rm files
what's a .rm file? Scanmail is going ballistic blocking those extensions... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: rm files
RealMovie/RealAudio www.real.com -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 April 2002 11:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: rm files what's a .rm file? Scanmail is going ballistic blocking those extensions... Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Clue. You've either got it, or you think all your helpdesk staff need to log into everyone's account every time theres an email trouble ticket. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Rome did not create a mighty empire by having management meetings -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students.
Event Log File
Hello, In Which Directory the Event Log file will be there for Exchange server 2000.I have registered one event sink for OnDelete,i want to see the event log file. If anyone knows about this pls let me know. regards Kumar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
And probably a cigarette afterwards. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700 From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the administrator I cannot delete any items from this mailbox. This is on an exchange 2000 SP2 environment. I get the following error The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. This is from both outlook 2000 and the OWA. Does anyone has any suggestions? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
try 'shift-del' -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the administrator I cannot delete any items from this mailbox. This is on an exchange 2000 SP2 environment. I get the following error The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. This is from both outlook 2000 and the OWA. Does anyone has any suggestions? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Sure.. Give me a few minutes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Beyond SSM status. Roger? I demand to see the test results. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
Yes, that worked. Thanks! Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox try 'shift-del' -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the administrator I cannot delete any items from this mailbox. This is on an exchange 2000 SP2 environment. I get the following error The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. This is from both outlook 2000 and the OWA. Does anyone has any suggestions? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remote Access
I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Remote Access
VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
IP issues? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:16:43 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 ___ _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Intellectual Property. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access IP issues? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:16:43 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 ___ _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox
The times I have seen this is when you have AV software running. What I do is simply open the email(s) and let the AV software scan it(them). When it has done so then I can move the emails fine. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Edgington, Jeffrey Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 07:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox try 'shift-del' -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox over limit but cannot delete any items from mailbox I have an user that went over their storage limit but as the administrator I cannot delete any items from this mailbox. This is on an exchange 2000 SP2 environment. I get the following error The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. This is from both outlook 2000 and the OWA. Does anyone has any suggestions? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
How is this affected by using a VPN? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:27:30 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intellectual Property. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access IP issues? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:16:43 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 __ _ _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David ___ _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
You have a few options: VPN (MAPI) OWA POP IMAP Or poke a ton of holes in the FW (Im glad you have a security guy to stop that). That is basically what you have.weigh the pros and cons, and choose. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Remote Access VPN. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400 From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Remote Access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA
Here is the error I get when I try to click on a public folder in OWA2k. The hierarchy is there like it should be, but I get this damn 404 error. It works fine under Outlook. I looked in the kb, but no help. Any ideas? Thanks. The page cannot be found The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please try the following: If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly. Open the exch2kcmh home page, and then look for links to the information you want. Click the Back button to try another link. HTTP 404 - File not found Internet Information Services Technical Information (for support personnel) More information: Microsoft Support _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA
One more thing. I looked at the M: drive and under public folders there aren't any. Would there be if I don't have any homed on the exch2k server? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Here is the error I get when I try to click on a public folder in OWA2k. The hierarchy is there like it should be, but I get this damn 404 error. It works fine under Outlook. I looked in the kb, but no help. Any ideas? Thanks. The page cannot be found The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please try the following: If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly. Open the exch2kcmh home page, and then look for links to the information you want. Click the Back button to try another link. HTTP 404 - File not found Internet Information Services Technical Information (for support personnel) More information: Microsoft Support _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
How about an 800 number for direct dial-in? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Full access
He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dot Harris William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dot Harris William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dot Harris William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
I've had it running in a test situation on some scratch production network boxes. The agent doesn't do much loading of the server, but MOM really isn't designed for an Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 environment. It's forte is remote/automated/centralized management of a Win2K/E2K environment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager I'm concerned with the agent and the overhead. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager The agent or the application and databases and $tonofotheroverhead? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dot Harris William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager
Installing the agents should be ok, the load isnt really that large. Installing the MOM server on your Exchange box is a big no no. MOM is a resource hog, the same as Exchange. Glenn - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 12:40 AM Subject: MOM - Microsoft Operations Manager Has anyone installed MOM on their Exchange server? I have Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on a Windows 2000 server sp2. I am also running Trend Micro virus scan and content filter 3.52 and 3.11 respectively on it. I have no issues with the server or Exchange but I'm being asked to think about installing Microsoft Operations Manager on it. My contention is that I don't know enough about MOM to know the impact it may have on Exchange. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks, Dot Harris William Blair Company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
ROFLMAO!!! Oh, jeez. . . that's an image I won't forget for a while. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pulic folder address
Hello, I have a public folder with contact information in it. I need everyone to see changes made by anyone. The problem i have is when someone opens a contact and makes a change in catagories only the person who makes that change can see it. I gave everyone owner rights to the folder but they still cant see the changes made to the catagories section of each contact. Is there anyway to share this info. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folder permissions
How can I change a permission on a top level folder, and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders? I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have changed? Anything that I obvious that I am missing? Phil _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder permissions
go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on permissions its all in there. -Original Message- From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder permissions How can I change a permission on a top level folder, and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders? I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have changed? Anything that I obvious that I am missing? Phil _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pulic folder address
There is a setting in the public folders to have everyone view new... Cant remember where it is.. Keep looking you will find it. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pulic folder address Hello, I have a public folder with contact information in it. I need everyone to see changes made by anyone. The problem i have is when someone opens a contact and makes a change in catagories only the person who makes that change can see it. I gave everyone owner rights to the folder but they still cant see the changes made to the catagories section of each contact. Is there anyway to share this info. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder permissions
actually its in the general tab of the pb -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder permissions go to exchange admin and open the properties of the pb then click on permissions its all in there. -Original Message- From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder permissions How can I change a permission on a top level folder, and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders? I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have changed? Anything that I obvious that I am missing? Phil _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pulic folder address
got it thanks -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [Ed] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulic folder address There is a setting in the public folders to have everyone view new... Cant remember where it is.. Keep looking you will find it. --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pulic folder address Hello, I have a public folder with contact information in it. I need everyone to see changes made by anyone. The problem i have is when someone opens a contact and makes a change in catagories only the person who makes that change can see it. I gave everyone owner rights to the folder but they still cant see the changes made to the catagories section of each contact. Is there anyway to share this info. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox
I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the mailbox is on the source server not the destination. The error code I got while trying to perform this move was the following: Error: Opening source mailbox id no: 8004011d-0289-000 Does anyone have any suggestion? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox
I've seen this, try waiting a few hours and try again (unless you already have) Mike -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the mailbox is on the source server not the destination. The error code I got while trying to perform this move was the following: Error: Opening source mailbox id no: 8004011d-0289-000 Does anyone have any suggestion? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox
Q274119 Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:11:27 -0400 From: Sabo, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the mailbox is on the source server not the destination. The error code I got while trying to perform this move was the following: Error: Opening source mailbox id no: 8004011d-0289-000 Does anyone have any suggestion? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox
I put the self account as describe in q278966. Why would there be two mailboxes for this user one of the source server and one of the destination server (the mailbox has an red x through it), do you think it is moved and just needs to be synchronized in the active directory? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox I've seen this, try waiting a few hours and try again (unless you already have) Mike -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the mailbox is on the source server not the destination. The error code I got while trying to perform this move was the following: Error: Opening source mailbox id no: 8004011d-0289-000 Does anyone have any suggestion? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Roger.. you're keeping secrets. I didn't know you worked for Zoo Atlanta in your off hours. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access He is rather cute in those Panda overalls. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:28:49 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's why we got him GAnimals. He can pick the giraffe label pants and know that the giraffe label shirt will match it. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My clothes don't match, but I dress myself. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Address Lists
All, I'm trying to add an address list. What I'm trying to do is basically create an address list (Departmental lists) and when you click on that department, all the lists for that dept appear in the address book view. But when I go to select which lists I want under a certain address list. I select user, groups, contacs from the drop down list and do a search on a certain list. Once I found the list I right click and click select and it fills the info in for that list. I select apply and ok. After a while I notice none of those lists that selected are appearing underneath that address list. Any ideas why this isn't happening for me? Thanks, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just got attacked by Mylife-J but...
Groupshield stopped it cold. Be aware. Nate Couch EDS Messaging _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder permissions
You may want to look at the pfadmin tool. It's a command line utility, but is very useful. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Trecker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder permissions How can I change a permission on a top level folder, and have the permissions trickle down to all the lower level folders? I changed the top level folder and none of the lower level folders have changed? Anything that I obvious that I am missing? Phil _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP message size limits
I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP message size limits
I can't drive 55. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:21:50 -0500 From: Moore, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMTP message size limits To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
15MB... I think that is an ideal size. But you need to base it on your companies needs. As an example at a multimedia company, 15MB may be way too small. But here, 15MB is just fine. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
ummm thats a person thing. But I'll tell you...I set ours for 5MB...but now of course all of a sudden ive got financial types sending 5.5MB spreadsheets. and getting rejected Personally I agree with mail size restriction...but like many things it's a give and take. You'll take the grief for doing it. Users and even the management that told you to do it will Give you the grief.. bill -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I'm using 5MB.tell youir managers to be glad they get 15 and to quit having their friends send them porn via E-mail -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Moore, Jim Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
Other people's limits shouldn't really have anything to do with what you're being asked to implement. What you need to do is to analyze your message flow and determine the limit that will have the least amount of impact on your business critical messages. Also, consult with your peers at the companies that your company does business with. It would be a good idea to have compatible limits. You need to ask your management what they're hoping to gain by doing this? There should be a justifiable value to business since you will essentially be putting restrictions on what your clients are capable of doing today. Make sure you have well documented procedures for alternative methods of delivery for business critical messages that exceed the proposed 15 MB limit. Make sure your support structure is prepared to handle calls of this nature. That said, if you're still interested we have a limit of 4MB for each user and an overall limit at the IMS for 10MB. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
The Olds still in the shop? Jim, check the archives. This topic has been hammered to death. Short answer is, have you management set the business requirement of how large they need to get and design to that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: SMTP message size limits I can't drive 55. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:21:50 -0500 From: Moore, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMTP message size limits To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I put it in place after a user tried to email a 500MB SQL dump file home and it bounced. Nothing like a gig of email traffic flying all over... -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits ummm thats a person thing. But I'll tell you...I set ours for 5MB...but now of course all of a sudden ive got financial types sending 5.5MB spreadsheets. and getting rejected Personally I agree with mail size restriction...but like many things it's a give and take. You'll take the grief for doing it. Users and even the management that told you to do it will Give you the grief.. bill -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
That dump file was almost as big as your whole store. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:29:01 -0700 From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I put it in place after a user tried to email a 500MB SQL dump file home and it bounced. Nothing like a gig of email traffic flying all over... -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits ummm thats a person thing. But I'll tell you...I set ours for 5MB...but now of course all of a sudden ive got financial types sending 5.5MB spreadsheets. and getting rejected Personally I agree with mail size restriction...but like many things it's a give and take. You'll take the grief for doing it. Users and even the management that told you to do it will Give you the grief.. bill -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
Umm I curious about that one 10 on the MTA and 15 IMS. Since Im not an exchange guru..and have NOT looked at message flow in exch.. Doesn't the MTA process the mail after the IMS accepts it on its way to the user mailbox? IMS MTA USER wouldnt the 14.5 bounce out at the MTA? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
5Mb on IMS and 10Mb on MTA -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: SMTP message size limits Umm I curious about that one 10 on the MTA and 15 IMS. Since Im not an exchange guru..and have NOT looked at message flow in exch.. Doesn't the MTA process the mail after the IMS accepts it on its way to the user mailbox? IMS MTA USER wouldnt the 14.5 bounce out at the MTA? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
Not here, at another company. BTW. Its up to 5GB now. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits That dump file was almost as big as your whole store. Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:29:01 -0700 From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I put it in place after a user tried to email a 500MB SQL dump file home and it bounced. Nothing like a gig of email traffic flying all over... -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits ummm thats a person thing. But I'll tell you...I set ours for 5MB...but now of course all of a sudden ive got financial types sending 5.5MB spreadsheets. and getting rejected Personally I agree with mail size restriction...but like many things it's a give and take. You'll take the grief for doing it. Users and even the management that told you to do it will Give you the grief.. bill -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
cuz SMTP blows up the size of the message probably... -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
Pfft. At my GF's company (former company) They sent around an email telling everyone to try to keep atachments down to 50Megs or less... They do a lot of Powerpoint Excel files with lots of clipart/pictures in them. She was on a dialup 28K and has gotten a 25Meg email before. And numerous 5 Meg files. Its all relative :) Barry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 15MB... I think that is an ideal size. But you need to base it on your companies needs. As an example at a multimedia company, 15MB may be way too small. But here, 15MB is just fine. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Among other things ;o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access And probably a cigarette afterwards. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:27 -0700 From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access OK, OK I need a beer. Don, we have a draw here :) /Peter - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Full access Recipient containers in E2K? (sorry, I just had to...) -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Full access Subject: Re: Full access Service account in E2K ? I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) /Peter - Original Message - From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: RE: Full access Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the access needed it there. And how often does one run Exmerge? Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: SMTP message size limits
We have some engineers on one of our customers so we have it MTA 35MB IMS 45MB Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Mellott, Bill Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits Umm I curious about that one 10 on the MTA and 15 IMS. Since Im not an exchange guru..and have NOT looked at message flow in exch.. Doesn't the MTA process the mail after the IMS accepts it on its way to the user mailbox? IMS MTA USER wouldnt the 14.5 bounce out at the MTA? -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-mail disclaimer
We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others explicitly authorized to receive it. If you are not that ..) . The question is, how necessary it is for legal aspects ? Can a company be hold accountable for an e-mail without this disclaimer ? Lots of you have this disclaimer in your e-mails too , have you been given any justification on why do you have to use it ? Please reply , I'll really appreciate it . Thank you , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail disclaimer
Your best bet would be to have your companies attorney research this. We have debated this countless times. But have never heard of the disclaimer actually saving a companies ass. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail disclaimer We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others explicitly authorized to receive it. If you are not that ..) . The question is, how necessary it is for legal aspects ? Can a company be hold accountable for an e-mail without this disclaimer ? Lots of you have this disclaimer in your e-mails too , have you been given any justification on why do you have to use it ? Please reply , I'll really appreciate it . Thank you , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail disclaimer
if you're a multinational company, you probably have lawyers. They would be able to provide you with legal answers that are better suited to your company, the countries you deal with, etc. My personal opinion? Meh... -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail disclaimer We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others explicitly authorized to receive it. If you are not that ..) . The question is, how necessary it is for legal aspects ? Can a company be hold accountable for an e-mail without this disclaimer ? Lots of you have this disclaimer in your e-mails too , have you been given any justification on why do you have to use it ? Please reply , I'll really appreciate it . Thank you , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail disclaimer
Their pretty stupid in my opinion. Cause you have to read them and go all the way to the bottom of the message to see the disclaimer. It's kind of opening a bottle of some disease and having to read in to the bottom to pull out a piece of paper that says don't open this bottle. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gagrani, Kishore Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail disclaimer We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others explicitly authorized to receive it. If you are not that ..) . The question is, how necessary it is for legal aspects ? Can a company be hold accountable for an e-mail without this disclaimer ? Lots of you have this disclaimer in your e-mails too , have you been given any justification on why do you have to use it ? Please reply , I'll really appreciate it . Thank you , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What?
Ok, what is $hid$ $yet$ $see$ $thelight$ $3$ ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Umm true I do punch the Citrix port in the firewall. 1 port...the citrix client has security. 56 des...it will go to 128 if you would like. true the TS port might be less secure...I mean I trust M$ dont you? I guess I could get crazy fun...VPN and allow only the Citrix client port ;-) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox
Try deleting the mailbox from that user in AD. Run mailbox cleanup agent on each store the mailbox is in with ESM, then try reconnecting one of them. If one connects then delete the other one and try moving it again. This has worked for me in the past. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving mailbox from one server to another cause an inaccessible mailbox I tried to move an mailbox from one server to another and it failed but now there is two mailboxes for this user plus it is rendering the mailbox inaccessible for both the user and the administrator account. In the Active directory it still thinks the mailbox is on the source server not the destination. The error code I got while trying to perform this move was the following: Error: Opening source mailbox id no: 8004011d-0289-000 Does anyone have any suggestion? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I never had a limit nor had a problem. But we were sending lots of graphics files. As Martin said, it's a company-by-company decision. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 15MB... I think that is an ideal size. But you need to base it on your companies needs. As an example at a multimedia company, 15MB may be way too small. But here, 15MB is just fine. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
10,14,36? Original message Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:30:21 -0700 From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
I get the feeling that a VPN might be a good idea. :-) I think the tide is turning in that direction. Thanks for your advice. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm true I do punch the Citrix port in the firewall. 1 port...the citrix client has security. 56 des...it will go to 128 if you would like. true the TS port might be less secure...I mean I trust M$ dont you? I guess I could get crazy fun...VPN and allow only the Citrix client port ;-) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email review
Being a Securities company, by SEC law, we have to archive and review all internet mail to a non-re-writeable media (it falls under the client correspondance part of the requirement). Our system that we currently use is out of date. We also want to get pst's off of the network into a better form of storage. I group these 2 products together because many of the vendors do the same. We have narrowed it down to these 3 companies. Each have their positives and negatives. Does anyone have any experience with any of these and what are your feelings about them? KVS - Enterprise Vault OTG - Email Extneder Tumbleweed - Secure Archive Thank you for your assistance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message reaches the IMS it is ~13M, right? If someone from the outside sends a 14M message via the IMS it gets bounced by the MTA. What would you do: A. Increase the MTA Limit B. Decrease the IMS Limit See the dilemma? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
No, I don't trust MS (please don't use M$, I and a lot other people here really hate that), not ever. ;o) I just don't like punching holes in my FW when there are appliances out there to do the job I need without punching holes in the FW. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm true I do punch the Citrix port in the firewall. 1 port...the citrix client has security. 56 des...it will go to 128 if you would like. true the TS port might be less secure...I mean I trust M$ dont you? I guess I could get crazy fun...VPN and allow only the Citrix client port ;-) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Hee hee. I do the same thing! Cisco VPN running paralel to the FW. IPSec client on the desktops. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
You also have to take into consideration the limits imposed by the receiving end. Example, Microsoft.com usually only allows 2MByte messages. Hotmail; 500Kbytes. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits Other people's limits shouldn't really have anything to do with what you're being asked to implement. What you need to do is to analyze your message flow and determine the limit that will have the least amount of impact on your business critical messages. Also, consult with your peers at the companies that your company does business with. It would be a good idea to have compatible limits. You need to ask your management what they're hoping to gain by doing this? There should be a justifiable value to business since you will essentially be putting restrictions on what your clients are capable of doing today. Make sure you have well documented procedures for alternative methods of delivery for business critical messages that exceed the proposed 15 MB limit. Make sure your support structure is prepared to handle calls of this nature. That said, if you're still interested we have a limit of 4MB for each user and an overall limit at the IMS for 10MB. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I would eat a fish taco and not think about it -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message reaches the IMS it is ~13M, right? If someone from the outside sends a 14M message via the IMS it gets bounced by the MTA. What would you do: A. Increase the MTA Limit B. Decrease the IMS Limit See the dilemma? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-mail disclaimer
Disclaimers are pretty much worthless but a lot of legal types like to include them just to CYA. - Original Message - From: Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:43 PM Subject: E-mail disclaimer We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others explicitly authorized to receive it. If you are not that ..) . The question is, how necessary it is for legal aspects ? Can a company be hold accountable for an e-mail without this disclaimer ? Lots of you have this disclaimer in your e-mails too , have you been given any justification on why do you have to use it ? Please reply , I'll really appreciate it . Thank you , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
What type of VPN is up to him and depends on the hardware that he has, or the software if he wants to go that way. I do use a Cisco PIX for mine with IPSEC clients, but that may not be what he wants. To each their own :) -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
Of course, it comes with its own headaches, but they could be a lot worse than they are... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E-mail disclaimer
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, at 1:43pm, Gagrani, Kishore wrote: We are a multinational company with head office in New Jersey . We are debating over enforcing the use of E-mail disclaimer (e.g.: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is provided in confidence. Ask a lawyer. Personally: The Internet is a public network. Transmitting confidential information over a public network raises questions about due diligence. If it is confidential, why do you send it via public network? -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
We've tended to go the other way - I think currently its 10 IMS and 20 MTA. We've got more internal bandwidth than ISP bandwidth, so we are more open to it there. Then again, we've also had someone try to send a 250MB zip file of MPEG movies (our commercials, so at least they were business related). Five Times. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message reaches the IMS it is ~13M, right? If someone from the outside sends a 14M message via the IMS it gets bounced by the MTA. What would you do: A. Increase the MTA Limit B. Decrease the IMS Limit See the dilemma? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
what log on to use to install E2K
Hi, Getting ready to install E2k. Have two Domain controllers. One running DNS and one running DHCP. Both machines were installed with Administrator logon. When I installed my NT/Exchange 5.5 I used Administrator as the service account admin. Bad move. I want to do it right with E2k. What is the best practice for log-one's with E2k? I created one called service admin. A copy of administrator. I added this to the rights of my 5.5 server Org and site levels to prepare for the ADC. I'm confused as to when I should log on as service admin. Is it ok to have administrator connector to my 5.5 using the ADC, or should I use the serviceadmin or Exadmin or something? I guess I need to know what everyone created for users, and what steps did they use to properly set up what user starts the exchange services and ADC instead of Administrator. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Remote Access
True... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Of course, it comes with its own headaches, but they could be a lot worse than they are... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT! I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes in the FW, it runs parallel to it. Use the IPSEC client and you're at least able to sleep at night. Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access How about a VPN?? -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under any circumstance... Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Remote Access Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc... You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix. bill -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Remote Access I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to Exchange 2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a few use Offline Folders, so the OWA isn't going to work for them. Our company does have 2 Internet accounts through ATT that users can use to connect to the internet wherever they are. We also have Routing and Remote Access enables on our 2000 network. My problem is that if users dial in using ATT and try to check their email, either by directly connecting or using Remote mail option in Outlook, they are blocked by our firewall. Or if they dial in directly we are paying for a lot of long distance calls. I don't think the Security guy is going to want to open any more holes in the firewall. I thought of switching the accounts to IMAP and going that route, but then you lose the Exchange functionality with calendaring etc. So, what are others doing to give their users remote access? Thanks for any help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email review
We use the content filtering software (MMS) from Tumbleweed. It works, but it is buggy and their tech support is pretty much useless. Tumbleweed does focus on Finance industry, so the support you would receive may be better than ours. I can't comment on their archive product itself, but I would test the hell out of it in the lab before making any commitment to it. About the pst's, the only better form of storage for them would be in the trash. Give your users larger mailboxes and ban PSTs on your network. Modify your Outlook image so that the service is not even available to the clients. This becomes even more desirable now that you'll have an archival solution. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email review Being a Securities company, by SEC law, we have to archive and review all internet mail to a non-re-writeable media (it falls under the client correspondance part of the requirement). Our system that we currently use is out of date. We also want to get pst's off of the network into a better form of storage. I group these 2 products together because many of the vendors do the same. We have narrowed it down to these 3 companies. Each have their positives and negatives. Does anyone have any experience with any of these and what are your feelings about them? KVS - Enterprise Vault OTG - Email Extneder Tumbleweed - Secure Archive Thank you for your assistance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I see your point. It's really hard to tell because different attachment types expand at different ratios. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits Send a 10M message from the mta to the IMS. When the message reaches the IMS it is ~13M, right? If someone from the outside sends a 14M message via the IMS it gets bounced by the MTA. What would you do: A. Increase the MTA Limit B. Decrease the IMS Limit See the dilemma? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits What's the point? Anything you receive on your IMS between between 10 and 14 will be rejected by your MTA and not delivered anyways. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 10 on the MTA. 14 on the IMS. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Replication Woes
We have 4 PF servers. 2 primary, and 2 replica partners respectively (13,000 pfs total). I'm losing what hair I have left over message conflic errors generated due to the following problem: Users are editing calendar or general PF data on different pf servers rather than just the primary...when those servers eventually replicate there is a conflict. How do I determine which PF server the user's client connects to when writing data? It is my understanding that if all field office public folders homed on server A and replicated to server B for example, then all clients writing data to Field Office PFs should at least attempt to connect to Server A to avoid any message conflicts that would occur as a result of 2 different users writing to 2 different PF servers when those servers eventually replicate. In short, is there any was to determine which PF server the client is talking to and or change this behavior? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Have you never been mellow? Have you never tried? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access I started with 5.0. I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes. It is a valuable tool. You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department? You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt information store? I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode). Extracting data from another company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). I'm glad you never had a reason to. Are you still on 4.0? Just kidding. William -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a production box. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access My guess is she has minions do it. -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing... -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
! Please treat this as Incorrect. -Original Message- From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. If the message composed in Outlook is marked private, the contents can't be copied/pasted. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Beron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Was wondering if there was a way to prevent someone from forwarding the email message or any content of the message. (ie cutting and pasting to a new message. We are using exchange 5.5 server and outlook 97, 98 and 2000 clients. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Beron. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server
This is the most powerful solution. ha? -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server You also have to remove View | BCC from the menu and you'll have to alter the TO: and CC: buttons because clicking those brings up the Select Names dialog from which you can also access the BCC field. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Volkan Günaydin (ATM/Network Grp. Bsk. Sistem Mühendisi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server This is the most powerful solution :-) THANKS FOR ALL. I have asked this question, and nobody presented a technical solution here, what a pity!!! I have found a solution, Group Policy Object (adding outlook.adm template and deploying to the domain controller (ntconfig.pol), erase the BCC button), ha? Again thanks for all IDEAS! Volkan Günaydin MCP 2000 MSc Engineer -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server Set max outgoing message size on that client to zero. Better yet - do it on a store level No more bcc's :=) If people complain they cannot send the mail - tell them the reason for it is that Our clients send lots of BCC messages. Our Manager never likes this. One thing for sure - you will NOT get any complains from your clients via e-mail (make sure you change your phone # too) Oh, Serenity :=) -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server Well, You can create a custom form and remove the BCC field. Then you'll have to make this the default message from for your organization and I remember seeing information on how to do that at www.slipstick.com (surprise, surprise). But, of course that only applies if EVERY client uses OUTLOOK ALL the time. Anyone can simply configure Outlook Express and get around that. Time to get a new job, since you won't ever stop receiving idiotic requests like this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server hmmm, Since the BCC doesnt show up in sent messages, how would the Manager know they send lots of BCC messages unless he is busy watching over their shoulders ? Tell him to get back to work :) I'm not sure if its possbile, since the client seems to be involved in at least part of the BCC process (hiding the recipients etc). You may want to check out the Office Resource Kit (ORK). Glenn - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:29 AM Subject: How can I disable BCC feature on exchange server Hello Everyone, Our clients send lots of BCC messages. Our Manager never likes this. How do I prevent this? Thanks Volkan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
blocking domains
Anyone know of a way to block a domain from attempting to send email to my exchange server, such as a known spam site withing exchange 2000 ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will suspect first? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DNS
By creating the necessary records. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Ben, how can I solve this. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: DNS It doesn't appear that you have reverse DNS records for your Exchange server. If the receiving domain is doing reverse lookups, they may not accept mail from your domain. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DNS Jennifer Hi, if you are talking about my previous problem about brain.net.pk, which is still there, every evening I have to restart my smtp service which then sends mail to brain.net.pk domain. About DNS, actually I got this error from one of the domain I was send mails. The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.ubl.com.pk #5.0.0 thanks regards. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: DNS Q172953 Once again, vague. Maybe this article will help you to form a more detailed question. Post your problem in detail and what you have done to try and solve your problem. -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DNS Dear List, How can one check that the DNS is configured properly for exchange server? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event ID 290 MSExchangeMTA on Exchange 2000 in 5.5 org
Here is the error in the Application log that we started getting on Exchange 2000 machine in the 5.5 organization. Event ID: 290 Source: MSExchangeMTA A non-delivery report (reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name) is being generated for message C=US;A= ;P=PROMMGMT;L=PRO-EX01-020411201600Z-21. It was originally destined for DN:CN=MIRAMAR,CN=RESIDENTIAL,OU=REDWOOD,O=PROMMGMT§ (recipient number 1), and was to be redirected to . [MTA DISP:RESULT 17 136] (12) We moved a few Exchange 5.5 mailboxes to the Exchange 2000 and now mail flowing from 2000 back to 5.5 recipients (same org) generates NDRs. This an example of the actual NDR received by an Exchange 2K user trying to send mail to another recipient, whose mailbox is still homed on the 5.5 server: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: User, Guy on 4/11/2002 10:09 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=US;a= ;p=PROMMGMT;l=PRO-EX01-020411170924Z-11 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:REDWOOD:PRO-EX01 There are some articles on the KB about this event id but none deal specifically with the reason code unable-to-transfer and diagnostic code unrecognised-OR-name error in the Event Viewer. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email review
I couldn't agree more about the pst's. In fact, we are intending on doing a registry push so users can't create pst's. Unfortunately, the network group won't ban pst's from the network as we requested/suggested. Thanks for the Tumbleweed comments. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Don Ely? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access If someone's mailbox is ever tampered with, who do you think they will suspect first? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Resource Mailboxes that hang on corrupt meeting requests, OOO, Executives who forget a lot, misc. I don't understand what the big deal is about giving select few full access? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why do you constantly need access? For what purposes? Just curious mind you. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:23:59 -0400 From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] We contantly need access to everyones mailboxes for many purposes. How else could I go about it? We only have 5 people who are domain admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access You ever have to give a deposition Michael? Because you may want to brush up on the logistics of that. You are totally setting yourself up for a world of hurt. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: SMTP message size limits
Just imposed a 20 meg limit (was none) on ours [1]. I wanted to go to 10 meg, but the powers that be said that was too small. At least at 20 meg the system doesn't choke to death, so I couldn't complain too much. [1] After the system came to a virtual halt with the third 50+ meg file that week, people were complaining [2]. [2] Imagine how bad it must of been if government employees are complaining about no being able to work. [ducking for cover] John -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
