RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Finally, a voice of reason. I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for yourself' answer a bit short. I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method, and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I could turn it off. :-) One would think some info on most of the options could be publicly available with special ones to be used on advice of PSS only. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Actually there is an answer. PSS should be able to access the document if you can justify the need for the information. Part of the information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too. Folks are much too touchy here. This group is really much less entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum. I think the question could have been phrased better. Thus the What to do before you post part of the FAQ. But I also find figure it out yourself to be less than helpful. And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by NDA from disclosing the information. Folks used to get upset at call PSS. Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer. I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question. In that case, try it yourself if you want to know really is an acceptable answer. Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But unfortunately, not everyone works that way. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Yes, I would have. That's the way I learned Exchange. :) -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Michelle, I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to help me. It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this though, your reputation precedes you. Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If someone told you to just try it, would you have just said OK? Thanks, Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe: I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner. Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came across the wire. The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know. Love 'n' kisses, -Michelle -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Thanks, Bubba. It's what I pointed out four days ago. Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bubba G Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. It is Exchange aware only after you load Exchange. One of the things Exchange does is modify ntbackup to be Exchange aware. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. From what I have been reading the Windows NT 2000 version of ntbackup.exe is not Exchange aware. I know they tell you to to use the Exchange 2000 version for MS Exchange 2000 Server. Admittedly, I don't recall anything about using it with MS Exchange 5.5. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2002 11:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2. Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and eject and mail the logs for verification. With 2000 I used the wizard to create the backup but I can't seem to get it to grab any tape I have inserted. I tried adding multiple tapes to the media pool with the same name, but I always get The operation was not performed, no storage media was specified message on the report. What am I missing? There must be a simple way to say any tape in there grab it and use it for a backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K It's called Exchange5.5. Do keep up. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000 install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 17:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future. Then no Exchange2000. Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Fors, II Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: custom NDR?
(blindfold sales surge noted) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (digital camera sales surge noted) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses in a hotel bar at MEC... -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit. I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your plans for following up on this critical success? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got education? Learn the difference between u and you. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got money ? Get MS to consult for u. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: custom NDR? OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can you make custom NDR's? or change the text of current ones? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
You want to learn? Try twiddling the logging levels and see what happens. If I knew of a handy-dandy reference that I could pull out of my head and give you, I'd have done it. Not having one, I merely pointed out that you could very easily determine the answer to your inquiry. Had you been doing that instead of whining here, you'd have a nice handy-dandy reference you could post on the list for the benefit of the rest of those who might be interested in the same thing. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) The reason I asked was to learn. Some are ok with only knowing half the story, others are not. When I asked in my original post, I just want a link to some type of document. Guess that was too much to ask for. My mistake. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually inaccurate. I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked with thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with regards to monitoring and reporting or something, we could provide you with a push in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case figure it out for yourself by testing is a more than appropriate response. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have been better :) The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one. Thanks for the attempt though! Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Try them and see. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
I suggest your skin is too thin. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Chris, On average you will find some of the most exchange knowledgeable people on this list. You'll also find them, on average, to be extremely helpful. I don't dispute this. The Boy if I had only known comment was to suggest if I had know about the crap for asking a question. Well, there is no link. The scope of your query wasn't limited to just a link. If it was, you'd have gotten the answer you wanted. But your reason(ing) is circular, and when complaining about our inability to think it a rational manner that's kinds funny. See other reply. (Again, what did you think I wanted. Could you try to define what the scope of MY query was?) As far as you telling me my reasoning is circular...huh? Do even know what you meant by using that word? I did not say that there was a link or that there even was an answer! I can see as how you might have interpreted that but I can't control your thought process. In general we're also pretty busy. This is like saying Oh ya! Apples are red! totally irrelevant. What does time have to do with this? Stick to the topic. So if you'd taken the time to properly phrase your technical question you would have saved all of us (yourself included a lot of time). That was my best shot at asking the question. How could I have gotten more technical with out having more knowledge of the subject. That is what circular reasoning is: Ask a more technical question of something you do not know the technical information about. Did you read the FAQ before you posted? If you had, you might have saved yourself from the perceived condescension you feel you've been subjected to. Based on the question you /asked/ the responses were reasonable. Perhaps the fact the question was completely ignored the first time you asked it should have served as a clue that it needed some work. Your insistence on reposting it without further revision or comment speaks volumes. I did read the FAQ sometime ago. I will admit that you are right on this point. Maybe I should have reworded my post. I have had problems before, where my posts did not make it through and I thought this might have been the case. On the other hand, I feel my post was stating exactly what I wanted. Could you rewrite for me to show me how it should have read? I WAS looking for some form of documentation on IMC logging, let me see it how you would have done it? Now, if your feelings are just too hurt, there are a number of other Exchange forums you might try. You'll find a heavy overlap of the top contributors in those forums as well, but who knows... You might get lucky and someone will tell you there is no link or do a ton of work to satisfy your seemingly idle curiosity. Are we in 1st grade? No. My feeling are not hurt. I was just I little taken by the arrogance of the replies I received, which you seem to think are OK. What is wrong with idle curiosity? If you have a problem with asking questions as a form of learning that is ok, but it doesn't mean everyone thinks that way. Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, On average you will find some of the most exchange knowledgeable people on this list. You'll also find them, on average, to be extremely helpful. The reason, that seemed obvious to me, that I asked the question was to have a link or something that would have taken about 10 seconds to type that would have pointed me it the right direction. Well, there is no link. The scope of your query wasn't limited to just a link. If it was, you'd have gotten the answer you wanted. But your reason(ing) is circular, and when complaining about our inability to think it a rational manner that's kinds funny. I thought to myself...Hey, these guys seem pretty smart on this list, let me ask them. Boy, if I had only known...wow! In general we're also pretty busy. So if you'd taken the time to properly phrase your technical question you would have saved all of us (yourself included a lot of time). Go back and read those replies that you guys wrote. They sound kind of silly huh? I've reread mine and find a distinct lack of silliness or irrational thought. Perhaps you can enlighten me. I was referred to this list by someone who mentioned that the people here are a great help...he forgot to mention the condescending comments that I you have to endure to get that help... Did you read the FAQ before you posted? If you had, you might have saved yourself from the
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
You know, if I had directed him to that book, something I have done on very many occasions in response to other questions, I suspect it would have generated a similar response. Honestly, I didn't recall that particular information being in that book. That's not to say you're wrong, Andy, just that I don't have his book handy here at present, and, even if I did, I wouldn't have looked it up to see if it were there. In any case, my answer (or non-answer depending on your point of view) is exactly the approach I personally would have taken had I been curious about that particular topic and didn't find any references anywhere. So I fail to understand all the brouhaha. It's not like I said, Figure it out yourself, pinhead! My terse response is hardly worthy of all this hand wringing. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Actually there is an answer. PSS should be able to access the document if you can justify the need for the information. Part of the information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too. Folks are much too touchy here. This group is really much less entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum. I think the question could have been phrased better. Thus the What to do before you post part of the FAQ. But I also find figure it out yourself to be less than helpful. And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by NDA from disclosing the information. Folks used to get upset at call PSS. Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer. I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question. In that case, try it yourself if you want to know really is an acceptable answer. Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But unfortunately, not everyone works that way. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Yes, I would have. That's the way I learned Exchange. :) -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Michelle, I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to help me. It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this though, your reputation precedes you. Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If someone told you to just try it, would you have just said OK? Thanks, Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe: I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner. Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came across the wire. The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know. Love 'n' kisses, -Michelle -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Slighty OT - Script site creation
Give me a few days. I've made it more generic (it had hard-coded server and domain names before) and have to test it. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slighty OT - Script site creation ever dig this up? I'd post it on our script library if so... === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slighty OT - Script site creation I wrote one some time ago. I'll see if I can find a place to post it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Childers Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 6:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slighty OT - Script site creation I am beginnig the testing on our w2k/e2k migration and was wondering if there is an adsi script floating around that will automate the creation of sites/subnets for w2k. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
10Mb deletes pretty fast. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Finally, a voice of reason. I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for yourself' answer a bit short. I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method, and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I could turn it off. :-) One would think some info on most of the options could be publicly available with special ones to be used on advice of PSS only. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Actually there is an answer. PSS should be able to access the document if you can justify the need for the information. Part of the information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too. Folks are much too touchy here. This group is really much less entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum. I think the question could have been phrased better. Thus the What to do before you post part of the FAQ. But I also find figure it out yourself to be less than helpful. And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by NDA from disclosing the information. Folks used to get upset at call PSS. Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer. I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question. In that case, try it yourself if you want to know really is an acceptable answer. Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But unfortunately, not everyone works that way. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Yes, I would have. That's the way I learned Exchange. :) -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Michelle, I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to help me. It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this though, your reputation precedes you. Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If someone told you to just try it, would you have just said OK? Thanks, Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe: I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner. Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came across the wire. The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know. Love 'n' kisses, -Michelle -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
Unfortunately it's rather hard to simulate/stimulate all the success and failure conditions that might occur such that full logging can be explored. I understand that a picture of some sort might be drawn from it, but I question the value of the picture. Perhaps the point was that if it's valuable enough, the testing should be worthwhile. There does seem to be an awful lot of extra wringing. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:15 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) You want to learn? Try twiddling the logging levels and see what happens. If I knew of a handy-dandy reference that I could pull out of my head and give you, I'd have done it. Not having one, I merely pointed out that you could very easily determine the answer to your inquiry. Had you been doing that instead of whining here, you'd have a nice handy-dandy reference you could post on the list for the benefit of the rest of those who might be interested in the same thing. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) The reason I asked was to learn. Some are ok with only knowing half the story, others are not. When I asked in my original post, I just want a link to some type of document. Guess that was too much to ask for. My mistake. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually inaccurate. I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked with thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with regards to monitoring and reporting or something, we could provide you with a push in the right direction. But at the moment, your post appears to be nothing more than idle curiosity, in which case figure it out for yourself by testing is a more than appropriate response. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 9/8/2002 2:09 PM Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have been better :) The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one. Thanks for the attempt though! Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Try them and see. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
How fast does it analyze and summarize? === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:37 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) 10Mb deletes pretty fast. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Finally, a voice of reason. I understood the original question and also thought the 'test it for yourself' answer a bit short. I remember desiring the same information once, and after trying Ed's method, and quickly had a 10mb application log full of useless information before I could turn it off. :-) One would think some info on most of the options could be publicly available with special ones to be used on advice of PSS only. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Actually there is an answer. PSS should be able to access the document if you can justify the need for the information. Part of the information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too. Folks are much too touchy here. This group is really much less entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum. I think the question could have been phrased better. Thus the What to do before you post part of the FAQ. But I also find figure it out yourself to be less than helpful. And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by NDA from disclosing the information. Folks used to get upset at call PSS. Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer. I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question. In that case, try it yourself if you want to know really is an acceptable answer. Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But unfortunately, not everyone works that way. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Yes, I would have. That's the way I learned Exchange. :) -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Michelle, I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to help me. It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this though, your reputation precedes you. Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If someone told you to just try it, would you have just said OK? Thanks, Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe: I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner. Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came across the wire. The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know. Love 'n' kisses, -Michelle -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) snip
RE: Slow performance
Can you confirm that running the client on the server is slow? IE eliminating the network. Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 23:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: urgent backup problem
Hi Chris Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site) I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the tape...:-)). Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Clearly that is what fooled him. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K It's called Exchange5.5. Do keep up. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000 install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 17:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future. Then no Exchange2000. Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Fors, II Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
Don't we all? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K It even comes on the Exchange 2000 CD. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K It's called Exchange5.5. Do keep up. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000 install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 17:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K no AD anywhere and none planned in the near future. Then no Exchange2000. Looks like you'll be happy with 5.5 for awhile. William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA? *arghhh* Im confused now :-) J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Do you do full text indexing. That can kill your box. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery)
Yup. Did a test about six months ago[1] with a company called NDR[2][3]. The procedure they use (for NT4 Server[4]) is this: Basic install of OS Restore data partitions, make sure they're OK Restore system/boot partition *DO NOT REBOOT* Edit necessary registry keys to match their hardware[5] Reboot Server comes up, no nasty BSODs, all working This was from one model of Compaq to another. They tell me they can do the same if the customer's hardware is of a different brand, with little more difficulty. [1] Oooh!! Time for the next one :) [2] http://www.ndr.co.uk/ [3] A name which always makes me laugh... [4] Slightly different for Win2K, but they say it works... [5] They've had a lot of practice, and have this nicely worked out Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Coming soon: the new, improved Tiggercam!! -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery) Exchange server 5.5: disaster recovery Has anyone recover MS Exchange server at a disaster recovery site. We are in the process of implementing a disaster recovery procedure and would like to know whether we can recover to a different Compaq hardware. Rather than reinstalling the OS, we would like to restore everything from the backup tape. Our exchange server is currently installed on a Compaq Presario 1600. Our recovery site has Compaq DL 380. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery)
This was of course, not just an Exchange recovery. -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 12:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery) Yup. Did a test about six months ago[1] with a company called NDR[2][3]. The procedure they use (for NT4 Server[4]) is this: Basic install of OS Restore data partitions, make sure they're OK Restore system/boot partition *DO NOT REBOOT* Edit necessary registry keys to match their hardware[5] Reboot Server comes up, no nasty BSODs, all working This was from one model of Compaq to another. They tell me they can do the same if the customer's hardware is of a different brand, with little more difficulty. [1] Oooh!! Time for the next one :) [2] http://www.ndr.co.uk/ [3] A name which always makes me laugh... [4] Slightly different for Win2K, but they say it works... [5] They've had a lot of practice, and have this nicely worked out Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Coming soon: the new, improved Tiggercam!! -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery) Exchange server 5.5: disaster recovery Has anyone recover MS Exchange server at a disaster recovery site. We are in the process of implementing a disaster recovery procedure and would like to know whether we can recover to a different Compaq hardware. Rather than reinstalling the OS, we would like to restore everything from the backup tape. Our exchange server is currently installed on a Compaq Presario 1600. Our recovery site has Compaq DL 380. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
Then you have to be cruel to be kind... -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 11:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA? *arghhh* Im confused now :-) J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so it is not as secure as an off-site tape, and I only have space for one backup. I am putting together a case for new hardware to go to my management, so maybe I can slip in a few removable disks without them spotting it! The answer I usually get, however, is that the public come to see the fish, not the computers! BTW We recently were hit by complaints from PETA because we serve fish in our restaurant (but not in tacos!) Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Hi Chris Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site) I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the tape...:-)). Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 02/08/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox information
Hello all, We are looking for a tool or application that will allow us to provide users with information about their mailboxes and any attached PST files mailbox size list of largest messages find new un-read messages old messages The goal is to encourage users to clean up their mailboxes (not move junk to PST files). I realize that Outlook 2002 has a tool that will do some of this, but I am wondering if there is anything else available in this area. Regards, Chris Chris Tanner AECL [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
You must give in to the Exchange side, or become overrun with people asking you if the mail server's down when it's not. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Kane Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA? *arghhh* Im confused now :-) J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
Uh, no. That was to be said more in a terrified young British Public School student's voice. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
The more cruel, the more kind. Unfortunately, you can't be so kind as to stick heads of offensive users on pikes outside the server room. Sometimes I wish companies would just let Exchange Admins do their jobs the way they were trained... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Busby, Jacob Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Then you have to be cruel to be kind... -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 11:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... What happens if you both an Exchange person and a SQL DBA? *arghhh* Im confused now :-) J -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Trent Hancock Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: custom NDR?
Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people in the world. Those who want to see Ed Crowley, Chris Scharff, Andy Webb, and Daniel Chenault in pink sundresses and matching hats singing barbershop harmony... and those who don't. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (blindfold sales surge noted) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (digital camera sales surge noted) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses in a hotel bar at MEC... -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit. I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your plans for following up on this critical success? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got education? Learn the difference between u and you. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got money ? Get MS to consult for u. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: custom NDR? OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can you make custom NDR's? or change the text of current ones? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Lol, thanks Sander SysAdmin Manager Korbitec Korbi.net -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 01:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Sander - I only say this because the disk is non-removable, so it is not as secure as an off-site tape, and I only have space for one backup. I am putting together a case for new hardware to go to my management, so maybe I can slip in a few removable disks without them spotting it! The answer I usually get, however, is that the public come to see the fish, not the computers! BTW We recently were hit by complaints from PETA because we serve fish in our restaurant (but not in tacos!) Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 09:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Hi Chris Just curious why you say that. I backup to different removable hard drives Monday to Thursday and to tape on Friday (keep one tape off-site) I find this solution not too bad and have found hard drive restores faster and more reliable than tape restores (I detest a CRC error on the tape...:-)). Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 06:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.381 / Virus Database: 214 - Release Date: 02/08/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: custom NDR?
wow so that's what Ill miss be not be able to go to MEC. Guess I'll just rent The Birdcage again.. -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people in the world. Those who want to see Ed Crowley, Chris Scharff, Andy Webb, and Daniel Chenault in pink sundresses and matching hats singing barbershop harmony... and those who don't. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (blindfold sales surge noted) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (digital camera sales surge noted) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses in a hotel bar at MEC... -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit. I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your plans for following up on this critical success? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got education? Learn the difference between u and you. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got money ? Get MS to consult for u. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: custom NDR? OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can you make custom NDR's? or change the text of current ones? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: custom NDR?
way too much information for this time of day -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Just goes to show... there are two kinds of people in the world. Those who want to see Ed Crowley, Chris Scharff, Andy Webb, and Daniel Chenault in pink sundresses and matching hats singing barbershop harmony... and those who don't. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 2:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (blindfold sales surge noted) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? (digital camera sales surge noted) (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses in a hotel bar at MEC... -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit. I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your plans for following up on this critical success? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got education? Learn the difference between u and you. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: custom NDR? Got money ? Get MS to consult for u. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: custom NDR? OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5 or 2k can you make custom NDR's? or change the text of current ones? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Mailbox information
Storstat will work against an Exchange 5.5 mailbox (haven't tried it against Exchange 2000 though). It comes in the BORK. As for the PST file - I don't know of anything that will help you there. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Chris tanner Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 06:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox information Hello all, We are looking for a tool or application that will allow us to provide users with information about their mailboxes and any attached PST files mailbox size list of largest messages find new un-read messages old messages The goal is to encourage users to clean up their mailboxes (not move junk to PST files). I realize that Outlook 2002 has a tool that will do some of this, but I am wondering if there is anything else available in this area. Regards, Chris Chris Tanner AECL [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2K SP3 good to go?
Go for it. Been running with Ex2k SP3 as well, with no issues. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Win2K SP3 good to go? Has the smoke settled...with Win2K SP3 O.K. to apply? TIA, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
Good place to get a few of them : http://www.entrysecurity.com/favs.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
Yea, those Rental Car links will come in handy. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites Good place to get a few of them : http://www.entrysecurity.com/favs.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Services fail after SP2
Q151427 , Q218458 , Q157363 , Q317140 , Q166184 , Q189649 , Q249023 , Q180140 , Q274447 , Q168683 , Q274814 , Q231604 , Q234636 , Q136934 , Q149706 , Q175529 , Q266208 , Q260698 , Q110582 , Q158520 , Q164130 It indicates the failure of a service startup due to the fact that one of the depedency did not start. This event can occur for potentially any service or application. See the various Q articles for some of them. Search Microsoft's support site for the latest updates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 08:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 OK The event messages are as follows: Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 09/08/2002 Time: 10:44:46 User: N/A Computer: MYSERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 09/08/2002 Time: 10:42:41 User: N/A Computer: MYSERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 On Sat, 24 August 2002, Great Cthulhu Jones wrote Well, you know of course the IS depends on the IIS. Just checking here and there... Now, are you able to apply SP3 to see if it resolves the issue? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 What do you mean by that? It is Small Business Server 2000 so it is running ISA, Exchange and SQL, along with file and print. On Thu, 22 August 2002, quot;Great Cthulhu Jonesquot; wrote gt; gt; Also, how's the web server running on that box? gt; gt; (:= gt; gt; -Original Message- gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf gt; Of Adam Romain gt; Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:21 AM gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 gt; gt; gt; Do the services just stop or does this happen on boot ? gt; gt; Do you get any event errors in the application log ? gt; gt; And... gt; gt; Do you have enough free space ? gt; gt; -Original Message- gt; From: Julian Brunt gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] gt; Sent: 22 August 2002 12:42 gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 gt; gt; gt; MSExchangeMTA gt; MSExchangeIS gt; gt; On Wed, 21 August 2002, amp;quot;Great Cthulhu Jonesamp;quot; wrote gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Which two services don't start? gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; (:= gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; -Original Message- gt; amp;gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gt; amp;gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf gt; amp;gt; Of Julian Brunt gt; amp;gt; Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:54 PM gt; amp;gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; amp;gt; Subject: Services fail after SP2 gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Hi All gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; I get 2 failed services on a clients SBS 2000 exchange gt; amp;gt; server after I installed Exchange SP2. If I use the gt; amp;gt; services MMC and start it they start fine. I have a gt; amp;gt; work around at the moment and I start them from a gt; amp;gt; batchfile in the startup folder. gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Obviously this is not ideal. gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Does anyone have an idea why this is so? gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Regards gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Julian Brunt gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; _ gt; amp;gt; List posting FAQ: gt; amp;gt; amp;lt;a gt; href=amp;quot;lt;a href=quot;a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex quot;gt;hthttp://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/res ource/exquot;gt;ht/a tp://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex lt;/agthttp://www.swinc.com/resource/exlt;/agt/a; gt; ch_faq.htmamp;quot;amp;gt;lt;a href=quot;a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex ch_fhttp://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex ch_f/a aq.htmamp;lt;/aamp;gtquot;gt;a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/resource/ex ch_faq.htmamp;lt;/aamp;gtlt;/agthttp://www.swinc.com/resource/exch _faq.htmamp;lt;/aamp;gtlt;/agt/a;; gt; amp;gt; Archives: gt; amp;gt; amp;lt;a gt; href=amp;quot;lt;a href=quot;a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch;
RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS. Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal. Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the network protocol used on your network? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
Personally, I like http://tiggercam.net (Tigger says he's developing it) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites Yea, those Rental Car links will come in handy. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites Good place to get a few of them : http://www.entrysecurity.com/favs.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel...
No, a Dickensian. -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 06:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... Aha ! The Great One is an AGGIE ? :-) Trent Hancock Native Terp, Assimilated Longhorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Look, Morons, Exchange Is Cruel... pleasesirmayihavesomemore (:= _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
Q255770 , Q282073 , Q269001 This problem was encountered for the first time after a server crash (Security Event Log full, even though the overwrite events as needed option was active). Other crashes had never caused this Trying to access the web site via internet resulted to the HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error error.Running synciwam.vbs fixed the problem. The server process could not be started because the configured identity is incorrect. Check the username and password. - We encountered this error when the IWAM_machine account went out-of-sync, usually after a server reboot. This can be fixed by running the Synciwam.vbs from \Inetpub\AdminScripts directory. See Q255770. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/1/ROOT'. The error was 'Server execution failed . - See Q282073 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA, I get the following event in my syslog: Event Type: Warning Event Source: W3SVC Event Category: None Event ID: 36 Date: 8/28/2002 Time: 10:06:12 AM User: N/A Computer: BEAUTY1 Description: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/root'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. W2K AS SP2 Cluster; E2K SP2. Exchange running in Mixed mode. OWA and stores all on one cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder, Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Slow performance
lmfao -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance It solved the problem here, we had 3000 contacts in a public folder, Secretaries where getting incredibly upset. When I tested this in the lab it worked great, when I applied it to the live server I became a hero Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks Katz, never thought there was resolution for this problem, now maybe I can try it out this weekend. Rich -Original Message- From: Katz, Gordon J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Q216076 Gordon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance I hear that, I have a huge public contact folder and when people save info to it, it takes about 45 seconds to save as well. I just told them that its so big thats why its slow. I guess there really is no solution for a large amount of data for a public folder. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge
Oh yeah... http://www.wickett.net/Default.asp?Page=WNMailKeeper -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 23:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Ho ho ho. PST on a CD. Good luck reading *that*! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Not a problem. We figured most of the monthly runs will be under that. In fact will make them under 650 so they will fit on a CD. Still can't believe I missed it in the manual. My only other possible problem is the older version doesn't have that feature. If not will have to load up 2000 workstation for the new Exmerge. The new one does not run on NT4.0 - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:58 PM Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Good news is, if you get a PST over 2GB in size, you only have to truncate the file size to read what's in it! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Thanks Andrey. I found it. I could I have missed it. Anyhow it looks like I will have experiment with that setting. I am guessing I may have to do this in two runs. One to get the user names that contain the subject matter and then run it again with the all mailboxes being put into one PST once the ones are identified in the first run. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: RE: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Yes this is possible with ExMerge. ExMErge documentation as well as the default ExMerge.ini file show such a configuration. -Original Message- From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Merge all Mailboxes to a single PST using Exmerge Fellow Admins. Is there away to run exmerge and put all of the selected mailboxes messages into a single PST. If not, is there a tool out there that will let you do that after you run Exmerge. I have looked hard and couldn't find anything in the latest Exmerge version's document. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
I don't think they're going to give up the whole file for any business need. There's probably way more in the relevant header file than Microsoft wants to give out. I mean...that's probably the one with the cabal members' names in it. *wringing hands* ;) -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Actually there is an answer. PSS should be able to access the document if you can justify the need for the information. Part of the information is covered in Paul Robichaux's Exchange 5.5 book too. Folks are much too touchy here. This group is really much less entertaining as an ongoing rugby scrum. I think the question could have been phrased better. Thus the What to do before you post part of the FAQ. But I also find figure it out yourself to be less than helpful. And, as for whether anyone here knows the answer or not, I suspect that the ones who do have kept humbly silent as they are likely prevented by NDA from disclosing the information. Folks used to get upset at call PSS. Hope that's not still the case - it's the right answer. I'd suggest that a copy of the previously mentioned Robichaux book be added to the reading list of anyone still working with Exchange 5.5. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe, I really don't think there IS an answer to that question. In that case, try it yourself if you want to know really is an acceptable answer. Sometimes, the documentation just doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) By asking question and accepting answers with no content? I applaud you. But unfortunately, not everyone works that way. -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Yes, I would have. That's the way I learned Exchange. :) -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Michelle, I am sorry to hear about this, but I am sure if it is out there I will find it. It will just take me longer than if someone opted to help me. It doesn't surprise me that you took the time to tell me this though, your reputation precedes you. Just curious...how would you have dealt with the situation? If someone told you to just try it, would you have just said OK? Thanks, Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Joe: I know of *at least* two ex-PSS people who read this list, and a few current MS employees who read the list as well. Perhaps one of them would have helped you had you not responded in such a manner. Maybe one of them was even looking for an answer when your reply came across the wire. The tone of your replies, though, were such that you'll never know. Love 'n' kisses, -Michelle -Original Message- From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Outlook however checks hosts and DNS servers for name resolution before switching to NetBIOS name resolution. This is of course can be changed if required. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS. Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal. Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the network protocol used on your network? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OALGen
As per Microsoft: This issue can occur if you did not enter a public folder store for the offline Address Book that it can replicate its contents to. . See the link below for more details. The problem is that the offline address list generator cannot generate offline address books if an entry in the global address list is hidden by Access Control Lists such that the global address list appears as a blank line. The offline address list generator creates corrupted Rdndex.oab files for visible mail-enabled public folder objects. See Q278641. Q286328 , Q278641 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cook, Jason Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OALGen Anyone ever get an event id 9127 when attempting to rebuild the OAL in Exchange 2000 system manager. I've looked at kb Q312250 and 318237. I'm running in a mixed mode with an E2k Server joined to a 5.5 organization. Any thoughts? Jason Cook Network Administrator J.H. Ellwood Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] 312 782-7493 x. 152 DISCLAIMER! The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender at (312) 782-5432 and delete this e-mail message. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Thanks for your reply Andrey, However, I was under the impression that Outlook is a winsock application and therefore will resolve names via a hosts file and the DNS before using WINS and NetBIOS as outlined in Q172218 and Q155048. I am not convinced it is a name resolution issue anyway because it only effects a small number of users across multiple subnets and Exchange servers, while the vast majority of users have no problem. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS. Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal. Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the network protocol used on your network? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery)
Here's the procedure for restoring Windows 2000 to different hardware that I developed and tested fairly well. It was developed around Legato Networker, but should work for any sort of backup/restore. Windows 2000 Server Recovery to Different Hardware 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document describes a method to restore Legato backups of a Windows 2000 server to different hardware than the original system. This procedure was developed and tested using Legato client version 6.0.3 and Windows 2000 service pack 2. 2. PROCEDURE 2.1 Install Windows 2000 server on the target hardware. Install the same level service pack as on the original system. Insure that the disk partitions have the same drive letters, are large enough, and are of the same type (NTFS, FAT32, etc). The server must also have the same name and IP address. Record the IP address for later use. 2.2 Install the Legato Client. 2.3 Run the Legato client. Select Recover. On the Options menu, select Recover Options..., Overwrite Existing File. 2.4 Mark all data drives as well as SYSTEM DB, SYSTEM FILES, and SYSTEM STATE. 2.5 Navigate through the file hierarchy and unmark C:\WINNT\SYSTEM32\HAL*.DLL. 2.6 Start Recovery 2.7 After recovery is complete, attempt to reboot. The reboot process will fail. 2.8 Boot to Windows 2000 CDROM. If needed, hit F6 and load SCSI drivers. 2.9 At the Welcome to Setup screen, hit ENTER to install Windows 2000. 2.10 Hit F8 to agree to the license terms. 2.11 Hit R at the prompt to repair the existing Windows 2000 installation. 2.12 Complete the Windows 2000 installation and reboot. 2.13 Re-install the appropriate Windows 2000 service pack. 2.14 Re-install the appropriate version of IE. 2.15 Re-install any hotfixes that were installed originally. 3. CLEANUP 3.1 If desired, remove unneeded devices and drivers via the device manager. 3.2 Verify that the network card TCPIP settings can be viewed. If you receive an error stating that you must install a network card before you can set TCPIP parameters, follow the procedure in Appendix A. 3.3 Verify applications. APPENDIX A 1. REINSTALL NETWORK CARD 1.1 From the control panel device manager, delete the network card. 1.2 Start regedit. Navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interf aces. 1.3 Each subkey represents a network interface. Delete the subkey that represents the ethernet adapter (look at the subkey's IPAddress entry and match to the server's IP address). 1.4 Use the control panel Add/Remove hardware applet to search for new hardware. It should find the ethernet adapter and install drivers for it (you may need a third party disk). 1.5 The ethernet adapter will be installed to use DHCP for settings. Change the network card to the appropriate settings (IP address, DNS, WINS, speed, duplex). -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 6:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery) Yup. Did a test about six months ago[1] with a company called NDR[2][3]. The procedure they use (for NT4 Server[4]) is this: Basic install of OS Restore data partitions, make sure they're OK Restore system/boot partition *DO NOT REBOOT* Edit necessary registry keys to match their hardware[5] Reboot Server comes up, no nasty BSODs, all working This was from one model of Compaq to another. They tell me they can do the same if the customer's hardware is of a different brand, with little more difficulty. [1] Oooh!! Time for the next one :) [2] http://www.ndr.co.uk/ [3] A name which always makes me laugh... [4] Slightly different for Win2K, but they say it works... [5] They've had a lot of practice, and have this nicely worked out Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Coming soon: the new, improved Tiggercam!! -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovery MS Exchange server from a backup (Disaster Recovery) Exchange server 5.5: disaster recovery Has anyone recover MS Exchange server at a disaster recovery site. We are in the process of implementing a disaster recovery procedure and would like to know whether we can recover to a different Compaq hardware. Rather than reinstalling the OS, we would like to restore everything from the backup tape. Our exchange server is currently installed on a Compaq Presario 1600. Our recovery site has Compaq DL 380. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
You may want to check their RPC binding order if you haven't done so. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q163576; -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Thanks for your reply Andrey, However, I was under the impression that Outlook is a winsock application and therefore will resolve names via a hosts file and the DNS before using WINS and NetBIOS as outlined in Q172218 and Q155048. I am not convinced it is a name resolution issue anyway because it only effects a small number of users across multiple subnets and Exchange servers, while the vast majority of users have no problem. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS. Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal. Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the network protocol used on your network? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Services fail after SP2
When you cut paste from a support site, do you mind referencing the source? It's bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=7001source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 07:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Services fail after SP2 Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 Q151427 , Q218458 , Q157363 , Q317140 , Q166184 , Q189649 , Q249023 , Q180140 , Q274447 , Q168683 , Q274814 , Q231604 , Q234636 , Q136934 , Q149706 , Q175529 , Q266208 , Q260698 , Q110582 , Q158520 , Q164130 It indicates the failure of a service startup due to the fact that one of the depedency did not start. This event can occur for potentially any service or application. See the various Q articles for some of them. Search Microsoft's support site for the latest updates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 08:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 OK The event messages are as follows: Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 09/08/2002 Time: 10:44:46 User: N/A Computer: MYSERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 Event Type: Error Event Source: Service Control Manager Event Category: None Event ID: 7001 Date: 09/08/2002 Time: 10:42:41 User: N/A Computer: MYSERVER Description: The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service depends on the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service which failed to start because of the following error: %%0 On Sat, 24 August 2002, Great Cthulhu Jones wrote Well, you know of course the IS depends on the IIS. Just checking here and there... Now, are you able to apply SP3 to see if it resolves the issue? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Brunt Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 What do you mean by that? It is Small Business Server 2000 so it is running ISA, Exchange and SQL, along with file and print. On Thu, 22 August 2002, quot;Great Cthulhu Jonesquot; wrote gt; gt; Also, how's the web server running on that box? gt; gt; (:= gt; gt; -Original Message- gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf gt; Of Adam Romain gt; Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:21 AM gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 gt; gt; gt; Do the services just stop or does this happen on boot ? gt; gt; Do you get any event errors in the application log ? gt; gt; And... gt; gt; Do you have enough free space ? gt; gt; -Original Message- gt; From: Julian Brunt gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] gt; Sent: 22 August 2002 12:42 gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; Subject: RE: Services fail after SP2 gt; gt; gt; MSExchangeMTA gt; MSExchangeIS gt; gt; On Wed, 21 August 2002, amp;quot;Great Cthulhu Jonesamp;quot; wrote gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Which two services don't start? gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; (:= gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; -Original Message- gt; amp;gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gt; amp;gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf gt; amp;gt; Of Julian Brunt gt; amp;gt; Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:54 PM gt; amp;gt; To: Exchange Discussions gt; amp;gt; Subject: Services fail after SP2 gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Hi All gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; I get 2 failed services on a clients SBS 2000 exchange gt; amp;gt; server after I installed Exchange SP2. If I use the gt; amp;gt; services MMC and start it they start fine. I have a gt; amp;gt; work around at the moment and I start them from a gt; amp;gt; batchfile in the startup folder. gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Obviously this is not ideal. gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Does anyone have an idea why this is so? gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Regards gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; Julian Brunt gt; amp;gt; gt; amp;gt; gt; _ gt; amp;gt; List posting FAQ: gt; amp;gt; amp;lt;a gt; href=amp;quot;lt;a href=quot;a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/r esource/ex quot;gt;hthttp://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swi nc.com/res ource/exquot;gt;ht/a tp://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/a href=http://mail.altavista.co.uk//jump/http://www.swinc.com/r esource/ex
RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=36source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 08:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Q255770 , Q282073 , Q269001 This problem was encountered for the first time after a server crash (Security Event Log full, even though the overwrite events as needed option was active). Other crashes had never caused this Trying to access the web site via internet resulted to the HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error error.Running synciwam.vbs fixed the problem. The server process could not be started because the configured identity is incorrect. Check the username and password. - We encountered this error when the IWAM_machine account went out-of-sync, usually after a server reboot. This can be fixed by running the Synciwam.vbs from \Inetpub\AdminScripts directory. See Q255770. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/1/ROOT'. The error was 'Server execution failed . - See Q282073 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA, I get the following event in my syslog: Event Type: Warning Event Source: W3SVC Event Category: None Event ID: 36 Date: 8/28/2002 Time: 10:06:12 AM User: N/A Computer: BEAUTY1 Description: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/root'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. W2K AS SP2 Cluster; E2K SP2. Exchange running in Mixed mode. OWA and stores all on one cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Hi Michelle, I have checked the RPC binding order and it is correctly set, this is also backed up by the fact that on the machines that have the problem, if you recreate the profile name resolution in the Mail Control Panel Applet takes less than 5 seconds to resolve the name to a Exchange server and mailbox. This is contrary to what would happen if the order was wrong as stated at the bottom of Q163576. Hence my feeling the issue has nothing to do with name resolution but is another part of the logon process. Thanks for your response though, Paul -Original Message- From: Harmon, Michelle M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process You may want to check their RPC binding order if you haven't done so. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q163576; -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Thanks for your reply Andrey, However, I was under the impression that Outlook is a winsock application and therefore will resolve names via a hosts file and the DNS before using WINS and NetBIOS as outlined in Q172218 and Q155048. I am not convinced it is a name resolution issue anyway because it only effects a small number of users across multiple subnets and Exchange servers, while the vast majority of users have no problem. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process I would tend to think that WINS is more responsible for Outlook logon than DNS. Outlook is a NetBIOS type of animal. Have you tweaked the Provider order in the registry of your clients to match the network protocol used on your network? -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process Hi all, Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done, i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then RPC connections to the Exchange server, then what happens when is the security token checked against the mailbox, how does Outlook Security Settings effect the logon as well as organisational form, address books, free-busy, etc, etc. Why I hear some of your cry, well we have been having an intermittent problem for some time in that occasionally (about 2 times a week) we will get a whole bunch of calls from users that complain that Outlook is hanging while logging in. The numbers are small say a maximum of 40 out of 4,500, they are located on different subnets, different Exchange servers (same site), etc, etc. I want to make a plan to start working through the logon process to see where things are failing and therefore need a detailed document on how Outlook logs onto the Exchange server. TIA Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: OALGen
When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=9127source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 08:46 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OALGen Subject: RE: OALGen As per Microsoft: This issue can occur if you did not enter a public folder store for the offline Address Book that it can replicate its contents to. . See the link below for more details. The problem is that the offline address list generator cannot generate offline address books if an entry in the global address list is hidden by Access Control Lists such that the global address list appears as a blank line. The offline address list generator creates corrupted Rdndex.oab files for visible mail-enabled public folder objects. See Q278641. Q286328 , Q278641 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cook, Jason Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OALGen Anyone ever get an event id 9127 when attempting to rebuild the OAL in Exchange 2000 system manager. I've looked at kb Q312250 and 318237. I'm running in a mixed mode with an E2k Server joined to a 5.5 organization. Any thoughts? Jason Cook Network Administrator J.H. Ellwood Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] 312 782-7493 x. 152 DISCLAIMER! The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please contact the sender at (312) 782-5432 and delete this e-mail message. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Remember to apply the same Exchange SP to your workstation that has been applied to Exchange. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04)
RE: Way OT - Websites
I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United
RE: urgent backup problem
Rob, Usually you are running Outlook on the same PC, this has a different Mapi32.dll and is a version that the exch admin prog does not like. So when installing rename the Outlook one, install then make sure that the exch admin dll is copied to the bin directory it is installed to and then rename the Outlook one back. I don't know off hand where you are going to get a installable copy of the admin or what all the files it requires (there is a few as I have tried to help a friend in your position, told him in the end to get hold of a old MS select CD and install from there and patch it). Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36
Again, I blame the American public school system for what will likely be a lifelong handicap for the poor man. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 When you get something from a support site, you should reference it. And don't delete the authors' names and present it as your own. Bad form, otherwise. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=36source= -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 08:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Subject: RE: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Q255770 , Q282073 , Q269001 This problem was encountered for the first time after a server crash (Security Event Log full, even though the overwrite events as needed option was active). Other crashes had never caused this Trying to access the web site via internet resulted to the HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error error.Running synciwam.vbs fixed the problem. The server process could not be started because the configured identity is incorrect. Check the username and password. - We encountered this error when the IWAM_machine account went out-of-sync, usually after a server reboot. This can be fixed by running the Synciwam.vbs from \Inetpub\AdminScripts directory. See Q255770. The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/1/ROOT'. The error was 'Server execution failed . - See Q282073 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Hill Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA2K logout.asp generates event 36 Anyone else ever get this? Whenever a user clicks the logout button in OWA, I get the following event in my syslog: Event Type: Warning Event Source: W3SVC Event Category: None Event ID: 36 Date: 8/28/2002 Time: 10:06:12 AM User: N/A Computer: BEAUTY1 Description: The server failed to load application '/LM/W3SVC/100/root'. The error was 'The specified metadata was not found. W2K AS SP2 Cluster; E2K SP2. Exchange running in Mixed mode. OWA and stores all on one cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
Tener... Why does it not surprise me that you like that web site? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: urgent backup problem
hmmm - think I might just stick with what I've done - more trouble than it's worth. Server is being decommissioned in approx 3 weeks anyway. thanks for the info the info tho - filed it away! cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, Usually you are running Outlook on the same PC, this has a different Mapi32.dll and is a version that the exch admin prog does not like. So when installing rename the Outlook one, install then make sure that the exch admin dll is copied to the bin directory it is installed to and then rename the Outlook one back. I don't know off hand where you are going to get a installable copy of the admin or what all the files it requires (there is a few as I have tried to help a friend in your position, told him in the end to get hold of a old MS select CD and install from there and patch it). Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
OT: Comparison Table for E2K standard vs Enterprise
I swear MS are hiding this information from me. I'm currently looking for the feature comprison table that compares the standard and Enterprise version of Exchange 2000. Anyone know of any pointers to this? Many thanks, Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
you dont like it i thought it was pretty good, just the thought of some guy speaking into a mic about his website makes me laugh. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites Tener... Why does it not surprise me that you like that web site? -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites A very well designed website is www.zombo.com put your speakers on though. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comparison Table for E2K standard vs Enterprise
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/howtobuy/choosing/default.asp -Original Message- From: Jason Kane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Comparison Table for E2K standard vs Enterprise I swear MS are hiding this information from me. I'm currently looking for the feature comprison table that compares the standard and Enterprise version of Exchange 2000. Anyone know of any pointers to this? Many thanks, Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OALGen
E2K sp3, Win2K sp3, OutlookXP I just set up my exchange server recently, only a few users. I have had a couple of accounts do this now thought maybe I had something misconfigured (though I don't know how) or if it's an undocumented feature. Has anyone seen this before? One user logs on to his OutlookXP and OWA at his computer with his password, all lowercase, without problems. Trying OWA from a couple other computers he had to use all caps for his password to get it to work. Another user got a new computer and setup his new account in Outlook xp. Originally he could log in with a lowercase password, but on the new computer it had to be in all caps. Reseting the password on the server seems to fix it in both cases. It's no big deal to reset the password, of course, but any one have an idea about this one? It seems rather strange to me, but, there's absolutely no doubt as to the case that had to be entered on each machine to get it to work. I set the passwords initially all lowercase and no one has access to change their own right now. thanks, -wendy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/ -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't join Exch 5.5 site
I am attempting the Ed Crowley Server Move Method. During the Exch 5.5 install on the new W2K SP3 machine, I try to join the existing Exch 5.5 SP4 / NT4 SP6a site. It fails at the replication phase stating Exch Setup Error c1030b11 A connection could not be made to the remote directory service. I have checked all suggestions in Q159485 (name resolution, rping, permissions). Using the Site Service Account, I was able to install the Exch Administrator on the new machine and had full access. These two machines are on the same LAN. Thanks, Steve Schario _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
But seriously the exception is the colonoscopy which if it detects and removes polyps can SAVE your life. Mine was painless, fell asleep listening to Beatles, awoke in a fine fettle with 6 polyps gone .. good for 5 years till the next one. Fenton * www.kathmandukids.org - saving one child at a time - low key yet high impact * -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Which is a good thing, believe you me. I won't go into details on the list, but, yeah, it's a good thing to not be anally probed. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 11:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) I have never been anal probed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harmon, Michelle M. Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) And who the hell is Cartman and why should he throw exceptions, anyway?!? -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) He knows, but is sworn to secrecy on the subject. About all he'll ever offer is the cryptic riddle, Try them and see. If you spent more than a millisecond deciphering that irony-laden statement, you would realize a dawn of knowledge you never before imagined possible, which is probably why you didn't spend any amount of time in excess of said millisecond trying to suss out the meaning of Ed's Chinese puzzle. You obviously haven't realized the connection between MS Exchange and the JFK assassination. Once you do, you'll stop writing responses like the one below and focus instead on that strange Error 45998 from the SMTP engine, Error 0008400D-C445643F in garrison.dll... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have been better :) The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a partial answer and I am looking for a complete one. Thanks for the attempt though! Joe Rojas -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Try them and see. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Rojas Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2) Hi All, I am trying to find some kind of documentation on the different levels of logging in the 'diagnostics logging' tab of the IMC (Exchange 5.5). I am trying to find out what is logged at the different levels for all the categories. (Initialization/Termination, Addressing, Message Transfer, SMTP Interface Events, Internal Processing, SMTP Protocol Log, and Message Archival) Thanks in advance! Joe Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Slow performance
hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Help with determining mailbox size using CDO....please
I am trying to determine the size of mailboxes in Exch. 5.5, SP4 using a CDO script with the following lines: Mailbox_size = HE08001E 'Code for mailbox size in bytes UserSize = Round((objUserSession.Infostores.Item(intCounter).Fields(Mailbox_Size)) / 1024 / 1024) This returns the mailbox size in MB, as long as the mailbox is less than 1 GB. If the mailbox is over 1 GB, then the value of UserSize is a negative number. (i.e. a 1.5 GB mailbox would return -2560 MB). Interestingly enough, this negative number subtracted from 4096 gives the correct size for the mailbox. 4096 also happens to be the largest size that ExchAdmin will report...anything over that returns 0 in mailbox resources. Are there any suggestions on how to get CDO to properly report mailbox size on mailboxes over 1 GB (we even have one user with 1 mailbox over 7 GB!)? Thank you in advance, --Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange
If your Domain is mixed-mode Active Directory, you could upgrade the Exchange server operating system to Windows 2000, and demote it as part of the upgrade. The only thing you should run into is that you'll have to re-enter the Exchange service account password on the service properties when the Windows 2000 upgrade is complete. Other than that I've seen this approach at a number of places with good success. Jim Collins Sr. Systems Engineer Competitive Computing, Inc. www.competitive.com -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server. I want to minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from Algin Technology? To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server. Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just re-install NT and exchange or trust UPromote? Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file
Hi, folks: E2k SP2 on W2k SP2, one SG, one DB, mixed mode. Server functions as a Connector server to other 5.5 remote sites with several X.400 connectors and one SMTP and RGC connectors. For the past several weeks, this server's .STM database file has grown much larger than its accompanying .EDB file. What could be causing this? While I see 9215's and 9318's in the App log, I was wondering if any of you have seen this problem and what your fix was. Thanks in advance! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Microsoft says it isn't possible (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q196533), but is there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000 and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks, Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage
Then take TS out of the equation, and figure out how to get them access straight to the Exchange server. VPN, dude. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:01 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage We have a lot of road warriors that want to write email, etc. while offline (in meetings, on an airplane, etc.) and synchronize with the home office when they're back in the hotel room. It's MUCH cheaper for them to use the Internet connection in the hotel room rather than dial up from Finland back to Texas. Not to mention MUCH faster. I'm would like to get the TS/Outlook2K to create an ost on their local drive that can be accessed by their local Outlook2K while offline. Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage They want to have a local OST, that is accessed from the server over a TS session over the internet? That does not sound possible at all. I access my outlook over a TS session. All of the email lives on the email server. I have a 4 gig email box. And have no speed problems at all. No PST no OST. I have no clue how or why you would try to stick an OST in the mix. I even TS my email from my local Desktop now. Why use my proc for Email when I can use someone else's. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Richard (NY Int) Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Let me know if you hear anything about this. One of my users wants to do this too. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage I would like to be able to create an ost on a remote laptop that uses Citrix over the Internet. I would like to avoid having the user dialup and sync (higher cost and lower bandwidth). Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Why would you want an OST in a TS profile? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond What are you on about mate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook/Citrix/offline storage Does anyone know a workaround to Q242195? Windows 2000 Terminal Services Does Not Support Outlook Offline Storage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q242195 Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5
Dear All, I got a problem like this: Our server is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz, with currently having 1 GB of Ram (I just added a 512 MB ram). The hard drive is a 9GB X 3 with RAID 5, and right now from totally 18 GB total capacity, only 1.5 GB left. The server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Service Pack 3, and Microsoft Exchange 5.5 service pack 3 (I'm going to put the service pack 4 soon). The problems right now are that some clients can't connect to the server whenever they want to check their email using Microsoft Outlook, which directly connect to the Exchange Server (without using POP3 or IMAP). The error message is connection time out. But for some clients they can still connect to the Exchange server, although it's kind of flaky (sometimes it takes 1 minute just to fetch the email directly from the server using MS Outlook). Whenever clients try to connect from the web, it works just fine. The size of the Exchange directory in c:\progra~1\exchsrvr is +/- 9 GB (the MDB/log consuming lot of space). My question is does anyone know what happening with the server right now? and how can I fix it ? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Determining mailbox size using CDO
Good morning, I was looking for a bit of help with determining Exchange mailboxes using CDO. The lines of code in question are as follows: Mailbox_Size = HE08001E UserSize = Round((objUserSess.Infostores.Item(intCounter).Fields(Mailbox_Size)) / 1024 / 1024) This works fine for all mailboxes under 1 GB (1024 KB)...returning the size in MB. However when a users mailbox exceeds 1 GB, a negative size is returned. Interestingly enough subtracting this negative size from 4 GB (4096 MB), results in the correct mailbox size. Rather than code this conversion into the script...is there a better way to do things? Thank you, Todd J. Etter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: need ammo
If the business drives the need to send large attachments around, it may be worth looking into a tool that works with the server to ZIP compress attachments automatically on their way out. Users tend to use email as a file transfer mechanism because it's all they're familiar with, and there are steps we can take to make it easier for the poor saps on the other end downloading this stuff. C2C has one that I know of. There's also tools to delay transmission of huge emails until off-peak times. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 12:05 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: need ammo Subject: RE: need ammo I guess the best answer would be business-related. What is the standard size of attachments that are sent to a company? I would say that if your company were an advertising agency, then you would need larger limits, due to the graphic file, etc. If your company was a law firm, you would need even larger limits. But if your company only exchanges emails messages and rarely sends back and forth attachments, the default could be no limit. As I said at the beginning -- it is all related to the type of business, IMHO. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo At my last gig we routinely received e-mail messages which were 200MB+. 5-10MB limits would have been laughed at. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo IIRC, the 5MB limit comes from some Microsoft article I remember reading a long time ago. It could go back as far as Microsoft Mail 3.5. However, I have only heard discussion in various Exchange groups, that 5-10MB seems to be the limit (with exceptions, of course). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo A quick check of 10 or so companies ESMTP compliant mail servers didn't bear out the assertion that most companies have a limit of 5MB on the IMS. Has someone actually done a more comprehensive survey of IMS limits or was the 5MB number an off the cuff statistic? -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 7:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: need ammo The general policy of most companies is 5MB limit of Internet inbound/Outbound messages. In my opinion, too many users think of email systems as being some panacean highway for any kind of data transmission no matter the threat or inconvenience to others. I have had nitwits send out large messages which got caught in a nasty mail loop. There is no easy answer but I recommend that you approach this from a policy point of view. Our policy here is 5MB. No ifs or butts (pun intended). D. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: need ammo Hi all. I have this customer who is unhappy about 10MB message limit size on SMTP connectors in our shared Exchange environment. Does anyone have any scary stories about what happens when people try to send too many messages that are too large? What is a reasonable size for SMTP message? Our servers originally had higher limits but a few times large SMTP messages crashed the servers. I just need to convince this customer that it is not a good idea to send large messages. Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent emails hang in Outbox
Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file
Sounds like expected behavior to me. The STM file is storing all your non-MAPI stuff. Since this server is a connector server as you described, I wouldn't expect much growth of the EDB at all. -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 05:27 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file Subject: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file Hi, folks: E2k SP2 on W2k SP2, one SG, one DB, mixed mode. Server functions as a Connector server to other 5.5 remote sites with several X.400 connectors and one SMTP and RGC connectors. For the past several weeks, this server's .STM database file has grown much larger than its accompanying .EDB file. What could be causing this? While I see 9215's and 9318's in the App log, I was wondering if any of you have seen this problem and what your fix was. Thanks in advance! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Are you going to keep posting this question until your IMC explodes? -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, September 08, 2002 01:21 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Microsoft says it isn't possible (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q1965 33), but is there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000 and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks, Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5
Network connectivity and name resolution (WINS or LMHOSTS DNS) is your starting point. -Original Message- From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 09:04 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Subject: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Dear All, I got a problem like this: Our server is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz, with currently having 1 GB of Ram (I just added a 512 MB ram). The hard drive is a 9GB X 3 with RAID 5, and right now from totally 18 GB total capacity, only 1.5 GB left. The server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Service Pack 3, and Microsoft Exchange 5.5 service pack 3 (I'm going to put the service pack 4 soon). The problems right now are that some clients can't connect to the server whenever they want to check their email using Microsoft Outlook, which directly connect to the Exchange Server (without using POP3 or IMAP). The error message is connection time out. But for some clients they can still connect to the Exchange server, although it's kind of flaky (sometimes it takes 1 minute just to fetch the email directly from the server using MS Outlook). Whenever clients try to connect from the web, it works just fine. The size of the Exchange directory in c:\progra~1\exchsrvr is +/- 9 GB (the MDB/log consuming lot of space). My question is does anyone know what happening with the server right now? and how can I fix it ? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Andy Webb answered this question very succinctly 11.5 hours ago. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 06:46 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Microsoft says it isn't possible (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q1965 33), but is there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000 and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks, Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file
There .stm file being larger than the .edb file is not necessarily indicative of a problem. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .STM database file growing much larger than .EDB file Hi, folks: E2k SP2 on W2k SP2, one SG, one DB, mixed mode. Server functions as a Connector server to other 5.5 remote sites with several X.400 connectors and one SMTP and RGC connectors. For the past several weeks, this server's .STM database file has grown much larger than its accompanying .EDB file. What could be causing this? While I see 9215's and 9318's in the App log, I was wondering if any of you have seen this problem and what your fix was. Thanks in advance! -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Tom... Notice the sent date. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Andy Webb answered this question very succinctly 11.5 hours ago. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 06:46 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Microsoft says it isn't possible (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q1965 33), but is there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000 and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks, Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with determining mailbox size using CDO....please
Guess I'll have to look it up :) Get the InfoStore.oft from wickett.net. All the code you could ever want for this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:12 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Help with determining mailbox size using CDOplease Subject: Help with determining mailbox size using CDOplease I am trying to determine the size of mailboxes in Exch. 5.5, SP4 using a CDO script with the following lines: Mailbox_size = HE08001E 'Code for mailbox size in bytes UserSize = Round((objUserSession.Infostores.Item(intCounter).Fields(Mailb ox_Size)) / 1024 / 1024) This returns the mailbox size in MB, as long as the mailbox is less than 1 GB. If the mailbox is over 1 GB, then the value of UserSize is a negative number. (i.e. a 1.5 GB mailbox would return -2560 MB). Interestingly enough, this negative number subtracted from 4096 gives the correct size for the mailbox. 4096 also happens to be the largest size that ExchAdmin will report...anything over that returns 0 in mailbox resources. Are there any suggestions on how to get CDO to properly report mailbox size on mailboxes over 1 GB (we even have one user with 1 mailbox over 7 GB!)? Thank you in advance, --Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the profile, it worked fine. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5
Oh. In that case: Wait a few days. In the future, which is so bright I gotta wear shades, Andy Webb will answer this question very succinctly. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:19 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Tom... Notice the sent date. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Andy Webb answered this question very succinctly 11.5 hours ago. -Original Message- From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 06, 2002 06:46 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Subject: searching multiple public folders outlook xp/exchange 5.5 Microsoft says it isn't possible (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q1965 33), but is there any way to search multiple public folders? We're using Outlook 2000 and XP with Exchange 5.5. Thanks, Daniel _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5
Reverse the search order of Tom's suggestion (DNS, LMHOSTS, then WINS) and you have my vote for the solution. Outlook uses DNS name resolution first (which can be circumvented by using a HOSTS or LMHOSTS file), then goes to WINS after that times out. Mike -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Network connectivity and name resolution (WINS or LMHOSTS DNS) is your starting point. -Original Message- From: Irwan Hadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 09, 2002 09:04 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Subject: Clients can't connect to Microsoft Exchange 5.5 Dear All, I got a problem like this: Our server is a dual Pentium III 500 Mhz, with currently having 1 GB of Ram (I just added a 512 MB ram). The hard drive is a 9GB X 3 with RAID 5, and right now from totally 18 GB total capacity, only 1.5 GB left. The server is running Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Service Pack 3, and Microsoft Exchange 5.5 service pack 3 (I'm going to put the service pack 4 soon). The problems right now are that some clients can't connect to the server whenever they want to check their email using Microsoft Outlook, which directly connect to the Exchange Server (without using POP3 or IMAP). The error message is connection time out. But for some clients they can still connect to the Exchange server, although it's kind of flaky (sometimes it takes 1 minute just to fetch the email directly from the server using MS Outlook). Whenever clients try to connect from the web, it works just fine. The size of the Exchange directory in c:\progra~1\exchsrvr is +/- 9 GB (the MDB/log consuming lot of space). My question is does anyone know what happening with the server right now? and how can I fix it ? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
Dave, Thanks, I will give that a go. Didy -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the profile, it worked fine. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox
one thing to mention is to completely rename the profile...don't use the same old name.. dave -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox Dave, Thanks, I will give that a go. Didy -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sent emails hang in Outbox I've seen corrupted profiles causing this error. After rebuilding the profile, it worked fine. -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sent emails hang in Outbox Has anybody come across the following problem: A user sends an email, sometimes it can be 500k in size or can be a couple of megs in size. He hits the send button and the message automatically goes to the Outbox and stays there. He opens the mail and click send again and the message goes immediately. No other users appears to have this problem. This happens once in a blue moon. The message can be destined for users on the same exchange server and also other exchangeservers through an X400 connector. The event viewer indicates that everything is fine. I am not sure if this message is getting stuck in the IS or in the MTA queue, and hence showing up in the Outbox. Has anybody else come across this. This is not a problem for the user. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flush committed logs
Q240145 -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Flush committed logs Is there a way to flush committed logs in Exchange ? Normally when my backup runs, it automaticall flushes the logs. For some reason, my backups were failing. With a result, the logs started piling up and are using up almost all of my disk space with a result the Information Store service stops every 10 mins or so. I'm trying to run a backup so that the logs will flush, but the time required to backup the Info Store is not enough to keep the Info Store service from stopping. Please help !!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Common Exchange 2000 problems
After a company has moved and installed Exchange 2000, not including any of the migration, upgrade or installation problems. What are the most common problems you Exchange Admins have to deal with. With 5.5, IS store failure and having a good knowledge of disaster recovery are top on my list. Any common area one should be aware of and have knowledge. Just curious. Tony Hlabse Exchange Administrator 574-237-5726 Robert Bosch Corporation _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
www.bluesforbuddha.com/ninjas/ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:57 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Way OT - Websites Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/ -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way OT - Websites
I killed the nija master. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites www.bluesforbuddha.com/ninjas/ -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:57 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Way OT - Websites Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites peter pan one is very good try this one http://www.realultimatepower.net/ -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/ -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Way OT - Websites I like www.backspace.com Very simple design and straight to the point. Not related to the PC business in any way, but you did ask for some that are a nice design! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2002 18:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Way OT - Websites I'm going to be putting together a web site for a PC break/fix business. What are your favorite websites relative to design that I can look at for inspiration? Thanks! Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Yeah we looked into the cache and it is enabled with size of 32k.. good point though. I've so far checked all the SAN settings and it seems fine. Ugh.. I guess I'll move the public folder to a different store on a different mirror set. See if that helps.. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance hrm... possibly you have write cache disabled... MS only recommends that this is enabled when the cache on the controller has a battery, but it does sound like this might be the case. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
public folder
Hello all, If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up 396mb on my hard drive. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public folder
When you delete a bunch of emails, what happens to the space on the private store. Same rules apply to Public Store. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: public folder Hello all, If I delete a 396mb public folder will this free up 396mb on my hard drive. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
