this morning following a
Mikrotik announcement.
"We are happy to announce that a new version of The
Dude has been released, marking the restart of
development of our free network monitoring utility.”
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
519-449-5656 x-600 <tel:519-449-5656%20x-600>
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
You always could. It just installed as another package similar to SNTP
or CALEA, etc. I can't recall exactly how it presented itself in Winbox,
but you would install it and connect using the regular Windows client.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 10:25 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
You can run the dude from a router? as in it will have an interface
and everything?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Rory McCann <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm thinking it was the PPC package on an RB1000.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 10:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Were you using a mipsle or something older?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Rory McCann <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
The reason I switched to the Windows server install was
because RouterOS and Dude always gave me problems reliably
reading SNMP for multiple devices. I was often left with
elements/links that had either useless or no information on
them.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 9:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
They make a vmdk sepcifically for vmware now. You can't
downgrade it to v4.11 FYI =(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists
<lis...@joshaven.com <mailto:lis...@joshaven.com>> wrote:
You can always run The Dude in RouterOS on a virtual
server like VMWare, Virtual Box or such. I am not sure
running on RouterOS only is a bad thing.
Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA
Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com
<mailto:yourt...@gmail.com>
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com <mailto:supp...@joshaven.com>
On Dec 9, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com <mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com>> wrote:
It seems like it's likely to be only developed for ROS x86
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=8=102772
They announced it on the 4th.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Englhardt
<s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:
I’ll buy a CCR just to run it once it is usable.
There is an export/import function.
Did not try if it works between versions.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von
*Rory McCann
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 15:11
*An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option.
Hoping I can export/import on to an x86 MT image
when they actually start to add/fix things in the
new versions.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net/>
On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
A grin came across my face this morning
following a Mikrotik announcement.
"We are happy to announce that a new version of
The Dude has been released, marking the restart
of development of our free network monitoring
utility.”
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Silo Wireless Inc.
519-449-5656 x-600 <tel:519-449-5656%20x-600>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
You're mistaken. It could be run as an agent for remote networks or as a
standalone server on ROS. They've removed the ability to use Windows
server for the backend (which on the older builds provided much better
performance).
That was part of the draw to Dude - you didn't have to have a windows
installation to throw it on to do its thing - you could install it on an
already on-premise RB.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 11:16 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
Noit was a "dude agent" that you could install on RouterOS. You
would then add it to the Windows server as an agent. When you assign
services to a device you can optionally select an agent. The default
agent is the dude server, but you could select the router with the
dude package installed as an agent. That way you could set up probes
on the LAN side of a NAT router. I've used it several times.
When I first installed that "Dude" package, I assumed I'd be able to
connect the dude client to it, but it didn't work that way.
On 12/9/2015 11:31 AM, Rory McCann wrote:
You always could. It just installed as another package similar to
SNTP or CALEA, etc. I can't recall exactly how it presented itself in
Winbox, but you would install it and connect using the regular
Windows client.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net
On 12/9/2015 10:25 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
You can run the dude from a router? as in it will have an interface
and everything?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Rory McCann <rmm.li...@gmail.com
<mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm thinking it was the PPC package on an RB1000.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 10:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Were you using a mipsle or something older?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Rory McCann
<rmm.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
The reason I switched to the Windows server install was
because RouterOS and Dude always gave me problems reliably
reading SNMP for multiple devices. I was often left with
elements/links that had either useless or no information on
them.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net>
On 12/9/2015 9:47 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
They make a vmdk sepcifically for vmware now. You can't
downgrade it to v4.11 FYI =(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Joshaven Mailing Lists
<lis...@joshaven.com> wrote:
You can always run The Dude in RouterOS on a virtual
server like VMWare, Virtual Box or such. I am not
sure running on RouterOS only is a bad thing.
Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, UACA
Google Hangouts: yourt...@gmail.com
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com
On Dec 9, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Joe Novak
<jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
It seems like it's likely to be only developed for
ROS x86
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=8=102772
They announced it on the 4th.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Stefan Englhardt
<s...@genias.net> wrote:
I’ll buy a CCR just to run it once it is usable.
There is an export/import function.
Did not try if it works between versions.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im
Auftrag von *Rory McCann
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 15:11
*An:* af@afmug.com
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] The DUDE is not dead!
Too bad they killed the Windows Server option.
Hoping I can export/import on to an x86 MT image
when they actually start to add/fix things in the
new versions.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web:www.mkap.net <http://www.mkap.net/>
On 12/9/2015 6:03 AM, Andreas Wiatowski wrote:
A grin came across my face this morning
following a Mikrotik announcement.
"We are happy to announce that a new version
of The Dude has been released, marking the
restart of development of our free network
monitoring utility.”
Cheers,
Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
Re: [AFMUG] The Dude. Is it still being updated?
Is it too early for a white russian? Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 8/28/2015 8:56 AM, Cameron Crum wrote: The Dude abides, man, the Dude abides. On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote: I think there were some hints about possible CAPsMAN integration as well. What baffles me is there is definitely a ton of interest in the project and several people have said they'd have no problem paying. Seems like it would be a no-brainer to at least set aside SOME resources towards bug fixes and minor feature enhancements, if nothing else. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net On 8/27/2015 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Image result for The Dude The Dude Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 tel:915-861-1390 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mathew Howard mhoward...@gmail.com mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote: But isn't that pretty much what they've been saying for the last few years? Maybe it's not dead, but it doesn't seem very alive either... more of a zombie. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: There's a rumor they're working on something now. Nothing official that I'm aware of other than The Dude isn't dead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com mailto:samtaos...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Thursday, August 27, 2015 4:39:10 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] The Dude. Is it still being updated? Is this app still being supported? Or is there something better now? -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 tel:575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com
Re: [AFMUG] The Dude. Is it still being updated?
I think there were some hints about possible CAPsMAN integration as well. What baffles me is there is definitely a ton of interest in the project and several people have said they'd have no problem paying. Seems like it would be a no-brainer to at least set aside SOME resources towards bug fixes and minor feature enhancements, if nothing else. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 8/27/2015 4:57 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: Image result for The Dude The Dude Jaime Solorza Wireless Systems Architect 915-861-1390 On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mathew Howard mhoward...@gmail.com mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote: But isn't that pretty much what they've been saying for the last few years? Maybe it's not dead, but it doesn't seem very alive either... more of a zombie. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: There's a rumor they're working on something now. Nothing official that I'm aware of other than The Dude isn't dead. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com mailto:samtaos...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Thursday, August 27, 2015 4:39:10 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] The Dude. Is it still being updated? Is this app still being supported? Or is there something better now? -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 tel:575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com
Re: [AFMUG] PTP820S
Was able to figure most of it out. Cambium had a few FAQ answers on their forum. Can anyone comment on the Remote IP fields. Is this mutually exclusive from setting the Local IP on the remote end - or is it similar to a discussion a read earlier where the Remote IP is required in order to see the signal levels at the other end? Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 8/24/2015 8:04 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote: It is the same and very confusing.. Need to have a quick set page that will pass all traffic and allow you to set freq, channel size, etc... Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com mailto:er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Jon Langeler jon-ispli...@michwave.net mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net wrote: In Ceragon's interface, you have to connect the service points. it's overly complicated in the web interface. it could be the same for 820 Sent from my iPhone On Aug 24, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Josh Baird joshba...@gmail.com mailto:joshba...@gmail.com wrote: It should pass all VLANs (tagged and untagged) by default, unless something has changed from the 800 to the 820. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any pointers for configuring these units as a simple bit-flingers with 802.1q VLAN? I'm used to the PTP400/500/650 series with a more simple GUI and less options. I have NO experience with licensed RF gear. We have a couple 820S links to deploy on our private network. I'm not a WISP, so I don't care about most of the advanced functionality. I need in-band management on a specific management VLAN and I need the unit to pass all VLAN (tagged and untagged) VLAN frames. I'd RTFM, but I'm a little overwhelmed with the sheer number of buttons and settings. -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net
[AFMUG] PTP820S
Anyone have any pointers for configuring these units as a simple bit-flingers with 802.1q VLAN? I'm used to the PTP400/500/650 series with a more simple GUI and less options. I have NO experience with licensed RF gear. We have a couple 820S links to deploy on our private network. I'm not a WISP, so I don't care about most of the advanced functionality. I need in-band management on a specific management VLAN and I need the unit to pass all VLAN (tagged and untagged) VLAN frames. I'd RTFM, but I'm a little overwhelmed with the sheer number of buttons and settings. -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] Large Single Volume Data Storage Options
+1 One of the companies I work with does a lot of video surveillance. They were using iSCSI Buffalo TeraStations for one of the jobs (50+ cameras for a Casino). Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 7/14/2015 12:41 PM, cstann...@gmail.com wrote: A 2-3TB HD should be all you need for over 30 days of storage with motion-based recording... Put the triggers to be sensitive, there is no reason to be recording when absolutely nothing changes on screen. --Original Message-- From: Nate Burke Sender: Af To: Animal Farm ReplyTo: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Large Single Volume Data Storage Options Sent: Jul 14, 2015 12:27 PM I'm getting ready to install a 20+ camera system for a customer that want's 9-5 Full Time Recording with 30 days storage. So he can go back and check work comp cases to see if employees were really hurt on the job. My Calcs come in at needing around 4-5tb of storage to accomplish this, so I'd like the server to have 6-8tb of storage for some overhead. Rather than building out a server with a bunch of drive bays, RAID Card and mirroring/striping drives etc, I was wondering if anyone has used an External JBOD enclosure for this? I'm thinking like a DROBO unit or similar. Any Caveats to watch out for? Is there too much disk IO to have this work well over a LAN, USB 3.0, or Thunderbolt connection? What other (Affordable) options am I missing to get a bunch of storage in a single volume for the NVR? Nate
Re: [AFMUG] Cisco buying Opendns
The only way that would be a more perfect analogy is if your hand was taped to the stuffed animal. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 10:24 AM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote: https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/when-your-favorite-startup-is-acquired-by-cisco/ On Jun 30, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote: I fully expect them to ruin it by raising the rates to a more cisco. I'm very disappointed in this news. Their Umbrella platform is a great product and was reasonably priced. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 9:50 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: Damn it... Wonder how Cisco will choose to ruin it. On Jun 30, 2015 9:36 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-acquire-opendns-12131.html Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Re: [AFMUG] Cisco buying Opendns
From a business perspective, absolutely. On the business and investor side, this was a huge win for them. From a user perspective, we always cheer for the underdog and hate it when big business takes over. Kind of like the whole Comcast TWC merger drama. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 10:37 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 6/30/15 8:03, Rory McCann wrote: I fully expect them to ruin it by raising the rates to a more cisco. I'm very disappointed in this news. Their Umbrella platform is a great product and was reasonably priced. But isn't this the whole point of a lot of these things, become popular so a large company will buy it? ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] Cisco buying Opendns
I fully expect them to ruin it by raising the rates to a more cisco. I'm very disappointed in this news. Their Umbrella platform is a great product and was reasonably priced. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 9:50 AM, Darin Steffl wrote: Damn it... Wonder how Cisco will choose to ruin it. On Jun 30, 2015 9:36 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-acquire-opendns-12131.html Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
Re: [AFMUG] Cisco buying Opendns
The consumer. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 10:42 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Who was the underdog in Comcast/TWC? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote: From a business perspective, absolutely. On the business and investor side, this was a huge win for them. From a user perspective, we always cheer for the underdog and hate it when big business takes over. Kind of like the whole Comcast TWC merger drama. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net On 6/30/2015 10:37 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 6/30/15 8:03, Rory McCann wrote: I fully expect them to ruin it by raising the rates to a more cisco. I'm very disappointed in this news. Their Umbrella platform is a great product and was reasonably priced. But isn't this the whole point of a lot of these things, become popular so a large company will buy it? ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] Canopy POE end of life :-/
Could you do something with white and black colored ethernet cabling and
label the corresponding ports white and black? IE: black goes outside,
white goes to the router/pc?
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 6/25/2015 3:17 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Absotutely. I actually had a subscriber argue with me about the
correct connection required for a Tycon POE (which I consider fairly
straightforward and easy to understand). Yet he insisted that it be
connected the opposite way.
Where upon, I had to reverse the connection, show him that it worked.
Only then was he satisfied that it was correct, but poorly labeled.
At that point, I covered up the Tycon labeling, and pasted on labeling
that satisfied him. Now everybody is happy.
Never underestimate the ability of a non-technical person to
misunderstand labels and/or instructions.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/25/2015 1:10 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Are you serious? There was a bright red sticker on Pac/Tycon POEs
and people still screwed it up.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Paul McCall pa...@pdmnet.net
mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:
Sean, what is the major complaint? Is it that the installer or
customer gets confused which port goes where? You could put
stickers on things to avoid that.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:57 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Cc:* memb...@wispa.org mailto:memb...@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Canopy POE end of life :-/
Ray can you please come and hang out with one of my clients for a
day and hand them each POE and see which one they can hook up and
which one they can't??
Just because you have made this decision doesn't mean it's a good
decision and we are asking cambium to reconsider. The new POE
sucks! Period!
2cents
On Thursday, June 25, 2015, Ray Savich
ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.com
mailto:ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
Check out the details at
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Canopy-POE-end-of-life/m-p/41732
Ray
Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/
*From:*members-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
*Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:38 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Cc:* memb...@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA Members] Canopy POE end of life :-/
Thanks for the link josh. They normally cost ~$10 so the eBay
price of $24 is someone trying to make a buck on them before they
are gone. Also eventually eBay will run out too so that's not a
long term solution.
Come on cambium listen to your long time loyal customers!
-Sean
On Thursday, June 25, 2015, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.Xcanopy+power+supply.TRS0_nkw=canopy+power+supply_sacat=0
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us
mailto:af...@zirkel.us wrote:
Dear Cambium,
Why won't you let us buy the ACPSSW-13B POE if we still want to?
It's very frustrating that we now have to change our install
procedures AND our tech support procedures. The new POE is also
very cumbersome and prone to clients plugging things in backwards
etc.
Can you either keep selling them or give us access to the
manufacturer so that we can still buy them?
-Sean
___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.org mailto:memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
I figure it's either gonna be Google, the NSA, or both. Privacy is dead.
Rory McCann
MKAP Technology Solutions
Web: www.mkap.net
On 6/15/2015 2:53 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
but... they'll know everything!!!
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Chuck McCown ch...@wbmfg.com
mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
We are all gonna die, the sun will burn out... does it really matter?
*From:* Travis Johnson mailto:t...@ida.net
*Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 1:45 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
I'm honestly surprised you guys are OK with Google reading all
your email...
Travis
On 6/15/2015 1:21 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Mine isn't so bad:
8.88 GB(7%) of115 GBused
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
On 06/15/2015 09:57 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
My Gmail is getting full =(
21.16 GB (70%) of 30 GB used
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Dennis Burgess
dmburg...@linktechs.net mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
I think my exchange mailbox is around 25 gig “Jhahehhee.
Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.
den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net –
314-735-0270 tel:314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net
http://www.linktechs.net
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 12:07 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
That is the sum total through all of my email accounts. Some
are IMAP; some are POP. One of the bigger ones is on a yahoo
account that was started back in ~~ 1994 (or about there).
It has been POP from the get-go, and I've never changed it.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/15/2015 9:25 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
me too...but is it on a pop3 server somewhere?
- Original Message -
*From:*Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent:*Monday, June 15, 2015 11:12 AM
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
I have something like 30GB of email
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 6/14/2015 3:36 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
yes, i agree. and if you DID leave messages
your box wasn't any larger than 2 gig. well
he's at 1.8 gig, i guess he was close
- Original Message -
*From:*Chuck McCown mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com
*To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Sent:*Sunday, June 14, 2015 4:05 PM
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
IMHO, POP3 should never leave messages. You
can’t leave a copy of your mail at the post
office. If you want to leave messages, that
is what IMAP is good for.
*From:*Ken Hohhof mailto:af...@kwisp.com
*Sent:*Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:59 PM
*To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
If Outlook is set up for POP3, make sure the
guy periodically stops the Send/Rcv process
so it can delete messages off the server
(assuming you did not set it up to leave
copies on the server forever). That way it
won’t start over with 1 of 54484 if it gets
stuck again.
And if it still can’t get past one
problematic message, see if Bell South has
webmail and he can go in and delete the
problem message from there.
*From:*Lewis Bergman
mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com
*Sent:*Sunday, June 14, 2015 3:31 PM
*To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] today's consulting fun
So weather is your point? Sounds like maybe
you have never had the pain of running your
own mail server. We used to get this note
and again. Someone needs to manually look
Re: [AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
You can specify channel size and 1+0, 2+0 etc in the link description. Also LinkPlanner lists the minimum uptime threshold and if you fail to meet it the link becomes red. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 6/4/2015 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: Doesn't the 820 bond channels and such? I guess two 80s for that kind of throughput? 27 miles is going to be 6 footers in 6 GHz. You need a certain threshold of uptime for licenses. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 4, 2015 9:00 AM, Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, Running into a strange problem with LinkPlanner. I have a couple of exisitng 5GHz links I'm looking at replacing with a licensed solution - one of which is about 27 miles. According to LinkPlanner this shot should be no problem (granted not with more than 3 9s of uptime, which is fine considering I have redundancy via another path) using 3 foot dishes, but the SAF engineers are telling me my only option is 6GHz with 6 foot dishes using the same parameters. The best the engineers at SAF could promise was about 150Mbps on Integra, whereas according to LinkPlanner I can get over 800Mbps using an 820s. Is LinkPlanner this far off, or are there some special knobs I need to turn to get real-world results? Or is Cambium somehow that much superior to the other products out there? -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net
[AFMUG] Cambium LinkPlanner and Licensed Frequencies
Hey guys, Running into a strange problem with LinkPlanner. I have a couple of exisitng 5GHz links I'm looking at replacing with a licensed solution - one of which is about 27 miles. According to LinkPlanner this shot should be no problem (granted not with more than 3 9s of uptime, which is fine considering I have redundancy via another path) using 3 foot dishes, but the SAF engineers are telling me my only option is 6GHz with 6 foot dishes using the same parameters. The best the engineers at SAF could promise was about 150Mbps on Integra, whereas according to LinkPlanner I can get over 800Mbps using an 820s. Is LinkPlanner this far off, or are there some special knobs I need to turn to get real-world results? Or is Cambium somehow that much superior to the other products out there? -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg
M-TOW - various flavors to choose from. We own several facilities like this (as we are an Ag business). I've used several combinations - most recently the M-TOW-V. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 5/13/2015 11:58 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: The grain leg is like this: http://www.agbuilders.com/MONTICELLO2_10.JPG Tim *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Justin Wilson - MTIN *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:51 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg If it’s angle iron I like using beam clamps and conduit hangers. Of course, this depends on the stuff you are mounting. Will dig up some photos and send offsets. Have another e-mail to send you as well. Justin Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net mailto:j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange On May 13, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com wrote: I am just wondering whats the best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg? Use clamps or drill into the railing or what? Tim
Re: [AFMUG] best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg
You just need to get yourself a thick piece of steel pipe or conduit. You can mount it to the railing with the M-TOWs. The last one we did was with a couple of M-TOW-V clamps and a 4 OD pipe. We used some sturdy u-bolts to attach the M-TOW to the rail and then the pipe mounted inside the M-TOW. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 5/13/2015 1:09 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: Rory Thing is m-tow don’t have an 10ft pole. Tim *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory McCann *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2015 2:03 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg M-TOW - various flavors to choose from. We own several facilities like this (as we are an Ag business). I've used several combinations - most recently the M-TOW-V. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net On 5/13/2015 11:58 AM, Tim Reichhart wrote: The grain leg is like this: http://www.agbuilders.com/MONTICELLO2_10.JPG Tim *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Justin Wilson - MTIN *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:51 PM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg If it’s angle iron I like using beam clamps and conduit hangers. Of course, this depends on the stuff you are mounting. Will dig up some photos and send offsets. Have another e-mail to send you as well. Justin Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net mailto:j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange On May 13, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com wrote: I am just wondering whats the best way to mount wireless gear onto grain leg? Use clamps or drill into the railing or what? Tim
[AFMUG] Managed Industrial PoE Switch with SFP
I'm looking for a hardened, managed, PoE switch with 1Gig SFP. It's going to be installed in an unprotected, unconditioned cabinet, so temps will be inconsistent (90F+ summer, -10F or colder winter). Was looking at the MOXA EDS-P510A-8PoE Series, however at the $1700+ price point I was hoping to find something a little cheaper. I have limited space, so rack mount is out of the question. Will be running a couple of IP cameras and a Serial-to-IP converter for a ticket printer. Do you guys have any recommendations? -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] Managed Industrial PoE Switch with SFP
These look promising too. Thanks! Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 5/11/2015 10:44 AM, Christopher Tyler wrote: We use Antaira and have not had any abnormal issues.
Re: [AFMUG] Managed Industrial PoE Switch with SFP
Didn't even think of Planet! Do these support a management VLAN or is everything done on VLAN1? I have a HP1905 (3com officeconnect) that I would've thrown in this cabinet, but I can't change the management VID. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 5/11/2015 10:39 AM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) wrote: Maybe something like: http://planetechusa.com/igs-10020hpt-industrial-8-port-10-100-1000t-802-3at-poe-2-port-100-1000x-sfp-managed-switch-with-wide-operating-temperature.html or if you don't need 802.3at http://planetechusa.com/igs-10020pt-industrial-8-port-10-100-1000t-802-3af-poe-2-port-100-1000x-sfp-managed-switch.html On 5/11/2015 10:25 AM, Rory McCann wrote: I'm looking for a hardened, managed, PoE switch with 1Gig SFP. It's going to be installed in an unprotected, unconditioned cabinet, so temps will be inconsistent (90F+ summer, -10F or colder winter). Was looking at the MOXA EDS-P510A-8PoE Series, however at the $1700+ price point I was hoping to find something a little cheaper. I have limited space, so rack mount is out of the question. Will be running a couple of IP cameras and a Serial-to-IP converter for a ticket printer. Do you guys have any recommendations?
Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik CAPsMAN
I contacted David offlist and worked with it a bit with him. Seems like I've found a bug with 6.28, as the problem I'm having is not present in 6.27. Reporting it to MT support. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 4/23/2015 1:23 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: Yep, shoot our office a call if you need assistance. -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory McCann Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:38 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik CAPsMAN Anyone out there have some solid experience with setting up CAPsMAN with multiple SSIDs, VLANs and VAPs? I'm banging my head against the wall with an issue and not getting anywhere. I want to enable local forwarding on all of my CAPs so that traffic doesn't have to be sent back to CAPsMAN for routing. The only way that I've been able to get the VLAN tagging to work properly in the datapaths is by having the CAP add the necessary interfaces (wireless and wired) to a single bridge, then add the VLAN tags to that bridge. The problem is as soon as I do that and enable a wireless interface, the ethernet port starts flapping (literally goes up and down in the log). -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
[AFMUG] Mikrotik CAPsMAN
Anyone out there have some solid experience with setting up CAPsMAN with multiple SSIDs, VLANs and VAPs? I'm banging my head against the wall with an issue and not getting anywhere. I want to enable local forwarding on all of my CAPs so that traffic doesn't have to be sent back to CAPsMAN for routing. The only way that I've been able to get the VLAN tagging to work properly in the datapaths is by having the CAP add the necessary interfaces (wireless and wired) to a single bridge, then add the VLAN tags to that bridge. The problem is as soon as I do that and enable a wireless interface, the ethernet port starts flapping (literally goes up and down in the log). -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
[AFMUG] Cambium SPAM
Is anyone else stuck on the hell that is Cambium's email marketing list? I've contacted Cambium (and Ray) several times regarding properly removing my email from their damn marketing list and it never happens. The unsubscribe link is apparently just there to infuriate me, as it clearly does nothing but tell lies. I know it's just a simple email and I shouldn't get so worked up over it, but c'mon guys. Get your shit together! -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna
If the landlord owns the property, they should ultimately have the final say. If the tenant did indeed lie/withhold the information in this case, bye-bye deposit. I get the OTARD argument, but I can guarantee if I was renting a townhouse and a tenant didn't ask for permission to mount something to the roof and drill holes, not only would the antenna be coming down but they'd either be fixing it or out on their asses sans deposit. It would definitely be part of the lease agreement. Personally, I'm of the group that believes you catch more flies with honey than vinegar so I would work with the landlord to make it right. If you handle things properly, you may actually end up gaining business - especially if he/she has other properties and is satisfied with how you resolved the issue. I'm betting they are just pissed right now about it and will cool off to a more reasonable level in the next few days. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 3/17/2015 5:56 AM, John Woodfield wrote: I guess that still depends on the situation. If the landlord is getting kickbacks from the cable company for having service in an MDU I call BS. If the landlord allows a satellite for TV but not an antenna for Internet I call BS. It all depends on the situation. John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc. 410-870-WiFi -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:10pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna Maybe all governments speak from both sides of their mouth. In this case I think there's a good reason for it, they say Landlords, you cannot prohibit tenants from having an antenna. They're not saying, Landlords, you must let John and Adam drill holes in your house, because they straight up can't make a mandate like that. If you *can* force the landlord to accept your antenna being on their building against their will, would you really want to? You gain $30-50/month, but also make a permanent enemy. IMO, better to just defuse the anger as best you can and fix the damage. So like everything else they are talking out both sides of their mouth. The problem becomes, how much aggravation does the landlord want to go through as the burden of proof undisputedly lies with them. John Woodfield, President Delmarva WiFi Inc. 410-870-WiFi -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:45pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna I've been going by the FCC QA posted here: http://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule#QA Highlighting added by me *Q: If I live in a condominium or an apartment building, does this rule apply to me? * *A: *The rule applies to antenna users who live in a multiple dwelling unit building, such as a condominium or apartment building, if the antenna user has an exclusive use area in which to install the antenna. Exclusive use means an area of the property that only you, and persons you permit, may enter and use to the exclusion of other residents. For example, your condominium or apartment may include a balcony, terrace, deck or patio that only you can use, and the rule applies to these areas. /The rule does not apply to common areas, such as the roof/, the hallways, the walkways or the exterior walls of a condominium or apartment building. Restrictions on antennas installed in these common areas are not covered by the Commission's rule. /For example, the rule would //*not*//apply to restrictions that prevent drilling through the exterior wall //of a condominium or rental unit and thus restrictions may prohibit installation that requires such drilling./ Don't think so. The rules are clear that permitted restrictions have to be reasonable and if there is a conflict the burden of proof is on the landlord. Further, restrictions cannot violate the impairment clause in section 2.2 i.e. may not unreasonable delay or increase costs, or preclude reception or transmission of an acceptable quality signal. This article, written by an attorney, addresses most of the misconceptions that have been voiced here http://www.wba-law.com/Unique_Practice_Areas/Homeowners_Associations/ John -Original Message- From: Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:24pm To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna OTARD says the landlord can't tell you not to put an antenna on the house. The landlord absolutely *can* tell you not to put holes in his property. The FCC website on the topic spells this out pretty clearly
Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK
MT introduced an auto-MTU option for EoIP tunnels a few versions back - perhaps that's the culprit? Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 3/6/2015 8:03 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: Problem found but not understood. EoIP tunnel was traversing (but not terminating on) a CCR that had been upgraded to 6.27. Downgrading FW fixed problem. Problem seems to be related to full 1500 byte packets inside the tunnel. No parameters like L2 MTU seem to have changed between FW versions. Strange. *From:* Josh Reynolds mailto:j...@spitwspots.com *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:29 PM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK And if there are things like NAT or routing over RFC1918 space, then it breaks PMTUD ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_MTU_Discovery ) -- Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 03/05/2015 04:14 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: My max DNS UDP packet size is 512. I assume that's the default. MTUs over 1500 wouldn't affect any traffic flowing through as the device on the other end wasn't able to pass a packet more than 1500 to begin with. I'd imagine what was happening is that your MT was generating DNS requests that were larger than could pass through the Intarwebz. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *Glen Waldrop mailto:gwl...@cngwireless.net *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Thursday, March 5, 2015 7:06:55 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK I bumped the L2 MTU to 2028, max of that particular unit and set the other side to match, then DNS stopped working. Traffic worked, I could ping by IP but not by name. Of course my DNS server was on the other side of that cable, so a handful of folks were having issues. I dropped the L2 MTU back to default on MT of 1600, improved, but not 100%. I had the DNS max packet size set to 4048 or so, dropped it back down to 1536, started improving. UDP speed tests were all over the map, then would randomly quit. TCP was decently reliable, though not as fast as they should be. - Original Message - *From:* Mike Hammett mailto:af...@ics-il.net *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2015 6:42 PM *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK Packet capture? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL *From: *CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Thursday, March 5, 2015 5:57:03 PM *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK wowhow did you figure that out? - Original Message - *From:* Glen Waldrop mailto:gwl...@cngwireless.net *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent:* Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:18 PM *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK I've got one similar to that. DNS doesn't work. TCP works okay, but DNS just absolutely fails. Turns out the Ethernet port is dying on me. I've got extra hardware in the air, so quick fix is a wireless shot from the AP to the ground to the switch that feeds the PTP shots. It'll work until I can fix it properly. What is happening in my case is the Ethernet is dropping packets, frames, something. TCP retransmits, UDP just disappears. Not sure if that will explain your broken download issue, but it is one of those odd problems. Could be the server side is just dropping the connection after 100+ retransmits. - Original Message - From: Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com mailto:af...@kwisp.com To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:10 PM Subject: [AFMUG] downloads stalling but streaming, speedtests, etc. OK I can't figure this out, but it seems like the sort of thing someone else here will say oh, I know what causes that. I've been tracking a smattering of customer complaints about downloads just stopping, and finally was able
Re: [AFMUG] Belkin F6D4230-4 bridging all wireless MACs
That's what I do with all of my battery backups. Unlimited, grid-free power! Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 2/16/2015 4:13 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: It only makes sense to plug something into itself... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:05 PM, David dmilho...@wletc.com mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com wrote: My fave is the I pressed the reset several times an plugged in a blue cable I found Router is placed into a loop because the blue cable is plugged into 2 separate ports. Make me want to use an .50 cal eagle and blow a hole in it and state that should do it :) On 02/16/2015 03:42 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: By witchcraft you mean possibly broken? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:39 PM, That One Guy thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any good reason this customer router would be bridging the internal device MACs? Theyre showing up on the bridging table in the canopy radio, but as best I can tell theyre getting their DHCP address from the router and not actually causing a problem. Is this some sort of witchcraft on Belkins part? -- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
Re: [AFMUG] 5.1 Band FCC
Maybe just on the connectorized models? I was able to generate the keys using Cambium's tool with no issues. Their system can tell if the MAC address is Lite, Mid or Full, so I see no reason why it couldn't figure out if it's integrated or connectorized. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 2/11/2015 6:50 AM, David Milholen wrote: I was told you would need Parabolic dishes to accommodate the new band for the 650 On 2/9/2015 3:05 PM, Rory McCann wrote: In this case I have a PTP650 with integrated antennas on SW 1-11 operating in 5.4GHz. Assuming the band itself is clean, I *think* I should be able to install at least SW load 1-21 to make 5.1GHz available. Since the power requirements are similar (sans DFS), I should expect similar performance (perhaps better). Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net On 2/9/2015 2:59 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: The theoretical max is 53dBm EIRP, but nothing is actually certified for that high of power because of OOBE, so how high of power you can actually use is very dependent on the specific radio you're using. It is available on PTP650... I think it requires a free key to unlock. On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: Closer to 5.8 than 5.1, but there were a bunch of other changes relating to OOBE. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com *From: *Rory McCann rmm.li...@gmail.com mailto:rmm.li...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, February 9, 2015 2:48:57 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] 5.1 Band FCC I must've been under a rock when this was discussed because I knew absolutely nothing about it. So 5.1GHz is legal for outdoor use in the US? If so, what are the power requirements (ie: is it more aligned with 5.4GHz or 5.7GHz?) Also, is it available for use on deployed PTP650 products? Thanks! -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net --
[AFMUG] 5.1 Band FCC
I must've been under a rock when this was discussed because I knew absolutely nothing about it. So 5.1GHz is legal for outdoor use in the US? If so, what are the power requirements (ie: is it more aligned with 5.4GHz or 5.7GHz?) Also, is it available for use on deployed PTP650 products? Thanks! -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450....
That's exactly it. This isn't a product aimed towards the guys that advertise streaming, nor is it aimed towards a user base that wants to do solely that. It's a product designed for the customer with no other good options. With the data caps on cellular 4G and the all around piss-poor performance of satellite, some customers only have 900MHz Canopy as another viable option aside from dialup. In our area it's going to be big for the company that purchased our WISP - especially since the group they are a part of who owns their 700MHz spectrum is flirting with selling it to ATT. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 2/4/2015 12:10 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: In fairness, some WISPs have consistently said they are deep in trees and 900 MHz spectrum is clean for them and also their customer base doesn’t need to stream 4K, they just want more throughput than 900 FSK will give them. Via wider channels, higher modulation, or magic. I know many of us can’t make the same statements about noise floor or customer expectations, but some people consistently say they want such a product. And who knows, maybe there’s some magic, too? Like maybe more robustness to multipath, which seems to bother 900 FSK quite a bit. *From:* Andy Trimmell mailto:atrimm...@precisionds.com *Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 11:47 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450 40Mbps by late 2016 should be just in time so we can hook up 1 customer to it because 4K TV will be streaming 50Mbps on Netflix *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown *Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 12:13 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450 Perhaps as much as 40 Mbps Dontcha wish you were at Animal Farm *From:*Chuck McCown mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:*Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:11 AM *To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz 450 3x throughput increase *From:*Chuck McCown mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com *Sent:*Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:11 AM *To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:*[AFMUG] 900 MHz 450 40 MHz channels
Re: [AFMUG] Site to site vpn
You could also do IPSec - that way it's actually encrypted. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 1/15/2015 1:19 PM, joseph marsh wrote: I'm learned a lot by tring it on my own YouTube helps too On Jan 15, 2015 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: It really is stupid simple with MT. You check enabled by the PPTP server. Then create a user. Then you add a client on the other device with the user info. Tunnel made. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote: Do what the rest of us do. Sit down with two mikrotiks and work through it. No better way to support the things you sell than to build it yourself. Paying someone to do it for you sets up a situation where you will always be paying them. As a startup, time is cheaper than money. Start here: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=13t=54691view=next Jerry Richardson airCloud Communications On Jan 15, 2015, at 10:39 AM, joseph marsh bwireless...@gmail.com mailto:bwireless...@gmail.com wrote: Sweet I have mikrotiks, I just need the expert now!! On Jan 15, 2015 12:37 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Sure you can. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jan 15, 2015 1:29 PM, joseph marsh bwireless...@gmail.com mailto:bwireless...@gmail.com wrote: Can I do multiple sites? Or just point A to point B On Jan 15, 2015 12:09 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller par...@cyberbroadband.net mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote: Link technologies or butch evans can set this up for you Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: joseph marsh bwireless...@gmail.com mailto:bwireless...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Site to site vpn Date: Thu, Jan 15, 2015 11:42 AM What us the best way to do a site to site vpn. I have a site 30 miles and 17 miles from my office and would like to make radio changes from my office if possible
Re: [AFMUG] BCP38
Can you not accomplish the same thing with the RP_Filter option in IP/Settings? I'm just asking - I don't know. http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Settings Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 1/12/2015 11:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote: Basically ,any IPs that SHOULD be sourced from your network. But yes, the idea behind BCP38 is to block src address packets originating from your network that SHOULD NOT. So yes, you should already have those rules to not all traffic from your network if it’s coming from a IP that should not come from your network, and yes that would include any customer originated traffic. An example, customer has 4 /19s and two /22s, plus has about 30 BGP peers for customer traffic. The 5 prefixes would be allowed out, plus any prefixes learned by the bgp peers. If there were two upstream on the same router, both would have a line, if the SRC address is ! (not) customer prefixes, including the 5 prefixes they use, then it would be dropped on egress of the upstream ports. An example of this is add action=drop chain=forward out-interface=ether17-internet src-address-list=!Inside-IPs The inside_ips list include the local prefixes and the customer prefixes. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 10:55 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Yeah, I’m missing what the big deal is here. If you’re talking about your border router to your upstream, why would you allow outbound traffic with source IPs outside your IP blocks? Allow your IPs, block the rest. If you’re talking about other routers within your network and are wanting to stop the traffic at the source, it could get more complicated since I assume we all use some private IP space within our networks for various purposes mostly management addresses on network equipment. Dennis mentions customer IPs, if you route customer blocks those would also be allowed, based on an LOA. *From:*Dennis Burgess mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net *Sent:*Monday, January 12, 2015 10:43 AM *To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Very simple. In MT we do an address list of all valid subnets behind the core routers, this would include any prefixes that you own or use, plus any BGP prefixes learned from your customers. Then a simple, out interface (internet) drop if its not SRCed from that list. Not exactly IP tables, but there ya go.. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 10:25 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Hey Mike, Would you be willing to post an iptables statement that would drop this traffic? Thanks, Sean On Monday, January 12, 2015, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: http://www.bcp38.info/index.php/Main_Page Make sure you implement this in your networks. Drop all outbound traffic to your upstream that is not from valid public IP space. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Re: [AFMUG] BCP38
So for someone like me who doesn't operate a transit network (ie: no BGP), I should be able to safely enable this? I'm basically small blocks of IPv4, some internal RIP for static routes and NAT. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 1/12/2015 12:54 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: The answer is yes, but if you are doing BGP, its very possible for you to have outbound traffic but no inbound traffic. I.e. there are gotchas. Normally I would not enable that and simply add a firewall rule. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory McCann *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 12:48 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Can you not accomplish the same thing with the RP_Filter option in IP/Settings? I'm just asking - I don't know. http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Settings Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web:www.mkap.net http://www.mkap.net On 1/12/2015 11:46 AM, Dennis Burgess wrote: Basically ,any IPs that SHOULD be sourced from your network. But yes, the idea behind BCP38 is to block src address packets originating from your network that SHOULD NOT. So yes, you should already have those rules to not all traffic from your network if it’s coming from a IP that should not come from your network, and yes that would include any customer originated traffic. An example, customer has 4 /19s and two /22s, plus has about 30 BGP peers for customer traffic. The 5 prefixes would be allowed out, plus any prefixes learned by the bgp peers. If there were two upstream on the same router, both would have a line, if the SRC address is ! (not) customer prefixes, including the 5 prefixes they use, then it would be dropped on egress of the upstream ports. An example of this is add action=drop chain=forward out-interface=ether17-internet src-address-list=!Inside-IPs The inside_ips list include the local prefixes and the customer prefixes. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 10:55 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Yeah, I’m missing what the big deal is here. If you’re talking about your border router to your upstream, why would you allow outbound traffic with source IPs outside your IP blocks? Allow your IPs, block the rest. If you’re talking about other routers within your network and are wanting to stop the traffic at the source, it could get more complicated since I assume we all use some private IP space within our networks for various purposes mostly management addresses on network equipment. Dennis mentions customer IPs, if you route customer blocks those would also be allowed, based on an LOA. *From:*Dennis Burgess mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net *Sent:*Monday, January 12, 2015 10:43 AM *To:*af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Very simple. In MT we do an address list of all valid subnets behind the core routers, this would include any prefixes that you own or use, plus any BGP prefixes learned from your customers. Then a simple, out interface (internet) drop if its not SRCed from that list. Not exactly IP tables, but there ya go.. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 10:25 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] BCP38 Hey Mike, Would you be willing to post an iptables statement that would drop this traffic? Thanks, Sean On Monday, January 12, 2015, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: http://www.bcp38.info/index.php/Main_Page Make sure you implement this in your networks. Drop all outbound traffic to your upstream that is not from valid public IP space. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
Re: [AFMUG] Mailing List Behavior
Threading was completely borked for me with Thunderbird. I made a couple of changes in the config and that helped. The new list definitely doesn't use the threading behavior Thunderbird expects/wants. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 11/2/2014 2:25 PM, David Milholen via Af wrote: Mail list gripe.. The other thing I dont like is the threading of the subject lines. Seems a thread is started but when replies come in they are placed on a separate thread and sometimes forked. Very messy and some mails lost in translation. my 2cents On 10/31/2014 10:15 AM, tcidan via Af wrote: Since the change to the new mailing list host, the From: header on messages shows af@afmug.com rather than the actual sender. I find this change to not be beneficial. --danp --
Re: [AFMUG] Structured Cabling - Looking for Ideas
It's insulated and generally dry year round. No musty smells, standing water, mold etc to speak of. My furnace is down there so it'll stay warmer during the winter months too. Also has plastic over the dirt. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 11/3/2014 9:53 AM, Chuck McCown via Af wrote: If this is an unheated crawl space with dirt floor, I would not use a patch panel. It would probably be OK, but if you do do it, I would put grease on the plugs. -Original Message- From: Rory McCann via Af Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:45 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Structured Cabling - Looking for Ideas Hi guys, I'm planning on rewiring my house this winter and was looking for ideas on structured wiring as well as products to use. I'm looking at simply RG6 coaxial and ethernet (for phone and data). The wiring will be run in a rather deep crawl space and would like something that can either mount to the floor joists or something where I could build out a mounting platform with 2x4s and install it that way. I'd like the wiring to be vertical so I can kneel and access things and not have to crank my head and look up. My original thought was to get a wall-mount vertical rack and mount it horizontal - this would effectively give me a 19 6u rack to work with that would hang from the floor joists. I was then going to just get a couple of keystone patch panels and populate them with the various connectors by room. Doesn't need to be fancy. It would still leave me some room for a battery backup, rackmount switch and router/modem. After looking around a bit I also see that Leviton offers some structured solutions. These would have to be mounted between some 2x4s or something so that I could have normal access to it. Wondering if any of you have any experience with these or similar products and if they would be a better solution than my rack idea? Unfortunately, I do not have any room or areas upstairs for the wiring, so the crawlspace is where it's going to go. I'm not looking to spend a small fortune on this project - just want something to centralize, label and clean up my existing house wiring as well as give me some flexibility in the future.
Re: [AFMUG] Odd switch question - CX4 to SFP+ direct attach copper cable?
Not having any direct experience, but a quick Google search yielded: http://www.datastoragecables.com/cx4/CX4-SFP+/ Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 10/25/2014 9:30 PM, Sterling Jacobson via Af wrote: Is there a direct attach copper 10Gbps cable that has a CX4 format on one end and SFP+ format on the other end? I want to connect my Dell array with CX4 Ethernet uplink module compatibility to my SFP+ switch port without using optics/conversion. Can't seem to find such a beast, but maybe I'm looking in all the wrong places.
Re: [AFMUG] Remote Desktop
Use ScreenConnect here - absolutely love it. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 10/27/2014 12:54 PM, Dennis Burgess via Af wrote: signature We resell Screenconnect if you need it. .Works great.. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net mailto:den...@linktechs.net -- 314-735-0270 -- www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Randy Cosby via Af *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 12:12 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* [AFMUG] Remote Desktop What remote desktop / support application do you use? We're looking at Teamviewer and ScreenConnect. Teamviewer works well but can get expensive for multiple users, version upgrades, etc. ScreenConnect is self-hosted and more customizable. Any other alternatives we should be looking at? -- http://www.infowest.com/ Randy Cosby InfoWest, Inc 435-674-0165 x 2010 infowest.com http://www.infowest.com/ This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. Unauthorized use, distribution, review or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contactrco...@infowest.com mailto:rco...@infowest.com by reply email and destroy the original message, all attachments and copies.
[AFMUG] List Threading
Is there anything that can be done to fix the message threading (or lack thereof) with this new list? Prior to the move to Amazon, things *mostly* threaded nicely based on subject, however now I'm seeing multiple separate threads related to the same discussion. I'm using Thunderchicken and Gmail. -- Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net
Re: [AFMUG] ptp650 interface - nice - and an ATPC question
Bill them for the trip. It wasn't your problem or your fault and your time isn't free. Rory McCann MKAP Technology Solutions Web: www.mkap.net On 9/25/2014 1:47 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote: big shocker, with our radios off, not a single bit of change hes recommending bigger antennas or a licensed link (better to make money than go fix a poor installation, right?) I did find out something cool I wish I had known yesterday, APC smart UPS with a management card has a sleep feature you can set a time in tenths of an hour to put the output power to sleep. I could have just shut the radios off remotely for 15 minutes while running the spectrum on their radio. Im still pissed for getting thrown under the bus. And I know every time the landlord has a wireless issue theyre now going to immediately be on the phone with us thinking we are interfering with them, hell probably even if they go with a licensed link. On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:36 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: So what happened? On 9/24/2014 1:45 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote: nope, just swapped radios, the leads are handmade crimp on N connectors that are like 4-5 years old, the lightning welded our switch to out battery backup. I dont have a problem with ten minute shutdown, but it will end up being an hour or more. I have 477 to do tomorrow so it will be the boss going. I told him to take the power supply completely out of the box so the guy doesnt claim the power supply capacitors must still have power going to the radio I also told him to not let the guy powercycle the 650 unless our radio is powered on because it will probably come back up and perform, so if our radio is powered down, of course its our radio causing the problems The whole point of this thread was to say the interface on the 650 is really cool and to find out about ATPC on the 650, but when i got the email telling me it was relayed to the landlord that its a combination of our radio and local interference I got really pissed. Going out on a limb and saying maybe there is not directly a physical issue looking at the fluctuations on both sides output power (-15 to 21) and receive power (-47 to -78) with an ATPC threshold set to -35 (is this the default value?) The numbers make sense, output power is ranging 36db and receive powers are ranging 31db. EXCEPT that when i was on them the remote transmit was 21 and the local rx was -78, its not correlated to the range of numbers. so our radio was on 5755 i think at the time before i moved it, 10mhz. so for the sake of argument their 650 was also sitting on 5755 for whatever reason, and we will say it was recieving at the linkplanner target of -61 and had a -35 threshold on ATPC, if my ubnt had some sort of massive fart and hit the 650 antenna with more energy than -35, could the 650 assume that additional energy is coming from the remote and and issue an ATPC power down? would that account for all the tx power and rx power fluctuations? What I dont understand is since the peak rx was -47, why would the tx have even dropped if atpc was functioning especially don as low as a negative 15 Are there any bugs with ATPC with the 650? I dont recall there being any real configurable atpc parameter in the 3/500 series. On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: I'm not talking about your issue, per say. Just commenting on the receiver front-end overload on rockets (and other UBNT AirMax radios). I'm sure this probably happens on MikroTik radios too. EPMP? Don't have any to test. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 09/23/2014 09:52 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: Im pretty sure there is no atheros chipset in a ptp650 to have this issue happen and since the rocket is a backhaul, if it were deaf im pretty sure it would be hard to manage, and the fsk customers beyond it would be calling in with concerns about the lack of internet. I highly doubt that a brand new 650 would go deaf the minute it is powered on, and had it gone deaf the minute it was powered on, I doubt the spectrum would show well defined hills and valleys so clearly you can tell the channel size of the interfering systems, it would more likely either be fairly flatline or constantly in flux On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com wrote: This is exactly what I am talking about. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com
