Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-11 Thread Driesprong, Fokko 
Thanks Kaxil,

I think it is good to merge this now after:
- Changing the url's to https
- Explicitly mention that it links to the master/latest docs

It would be great to host the docs of Airflow 1.9 using
https://pythonhosted.org/. I've tried to submit the apache-airflow package,
but I'm not allowed to do this. Anyone any idea how to resolve this?

Kind regards,
Fokko Driesprong


2018-02-11 22:29 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :

> I have updated the Pythonhosted links with the docs at
> http://airflow.incubator.apache.org/ . This has been documented at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/
> Building+and+deploying+the+docs by Chris Riccomini.
>
> I have also added the Readthedocs badge for the latest version. Have
> created a PR (https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/3033).
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
>
>
> On 12/02/2018, 01:54, "Naik Kaxil"  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think instead of the old "airflow" docs on PyPi mentioned by @ash, I
> think the latest docs are also deleted from PyPI..
>
> The links for the docs on the GitHub home (Readme) are all broken.
>
> Should I change the all the links to readthedocs? Or can someone who
> has access to PyPI create the docs?
>
> What do you suggest?
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> On 11/02/2018, 06:03, "Driesprong, Fokko" 
> wrote:
>
> Vo
>
>
> Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin <
> maximebeauche...@gmail.com>
>
> > I just hit the "Destroy" button.
> >
> > Max
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil 
> wrote:
> >
> > > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch,
> aoen, artwr
> > .
> > > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" <
> > ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow"
> dist on pypi?
> > >
> > > If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you
> go to
> > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow <
> > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit=airflow>
> and hit the
> > > "Destroy Documentation" button:
> > >
> > > > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation
> hosted at
> > > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no
> undo.
> > > This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older
> version of the
> > > docs form Google etc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -ash
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Andy,
> > > >
> > > > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/
> .readthedocs.yml
> > )
> > > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and
> dependencies
> > > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my
> fork for
> > > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether
> we should
> > do
> > > that or ignore V1.8 version.
> > > >
> > > > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <
> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable.
> 1.8.2
> > > building failed (
> > > >https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> 6724340/)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil <
> k.n...@reply.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same
> for version
> > > 1.9 and
> > > >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but
> if you can
> > > spare some
> > > >> time to do that, it would be great.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" <
> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>Absolutely, thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a
> proper
> > > cadence for
> > > >> it.
> > > >>
> > > >>- Andy
> > > >>
> > > >>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> > > >>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Done.
> > > >>>
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-11 Thread Naik Kaxil 
I have updated the Pythonhosted links with the docs at 
http://airflow.incubator.apache.org/ . This has been documented at 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Building+and+deploying+the+docs
 by Chris Riccomini.

I have also added the Readthedocs badge for the latest version. Have created a 
PR (https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/3033).

Regards,
Kaxil



On 12/02/2018, 01:54, "Naik Kaxil"  wrote:

Hi all,

I think instead of the old "airflow" docs on PyPi mentioned by @ash, I 
think the latest docs are also deleted from PyPI..

The links for the docs on the GitHub home (Readme) are all broken. 

Should I change the all the links to readthedocs? Or can someone who has 
access to PyPI create the docs?

What do you suggest?

Regards,
Kaxil

On 11/02/2018, 06:03, "Driesprong, Fokko"  wrote:

Vo


Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche...@gmail.com>

> I just hit the "Destroy" button.
>
> Max
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
>
> > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, 
artwr
> .
> > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
> >
> >
> > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" <
> ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on 
pypi?
> >
> > If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow <
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit=airflow> and hit 
the
> > "Destroy Documentation" button:
> >
> > > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation 
hosted at
> > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
> > This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version 
of the
> > docs form Google etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > -ash
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Andy,
> > >
> > > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> > 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml
> )
> > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and 
dependencies
> > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork 
for
> > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we 
should
> do
> > that or ignore V1.8 version.
> > >
> > > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 

> > wrote:
> > >
> > >Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2
> > building failed (
> > >https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil 

> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for 
version
> > 1.9 and
> > >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you 
can
> > spare some
> > >> time to do that, it would be great.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 

> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Absolutely, thanks!
> > >>
> > >>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper
> > cadence for
> > >> it.
> > >>
> > >>- Andy
> > >>
> > >>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for the help Andy!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> > >> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> > 
> >  Thanks for the help Arthur!
> > 
> >  - Andy
> > 
> >  On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> > 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > >

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-11 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Hi all,

I think instead of the old "airflow" docs on PyPi mentioned by @ash, I think 
the latest docs are also deleted from PyPI..

The links for the docs on the GitHub home (Readme) are all broken. 

Should I change the all the links to readthedocs? Or can someone who has access 
to PyPI create the docs?

What do you suggest?

Regards,
Kaxil

On 11/02/2018, 06:03, "Driesprong, Fokko"  wrote:

Vo


Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche...@gmail.com>

> I just hit the "Destroy" button.
>
> Max
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
>
> > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, artwr
> .
> > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
> >
> >
> > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" <
> ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on 
pypi?
> >
> > If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow <
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit=airflow> and hit the
> > "Destroy Documentation" button:
> >
> > > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at
> > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
> > This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of 
the
> > docs form Google etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > -ash
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Andy,
> > >
> > > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml
> )
> > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies
> > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for
> > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should
> do
> > that or ignore V1.8 version.
> > >
> > > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2
> > building failed (
> > >https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for 
version
> > 1.9 and
> > >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can
> > spare some
> > >> time to do that, it would be great.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Absolutely, thanks!
> > >>
> > >>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper
> > cadence for
> > >> it.
> > >>
> > >>- Andy
> > >>
> > >>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for the help Andy!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> > >> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> > 
> >  Thanks for the help Arthur!
> > 
> >  - Andy
> > 
> >  On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> > 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> > >> them as
> > >>> a
> > > maintainer for the project.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> > >> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> > >> could be
> > >> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > >>
> > >> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Bolke
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-10 Thread Driesprong, Fokko 
Vo


Op zo 11 feb. 2018 om 01:31 schreef Maxime Beauchemin <
maximebeauche...@gmail.com>

> I just hit the "Destroy" button.
>
> Max
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
>
> > From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, artwr
> .
> > Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
> >
> >
> > On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" <
> ash_airflowl...@firemirror.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on pypi?
> >
> > If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow <
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit=airflow> and hit the
> > "Destroy Documentation" button:
> >
> > > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at
> > http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
> > This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of the
> > docs form Google etc.
> >
> >
> >
> > -ash
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Andy,
> > >
> > > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml
> )
> > file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies
> > instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for
> > V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should
> do
> > that or ignore V1.8 version.
> > >
> > > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2
> > building failed (
> > >https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> > >
> > >
> > >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version
> > 1.9 and
> > >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can
> > spare some
> > >> time to do that, it would be great.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Absolutely, thanks!
> > >>
> > >>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper
> > cadence for
> > >> it.
> > >>
> > >>- Andy
> > >>
> > >>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for the help Andy!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> > >> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> > 
> >  Thanks for the help Arthur!
> > 
> >  - Andy
> > 
> >  On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> > >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> > 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> > >> them as
> > >>> a
> > > maintainer for the project.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> > >> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> > >> could be
> > >> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > >>
> > >> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers
> > >> Bolke
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
> > >> use a
> > > Google
> > >> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so
> he
> >  couldn't
> > >> find one.
> > >>>
> > >>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > >>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > >>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
> > >> GitHub
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Kaxil
> > >>>
> > >>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> >  Driesprong,
> > >> Fokko"  > >> fo...@driesprong.frl>
> >  wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>   This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
> > >> owners
> > >>> of
> > > the
> > >>>   project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
> > >>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-10 Thread Maxime Beauchemin 
I just hit the "Destroy" button.

Max

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:

> From what I see the package owners at PyPi are mistercrunch, aoen, artwr .
> Will it be possible for one of you to take care of this?
>
>
> On 10/02/2018, 20:26, "Ash Berlin-Taylor" 
> wrote:
>
> Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on pypi?
>
> If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow <
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=pkg_edit=airflow> and hit the
> "Destroy Documentation" button:
>
> > If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at
> http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
> This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of the
> docs form Google etc.
>
>
>
> -ash
>
>
>
> > On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Andy,
> >
> > It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' (
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml)
> file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies
> instead of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for
> V1.8-Stable branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should do
> that or ignore V1.8 version.
> >
> > On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> wrote:
> >
> >Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2
> building failed (
> >https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version
> 1.9 and
> >> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can
> spare some
> >> time to do that, it would be great.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>Absolutely, thanks!
> >>
> >>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper
> cadence for
> >> it.
> >>
> >>- Andy
> >>
> >>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Done.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the help Andy!
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> >> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> 
>  Thanks for the help Arthur!
> 
>  - Andy
> 
>  On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> >> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> 
>  wrote:
> 
> > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> >> them as
> >>> a
> > maintainer for the project.
> >
> > Best,
> > Arthur
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> >> bdbr...@gmail.com>
>  wrote:
> >
> >> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> >> could be
> >> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> >>
> >> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Bolke
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
> >> use a
> > Google
> >> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
>  couldn't
> >> find one.
> >>>
> >>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> >>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> >>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
> >> GitHub
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Kaxil
> >>>
> >>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
>  Driesprong,
> >> Fokko"  >> fo...@driesprong.frl>
>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
> >> owners
> >>> of
> > the
> >>>   project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
> >> Airflow
> >> committers
> >>>   as readthedocs project owners.
> >>>
> >>>   I get quite some questions from colleagues because they
> >> are
>  reading
> >> old
> >>>   docs :)
> >>>
> >>>   Cheers, Fokko
> >>>
> >>>   2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> >>>
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-10 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor 
Relatedly: can we remove the docs for the old "airflow" dist on pypi?

If someone has permissions to manage the on pypi, can you go to 
https://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=pkg_edit=airflow 
 and hit the 
"Destroy Documentation" button:

> If you would like to DESTROY any existing documentation hosted at 
> http://pythonhosted.org/airflow Use this button, There is no undo.
This should hopefully mean fewer people find the older version of the docs form 
Google etc.



-ash 



> On 9 Feb 2018, at 22:35, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> 
> Thanks Andy, 
> 
> It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' 
> (https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml) 
> file that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies instead 
> of using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for V1.8-Stable 
> branch and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should do that or ignore 
> V1.8 version.
> 
> On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:
> 
>Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2 building failed 
> (
>https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)
> 
> 
>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version 1.9 and
>> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can spare some
>> time to do that, it would be great.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:
>> 
>>Absolutely, thanks!
>> 
>>Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper cadence for
>> it.
>> 
>>- Andy
>> 
>>On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
>> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> Done.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the help Andy!
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
>> andyxha...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
 
 Thanks for the help Arthur!
 
 - Andy
 
 On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
>> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
 
 wrote:
 
> Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
>> them as
>>> a
> maintainer for the project.
> 
> Best,
> Arthur
> 
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
>> bdbr...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
> 
>> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
>> could be
>> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
>> 
>> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Bolke
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
>> use a
> Google
>> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
 couldn't
>> find one.
>>> 
>>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
>>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
>>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
>> GitHub
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Kaxil
>>> 
>>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
 Driesprong,
>> Fokko" > fo...@driesprong.frl>
 wrote:
>>> 
>>>   This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
>> owners
>>> of
> the
>>>   project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
>> Airflow
>> committers
>>>   as readthedocs project owners.
>>> 
>>>   I get quite some questions from colleagues because they
>> are
 reading
>> old
>>>   docs :)
>>> 
>>>   Cheers, Fokko
>>> 
>>>   2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
>>> 
 Hi guys,
 
 
 
 Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for
>> latest
 documentation?
 
 
 
 I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
 
 
 
 http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
 
 
 
 The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will
>> only
>>> be
> for
 the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
 
 
 
 It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub
>> version at
 readthedocs.
 
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Kaxil
 
 
 Kaxil Naik
 
 Data Reply
 38 Grosvenor Gardens
 > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
 London SW1W 0EB - UK
 phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
 k.n...@reply.com
 www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Thanks Andy, 

It fails because of missing '.readthedocs.yml' 
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/.readthedocs.yml) file 
that forces it to use 'pip' to install packages and dependencies instead of 
using 'setup.py' file. I uploaded that file in my fork for V1.8-Stable branch 
and it passes there. I am not sure whether we should do that or ignore V1.8 
version.

On 10/02/2018, 00:46, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:

Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2 building failed (
https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)


On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:

> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version 1.9 and
> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can spare 
some
> time to do that, it would be great.
>
>
>
> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:
>
> Absolutely, thanks!
>
> Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper cadence for
> it.
>
> - Andy
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Done.
> >
> > Thanks for the help Andy!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the help Arthur!
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> them as
> > a
> > > > maintainer for the project.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Arthur
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> could be
> > > > > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > > > >
> > > > > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Bolke
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
> use a
> > > > Google
> > > > > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so 
he
> > > couldn't
> > > > > find one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > > > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > > > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
> GitHub
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Kaxil
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> > > Driesprong,
> > > > > Fokko"  fo...@driesprong.frl>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
> owners
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
> Airflow
> > > > > committers
> > > > > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they
> are
> > > reading
> > > > > old
> > > > > >docs :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Cheers, Fokko
> > > > > >
> > > > > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for
> latest
> > > > > >> documentation?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will
> only
> > be
> > > > for
> > > > > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It would be good to have

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
Absolutely - I did it for 1.9 stable and 1.8 stable. 1.8.2 building failed (
https://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/6724340/)


On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:

> Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version 1.9 and
> 1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can spare some
> time to do that, it would be great.
>
>
>
> On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:
>
> Absolutely, thanks!
>
> Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper cadence for
> it.
>
> - Andy
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> arthur.wied...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Done.
> >
> > Thanks for the help Andy!
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou <
> andyxha...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the help Arthur!
> > >
> > > - Andy
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
> arthur.wied...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add
> them as
> > a
> > > > maintainer for the project.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Arthur
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin <
> bdbr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this
> could be
> > > > > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > > > >
> > > > > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Bolke
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to
> use a
> > > > Google
> > > > > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
> > > couldn't
> > > > > find one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > > > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > > > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on
> GitHub
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Kaxil
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> > > Driesprong,
> > > > > Fokko"  fo...@driesprong.frl>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are
> owners
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more
> Airflow
> > > > > committers
> > > > > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they
> are
> > > reading
> > > > > old
> > > > > >docs :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Cheers, Fokko
> > > > > >
> > > > > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for
> latest
> > > > > >> documentation?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will
> only
> > be
> > > > for
> > > > > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub
> version at
> > > > > >> readthedocs.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Kaxil
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Kaxil Naik
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Data Reply
> > > > > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > > >>  > > > > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> > > > > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> > > > > >> k.n...@reply.com
> > > > > >> www.reply.com
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [image: Data Reply]
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kaxil Naik
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Data Reply
> > > > > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > > > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > > > > > k.n...@reply.com
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Thanks Andy for doing that. Can you please do the same for version 1.9 and 
1.8.2 if possible? If Arthur adds me I will do it but if you can spare some 
time to do that, it would be great.



On 09/02/2018, 22:58, "Andy Hadjigeorgiou"  wrote:

Absolutely, thanks!

Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper cadence for it.

- Andy

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer 
wrote:

> Done.
>
> Thanks for the help Andy!
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
> wrote:
>
> > My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> >
> > Thanks for the help Arthur!
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as
> a
> > > maintainer for the project.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could 
be
> > > > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > > >
> > > > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Bolke
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a
> > > Google
> > > > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
> > couldn't
> > > > find one.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kaxil
> > > > >
> > > > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> > Driesprong,
> > > > Fokko" 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners
> of
> > > the
> > > > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> > > > committers
> > > > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > > > >
> > > > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are
> > reading
> > > > old
> > > > >docs :)
> > > > >
> > > > >Cheers, Fokko
> > > > >
> > > > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> > > > >> documentation?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only
> be
> > > for
> > > > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> > > > >> readthedocs.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kaxil
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kaxil Naik
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Data Reply
> > > > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > >>  > > > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> > > > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> > > > >> k.n...@reply.com
> > > > >> www.reply.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [image: Data Reply]
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kaxil Naik
> > > > >
> > > > > Data Reply
> > > > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > > > > k.n...@reply.com
> > > > > www.reply.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>






Kaxil Naik 

Data Reply
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB - UK 
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.n...@reply.com
www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Naik Kaxil 
My username is "Kaxil" and email address is "kaxiln...@gmail.com". It would be 
good if you can me as well so that we can have 2 maintainers.

Thanks

On 09/02/2018, 20:17, "Arthur Wiedmer"  wrote:

Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as a
maintainer for the project.

Best,
Arthur

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:

> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be
> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
>
> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
>
> > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google
> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't
> find one.
> >
> > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kaxil
> >
> > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong,
> Fokko"  wrote:
> >
> >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of 
the
> >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> committers
> >as readthedocs project owners.
> >
> >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading
> old
> >docs :)
> >
> >Cheers, Fokko
> >
> >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> >> documentation?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
> >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> >> readthedocs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Kaxil
> >>
> >>
> >> Kaxil Naik
> >>
> >> Data Reply
> >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >>  London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> >> k.n...@reply.com
> >> www.reply.com
> >>
> >> [image: Data Reply]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kaxil Naik
> >
> > Data Reply
> > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > k.n...@reply.com
> > www.reply.com
>
>






Kaxil Naik 

Data Reply
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB - UK 
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.n...@reply.com
www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
Absolutely, thanks!

Updated the docs, build passing, Will think about a proper cadence for it.

- Andy

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Arthur Wiedmer 
wrote:

> Done.
>
> Thanks for the help Andy!
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
> wrote:
>
> > My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
> >
> > Thanks for the help Arthur!
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as
> a
> > > maintainer for the project.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be
> > > > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > > >
> > > > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Bolke
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a
> > > Google
> > > > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
> > couldn't
> > > > find one.
> > > > >
> > > > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kaxil
> > > > >
> > > > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> > Driesprong,
> > > > Fokko" 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners
> of
> > > the
> > > > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> > > > committers
> > > > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > > > >
> > > > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are
> > reading
> > > > old
> > > > >docs :)
> > > > >
> > > > >Cheers, Fokko
> > > > >
> > > > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> > > > >> documentation?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only
> be
> > > for
> > > > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> > > > >> readthedocs.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kaxil
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Kaxil Naik
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Data Reply
> > > > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > >>  > > > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> > > > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> > > > >> k.n...@reply.com
> > > > >> www.reply.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [image: Data Reply]
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Kaxil Naik
> > > > >
> > > > > Data Reply
> > > > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > > > > k.n...@reply.com
> > > > > www.reply.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Arthur Wiedmer 
Done.

Thanks for the help Andy!

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
wrote:

> My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.
>
> Thanks for the help Arthur!
>
> - Andy
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer 
> wrote:
>
> > Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as a
> > maintainer for the project.
> >
> > Best,
> > Arthur
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be
> > > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> > >
> > > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Bolke
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a
> > Google
> > > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he
> couldn't
> > > find one.
> > > >
> > > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kaxil
> > > >
> > > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of
> Driesprong,
> > > Fokko" 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of
> > the
> > > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> > > committers
> > > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > > >
> > > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are
> reading
> > > old
> > > >docs :)
> > > >
> > > >Cheers, Fokko
> > > >
> > > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > > >
> > > >> Hi guys,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> > > >> documentation?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be
> > for
> > > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> > > >> readthedocs.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> Kaxil
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Kaxil Naik
> > > >>
> > > >> Data Reply
> > > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > >>  > > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> > > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> > > >> k.n...@reply.com
> > > >> www.reply.com
> > > >>
> > > >> [image: Data Reply]
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kaxil Naik
> > > >
> > > > Data Reply
> > > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > > > k.n...@reply.com
> > > > www.reply.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
My username is andyxhadji, email is andyxha...@gmail.com.

Thanks for the help Arthur!

- Andy

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Arthur Wiedmer 
wrote:

> Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as a
> maintainer for the project.
>
> Best,
> Arthur
>
> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:
>
> > Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be
> > picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> >
> > @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bolke
> >
> >
> > > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a
> Google
> > Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't
> > find one.
> > >
> > > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kaxil
> > >
> > > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong,
> > Fokko"  wrote:
> > >
> > >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of
> the
> > >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> > committers
> > >as readthedocs project owners.
> > >
> > >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading
> > old
> > >docs :)
> > >
> > >Cheers, Fokko
> > >
> > >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> > >
> > >> Hi guys,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> > >> documentation?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be
> for
> > >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> > >> readthedocs.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Kaxil
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Kaxil Naik
> > >>
> > >> Data Reply
> > >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > >>  > London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> > >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> > >> k.n...@reply.com
> > >> www.reply.com
> > >>
> > >> [image: Data Reply]
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Kaxil Naik
> > >
> > > Data Reply
> > > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > > k.n...@reply.com
> > > www.reply.com
> >
> >
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-09 Thread Arthur Wiedmer 
Someone needs to create an account on the site, I can then add them as a
maintainer for the project.

Best,
Arthur

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 8:14 AM, Bolke de Bruin  wrote:

> Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be
> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
>
> @Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
>
> > On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google
> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't
> find one.
> >
> > I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> > 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI
> > 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kaxil
> >
> > On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong,
> Fokko"  wrote:
> >
> >This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
> >project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow
> committers
> >as readthedocs project owners.
> >
> >I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading
> old
> >docs :)
> >
> >Cheers, Fokko
> >
> >2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> >> documentation?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
> >> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> >> readthedocs.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Kaxil
> >>
> >>
> >> Kaxil Naik
> >>
> >> Data Reply
> >> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> >>  London+SW1W+0EB+-+UK=gmail=g>
> >> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> >> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> >> k.n...@reply.com
> >> www.reply.com
> >>
> >> [image: Data Reply]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kaxil Naik
> >
> > Data Reply
> > 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> > London SW1W 0EB - UK
> > phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> > k.n...@reply.com
> > www.reply.com
>
>

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Andy Hadjigeorgiou 
Same here - I still have a couple outstanding tickets re: documentation for 
2.0, would be helpful if I had additional access

- Andy

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 12:07 PM, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> 
> Happy to pick it up if permitted.
> 
> Regards,
> Kaxil
> 
> On 04/02/2018, 16:14, "Bolke de Bruin"  wrote:
> 
>Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be 
> picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.
> 
>@Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?
> 
>Cheers
>Bolke
> 
> 
>> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google 
>> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't 
>> find one.
>> 
>> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
>> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI 
>> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Kaxil
>> 
>> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong, Fokko" 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>   This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
>>   project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow committers
>>   as readthedocs project owners.
>> 
>>   I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading old
>>   docs :)
>> 
>>   Cheers, Fokko
>> 
>>   2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
>>> documentation?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
>>> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
>>> readthedocs.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Kaxil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Kaxil Naik
>>> 
>>> Data Reply
>>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
>>> 
>>> London SW1W 0EB - UK
>>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
>>> k.n...@reply.com
>>> www.reply.com
>>> 
>>> [image: Data Reply]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kaxil Naik 
>> 
>> Data Reply
>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
>> London SW1W 0EB - UK 
>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
>> k.n...@reply.com
>> www.reply.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kaxil Naik 
> 
> Data Reply
> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> London SW1W 0EB - UK 
> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> k.n...@reply.com
> www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Happy to pick it up if permitted.

Regards,
Kaxil

On 04/02/2018, 16:14, "Bolke de Bruin"  wrote:

Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be 
picked up so it can be made opart of the release process.

@Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?

Cheers
Bolke


> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> 
> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google 
Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't find 
one.
> 
> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI 
> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> 
> Regards,
> Kaxil
> 
> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong, 
Fokko"  wrote:
> 
>This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
>project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow 
committers
>as readthedocs project owners.
> 
>I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading old
>docs :)
> 
>Cheers, Fokko
> 
>2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
>> documentation?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
>> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
>> readthedocs.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Kaxil
>> 
>> 
>> Kaxil Naik
>> 
>> Data Reply
>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
>> 

>> London SW1W 0EB - UK
>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
>> k.n...@reply.com
>> www.reply.com
>> 
>> [image: Data Reply]
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kaxil Naik 
> 
> Data Reply
> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> London SW1W 0EB - UK 
> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> k.n...@reply.com
> www.reply.com







Kaxil Naik 

Data Reply
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB - UK 
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.n...@reply.com
www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Bolke de Bruin 
Perfectly fine to me. It would be highly appreciated if this could be picked up 
so it can be made opart of the release process.

@Arthur @max: can you share / make available credentials?

Cheers
Bolke


> On 4 Feb 2018, at 15:16, Naik Kaxil  wrote:
> 
> Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google 
> Cloud Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't find 
> one.
> 
> I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
> 1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI 
> 2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub
> 
> Regards,
> Kaxil
> 
> On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong, Fokko" 
>  wrote:
> 
>This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
>project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow committers
>as readthedocs project owners.
> 
>I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading old
>docs :)
> 
>Cheers, Fokko
> 
>2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :
> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
>> documentation?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
>> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
>> readthedocs.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Kaxil
>> 
>> 
>> Kaxil Naik
>> 
>> Data Reply
>> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
>> 
>> London SW1W 0EB - UK
>> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
>> k.n...@reply.com
>> www.reply.com
>> 
>> [image: Data Reply]
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kaxil Naik 
> 
> Data Reply
> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> London SW1W 0EB - UK 
> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
> k.n...@reply.com
> www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Yes, the same happened to me. One of my colleague wanted to use a Google Cloud 
Storage operator but he was looking at the old docs so he couldn't find one.

I suggest we should have documentation at 2 places:
1) PythonHosted - For latest stable airflow version on PyPI 
2) Readthedocs - For up-to-date documentation of Airflow on GitHub

Regards,
Kaxil

On 04/02/2018, 13:47, "fo...@driesprongen.nl on behalf of Driesprong, Fokko" 
 wrote:

This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow committers
as readthedocs project owners.

I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading old
docs :)

Cheers, Fokko

2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :

> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> documentation?
>
>
>
> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
>
>
>
> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
>
>
>
> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
>
>
>
> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> readthedocs.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kaxil
>
>
> Kaxil Naik
>
> Data Reply
> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> 

> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> k.n...@reply.com
> www.reply.com
>
> [image: Data Reply]
>






Kaxil Naik 

Data Reply
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB - UK 
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.n...@reply.com
www.reply.com

Re: Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Driesprong, Fokko 
This is a good question, I see that artwr and Maxime are owners of the
project, maybe they can fix the build? Or add some more Airflow committers
as readthedocs project owners.

I get quite some questions from colleagues because they are reading old
docs :)

Cheers, Fokko

2018-02-04 14:32 GMT+01:00 Naik Kaxil :

> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest
> documentation?
>
>
>
> I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..
>
>
>
> http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/
>
>
>
> The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for
> the latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).
>
>
>
> It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at
> readthedocs.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kaxil
>
>
> Kaxil Naik
>
> Data Reply
> 38 Grosvenor Gardens
> 
> London SW1W 0EB - UK
> phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000 <+44%2020%207730%206000>
> k.n...@reply.com
> www.reply.com
>
> [image: Data Reply]
>

Airflow Documentation - Readthedocs

2018-02-04 Thread Naik Kaxil 
Hi guys,

Are we still using http://airflow.readthedocs.io/ for latest documentation?

I see that the last build was 2 months ago which failed..

http://readthedocs.org/projects/airflow/builds/

The documentation at http://pythonhosted.org/airflow/ will only be for the 
latest airflow version at PyPI (1.9 for now).

It would be good to have documentation of the GitHub version at readthedocs.

Regards,
Kaxil


Kaxil Naik

Data Reply
38 Grosvenor Gardens
London SW1W 0EB - UK
phone: +44 (0)20 7730 6000
k.n...@reply.com
www.reply.com

[Data Reply]