Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone in B. C. using CUCM?

[Heim, Dennis]

In Central Indiana we went the opposite way about a decade ago. It definitely 
creates its challenges. Biggest thing is waiting for OEM’s to put in the new 
time zone, which in your case you can’t do too far ahead of time, since you 
still using DST this year. Additionally, all those systems are that end of life 
or outside maintenance, sometimes it force old systems to be upgraded across 
multiple major releases.

Dennis Heim | Technical Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]

“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
“Leadership isn’t a different maker. It is the difference maker” – Tim Kight
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 7:52 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone in B. C. using CUCM?


This ain’t gonna be fun...

https://www.narcity.com/news/ca/bc/vancouver/cancel-bc-daylight-savings-time-province-makes-and-brings-new-legislation-this-week

-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
 | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

[Heim, Dennis]

Without , I was getting interdigit timeouts. It may be 
possible to clean up that behavior by refining the dialplan definition.

Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]

“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
“Leadership isn’t a different maker. It is the difference maker” – Tim Kight
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Anthony Holloway 
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 10:50 AM
To: Heim, Dennis 
Cc: Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) ; Kent Roberts 
; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

I was going to mention that, but your email signature Chat button doesn't work.

Just kidding.  Kudos to Kent for the quick thinking.

But why did you turn off KPML?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:41 AM Heim, Dennis 
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
The issue was related to the overlay (VXLAN), that I use in our lab 
environment. The overhead of around 50 bytes caused the UDP packet to fragment, 
and it was not handled well. The solution was to switch the phones from UDP to 
TCP at the voice register pool level.

voice register pool  <#>
id mac 
session-transport tcp
type 7942
number 1 dn 2
no digit collect kpml
dialplan 1
dtmf-relay sip-kpml sip-notify
username mblack2 password Cisc0123
codec g711ulaw
no vad

Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]

“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
“Leadership isn’t a different maker. It is the difference maker” – Tim Kight
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) 
mailto:sreen...@cisco.com>>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 11:34 PM
To: Kent Roberts mailto:k...@fredf.org>>; Heim, Dennis 
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

This behavior sounds as though the phone thinks it’s registered to the CME, but 
isn’t..
What are the outputs of these commands?
show voice register pool all brief
show voice register global
show voice register pool 

Also, take a packet capture from the CME if you can to see if any SIP packets 
are making it to the router. It could also be a binding problem on the 
interface.

Regards
Sreekanth


From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Kent Roberts
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 9:42 AM
To: Heim, Dennis mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12

Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

[Heim, Dennis]

The issue was related to the overlay (VXLAN), that I use in our lab 
environment. The overhead of around 50 bytes caused the UDP packet to fragment, 
and it was not handled well. The solution was to switch the phones from UDP to 
TCP at the voice register pool level.

voice register pool  <#>
id mac 
session-transport tcp
type 7942
number 1 dn 2
no digit collect kpml
dialplan 1
dtmf-relay sip-kpml sip-notify
username mblack2 password Cisc0123
codec g711ulaw
no vad

Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]

“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
“Leadership isn’t a different maker. It is the difference maker” – Tim Kight
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Sreekanth Narayanan (sreenara) 
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 11:34 PM
To: Kent Roberts ; Heim, Dennis 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

This behavior sounds as though the phone thinks it’s registered to the CME, but 
isn’t..
What are the outputs of these commands?
show voice register pool all brief
show voice register global
show voice register pool 

Also, take a packet capture from the CME if you can to see if any SIP packets 
are making it to the router. It could also be a binding problem on the 
interface.

Regards
Sreekanth


From: cisco-voip 
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Kent Roberts
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 9:42 AM
To: Heim, Dennis mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

Have you tried it with tcp on that dial peer?   I know it sounds stupid, but 
never know these days…..

On Aug 24, 2019, at 10:07 PM, Heim, Dennis 
mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:

I am configuring CME 12.5 with SIP phones. However, when I dial from the phone, 
I see nothing on the router from either dial-peer or ccsip traces. When I dial 
any of the numbers such as +13145552002, the SIP phone just sits there and 
eventually gives you reorder.

ip dhcp pool PSTN-Voice
network 10.1.100.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.1.100.1
 option 150 ip 10.1.100.1
 dns-server 10.1.5.14
 domain-name ciscoclass.com<http://ciscoclass.com/>
class PSTN-Voice-Range-Class
  address range 10.1.100.100 10.1.100.199

voice service voip
no ip address trusted authenticate
address-hiding
media disable-detailed-stats
allow-connections sip to sip
no supplementary-service sip handle-replaces
sip
  bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet2
  bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet2
  registrar server expires max 1200 min 300
  early-offer forced
!
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw

voice register global
mode cme
source-address 10.1.100.1 port 5060
max-dn 10
max-pool 10
authenticate register
authenticate realm all
timezone 8
service https
tftp-path flash:
create profile sync 0274021104025313
auto-register
!
voice register dn  1
number +13175551000
name PSTN Phone
label PSTN-3175551000
!
voice register pool  1
id mac 3CCE.7359.9A93
type 7942
number 1 dn 1
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
username  password 
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
interface GigabitEthernet1
description ** SIP SP **
ip address 10.1.20.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
interface GigabitEthernet2
description ** PSTN Voice **
ip address 10.1.100.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
interface GigabitEthernet3
description ** Management **
ip address 192.168.15.52 255.255.255.0
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.15.1
!
tftp-server bootflash:apps42.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:cnu42.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:cvm42sip

[cisco-voip] CME 12.5 SIP

[Heim, Dennis]

I am configuring CME 12.5 with SIP phones. However, when I dial from the phone, 
I see nothing on the router from either dial-peer or ccsip traces. When I dial 
any of the numbers such as +13145552002, the SIP phone just sits there and 
eventually gives you reorder.

ip dhcp pool PSTN-Voice
network 10.1.100.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.1.100.1
 option 150 ip 10.1.100.1
 dns-server 10.1.5.14
 domain-name ciscoclass.com
class PSTN-Voice-Range-Class
  address range 10.1.100.100 10.1.100.199

voice service voip
no ip address trusted authenticate
address-hiding
media disable-detailed-stats
allow-connections sip to sip
no supplementary-service sip handle-replaces
sip
  bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet2
  bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet2
  registrar server expires max 1200 min 300
  early-offer forced
!
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw

voice register global
mode cme
source-address 10.1.100.1 port 5060
max-dn 10
max-pool 10
authenticate register
authenticate realm all
timezone 8
service https
tftp-path flash:
create profile sync 0274021104025313
auto-register
!
voice register dn  1
number +13175551000
name PSTN Phone
label PSTN-3175551000
!
voice register pool  1
id mac 3CCE.7359.9A93
type 7942
number 1 dn 1
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
username  password 
codec g711ulaw
no vad
!
interface GigabitEthernet1
description ** SIP SP **
ip address 10.1.20.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
interface GigabitEthernet2
description ** PSTN Voice **
ip address 10.1.100.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
interface GigabitEthernet3
description ** Management **
ip address 192.168.15.52 255.255.255.0
negotiation auto
no mop enabled
no mop sysid
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.15.1
!
tftp-server bootflash:apps42.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:cnu42.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:cvm42sip.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:dsp42.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:jar42sip.9-4-2ES26.sbn
tftp-server bootflash:SIP42.9-4-2SR3-1S.loads
tftp-server bootflash:term42.default.loads
tftp-server bootflash:term62.default.loads
!
elephony-service
load 7945 term42.default
max-conferences 8 gain -6
transfer-system full-consult
!
!
dial-peer voice 100 voip
description *** Inbound LAN side dial-peer ***
session protocol sipv2
incoming called-number .
voice-class codec 1
 voice-class sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet1
voice-class sip bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet1
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
!
dial-peer voice 500 voip
description ** HQ DIDs **
destination-pattern +1314555200[0-9]
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:10.1.20.10
session transport udp
voice-class codec 1
 voice-class sip early-offer forced
voice-class sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet1
voice-class sip bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet1
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
!
dial-peer voice 501 voip
description ** BR DIDs **
destination-pattern +1206555300[0-9]
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:10.1.20.20
session transport udp
voice-class codec 1
 voice-class sip early-offer forced
voice-class sip bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet1
voice-class sip bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet1
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
!
Dennis Heim | Domain Architect (Collaboration Labs)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]

"The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come" - 
Steve Jobs
"Leadership isn't a different maker. It is the difference maker" - Tim Kight
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."  -- Albert Einstein
"If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader" - Urban Meyer
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)" - Marcus Buckingham
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 CCMAdmin login error

[Heim, Dennis]

Best part of that bug….

Workaround:
Keep trying to login until it is successful.


Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
“The most powerful person in the world is the story teller. The storyteller 
sets the vision, values and agenda of an entire generation that is to come” – 
Steve Jobs
"Leaders who don't listen will eventually be surrounded by people who have 
nothing to say" --- Andy Stanley
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.”  -- Albert Einstein
“If you can raise the level of effort and performance in those around you, you 
are officially a leader” – Urban Meyer
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Chris Clouse
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 9:58 AM
To: Jason Aarons (Americas) ; cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 CCMAdmin login error

CSCvm76719

~Chris

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason 
Aarons (Americas)
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 8:09 AM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 12.5 CCMAdmin login error


Every time we are logged in to CUCM pub and step away when we try to log back 
in we get the below error

https://blah/ccmadmin/j_security_check

HTTP Status 400 - Invalid direct reference to form login page


Known bug?

-jason


This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down

[Heim, Dennis]

I think quite a few webex sites are still living on platform 1.0, which means 
no sip endpoints.


From: cisco-voip  On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:33 AM
To: Ryan Huff 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Teams Down


Looks like Webex cmr went back to degraded performance at 6:41 ET.

—-
Open Incidents
· Webex Meetings: Webex Video Platform 2.0 intermittent connectivity 
issues
oIdentified -
Engineering has identified a specific behavior in the Webex infrastructure that 
is impacting the traffic for the Video Platform 2.0 users. A change is being 
implemented to address the issue.
Sep 26, 2018 3:28 AM UTC
oIdentified -
Engineering is still working on the Video Platform 2.0 infrastructure. As the 
broader service repairs to the Webex Teams platform is being completed, there 
are intermittent failures or service quality issues when joining to Webex 
Meetings using video call-in or call-back from a video endpoint or SIP device. 
Users connecting to meetings using the Webex Meetings apps to connect VoIP or 
video, or connecting through PSTN audio continue to be unaffected. Any users 
that may be seeing issues with their SIP call-in or call-back functionality may 
retry their operation, or utilize one of those other connection options. To 
check the Cisco Webex Video Platform Version on a site, visit 
https://collaborationhelp.cisco.com/article/en-us/WBX28853. Thank you for 
your continued patience while we continue to improve and restore services.
Sep 25, 2018 10:41 PM UTC





-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Sep 25, 2018, at 6:39 AM, Ryan Huff 
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>> wrote:
I haven't seen one this long this since the early days of Spark ... been down 
since 9:22PM eastern on 9-24-18 ... wow 

 
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco hdmi to dvi cable - audio from HDMI?

[Heim, Dennis]

I haven’t been following this thread too closely, so I might be off base, but 
here goes. I have a C40 and my laptop has HDMI and through more work than it 
should be am able to share video and audio.

Laptop->HDMI->HDMI Doctor/EDID spoofer->HDMI splitter->C40.

The HDMI doctor is used to make my laptop think audio is supported down the 
HDMI wire.
Connected to the HDMI doctor is a gefen HDMI audio extractor which sends the 
audio via RCA/SPDIF to the C40. The video travels down hdmi, which has a 
HDMI->DVI adapter. I have been using this setup for about 3 years.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“Mediocore managers play checkers (assuming everyone is the same). Great 
managers play chess (acknowledging that everyone is unique)” – Marcus Buckingham
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 9:08 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco hdmi to dvi cable - audio from HDMI?


Interesting... macro to switch pc to main video stream? how so?
-sent from mobile device-


Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | 
le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Sep 7, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Playing music through the room audio system (maybe that’s just me).

On your side it’s going to be driven by your users I think, but keep in mind 
that if they are sharing a video you’ll want a macro set up to switch the PC 
input to the main video stream from content to take advantage of the higher 
framerates on the main channel.

-Ryan


On Sep 7, 2018, at 3:37 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:

Alright – before I go spending big bucks… what do we think the use case here is?

I plug my laptop into the V/C unit so I get my display to share. When would I 
need audio? For fancy slide shows, maybe a video show?

I’m thinking it’s not gonna happen often…

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 2W1
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook



From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>>
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 9:19 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>>
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip 
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net) 
mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco hdmi to dvi cable - audio from HDMI?

I’m quite certain it will not transfer digital audio from the HDMI port to the 
analog 3.5mm connector on the DVI side. That would require an active converter.

Given the complexities in this (and how it breaks HDCP) unless the thing you 
are buying specifically says it does it assume it does not.

Amazon has boxes that will do this, but a quick search doesn’t give me any 
cables that do it.

-Ryan



On Sep 6, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>> wrote:


Does anyone know if the CAB-DVI-HDMI-8M+= cable will take audio directly from 
the HDMI source and pump it to the audio cable in the DVI end? Or whether both 
1/8” jacks need to be plugged in to feed audio to the far end?

https://www.cdw.ca/product/cisco-video-audio-cable-hdmi-dvi-8-m/4486020#PO

We have a C60 and two SX20s that only have DVI in with a spare mic input. Of 
course, laptops nowadays have HDMI. Not too many have the audio out. Or close 
enough for that little pigtail.


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

[Heim, Dennis]

And the “admin” of the corporate smart account is probably whoever registered 
the first Cisco One router several years ago. You can start moving your 
existing PAKs into smart licensing virtual accounts. I would start trying to 
get customers to do that.

Remembe, PAK keys were associated with a specific user’s CCO. Smart licensing 
entitlement gets owned by org/virtual account.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Scott Voll ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

It’s all in the cloud now. They’ve been talking about it for a while. I did the 
conversion for an internal system and it was fairly painless, but should be fun 
for the customers. Everybody needs their own smartholdings account and CCO 
logins.



Matthew Loraditch

Sr. Network Engineer


p: 443.541.1518



w: www.heliontechnologies.com

 |

e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com


[cid:image005.png@01D34417.DCE04C20]


[Facebook]


[Twitter]


[LinkedIn]






 From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Scott Voll
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:31 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

am I last to know?  They are once again moving licensing?

https://communities.cisco.com/message/271653

Scott
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

[Heim, Dennis]

As long as they actually get it all there, I am fine with it. My fear is they 
get ½ way through and go… nah too much work… lets go in another direction. Of 
course license migrations is really code for licensing true up and prove what 
you actually paid for because Cisco’s records always disappear around this time.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed 
Leatherman
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 11:13 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

At CiscoLive this year it sounded like they were getting push from top down to 
unify product licensing, so hopefully CC gets on the same boat. Not thrilled 
that its all online but if it gets everything consistent that will be a plus.

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
> wrote:

I knew that v12 was smart licensing only, but I did not know that they were 
removing PLM. I’m guessing it’s going to follow the rest of Cisco products 
(finally) and use whatever smart licensing deployment you have on site. They 
have a few options, we’ll likely go with a proxy.

Of course, UCCx will use it’s own licensing solution. Maybe even pick up PLM at 
a firesale. ;)

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:31 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] PLM dead

am I last to know?  They are once again moving licensing?

https://communities.cisco.com/message/271653

Scott

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] python project ideas

[Heim, Dennis]

Expressway API’s should be fairly easy.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abebe 
Amare
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 11:13 AM
To: cisco voip 
Subject: [cisco-voip] python project ideas

Hi,

I am taking Python for network engineers course and have to do a project on it. 
The project must be using an API or a major framework to do something. It 
ideally should involve manipulating real-world data.
I was looking to do my project focusing on Cisco collaboration using REST API. 
Can you guys suggest any project ideas?

Thanks in advance
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PLM 11.0 issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3?

[Heim, Dennis]

So if you upgrade CUC to SU3, and don't have the encryption loaded, it will 
disable encryption?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
"When you have unlimited time, its easy" - Captain Chesley Sullenberger
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should transform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick 
Bergquist
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:41 AM
To: Charles Goldsmith 
Cc: voip puck 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PLM 11.0 issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3?

Thanks Charles.  Rehosted Unity licenses to unity server w/added encryption 
license and Unity is happy again.

Weird it worked fine for a week before throwing a licensing error.

Erick

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Erick Bergquist  wrote:
> FWIW,
>
> This is the only paragraph in the CUC 11.5 SU3 release notes.
> Encryption is disabled on CUC at moment.
>
> In earlier releases, by default encryption was enabled on Cisco Unity 
> Connection. However, Unity Connection 11.5(1) SU3 and later allows you 
> to enable or disable the encryption on restricted version of Cisco 
> Unity Connection to use the security modules. In Demo Mode, the 
> encryption is disabled by default. It means you are not allowed to use 
> the security modules of Cisco Unity Connection in Demo Mode. You can 
> enable the encryption on Unity Connection only when $0 ENC SKU/license 
> file is installed on the PLM. To enable or disable the encryption, a 
> new CLI command utils cuc encryption is introduced in Unity Connection 
> 11.5(1) SU3 and later.
>
>
> admin:utils cuc encryption ?
> utils cuc encryption [enable | disable | status] admin:utils cuc 
> encryption status
>
> Encryption Mode: Disabled
>
>
> I'm not finding much yet on CUCM 11.0 talking to a PLM 11.5 with the 
> encryption license, if I rehost the licenses to the CUC PLM instance 
> will CUCM 11.0 sync fine?
>
> Or switch version reboot back to 9.x and upgrade unity to 11.5.1 SU2.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Erick Bergquist  wrote:
>> Ok, I was thinking about it being that.  Should have stuck to CUC 11.5.1 SU2.
>>
>> It was working fine for a week. Weird.
>>
>> So I wonder if I can rehost the licenses to Unity Connection 11.5 SU3 
>> and have CUCM 11.0 talk to PLM on unity connection 11.5.1 SU3 fine?
>>
>> PLM is co-located on CUCM 11.0 right now (not standalone PLM server).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Charles Goldsmith 
>>  wrote:
>>> 11.5.1su3 requires PLM 11.5.1su2, due to the change with the 
>>> encryption
>>> license:
>>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/11_5_1_
>>> SU2/releasenotes/cplm_b_release-notes-cplm-1151su2/cplm_b_release-no
>>> tes-cplm-1151su2_chapter_01.html
>>> Look at the first Note.
>>>
>>> YMMV, but I ran into a bug when I upgraded a PLM to su2 recently, it 
>>> wouldn't switch version, even after a reboot, got a vague error 
>>> about locking the database.  After waiting a few hours with no 
>>> change, booted off of the recovery CD and forced the switch.  No 
>>> issues after that.  I had a good backup, so wasn't concerned about forcing 
>>> it.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Erick Bergquist 
>>> 
>>> wrote:

 Anyone having any issues with CUC 11.5.1 SU3 and PLM on a 11.0.1?

 (thinking about rehosting licenses to the 11.5.1 SU3 CUC node)

 It has been working fine for a week since the upgrade and today CUC 
 threw a license error.

 PLM 11.0 shows a "Application Error" for the Unity Connection instance.

 I deleted the product instance from PLM, added it back and it picks 
 up correct 11.5 version fine then on Sync gives "Application Error".

 I've reset the unity servers and call manager acting as PLM and 
 same thing.

 I reset PLM to default demo mode, deleted the Product instances, 
 and applied the licenses again.  I added Product instances back and 
 it is not liking  Unity still. PLM has all 11.x licenses. PLM 
 detects the unity version 11.5 correct but doesn't sync.

 Reason we're using CUCM 11.0 over 11.5 is due to phone depreciation 
 in
 11.5 with some model phones.

 Erick
 

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

[Heim, Dennis]

I would love to, but I have another session at the same time.. so just imagine 
my heckling from the virtual sense.

Security and certificates need to be easier. There can be a million reasons or 
excuses, as to why its not. But in the end, if it’s complex or difficult, it 
all just goes to the cloud, aka Spark.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com>[cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<tel:+13142121814>[cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<sip:dennis.h...@wwtatc.com>
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) [mailto:rratl...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 12:44 PM
To: Charles Goldsmith <wo...@justfamily.org>
Cc: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>; Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>; cisco-voip voyp list 
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Letsencrypt has 90-day certificates and they auto-renew at 60 days (IIRC).

If you think that’s ok for a CUCM you really need to come listen to me on 
Monday morning.

-Ryan

On Jun 23, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Charles Goldsmith 
<wo...@justfamily.org<mailto:wo...@justfamily.org>> wrote:

Nothing has been announced about it that I'm aware of, but it would be awesome 
if they did.  It only makes sense since Cisco is a major sponsor of Let's 
Encrypt.

CUCM, CUC, UCCX, IM and Expressway should be the priority in my mind :)  
After that, CIMC (updated for all m3 and higher hosts of course), and after 
that, you can throw a bone to the security, wireless and R groups...

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Heim, Dennis 
<dennis.h...@wwt.com<mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
Is 12.x going to support ACME?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814<tel:(314)%20212-1814>
<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
<tel:+13142121814>
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>]
 On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratl...@cisco.com<mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Like how 12.0 seamlessly integrates with https://letsencrypt.org/?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:31 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
<rratl...@cisco.com<mailto:rratl...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Since I have the bright and way-too-early Monday 8AM slot this year I need all 
the advertisement I can get :)

The deck got a big overhaul for Berlin this year and next week won’t be much 
different than the recording I linked to earlier, though I do get to talk about 
some cool stuff coming in 12.0.

-Ryan

On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Geez Philip! Way to be pushy about your session!  ;)

I was in this session (sitting behind Josh Warcop of all people) and it was 
really informative.  It was at the time when multi-server Tomcat certificates 
were just coming out and the session really helped prepare me for that new 
feature.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:34 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
<rratl...@cisco.com&

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

[Heim, Dennis]

Is 12.x going to support ACME?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:00 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Like how 12.0 seamlessly integrates with https://letsencrypt.org/?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:31 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
> wrote:
Since I have the bright and way-too-early Monday 8AM slot this year I need all 
the advertisement I can get :)

The deck got a big overhaul for Berlin this year and next week won’t be much 
different than the recording I linked to earlier, though I do get to talk about 
some cool stuff coming in 12.0.

-Ryan

On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Anthony Holloway 
> wrote:

Geez Philip! Way to be pushy about your session!  ;)

I was in this session (sitting behind Josh Warcop of all people) and it was 
really informative.  It was at the time when multi-server Tomcat certificates 
were just coming out and the session really helped prepare me for that new 
feature.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:34 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
> wrote:
I would highly recommend checking out 
https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=93902=true.
(BRKUCC-2501 from ciscolive365.com if that link does 
not work).

Yes, it’s my session but with CLUS next week hopefully nobody minds the plug.

-Ryan

On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:02 PM, 
erik.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:

Take a look at the link below, it walks through what each cert does so it 
should help you understand the impacts. From my experience working with 
non-secured clusters you need to do one cert at a time to allow CUCM to push 
out that cert to the phones. Since the phones essentially use 2 certs trust 
CUCM you can regen them in stages.

http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/117299/117299-problemsolution-product-00.pdf

-Erik Anderson

From: Samadi boukil
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:32 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Hi,
I want to know about the ampact(s) of re-generation of certifications on CUCM 
8.x (call manager in Mode secure).
thanks.

--
SAMADI Boukil
Élève Ingénieur
Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZS01PWV91S01WWXM=0B_xjs74PFblZYkhMeVRWYkdhZ2tIN3lHaG5NK3RMZWIrRlRNPQ]Profile
 LinkdeIn
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZWU9hNzB0cDQwblE=0B_xjs74PFblZZ1M3b2JBTFp0MjVJL2orUE1OcmZHRStwUE1VPQ]+212696184254

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

[Heim, Dennis]

And you are competing against Spark and Webex Roadmap CCP session as well.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:31 PM
To: Anthony Holloway 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Since I have the bright and way-too-early Monday 8AM slot this year I need all 
the advertisement I can get :)

The deck got a big overhaul for Berlin this year and next week won’t be much 
different than the recording I linked to earlier, though I do get to talk about 
some cool stuff coming in 12.0.

-Ryan

On Jun 22, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Anthony Holloway 
> wrote:

Geez Philip! Way to be pushy about your session!  ;)

I was in this session (sitting behind Josh Warcop of all people) and it was 
really informative.  It was at the time when multi-server Tomcat certificates 
were just coming out and the session really helped prepare me for that new 
feature.

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:34 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
> wrote:
I would highly recommend checking out 
https://www.ciscolive.com/online/connect/sessionDetail.ww?SESSION_ID=93902=true.
(BRKUCC-2501 from ciscolive365.com if that link does 
not work).

Yes, it’s my session but with CLUS next week hopefully nobody minds the plug.

-Ryan

On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:02 PM, 
erik.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:

Take a look at the link below, it walks through what each cert does so it 
should help you understand the impacts. From my experience working with 
non-secured clusters you need to do one cert at a time to allow CUCM to push 
out that cert to the phones. Since the phones essentially use 2 certs trust 
CUCM you can regen them in stages.

http://www.cisco.com/image/gif/paws/117299/117299-problemsolution-product-00.pdf

-Erik Anderson

From: Samadi boukil
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:32 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] re-genarate certifications

Hi,
I want to know about the ampact(s) of re-generation of certifications on CUCM 
8.x (call manager in Mode secure).
thanks.

--
SAMADI Boukil
Élève Ingénieur
Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux
[Image removed by sender. 
https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZS01PWV91S01WWXM=0B_xjs74PFblZYkhMeVRWYkdhZ2tIN3lHaG5NK3RMZWIrRlRNPQ]Profile
 LinkdeIn
[Image removed by sender. 
https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZWU9hNzB0cDQwblE=0B_xjs74PFblZZ1M3b2JBTFp0MjVJL2orUE1OcmZHRStwUE1VPQ]+212696184254

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Hide Number Translation on Screen

[Heim, Dennis]

Even on newer phones you can hide it with transformations, but the second you 
hit hold, it will shot the full numbers, so my guessing is.. it can’t be done.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David 
Zhars
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 12:23 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Hide Number Translation on Screen

Is there a way to not show the number translations on the 7940/7960 series?  
For instance, a 4 digit extension that translates to 95551212.  Can we just not 
show that we are grabbing an outbound line and dialing direct?  trivial, but 
for one customer, it drives him batty...
Dave
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Remote Phone Control

[Heim, Dennis]

Can Unified FX or any of the remote phone control software control a device 
when it is unregistered?



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
"When you have unlimited time, its easy" - Captain Chesley Sullenberger
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should transform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA Multiline on CUCM 11.5(1)SU1 and lower

[Heim, Dennis]

It says , does that mean it only causes the reporting 
issue on CUCM prior to SU2?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 11:06 AM
To: Jeffrey McHugh 
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MRA Multiline on CUCM 11.5(1)SU1 and lower

CER IP Subnet Tracking Issues and Device Mobility issues I can think of 
off-hand.  A lot of people utilize Device Mobility feature to give different 
policies to MRA devices.

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey McHugh 
> wrote:
Anyone try MRA multiline support on call manager lower than 11.5(1)SU2? 
Expressway 8.9.2 guide states the following:

[cid:image006.png@01D2CFC8.F8A9EBA0]



Really, I’m curious as to what the “other features may also be affected by this 
change” when turning on SIP path headers. Any one try it?

Jeffrey McHugh | Sr. Collaboration Consulting Engineer | VCP-DCV, CCNP 
Collaboration
[Company_Logo_Image]
Fidelus Technologies, LLC
Named Best UC Provider in the 
USA
240 West 35th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10001
+1-212-616-7801 office | 
+1-212-616-7850 fax | 
www.fidelus.com
[LinkedIn][Twitter][Facebook][YouTube]

Disclaimer - May 18, 2017
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for Cisco VoIP Group. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions 
presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent 
those of Fidelus Technologies, LLC. Warning: Although Fidelus Technologies, LLC 
has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this 
email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising 
from the use of this email or attachments.

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Tomcat Service SSL Certificate Issue

[Heim, Dennis]

Do you left/system certs have a SAN that matches the common name (CN)?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gary 
Parker
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:21 AM
To: NateCCIE 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.5 Tomcat Service SSL Certificate Issue


> On 16 May 2017, at 21:22, NateCCIE  wrote:
> 
> I don't think you can upload a cert unless there is an active CSR for it.  

Correct: the CSR gets removed when you install a server cert that matches it.

Brian > looking at 'OS Administration -> Security -> Certificate Management’ I 
can see the tomcat server certificate issued by “QuoVadis_Global_SSL_ICA_G2” 
and the intermediate with the same name issued by “QuoVadis_Root_CA_2” and that 
matching root certificate.


Here’s a screen grab:
https://www.osx.ninja/tomcat_certs.jpeg

Looking at the cert info I can see the serial numbers match up for the chain, 
too.

I’ll get a new cert issued for one of the servers today and install it out of 
hours, ensuring I install root, then intermediate, then server in the correct 
order. If it solves the problem for server I’ll repeat for the rest of them. 
I’ll let the list know how I get on.

Gary
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

[Heim, Dennis]

If you work for a Cisco partner.. look at the UC NFR Kit.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Samadi boukil
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:29 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.X

Hello,

I'm running CUCM 11.x since a week, and when I installed IM Presence, it tell 
me that i can't add new users and phones and that  my demo licence has expired.
I can't buy a licence I just need it for Lab environment.

Thanks.
--
SAMADI Boukil
Élève Ingénieur
Génie Télécommunications & Réseaux
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZS01PWV91S01WWXM=0B_xjs74PFblZYkhMeVRWYkdhZ2tIN3lHaG5NK3RMZWIrRlRNPQ]Profile
 LinkdeIn
[https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download=0B_xjs74PFblZWU9hNzB0cDQwblE=0B_xjs74PFblZZ1M3b2JBTFp0MjVJL2orUE1OcmZHRStwUE1VPQ]+212696184254
[https://mailfoogae.appspot.com/t?sender=aYm91a2lsc2FtYWRpQGdtYWlsLmNvbQ%3D%3D=zerocontent=30c88e72-6672-41b5-a8a3-ce682e6b3150]ᐧ
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

[Heim, Dennis]

My understanding is that the answer is "No," to updated IP communicator.  I am 
also not sure of the true commitment to multi-line Jabber support. I have yet 
to see any dates around multi-line Jabber at this point, which my experience 
with Cisco say's don't count on it or expect it.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
"When you have unlimited time, its easy" - Captain Chesley Sullenberger
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should transform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben 
Amick
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:45 AM
To: Cisco VOIP 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Curiosity: New IP Communicator

I'm assuming no on this question, based on the fact that I haven't heard even 
an inkling, and I know they're working on multi-line support for Jabber, but I 
was wondering: Has anyone heard anything about them possibly coming up with a 
new IP communicator that is based on the 8800 series code? I think that'd be 
great, and even better if they made it based on 8845 code, so it could use 
video as well, short of getting everyone to use jabber.

Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst


Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

[Heim, Dennis]

This comes back to Cisco failing what I call the apple test. Give someone a 
piece of tech and watch what they try to do with it in the first couple of 
hours. If you can check the box to yes on all those things, then you got a 
winning product.

This goes to the whole UDS vs. LDAP. Customers want the same experience inside 
and outside the organization.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"Worry less about who you might offend, and more about who you might inspire" 
-- Tim Allen
“When you have unlimited time, its easy” – Captain Chesley Sullenberger
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Huff
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 10:28 AM
To: Nick 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Flexible JID / MRA

It seems obvious to me (and apparently you) that it should work.

As I understand it FJID was more of an after thought and was intended to allow 
XMPP routing to an alternate alias in federated scenarios.

However, that's a bit like letting the cat out of the bag ... if your going to 
make it 'sort of' work. From a lay perspective, I would expect this to work 
right out of the gate (especially since it does through non proxy 
authentication i.e, internal).

Doesn't seem like this would be a difficult ask for the BUs involved ... seems 
like a couple of COP files maybe and it's off to the races. Although, not sure 
what the priorities are; all things 'Spark' considered :).

Thanks,

Ryan

On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Nick 
> wrote:
Hi Ryan

Thanks for your reply, thats saved me a lot of time. I can't believe this is 
not supported. I'll log a case and get it added to the enhancement.

Regards

Nick

On 27 February 2017 at 12:14, Ryan Huff 
> wrote:
I can confirm that FJID is not supported over MRA. There is a bug ID for an 
enhancement request. It's only got 10 case on it though so you might want to 
jump on that wagon ;)  squeaky wheel gets the attention and all.

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuy33691/?reffering_site=dumpcr

If you enable the experimental menu (assuming your EXP version has that 
capability) and you look in the unified log of Exp-C during a MRA login attempt 
with FJID (you could see this in the normal event log but there is a lot more 
noise) you'll notice that Exp-C is doing the standard UDS Service Discovery and 
then asking about the UserID being attempted, to the host it found in the 
discovery.

CCM (assuming that is your UDS target) will only respond positively to requests 
for the actual UserID ... which of course, is not the user's FJID.

Either CCM/IMP would have to be modified to also be able to authenticate and 
identify users with the Directory URI OR, Expressway would have to have some 
sort of MRA alias authentication capability  or a combination of both.

The solution I've come up with is for the user to login with FJID initially 
(internally), thereby caching the real UserID (which is subsequently 
pre-populated in future login attempts...assuming a recent client version). 
Then, whether MRA or not, the user is simply entering the password or using 
auto sign in.

On Feb 27, 2017, at 6:40 AM, Nick 
> wrote:
Hi Ryan

Did you get this working, I have exactly the same issue, flexible JID works 
fine internally, when the service discovery is done, it presents the actual 
user id and password prompt, however when using MRA, it does its service 
discovery but prompts the email address and password field which it doesnt 
allow you to log in with, if you then change it to user id you can log in?

Anyone else come across this?

Regards

Nick

On 15 February 2017 at 18:15, Ryan Huff 
> wrote:
Has anyone got Flexible JID to work via MRA for the Jabber client's INITIAL, 
registration? FJID is working fine internally for INITIAL registration (and 
then the bootstrap is cached with the actual user ID so after that, doesn't 
really 

Re: [cisco-voip] vmware support on BE7K - painful - tips on reducing ?

[Heim, Dennis]

VMware support is a total joke.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:35 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vmware support on BE7K - painful - tips on reducing ?




aha! that will likely do the trick. i did not use that technology. i guess the 
serial number is not enough to identify it as a BE7K product.



I will open the next one using that technology selection.



thanks for the tip!


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) >
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:10 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vmware support on BE7K - painful - tips on reducing ?

The trick is when choosing the Technology for the case you must pick "UC 
Hypervisor and VMware Foundation on Cisco Business Edition Servers (Non ISV1)" 
under "Voice - Communications Manager". If you pick any of the Data Center ones 
they are looking for your ISV1 contract number.

If that's what you picked and you are still getting pushback send me the SR 
number please.

-Ryan

On Jan 31, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
> wrote:


I had a few outstanding, but rather simple issues, with our BE7K deployment, so 
I thought I'd try my luck with TAC. These were specifically vmWare issues, so I 
was pessimistically optimistic (or optimistically pessimistic) about the whole 
thing.

Turns out, my expectations of entitlement issues were spot on.

Anyone have any tricks to speed things along?

I provide the serial number which should have the original vmware hypervisor 
support attached. But they just don't seem to acknowledge that. They're looking 
for data centre SKUs.

I wish there was html support in the case open tool, I'd write it in big fonts.





---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519-824-4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] TAPS - 3rd party SIP Phones?

[Heim, Dennis]

If you sell the 3rd party phone on  ebay and buy a Cisco one. Then you can.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 5:52 PM
To: Carlo Calabrese 
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TAPS - 3rd party SIP Phones?

I wouldn't think so.  3rd party SIP phones usually are manually configured on 
the phone side to use a certain extension/username/password.  Some 3rd party 
SIP phones have provisioning servers or can use any TFTP/Web server but nothing 
that CUCM is going to be able to update automatically after a successful TAPS.

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip 
> wrote:

  can you tap in 3rd party SIP phones? I need to add a site to a current system 
and would like to use their phones before we can order more 7841s


Thanks

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

[Heim, Dennis]

Maybe I am crazy/spoiled, but I refuse to go back to single screen 
telepresence. 1 screen for remote video, and 1 screen for content share.

The wide field of view FOV) on the Sparkboard camera is what makes it seem more 
real like. I think it is an interesting product, and it will get there 
eventually. I’d love to see them come up with a way to integrate multiple 
Sparkboards together, to get to a dual screen solution.

I am wondering how much the Sparkboard weighs. I have hung a Smartboard Kapp IQ 
 65” and that weights 140lbs, and that was a treat to hang.

I will also say this, wireless content sharing you can say all you want, but I 
am going to plug in the cable every time until you can deliver 30FPS over 
wireless.

While I am providing input, Cisco should integrate a 4K to 1080P scaler into 
the codec’s. More and more people go and buy laptops with 4K screens, only to 
discover how much it is not cool when it has to scale that down to 1080P for 
content sharing.

From: Randall (Randy) Raitz [mailto:randy.ra...@readytalk.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:10 PM
To: 'Anthony Holloway' <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>; Heim, Dennis 
<dennis.h...@wwt.com>; Matt Slaga (Americas) <matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com>; 
Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

Coming from an organization that competes directly against the likes of Cisco 
and Microsoft collaboration suites, the Spark Board is very appealing to me in 
terms of functionality and capabilities and my understanding is the price point 
is far more reasonable than the Microsoft Hub solution.

Our org adopted Slack pretty early on, so Spark has some room to improve in 
terms of UI, but the idea of your notes and communication stream existing into 
perpetuity without a break in continuity is going to be pretty valuable in the 
enterprise for business users, IMO.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 12:05 PM
To: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com<mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>>; Matt Slaga 
(Americas) <matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com<mailto:matt.sl...@dimensiondata.com>>; 
Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu<mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

"Everyone wants to say their touch panel is special and is going to change the 
world."

In addition to your statement, I also dislike how companies will manufacture 
demand out of thin air.

The whole Spark Board event was cringe worthy in my opinion; with their 
over-the-top showmanship, and pretend first to market smugness.


On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:08 AM Heim, Dennis 
<dennis.h...@wwt.com<mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
Everyone wants to say their touch panel is special and is going to change the 
world. The fact is touch is quickly becoming a commodity. It is all about the 
application that you put on top of it. I am not sure on the Surface Hub and 
Spark Board, but I doubt the OEM is actually manufacturing the touch panel 
itself.  We do know that the Spark board is leveraging a computer from Nvidia 
providing the compute and GPU capabilities.

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>]
 On Behalf Of Matt Slaga (Americas)
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:44 AM
To: Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu<mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>>; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

Nice Freudian slip 

Seems it is based on the existing Surface Hub.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:00 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board



Correction, Spark Board!

Thanks Charles!
On Jan 24, 2017 5:51 PM, "Brian Meade" 
<bmead...@vt.edu<mailto:bmead...@vt.edu>> wrote:
Looks like this thing is finally out- 
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collaboration-endpoints/spark-board/index.html

Definitely looks like a game-changer in this space assuming you can get 
everyone using Spark.


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others 
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has b

Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

[Heim, Dennis]

Everyone wants to say their touch panel is special and is going to change the 
world. The fact is touch is quickly becoming a commodity. It is all about the 
application that you put on top of it. I am not sure on the Surface Hub and 
Spark Board, but I doubt the OEM is actually manufacturing the touch panel 
itself.  We do know that the Spark board is leveraging a computer from Nvidia 
providing the compute and GPU capabilities.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matt 
Slaga (Americas)
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:44 AM
To: Brian Meade ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

Nice Freudian slip 

Seems it is based on the existing Surface Hub.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:00 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board



Correction, Spark Board!

Thanks Charles!
On Jan 24, 2017 5:51 PM, "Brian Meade" 
> wrote:
Looks like this thing is finally out- 
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collaboration-endpoints/spark-board/index.html

Definitely looks like a game-changer in this space assuming you can get 
everyone using Spark.


itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

[Heim, Dennis]

Maybe worst kept secret.  The monthly subscription will add up quick. The other 
thing to remember about Spark is the overall pricing model is completely 
different. It is no longer, everyone gets 42% off. It is more of a MSRP model, 
so there may be some discounting, but nothing compared to the past.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 5:51 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Surface Board

Looks like this thing is finally out- 
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collaboration-endpoints/spark-board/index.html

Definitely looks like a game-changer in this space assuming you can get 
everyone using Spark.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade 10.0 to 11.5 only via PCD?

[Heim, Dennis]

Don’t expect PCD to work for the first. Just my experience. It’s just as fickle 
as CUCM is. What I am saying is just plan accordingly from the time and outage 
perspect. Have a plan-B.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben 
Amick
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:49 PM
To: Bruno Takahashi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade 10.0 to 11.5 only via PCD?

Not to 11.5, but I know 10->11 can go fine via standard OS admin, I’ve 
personally done it. I’d be surprised if it was different to 11.5
Worst comes to worst, you could do the incremental to 10.5, and then do OS 
admin to go 10.5->11.5 (or 10->11, then the incremental from 11->11.5)

Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bruno 
Takahashi
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:43 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM Upgrade 10.0 to 11.5 only via PCD?

Hello all,
Looking at the upgrade docs for 11.5 @ 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/11_5_1/cucm_b_upgrade-guide-cucm-115/cucm_b_upgrade-guide-cucm-115_chapter_01100.html
It states that upgrades from 10.0.x to 11.5 are only supported via PCD upgrade.
Has anyone already done this via standard OS Admin?
As I'm not migrating, I don't see any major advantages on using PCD.
Regards.
--
Bruno

Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or 
agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its 
entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.5 Upgrade Disaster

[Heim, Dennis]

Is tomcat-ECDSA required in order to use signed certificates on the live data?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 4:44 PM
To: Randall (Randy) Raitz 
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.5 Upgrade Disaster

It was version 11.5 which brought Tomcat to ECDSA certs and is causing those 
new challenges, so you wouldn't have seen the same issues as Greg.

"Note: When you use UCCX 11.5 and later, there is a new certificate for 
tomcat-ECDSA. When you use CA signed certificates, ensure that the CSR is 
downloaded for this certificate as shown previously and the application 
certificate for tomcat-ECDSA is uploaded into the tomcat-ECDSA as explained in 
the previous procedure. This is required for the Live Data functionality which 
uses Socket IO from UCCX 11.5"

Source: 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/118855-configure-uccx-00.html



On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Randall (Randy) Raitz 
> wrote:
We didn’t have those failures, though we took call manager , IM, and unity 
connection to 11.5 and UCCX to 11.0.1 several weeks ago. I believe at the time, 
there was not a compatible version of UCCX to go to 11.5 with, but the 
11.0.1.1-75 was listed as a supported matrix.

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Ayoub,Gregory
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 12:53 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11.5 Upgrade Disaster

We recently attempted to upgrade UCCX 10.5 -- > 11.5.  The deployment was HA, 
and we didn’t see much risk.   The upgrade went fairly smooth, and we hit a 
finesse bug which required the ECDSA COP file.  While minor, it’s still not 
mentioned in the release notes.

The real shocker was 4 hours later when the system stopped accepting calls and 
just handed out fast busys.  Failing over to the secondary would fix the issue 
for a few minutes, but then fast busy.

Our entire contact center, which is HA, was entirely down.  Primary down, 
Secondary Down, and TAC was unable to resolve after hours and hours.  It was a 
total unmitigated Cisco disaster.

Rolling back fixed the problem.  And then rolling forward again to 11.5 the 
system worked great again – but only for 4 hours.  Then endless fast busys.  We 
rolled back and are on 10.5 working fine.  But we are at a loss what could be 
causing this problem.  Cisco TAC is in the same boat.

If I had to guess, that seems like more of a licensing failure, because TAC 
even tried replacing our license.   Anyone have a similar experience?

Thanks Greg.






Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others 
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been 
automatically archived.

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Clarify Network Clock Select

[Heim, Dennis]

The because thing is understanding what PVDM's are being used to drive that 
circuit. If the module has its own PVDM's, then it will use them and 
subsequently clocking. If it has to use the chassis based PVDM's, then it will 
use the global clocking/pvdm domain. This applies to the ISRG1/G2's. the 4xxx's 
are a treat to themselves.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam 
Piasecki
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:39 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Clarify Network Clock Select

I found this post by ccie15672 in 2008..

"There is one PLL on the motherboard, called the network-clock.  Modules on 
your router may participate in this clocking scheme or not.  Some have to, 
because they don't have their own PLLs/clocks on-board.  When you need/want a 
module to participate in the network clock, you use the network-clock-select 
command.  You select the master clock with the network-clock-select command.  
You can choose multiple master clocks and order them by priority.  Only one is 
active at a time."

Assuming my ISR primary clock source is the telco PRI. My question is I have 
another T1 PRI I am PROVIDING clock too (Clock source Internal), I would never 
add that T1 to the network-clock-select command. As I am not trying to receive 
clock from it, but rather send it.

The remote side would use network-clock-select to get clocking from my T1.

Thanks,
Adam

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CMS/Acano

[Heim, Dennis]

Now there is a single license file (cms.lic) for CMS 2.0. Outbound calling to 
Lync fails regardless of the client. This is for a lab system, so don’t mind 
the 7 dwarf’s theme. Calling Lync to CMS works without a problem.

This appears to be the fun:
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: User-Agent: UCCAPI/15.0.4813.1000 
OC/15.0.4809.1000 (Microsoft Lync)
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: ms-client-diagnostics: 31; 
reason="Call terminated on a mid-call media failure where one endpoint is of 
unknown type";UserType="Callee";MediaType="audio";NetworkErr="time 
out";ErrTime="3681
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: 
="0";TransptRecvErr="0x0";RecvErrTime="0";TransptSendErr="0x0";SendErrTime="0";InterfacesStall="0x2";InterfacesConnCheck="0x2";ICEWarn="0x80020";ICEWarnEx="0x1";LocalSite="192.168.10.73:250
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: connection 4: incoming SIP TLS 
data from 192.168.10.12:64876 to 192.168.11.17:5061, size 618:
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: 
2.168.11.17:51090";PortRange="1025:65000";LocalLocation="2";RemoteLocation="0";FederationType="0";NetworkName="ciscouclab.com";Interfaces="0x2";IceRole="2";RtpRtcpMux="0,FirstHopRTTInMs=0";
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: 
ICEWarnEx="0x1";LocalSite="192.168.10.73:25086";RemoteSite="192.168.11.17:51090";PortRange="1025:65000";LocalLocation="2";RemoteLocation="0";FederationType="0";NetworkName="ciscouclab.com";
2016-08-26  16:32:58.891  Info SIP trace: 
DllVersion="5.0.8687.149";MrDnsX="NoRelays"

From: Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 7:48 PM
To: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CMS/Acano


Does it work from the 'thick' desktop client or does that also fail after 30 
seconds?  Are all of your licenses installed?  Before the rebrand there were 
two license files. A general file for the Acano product and another for xmpp.

On Aug 26, 2016 1:27 PM, "Heim, Dennis" 
<dennis.h...@wwt.com<mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>> wrote:
Has anyone played around with the Cisco Meeting Server? I am trying to get 
dialing from the webRTC clients to Lync to work? The call goes through, but 
after 30 seconds disconnects.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814<tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814>
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]<tel:+13142121814>[cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should transform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
2016-08-26  16:30:41.005  Info SCTP data channel module initialised
2016-08-26  16:30:41.006  Info starting up; build version 2.0.1 (activated)
2016-08-26  16:30:41.010  Info Reading configuration from config tree
2016-08-26  16:30:41.010  Info configuration now ready
2016-08-26  16:30:41.011  Info rx media fast path initialisation successful
2016-08-26  16:30:41.036  Info tx media fast path initialisation successful
2016-08-26  16:30:41.062  Info successful copied default resource data, 
size 8227
2016-08-26  16:30:41.090  Info media framework manager started up; 6 
object limit
2016-08-26  16:30:41.115  Info server media sub-system initialised
2016-08-26  16:30:41.144  Info mediaEntityAvailable (mf_handle_t=BEEF)
2016-08-26  16:30:41.175  Info created UDP socket (type 6) for BFCP on port 
5070
2016-08-26  16:30:41.218  Info branding licensing level 10
2016-08-26  16:30:41.311  Info now using plaza ID '7000'
2016-08-26  16:30:41.312  Info new media connection
2016-08-26  16:30:41.312  Info co-located media blade starting up
2016-08-26  16:30:41.312  Info registration acknowledgement received
2016-08-26  16:30:41.312  Info co-located media blade startup complete, all 
modules present (1)

[cisco-voip] CMS/Acano

[Heim, Dennis]

Has anyone played around with the Cisco Meeting Server? I am trying to get 
dialing from the webRTC clients to Lync to work? The call goes through, but 
after 30 seconds disconnects.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should transform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 11.5(1) ?

[Heim, Dennis]

11.5 thinks the CUPS server needs a CUCM Certificate. The CUPS server rejects 
it, it generates and error to the user by functionality is the same. However, I 
wonder what else has been omitted from the test plan.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris 
Osborne (AM)
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUCM 11.5(1) ?


Hey anybody run into any major issues with 11.5 Train of CUCM etc ?  or even 
11.0.1

Got a global IPT install with the works and was wondering if anybody had run 
into any major problems ( jabber, IM, call center stuff) ?


Thanks

Chris Osborne


This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer;
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K + Nexus FEX module + Port Channel ON (no LACP support)

[Heim, Dennis]

Per this: 
https://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/search.do?cmd=displayKC=kc=DT_KB_1_1=2051307

It looks like LACP is supported with vDS, so if you are running vCenter. Other 
option could be the Nexus1000v. The essentials version of the Nexus1000v, I 
believe is free, but would require time and effort to configure/stand it up. 
That looks to be your two options, Lelio.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:34 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: [cisco-voip] BE7K + Nexus FEX module + Port Channel ON (no LACP 
support)



Anyone running Cisco UCS 240 (BE7K) with port channel ON connected to Nexus FEX 
modules?

Our data centre team has concerns with turning port channel ON without LACP 
negotiation.

Our partner has said that the BE7K does not support LACP.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?

[Heim, Dennis]

Can many mobile jabber devices with cellular connectivity do more than 360p?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:53 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or 
not?



Thanks Eric.

I had a similar discussion with a Cisco engineer. Basically, let Jabber figure 
things out. Which is all fine and dandy, until you read that Canada pays some 
of the highest fees for mobile data in the world. lol.

There are not many unlimited data plans available, and a simple 10 minute video 
call at 10mbps (using 5mbps for calc) could probably use up 3gb of data traffic.

But then, I don't want to impact quality for Jabber clients on wifi connections.

I'm guessing that I might go with leaving device mobility out of the picture 
for now and ensuring video calling is disabled while on mobile networks.






From: "Eric Pedersen" 
>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" >, 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 11:00:36 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or 
   not?

Jabber apparently monitors packet loss and sets the video rate accordingly, 
which is why the quality starts out really low and them improves with the call. 
I don't think any of the phones do that, but I believe the 8845 maximum 
bandwidth is 2mpbs.



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: 04 April 2016 7:40 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] bandwidth restrictions for MRA clients - necessary or not?



quick question... how are people restricting the video/audio bandwidth for 
Jabber MRA clients or physical phone MRA clients for that matter?



we have not had to use locations or enabled mobility (i think that's the IP 
Address based feature) since we have high speed, low latency WAN links to our 
locations.



is it even a problem that I need to consider?



i'd like to make sure we have the best video quality while on-campus (including 
those connected via high speed WAN links), so i've set the default bw to 10mbps.



i'm wondering how that will impact MRA clients.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1



The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged subject 
matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact the sender 
and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail communications 
may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish 
us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us at your earliest 
convenience. In the absence of such notification, your consent is assumed. 
Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, we will not take any 
additional security measures (such as encryption) unless specifically requested.

If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe by 
accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

[Heim, Dennis]

You can always turn up a vCenter trial. You would need some type of shared 
storage. Many consumer grade NAS boxes will support NFS or iSCSI which will do 
the trick. I have never tried the cold move without vCenter.

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:42 AM
To: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>
Cc: Reto Gassmann <v...@mrga.ch>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server


I believe cold moves are also available without vCentre. But rather than moving 
from one UCS to another, you have to move from UCS to a PC then to the other 
UCS.

We're looking at BE7K servers without the vCentre compatible ESXi software for 
at least the next year. Gonna see if we can manage without vCentre for a while.

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca<mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: "Dennis Heim" <dennis.h...@wwt.com<mailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com>>
To: "Reto Gassmann" <v...@mrga.ch<mailto:v...@mrga.ch>>, 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:32:23 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

Do you have vCenter?

If you have vCenter, I would do cold migrations. Shut down the VM and then 
migrate it to the new host, then power it back on.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reto 
Gassmann
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:09 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

Hello group

We have to replace some of our old UCS C210-M2 server to new UCS 240-M4.
On the old server are 2 UCM (10.5.2) and 1 CUIC (10.5.1) VM installed.
What are your experiences and recommondations to move the VMs with the least 
effort and impact to the new UCS servers?

Thanks for feedback
Regards Reto


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

[Heim, Dennis]

Do you have vCenter?

If you have vCenter, I would do cold migrations. Shut down the VM and then 
migrate it to the new host, then power it back on.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reto 
Gassmann
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:09 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCS move VMs to new server

Hello group

We have to replace some of our old UCS C210-M2 server to new UCS 240-M4.
On the old server are 2 UCM (10.5.2) and 1 CUIC (10.5.1) VM installed.
What are your experiences and recommondations to move the VMs with the least 
effort and impact to the new UCS servers?

Thanks for feedback
Regards Reto

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

[Heim, Dennis]

My thought process is to pick either one, and make it all that way. There have 
been bugs over time related to case sensitivity where it shouldn't. We have had 
issues where naming media resources not in all CAPs changes how it selects the 
resource.

Whatever you pick, I think consistency is the most important aspect.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should tansform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Collins
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 6:49 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] UPPERCASE lowercase host names

Hi All,

I'm sure I read somewhere on a Cisco Doc that all UC hostname should be set up 
using lowercase name. But I can't seem to find anything documented with the 
exception of CWMS documents.

Can anyone clarify this and hopefully point me to a relevant document.



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C Series CIMC Password Change

[Heim, Dennis]

That's an awesome feature.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should tansform the way we work" - Rowan Trollope
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing 
anything very innovative" - Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Huff
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:40 PM
To: Anthony Holloway ; Cisco VoIP Group 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCS C Series CIMC Password Change


LOL, thats the sort of thing that could have you cussing during a 2am remote 
cut.



Thanks for the heads up brother!



Thanks,


= Ryan =





Email: ryanthomash...@outlook.com

Spark: ryanthomash...@outlook.com

Twitter: @ryanthomashuff

LinkedIn: ryanthomashuff

Web ryanthomashuff.com


From: cisco-voip 
> 
on behalf of Anthony Holloway 
>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:32 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCS C Series CIMC Password Change

Just a heads up to my fellow Cisco Collab brothers and sisters.

Your new CIMC might be loaded with "Cisco1234" versus "password"

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/640/fn64093.html
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11 and Finesse

[Heim, Dennis]

Thanks. Sounds like someone has been having some real fun lately.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
[cid:image002.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image003.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90][cid:image004.png@01D10DD2.7FC81F90]
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should tansform the way we work” – Rowan Trollope
“If you’re not failing every now and again, it’s a sign you’re not doing 
anything very innovative” – Woody Allen

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 6:43 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group 
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 11 and Finesse

Just a heads up to my Cisco Collab brothers and sisters.

If you are deploying UCCX v11 with Enhanced or Standard licensing, you can 
expect Live Data to be broken in Finesse.

Cisco TAC has to root your box and upload new JAR files to fix it.

https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/cscux33949

And also, not a defect, but a feature which would be undesirable by most: 
Finesse Supervisors with Reporting Role see all CSQs instead of just their Team 
only (not specific to v11).

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/customer-collaboration/unified-contact-center-express/118823-technote-uccx-00.html
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Collab summit keynote simulcast on now...

[Heim, Dennis]

Since I have been doing this for 10+ years, it seems that all the complex 
telephony features become less and less important. It seems that a single line 
per user is “good enough.” Lync has been pushing a good enough mantra for some 
time. I think for most users the call coverage of ring my phone, and other 
devices then go to voicemail.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:29 PM
To: Brian Meade 
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Collab summit keynote simulcast on now...


Key point is traditional. Cisco has said on more than one occasion (officially 
or unofficially) that feature parity with the pbx is no longer their focus. I 
twitch a little less each time someone mentions forwarding non-primary lines 
(sorry Ed and Scott, you'll need to find new entertainment) as time goes on.

Just a cell phone companies have trained us into thinking cell coverage and 
clarity is "good enough", we'll find that with features going forward.

It certainly seems like they've put a lot of thought into it this time around. 
Very little had me scratching my head saying why.

Well, except for the fact that I couldn't watch on my iPad! Ugh! Apple this. 
Apple that. Mobile device this. Mobile device that. Look what we can do.

The price point was interesting as well.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 8, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Brian Meade 
> wrote:
What did everyone think?  Seems fairly polished but I'm sure definitely missing 
a ton of traditional telephony features.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) 
> wrote:
https://communities.cisco.com/community/technology/collaboration/collaborat
ion_virtual_experience


On 08/12/15, 10:38 PM, "cisco-voip on behalf of Lelio Fulgenzi"
 
on behalf of le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>
>Head on over to the collab user group pages for a link to the simulcast.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>___
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple Version of CUCM integrated with CER

[Heim, Dennis]

Been down this design before… each CER Group/cluster can support 1 version of 
CUCM. So technically from a support perspective, you would need 2. Maybe you 
can get some temp licenses from Cisco? The issue is our good friend JCRAPI.. I 
mean JTAPI.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]
[chat][Phone][video]
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should tansform the way we work” -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
NateCCIE
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 1:32 PM
To: 'Mike Lydick' ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Multiple Version of CUCM integrated with CER

Support or work with?  It works, but you may not get support if it doesn’t.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike 
Lydick
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 11:14 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Multiple Version of CUCM integrated with CER

We are doing a parallel migration of several CUCM clusters. The current 
production CUCM cluster is 8.5 and is integrated with CER 10.5. We need to 
support the user migration to 2 new CUCM 10.5 clusters. So the requirement 
would be for CER 10.5. to support (1) CUCM 8.5 and (2) CUCM 10.5 clusters.

We see only one CUCM Version selection option in CER. Does CER support Multiple 
CUCM versions simultaneously?

Thanks!

Mike Lydick
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

[Heim, Dennis]

My preferred approach is to leverage a CSR1000v to do all the routing and then 
NAT that traffic out to the network. In the art of transparency, I am currently 
an architect for a Lab as a Service (LaaS) style service, and migrations is one 
of the primary use cases. Once the migration is done in the lab then the 
configs are restored back to the production servers. There are always issues 
and unexpected “features” during these upgrades, and it seems to get more 
complicated with every release.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]
[chat][Phone][video]
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should tansform the way we work” -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
V
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:51 PM
To: Cisco VOIP ; le...@uoguelph.ca
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How Many Docs Does it Take to Prep for an Upgrade?

I've found it useful to put your duplicate network behind  separate NAT router.

Create a L2 (only L2, no L3 interface) VLAN on your production network, call it 
"Isolated"
Pick a L2/L3 network that can be your NAT "outside"  This network should be 
fully reachable in the enterprise and have some free IP addresses on it (like 
5-10 free addresses)

Find a separate physical router (like an old 28xx), Connect the outside 
interface to your switch on an access port that was selected for the NAT 
"outside"
Connect the inside interface of the router to your switch on a port mapped to 
the "isolated" L2-only network

On the NAT router inside interface create the duplicate IP network as your 
production UC network
(don't run any routing protocols, just use a static default on the NAT router 
to get back to the core network for mgmt)
On the NAT router outside, assign an IP to the interface for management. Then 
configure simple 1:1 NATs for each of your voice servers.  Trunk the 
"isolated", L2 only, VLAN into your VMware host and assign to the guest UC VMs

Since the duplicate IP interface only exists on the NAT router "inside" 
interface and you don't have any L3 IP address created on the isolated VLAN, 
your duplicate network is safely isolated yet reachable.

You'll be able to reach the voice servers via the NAT "outside" address
The voice servers will be able to "reach out" to the production network for 
NTP, LDAP. sFTP,  etc. but appear to come from the NAT address.


On 10/20/2015 9:40 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

My major concern is IP address conflicts. Right now, with my offline network, 
it's completely isolated, with the UCS solution, unless I buy a UCS server(s) 
that is sized accordingly to hold the VMs sized for my production environment 
(which is unlikely), I'll have to consider feeding the UCS servers with the 
offline network which is a duplicate of the production network.

While technically possible, it would mean that the entire team be aware of this 
special configuration and not mess with anything that could bridge the 
configurations and cause IP address conflicts. I'm envisioning a separate 
network cable plugged into our offline switch/routers that would connect to the 
UCS server(s) in a separate VLAN. Unfortunately, I'm not up to speed with the 
intricacies of the UCS systems and VM, etc. and whether or not that would cause 
issues.

As with other organizations, we're under pressure to keep systems up and 
running 24 hours a day. We're improving our service availability design to 
hopefully help us going forward. For example, building an almost exact 
duplicate of our auto-attendant and call processing on Unity Express, so that 
we can do work on Connection while peoples business can continue at 3 in the 
morning while we do work.

We may revisit the offline upgrade in lieu of an inplace upgrade, but I'm not 
sure we're there yet.

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: "Ryan Huff" 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" 
Cc: "Kevin Przybylowski" 
, "Anthony Holloway" 

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

[Heim, Dennis]

I always wished they had exposed the necessary directories via SAMBA. However, 
since we have been on the Linux platform for nearly 10 years at this point, I 
think assimilating is the best option.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[chat]<xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com>[Phone]<tel:+13142121814>[video]<sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com>
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should tansform the way we work” -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: Buchanan, James [mailto:jbucha...@presidio.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 5:03 AM
To: Heim, Dennis <dennis.h...@wwt.com>; norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: DRS Backups 10.5

Actually, it is only SFTP, right? FTP is not supported (a continual pain point 
for customers).


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, 
Dennis
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 3:17 PM
To: norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca<mailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca>; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

SFTP/FTP Is the supported mechanism.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]<https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
[chat]<xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com>[Phone]<tel:+13142121814>[video]<sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com>
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon Cooper
“The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it.” -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
“We should tansform the way we work” -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room<https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca<mailto:norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 1:52 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5


I have been asked if Cisco supports SMB or NFS for our nightly DRS backups 
instead of SFTP.



Thanks



Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519) 741-2200 x 7000



This message w/attachments (message) is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or proprietary. If you are not an intended recipient, please 
notify the sender, and then please delete and destroy all copies and 
attachments. Please be advised that any review or dissemination of, or the 
taking of any action in reliance on, the information contained in or attached 
to this message is prohibited.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5

[Heim, Dennis]

SFTP/FTP Is the supported mechanism.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]
[chat][Phone][video]
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should tansform the way we work" -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 1:52 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] DRS Backups 10.5


I have been asked if Cisco supports SMB or NFS for our nightly DRS backups 
instead of SFTP.



Thanks



Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519) 741-2200 x 7000


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] UnifiedFX Gurus

[Heim, Dennis]

Reading the licensing model for unifiedfx and it says "Phone Estate"... what is 
that?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]
[chat][Phone][video]
"There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it." - Sheldon Cooper
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss 
it, but that it is too low and we reach it." -- Michelangelo Buonarroti
"We should tansform the way we work" -- RowanTrollope

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Room

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

[Heim, Dennis]

Wildcard certs are not support on the UC applications.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. – Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Rajkumar Yadav
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

Hi,

I would like to know whether can i use the digicert wild card certificate for 
CUCM, CUC and IMP.

CUCM version is 10.5.2.

As CUCM 10.5.2 support cluster wide multi  server certificate.

As per Cisco it required multi san certificate, still will it work with wild 
card ?


Regards,
Raaj




Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:29:39 +
From: Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:cisco-v...@gmail.com
To: Heim, Dennis dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com, Ryan Huff
ryanh...@outlook.commailto:ryanh...@outlook.com,  
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug
Message-ID:

cacrcjogp3h8ydblfo5ofygfmftmd_oqyon6pngpnapltayy...@mail.gmail.commailto:cacrcjogp3h8ydblfo5ofygfmftmd_oqyon6pngpnapltayy...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

More like, another reason not to run base versions, especially when there's
two major service updates available.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:

  Looks like another reason to move to 10.5(2)SU2A.



 *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)*

 World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814

 [image: twitter] https://twitter.com/CollabSensei

 [image: chat][image: Phone] +13142121814[image: video]

 ?There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have
 to be a visionary to see it. ? Sheldon Cooper



 *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
 https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim*



 *From:* cisco-voip 
 [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
  *On Behalf
 Of *Ryan Huff
 *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 4:10 PM
 *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug



 So this bug cost me 2 hours last night .. one of the more ridiculous ones
 I have seen in awhile. 10.5.2; the Subject Alternative Name in the CSR
 can't be the same as the CN (although that is how most CA's will generate).

 The work around? Add a space character at the end of the CN when you
 generate the CSR and then the call manage *magically* puts the CN in the
 SAN field of the CSR . W.T.F

 https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus47235

  ___
 cisco-voip mailing list
 cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
 https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0001.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0004.png
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1389 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0005.png
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1292 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0006.png
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1391 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0007.png

--
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

[Heim, Dennis]

Looks like another reason to move to 10.5(2)SU2A.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. - Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Huff
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 4:10 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug

So this bug cost me 2 hours last night .. one of the more ridiculous ones I 
have seen in awhile. 10.5.2; the Subject Alternative Name in the CSR can't be 
the same as the CN (although that is how most CA's will generate).

The work around? Add a space character at the end of the CN when you generate 
the CSR and then the call manage magically puts the CN in the SAN field of the 
CSR . W.T.F

https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus47235

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

[Heim, Dennis]

If you have not seen the Cisco Live session on collab security I would 
definitely recommend it. It had some good discussion on certificates. Based on 
that Wildcard certs will never be supported on CUCM and the like and are 
frowned upon within the security community.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. – Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: Eric Pedersen [mailto:peders...@bennettjones.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 12:51 PM
To: Anthony Holloway; Heim, Dennis; Ian Anderson; NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

Good point. I spoke too soon: we use wildcard certificates on VCS-E and WebEx 
Meeting Server only. IIRC VCS officially doesn’t support wildcard certificates 
either but everything seems to work provided the hostnames are configured as 
SANs. CUCM might be the same with the multi-server certificate but I haven’t 
tried.

From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 July 2015 10:43 AM
To: Eric Pedersen; Heim, Dennis; Ian Anderson; NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

I'm a little confused here.  According to this article: 
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/115957-high-level-view-ca-00.html#wildcard,
 and this defect ID: https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCta14114/, wild 
card certs are not supported.  Are we talking about the same thing here?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:08 AM Eric Pedersen 
peders...@bennettjones.commailto:peders...@bennettjones.com wrote:
Digicert lets you put your domain and subdomains of any level as SANs. It’s 
great! They even generated a duplicate certificate for me with a different root 
CA that was supported with WebEx enabled Telepresence. We use their wildcard 
certificates on all of our UC servers.

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis
Sent: 15 July 2015 8:28 AM
To: Ian Anderson; NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates

I’ve found the hardest thing to find a cert providers that likes putting the 
domain as a san such as DNS=mycollab.com. Has anyone found any providers that 
are kosher with that? From one of the Cisco Live sessions, I was told this is 
needed for service discovery to function properly.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat][Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. – Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ian 
Anderson

Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 10:18 AM
To: NateCCIE; Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard certificates


On 15 July 2015 at 15:02, NateCCIE 
natec...@gmail.commailto:natec...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you put all of your SANs in the digicert page?
z
I have this working on all of my expressway installs.
Hi Nate,

Thanks for the quick response, just for preservation in the archives for future 
posterity and confirmation that digicert seems fine despite the warnings in the 
manuals, it seemed I was running into 2 separate issues.

1) I had uploaded the intermediate cert, but needed to manually download and 
upload the root CA
2) That then got me past the TLS error, only to find that I had fat-fingered 
the hostname in the SAN field :-(

Cheers

Ian


The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged subject 
matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact the sender 
and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail communications 
may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish 
us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us at your earliest 
convenience. In the absence of such notification, your consent is assumed. 
Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, we will not take any 
additional security measures (such as encryption) unless specifically requested.

If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe by 
accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

[Heim, Dennis]

[cid:image005.png@01D0BA5F.9E719E10]

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. - Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:55 PM
To: Heim, Dennis; Charles Goldsmith; voip puck
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

Here is a good explanation of the issue and how to work around it:

http://eltonoverip.com/blog/2015/07/firefox-39-0-ssl-error-weak-ephemeral-diffie-hellman-key/

From: dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com
To: wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org; 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:53:09 +
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page
There is a parameter for those the keys that you need to toggle to disable and 
then it will work. Not sure of the true impact of that, but that is what I 
changed.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat][Phone][video]
There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. - Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:50 PM
To: voip puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

Getting this error with Firefox 39
An error occurred during a connection to 10.52.122.26. SSL received a weak 
ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key in Server Key Exchange handshake message. (Error 
code: ssl_error_weak_server_ephemeral_dh_key)

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of 
the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.

I've seen this on 8.6.2 and 9.1.2, the two 10.5.x systems I have access to have 
3rd party certs, and they both work fine.  The 8.x and 9.x systems do not have 
3rd party, just internally signed.

Anyone else seeing this and know a work around?  I detest using IE or Safari 
for CUCM work.

___ cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

[Heim, Dennis]

There is a parameter for those the keys that you need to toggle to disable and 
then it will work. Not sure of the true impact of that, but that is what I 
changed.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
“There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. – Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 3:50 PM
To: voip puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] firefox upgrade causing issues with CUCM CCMadmin page

Getting this error with Firefox 39
An error occurred during a connection to 10.52.122.26. SSL received a weak 
ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key in Server Key Exchange handshake message. (Error 
code: ssl_error_weak_server_ephemeral_dh_key)

The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of 
the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem.

I've seen this on 8.6.2 and 9.1.2, the two 10.5.x systems I have access to have 
3rd party certs, and they both work fine.  The 8.x and 9.x systems do not have 
3rd party, just internally signed.

Anyone else seeing this and know a work around?  I detest using IE or Safari 
for CUCM work.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations for new handsets

[Heim, Dennis]

I would recommend the 8800's. There have been numerous bugs, but those will get 
resolved in due time. I'd imagine by the time you order, and it gets fulfilled, 
more of the major bugs will be resolved. The 7800/8800/DX/MX/IX is where you 
want to be from the future proof perspective.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to 
be a visionary to see it. - Sheldon Cooper

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Jeremy Bresley
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:48 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendations for new handsets

On 7/7/2015 4:58 PM, Terry Oakley wrote:
We are in the process of updating our fleet of handsets (most are 7 years or 
older) and looking for recommendations for what handset model we should move 
to.   Currently most of our sets are the problematic 7941/61 with a number of 
7911sets.   In classrooms and meeting rooms we have 7945 and 7965 sets that 
have been very reliable.

We are looking at either the 9900 or 8800 series (color screen) but we are 
seeking your experience and knowledge of those series or what you believe would 
be a series that we should look at.

Thanks

Terry

Terry Oakley
Telecommunications Coordinator | Information Technology Services
Red Deer College |100 College Blvd. | Box 5005 | Red Deer | Alberta | T4N 5H5
work (403) 342-3521   |  FAX (403) 343-4034

We've deployed a couple of sites with the 8851s as the 7945s are getting price 
increases (sign of impending EOL usually).

Plus'es on the 8851s:  Higher res screen (check docs if you have custom 
backgrounds, sizes are different than any previous models, at least one doc has 
the wrong size for thumbnails listed), Bluetooth support, Proximity support for 
phone connectivity (contacts, mobility), USB port for charging a phone (or slow 
charging a tablet except on the 8861s)

Minus'es: Firmware 10.2 had some serious bugs.  Worst ones we hit were related 
to Energy Efficient Ethernet that would cause the PCs to randomly drop 
connection, and unplugging the PC and plugging it back in was the only way to 
recover (or resetting the phone).  Engineers with these phones having to reboot 
4-6X in an 8 hour work day were NOT happy.  Upgrading to 10.3 firmware has had 
them be pretty stable.  If you do run into any code bugs, there are only 3 
total releases of firmware for these phones, so they are fairly new and aren't 
as long lived as the 7900's firmware.

Different: These are SIP only phones.  If all your existing phones are SCCP, 
this has ramifications for things like SRST configs as well as call flow 
troubleshooting.  (This is an issue for the 9900 series phones as well.)
The overlay stickers that come with the 7900 series phones with the text 
descriptions for the buttons don't exist on 8800s, they're pictograms only for 
the physical buttons, may require some additional documentation for users to 
know what the buttons do.
The handsets are the newer slimline design, don't sit on the shoulder nearly as 
well as the 7900s more rounded models, this may make a difference if your users 
don't use headsets.

You didn't mention using any KEMs, the 8800s use the BEKEM which is a 36-line 
(9 buttons per side, two columns, 2 pages) rather than the 24-line of the 
7916-24s.  8851s support 2, 8861s support 3.

Having used a number of 7941s, I'm pretty sure users would be ecstatic with an 
upgrade to an 8800 due to the improved display alone.  The Bluetooth only 
exists on 8851/8861s, not available on the 8811/8841s.  There's also the new 
8845/8865 which are video enabled units.  The 8865 is basically the 8861 with a 
camera, the 8845 is an 8851 minus the USB port and KEM support (does have 
Bluetooth/Proximity)

Jeremy TheBrez Bresley
b...@brezworks.commailto:b...@brezworks.com
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco live

[Heim, Dennis]

I am all for it. Anyone is the CCP sessions for this afternoon?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim

From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 11:38 PM
To: Daniel Pagan
Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco live

Anyone feel up for organizing a meet?

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:29 PM Daniel Pagan 
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
I'm also attending.

Anthony: Nice! I'll be sure to do my best to stop by and check it out.

Stephen: Looking forward to checking out the applications on demo.

- Dan

Sent from my mobile device.

On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com
 wrote:

I am. Come see me compete in Engineering Deathmatch on Wednesday at 11:00am in 
the 2Ring booth of World of Solutions.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:12 AM Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com
 wrote:
who all is in San Diego for Cisco Live?

Sent from my iPhone
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Cisco live

[Heim, Dennis]

who all is in San Diego for Cisco Live?

Sent from my iPhone
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

[Heim, Dennis]

I have not had a chance yet,

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: Erick [mailto:erick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:28 PM
To: Anthony Holloway
Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

Did you try the command to remove this?

Any side effects or gotchas? Just curious as I'd like to get rid of the link on 
some subscriber nodes and such.


Sent from my iPhone

On May 15, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:
Search for:

Remove Cisco Prime License Manager

In:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/plm/10_5_1/userguide/CPLM_BK_U9B156B7_00_user-guide-rel-1052.pdf

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:15 PM Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
Is there a command to remove the ELM option from the webpage of CUCM? I have a 
dedicated ELM, and I thought there was a way to do this.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
image001.pnghttps://twitter.com/CollabSensei
image002.pngimage003.pngtel:+13142121814image004.png
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Remove ELM/PLM Option

[Heim, Dennis]

Is there a command to remove the ELM option from the webpage of CUCM? I have a 
dedicated ELM, and I thought there was a way to do this.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

[Heim, Dennis]

I think CER is still on its on island.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott 
Voll
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:04 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

we are looking at upgrading soon.  Can someone confirm what I believe:

in version 10.x our licensing changes to user based.  With this, I can add as 
many nodes as I like? I currently have 2 nodes. if I wanted to add a 3rd that 
would be included?  or adding HA?

This would be for CM, UC, CER, presence, but not UCCx?  am I correct?

TIA

Scott


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

[Heim, Dennis]

CER10 is still outside of CUWL, right?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: Scott Voll; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

CER10 is managed by PLM10.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I think CER is still on its on island.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat][Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:04 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

we are looking at upgrading soon.  Can someone confirm what I believe:

in version 10.x our licensing changes to user based.  With this, I can add as 
many nodes as I like? I currently have 2 nodes. if I wanted to add a 3rd that 
would be included?  or adding HA?

This would be for CM, UC, CER, presence, but not UCCx?  am I correct?

TIA

Scott



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PER CALL BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION OVER ETHERNET+802.1Q

[Heim, Dennis]

With BiB it is 3x your codec.
G.711 example:

1.   80k down far-end audio (remote party-current user)

2.   80k up current user audio (current user-remote party)

3.   80k up bib far-end audio (current user-recording server)

4.   80k up bib current user audio. (current user-recording server).

On a G.711 call you would have need 80k down and 240k up.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Abbas 
Wali
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 5:16 AM
To: 'Anthony Holloway'
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PER CALL BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION OVER ETHERNET+802.1Q

Thanks mate.

From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 April 2015 21:46
To: abbas Wali
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PER CALL BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION OVER ETHERNET+802.1Q

I read somewhere that a phone could generate up to 2.5x call traffic with its 
BIB.  Multiplying by 3x would still be acceptable, I would think.

The 8000 is a burst threshold over the policed rate.  It's always been 8000 in 
my experience, but probably only because no one knows enough to adjust it  You 
cannot have an average and a max rate with voice.  It's constant (excluding 
VAD).  Video on the other hand is variable.

If you are studying for your CCIE, I can share with you that Cisco has publicly 
stated they have some percentage of forgiveness.  I.e., If they say 3 g711ulaw 
calls worth of bandwidth, and I enter 90*3=270, but you enter 93*3=279 (or even 
round up to 280), we would both get the points.  What the percentage is, I 
don't recall.  I want to say it was like 10%.  So for every 100kbps, you can be 
plus or minus 10kbps.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM abbas Wali 
abba...@gmail.commailto:abba...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony,

yes makes sense. but for the sake of argu. a single phone with even with BIB 
how many max g711 streams it can get to. 3? if so, for a safe figure can 
multiply by 3.
moreover, I dont really understand this statement ​police 90500 8000 exc drop - 
as per docs, the actual transmission is 8k but on the avg. the max is 90k ( plz 
correct if wrong)

On 15 April 2015 at 18:10, Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:
After reading the Medianet document, I'm certain they are just giving you an 
example, not a definitive answer nor the best practice.  While 128kbps does 
police the port to a single g711ulaw call, it also allows for a little wiggle 
room, which I like.  If you are looking for the absolute minimum bandwidth 
needed for a g711ulaw call, you could go lower than 128kbps, but you wouldn't 
gain anything.  Don't forget that the BIB of the phone could cause more than a 
single call's worth of RTP to ingress the switch port, in which case your 
128kbps would not be enough and you would have issues with things such as 
network recording or silent monitoring.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:19 AM abbas Wali 
abba...@gmail.commailto:abba...@gmail.com wrote:
medianet is
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND_40/QoSCampus_40.html

Vik's post
http://www.collabcert.com/blog/qos/how-much-bandwidth-does-1-call-consume/


On 15 April 2015 at 13:44, Anthony Holloway 
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.commailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you link us to the sources in question? I personally need a little more 
context to go with your question.

In general, policing a single g711ulaw call is around 93kbps, and rounding it 
to 100kbps still achieves the goal of policing a single call. And yes, a class 
based policer would police media and signaling separately.

Also, I saw something on medianet at last year Cisco Live, but other than that, 
I'm clueless about medianet. I can't say if and how things changed once 
medianet came in to the picture. I'm sure Vik wasn't considering that either, 
based on the fact that he teaches CCIE Collab boot camps, and medianet is not a 
part of the blueprint.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:22 AM abbas Wali 
abba...@gmail.commailto:abba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,

Vik Malhi posted that for a successful g711 call

HQSW(config-pmap-c)#police 90500 8000 exc drop ! 0 packet loss

now, as per Ciso medianet 4

The VoIP and signaling traffic from the VVLAN can be policed to drop at 128 
kbps and 32 kbps, respectively (as any excessive traffic matching this criteria 
would be indicative of network abuse)

Question is 128 kbps supports 1 single voice stream of g711 OR 

Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

[Heim, Dennis]

Associate a ccm end user to the device and user those credentials to 
authenticate.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott 
Voll
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:57 PM
To: Brian Meade; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

[Inline image 1]

unless the admin user / pwd is something other than the CCM one then I guess it 
doesn't work.

Scott


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
You should be able to at least pull screenshots using 
http://x.x.x.x/CGI/Screenshot

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Scott Voll 
svoll.v...@gmail.commailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any of these DX80's?

How are you supporting it remotely?

Log me in Rescue does not work.
Webex does not work

I'm deploying these to remove sites and need to support the users and don't 
want to drive 4 hours each way.

TIA

Scott



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] License requirements to upgrade from 12.4 to 15

[Heim, Dennis]

2016 is last day of tac support for the 2800’s. Technically any code upgrade 
requires proper support. Ironically, the 1800/2800/3800 series lacked the 
ability to lock the ios by feature set other than say gatekeeper. When the G2’s 
came out we got feature locking. Then by around 15.2 we went back to right to 
use licenses because it was such a pain to administrator for all parties 
involved. Customers are still required legally to purchase the licenses.

In your scnerio.. they need to have purchased the voice feature set. Then the 
devices need to be under support to be entitled to any version of IOS. That is 
my take on this scenario.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hank 
Keleher (AM)
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 4:54 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] License requirements to upgrade from 12.4 to 15

I have a customer with 18 2800 voice gateways in production and 5 cold spares. 
Are they required to purchase a license in order to upgrade from 12.4 to 15 for 
the base and/or voice features?

For the cold spares would they need to have those under SmartNET in order to 
swap them out with a failed router or can they be upgraded and license 
transferred in the event of a failure?

Hank

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K Network card issue

[Heim, Dennis]

I just turned up 6 BE7k’s this week, integrated to UCS Fabric Interconnects, 
but the NIC’s showed up out of the gate no problem.


Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:01 PM
To: Rob Dawson
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K Network card issue

I havent tried reseating them yet,will give it ago in the morning but its 
strange that I have 4 servers that are all the same.
On 7 April 2015 at 20:19, Rob Dawson 
rdaw...@force3.commailto:rdaw...@force3.com wrote:
Have you reseated the cards or tried swapping with known working cards?

I’ve definitely seen bad risers in out of box failures before . . . not two in 
one batch though.

Rob

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Tommy Schlotterer
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:17 PM
To: Nick; cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BE7K Network card issue

Did you use the Cisco ESXI custom image?

It has custom drivers for the server.

Tommy

Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer
CCNA, CCNA Voice
48325 Alpha Dr. Ste. 150
Wixom, MI 48393
p 248.468.0710tel:248.468.0710
e tschlotte...@netechcorp.commailto:tschlotte...@netechcorp.com
w netechcorp.comhttp://netechcorp.com/
 [cid:DE00F175-A6C9-45A6-B3AC-D658551F1586]
[cid:62EB95BF-20B4-4A1B-98FE-9E042594730A]https://www.linkedin.com/company/75843?trk=tyahtrkInfo=tarId%3A1397760375508%2Ctas%3Anetech%2Cidx%3A3-1-5
 [cid:47C21B6C-578D-4D72-BFF4-8A482CE7A978] 
https://www.facebook.com/NetechCorporation  
[cid:A362BD4D-9EC8-47CC-96A8-8A17AF38C15C] https://twitter.com/netechcorp  
[cid:F52A69B8-DA49-4CD7-91E9-C057917D90C2] 
https://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:15 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] BE7K Network card issue

Hi All

I have four BE7K (UCS C240 M3S) servers that have the two quad port network 
cards, they all came prebuilt with ESXi 5.5 U2 on them, however only the 
on-board Nic's show up anywhere, I cant see the quad card ports in the BIOS, 
CIMC or ESXi?

I have the ports on the quad cards patched and the switchports come up but 
cannot get the ports to appear, have checked BIOS etc but cannot see where they 
woudl be enabled.

Anyone come across anything like this before?

Regards

Nick

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Hardware for UC

[Heim, Dennis]

It all depends on the layer 8 of your environment and the size of your 
environment. If your environment is more than say 3-4 physical servers, then I 
would make a push for UCSM (UCS Manager). I think a compelling case could be 
made for the virtual san stuff that Brian mentioned coupled with UCS Fabric 
Interconnects and C-series with single connect (vic 1225 cards).

Cons:
Cost of Fabric Interconnects

Pros:
Ease of Management
vSAN is under your control just like local disks
Flexibility of shared storage
2-4 10gb uplinks instead of 4-6 per physical server.
Centralized Management platform

I personally am not a big fan of the TRCs for larger installs, as the TRC’s 
limit flexibility which is sometimes needed. Booting esxi via flash card is not 
supported under TRC, but under spec’s based is. However, despite my dislike UCS 
C-series server sprawl, that is the most common option deployed today. UCS-mini 
does bring a lot of cool options with it too. I have never touched a UCS mini.

I contend you could create a RAID 5 or  6 array on SSD’s and never ever have to 
worry about IOPS again.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:16 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Hardware for UC

C series with local storage is definitely the most popular for UC.  If you 
still want enterprise storage features, Nutanix has a nice solution for 
utilizing your local storage- 
http://urns.com/blog/2014/12/nutanix-and-uc-part-1-introduction-and-overview/

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Scott Voll 
svoll.v...@gmail.commailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote:
What hardware is everyone using to upgrade there UC enviroment to?

We have UCS Blades with netapp storage, but have had some limitations on IO 
(prior to the upgraded controllers) that I'm a little concerned about.

I like the idea of vmotion.  But I'm thinking if it's my back side on the line 
with my UC environment, Maybe the rack mount UCS might be a better bet?  We (UC 
Team) have also been thinking about the UCS mini with storage blade.

What our others doing?  What is Cisco suggesting these days?

Thanks

Scott



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

[Heim, Dennis]

PCD is a great tool for single-site installs or upgrades in a lab environment. 
Biggest limitation of PCD when multisites are involved, since it pushes all 
ISOs from the PCD server. Maybe an ability to leverage ISOs on VMWare 
datastores instead of from the PCD server.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Collins
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 6:08 AM
To: Haas, Neal; 'Andrew Grech'; Nick
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

Just a note on this.

I have just completed a direct Hardware 8.5 to VM 10.5 with network changes 
using Prime collaboration deployment. No Cop files need to be installed, No 
jump upgrades, No restoring from backup. Really was a simple process.

If you haven’t used PCD I would strongly suggest taking a look next time you 
upgrade or install a new build.

Regards

Matthew Collins


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, 
Neal
Sent: 27 March 2015 14:41
To: 'Andrew Grech'; Nick
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5

10.5 is VM only, 8.6.1 usually was MCS hardware.

To upgrade you will need to 8.6.1 upgrade to 9.1 on MCS. Then 9.1 MCS to VM, 
the upgrade 9.1 to 10.5(2)SU1.


Neal Haas

From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]mailto:[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Andrew Grech
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:30 AM
To: Nick
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Upgrading CUCM from 8.5 to 10.5


Supported vs the system will upgrade are two different things.
On 27/03/2015 1:51 AM, Nick 
csv...@googlemail.commailto:csv...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi All

Just checking through documentation for CUCM 10.5 for an upgrade, the 
compatibility guide states that a direct upgrade is from 8.6.1 onwards as shown 
below.

Upgrade Paths for Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 10.5(2)SU1

[http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/i/templates/note.gif]
Note



If your release is not listed in the following table, find the upgrade path 
from your current release to a listed release in Cisco Unified Communications 
Manager Software Compatibility Matrix for Release 9.X and Earlier at 
http:/​/​www.cisco.com/​en/​US/​docs/​voice_ip_comm/​cucm/​compat/​ccmcompmatr1.pdfhttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/compat/ccmcompmatr1.pdf.




Table 15 Export Restricted Supported Cisco Unified Communications Manager 
Upgrades for Release 10.5(2)SU1


10.5(2)SU1


10.5.2.11900-3


Active


February 24, 2015


Direct Upgrade:

10.5(2), 10.5(1)SU1a, 10.5(1)SU1, 10.5(1), 10.0(1)SU2, 10.0(1)SU1, 10.0(1), 
9.1(2)SU2a, 9.1(2)SU2, 9.1(2)SU1, 9.1(2), 9.1(1a), 9.1(1), 9.0(1),

8.6(2a)SU5, 8.6(2a)SU4a, 8.6(2a)SU4, 8.6(2a)SU3, 8.6(2a)SU2, 8.6(2a)SU1, 
8.6(2a),

8.6(2), 8.6(1a), 8.6(1)


Supported: (Consult the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Upgrade Guide for 
details)

8.5.(1)SU7, 8.5.(1)SU6, 8.5(1)SU5, 8.5(1)SU4, 8.5(1)SU3, 8.5(1)SU2,

8.5(1)SU1, 8.5(1), 8.0(3a)SU3, 8.0(3a)SU2, 8.0(3a)SU1, 8.0(3a),

8.0(3), 8.0(2c)SU1, 8.0(2c), 8.0(2b), 8.0(2a), 8.0(2), 8.0(1),

7.1(5b)SU6(restricted), 7.1(5b)SU5(restricted), 7.1(5b)SU4(restricted),

7.1(5b)SU3(restricted), 7.1(5b)SU2(restricted), 7.1(5b)(restricted),

7.1(5a)(restricted), 7.1(5)SU1a(restricted), 7.1(5)SU1(restricted),

7.1(5)(restricted), 7.1(3b)SU2, 7.1(3b)SU1, 7.1(3b), 7.1(3a)SU1a,

7.1(3a)SU1, 7.1(3a), 7.1(3), 6.1(5)SU3, 6.1(5)SU2, 6.1(5)SU1,

6.1(5), 6.1(4a)SU2, 6.1(4a), 6.1(4)SU1, 6.1(4)


However in the Read Me notes for 10.5.2 Su1 it states the following


　

Version and Description

This SU is a cumulative update that incorporates all of the fixes and changes 
from Cisco Unified Communications Manager 10.5(2) along with additional changes 
that are specific to this SU.

Note

You can only install this SU on Cisco Unified Communications Manager Release 
6.1(4x), 6.1(5x), 7.1(3x), 7.1(5x), 8.0(x), 8.5(1x), 8.6(x), 9.0(x), 9.1(x), 
10.0(1), 10.5(1), or 10.5(2) This SU will not install over any 10.5(2)ES’s. 
Upgrades from 6x, 7x, 8.x, and 9.x need to be requested via PUT 
(www.cisco.com/upgradehttp://www.cisco.com/upgrade) to obtain the necessary 
license. This SU should not be installed on a Business Edition 3000 server.

I would normally always go with what is says in the compatibility matrix, 
however my colleague has just done an upgrade albeit in a lab from 8.5.1 direct 
to 10.5.2 SU1.

Anyone know if he just got lucky or if that is now 

Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party PBX integration

[Heim, Dennis]

PIMG are EOL by Dialogic. My understanding is the TIMG is still being produced 
by Dialogic.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 9:58 PM
To: Brian Meade
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3rd Party PBX integration

Both the TIMG and PIMG are EOL as far as I can tell.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/unified-communications/unity/eos-eol-notice-listing.html

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
Are there some constraints you're working around here that rule out those 
options?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Rob Dawson 
rdaw...@force3.commailto:rdaw...@force3.com wrote:
Have a customer looking to integrate a Nortel CS1000 and a few Aastra/Intecom 
PointSpans with Unity Connection. Aside from PIMG/TIMG, SIP via CUCM and SIP 
normalization, and QSIG can anyone come up with any other options?

Thanks,
Rob

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

[Heim, Dennis]

Multiple pubs is not supported. The appropriate approach is to use some type of 
VM backup and restore solution. This could be some scripts that you run on 
VMware that back up the vmx/vmdk files and zip them up, or it could be a 
solution such as Veeam. That way if everything goes to crap you can do a full 
cluster restore to a known good state.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed 
Abd EL-Rahman
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:57 PM
To: nizarshab...@live.com
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

Hi Nizar,
  This is what I’m asking about, the client suggested this approach and 
I was asking about the pros and cons for such approach.



Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer


From: Nazar Shabour [mailto:nizarshab...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:57 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy

hi

You mean you wan t to have 2 pubs in one cluster ?!! ? What is the benefit of 
this machine.?

regards



On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman 
ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.commailto:ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com wrote:
Hi All,
  I have a UC cluster V10.5 on 2 UCS Blade servers having 1 Pub and 4 
Subs, and I’d like to ask if there is any need or benefit from having a cold 
standby virtual machine for the Pub server (a replicated VM for the Pub which 
is turned off to backup Pub functionality in case of Pub failure), and also if 
the license will be valid on this cold standby VM for the Pub so that if the 
main Pub fails and we turned on the cold standby Pub VM everything will be fine 
and the operation continues normally.

Waiting your feedback.


Best Regards

Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network Engineer

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

[Heim, Dennis]

You could always do a migration with PCD, right?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 6:32 PM
To: Justin Steinberg; Tim Frazee
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] (no subject)

Justin,

How do you feel about that fact? If you kept on doing it this way, you'd end up 
with 1TB common and still have 14GB active. At what point would you consider a 
rebuild with the desired OVA and a restore from DRS?
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:21 AM Justin Steinberg 
jsteinb...@gmail.commailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote:

I pulled the trigger on this last night with CM 10.5.2, migrating two UCMs 
changing from the 2500 template to the 7500 template.  There was really nothing 
to it, other than shutting down the VM and increasing the vDisk from 80 GB to 
110 GB.

Upon startup the software automatically detected the vdisk change and ran an 
'Expanding Disk' script.   The new disk space was given to the common partition.

I did compare a new 10.5 7500 template with the expanded 2500 to 7500 template. 
  The difference I noticed was that on a true fresh install of 7500 user 
template the active and inactive software partitions have 20GB allocated.   The 
2500 had about 14 GB to these partitions.  Expanding the 2500 user template to 
7500 user only increased the common partition, the software partitions remained 
at 14GB.

Justin
On Mar 21, 2015 11:03 AM, Tim Frazee 
tfra...@gmail.commailto:tfra...@gmail.com wrote:
the resize cop file is for 9x only, 10 has it built in. I'm running around with 
a tac case to address a stock 9x or 10x 7.5 to 10k user build that results with 
a 110G disk. doesn't leave much space for those 500 moh sources.
if you shut the image down and increase from 110 to at least 112G, the boot 
process grows the common partition out.
as a standard, any of our 10x installs for large clients, we are growing the 
disk out to 120G just to be safe.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Erick 
erick...@gmail.commailto:erick...@gmail.com wrote:
The VMware disk reallocation worked for us also going from 80gig  to 110gig for 
10.5. Were on. 9.1 prior.

The readme in the download link Is pretty good but doesn't say outright what to 
increase it to.

High level steps ,

Make sure you have a good backup

Install the cop file
Shutdown the vm
Change virtual disk from 80G to 110G
Save /OK settings
Power on VM

It will reboot a few times while extending disk then come up fine / normal .


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Justin Steinberg 
jsteinb...@gmail.commailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote:
So in the CUCM 10.5 download section for the Utilities, it seems to have 
combined the common cleanup COP file and the VMware Disk Size Reallocation.

There is a COP file title 'VMware Disk Size Reallocation COP file' but the 
actual file is ciscocm.free_common_space_v1.3.k3.cop.sgn

The actual reallocation cop file isn't part of the CUCM 10.5 download, I had to 
go back into an older version to file that COP.  So that is why I was thinking 
in 10.5 all you would need to do is change the size of the vDisk in VMware and 
restart CUCM 10.5.

Is there an official document on the process to follow for this change ?

Justin



On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Roger Wiklund 
roger.wikl...@gmail.commailto:roger.wikl...@gmail.com wrote:
I have.

Went from 2500 to 7500 on CUCM 10.5(1).

You need to download the VMware Disk Size Reallocation COP file for
10.5. Worked like a charm.

http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/CleanupCommonCOPfilev1.3.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/ciscocm.vmware_disk_size_reallocation_v1.0.pdf

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Justin Steinberg 
jsteinb...@gmail.commailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Has anyone successfully expanded the virtual disk size of CUCM VMs without
 rebuild/DRS?



 I have an install where CM 10.5 is using the 2500 user template and we want
 to increase to 7500 users.  The 2500 OVA is 1 vCPU, 4GB, 1x80GB.The 7500
 OVA is 2vCPU, 6 GB, 1x110GB.In the past, the older 7500 user CM versions
 had two virtual 80 GB disks, however since 9.1 the 7500 user is a single 110
 GB disk.   It seems like with a single virtual disk it would be easier to
 expand an existing VM without rebuild.



 There are several bugs on the topic:

 https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCug63058

 https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuc58936



 In older CM versions there was a COP file to assist with allowing the VM to
 use more disk when the vdisk 

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway certificate advice required.

[Heim, Dennis]

Traditionally, you put the public Certificate on the Expressway-E.

This would traditionally contain SANs such as:
DNS:Expe.domain.com
DNS:domain.com
DNS: conference-2-CUPSCluster1.domain.com

If you are doing security you would have the secure profile names in there, and 
I believe persistent chat has some implications too.

On the expressway-C you would have certificates signed by your enterprise CA. 
Expressway-C and Expressway-E must be able to chain each other’s certificates 
so that the SIP/TLS can be established on the Unified Communication zone – aka 
trust chains must loaded.

Enterprise certificates are traditionally installed on your internal servers 
such as tomcat, etc. If using MultiSAN you must be on 10.5(2)SU2, because prior 
versions had a bug where the phones would reset every 7 minutes.

For your internal certificates when possible I have the following SANs inserted 
(depending on competency and give a crap factor of the security team:
DNS:Hostname
DNS:FQDN
DNS:IP-Address
IP:IP-Address

Remember that from a certificate warning perspective, the service such as CUPS 
presents the client certificate and it is up to the operating system to before 
the validation. All devices internally will need to trust your enterprise CA. 
If you have mobile devices registering internally, they will need to have the 
Enterprise CA installed. If you don’t have a BYOD/MDM solution, it may be 
easier to bite the bullet and get public certificates for your entire UC 
enterprise if that is important to you.

A couple of notes when generating your Certificates off your enterprise CA:

·  Make sure the certificate template you are using is set for Client 
AND Server Authentication

·  Make sure you are published certificate revocation lists 
(CRL/OCSP/AIA), that is accessible to all of your clients.. wherever they are. 
If you are using a Windows CA, by default it just published into LDAP/AD. This 
is a problem when clients are external, or not joined to the domain. The 
solution is to publisher to a directory on your CA and share that location via 
HTTP/HTTPS.

Hope this helps


Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Rajkumar Yadav
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:58 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway certificate advice required.

Hi,

Need few clarification for the Expressway MRA and certificate.

we have bought Multi san certificate from Go Daddy for UC applications.

Step 1:

If the certificate management part is done on the CUCM publisher for Tomcat 
with Multi San capabilities it would include the FQDN of all CUCM ( Pub  Sub), 
CUC, Im  Presence and domain.com.
Also i have to repeat the step for the Im  Presence server with Cup XMPP.

Step2:

Now if I'm doing the expressway (MRA) certificate management for traversal zone 
with Multi San capabilities, then will it include all the above FQDN and is it 
i don't have to perform step 1.

If i don't perform step 1, will it Jabber clients will not throw error for 
certificate acceptance (both inside and outside).

Please confirm is it both need to be done or just step 2 is enough ?


Regards,
Raaj.
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

[Heim, Dennis]

This is definitely interesting that you can migration between datastore’s even 
if a specific host does not have access. However, I think this is getting close 
to the just because you can, doesn’t mean you should. In today’s age it should 
be pretty easy to get a NFS mount that both hosts can point to. Heck, you can 
even do NFS or iSCSI on a Synology SAN. Load it with SSD’s and probably get 
acceptable IOPS (not recommending this as an enterprise solution).

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dave 
Goodwin
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 6:54 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

What about a live migration from one C-series with DAS to another C-series with 
DAS? VMware supports this in 5.1 and later. VMware doesn't really call this 
Storage vMotion (even if part of the underlying task is performing a similar 
feat). They don't even call it enhanced vMotion anymore in 5.5.
https://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-55/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vsphere.vcenterhost.doc%2FGUID-561681D9-6511-44DF-B169-F20E6CA94944.html

If it definitely falls into the not supported area, does anyone have an idea 
of whether it's not supported on purpose, because it was shown to wreak some 
kind of havoc on live traffic compared with a more simple vMotion? Or, 
unsupported due to lack of testing or knowledge of impact potential? Just 
trying to get a sense as to whether or not folks have tried it in a real 
production environment.

-Dave

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) 
rratl...@cisco.commailto:rratl...@cisco.com wrote:
The storage part of enhanced vMotion is called Storage vMotion and essentially 
isn’t supported.
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Storage_vMotion

May only be done during a maintenance window with UC VMs shut down.”  This is 
basically saying storage vMotion isn’t supported but you can migrate between 
datastores all day long.  I don’t even see the point of requiring SAN since 
with the VM shut down whether you are going between SANs or DAS datastores is 
just a matter of time.

-Ryan

On Mar 13, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Daniel Pagan 
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:

Hey how’s it going, Anthony – The confusion I had was mostly with VMware/ESX 
terminology behind migration methods. The Cisco documentation I was reading for 
supported vMotion methods all said “when shared storage is available”… and my 
question was “well… what if you have no shared storage and need to migrate 
between such datastores and hosts? Is this supported?”

The steps I was interested in taking to migrate the virtual machine is 
documented as “Enhanced vMotion”: http://vmdamentals.com/?p=4222

But here’s why I say I was confusing VMware terms… the vMotion (or Enhanced 
vMotion) process applies to live/powered-up virtual machines. For a powered 
down machine it’s simply considered a cold migration:

https://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vsphere.vcenterhost.doc_50%2FGUID-326DEC3C-3EFC-4DA0-B1E9-0B2D4698CBCC.html

Since I plan on having the machine powered off anyway, and Cisco fully supports 
a cold migration, then it seems I should have no concerns for my specific 
scenario…

… but on the topic of vMotion on a powered on UC VM, since documentation states 
that regardless of the UC app, the “VM must be installed on shared storage” and 
“source and destination servers must be connected to same SAN” – which tells me 
that Enhanced vMotion on a powered up UC VM between unshared storage is not 
supported.

^^^ The confusion of a non-VCP :)

- Dan

From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:01 AM
To: Daniel Pagan; Dave Goodwin
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage

Daniel,
Could you give a little more detail about your experience with this process?  
The confusion you faced is likely the same confusion many of us would face.

Which document(s) did you follow?  Which files did you copy?  What were the 
high level steps? etc.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:02 PM Daniel Pagan 
dpa...@fidelus.commailto:dpa...@fidelus.com wrote:
Thanks Dave. I also came across these details, but it too states shared storage:

“A Virtual Machine (VM) file on network/shared storage can be booted on any 
physical server hosting ESXi that has access to that network shared storage.”

But perhaps my confusion was 

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM ver 8.x to 10.x licensing conversion

[Heim, Dennis]

No they don’t. It is all determined based on owner id for the most part. Be 
prepared to find the Sales Order Numbers of your original order in order to 
provide what you are entitled to. Depending how long those orders were made 
determine how good of records Cisco has.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Countryman, Edward
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:15 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM ver 8.x to 10.x licensing conversion

We are in the process of planning our upgrade from 8.6 to 10.5 which means we 
need to plan for a conversion of our DLU’s to the new licensing model.

Does anyone know if a CUWL user license has to have the same extension on all 
of their devices?

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

[Heim, Dennis]

If past experience has anything to do... Cisco Live + 30-60 days NPH. That is 
what we have seen consistently year after year.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room



-Original Message-
From: Daniel Pagan [mailto:dpa...@fidelus.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 1:28 PM
To: Heim, Dennis; gen...@ucpenguin.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

Adding to Dennis's question below, is CUCM v11 going to be discussed at Cisco 
Live in June? I see no sessions or breakouts about this. There's a few sessions 
on CUC and UCCX roadmaps but nothing similar with regards to UCM.

Thanks!

- Dan

-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, 
Dennis
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 10:05 AM
To: gen...@ucpenguin.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

When does Cisco usually release their new versions of all their stuff?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide 
Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room



-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
gen...@ucpenguin.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:41 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO?

Its starting to show as the latest version in some places:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DNIS Question

[Heim, Dennis]

Out of the box no. You could leverage the Routing Rules API to build a policy 
and database lookup.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 6:07 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] DNIS Question


I have a user request for the following:


We are having an issue with a nuisance caller calling dispatch 20-30 times a 
day for the past month.  Can we set up the phone system to only allow the 
following number to call once a day on our   and  extension numbers ?

519 XXX 

After the one call is used for that day, the following call goes to this 
message:
If this is an emergency, please hang up and call 911 (hang up)




The question is it possible to accept one call a day then route them to a 
message or is it all or nothing ?







Thanks






Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519) 741-2200 x 7000


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

[Heim, Dennis]

When does Cisco usually release their new versions of all their stuff?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room



-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
gen...@ucpenguin.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:41 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 11.0 Release Date?

Anyone have any guesses for the date when CUCM 11.0 hits CCO?

Its starting to show as the latest version in some places:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-11-0/model.html


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] SJC-This week

[Heim, Dennis]

Anyone else in San Jose for the Collaboration festivities with Cisco this week?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA

[Heim, Dennis]

Here is a lab guide from Cisco dcloud, that goes through a good portion of it.

https://dcloud-rtp-web-1.cisco.com/dCloud/docs/Documents/pa_for_mm_video_10.5_v1/PA_for_MM_Video_Lab_Guide.pdf


Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Charles Goldsmith
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Andy
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRV records for Jabber/Telepresence/MRA

You definitely do not want _cisco-uds and _cuplogin on the outside from my 
understanding.  
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/expressway-series/117811-configure-vcs-00.html#anc10

Just collab-edge on the outside, plus any b2b/federation records you need.

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Andy 
andy.ca...@gmail.commailto:andy.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
I seem to have got myself into a stew and can’t seem to get in my mind what I 
need to do with SRV records.
I’m trying to deploy Expressway MRA and B2B.

We currently have an external DNS domain and a different internal domain.

For our internal domain which I’ll call andy.local we have the following SRV 
records setup.
_cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub1.andy.local
_cisco-uds._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 sub2.andy.local
_cuplogin._tcp.andy.local 8443 10 10 cups1.andy.local

For our External domain which I’ll call andy.comhttp://andy.com
_h323cs._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 1720 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_h323ls._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 1719 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_sip._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 5060 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_sip._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 5060 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_sips._tcp.andy.comhttp://tcp.andy.com 5061 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_turn._udp.andy.comhttp://udp.andy.com 3478 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com
_collab-edge.tls.andy.comhttp://collab-edge.tls.andy.com 8443 10 10 
videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com

We have an A Record for videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com which 
points to our public address.

As it doesn’t work I raised a TAC case and the engineer changed my errors in 
the config, but also says I need to add _cisco-uds._tcp and _cuplogin._tcp for 
our external domain.
now I’m really confused as I thought that Jabber uses the DNS records to 
determine which side of the firewall it was by the dns records it receives when 
you boot the app.
Also videoconf.andy.comhttp://videoconf.andy.com needs to be changed to match 
the FQDN of the VCSe or Expressway Edge server.

We are running CUCM 9.1.2 with a single expressway-c and expressway-e running 
x8.5

TIA

Andy
andy.ca...@gmail.commailto:andy.ca...@gmail.com




___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points

[Heim, Dennis]

Don’t forget to add codec passthrough on all your MTP’s. otherwise it will pick 
software ones over the hardware ones.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:01 PM
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points


Just following up on this thread.

I've read through a number of documents, and I'm beginning to really like the 
idea of trusted relay points.

I'm hoping to set up a IOS software based MTP and configure that as TRP (using 
the firewall traversal command). I'd also set it up as codec passthrough since 
that's primarily what we'd use it for.

That being said, as far as I can tell, if I ever do need a XCODER, it would 
simply call that on top of the MTP/TRP, since I don't think I want to be 
marking my XCODERs as TRPs since there's no real way to not use them as such 
and waste resources.

An alternative would be to modify my MRGLists to contain multiple MRGroups, and 
order them appropriately, i.e. MTP/TRPs first, then XCODER/TRPs next.

Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated.

Lelio


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
Cc: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:33:05 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points
Thanks Eric.

Transcoders are another question I'm trying to clear up as well. I might spin 
that off into another thread after I read up some more.

It's good to know that if we don't need transcoding, that we won't need 
additional DSPs.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Eric Pedersen 
peders...@bennettjones.commailto:peders...@bennettjones.com
To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca, Brian 
Meade bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu
Cc: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:22:54 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points
I believe you can configure your router to be a software MTP with “codec 
pass-through” as long as you don’t need transcoding. Then you won’t need DSPs.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: 17 February 2015 9:55 AM
To: Brian Meade
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points


Thanks Brian.

I'm guessing the only things I would have to do is ensure that I have enough 
MTP resources on the trusted device. I could use the DSP calculator for that.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu
To: Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
Cc: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:34:22 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] trusted relay points
They're basically just MTPs you deem to be trusted.  A lot of people use them 
for switching between IPv4 and IPv6.  Really not anything different than just 
forcing MTP Required other than maybe just narrowing down the MTP list.  Some 
people use the same setup for VPN phones/IP Communicators over VPN so VPN 
clients don't have to be able to talk directly to each other.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca wrote:

We had a security discussion with our account team, and one thing that was 
brought up was the concept/feature of trusted relay points.

There's not much on the subject in the guides, other than saying some MTPs are 
trusted relay points.

Our thought was, rather than opening up 

Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

[Heim, Dennis]

This year will mark 10 years hold the CCVP/CCNP Voice for me, and mine expires 
Fall of this year. When I took all the exams there was still a 
gateway/gatekeeper exam. In my case basically I need to pass all the exams or 
achieve a CCIE Collaboration certification before my CCNP Voice expires.

My approach is this:

1.   Renew CCNP Voice by taking any of the existing CCNP Voice exams.

a.   Keeps is active and alive and give me time to get motivated for more 
certs

b.  If I have time work through the other exams in this order before Q4.

   i.  TVOICE 
(642-427)

 ii.  CAPPS 
(642-467)

2.   Pass CIPTV2 sometime over the next couple years to get CCNP 
Collaboration.

I cannot say all of this really excites me.


Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben 
Story
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 1:10 PM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

Better than how they handled CCSP to CCNP Security and required a complete redo.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Ryan Huff 
ryanh...@outlook.commailto:ryanh...@outlook.com wrote:
What gets me is that a CCNP Voice needs one test to upgrade to CCNP 
Collaboration 
(http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/tools/ccnp_collab/ccnp_collab_tool.html).

Really? Only one test's worth of info is what changes between Voice and 
Collaboration?

If you are going to retire and invalidate a credential and move to another 
tract altogether, then it should be a top-down revamp, not just one test of a 
few new questions about video.

This feels like it is nothing more than re branding/marketing; and I shouldn't 
have to pay for that.

My grumpy two cents,

Ryan


Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:10:24 -0600
From: ben.st...@gmail.commailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
To: wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs
Is it just me or does it seem weird for a CCNA level to now require two tests.  
Money grab?

--
Ben Story
CCNP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA
ben.st...@gmail.commailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
mailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
@ntwrk80
http://showbrain.blogspot.com
http://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.comhttp://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.com/


From sour-faced saints and silly devotions, good Lord, preserve us!. -- St. 
Teresa of Avila

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Charles Goldsmith 
wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/ccna-ccnp-collaboration

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___ cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

[Heim, Dennis]

What exam is required to convert CCNP voice to CCNP collaboration?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Huff
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:58 AM
To: Ben Story; Charles Goldsmith
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs

What gets me is that a CCNP Voice needs one test to upgrade to CCNP 
Collaboration 
(http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/tools/ccnp_collab/ccnp_collab_tool.html).

Really? Only one test's worth of info is what changes between Voice and 
Collaboration?

If you are going to retire and invalidate a credential and move to another 
tract altogether, then it should be a top-down revamp, not just one test of a 
few new questions about video.

This feels like it is nothing more than re branding/marketing; and I shouldn't 
have to pay for that.

My grumpy two cents,

Ryan


Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:10:24 -0600
From: ben.st...@gmail.commailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
To: wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCNA/CCNP Collaboration certs
Is it just me or does it seem weird for a CCNA level to now require two tests.  
Money grab?

--
Ben Story
CCNP, CCNA, CCNA Wireless, CCDA
ben.st...@gmail.commailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
mailto:ben.st...@gmail.com
@ntwrk80
http://showbrain.blogspot.com
http://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.comhttp://rand0mw0rds.blogspot.com/


From sour-faced saints and silly devotions, good Lord, preserve us!. -- St. 
Teresa of Avila

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Charles Goldsmith 
wo...@justfamily.orgmailto:wo...@justfamily.org wrote:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/ccna-ccnp-collaboration

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___ cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Applications - Default Gatweay

[Heim, Dennis]

Does default  gateway impact license mac?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian 
Meade
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:47 PM
To: Jose Colon II
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Applications - Default Gatweay

Yep, that should do it.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jose Colon II 
jcolon...@gmail.commailto:jcolon...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to verify from CLI the command to change default gateway is

set network gateway x.x.x.x





On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Jose Colon II 
jcolon...@gmail.commailto:jcolon...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys, Appreciate the quick responses.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
Shouldn't have to worry about anything then.  Just the small blip when you set 
the new default-gateway and networking service restarts.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Jose Colon II 
jcolon...@gmail.commailto:jcolon...@gmail.com wrote:
Running version 10.5 on all boxes

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
What versions are you on?  If 8.x or below, it will change the license MAC so 
you'll need to rehost all of your licensing.

9.x and above shouldn't have any issue besides a short blip when it restarts 
the networking services.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Jose Colon II 
jcolon...@gmail.commailto:jcolon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some voice applications at our colo that were setup with the incorrect 
default gateway. They were setup with the gateway being a 3750 stack of 
switches. IT does work but I believe is causing some unnecessary IP processing 
on the switch making the IP Input process go crazy.

What is the effect on the voice apps when changing the default gateway on the 
voice applications, Call Manager, UCCX and Unity?

Thanks

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

[Heim, Dennis]

I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that 
limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective:

1.   SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an 
Android feature.

2.   No screen sharing in Webex.

3.   Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via 
SIP-URI.

4.   Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would 
drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.

5.   No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am 
sure.

When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical misses. 
Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the telepresence 
experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I can move the 
video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch between video and 
presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I have become a video 
snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call.

The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less. There is 
no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an airplane.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network device?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.commailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com
To: Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.commailto:ealeather...@gmail.com
Cc: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
We have just purchased 4 of them.  We have large conference rooms in our larger 
sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit.  But in our smaller sites (under 20 
employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small conference room size 
and that typically only one or two people would be in, at a time.

We will see if some of our Regional Managers end up with one as a second 
monitor at there desk.  But that would be, due to the fact that they do a lot 
of video conferencing, and burn up a conference room that multiple people could 
use for meetings.

Only time will tell.

Scott




On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Ed Leatherman 
ealeather...@gmail.commailto:ealeather...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have these deployed to actually end-users? Thoughts or opinions?

I have a DX80 on loan, after i got over the This is pretty cool after 
initially getting it setup, I'm trying to figure out if/where it would be 
useful here (edu) at the steepish price point. We have some disability services 
groups that are using video now, price tag is probably out of their budget 
though.

--
Ed Leatherman

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

[Heim, Dennis]

With the SIP: vs TEL:, maybe they could add that into the default webex invite 
at somepoint.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan 
Ratliff (rratliff)
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 1:38 PM
To: Ed Leatherman; Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

To Lelio, yes these are just like the other desktop IP phones from a network 
perspective.

Ed,
1.   SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an 
Android feature.
Use tel: URIs instead of sip:.  I’ve found a couple enhancements on this but 
nothing committed.

2.   No screen sharing in Webex.
Roadmapped but I don’t know when it’s planned.  I *think* it’s a WebEx feature 
so could potentially come outside of a phone load with an app update.


3.   Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via 
SIP-URI.
This is for a connected HDMI-In device, not the native android desktop.  Works 
on any video call.

4.   Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would 
drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.
Don't recall this one off the top of my head.

5.   No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am 
sure.
On the roadmap.

-Ryan

On Feb 13, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:

It's the WebEx Android app in general.  Anyone know if the iOS WebEx app 
support screen sharing yet?  I don't have an iPhone.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ed Leatherman 
ealeather...@gmail.commailto:ealeather...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I wasnt crazy when I couldn't get screen sharing working with WebEx :) 
yes that seems like a critical fail to me

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 11:40 AM Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things that 
limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective:
1.   SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this is an 
Android feature.
2.   No screen sharing in Webex.
3.   Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via 
SIP-URI.
4.   Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it would 
drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.
5.   No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions, I am 
sure.

When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical misses. 
Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the telepresence 
experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I can move the 
video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch between video and 
presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I have become a video 
snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call.

The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less. There is 
no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an airplane.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
image001.pnghttps://twitter.com/CollabSensei
image002.pngimage003.pngtel:+13142121814image004.png
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip 
[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]
 On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: Cisco VOIP

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network device?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.commailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com
To: Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.commailto:ealeather...@gmail.com
Cc: Cisco VOIP cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
We have just purchased 4 of them.  We have large conference rooms in our larger 
sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit.  But in our smaller sites (under 20 
employees

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway CE with multiple CUCM clusters

[Heim, Dennis]

My understanding is that with the legacy VCS platform you can do 1:Many 
relationship.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/

Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting 
Roomhttps://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Erick 
Wellnitz
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:54 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway CE with multiple CUCM clusters

Hey all,

Wondering if anyone has done expressway ce with multiple clusters. Am I 
correct to assume it's a 1:1 relationship (1 CE to 1 CUCM cluster) or is there 
a way to use 1 CE with multiple CUCM clusters?

Thanks in advance!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] GoDaddy UCC Cert?

[Heim, Dennis]

As of 10.5 SU1 we were still running into issues with the multi-server 
certificates not work. Supposedly it is fixed in SU2. However, we decided just 
to go with single server certs to resolve the issue. Anyone have it working on 
SU2 and not getting device resets?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:11 PM
To: Kevin Przybylowski; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] GoDaddy UCC Cert?

They have always done this. It's a bonus I suppose. Even when you buy a single 
hostname cert they add www to it. A little lagniappe I suppose but a bit of 
work in this case.

Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech | 
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home 
| G+https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin 
Przybylowski
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 11:55 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] GoDaddy UCC Cert?

I ran into an issue recently where I wasn't able to upload a godaddy UCC cert 
to CUCM (Multi-Server) until regenerating the CSR with 
www.Common-Namehttp://www.Common-Name .

It appears godaddy adds www. as a SAN for all UCC certs now?  Has anyone else 
seen this?


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For Jabber/Presence Use

[Heim, Dennis]

For those windows clients you can run the following:

certutil -verify -urlfetch Path-to-CUPS-tomcat-cert.cer

That should show why the certificate is failing validation. If you use an 
internal ca to sign your certs include the following subject alternative names:
DNS:FQDN
DNS:Hostname
DNS:IP-Address
IP:IP-Address

I find that overkill usually helps certs validate.

A few other things:
-If using internal certificates, make sure that the AIA and CRL is published 
outside of Active Directory (aka via URL)
-Make sure your template is supporting Server AND Client authentication.

If you are using MRA, then the Expressway-E is the only entity the should 
require and external certificate.

Hope this helps.



Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814


Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gary 
Parker
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:24 AM
To: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: [cisco-voip] Recommendation For Certificate Provider For 
Jabber/Presence Use

Hi folks, I’m in the process of replacing a load of self-signed certs on my 
8.6.x CUCM, CUC and CUP servers.

I’ve been having issues getting certs with the correct KeyUsage extensions from 
our current provider and wondered if anyone could recommend a company who can 
provide certificates that honour the requirements in the CSRs generated by the 
Cisco Unified Communications servers.

I’m particularly interested in certificates that contain the digitalSignature, 
nonRepudiation,keyEncipherment,dataEncipherment” extensions as per:

http://blog.warcop.com/2015/01/22/cisco-jabber-certificate-warning-again/

Jabber for Windows clients 9.2.5 and greater are flagging invalid certificates 
on our currently installed TERENA certificates.

---
/-Gary Parker--f--\
| Unified Communications Service Manager  |
n   Loughborough University IT Services   |
| Tel: +441509635635  Mob: +447989172258  o
| http://delphium.lboro.ac.uk/pubkey.txt  |
\r--d-/


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI

[Heim, Dennis]

Felt the need to add my daily dose of sarcasm… easiest and quickest way to 
disable a PRI… a backhoe.




Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:19 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI


Thanks everyone.

Since the Poll Status option is not enabled on the gateways in question, I 
won't be able to use this. I was not able to get consistent results with 
changing the parameter and not resetting the gateway.

Gonna have to try simply shutting it down and potentiality losing a call or 
two. Will have to see.

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Adam Pawlowski aj...@buffalo.edumailto:aj...@buffalo.edu
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 12:06:13 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] easiest and quickest way to disable a PRI

Last time I busied out bearer channels, I was not able to restore them to 
service without reloading the gateway, which was not ideal given I didn't want 
to bring everything down, but it was graceful.

You could take it out of your route lists for outbound and shut it down 
after-hours, and just chance losing a call somewhere in there.

I also had luck changing the ISDN switch type on our emulated 5ESS to national 
which causes it to work for a while and eventually drop D and stop working 
which had the desired effect too. That is a bad idea and not recommended.



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Single PRI with multiple virtual trunk groups

[Heim, Dennis]

I am guessing you would need some adtran magic. Sounds interesting… ;-).

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Justin Steinberg
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 4:22 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] Single PRI with multiple virtual trunk groups

Has anyone heard of splitting a single PRI into multiple virtual trunk groups ? 
   Not splitting the B channels into two trunk groups, but creating a virtual 
trunk group on the D channel.

When an outbound call is sent out the PRI, Cisco would specify which virtual 
trunk group is being used and this would be sent in the D Channel message.

The use case is around E911/PSALI and DID screening ranges.  We want to have 
the telco remove the screening range, but they said it isn’t possible with 
their CO switch since we are also using E911/PSALI.The workaround the Telco 
provided was to create two virtual trunk groups, one for E911/PSALI and one for 
no screening range.   911 calls would need to route out the PSALI virtual trunk 
group and all other calls out the other virtual trunk group.

I’ve never heard of this in Cisco land.  Any ideas?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 10.6 Updates

[Heim, Dennis]

They have been dancing to agile for a little while.. or at least it makes a 
good excuse not to have a roadmap of upcoming features.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Josh Warcop; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 10.6 Updates

That makes three versions in one month.  I heard Cisco adopted the Agile 
methodologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development, but dang, 
that's next level.
On Tue Jan 27 2015 at 1:53:48 PM Josh Warcop 
j...@warcop.commailto:j...@warcop.com wrote:
Just an FYI for anyone working with Jabber.

The 10.6 releases are going to post today for download across Windows, Mac, 
iPad, iPhone, and Android.

New planning guide:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_6/planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-106-planning-guide/CJAB_BK_CD3376A0_00_cisco-jabber-planning-guide_chapter_0100.html

New deployment and installation guide:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_6/CJAB_BK_C56DE1AB_00_cisco-jabber-106-deployment-and-installation-guide.html

Windows release notes:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/Windows/10_6/rn/JABW_BK_C6A8A6C3_00_cisco-jabber-for-windows-10_6-release-notes.html

Mac release notes:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/mac/10_6/JABM_BK_C6D012D7_00_cisco-jabber-for-mac-106.html

iPhone/iPad release notes
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/iPhone_iPad/10_6/RN/JABI_BK_CF3573C2_00_cisco-jabber-for-iphone-and.html

Android release notes:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/Android/10_6/rn/JABA_BK_CB805EB4_00_cisco-jabber-for-android-10-6-release_notes.html

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] dx80 wallpaper resolution

[Heim, Dennis]

I know when you do the screenshot off the device /CGI/Screenshot it shows 
1920x1080.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim 
Frazee
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:17 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] dx80 wallpaper resolution

hey all,
Anyone have any experience with setting a wallpaper on a DX80? I've gotten how 
to set the file from UCM all figured out but the issue I'm having is the 
dimensions of the file itself and how Android interprets the file.
Data Sheet says the screen is 1920 x 1080 while the admin guide to make a 
wallpaper 1600 x 1280.
With how Android displays the actual wallpaper, it seems the dimensions need to 
be something completely different.

Some googling shows that the best way to figure the resolution is to double the 
width since when you slide the screen to the left or to the right, you get 50% 
of the screen in that new spread. 50+100+50 percent.
Anyone ever done this? Am I on the right path?
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have experience with OpenGear Console Manager or Infrastructure Manager?

[Heim, Dennis]

Not sure the pricing. Cisco does have a 2901 Terminal Server Bundle, which is 
essentially a 2901 with octal serial cables on it.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio 
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:56 PM
To: Jeffrey Girard
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone have experience with OpenGear Console Manager 
or Infrastructure Manager?

I would recommend OpenGear in a heart beat. There were some things I didn't 
like, mainly firewall default rules, but other than that, it's a great product. 
Technical support was also very good.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.camailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccshttp://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: Jeffrey Girard 
jeffrey.gir...@girardinc.commailto:jeffrey.gir...@girardinc.com
To: voip puck cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:09:28 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Anyone have experience with OpenGear Console Manager or 
Infrastructure Manager?
I am setting up a classroom with 40 cisco devices (routers and switches) split 
between 8 student pods.

I was doing some research and looking at OpenGear for remote / OOB Console 
access.

Anyone have any experience or input?

--
Dr. Jeffrey T. Girard (Jeff), PhD
Colonel, United States Army (Retired)
Senior Network Engineer / VoIP Engineer - WireMeHappy.com
(607) 835-0406 (home office)
(845) 764-1661 (mobile)
(607) 835-0458 (fax)

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

[Heim, Dennis]

Working on building a dynamic lab environment. The goal is cable the PRI cards 
once, and then through configuration be able to change where they connect to. 
Basically a layer 1 switch for PRI’s.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: Walenta, Philip [mailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 5:38 PM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

What is the end goal?  I've frequently used plain old voice gateways (as5350 is 
cheap).  Setup dial peers and you are off and running for voice, unless you 
need pure transport for things like data service.



Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 10, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
What have others used when there is a need to mux PRI’s over the IP network?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
image001.pnghttps://twitter.com/CollabSensei
image002.pngxmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.comimage003.pngtel:+13142121814image004.pngsip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

[Heim, Dennis]

It looks like those have been replaced by the ASR 920’s, from what I have been 
able to determine.

Cisco provides the following mechanism to transport TDM over IP

· Circuit Emulation Service over Packet Switched Network (CESoPSN) – 
works with Channel Associated Signaling (not a PRI)

· Structure Agnostic TDM over Packet (SAToP)/Psuedowires – as far as I 
can tell worked with CAS and CCS (includes PRI).

CESoPSN allows you to peel off individual bearer channels, which would explains 
why CCS would not play nice with that. Both CESoPSN and SAToP require the 
Advanced IP Metro IP Access License.

The ASR9XX series supports 16 and 32 PRI modules, but are connected via 
something similar to a SCSI connector and requires a specialized patch panel. 
However the ASR920, supports a 8 port module that terminates in RJ-45/RJ-48 
connectors.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


From: Stephen Welsh [mailto:stephen.we...@unifiedfx.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:33 PM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: Walenta, Philip; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

Is this what you are looking for?

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/access/interfaces/nm/hardware/installation/guide/ceoipnm.html




On 11 Jan 2015, at 23:08, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:

Working on building a dynamic lab environment. The goal is cable the PRI cards 
once, and then through configuration be able to change where they connect to. 
Basically a layer 1 switch for PRI’s.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
image001.pnghttps://twitter.com/CollabSensei
image002.pngxmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.comimage003.pngtel:+13142121814image004.pngsip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/


From: Walenta, Philip [mailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 5:38 PM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

What is the end goal?  I've frequently used plain old voice gateways (as5350 is 
cheap).  Setup dial peers and you are off and running for voice, unless you 
need pure transport for things like data service.



Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 10, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
What have others used when there is a need to mux PRI’s over the IP network?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
image001.pnghttps://twitter.com/CollabSensei
image002.pngxmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.comimage003.pngtel:+13142121814image004.pngsip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- 
http://www.projectsquared.comhttp://www.projectsquared.com/


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] PRI to Ethernet transport

[Heim, Dennis]

What have others used when there is a need to mux PRI's over the IP network?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[twitter]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[chat]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[Phone]tel:+13142121814[video]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Innovation happens on project squared -- http://www.projectsquared.com


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] UCCX 10.X and CUCM 8.6

[Heim, Dennis]

I saw some posts back from this summer with UCCX 10 connected with CUCM 8.6. Is 
that supported currently?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D00984.16F5B980]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01D00984.16F5B980]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01D00984.16F5B980]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01D00984.16F5B980]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CER 10.0(2) and 3850 Support

[Heim, Dennis]

I have not had a chance to pursue it any further.

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeather...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 7:07 AM
To: Brian Meade
Cc: Heim, Dennis; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CER 10.0(2) and 3850 Support

Hi Dennis,

Did you resolve this one?

pretty sure it's CSCuq22827 although the bug tracker only lists 9.0 as 
affected. Newer code on 3850 presents a different OID and CER doesn't know how 
to use it. Supposed to be a TAC workaround, I still need to follow up and see.

Ed

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Brian Meade 
bmead...@vt.edumailto:bmead...@vt.edu wrote:
I don't think you should be able to do an SNMP get for 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1641.

That's just the object ID in the CISCO-PRODUCTS-MIB.

Brian

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I just upgraded to 10.0(2). We have some 3850-48P switches.  Which based on the 
release notes is supported. However, when I do an Snmp get  for 
1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1641, I am getting nothing. I am able to get snmp from other 
parts of the snmp tree. I started doing the snmp walks and gets because CER was 
saying these switches are unsupported.

Anyone got 3850 switches to work with CER?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0][cid:image003.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01D004A4.D11E5CC0]



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Ed Leatherman
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] PRI E1/T1 utilization

[Heim, Dennis]

What protocol is your gateway running?

Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01D00525.739B97D0]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01D00525.739B97D0]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01D00525.739B97D0]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01D00525.739B97D0]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Dharambir kumar varma
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 5:10 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] PRI E1/T1 utilization

Hi All,

is it possilble to check PRI utilization on CUCM side or ISR.?

--
 Regards,
 Dharambir Kumar



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Deployment Tool

[Heim, Dennis]

PCD is a tool, it is not a complete upgrade and patching solution 
(sales/marketing). It has specific versions and specific tasks that it can do. 
Many things it cannot (verify with cco).  It does work with all the caveats. 
You will need to upload all cop files and iso files to the PCD server. All 
files will be pushed from the PCD server as part of the upgrade task. If you 
have nodes at remote locations, this will be 4-5gb across your network 
(allocate necessary time). It will upgrade one node at a time, streamlining and 
parallel ops is not really in PCD’s deck of cards at this time. For example, it 
will do each cucm subscriber in serial, instead of all at the same time, or 
upgrading IMP while it doing cucm. With proper time, it will complete.

Normally in a significant upgrade as 6.x to 10.x is, you are obviously getting 
new hardware. Without PCD, this would all be staged in an offline environment, 
so cut night is turning off the existing servers and turning on the new ones. 
VM migration and all that has to be planned for, etc. However, with PCD, 
everything happens the night of cut. PCD migrates the data out of the existing 
cluster, then it shuts those down and bring up the new VM’s.

Please also note that you need appropriate VMWare licensing to support the 
storage API’s .. you need foundation or standard the default that is offered as 
part of BE7K will not permit the use of PCD.

In your migration you will also  need to plan for endpoint firmware upgrades, 
depending on what you are running for some endpoints this may be a multi-step 
upgrade. Some have also noted there is a bug with the default 10.5 firmware as 
it relates to headset and transfer functionality, so following your upgrading 
to 10.X you will want to upgrade past the default firmware.

The trick with PCD is to figure out what you want your upgrade process to look 
like then determine where PCD can help. PCD is great for pushing cop files and 
firmware upgrades across medium to large size clusters (big time savings). When 
it comes to full upgrades, it does get the job done, but it does take longer.

Hope this helps,

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFD8A.DC84F950]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFD8A.DC84F950]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFFD8A.DC84F950]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFD8A.DC84F950]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Boon
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:49 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Prime Collaboration Deployment Tool

I'm planning on upgrading a customer's CUCM 6.1(5) to 10.5 in the next few 
weeks by using the new PCD tool. I've tried it out in the lab and it seems ok.

Has anyone used this tool to perform upgrades on production systems? If so what 
was your experience please, good or bad? Are there any gotchas that I need to 
be aware of?

Thanks

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Enable DNS

[Heim, Dennis]

I have a 2 node cluster that currently has DNS disabled. My intention is to 
configure and enable DNS. I know this will regenerate all the certificates at 
once. My understanding is that as long as I do not do both nodes at the same 
time and all the endpoints register with the other server all will be well. 
However, any endpoints that are offline will require their CTL's to be cleared.

Has anyone seen anything different?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFD9B.8F3AFE40]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFD9B.8F3AFE40]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFFD9B.8F3AFE40]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFD9B.8F3AFE40]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

[Heim, Dennis]

I meant ITL’s. We are in non-secure mode, so ITL’s only. This is 10.5SU1.

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

What CUCM version?  Also you mention CTLs so is this a mixed-mode cluster?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I have a 2 node cluster that currently has DNS disabled. My intention is to 
configure and enable DNS. I know this will regenerate all the certificates at 
once. My understanding is that as long as I do not do both nodes at the same 
time and all the endpoints register with the other server all will be well. 
However, any endpoints that are offline will require their CTL’s to be cleared.

Has anyone seen anything different?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70][cid:image003.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA1.ADCDEE70]



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

[Heim, Dennis]

With the recovery key thing, will that process work after you have screwed 
yourself and the phones won’t register?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:49 AM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

Since you're on 10.5, you can also take a backup of the ITL recovery key that 
you can use to recover with if anything goes wrong:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/10_0_1/delta/CUCM_BK_C206A718_00_cucm-new-and-changed-1001/CUCM_BK_C206A718_00_cucm-new-and-changed-1001_chapter_010.html#CUCM_RF_S1EF9820_00

Make sure all the devices are using a CM Group with both servers in it so they 
have a 2nd TVS server they can use and just do one server at a time making sure 
the phones get the updated ITLs before doing the next server.

You could be really safe and set Prepare Cluster for Rollback to 8.x to 
True, make your DNS changes, then change it back to False.

Brian

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I meant ITL’s. We are in non-secure mode, so ITL’s only. This is 10.5SU1.

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880][cid:image003.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]


From: bmead...@gmail.commailto:bmead...@gmail.com 
[mailto:bmead...@gmail.commailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Heim, Dennis
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Enable DNS

What CUCM version?  Also you mention CTLs so is this a mixed-mode cluster?

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Heim, Dennis 
dennis.h...@wwt.commailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com wrote:
I have a 2 node cluster that currently has DNS disabled. My intention is to 
configure and enable DNS. I know this will regenerate all the certificates at 
once. My understanding is that as long as I do not do both nodes at the same 
time and all the endpoints register with the other server all will be well. 
However, any endpoints that are offline will require their CTL’s to be cleared.

Has anyone seen anything different?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814tel:%2B1%20314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880][cid:image003.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFFDA6.D7B3D880]



___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 7965s dropping like flies

[Heim, Dennis]

POE switches and end devices are fairly sensitive to power over/under voltages.

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814




-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James 
Andrewartha
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:29 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7965s dropping like flies

Has anyone seen a high rate of failure from 7965s? Ours have just hit 4 years 
old, and I've had about 6 (of 250) die then get stuck on the boot screen in the 
last month or so. Cisco is happily RMAing them, but I'm wondering if there's 
some latent flaw that's coming to light.

--
James Andrewartha
Network  Projects Engineer
Christ Church Grammar School
Claremont, Western Australia
Ph. (08) 9442 1757
Mob. 0424 160 877
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] MRA deploy

[Heim, Dennis]

What does the following show:

Do this from an entity/pc on the outside?

Nslookup
Set type = all
_collab-edge._tls.domain

Does it resolve to your expressway-E’s address?

Dennis Heim | Collaboration Solutions Architect
World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
[cid:image001.png@01CFE3C8.D1980900]https://twitter.com/CollabSensei
[cid:image002.png@01CFE3C8.D1980900]xmpp:dennis.h...@wwt.com[cid:image003.png@01CFE3C8.D1980900]tel:+13142121814[cid:image004.png@01CFE3C8.D1980900]sip:dennis.h...@wwt.com


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of José 
Paulo de Oliveira Petry
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:44 PM
To: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] MRA deploy

Hello,

Have followed the MRA via Expressway Deployement Guide and things are not 
working.

The situation is this:

Login from Jabber inside my lan is ok.

when I type an incorrect password  in my Jabber for iPhone from internet, i 
receive an invalid username/password error, so looks like the communication 
from internet to CUCM/IMP through expressway is ok

when i type the correct password, i receive the following error: Cannot 
communicate with the server.

I downloaded the debug Jabber for iphone generate but couldn't find any clue 
about what is happening.

Diagnose logging at Expressway-C neither.

What should i look first?

Does my Jabber devices at CUCM needs to use a secure phone profile or i can 
use a non-secure phone profile (default)?

Thanks in advance,

José Paulo de Oliveira Petry
petr...@gmail.commailto:petr...@gmail.com
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip