Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?
Why? What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such? On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:35 PM Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, > > I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more. > > Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the > package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on > the list. > > # module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package > branch name (rpms/foo's branch), another package name (rpms/bar's > branch) > mongodb3.6 3.6 None > nodejs8 8 None > perl5.24 fXX fXX > python3 3.6 None None > python36 3.6 None master > ruby 2.5 ruby-2.5 master > scala 2.10 javapackages javapackages > varnish 6 stream-6 stream-6 > > See more detail at https://pagure.io/jaruga-modules-branches > I think "None" is same with "master" technically. > > In case of modules/ruby, we ruby team decided "the package branch > name" as "ruby-X.Y" with a module name prefix against "X.Y" documented > in the naming guideline. > Because a package of a module A (ex. modules/ruby) can be used also in > a module B (ex. modules/rubygem-rails, modules/vagrant and etc. > In this case, a package branch name needs to have "ruby-X.Y", > "rubygem-rails-X.Y", "vargrant-X.Y". > > Do you like to see some alignments for the naming? > Hopefully after the discussion here in this thread, below page will be > updated. > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_package_branch_name > > Regards, > Jun > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
FF v dnf needs-restarting
I'm guessing most of you here probably observed this behaviour with dnf when FF is upgraded. Even after FF restarted, dnf needs-restarting reports that it needs restarting. Does that sound like a bug or is this somehow intentional? I'm seeing this in f29 and previous releases are the same. Once I upgrade to f30, I'm planning to open a bug on this if it's still the same, unless someone tells me this is how it's supposed to work. Thanks, -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 compose report: 20190416.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-30-20190415.n.2 NEW: Fedora-30-20190416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 80 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.77 MiB Size of dropped packages:245.61 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.00 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -10.93 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Python_Classroom live i386 Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-i386-30-20190416.n.0.iso Image: Workstation live i386 Path: Workstation/i386/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-30-20190416.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Design_suite live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Design_suite-Live-x86_64-30-20190415.n.2.iso Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-30-20190415.n.2.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: butt-0.1.17-3.fc30 Summary: Broadcast using this tool RPMs:butt Size:1.12 MiB Package: golang-github-benbjohnson-clock-0-0.1.20190325git7dc7640.fc30 Summary: Go library for mocking time RPMs:golang-github-benbjohnson-clock-devel Size:14.78 KiB Package: golang-github-codahale-hdrhistogram-0-0.1.20190318git3a0bb77.fc30 Summary: Go implementation of the High Dynamic Range (HDR) Histogram RPMs:golang-github-codahale-hdrhistogram-devel Size:16.38 KiB Package: golang-github-ldap-v3-3.0.2-2.fc30 Summary: Basic LDAP v3 functionality for Go RPMs:golang-github-ldap-v3-devel golang-gopkg-3-ldap-devel golang-gopkg-ldap-3-devel Size:136.41 KiB Package: golang-github-oklog-run-1.0.0-1.fc30 Summary: Universal mechanism to manage goroutine lifecycles RPMs:golang-github-oklog-run-devel Size:15.00 KiB Package: golang-github-rainycape-unidecode-0-0.1.20190315gitcb7f23e.fc30 Summary: Replaces non-ASCII characters with their ASCII approximations RPMs:golang-github-rainycape-unidecode-devel Size:197.20 KiB Package: golang-github-stack-1.8.0-1.fc30 Summary: Capture, manipulate and format Go call stacks RPMs:golang-github-stack-devel Size:16.18 KiB Package: golang-github-teris-io-shortid-1.0-1.20190315git771a37c.fc30 Summary: Short, fully unique, non-sequential and URL friendly Ids RPMs:golang-github-teris-io-shortid-devel Size:17.16 KiB Package: golang-github-unknwon-com-2-2.fc30 Summary: Commonly used functions for the Go programming language RPMs:golang-github-unknwon-com-devel Size:29.19 KiB Package: golang-github-xorm-0.7.1-1.fc30 Summary: Xorm is a simple and powerful ORM for Go RPMs:golang-github-xorm-devel Size:126.85 KiB Package: golang-github-xorm-builder-0.3.4-1.fc30 Summary: Lightweight and fast SQL builder for Go and XORM RPMs:golang-github-xorm-builder-devel Size:31.40 KiB Package: golang-github-xorm-core-0.6.2-1.fc30 Summary: Lightweight Go sql.DB wrapper RPMs:golang-github-xorm-core-devel Size:26.96 KiB Package: golang-github-yudai-gojsondiff-1.0.0-1.fc30 Summary: Go JSON format differences RPMs:golang-github-yudai-gojsondiff-devel Size:23.77 KiB Package: golang-github-yudai-golcs-0-0.1.20190315gitecda9a5.fc30 Summary: Go Longest Common Subsequence RPMs:golang-github-yudai-golcs-devel Size:12.02 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: mongodb-4.0.3-3.fc30 Summary: High-performance, schema-free document-oriented database RPMs:mongodb mongodb-server mongodb-test Size:214.75 MiB Package: ruby-2.5.1-100.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language RPMs:ruby ruby-devel ruby-doc ruby-irb ruby-libs rubygem-bigdecimal rubygem-did_you_mean rubygem-io-console rubygem-json rubygem-minitest rubygem-net-telnet rubygem-openssl rubygem-power_assert rubygem-psych rubygem-rake rubygem-rdoc rubygem-test-unit rubygem-xmlrpc rubygems rubygems-devel Size:25.12 MiB Package: rubygem-abrt-0.3.0-5.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: ABRT support for Ruby RPMs:rubygem-abrt rubygem-abrt-doc Size:239.67 KiB Package: rubygem-bson-4.3.0-4.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: Ruby Implementation of the BSON specification RPMs:rubygem-bson rubygem-bson-doc Size:701.66 KiB Package: rubygem-bundler-1.16.1-4.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: Library and utilities to manage a Ruby application's gem dependencies RPMs:rubygem-bundler rubygem-bundler-doc Size:1.59 MiB Package: rubygem-mongo-2.6.2-1.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: Ruby driver for MongoDB RPMs:rubygem-mongo rubygem-mongo-doc Size:1.60 MiB Package: rubygem-mysql2-0.5.2-1.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: A simple, fast Mysql library for Ruby, binding to libmysql RPMs:rubygem-mysql2 rubygem-mysql2-doc Size:557.55 KiB Package: rubygem-pg-1.1.3-1.module_2208+c4843ca5 Summary: A Ruby interface to the PostgreSQL RDBMS RPMs:rubygem-pg rubygem-pg-doc Size:1.08 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: R-remotes-2.0.4
Fedora Rawhide-20190416.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 13/146 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 384123 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384123 ID: 384149 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384149 ID: 384152 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384152 ID: 384154 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384154 ID: 384155 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384155 ID: 384156 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384156 ID: 384158 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384158 ID: 384159 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384159 ID: 384172 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384172 ID: 384175 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384175 ID: 384178 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384178 ID: 384214 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384214 ID: 384223 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384223 ID: 384240 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384240 ID: 384247 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384247 ID: 384249 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384249 ID: 384261 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384261 ID: 384272 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384272 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/24 (i386), 7/146 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 384135 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384135 ID: 384136 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384136 ID: 384145 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384145 ID: 384195 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384195 ID: 384197 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384197 ID: 384198 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384198 ID: 384199 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384199 ID: 384234 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384234 ID: 384255 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384255 Passed openQA tests: 126/146 (x86_64), 18/24 (i386) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 172 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Module's package branch name to be aligned?
Hi, I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more. Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on the list. # module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package branch name (rpms/foo's branch), another package name (rpms/bar's branch) mongodb3.6 3.6 None nodejs8 8 None perl5.24 fXX fXX python3 3.6 None None python36 3.6 None master ruby 2.5 ruby-2.5 master scala 2.10 javapackages javapackages varnish 6 stream-6 stream-6 See more detail at https://pagure.io/jaruga-modules-branches I think "None" is same with "master" technically. In case of modules/ruby, we ruby team decided "the package branch name" as "ruby-X.Y" with a module name prefix against "X.Y" documented in the naming guideline. Because a package of a module A (ex. modules/ruby) can be used also in a module B (ex. modules/rubygem-rails, modules/vagrant and etc. In this case, a package branch name needs to have "ruby-X.Y", "rubygem-rails-X.Y", "vargrant-X.Y". Do you like to see some alignments for the naming? Hopefully after the discussion here in this thread, below page will be updated. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_package_branch_name Regards, Jun ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:26 PM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I like to see "package branch name" of each modules to be aligned more.
>
> Here is a list of the current module, the module stream name, the
> package branch name, another package name. There are some patterns on
> the list.
>
> # module, the module stream name (module/foo's branch), the package
> branch name (rpms/foo's branch), another package name (rpms/bar's
> branch)
> mongodb3.6 3.6 None
> nodejs8 8 None
> perl5.24 fXX fXX
> python3 3.6 None None
> python36 3.6 None master
> ruby 2.5 ruby-2.5 master
> scala 2.10 javapackages javapackages
> varnish 6 stream-6 stream-6
>
> See more detail at https://pagure.io/jaruga-modules-branches
> I think "None" is same with "master" technically.
>
> In case of modules/ruby, we ruby team decided "the package branch
> name" as "ruby-X.Y" with a module name prefix against "X.Y" documented
> in the naming guideline.
> Because a package of a module A (ex. modules/ruby) can be used also in
> a module B (ex. modules/rubygem-rails, modules/vagrant and etc.
> In this case, a package branch name needs to have "ruby-X.Y",
> "rubygem-rails-X.Y", "vargrant-X.Y".
>
> Do you like to see some alignments for the naming?
For my modules I also want component branch names to correspond to
module name/stream.
If the same component is used across different modules/streams then
there would simply be several branches pointing to the same commit.
I thought of using names in format "stream-${name}-${stream}" (eg.
stream-scala-2.10), but I can use "${name}-${stream}" (scala-2.10)
format too - consistency between modules is more important than
maintainer personal preferences.
--
Mikolaj
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:14 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > > rpm macros. > > > > Here is the documentation: > > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu > > les/#_build_macros_optional > > > > Here is an example where I needed to set --with bootstrap in my module: > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d6 > > 38a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76 > > > > > Thanks for the tip but that wouldn't work for Golang. When we bootstrap we > disable certain codepath to workaround the cycle, but we still need to > reenable them later to build the final binary. So we need to do both a > bootstrap build, and then a non-bootstrap build to get all the > functionality. > This is quite common. One way to approach is is to have two modules, for example: * golang-bootstrap — with the bootstrap macros set, to build the first pass * golang — the final one, it would build-require the golang-bootstrap module Here is an example with Perl: * perl-bootstrap: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl-bootstrap/blob/5.26/f/perl-bootstrap.yaml * perl: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/5.26/f/perl.yaml Would that work for you? > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Adam Šamalík --- Senior Software Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:55 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:58 AM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > I already basically wrote this: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > > Wow, very cool, looks comprehensive, thanks. > I see it even downloads composed images from Koji. That's actually what it's mainly used for: it started when we (QA) wanted to be running tests on both nightly image builds and TCs/RCs in various places, and found ourselves writing big ugly lumps of conditionals for where various bits turned up under different circumstances into all these different places. I hated that, so I made fedfind to be a sort of 'hey where the hell do I get these bits' helper. That was before Pungi 4, when there wasn't really a proper 'compose' concept, so to find nightly lives it had to run Koji queries and all sorts of nastiness like that. Since Pungi 4 things are better, but it turns out fedfind is still useful for...various reasons (it provides a bunch of helper features, it flattens image metadata into a more usable form, it provides a sort of 'compatibility' implementation so you can treat stable releases as if they were Pungi 4 composes even though they actually either weren't built by Pungi 4 or have had their metadata stripped and bits of themselves moved around...stuff like that). fedfind does not actually implement downloading (you'd have to just pipe the URLs it can give you to curl, or whatever) and doesn't actually have a concept of 'the current rawhide' or 'the current branched' exactly - that is, it can't find these for you: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/ https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/30/ if you ask it for just 'branched' or 'rawhide' without any version information, it will find the latest successful pre-mirroring compose location for you, e.g. right now it would find: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20190416.n.0/ https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-30-20190416.n.0/ it's quite a subtle difference - those things will usually be *the same thing*, just in different places - but if it's important to you, we could probably write that support into fedfind somehow. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
libiptcdata long-term FTBFS
Hi libiptcdata-maintainers, libiptcdata FTBFS for a long time. Please either fix it or oprhan the package if you don't have time to do it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1604602 Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:58 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > I already basically wrote this: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind Wow, very cool, looks comprehensive, thanks. I see it even downloads composed images from Koji. Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:11 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > You can do something like: > > > > rpms: > > foo-bootstrap: > > name: foo > > bar: > > buildafter: > > - foo-bootstrap > > foo: > > buildafter: > > - bar > > > > How does foo.spec get to know that it should enable bootstrapping in > foo-bootstrap component, but disable it in foo component? You can use different refs (and therefore different spec files) for foo and foo-bootstrap. -- Mikolaj Izdebski ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:38 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Why? > > What is the problem with packages having branch "latest", "1.x" and such? It's no problem. Rather it might be better in the point of view of "minimal necessary package branches for now". I thought it again. I considered below case of that a package is included in 2 different modules. Then in the case, a module bar can not refer rpms/bar's 1.2 branch because of specific issue of module bar. But creating new branch "bar-1.2" on rpms/foo on that time might solve the situation. On modules/foo branch: 1.2 foo.yml data: components: foo: ref: 1.2 On modules/bar branch: 3.4 bar.yml data: components: foo: ref: bar-1.2 rpms/foo branch: 1.2 branch: bar-1.2 -- Jun ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation
I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the workstation. It would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know we've asked for this before... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What is a PDC branch?
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote: > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch > already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more > information, but they just got closed again with the same message, > which tells me that humans are not reading these, so there's no point > in opening them again. Here are the relevant tickets: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10798 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10799 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10800 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10801 > > Could somebody please (a) tell me what on earth that means, and (b) > fix whatever generates that error message so that it says something > intelligible to us mere mortals? > > Thank you, > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org It means your packages already exist in the Product Definition Center, For example: https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/? active=true_component=gap-pkg-francy Most likely the script which creates them went wrong. Ask infra to solve the issues. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
Le 2019-04-16 15:06, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify rpm macros. Here is the documentation: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu les/#_build_macros_optional Here is an example where I needed to set --with bootstrap in my module: https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d6 38a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76 Thanks for the tip but that wouldn't work for Golang. When we bootstrap we disable certain codepath to workaround the cycle, but we still need to reenable them later to build the final binary. So we need to do both a bootstrap build, and then a non-bootstrap build to get all the functionality. And that BTW is not Go specific at all. That's the usual bootstrap definition within Fedora. -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Maintainer test instances
https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up running on hardware at Marist brothers college. there is also some info on how to use Jenkins for ci on mainframe. Dennis On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 4:41 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On 4/4/19 1:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:02 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >> > > >> Greetings. > > >> > > >> This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instances setup for > > >> package maintainers. Please see: > > >> > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers > > >> > > >> for more information. > > >> > > >> Additionally, I have just added 2 aarch64 instances (running Fedora 29). > > >> > > >> I hope folks will find them useful. > > >> > > > > > > These are definitely awesome, thanks Kevin! > > > > > > Would it also be possible to get some s390x in here? It seems like > > > it's the only arch we support that we don't have here... > > > > I'd love to, but sadly the ones we have now are: limited in number, > > accessible only via a slowish link, and in a lab where we definitely do > > not want to allow unrestricted access. > > > > I think there may be some ibm resources that have instances available, > > but not sure of the details. I can try and look into getting us an > > instance somewhere that we could setup as a maintainer test one... > > > > That'd be super useful, as there are times when I have failures only > in s390x, and not having a way to debug them makes it very painful. :( > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
environment variables LANGUAGE
Hi, from this bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574222#c35 I have my locale all set to en_US.UTF-8 but LANGUAGE=en_US:pt , where LANGUAGE is set ? I can't find it Thanks -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190416.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190413.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 18 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 194 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 41.32 MiB Size of dropped packages:555.92 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 8.01 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 263.80 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Mate live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190416.n.0.iso Image: Python_Classroom live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190416.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20190413.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20190413.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-armhfp-Rawhide-20190413.n.0-sda.raw.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20190413.n.0.ppc64le.tar.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: codemodel-2.6-26.fc31 Summary: Java library for code generators RPMs:codemodel codemodel-javadoc Size:333.20 KiB Package: deepin-kwin-0.0.3.2-1.fc31 Summary: KWin configuration for Deepin Desktop Environment RPMs:deepin-kwin deepin-kwin-devel Size:1.13 MiB Package: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin-1.1.25-1.fc31 Summary: Qt platform integration plugin for Deepin Desktop Environment RPMs:deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin Size:1001.87 KiB Package: erlang-mqtree-1.0.2-2.fc31 Summary: Index tree for MQTT topic filters RPMs:erlang-mqtree Size:178.72 KiB Package: geronimo-jta-1.1.1-25.fc31 Summary: J2EE JTA v1.1 API RPMs:geronimo-jta geronimo-jta-javadoc Size:65.61 KiB Package: glassfish-dtd-parser-1.2-0.19.20120120svn.fc31 Summary: Library for parsing XML DTDs RPMs:glassfish-dtd-parser glassfish-dtd-parser-javadoc Size:131.30 KiB Package: glassfish-fastinfoset-1.2.13-11.fc31 Summary: Fast Infoset RPMs:glassfish-fastinfoset glassfish-fastinfoset-javadoc Size:690.23 KiB Package: glassfish-jaxb-2.2.11-11.fc31 Summary: JAXB Reference Implementation RPMs:glassfish-jaxb glassfish-jaxb-bom glassfish-jaxb-bom-ext glassfish-jaxb-codemodel glassfish-jaxb-codemodel-annotation-compiler glassfish-jaxb-codemodel-parent glassfish-jaxb-core glassfish-jaxb-external-parent glassfish-jaxb-javadoc glassfish-jaxb-jxc glassfish-jaxb-parent glassfish-jaxb-rngom glassfish-jaxb-runtime glassfish-jaxb-runtime-parent glassfish-jaxb-txw-parent glassfish-jaxb-txw2 glassfish-jaxb-txwc2 glassfish-jaxb-xjc glassfish-jaxb1-impl Size:4.56 MiB Package: istack-commons-2.21-10.fc31 Summary: Common code for some Glassfish projects RPMs:import-properties-plugin istack-commons istack-commons-buildtools istack-commons-javadoc istack-commons-maven-plugin istack-commons-runtime istack-commons-soimp istack-commons-test istack-commons-tools Size:396.70 KiB Package: jdepend-2.9.1-20.fc31 Summary: Java Design Quality Metrics RPMs:jdepend jdepend-demo jdepend-javadoc Size:244.16 KiB Package: jsr-311-1.1.1-18.fc31 Summary: JAX-RS: Java API for RESTful Web Services RPMs:jsr-311 jsr-311-javadoc Size:155.17 KiB Package: kim-api-2.0.2-2.fc31 Summary: Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API RPMs:kim-api kim-api-devel kim-api-examples Size:3.40 MiB Package: ogr2osm-0.1-0.1.20190104git183e226.fc31 Summary: Convert ogr-readable files like shapefiles into .osm data RPMs:ogr2osm Size:28.05 KiB Package: perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults-1.20180923-2.fc31 Summary: Object Oriented Authentication-Results Headers RPMs:perl-Mail-AuthenticationResults Size:59.97 KiB Package: python-OBD-0.7.0-1.fc31 Summary: OBD-II serial module for reading engine data RPMs:python3-OBD Size:97.41 KiB Package: rust-askalono-cli-0.3.0-1.module_f31+3935+a5a19355 Summary: Tool to detect the contents of license files RPMs:askalono-cli Size:14.54 MiB Package: smoldyn-2.58-1.fc31 Summary: A particle-based spatial stochastic simulator RPMs:smoldyn smoldyn-doc Size:13.71 MiB Package: xsom-0-21.20110809svn.fc31 Summary: XML Schema Object Model (XSOM) RPMs:xsom xsom-javadoc Size:693.64 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: SimplyHTML-0.16.18-6.fc30 Summary: Application and a java component for rich text processing RPMs:SimplyHTML SimplyHTML-javadoc Size:510.53 KiB Package: docker-2:1.13.1-66.git1185cfd.fc31 Summary: Automates deployment of containerized applications RPMs:docker docker-common docker-devel docker-fish-completion docker-logrotate docker-lvm-plugin docker-novolume-plugin docker-rhel-push-plugin docker-vim docker-zsh-completion Size:186.44 MiB Package
Fedora 30 Final Freeze
Hi all, Today, April 16th 2019, is an important day on the Fedora 30 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final composes. Other builds will remain in updates-testing until the Final release is approved, at which point the Final freeze is lifted and packages can move to the 'updates' repository, pending updates will be pushed before final release as zero day updates. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/30/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu Release Engineering ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > rpm macros. > > Here is the documentation: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu > les/#_build_macros_optional > > Here is an example where I needed to set --with bootstrap in my module: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d6 > 38a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76 > Thanks for the tip but that wouldn't work for Golang. When we bootstrap we disable certain codepath to workaround the cycle, but we still need to reenable them later to build the final binary. So we need to do both a bootstrap build, and then a non-bootstrap build to get all the functionality. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:14, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 02:46:49 CEST Mat Booth wrote: > > > > Yes, there is a buildopts section in the yaml file where you can specify > > rpm macros. > > > > Here is the documentation: > > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/defining-modu > > les/#_build_macros_optional > > > > Here is an example where I needed to set --with bootstrap in my module: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/tycho/blob/df837b8793fe460d2c7e72ab6d6 > > 38a0f6e9f47a7/f/tycho.yaml#_76 > > > > > Thanks for the tip but that wouldn't work for Golang. When we bootstrap we > disable certain codepath to workaround the cycle, but we still need to > reenable them later to build the final binary. So we need to do both a > bootstrap build, and then a non-bootstrap build to get all the functionality. > Why wouldn't this work for you? You would just rebuild the module a second time without the bootstrap flag set. This is fairly standard process for packages that buildrequire themselves and not unique to golang. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30
On Sunday, 14 April 2019 08:55:32 CEST Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote: > Hello > > I tested upgrades from F29 to F30. I use the following images: > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_64 > /images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-29-1.2.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/29/Cloud/x86_6 > 4/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-1.2.x86_64.qcow2 > > On the image for Vagrant, I failed upgrades I usually use this image for > rpm packaging.``` [vagrant@fedora29 ~]$ sudo dnf --releasever=30 > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing > distro-sync Fedora Modular 30 - > x86_64 >650 kB/s | 2.3 MB > 00:03 Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - > Updates > 219 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora > 30 - x86_64 - Test > Updates > 1.8 MB/s | 14 MB 00:07 > Fedora 30 - x86_64 - > Updates > 234 B/s | 257 B > 00:01 Fedora 30 - > x86_64 >1.1 MB/s | 54 > MB 00:48 Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch - > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - nothing provides python2.7dist(git) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(hglib) needed by gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - > nothing provides python2.7dist(koji) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(python-gitdb) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(tarfile) needed by gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - > nothing provides python2.7dist(urllib2) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed > package gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 - > gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - nothing provides python2.7dist(jinja2) = 2.8 needed by > gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 - nothing provides > python2.7dist(markupsafe) = 0.23 needed by > gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed > package gofed-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 - package > gofed-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 requires gofed-infra = > 1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - > gofed-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - nothing provides python2.7dist(git) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(hglib) needed by gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - > nothing provides python2.7dist(koji) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(python-gitdb) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides > python2.7dist(tarfile) needed by gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch - > nothing provides python2.7dist(urllib2) needed by > gofed-infra-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed > package gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch - package > gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.noarch requires gofed-gofedlib = > 1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - > gofed-resources-1.0.0-0.21.rc1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository - nothing provides python2.7dist(jinja2) = 2.8 needed by > gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 - nothing provides > python2.7dist(markupsafe) = 0.23 needed by > gofed-gofedlib-1.0.0-0.22.rc1.fc30.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to > skip uninstallable packages) > ``` > > On the image for OpenStack, dependencies are successfully resolved. > ``` > Transaction Summary > > > == Install 20 Packages > Upgrade 392 Packages > > ... > > Total download size: 282 M > Is this ok [y/N]: > Operation aborted. > ``` > > Upgrades are successfully completed while I found scriptlets in dbus-daemon > and systemd are failed because of "Failed to reload daemon: Access > denied".``` > Transaction Summary > > > == Install 20 Packages > Upgrade 392 Packages > > Total
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30
Hello, I updated 2 systems today to F30 using dnf system-upgrade. Ran into a few issues, but nothing major. I worked around them by removing the offending packages and then proceeding with the upgrade. Here are the bugs I filed: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700307: package Mayavi-4.6.2-3.fc30.x86_64 requires python3-mayavi, but none of the providers can be installed - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674843: ekiga is FTBFS in F30 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700305: (Apparently fixed in testing, but I haven't been able to test yet.) package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700310: package python2-envisage-4.6.0-1.fc29.noarch requires python2-ipykernel, but none of the providers can be installed - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700286: package ghc-hoopl-3.10.2.2-70.fc29.x86_64 requires libHSarray-0.5.2.0-ghc8.2.2.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686746: python3-fsleyes uninstallable because of missing deps: we're looking into this now. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Maintainer test instances
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:37:55 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > https://www.openmainframeproject.org/ has some information on getting > access to mainframe resources. there is also some information at > https://osuosl.org/services/ibm-z/ I believe both of them end up > running on hardware at Marist brothers college. there is also some > info on how to use Jenkins for ci on mainframe. > > Dennis > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 4:41 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On 4/4/19 1:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:02 AM Kevin Fenzi > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Greetings. > > > >> > > > >> This is a periodic reminder that we have some test instances > > > >> setup for package maintainers. Please see: > > > >> > > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers > > > >> > > > >> for more information. > > > >> > > > >> Additionally, I have just added 2 aarch64 instances (running > > > >> Fedora 29). > > > >> > > > >> I hope folks will find them useful. > > > >> > > > > > > > > These are definitely awesome, thanks Kevin! > > > > > > > > Would it also be possible to get some s390x in here? It seems > > > > like it's the only arch we support that we don't have here... > > > > > > I'd love to, but sadly the ones we have now are: limited in > > > number, accessible only via a slowish link, and in a lab where we > > > definitely do not want to allow unrestricted access. > > > > > > I think there may be some ibm resources that have instances > > > available, but not sure of the details. I can try and look into > > > getting us an instance somewhere that we could setup as a > > > maintainer test one... > > > > > > > That'd be super useful, as there are times when I have failures only > > in s390x, and not having a way to debug them makes it very > > painful. :( Neal, seems I missed this email. If a shared host is sufficient, I can make you an account there. Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya, > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda > again, just because I wanted to undo something). But I don't really > want to discuss that. What I do want to discuss is this: > > > > Ideally, the top 4 wouldn't be installed at all anymore (in case of > the first two at least on the systems which do not need them). But if > that's not in the cards, it would be great to at least not enable > these services anymore in the default boot so that they are only a > "systemctl enable" away for people who need them? > > I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a nice highlevel goal to shoot for. Another one I might add: "No stuck stop jobs" - it annoys me every single time when I reboot and something like rngd or conmon holds up my reboot for several minutes for no reason at all. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 11:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:08 PM Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new > > laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?) > > crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda > > again, just because I wanted to undo something). But I don't really > > want to discuss that. What I do want to discuss is this: > > > > > > > > Ideally, the top 4 wouldn't be installed at all anymore (in case of > > the first two at least on the systems which do not need them). But if > > that's not in the cards, it would be great to at least not enable > > these services anymore in the default boot so that they are only a > > "systemctl enable" away for people who need them? > > > > > I think all of these are good ideas. "No udev-settle" seems like a nice > highlevel goal to shoot for. > > Another one I might add: "No stuck stop jobs" - it annoys me every single > time when I reboot and something like rngd or conmon holds up my reboot > for several minutes for no reason at all. I've seen the rngd stop thing, hadn't had time to investigate it yet as more urgent fires keep showing up :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 19:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide > > > are > > > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > > > executables and shared libraries. > > > > > > I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 > > > seems to be a good candidate, since all my affected packages are built > > > with > > > meson and the new version landed six days ago. > > > > > > Is that new warning something we should worry about? > > > > Just to loop back on this...this wound up causing a release blocker > > bug: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699099 > > > > mclasen, mcatanzaro and I investigated it and eventually worked out > > that it is indeed caused by a bug in meson 0.50.0: > > > > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/5268 > > > > the offending meson change was actually later reverted for other > > reasons. I have now backported the reversion to the Fedora meson > > packages and am rebuilding everything that was built with meson 0.50.0 > > (it's likely that at least some of the rebuilds aren't strictly > > necessary, but it's easier to rebuild everything than try to figure out > > which packages did and didn't wind up with execstack marked bits). > > > > Note meson 0.50.0 wound up in the buildroots for F29 and F30 as well as > > Rawhide, so there are rebuilds for all three going through. > > > > Once I've rebuilt everything (there are quite a lot of things) I'll > > figure out a strategy for sending out updates. > > Since you probably have a list of affected packages / builds, I can > help by submitting updates for my own packages at least (once the > rebuilds are finished), if that helps. Thanks, but it's probably gonna be easier for one person just to do it, so we don't have to spend cycles trying to co-ordinate :P I'll let you know if I need help, though. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation
Le mardi 16 avril 2019 à 14:57 +, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I don't think we particularly need autostarting vms on the > workstation. It would be very nice to get libvirtd activated. I know > we've asked for this before... I have autostarted vms on my other_os workstation and it is very convenient. You set the hypervisor to save vm state on shutdown, and autorestart all the vms that were running next boot, and you don't need to bother about the hybernation vs sleep vs shutdown nonsense anymore. It just works -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:11 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > > executables and shared libraries. > > > > I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 > > seems to be a good candidate, since all my affected packages are built with > > meson and the new version landed six days ago. > > > > Is that new warning something we should worry about? > > Just to loop back on this...this wound up causing a release blocker > bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699099 > > mclasen, mcatanzaro and I investigated it and eventually worked out > that it is indeed caused by a bug in meson 0.50.0: > > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/5268 > > the offending meson change was actually later reverted for other > reasons. I have now backported the reversion to the Fedora meson > packages and am rebuilding everything that was built with meson 0.50.0 > (it's likely that at least some of the rebuilds aren't strictly > necessary, but it's easier to rebuild everything than try to figure out > which packages did and didn't wind up with execstack marked bits). > > Note meson 0.50.0 wound up in the buildroots for F29 and F30 as well as > Rawhide, so there are rebuilds for all three going through. > > Once I've rebuilt everything (there are quite a lot of things) I'll > figure out a strategy for sending out updates. Since you probably have a list of affected packages / builds, I can help by submitting updates for my own packages at least (once the rebuilds are finished), if that helps. Fabio > Thanks for spotting this earlier, wish we'd worked out the cause at the > time, it would've saved some pain! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30-20190416.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 384350 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384350 ID: 384354 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384354 ID: 384357 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384357 ID: 384360 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384360 ID: 384364 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384364 ID: 384375 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384375 ID: 384380 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384380 ID: 384383 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384383 ID: 384412 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384412 ID: 384419 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384419 ID: 384445 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384445 ID: 384466 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384466 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/146 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 384332 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384332 ID: 384340 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384340 ID: 384341 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384341 ID: 384359 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/384359 Passed openQA tests: 135/146 (x86_64), 20/24 (i386) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 172 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190414.0
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190414.0 Commit(x86_64): 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639 Commit(aarch64): 4bf47dda2c658c4392fad85ed78cf563123dc7bd7a86dd644b2dfd252016d535 Commit(ppc64le): 03469a10666f0b65428974bd610c926f5493ee7a76e2ceccd3abec84c4549e69 We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note that x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automated testing at this time. Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host upgrade`. Corresponding image media for new installations can be downloaded from: https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/download/ Alternatively, image artifacts can be found at the following links: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.aarch64.qcow2 https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.aarch64.raw.xz https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-aarch64-29-20190414.0.iso https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.ppc64le.qcow2 https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.ppc64le.raw.xz https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-ppc64le-29-20190414.0.iso https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64.qcow2 https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64.raw.xz https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20190414.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant-29-20190414.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-ostree-x86_64-29-20190414.0.iso Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/aarch64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-aarch64-CHECKSUM https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/aarch64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-aarch64-CHECKSUM https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/ppc64le/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-ppc64le-CHECKSUM https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-ppc64le-CHECKSUM https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/images/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-x86_64-CHECKSUM https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Fedora-29-updates-20190414.0/AtomicHost/x86_64/iso/Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0-x86_64-CHECKSUM For direct download, the "latest" targets are always available here: x86_64: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest aarch64: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_aarch64_latest ppc64le: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_ppc64le_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_ppc64le_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_ppc64le_latest Filename fetching URLs are available here: x86_64: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_x86_64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_x86_64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_x86_64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_x86_64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_x86_64_latest_filename aarch64: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_aarch64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_aarch64_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_dvd_ostree_aarch64_latest_filename ppc64le: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_ppc64le_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_ppc64le_latest_filename
Re: Maintainer test instances
Also, pertinent to the main topic... Any chance of getting a EL 8 test instance? I'm working on getting some preliminary builds done in COPR but having some issues which are difficult to troubleshoot just with logs. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Module's package branch name to be aligned?
Hi Mikolaj
> I thought of using names in format "stream-${name}-${stream}" (eg.
stream-scala-2.10), but I can use "${name}-${stream}" (scala-2.10)
format too - consistency between modules is more important than
maintainer personal preferences.
I just checked current modules' situation in f29 module repository.
Maybe this list shows all the module or most modules in it.
The result is here.
https://pagure.io/jaruga-modules-branches
So, current package branch name patterns are
* "stream-${name}-${stream}": 2 (postgresql, varnish)
* "${name}-${stream}": 1 (ruby (but not created yet))
* Both "${name}-${stream}" and "${stream}": 1 (kubernetes)
* "${stream}": 11
Remarkable case is kubernetes module.
2 types of module stream names: 1.10, openshift-3.10
2 types of package branch names: 1.10, openshift-3.10
1.10 is maybe used like a kubernetes-1.10 branch.
There is no "${name}-${stream}" except ruby I thought I would create it.
As the examples of package branch names are defined explicitly
referring http://calver.org/ .
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_package_branch_name
In the point of consistency of "current" modules, it might be better
to align with a kubernetes module's style.
That is
* As a first branch name: "${stream}"
* As a 2nd branch name: foo-${stream}
Jun
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:00 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > > On 15/04/19 19:25, Andrew Lutomirski wrote > > > Would one of you be interested in maintaining coin-or-lemon? I > packaged > > > it because I thought I was going to use it, but I ended up not using > it. > > > > Add me, please. > > My FAS: sagitter > > I can comaintain too, if you like. FAS: jjames. > > Done. Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Stewardship SIG Meeting (2019-04-17; 17:00 UTC)
Hi everybody, Tomorrow we'll have the first meeting of the Stewardship SIG. Non-SIG-members are of course welcome to participate, as well. I considered both the final whenisgood survey results and the fedora meeting calendar to find a good spot for this week (which is a bit of a weird one due to the Easter holidays). We'll try to find a better slot for future meetings. - When: 2019-04-17, 17:00 UTC - Where: #fedora-meeting on freenode fedocal event: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/location/fedora-meeting%40irc.freenode.net/#m9512 Current Agenda: - Review broken dependencies and build failures - Review Open RHBZ Bugs - Review Open Pull Requests - Review (SIG) Leaf Packages - Discuss and agree upon future meeting schedule Some helpful hyperlinks for these items are available in the ticket on pagure. Also, SIG members, feel free to add further things to the agenda: https://www.pagure.io/stewardship-sig/issue/8 If you can't make it tomorrow, we will continue discussions on the tickets that I'll be creating for every open issue that we come across during the meeting. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 12:07 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included executables > and shared libraries. > > I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 seems > to be a good candidate, since all my affected packages are built with meson > and the new version landed six days ago. > > Is that new warning something we should worry about? > > Fabio Well, it turns out, it *was* a bug in meson 0.50.0 which, by now, has affected a long list of packages and is starting to cause issues with SELinux denials, etc. The issue is tracked at [0] and meson has been fixed for all branches of fedora, rebuilds of affected packages are running now. Fabio [0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699099 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmlint: new "executable stack" warnings on rawhide
On Sun, 2019-03-17 at 12:07 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've noticed that as of some days ago, some packages I build on rawhide are > now triggering the "W: executable-stack" warning for all included > executables and shared libraries. > > I'm not sure which change might be the cause of this, but meson 0.50.0 > seems to be a good candidate, since all my affected packages are built with > meson and the new version landed six days ago. > > Is that new warning something we should worry about? Just to loop back on this...this wound up causing a release blocker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699099 mclasen, mcatanzaro and I investigated it and eventually worked out that it is indeed caused by a bug in meson 0.50.0: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/5268 the offending meson change was actually later reverted for other reasons. I have now backported the reversion to the Fedora meson packages and am rebuilding everything that was built with meson 0.50.0 (it's likely that at least some of the rebuilds aren't strictly necessary, but it's easier to rebuild everything than try to figure out which packages did and didn't wind up with execstack marked bits). Note meson 0.50.0 wound up in the buildroots for F29 and F30 as well as Rawhide, so there are rebuilds for all three going through. Once I've rebuilt everything (there are quite a lot of things) I'll figure out a strategy for sending out updates. Thanks for spotting this earlier, wish we'd worked out the cause at the time, it would've saved some pain! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: environment variables LANGUAGE
My first thought is accountsservice, check that first. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc. > > > > It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation > > Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins coming later). > > > > You can try it now from < > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/>;. > > > > Feedback is welcome. > > I already basically wrote this: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > > it has a lot more capabilities, and is used quite heavily in various > tools and processes the QA team uses. Well I can go one better here and say there's a way to *not* download the ISOs :-) https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2019/04/13/virt-install-nbdkit-live-install/#content Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora-img-dl: a tool for downloading Fedora iso's and images
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 21:55 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:57:26AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 17:22 +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > > Hi, I made a small cli tool for downloading Fedora iso's etc. > > > > > > It can download rawhide, branched, beta, and released isos (eg Workstation > > > Live etc), and even WS Live respins (support for spins coming later). > > > > > > You can try it now from < > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/fedora-img-dl/>;;. > > > > > > Feedback is welcome. > > > > I already basically wrote this: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind > > > > it has a lot more capabilities, and is used quite heavily in various > > tools and processes the QA team uses. > > Well I can go one better here and say there's a way to *not* download > the ISOs :-) > > https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2019/04/13/virt-install-nbdkit-live-install/#content But you still need to know where the ISO you want to use *is*, which fedfind can help you with ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
`dnf system-upgrade download` throws RuntimeError: TransactionItem not found for key: rtkit
I am running in a reproducible traceback which happens during `dnf system-upgrade download` as reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700551. Does anyone know whether this will let me run into upgrade issues? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: `dnf system-upgrade download` throws RuntimeError: TransactionItem not found for key: rtkit
This was fallout from an older bug in rtkit's rpm scripts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637496. Thanks for the help! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: What is a PDC branch?
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:21 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 04:40:22 CEST Jerry James wrote: > > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my > > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch > > already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more > > information, but they just got closed again with the same message, > > which tells me that humans are not reading these, so there's no point > > in opening them again. Here are the relevant tickets: > > > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10798 > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10799 > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10800 > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10801 > > > > Could somebody please (a) tell me what on earth that means, and (b) > > fix whatever generates that error message so that it says something > > intelligible to us mere mortals? > > > > Thank you, > > -- > > Jerry James > > http://www.jamezone.org/ > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > It means your packages already exist in the Product Definition Center, > For example: > https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/rest_api/v1/component-branches/? > active=true_component=gap-pkg-francy > > Most likely the script which creates them went wrong. Ask infra to solve the > issues. I had the same problem for the newly added kim-api package: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/11076 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/11077 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/11078 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/11079 However I was able to create branches myself, by disabling the "Prevent creating new branches by git push" hook and doing: $ git push origin master:f30 $ git push origin master:f29 $ git push origin master:f28 $ git push origin master:epel7 Christoph > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Christoph Junghans Web: http://www.compphys.de ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190414.0
An example of the diff between this and the previous released version (for x86_64) is: rpm-ostree db diff a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5c3ba5c9bedd59a9e76aa3e9924 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639 ostree diff commit old: a39e99a72c80c9c4a8fce8a2092b2856f742a5c3ba5c9bedd59a9e76aa3e9924 ostree diff commit new: 3fa99cde65f41035e0a912643b64251cc84eec8fedd53ca42df2c4857d569639 Upgraded: audit 3.0-0.5.20181218gitbdb72c0.fc29 -> 3.0-0.7.20190326git03e7489.fc29 audit-libs 3.0-0.5.20181218gitbdb72c0.fc29 -> 3.0-0.7.20190326git03e7489.fc29 cockpit-bridge 190-1.fc29 -> 191-1.fc29 cockpit-docker 190-1.fc29 -> 191-1.fc29 cockpit-networkmanager 190-1.fc29 -> 191-1.fc29 cockpit-system 190-1.fc29 -> 191-1.fc29 container-selinux 2:2.91-1.gitacc6941.fc29 -> 2:2.94-1.git1e99f1d.fc29 containers-common 1:0.1.35-1.git404c5bd.fc29 -> 1:0.1.35-2.git404c5bd.fc29 fuse 2.9.9-1.fc29 -> 2.9.9-2.fc29 fuse-common 3.4.2-1.fc29 -> 3.4.2-2.fc29 fuse-libs 2.9.9-1.fc29 -> 2.9.9-2.fc29 fuse-overlayfs 0.3-5.dev.git8ec68ae.fc29 -> 0.3-8.dev.gita6958ce.fc29 fuse3-libs 3.4.2-1.fc29 -> 3.4.2-2.fc29 glibc 2.28-26.fc29 -> 2.28-27.fc29 glibc-all-langpacks 2.28-26.fc29 -> 2.28-27.fc29 glibc-common 2.28-26.fc29 -> 2.28-27.fc29 hostname 3.20-6.fc29 -> 3.20-7.fc29 kernel 5.0.4-200.fc29 -> 5.0.7-200.fc29 kernel-core 5.0.4-200.fc29 -> 5.0.7-200.fc29 kernel-modules 5.0.4-200.fc29 -> 5.0.7-200.fc29 librepo 1.9.6-1.fc29 -> 1.9.6-2.fc29 libsolv 0.7.4-1.fc29 -> 0.7.4-2.fc29 linux-firmware 20190213-93.git710963fe.fc29 -> 20190312-94.fc29 linux-firmware-whence 20190213-93.git710963fe.fc29 -> 20190312-94.fc29 pcre2 10.32-8.fc29 -> 10.32-9.fc29 podman 1:1.1.2-1.git0ad9b6b.fc29 -> 1:1.2.0-2.git3bd528e.fc29 python2-audit 3.0-0.5.20181218gitbdb72c0.fc29 -> 3.0-0.7.20190326git03e7489.fc29 python3 3.7.2-5.fc29 -> 3.7.3-1.fc29 python3-audit 3.0-0.5.20181218gitbdb72c0.fc29 -> 3.0-0.7.20190326git03e7489.fc29 python3-libs 3.7.2-5.fc29 -> 3.7.3-1.fc29 rpm-ostree 2019.2-1.fc29 -> 2019.3-1.fc29 rpm-ostree-libs 2019.2-1.fc29 -> 2019.3-1.fc29 selinux-policy 3.14.2-51.fc29 -> 3.14.2-53.fc29 selinux-policy-targeted 3.14.2-51.fc29 -> 3.14.2-53.fc29 skopeo 1:0.1.35-1.git404c5bd.fc29 -> 1:0.1.35-2.git404c5bd.fc29 sos 3.6-4.fc29 -> 3.7-1.fc29 tzdata 2018i-1.fc29 -> 2019a-1.fc29 vim-minimal 2:8.1.998-1.fc29 -> 2:8.1.1137-1.fc29 zchunk-libs 1.0.4-1.fc29 -> 1.1.0-1.fc29 Added: fedora-repos-ostree-29-5.noarch libmodulemd1-1.8.6-2.fc29.x86_64 x86_64 AMIs are here: Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-west-2 ami-0bd332308bc3eba3e hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-northeast-1 ami-08efa8173fff3eed5 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-central-1 ami-0688e285ec827b754 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64us-west-1 ami-08c7ed821cb1fd96e hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64us-west-2 ami-057420b7ffc1693d3 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-southeast-2 ami-01bd4bfc033057635 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ca-central-1 ami-0257477b2daa8537b hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-southeast-1 ami-0c65755f9d937d4ab hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64sa-east-1 ami-03e5ca1d15a5e905d hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-northeast-2 ami-0c74edb4ed48a1ea0 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-west-1 ami-006336604d5af77ef hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-south-1 ami-0a489967ae23505e1 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64us-east-1 ami-06c265399b45b5603 hvm gp2 Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-west-2 ami-0feb622c519791e60 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-northeast-1 ami-020c6abfe8d647756 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-central-1 ami-018e5f039cd07f4d2 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64us-west-1 ami-0c19ed8ad28100504 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64us-west-2 ami-04f9f2b66737c87f3 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-southeast-2 ami-07b851fd42ae8530e hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ca-central-1 ami-0a101ac57cd320666 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-southeast-1 ami-025ccb3a8083b11da hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64sa-east-1 ami-0bcc21570f1c10a54 hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64ap-northeast-2 ami-0be3498a6852e800f hvm standard Fedora-AtomicHost-29-20190414.0.x86_64eu-west-1 ami-0140d503b655f2942 hvm standard
Re: What is a PDC branch?
On Mon, 2019-04-15 at 20:40 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I had two packages pass review a couple of weeks ago. However, my > requests for repos were closed as invalid because "The PDC branch > already exists". I reopened the tickets with a request for more > information, but they just got closed again with the same message, > which tells me that humans are not reading these, so there's no point > in opening them again. Here are the relevant tickets: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10798 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10799 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10800 > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10801 > > Could somebody please (a) tell me what on earth that means, and (b) > fix whatever generates that error message so that it says something > intelligible to us mere mortals? First Google result for 'fedora branch pdc': https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers
On 15. 04. 19 18:52, Christopher wrote: If nobody picks up the ones by my name (nodejs-path-exists, nodejs-bluebird, nodejs-grunt-known-options), then I will probably have to orphan js-jquery, because it probably needs those for its build (I can't think of any other reason my name would be listed next to those). That is indeed the reason. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora modularity and cyclic dependencies
On 2019-04-16, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > You can do something like: > > rpms: > foo-bootstrap: > name: foo > bar: > buildafter: > - foo-bootstrap > foo: > buildafter: > - bar > How does foo.spec get to know that it should enable bootstrapping in foo-bootstrap component, but disable it in foo component? -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700352] New: perl-LDAP-0.66 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700352 Bug ID: 1700352 Summary: perl-LDAP-0.66 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-LDAP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, caol...@redhat.com, john.j5l...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.66 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.65-13.fc31 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/ldap/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3019/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 Final Freeze
Hi all, Today, April 16th 2019, is an important day on the Fedora 30 schedule [1], with significant cut-offs. Today we have the Final Freeze [2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [3][4][5] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Final composes. Other builds will remain in updates-testing until the Final release is approved, at which point the Final freeze is lifted and packages can move to the 'updates' repository, pending updates will be pushed before final release as zero day updates. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [5] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/30/final/buglist Regards, Mohan Boddu Release Engineering ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700352] perl-LDAP-0.66 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700352 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-LDAP-0.66-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-04-16 14:31:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-04-17 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the https://infinote.fedoraproject.org/cgit/infinote/tree/epel-meeting-next Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9364/ ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] please review: PR 50333 - Add replication conflict entry support to CLI
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50333 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700166] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4709e34f6f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698172] perl-Sereal-4.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-4.007-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0a61d982af -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-04-17 - 92% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/04/17/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190416gitaf97382.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700644] New: perl-Net-CIDR-0.20 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700644 Bug ID: 1700644 Summary: perl-Net-CIDR-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-CIDR Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, kwiz...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 0.20 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.19-4.fc30 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-CIDR/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/11877/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700166] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3e6b570104 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698172] perl-Sereal-4.007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698172 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Sereal-4.007-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0a61d982af -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700166] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 ||-1.fc31 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700166] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4709e34f6f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700166] perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700166 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.22-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3f9683e01f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700135] perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.77 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700135 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.77-1.fc ||31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-04-16 07:04:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Philosophical question regarding setuptools dependency
On Tuesday, 16 April 2019 10.04.15 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit): > > > > "setuptools is required at runtime" > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045 > > > > The obvious fix is to add python3-setuptools as a BR for python3-doit. > > > I suppose you meant: As runtime requires. Yes, I meant that. I even had to double check to ensure that the fix was correct. (BTW it was :-) ) > > My question here is if I should report this upstream? > > > Not needed. Upstream installs via pip. You already get pkg_resourcess > (setuptools) and no upstream has setuptools in their requires. I suspected so but I was not sure and thus this thread. > > If this requirement were in the dependencies of the package the auto > > generator would had picked initially. > > > If the auto generator is capable of seeing an console_script entry point > (hint, yes it is) they should add setuptools to the required packages. > > We should open a RFE bug for this (on it). I saw that already sent a fix for this issue. Thanks. :-) > -- > Miro Hrončok Regards, -- José Abílio ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Philosophical question regarding setuptools dependency
On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote: Hi, recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit): "setuptools is required at runtime" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045 The obvious fix is to add python3-setuptools as a BR for python3-doit. I suppose you meant: As runtime requires. My question here is if I should report this upstream? Not needed. Upstream installs via pip. You already get pkg_resourcess (setuptools) and no upstream has setuptools in their requires. If this requirement were in the dependencies of the package the auto generator would had picked initially. If the auto generator is capable of seeing an console_script entry point (hint, yes it is) they should add setuptools to the required packages. We should open a RFE bug for this (on it). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Philosophical question regarding setuptools dependency
On 16. 04. 19 11:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 15. 04. 19 19:11, José Abílio Matos wrote: Hi, recently I got a bug report regarding doit (packaged in python3-doit): "setuptools is required at runtime" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695045 The obvious fix is to add python3-setuptools as a BR for python3-doit. I suppose you meant: As runtime requires. My question here is if I should report this upstream? Not needed. Upstream installs via pip. You already get pkg_resourcess (setuptools) and no upstream has setuptools in their requires. If this requirement were in the dependencies of the package the auto generator would had picked initially. If the auto generator is capable of seeing an console_script entry point (hint, yes it is) they should add setuptools to the required packages. We should open a RFE bug for this (on it). https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/664 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1700138] perl-Module-Build-0.4229 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700138 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Build-0.42.29-1 ||.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-04-16 09:49:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
