Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-30 Thread drewko1
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:58:27 -0700, Brett Howard wrote:

I understand that but I'm not so sure that both adjustment while hearing the
pitch and adjustment while hearing a signal is needed.  Why not just
adjustment while hearing sigs?



Brett,

You got me... if while adjusting the pitch we could hear the signal I
can't think of any reason to prefer the sidetone.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-30 Thread drewko1
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:16:16 -0700, Keith N1AS wrote:

I don't disagree at all Drew.  I would fancy having the RIT / XIT knob
operate as a CW Pitch control so one knob could vary all required
parameters in real time.  Until that day comes, I'm thinking I can get
most of the functionality using 2 knobs (RIT  Shift).  Actually, using
2 knobs makes me feel more like a real ham radio operator since I'm
actually using 2 knobs plus my brain to make an adjustment LOL!

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 - 


Well, Keith... the next thing you will be telling me is you prefer a
straight key or bug over a keyer... hee,hee.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-30 Thread Darwin, Keith
 

-Original Message-
Actually, using
2 knobs makes me feel more like a real ham radio operator since I'm 
actually using 2 knobs plus my brain to make an adjustment LOL!

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -

Well, Keith... the next thing you will be telling me is you prefer a
straight key or bug over a keyer... hee,hee.
--

Awe, man, Drew, you've ratted me out!

If you look on my operating desk, you'll see a straight key hooked in
parallel with a bug.  My paddles are on a shelf in the same room but
safely tucked away in a zip lock bag to keep dust off.  My microphone is
... well, give me a few minutes ... I know I have one ... somewhere :-)

Your other point not needing to hear the sidetone to adjust pitch (just
do it using the RX signal) is a good one.  I think most times, adjusting
offset while listening to the receiver and just having the sidetone
pitch follow along would be just fine.  But, if some crazy OT has
decided to adjust RIT and SHIFT, then the received pitch will thrown
off.  Other than that, I think the idea is a grand one!

I guess if I had the choice between adjusting pitch only while hearing
the sidetone or only while hearing the received signal, I'd choose the
latter - assuming I still get the pitch readout in Hz during the
adjustment.

73 all!

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 - 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Jon K Hellan

Jim Brown wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:42:17 -0400, n4lq wrote:

Using a set of computer speakers which have their own gain control 


Most speakers with built-in electronics have RFI problems!


Indeed they do. If you have a GSM phone, each text message is announced with a 
rattle rattle rattle in the computer speakers.


LA4RT Jon, Trondheim, Norway

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread drewko1
Yes, PITCH would seem like a good choice for the signal pitch
adjustment. Or perhaps signal pitch could be made an additional option
for the RIT/XIT control when RIT/XIT is off? (RIT is already an
optional coarse tune control and has also been suggested as an
optional band switch.)

For sidetone pitch adjustment, perhaps MON could allow it with a 2nd
push? Then you'd have sidetone pitch and volume with a single control.
Makes sense?

73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:50:48 -0400, Steve Ellington wrote:

How about eliminating the tone when pushing either pitch or mon and only 
producint the tone when pushing spot? That seems like a good compromise. 
That way we could change pitch or st level mid-QSO and still have the tone 
available when we want it.
Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions


 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:21:17 -0500, Nick, WA5BDU wrote:


Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that.


 I wasn't suggesting that the ability to adjust sidetone pitch be
 eliminated. Merely that we have the additional ability to
 interactively adjust the pitch of the received signal. Yes, both
 pitches are the same. But as it is now you cannot hear the effect on
 the signal itself while adjusting PITCH-- the received audio is cut
 off and the sidetone comes on. This makes it difficult to tell what
 pitch is optimum for the particular signal and the given reception
 conditions.

 IOW, I don't really care what the sidetone pitch is-- one is as good
 as another. It is the offset pitch of the signal that is important. So
 why not be able to adjust it for best copy under current conditions?
 We can adjust the volume of a signal while listening to it; so why not
 the pitch?  Depending on noise, QRM, keying characteristics, speed,
 etc. you might want to alter the pitch for better copy. I think it
 would be useful.

 73,
 Drew
 AF2Z


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Brett Howard
Sidetone pitch and signal pitch should always be the same.  Otherwise its
kinda hard to zerobeat a station to make sure the auto zero beat did things
right.  I realize there are too many people who don't understand how to zero
beat a station but that doesn't mean we should add functionality to make it
even harder for people to do things right.  :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:25 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

Yes, PITCH would seem like a good choice for the signal pitch
adjustment. Or perhaps signal pitch could be made an additional option
for the RIT/XIT control when RIT/XIT is off? (RIT is already an
optional coarse tune control and has also been suggested as an
optional band switch.)

For sidetone pitch adjustment, perhaps MON could allow it with a 2nd
push? Then you'd have sidetone pitch and volume with a single control.
Makes sense?

73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:50:48 -0400, Steve Ellington wrote:

How about eliminating the tone when pushing either pitch or mon and
only 
producint the tone when pushing spot? That seems like a good compromise. 
That way we could change pitch or st level mid-QSO and still have the tone 
available when we want it.
Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions


 On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:21:17 -0500, Nick, WA5BDU wrote:


Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that.


 I wasn't suggesting that the ability to adjust sidetone pitch be
 eliminated. Merely that we have the additional ability to
 interactively adjust the pitch of the received signal. Yes, both
 pitches are the same. But as it is now you cannot hear the effect on
 the signal itself while adjusting PITCH-- the received audio is cut
 off and the sidetone comes on. This makes it difficult to tell what
 pitch is optimum for the particular signal and the given reception
 conditions.

 IOW, I don't really care what the sidetone pitch is-- one is as good
 as another. It is the offset pitch of the signal that is important. So
 why not be able to adjust it for best copy under current conditions?
 We can adjust the volume of a signal while listening to it; so why not
 the pitch?  Depending on noise, QRM, keying characteristics, speed,
 etc. you might want to alter the pitch for better copy. I think it
 would be useful.

 73,
 Drew
 AF2Z


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread drewko1
Brett, 

I'm not suggesting that offset pitch and sidetone pitch be different.
They are the same. 

I'm suggesting that sometimes you want to adjust this pitch by
listening to the sidetone and sometimes you want to adjust it by
listening to the received signal. Currently you can't hear the signal
while you adjust PITCH-- the received audio is blocked.

Why would you want to vary the signal pitch? Because a different pitch
can provide better copy under different reception condtions. But it's
pretty hard to tell what that optimum pitch might be without listening
to the signal as you adjust it, right?

 Now, you can vary the VFO in order to change the signal's pitch, but
then you have detuned it. I want to vary the pitch of a signal without
detuning it. The K3 can do this, only it doesn't let us hear the
signal while doing it.

73,
Drew
AF2Z


On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:50:15 -0700, Brett Howard wrote:

Sidetone pitch and signal pitch should always be the same.  Otherwise its
kinda hard to zerobeat a station to make sure the auto zero beat did things
right.  I realize there are too many people who don't understand how to zero
beat a station but that doesn't mean we should add functionality to make it
even harder for people to do things right.  :)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Darwin, Keith
 

-Original Message from Drew, AF2Z -
Why would you want to vary the signal pitch? Because a different pitch
can provide better copy under different reception condtions. But it's
pretty hard to tell what that optimum pitch might be without listening
to the signal as you adjust it, right?

 Now, you can vary the VFO in order to change the signal's pitch, but
then you have detuned it. I want to vary the pitch of a signal without
detuning it. The K3 can do this, only it doesn't let us hear the signal
while doing it.
---


Which brings us to the old fashioned way to adjust the pitch of the RX
signal - RIT.  It keeps the TX on the same frequency and as long as you
don't adjust it too far, the signal will stay in the passband.  Better
yet, combine it with an IF Shift and you can go farther with RIT while
keeping the signal where you want it in the passband.

Do I remember correctly?  Didn't the TS-930s have a CW Offset control
that would adjust sidetone pitch, TX-RX offset and IF Shift at the same
time?  I used to want one of those rigs something bad.  Then I borrowed
one for a weekend and decided I liked my TenTec Corsair II better.

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Brett Howard
I understand that but I'm not so sure that both adjustment while hearing the
pitch and adjustment while hearing a signal is needed.  Why not just
adjustment while hearing sigs?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:21 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

Brett, 

I'm not suggesting that offset pitch and sidetone pitch be different.
They are the same. 

I'm suggesting that sometimes you want to adjust this pitch by
listening to the sidetone and sometimes you want to adjust it by
listening to the received signal. Currently you can't hear the signal
while you adjust PITCH-- the received audio is blocked.

Why would you want to vary the signal pitch? Because a different pitch
can provide better copy under different reception condtions. But it's
pretty hard to tell what that optimum pitch might be without listening
to the signal as you adjust it, right?

 Now, you can vary the VFO in order to change the signal's pitch, but
then you have detuned it. I want to vary the pitch of a signal without
detuning it. The K3 can do this, only it doesn't let us hear the
signal while doing it.

73,
Drew
AF2Z


On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:50:15 -0700, Brett Howard wrote:

Sidetone pitch and signal pitch should always be the same.  Otherwise its
kinda hard to zerobeat a station to make sure the auto zero beat did things
right.  I realize there are too many people who don't understand how to
zero
beat a station but that doesn't mean we should add functionality to make it
even harder for people to do things right.  :)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread drewko1
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:41:24 -0700, Keith N1AS wrote:



Which brings us to the old fashioned way to adjust the pitch of the RX
signal - RIT.  It keeps the TX on the same frequency and as long as you
don't adjust it too far, the signal will stay in the passband.  Better
yet, combine it with an IF Shift and you can go farther with RIT while
keeping the signal where you want it in the passband.



Keith, 

Say you have managed to tune in a very weak signal to the very
optimum... no further adjustment on the K3 controls could improve it.
Except, your offset is 400 Hz; but some combination of QRM, noise, his
code speed, keying characteristics and your own psycho-acoustics would
make it easier to copy at, say, 800 Hz. Turning the VFO (or RIT) 400
Hz will put him out of the passband (then use SHIFT, etc, i know...). 

Why not just be able to vary the pitch; the K3 keeps the signal
centered in the passband. This seems like the obvious simple solution.

I wonder if it would be possible to just have received audio when
PITCH is engaged. Then we could turn the sidetone volume to zero and
observe the pitch variation of the received signals directly. It is a
little clumsy  but I wouldn't mind and I don't think this feature
would upset anyone with more control functions, etc.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Darwin, Keith
I don't disagree at all Drew.  I would fancy having the RIT / XIT knob
operate as a CW Pitch control so one knob could vary all required
parameters in real time.  Until that day comes, I'm thinking I can get
most of the functionality using 2 knobs (RIT  Shift).  Actually, using
2 knobs makes me feel more like a real ham radio operator since I'm
actually using 2 knobs plus my brain to make an adjustment LOL!

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 - 

-Original Message-
Say you have managed to tune in a very weak signal to the very
optimum... no further adjustment on the K3 controls could improve it.
Except, your offset is 400 Hz; but some combination of QRM, noise, his
code speed, keying characteristics and your own psycho-acoustics would
make it easier to copy at, say, 800 Hz. Turning the VFO (or RIT) 400 Hz
will put him out of the passband (then use SHIFT, etc, i know...). 

Why not just be able to vary the pitch; the K3 keeps the signal centered
in the passband. This seems like the obvious simple solution.

I wonder if it would be possible to just have received audio when PITCH
is engaged. Then we could turn the sidetone volume to zero and observe
the pitch variation of the received signals directly. It is a little
clumsy  but I wouldn't mind and I don't think this feature would upset
anyone with more control functions, etc.
--

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-29 Thread Brett Howard
Yea this is kinda what I figured would need to happen.  I wasn't sure though
so I wasn't going to speak on it till I'd gotten a chance to go home and try
it.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:18 AM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:41:24 -0700, Keith N1AS wrote:



Which brings us to the old fashioned way to adjust the pitch of the RX
signal - RIT.  It keeps the TX on the same frequency and as long as you
don't adjust it too far, the signal will stay in the passband.  Better
yet, combine it with an IF Shift and you can go farther with RIT while
keeping the signal where you want it in the passband.



Keith, 

Say you have managed to tune in a very weak signal to the very
optimum... no further adjustment on the K3 controls could improve it.
Except, your offset is 400 Hz; but some combination of QRM, noise, his
code speed, keying characteristics and your own psycho-acoustics would
make it easier to copy at, say, 800 Hz. Turning the VFO (or RIT) 400
Hz will put him out of the passband (then use SHIFT, etc, i know...). 

Why not just be able to vary the pitch; the K3 keeps the signal
centered in the passband. This seems like the obvious simple solution.

I wonder if it would be possible to just have received audio when
PITCH is engaged. Then we could turn the sidetone volume to zero and
observe the pitch variation of the received signals directly. It is a
little clumsy  but I wouldn't mind and I don't think this feature
would upset anyone with more control functions, etc.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq
CW sidetone should follow the AF gain control and be adjustable so they are 
about the same level. Why would anyone want a fixed sidetone level? Changing 
from speaker to headphones requires readjustment of the sidetone level. When 
the xyl turns on the washing machine, I have to turn up the AF gain then the 
sidetone is buried in noise so I have to crank it up.
Many of us with Omni VI's performed a simple mod that allowed sidetone to 
track with the AF gain. Kenwood got it right with tracking sidetone. I think 
most Icoms do too. Yaesu was really bad. On the MP you had to reach behind 
the rig and find a little knob to change sidetone level!!
So if there were some way to merge sidetone into AF gain, I would love 
it...73

Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:53 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



Just out of curiosity what do you gentlemen prefer?  Do you like things
better the way the K3 does things where the monitor level is a fixed
output regardless of the AF knob.  Or is the way the K1 does things more
preferred.  The STL menu entry allows one to set the side tone monitor
as an offset from the RX level.  So you set the monitor level and it
gets louder or quieter as you adjust the AF Gain.

My personal preference is the K1 method.  I like this because if my wife
is sleeping then I like to turn down the volume (if not go all the way
and use headphones).  I like to have the sidetone go down as well rather
than make a separate adjustment.  I'm not asking for any changes.  Just
curious to hear the thoughts of others on this topic.

~Brett (KC7OTG)

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1576 - Release Date: 7/27/2008 
4:16 PM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread David Pratt

In a recent message, n4lq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ...
CW sidetone should follow the AF gain control and be adjustable so they 
are about the same level.

...
Many of us with Omni VI's performed a simple mod that allowed sidetone 
to track with the AF gain.


Yes, Steve, but on here we're talking about the Elecraft K3 on which the 
sidetone level is a simple matter of just pushing and turning a knob. Do 
try a K3 sometime and you will find how simple it is.


73
--
David G4DMP
Leeds, England, UK
--


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Jan Erik Holm

n4lq wrote:
CW sidetone should follow the AF gain control and be adjustable so they 
are about the same level.





IMO absolutely not. Sidetone level should have a separate level adjust.

73 Jim SM2EKM

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq

David
I do have the K3 and know how to adjust the sidetone. I just prefer having 
the AF gain and sidetone track to one control. Also, I like to be able to 
adjust the sidetone level while sending CW which you can't do on the K3. 
When you push the mon button you get a constant sidetone. You cannot hear 
the other guy sending no can you send cw yourself while doing this. This is 
very weird and I have never seen a rig act like this. It's not a deal 
breaker but it sure seems crude. Rigs such as the IC-756PRO have a little 
sidetone level knob that allows you to simply increase or decrease the 
sidetone level while sending or receiving with no interruptions. That's how 
it should be.

Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: n4lq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



In a recent message, n4lq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ...
CW sidetone should follow the AF gain control and be adjustable so they 
are about the same level.

...
Many of us with Omni VI's performed a simple mod that allowed sidetone to 
track with the AF gain.


Yes, Steve, but on here we're talking about the Elecraft K3 on which the 
sidetone level is a simple matter of just pushing and turning a knob. Do 
try a K3 sometime and you will find how simple it is.


73
--
David G4DMP
Leeds, England, UK
--



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 
270.5.6/1576 - Release Date: 7/27/2008 4:16 PM






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread drewko1
I don't adjust the sidetone level very often. Not sure I'd like to
have it vary with the AF Gain. I think I like having it as a reference
audio level. Mine is set at 25. 

What I would like is the option to adjust the PITCH without hearing
the sidetone. In other words, listening to a weak signal I want to
adjust it's pitch (offset) for best copy. Different signal conditions
can warrant the use of different pitches for optimum copy. But you
can't do this with the sidetone overriding the received audio. Even if
you set the sideone level to zero the received audio is blocked
whenever PITCH is on.

73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:53:14 -0700, Brett (KC7OTG) wrote:

?Just out of curiosity what do you gentlemen prefer?  Do you like things
better the way the K3 does things where the monitor level is a fixed
output regardless of the AF knob.  Or is the way the K1 does things more
preferred.  The STL menu entry allows one to set the side tone monitor
as an offset from the RX level.  So you set the monitor level and it
gets louder or quieter as you adjust the AF Gain.  

My personal preference is the K1 method.  I like this because if my wife
is sleeping then I like to turn down the volume (if not go all the way
and use headphones).  I like to have the sidetone go down as well rather
than make a separate adjustment.  I'm not asking for any changes.  Just
curious to hear the thoughts of others on this topic.

~Brett (KC7OTG)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq
Again I agree. Changing the sidetone level or pitch requires us to listen to 
the constant tone which covers up everything. I think the intent was good 
but a bit impractical.

Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



I don't adjust the sidetone level very often. Not sure I'd like to
have it vary with the AF Gain. I think I like having it as a reference
audio level. Mine is set at 25.

What I would like is the option to adjust the PITCH without hearing
the sidetone. In other words, listening to a weak signal I want to
adjust it's pitch (offset) for best copy. Different signal conditions
can warrant the use of different pitches for optimum copy. But you
can't do this with the sidetone overriding the received audio. Even if
you set the sideone level to zero the received audio is blocked
whenever PITCH is on.

73,
Drew
AF2Z



On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:53:14 -0700, Brett (KC7OTG) wrote:


?Just out of curiosity what do you gentlemen prefer?  Do you like things
better the way the K3 does things where the monitor level is a fixed
output regardless of the AF knob.  Or is the way the K1 does things more
preferred.  The STL menu entry allows one to set the side tone monitor
as an offset from the RX level.  So you set the monitor level and it
gets louder or quieter as you adjust the AF Gain.

My personal preference is the K1 method.  I like this because if my wife
is sleeping then I like to turn down the volume (if not go all the way
and use headphones).  I like to have the sidetone go down as well rather
than make a separate adjustment.  I'm not asking for any changes.  Just
curious to hear the thoughts of others on this topic.

~Brett (KC7OTG)



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1577 - Release Date: 7/28/2008 
6:55 AM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread John King
I have to agree with Steve on this. I'm a CW operator.
I would like to have the sidetone track volume, while
still being able to adjust the mix ratio, preferably
while working CW.

After FD this year one fellow asked me an excellent
question: What don't you like about the K3?
I had been answering K3 questions all weekend, but I
wasn't prepared for that one. The single gripe I could
come up with was the sidetone volume adjustment.

As Steve says, it's not a deal breaker. We both own K3's.

73,
  john  WA1ABI


 I do have the K3 and know how to adjust the sidetone. I just
 prefer having
 the AF gain and sidetone track to one control. Also, I like to be able to
 adjust the sidetone level while sending CW which you can't do on the K3.
 When you push the mon button you get a constant sidetone. You cannot hear
 the other guy sending no can you send cw yourself while doing
 this. This is
 very weird and I have never seen a rig act like this. It's not a deal
 breaker

 Steve Ellington

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Darwin, Keith
I too am a CW operator but I greatly prefer the sidetone NOT track with
the AF gain control.  I want them separate so that I can adjust the mix
on the fly.  Rather than trying to adjust sidetone volume, I set it and
leave it alone.  If I want more sidetone, I turn the AF gain down which
is simple rather than trying to turn the sidetone up.

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John King
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

I have to agree with Steve on this. I'm a CW operator.
I would like to have the sidetone track volume, while still being able
to adjust the mix ratio, preferably while working CW.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Darwin, Keith
Before you put your waking shoes on, consider that just maybe I'm the
weird one LOL!

By turning down the AF gain, I'm increasing the sidetone-to-band-noise
ratio, making the sidetone easier to hear.  This assumes the sidetone is
loud enough but is being masked by the loud band noise since the AF gain
is way up to copy that weak signal.

Enjoy your walk.  I'm jealous.  I have to stay at my desk and keep
working ... :-)

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -


-Original Message-
From: n4lq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

If I want more sidetone, I turn the AF gain down which is simple rather
than trying to turn the sidetone up.

Obviously I missed something in life. Turning down the AF gain to get
more sidetone? Ok..I'm going to take a walk and get some fresh air.

Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Bob Cunnings
Sidetone level should be independently adjustable IMO.

I use headphones. When operating QSK, if I've run up the AF gain to
hear a weak station, I don't want to be blasted by high sidetone level
when I start sending, as would be the case if sidetone level tracked
the AF gain.  I don't want to have to adjust the AF gain control
between sending and receiving under those circumstances to control the
sidetone level.

Bob NW8L

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just out of curiosity what do you gentlemen prefer?  Do you like things
 better the way the K3 does things where the monitor level is a fixed
 output regardless of the AF knob.  Or is the way the K1 does things more
 preferred.  The STL menu entry allows one to set the side tone monitor
 as an offset from the RX level.  So you set the monitor level and it
 gets louder or quieter as you adjust the AF Gain.

 My personal preference is the K1 method.  I like this because if my wife
 is sleeping then I like to turn down the volume (if not go all the way
 and use headphones).  I like to have the sidetone go down as well rather
 than make a separate adjustment.  I'm not asking for any changes.  Just
 curious to hear the thoughts of others on this topic.

 ~Brett (KC7OTG)

 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq
Good point and there's probably no one answer to this therefore it should be 
made configurable.

At least, the constant tone feature for level and pitch should be optional.
Basically, if I could just reach for a knob and turn it when I want to 
change sidetone level during a QSO, I would be happy. Oh..heck...I'm already 
happy but this gives us something to discuss.


Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Bob Cunnings [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



Sidetone level should be independently adjustable IMO.

I use headphones. When operating QSK, if I've run up the AF gain to
hear a weak station, I don't want to be blasted by high sidetone level
when I start sending, as would be the case if sidetone level tracked
the AF gain.  I don't want to have to adjust the AF gain control
between sending and receiving under those circumstances to control the
sidetone level.

Bob NW8L

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Brett Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Just out of curiosity what do you gentlemen prefer?  Do you like things
better the way the K3 does things where the monitor level is a fixed
output regardless of the AF knob.  Or is the way the K1 does things more
preferred.  The STL menu entry allows one to set the side tone monitor
as an offset from the RX level.  So you set the monitor level and it
gets louder or quieter as you adjust the AF Gain.

My personal preference is the K1 method.  I like this because if my wife
is sleeping then I like to turn down the volume (if not go all the way
and use headphones).  I like to have the sidetone go down as well rather
than make a separate adjustment.  I'm not asking for any changes.  Just
curious to hear the thoughts of others on this topic.

~Brett (KC7OTG)

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1577 - Release Date: 7/28/2008 
6:55 AM






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:16:11 -0600, Bob Cunnings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks,

After reading all the posts to date on this topic, I have decided what my
opinion is:

Go ahead and change it, but if you do, please add another feature that allows
myself and others who would surely not like it at all, to turn the feature
off.

I'm a 63 year old, 46 year CW operator and CW SWL buff, military trained.

73,

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Brett Howard
After reading posts here I'm not 100% sure what my opinion is...  I'm pretty
happy either way...  I was mostly curious to hear what the peanut gallery
thought.  Seems this is another one that everyone is different on...

Thankfully its also another one that is easy to deal with if its not the way
you prefer.

~Brett (KC7OTG)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Childers, N5GE
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 9:09 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:16:11 -0600, Bob Cunnings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks,

After reading all the posts to date on this topic, I have decided what my
opinion is:

Go ahead and change it, but if you do, please add another feature that
allows
myself and others who would surely not like it at all, to turn the feature
off.

I'm a 63 year old, 46 year CW operator and CW SWL buff, military trained.

73,

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:16:11 -0600, Bob Cunnings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Sidetone level should be independently adjustable IMO.

I use headphones. When operating QSK, if I've run up the AF gain to
hear a weak station, I don't want to be blasted by high sidetone level
when I start sending, as would be the case if sidetone level tracked
the AF gain.  I don't want to have to adjust the AF gain control
between sending and receiving under those circumstances to control the
sidetone level.

Bob NW8L


Sorry Bob for deleting you response in my first reply.  Your explanation is spot
on.

Folks,

After reading all the posts to date on this topic, I have decided what my
opinion is:

Go ahead and change it, but if you do, please add another feature that allows
myself and others who would surely not like it at all, to turn the feature
off.

I'm a 63 year old, 46 year CW operator and CW SWL buff, military trained.

73,
Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread hank k8dd
Allow the PITCH to be changed without having to listen to the tone  or 
with the tone.


Allow the sidetone level to be changed without having to listen to it  
or with the tone..


Allow the sidetone to be independently controlled (and be able to change
it while you are transmitting) or AF Gain controlled.

Personally I like the PITCH to be adjustable without having to listen to it.
And the sidetone adjustable without having to listen to it.
And the sidetone level independent of the AF Gain control.

And I'd like to be able to record both the TX and RX audio at a fixed level 
rather than have the level controlled by the AF Gain!



- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



I don't adjust the sidetone level very often. Not sure I'd like to
have it vary with the AF Gain. I think I like having it as a reference
audio level. Mine is set at 25.

What I would like is the option to adjust the PITCH without hearing
the sidetone. In other words, listening to a weak signal I want to
adjust it's pitch (offset) for best copy. Different signal conditions
can warrant the use of different pitches for optimum copy. But you
can't do this with the sidetone overriding the received audio. Even if
you set the sideone level to zero the received audio is blocked
whenever PITCH is on.

73,
Drew
AF2Z


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Then there are those of us who set the AF gain and forget it, since we
use the RF gain control to adjust the volume for each signal. 

Whether or not the sidetone level tracks the audio gain is of little
concern. 

We turn off the AGC, so its characteristics are of no consequence.

We give *real* signal reports based on what we hear, not on what an
S-Meter tells us.

There's a reason why a great many radiomen have preferred to operate
that way over the years. For many of us, it's the easiest, fastest, and
surest way to hear signals at their best. 

Frequently it's easier to do the simple stuff ourselves instead of
expecting a box of parts and a gazillion lines of code to do it for
us...

Ron AC7AC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread K2/100 S/N 838

Dear Ron,

Hear ! Hear !

You have said it so very well.  My kudos !

TR, WB6TMY

At 11:03 AM 7/28/2008 -0700, you wrote:

Then there are those of us who set the AF gain and forget it, since we
use the RF gain control to adjust the volume for each signal.

Whether or not the sidetone level tracks the audio gain is of little
concern.

We turn off the AGC, so its characteristics are of no consequence.

We give *real* signal reports based on what we hear, not on what an
S-Meter tells us.

There's a reason why a great many radiomen have preferred to operate
that way over the years. For many of us, it's the easiest, fastest, and
surest way to hear signals at their best.

Frequently it's easier to do the simple stuff ourselves instead of
expecting a box of parts and a gazillion lines of code to do it for
us...

Ron AC7AC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Tel: . . . 707-832-4304 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread drewko1
I've been very happy with the AGC-NR on the K3, so turning off AGC is
starting to become a last resort for me. And the configurable AGC
parameters give you a lot of options, not one AGC fits all. (I do
adjust the RF gain even with AGC on.)

I also give signal reports corresponding to the s-meter reading. This
is convenient with the K3's absolute meter mode (doesn't matter
whether attenuator or preamp is on). It's just for my own interest,
comparing signal strengths at the antenna terminals. Can't see why I
wouldn't want to record them as long as I'm going to the trouble of
making RST notations anyway. 

73,
Drew
AF2Z




On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:03:27 -0700, Ron AC7AC wrote:

Then there are those of us who set the AF gain and forget it, since we
use the RF gain control to adjust the volume for each signal. 

Whether or not the sidetone level tracks the audio gain is of little
concern. 

We turn off the AGC, so its characteristics are of no consequence.

We give *real* signal reports based on what we hear, not on what an
S-Meter tells us.

There's a reason why a great many radiomen have preferred to operate
that way over the years. For many of us, it's the easiest, fastest, and
surest way to hear signals at their best. 

Frequently it's easier to do the simple stuff ourselves instead of
expecting a box of parts and a gazillion lines of code to do it for
us...

Ron AC7AC



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Tom Childers, N5GE
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:03:27 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Then there are those of us who set the AF gain and forget it, since we
use the RF gain control to adjust the volume for each signal. 

Whether or not the sidetone level tracks the audio gain is of little
concern. 

We turn off the AGC, so its characteristics are of no consequence.

We give *real* signal reports based on what we hear, not on what an
S-Meter tells us.

There's a reason why a great many radiomen have preferred to operate
that way over the years. For many of us, it's the easiest, fastest, and
surest way to hear signals at their best. 

Frequently it's easier to do the simple stuff ourselves instead of
expecting a box of parts and a gazillion lines of code to do it for
us...

Ron AC7AC

Exactly.

Tom, N5GE - SWOT 3537 - Grid EM12jq

Those who would give up 
Essential Liberty to 
purchase a little Temporary 
Safety deserve neither 
Liberty nor Safety 

An excerpt from a letter 
written in 1755 from the 
Assembly to the Governor 
of Pennsylvania.

Support the entire Constitution, not 
just the parts you like.

http://www.n5ge.com
http://www.eQSL.cc/Member.cfm?N5GE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Nick-WA5BDU
I hadn't noticed that they didn't track until this thread, so I guess 
status quo is OK with me.  Just now, I found that in swapping between 
speaker and phones, I do not feel the need to adjust the sidetone level.


While transmitting ... well, it can be disconcerting to start 
transmitting full QSK and the band noise is so loud you can't hear your 
sidetone.  But as one poster said, you could turn down the AF gain in 
that case as a quick interim cure. During noisy contests, I like the 
keep the sidetone level high.  A dedicated knob would be nice, but not 
worth the panel space for just that function.  I'm well pleased with the 
ease of accessing both pitch and sidetone level -- much easier than on 
the FT-1000 I sold to buy the K3. 

Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that. 


Bonus opinion:  I like the CCW for less bandwidth of the Width control.

Can I have a little more banjo in the monitor?

73--Nick, WA5BDU


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq
Using a set of computer speakers which have their own gain control allows 
you to adjust the overall AF gain, including the sidetone then use the AF 
gain control on the K3 to adjust for band noise. That's how I avoid having 
to fiddle with the sidetone level.


Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Nick-WA5BDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions


I hadn't noticed that they didn't track until this thread, so I guess 
status quo is OK with me.  Just now, I found that in swapping between 
speaker and phones, I do not feel the need to adjust the sidetone level.


While transmitting ... well, it can be disconcerting to start transmitting 
full QSK and the band noise is so loud you can't hear your sidetone.  But 
as one poster said, you could turn down the AF gain in that case as a 
quick interim cure. During noisy contests, I like the keep the sidetone 
level high.  A dedicated knob would be nice, but not worth the panel space 
for just that function.  I'm well pleased with the ease of accessing both 
pitch and sidetone level -- much easier than on the FT-1000 I sold to buy 
the K3.

Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that.
Bonus opinion:  I like the CCW for less bandwidth of the Width control.

Can I have a little more banjo in the monitor?

73--Nick, WA5BDU


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 
270.5.6/1578 - Release Date: 7/28/2008 5:13 PM






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread Jim Brown
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:42:17 -0400, n4lq wrote:

Using a set of computer speakers which have their own gain control 

Most speakers with built-in electronics have RFI problems!

73,

Jim K9YC



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread drewko1
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:21:17 -0500, Nick, WA5BDU wrote:


Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that. 


I wasn't suggesting that the ability to adjust sidetone pitch be
eliminated. Merely that we have the additional ability to
interactively adjust the pitch of the received signal. Yes, both
pitches are the same. But as it is now you cannot hear the effect on
the signal itself while adjusting PITCH-- the received audio is cut
off and the sidetone comes on. This makes it difficult to tell what
pitch is optimum for the particular signal and the given reception
conditions. 

IOW, I don't really care what the sidetone pitch is-- one is as good
as another. It is the offset pitch of the signal that is important. So
why not be able to adjust it for best copy under current conditions?
We can adjust the volume of a signal while listening to it; so why not
the pitch?  Depending on noise, QRM, keying characteristics, speed,
etc. you might want to alter the pitch for better copy. I think it
would be useful.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions

2008-07-28 Thread n4lq
How about eliminating the tone when pushing either pitch or mon and only 
producint the tone when pushing spot? That seems like a good compromise. 
That way we could change pitch or st level mid-QSO and still have the tone 
available when we want it.

Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Sidetone Monitor Preference Opinions



On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:21:17 -0500, Nick, WA5BDU wrote:



Adjust pitch without hearing it?  I can't imagine that.



I wasn't suggesting that the ability to adjust sidetone pitch be
eliminated. Merely that we have the additional ability to
interactively adjust the pitch of the received signal. Yes, both
pitches are the same. But as it is now you cannot hear the effect on
the signal itself while adjusting PITCH-- the received audio is cut
off and the sidetone comes on. This makes it difficult to tell what
pitch is optimum for the particular signal and the given reception
conditions.

IOW, I don't really care what the sidetone pitch is-- one is as good
as another. It is the offset pitch of the signal that is important. So
why not be able to adjust it for best copy under current conditions?
We can adjust the volume of a signal while listening to it; so why not
the pitch?  Depending on noise, QRM, keying characteristics, speed,
etc. you might want to alter the pitch for better copy. I think it
would be useful.

73,
Drew
AF2Z

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1578 - Release Date: 7/28/2008 
5:13 PM






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com