Re: Scouted: U.S. to collapse in next two years?

2009-01-03 Thread David Land
Right. As everyone knows, Mexico is a great power that is poised to
take over the entire Southern tier of the United States. And those
damned Canadians have been quietly biding their time since the
American revolution, lying in wait for just the right moment to
arrive. And the European Union is so blatantly an effort to organize
Europe for a take-over of the United States that it's a wonder no
one's mentioned it before...

Clearly, the only solution is for the US to mount a massive attack on
all the countries listed in the article at once.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Who's on Twitter?

2009-01-03 Thread David Land
I'm no twitter as http://twitter.com/dland Nick has been kind enough
to mention me several times in his musings on Twitter.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Who's on Twitter?

2009-01-03 Thread David Land
Julia,

 OK, that one looks somewhat more interesting than some of the Tweets I see
 dumped to LiveJournal.

Thank you (if you're referring to my twitter feed). I try to remember
that the people who are following me (there are a little under a
hundred, with some falling off and new ones replacing them over time)
are an audience, so I write with them in mind.

 Then again, the less interesting things are in response to other Tweets,
 and the person Tweeting the most is engaged in discussions with other
 folks.

In my experience, the least interesting tweeple are the ones who use
twitter as a kind of public instant message with their friends. Every
message is a reply to someone else, and they often look something
like:

@boogerbrain *Yawn*
@mesopotamia That's what she said!
@fooboo Was that thing actually _on_ your plate?
@noobee If you say so, but actually, I like em crunchy.

I wonder if these people have anything at all to say on their own...

There is a hierarchy of engagement on Twitter in which following is
worth one point, replying is worth more -- maybe two to five
points, and retweeting is maybe double that again. I don't think
I've been retweeted. Not bleeding edge enough, I guess.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Government regulation

2008-11-01 Thread David Land
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 the economic boom due to unregulated greed has turned into an exploded bomb - 
 no longer ticking...

I like what Tom Evslin had to say about this at http://budurl.com/ejfz:

This correction from excess has been violent and in many ways
harmful but it HAS cured many of the excesses; the goal
shouldn't be to reestablish them. We don't want housing prices
to boom out of reach again; we don't want oil prices to go up or
credit to be extended promiscuously; we don't want a banking
economy based on the third derivative of valueless debt. We need
to be wary of those crying crisis because they have a solution
to sell. We've already gone too far in pouring aid in at the top
of the financial system hoping (to put a good light on it) that
it'll trickle down.

We will need to cushion some of the pain at the bottom of the
economic heap; there'll be more need for unemployment insurance
before there's less. We can't afford to let starved states cut
back on infrastructure projects both for the sake of the
infrastructure and for the sake of the economy. But we also want
the excesses that have been corrected stay corrected – at least
until the next bubble.

We also want the excesses that have been corrected to stay
corrected. A nice dream.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Government regulation

2008-11-01 Thread David Land
To give credit where it is due: Tim O'Reilly posted a reply on Twitter
(@timoreilly) to Tom Evslin's (@tevslin) piece.

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:52 PM, David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Jon Louis Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 the economic boom due to unregulated greed has turned into an exploded bomb 
 - no longer ticking...

 I like what Tom Evslin had to say about this at http://budurl.com/ejfz:

This correction from excess has been violent and in many ways
harmful but it HAS cured many of the excesses; the goal
shouldn't be to reestablish them. We don't want housing prices
to boom out of reach again; we don't want oil prices to go up or
credit to be extended promiscuously; we don't want a banking
economy based on the third derivative of valueless debt. We need
to be wary of those crying crisis because they have a solution
to sell. We've already gone too far in pouring aid in at the top
of the financial system hoping (to put a good light on it) that
it'll trickle down.

We will need to cushion some of the pain at the bottom of the
economic heap; there'll be more need for unemployment insurance
before there's less. We can't afford to let starved states cut
back on infrastructure projects both for the sake of the
infrastructure and for the sake of the economy. But we also want
the excesses that have been corrected stay corrected – at least
until the next bubble.

 We also want the excesses that have been corrected to stay
 corrected. A nice dream.

 Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Humor: Wall Street Bailout 409-Scam eMail

2008-11-01 Thread David Land
Subject: Please to Help
To; John Q. Public
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2008 22:22:22

Dear American:

I need to ask you to support an urgent secret business
relationship with a transfer of funds of great magnitude.

I am Ministry of the Treasury of the Republic of America. My
country has had crisis that has caused the need for large
transfer of funds of 700 billion dollars US. If you would assist
me in this matter, it would be most profitable to you.

I am working with Mr. Phil Gramm, lobbyist for UBS, who will be
my replacement as Ministry of the Treasury in January. As a
Senator, you may know him as the leader of the American banking
deregulation movement in the 1990s. This transaction is 100%
safe.

This is a matter of great urgency. We need a blank check. We
need the funds as quickly as possible. We cannot directly
transfer these funds in the names of our close friends because
we are constantly under surveillance. My family lawyer advised
me that I should look for a reliable and trustworthy person who
will act as next of kin so the funds can be transferred.

Please reply with all of your bank account, IRA and college fund
account numbers and those of your children and grandchildren to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] so that we may transfer your
ocmmission for this transaction. After I receive that
information, I will respond with detailed information about
safeguards that will be used to protect the funds.

Yours Faithfully,
Minister of Treasury Paulson

(Any typos are mine -- this was transcribed from uncredited graphics
in the November issue of Funny Times http://funnytimes.com/)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Secular belief vs Science

2008-08-29 Thread David Land
Folks,

We talk a lot -- some might say too much -- about the pernicious
effects of blind religious belief, especially as it prevents rational
thought about science. You might say that Science is sacred around
here. But secular belief can be just as blinding  just as stupid 
dangerous.

Consider the caller Charlane on NPR's Science Friday just now. The
topic was the (now thoroughly-debunked) concerns about links between
vaccines  autusm and other vaccine scares. She was adamant about not
having her baby immunized on the CDC-recommended schedule because,
among other things, she didn't think that it was safe to give a baby
six immunological agents at once. Nothing the guest scientist said
could convince her.

She demanded to know how many tests had been conducted specifically
testing the interactions of multiple vaccines at once. The guest
thought about it  replied, In the high hundreds to low thousands.
Before he even finished his answer, she talked over him, saying, I
don't believe it.

My mind boggled. Why ask the damn question, then?

Dave

Frames trump facts Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hamcam fire view

2007-09-04 Thread David Land
Folks,

It comes to my attention that the tinyurl in my previous post is
bogus. It works if you happen to be on the network at LiveWorld, but
not so much if you're out there in the wide-open interwebs.

This one should go to that overlong URL that you _could_ have
reconstructed by hand if you were so inclined:

http://tinyurl.com/2sw2we

Dave

Not Licked Yet Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Bush: I'd rather be right than popular

2006-07-08 Thread David Land

Doug Pensinger wrote:


But of course he's neither.


He's about as far right as I care to stomach.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: Science Blog: Our grip on reality is slim

2006-06-24 Thread David Land

I think we all knew this, but:

The neurological basis for poor witness statements
and hallucinations has been found by scientists at
University College London. In over a fifth of cases,
people wrongly remembered whether they actually
witnessed an event or just imagined it, according
to a paper published in NeuroImage this week.

http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/our-grip-on-reality-is-slim-10871.html

Dave No, really, I read it! Land
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: Was the 2004 Election Stolen

2006-06-04 Thread David Land

Friends,

After carefully examining the evidence, I've become convinced
that the president's party mounted a massive, coordinated
campaign to subvert the will of the people in 2004. Across the
country, Republican election officials and party stalwarts
employed a wide range of illegal and unethical tactics to fix
the election.

I came across the above in a very well-written (if extraordinarily long) 
article in Rolling Stone by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.:


http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen/print
or
http://makeashorterlink.com/?S2586163D
or
http://shorl.com/gydrofridrohyfry

(Incidentally, TinyURL seems to be broken tonight)

You probably know that I'm steadfastly resisting the urge to turn into a 
conspiracy theorist, but frankly, I'm sick of being labeled one just 
because I hold out the possibility that my government has been taken 
over by a power-mad bunch of freaks. One is not a conspiracy theorist if 
the theory turns out to be true.


Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: The Worst President in History?

2006-04-26 Thread David Land

Folks,

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/

This piece appeared in the Rolling Stone last Friday. It considers, 
without immediately jumping to its conclusion, whether GWB may be what 
the title suggests. (For our international readers, that's Worst US 
President, of course -- I'm sure that Brazil, Australia and wherever 
else we hail from have had their own Boneheads of State.)


He's up against the likes of the corrupt but apparently likable Warren 
G. Harding and the corrupt and eminently unlikable Richard M. Nixon.


It's a longish piece, but has some interesting moments.

After reviewing a 2004 survey of 415 historians, of whom 81% rated 
Bush's administration a failure (and of the remaining 19%, a tenth 
only considered him to be the best president since Bill Clinton), he 
goes on to say:


The lopsided decision of historians should give everyone
pause. Contrary to popular stereotypes, historians are
generally a cautious bunch. We assess the past from widely
divergent points of view and are deeply concerned about
being viewed as fair and accurate by our colleagues. When we
make historical judgments, we are acting not as voters or
even pundits, but as scholars who must evaluate all the
evidence, good, bad or indifferent. Separate surveys,
conducted by those perceived as conservatives as well as
liberals, show remarkable unanimity about who the best and
worst presidents have been.

Historians do tend, as a group, to be far more liberal than
the citizenry as a whole -- a fact the president's admirers
have seized on to dismiss the poll results as transparently
biased. One pro-Bush historian said the survey revealed more
about the current crop of history professors than about
Bush or about Bush's eventual standing. But if historians
were simply motivated by a strong collective liberal bias,
they might be expected to call Bush the worst president
since his father, or Ronald Reagan, or Nixon. Instead, more
than half of those polled -- and nearly three-fourths of
those who gave Bush a negative rating -- reached back before
Nixon to find a president they considered as miserable as
Bush.

Dave Heckuva Job, Georgie Land
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


10 Reasons Why Gay Marriage Should be Illegal

2006-04-08 Thread David Land

Folks,

From Craigslist:

01) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural
things like eyeglasses, polyester, and air conditioning.

02) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way tha
hanging around tall people will make you tall.

03) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy
behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog
has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.

04) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed
at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites,
and divorce is still illegal.

05) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were
allowed; the sanctity of Britany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun
marriage would be destroyed.

06) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay
couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to
marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs
more children.

07) Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight
parents only raise straight children.

08) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours,
the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's
why we have only one religion in America.

09) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at
home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to
raise children.

10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never
adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the
service-sector economy, or longer life spans.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: Amazing Art Installation: Toast Mosaic of a Toaster

2006-04-08 Thread David Land

Folks,

It's not lyrics from a song we love to hate.

It's not the latest political outrage.

It's not even a sci-fi or anime reference.

It's just toast: 2500 pieces of toast in various degrees of toastedness 
arranged into the ginormous image of a toaster in Buenos Aires.


http://www.fa-art.pp.se/Baires.htm

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Tales From Earthsea.........Anime!!!!!

2006-04-08 Thread David Land
I read Le Guin at the same time in my life when I was listening to Baby 
I'm-a Want You and Please, Mister, Please and thinking they were 
really good stuff, so I'm reluctant to be too excited about this, but 
Holy Flaming Snot may be right!


Dave That is what you meant, right? Land :-)

Damon Agretto wrote:

HOLY F^%$#  S^*%

Damon.


As reported yesterday the Studio Ghibli website has relaunched, their
new URL is http://www.ghibli.jp/. Via the revamp, the studio has
revealed their next animation film project will be Gedo Senki (with
English subtitle TALES from EARTHSEA) directed by Goro Miyazaki
(Hayao Miyazaki's son). The new movie is adapted from American writer
Ursula K Le Guin's A Wizard of Earthsea. The planned theatrical
release in Japan is July, 2006. Additionally on the new site you can
view a production and director's diary. Readers may recall on
September 20th ANS was the first English news source to report on this
possibility. A blog entry of an anonymous editor working for a
publisher in Tokyo then predicted the next film animation work to be
tackled by Studio Ghibli would be based on the Earthsea series of
novels by American fantasy writer Ursula K. Le Guin. When presented
with only a last (family) name we incorrectly assumed Hayao Miyazaki
would be directing although at the time he was the only publicly known
Miyazkai directing films at the studio. The Japanese editor reportedly
first learned of this news when a film rights option was being sought
by the book's Japanese publisher Iwanami Shoten. The America-based
Sci-Fi Channel adapted Le Guin's Earthsea series to TV in 2004 in it's
Legend of Earthsea miniseries. The author has expressed her
disapproval of the faithfulness to the original works of the above TV
version. Hayao Miyazaki, has in the past admitted being an admirer of
Le Guin's writings.



Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: EE's BRDM-1 Recce Vehicle





--

 Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] 408-551-0427
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


FEAR NOT

2006-04-05 Thread David Land

Folks,

I re-read the article and when I got to the part where the ads work 
through a nano-technology brain implant, my skeptometer began ticking.


Then, at the very bottom of the article, there's a link to Ancestral 
Advertising: Reaching an Untapped Demographic with a URL that looks 
totally unlike all their others, which contains only the words Happy 
April Fools Day.


Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hello (hello, hello) (Or, The thread that will not die)

2006-04-03 Thread David Land


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Hello (hello, hello) (Or, The thread that will not die)

2006-04-03 Thread David Land

David Land wrote:


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


There was more to the original message, but I think Nick's server may 
have gobbled it up. I'll talk to him tomorrow and see if that's the case.


In the meanwhile, talk (or sing) amongst yourselves.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dr. Demento (was Re: Hello (hello, hello))

2006-03-23 Thread David Land

Mauro Diotallevi wrote:


And tuxedoed dolphins bring you breakfast


And even appropriate for the purported topic of the list!


I feel better than James Brown
I feel better now
I feel better than James Brown
I feel better now
I feel better than James Brown
I feel better now, how do you feel?


I feel the shock of recognition. One of my favorite CDs
of the mid-90s. Thanks for the reminder.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: A very sensible idea

2006-01-29 Thread David Land

PAT MATHEWS wrote:

Someone on FourthTurning came up with a very sensible idea. It was 
that the only time the federal government should interfere with state 
law is if the state is violating the Bill of Rights. (This does not 
restrict the power of the feds to regulate air traffic, public 
health, etc...we're talking about laws affecting individual 
liberties.) And that every Constitutional amendment from #1 on down 
should carry the proviso, now used for the newest ones, that the 
Congress shall have the power to enforce this amendment.


Works for me. But would it require a constitutional amendment to 
retroactively add those words to the amendments that do not explicitly 
have them?


I have no problem with this, but it doesn't address the greater 
problem - an executive that considers himself above the bill of rights 
and possibly, with its new justices, a Supreme Court that might agree 
with him.


No, but it gets the structure in place. As for the situation you 
describe, it's for the people to turn him out (in 2008) and the Congress 
to put a leash on  him and the opposition party to come up with better 
arguments and ideas in order to do so.


Of course, the brilliance of the two-term Presidency will do that for 
us, but what remains to be seen is whether the country figures out that 
keeping his ilk in power for four, eight, twelve more years (about as 
long as it'll take to completely end the American Experiment).


I wonder which state will receive the most attention on Tuesday 
evening. The one whose population almost elected him once and barely did 
a second time, or the one that he invaded without provocation?


I'm not taking any bets, because I'm fairly certain it's the latter.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What some women have always known . . .

2006-01-27 Thread David Land

Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What some women have always known . . .

2006-01-27 Thread David Land

Deborah Harrell wrote:

David Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  

Or, put briefly, Not tonight, honey. I have a PhD.



scratching head - I mean *forehead* - in puzzlement
I must be rather thick today...care to elucidate
further?
  


Are you trying to say that you're promiscuous? (puzzled -- possibly 
unintelligent -- small brain -- sexy, according to study), or if you 
really don't understand...


I'll assume the latter, at the risk of having my sexual prowess 
challenged for showing the slightest sign of intelligence here...


The joke, if that's the word I want, was that a PhD (presumably a smart, 
large-brained person) would not have much interest in sex, due to the 
damage that all that brain mass has done to his testicles.


Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: Granny D -- We are Resolved to Follow Our National Dream

2005-10-17 Thread David Land

Folks,


You might remember Doris Granny D Haddock as the 89-year-old who  
walked 3,200 miles in 1999 to dramatize the issue of soft money  
regulation. You might not remember her at all.


In any event, she delivered a speech at Orchard House in Concord, MA  
on October 6 that I enjoyed a heck of a lot, and thought some others  
might, too.


We are Resolved to Follow Our National Dream

http://www.grannyd.com/speeches/orchardhouse.htm

She begins by comparing our times to the moments leading up the Civil  
War:


In some ways the conflict of the Civil War was not resolved, but
rather accommodated, in the same way that smoldering coals under
ashes are but a fire asked to bide its time. Do not the sparks
now swirl up fresh? Is the heat and danger we feel not the old
conflict between those who believe that authority comes from
above: from an Old Testament God, delivered through husbands,
presidents, preachers, ayatollahs and plantation overseers to
people arranged in layers according to their worth--is it not a
conflict between those authoritarians and those others who
instead believe that all men are created equal, and that the
authority to govern issues forth from them, upward to their
government--their common vessel of community--and not downward?
Is this not the divide of 1860 and also of our own time?

She concludes by calling upon qualities that have made America great:

Are your hearts perhaps stronger and your souls deeper than you
imagined? Yes, this is what you came here to do. There is no
greater gift than to be given a life of meaning. There is no
greater heroism than to bravely represent love in a dark time of
fear and danger.

We are resolved to help each other. We are resolved to represent
love in the world and to follow our national dream.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Hello. My name is Harriet, and I'm a crony. (Hi, Harriet. Welcome!)

2005-10-11 Thread David Land

Folks,

Politics is rife with cronyism. Nothing new there.

But I think it used to be kind of a dirty little secret, or at  
least something that people didn't talk about, except as a way to  
criticize the other guys.


The Bush administration turns that logic on its head... Here's the  
transcript of an October 6 conference call that brought together top  
RNC strategists and White House staffers to rally support for the  
President's nomination of Harriet Miers: http://www.nocrony.com/ 
#conferencecall (a recording of the call is also available at http:// 
www.crooksandliars.com/2005/10/06.html#a5253).


The transcript contains a wonderful piece of unintentional  
transparency at about 23 minutes:


He and she [the president and Miers] both understand that if
she were to get on the court, and she were to rule in ways that
are contrary to the way the president would want her to approach
her role as a justice, it would be a deep personal betrayal, and
would be perceived as such both by him and by her.

So much for the President's yak about how important it is for  
Supremes to be independent.


Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Fear The Future[tm]: View-Once DVDs From Microsoft Promise More Petroleum Waste

2005-10-04 Thread David Land

Folks,

Some ideas are so stupid that they should be quietly killed before they 
see the light of day. I think I found one: View-Once DVDs.


Reminds me of a very funny piece by Colin McEnroe: Why Gasoline Costs 
So Much (http://tinyurl.com/czvfu).


The DVD story is below, with link to original.

Dave



Microsoft invents a ‘one-play only’ DVD to combat Hollywood piracy
By Tony Glover Technology Editor, TheBusinessOnline.com, 2-Oct-2005.

http://tinyurl.com/7qb3v

COMPUTER software giant Microsoft has developed a cheap, disposable 
pre-recorded DVD disc that consumers can play only once. The discs would 
give Hollywood increased control over the release of new films and allow 
consumers the chance to watch a film at the fraction of the price of an 
ordinary pre-recorded DVD. More important, the discs would prevent 
copying and digital piracy, which is costing the film and music industry 
billions in lost revenues.


The revolutionary product could be on the market as early as next year, 
with the new DVD players needed to view them. Microsoft hopes it will 
help the company dominate home entertainment as it dominates the desktop 
computer market.


The film industry has been growing increasingly alarmed at the prospect 
of film fans using the internet to download pirated films, just as music 
fans download copyrighted songs on their personal computers. Researchers 
at Microsoft believe they have a simple solution to the challenge of 
piracy. Hollywood’s movie moguls are said to be excited at the prospect 
of having a piracy-proof means of distribution.


Buying an ordinary DVD of a new film costs between £15 (E22, $26.40) and 
£20. Microsoft’s new disc will enable the studios to release a 
“play-once, then throw away” copy for as little as £3, much the same as 
renting a video or DVD. But unlike a rented DVD, the new disc allows 
consumers to decide when they watch films and there is no need to return it.


The new generation of DVD disc will spearhead a fresh assault by 
Microsoft on the home-entertainment market. A big chunk of its $7bn 
research budget is spent on digital rights management (DRM). A senior 
source in the company says Microsoft is in talks with the main 
electronics manufacturers about developing DVD players to play the new 
discs. And when the movie industry does find the courage to move to a 
fully internet-based distribution model, Microsoft wants its DRM 
software to be the industry standard, giving it dominance of the server 
market, and the telecoms and cable companies that need to store and 
manage their video-on-demand services.


Chairman Bill Gates has been working on a solution to the film 
industry’s piracy problem since making a now legendary pitch to the 
industry in September 2002. Showing a video of himself dressed in a 
sailor suit pretending to audition for the blockbuster Titanic, Gates 
pitched Hollywood with the proposition that only Microsoft could solve 
its piracy problem by making its DRM software a standard across every 
home entertainment playback and recording device. By installing its DRM 
software in every device used to play or store movies, Microsoft plans 
to dominate the home entertainment industry in the same way it does the 
desktop computer software market.


This will mean convincing competitors such as Sony – whose Playstation 
rivals Gates’s XBox – that allowing Microsoft dominance of the home 
entertainment software market is a price worth paying to establish a 
single global DRM standard. But despite the telecoms and cable 
companies’ plans to offer video-on-demand through the internet, the most 
popular internet-based movie service in the US is still a company called 
Netflix, which posts DVDs to users’ homes. The customers only use the 
internet to make a selection from Netflix’s store of 42m DVD discs and 
place an order online.


Netflix has more than 4m subscribers, but its founder and head, Reed 
Hastings, last week told Newsweek it will have more than 20m subscribers 
by 2010 and that DVD discs will not be entirely replaced by newer 
digital technologies for at least another 20 years.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: MTG fans: Yer missin out...

2005-07-21 Thread David Land

Damon Agretto wrote:


The first unofficial MTG tourney to be held in NW AZ is less than 12 
hours away.



Pass...

Damon, got trapped in collectable games, learned his lesson, and now has 
deep philosophical opposition to the concept...


Hi. I'm Damon, and I am a cardaholic.

Hi, Damon, Welcome.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Writing software

2005-06-13 Thread David Land

George,


I'm sure this has come up before, but what software is there out there that
can help you manage versions.  As I get further into my English program, I
find that I'm having a hard time keeping track of what's what and when I
wrote what when?

Low- and no-cost preferred but I am interested in all.


With what do you write? What word processor, what platform?

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: Meet The World

2005-06-02 Thread David Land
Brazilian artist Icaro Doria interprets flags of various countries as 
statistical graphs:


http://www.brazilianartists.net/home/flags/

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Intel quietly Adds Palladium DRM and Backdoor Networking to New Processors

2005-05-28 Thread David Land

KZK wrote:


http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=4915

Intel quietly adds DRM to new chips

Microsoft and the entertainment industry's holy grail of controlling 
copyright through the motherboard has moved a step closer with Intel 
Corp. now embedding digital rights management within in its latest 
dual-core processor Pentium D and accompanying 945 chipset.


Understanding fully that it's only a matter of time before IBM and
Motorola start thus encumbering their PowerPC chips, and acknowledging
last week's rumor that a certain computer company down the road from
here is (once again) considering the use of Intel silicon in their
products, I am reminded again why it is that I prefer computers from
Apple.

Oh, wait. They're the bad guys now, because of the iPod's proprietary
AAC nonsense.

Dave Can't Win, Can't Lose, Can't Even Quit Land

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Revenge of the REAL George Lucas...

2005-05-24 Thread David Land
Its one thing to put your faith in a religion founded by a real person 
who claimed divine revelation, but its something else entirely to have, 
as the scripture of your religion, a storyline that you know was made up 
by a very nonprophetic human being.


Its a terrible thing, I suppose, for a writer to invent a religion and 
then discover that he and all his friends are on the wrong side of it.


http://www.beliefnet.com/story/167/story_16700_1.html

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Play the Future: Sony Patents Mind-Control Device

2005-04-07 Thread David Land
Folks,
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18624944.600
http://tinyurl.com/6gf46
Dave
-
Sony patent takes first step towards real-life Matrix
-
07 April 2005
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition
Jenny Hogan
Barry Fox
IMAGINE movies and computer games in which you get to smell, taste and 
perhaps even feel things. That's the tantalising prospect raised by a 
patent on a device for transmitting sensory data directly into the 
human brain - granted to none other than the entertainment giant Sony.

The technique suggested in the patent is entirely non-invasive. It 
describes a device that fires pulses of ultrasound at the head to 
modify firing patterns in targeted parts of the brain, creating 
sensory experiences ranging from moving images to tastes and sounds. 
This could give blind or deaf people the chance to see or hear, the 
patent claims.

While brain implants are becoming increasingly sophisticated, the only 
non-invasive ways of manipulating the brain remain crude. A technique 
known as transcranial magnetic stimulation can activate nerves by using 
rapidly changing magnetic fields to induce currents in brain tissue. 
However, magnetic fields cannot be finely focused on small groups of 
brain cells, whereas ultrasound could be.

If the method described by Sony really does work, it could have all 
sorts of uses in research and medicine, even if it is not capable of 
evoking sensory experiences detailed enough for the entertainment 
purposes envisaged in the patent.
This was a prophetic invention. It was based on an inspiration that 
this may someday be the direction technology takes us

Details are sparse, and Sony declined New Scientist's request for an 
interview with the inventor, who is based in its offices in San Diego, 
California. However, independent experts are not dismissing the idea 
out of hand. I looked at it and found it plausible, says Niels 
Birbaumer, a pioneering neuroscientist at the University of Tbingen in 
Germany who has created devices that let people control devices via 
brain waves.

The application contains references to two scientific papers presenting 
research that could underpin the device. One, in an echo of Galvani's 
classic 18th-century experiments on frogs' legs that proved electricity 
can trigger nerve impulses, showed that certain kinds of ultrasound 
pulses can affect the excitability of nerves from a frog's leg. The 
author, Richard Mihran of the University of Colorado, Boulder, had no 
knowledge of the patent until New Scientist contacted him, but says he 
would be concerned about the proposed method's long-term safety.

Sony first submitted a patent application for the ultrasound method in 
2000, which was granted in March 2003. Since then Sony has filed a 
series of continuations, most recently in December 2004 (US 
2004/267118).

Elizabeth Boukis, spokeswoman for Sony Electronics, says the work is 
speculative. There were not any experiments done, she says. This 
particular patent was a prophetic invention. It was based on an 
inspiration that this may someday be the direction that technology will 
take us.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SSN 711

2005-02-06 Thread David Land
Damon Agretto wrote:

So it wasn't that he had the bad luck to hit an uncharted undersea
mountain in an area that was supposed to be charted. Rather, he was
going at a reckless speed in uncharted waters?
Probably, or at least that's my interpretation. Really a combination of 
both, though (bad luck in that the sea mound was uncharted, but reckless 
because he was going 30+kts in an incompletely charted region). But even 
if it wasn't the captain (say the XO decided to do some high speed 
drills), the Captain would still be responsible. Even if he wasn't in 
command, he's still in Command.
I'm not sure if anyone's seen the pictures, but they're here:
http://www.navy.mil/view_gallery.asp?category_id=17
What's amazing to me is how high the damage goes -- practically all the
way to the deck.
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: NASA envisions Mars warmed up for life

2005-02-06 Thread David Land
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002172407_mars06.ht
ml
http://tinyurl.com/58hnw
Global warming may be a scourge on Earth, but injecting greenhouse
gases into the atmosphere of Mars might be just the thing to turn the
barren planet into a living, breathing world that could support future
human colonies, NASA researchers said.
And why not? Left Behind-reading, Biblical-literalist eco-terrorists 
are plotting the demise of Earth in order to force God's hand and bring 
about the end of days anyway. They need somewhere for La Haye's sick 
fantasy of suffering for people who don't believe just like him and his 
kind to take place.

God help us.
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: SpamAdaption

2005-02-06 Thread David Land
Trent Shipley wrote:
I really do not get that angry with spammers.  They are just rational 
entrepreneurs.
I take from this it that you are some kind of extreme libertarian that 
rejects both property and privacy.

What would you say to the overt act of stealing a speaker truck (with 
the intention of returning it after using it for your entrepreneurial 
purposes) and driving around neighborhoods hawking sexual enhancements 
at all hours? Would that, too, be rational entrepreneurship?

Spam -- especially this adaptation -- is theft and harrassment.
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Songs You Cannot Expel

2005-02-02 Thread David Land
Did you ever know that you're my hero?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: Humor: The US government has a new website

2005-01-21 Thread David Land
Blogger Sean Young hilariously misinterprets graphics from ready.gov:
http://www.msxnet.org/humour/terror_alert
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: mail-archive.com ??

2005-01-20 Thread David Land
Gary Nunn wrote:
Occasionally I do a search on Google for my name and email address just to
see what pops up. Typically only the MCCMEDIA archives show up, but today I
ran across Brin-L archives at mail-archive.com.
 
Not a big deal, just surprised that we were being archived somewhere other
than mccmedia.
 
http://www.mail-archive.com/brin-l@mccmedia.com/
It really isn't a big deal, but it is a Good Thing[tm].
Nick knows the guy who runs mail-archive.com, who has been archiving 
brin-l for quite a while.

Peace,
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Scouted: Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities

2004-10-14 Thread David Land
Alberto,
John Horn asked:
Some members of br military during the brazilian dictatorship
of 1964-(1980 or 1985 or 1989) had some similar plans - maybe
the source was the same. They would explode a huge gas reservoir
in Rio downtown, blame the commies, and start a pogrom to kill
them all.
The plan was aborted by the heroic acts of one man.
This sounds very very interesting and I've been wanting to respond
ever since you originally posted it.  Do you have more information
about this? 
Yes
Maybe it's just me, but this answer strikes me as somehow
missing the point, or trying to be a smart-alek.
Allow me to restate John's question as a request: Please post more 
information or a link to more information.

Thanks,
Dave
Pedantic Nonsense Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Scouted: 38 Dishonest Tricks from Straight and Crooked Thinking

2004-08-15 Thread David Land
Folks,
With the quadrennial American exercise in rhetorical excess well under 
way to elect the Leader of the Free World[tm] (no apologies to so-called 
free countries who don't get a vote), I thought this extract from the 
1930 book Straight and Crooked Thinking might be worthwhile reading:

http://www.246.dk/38tricks.html
Rather than a scholarly listing of logical fallacies, the book (and this 
brief extract) aims to be a practical and useful guide:

  Practical convenience and practical importance are the criteria
   I have used in this list. If we have a plague of flies in the
   house we buy fly-papers and not a treatise on the zoological
   classification of Musca domestica.
As a bonus, in keeping with the discussion of SPSS and figures that 
lie, the above-linked page also contains a list of ways to make 
misleading graphs.

-
Rule  1: Show as little data as possible (minimize the data density)
Rule  2: Hide the data you do show (minimize the data/ink ratio)
Rule  3: Ignore the visual metaphor altogether
Rule  4: Only order matters
Rule  5: Graph data out of context
Rule  6: Change scales in mid-axis
Rule  7: Emphasize the trivial (ignore the important)
Rule  8: Jiggle the baseline
Rule  9: Alabama first!
Rule 10: Label: (a) illegibly, (b) incompletely, (c) incorrectly,
 and (d) ambiguously
Rule 11: More is murkier: (a) more decimal places and
 (b) more dimensions
Rule 12: If it has been done well in the past, think of a new way
 to do it
-
Over and Out,
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Not a PDA

2004-08-15 Thread David Land
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
Bryon Daly wrote:
(I'd even demand cell phone capability, but the largish displays on PDA
make them not very conducive, shape-wise, to being phone handsets.)

Use a headset instead of the holding the whole thing up to your ear? 
My BlackBerry is a PDA/Cell phone, and I have to admit that I have had a 
few folks wonder why it was that I was holding my PDA against my head... 
 The headset helps with that, and also avoids getting ear oil all over 
the screen (please begin throwing up now).

I don't know how long it'll be before RIM puts a music player in there, 
but I wouldn't hold my breath: they're very business-focused. It took 
them /forever/ (in highly accelerated gadget-time) to get around to 
having color screens.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Weasle

2004-08-15 Thread David Land
The Fool wrote:
http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/archives/000679.html
Compare the new BSA's mascot for propaganzing children to classic villian
comics (the chest numbers were prison numbers not gang numbers).
It's not a weasel. It's a rat.
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: NYT admits shoddy Iraq reporting

2004-05-27 Thread David Land
William T Goodall wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/international/middleeast/ 
26FTE_NOTE.html?8dpc

To those who hold the belief that there is a liberal bias in the media, 
and the NYT in particular, what do you make of this sloppy assumption 
that the story put forward by the adminsitration and its Iraqi 
story-tellers was true?

I have to believe that most of what passes for liberal (or conservative) 
bias in the media is just sloppiness, hurrying and laziness.

Dave (who did not check any facts in the construction of this post)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Symbiosis

2004-05-27 Thread David Land
A thread drifted, then:
Got me, what is the difference between disease
organisms and parasites?  

Delineating one from another is not always
straightforward.
My Steadman's definition of parasite is
1) an organism that lives on or in another and draws
its nourishment therefrom
The word comes from the Greek, and means one who eats from someone 
else's table. (Para = beside, Sitos = grain, food).

Practically speaking, I think what makes something a
parasite involves the eeuuww! factor: tapeworms are
just *gross,* while cold-causing viruses really
aren't.
Not necessarily, but people who have 'em sure are!
If anyone's really interested, Google will locate any number of med 
school syllabi on the subject, including this one:

http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~terry/229sp02/lectures/Lect10.html
Dave
I am Joe's Mitochondria Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Cults vs Religions, was Bullying and Battering

2004-05-26 Thread David Land
David Hobby wrote:
   I think the more common behavior is pushing back the
predicted date of the apocalypse.  But I guess one can only do
this so many times.
Indeed: http://www.freeminds.org/history/list.htm
   

Amazing.
 

Especially for people who claim to speak with the authority of God, 
given that Jesus said No one knows about that day or hour, not even the 
angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. (Matthew 13:32).

From the above document: ... this measurement [of a length of an 
interior passageway discovered inside the Pyramids - it has no reference 
in Scripture] is 3416 inches, symbolizing 3416 years ...

Let's see... that's about 285 feet, and also about 87 meters, which 
means that they missed the end by a little more 3000 years. It's also 
about 9000 of my little pinkie widths, which means we have a long time 
to wait.

Dave
What's that come to in skoshes?
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: More Spent on Drugs for Behavior Disorders in Children Than on Asthma Medications and Antibiotics

2004-05-21 Thread David Land
Another take on drugging kids:
http://www.bruderhof.com/articles/ritalin.htm
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Bullying and Battering

2004-05-21 Thread David Land
While I was in the Bruderhof neighborhood...
http://www.bruderhof.com/articles/Fight-or-Flight.htm
There /is/ an alternative to the kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out 
mentality.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dog's breed can be determined from DNA with 99% accuracy . . .

2004-05-21 Thread David Land
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/21/science/21dog.html

NPR's coverage of this story highlighted the fact that some very 
different-looking dogs are actually fairly closely related, and among 
the group of breeds most closely related to their wolf ancestors: 
everything from Alaskan Malamutes and Siberian Huskies, which most 
people would agree look pretty much like wolves, to Pekingese, Shih 
Tzus, and Shar-Peis, which hardly anyone would take for a wolf.

Dave
Yappy Little Throwbacks Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: group still active?

2004-05-20 Thread David Land
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Voice of the web server:
What do you mean it was out?
Golly, it's nice out. I think I'll leave it out.
Nick's server has been out of the server closet for a couple of years.
Aww come on, it was in by a mile!
Are you blind?
It's not mcenroemedia.com, you know.
Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Disturbing evidence of torture

2004-05-07 Thread David Land
Mike Lee wrote:

Gary Denton, putting me in Oh, Please! mode:
Cool! Gary found a switch. Is there one marked off nearby?

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What America Does with its Hegemony

2004-05-03 Thread David Land
The Fool wrote:

The world Orwell described does not require complete
control of the press, just a very large market share.
-Kuro5hin Poster
Does anybody remember Neil Postman's excellent Amusing Ourselves to 
Death from the mid-80's (Amazon: http://tinyurl.com/2uvuo)?

Using 1984 and Brave New World, he made pretty much the point above. 
No central agency of government control is needed to enslave the minds 
of the masses: just give 'em American Idol, Fear Factor and Fox News 
(are the last even two different shows?), and they'll gladly enslave 
themselves, and pay for the privilege.

Now, excuse, me, the NBC Blockbuster Television Event 10.5 is on.


 Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] 408-551-0427
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Winning the War on Terror

2004-04-06 Thread David Land
Folks,

 Ah, but it is so easy to whip mobs into a murderous frenzy.
 At least in some parts of the world, including my own.
Sometimes, all it takes is the home team winning the SuperBowl.

A friend of mine -- then a videographer for KRON in San Francisco -- was 
assigned to cover the crowds spilling into the streets after the Niners 
won. He wasn't out there very long before someone took a baseball bat to 
the back of his head to steal his camera. A videographer from another 
station caught it on tape. Paul told me that he watched it once, and 
never could again. He continued to have horrible headaches and other 
neurological effects from the attack years later.

Ironically, Paul went on to create the TV series Cops, American 
Detective, and World's Scariest Police Chases. Paul pretty much 
invented the reality TV genre with his. I wonder if he would have aired 
that footage on one of his shows if it hadn't been his own head getting 
bashed?

Paul died almost exactly one year ago when he fell from a bluff 
overlooking the Pacific Ocean while hiking along the Oregon coast with 
his fiance.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Winning the War on Terror

2004-04-01 Thread David Land
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

OTOH what religion does dance in the streets when innocents 
are killed? 
Don't forget hanging mutilated corpses on bridges and dancing around the
bridge chanting death to Americans...
Sorry, but I feel compelled to state that Islam didn't hang mutilated 
corpses from bridges or dance around the bridge or chant death to 
Americans. A mob of deranged people did that.

Believe me, I am no apologist for Muslim culture, I just know the 
difference between a set of beliefs and an angry mob in a famously 
violent city.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Tyranny

2004-03-18 Thread David Land
Folks,

The question, however, is whether our civilization will be undermined by:
...
3) permitting homosexual couples to adopt or to artificially create 
children.
Thus the need for a constitutional amendment banning homosexual
couples from playing The Sims.
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Rumsfeld caught lying on Face the Nation

2004-03-18 Thread David Land
Folks,
 That he didn't take 30 seconds to have some bright intern type
 in a quick search, and go around spouting off about how certain
 he is he never used that phrase, is just.. well, nutty.
I sincerely believe that he didn't have a bright intern type do that
simple search because he doesn't care and doesn't think he has to.
He and his boss really believe that it doesn't matter whether there
were WMDs or not (Bush's exact words to Diane Sawyer: what's the
difference?). They don't really care whether people think they did
the right thing or not, whether some lefty media types think they
lied to the American people. Crusaders don't need approval.
Dave


 David M. Land[EMAIL PROTECTED]  408-551-0427

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Anatomy of a rape culture

2004-02-12 Thread David Land
Fool:

Don't use absolutes. Ever.

Allow me to say that Top-posting is no worse than bottom-only-posting. 
In my brief sojourn here, I have observed that most people practice and 
prefer a more sophisticated intralinear style of posting. Perhaps you'd 
like to attack bottom-posters, too, for failing to observe /that/ 
convention?

Is 'being an anti-social pedant' one of Dr. Brin's memes?

Dave

The Fool wrote:

From: Travis Edmunds [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How about freedom?

-Travis as a cause I mean Edmunds



Don't top-post.  Ever.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Doing Business With The Enemy

2004-02-02 Thread David Land
Folks,

Gautam:   Teddy was probably drunk off his ass, or too
  busy drowning innocent young women to think
  about what he was saying - something like that.
Reggie:  Personal attacks make for good arguements since when?
 Maybe you've been working such long hours that you've
 forgotten that one of the principles of this list is to
 attack the argument, not the person who made it.
 Tell us why Ted Kennedy's arguements are wrong
 without resorting to bringing up an incident that
 happened ... how many decades ago?
Ronn!:   Mary Jo Kopeckne is still dead after all those decades.

Dave: Which doesn't make Gautam's ad hominem attach justifiable
  or Reggie's rejoinder any less on point. I thought that
  Reggie was pointing out that the Senator probably wasn't
  busy drowning innocent young women, as that event had
  taken place decades before the Iraq comment.
  On the other hand, if Senator Kennedy *had* come up with
  his statement on the Texas oil-interest origins of the
  Iraq war when he was, as Gautam so delicately put it,
  busy drowning innocent women, then he has some
  prodigious prophetic powers.
Sincerely,

Dave


 Dave Land[EMAIL PROTECTED]  408-551-0427
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Janet Jackson: 1, George Bush: 0

2004-02-02 Thread David Land
President falls asleep, misses the whole thing:

http://tinyurl.com/2szso


 Dave Land[EMAIL PROTECTED]  408-551-0427
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: LotR and Conservatives

2004-01-30 Thread David Land
Folks,

With respect to the ongoing debate about Left vs. Right, the the current 
administration's willingness to trade freedom for security, consider the 
following quote, and try to guess who said it. The URL of a web page 
with the answer is at the end of this email.

You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose
between a left or a right. There is only an up or down:
up to man's age-old dream -- the ultimate in individual
freedom consistent with law and order -- or down to the
ant heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their
sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would
trade our freedom for security have embarked on this
downward course.
A Libertarian friend urged me to be skeptical of the false dichotomy of 
Left vs. Right. Some of you may be familiar with the Nolan Chart, or 
diamond quiz created by Libertarian party founder David Nolan. It 
measures political beliefs on two axes: personal liberty and economic 
liberty. It neatly preserves the prevailing Left-center-Right axis, 
from the left (people who place high value on personal liberty, less on 
economic liberty) to the  right (high value on economic liberty, less on 
personal liberty). The new vertical axis runs from Libertarian at the 
top (value both personal and economic liberty) to Authoritarian at the 
bottom (at least the trains run on time).

The origin of the quote at the top of this email is at 
http://www.friesian.com/quiz.htm. I know almost nothing about the 
publishers of the page that contains the quote above. If you see 
something there that you like, feel free to let them know. If something 
there pisses you off, feel free to take it up with them.

Dave


 Dave Land[EMAIL PROTECTED]  408-551-0427
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: did I break it?

2004-01-23 Thread David Land
Folks,

The choice of email vs. voicemail seems to me to be a cultural thing
on several levels.
I've worked at big high-tech companies that were almost pure email
cultures -- pretty much the first thing any new group did was to set
up the email alias for the group.
Then again, it may be that a company prefers voicemail as a general
rule, but a particular organization (divisiton, department, task
force, what have you) prefers email. Or vice versa.
And of course, there's the business of personal preference. I've
called people whose outgoing voicemail announcements said, in effect,
Go ahead and leave me a message if you don't care to hear from me.
Otherwise, send me an email. Some are friendly and funny, some are
genuinely snarly about it.
Finally, there is the great advice offered earlier: if your boss
wants you to use voicemail, use voicemail. But send an email that
says that you just left a voicemail, but wanted to make sure that
the message got through, so you're following up via email. I often
did this to good effect, though usually the other way 'round: sent
an email with all the details, and a quick voicemail follow-up.
Be sure to CC: your boss so that he sees that you're following his
instructions.
Dave


 Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] 408-551-0427
 Connect to the Conversation -- Identify Influencers, Topics and Trends
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l