RE: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange
What version of Windows/SP level are you on? If Windows NT 4 sp5 then there is a memory leak problem resolved with SP6? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange We'll apply service pack 4 on Exchange then monitor it. If that don't work we'll put a newer version of Norton. P.S. Do you have to uninstall the old version when installing the new version of NAV? And some old SW. Get to SP4 and I may be wrong, but isnt that a rather old version of Norton as well? -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange Sounds like you might have some type of memory leak. Geoff -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Norton Anti-Virus For Exchange We currently run Exchange 5.5 SP3. We have installed NAV for Excahnge Version 1.5.2 The server has 1 gig of RAM. Recently we have been experiencing and issue in task manager. The memory allocated for NAVeAP.exe is very hightotaling almost all of the memory for the server. It usually is in the 900 meg range then the server begins to run VERY slow. Also when you look in Task Manager it is listed twice (NAVeAP.exe)The second one totaling about half the memory allocated of the first. I only have about 250 users with email accounts and by all accounts the server is not hit very hard. When rebooting the server everything seems ok for a day or so but then the memory allocated shoots up very high when a virus is detected and the server does a scan, when finished the server never reclaims the memory used and within a week I am more than likely forced to again reboot the server to reclaim the memory. Thanks in Advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK?
1. I think there is a small doc bug because file://./backofficestorage will not return a lost of organizations but the SMTP mail domain set in the Default Recipient Policy. 2. As the doc states a directory listing will return those things. Not ExOLEDB or MSDAIPP.DSO with ADO. It's a simple file based directory listing the SDK is talking about (a dir on the evil M: drive). Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? In the Exchange SQL (wss.chm) it mentions in a section called File URL Namespace Also, a directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage level will return a list of organizations. A directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage/domainName will return the list of top level folders for the specified domain or organization, including the static MBX string which represents private mailboxes. I am able to connect to mailboxes, inboxes, public folders, essentially to any Exchange resource using exoledb (or letting URL binding figure it out itself), but I can't get this to work. Is this a doc bug? Has anyone got it to work? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change site and organization names in exch 5.5
I agree, Move Server Wizard is the tool that you need to preform this, but take a CSV export of all your accounts using all the headers available and a offline backup copy of the DB's. (MSW will create all these CSV files for you anyway i.e. one for DL's, users, CR's and all people who have a secondarty proxy addresses). once the MSW is done, just manually import these CSV files. THe DL's will need to be modified abit to match the new org and just add the old x500 addresses so that old mail doesnt bounce back. Hope this helps. Kulwinder The Move Server Wizard is what you're looking for and will do what you want (essentially you'll be unloading the Exchange IS and DS databases and reloading them with the new names). I think it's on a utils subdirectory on the Exchange SP4 upgrade cd. Or maybe sp2? - I'd look for you but I got RIF'd a couple of months ago and don't have access to the cd's. There is a 50-60 page Word doc of planning info and options and things you need to be aware of to run it; it is complete and very good - read every word before you do anything. I think MSW was introduced in SP2 and may be on that cd, but I would take the server to sp4 first. If you have any problems and have to call MS, they'll be much more helpful if you're at current sp. Trent Hancock Anyone know of an available Admin/Exchange gig in Austin TX? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jerry Jones Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change site and organization names in exch 5.5 I am looking for a tool that will allow me to change the site and organization name on a single exchange 5.5 sp2 server. This is the only server that this organization has. Bought a portion of an exsisting company and it included the mail server, and now want to change that info. MS supposedly had a wizard for this but I cannot locate it on their site. Anyone know of any 3rd party tools? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members
I'm not going to start another discussion about turning OOO replies generally on to the Internet or not [1]. I just got three OOO replies from people I don't know, with instructions to contact people I never heard and I just want to let all list members know that they should not consider me as rude if I refrain from replying to people who ever in their life had OOO to the list turned on. The reason is that the new rule [2] created here will delete such OOO messages and put those people into a killfile to keep all mailboxes in this organization clean of such unwanted garbage. [1] I personally have a list of clients I have turned it on but not generally and I think this is a good policy [2] It is not an Outlook rule per se but just a server-side filter on the originator address Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question
This topic seems to arise every other year or so since early in Exchange 4.0. There is a heated debate on e-mail, with no-one really proving anything. Then it all goes quiet. At least this time we seem to have two valid approaches for those that want to bother. A book by Curt Aubley and a website at Tricord. I agree with Ed. I would like someone with more time than most of us have, go out and investigate this in a real-world situation. Then report back here, there and everywhere (MEC) to let the rest of us know whether we were right or not in not worrying about it. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 June 2002 05:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question I would recommend that you beat this to death in the lab and then present your findings at the MEC. I would truly be interested (no sarcasm, really) if there were any significant difference. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin, Jon Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question Actually, my boss prefers that I get the most out of the money he spends on hardware and software. When I ask a group of knowledgeable folks a question concerning a little documented but potentially useful way to increase system performance, my boss sees that as a useful expenditure of my time. Trading shots with someone who has indicated she really doesn't know the answer probably would not meet his idea 'useful expenditure of time', but he will probably get over it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question If performance is really an issue maybe you should consider different hardware configurations. For instance, RAID 0+1 instead of RAID5, use more disks in your RAID array to spread the data access, faster disks, higher end controllers with more R/W cache, etc. To worry about negligible performance (probably .01%) increases while investing actual productive time probably means you need your boss to assign you more work. Unless, of course the time you spend measuring all the differences in performance while tweaking your system with different configurations actually translates to no extra cost. -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question Uh, if I understand you correctly, you are not much interested in tweaking a few easy (during system installation, anyways) settings to optimize (at no extra cost) the performance of your system. Jon -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question If I understand you correctly, you are talking about some nit-picky settings that probably will have very little, if any, affect on performance. -Original Message- From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Allocation Unit (Cluster) Size Question Exchange writes to the database in 4k pages. This being the case, does it not make sense to format database drives in 4k Allocation Units (clusters)? And beyond that, since my RAID controller gives me the ability to control the stripe size, shouldn't make this 4k also? Get everyone (database, OS and hardware) in 4k harmony, so to speak. On a similar track regarding transaction logs, if we have valid information as to the average size of messages in our system, would there be a performance boost by configuring the transaction log drive to use clusters and stripes close to (but a little bigger) that the average message size? Or, do I have no clue as to how these things work (always a possibility)? Thanks . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
They had radio back then? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 I hope you realize that's a joke and that you should keep open files agent away from the Exchange directories. KUHL is a radio station in Santa Maria, California, by the way. They used to broadcast my high school's basketball and football games. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 The open files agent will back it up. ;) The Exchange Agent is installed, but now I am not sure about the Open Files Agent. It was suppose to be installed, but some of the work that was done by outside company has been questionable. like i was saying from the beginning of this discussion arcserve is not the way to go for exchange backups but still did you guys have the exchange agent installed for arcserver if you did not arcserve will skip the priv.edb as it is in use. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail
I can't install it in another site, they all are remote sites. I understand relaying the mail to the 2k server, but what would happen when I need to remove the only 5.5 server (IMC) in the local site? How then would the remote 5.5 sites send internet mail? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail Install the IMC on another server in the 5.5 site, forward all messages to your smtp connector and do a little mx magic. In other words, set up the smtp connector as a relay host for your internal network. Otherwise, yes, you will need to go into mixed mode. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail OK, so it needs to co-exist with 2k then? I have 4 sites. 2 other sites are still running 5.5. My main site has the first 5.5 server which hosts the IMC. We just put in a 2k server that will be handling Internet Mail from now on. We are going to be removing the first server(the one with the IMC), so how would I route internet traffic from the 5.5 sites then? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail No no.. You don't disable anything. Why do you want to disable it? You have it relay all out bound email to the 2k SMTP server. What is it you want to accomplish? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail If I disable the IMC on our 5.5 bridgehead and create an SMTP Connector on our 2k server to handle incoming and outgoing Internet Mail, how will the other 5.5 sites know who will handle sending of Internet Mail? That is my question. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail Huh? Check the FaQ there is a entry about using a win2k SMTP server as a relay. I think that is what you want to do. Forward all outbound email to the 2k SMTP server. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP Connector for Internet Mail If I were to disable the (5.5)IMC and create a (2k)SMTP connector to point to the internet, would routing be updated in the 5.5 sites to point to the 2k box for internet mail traffic? Thanks. Mike Personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Outllook Msg
Three people at my office recieved a message from our other office in florida but for some reason only the people in the cc line got half the message and the person in the TO line recieved the whole message. Does anyone know what would cause this. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring application for Exchange
That was fun. You will need: The NT Resource Kit Scissors (ask your parents!) A cookie (optional) A command-line mailer (blat, wsendmail, what have you). Using the at facility, schedule a regular dump of the Event Log using the dumpel utility, then grep for the string you want. dumpel -f c:\scratch\fred.txt -l system -m -- be - MOS Nonsense. Space is blue and birds fly through it. --Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange Do you have any unix/linux servers about? There is a free program out there (name escapes me at the moment) that sends event log entries to syslog on a unix box. On the unix side, it's pretty simple to configure syslog to send email on receipt of given events. If memory serves, there is also an event log reader program in the NT4 reskit. You could use that, combined with at, findstr and blat (SMTP mailer) to do what you want to do. Lastly, this would be pretty simple in Perl. If you want it written for you, send me the requirements directly, and I'll send a quote. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring application for Exchange Is there is a product out there that will monitor the application/system/security NT logs on exchange servers and e-mail certain errors? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Monitoring application for Exchange
Dangit. I don't know what key I hit. Anyway, dumpel -f c:\scratch\fred.txt -l system|application -m /youreventsource/ -e /youreventnumber/ grep /youreventnumber/ c:\scratch\fred.txt if not errorlevel 1 /your command-line mailer commands/ del c:\scratch\fred.txt I've only tested it a little, but of course you could do a bunch of different tests with grep each time. -- be - MOS People in general do not willingly read if they have anything else to amuse them. -- S. Johnson -Original Message- From: East, Bill Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:38 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange That was fun. You will need: The NT Resource Kit Scissors (ask your parents!) A cookie (optional) A command-line mailer (blat, wsendmail, what have you). Using the at facility, schedule a regular dump of the Event Log using the dumpel utility, then grep for the string you want. dumpel -f c:\scratch\fred.txt -l system -m -- be - MOS Nonsense. Space is blue and birds fly through it. --Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring application for Exchange Do you have any unix/linux servers about? There is a free program out there (name escapes me at the moment) that sends event log entries to syslog on a unix box. On the unix side, it's pretty simple to configure syslog to send email on receipt of given events. If memory serves, there is also an event log reader program in the NT4 reskit. You could use that, combined with at, findstr and blat (SMTP mailer) to do what you want to do. Lastly, this would be pretty simple in Perl. If you want it written for you, send me the requirements directly, and I'll send a quote. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring application for Exchange Is there is a product out there that will monitor the application/system/security NT logs on exchange servers and e-mail certain errors? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for something like MIS 2002
Hello! Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a over week to talk to Pre sales people. I am looking for a software that will work with Pocket PC, Palm, etc. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outllook Msg
Was the message sent in (shudder) HTML format? If so, then you need to replace MLANG.DLL from the original Win98/Win2000 install... There's a Q article about this somewhere on MS's site, but I don't know the number off the top of my head.. MLANG.DLL from IE6 beta causes problems with HTML messages in Outlook 2000 (supposedly this was fixed in the release version of IE6, but I've run into the problem with the release/IEAK version of IE6 too, not just the beta as Microsoft suggests)... In a few odd instances, replacing MLANG.DLL with the original version caused Outlook not to be able to open any messages, so I needed to restore the partially functional MLANG.DLL... Haven't found a fix for those odd cases yet (anyone help with that one?).. FWIW, next time please supply more information about OL/Exch versions, symptoms, etc since my reply is based on many assumptions and may not help you at all... Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: killinewoks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outllook Msg Three people at my office recieved a message from our other office in florida but for some reason only the people in the cc line got half the message and the person in the TO line recieved the whole message. Does anyone know what would cause this. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for something like MIS 2002
Blackberry - Original Message - From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: Looking for something like MIS 2002 Hello! Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a over week to talk to Pre sales people. I am looking for a software that will work with Pocket PC, Palm, etc. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for something like MIS 2002
But it only works with Blackberry. But hey, I think the BB is the best PDA ever. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for something like MIS 2002 Blackberry - Original Message - From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: Looking for something like MIS 2002 Hello! Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a over week to talk to Pre sales people. I am looking for a software that will work with Pocket PC, Palm, etc. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Temp.edb ??
I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
From the DR paper: Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created? Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes used for temporary storage during online compaction. Neil -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 14:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Temp.edb ?? Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? From the DR paper: Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created? Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes used for temporary storage during online compaction. Neil -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 14:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Temp.edb ?? Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
An indication of what? -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? From the DR paper: Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created? Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes used for temporary storage during online compaction. Neil -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 14:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Temp.edb ?? Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
That online defragmetation has created a temp.edb file? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? An indication of what? -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? From the DR paper: Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created? Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes used for temporary storage during online compaction. Neil -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 14:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Temp.edb ?? Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
You don't need the /3GB if you aren't running advanced server. Normal server will work fine with 3Gb. But then you knew that :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 June 2002 15:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
Yes, but then you essentially loose 1GB of RAM since win2k will only allocate 2GB of virtual address space to applications. -Original Message- From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install You don't need the /3GB if you aren't running advanced server. Normal server will work fine with 3Gb. But then you knew that :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 June 2002 15:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Exchange 2000 Install
thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Temp.edb ??
no -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? That online defragmetation has created a temp.edb file? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? An indication of what? -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Shouldn't I expect an indication of that in the application log? -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? From the DR paper: Question 15: What is the TEMP.EDB file and why is it created? Answer: This stores in-progress long-term transactions and is sometimes used for temporary storage during online compaction. Neil -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 14:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Temp.edb ?? Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? Yes, however I have not done that... -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Temp.edb ?? I think temp.edb is a file created by doing an offline defrag of the information store. -Original Message- From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Temp.edb ?? I am running MS Exchange 5.5 SP3 on Windows 2000 SP2. All of a sudden I started seeing a file temp.edb in \exchsrvr\mdbdata folder. Any ideas?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for something like MIS 2002
I agree, and their server software is decent to install and reliable. You can have my RIM when you take it from my cold dead hands. These have saved our company a bundle by having faster communications on everything from network outages to new sales leads. I can't recommend them enough. One thing to keep in mind is if you are already a email centric company, go for the bigger 957 handhelds, the larger display makes a big difference. Cingular has em for $299 a pop now (which is their going ebay rate). Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for something like MIS 2002 But it only works with Blackberry. But hey, I think the BB is the best PDA ever. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Looking for something like MIS 2002 Blackberry - Original Message - From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:20 AM Subject: Looking for something like MIS 2002 Hello! Can anyone recommend a software to allow wireless PDAs to access Exchange mailbox? I know there is MIS 2002, but it requires a AD which I don't have. I also looked at the Infowave software, but it's taking a over week to talk to Pre sales people. I am looking for a software that will work with Pocket PC, Palm, etc. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members
and that is totally their loss. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members I'm not going to start another discussion about turning OOO replies generally on to the Internet or not [1]. I just got three OOO replies from people I don't know, with instructions to contact people I never heard and I just want to let all list members know that they should not consider me as rude if I refrain from replying to people who ever in their life had OOO to the list turned on. The reason is that the new rule [2] created here will delete such OOO messages and put those people into a killfile to keep all mailboxes in this organization clean of such unwanted garbage. [1] I personally have a list of clients I have turned it on but not generally and I think this is a good policy [2] It is not an Outlook rule per se but just a server-side filter on the originator address Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Yup, even in that little backward town. It had four radio stations and a Tee Vee station even! I was shocked that when I arrived there in 1973 they still had five-digit dialing for in-town phones, and if you wanted to call Guadalupe or Los Alamos you had to dial the operator and ask for the number. Our phone number was WEllington 7-7032. If you bought touch-tone service, your touch-tone phone invoked a dialer--you could hear the dialing clicks on the line! Yes, we've all heard of this, but I'm talking about 1973! We had finished sending moon rockets by then! Gee! No, GTE! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 They had radio back then? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 I hope you realize that's a joke and that you should keep open files agent away from the Exchange directories. KUHL is a radio station in Santa Maria, California, by the way. They used to broadcast my high school's basketball and football games. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 The open files agent will back it up. ;) The Exchange Agent is installed, but now I am not sure about the Open Files Agent. It was suppose to be installed, but some of the work that was done by outside company has been questionable. like i was saying from the beginning of this discussion arcserve is not the way to go for exchange backups but still did you guys have the exchange agent installed for arcserver if you did not arcserve will skip the priv.edb as it is in use. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Exchange 2000 Install
Ed, would you recommend having just one storage group with the equipment i have to work with? thanks for your insights.. BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:09 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a performance benefit. Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the same log drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Internet Mail Connector Question
Stop the IMS service. Thanks, Cesar -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 10:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Connector Question How would you disable it? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail Connector Question May I please have your opinions? I am going to move our Internet Mail Connection from our 5.5 server to our 2k server. I think am going to go with one smtp server for all inbound and outbound traffic on the 2k server. My quesiton is, should I totally remove the IMC on our 5.5 server or just disable it? Thanks. Mike personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange digest: June 17, 2002
Alan, In my opinion, the best resource for CDO programming is MSDN. If you're attempting to modify your Auto Registration application, you should find c++ examples which will do everything you require, from creating mailboxes to setting permissions on MSDN. I know it sounds like a cop out, but I've written a similar system in VB using nothing but that and www.cdolive.com for reference. Darren. Subject: Books on managing Ex2K from C++? From: Phillips, Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:28:42 +0100 X-Message-Number: 3 Can anyone recommend a book on programming Ex2K servers from C++ (or at least a VBS-focussed book that occasionally mentions C++?) I'm specifically interested in using CDOEXM to manage mailboxes Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Mail Connector Question
You might as well remove it. It'd be easy enough to reinstall it if necessary later. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cesar Salinas Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Connector Question Stop the IMS service. Thanks, Cesar -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 10:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail Connector Question How would you disable it? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail Connector Question May I please have your opinions? I am going to move our Internet Mail Connection from our 5.5 server to our 2k server. I think am going to go with one smtp server for all inbound and outbound traffic on the 2k server. My quesiton is, should I totally remove the IMC on our 5.5 server or just disable it? Thanks. Mike personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
You should never have the logs for more than one storage group on a single physical drive. You can use the same RAID set for multiple stores' databases, but because storage groups have separate sets of log files, you could take a performance hit by sharing a physical drive between two or more storage groups. In your case, I think you could justify two storage groups for 2,000 users, but that, of course, depends on usage patterns. I think that if you wanted to implement two storage groups, however, you would absolutely require an additional RAID-1 pair for the other set of logs, and I think you would seriously want to consider another RAID-5 for the second set of databases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bob Chyka Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install Ed, would you recommend having just one storage group with the equipment i have to work with? thanks for your insights.. BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:09 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a performance benefit. Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the same log drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C.
RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
I would, otherwise you'll have another set of transaction log files. Also, if a user on database A in storage group A sends a message to a user on database B in storage group B, then you've got copies of the message in two databases and two sets of log files. With 2000 users on a single server, space can diminish quickly. The trade off with multiple databases is reduced efficiency in storage requirements, since single instance storage is per-database, against the theory that you could recover the database of a portion of your users more quickly than if they were all on one database. Backing up and restoring a single huge database could be a problem if you've got strict SLA windows. Neil -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 16:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: New Exchange 2000 Install Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install Ed, would you recommend having just one storage group with the equipment i have to work with? thanks for your insights.. BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:09 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a performance benefit. Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the same log drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache. i have 3 gigs of ram and 7 hard drives to work with with a perc RAID controller. i was going to configure raid 1 for the OS and another RAID 1 set for the log files, then use the last 3 drives in a raid 5 config for the databases. i have some whitepapers from microsoft on how to set up the server with that many users but they dont really get into details. any help is greatly appreciated! thanks for your time, Bob C. _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Outlook 97 Journal
sorry... ex 5.5 sp4 nt4 sp6a -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 June 2002 07:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 97 Journal which version of EX - Original Message - From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:19 PM Subject: Outlook 97 Journal Is there a way of turning off journalling on all mailboxes without having to log into them individually ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New Exchange 2000 Install
Neil, thanks you cleared alot up for me. im going to go with one group and backup will be every night (got an autoloader) and see what happens.. thanksit isnt going ot be 2000 users on at once ever. i think at most on any given day the maximum concurrent users on the system will be 500 max... Bob C. - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I would, otherwise you'll have another set of transaction log files. Also, if a user on database A in storage group A sends a message to a user on database B in storage group B, then you've got copies of the message in two databases and two sets of log files. With 2000 users on a single server, space can diminish quickly. The trade off with multiple databases is reduced efficiency in storage requirements, since single instance storage is per-database, against the theory that you could recover the database of a portion of your users more quickly than if they were all on one database. Backing up and restoring a single huge database could be a problem if you've got strict SLA windows. Neil -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 18 June 2002 16:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: New Exchange 2000 Install Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install Ed, would you recommend having just one storage group with the equipment i have to work with? thanks for your insights.. BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:09 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I wouldn't characterize that advantage as a performance benefit. Creating two or more storage groups with that configuration could actually reduce performance since the two would be competing for the same log drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install That's not entirely true I think. Even if all databases have the same recoverability requirements there is potential savings of restoration time in using multiple databases or storage groups if just one edb fails. :) -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install With only one set of spindles for information store, there is no performance benefit to be had from multiple storage groups or databases. If you have a set of mailboxes that have differing recoverability requirements, you might consider making them a separate storage group. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: New Exchange 2000 Install thanks i already have that article printed out. thanks for the info ..and yes i am going to be running advanced server with exchange enterprise...any insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc. thanks, BOb C. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more RAM. BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get 2GB See http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q266096 for more details. -Original Message- From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Exchange 2000 Install Hello everybody, just looking for a little guidance/insight on a new project im looking at doing. i have exchange 5.5 running at 3 different companies and understand how it works, etc. for the college that i work for, they want me to deploy a exchange 2000 server that will host 2000 mail accounts. i just need some guidance of where i should go to design our server for this many users and how to set up exchange. i wanted to split the users onto a couple servers but money doesnt allow this right now. this is the hardware i have to work with. i have a dell 6400 with dual PIII 1.0ghz xeons with 2 megs of cache.
Why would an email?
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Because the universe is not in synch?? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Have a look at the times in the headers to see where the delay is occurring. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your problems. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Thanks Andy.. I appreciate all the moral support that you can give me. I am really trying and hopefully someday this list will forgive me my tirades. I sometimes get frustrated like all of you do and just can't control myself. I have apologized before and will do so again. I am sorry if I offended anyone but it was one of those things. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would an email? I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your problems. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
MX record pointing to your mail server possibly. I had this exact problem only I was trying to send to an organization. Some mail would go through, some mail would fail. Turned out my ISP DNS servers had two MX records for the recipient and one of them was wrong. It only happened on this one particular domain. It is possible the organization in question for you has a problem on their DNS finding your correct MX server. After doing some recursive queries it is finally finding your MX server. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only 1 person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e-mail from this outside user to oblivion? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Yes. I checked for filters and rules and there are none. I also had the outside user send the messages to me with the same delays... Seemed liked days, even though it was only hours. Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would an email? Well I have a YAHOO account as well, sometimes a delay happens but as you mentioned, it works. I hate to ask but you did ensure (since it is only 1 person) that there is no filtering rule on the client, sending e-mail from this outside user to oblivion? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would an email?
Heck, nothing offends me! I would have the admin of the external site check his/her queues/DNS/Have them telnet into your mail server etc... -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would an email? Thanks Andy.. I appreciate all the moral support that you can give me. I am really trying and hopefully someday this list will forgive me my tirades. I sometimes get frustrated like all of you do and just can't control myself. I have apologized before and will do so again. I am sorry if I offended anyone but it was one of those things. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would an email? I know an excellent administrator in Indiana who could solve all of your problems. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why would an email? Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 I have a user that claims they are not receiving eMAILs from one person outside the organization. I emailed that outside person and asked for a reply. I cc: my Yahoo account so I could see if I was having networking problems. I have checked this person's mailbox and there is no messages from this outside person. The outside person received my eMAIL and replied to all. My Yahoo account got the reply just like that but my Outlook account finally got the message after 4 1/2 hours... WOW. What is up with that? I have checked my queues and nothing is backed up. I can send eMAIL to my Yahoo account from my Outlook account and vice versa and the messages are received on a timely bases. I have checked my logs and see nothing strange. Has anyone had a similar problem? Please help me out. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Several links for you to follow up with http://ordb.org/ http://ordb.org/faq/#how_to_close http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Nice, Thanks Brett -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Several links for you to follow up with http://ordb.org/ http://ordb.org/faq/#how_to_close http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
What's in their Deleted Items area? :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
The VIEW is probably set incorrectly. Usually it is set to Unviewed messages when indeed it should be all messages. Good luck and have fun. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 June, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
All folders are subject to quotas in Exchange, not just InBox. Check Sent Items and Deleted Items as these tend to not get cleaned out regularly. Clients can also get folder sizes by viewing the properties of their mailbox in Outlook and clicking on Folder Size. That'll clue them in on where to start cleaning. - Karen On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
They have files in their deleted items or sent items, probably with huge attachments. Make them set their options to Empty deleted items upon exiting, and get them to delete those big attachments out of their sent items. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Argle! #$^%*(ing Pix. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
You said you checked the server side. Assuming you mean, information store defaults. Did you check the limits on the actual mailboxes themselves? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
I hAvE 1 mEsSaGe In My InBoX wHiCh Is 57Mb, WhAt DoEs BaReLy AnY mAiL MeAn? AnD wHaT dOeS tHiS sToRaGe ErRoR sAy ExAcTlY? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
I know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my spam and hack attempts way down. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
This wouldn't happen to be a mixed Exchange environment is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
As Chris says, when I enter: telnet mail.stainsafe.com 25 I receive: 220 ***2* That is NOT an Exchange server responding. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
Since we are academic and we have a large number of Asians, I don't believe that is an option for us. -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my spam and hack attempts way down. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Policies
All, I'm trying to update my default recipient policy to add another SMTP address. But when I create new users it doesn't seem to apply the policy and create the SMTP address that I want. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas? Am I missing something here? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
If you have your IMC set to not allow any relaying, it doesn't give you the relaying prohibited response as you'd expect, but goes much further into the process before it stops you. This is covered in http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 But I see from Chris and Ed's messages that it's not Exchange anyway. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Argle! #$^%*(ing Pix. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error sending to DL
Accept Messages FromReject Messages From *List *None 29Palms Exchange Admins (DL) Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR) Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL How is the list's Delivery Restrictions property page configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error sending to DL NT4 w/SP6 SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 I've created a custom recipient for myself and am attempting to send to a DL. I have delivery restrictions in place, but have included my new Custom Recipient as being able to send to the DL. When I attempt to send a message I receive this error: --- Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Sent:Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:09 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): 29PALMS EXCHANGE ADMINS on Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:11 -0700 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=organization;l=29PALMS003E0206170103NCD748HW MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:29PALMS:29PALMS003E --- Any help would be highly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policies
Do you have a recipient update service defined for the AD domain? Did you force application of the policy to be sure it ran? It isn't instantaneous, you know. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policies All, I'm trying to update my default recipient policy to add another SMTP address. But when I create new users it doesn't seem to apply the policy and create the SMTP address that I want. I'm using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas? Am I missing something here? TIA, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Then go run the folder size thingy on the whole mailbox (start with Outlook Today) and it will tell you where the Large Sized Mail is. It only takes one big item you know. Did they close their mail client fully and then open it again? You've oversnipped again jazzy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error sending to DL
Is the account you're sending from in the list shown? CRs don't work for this, by the way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Accept Messages FromReject Messages From *List *None 29Palms Exchange Admins (DL) Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR) Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL How is the list's Delivery Restrictions property page configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error sending to DL NT4 w/SP6 SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 I've created a custom recipient for myself and am attempting to send to a DL. I have delivery restrictions in place, but have included my new Custom Recipient as being able to send to the DL. When I attempt to send a message I receive this error: --- Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Sent:Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:09 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): 29PALMS EXCHANGE ADMINS on Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:11 -0700 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=organization;l=29PALMS003E0206170103NCD748HW MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:29PALMS:29PALMS003E --- Any help would be highly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Check for journaling set to on. Turn it off and show the user how to clear all the previous entries out by hand. They'll leave you alone for a while and will be happy to send mail again. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Hmmm Strange that is the only SMTP server we have. Try 208.216.254.13. Maybe resolution is incorrect. It looks okay from my end, but I am inside so... -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP If you have your IMC set to not allow any relaying, it doesn't give you the relaying prohibited response as you'd expect, but goes much further into the process before it stops you. This is covered in http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 But I see from Chris and Ed's messages that it's not Exchange anyway. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Argle! #$^%*(ing Pix. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
So you're not going through the firewall. Turn off Mailguard on the Pix. There's a good reason that's in the FAQ. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Hmmm Strange that is the only SMTP server we have. Try 208.216.254.13. Maybe resolution is incorrect. It looks okay from my end, but I am inside so... -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP If you have your IMC set to not allow any relaying, it doesn't give you the relaying prohibited response as you'd expect, but goes much further into the process before it stops you. This is covered in http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 But I see from Chris and Ed's messages that it's not Exchange anyway. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Argle! #$^%*(ing Pix. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay SMTP
Yeah PIX. NAT to DMZ Thanks I will check it out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP So you're not going through the firewall. Turn off Mailguard on the Pix. There's a good reason that's in the FAQ. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Hmmm Strange that is the only SMTP server we have. Try 208.216.254.13. Maybe resolution is incorrect. It looks okay from my end, but I am inside so... -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP If you have your IMC set to not allow any relaying, it doesn't give you the relaying prohibited response as you'd expect, but goes much further into the process before it stops you. This is covered in http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 But I see from Chris and Ed's messages that it's not Exchange anyway. -Peter -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Argle! #$^%*(ing Pix. -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP Mail.stainsafe.com I tested with rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and it didn't give me the relay prohibited 550 error. Like it should. Thanks -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Relay SMTP How do you know it allows relay? Post the hostname of the server and I can test it for you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Esgro Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay SMTP Hello, I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 server. The server is primarily the connector server in my site. It has no mailboxes on it. I have the server setup to not relay smtp message. The option DO NOT REROUTE INCOMING SMTP MAIL is selected. However it is still allowing SMTP relay messages. I have re-installed the service pack, restarted the server and it still allows relay. Is there something I am missing? Any info would be appreciated. Thank you Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Error sending to DL
If that's true, then he should check his custom recipient to ensure that the address exactly matches the address he's sending from. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Wait a minute. That's not right. I do this too - I have a DL that only ONE person can send to, and they are external to my org. I created a CR and put that on the Allowed list. I know that it works because I have had complaints from other chuckleheads trying to use the list, and it's HUGE, so I don't allow anyone else to use it. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Yes, the CR is the one I'm trying to send from (My home account). So are you saying that I cannot send to a Distribution List from my home account even if I've created a Custom Recipient and added it to the 'allowed' list? If this is the case, what options do I have for allowing someone not within my org to send to a DL? The DL must have delivery restrictions in place, so I can't simply allow everyone to send to it. Thanks for your help. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Is the account you're sending from in the list shown? CRs don't work for this, by the way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Accept Messages FromReject Messages From *List *None 29Palms Exchange Admins (DL) Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR) Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL How is the list's Delivery Restrictions property page configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error sending to DL NT4 w/SP6 SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 I've created a custom recipient for myself and am attempting to send to a DL. I have delivery restrictions in place, but have included my new Custom Recipient as being able to send to the DL. When I attempt to send a message I receive this error: --- Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Sent:Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:09 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): 29PALMS EXCHANGE ADMINS on Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:11 -0700 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=organization;l=29PALMS003E0206170103NCD748HW MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:29PALMS:29PALMS003E --- Any help would be highly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK?
Sorry, my mistake I meant SDK! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK?
Oops, my fault. You're right. You even can't do a dir on file://./backofficestorage/mydomain. As for the question why either file:\\.\ or file://./ works I believe it's because even IE can handle that ;-) I think this is just a doc bug as you mentioned. You can send your feedback to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? 1) I will try point one out at home. 2) But if you are claiming I can do a simple dir file://./backofficestorage/DomainName this won't work from the command prompt either. It only works if you try to programmatically access it through ADO (or someother access method) which is smart enough in most cases to launch the appropriate provider unless you specify the provider using the connection object. BTW - you can programmatically access most items using file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/MBX/Inbox/ etc, or file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/Public Folders/ but you can also use file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\MBX\Inbox\ etc, or file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\Public Folders\ as well. I have yet to find a difference between the two. Can you comment on this. Thanks for your help. 1. I think there is a small doc bug because file://./backofficestorage will not return a lost of organizations but the SMTP mail domain set in the Default Recipient Policy. 2. As the doc states a directory listing will return those things. Not ExOLEDB or MSDAIPP.DSO with ADO. It's a simple file based directory listing the SDK is talking about (a dir on the evil M: drive). Cheers:Siegfried runat=3Dserver / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? =20 In the Exchange SQL (wss.chm) it mentions in a section called File URL Namespace =20 Also, a directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage level will return a list of organizations. A directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage/domainName will return the list of top level folders for the specified domain or organization, including the static MBX string which represents private mailboxes. =20 I am able to connect to mailboxes, inboxes, public folders, essentially to any Exchange resource using exoledb (or letting URL binding figure it out itself), but I can't get this to work. =20 Is this a doc bug? Has anyone got it to work? =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK?
I think I found my answer, \\ if filepath, // is ExOleDb path. If you can stand one more question on this topic of URL binding I can do file://./backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ file://LocalHost/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ file://ServerName/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ but can I do file://RemoteServerName/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ where I'm trying to connect to a remote Exchange server in the same domain assuming I have permission and all, and that the mailbox I am trying to access is homed on RemoteServername? Oops, my fault. You're right. You even can't do a dir on file://./backofficestorage/mydomain. As for the question why either file:\\.\ or file://./ works I believe it's because even IE can handle that ;-) I think this is just a doc bug as you mentioned. You can send your feedback to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers:Siegfried runat=3Dserver / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? =20 1) I will try point one out at home. =20 2) But if you are claiming I can do a simple dir file://./backofficestorage/DomainName this won't work from the command prompt either. It only works if you try to programmatically access it through ADO (or someother access method) which is smart enough in most cases to launch the appropriate provider unless you specify the provider using the connection object. =20 BTW - you can programmatically access most items using file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/MBX/Inbox/ etc, or file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/Public Folders/ =20 but you can also use =20 file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\MBX\Inbox\ etc, or file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\Public Folders\ =20 as well. I have yet to find a difference between the two. Can you comment on this. =20 Thanks for your help. =20 =20 1. I think there is a small doc bug because file://./backofficestorage will not return a lost of organizations but the SMTP mail domain set in the Default Recipient Policy. 2. As the doc states a directory listing will return those things. Not ExOLEDB or MSDAIPP.DSO with ADO. It's a simple file based directory listing the SDK is talking about (a dir on the evil M: drive). Cheers:Siegfried runat=3D3Dserver / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? =3D20 In the Exchange SQL (wss.chm) it mentions in a section called File URL Namespace =3D20 Also, a directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage level will return a list of organizations. A directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage/domainName will return the list of top level folders for the specified domain or organization, including the static MBX string which represents private mailboxes. =3D20 I am able to connect to mailboxes, inboxes, public folders, essentially to any Exchange resource using exoledb (or letting URL binding figure it out itself), but I can't get this to work. =3D20 Is this a doc bug? Has anyone got it to work? =3D20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK?
No remote connection with ExOLEDB and file://./backofficestorage. It only works on the local Exchange 2000 Server. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? I think I found my answer, \\ if filepath, // is ExOleDb path. If you can stand one more question on this topic of URL binding I can do file://./backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ file://LocalHost/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ file://ServerName/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ but can I do file://RemoteServerName/backofficestorage/domain.mydomain.com/MBX/inbox/ where I'm trying to connect to a remote Exchange server in the same domain assuming I have permission and all, and that the mailbox I am trying to access is homed on RemoteServername? Oops, my fault. You're right. You even can't do a dir on file://./backofficestorage/mydomain. As for the question why either file:\\.\ or file://./ works I believe it's because even IE can handle that ;-) I think this is just a doc bug as you mentioned. You can send your feedback to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers:Siegfried runat=3Dserver / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? =20 1) I will try point one out at home. =20 2) But if you are claiming I can do a simple dir file://./backofficestorage/DomainName this won't work from the command prompt either. It only works if you try to programmatically access it through ADO (or someother access method) which is smart enough in most cases to launch the appropriate provider unless you specify the provider using the connection object. =20 BTW - you can programmatically access most items using file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/MBX/Inbox/ etc, or file://./backofficestorage/DomainName/Public Folders/ =20 but you can also use =20 file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\MBX\Inbox\ etc, or file:\\.\backofficestorage\DomainName\Public Folders\ =20 as well. I have yet to find a difference between the two. Can you comment on this. =20 Thanks for your help. =20 =20 1. I think there is a small doc bug because file://./backofficestorage will not return a lost of organizations but the SMTP mail domain set in the Default Recipient Policy. 2. As the doc states a directory listing will return those things. Not ExOLEDB or MSDAIPP.DSO with ADO. It's a simple file based directory listing the SDK is talking about (a dir on the evil M: drive). Cheers:Siegfried runat=3D3Dserver / -Original Message- From: Hilary Cotter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doc bugs in Exchange SDK? =3D20 In the Exchange SQL (wss.chm) it mentions in a section called File URL Namespace =3D20 Also, a directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage level will return a list of organizations. A directory listing at the file://./backofficestorage/domainName will return the list of top level folders for the specified domain or organization, including the static MBX string which represents private mailboxes. =3D20 I am able to connect to mailboxes, inboxes, public folders, essentially to any Exchange resource using exoledb (or letting URL binding figure it out itself), but I can't get this to work. =3D20 Is this a doc bug? Has anyone got it to work? =3D20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
Yes, I've seen this here at the San Diego Community College District, I looked at the internet headers and here is what I find. Sun, 16 Jun 2002 07:55:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: intergate.sdccd.cc.ca.us: [203.106.238.32] didn't use HELO protocol I' ve also recieved one where the FROM: address has this in it today: FROM: C:\Email\Headers\[EMAIL PROTECTED] john -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Error sending to DL
Come on. Tell us - Original Message - From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Doh! I'm not even going to say what was wrong. Thanks for all the input. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL If that's true, then he should check his custom recipient to ensure that the address exactly matches the address he's sending from. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Wait a minute. That's not right. I do this too - I have a DL that only ONE person can send to, and they are external to my org. I created a CR and put that on the Allowed list. I know that it works because I have had complaints from other chuckleheads trying to use the list, and it's HUGE, so I don't allow anyone else to use it. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Yes, the CR is the one I'm trying to send from (My home account). So are you saying that I cannot send to a Distribution List from my home account even if I've created a Custom Recipient and added it to the 'allowed' list? If this is the case, what options do I have for allowing someone not within my org to send to a DL? The DL must have delivery restrictions in place, so I can't simply allow everyone to send to it. Thanks for your help. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Is the account you're sending from in the list shown? CRs don't work for this, by the way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Accept Messages From Reject Messages From *List *None 29Palms Exchange Admins (DL) Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR) Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL How is the list's Delivery Restrictions property page configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error sending to DL NT4 w/SP6 SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 I've created a custom recipient for myself and am attempting to send to a DL. I have delivery restrictions in place, but have included my new Custom Recipient as being able to send to the DL. When I attempt to send a message I receive this error: --- Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Sent:Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:09 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): 29PALMS EXCHANGE ADMINS on Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:11 -0700 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=organization;l=29PALMS003E0206170103NCD748HW MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:29PALMS:29PALMS003E --- Any help would be highly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Error sending to DL
Ahh, I had the CR setup with my inbound address, but forgot that I send out with a different address with Outlook. Tried it through webmail and it worked. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Error sending to DL Come on. Tell us - Original Message - From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Doh! I'm not even going to say what was wrong. Thanks for all the input. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL If that's true, then he should check his custom recipient to ensure that the address exactly matches the address he's sending from. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Wait a minute. That's not right. I do this too - I have a DL that only ONE person can send to, and they are external to my org. I created a CR and put that on the Allowed list. I know that it works because I have had complaints from other chuckleheads trying to use the list, and it's HUGE, so I don't allow anyone else to use it. -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Yes, the CR is the one I'm trying to send from (My home account). So are you saying that I cannot send to a Distribution List from my home account even if I've created a Custom Recipient and added it to the 'allowed' list? If this is the case, what options do I have for allowing someone not within my org to send to a DL? The DL must have delivery restrictions in place, so I can't simply allow everyone to send to it. Thanks for your help. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Is the account you're sending from in the list shown? CRs don't work for this, by the way. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL Accept Messages From Reject Messages From *List *None 29Palms Exchange Admins (DL) Parrnelli Mr Ben (CR) Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error sending to DL How is the list's Delivery Restrictions property page configured? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Parrnelli GS11 Ben T Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error sending to DL NT4 w/SP6 SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 Outlook 2000 I've created a custom recipient for myself and am attempting to send to a DL. I have delivery restrictions in place, but have included my new Custom Recipient as being able to send to the DL. When I attempt to send a message I receive this error: --- Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test Sent:Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:09 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): 29PALMS EXCHANGE ADMINS on Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:03:11 -0700 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=organization;l=29PALMS003E0206170103NCD748HW MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:29PALMS:29PALMS003E --- Any help would be highly appreciated. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List
LDAP DN Question
In our current NT/Exchange 5.5 system, user display names are formatted as 'lastname, firstname'. In testing Win2k/Exch2k upgrades I noticed, using ADSI Edit, that the LDAP distinguished name for users ends up 'lastname\, firstname', with the slash thrown in to escape the comma character. There are references on various software development newsgroups that this slash in the DN occasionally causes headaches for developers. Has anyone seen this slash in the DN cause a problem in either Exchange or other applications that depend on LDAP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Check Top of Information Store, people always seem to put mail in here for some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll see what I mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Actually, it does show the folder size. Its listed above the subfolders dialog box: Folder Size: nk Total Size (Fld + SubFldr) : nnnK Another way to easily get to it is to uncheck the Show Home Page box under the Properties/Home Page tab for the Outlook Today folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Check Top of Information Store, people always seem to put mail in here for some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll see what I mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
True, but it will not show a breakdown of that Top of Information Store folder. It only shows a total of everything. Unchecking the Show Home Page did nothing for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Actually, it does show the folder size. Its listed above the subfolders dialog box: Folder Size: nk Total Size (Fld + SubFldr) : nnnK Another way to easily get to it is to uncheck the Show Home Page box under the Properties/Home Page tab for the Outlook Today folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Check Top of Information Store, people always seem to put mail in here for some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll see what I mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Im not sure what you mean by breakdown. The Folder Size *is* the size of the folder in the question. So if you are looking at the properties of Outlook Today folder (i.e. The top of the Information Store) , that is its size. Unchecking that box should remove the Outlook Today pane and restore the regular folder view and allow you to easily see any emails that may be in that folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM True, but it will not show a breakdown of that Top of Information Store folder. It only shows a total of everything. Unchecking the Show Home Page did nothing for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Actually, it does show the folder size. Its listed above the subfolders dialog box: Folder Size: nk Total Size (Fld + SubFldr) : nnnK Another way to easily get to it is to uncheck the Show Home Page box under the Properties/Home Page tab for the Outlook Today folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Check Top of Information Store, people always seem to put mail in here for some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll see what I mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
My meaning of breakdown is, when you go into the properties of the Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name] and click on folder size, you see a breakdown of every folder listed under it. The top of Information store is not one of them. A quick test will prove my point. Verify the folder size of your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], now create a new message with a known size attachment and send it to yourself. Check the folder size again and it should have increased by the size of the new message. Now, take that message and drag it onto your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], the entire mailbox size will remain the same, however, the size of your inbox folder will be decreased by the size of the message you moved. You will not see where this message has been moved to because you can't look at the Top of Information Store and the only way to see if there are some messages there, is to do an advanced find. It has been my experience, that when users complain about having a full mailbox and swear they are under the limit, I check for messages in their Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name]and walla, they their are. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Im not sure what you mean by breakdown. The Folder Size *is* the size of the folder in the question. So if you are looking at the properties of Outlook Today folder (i.e. The top of the Information Store) , that is its size. Unchecking that box should remove the Outlook Today pane and restore the regular folder view and allow you to easily see any emails that may be in that folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM True, but it will not show a breakdown of that Top of Information Store folder. It only shows a total of everything. Unchecking the Show Home Page did nothing for me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Actually, it does show the folder size. Its listed above the subfolders dialog box: Folder Size: nk Total Size (Fld + SubFldr) : nnnK Another way to easily get to it is to uncheck the Show Home Page box under the Properties/Home Page tab for the Outlook Today folder. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Check Top of Information Store, people always seem to put mail in here for some reason. It won't show up when you check folder size, you have to do an advanced find. Try dragging a message to your Outlook Today - [Mailbox - your name], and then do an advanced find for this message and you'll see what I mean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Did you check the 'view' setting yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168,
