RE: Change Roles before AD migration
Since you can't change the role of an NT4 server from DC to member server, if you really want to do this you will need to upgrade the OS to W2K, then run DCPROMO to demote it to a member server. However I agree with Ed's comments. It would seem a lot easier to me to build a new Exchange 5.5 server on a W2K platform and move the users onto it if you don't want the Exchange 5.5 server to be a DC. Even better, leave it where it is, implement AD leaving the Exchange 5.5 server as an NT4 BDC, add Exchange 2000 on a new server, move the mailboxes across, switch off the old 5.5 server. -Original Message- From: Bravo, Liliana (CIP) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2003 21:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Roles before AD migration Hi folks, We are planning to migrate AD . Before that we want to do the following: Currently we have an NT Domain (1 PDC and 2 BDC) and my exchange Server 5.5 is on BDC (named cipx2). I want to move my Exchange on another server with the same name( cipx2) , however as member server. Do you know if after I moved my exchange on a member server with the same name of my old BDC we could have any problem with the change role? Do you know about any link about this process? TIA Liliana _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange migration
There is so much documentation available that I'm surprised that you haven't found it. Start at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/deploy/de fault.asp -Original Message- From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 July 2003 10:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange migration What are the actual steps to first install E2K. Should the ADC be installed first and then the ForestPrep done to expand the schema or the other way around. Also is there any documents available: Technet etc. which documents in great detail a migration from 5.5 to E2K using an existing Exchange 5.5 organization. Thanks. Ralph H. Elmerick NT/Exchange Administrator 330-471-3409 -Original Message- From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2k log reporting All, I would be interested on feedback on what you all use to monitor and report on Exchange 2000 e-mail usage. I was using Melia for 5.5 but when we upgraded the Exchange 2000 version was not ready. I am currently testing Promodag so I would be grateful of any experience of this package but also any other packages that you guys recommend. I need to monitor 2 exchange servers in separate administrative groups and would like to be able to report on a team by team basis, and also report on public folders TIA -Mark Mark Condron ICT Manager Tel: 029 2043 1740 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom:029 2043 1702 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.wcva.org.uk www.volunteering-wales.net Wales Council for Voluntary Action (WCVA) Registered Charity: 21809 Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299 Registered in Wales -- -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specipically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Registered Charity: 21809 Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299 Registered in Wales Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Internet E-mail on dial-up
Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change Roles before AD migration
Possibly because if you do change the name and don't perform a side-by-side migration (where the other server is still available), outlook will break and wont be able to resolve mailboxes without having to recreate all the outlook profiles. They may also have applications that rely on the name of the Exchange server being a particular name (or at least staying constant). The existing hardware for exchange may not be appropiate anymore (cant scale etc), but for the reasons above want to retain the same name. All valid reasons for keeping the name the same sounds like you scare easily in your *old* age*grin* G. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: RE: Change Roles before AD migration Why do you feel you need to move it to another server with the same name? Your idea scares me. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana (CIP) Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi folks, We are planning to migrate AD . Before that we want to do the following: Currently we have an NT Domain (1 PDC and 2 BDC) and my exchange Server 5.5 is on BDC (named cipx2). I want to move my Exchange on another server with the same name( cipx2) , however as member server. Do you know if after I moved my exchange on a member server with the same name of my old BDC we could have any problem with the change role? Do you know about any link about this process? TIA Liliana _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Roles before AD migration
Your second reason is easily fixable via DNS or even WINS, if necessary. For the others, the FAQ details a proven method to avoid any and all issues with moving to a new Exchange server. I find too many people want to keep the same name without having a truly valid reason for doing it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Change Roles before AD migration Possibly because if you do change the name and don't perform a side-by-side migration (where the other server is still available), outlook will break and wont be able to resolve mailboxes without having to recreate all the outlook profiles. They may also have applications that rely on the name of the Exchange server being a particular name (or at least staying constant). The existing hardware for exchange may not be appropiate anymore (cant scale etc), but for the reasons above want to retain the same name. All valid reasons for keeping the name the same sounds like you scare easily in your *old* age*grin* G. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: RE: Change Roles before AD migration Why do you feel you need to move it to another server with the same name? Your idea scares me. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana (CIP) Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi folks, We are planning to migrate AD . Before that we want to do the following: Currently we have an NT Domain (1 PDC and 2 BDC) and my exchange Server 5.5 is on BDC (named cipx2). I want to move my Exchange on another server with the same name( cipx2) , however as member server. Do you know if after I moved my exchange on a member server with the same name of my old BDC we could have any problem with the change role? Do you know about any link about this process? TIA Liliana _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Change Roles before AD migration
Using Ed's Move Server Method is the easiest, safest way to do this. If there are applications that rely on the name of Exch Server and you can't change that within that application, it may be time to dump said app. - Original Message - From: Glenn Corbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 7:12 AM Subject: Re: Change Roles before AD migration Possibly because if you do change the name and don't perform a side-by-side migration (where the other server is still available), outlook will break and wont be able to resolve mailboxes without having to recreate all the outlook profiles. They may also have applications that rely on the name of the Exchange server being a particular name (or at least staying constant). The existing hardware for exchange may not be appropiate anymore (cant scale etc), but for the reasons above want to retain the same name. All valid reasons for keeping the name the same sounds like you scare easily in your *old* age*grin* G. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: RE: Change Roles before AD migration Why do you feel you need to move it to another server with the same name? Your idea scares me. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana (CIP) Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi folks, We are planning to migrate AD . Before that we want to do the following: Currently we have an NT Domain (1 PDC and 2 BDC) and my exchange Server 5.5 is on BDC (named cipx2). I want to move my Exchange on another server with the same name( cipx2) , however as member server. Do you know if after I moved my exchange on a member server with the same name of my old BDC we could have any problem with the change role? Do you know about any link about this process? TIA Liliana _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet E-mail on dial-up
There is no error message, the status of 'checking and sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port 25 and 110 ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions There is no error message, the status of 'checking and sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internet E-mail on dial-up
with port 25, I get: MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready With port 110: MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port 25 and 110 ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions There is no error message, the status of 'checking and sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list the messages -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions with port 25, I get: MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready With port 110: MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port 25 and 110 ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions There is no error message, the status of 'checking and sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPNs and SMTP delays
I have several clients that I vpn and/or terminal service into for remote administration. I VPN into either a Small Business Server 2000 with ISA or a ISA box with the exchange 2k behind it. Any email originating from these clients sent to me or anyone in my organization seems to have at least a half hour delay before delivery. The emails just pile up in the queue listed as queued. Sometimes forcing a connection pushes them but mostly you just have to wait. I am connecting out to them through an ISA box, so there are connections from my mx ip to their mx ip on a regular basis, but the lag happens even when not connected. Are my vpns causing routing confusion of behalf of the exchange servers. The lag is in both directions by the way. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanx. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change Default Show Time As Question
Hello All. Is there a way to change the default for the Show Time As in the calendar when making an appointment? Right now it comes up by default as Busy. Want to change the default to Free. Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
You must stop all your Exchange services every night before doing your backup, then, right? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service I do a flat file backup using Retrospect for exchange and then also use backupexec 8.5 as well. Have yet to show any errors. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service I had HTML display problems after this patch. As a test I applied the DirectX 9.0 runtimes that show up in Windows Update, rebooted, and all was well. I can't say that it wasn't just the reboot that fixed it, however, I'm wondering if the issue wasn't interaction between that patch and W2K SP4, something like that. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service MS03-023 has caused about 6 workstations here to endlessly reboot... I haven't tried it personally, but a couple guys in my group have and are hosed.. Don't know about the others causing any specific issues. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Windows XP Professional Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-024 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03- 024.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-024.asp - - - John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Hmmm... Hotfixes bad Sp's good (hopefully) Were you experiencing any of the symptoms described in the hotfix(es) you installed? Which were they? (kb articles) -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions No known Network issues. CPU is at 2% Mem is at 505232 of 2 GB Attributes pop up instantly. I did notice on reboot, that the info store took about 10 minutes to start. (9GB) I did install the hotfixes
RE: Change Default Show Time As Question
That's a client side setting, so dig around at http://www.slipstick.com for an answer.. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Default Show Time As Question Hello All. Is there a way to change the default for the Show Time As in the calendar when making an appointment? Right now it comes up by default as Busy. Want to change the default to Free. Thanks for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
The Retrospect Exchange Agent does not require that. It is made to do online backups John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service You must stop all your Exchange services every night before doing your backup, then, right? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service I do a flat file backup using Retrospect for exchange and then also use backupexec 8.5 as well. Have yet to show any errors. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service I had HTML display problems after this patch. As a test I applied the DirectX 9.0 runtimes that show up in Windows Update, rebooted, and all was well. I can't say that it wasn't just the reboot that fixed it, however, I'm wondering if the issue wasn't interaction between that patch and W2K SP4, something like that. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service MS03-023 has caused about 6 workstations here to endlessly reboot... I haven't tried it personally, but a couple guys in my group have and are hosed.. Don't know about the others causing any specific issues. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Windows XP Professional Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-024 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03- 024.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-024.asp - - - John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:26 PM To: Exchange
RE: Disable POP on multiple accounts
Sorry, I always forget to mention the version. It is E2K with all the service packs. Scripting isn't my strong suit. I really miss the ability to select multiple users and make changes like this. Oh well, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disable POP on multiple accounts It can be scripted. How depends on the Exchange version in use. On 07/10/03 17:35, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a way to disable the POP protocol on a large number of accounts. Is there a way to do this in bulk? - Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
Then it isn't a flat-file backup any more. As soon as you use the agent for Exchange, it is a Full Online backup. A Flat-file backup would be considered an Offline backup when nothing is being written to the databases (thus the files are not open and are flat). Sounds like it is working fine for you. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service The Retrospect Exchange Agent does not require that. It is made to do online backups John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service You must stop all your Exchange services every night before doing your backup, then, right? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service I do a flat file backup using Retrospect for exchange and then also use backupexec 8.5 as well. Have yet to show any errors. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service I had HTML display problems after this patch. As a test I applied the DirectX 9.0 runtimes that show up in Windows Update, rebooted, and all was well. I can't say that it wasn't just the reboot that fixed it, however, I'm wondering if the issue wasn't interaction between that patch and W2K SP4, something like that. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service MS03-023 has caused about 6 workstations here to endlessly reboot... I haven't tried it personally, but a couple guys in my group have and are hosed.. Don't know about the others causing any specific issues. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Windows XP Professional Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-024 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at:
RE: Disable POP on multiple accounts
Windows Server 2003 I believe allows you the ability to do this. No help for your current predicament, but something to look forward to. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Disable POP on multiple accounts Subject: RE: Disable POP on multiple accounts Sorry, I always forget to mention the version. It is E2K with all the service packs. Scripting isn't my strong suit. I really miss the ability to select multiple users and make changes like this. Oh well, - Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. Voice: 602.631.7486 Fax: 602.294.7486 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disable POP on multiple accounts It can be scripted. How depends on the Exchange version in use. On 07/10/03 17:35, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for a way to disable the POP protocol on a large number of accounts. Is there a way to do this in bulk? - Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up
Boyz [do any of you have a real name?] Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing access via the internet? Steve -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up Try to log in to the POP3 server with telnet and list the messages -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions with port 25, I get: MS Exchange Internet Mail service **version** ready With port 110: MS Exchange Server POP3 server **version** ready BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:42:35 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happens if you try to telnet to the mailserver on port 25 and 110 ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 13:33 To: Exchange Discussions There is no error message, the status of 'checking and sending messages' goes forever and there is nothing happening. BOYZ On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:26:21 +0200 Freddie Soerensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the error message(s) you are receiving ? -Original Message- From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 11. Juli 2003 12:58 To: Exchange Discussions Hello list, On the LAN where there is mail server and on Dial-up connection to the server, all my (Internet E-mail) mails work fine. But when I dial-up to the local ISP, the mails sending / receiving do not work at all. No mail can be sent out nor can be received even after I choose the connection manually to the local ISP dial-up from the choices. What would be wrong. Please advice. The BOYZ. +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange; text_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ Get a free DrukNet e-mail account and stay in touch http://www.druknet.bt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . --- Information in this email may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks.
Internet Email
This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
Actually, the trouble began when I applied the hotfixes listed below. Upon further conversation, I removed these hot fixes. And now, the problems I am seeing are: When outlook is launched, AFTER it looks like it is ready to go, (You can see your folders and email etc.) it freezes for approx 60 seconds and then seems to work fine. This occurs on ALL workstations. But oddly enough, Web Outlook works just fine. Some users, when they create a new email, or reply to an email, will experience a wait of up to a minute before the message is actually sent. The message will stay on their screen and basically lock up outlook until it sends. Obviously, this is very frustration, and I am not sure what to do next... Any help would be appreciated -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Windows XP Professional Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-024 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03- 024.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-024.asp - - - John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Then it isn't a flat-file backup any more. As soon as you use the agent for Exchange, it is a Full Online backup. A Flat-file backup would be considered an Offline backup when nothing is being written to the databases (thus the files are not open and are flat). Sounds like it is working fine for you. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service The Retrospect Exchange Agent does not require that. It is made to do online backups John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service You must stop all your Exchange services every night before doing your backup, then, right? Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, July 10, 2003 4:03 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation:
RE: Internet Email
What does the NDR say? -Original Message- From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Internet Email Subject: Internet Email This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient update service
Network? Antivirus software? Name resolution? Build a clean W2K machine with just Outlook installed and see what happens. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2003 14:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Actually, the trouble began when I applied the hotfixes listed below. Upon further conversation, I removed these hot fixes. And now, the problems I am seeing are: When outlook is launched, AFTER it looks like it is ready to go, (You can see your folders and email etc.) it freezes for approx 60 seconds and then seems to work fine. This occurs on ALL workstations. But oddly enough, Web Outlook works just fine. Some users, when they create a new email, or reply to an email, will experience a wait of up to a minute before the message is actually sent. The message will stay on their screen and basically lock up outlook until it sends. Obviously, this is very frustration, and I am not sure what to do next... Any help would be appreciated -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun In HTML Converter Could Allow Code Execution (823559) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 98 Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition Microsoft Windows Me Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Services Edition Microsoft Windows 2000 Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Critical Bulletin: MS03-023 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-023.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-023.asp - - --- - - - --- Title: Flaw in Windows Message Handling through Utility Manager Could Enable Privilege Elevation (822679) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: Microsoft(r) Windows (r) 2000 Impact: Privilege Elevation Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-025 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-025.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-025.asp - - - --- Title: Buffer Overrun in Windows Could Lead to Data Corruption (817606) Date: 09 July 2003 Software: - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 - Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0, Terminal Server Edition - Microsoft Windows 2000 - Windows XP Professional Impact: Allow an attacker to execute code of their choice Max Risk: Important Bulletin: MS03-024 Microsoft encourages customers to review the Security Bulletins at: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03- 024.asp http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-024.asp - - - John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service Then it isn't a flat-file backup any more. As soon as you use the agent for Exchange, it is a Full Online backup. A Flat-file backup would be considered an Offline backup when nothing is being written to the databases (thus the files are not open and are flat). Sounds like it is working fine for you. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Recipient update service Subject: RE: Recipient update service The Retrospect Exchange Agent does not require that. It is made to do online backups John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient update service You must stop all your Exchange services every
RE: Internet Email
Oh... Both services in the same profile? Not a supported config in that version. Upgrade to Outlook 2002, it supports that config, or install an IMS which is much simpler. -Original Message- From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Internet Email Subject: Internet Email This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email
I'm a simpleton.. but from your description it sounds to me like you have each and every client workstation pop'ing their mail from your third party... We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. maybe your third party updated/changed something? maybe it may thinks your trying to relay thru them (I've had troubles with covad's mail servers think that on occasion) maybe a quick telnet to the POP and SMTP server on the third party to see if you can communicate with it in general?? just some ideas bill -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Email What does the NDR say? -Original Message- From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Internet Email Subject: Internet Email This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email
I guess that you are using Outlook to connect to Exchange. What client are you using for Internet email? -Original Message- From: Rob Talkington III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2003 13:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Email This is the first time I've posted here and I couldn't find a search function. I use Exchange 5.5 SP4 and Outlook 2000 clients. We have our email hosted by a third party but use Exchange locally. We do not have IMS running on Exchange but have been able to send and receive internet email for years. Monday I came in and for some reason no one can send internet email anymore. Receiving it is fine but sending it generates a Non Delivery Report immediately after clicking on Send. I did not change anything on Exchange the weekend prior. I have searched many discussions and cannot find an answer that pertains to our problem. Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Email
I guess I'll install an IMS. I know the config isn't supported by MS but it has worked for years so I thought I'd see if anyone had the same problem. Thanks for your help!!! Rob _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
attachement overload
Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
I'd look into some kind of web-based file storage solution. I'm planning on implementing something similar this summer. I'll allow faculty to logon, upload a file, and designate who can access it. While Public Folders isn't the best way, it's better than individual copies of the attachments in mailboxes. At least with a public folder, you only have one copy. On a similar note, does anyone know of a way to prohibit attachments from being saved in the Sent Items folder? It's quite annoying. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
Doesn't work like that...SIS Stu -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
SIS in Ex5.5? For some reason I thought that was only on E2K and above. Cool. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachement overload Doesn't work like that...SIS Stu -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
SIS=single instance storage, that is your 5mb file sent to 5 users on the SAME server will only consume 5mb. Everyone gets a pointer to the same message in the store. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2003 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachement overload Doesn't work like that...SIS Stu -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
QMQP protocol
One of our vendors received an email infected with BugBear virus coming from an address from our domain. However it's a bogus address. After checking out the header and the path, I found the sender's IP address and found out that it's running QMQP on port 628. I found a link through Google that it says it's a faster protocol than SMTP and it's used to centralize mail queue for cluster of hosts. Apparently it runs on Unix. Does anyone know whether the protocol is legitimate and/or could be used for spamming or spreading virus? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: S/MIME for public folders?
Well folks, In the end I did not find happiness in this problem through Microsoft. However, we were able to hack together a solution using: * OpenSSL * PHPki certificate management software (check Sourceforge for details) * An ordinary gentleman's handkerchief and 12 milligrams of sodium bisulfate. We are generating certs for the public folder using PHPki then sending the public key to our vendor. Note that the certs appear not to work within the organization because the Exchange server won't let you send S/MIME to an address for which it has not generated the certificate. This is, as my dear Aunt Gladys used to say, enough to piss off the pope. But all's well that ends well, right? S/MIME certs drift out To our webhost provider Like snow descending -- be - MOS This is turning into one very sexy struggle for the human race. -Zapp Brannigan -Original Message- From: East, Bill Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: S/MIME for public folders? I'm running Exchange 2000 and can issue S/MIME keys for individual users. However, I'd really like to issue one for a public folder. Is there a simple way to do this that I am missing, or is the feature not present? I've set up a test folder and unchecked the box Hide from Exchange address lists - but the folder does not show up as an option in the Advanced Security section of the SM. -- be - MOS I can feel for her because, although I have never been an Alaskan prostitute dancing on the bar in a spangled dress, I still get very bored with washing and ironing and dishwashing and cooking day after relentless day. -- Betty MacDonald _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Where to look to allow email
Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to look to allow email
Your home firewall is not going to have a Public IP of 192.168.0.1, now is it? Try adding the Public IP of your firewall instead of your internal IP. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:05 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Where to look to allow email Subject: FW: Where to look to allow email Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to look to allow email
But it is 01 - 0.5 , with internal DNS, why would that matter? It is the router to internal mail server. It isn't going public. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where to look to allow email Your home firewall is not going to have a Public IP of 192.168.0.1, now is it? Try adding the Public IP of your firewall instead of your internal IP. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:05 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Where to look to allow email Subject: FW: Where to look to allow email Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
How about telling them not to send attachments that large anyway? I'm assuming you have a file server? Create group shares and have them send the link to the file via e-mail. How hard is that? -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where to look to allow email
I see. You didn't specify that this is in your home. I mistakenly assumed that the mail server was at your company and you were trying to send e-mail from your home to your work. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:17 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Where to look to allow email Subject: RE: Where to look to allow email But it is 01 - 0.5 , with internal DNS, why would that matter? It is the router to internal mail server. It isn't going public. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where to look to allow email Your home firewall is not going to have a Public IP of 192.168.0.1, now is it? Try adding the Public IP of your firewall instead of your internal IP. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:05 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Where to look to allow email Subject: FW: Where to look to allow email Ok as I fumble through 2003 from 5.5, it was a relative easy process to allow my home firewall router to email me in the morning with the log reports. Now it can't send me the email reports. The part I don't understand is if this is considered a relay restriction, I simply add the 192.168.0.1 to the relay restrictions of machines allowed to relay, (in the virtual SMTP server properties) it doesn't appear to resolve this issue. What am I missing on this? I can't authenticate against it so that isn't a option. P.S. xx.mydomain substitutes my home domain. -Original Message- Ok 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 11, 44, 250, 0, HELO, -, FVS318, 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 42, 55, 250, 0, MAIL, -, FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:00:15, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 0, 40, 43, 250, 0, RCPT, -, TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED], 192.168.0.1, FVS318, 7/11/2003, 7:01:16, SMTPSVC1, POOMBA1, 192.168.0.5, 60594, 40, 43, 240, 60656, QUIT, -, FVS318, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: attachement overload
Actually, yes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachement overload SIS in Ex5.5? For some reason I thought that was only on E2K and above. Cool. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachement overload Doesn't work like that...SIS Stu -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each other on a regular basis. We have mailboxes in excess of 500mb. IS there any way to manage attachements better. We do not want to tell people not to use them. We do not want to block them. If one user sends a 5mb file to 5 users this will take 30 mb of space on the exchange server (5X5+5 for the sender in sent items). This is an AWFULL lot of redundancy in the database. IS there any way to manage this better? We tried public folders but this just moves the files from one database to another in Exchange 5.5. TIA __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AD Learning Material
Does anyone know of a good study/reference resource for advanced AD? It can be in print/online whatever. I'm looking for something beyond a AD-101 type book that covers details such as using LDP, ASDI Edit, etc as well as the intricacies of replication, extended attributes and other features. Thanks! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD Learning Material
Does anyone know of a good study/reference resource for advanced AD? It can be in print/online whatever. I'm looking for something beyond a AD-101 type book that covers details such as using LDP, ASDI Edit, etc as well as the intricacies of replication, extended attributes and other features. I'm new to all of LDAP-querying to AD to retrieve currently logged-in user's information (password, other info etc.), and am looking for a beginner's resource for programming all this. Any pointers ? Also, does this involved any Kerberos programming also ? - Shshank Sharma QTC Management Inc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet?
Here also. We went round and round, and I finally took the attitude, I can tell you what are the pros and cons, and my recommendation. However, you do pay me, so I will do as you ask. Ultimately, the PHB decided to allow OOF to the internet. When I went on vacation for two weeks, guess what I didn't use! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions I agree. My esteemed employer allows out of office notifications to the Internet, so I never use the feature. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet? My employer allows OOFs , but I never set it because I dont think its anyone's business outside of the company where I am, and I dont need to help out any spammers by verifiing my address. (Note that you can specify allowed OOFs by domain) FWIW, Exchange 2003 will *not* send OOFs if the user is not specified in the TO: or CC: field. (Re: your mailing list storm). .Auto-replies to the Internet are bad for that reason and for the potential mail-loops they can cause. - Original Message - From: ml.exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 12:13 PM Subject: What is the Current thinking on OOF to the Internet? Looks like it is that time of the year again, strong pressure from the top has arrived trying to mandate the use of the Out of Office and auto response to the Internet. Even though we have helped cause mailing list storms in the past when it was forced on for a sales convention (thus leading to it's current banishment) once again users want it enabled. Any thoughts on the subject to help enlighten the PHB's would be again most welcome. Thanks in advance all. Miles --- Miles Holt, MCP Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info. I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some hotfixes) who is getting the Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange server message and long delays opening or deleting a message etc. Originally over 3 minutes to delete a single message I got it down some with the RPC binding order but not enough. Everything, contacts, calendar, items in public folders, items in his other folders created at the same level as the inbox all behave perfectly normally (ie fast). It seems to be just his inbox. None of the 4 articles (290003, 299485, 293650, 328880) I got searching for Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server or the zero articles from searching for Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server seemed to apply[1]. There are no errors in the error logs of either his machine or either of the Exchange servers (neither new nor old). The error message always refers to the new server. It's not network related and although he was running Cloudmark anti-spam and auto-archiving, turning them off did not help[2]. I have already tried the reg change to reorder the Exchange Provider RPC binding order and that may have helped a bit but not enough. It is down to under 60 seconds but over about 20 to delete a message now. Still not good enough. Using an Outlook 2000 client on a different box still shows an abnormal delay although less of one than Outlook XP so I believe the root cause to be unrelated to the client, freely conceding that I could easily be wrong[3]. When I added my account as a user on his mailbox and tried to open it with my Outlook 2000 as an additional mailbox I was able to add the mailboxes just fine but when I tried to open either one I got an error message Unable to expand the folder. Which did not give me any articles when I searched the MS KB site for it. Which doesn't seem right but I even made sure I wasn't limiting it to Exchange only and still no joy. There were no differences in permissions between his mailboxes that wouldn't open and those of another user I tested whose mailbox I had no trouble adding and opening. I do not know if this is a related problem or a different one. His mailbox that is slow contains 26,000 items for a total usage of 211,000K. His secondary mailbox (for the other internet domain) that opens fine contains 21,500 items for a total usage of 325,000K. Mine is 4xx,000K and has 115,000K items and I do not have problems so I don't think that is it either. There is plenty of free space in the store. I looked over the command line switches documented in article 296192 but I don't see anything there that looks likely to help. I looked over the fixes in SP4 for Exchange 5.5 and I didn't see anything there although, I will apply that this weekend. I am at a loss for where to look next. Other than to look at isinteg checks and possibly exmerging his box out and in again. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since I have completed all but deleting the old Exchange server from the site I thought I should perhaps do that first but if that were the root cause it should affect more than just the one user should it not? Any help or pointers would be gratefully received. Ronni [1] He is on the lan not over VPN on DSL so 290003 is out. I am in the process of moving to a new Exchange 5.5 server but his mailboxes and all the public folders are already on the new server and the server the message claims is the problem is the new server so I think that lets 299485 out. 293650 tells me how to remove the message but what I want to do is remove the delay. 328880 refers to an Exchange 2000/2003 server which this obviously is not. [2] He was running Cloudmark (anti-spam add-in) and had recently started auto-archiving. I had him stop the auto-archiving for now and stop the cloudmark from automatically checking his inbox. I think the best improvement was the RPC binding order and the others made little difference but he is impatient and would not try things one at a time. He had been on a gigabit switch and moved a few weeks ago back to a 10/100 switch but checking the switch didn't show any issues and I had him switch back and it did not help. [3] I put Outlook 2000 on a new box and had him log in on it. There opening his mailbox takes about 40 seconds and deleting the Welcome to Outlook 2000 message took about 8 seconds. That seems like at least 7 seconds too long to me. Also, he has two mailboxes (one for a different internet domain that we also accept mail for here) that he accesses independently (different icons on his desktop for the different profiles). If he opens his main one for the company domain (as in internet) he has the problem accessing his inbox. He has the company mailbox opening as an added mailbox when he
E2k trans logs #s increasing rapidly
Hi all, The number of transaction logs being created on one of my Exchange servers(E2k sp3) has increased quite a bit recently. For this installation, the total trans log size was under 1 gig every day until a few weeks back and now is between 4-5 gig. MSFT KB talks about the possible culprits being Virusscan or backup programs accessing the M drive for filescans or to make backups. In my case I use both Exchange aware AV program and backup program(Groupshield and Arcserve E2k agent) and I confirmed that neither is accessing the M drive directly for scanning or backing up. Searches from OWA also supposedly increases the number of logs being created, but I don't think that is the case here - don't think usage pattern has changed dramatically in the last few weeks. Has anyone else experienced this problem? Any other thoughts on what could be causing this. Thanks in advance . Regards, Reju _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AD Learning Material
Roger has posted a nice collection of books on AD at http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=booksfile=indexreq= view_subcatsid=7min=0orderby=titleAshow=8 (url will probably wrap) I've had good luck with Alistair Lowe-Norris' book, but mainly use it as a scripting reference. Hunter -Original Message- From: Sean Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AD Learning Material Does anyone know of a good study/reference resource for advanced AD? It can be in print/online whatever. I'm looking for something beyond a AD-101 type book that covers details such as using LDP, ASDI Edit, etc as well as the intricacies of replication, extended attributes and other features. Thanks! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Apply SP4 Run Performance Optimizer. Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options. This only effects one user? - Original Message - From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info. I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some hotfixes) who is getting the Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange server message and long delays opening or deleting a message etc. Originally over 3 minutes to delete a single message I got it down some with the RPC binding order but not enough. Everything, contacts, calendar, items in public folders, items in his other folders created at the same level as the inbox all behave perfectly normally (ie fast). It seems to be just his inbox. None of the 4 articles (290003, 299485, 293650, 328880) I got searching for Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server or the zero articles from searching for Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server seemed to apply[1]. There are no errors in the error logs of either his machine or either of the Exchange servers (neither new nor old). The error message always refers to the new server. It's not network related and although he was running Cloudmark anti-spam and auto-archiving, turning them off did not help[2]. I have already tried the reg change to reorder the Exchange Provider RPC binding order and that may have helped a bit but not enough. It is down to under 60 seconds but over about 20 to delete a message now. Still not good enough. Using an Outlook 2000 client on a different box still shows an abnormal delay although less of one than Outlook XP so I believe the root cause to be unrelated to the client, freely conceding that I could easily be wrong[3]. When I added my account as a user on his mailbox and tried to open it with my Outlook 2000 as an additional mailbox I was able to add the mailboxes just fine but when I tried to open either one I got an error message Unable to expand the folder. Which did not give me any articles when I searched the MS KB site for it. Which doesn't seem right but I even made sure I wasn't limiting it to Exchange only and still no joy. There were no differences in permissions between his mailboxes that wouldn't open and those of another user I tested whose mailbox I had no trouble adding and opening. I do not know if this is a related problem or a different one. His mailbox that is slow contains 26,000 items for a total usage of 211,000K. His secondary mailbox (for the other internet domain) that opens fine contains 21,500 items for a total usage of 325,000K. Mine is 4xx,000K and has 115,000K items and I do not have problems so I don't think that is it either. There is plenty of free space in the store. I looked over the command line switches documented in article 296192 but I don't see anything there that looks likely to help. I looked over the fixes in SP4 for Exchange 5.5 and I didn't see anything there although, I will apply that this weekend. I am at a loss for where to look next. Other than to look at isinteg checks and possibly exmerging his box out and in again. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since I have completed all but deleting the old Exchange server from the site I thought I should perhaps do that first but if that were the root cause it should affect more than just the one user should it not? Any help or pointers would be gratefully received. Ronni [1] He is on the lan not over VPN on DSL so 290003 is out. I am in the process of moving to a new Exchange 5.5 server but his mailboxes and all the public folders are already on the new server and the server the message claims is the problem is the new server so I think that lets 299485 out. 293650 tells me how to remove the message but what I want to do is remove the delay. 328880 refers to an Exchange 2000/2003 server which this obviously is not. [2] He was running Cloudmark (anti-spam add-in) and had recently started auto-archiving. I had him stop the auto-archiving for now and stop the cloudmark from automatically checking his inbox. I think the best improvement was the RPC binding order and the others made little difference but he is impatient and would not try things one at a time. He had been on a gigabit switch and moved a few weeks ago back to a 10/100 switch but checking the switch didn't show any issues and I had him switch back and it did not help. [3] I put Outlook 2000 on a new box and had him log in on it. There opening his mailbox takes about 40 seconds and deleting the Welcome to Outlook 2000 message took about 8 seconds. That
Re: E2k trans logs #s increasing rapidly
Mail Loop? - Original Message - From: George, Reju [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: E2k trans logs #s increasing rapidly Hi all, The number of transaction logs being created on one of my Exchange servers(E2k sp3) has increased quite a bit recently. For this installation, the total trans log size was under 1 gig every day until a few weeks back and now is between 4-5 gig. MSFT KB talks about the possible culprits being Virusscan or backup programs accessing the M drive for filescans or to make backups. In my case I use both Exchange aware AV program and backup program(Groupshield and Arcserve E2k agent) and I confirmed that neither is accessing the M drive directly for scanning or backing up. Searches from OWA also supposedly increases the number of logs being created, but I don't think that is the case here - don't think usage pattern has changed dramatically in the last few weeks. Has anyone else experienced this problem? Any other thoughts on what could be causing this. Thanks in advance . Regards, Reju _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587. When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it? Man that doesn't sound right to me. I spoke to Trend and they said that is how it works and it always worked that way. I recently customized the recipient notification message to contact our help desk but I didn't think that external users would get it. Anyone else run into this issue? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just the users on Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender. This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587. When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it? Man that doesn't sound right to me. I spoke to Trend and they said that is how it works and it always worked that way. I recently customized the recipient notification message to contact our help desk but I didn't think that external users would get it. Anyone else run into this issue? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unknown Error 12029
Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3 Windows 2000 SP4 IE6.0 Sp1 I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Do you still have the old server on and all the services running? Do you have Cloudmark configured to check ALL inboxes or have you got it configured to only scan the primary mailbox? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Apply SP4 Run Performance Optimizer. Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options. This only effects one user? - Original Message - From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info. I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some hotfixes) who is getting the Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange server message and long delays opening or deleting a message etc. Originally over 3 minutes to delete a single message I got it down some with the RPC binding order but not enough. Everything, contacts, calendar, items in public folders, items in his other folders created at the same level as the inbox all behave perfectly normally (ie fast). It seems to be just his inbox. None of the 4 articles (290003, 299485, 293650, 328880) I got searching for Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server or the zero articles from searching for Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server seemed to apply[1]. There are no errors in the error logs of either his machine or either of the Exchange servers (neither new nor old). The error message always refers to the new server. It's not network related and although he was running Cloudmark anti-spam and auto-archiving, turning them off did not help[2]. I have already tried the reg change to reorder the Exchange Provider RPC binding order and that may have helped a bit but not enough. It is down to under 60 seconds but over about 20 to delete a message now. Still not good enough. Using an Outlook 2000 client on a different box still shows an abnormal delay although less of one than Outlook XP so I believe the root cause to be unrelated to the client, freely conceding that I could easily be wrong[3]. When I added my account as a user on his mailbox and tried to open it with my Outlook 2000 as an additional mailbox I was able to add the mailboxes just fine but when I tried to open either one I got an error message Unable to expand the folder. Which did not give me any articles when I searched the MS KB site for it. Which doesn't seem right but I even made sure I wasn't limiting it to Exchange only and still no joy. There were no differences in permissions between his mailboxes that wouldn't open and those of another user I tested whose mailbox I had no trouble adding and opening. I do not know if this is a related problem or a different one. His mailbox that is slow contains 26,000 items for a total usage of 211,000K. His secondary mailbox (for the other internet domain) that opens fine contains 21,500 items for a total usage of 325,000K. Mine is 4xx,000K and has 115,000K items and I do not have problems so I don't think that is it either. There is plenty of free space in the store. I looked over the command line switches documented in article 296192 but I don't see anything there that looks likely to help. I looked over the fixes in SP4 for Exchange 5.5 and I didn't see anything there although, I will apply that this weekend. I am at a loss for where to look next. Other than to look at isinteg checks and possibly exmerging his box out and in again. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since I have completed all but deleting the old Exchange server from the site I thought I should perhaps do that first but if that were the root cause it should affect more than just the one user should it not? Any help or pointers would be gratefully received. Ronni [1] He is on the lan not over VPN on DSL so 290003 is out. I am in the process of moving to a new Exchange 5.5 server but his mailboxes and all the public folders are already on the new server and the server the message claims is the problem is the new server so I think that lets 299485 out. 293650 tells me how to remove the message but what I want to do is remove the delay. 328880 refers to an Exchange 2000/2003 server which this obviously is not. [2] He was running Cloudmark (anti-spam add-in) and had recently started auto-archiving. I had him stop the auto-archiving for now and stop the cloudmark from automatically checking his inbox. I think the best improvement was the RPC binding order and the others made little
RE: Unknown Error 12029
This have any bearing on your situation? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329121 Dynamic Update Not Successful During Windows Server 2003 Setup and 12029 Error Is Added to Setuperr.log (I know it's the wrong O/S, but with as little info as you gave us, I thought I'd give it a try.) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;312434 XADM: An Unexpected Error Occurs When Users Try to Gain Access to Messages Through OWA -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unknown Error 12029 Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3 Windows 2000 SP4 IE6.0 Sp1 I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unknown Error 12029
I would have given more info if I had more to give. When you access your mailbox via the http://server/exchange link i.e. OWA 2000 it opens up just fine with no errors but when you click on the Folders Icon the Unknown Error 12029 window pops up. You click ok and then your fine. I am going to open up a ticket with Microsoft and see what they have to say. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029 This have any bearing on your situation? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329121 Dynamic Update Not Successful During Windows Server 2003 Setup and 12029 Error Is Added to Setuperr.log (I know it's the wrong O/S, but with as little info as you gave us, I thought I'd give it a try.) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;312434 XADM: An Unexpected Error Occurs When Users Try to Gain Access to Messages Through OWA -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unknown Error 12029 Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3 Windows 2000 SP4 IE6.0 Sp1 I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unknown Error 12029
Sorry Rick...wasn't trying to be combative... So there's nothing in the client logs or the Exchange logs either? -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029 I would have given more info if I had more to give. When you access your mailbox via the http://server/exchange link i.e. OWA 2000 it opens up just fine with no errors but when you click on the Folders Icon the Unknown Error 12029 window pops up. You click ok and then your fine. I am going to open up a ticket with Microsoft and see what they have to say. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029 This have any bearing on your situation? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329121 Dynamic Update Not Successful During Windows Server 2003 Setup and 12029 Error Is Added to Setuperr.log (I know it's the wrong O/S, but with as little info as you gave us, I thought I'd give it a try.) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;312434 XADM: An Unexpected Error Occurs When Users Try to Gain Access to Messages Through OWA -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unknown Error 12029 Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3 Windows 2000 SP4 IE6.0 Sp1 I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unknown Error 12029
Is URLScan installed? -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029 I would have given more info if I had more to give. When you access your mailbox via the http://server/exchange link i.e. OWA 2000 it opens up just fine with no errors but when you click on the Folders Icon the Unknown Error 12029 window pops up. You click ok and then your fine. I am going to open up a ticket with Microsoft and see what they have to say. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unknown Error 12029 This have any bearing on your situation? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;329121 Dynamic Update Not Successful During Windows Server 2003 Setup and 12029 Error Is Added to Setuperr.log (I know it's the wrong O/S, but with as little info as you gave us, I thought I'd give it a try.) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;312434 XADM: An Unexpected Error Occurs When Users Try to Gain Access to Messages Through OWA -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unknown Error 12029 Exchange 2000 SP3 Post SP3 Windows 2000 SP4 IE6.0 Sp1 I am in a mixed environment of 5.5 and 2000 servers but my mailbox is on Exchange 2000. Why do I get this error when I use OWA? Anyone else getting this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Planning to run SP4 asap. It is only the one user though so I am not doing it until the weekend. Other users with Office XP had noticed the little message box but the delays were slight (under a couple of seconds or so) and for them the registry change fixed it right up. IM Messaging thingy huh? I'll check for that. It certainly isn't on in the Outlook 2000 client I tested with. Ronni * ..sittin' here on the Group W bench... (Alice's Restaurant Arlo Guthrie) - -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Apply SP4 Run Performance Optimizer. Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options. This only effects one user? - Original Message - From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info. I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some hotfixes) who is getting the Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange server message and long delays opening or deleting a message etc. Originally over 3 minutes to delete a single message I got it down some with the RPC binding order but not enough. Everything, contacts, calendar, items in public folders, items in his other folders created at the same level as the inbox all behave perfectly normally (ie fast). It seems to be just his inbox. None of the 4 articles (290003, 299485, 293650, 328880) I got searching for Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server or the zero articles from searching for Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server seemed to apply[1]. There are no errors in the error logs of either his machine or either of the Exchange servers (neither new nor old). The error message always refers to the new server. It's not network related and although he was running Cloudmark anti-spam and auto-archiving, turning them off did not help[2]. I have already tried the reg change to reorder the Exchange Provider RPC binding order and that may have helped a bit but not enough. It is down to under 60 seconds but over about 20 to delete a message now. Still not good enough. Using an Outlook 2000 client on a different box still shows an abnormal delay although less of one than Outlook XP so I believe the root cause to be unrelated to the client, freely conceding that I could easily be wrong[3]. When I added my account as a user on his mailbox and tried to open it with my Outlook 2000 as an additional mailbox I was able to add the mailboxes just fine but when I tried to open either one I got an error message Unable to expand the folder. Which did not give me any articles when I searched the MS KB site for it. Which doesn't seem right but I even made sure I wasn't limiting it to Exchange only and still no joy. There were no differences in permissions between his mailboxes that wouldn't open and those of another user I tested whose mailbox I had no trouble adding and opening. I do not know if this is a related problem or a different one. His mailbox that is slow contains 26,000 items for a total usage of 211,000K. His secondary mailbox (for the other internet domain) that opens fine contains 21,500 items for a total usage of 325,000K. Mine is 4xx,000K and has 115,000K items and I do not have problems so I don't think that is it either. There is plenty of free space in the store. I looked over the command line switches documented in article 296192 but I don't see anything there that looks likely to help. I looked over the fixes in SP4 for Exchange 5.5 and I didn't see anything there although, I will apply that this weekend. I am at a loss for where to look next. Other than to look at isinteg checks and possibly exmerging his box out and in again. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since I have completed all but deleting the old Exchange server from the site I thought I should perhaps do that first but if that were the root cause it should affect more than just the one user should it not? Any help or pointers would be gratefully received. Ronni [1] He is on the lan not over VPN on DSL so 290003 is out. I am in the process of moving to a new Exchange 5.5 server but his mailboxes and all the public folders are already on the new server and the server the message claims is the problem is the new server so I think that lets
RE: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Yes, still have the old server up and services running. But have finished everything else for the move. He had Cloudmark configured to check all inboxes. And there was no difference from changing it to not scan anything automatically. Ronni * Don't count the days, make the days count. - -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Do you still have the old server on and all the services running? Do you have Cloudmark configured to check ALL inboxes or have you got it configured to only scan the primary mailbox? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Apply SP4 Run Performance Optimizer. Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options. This only effects one user? - Original Message - From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info. I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some hotfixes) who is getting the Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange server message and long delays opening or deleting a message etc. Originally over 3 minutes to delete a single message I got it down some with the RPC binding order but not enough. Everything, contacts, calendar, items in public folders, items in his other folders created at the same level as the inbox all behave perfectly normally (ie fast). It seems to be just his inbox. None of the 4 articles (290003, 299485, 293650, 328880) I got searching for Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server or the zero articles from searching for Requesting data from the Microsoft Exchange Server seemed to apply[1]. There are no errors in the error logs of either his machine or either of the Exchange servers (neither new nor old). The error message always refers to the new server. It's not network related and although he was running Cloudmark anti-spam and auto-archiving, turning them off did not help[2]. I have already tried the reg change to reorder the Exchange Provider RPC binding order and that may have helped a bit but not enough. It is down to under 60 seconds but over about 20 to delete a message now. Still not good enough. Using an Outlook 2000 client on a different box still shows an abnormal delay although less of one than Outlook XP so I believe the root cause to be unrelated to the client, freely conceding that I could easily be wrong[3]. When I added my account as a user on his mailbox and tried to open it with my Outlook 2000 as an additional mailbox I was able to add the mailboxes just fine but when I tried to open either one I got an error message Unable to expand the folder. Which did not give me any articles when I searched the MS KB site for it. Which doesn't seem right but I even made sure I wasn't limiting it to Exchange only and still no joy. There were no differences in permissions between his mailboxes that wouldn't open and those of another user I tested whose mailbox I had no trouble adding and opening. I do not know if this is a related problem or a different one. His mailbox that is slow contains 26,000 items for a total usage of 211,000K. His secondary mailbox (for the other internet domain) that opens fine contains 21,500 items for a total usage of 325,000K. Mine is 4xx,000K and has 115,000K items and I do not have problems so I don't think that is it either. There is plenty of free space in the store. I looked over the command line switches documented in article 296192 but I don't see anything there that looks likely to help. I looked over the fixes in SP4 for Exchange 5.5 and I didn't see anything there although, I will apply that this weekend. I am at a loss for where to look next. Other than to look at isinteg checks and possibly exmerging his box out and in again. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since I have completed all but deleting the old Exchange server from the site I thought I should perhaps do that first but if that were the root cause it should affect more than just the one user should it not? Any help or pointers would be gratefully received. Ronni [1] He is on the lan not over VPN
