RE: IS 70GB and growing....
Mark, It also depends on your SIS ration at the moment, if it's 1:1 then there will be no SIS to break (unlikely though). You would have to run the report on your database to know though. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 21:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN
Stop HR from recruiting anyone with a blocked surname. Eg. John Pol, Mark Vbs, Michael Com, etc... -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 8:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN I've seen URLScan fail when a user who's last name was POL to allow this user to open up his mailbox. POL is an extension that is normally blocked. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Tom.Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:39 PM Subject: Another reason to be careful with OWA and URLSCAN URLSCAN is a great tool. It helps secure your web server. If you use the Outlook Web Access template when installing URLSCAN you should be good to go, right? WRONG! URLSCAN wreaks havoc with OWA. First, remember that with OWA the SUBJECT line of a mail message is the FILE NAME. So if you are logged into OWA and want to read a message with subject: I want to hold your hand Your browser sends a URL like the following htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand.eml URLSCAN examines that URL to make sure it isn't evil. Looks good so far. If the subject is: I want to hold your hand. The url would be htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand..eml Since there are two dots (..) URLSCAN Rejects it. And if the subject is: I want to hold your hand foot The URL would be htps:/servername/username/inbox/i%20want%20to%20hold%your%20hand%20%26%2 0foo t.eml Since there is an (or hex 26) URLSCAN Rejects it. Now how common is a period at the end of a subject in email? How common is the perfectly RFC822 legal in the subject of a message? There are truly good reasons to reject those chars/patterns as URL's, but they are allowed as file names. So do you a) lower the security of your webserver by disabling those features of URLSCAN? b) convince everyone to not end their subjects with a period or use the symbol? hm, what were the OWA guys thinking (or smoking?) when they set up the URL's to be based on subject lines??? Tom Gray, Network Engineer All Kinds of Minds The Center for Development and Learning University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATT Net: (919)960- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
Thanks for the Q, but these servers (or the clients) are not behind a proxy. Apparently it's an ISP issue. A colleague of mine tried it from his home Cable connection (which is on the same ISP as the office) and he had the same problems. I tried it using my home ADSL connection (different ISP) and it was fine. Spooky... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Check this: Q290177 -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0
No PIX. It's a watchguard firebox. Regards, Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Weigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2002 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 You're not by chance using a PIX with fixup for your firewall are you? I've had problems with hotmail prior to turning this off in the past. - Brian C. Weigle, MCSE,CCEA,CCNA,CNA Systems Engineer - DE Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 09:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Updated - I think I might have found the problem: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q240832 but if I set it to use HELO, I don't get the option for it to use EHLO, so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP?? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis Sent: 26 September 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Using a Win2K sp2 box in our DMZ running the MS smtp server, as a relay for our E2K server. All incoming traffic flows fine, but we are getting a number of NDRs such as: The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.profectus.co.uk #5.0.0 smtp;500 Syntax error, command unrecognized this is happening for a variety of domain names, including hotmail.com (which I'm not that worried about, but some of the domains are actually 'proper' domains.) Could it be that the IP that our server sits on has been blacklisted by certain ISPs? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
Thanks for the Q, however I checked and I do have English-United Kingdom set as a language in IE. Coincidentally, the 2 servers I tested are both in the UK. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA from a client behind FW Try this if it applies. Q315515 - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW There is a Microsoft KB article on just that. Can't remember the number. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW - SOLVED
The problem has been solved. It was an ISP issue. They had blocked any non-HTTP traffic which tries to pass through port 80, and this blocked OWA since it uses this data. Don't have any more info about it though... -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini Sent: 02 October 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Thanks for the Q, however I checked and I do have English-United Kingdom set as a language in IE. Coincidentally, the 2 servers I tested are both in the UK. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA from a client behind FW Try this if it applies. Q315515 - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW There is a Microsoft KB article on just that. Can't remember the number. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet
RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0
How about this one? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262168 -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 No PIX. It's a watchguard firebox. Regards, Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Weigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2002 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 You're not by chance using a PIX with fixup for your firewall are you? I've had problems with hotmail prior to turning this off in the past. - Brian C. Weigle, MCSE,CCEA,CCNA,CNA Systems Engineer - DE Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 09:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Updated - I think I might have found the problem: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q240832 but if I set it to use HELO, I don't get the option for it to use EHLO, so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP?? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis Sent: 26 September 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Using a Win2K sp2 box in our DMZ running the MS smtp server, as a relay for our E2K server. All incoming traffic flows fine, but we are getting a number of NDRs such as: The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.profectus.co.uk #5.0.0 smtp;500 Syntax error, command unrecognized this is happening for a variety of domain names, including hotmail.com (which I'm not that worried about, but some of the domains are actually 'proper' domains.) Could it be that the IP that our server sits on has been blacklisted by certain ISPs? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft Supports NAS for Exchange
I know this argument has occurred on here before, but it looks as though Microsoft will support Exchange 2000 on a particular NAS solution. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/63/27368.html Regards, Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Issues
Kishore This is probably blindingly obvious, but you are not actually using DC=mydomain,DC=com as your search string are you? This was only intended as an example. For example, my search base would be DC=cibasc,DC=com, as this is the domain name (in distinguished name format) of the AD domain that contains my user objects. Tony -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 21:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Thanks everyone who responded to my this problem. I'm using GC at port 3268 . Here are the error messages I get : If I use base search c=us , I get Operation Error If I use base search DC=mydomain,DC=com , I get LDAP Referral Received and than No search Result found errors. I have been looking everywhere I can possibly get help , my last alternative probably would be to call PSS . If someone can please show me more lights on this , I'll really appreciate that. Thanks , Kishore -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues GCs doe not use 389. They use 3268 See http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/techinfo/reskit/en/Distrib/dsbc_nar_bsa d.htm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: LDAP Issues Remember GC and LDAP both use port 389. If you GC is also on your Exchange server then that may be the problem. I remember seeing a Q article on this on MS's site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: LDAP Issues What's their base search? What errors do they receive? -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Issues Hi, We moved from Win-NT 4 / Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Win2K (mixed mode) /Exchange 2K-SP2. The problem is internet Outlook users were earlier able to access my companies address book using LDAP they are no more able to do this. Could some one PLEASE guide me as to what I need to bring them back the same LDAP functionality in Outlook. I tried pointing their LDAP client to the GC but it still doesn't work. Thank you very much in advance for any help. Kishore Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
Hehehe... Whenever possible, blame some other guy and you got better than even chances of being right, provided you're competent. I had to put that qualifier on at the end for certain other folks on the list, and not you, Andrea. Feel free to look for blame outside your demense. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Thanks for the Q, but these servers (or the clients) are not behind a proxy. Apparently it's an ISP issue. A colleague of mine tried it from his home Cable connection (which is on the same ISP as the office) and he had the same problems. I tried it using my home ADSL connection (different ISP) and it was fine. Spooky... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Check this: Q290177 -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA from a client behind FW Hi, We are running an Exch 2k server with no problems. One of our users needs to access another OWA 2k server (of his previous company) from within our LAN, and he can log in just fine, but for example if he goes to his inbox, the e-mail list pane gets stuck on 'Loading'... And never loads anything. He has tried connecting to this same account using a dial-up and that works fine. What could the problem be? Also, is there someone nice enough to create an Exch 2k mailbox which I can access via OWA to see if it is indeed a problem on our end. I only need a couple of e-mails in there to see if mails show up. Regards Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If yo u are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Mail
Exchange or ArGoSoft? -Original Message- From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay Mail Dear Everyone, I found out that this ArGoSoft Mail Server freeware, allow remote users to relay mail from Exchange server. Can anyone tell me how secure is it? TIA Cheers! Carine Maximise your productivity and prepare your network for future demands with the latest cabling solutions. For details, contact 03-79560023 or email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any suggestions/feedback/comments on our products and services, please contact our Quality Improvement Manager at : Email : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DID: 03 - 79512757 H/P: 016 - 2010877 or alternatively use our customer feedback form at http://www.scs.com.my _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address
I'm running FE/BE with NLB using a single virtual Ip address to get to OWA from the internet. I also have users who dial into the company via an AS5200 and try getting to OWA via IE or Netscape. If they use the Virtual DNS name /or IP address it will not allow them access. But, If they use the IP address of eith Front End servers they get in. Any ideas that might help Ron Pennell Institute For Defense Analyses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA from a client behind FW
If it's any help, we'v had this problem with a number of ISPs. It looks like some run caches that only accept a limited set of HTTP verbs, and throw away any request that uses others. This nobbles OWA. We found the answer was to put a certificate on the server and get people to access it via https:. Web proxies/caches have to tunnel SSL traffic, and we've had no further problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Coppini Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA from a client behind FW Thanks for the Q, but these servers (or the clients) are not behind a proxy. Apparently it's an ISP issue. A colleague of mine tried it from his home Cable connection (which is on the same ISP as the office) and he had the same problems. I tried it using my home ADSL connection (different ISP) and it was fine. Spooky... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Importing into contact list from CSV file
Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
Automagically. No. But you can do a regular import, point it to the .csv file and just import the contact items. Do not import duplicates is an option. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
Insert evil booming laughter here -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I think there's a muppet who does this sort of thing. I saw it on Sesame Street. Grover: Oh! I have gotten too much SPAM on my mail server! What will I do? (Puff of smoke and a new muppet appears) Grover: Who are you? Content Filter: They call me... the Content Filter. And do you know *why* they call me the Content Filter? It is because I *love* to filter... content. I will go through your message store now! Grover: Uh, well, you need to first meet with my manager and- Content Filter: SILENCE! (waves hand and Grover stands perplexed) One... one piece of SPAM... (hits Delete key) Two... two pieces of SPAM... (hits Delete key)... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering You forgot the quack. There have been numerous discussions regarding content filtering and how it works. Decide what you are willing to risk in lost mail, or additional manpower resources versus what you are trying to accomplish. Then go find the tool that meets those requirements. Looking a tools before defining your needs is bass ackwards. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes you do. I expect a full report on my desk by 8am tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I was going to but haven't had a chance yet. I guess I need to take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Have you installed or tested 7.0? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen is great for virus scanning, but they have only recently gotten into content scanning. And their content scanning is very basic so far. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What do you all feel is the most reliable content filter? Thanks, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Content Filtering
throws Elmo in trash can -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Insert evil booming laughter here -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I think there's a muppet who does this sort of thing. I saw it on Sesame Street. Grover: Oh! I have gotten too much SPAM on my mail server! What will I do? (Puff of smoke and a new muppet appears) Grover: Who are you? Content Filter: They call me... the Content Filter. And do you know *why* they call me the Content Filter? It is because I *love* to filter... content. I will go through your message store now! Grover: Uh, well, you need to first meet with my manager and- Content Filter: SILENCE! (waves hand and Grover stands perplexed) One... one piece of SPAM... (hits Delete key) Two... two pieces of SPAM... (hits Delete key)... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering You forgot the quack. There have been numerous discussions regarding content filtering and how it works. Decide what you are willing to risk in lost mail, or additional manpower resources versus what you are trying to accomplish. Then go find the tool that meets those requirements. Looking a tools before defining your needs is bass ackwards. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Yes you do. I expect a full report on my desk by 8am tomorrow. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering I was going to but haven't had a chance yet. I guess I need to take a look at it. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Have you installed or tested 7.0? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Antigen is great for virus scanning, but they have only recently gotten into content scanning. And their content scanning is very basic so far. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Sybari Antigen for Exchange is an excellent package. We use it and are very happy with the automatic updates and the content filtering. Also you can create templates to distribute new changes (upgrades are free for the life of your contract). They are releasing their Gold Package at MEC, and were voted Best of Show for their Gold Package -- Antigen 7.0. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Excellent that works for me. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Content Filtering Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail. -Original Message- From: Cooke, Brian To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM Subject: Content Filtering Hi all, I just had a quick question in regards to a content filter add on and which would be the best to use for Exchange 5.5. Currently we are using NEMX but I would like to explore other options. What do you all feel is the most reliable content filter? Thanks, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
POP environment as in users only connect via POP3? Is the customer currently running 5.5? Do they have AD in place? -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
Depends on your understanding of AD. Exchange 2000 requires AD. Alan L. Wolf MCSE, MCP, MCP + I SAIC Frederick PO Box B Bldg 458 Frederick, Maryland 21702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 301-846-5479 (V) 301-846-6886 (F) Good luck, and have a good 'un. -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
Yes, that is my understanding, no AD in place, I don't think they are running anything. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment POP environment as in users only connect via POP3? Is the customer currently running 5.5? Do they have AD in place? -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
Without AD being in place, there's some potentially substantial work around deploying a Windows 2000 domain infrastructure. Don't know enough about the customer to say for certain which would be the better path to take. If they're only going to use mail for POP3 access it might even be that Exchange in general isn't appropriate for their needs. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment Yes, that is my understanding, no AD in place, I don't think they are running anything. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment POP environment as in users only connect via POP3? Is the customer currently running 5.5? Do they have AD in place? -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Importing into contact list from CSV file
OK which POP3 based email system is it? - Original Message - From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Issues
Thanks for replying Tony. Not of course I'm using DC=pricesystems,DC=com as my search strings but it says no results found in the search criteria. Kishore -Original Message- From: Murray-Smith Tony CF CH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Kishore This is probably blindingly obvious, but you are not actually using DC=mydomain,DC=com as your search string are you? This was only intended as an example. For example, my search base would be DC=cibasc,DC=com, as this is the domain name (in distinguished name format) of the AD domain that contains my user objects. Tony -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 21:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Thanks everyone who responded to my this problem. I'm using GC at port 3268 . Here are the error messages I get : If I use base search c=us , I get Operation Error If I use base search DC=mydomain,DC=com , I get LDAP Referral Received and than No search Result found errors. I have been looking everywhere I can possibly get help , my last alternative probably would be to call PSS . If someone can please show me more lights on this , I'll really appreciate that. Thanks , Kishore -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues GCs doe not use 389. They use 3268 See http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/techinfo/reskit/en/Distrib/dsbc_nar_bsa d.htm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: LDAP Issues Remember GC and LDAP both use port 389. If you GC is also on your Exchange server then that may be the problem. I remember seeing a Q article on this on MS's site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: LDAP Issues What's their base search? What errors do they receive? -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Issues Hi, We moved from Win-NT 4 / Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Win2K (mixed mode) /Exchange 2K-SP2. The problem is internet Outlook users were earlier able to access my companies address book using LDAP they are no more able to do this. Could some one PLEASE guide me as to what I need to bring them back the same LDAP functionality in Outlook. I tried pointing their LDAP client to the GC but it still doesn't work. Thank you very much in advance for any help. Kishore Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address
Maybe your dial-up router does not understand the virtual MAC address generated by NLB? You could create a permanent ARP for that MAC address, although I don't know where you would do that since I don't know what your network looks like. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Dial-up problems with Virtual IP address I'm running FE/BE with NLB using a single virtual Ip address to get to OWA from the internet. I also have users who dial into the company via an AS5200 and try getting to OWA via IE or Netscape. If they use the Virtual DNS name /or IP address it will not allow them access. But, If they use the IP address of eith Front End servers they get in. Any ideas that might help Ron Pennell Institute For Defense Analyses _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy Question
Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
Why not install an LDAP server locally at their site and then have it do referrals to your GC? david -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 02 October, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
Stick with Exchange 5.5 unless you need a specific function of 2000. 2000 is no where as developed as 5.5 and the third party add-ins market isn't close to what 5.5 has. david who just finished his E2K upgrade -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 02 October, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Same here; none yet. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly No sign of it yet on any of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: John Q Jr. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a unprecedented distribution. I have not been alerted to one infected message yet. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP Issues
Okay :-) How are you specifying the User Name? Tony -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 17:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Thanks for replying Tony. Not of course I'm using DC=pricesystems,DC=com as my search strings but it says no results found in the search criteria. Kishore -Original Message- From: Murray-Smith Tony CF CH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Kishore This is probably blindingly obvious, but you are not actually using DC=mydomain,DC=com as your search string are you? This was only intended as an example. For example, my search base would be DC=cibasc,DC=com, as this is the domain name (in distinguished name format) of the AD domain that contains my user objects. Tony -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 21:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues Thanks everyone who responded to my this problem. I'm using GC at port 3268 . Here are the error messages I get : If I use base search c=us , I get Operation Error If I use base search DC=mydomain,DC=com , I get LDAP Referral Received and than No search Result found errors. I have been looking everywhere I can possibly get help , my last alternative probably would be to call PSS . If someone can please show me more lights on this , I'll really appreciate that. Thanks , Kishore -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP Issues GCs doe not use 389. They use 3268 See http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/techinfo/reskit/en/Distrib/dsbc_nar_bsa d.htm -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: LDAP Issues Remember GC and LDAP both use port 389. If you GC is also on your Exchange server then that may be the problem. I remember seeing a Q article on this on MS's site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: LDAP Issues What's their base search? What errors do they receive? -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP Issues Hi, We moved from Win-NT 4 / Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Win2K (mixed mode) /Exchange 2K-SP2. The problem is internet Outlook users were earlier able to access my companies address book using LDAP they are no more able to do this. Could some one PLEASE guide me as to what I need to bring them back the same LDAP functionality in Outlook. I tried pointing their LDAP client to the GC but it still doesn't work. Thank you very much in advance for any help. Kishore Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
It uses OL97 connectinng to a system called MDaemon -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Importing into contact list from CSV file OK which POP3 based email system is it? - Original Message - From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For
RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file
WIthout going into programming you could make it a simpler import by giving them a PST, instead of a CSV. Replacing dupes is the default with PST imports and they wouldn't have to pick a target folder or worry about field mapping screens. -Peter -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now for something completley different
Nowt to do with exchange, but I know you all like a challenge ! Does anyone have a good way of being able to read an access database to map drives from within a logon script. I currently hav a script that reads a text file and maps the drives which works OK but is not very scaleable as it needs to read the entire text file which grows increasingly larger !!! TIA Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
Thank U -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment Without AD being in place, there's some potentially substantial work around deploying a Windows 2000 domain infrastructure. Don't know enough about the customer to say for certain which would be the better path to take. If they're only going to use mail for POP3 access it might even be that Exchange in general isn't appropriate for their needs. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment Yes, that is my understanding, no AD in place, I don't think they are running anything. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment POP environment as in users only connect via POP3? Is the customer currently running 5.5? Do they have AD in place? -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment
I'll never go back. Of course if you are just running a server in a POP environment, Exchange is not likely the best product to serve your needs. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Moore, David K Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment Stick with Exchange 5.5 unless you need a specific function of 2000. 2000 is no where as developed as 5.5 and the third party add-ins market isn't close to what 5.5 has. david who just finished his E2K upgrade -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 02 October, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing and maintaining exchange in a POP environment I have been away from exchange for over a year and I need to get back to speed as quickly as possible. What is the best book to buy for installing and maintaining exchange these days. /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC Should I continue with 5.5 or go to Exchange 2000?? Thanks in advance for all suggestions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public contact data from SQL Server?
Hello All. I posted this question in microsoft.public.exchange2000.development, but I thought there might be some other Exchange experts here as well... I'm investigating writing an application that would be used with Outlook Web Access and Exchange 2000. There is a SQL Server 2000 database that contains some contact information. I want to be able to display this data seamlessly along with the regular OWA stuff. After viewing the contact, the user can perform a certain operation on the contact which will involve some more processing on the SQL Server. Here are a couple ideas I had from my preliminary research. (1) Create a public folder and populate the folder with the data from SQL Server. This would require some sort of synchronization between SQL and Exchange. Since there are some custom fields involved, I assume that I would have to create a custom content-class, along with a custom web form for displaying that data, which would be added to the Forms registry. (2) Customize / replace the Outlook navbar so that it will contain a new button that loads a separate ASP page that queries the SQL server. In this case the contact data would not be stored in Exchange, so any contact forms would have to be developed from scratch. With this approach, is it possible to add a third section to the navbar (in addition to Folders and Shortcuts)? Comments on the feasibility of each approach would be appreciated. Which one would be the faster and/or better approach? Thanks, Brian Baker _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message truncated to 1K
The IP address resolved to smtp.cubist.com. I have done some more troubleshooting and checked our firewall logs. It appears that the firewall is dropping the message with the following error: Invalid SMTP protocol: Overly long line received from web40203.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.78.64]) (3419 bytes received. Configured: smtpd.max_body_line_length=1024) I was able to recreate the problem by sending a message that had more that 1024 characters on one line in the body of a Yahoo email. It appears that for some reason the Yahoo web mail was sending the entire message as one line of text without any carriage returns in the message. I will be looking into this issue a bit more. Steve Iadarola -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Message truncated to 1K Well, you've also munged the headers sufficiently so as to make troubleshooting neigh unto impossible. However if x.x.x.x corresponds to bigbird1.cubist.com or bigbird3.terragenco.uk, your issue would appear to be unrelated to Exchange. -Original Message- From: Steve I [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message truncated to 1K Hello, I have had a few employees say that emails from Yahoo.com are bouncing. The sender (a Yahoo account) is receiving the following message from Yahoo (see below). Has anyone else seen similar errors? I have done a search of TechNet and have come up with nothing. A Google search came up with MANY similar error messages posted to web based chat boards. What can I do to fix this so that the email goes through to its intended recipient? TIA, Steve Iadarola -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure delivery Message from yahoo.com. Unable to deliver message to the following address(es). __ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: x.x.x.x failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 Invalid data in message --- Original message follows. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [x.x.x.x] by web40203.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 07:24:59 PDT Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:24:59 -0700 (PDT) From: User Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: meeting on Oct 9 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0-194916566-1033482299=:3698 --0-194916566-1033482299=:3698 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Three lines of the original message were visible. I have deleted the original message for security reasons. *** MESSAGE TRUNCATED *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2k downgrade !!
Is it possible to downgrade 2000 Enterprise Edition back to Standard Edition?? Thanks Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
Yes, that's correct. But since you're busting at the seams, so to speak, that's the price you'll have to pay. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced SMTP outbound management
Hi, Does anyone know of an add for Exchange 2000 that will intelligent route via an SMTP connector to the internet if the other SMTP connector is down. The intention is to have Dual Mailsweeper boxes running and to route via MailSweeper box 1 unless it fails then route via Mailsweeper box 2. MailSweeper can't act as a smart host. Any info greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Relay Mail
How secure what is? Exchange or Argosoft? Exchange is as secure as the skill of the admin running it; can't comment on the other. -Original Message- From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 8:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Relay Mail Dear Everyone, I found out that this ArGoSoft Mail Server freeware, allow remote users to relay mail from Exchange server. Can anyone tell me how secure is it? TIA Cheers! Carine Maximise your productivity and prepare your network for future demands with the latest cabling solutions. For details, contact 03-79560023 or email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have any suggestions/feedback/comments on our products and services, please contact our Quality Improvement Manager at : Email : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DID: 03 - 79512757 H/P: 016 - 2010877 or alternatively use our customer feedback form at http://www.scs.com.my _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advanced SMTP mgmt
Has anybody found an add on for Exchange that will act as a smarthost that is configurable for route redundancy. ie. I wanted to use 2 Mailsweeper boxes and would like to route via a main Mailsweeper box unless it fails, then I would like to route via the secondary. Any help greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's ba-a-aack!!
I've returned after a hiatus to see if I can learn something. ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Message truncated to 1K
Looks like the server at domain.com has a delivery size restriction: The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K. - Original Message - From: Steve I [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:27 PM Subject: Message truncated to 1K Hello, I have had a few employees say that emails from Yahoo.com are bouncing. The sender (a Yahoo account) is receiving the following message from Yahoo (see below). Has anyone else seen similar errors? I have done a search of TechNet and have come up with nothing. A Google search came up with MANY similar error messages posted to web based chat boards. What can I do to fix this so that the email goes through to its intended recipient? TIA, Steve Iadarola -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: failure delivery Message from yahoo.com. Unable to deliver message to the following address(es). ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: x.x.x.x failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 554 Invalid data in message --- Original message follows. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message is over 5k. Message truncated to 1K. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [x.x.x.x] by web40203.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Oct 2002 07:24:59 PDT Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:24:59 -0700 (PDT) From: User Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: meeting on Oct 9 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0-194916566-1033482299=:3698 --0-194916566-1033482299=:3698 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Three lines of the original message were visible. I have deleted the original message for security reasons. *** MESSAGE TRUNCATED *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange with 2 email address
Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2k downgrade !!
No !! YQW -tom -Original Message- From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 09:16 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2k downgrade !! Subject: Exchange 2k downgrade !! Is it possible to downgrade 2000 Enterprise Edition back to Standard Edition?? Thanks Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Importing into contact list from CSV file
Only thing I can think of is that location of Outlook's WAB file be on a shared drive for all to access. Then just change that file. But not 100% sure on having multiple people hitting it. You may have to use a different email client that will allow that or allow it to be done programmatically - Original Message - From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file It uses OL97 connectinng to a system called MDaemon -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 16:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Importing into contact list from CSV file OK which POP3 based email system is it? - Original Message - From: Darren Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file Perhaps I should explain... I use exchange here but this is at another site owned by the same group of companies who are using a POP3 based mail system. I am having to export my GAL every couple of weeks and import the generated CSV file into their contacts (Which is configured to be viewed as the address book) (The other mail system does not have GAL's ) I know it can be done programatically .. does anyone know of a good example ??? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 15:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Importing into contact list from CSV file So multiple users are going to be importing the same data? Why not use a PF and just import it once? Regarding the original question... Not using Outlook alone, but it's certainly possible programmatically. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Importing into contact list from CSV file Hi All Does anyone know a way of automatically importing a CSV file into a users contact list and specifying certain options in the process (such as do not import duplicates). If possible i would like users to be able to run this program themselves from a shared drive which points to the CSV file that I update. TIA Darren Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Brightmail
I agree that SpamNet has the limitations you mention in architecture. The client-side software that they put together can't, by its nature, deal with server-side processing such as MAPI does. Remember that it was designed for server-side filtering and/or POP3 mailboxes. This is an argument for having Cloudmark design a gateway or server-based product. As for whether the community reporting will work, I don't know. Maybe, just maybe, Dr. EvilSpammer could set it up to blacklist all spam except the stuff that he sends out - and whitelist that. But he would still have to generate enough unblock requests to counterbalance all the block requests that users were sending... The Razor database maintainers aren't dumb either, and if they were getting unblock requests from a known spamhaus they might decide to delist that user. I think that the larger the community is, the less likely that a single spammer will be able to affect the outcome. As for your example, I guess you need to figure out for yourself what spam is. I have never agreed to allow someone to sell or give away my email address, so any time someone tries that line on me Rule 3 applies. Is Kean really opt-in? Did you request their email? Or are they actually opt-out, forcing you to unsubscribe from a list you never subscribed to? In the end I think that the Razor experiment is going to be one worth watching. It is smarter than dumb filters, and less retributive than services such as SPEWS. For effectiveness I think it falls somewhere in between the two as well. Last but not least, you might want to sign up for one of the Razor lists - there you'll be talking with the folks working on the code and databases, although they probably won't help much with questions about the SpamNet client. -- be - MOS I eat swiss cheese. But I only nibble on it. I make the holes bigger. -- Steven Wright -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail I've been using the Cloudmark's Spamnet on my system for a few weeks now, and it just doesn't seem to do the job very well. First of all, with my MAPI connection, The spam email is sitting there waiting for Spamnet when I start Outlook. Spamnet won't automatically scan new mail on start up. It's a couple of clicks to make it scan the Inbox. Which it does _slowly_. Also, it checks all mail in the requested folder rather than just Unread mail. If you have rules that have moved mail to other folders while outlook is running, you'll have to manually check those folders for Spam. In my case, it seems to block _maybe_ 50% of the 15-30 spam messages that I get eache evening. Then I have to block them manaully, which is also time consuming. And more often than not, the same Spam from the same source (or something slightly similar) is back the next day and I start over. I gather from reading the Cloudmark forums that it has the same problem with IMAP clients. It apears that it's really only designed for use with POP mailboxes. Spamnet seems to run well during the day, however since this morning, it's only 2 for 6 in correctly catching Spam. I also wonder about how well this whole community reporting thing is going to work. I religiously report spam everyday, but it seems the same stuff comes over and over again. I know that people are going to block newsletters, I've done it myself by mistake. But consider this. A company called Kean Offers has my name on their lists and is sending me Spam. But, this company just happens to be a legit opt-in company, and they will happily take me off their mailing list if I click Remove. They got my name from a purchased mailing list, not from me opting in, but since they have a working remove policy, they can legitimately argue that they should not be blocked. However, I have no idea whether the remove link is legit, or if it's just going to get me on more mailing lists! And isn't it just as easy for a spamming compnay to unblock itself as it is for users to block them? Dr. Evil is evil, not stupid. Seeing as how the Spam blocking feauture doesn't seem all that effective now, I can only imagine that strategies to thwart Spamnet are in the works. I'd feel better if the company seemed to be participating in there support forums. Most of the questions and comments on the web page are simply answered by other users saying Me Too Jim Helfer WTW Architects Pittsburgh PA Go Stillers ::-Original Message- ::From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:43 AM ::To: Exchange Discussions ::Subject: RE: Brightmail :: :: ::Actually I've just completed an installation of Razor, which is the ::open-source predecessor to Cloudmark's SpamNet. Like SpamNet, ::Razor uses
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: now for someone completely indifferent
What does the Windows or access lists say? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darren Ash Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: now for something completley different Nowt to do with exchange, but I know you all like a challenge ! Does anyone have a good way of being able to read an access database to map drives from within a logon script. I currently hav a script that reads a text file and maps the drives which works OK but is not very scaleable as it needs to read the entire text file which grows increasingly larger !!! TIA silly disclaimer thing snipped _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
We are getting hit by it, but Mailsweeper for SMTP is doing its job. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tml -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Same here; none yet. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly No sign of it yet on any of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: John Q Jr. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a unprecedented distribution. I have not been alerted to one infected message yet. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IS 70GB and growing....
Hi Darcy. Thanks for your answer. - Original Message - From: Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 11:52 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Pfooey! I have several stores that are well over 50gb each. No problems with cycling the store, rebooting the boxes, performing backups (and restores) etc. . . You just have to know WTF you're doing. Hey - didn't you once claim to be an expert in Exchange 5.5? Darcy -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hello. I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G is VERY bad. It means there is big chance the IS won't start after restart. I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an undocument limitation, and should I be afraid to have IS above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong and acts very fast Thanks for your time! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users between databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how and where you should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not a universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the information you've provided there is no right answer. I know of organizations with significantly larger databases than 70GB, whether or not that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is impossible to say at this point. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the
Re: IS 70GB and growing....
And may I ask why? I am going to use clariion , if it makes any change. - Original Message - From: Davis,Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:00 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more worried about EMC as your storage than the size of your IS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hello. I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G is VERY bad. It means there is big chance the IS won't start after restart. I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an undocument limitation, and should I be afraid to have IS above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong and acts very fast Thanks for your time! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users between databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how and where you should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not a universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the information you've provided there is no right answer. I know of organizations with significantly larger databases than 70GB, whether or not that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is impossible to say at this point. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: IS 70GB and growing....
if a 73GB IS bothers you Will 73GB IS in Exchange5.5 bother you? how you feel about it? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Then you didn't read my last paragraph. Now read ye my full message, ye scurvy dog, or I'll keel-haul ye! (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. You didn't help me. You don't have too. - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 11:40 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing The best thing to do is get the two departments who have the most mail on the server together in a room. Explain that you have to split the IS in half and hold a sword over the server. The department that asks for their mail to be deleted so the store need not be split in that manner is the one that truly loves the server most and, hence, deserves to have the whole of it. Wipe out all the other mail on that server, delete the accounts from other departments, and take enough money for a 2TB drive array out of that department's budget. If neither department steps in, then hand each half of a server and chastise them for their foolishness. Alternatively, if a 73GB IS bothers you, you could always buy bigger hard drives for the box or tell people it's time to right-click the Deleted Items folder and select Empty 'Deleted Items' Folder from the available choices and then to select Yes at the next prompt... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
How do you write with your hands down? http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~uu9r/lang/html/lang.en.html http://www2.latech.edu/~acm/HelloWorld.shtml William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I can write the best Hello World hands down. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I write a mean .bat file -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC It's just further evidence of the view that you must be a programmer to be a sysadmin. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 28, 2002 11:51 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: MEC Subject: RE: MEC Yeah, TechEd used to have an infrastructure track, then they dropped it and left a developer focus and I quit going. Now it looks like they're putting it back. My experience was that the bulk of the TechEd infrastructure sessions were repeats of MEC or vice-versa anyway. Oh well, I'll be able to say that I attended every MEC! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
We are getting it also but SAVFMSE 3.0 is doing a good job catching and cleaning it Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly We are getting hit by it, but Mailsweeper for SMTP is doing its job. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tml -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Same here; none yet. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly No sign of it yet on any of our customers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: John Q Jr. Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 14:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a unprecedented distribution. I have not been alerted to one infected message yet. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stripping email addresses
I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: He's ba-a-aack!!
And did you. . . learn something that is. -- From: Daniel Chenault Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2002 12:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: He's ba-a-aack!! I've returned after a hiatus to see if I can learn something. ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange with 2 email address
Why exactly do you want to do this. Are you involved with acquiring/merging with another company? - Original Message - From: Gunanathan, Amir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
FAQ 3.23 -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:15 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange with 2 email address Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Check the FAQ. -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Add the other domain to the Routing tab on the IMC. Then add the additional SMTP address to the first mailbox you created. (If this is what you were trying to accomplish -- I was unsure of what your email was trying to convey). Geoff... -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advanced SMTP outbound management
Sounds like a job for a network load balancer. -Original Message- From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advanced SMTP outbound management Hi, Does anyone know of an add for Exchange 2000 that will intelligent route via an SMTP connector to the internet if the other SMTP connector is down. The intention is to have Dual Mailsweeper boxes running and to route via MailSweeper box 1 unless it fails then route via Mailsweeper box 2. MailSweeper can't act as a smart host. Any info greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Section 3.23 and 3.21-3.22: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gunanathan, Amir Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange with 2 email address
Add b.com as inbound under the routing tab of the IMC properties page, and then add the b.com version of everyone's address to their email addresses and make it the primary address. If you have a lot of people to change, you'll want to use a directory import rather than doing it manually. You'll probably also want to muck with the address generator so that new users get a b.com address from the beginning, and of course there's the issue of adding DNS records for the new domain. I've glossed over a lot of details here, but that's the overview. Also, you don't have to do any forwarding. Just let everyone's address have both an a.com address, and a b.com address, and they'll get messages for both. -Peter -Original Message- From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange with 2 email address Hi, We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with SP6a. I would like to know how to configure the Exchange to allow it to accept emails for 2 different domains. That is, say currently we have a mail box of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I would like to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason for this is because we want to change the domain (address name) name. I would forward any emails sent to @a.com to @b.com, this part I know. What I don't know is how to configure the server with @b.com. I would appreciate any help Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stripping email addresses
Are you sure that you want to do this? As with any tool that is automagic, it can be used maliciously. Consider to what other ends it might be put. In effect, you would be converting every person with access to that folder with censorship powers. A bigger problem might be that you would get exactly what you have asked for . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
I believe Harolds' original question was, once the manager stops publishing his free/busy info, will the existing info that has already been published still be on the server? I don't think he was asking anything about his calendar data being deleted. Yes, I agree it does sound like the manager wants his previously published free/busy info to be deleted, which is probably why Harold is asking the question in the first place. Jason -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advanced SMTP outbound management
Why not have the mailsweeper boxes running in WLBS mode, you won't need the other connector then. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2002 12:27 pm To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advanced SMTP outbound management Hi, Does anyone know of an add for Exchange 2000 that will intelligent route via an SMTP connector to the internet if the other SMTP connector is down. The intention is to have Dual Mailsweeper boxes running and to route via MailSweeper box 1 unless it fails then route via Mailsweeper box 2. MailSweeper can't act as a smart host. Any info greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advanced SMTP mgmt
How about creating two different Exchange SMTP connectors with different costs? -Original Message- From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advanced SMTP mgmt Has anybody found an add on for Exchange that will act as a smarthost that is configurable for route redundancy. ie. I wanted to use 2 Mailsweeper boxes and would like to route via a main Mailsweeper box unless it fails, then I would like to route via the secondary. Any help greatly appreciated. Dave Turner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
Well, I don't know - but it won't hurt anything to set it to 0 months. As Jim pointed out, it won't wipe out any of his calendar information. You can then see for yourself and answer the question. You know - run a test and see what happens. Darcy -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
So far, I've only have seen one Bugbear-A compared to the dozen or more Klez that I get each day. Aaron -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
Either that or you're blocking all the files through your file filtering so they're blending in with all the Klez background noise. The way this is ramping up I have a feeling that Bugbear, just like Klez before it, is destined to become a permanent part of our lives. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
No, it shouldn't be making it through your Antigen/Sophos or Worm AV. I have seen it, and Antigen purged it. Geoff... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly Gulp! Either it's making it thru Sophos and Antigen or I'm not getting any. I sure hope it's the latter. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly It's now a neck and neck race which virus is hitting us more Klex or Bugbear-A. Thank the programmers for ScanMail and Nemex. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly I haven't seen it yet either and I can't find anything on it yet. Anyone have any info on it, (is it an attachment)?? I haven't seen any yet either, but Messagelabs already has it in 3rd place behind Klez and Yaha, so they are out there. -Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Stripping email addresses
I certainly see your point. I was hoping there was the ability to create a piece of VBScript or something I could execute from my machine against a public folder. As for the second point I dont really understand . . . almost anything would be preferable to the manual process . . . - Original Message - From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Stripping email addresses Are you sure that you want to do this? As with any tool that is automagic, it can be used maliciously. Consider to what other ends it might be put. In effect, you would be converting every person with access to that folder with censorship powers. A bigger problem might be that you would get exactly what you have asked for . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
And the answer would be? Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I believe Harolds' original question was, once the manager stops publishing his free/busy info, will the existing info that has already been published still be on the server? I don't think he was asking anything about his calendar data being deleted. Yes, I agree it does sound like the manager wants his previously published free/busy info to be deleted, which is probably why Harold is asking the question in the first place. Jason -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
Test it and see? -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question And the answer would be? Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I believe Harolds' original question was, once the manager stops publishing his free/busy info, will the existing info that has already been published still be on the server? I don't think he was asking anything about his calendar data being deleted. Yes, I agree it does sound like the manager wants his previously published free/busy info to be deleted, which is probably why Harold is asking the question in the first place. Jason -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
I was only concerned with the info up on the server. And you are correct in that I do want it to wipe out everything on the server. Since, by default, two months of info is posted, I was wondering if he'd have to deal with it for the next 60 days. Thanks, Harold -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: He's ba-a-aack!!
Just got here; dunno yet. ;) - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: RE: He's ba-a-aack!! And did you. . . learn something that is. -- From: Daniel Chenault Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2002 12:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: He's ba-a-aack!! I've returned after a hiatus to see if I can learn something. ;) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Large Mailing List
OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stripping email addresses
Sure, this can be done with VB inside of Outlook. You will be the only one that will have this macro installed on your computer. Enrique -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Stripping email addresses I certainly see your point. I was hoping there was the ability to create a piece of VBScript or something I could execute from my machine against a public folder. As for the second point I dont really understand . . . almost anything would be preferable to the manual process . . . - Original Message - From: Dupler, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Stripping email addresses Are you sure that you want to do this? As with any tool that is automagic, it can be used maliciously. Consider to what other ends it might be put. In effect, you would be converting every person with access to that folder with censorship powers. A bigger problem might be that you would get exactly what you have asked for . . . -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
Ah ha ha ha hasucks to be youI know I have the same type of person here -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Goforth Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large Mailing List OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC Connector
I believe this may have been covered close to a zillion times, but can anyone point me to a good site or document on how to setup an ADC Connector. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
I'm assuming you are referring to the FC series and not the IP series. As long as they will concatenate you the proper sized LUN's, and you get the I/O requirements for your user load, you should be OK. It's been my experience that with any LUN over 36GB, EMC gets very nervous about. I'm in the process right now of trying to get 4, 143.31GB storage group volumes, 3, 33.6GB Transaction log volumes, and a Quorum volume configured for a client.. I'll let you know how it turns out after I run JetStress against them. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing And may I ask why? I am going to use clariion , if it makes any change. - Original Message - From: Davis,Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:00 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more worried about EMC as your storage than the size of your IS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 4:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hello. I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G is VERY bad. It means there is big chance the IS won't start after restart. I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an undocument limitation, and should I be afraid to have IS above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong and acts very fast Thanks for your time! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users between databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how and where you should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not a universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the information you've provided there is no right answer. I know of organizations with significantly larger databases than 70GB, whether or not that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is impossible to say at this point. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
Reading highly active mailing lists isn't a reasonable way to pick up some information on a given subject? ::-Original Message- ::From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:30 PM ::To: Exchange Discussions ::Subject: Large Mailing List :: :: ::OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT ::Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of ::email. He likes to read through emails on almost any ::subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best ::way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the ::subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a ::Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give ::up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the ::rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. :: :: ::Eric J. Goforth :: ::_ ::List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm ::Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp ::To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
You don't have to tell me. I have been looking at the Yahoo Groups for some mind blowing traffic and am not finding anything that would really drive it home. Guy is driving me Nucking Futz. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List Reading highly active mailing lists isn't a reasonable way to pick up some information on a given subject? ::-Original Message- ::From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:30 PM ::To: Exchange Discussions ::Subject: Large Mailing List :: :: ::OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT ::Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of ::email. He likes to read through emails on almost any ::subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best ::way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the ::subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a ::Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give ::up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the ::rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. :: :: ::Eric J. Goforth :: ::_ ::List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm ::Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp ::To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
Go to google and sign him up for some porn mailing list. He'll be too busy with all the spam that he won't have time to bug you -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Goforth Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List You don't have to tell me. I have been looking at the Yahoo Groups for some mind blowing traffic and am not finding anything that would really drive it home. Guy is driving me Nucking Futz. Thank you for your time, Eric J. Goforth -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Large Mailing List Reading highly active mailing lists isn't a reasonable way to pick up some information on a given subject? ::-Original Message- ::From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 5:30 PM ::To: Exchange Discussions ::Subject: Large Mailing List :: :: ::OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT ::Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of ::email. He likes to read through emails on almost any ::subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best ::way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the ::subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a ::Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give ::up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the ::rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. :: :: ::Eric J. Goforth :: ::_ ::List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm ::Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp ::To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Connector
Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design ISBN: 182451 -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Connector I believe this may have been covered close to a zillion times, but can anyone point me to a good site or document on how to setup an ADC Connector. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Large Mailing List
Send him to groups.yahoo.com? -Original Message- From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Large Mailing List OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT Puppet. I have a supervisor that literally wants A LOT of email. He likes to read through emails on almost any subject. He's one of those people that thinks that the best way to get knowledge is to read other peoples thoughts on the subject (whatever that may be). Can someone recommend a Distro List that I can set him up on that would make him give up on this idea? He had me setup public folders so that the rest of the office can share in his JOY. Whatever. Thanks. Eric J. Goforth _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADC and mixed mode
Dear All I need to take my exchange 55 server offline to re install a backup device, how will this affect the ADC replication, will this affect synchronisation, do I need to bring both servers offline to do this? Can I just stop the ADC services on the Exchange 2000 Server? Also, is this a good time to test the actual native mode without actually going native? Exchange 2000 SP3 enterprise edition. exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stripping email addresses
http://www.cdolive.com/cdo5.htm#EMailAddressOfSender http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/getsenderaddy.htm -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ADC Connector
A gripping read! Starts off simple enough, but then BAM! Page 6... Straight to the DSAccess and DSProxy stuff. I wish I had read this book prior to doing my first 5.5 to 2000 migration. William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Connector Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design ISBN: 182451 -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Connector I believe this may have been covered close to a zillion times, but can anyone point me to a good site or document on how to setup an ADC Connector. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stripping email addresses
For a moment, I thought this was a title of a Jenny Jones show or a porn spam. Imagine my disappointment. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stripping email addresses I am far from a programmer so if this is obvious a thousand humble pardons!! Is there a way to programmatically strip email addresses from a bunch of emails posted to a Public Folder? We have a SPAM Submissions Folder where users can send emails that make it past our SPAM guard to be added to the database. Right now I manually open each one and copy the email address to a text file. Can anyone think of a way to automate this? TIA! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADC and mixed mode
it won't only slightly no yes NO! - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:30 PM Subject: ADC and mixed mode Dear All I need to take my exchange 55 server offline to re install a backup device, how will this affect the ADC replication, will this affect synchronisation, do I need to bring both servers offline to do this? Can I just stop the ADC services on the Exchange 2000 Server? Also, is this a good time to test the actual native mode without actually going native? Exchange 2000 SP3 enterprise edition. exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free/Busy Question
Set to 0 months and then run Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch to axe the old message. No F/B info, that way. Sweet. I hate F/B messages. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WAISEL, HAROLD B Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question I was only concerned with the info up on the server. And you are correct in that I do want it to wipe out everything on the server. Since, by default, two months of info is posted, I was wondering if he'd have to deal with it for the next 60 days. Thanks, Harold -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question If he stops publishing his free/busy info, it's not going to wipe out his Calendar, if that's what your worried about. With that in mind, who cares if it wipes out all of his free/busy information past/present/future? Sounds like that's what he wants anyway. -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Free/Busy Question Outlook 2000, Exch 5.5 SP4. Manager wants to stop publishing his free/busy time to the server. If he sets the Free/Busy Options to publish 0 months, will all the information that has been published to this point be wiped out from the server, or will it only stop publishing any new info from this point forward? Thank you, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
