Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds
Hello That was also the case for the ASR1001 but we just checked the specification for the ram and then sought out some compatible sticks (seems like HP has some server that uses the same specification) When that was done all we needed to do was to see who was making sticks to compatible with the HP Spare part number. :) Gustav UHLANDER Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Sopra Steria Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm - Sweden Phone: +46 8 622 42 00 - Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com www.soprasteria.se The content of this message may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and remove it from your system. While attachments to this e-mail are checked for viruses, we do not accept any liability for any damage sustained by viruses. Before printing, think about the environment. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: den 24 april 2015 00:17 To: 'Scott Granados' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds Good to know. Thanks, Scott. Unfortunately, it looks like Kingston does not carry RAM for the ASR1002-X ... Will keep hunting! -Original Message- From: Scott Granados [mailto:sc...@granados-llc.net] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:52 AM To: Adam Greene Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds Kingston all the way. At least for a while I know they were the company having their memory rebranded. Not sure if this is still the case but have had very good luck with their memory modules in Cisco devices. On Apr 23, 2015, at 10:48 AM, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote: Hi guys, Following up on this thread ... is there a particular non-Cisco RAM manufacturer you've had good experience with (for example, a vendor known to sell re-branded Cisco RAM?). You can hit me off-list if preferred. Thanks, Adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:51 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds Thanks, guys, for all the feedback. Summary: - ASR1002-X with default processor and 8GB RAM is plenty for (2) full BGP feeds - if buying non-Cisco RAM, 16GB is cheap, so consider doing it now rather than later to avoid headaches - (2) full BGP feeds will be well below 1,000,000 FIB limit (which is comprised only of best routes) Besides the risk of not being able to obtain support from Cisco (and maybe being billed by them) if a problem is traced to the third-party RAM (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/prod_warranty09186a00800b5594.h tml), does anyone see any issue with using non-Cisco RAM? Is it generally just as reliable as the Cisco stuff? Thanks again, Adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 1:40 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds On 19/Mar/15 15:57, Lukas Tribus wrote: In my opinion this box should work fine with 8GB RAM both from a memory and CPU perspective, even with 2 or more full feeds. I have ASR1004-RP2s with 8GB RAM doing a similar job (in MPLS VPNs), its fine. ASR1002-X is a refreshed RP2 afaik. RP1 with 4GB RAM, not su much ... I've got tons of ASR1002-X's with 16GB of RAM running 2x full IPv4 and IPv6 feeds. No complaints. My guess is I'll run out of physical ports and ESP bandwidth before I run out of RAM and FIB memory :-). Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Slightly off-topic - Network Monitoring software
Hello We are using Observium for this at present. It works well for us and is available both in a commercial and free license. Commercial license is also rather cheap. It works pretty good with nice graphs and customizable alert levels. Also it understands Pseudowires ok from most plattforms and has support for the most popular manufacturers. Gustav UHLANDER Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Sopra Steria Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm - Sweden Phone: +46 8 622 42 00 - Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com www.soprasteria.se The content of this message may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and remove it from your system. While attachments to this e-mail are checked for viruses, we do not accept any liability for any damage sustained by viruses. Before printing, think about the environment. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados Sent: den 24 april 2015 12:53 To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Slightly off-topic - Network Monitoring software I would also add Nagios to the list. Open NMS has also been useful in the past and groundwork was interesting all be it expensive for the fully baked commercial version. On Apr 24, 2015, at 12:00 AM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, Slightly off-topic, but we currently use Solarwinds - It works, is functional, but some parts of it (Alerting for example), I find a bit cumbersome. Ive had a look at some alternatives, and came across Opmantekhad a look at a demo, and first impressions were positive...looks good, Interface appears intuitive+fairly easy to modifyjust wondering if anyone is using it in production, and how they find it? Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
Yea thats our thought also no niggles just plain sailing :) Gustav UHLANDER Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Sopra Steria Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm - Sweden Phone: +46 8 622 42 00 - Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com www.soprasteria.se The content of this message may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and remove it from your system. While attachments to this e-mail are checked for viruses, we do not accept any liability for any damage sustained by viruses. Before printing, think about the environment. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ian Henderson Sent: den 15 april 2015 11:27 To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) On 15 Apr 2015, at 9:08 am, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Nexus 3000's ? (Option to do VPC with multiple 3000's in one rack back to core/agg switches?) Just installed two 3048’s to replace a Cat65k/Sup2. Configured vPC with LACP towards switches, ESX, Filers and Windows machines. Very happy with them, very good price. Haven’t thrashed them particularly hard - just simple L2 - but its seems to ‘just work’. Rgds, - I. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
Hello. Yea we are aware of that but we were pleasantly surprised with no buffer drops actually. We are having a bunch of old ESX servers on these also with lots of north/south traffic so it doesn't seem to be that big of an issue at least not for us with our traffic profiles. /Gustav From: CiscoNSP List [mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com] Sent: den 15 april 2015 10:44 To: Gustav UHLANDER; Bill Woodcock Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) Thanks Gustav - Notice there is a difference in buffer size (4948 v Nexus), but store and forward vs cut-though may make the buffer difference moot? Any issues with micro bursts causing drops on the Nexus? (As we see virtually none on the 4948's) Cheers. From: gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.commailto:gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com To: wo...@pch.netmailto:wo...@pch.net; cisconsp_l...@hotmail.commailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:29:29 + Hello. Yes we are using Nexus 3048 for TOR when 10 Ge isn't necessary so that is the direct replacement for our 4948E TOR switches. We are generally very pleased with them both price, feature and performance wise. However these are getting rather old now so we are woundering if they are being EOLed soon. //Gustav. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock Sent: den 15 april 2015 02:59 To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.commailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks Bill - So you've been happy with the Nexus? Have you moved from the Cat range to Nexus? Yes, entirely, as of about two years ago. Very happy with them. -Bill ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
Hello. Yes we are using Nexus 3048 for TOR when 10 Ge isn't necessary so that is the direct replacement for our 4948E TOR switches. We are generally very pleased with them both price, feature and performance wise. However these are getting rather old now so we are woundering if they are being EOLed soon. //Gustav. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Woodcock Sent: den 15 april 2015 02:59 To: CiscoNSP List Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948) On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Thanks Bill - So you've been happy with the Nexus? Have you moved from the Cat range to Nexus? Yes, entirely, as of about two years ago. Very happy with them. -Bill ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Whatsup Calls
Hello Ytti. I tend to agree. Often it is not the ones that write to this list that makes policy but often just try to come up with ways to enforce it. Gustav UHLANDER Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Sopra Steria Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm - Sweden Phone: +46 8 622 42 00 - Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com www.soprasteria.se The content of this message may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and remove it from your system. While attachments to this e-mail are checked for viruses, we do not accept any liability for any damage sustained by viruses. Before printing, think about the environment. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti Sent: den 2 april 2015 15:49 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Whatsup Calls On (2015-04-02 13:06 +0300), M K wrote: Whatsup released voice recently , i wonder does Cisco SCE has the ability to block it ? Sorry, no clue. But from some responses you got, I'm emphatically people would keep political and commercial agendas out from c-nsp. This is technical question and merits technical answer. If I'd ask how to setup netflow on this forum, I wouldn't want answer that I should stop spying on my customers. -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2015.0.5856 / Virus Database: 4315/9400 - Release Date: 03/28/15 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds
Hello Adam. We are running a couple of ASR1001 with 8Gb memory with 2 full feeds and some minor L3vpns in the same box without issue. Gustav UHLANDER Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Sopra Steria Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm - Sweden Phone: +46 8 622 42 00 - Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@soprasteria.com www.soprasteria.se The content of this message may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and remove it from your system. While attachments to this e-mail are checked for viruses, we do not accept any liability for any damage sustained by viruses. Before printing, think about the environment. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lukas Tribus Sent: den 19 mars 2015 14:57 To: Adam Greene; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X (2) full BGP feeds Hi Adam, We have a customer with an ASR1002-X supporting redundant links to the Internet, currently taking only default routes to both in a primary/failover scenario. However, they want to have the absolute best path to all destinations to the Internet, and so are considering taking full routes from both providers. According to their research the ASR1002-X supports up to 1,000,000 routes and to support two full BGP feeds, Cisco recommends upgrading from the default 1 GB RAM to 16 GB RAM. In my opinion this box should work fine with 8GB RAM both from a memory and CPU perspective, even with 2 or more full feeds. I have ASR1004-RP2s with 8GB RAM doing a similar job (in MPLS VPNs), its fine. ASR1002-X is a refreshed RP2 afaik. RP1 with 4GB RAM, not su much ... Lukas ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9500
Hello Skeeve. We are running the smaller 9300 series platform and in our experience there is still some bugs and missing features that are still there. We are missing multihomed FEXes for instance. We have also had some issues with some features that was in the documentation but when asking TAC why the commands aren't there we where informed that the platform didn't have support for it and that they would remove it from the documentation (MP-BGP in that case). It seems that the platform isn't quite ready yet and that new features is being added with each and every new release of software. I cannot say if the same is true for the 9500 platform but I suspect it is seeing as the two are more or less the same platform as I understand it. Could be wrong on that one though. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens Sent: den 24 december 2014 17:15 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9500 Hi all, I am considering selecting the Nexus 9500 series for a project. I've seen/heard/read all the good stuff, and I want to know if there are any major issues/horror stories about this platform. Any comments/experiences won't necessarily change my mind, but I'd like to know what I'm in for. Feel free to reply off-list. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; http://twitter.com/networkceoau linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cumulus Linux - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card
Hello We have a number of those connected and in use. We use the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G version of it. The only complaint we have is that the connection sometimes suffer from packetloss and a reboot is required to clear it up. Although we haven't done any more in-depth analysis of it since the nature of the connection has been best effort in nature. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Blake Dunlap Sent: den 10 december 2014 02:52 To: Mike Hale Cc: cisco-nsp@pu ck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card The software got much better in the last year or two. It works pretty well all things considered. -Blake On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.com wrote: I can only speak to the ATT Version of the card, but for us it's been pretty solid. We have it sitting at an isolated site in the bay area, and it's been reliable. Pain in the ass to get setup at first, but after that it's been good. They must have fixed a lot of the stability issues. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Ryan Wilkins r...@deadfrog.net wrote: On Dec 9, 2014, at 10:35 AM, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any experience with the EHWIC-4G-LTE-V card for VZW 4G? I've implemented one in a mobile command truck for a police department. I can't say that I've been very impressed and have had to open numerous TAC cases pertaining to both the LTE EHWIC card and its predecessor, the 3G HWIC card. The issue that I've had have been that the connection doesn't stay up all the time. There were some settings that I felt would help keep the card stay online (disabling idle timeouts, short delays between disconnect and reconnect, etc) however the card would still drop offline regularly even in the middle of a data transfer. It has been a couple years since I've touched that card so I don't remember all the specifics but my recollection is that after about 10 minutes the card would disconnect. Verizon claimed that they weren't doing anything of the sort. One thing that will drop the connection, by the way, is sending out RFC1918 and multicast traffic to the VZW network. I implemented egress filtering to block those types of traffic but th! e! link would still regularly drop. The TAC engineer told me that some of the commands I was trying to configure weren't actually doing anything because the support didn't exist in the IOS release I was using and he didn't think the commands would ever be supported. Maybe things are different now but my previous experience had been anything but flawless. Best, Ryan Wilkins ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR920
Hello. We are looking into this plattform as a highend CPE so we would also be interested in such information if available. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: den 24 november 2014 15:15 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 On Monday, November 24, 2014 03:43:05 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: If anyone else has any information to share about the ASR 920, either privately or to the list, please let me know. Reach out to Waris for more details. He's always helpful with this, as we're also doing the same re: this platform. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600
Hello. The feeling we have had is that mostly it's the tri-rate copper SFPs that is causing the frustration. Same with ASR1001. Never had an issue with optical fixed rate modules though. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: den 4 september 2014 20:41 To: 'Lobo'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600 Have you tried the hidden global command... service unsupported-transceiver This worked for me when I couldn't get sfp's to work. My notes below... after typing that global command, just shut/no shut the port and it should immediately start working. you won't need to reboot me3600 nor will you need to reinsert the sfp. it will work. insert sfp... show log will show bad crc error and port in err-disabled mode. sh int status err sh int g0/23 ...will show port in err-disabled sh inventory ...will not be listed at first. ...will be down down on sh ip int br conf t int g0/23 shut no shut sh inventory ...will now show like this... NAME: GigabitEthernet0/23, DESCR: Not Present PID: , VID: , SN: 08332636 Apr 18 07:59:26: %GBIC_SECURITY_CRYPT-4-VN_DATA_CRC_ERROR: GBIC in port 23 has bad crc Apr 18 07:59:26: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: gbic-invalid error detected on Gi0/23, putting Gi0/23 in err-disable state eng-lab-3600-2#sh int status err Port Name Status Reason Gi0/23lab2 pcerr-disabled gbic-invalid conf t service unsupported-transceiver eng-lab-3600-2#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. eng-lab-3600-2(config)#service unsupported-transceiver Warning: When Cisco determines that a fault or defect can be traced to the use of third-party transceivers installed by a customer or reseller, then, at Cisco's discretion, Cisco may withhold support under warranty or a Cisco support program. In the course of providing support for a Cisco networking product Cisco may require that the end user install Cisco transceivers if Cisco determines that removing third-party parts will assist Cisco in diagnosing the cause of a support issue. eng-lab-3600-2(config)#int g0/23 eng-lab-3600-2(config-if)#shut eng-lab-3600-2(config-if)#no shut eng-lab-3600-2(config-if)#^Z eng-lab-3600-2#ib g0/23 Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol GigabitEthernet0/23unassigned YES unset down down eng-lab-3600-2#ib g0/23 Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol GigabitEthernet0/23unassigned YES unset down down eng-lab-3600-2#ib g0/23 Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol GigabitEthernet0/23unassigned YES unset upup eng-lab-3600-2# ...show invent... NAME: GigabitEthernet0/23, DESCR: Not Present PID: , VID: , SN: 08332636 ...sho log... Apr 18 08:08:24: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/23, changed state to up Apr 18 08:08:25: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/23, changed state to up eng-lab-3600-2#sh int status err eng-lab-3600-2# Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lobo Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 10:48 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600 Similar issues here. The only 1000BaseT SFPs that we've gotten to work are the Cisco branded ones. Some of the other brands/manufacturers we've used have given mixed results. In one instance we had plugged in a 10/100/1000 SFP and tried connecting it to a Cisco 3750 FE port. The FE port on the 3750 would come up but it would not come up on the 3600X side. Swapping the SFP with a Cisco branded one would resolve the issue most of the time. The 3600X has proven to be one of the more finicky switches in terms of accepting non Cisco branded SFPs. Jose On 9/4/2014 6:53 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 03/09/2014 22:03, David Farrell wrote: On 02/09/2014 20:10, James Bensley wrote: I've used hundreads with no issues at all (with both insertion/removal and actual operation). I've had a few 1000BaseT SFPs, both Cisco-branded and otherwise, where the wee tab mechanism has broken and the 'release' isn't pushed in to allow the SFP to slide out. I ended up having to push the 'release' mechanism in with a screwdriver to pop the SFP out. Had to file those SFPs in the bin. Likewise. The copper SFPs seem to be a bit hit and miss TBH, in terms of physical build quality and actual work-ing-ness, particular the tri-rate / autoneg style issues
Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM
Yea that depends on sw version. We ran into the issue when upgrading to a newer image on routers that receive full feeds from upstream. Sent it to tac and they said it was memory issue. Skickas med OWA för iPad Från: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net för Rich Lewis rle...@sis.tv Skickat: den 6 augusti 2014 21:30:55 Till: Chuck Church; 'Richard Hicks'; 'CiscoNSP List' Kopia: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: 06 August 2014 19:20 That seems crazy that 4GB can't support a full table. FWIW, we have full tables on an ASR1001 with 4GB RAM, and with add-path enabled: 503890 network entries using 124964720 bytes of memory 982424 path entries using 110031488 bytes of memory BGP using 281251490 total bytes of memory I guess it depends what else you're doing, but 4GB would seem ample on the face of it. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard Hicks $15k list price for 16GB of standard ECC RAM is criminal. Agreed! ** Satellite Information Services Limited. Registered Office: Whitehall Avenue, Kingston, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK10 0AX. Company No. 4243307 The information in this email (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. ** ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM
Yepp same here we upgraded our route reflectors to 16gig just a couple if weeks ago. We used hp memory for it. I Will try and get a partnumber for it on monday. :) Skickas med OWA för iPad Från: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net för Richard Hicks richard.hi...@gmail.com Skickat: den 6 augusti 2014 19:33:15 Till: CiscoNSP List Kopia: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [c-nsp] ASR1001 RAM We just purchased these 16GB kits for our ASR1001's: http://www.memoryx.com/masr1k100116gb.html Haven't had any problems. The 4GB that come default on the ASR1001's cannot hold a full BGP routing table. I tried to get our Cisco Rep and Reseller to recommend Cisco Approved RAM but they would not bite. Said they were concerned that any non-Cisco branded memory would not be up to the task. Hog wash. $15k list price for 16GB of standard ECC RAM is criminal. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:36 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Can anyone please recommend (Non Cisco) ram for the ASR1001's ? Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509
Hello. In ios-xr the mtu is the L2 mtu while in vanilla ios the mtu is L3 mtu. This gives that XR is including L2 headers in the mtu setting. So in reality you have matching MTUs at present but when you configure XR with an mtu of 1500 you get a mismatch. How is the etherchannel configured? Is the 6509 routing anything or are you using it as a switch? Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lee Starnes Sent: den 20 maj 2014 23:00 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] MTU packet loss problem 12410 XR and 6509 Hello everyone, A strange MTU issue has popped up and for the life of me I am unable to figure out why. This seems to only affect one Metro-E carrier and only when the traffic passes between the 6500 and the 12410. ME Carrier A --- 10G 6509 bundle-ether1(4G)---12410A ME Carrier B ---/ \-bundle-ether2(4G)---12410B ME Carrier C --/ Traffic that passes from either 12410 to customer links on ME carrier A are seeing MTU issues and packet loss. Traffic across those same links for carriers B and C have no issue. To test this, we can ping from from the 12410 to a site on ME carrier A with 1500byte packet size and get packet loss. The same test to clients on ME carrier B and C have no issues. Now, since no changes were made on our end and the carrier states no changes were made on their end, we are at a standstill. However, I did see that the MTU size on the 12410's is by default 1514 and the MTU on the 6500 is 1500. Changing this to match 1500 on both sides causes no traffic to pass. I'm not sure why both sides of the bundle-ether interfaces matching MTU causes 100% packet loss. Anybody have any ideas on why matching MTU size would cause no traffic to pass? Ultimately the carrier will need to fix their issue, but I would like to understand why this problem of matched MTU sizes causes no traffic. Thanks. -Lee ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4570 / Virus Database: 3950/7522 - Release Date: 05/19/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Replacing 3750X stack
Maybee the new 3650 is enough? Should have dubbel the buffer size according to cisco (12mb vs 6mb) Shared on all ports. Question is if its enough? Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: den 2 maj 2014 09:55 To: Garry Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Replacing 3750X stack Hi, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:32AM +0200, Garry wrote: We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a core switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so we are looking to upgrade them. Not sure about your feature requirements, but have you thought about a Nexus 5500/2200 combo? Alternatively, the 2960X series provides pretty If buffers are an issue, 2960 is no better than 3750. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASR-1K and 3rd party sfps
Hello We have previously had problems with SFPs that has the ability to link up on 10/100/1000. Even Ciscos own 10/100/1000 SFPs dosent work there for us at least. When we insert an SFP that can only establish a link on 1000mbit then it has worked so far for us regardless of manufacturer. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman Sent: den 23 april 2014 07:08 To: Mike Hale Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR-1K and 3rd party sfps On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Mike Hale wrote: We've seen really weird behavior with third party SFPs in the past. NHR has been surprisingly solid for us across all out platforms so far *knock on wood*. We've got some Finisar-branded SFPs in our ASR which work nicely (but that's expected since Finisar is the OEM, IIRC, for Cisco's SFPs). Actually...check this out. https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11445646/advice-needed-cisc o-asr-1002-routers-sfps The GLC-T don't appear to be supported on first glance. The GE-T are. Since your vendor calls them GLC-T (even though they claim to be GE-T), that might be your issue? I suspect you nailed it. The sticker says GLC-T, the idprom (or perhaps this is something IOS is generating based on some other properties of the GBIC) says GE-T: Transceiver Type: = GE T (26) Of course it also claims the connector is an LC (or LC.), which is beyond nonsensical: Connector type= LC. Vendor is supposed to be shipping something out to replace it, not sure what yet. I promise to follow-up for the archives when I've got something that works. Thanks, Charles On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:17 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote: Ive got some ASR1006's with SPA-5X1GE with NHR Gb copper SFP's that work finedont have any 1002-X's to test sorry. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4355 / Virus Database: 3882/7378 - Release Date: 04/22/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA Software
Hello. We had to request some of the images when we upgraded all our firewalls. Got a response from TAC an hour or so later, Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brandon Ewing Sent: den 15 april 2014 20:14 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA Software On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:05:46PM -0400, Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA Software Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20140409-asa Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2014 April 9 16:00 UTC (GMT) Has anyone had any luck finding the fixed 8.3(2.40) images? The latest interims I can find are 2.39. Emailed TAC, but no response yet. -- Brandon Ewing(nicot...@warningg.com) ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues
Hello Mark and Lukas. We have a full view of Both IPV6 and IPV4 from 2 providers until recently. Yes the CSR 1000V and more so ios XRv is interesting actually. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: den 25 mars 2014 06:32 To: Lukas Tribus Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues On Monday, March 24, 2014 11:45:28 PM Lukas Tribus wrote: You definitely cannot run a full view on a 64-bit ASR1k platform with only 4GB of physical RAM. Which is why I ditched the ASR1001 and went for CSR1000v on Dell servers. Mark. - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3722/7238 - Release Date: 03/23/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues
We have also had the same issue with some of our ASR 1001 boxes running 4 Gig memory and 4 peers 2x V4 and 2x V6. So upgrade of memory on those for us. Reboot frees up enough ram to get them going for a short while but memory upgrade and software upgrade for longterm. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Harold 'Buz' Dale Sent: den 24 mars 2014 14:56 To: Patrick M. Hausen; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues We had a similar problem with a 7609 with a supe720. TAC diagnosed that we were using too much memory for our BGP tables. We would get a login prompt but it would fail even with the correct password. The box seems to be passing packets although we get some BGP peering issues occasionally. This box is scheduled for replacement soon so we are just dealing with it for the next week or so. Good Luck, Buz -- buz.d...@usg.edu Network Support Specialist University System of GA -IT Services. 706-583-2052 or (Toll Free in GA) 888-875-3697 On 3/24/14, 9:16 AM, Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de wrote: Hi, all, in Saturday our Rancid started to complain that it could not log on to one of our core/uplink routers, anymore. Yet the system is generally alive and happily pushing packets - Nagios did not ring me about any link or service failing, so this came as a bit of a surprise. Turns out, SSH logins are not possible, anymore. Telnet and rsh work just fine. For each faile SSH login there is a line like this in the log: Mar 20 12:30:09.415: %AAA-3-ACCT_LOW_MEM_UID_FAIL: AAA unable to create UID for incoming calls due to insufficient processor memory Ah ... OK ... if it's failing in AAA, why does telnet still work? And the free memory doesn't look too bad, either: HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b) Processor 477267E0 881661984 8603850442127694018235288 20933772 I/O80067108864216056044550326045451176 45501532 Processor memory Alloc PCSize Blocks BytesWhat 0x4014A218 24 01 24XDR: mfib pltf group 0x4014A218 28 01 28XDR: mfib pltf group 0x4014A218 32 01 32XDR: mfib pltf group 0x401567F4 003808 01 003808Init 0x4016D4BC 24 01 24Init ... In the thousands of lines that follow, there are precisely 256 memory blocks allocated to the SSH process. Is this a single process holding all that memory or are there 256 SSH processes, that are somewhat stuck/zombie because they are not terminated when the connection is closed? I admit that I rarely log off, but rather just close the window running my SSH connection. Bad admin. ;-) But any sane OS should timeout the TCP connection eventually and then terminate the process waiting on that socket. IOS version is 15.1(2)SY1 advanced enterprise. How can I proceed finding and eliminating the root cause? Rebooting the box to clean up is an option if planned ahead, but not a suitable permanent fix (i.e. rebooting regularly is out of the question). Thanks for any hints, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 i...@punkt.de http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues
Hello. Nop but an old image. Ran it through TAC and they advised to upgrade memory. It was apparently expected behavior with only 4 Gb of ram and 2 full IPV4 feeds and 2 full IPV6 feeds. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: den 24 mars 2014 17:14 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Gustav UHLANDER; Harold 'Buz' Dale; Patrick M. Hausen Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6504-E IOS SSH/memory issues On Monday, March 24, 2014 05:14:13 PM Gustav UHLANDER wrote: We have also had the same issue with some of our ASR 1001 boxes running 4 Gig memory and 4 peers 2x V4 and 2x V6. So upgrade of memory on those for us. Reboot frees up enough ram to get them going for a short while but memory upgrade and software upgrade for longterm. Sounds strange, but then again, I've never ran the ASR1001 myself (only the ASR1002 and ASR1006). You're not, perhaps, running a second IOSd instance, are you? Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] FCoE or FCIP over MPLS possible?
Hello. We are having the same thoughts also and so far we have come to the conclusion that it should be possible from e technical standpoint but haven't done any tests with it. Then we have the age old question if we really should. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vitkovský Adam Sent: den 19 mars 2014 11:45 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] FCoE or FCIP over MPLS possible? Hi folks, Is it possible to run FCoE over p2p PW or FCIP in an MPLS VRF please? Or there are so tight limitations regarding delay and variation that a dedicated fiber is the only option please? Thank you adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] management access BCP?
Hello. We usually place a 1900 router with cellular modem, serial card and appropriate cellular plan to go with it. This usually just calls home through a DMVPN tunnel. I know it isn't fool proof but we consider it good enough at the moment. We are thinking about some dsl or similar connection to our bigger sites. Although we find that the cellular solution is pretty good. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: den 14 mars 2014 09:28 To: Charles Sprickman Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] management access BCP? Hi, On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:02:29PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: What are people doing these days to get OOB into a single small location? Cellular? What we've done is find some other ISP in the same colo that we knew from some common event, and just throw two cat5 cables over the wall - one has a /29 from their IP space, one has a /29 from our IP space, and we both get nicely independent OOB-over-IP. Of course you might want to connect that to a device that is seriously hardened, and such :-) - not to a speaks telnet-only and has direct access to all your consoles boxes. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3722/7186 - Release Date: 03/12/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] management access BCP?
Hello. We usually place a 1900 router with cellular modem and appropriate cellular cell plan to go with it. This usually just calls home through a DMVPN tunnel. I know it isn't fool proof but we consider it good enough. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: den 14 mars 2014 09:28 To: Charles Sprickman Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] management access BCP? Hi, On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:02:29PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote: What are people doing these days to get OOB into a single small location? Cellular? What we've done is find some other ISP in the same colo that we knew from some common event, and just throw two cat5 cables over the wall - one has a /29 from their IP space, one has a /29 from our IP space, and we both get nicely independent OOB-over-IP. Of course you might want to connect that to a device that is seriously hardened, and such :-) - not to a speaks telnet-only and has direct access to all your consoles boxes. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3722/7186 - Release Date: 03/12/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] output rate-limiting ME-3600X
Hello. We also do it in the same manner but usually on physical ports only (one port per customer on most devices.) policy-map 10mbit-out description 10mbit output class class-default shape average 1000 interface GigabitEthernet0/19 description cust: [10mbit] no switchport vrf forwarding x ip address service-policy input 10mbit-in service-policy output 10mbit-out We use the following software atm. Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.3(2)S1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) at the moment. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Louie Sent: den 25 februari 2014 02:21 To: 'Pshem Kowalczyk' Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] output rate-limiting ME-3600X Thanks, Pshem. I'll try it on 15.2(4) and see if it works. much appreciated, Eric Louie -Original Message- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 4:45 PM To: Eric Louie Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] output rate-limiting ME-3600X Hi, We do it regularly and for all interfaces: policy-map PM-INT-100M-OUT class class-default shape average 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/2 switchport trunk allowed vlan none switchport mode trunk service-policy output PM-INT-100M-OUT We'd generally have a service-instance rate-limit under that as well: service instance 331 ethernet encapsulation dot1q 331 l2protocol forward service-policy input PM-CUST-DEFAULT-50M-AF-IN service-policy output PM-CUST-DEFAULT-50M-OUT xconnect 10.123.111.1 271331 encapsulation mpls policy-map PM-CUST-DEFAULT-50M-OUT description limiting to 50 Mbps class CM-DUMMY class class-default shape average 5000 queue-limit percent 100 (CM-DUMMY is there to allow for a queue-limit with only class-default). This is on 15.3(2)S. kind regards Pshem On 25 February 2014 11:05, Eric Louie elo...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm at an impasse trying to get this to work. Does anyone have any examples of setting output rate limiting on a physical interface? Am I running into an IOS feature issue? lab-kma-sd-base1# sh ver Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(4)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) much appreciated, Eric Louie ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment
I think the more expensive kit the more checks are performed. Also notice if you are cisco partner then you might be excluded from that if you buy second hand equipment (registered partners can only buy equipment from dists) Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Elliot Sent: den 10 januari 2014 01:32 To: Sander Steffann Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment Hi, So, just to clarify - You can purchase refurb/secondhand Cisco kit and then purchase a smartnet contract for software access/updates(And also hardware replacement)? Maybe, but Cisco is going to charge you a lot of money for that. More money than purchasing new? Smartnet on a secondhand vs new is the same price? But you cant purchase (legally) refurb/secondhand kit and use it with the software running on it? In the EU you can always legally use the software that came with the hardware. In other parts of the world you will probably have to pay. This is based on the following pages on cisco.com: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/hw_sw_relicensing_program.html: - The embedded Cisco software that runs on the hardware-as well as Cisco standalone software-is not transferable. If you purchase used or secondary-market Cisco equipment, you must acquire a new license from Cisco before the software can be used. - Used and secondary-market equipment is not covered under the Cisco standard warranty, and you cannot place it under a Cisco service and support contract unless it is re-licensed by Cisco and has passed an inspection by Cisco We have occasionally purchased secondhand kit out of necessity (Disty's have no stock available - CE equipment..800 series etc), and we were able to smartnet them without issue, and also without being re-licensed or being inspectedIs this deemed illegal by Cisco even though they smartnet the unit based on serial numbers? This is a complete minefield! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6987 - Release Date: 01/08/14 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment
Hello mark. What I meant was the more expensive kit as in higher range platforms (6500/7600 platform for instance). There seems to be some checks done when you as a partner buy smartnet for those platforms. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] Sent: den 10 januari 2014 10:24 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Gustav UHLANDER; John Elliot; Sander Steffann Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Re-licensing secondhand Cisco equipment On Friday, January 10, 2014 10:38:03 AM Gustav UHLANDER wrote: I think the more expensive kit the more checks are performed. Also notice if you are cisco partner then you might be excluded from that if you buy second hand equipment (registered partners can only buy equipment from dists) Intuitively, more expensive kit is likely more current kit, which means you don't need re-licensing as it's not so available on the grey market (not including things like optics, SPA's, e.t.c.) :-). Unless you meant something else... Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 clustering (like 6509 vss or IOS-VR nV edge)
Should also be possible with SUP2T but then you are bound to the SY train last I checked so its probably not relevant to most outfits. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stefano Sasso Sent: den 8 januari 2014 16:16 To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 clustering (like 6509 vss or IOS-VR nV edge) Never tested nor used, but if you check table 1 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856_ps2797_Products_Data_Sheet.html VSS is supported on VS-S720-10G that can fit both 6500 and 7600. bye stefano 2014/1/8 Aaron aar...@gvtc.com Is it possible to take two 7609's and make them operate as one ? Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- Stefano Sasso http://stefano.dscnet.org/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 10Gig CWDM
Hello. We are using third party X2 CWDM optics in almost all of our 6500s. Havent hit a snag yet. :) Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 622 42 15 Fax: +46 8 622 42 23 Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03 gustav.ulan...@steria.se www.steria.se -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Turnbow Sent: den 23 oktober 2013 18:01 To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: [c-nsp] 10Gig CWDM Hello Everyone, We are looking into upgrading some links actually on a cwdm run to 10Gig. After looking into DWDM equipment I was told to check into 10Gig CWDM plugs offered in sfp+ xenpak x2 xfp etc Such as the ones offered by smartoptics http://www.smartoptics.com/optical-transceivers/10g-ethernet-2/ As we would like to add this to our existing 6500s does anyone have any experience using the x2/xenpaks in a cisco 6500 environment? AFAIK cisco does not support 10G CWDM plug ins, at least I can't find anything stating that they do publically. They are telling me it'll work but is unsupported , yet I would sleep better at night knowing that we are not beta testers Thanks Brian --- This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information, if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
