RE: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixe d si te
Thanks Daniel, All our clients are connecting to the new server without having to change their profiles, so I just need to ensure the first X5.5 server is removed correctly, yes? Sakti -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixed si te If you followed the Q article for removing the first server AND all clients have connected and been redirected to their new server, all is well. The only thing you may run into is if anyone had any pointers in their PF Favorites pointing to that old server. - Original Message - From: Sakti Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixed si te Hi all, Our organisation has a single site with two Exchange 5.5 servers and one Exchange 2000 server. We're almost at the stage when we're about to remove our first Exchange 5.5 server from the site. We have moved all users from this 5.5 server onto 2000. Our Outlook 2000 clients did not need any reconfiguration to connect to the new X2K server after their mailboxes were moved, but I read somewhere that removing the 5.5 server that they originally connected to would cause client connection problems. Does anyone know of any further detail on this subject? Any help appreciated Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K full-text indexing
Could there be a real-time (file-level) virus-scanning service kicking in as soon as they are created and preventing them being released for deletion by the indexing service in time? -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 23:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing Thanks Mike, This is a very good article, but unfotunatly doesen't answer my question: why I have *.xls files cloging my hard drive in the temp directory for the indexing service (and ONLY excel files). All other paths for the service are pointing to other drives. Hmmm, I suppose for some odd reason it is not cleaning up after itself. /Peter -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Peter Szabo Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing Peter, There's an article (http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestIndexing .asp) that describes the file locations and functions. This should tell you all you need to know. I ended up using a utility called Catutil to move the index file locations off my C: drive altogether. Regards, Mike Scott EPS -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 00:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K full-text indexing Hi, I have 2 E2K sp1 w2k sp2 servers with full-text indexing enabled on the private store. One of them went down the other day reporting c: drive full. After some seaching we found 5 GB worth of Exel files in c:\winnt\temp\gthrsvc. It is looks like when the indexing is running it will make a copy of all exel files found in the store. Checked the other server and it is the same. Deleting the files did not seems to have any advers effect on the server but I'm not looking forward to delete them manualy. The name of the files are the original name prepended by a hex number, like A56Bmyoriginalfile.xls. I checked technet w/o any luck. Did somebody see this problem? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: migrating from 5.5 to e2k (public folders)
OWA 2000 can not access PFs on 55 servers so if they use OWA much it could be a problem (unless you set the 55 box as their front-end server for OWA) Ensure that you run an IS/DS adjust to remove unknown permissions from both PFs and mailboxes prior to the moves you have a good chance of avoiding most problems. When it comes to users actually authenticating with their AD accounts, use something like the ADMT to repermission all the mailboxes so that the AD account (seen as SELF in AD UC) is the primary NT account as seen by the 55 servers. It shouldn't be necessary to repermission the public folders at all for client permissions. If you do get problems read Paul Bowden's document on PFs from www.exinternals.com Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Alex Kasyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 18:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: migrating from 5.5 to e2k (public folders) this weekend i am going to move the mailboxes from our ex 5.5 server to e2k (they are in 1 site but in 2 different domains). users still access the mailboxes with their nt 4.0 user accounts until end of september. the public folder store will be located on the 5.5 server for approx. 2 months. client permissions on the folders have been set under nt4.0/ex5.5. replication between 5.5 and e2k has been set up. will there any problems arise if i do migration in the above stated way (public folder access)? do i have to set/replace the permissions (pf) again when the win2k accounts are enabled? thanks in advance for your answers. Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixe d si te
Yep. - Original Message - From: Sakti Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:22 AM Subject: RE: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixe d si te Thanks Daniel, All our clients are connecting to the new server without having to change their profiles, so I just need to ensure the first X5.5 server is removed correctly, yes? Sakti -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2001 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixed si te If you followed the Q article for removing the first server AND all clients have connected and been redirected to their new server, all is well. The only thing you may run into is if anyone had any pointers in their PF Favorites pointing to that old server. - Original Message - From: Sakti Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: repercussions of removing first Exchange 5.5 server from mixed si te Hi all, Our organisation has a single site with two Exchange 5.5 servers and one Exchange 2000 server. We're almost at the stage when we're about to remove our first Exchange 5.5 server from the site. We have moved all users from this 5.5 server onto 2000. Our Outlook 2000 clients did not need any reconfiguration to connect to the new X2K server after their mailboxes were moved, but I read somewhere that removing the 5.5 server that they originally connected to would cause client connection problems. Does anyone know of any further detail on this subject? Any help appreciated Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2000 losing a email as it being created
Has anyone experienced a problem with Outlook 2000 connecting to Exchange 5.5 sp4 and receiving the error 'The messaging interface has returned an unknown error. If the problem persists, restart Outlook.' when composing large emails (it loses the new email). Article Q275/1/86 refers to this error but to when forwarding emails not creating them, and the check list given does not apply to the users outlook configuration. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony. (01) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MXS 5.5 Sp4 on WinNT 4/6a - IS problem 0x8004011b
Hy, today i recieved a message from one of my coworkers. She sent it to a local dl. Neither me nor anyone other who received it can delete/read/move this message. Outlook just coming up with Unknown error. The local MXS is logging this: ID 1025 MSExchangeIS Private An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcTestMsgRestriction Error: 0x8004011b An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcTestMsgRestriction Error: 0x8004011b An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcTestMsgRestriction Error: 0x8004011b Archive Deja.com kb leads me to the assumption that isinteg might do something good, but what is this error about and why is it showing up from nowhere ? Thanks. This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SV: How to lookup Exchange SMTP addresses for a specified mailbox alias
This VBScript should work on any LDAP server, although the LdapURL is made for Exchange 5.5 in this example. dim rsRecipient, stSearchString Set oArgs = WScript.Arguments stSearchString = oArgs(0) Set conn = CreateObject(ADODB.Connection) conn.Open Provider=ADSDSOObject strQuery = LDAP://yourServer/cn=Recipients,ou=yourSite,o=yourOrg;((objectClas s=organizationalPerson)(rdn= stSearchString ));mail;subtree Set rsRecipient = CreateObject(ADODB.Recordset) rsRecipient.PageSize = 10 rsRecipient.Open strQuery, conn rsRecipient.MoveFirst do while not rsRecipient.EOF on Error Resume Next WScript.Echo rsRecipient.fields(0) rsRecipient.MoveNext loop rsRecipient.Close conn.Close Set rsRecipient = Nothing Set conn = Nothing Ronny Lundberg, MCSEhttp://www.forv.mh.se/IT/RonnyLundberg Dep. of IT-Services http://www.forv.mh.se/IT Mid Sweden University mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Holmgatan 10Phone: +46 (0)60-148766 851 70 SundsvallMobile:+46 (0)70-5588930 Sweden Fax: +46 (0)60-148950 -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Skickat: den 28 augusti 2001 20:40 Till: Exchange Discussions Ämne: How to lookup Exchange SMTP addresses for a specified mailbox alias I'm writing an ASP page that is going to run on an IIS server (versions 4 and 5). This ASP page needs to be able to look up the SMTP address(es) for a specified mailbox alias on Exchange 5.5 and 2000. I wrote some code to do it using LDAP and Active Directory for Exchange 2000 but I'm struggling to find a way to do it in Exchange 5.5. Anyone do this before or have any ideas? Also, is there a way to programmatically determine if I'm connected to an Exchange 2000 server or an Exchange 5.5 server? Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer
no way to turn it off on an individual message? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will. - -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer Tell me about it. I actually have to do their there dirty work and be subjected to the wrath of all e-mail recipients who receive the long ass disclaimer Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 16:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer Frickin' lawyers... -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer It's certainly not morally defensible. In a court of law, however... Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Go around the barn at high noon to avoid colloquialisms. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer I'm not sure it's defensible -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Don't Treat Me Any Differently Than You Would the Queen - -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer that's a heck of a disclaimer. They're basically not responsible, even if they knowingly send a virus... Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Aristotle, so far as I know, was the first man to proclaim explicitly that man is a rational animal. His reason for this view was one which does not now seem very impressive; it was, that some people can do sums. -- Bertrand Russell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer I am not the intended recipient of this message. Please destroy your mail server. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 disclaimer How, everyone has diredted me to the FAQ's be I haven't found anything detailed enough, or nor requiring a registry hack which I would like to avoid if possible Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this message is confidential and proprietary to DataSynapse, Inc. and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this information, you are hereby notified that the use, circulation, quoting, or reproducing of it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ACCURACY, ADEQUACY, OR ANY OTHER KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. DATASYNAPSE, INC. SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR FOR LOST PROFITS OR REVENUES, IN CONNECTION WITH ITS TRANSMISSION OF, OR THE RECIPIENT'S OR ANY THIRD PARTY'S USE OF AND/OR RELIANCE ON, THIS INFORMATION, REGARDLESS OF LEGAL THEORY AND WHETHER OR NOT DATASYNAPSE, INC. HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet.com format error
I tried to send the reply below to the list. When I hit reply, it was in HTML format because that's what the original message was in. My message bounced with this error: quote Sorry, your stylized text, or HTML mail can not be distributed through the Internet.Com. The only acceptable format for posting to the Internet.Com is ASCII Text. Please, re-send your post to continue your discussion on the Internet.Com. /quote Huh? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Life's golden age is when the kids are too old to need baby-sitters and too young to borrow the family car. - -Original Message- From: Sharik, Michèle Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:10 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Enterprise Calendar by Tom Howe http://support.microsoft.com/directory/directory/phonepro.asp?sd=gn -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to think people are laughing WITH you. - -Original Message- From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Enterprise Calendar by Tom Howe PSS? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Enterprise Calendar by Tom Howe I think that's gonna be one for PSS. - Original Message - From: Saul Gonzalez To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:52 PM Subject: Enterprise Calendar by Tom Howe I have been trying to configure this and have hit a point in where I can't go further. I am receiving the following error message. Do you know what this is? IF you don't see the picture here is what the error says; Error: Object or data matching the name, range, or selection criteria was not found within the scope of this operation. (-2148217895). I get this error when I try to add the event registration to all users. I do have access to everyone's calendar since I can see them and have owner permissions to them. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Backup
Pete, I need Exchange administrator running on the backup server along with the same Exchange SP as the Exchange server is running, is there anything else? Thank you, Gordon -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup I'm not using Windows 2000 server but am on NT 4.0 SP5. We use NTBACKUP to backup all our Exchange servers on the nightly basis. I send the corresponding log files to my account for verification on the daily basis using BLAT. You can create a command procedure and use the AT scheduler to launch the program at a designated time on the nightly basis. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Backup I am having so many problems with Backup exec, I am disgusted with it. Is anyone using NT Backup for exchange? Is there anything I should know? I don't care about the Brick level backup anymore, I just want to know that I can restore without a bunch of hassels in case of a disaster. Does anyone have any suggestions for scheduling? I will be using Windows 2000 server and DLT drive. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K full-text indexing
Nop. The other apps on this box are ScanMail 5.0 and BE 8.5 client. /Peter -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing Could there be a real-time (file-level) virus-scanning service kicking in as soon as they are created and preventing them being released for deletion by the indexing service in time? -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 23:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing Thanks Mike, This is a very good article, but unfotunatly doesen't answer my question: why I have *.xls files cloging my hard drive in the temp directory for the indexing service (and ONLY excel files). All other paths for the service are pointing to other drives. Hmmm, I suppose for some odd reason it is not cleaning up after itself. /Peter -Original Message- From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Peter Szabo Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing Peter, There's an article (http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestIndexing .asp) that describes the file locations and functions. This should tell you all you need to know. I ended up using a utility called Catutil to move the index file locations off my C: drive altogether. Regards, Mike Scott EPS -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 00:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K full-text indexing Hi, I have 2 E2K sp1 w2k sp2 servers with full-text indexing enabled on the private store. One of them went down the other day reporting c: drive full. After some seaching we found 5 GB worth of Exel files in c:\winnt\temp\gthrsvc. It is looks like when the indexing is running it will make a copy of all exel files found in the store. Checked the other server and it is the same. Deleting the files did not seems to have any advers effect on the server but I'm not looking forward to delete them manualy. The name of the files are the original name prepended by a hex number, like A56Bmyoriginalfile.xls. I checked technet w/o any luck. Did somebody see this problem? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT Backup
make sure you put the Exchange Service packs on..they update the ntbackup dll's. dave -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup Actually, you do not need to install the admin program on the server in order to do remote Exch aware backups with NTBACKUP. If you do a search in Technet, you'll find that you only need NTBACKUP, a dll and two other files to make it happen. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup Pete, I need Exchange administrator running on the backup server along with the same Exchange SP as the Exchange server is running, is there anything else? Thank you, Gordon -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT Backup I'm not using Windows 2000 server but am on NT 4.0 SP5. We use NTBACKUP to backup all our Exchange servers on the nightly basis. I send the corresponding log files to my account for verification on the daily basis using BLAT. You can create a command procedure and use the AT scheduler to launch the program at a designated time on the nightly basis. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT Backup I am having so many problems with Backup exec, I am disgusted with it. Is anyone using NT Backup for exchange? Is there anything I should know? I don't care about the Brick level backup anymore, I just want to know that I can restore without a bunch of hassels in case of a disaster. Does anyone have any suggestions for scheduling? I will be using Windows 2000 server and DLT drive. Any hints or suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
If that's the case, then why would an ISP ever use Exchange as their Email server? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: User Friendly Exchange List
I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
Because you can't change it in any other major product, either. This is a client-side issue. I can put whatever I want in it, no matter what type of SMTP box I'm bouncing it off, as long as it's open for me to relay through. It's no different from the subject line or the to: line. I can type rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] data from: Ronald McDonald to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [bunch of text][cr].[cr] and it will go through just fine. per rfc. -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 09:36 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address If that's the case, then why would an ISP ever use Exchange as their Email server? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
I respect the sentiment, Larry. Perhaps someone (not me! I'm overworked and far too lazy) ought to write a FAQ along the lines of the [glowing adjective] Andrew S. Baker's [glowing adjective] http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=~Help.TXT from his [glowing adjective] knowledge base. But I submit that between: 1. This list [has incredibly knowlegeable people, but the atmosphere can seem unfriendly, impolite, and insensitive] 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] 3. microsoft.public.exchange.* or microsoft.public.exchange2000.* [friendlier, also with incredibly knowledgeable people, but hey, it's Usenet] and 4. PSS [accurate, quick, friendly, and professional, but it's $245 per call] ...you will be reinventing the wheel. I wish you luck, though. Between usenet, and the two groups listed above, I think all of the MVPs extant are regular contributors and provide a great wealth of information. -tom -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 09:47 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: User Friendly Exchange List Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
But then what about my 401K? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? honest question Have you even posted to this list? You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
What to do *Before* you post: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxd.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Invisible Man of La Mancha- Don Quixote discovers a mysterious elixir which renders him invisible. He proceeds to go on a mad rampage of corruption and terror, attacking innocent people in the streets and all the while singing To fight the Invisible Man! until he is finally stopped by a windmill. - -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: User Friendly Exchange List
Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
/lurk Long live this nasty a** list. The attitude of this list is one of it's most valued properties. As a new admin (in the exchange realm) this list has forced me to be very, very diligent in my study and in the administration on my company's investment. If this list should become user friendly it will loose the school master appeal. I'm sure that we all have a school master that we would like to go back and thank 10 or 15 years on. just my $.02 --steve lurk -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
for the first question, RTM is available for certian people :-) for the second question, this is what I am looking for. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:36 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
That's because I haven't spent enough time there... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Awww man... Who let this piece of road kill in here? ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Hello. - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:45 Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Well at least someone is learning around here... Well somewhat anyway, there's still work to be done for this one. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I love this list even though I get flammed on a constant basis :) :) wo ho!!. But 8 times out of 10 people are willing to help you out or point you in the right direction. I'm immune to the flames by now and laugh at some of them. They use to piss me off but now I just take it in stride. There is alot of experience on this list and I don't know how many times it's helped me out. Just my .02 cents. Wh's your daddy?? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Part of the problem today is that there are a lot of users and beginning sysadmins who did not grow up in the era of Each List / Usenet group has a FAQ that should be read, completely and thoroughly, before asking a question. This is one of the few lists that I've seen that still holds to that idiom, though many Usenet groups still do. I, for one, love this list for that reason. I get tired of lists that constantly rehash the same information over and over from people who are too lazy to do some research on their own. JoeP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List What to do *Before* you post: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxd.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Invisible Man of La Mancha- Don Quixote discovers a mysterious elixir which renders him invisible. He proceeds to go on a mad rampage of corruption and terror, attacking innocent people in the streets and all the while singing To fight the Invisible Man! until he is finally stopped by a windmill. - -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Perhaps you also have a certian (sic) support number for help on that product? - Original Message - From: Mark Hanji [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp for the first question, RTM is available for certian people :-) for the second question, this is what I am looking for. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:36 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
Thanks Chris, that's what I guessed the answer was. I did receive your message, although the address was slightly different from what your message said it would be. I will take a couple of NO-DOZE and read those RFCs. -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address Because that's how SMTP mail works? [EMAIL PROTECTED] just sent you a mail message in a completely RFC compliant manner.. and I'm fairly sure he wasn't logged onto your network or using a POP3 client at the time. RFC821 822 explain it all in amazing detail. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address If that's the case, then why would an ISP ever use Exchange as their Email server? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Do you use Exchange? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Perhaps you also have a certian (sic) support number for help on that product? - Original Message - From: Mark Hanji [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp for the first question, RTM is available for certian people :-) for the second question, this is what I am looking for. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:36 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Exchange 5.5 works great on Windows XP. I've been using Windows XP RC1 and no issues with it. Raj Grewal, MCSE, CNE5, CNA4.11, Network+ Network Analyst Playboy Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 751-8000 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Perhaps you also have a certian (sic) support number for help on that product? - Original Message - From: Mark Hanji [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp for the first question, RTM is available for certian people :-) for the second question, this is what I am looking for. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:36 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Goodbye -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Hello. - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:45 Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
Really? - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 18:43 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Well, you know our motto: Test everything first on your production box. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Thanks allot. I hope I wont crash my servers while adding mailbox from my XP station. - Original Message - From: Grewal, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 18:28 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Exchange 5.5 works great on Windows XP. I've been using Windows XP RC1 and no issues with it. Raj Grewal, MCSE, CNE5, CNA4.11, Network+ Network Analyst Playboy Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 751-8000 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Perhaps you also have a certian (sic) support number for help on that product? - Original Message - From: Mark Hanji [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp for the first question, RTM is available for certian people :-) for the second question, this is what I am looking for. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 17:36 Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Is XP Pro publicly available yet? I thought it was still in beta? If it's still in beta, what do the beta support people say? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The real measure of your wealth is how much you'd be worth if you lost all your money. -- Anonymous - -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Hello. I am trying to install the Exchange 5.5 admin program on windows xp pro. It tells me there are known issues with back office 4 and 4.5. the details button doesn't help allot. Can anyone please point those known issues?! Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Restore of directory.
Hi all, Exchange 5.5 on NT 4. Veritas Backup Exec and TSM/ADSM backup solution. We had some issues recently where we had a corrupted directory on a server and I had a brain cramp in implementing the restore. Looking back, it was definitely an oversight on my part, however even after the 20/20 hindsight, I see no easy way around the problem. We were doing service pack updates on all of our servers from NT SP4 to NT SP6a and then from Exchange SP2 to SP4. Prior to packing the servers I had an online and offline back available. This was server number 18 out of 19. Work had been commencing over a 3 month period and all our servers are on Compaq proliants with the same h/w and s/w configuration. Installed both NT SP6a and Exchange SP4 on this particular server with no unusual entries in the event logs. However on the next backup of the directory using backup exec, started getting the following -1018 errors: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Database Page Cache Event ID: 118 Date: 8/12/2001 Time: 11:50:27 AM User: N/A Computer: CAEEXP01 Description: MSExchangeDS (471) Direct read found corrupted page (25075) with error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup. The indication in technet was that there is a hardware issue. At that point, using perfopt, moved the directory around to different physical/logical hard drives. Also ran the eseutil with the verify switch. Moving the directory around still caused the above error and the eseutil program returned no errors. At this point I tried using the TSM/ADSM backup solution that we were rolling out and this caused the same -1018 error. This pretty much told me that there was no issue with the backup solution and sort of exonerated the h/w. At this point I decided to do a restore of the directory from the last good backup I had, which was the night prior to the service pack work. I placed the tape in and kicked of the restore. Now for all of you reading along, this is where you go You can't do that. The braincramp is that the server is at NT SP6a and Exchange SP4 now and the backup set is at NT SP4 and Exchange SP2. The disaster recovery whitepaper specifically states that the service pack levels need to be the same as the backed up copy. I also realized that after I kicked of the restore. The restore finished successfully and all I need to do was start the directory. At this point, I said just let me see what happens. I had an online and offline backup of the corrupted directory and could return to the point I was prior to doing the restore. After starting the directory it started replaying log files and the came up with the following error: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 134 Date: 8/25/2001 Time: 2:22:18 PM User: N/A Computer: CAEEXP01 Description: (501) The database s:\exchsrvr\DSADATA\dir.edb created at 10/22/1997 20:51:54 was not recovered. After that, I got a bunch of table rebuilds indicating that something was aware that the restored directory was NT SP4 and the OS was now NT SP6a. After that everything came up smoothly. No errors anywhere in sight. I then performed a backup and it worked w/o and errors on both backup exec and the TSM/ADSM backups. I really don't understand the above error. Anybody have any insights on that one? I guess my question is, is the directory all right or should I run as fast as I can to the server an turned it off before it poisons my entire organization. Thank You! Michael Semiglia Exchange E-mail Engineering *207 575-1094 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Plain Text Only
Did he go into IE and mess with the color settings maybe? What happens when you view a web page? -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only No, we're a small shop with limited resources. We just added 3 new people and I was scraping the bottom of the barrel to scrounge up machines for them. We will not be able to buy anything new until after the new year. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only can you build him another machine to use while you figure out what's wrong with this one? surely that would be less disruptive to your user? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - No fight for liberty ever stays won. - Roger Baldwin, founder of the ACLU - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Correct, but he never uses any other machine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only This user can receive HTML ok on a different machine? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You sound reasonable...Time to up my medication. - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only I've put two different ones in. A Matrox and an ATI. I suspect it is something in the BIOS, which is not something I am prepared to deal with. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only So if you completely wipe the disk clean. Reinstall Windows (without installing anything else), you still cannot change the video mode? What kind of card is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Already been done. Didn't help. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only It means wipe the drive start over! :0) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Behind every successful woman . . . is a substantial amount of coffee. -Stephanie Piro - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only If I could identify the problem, I could solve it. All HTML messages come out with a black background. I've replaced the video board and the monitor, but have had no luck. The machine will not display in anything but 16 colors, 640 x 480. Format C: /U? - What does this mean? ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Format C: /U? So what is the problem with this users machine and why cant he view HTML? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Outlook 2000 w/ E2k. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only What are you using now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Sorry, not an option. We don't have that available. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Have them use
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
Well, for one thing, I don't think they do. For another, the address itself isn't being forged, it's the display name, isn't it? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved... the ones who never yawn and say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars. - Jack Kerouac -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address If that's the case, then why would an ISP ever use Exchange as their Email server? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
point being, if I leave the list, don't I lose my investment in it, yuk yuk. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] o__, | /\ Talk to the hand! that's between you your accountant! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Life's golden age is when the kids are too old to need baby-sitters and too young to borrow the family car. - -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List But then what about my 401K? Dale L. Orr Network Administrator DoD Polygraph Institute -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can never tell which way the train went by looking at the track. - -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
LOL!! I wasn't FAQing you, Larry! It was just meant as a supplement to your post. :-) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Don't be so superstitious. - Famous Last Words - -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Michèle, I have never been FAQ'ed before. First time for everything. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List What to do *Before* you post: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxd.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Invisible Man of La Mancha- Don Quixote discovers a mysterious elixir which renders him invisible. He proceeds to go on a mad rampage of corruption and terror, attacking innocent people in the streets and all the while singing To fight the Invisible Man! until he is finally stopped by a windmill. - -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp
if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. thanks -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Oh... oh YEAH? Well, we didn't even HAVE water! We had to *make* it from its constituent elements! We'd inhale a hydrogen/oxygen mix, and then swallow a match! And we were glad to have it, too! Feh! You spoiled kids and your ready-made liquids - Mike, in response to a quote posted at www.inpassing.org - -Original Message- From: ian midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 admin program on windowsxp Usually the official beta and RTM programs come with extensive instructions on how to post bug reports through official channels. Obviously Microsoft are keen to ensure that they catch as many bugs as possible before going gold. If you are on an official program, report back as you have been told. Else, stop playing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: User Friendly Exchange List
Only 30 hours a day to spend, don't we? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:14 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List That's because I haven't spent enough time there... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Does the subscription message for this list NOT direct users to look at the FAQ? Read it. Love it. Live it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The Bible is not my Book and Christianity is not my religion. I could never give assent to the long complicated statements of Christian dogma. (Abraham Lincoln) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Part of the problem today is that there are a lot of users and beginning sysadmins who did not grow up in the era of Each List / Usenet group has a FAQ that should be read, completely and thoroughly, before asking a question. This is one of the few lists that I've seen that still holds to that idiom, though many Usenet groups still do. I, for one, love this list for that reason. I get tired of lists that constantly rehash the same information over and over from people who are too lazy to do some research on their own. JoeP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List What to do *Before* you post: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxd.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Invisible Man of La Mancha- Don Quixote discovers a mysterious elixir which renders him invisible. He proceeds to go on a mad rampage of corruption and terror, attacking innocent people in the streets and all the while singing To fight the Invisible Man! until he is finally stopped by a windmill. - -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Something like that... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Only 30 hours a day to spend, don't we? -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:14 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List That's because I haven't spent enough time there... ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Thank you Tom :) You know it isn't easy to be the judge all the time, but for the two years the Exchange 2000 list has running now, flames have been kept to almost nil :) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- 2. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Exchange2000 [Martin tries to keep flames down, also with incredibly knowledgeable people] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Plain Text Only
eh? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herrick, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Every user who can start Outlook is an Exchange Expert!! Michael Herrick Groton CIT Messaging Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address
No, the underlying SMTP address is the one for the displayed name. Anyway, I've come to find out it's just the nature of SMTP. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address Well, for one thing, I don't think they do. For another, the address itself isn't being forged, it's the display name, isn't it? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved... the ones who never yawn and say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars. - Jack Kerouac -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address If that's the case, then why would an ISP ever use Exchange as their Email server? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address I don't believe you can. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you are whispering when you are not. - -Original Message- From: McCrary Earl Contr 411 FLTS/TSF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address How can I prevent a POP3 email client from using another user's SMTP address in the From: field of an email message? Here's the situation: When configuring a POP3 email client on a networked connected workstation using a valid network user account; I can configure the POP3 client to use any users' Exchange container name as the username (blank password) and once configured, send an email to the Exchange Server IMS connector for delivery via SMTP. The email arrives at the destination with the forged user's address in the FROM field. Is there some setting on the IMS connector to prevent this? Earl McCrary, MCSE, CCNA F-22 Combined Test Force CSC, Federal Sector - Defense Group 661.277.7993 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Restore of directory.
I guess I forgot to mention that I looked at that. I got misled because the error states that the signature may get altered through an offline defrag. I didn't do anything like that. However, the database was probably given a different signature due to the service pack upgrades. That still leaves open the question that the service pack level was different than the restored file service pack level. This is in contradiction to what the exchange disaster recovery whitepaper states. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore of directory. Article Q191357 has a description of that error that may be helpful. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore of directory. Hi all, Exchange 5.5 on NT 4. Veritas Backup Exec and TSM/ADSM backup solution. We had some issues recently where we had a corrupted directory on a server and I had a brain cramp in implementing the restore. Looking back, it was definitely an oversight on my part, however even after the 20/20 hindsight, I see no easy way around the problem. We were doing service pack updates on all of our servers from NT SP4 to NT SP6a and then from Exchange SP2 to SP4. Prior to packing the servers I had an online and offline back available. This was server number 18 out of 19. Work had been commencing over a 3 month period and all our servers are on Compaq proliants with the same h/w and s/w configuration. Installed both NT SP6a and Exchange SP4 on this particular server with no unusual entries in the event logs. However on the next backup of the directory using backup exec, started getting the following -1018 errors: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Database Page Cache Event ID: 118 Date: 8/12/2001 Time: 11:50:27 AM User: N/A Computer: CAEEXP01 Description: MSExchangeDS (471) Direct read found corrupted page (25075) with error -1018. Please restore the databases from a previous backup. The indication in technet was that there is a hardware issue. At that point, using perfopt, moved the directory around to different physical/logical hard drives. Also ran the eseutil with the verify switch. Moving the directory around still caused the above error and the eseutil program returned no errors. At this point I tried using the TSM/ADSM backup solution that we were rolling out and this caused the same -1018 error. This pretty much told me that there was no issue with the backup solution and sort of exonerated the h/w. At this point I decided to do a restore of the directory from the last good backup I had, which was the night prior to the service pack work. I placed the tape in and kicked of the restore. Now for all of you reading along, this is where you go You can't do that. The braincramp is that the server is at NT SP6a and Exchange SP4 now and the backup set is at NT SP4 and Exchange SP2. The disaster recovery whitepaper specifically states that the service pack levels need to be the same as the backed up copy. I also realized that after I kicked of the restore. The restore finished successfully and all I need to do was start the directory. At this point, I said just let me see what happens. I had an online and offline backup of the corrupted directory and could return to the point I was prior to doing the restore. After starting the directory it started replaying log files and the came up with the following error: Event Type: Error Event Source: ESE97 Event Category: Logging/Recovery Event ID: 134 Date: 8/25/2001 Time: 2:22:18 PM User: N/A Computer: CAEEXP01 Description: (501) The database s:\exchsrvr\DSADATA\dir.edb created at 10/22/1997 20:51:54 was not recovered. After that, I got a bunch of table rebuilds indicating that something was aware that the restored directory was NT SP4 and the OS was now NT SP6a. After that everything came up smoothly. No errors anywhere in sight. I then performed a backup and it worked w/o and errors on both backup exec and the TSM/ADSM backups. I really don't understand the above error. Anybody have any insights on that one? I guess my question is, is the directory all right or should I run as fast as I can to the server an turned it off before it poisons my entire organization. Thank You! Michael Semiglia Exchange E-mail Engineering *207 575-1094 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Nate, can you post the full text of your NDR? Also, have you checked MAPS or ORBZ to make sure you're not listed there? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Nate, what are the rules you are referring to? 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
The elders? How about a game of DD anyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
You'd be surprised ;) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel=20 free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
FW: User Friendly Exchange List
I want to be a wizard. An Exchange Wizard! Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The elders? How about a game of DD anyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
The way I roll dice, I'd end up as a retarded Orc with a lisp. Oops! That's not nice... John Allhiser MCSE CCNA Network Engineer Business Men's Assurance -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: User Friendly Exchange List I want to be a wizard. An Exchange Wizard! Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The elders? How about a game of DD anyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Mail Service
When I check the IMS Queue I see alot of mail messages that have been sitting in the Queue for days. The error (Network error during host resolution) I can not find any info from Technet. Any suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?
All, Is there any way of customising the Your mailbox is over its size limit message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4). As we do not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System administrator message from You may not be able to send or receive new mail to something more appropriate... Thanks, Marie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Offline Address Book
When trying to download the Offline Address Books, no selection appears in the list box in Outlook 2000. I have followed Microsoft's papers on setting up multiple address books, but they haven't worked. I have two recipients containers. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2000 losing a email as it being created
We had a problem a little while ago that we were unable to send any e-mails with a graphic or an attachment in it. If the message is open for editing long enough Outlook will try to save a copy to the Drafts folder until you send it and the Outlook would give back an error when it done that as well as if we sent it. I don't know how relevant this is for you but it may be something to look at. PS: the server problem turned out being a bad cable. Chris Hyche -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2000 losing a email as it being created Has anyone experienced a problem with Outlook 2000 connecting to Exchange 5.5 sp4 and receiving the error 'The messaging interface has returned an unknown error. If the problem persists, restart Outlook.' when composing large emails (it loses the new email). Article Q275/1/86 refers to this error but to when forwarding emails not creating them, and the check list given does not apply to the users outlook configuration. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Sony cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of Sony. (01) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox limit notification message - Exc55
Does anyone know how to change the Mailbox limit notification message that is sent automatically by the System Administrator when users exceed their storage limit. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Well, actually a user non-hostile exchange list IS a good idea, but you didn't have to create one. It already exists, a real LISTSERV (tm) list with searchable archives and everything! To subscribe send email to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe exchange-l firstname lastname in the body (YOUR first and last name) It's not as active, but it could be, and is certainly got a different tone. -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: User Friendly Exchange List I want to be a wizard. An Exchange Wizard! Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The elders? How about a game of DD anyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Chadowboxing: Debating back- and-forth as to how to count a close election. - -Original Message- From: Marie Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise? All, Is there any way of customising the Your mailbox is over its size limit message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4). As we do not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System administrator message from You may not be able to send or receive new mail to something more appropriate... Thanks, Marie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox limit notification message - Exc55
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Oh... oh YEAH? Well, we didn't even HAVE water! We had to *make* it from its constituent elements! We'd inhale a hydrogen/oxygen mix, and then swallow a match! And we were glad to have it, too! Feh! You spoiled kids and your ready-made liquids - Mike, in response to a quote posted at www.inpassing.org - -Original Message- From: Marie Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox limit notification message - Exc55 Does anyone know how to change the Mailbox limit notification message that is sent automatically by the System Administrator when users exceed their storage limit. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?
And if that link doesn't work, 3.35 Q: How do I change the NDR, storage limit warnings and other system generated warning or error messages generated by Exchange? A1: In Exchange 2000, you can use Event Sinks to programmatically change these. See MSDN. A2: By contracting with Microsoft Consulting Services (MCS) [plain English: Get out your wallet.] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise? http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Chadowboxing: Debating back- and-forth as to how to count a close election. - -Original Message- From: Marie Buckley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise? All, Is there any way of customising the Your mailbox is over its size limit message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4). As we do not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System administrator message from You may not be able to send or receive new mail to something more appropriate... Thanks, Marie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Mail Service
There is some sort of DNS error. Either your IMC server is not communicating properly with your DNS server, or the receiving server's DNS entry is wrong. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail Service When I check the IMS Queue I see alot of mail messages that have been sitting in the Queue for days. The error (Network error during host resolution) I can not find any info from Technet. Any suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?
hex editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/29/01 10:07AM All, Is there any way of customising the Your mailbox is over its size limit message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4). As we do not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System administrator message from You may not be able to send or receive new mail to something more appropriate... Thanks, Marie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise?
http://mlarchive.ima.com/msexchange/2000/Jul/2297.html It references a Q article that is only available for Premium support members. - Original Message - From: Marie Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:07 AM Subject: Mailbox size notification message - possible to customise? All, Is there any way of customising the Your mailbox is over its size limit message sent when mailbox storage limits are used (Exc 5.5 SP4). As we do not prohibit receiving mail we would like to change the text in the System administrator message from You may not be able to send or receive new mail to something more appropriate... Thanks, Marie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-¦-xm¶ÿà ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\ öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³ §ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.˱Êâmé[hæ¯yì\ ©àz[,Ã)ärÅÈZËZvh§+-iÙ¢Ì2G(
Re: Mailbox limit notification message - Exc55
http://mlarchive.ima.com/msexchange/2000/Jul/2297.html
It references a Q article that is only available for Premium support members.
- Original Message -
From: Marie Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know how to change the Mailbox limit notification message that
is sent automatically by the System Administrator when users exceed their
storage limit.
Ëi¢Ëb@Bm§ÿðà 0w ¢oëzÊ.Ç¿{!}ª¡¶`+r¯zÈm¶ÿÃ
,Ã)är¿²+^±æ«r ìyªÜ
«)N§²æìr¸zf¢Ú%y«Þ{!jx Ë0Êy ¢a1r§ââ²Ö)åËZvh§³ §Ê
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel=20 free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
I call them rules, but this may be a misnomer. They are configuration settings on the firewall which an admin can use to filter traffic to and from the Internet. Nate -- From: Andy David Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Nate, what are the rules you are referring to? 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Do you use Outlook? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Remember you're never too old to hold your father's hand. - Molly, age 11 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel=20 free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ:
FE/BE Setup
I have installed two Exchange 2000 Enterprise servers, one of them has been configurated as Front-End (FE) Server. After rebooting the FE Server, I use OWA and Internet Explorer i.e.: http://front-end/exchange/user1, then a window appears asking account and password. However, no matter what account/password I type, i cannot pass the authentication. I also open Internet Services Manager of the FE Server, and discover that inside the Default Web Site -public, Exchange, Exadmin appear as RED icons (error icons). They are pointed to M:\exchange_server\MBX, public folders, etc. However, all of these are on the BE server and it is not finding them. I have followed the Microsoft whitepaper for FE/BE configuration to the letter. What is it that I am missing? Please help . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Here you go Michele. === Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: from NSC Sent: 8/29/01 11:42 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Smith, John on 8/29/01 11:42 AM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=COMPANY NAME;l=NSCHQDNT50-010829164139Z-30386 === I will check MAPS and ORBZ. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Nate, can you post the full text of your NDR? Also, have you checked MAPS or ORBZ to make sure you're not listed there? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Outlook? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Do you use Outlook? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Remember you're never too old to hold your father's hand. - Molly, age 11 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list,
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Where'd you get that from? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel=20 free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. =20 =20 =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Nope, not a misnomer. That's what they're called. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net I call them rules, but this may be a misnomer. They are configuration settings on the firewall which an admin can use to filter traffic to and from the Internet. Nate -- From: Andy David Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Nate, what are the rules you are referring to? 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Michèle, I had to steal your talk to the hand. Not quite the same as the one that I saw the other day on a bumper. It had a picture of someone giving you the middle finger instead. Perhaps it could become the *official* icon of this list :) Sorry, I couldn't resist. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List o__, | /\ Talk to the hand! that's between you your accountant! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Life's golden age is when the kids are too old to need baby-sitters and too young to borrow the family car. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Plain Text Only
That's what I was just thinking.. Maybe try to reset to the defaults in Internet control panel? If you 'select-all' on the HTML email can you see anything? Black text on black background doesn't work :) Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neubauer, Joseph Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Did he go into IE and mess with the color settings maybe? What happens when you view a web page? -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only No, we're a small shop with limited resources. We just added 3 new people and I was scraping the bottom of the barrel to scrounge up machines for them. We will not be able to buy anything new until after the new year. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only can you build him another machine to use while you figure out what's wrong with this one? surely that would be less disruptive to your user? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - No fight for liberty ever stays won. - Roger Baldwin, founder of the ACLU - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Correct, but he never uses any other machine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only This user can receive HTML ok on a different machine? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You sound reasonable...Time to up my medication. - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only I've put two different ones in. A Matrox and an ATI. I suspect it is something in the BIOS, which is not something I am prepared to deal with. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only So if you completely wipe the disk clean. Reinstall Windows (without installing anything else), you still cannot change the video mode? What kind of card is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Already been done. Didn't help. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only It means wipe the drive start over! :0) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Behind every successful woman . . . is a substantial amount of coffee. -Stephanie Piro - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only If I could identify the problem, I could solve it. All HTML messages come out with a black background. I've replaced the video board and the monitor, but have had no luck. The machine will not display in anything but 16 colors, 640 x 480. Format C: /U? - What does this mean? ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Format C: /U? So what is the problem with this users machine and why cant he view HTML? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only Outlook 2000 w/ E2k. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Plain Text Only What are you using now? -Original Message-
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
No problem, Ken. I forget where I stole it from! :-) -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he/she knows absolutely everything about nothing. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Michèle, I had to steal your talk to the hand. Not quite the same as the one that I saw the other day on a bumper. It had a picture of someone giving you the middle finger instead. Perhaps it could become the *official* icon of this list :) Sorry, I couldn't resist. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List o__, | /\ Talk to the hand! that's between you your accountant! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Life's golden age is when the kids are too old to need baby-sitters and too young to borrow the family car. - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
The O is for Outlook. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net If you have a lot of tension and you get a headache, do what it says on the aspirin bottle:.. Take two aspirin and Keep away from children. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Outlook? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Do you use Outlook? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Remember you're never too old to hold your father's hand. - Molly, age 11 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly
RE: Offline Address Book
Matt, Do you see any errors in the Event log? I had a similar problem and had Failure to generate offline address book errors in the event log. Searched the Microsoft KB and found the fix. Sorry, I don't have the article # offhand. -Mary -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline Address Book When trying to download the Offline Address Books, no selection appears in the list box in Outlook 2000. I have followed Microsoft's papers on setting up multiple address books, but they haven't worked. I have two recipients containers. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net
Yes, but what are the rules specifically? Your statement seems to imply that your firewall has something unusual setup. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net I call them rules, but this may be a misnomer. They are configuration settings on the firewall which an admin can use to filter traffic to and from the Internet. Nate -- From: Andy David Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Nate, what are the rules you are referring to? 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Michele, We have a Checkpoint firewall on our side. I did try contacting Earthlink and after dealing with them for a while I felt like I had passed through a gauntlet of no help. Very frustrating. Nate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC problem with Earthlink.net what kind of firewall? PIX? UUNet is known as a spam haven, so it's possible that this server is blocking all traffic from them. You could always use the telephone to call the admin of that box find out. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. - -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC problem with Earthlink.net Scenario: MS Exchange 5.5. SP4 MS Exchange/Outlook 98 for the clients. IMC through UU.NET Here is what I am encountering: 1) IMC functions fine for just about everyone we send to EXCEPT Earthlink.net 2) Based on the rules we have setup on the firewall the messages for Earthlink are leaving the firewall destined most often for mx00.earthlink.net. 3) When we send to earthlink.net addresses we get: Unable to deliver the message due to a communications error 4) Our ISP engineer and they can send email to earthlink from the firewall as a company.com address so they tell me. However, anyone from inside the firewall sending to earthlink.com gets kicked back with the above error code. 5) It seems that something on the earthlink.net side does not like whatever MS Exchange is doing to the outbound messages. Inbound works fine so far. Headers reveal that earthlink.net is using: 220 eagle EL_3_4_2 /EL_3_4_1 ESMTP EarthLink SMTP Server 6) I have checked the IMC and found no filters nor any weird configuration (I haven't changed anything on the setup for the IMC in months and this whole thing started up about four weeks ago. 7) I haven't found anything in the archives, FAQ, or Technet for the above error code (at least nothing helpful). I am not seeing anything strange in the Event logs (not sure if I really would, but checked anyway just to be sure). 8) Message Tracking doesn't reveal much information as to why the message is not being delivered. 9) Earthlink.net Tech Support hasn't been much help to date. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this? My feeling is that either company.com is being blocked due to spam being sent from us (I checked UXN Spam Combat and did not find our domain listed, but did find UU.NET listed). Or, more likely the MS Exchange IMC and earthlink.net are not talking the same language. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
YES! Jessuu has spoken!! Slap my forehead now please -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 29, 2001 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Missy, You will probably find few by me as well other than NAI/McAfee related. I don't know about much else:) I have *learnt* quite alot from this list, you and Ed especially. Larry does bring up a good point though. This list does have a reputation that does not seem to occur on other lists that these same people are on (E2K list for one). As for the value of a list that Larry hosts, all I can speak to is the one that he set up for Scripting. He is every bit as knowledgeable about Scripting and SMS (as has already been pointed out) as anyone on this list is about Exchange. He gives of his time and skills and requires no more than you or Ed would in return. Only time will tell if there is a need for what Larry is proposing. As for why you do not see many post by me on this list, I have always tried to follow the advise found in JOB 13:5 If only you would be altogether silent, for you that would be wisdom. NIV Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those interested in joining this new list, you can
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Hello All, I'd just like to say that if I post to this a question to this list that seems to result from some careless misconception or something that I missed because I wasn't following instructions, PLEASE TELL ME. There is always the possibility that I have been proceeding in an idiotic fashion, and need to be stopped before I do any real damage to myself or others. In addition, if I pose any Frequently Asked Questions, I would apreciate being directed to where the canonical answer is recorded, just in case I was asking the wrong question, and to avoid any translations errors by a 2nd-hand explanations. Comparing the possibility of getting kicked in the butt once in a while with the prospect of having my Exchange server crash because of a mail loop and having to restore from a brick-level backup to a PDC without an adequately tested Disaster Recovery procedures seems a worse deal[1]. For me, my Company, my Users and my career. If someone gets on over on me, it's because I'm not on the ball. Not because I'm being picked on. Personally, if I need uncritical encouragement and self-esteem building validation of my personhood, I'll join a mailing list with this guy: http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA [1] Some of the stuff that could have happened to me before I started learning by reading this list -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List /lurk Long live this nasty a** list. The attitude of this list is one of it's most valued properties. As a new admin (in the exchange realm) this list has forced me to be very, very diligent in my study and in the administration on my company's investment. If this list should become user friendly it will loose the school master appeal. I'm sure that we all have a school master that we would like to go back and thank 10 or 15 years on. just my $.02 --steve lurk -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Consider yourself slapped. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax:(360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List YES! Jessuu has spoken!! Slap my forehead now please -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 29, 2001 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Missy, You will probably find few by me as well other than NAI/McAfee related. I don't know about much else:) I have *learnt* quite alot from this list, you and Ed especially. Larry does bring up a good point though. This list does have a reputation that does not seem to occur on other lists that these same people are on (E2K list for one). As for the value of a list that Larry hosts, all I can speak to is the one that he set up for Scripting. He is every bit as knowledgeable about Scripting and SMS (as has already been pointed out) as anyone on this list is about Exchange. He gives of his time and skills and requires no more than you or Ed would in return. Only time will tell if there is a need for what Larry is proposing. As for why you do not see many post by me on this list, I have always tried to follow the advise found in JOB 13:5 If only you would be altogether silent, for you that would be wisdom. NIV Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Do you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Do you use Outlook? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Remember you're never too old to hold your father's hand. - Molly, age 11 - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. =20 This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. =20 I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll=20 do the same for us. =20 For those
OWA F/E B/E Protocol Question
Per KB article (below) these ports must be opened for F/E B/E OWA to work (not included in the list is HTTP but that one's easy). My question is, assuming multiple Domain Controllers and a single GC - which servers need 88, 389, 445, 3268 available? All domain controllers or just the GC? From my understanding, 88, 389, 445 must be opened to all DCs. 3268 only to the GC. Then again, I'm not too bright. Thanks. Eric http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q280/1/32.ASP -- Enable Windows 2000 Server-based computers to log on to the domain through the firewall by opening the following ports for inbound traffic: 53 (User Datagram Protocol [UDP]) - Domain Name System (DNS). 88 (Transmission Control Protocol [TCP], UDP) - Kerberos authentication. 135 (TCP) - EndPointMapper. 389 (TCP, UDP) - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). 445 (TCP) - Server message block (SMB) for Netlogon, LDAP conversion and distributed file system (Dfs) discovery. 3268 (TCP) - LDAP to global catalog servers. One port for the Active Directory logon and directory replication interface (universally unique identifiers [UUIDs] 12345678-1234-abcd-ef00-01234567cffb and e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2), which is typically assigned port 1025 or 1026 during startup. This value is not set in the DSProxy or System attendant (MAD) source code, so you need to map the port in the registry and then open the port on the firewall. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
I'd hate to be the idiot who originally posted that question somewhere and then had it copied here without citation or permission... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Looks vaguely familiar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Where'd you get that from? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 - =20 =20 -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone = of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other=20 lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself=20 to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
nice site... :P If you need it again, here it is: FAQ. Read it. Love it. Live it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm (bookmarking is good) Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net On the other hand, you have different fingers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Hello All, I'd just like to say that if I post to this a question to this list that seems to result from some careless misconception or something that I missed because I wasn't following instructions, PLEASE TELL ME. There is always the possibility that I have been proceeding in an idiotic fashion, and need to be stopped before I do any real damage to myself or others. In addition, if I pose any Frequently Asked Questions, I would apreciate being directed to where the canonical answer is recorded, just in case I was asking the wrong question, and to avoid any translations errors by a 2nd-hand explanations. Comparing the possibility of getting kicked in the butt once in a while with the prospect of having my Exchange server crash because of a mail loop and having to restore from a brick-level backup to a PDC without an adequately tested Disaster Recovery procedures seems a worse deal[1]. For me, my Company, my Users and my career. If someone gets on over on me, it's because I'm not on the ball. Not because I'm being picked on. Personally, if I need uncritical encouragement and self-esteem building validation of my personhood, I'll join a mailing list with this guy: http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA [1] Some of the stuff that could have happened to me before I started learning by reading this list -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List /lurk Long live this nasty a** list. The attitude of this list is one of it's most valued properties. As a new admin (in the exchange realm) this list has forced me to be very, very diligent in my study and in the administration on my company's investment. If this list should become user friendly it will loose the school master appeal. I'm sure that we all have a school master that we would like to go back and thank 10 or 15 years on. just my $.02 --steve lurk -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: User Friendly Exchange List
You forgot the spellchecker. Martin - Original Message - From: Black, Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:42 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I don't think this list is hostile, you just have to phrase your question correctly and very short as they rarely get read past the first 10 words. So if you start by asking the question (in less than 10 words) then explain in detail later it helps the answers focus on the actual issue instead of getting goofy answers that don't apply to the question. ...But it helps to have a lead lined kevlar fire-proof suit of vanquishing magic. Nathan -Original Message- From: Lynne Seamans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Well, actually a user non-hostile exchange list IS a good idea, but you didn't have to create one. It already exists, a real LISTSERV (tm) list with searchable archives and everything! To subscribe send email to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe exchange-l firstname lastname in the body (YOUR first and last name) It's not as active, but it could be, and is certainly got a different tone. -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: User Friendly Exchange List I want to be a wizard. An Exchange Wizard! Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The elders? How about a game of DD anyone? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: August 29, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List The list is what it is. It has a reputation, and lives up to it, but if you do need help, it is an invaluable resource. People forget the one thing that could save them before they post to any list: subscribe for a few days to get the feel of it. Think before you post. I listened for a couple of weeks before I was brave enough to post a reply, and was quite honestly tickled when my answer was affirmed by one of the elders. -Original Message- From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User Friendly Exchange List I normally would never do such a thing, but after watching the tone of this group for some time now and seeing compliants on other lists about the abusive nature of it's elders, I've taken it upon myself to create an alternative Exchange mail list that will be user friendly, polite and sensitive to new Admin needs. This is not an attack on you or your methods, just a realization that different people learn different ways and it's time to have an alternative. I wish the Swynk Exchange mail list well, and I hope you'll do the same for us. For those interested in joining this new list, you can feel free to do so at: http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blocking a domain
I need to block an entire domain to stop spam. How do I do this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating from Lotus Notes to Exchange 5.5 Outlook
We will be moving 75 people off of their current network onto a new seperate network. They are currently using Lotus Notes for email and we will be using Exchange5.5 and Outlook. Any hints, tips, suggestions etc will be greatly appreciatredd. Michael G. Jones System Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to block messages from a spammer
Do you need to send three messages to ask us Jeezuz! IMC, Connections, Filtering I believe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karen Swart Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to block messages from a spammer
In the Connections container, open the properties page for your IMS server. Go the connections tab. In the Accept Connections section, click on the Advanced button. Enter the domain and select reject. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: User Friendly Exchange List
He's still around. Just busy with projects and such. M - Original Message - From: Byron Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:13 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Yeah, what ever happened to Mr. Woodrick? I miss his subtle approach to exchange excellence :) -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List I know who you are, Ken. :) In any case, my curiosity was really spurred by the intervention of someone who has not, in the past 18 months or so, posted to this list. I can check the archives back to the beginning, but that's really not my point at all. I do think that this list is often out of hand - and it's been up and down like this since I've been a member of it. Sometimes, the flames are wild, other times, we're all quite nice. The only thing that doesn't change is Ed. :) (It was even more fun when we had two Ed's!) In any case, a list for nice questions about Exchange is fine. Maybe even a newbie, or Jr. Admin list. The fact is, and you know this, that the stuff that's covered in the FAQ is covered in the FAQ. If someone wants to pay me to do consulting, I'll be happy to bring their business to the company where I work. When I first joined this list, it had a reputation. It is what it is. I miss Peter's quiet interventions, but, other than that, I think we're just fine. I'm rambling though. Later... - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:21 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Missy, You will probably find few by me as well other than NAI/McAfee related. I don't know about much else:) I have *learnt* quite alot from this list, you and Ed especially. Larry does bring up a good point though. This list does have a reputation that does not seem to occur on other lists that these same people are on (E2K list for one). As for the value of a list that Larry hosts, all I can speak to is the one that he set up for Scripting. He is every bit as knowledgeable about Scripting and SMS (as has already been pointed out) as anyone on this list is about Exchange. He gives of his time and skills and requires no more than you or Ed would in return. Only time will tell if there is a need for what Larry is proposing. As for why you do not see many post by me on this list, I have always tried to follow the advise found in JOB 13:5 If only you would be altogether silent, for you that would be wisdom. NIV Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:37 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:
RE: User Friendly Exchange List
Dude, we are just having some fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Oh, I just didn't put citation/permission/attribution in the in the body of my post, it was (and still is in the subject... My apologies to anyone offended, -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List I'd hate to be the idiot who originally posted that question somewhere and then had it copied here without citation or permission... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Looks vaguely familiar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Where'd you get that from? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List How do I add a disclaimer to my brick level backups? I'm using Arcserve. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List Not without you there -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List LOL, I don't imagine I'll find myself spending any time there either. Doesn't sound like it will be any fun. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: User Friendly Exchange List Gee, Larry, I can't find any posts by a Larry Duncan (or a Duncan, Larry or a Duncan, Lawrence or a Lawrence Duncan) in the archives that I currently have available. But they only go back to February 2000, so I guess you've been lurking for a couple years. Your answers below remind me of a certain smarmy congressman who was on TV a week or so ago. What's the whole answer here? I don't believe we're getting it. You're free to start your own list. I do hope it's a success. I don't think I'll be playing though. If I tire of this list, I can go visit the E2K one that Martin hosts, or the Sunbelt Software list, or the newsgroups, all of which offer additional Exchange information. Missy - Original Message - From: Larry A. Duncan MCP, MCT [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List See inline comments. Besides, Larry; Aren't you an SMS guru? Thanks for the compliment. Yes, SMS is my core competency. But any mail list is more than one person. honest question Have you even posted to this list? Yes, in the past I have. However, I'm on of the many that is turned off by the tone of the group. As such, I've changed my settings to webbased only and I now only refer to it on an as-needed basis. You're not trying to steal subscribers to a competing service, are you? HONEST RESPONSESteal? Steal? Are these users owned by you? The Internet offers a vast number of resource for people to use. I'm now providing a more user friendly environment for passing information regarding Exchange. If the users come, that that's their choice and perhaps a signal to this group that you can be excellent without attitude./HONEST RESPONSE /honest question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: User Friendly Exchange List =20 =20 I still maintain that if you don't like the services of this=20 list, just request a refund of your subscription fee. =20 -Mich=E8le Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Laws Murphy's Technology Law #1: You can=20 never tell which way the train went by looking at the track.=20 -
Re: I need to block messages from a spammer
Now Don, that's close to abusive. Be gentle, my sweet... - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: RE: I need to block messages from a spammer Do you need to send three messages to ask us Jeezuz! IMC, Connections, Filtering I believe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karen Swart Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to block messages from a spammer
IMS, Connections, Message Filtering -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karen Swart Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to block messages from a spammer
http://www.topica.com/lists/msexchange or FAQ 3.73 The link to the FAQ is at the bottom of all three messages that you sent. -- be - MOS You get along very well with everyone except animals and people. -Original Message- From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to block messages from a spammer Using Exchange 5.5, how do I block all messages from a specific domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
