Re: [datameet] how to crawl Indian newspaper sites
On 9 December 2013 19:37, Debamitro Chakraborti wrote: > Any way to crawl the back issues of prominent Indian newspapers like The > Hindu, TOI, Indian Express, Hindustan Times etc? > I was part of a team which needed to analyse news reports from a time frame > and we hacked together a TOI crawler (which still has limitations) and were > working on a The Hindu crawler -- would love to know about something simpler > that is already available. The newsrack.in recommendation is a good one, but Newsrack is intended as much more than a simple crawler. If a crawler is what you need, you should look into something like Nutch ( http://nutch.apache.org/ ). If you prefer to write your own for simple, non-generic. needs we have happily used Scrapy in the Python world ( http://scrapy.org/ ). Regards, Gora -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] how to crawl Indian newspaper sites
Hi Debamitro, Couple of months ago, me and few of my friends built a media monitoring tool to track what traditional media was writing about Aam Aadmi Party. Our work can be seen here - http://aap.mediatrack.in As part of the process, we wrote a crawler that crawls Hindu, TOI, HT and three other sources. To keep track of scale we are crawling a depth of 2 starting from the daily site map page of each of these news sites. I can share our crawler code. We also have last two months of crawl data from these sources, we will be happy to share that as well. Please do let me know if you are interested. Thanks, arvind On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Debamitro Chakraborti wrote: > I know of newsrack (in fact I created the NREGA topic on the site long > long ago) but what I am looking for is a crawler of past records which I > can use for my own research. Maybe the code behind newsrack can be reused > to build such a crawler -- but I didn't see it anywhere on the site. > Anyway, thanks. > > Debamitro > > > On Monday, 9 December 2013 19:48:32 UTC+5:30, Meera K wrote: > >> See if newsrack.in fits your needs, it uses rss feeds though. But allows >> programming it so more powerful than Google news. >> >> Regds, Meera >> ~ Bangalore's own interactive newsmagazine at www.citizenmatters.in ~ >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Debamitro Chakraborti >> wrote: >> >>> Any way to crawl the back issues of prominent Indian newspapers like The >>> Hindu, TOI, Indian Express, Hindustan Times etc? >>> I was part of a team which needed to analyse news reports from a time >>> frame and we hacked together a TOI crawler (which still has limitations) >>> and were working on a The Hindu crawler -- would love to know about >>> something simpler that is already available. >>> >>> Debamitro >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com. >>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] how to crawl Indian newspaper sites
I know of newsrack (in fact I created the NREGA topic on the site long long ago) but what I am looking for is a crawler of past records which I can use for my own research. Maybe the code behind newsrack can be reused to build such a crawler -- but I didn't see it anywhere on the site. Anyway, thanks. Debamitro On Monday, 9 December 2013 19:48:32 UTC+5:30, Meera K wrote: > > See if newsrack.in fits your needs, it uses rss feeds though. But allows > programming it so more powerful than Google news. > > Regds, Meera > ~ Bangalore's own interactive newsmagazine at www.citizenmatters.in ~ > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Debamitro Chakraborti > > > wrote: > >> Any way to crawl the back issues of prominent Indian newspapers like The >> Hindu, TOI, Indian Express, Hindustan Times etc? >> I was part of a team which needed to analyse news reports from a time >> frame and we hacked together a TOI crawler (which still has limitations) >> and were working on a The Hindu crawler -- would love to know about >> something simpler that is already available. >> >> Debamitro >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+u...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] how to crawl Indian newspaper sites
See if newsrack.in fits your needs, it uses rss feeds though. But allows programming it so more powerful than Google news. Regds, Meera ~ Bangalore's own interactive newsmagazine at www.citizenmatters.in ~ On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Debamitro Chakraborti wrote: > Any way to crawl the back issues of prominent Indian newspapers like The > Hindu, TOI, Indian Express, Hindustan Times etc? > I was part of a team which needed to analyse news reports from a time > frame and we hacked together a TOI crawler (which still has limitations) > and were working on a The Hindu crawler -- would love to know about > something simpler that is already available. > > Debamitro > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[datameet] how to crawl Indian newspaper sites
Any way to crawl the back issues of prominent Indian newspapers like The Hindu, TOI, Indian Express, Hindustan Times etc? I was part of a team which needed to analyse news reports from a time frame and we hacked together a TOI crawler (which still has limitations) and were working on a The Hindu crawler -- would love to know about something simpler that is already available. Debamitro -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Download CSV here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vude8hbtupp8tda/2013-Chg-Delhi-MP-Raj-Assembly-Result.csv Thanks... Vikas sent from my phone On Dec 9, 2013 8:01 AM, "Pavan Srinath" wrote: > Do see Karthik Shashidhar's piece on this in Mint that just came out: > > > http://www.livemint.com/Specials/t5687TxRCE3aKu4svfHXrK/Assembly-elections-Analysing-NOTA.html > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> Thanks. very informative. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The NOTA % from my calculations show as 0.64% for Delhi overall. >>> >>> There are only four constituencies where NOTA% exceeds margin of >>> victory. Details are here - >>> >>>*constituency* *votes* *candidate* *Vote%* *%Margin bet. >>> Winner/Runner* *NOTA More?* DELHI CANTT 478 None of the Above 0.73 >>> 0.54 Yes R K PURAM 528 None of the Above 0.63 0.39 Yes SULTANPUR >>> MAJRA 1232 None of the Above 1.17 1.05 Yes VIKASPURI 1426 None of >>> the Above 0.79 0.22 Yes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a way to prove this otherwise it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be some lessons to be learnt from this. regards. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks... > > NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. > Only 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some > constituencies where difference between the winner and the loser has been > very narrow, I am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think > including NOTA would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for > results. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> Cool job and very fast. >> >> Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency >> database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose >> NOTA >> can turn the tables... in many places >> >> good to see it live. many thanks. >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - >>> http://bit.ly/IWSeCq (Click on constituency to view more details). >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> hi. yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who have already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. else, it is hard wok for now. :) If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. regards. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Konark: Check this > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. > > Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, > and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data > be > culled and made more interactive? > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN > wrote: > >> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS >> went live at around 8 pm last evening. >> >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >> >> nevertheless, not user-friend
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Do see Karthik Shashidhar's piece on this in Mint that just came out: http://www.livemint.com/Specials/t5687TxRCE3aKu4svfHXrK/Assembly-elections-Analysing-NOTA.html On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > Thanks. very informative. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Srinivasan Ramani > wrote: > >> The NOTA % from my calculations show as 0.64% for Delhi overall. >> >> There are only four constituencies where NOTA% exceeds margin of victory. >> Details are here - >> >>*constituency* *votes* *candidate* *Vote%* *%Margin bet. >> Winner/Runner* *NOTA More?* DELHI CANTT 478 None of the Above 0.73 0.54 >> Yes R K PURAM 528 None of the Above 0.63 0.39 Yes SULTANPUR MAJRA >> 1232 None of the Above 1.17 1.05 Yes VIKASPURI 1426 None of the Above >> 0.79 0.22 Yes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in >>> chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant >>> effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are >>> very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in >>> results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for >>> NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a >>> way to prove this otherwise >>> >>> it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right >>> amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for >>> interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be >>> some lessons to be learnt from this. >>> >>> regards. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >>> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks... NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > Cool job and very fast. > > Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency > database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA > can turn the tables... in many places > > good to see it live. many thanks. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < > srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - >> http://bit.ly/IWSeCq (Click on constituency to view more details). >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> hi. >>> >>> yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each >>> candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS >>> back >>> to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already >>> available. >>> >>> for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media >>> who have already done it and used in the election results discussions >>> yesterday (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. >>> >>> else, it is hard wok for now. :) >>> >>> If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above >>> option) on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can >>> show >>> some interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% >>> NOTA >>> and the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than >>> NOTA >>> and New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. >>> >>> regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >>> Konark: Check this http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled and made more interactive? On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS > went live at around 8 pm last evening. > > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ > > nevertheless, not user-friendly > > Hope this helps for starters... > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi > wrote: > >> Hi Pukhraj, >> >> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be >> released. >> >> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I >
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Thanks. very informative. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Srinivasan Ramani wrote: > The NOTA % from my calculations show as 0.64% for Delhi overall. > > There are only four constituencies where NOTA% exceeds margin of victory. > Details are here - > >*constituency* *votes* *candidate* *Vote%* *%Margin bet. Winner/Runner* > *NOTA > More?* DELHI CANTT 478 None of the Above 0.73 0.54 Yes R K PURAM 528 None > of the Above 0.63 0.39 Yes SULTANPUR MAJRA 1232 None of the Above 1.17 > 1.05 Yes VIKASPURI 1426 None of the Above 0.79 0.22 Yes > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in >> chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant >> effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are >> very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in >> results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for >> NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a >> way to prove this otherwise >> >> it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right >> amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for >> interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be >> some lessons to be learnt from this. >> >> regards. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks... >>> >>> NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only >>> 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies >>> where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I >>> am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA >>> would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> Cool job and very fast. Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA can turn the tables... in many places good to see it live. many thanks. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - > http://bit.ly/IWSeCq (Click on constituency to view more details). > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> hi. >> >> yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each >> candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS >> back >> to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already >> available. >> >> for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who >> have already done it and used in the election results discussions >> yesterday >> (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. >> >> else, it is hard wok for now. :) >> >> If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) >> on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some >> interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA >> and >> the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and >> New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. >> >> regards. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >> >>> Konark: Check this >>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. >>> >>> Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, >>> and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be >>> culled and made more interactive? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went live at around 8 pm last evening. http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ nevertheless, not user-friendly Hope this helps for starters... On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: > Hi Pukhraj, > > Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be > released. > > For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I > could find : > http://indiaelecting.com > > Regards > Konark > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh > wrote: > >> Greetings! >> >> Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A >> geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
The NOTA % from my calculations show as 0.64% for Delhi overall. There are only four constituencies where NOTA% exceeds margin of victory. Details are here - *constituency* *votes* *candidate* *Vote%* *%Margin bet. Winner/Runner* *NOTA More?* DELHI CANTT 478 None of the Above 0.73 0.54 Yes R K PURAM 528 None of the Above 0.63 0.39 Yes SULTANPUR MAJRA 1232 None of the Above 1.17 1.05 Yes VIKASPURI 1426 None of the Above 0.79 0.22 Yes On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in > chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant > effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are > very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in > results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for > NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a > way to prove this otherwise > > it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right > amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for > interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be > some lessons to be learnt from this. > > regards. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani > wrote: > >> Thanks... >> >> NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only >> 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies >> where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I >> am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA >> would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> Cool job and very fast. >>> >>> Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency >>> database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA >>> can turn the tables... in many places >>> >>> good to see it live. many thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >>> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - http://bit.ly/IWSeCq (Click on constituency to view more details). On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > hi. > > yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each > candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back > to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already > available. > > for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who > have already done it and used in the election results discussions > yesterday > (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. > > else, it is hard wok for now. :) > > If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) > on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some > interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and > the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and > New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. > > regards. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > >> Konark: Check this >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. >> >> Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, >> and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be >> culled and made more interactive? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went >>> live at around 8 pm last evening. >>> >>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >>> >>> nevertheless, not user-friendly >>> >>> Hope this helps for starters... >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi >>> wrote: >>> Hi Pukhraj, Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could find : http://indiaelecting.com Regards Konark On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Greetings! > > Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A > geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be > very > useful. > > Best, > Pukhraj > Founder, Abroo > www.abroo.in > > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You receiv
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a way to prove this otherwise it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be some lessons to be learnt from this. regards. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani wrote: > Thanks... > > NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only > 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies > where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I > am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA > would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> Cool job and very fast. >> >> Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency >> database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA >> can turn the tables... in many places >> >> good to see it live. many thanks. >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - >>> http://bit.ly/IWSeCq(Click on constituency to view more details). >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> hi. yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who have already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. else, it is hard wok for now. :) If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. regards. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Konark: Check this > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. > > Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and > other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled > and made more interactive? > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went >> live at around 8 pm last evening. >> >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >> >> nevertheless, not user-friendly >> >> Hope this helps for starters... >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: >> >>> Hi Pukhraj, >>> >>> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. >>> >>> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I >>> could find : >>> http://indiaelecting.com >>> >>> Regards >>> Konark >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >>> Greetings! Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very useful. Best, Pukhraj Founder, Abroo www.abroo.in -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more opti
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Thanks... NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > Cool job and very fast. > > Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency > database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA > can turn the tables... in many places > > good to see it live. many thanks. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani > wrote: > >> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - >> http://bit.ly/IWSeCq(Click on constituency to view more details). >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> hi. >>> >>> yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate >>> and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or >>> some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. >>> >>> for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who >>> have already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday >>> (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. >>> >>> else, it is hard wok for now. :) >>> >>> If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on >>> the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some >>> interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and >>> the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and >>> New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. >>> >>> regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >>> Konark: Check this http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled and made more interactive? On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went > live at around 8 pm last evening. > > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ > > nevertheless, not user-friendly > > Hope this helps for starters... > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: > >> Hi Pukhraj, >> >> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. >> >> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I >> could find : >> http://indiaelecting.com >> >> Regards >> Konark >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >> >>> Greetings! >>> >>> Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A >>> geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very >>> useful. >>> >>> Best, >>> Pukhraj >>> Founder, Abroo >>> www.abroo.in >>> >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http:
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Cool job and very fast. Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA can turn the tables... in many places good to see it live. many thanks. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani wrote: > Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - > http://bit.ly/IWSeCq(Click on constituency to view more details). > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> hi. >> >> yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate >> and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or >> some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. >> >> for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who >> have already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday >> (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. >> >> else, it is hard wok for now. :) >> >> If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on >> the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some >> interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and >> the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and >> New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. >> >> regards. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >> >>> Konark: Check this >>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. >>> >>> Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and >>> other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled >>> and made more interactive? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >>> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went live at around 8 pm last evening. http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ nevertheless, not user-friendly Hope this helps for starters... On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: > Hi Pukhraj, > > Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. > > For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could > find : > http://indiaelecting.com > > Regards > Konark > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > >> Greetings! >> >> Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A >> geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very >> useful. >> >> Best, >> Pukhraj >> Founder, Abroo >> www.abroo.in >> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Srinivasan V. Ramani , > Senior Assistant Editor, > Economic and Political Weekly , > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are sub
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - http://bit.ly/IWSeCq(Click on constituency to view more details). On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > hi. > > yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate > and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or > some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. > > for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who have > already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday > (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. > > else, it is hard wok for now. :) > > If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on > the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some > interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and > the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and > New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. > > regards. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > >> Konark: Check this >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. >> >> Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and >> other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled >> and made more interactive? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: >> >>> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went >>> live at around 8 pm last evening. >>> >>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >>> >>> nevertheless, not user-friendly >>> >>> Hope this helps for starters... >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: >>> Hi Pukhraj, Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could find : http://indiaelecting.com Regards Konark On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Greetings! > > Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A > geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very > useful. > > Best, > Pukhraj > Founder, Abroo > www.abroo.in > > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Best Regards, Srinivasan V. Ramani , Senior Assistant Editor, Economic and Political Weekly , -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
hi. yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS back to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already available. for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who have already done it and used in the election results discussions yesterday (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. else, it is hard wok for now. :) If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA and the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. regards. On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Konark: Check this > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. > > Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and > other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled > and made more interactive? > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went live >> at around 8 pm last evening. >> >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >> >> nevertheless, not user-friendly >> >> Hope this helps for starters... >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: >> >>> Hi Pukhraj, >>> >>> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. >>> >>> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could >>> find : >>> http://indiaelecting.com >>> >>> Regards >>> Konark >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >>> Greetings! Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very useful. Best, Pukhraj Founder, Abroo www.abroo.in -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:41 PM, konark modi wrote: > If this can be available in CSV format then it is very easy to incorporate > in my framework and visualize it. I'm hoping they will make the Excel sheets available soon: http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/ElectionStatistics.aspx -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Hi Pukhraj, Thanks. If this can be available in CSV format then it is very easy to incorporate in my framework and visualize it. Regards Konark On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: > Konark: Check this > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. > > Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and > other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled > and made more interactive? > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > >> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went live >> at around 8 pm last evening. >> >> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >> >> nevertheless, not user-friendly >> >> Hope this helps for starters... >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: >> >>> Hi Pukhraj, >>> >>> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. >>> >>> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could >>> find : >>> http://indiaelecting.com >>> >>> Regards >>> Konark >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >>> Greetings! Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very useful. Best, Pukhraj Founder, Abroo www.abroo.in -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [datameet] Analytics for the Delhi results?
Konark: Check this http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4 . Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be culled and made more interactive? On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN wrote: > the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS went live > at around 8 pm last evening. > > http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ > > nevertheless, not user-friendly > > Hope this helps for starters... > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi wrote: > >> Hi Pukhraj, >> >> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be released. >> >> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I could >> find : >> http://indiaelecting.com >> >> Regards >> Konark >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh wrote: >> >>> Greetings! >>> >>> Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A >>> geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be very >>> useful. >>> >>> Best, >>> Pukhraj >>> Founder, Abroo >>> www.abroo.in >>> >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
