RE: Blocking a newsletter
makes note: never work at American Tower If it isn't in writing, I don't go there. If there's a lawsuit, I have that permission in writing. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Like I said, in some companies they do, in others, they realize that the Mail Administrator has access to everything on the Network, and knows there has to be a certain amount of trust to go along with that title. As far as accessing other people's mailboxes, how do you troubleshoot what problems them might be having? We open Users' mailboxes that are having problems, inside out own mailbox and also log into their mailbox with their credentials 3 or 4 times a day. We then ask them to change their password. But all Mail Administrators know that if you know certain AD accounts and their passwords, you can get into anybody's mailbox. But does that mean you should? No. I have never just randomly selected someone's mailbox and opened it to see what the contents were. But I have worked with some people who have done it. There's where the trust has to come into play. I even showed management that they had logged into some very highly sensitive mailboxes. They then asked me to monitor their whereabouts on the Network and were eventually let go. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter there is implicit trust That 'implicit trust' would have to be in writing in policy, or I am not touching it. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey Edwards Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's not true. As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO. You have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, it is a position of high sensitivity. Highly sensitive documents are passed through the mail system. You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about. It may not be written in some companies, but it is written in others. And I learned that the more you stay out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive documents. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter that's not necessarily true. Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it. He has to be tasked with it. Drew Nicholson Technical Writer Network Engineer LAN Manager RapidApp 312-372-7188 (work) 312-543-0008 (cell) Born To Edit -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter Rachel: As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail. That mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser would be afraid of someone else seeing. Remember -- the email is on Company's equipment, software, etc. It is THEIRS. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter From my point of view: If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone. I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly, Rachel -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Blocking a newsletter Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the f^ckedcompany.com newsletter. Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the newsletter. So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask the
RE: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change
A very wise man once said you can't hurry Exchange. Why, I think it was you! :) -Original Message- From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change Move the server further north. It will have less angular velocity the further away from the equator it is. Less angular velocity means time will pass more quickly in that new location. Should cut down the time from an hour to 59.999 minutes or so. Directory replication requires time and patience. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change Hi, We have an Exchange 2000 server with about 750 users with Outlook 2000. We have 30 branches, all of which have their own domain controllers. We have about 35 domain controllers total. I'm having a problem when I change users' mailbox size limit. After I change it, it takes up to an hour to take effect. I understand it may be a replication issue but is there any way to speed that up? I have already created a batch file that uses repadmin /syncall to replicate the domain immediately. Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
Don't block .zip, make them zip their .exe. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product on Exchange(55) answer the following: Q: Is it possible to set the scanmail to filter EXE attachments, and/but Make exceptions for centain EXE's? Here is the deal: Ive got Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a... Running GRPSHL 4.5sp1(stop laughing it works now..finally) Ok So Ive got GS to filter out all EXE (along with martins list of evil too...plus some others) My problem was that I had to make an exception for 2 EXE's for an internal app to send out...NAI Tech came up with a reg hack/entry where I could specify these 2 EXE's and GS would allow them to pass. Ive been considering going to Scanmail...but have not gotten a straight answer(from Trend) as to weather I could do this...All I got was...dont filter EXE on the exchange box..do it at the interscan smtp prefilter software/boxsorry but I want to filter EXE's in the exchange box toobut I need these exceptions thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
I've heard nothing good about black ice. Most people I know run zone alarm. What changes when you turn black ice off? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option
Nope. Buy the Exchange agent and backup your edbs, not mailboxes, and you'll be fine. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec 8.6 - Open File Option Hello, I am thinking about purchasing Backup Exec to backup Exchange 2000, and the sales rep asked me if I want the Open File Option. Since I will be making online backups of the server at night when no one is ever logged on, do I really need to pay the extra 441 Euro for this option? AW _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting messages disappearing.. Oh my...
calendar caching http://www.slipstick.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Meeting messages disappearing.. Oh my... Good afternoon, Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 We have people reporting that meeting messages are disappearing from their calendars. (we use McAffee) Does anyone have this problem? Have a great day. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue
Not necessarily. Spam comes in for ex-luser. NDR tries to go back out as it should. Return address was fake, so it waits for the retry period to expire. When the retry period expires, they go away. It's best to not look at them too much if they bother you. If you're closed to relay, then there is nothing to worry about. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue So if an NDR is trying to go to faked addresses used by SPAMMERS, then does that mean that my server is being SPAM RELAYED? I've done the Relay test and it's not being used as a Relay so are they getting in some other way? When I called Microsoft they say it's from a misconfigured firewall but my firewall guy says impossible. So, I'm back to looking at the Exchange server. Any other ideas? Thanks! It's normal. They're NDRs, and probably NDRs trying to go to the faked addresses used by spammers. Feel free to delete. -Peter -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anonymous messages in the outbound queue I've tried several things to prevent messages getting stuck in the Outbound queue of the IMS it's like someone is relaying SPAM off of us. I've installed Trend Micro's InterScan 5 Messaging Security Suite and tried to block anonymous messages that way. Are they NDR's or messages to user's that are no longer here? Normally I just delete them everyday but I'm concerned that we're being a relay of somekind. Is this normal for Exchange 5.5 Thanks! Karon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Time Sync
Net time for the workstations and servers, pointing to one server. However my firewall won't allow me to nntp so we just lookup the time once a week and adjust if necessary. It's the poor man's solution. -Original Message- From: Paul Patti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Time Sync Hi everyone, What is everyone using to sync the time on servers and workstations? Thanks Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schedule + service cannot start.
You're using Schedule+? Say it ain't so!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Schedule + service cannot start. First of all, thank you to all that offered me advise on my mail migration. I am nearly done. But I am getting an error on my exchange 5.5 server. Event ID 7023. The MS Schedule Free/Busy connector service terminated with the following error: The service did not start due to a logon failure. Now I just finished moving everything from an old server to this new one. It is running fine otherwise. I checked to make sure that the service was using the same account that the old server was using and it is. And I have the password correct. I also tried the local system account and that did not work either. I look in exchange manager and under the new server the connector is not listed under recipients. When I went to the public info store properties for the new server and went to instances to add it, it was already listed. How can I get this to start properly? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar trouble
I've had them just go bad. Can you kill it and recreate? Or are there meetings booked out to forever and a day? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar trouble One more question for today and I will be done:) I have resource calendars setup on one of our 5.5 servers using Mr. Stongs Code. Everything works fine except on one calendar. When I add it as an attendee and let the meeting request set open for 3 seconds or so, the outlook just closes. This happens on everyone client so I know it is a server issue. I am using his latest exchange code for booking the resource. I'm not even sure if that is the problem. Has anyone else seen this. Thanks. personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help - can't browse exchange org
Can you ping the other server from wherever you are running the admin gui? -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 4:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help - can't browse exchange org How does browsing for the exchange org work? We have a mixed E2k/E5.5 org. Everything was fine until we recently added a new exchange 5.5 server into a new site in this org. Now when we open up the Exchange 5.5 admin program choose File connect to other server and choose browse we get the error message back stating an exchange server can not be found?? We connect via ESM fine. I think this problem is related to the fact that when we try to move a users mailbox from this exchange 5.5 server using ad users and computers the target server and storage group drop down boxes are greyed out! Regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Copying or merging a user's mailbox with another
The user ID can be deleted without affecting the mailbox, and you should never delete a mailbox until it's been sitting about a month anyway. Just hook up the manager's account to the mailbox for awhile, then let it go. -Original Message- From: Anthony Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Copying or merging a user's mailbox with another Hi, I am running Exchange 2000 SP2. I need a way of copying the contents of one user's mailbox to another, on the same server. Preferably, specifying a folder in the destination mailbox for the old contents. The deal is, when people leave the company, their manager wants their old email. The admins want to delete the user id and mailbox for obvious reasons. We would like to do this on the server as opposed to on the client with pst files... Any ideas? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS
Reason Number 3842 to use The Blackstone Blocking list. Or at least .exe man! -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS Dear All, Has anyone come across a spyware called winwhatwhere it was mailed to a user here and he opened it... It was programmed to capture the keystrokes for all passwords... and e-mailed as an attachment... Is there any reputable anti-virus that can actually detect such malicious spywares ... we have norton for exchange, and desktops and file and prin servers... it failed to detect it... furthermore when contacted we were informed that since it is a spyware... norton is designed to ignore such programmed.. like SPYWARE.. since it doesnt want the unsuspecting users to panic unneccessarily I did read about a software called bodetect that claims to stop this kind of programme and infact zonealarm informs the user ... anytime that this winwhatwhere attemtps to connect to the hotmail server on port 25 to stealthly send the email attachment and inform that a programmed was attempting to make an outgoing connection on port 25... .. but other than this personal firewall... are you folks aware of any software that can actually detect all spywares In case any one of you is interested.. just go to www.winwhatwhere.com regards _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Putting Outlook 2000 in everyone's startup group
The answer to just about every technical question is depends. How beefy is your hardware? When I was a desktop tech, I learned very quickly that the more things in the startup group, the greater the chance of problems. I made it a personal mission to eradicate Find Fast wherever I saw it. -Original Message- From: Nelsen, Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Putting Outlook 2000 in everyone's startup group My boss wants everyone to have Outlook in their startup group. I have about 1000 users on 1 Exchange Server spread across 8 buildings via T1's. Any data on why this is not a good idea? Grant This e-mail was scanned for viruses by the Eastern Suffolk BOCES WebShield prior to delivery. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win32/Klez.H.Worm
The Trend pattern has been detecting this for some time. What's your Exchange AV setup? -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Win32/Klez.H.Worm Exchange5.5 NT4 We have been getting a lot of the Win32/Klez.H.Worm virus and I think they are coming in with attachment extension html. How can I block this extension from coming in? Tony Nguyen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Storage Limits Warning
I reduced mine to send the warnings something like once a night for one hour. Otherwise it will repeat over and over unless something is done about the size of the mailbox, which won't (typically) happen over a weekend. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Limits Warning Ours is set to kick off at 7 p.m. on Tuesday but what is throwing me off is that the user got this error over and over from Friday evening to Monday morning. Dot Exchange Administrator -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Limits Warning As far as I know the Information Store Site Configuration is the only place to modify those settings. How is yours currently setup? What time(s) is it set to kick off? Nate Couch EDS Messaging -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Storage Limits Warning I have a user that received more than 30 storage limit warnings every 15 minutes for about 3 hours. Is there a way to have the storage limit warning fire once and not ongoing then stop their ability to send email or whatever we determine appropriate until they've resolved the issue? I'm hesistant to adjust the storage limits warning in the Information Store Site Configuration, since I've never actually seen anyone other than this user hit their storage limits, and I don't want to compromise the way this seems to work for other users. We are currently using Exchange 5.5, sp4. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Dot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication Question
Is your actual question Can I force workstations to log onto a domain by not letting them get onto their mailbox while logging on locally? Not that I know of. We have to make it policy here so that the antivirus updates work. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Authentication Question All, We have users that their workstations are not in a domain. They are able to logon onto our Exchange server by giving their credentials to get in. My question is, can you disable that function? And if so, are there any repercussions if you disable it? Thank you, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Replication
That's so you can pick with attributes you want to propagate. I generally uncheck all but permissions. -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Replication Ed, Thanks for the reply. This has been a point of confusion for me. If you get the opportunity, can you shed some light on what the 'Propagate these properties to all subfolders' check box on the general tab is supposed to do? When I check it and click ok, a window pops up that lists things like replicas, rep schedule, home server, etc.. Thanks again, Jim Sorry, that doesn't propagete down to the child folders. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ExchDiscList Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Replication I'm using the Ed Crowley server move method on Exchange 5.5/SP4 and want to set the public folders to replicate to the new server. I've seen references to using pfadmin today, but if I have 5 top level public folders with hundreds of subfolders, could I just set the replication options of the top folder and propagate the settings? Will this work to set the replication on all folders or is a tool like pfadmin needed? Thanks, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
Why are mailboxes being deleted erroneously? You need to address the root cause. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 We currently don't backup the Deleted Items folder at all and we have a 7 day deleted items retention after emptying the trash. We're a law firm and it's so political on what software we use and how we use it. They're used to us being able to restore a single mailbox. I suggested a recovery / test server but we'd have to restore the entire database each time we needed just one mailbox and that takes a while and time is money here. Karon 1) Stop doing BLB. You know yourself that they don't work. Just use an Exchange aware backup program (I use BackupExce) and backup the whole thing at one time. You will continue to have nothing but problems no matter what software you use to do it. 2) Setup Deleted Item Retention. Choose how long you want to save deleted emails and make that the policy on recovering them. We do 30 days. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 My company prefers to backup individual mailboxes (brick level backups) and we're using the latest version of Backup Exec. It seems to put a load on the server though and occassionally gives us problems. We aren't even able to get a full backup every night of the whole server but just the .EDB files due to the mailboxes being so large. You see, we don't enforce limits on mailboxes however, I've tried to convince management otherwise. What's the best practice for backing up an Exchange 5.5 system? What's the best backup software? Also we have to occassionally restore mailboxes on the server and will get Access denied to directory errors and a reboot is the only way to fix that. I'm told this is due to no physical memory available because the store eats it all up but from the research I've done, this isn't what that error is from. Any help, advice, or suggestions would be great. Karon Miller Systems Administrator Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
I don't have any tapes older than 6 weeks. That's good, right? Nips that request right in the bud anyway! I had a request yesterday for a file restore from 2000. We laughed and laughed! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 I think it might be a little more complicated than that for a law firm. Imagine having to restore a mailbox for an employee who worked there 5 years ago because you are being subpoenaed for correspondence with a client in a case related to the firing of a 49 year old woman in 1996. It's very much related to Ed's POV on 30, 60, 90 day tape backup rotation policies... odds are something that simple can be detrimental (or even illegal). -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 Why are mailboxes being deleted erroneously? You need to address the root cause. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 We currently don't backup the Deleted Items folder at all and we have a 7 day deleted items retention after emptying the trash. We're a law firm and it's so political on what software we use and how we use it. They're used to us being able to restore a single mailbox. I suggested a recovery / test server but we'd have to restore the entire database each time we needed just one mailbox and that takes a while and time is money here. Karon 1) Stop doing BLB. You know yourself that they don't work. Just use an Exchange aware backup program (I use BackupExce) and backup the whole thing at one time. You will continue to have nothing but problems no matter what software you use to do it. 2) Setup Deleted Item Retention. Choose how long you want to save deleted emails and make that the policy on recovering them. We do 30 days. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 My company prefers to backup individual mailboxes (brick level backups) and we're using the latest version of Backup Exec. It seems to put a load on the server though and occassionally gives us problems. We aren't even able to get a full backup every night of the whole server but just the .EDB files due to the mailboxes being so large. You see, we don't enforce limits on mailboxes however, I've tried to convince management otherwise. What's the best practice for backing up an Exchange 5.5 system? What's the best backup software? Also we have to occassionally restore mailboxes on the server and will get Access denied to directory errors and a reboot is the only way to fix that. I'm told this is due to no physical memory available because the store eats it all up but from the research I've done, this isn't what that error is from. Any help, advice, or suggestions would be great. Karon Miller Systems Administrator Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5
We have no document retention policies whatsoever. Remember, here we have the policy that all PSTs must be on network shares. ;p -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 Depends. If you had a legal requirement to retain the document and you didn't you (the company) are now fscked. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 I don't have any tapes older than 6 weeks. That's good, right? Nips that request right in the bud anyway! I had a request yesterday for a file restore from 2000. We laughed and laughed! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 I think it might be a little more complicated than that for a law firm. Imagine having to restore a mailbox for an employee who worked there 5 years ago because you are being subpoenaed for correspondence with a client in a case related to the firing of a 49 year old woman in 1996. It's very much related to Ed's POV on 30, 60, 90 day tape backup rotation policies... odds are something that simple can be detrimental (or even illegal). -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 Why are mailboxes being deleted erroneously? You need to address the root cause. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 We currently don't backup the Deleted Items folder at all and we have a 7 day deleted items retention after emptying the trash. We're a law firm and it's so political on what software we use and how we use it. They're used to us being able to restore a single mailbox. I suggested a recovery / test server but we'd have to restore the entire database each time we needed just one mailbox and that takes a while and time is money here. Karon 1) Stop doing BLB. You know yourself that they don't work. Just use an Exchange aware backup program (I use BackupExce) and backup the whole thing at one time. You will continue to have nothing but problems no matter what software you use to do it. 2) Setup Deleted Item Retention. Choose how long you want to save deleted emails and make that the policy on recovering them. We do 30 days. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best practices for backing up Exchange 5.5 My company prefers to backup individual mailboxes (brick level backups) and we're using the latest version of Backup Exec. It seems to put a load on the server though and occassionally gives us problems. We aren't even able to get a full backup every night of the whole server but just the .EDB files due to the mailboxes being so large. You see, we don't enforce limits on mailboxes however, I've tried to convince management otherwise. What's the best practice for backing up an Exchange 5.5 system? What's the best backup software? Also we have to occassionally restore mailboxes on the server and will get Access denied to directory errors and a reboot is the only way to fix that. I'm told this is due to no physical memory available because the store eats it all up but from the research I've done, this isn't what that error is from. Any help, advice, or suggestions would be great. Karon Miller Systems Administrator Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Appointments.
You can't stop them from trying, you can only stop them from succeeding. You are talking about SENDING an appointment REQUEST, aren't you? It's a request, not a mandate. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appointments. Outlook 98, Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. Is it possible to block User 1 from trying to make an appointment on User 2's calendar? We have a few management employees (User 2) that do not put EVERYTHING they do on their calendar, and they would prefer not to have other people trying to make an appointment on their calendar, thinking that they are free, when actually they aren't. Yes, the easiest thing to do is to deny the request, but is there a way to block their calendar from even showing up when someone tries to request a meeting? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive M missing
There is no M drive - Chris Scharff -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive M missing We had to delete first storage group on one of our exchange servers and when we created a new storage group and added a public and private information store all seemed well. Unfortunately there appears to be no drive M? Also in Internet Services manager the exchange subwebs appear and have paths to drive m. When I click on them they report location can not be found but when I do a right click browse they open up fine? We are running exchange 2000 enterprise with Sp2. Any ideas how to get the drive M back? Regards Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script
Put that thing away Andy. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script When I run in raw mode you can see my schema as well! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script Running Admin in raw mode you can look at the schema. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wood, Harriet [CCS] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script Perfect, thanks, I didn't get that one using header.exe, is there a more comprehensive list somewhere? Harriet -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 June 2002 15:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script You can export and import this using the attribute (property) Protocol-Settings. You'll get a long, ugly string. Find the IMAP4. You'll see a substring like IMAP4§1§1§1§ISO-8859-1§0§1§1§0%. The 1 immediately after the IMAP4§ says the protocol is enabled. Change it to 0 to disable it, or vice-versa. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wood, Harriet [CCS] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disabling mailbox IMAP on ex5.5 via import script We have never used IMAP here in our exchange 5.5 site, so it was disabled at site level. We now want to investigate using it for at least a small number of mailboxes. My problem is it seems to be enabled by default at the mailbox level. Im don't want to have to manually change 1000+ mailboxes so I can enable it on the server, but can't see any reference to protocols in import headers. Can it be done? Thanks Harriet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
the friggin was for lyris, if that's what you're bitching about. and it was helpful, and Don was helpful ... if he had called MS it's the first thing they tell you to do, you know. unfortunately they aren't allowed to call it BAS, which it is anyway, because Don owns that! -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY What a helpful response... This might be more helpful. What versions of Virusscan Groupshield? If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied? I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( ) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Friggin Remove them and find out. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY We are running Exchange 5.5 with the latest service packs and updates. Our message store consumes more and more memory until is it shut down by Exchange. This just started happening recently. When it happens, all users are prevented from connecting via Windows Outlook Client. What could cause something like this? We are running MacAfee Virus scan and GroupShield on this machine. Could that have any effect? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members
and that is totally their loss. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 4:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unwanted OOO auto replies to the list members I'm not going to start another discussion about turning OOO replies generally on to the Internet or not [1]. I just got three OOO replies from people I don't know, with instructions to contact people I never heard and I just want to let all list members know that they should not consider me as rude if I refrain from replying to people who ever in their life had OOO to the list turned on. The reason is that the new rule [2] created here will delete such OOO messages and put those people into a killfile to keep all mailboxes in this organization clean of such unwanted garbage. [1] I personally have a list of clients I have turned it on but not generally and I think this is a good policy [2] It is not an Outlook rule per se but just a server-side filter on the originator address Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Then go run the folder size thingy on the whole mailbox (start with Outlook Today) and it will tell you where the Large Sized Mail is. It only takes one big item you know. Did they close their mail client fully and then open it again? You've oversnipped again jazzy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM Hi I have checked the deleted items in his inbox and there is nothing there, including all other folders _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
It's always harder to do the right thing when you've gotten yourself accustomed to a Kludge of Grand Proportions. No sheep here Kanee, although I'm seriously considering turning you into one now. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 its always harder to stand up for what you believe and what your experience was with anything rather than just being a sheepLori. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Well. There you have it. BLB must be OK because Kanee says so. All you pundits can just take your wealth of experience and knowledge and go home because Kanee says so. Sheesh. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 This has been a known issue with veritas products. The mapi32.dll file is very sensitive and reports errors on messages as cannot open and thus will show the status of backup as failed. There isnt really much you can do about this, except ask the user to delete the message its referencing in the error message from his mailbox and empty it from deleted items. I have spent some time with veritas and they point fingers at microsoft and i spoke to microsoft and they point the fingers back to veritas, veritas knows of this issue and they say they are looking at a solution and should be out in the next build for backup exec8.6, i know you use netbackup so maybe you should look into their next build for netbackup. Even though this error pops up and the overall status of the backup job shows up as failed, the backup in actuality is successful, you can restore the users mailbox and the only thing missing would be those messages that it reported as corrupted or cannot open. So dont loose any sleep over this you are fine. dONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU NOT TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, ITS ABSOLUTELY NECCESSARY TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, IT WILL SAVE YOU SO MUCH HEADACHE AND HEART ACHE LATER..TRUST ME. -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Thanks for the info. Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to ponder over. http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm http://www.exchangefaq.org/recovery/0004.php3 Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of the store - everything is fine - the mailbox account that we use has the exchange service account set as the nt account, sop has the permissions set. Im sorry, im getting confused now. Do you get the error when doing a brick level back-up? Or when you just back up the store on its own? Are you saying you only carry out BLB's when you get this type of error? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 We do carryout Brick-level backups for when this occurs. Are you carrying out bricklevel backups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Permissons are setup fine, because normal backups work, and also the error comes up on only some mailboxes and others work fine, which to be shows that permissions are setup fine. Service account admin rights on the IS I would check all the permissions on the Information store. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 We use netbackup from Veritas as a backup solution. when we perform mailbox backups we get the following error on some mailboxes. I have looked and dealt with veritas and they are saying its an exchange issue and not veritas. Has anyone got any idea what could be causing
RE: Default folders in Exchange
You can, I have done so myself using the Exchange 4.0 client. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange I thought you could just use the old mail client to fix these kinds of things. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange While this isn't supposed to happen, I have witnessed something similar myself. I had a user who had her inbox renamed to the subject of an email. I would probably exmerge all the data out to PST, blow away the mailbox, recreate it, and then exmerge everything back in and massage the data to the correct folders. -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default folders in Exchange User Group Exchange 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SR1 I have a user who has their drafts folder below the deleted items folder and their inbox below the drafts folder. Can any one tell me how I can get these folders back at the root level of the users mailbox. This is not the first time that this has happened and am wondering what would cause this problem. I can't see this as a user error. Deleted Items\Drafts\Inbox Actions: 1. Look on TechNet 2. Use Exchange 5.0 Client to try and move the folders back 3. Run Outlook.exe with /ResetFolders 4. Moving the users mailbox in the past did not cure the problem I know as a last resort I can export the users mailbox out into a pst and recreate the mailbox. Constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
hmmm, wasn't tech buddy basically an insult here awhile back? But you can still be my Exchange buddy! -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Kanee, if you want to get into a pissing contest with folks on this list about the size of environments, you're a bigger bonehead that most of us already think you are. You don't know me, Andy, Lori, or Ed. It's never safe to assume anything from the email addresses people use. Many of the folks on this list who have been around for a while know who I am. Some of them know where I work. You are not one of them. Not that it matters, I am currently doing infrastructure and supportability consulting work for multiple customers with user bases ranging from 5K to 100K. The last dedicated environment I was responsible for was 60 servers, 19 sites, 4 countries, and 23K users. Not a BLB in sight. One mailbox restore in 2.5 years. You do the math. Are the tapes, time, and energy worth it? I posit that they are a waste of your employer's money. There are reasons why every person that has been at this for a while says BLB's are a bad thing. When you are hired by a company to make their environment more efficient and less costly, you do not do things like BLB's. If your employer knew how much of their resources you were wasting, I think they would be less than happy. Delusions are not a substitute for experience and good judgment. Both of which you are obviously lacking. Regarding the sheep comment. You'll be lucky if Lori doesn't turn you into one. [1] Tom. [1] Hi Lori! Can I be your tech-buddy? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Ao thomas shed some light and tell me what your exchange environment is...if you dont mind -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 That's right! Why do things the easy way when you can screw them up with so much style! Go on, do your BLB's. Hell, while you're at it, why not have your users copy the contents of their mailboxes into PSTs and store them in their home-directories just in case your BLB's fail! That's a good plan. But why stop there? You really ought to start clustering too; after all, we all know what a great idea that is, right? Or, you could always learn to put the cork on the fork so you don't stab yourself in the eye. That's a good idea too. Tom. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 This has been a known issue with veritas products. The mapi32.dll file is very sensitive and reports errors on messages as cannot open and thus will show the status of backup as failed. There isnt really much you can do about this, except ask the user to delete the message its referencing in the error message from his mailbox and empty it from deleted items. I have spent some time with veritas and they point fingers at microsoft and i spoke to microsoft and they point the fingers back to veritas, veritas knows of this issue and they say they are looking at a solution and should be out in the next build for backup exec8.6, i know you use netbackup so maybe you should look into their next build for netbackup. Even though this error pops up and the overall status of the backup job shows up as failed, the backup in actuality is successful, you can restore the users mailbox and the only thing missing would be those messages that it reported as corrupted or cannot open. So dont loose any sleep over this you are fine. dONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU NOT TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, ITS ABSOLUTELY NECCESSARY TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, IT WILL SAVE YOU SO MUCH HEADACHE AND HEART ACHE LATER..TRUST ME. -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Thanks for the info. Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to ponder over. http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm http://www.exchangefaq.org/recovery/0004.php3 Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of the store - everything is fine - the mailbox account that we use has the exchange service account set as the nt
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Yep! I think it started with Hanjii. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 G The insult depended on the company now didn't it? -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 hmmm, wasn't tech buddy basically an insult here awhile back? But you can still be my Exchange buddy! -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Kanee, if you want to get into a pissing contest with folks on this list about the size of environments, you're a bigger bonehead that most of us already think you are. You don't know me, Andy, Lori, or Ed. It's never safe to assume anything from the email addresses people use. Many of the folks on this list who have been around for a while know who I am. Some of them know where I work. You are not one of them. Not that it matters, I am currently doing infrastructure and supportability consulting work for multiple customers with user bases ranging from 5K to 100K. The last dedicated environment I was responsible for was 60 servers, 19 sites, 4 countries, and 23K users. Not a BLB in sight. One mailbox restore in 2.5 years. You do the math. Are the tapes, time, and energy worth it? I posit that they are a waste of your employer's money. There are reasons why every person that has been at this for a while says BLB's are a bad thing. When you are hired by a company to make their environment more efficient and less costly, you do not do things like BLB's. If your employer knew how much of their resources you were wasting, I think they would be less than happy. Delusions are not a substitute for experience and good judgment. Both of which you are obviously lacking. Regarding the sheep comment. You'll be lucky if Lori doesn't turn you into one. [1] Tom. [1] Hi Lori! Can I be your tech-buddy? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Ao thomas shed some light and tell me what your exchange environment is...if you dont mind -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 That's right! Why do things the easy way when you can screw them up with so much style! Go on, do your BLB's. Hell, while you're at it, why not have your users copy the contents of their mailboxes into PSTs and store them in their home-directories just in case your BLB's fail! That's a good plan. But why stop there? You really ought to start clustering too; after all, we all know what a great idea that is, right? Or, you could always learn to put the cork on the fork so you don't stab yourself in the eye. That's a good idea too. Tom. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 This has been a known issue with veritas products. The mapi32.dll file is very sensitive and reports errors on messages as cannot open and thus will show the status of backup as failed. There isnt really much you can do about this, except ask the user to delete the message its referencing in the error message from his mailbox and empty it from deleted items. I have spent some time with veritas and they point fingers at microsoft and i spoke to microsoft and they point the fingers back to veritas, veritas knows of this issue and they say they are looking at a solution and should be out in the next build for backup exec8.6, i know you use netbackup so maybe you should look into their next build for netbackup. Even though this error pops up and the overall status of the backup job shows up as failed, the backup in actuality is successful, you can restore the users mailbox and the only thing missing would be those messages that it reported as corrupted or cannot open. So dont loose any sleep over this you are fine. dONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU NOT TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, ITS ABSOLUTELY NECCESSARY TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, IT WILL SAVE YOU SO MUCH HEADACHE AND HEART ACHE LATER..TRUST ME. -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Thanks for the info. Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to ponder over. http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm http
RE: emergency help needed
That takes me back. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: emergency help needed API 14 - Original Message - From: Brett Wesoloski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:34 PM Subject: RE: emergency help needed What was on the M drive? -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: emergency help needed My exchange server is down . after a reboot the M drive is no where to be found. i can't open the network properties on the server. i realy need help. thanks. windows 2000 server exchange 2000 server _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring application for Exchange
Don't allow internet access there at WF, eh? There may even be mention of some in the FAQ, but now you've made me too lazy to go look. We use ProVision Network Monitor, which is now owned by someone else and I don't recommend it anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitoring application for Exchange Is there is a product out there that will monitor the application/system/security NT logs on exchange servers and e-mail certain errors? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
Well. There you have it. BLB must be OK because Kanee says so. All you pundits can just take your wealth of experience and knowledge and go home because Kanee says so. Sheesh. -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 This has been a known issue with veritas products. The mapi32.dll file is very sensitive and reports errors on messages as cannot open and thus will show the status of backup as failed. There isnt really much you can do about this, except ask the user to delete the message its referencing in the error message from his mailbox and empty it from deleted items. I have spent some time with veritas and they point fingers at microsoft and i spoke to microsoft and they point the fingers back to veritas, veritas knows of this issue and they say they are looking at a solution and should be out in the next build for backup exec8.6, i know you use netbackup so maybe you should look into their next build for netbackup. Even though this error pops up and the overall status of the backup job shows up as failed, the backup in actuality is successful, you can restore the users mailbox and the only thing missing would be those messages that it reported as corrupted or cannot open. So dont loose any sleep over this you are fine. dONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU NOT TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, ITS ABSOLUTELY NECCESSARY TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, IT WILL SAVE YOU SO MUCH HEADACHE AND HEART ACHE LATER..TRUST ME. -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Thanks for the info. Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to ponder over. http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm http://www.exchangefaq.org/recovery/0004.php3 Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of the store - everything is fine - the mailbox account that we use has the exchange service account set as the nt account, sop has the permissions set. Im sorry, im getting confused now. Do you get the error when doing a brick level back-up? Or when you just back up the store on its own? Are you saying you only carry out BLB's when you get this type of error? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 We do carryout Brick-level backups for when this occurs. Are you carrying out bricklevel backups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 10:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Permissons are setup fine, because normal backups work, and also the error comes up on only some mailboxes and others work fine, which to be shows that permissions are setup fine. Service account admin rights on the IS I would check all the permissions on the Information store. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Specialist BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 We use netbackup from Veritas as a backup solution. when we perform mailbox backups we get the following error on some mailboxes. I have looked and dealt with veritas and they are saying its an exchange issue and not veritas. Has anyone got any idea what could be causing this and a possible solution. Error we get. 06/09/2002 08:14:29 mastersrv ourserver.domain.com from client ourserver.domain.com: WRN - can't open Exchange Mailbox message: ?UsersLastname, Usersfirstname? Top of Information Store? Calender (0xFE05:FS_ACCESS_DENIED) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE
Yep. It must be the application. After all it's a proven fact that OpenVMS mail users have absolutely no use for herbal viagra and cheap home mortgages. -Original Message- From: Richard Serafin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Hotmail sells your address to them. I am not the one getting the excessive junk mail its my users. I have one who recently moved from using OpenVMS/PMDF mail to Exchange and Outlook, he reportedly received little or no junk mail while on VMS/PMDF, but now recieves dozens a day with Outlook/Exchange. rick -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE How would that explain the amount of junk mail I get into my Hotmail account? I think you're just paranoid. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Richard Serafin Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 6:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: slightly OT - Outlook and IE Since our users have moved to Outlook (MAPI) to get their mail from Exchange, they have reported an increase in JUNK mail. Is it possible that when you are browsing with IE the websites are sucking down (or up) your E-Mail address from Outlook??? rick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Irritating calendar problem
Export to PST. Dump the calendar altogether. Create a blank calendar. Drag and drop each item back from PST to mailbox until it croaks. When it croaks, you've found the corrupt item. Delete it. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 5:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Irritating calendar problem To all the Genii out there ..your assistance would be truly appreciated. I have a problem, experienced by a couple of users, that has so far defied all attempts at resolution. Running Exchange Server 5.5 SP4, incl. all hotfixes on Windows NT4 SP6a. Antivirus:Trend Micro Scanmail for Exchange. The problem is as follows: A couple of users are able to access mailbox and work normally in all folders, except for Calendar and Outlook Today. As soon as the user selects one of these options, utilization reaches 100% and remains at this level. Even after 15-20 minutes, machine remains frozen until Outlook is cancelled. The following actions have so far been taken: 1. Attempted to load Outlook using a variety of startup parameters; however problem remains. 2. Created new mailbox and exported contents of old mailbox to PST. Then imported PST to new mailbox, first with contents of calendar and then without the calendar. However each time calendar is accessed the same problem occurs. 3. Have attempted to access the mailbox from other PCs and loaded different versions of Outlook (97,98, 2000 and XP) however the problem remains. This problem does not affect any other users or any newly created mailboxes. As a temporary solution, both users are able to use Calendar under OWA. Any suggestions, recommendations .please. Regards Jonathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A mistake was made...
I hope you've now learned the value of applying permissions to large distribution lists. Keep hoping, Ed. I know you're ever the optimist!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: A mistake was made... All together: There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. I hope you've now learned the value of applying permissions to large distribution lists. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A mistake was made... Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4 User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall Message action feature did not work very well on this. This was very sensitive eMAIL that went out and needs to be trapped before too many people read it. What can I do? Thanks in advance. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 97 Notification
Who knew? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification Slipstick has answers to Outlook questions? Get outta town! Somebody oughta to add that place to the FAQ. -Original Message- Amazingly enough, I found it at www.slipstick.com. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource
Yes, just install it on the shared drive. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource
Well, given the very limited information you posted (and you do know better by now Eric!) I answered your question. Cluster aware? What does that really mean? I have a 5.5 sp4 active/passive cluster that I despise. Trend Scanmail is installed on the hard drive partition that is shared, that is when the cluster fails over, that partition is still available to Exchange. Sometimes Trend *causes* the failover, sometimes he prevents it. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource Lori, Are you saying this is an cluster aware application? I am having some many problems with this on my active/active cluster. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource Yes, just install it on the shared drive. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Configuration of Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource Can you configure Trendmicro Scanmail as a cluster application resource? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch55 exp/imp user mailbox info
What do you need the resource kit for? All you need is Excel. I can send you a list of the valid header names personally if you want - I think this list blocks them. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch55 exp/imp user mailbox info Ive read Q15414 and well I do not happen to have the Exch55 Res Kit Can anybody give me a hint/clue on way's get these CSV files and/or Header.exe tis artical talks about Im trying to do Address, Tel, etc..updating etc with it Exch55sp4 thx bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
We had three inches of rain since midnight here. You're welcome to it .. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? You mind shipping some of that rain down my way? My lawn is starting to crunch when I walk across it. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Ohio, 80 F Very muggy and has rained almost every day for the past 30+ days :( -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Hi, I'm Andy and I like gladiator movies and margaritas. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Hi John. I'm in Phoenix too. Too hot, too dry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot. Data Center: 68° F I'll stay inside today. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours SE of Seattle. Temperature 73° F (supposed to get to 85) Windchill 76° F (means it's a hot wind) Humidity 41% Wind Southwest at 13 mph Conditions Fair Visibility 10.0 miles -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Calendar Default Permission
Send out a note to the users to tell them how. Make it a policy so they have to do it. Report to management those that do not comply. -Original Message- From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar Default Permission Hi all, Is there a way I can change all the mailboxe's calendar's default permission ? (I mean without logging into everyone's mailboxes's individually ). Thank you for your answers in advance , Kishore _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org
OfficeVision on the mainframe!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org You might want to get your buyers club card from O'Reliy and Associates (www.ora.com) and get familiar with *nix. You could always suggest that instead of running Notes, go all the way back to Netscape mail server, or ISOCOR's X.400 mixer and mailbox server. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org All, Our corporate standards include an NT4 domain and Exchange 5.5 (and has for several years now). We have 13 plants located in various countries around the world. Our corporate HQ (located in Finland) has hired a new IS director who has given us a directive that, in lieu of the anticipated AD/Win2K/E2K rollout, we will be changing our backend infrastructure to novell e-directory/lotus notes/linux servers! Now, I am as open-minded as the next guy about the prospect of padding my resume with all sorts of new applications, but that seems a bit drastic. Apparently, it all comes down to money. Besides, I love my E55sp4 server; it NEVER gives me any problems. Has anyone else experienced this? Which would be more painful short-term? long-term?: the AD/Win2K/E2K or Novell/Lotus/Linux? I get the impression that this is a knee-jerk reaction to Microsoft licensing costs. Any thoughts, experiences, or warnings concerning this migration would be appreciated. Sincerely, Joseph Smith MCSE (NT4 + 2K), CCNA, Network+ Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org
Ah Prozac, the number one used drug in the state of Utah. Er, we're still running that IBM emulator - we have some custom apps that need to be completely recoded before they can go to rhumba. I don't even think this one is Y2K compliant. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org ProfsMail? I think I have some IRMA cards and 3270 emulator software gathering dust down in the basement. (Very strange.. Spellcheck picks up ProfsMail and suggests Prozac as a replacement word.) John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org OfficeVision on the mainframe!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org You might want to get your buyers club card from O'Reliy and Associates (www.ora.com) and get familiar with *nix. You could always suggest that instead of running Notes, go all the way back to Netscape mail server, or ISOCOR's X.400 mixer and mailbox server. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trying to keep Exchange (et al) in our org All, Our corporate standards include an NT4 domain and Exchange 5.5 (and has for several years now). We have 13 plants located in various countries around the world. Our corporate HQ (located in Finland) has hired a new IS director who has given us a directive that, in lieu of the anticipated AD/Win2K/E2K rollout, we will be changing our backend infrastructure to novell e-directory/lotus notes/linux servers! Now, I am as open-minded as the next guy about the prospect of padding my resume with all sorts of new applications, but that seems a bit drastic. Apparently, it all comes down to money. Besides, I love my E55sp4 server; it NEVER gives me any problems. Has anyone else experienced this? Which would be more painful short-term? long-term?: the AD/Win2K/E2K or Novell/Lotus/Linux? I get the impression that this is a knee-jerk reaction to Microsoft licensing costs. Any thoughts, experiences, or warnings concerning this migration would be appreciated. Sincerely, Joseph Smith MCSE (NT4 + 2K), CCNA, Network+ Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Negative -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Are you 'positive' about that? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Im not an ion, but I am a charged particle. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You are right Lori. I did not say new to the list, nor did I say brand new. But I am new compared to you older folks that have been doing this for years and years and ions. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used....
Hope so. This man refuses to learn to fish, so he can just starve. -Original Message- From: Mark Arnold () [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used That got him where it hurts Lori. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Except you're not new Mike. You've been asking questions of this caliber for over a year. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot read. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used You all are my friends here. Thanks... -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used A popular (read effective) antivirus for mail servers. Google is your friend here. :^) -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Yeah really... I am a new administrator and I haven't a clue. Sorry. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 May, 2002 4:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used Really? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer b eing used What is Scanmail and what is it used for? Thanks.. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 20 May, 2002 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3rd party utility to check for mailboxes that are no longer being used Does anyone know of a 3rd party utility that can calculate the mailboxes that are not currently being used. Since we are using Trend Micro's Scanmail, we cannot depend on using the last time a user logs onto his/her mailbox, since Scanmail does so on a regular basis. Any help would be appreciated. James Casstevens. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Internet Mail service lockups
Anything in the event log? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail service lockups Good morning to you all: I've recently had a rash of IMC failures on two different boxes. Both are Exchange 5.5 SP4, on NT 4.0 boxes running SP6a. One server is running Nemex, and the other is an internal IMC so it has no virus scanning capability. The lock ups happen at different times and seem to effect only the Internet Mail Connector. When we try to shut down the service, NT pops up a message saying that the service can't be controlled in it's present state; however, the box will shut down normally and reboot. Any advice will be appreciated. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Exec
Full package or the remote agent? I can't remember about the former but most certainly the latter does require a reboot. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Exec Does BE 8.6 intsall require a reboot on WINNT 4.0 Server? I don't want to go throught the install if it does. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Mail service lockups
My guess with nothing to go on would be that you had a malformed message, and that if you had the app log it would have told you that. Didn't anyone look in there before blindly rebooting? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail service lockups Don't know. The event log events were overwritten. I've since doubled the size of the event log. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet Mail service lockups Anything in the event log? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail service lockups Good morning to you all: I've recently had a rash of IMC failures on two different boxes. Both are Exchange 5.5 SP4, on NT 4.0 boxes running SP6a. One server is running Nemex, and the other is an internal IMC so it has no virus scanning capability. The lock ups happen at different times and seem to effect only the Internet Mail Connector. When we try to shut down the service, NT pops up a message saying that the service can't be controlled in it's present state; however, the box will shut down normally and reboot. Any advice will be appreciated. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment?
Yes, I'm using it on a cluster. No, I don't like it. Yes, it causes problems. Problems that do not occur when it's used non-clustered. I just posted a week ago that if the services (trend's) take a nanosecond too long to restart when you force a dat update that the cluster *does* failover, which it should not. I've had all kinds of things hangup on a failover and it doesn't fail over completely and there you are with no mail and two servers that have become truculent. [1] Clustering 5.5 is just not worth the amount of jerry-rigging and praying to $deity that is required for it to function. [1] blatantly stolen from kim :) -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone using TrendMicro Scanmail in a cluster environment? If so, are you experiencing any problems with this software not allowing the cluster to failover. Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bounce Problem
Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce Problem Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually adds some additional organizational addresses he needs, to the To: line. When he sends the email, some of the internal addressees bounce back (as at the bottom of this message). He then sends the original email to the bounced folks, individually, and it goes fine. So the problem only crops up when he addresses a message to both internal and external recipients. Any suggestsions for what might be going on? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Madeline Haggans; Josefina Castillo Subject:Undeliverable: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Sent: 5/15/02 2:25 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Madeline Haggans on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL Josefina Castillo on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
flip flip flip I see why!! -Original Message- From: Les Bessant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I especially like the illustration on page 75.. Les Bessant MCSE mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert Acting in a personal capacity http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - New, improved and with more bounce! -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 May 2002 16:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk The information in this communication and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately on 0191 261 2681 and delete the original message and any copies of it. Any opinions, conclusions or other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Sanderson Townend Gilbert are neither given nor endorsed by the firm. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Might be on that E2K list, but I haven't heard from him in quite awhile. Especially not on the Secret Cabal List. [1] [1] There is no cabal. [2] [3] [2] If there was, he'd be in it. [3] Is there? -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Paul's (Robichaux, I presume you mean) is gone? I forgot to add his name to the list earlier. But, I agree, I've got his book and it's great. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Actually most of them are NT. They don't know how to work it, but there it is. It takes them 20 minutes to boot up because of all the errors they have to F1 past, click OK on, etc. Bios errors, driver errors, they don't care. The bulk of the company Citi bought when they bought us (now known as Legacy Associates) are all Win95. We're going to roll out W2K Pro later this year here, but as far as I know Dallas and Irving are going to stay Win95. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go Windows 98! ;) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Attack ??
Well, 90% of Citi is on Openmail, so I plan to recommend that they call Andy Webb to help them with that! The Exchange sites were all purchased through company buyouts and so far (touch my touchstone) they are leaving us alone. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? IF they ever do, would you mind if I dropped in on the day you start your conversion process? I would like to see the things a big corporation has to go through to get their mailboxes over. I only had 200 mailboxes, and just did them by saving them to PST, then reloading them on the server we were going to put in place of the old server. Thanks :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Citi would go to E2K! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I wish Lori would go to the E2K list...then she could once again be my Tech-Buddy and scold me for the idiot questions I ask :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? When signing up for this list, I think an email should be sent first to the person wishing to join that states, If you haven't done your homework, don't expect to be treated with kid gloves!. An email referencing the Awesome FAQ used to go out to new subscribers. Now that just posting can get you autosubscribed to more spam than you can possibly read, I am no longer sure if that is the case. At a minumum people should be willing to spend $50 US for a decent Exchange book which will cleverly have the answers to most of these questions hidden therein. But sadly, NO ONE reads anymore. I love my book. (Thanks to Paul, another wonderful human being who is no longer here.) -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
er, lock the workstation? -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bounce Problem
Hmmm. That's weird. OK, try setting up server custom recipients for the external people, remove them from his contacts folder, and see what happens then. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Nope, that's not it. (Sorry about posting my I'll check message to the whole list. I did it before I thought.) Rob -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bounce Problem Are we sure he doesn't have those internal folks in his personal or contacts? That would supercede any GAL entries you might have for them. -Original Message- From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bounce Problem Hi list: I have a user with this odd situation: He regularly emails people both inside and outside our organization (the organization includes 9 separate sites scattered around the country). He has a personal DL in his Contacts that includes only external addresses. He uses that, then manually adds some additional organizational addresses he needs, to the To: line. When he sends the email, some of the internal addressees bounce back (as at the bottom of this message). He then sends the original email to the bounced folks, individually, and it goes fine. So the problem only crops up when he addresses a message to both internal and external recipients. Any suggestsions for what might be going on? Exchange 5.5 SP4 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:25 PM To: Madeline Haggans; Josefina Castillo Subject:Undeliverable: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: updated CRO program retreat notes from April 20 meeting in Kansas City Sent: 5/15/02 2:25 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Madeline Haggans on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL Josefina Castillo on 5/15/02 2:25 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a=att.net;p=afsc.org;l=DESMOINES-020515212453Z-17029 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:Philadelphia:NATIONAL _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Active Mailboxes
You can export the Windows NT account field, which if the user is gone should be blank, correct? For shared mailboxes, once a year I send them a message and give them one month to reply. If they do not, the mailbox gets hidden for another month, and then deleted. -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Active Mailboxes I have been asked to produce a list of active mailboxes for Exchange 5.5, how would you go about this task? I guess I could do a dump of the Mailbox resources for the last logon time, but I seem to remember this field is not particularly reliable, in addition the service account seems to often logon to accounts. Regards, Paul -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
Once you get it fixed as Serdar said, dump the receptionist plan and use the script from exchangecode.com. You will have fewer of these issues when you implement it. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Board Calendar Hello everyone, We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of our users including the exchange admin account are unable to open the conference room's calendar to view who has booked the room. Everyone can request the conference room and only the receptionist is able to view the conference room's calendar to accept and reject the requests. Even she can only do it for one day that is just for today. If she tries to look it up for tomorrow or next week, then it just hangs, and I see that it tries to Synchronize for hours. This issue just started recently as far as I know. What can I do to resolve this issue? Please help. I even tried to recreate the mail box and it doesn't work. Meaning, even after I created a .pst file and put the data back into the new mail box that I created, it still does the same thing..it just freezes up if you try to look up the information for more than one day. Any way to clean this up or resolve this issue. Thanks everyone. rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a
Why SP2? -Original Message- From: Neil Luczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 Sp2 and NT4 Sp6a Anyone out there had problems upgrading an NT4 box at Sp4 running Exch 5.5 Sp2 to NT4Sp6a. We recently done this on our servers and all the NT4Sp6a boxes could not make external RPC connections. Exchange boxes still on NT4Sp4 could connect OK to the Sp6a boxes, but not vice versa. Any help or ideas gratefully recieved. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 catch all account
If you mean nondeliverable mail intended for your domain, then it's a property of the Internet Mail Connector. I'm not going to tell you where, because this has been asked and answered ad nauseum in the last month alone, not to mention for the last 5 years. Go poke around. You'll find it. It's patently obvious when you get there. Read the FAQ while you're at it. -Original Message- From: Ferrell Ramey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 catch all account Does anyone know how to setup a catch all account in Exchange 5.5? I want ALL email that is not intended for a specific recipient to go to the administrator. Thanks! f _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conference Board Calendar
PST FILE Egads man, don't you have a SERVER? My question mark key is acting weird. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar I did setup a profile for this conference room and I was able to open up the pst file and I can view everything but as soon as I click on Calendar, that's it. It freezes up. What should I do? How do I switch by category or by recurrence? Any ideas? Thanks again for all the help. rama -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conference Board Calendar You probably have a corrupt calendar entry in there. Set up a profile for this conference room, open the PST, switch to By Category or By Recurrence view and copy only the NON-RECURRING meetings back into the original calendar. Then you can start looking for the culprit recurring meeting [1]. Look for meetings with lots of exceptions or blank subject lines or that have a conflict icon next to it. Serdar Soysal [1] It is a recurring meeting 99% of the time. -Original Message- From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conference Board Calendar Hello everyone, We are currently running exchange 5.5 SP4. Recently all of our users including the exchange admin account are unable to open the conference room's calendar to view who has booked the room. Everyone can request the conference room and only the receptionist is able to view the conference room's calendar to accept and reject the requests. Even she can only do it for one day that is just for today. If she tries to look it up for tomorrow or next week, then it just hangs, and I see that it tries to Synchronize for hours. This issue just started recently as far as I know. What can I do to resolve this issue? Please help. I even tried to recreate the mail box and it doesn't work. Meaning, even after I created a .pst file and put the data back into the new mail box that I created, it still does the same thing..it just freezes up if you try to look up the information for more than one day. Any way to clean this up or resolve this issue. Thanks everyone. rama _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
Perzactly. It's not for the faint of heart, or the under-Exchange-ucated either. -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy eh... you're better off just having multiple mailbox servers... if one goes down you still have some people without e-mail but not all. clustering adds more complication/headaches than it's worth IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy And even if/when you do failover, like when it takes the Trend service a couple cpu cycles too long to start back up when you're forcing a pattern update for klez, your users will still almost definitely notice the failure, and you will still get people calling the help desk to ask why. It's not seamless, and in most cases not necessary anyway. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Redundancy
This however does not help you one whit if the MAINTENANCE required is Exchange maintenance. -Original Message- From: Schneider, Bryan D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy Clustering won't help you if your problem is an EDB problem. But, clustering will help you if (like your original request) you desire redundancy for the server, the Windows OS, and all processes and services running on that server. If you have problems with services stopping, Dr. Watson or Blue Screens or even intermittent hardware failures, the passive server will fail over and start your virtual Exchange server on the other hardware. We don't have many problems at all with Exchange or hardware, but where clustering is really advantageous is when you have to do MAINTENANCE - such as applying security hotfixes, service packs, or if you're having problems with a stuck service that requires a reboot. Trigger the servers to failover and you've got the machine to yourself. Failovers typically take about 30 seconds. During that time Outlook will appear to hang, but then (I always recommend Outlook 2002) it will reconnect to the other server and continue normally. The cluster manager will also attempt to start services when they've gone down before they failover - if that's what you want it to do. So, it's pretty flexible and does a lot for uptime and customer satisfaction. Bryan -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy I didn't even want to go down that path, but you're correct. You don't need clustering if you use good quality hardware and proactive monitoring. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy And even if/when you do failover, like when it takes the Trend service a couple cpu cycles too long to start back up when you're forcing a pattern update for klez, your users will still almost definitely notice the failure, and you will still get people calling the help desk to ask why. It's not seamless, and in most cases not necessary anyway. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Redundancy It's still called clustering. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mark Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Redundancy Having just had our sole Exchange server go down, is there a way of having a redundant server (or load balancing) that is an exact replicar (in terms of user mailboxes etc..)? Basically i am after failover redundacy, so that if one server goes down it will not effect users abilities to send and recive mail. - Is this practical? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL usage
I like it! -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL usage I have a hidden user named DL Monitor, that I slip into DLs that might be, shall we say, underutilized. -Peter -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers?
Sue Mosher has a list on Yahoo Groups. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailing Lists for Outlook/Exchange Developers? Hi All, I know there must be at least one good list for people developing Outlook Exchange Apps... Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
LOL! You crack me up Tom. The truth is just that funny! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They're all trying to fix their broken networks, and it's taking them awhile. That isn't part of the core curriculum, unfortunately. -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, May 06, 2002 04:50 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question There is a list just for MCSE and another for MCSD. I'm subscribed to both, but there hasn't been any post in the last 2 months ;) Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: segunda-feira, 6 de Maio de 2002 14:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Isn't there a swynk list dedicated to certification banter? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Why do we go through this every three to six months? William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments to block
FAQ? Isn't it in there Martin? Search for the Martin Blackstone List on google then. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments to block Dear All, I havent had any success searching the archives to get the answer to this no doubt frequentley asked question Does anyone have a resource for a list of attachments that should be blocked at our Exchange Server? We have Trend Scanmail which makes it very easy to block attachments, and I have put into here manually some extensions that I believe should be stopped, as well as some I have picked up from web searches. Is it reasonable to block all htm/html attachments? One of our clients got an alert about the Klez virus last week, which it found in an attached htm file which was in the Temp internet folder cache, Officescan quarantined it okay. This threw me somewhat as I assumed we would be protected by an up to date Scanmail looking for the various BAT EXE or SCR extensions Any examples of a list of file extensions you block would be great Also, apart from the newest MS Security Bulletins, is the windowsupdate site a reliable way of keeping clients and servers secure? Obviously we pay particular attention to updates on our servers, but rely on windowsupdate alone to keep our clients up to date Thanks... Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Password Policy Enforcement
What is the goal? What are you already doing to enforce strong passwords? Are you running passfilt? This is really a question better suited for the WinNT list, by the way. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Password Policy Enforcement Let's say one uses pwdump and LophtCrack to look at how secure folks passwords are. Using this approach does anyone have any good guidelines as to a time cut off before a password is cracked to set for establishing that a password has a certain level of security. For example If I use Lophtcrack in the non-brute force mode how many minutes (seconds?) is a good limit? Is anyone using this approach to help manage password security policies? Jim Liddil M.S. Lab/IT Manager Phytoceutica Inc. (203)781-2544 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
I am probably already in contact with them. We tend to find each other wherever we go. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I know a couple others already. It could be a technical witches coven. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Cool. You should create a course and offer a cert in it...I'd sign up! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question No shit. Most of these companies don't know that many of us don't have certs, but are most definitely the best person for the job. It is their loss. never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. Bullshit. I am fully versed in witchcraft. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Shiminy. I was with ya until you hired the MCSE instead of me. - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley
His subscription got bounced too many times in a row. Then there's all the spam that they auto-sub you to, as well as never getting any answer from the so-called list admin. They had a good one, once, but they fired him. Now they suck. -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley why can he not post here? How would list mismanagement cause that? Sounds vaugue to me -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Evans Sent: May 2, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley He posts on the Yahoo Group called Exchange 2000 daily. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: totally OT:Ed Crowley Our loss. Thats for dang sure. Its not the same w/o him. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: totally OT:Ed Crowley He's alive and well. Swynk's mismanagement of this list has made it impossible for him to post as of late. - Original Message - From: Chinnery Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: totally OT:Ed Crowley Does anybody know what happened to Ed Crowley? It just hit me that I haven't seen any posts from him for a long time. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard
What is the rule trying to do EXACTLY. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard I checked the user doesn't have any other rule set besides a different user tried to create the same rule or a similar rule and got the same error... Bashir Malekzada AOptix Technologies , Inc. (408) 583 1130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules Wizard MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user. This is a hard limit and there is no getting around it. The only solution is to delete old rules and try to consolidate some. This applies to 5.5 and E2K. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard A user trying to create a rule which auto reply from the server to certain messages gets the following error: There is not enough space on the Microsoft Exchange Server to store all of your rules. The rules that failed to upload have been deactivated. the knowledge base article (Q241325) doesn't apply to this matter. Any body Any Idea Thanks, BAshir. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard
Check to be sure that the mailbox is not overlimit, and if not then do what Missy said! -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard The user wants the server to reply with AOptix - Product Information Request in the subject and some text in the body to all messages send to that user mailbox and with AOptix - Product Information Request in the subject. That is it. Bashir Malekzada AOptix Technologies , Inc. (408) 583 1130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules Wizard What is the rule trying to do EXACTLY. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Wizard I checked the user doesn't have any other rule set besides a different user tried to create the same rule or a similar rule and got the same error... Bashir Malekzada AOptix Technologies , Inc. (408) 583 1130 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Rules Wizard MS Exchange server allocates 32 of space for rules per user. This is a hard limit and there is no getting around it. The only solution is to delete old rules and try to consolidate some. This applies to 5.5 and E2K. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard A user trying to create a rule which auto reply from the server to certain messages gets the following error: There is not enough space on the Microsoft Exchange Server to store all of your rules. The rules that failed to upload have been deactivated. the knowledge base article (Q241325) doesn't apply to this matter. Any body Any Idea Thanks, BAshir. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messed up PST
You often have to run scanpst multiple times, alternating with scandisk on the volume where the pst lives. Don't spend too much time tho - there is a Very Good Reason why PST=BAD. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messed up PST I have a user that has a messed up .PST file. I can open all the mail however mail after than a certain date ( anything older than 2 years)cannot be moved or deleted. I ran the inbox repair tool (scanpst.exe) and it didn't fix it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks much. Matt Plahtinsky _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Certification question
I believe you are correct, and it's just one more thing that's wrong with this world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Certification question As an unemployed IT person, I'd say get whatever certs you can, because like it or not, there's more jobs available for paper mcse's than there are for experienced non-mcse's. My disclaimer - At least that's been my experience, and of course your mileage may vary. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Schwartz Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Certification question As a recruiter, I would agree. There's no substitute for experience. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Could we rephrase this? How about: Which went to a braindump or bootcamp got his paper certification with no real-world experience would you be quickest to lock out of your server room for fear that he might touch something? -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:58 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messed up PST
You mean restore from the user's backup that they maintain and test frequently. Right? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Messed up PST Restore from backup. - Original Message - From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:56 PM Subject: Messed up PST I have a user that has a messed up .PST file. I can open all the mail however mail after than a certain date ( anything older than 2 years)cannot be moved or deleted. I ran the inbox repair tool (scanpst.exe) and it didn't fix it. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks much. Matt Plahtinsky _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
No shit. Most of these companies don't know that many of us don't have certs, but are most definitely the best person for the job. It is their loss. never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. Bullshit. I am fully versed in witchcraft. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Shiminy. I was with ya until you hired the MCSE instead of me. - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Well. There's concrete proof right there. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I admit it myself after going through school for my mcse I really didn't learn that much. I thought I know everything after school. Once I got a job in the field I learned so much. Hands on beats any 55 question test. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a few of the 100's of routers the company I work for, as a day job, owns. I am solely responsible for all of those routers as well the rest of the network and a 5,000 user install of Exchange. Books and paper mean very little... Would you hire a paper MCSE over me? Would you hire someone who could Quote the OSI model over me? Why memorize what I have one the wall and in Text files. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
RE: Mail Question
If the user did not completely close out of ALL outlook windows, the server doesn't know he deleted a thing. I usually tell them reboot just to get them off of my back for 5 ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Question Hi I have some user that can't send mail because they are over the size limits in the information store. But after they deleted all thier mail including the deleted items folder they still can't send. The information store says one user has 3000k, but at thier desktop there is nothing in the inbox, everything that wasn't deleted was moved to the pst. any ideas would be appreciated. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: RE: Rules Wizard
Friggin!! -Original Message- From: internet.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Rules Wizard Sorry, your message was not sent out to 'exchange' because the first word of your message looks very similar to a system command. snip --- The rejected text was: Delete some of your other rules, or work to combine them. Use DLs. Change something because you can't change the limit. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exch --- Delete some of your other rules, or work to combine them. Use DLs. Change something because you can't change the limit. -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard A user trying to create a rule which auto reply from the server to certain messages gets the following error: There is not enough space on the Microsoft Exchange Server to store all of your rules. The rules that failed to upload have been deactivated. the knowledge base article (Q241325) doesn't apply to this matter. Any body Any Idea Thanks, BAshir. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Leaving for a while...
Martin's busy. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Leaving for a while... Y'all behave while I'm gone.[1][2] [1]That goes double for Andy Martin. [2] I'm Moving Barry _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped
and also not a *sub* folder of the calendar. You can have calendar\calendar1 or something like that. Have you tried exporting the calendar, deleting it, and reimporting it? I can't remember if reminders are retained that way or not. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped If I understand what you are referring to, you mean the calendar folder in the mailbox versus something like a calendar folder in a PST? If that is what you speak of then the appointments are in the calendar folder on the mailbox. If not then please tell me cause I'm very curious. e- -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped Eric, You can confirm that these reminders are in the calendar folder created by Outlook (not a look-alike folder called 'calendar'? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 14:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped I'm about ready to fork over the cash and call PSS. Exchange 5.5 sp4, 2k sp2, single site, outlook 2000 clients. I have a user who doesn't get outlook reminders, I've tried almost every oulook.exe switch including /cleanreminders and /cleanfreebusy, outlook is set to give a reminder for appointments, outlook has been reinstalled many many times, and I have gone to the download center and grabbed everything they have to offer in the way of Office or Outlook 2000 updates. Still no reminders pop up. I setup that particular user on my machine( my reminders work ) and her reminders will not popup on my machine, this makes me worry that it may be larger then a client issue. We did migrate out our first server about 3 months ago, I did check the golden article about migrating system folders and got all that taken care of. Is it my server? Is it my clients? I'm really starting to see a increase in this problem too, most people reboot or run the /cleanreminders and its fixed, but this one and one other are flat out not working. I'm pulling out what extremely little hair I have, any help would be GREATLY appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98)
What about the other columns? What about if you just go to the date of a holiday - is anything listed at the top? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays not showing up (OL98) I have a test account. I deleted the mailbox and recreated another one to start fresh. I added the United States Holidays. However, when I added them, I received an error message stating that the holidays are already installed. I selected YES to reinstall them (which I assume could have caused duplicates), but the holidays still are not visible. If I highlight the Calendar, and then select VIEW - CURRENT VIEW - EVENTS, there is nothing in the LOCATION column. I believe this column should say UNITED STATES. Has anybody else ran into a similar situation? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98)
In that view he should see all events, including past ones, IIRC. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98) In OL98 the holidays.txt file only went up to just before Christmas 2000 (if memory serves...) Replace your holidays.txt with one from OL2K and then load holidays. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays not showing up (OL98) I have a test account. I deleted the mailbox and recreated another one to start fresh. I added the United States Holidays. However, when I added them, I received an error message stating that the holidays are already installed. I selected YES to reinstall them (which I assume could have caused duplicates), but the holidays still are not visible. If I highlight the Calendar, and then select VIEW - CURRENT VIEW - EVENTS, there is nothing in the LOCATION column. I believe this column should say UNITED STATES. Has anybody else ran into a similar situation? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98)
Well, my copy is Pagan. Beltane approaches ... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98) Maybe OL98 is Jewish? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98) The other columns have data. However, if I just go to December 25th, nothing is listed. Baffling. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays not showing up (OL98) What about the other columns? What about if you just go to the date of a holiday - is anything listed at the top? -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays not showing up (OL98) I have a test account. I deleted the mailbox and recreated another one to start fresh. I added the United States Holidays. However, when I added them, I received an error message stating that the holidays are already installed. I selected YES to reinstall them (which I assume could have caused duplicates), but the holidays still are not visible. If I highlight the Calendar, and then select VIEW - CURRENT VIEW - EVENTS, there is nothing in the LOCATION column. I believe this column should say UNITED STATES. Has anybody else ran into a similar situation? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped
Use the exchange client. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped Ok, so I'm trying the PST import export thing and I have hit a snag. How can I delete all the Calendar appointments without deleting the mailbox? I have already tried a clean mailbox and id rather not delete them one by one. e- -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped and also not a *sub* folder of the calendar. You can have calendar\calendar1 or something like that. Have you tried exporting the calendar, deleting it, and reimporting it? I can't remember if reminders are retained that way or not. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped If I understand what you are referring to, you mean the calendar folder in the mailbox versus something like a calendar folder in a PST? If that is what you speak of then the appointments are in the calendar folder on the mailbox. If not then please tell me cause I'm very curious. e- -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped Eric, You can confirm that these reminders are in the calendar folder created by Outlook (not a look-alike folder called 'calendar'? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 April 2002 14:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar - I'm stumped I'm about ready to fork over the cash and call PSS. Exchange 5.5 sp4, 2k sp2, single site, outlook 2000 clients. I have a user who doesn't get outlook reminders, I've tried almost every oulook.exe switch including /cleanreminders and /cleanfreebusy, outlook is set to give a reminder for appointments, outlook has been reinstalled many many times, and I have gone to the download center and grabbed everything they have to offer in the way of Office or Outlook 2000 updates. Still no reminders pop up. I setup that particular user on my machine( my reminders work ) and her reminders will not popup on my machine, this makes me worry that it may be larger then a client issue. We did migrate out our first server about 3 months ago, I did check the golden article about migrating system folders and got all that taken care of. Is it my server? Is it my clients? I'm really starting to see a increase in this problem too, most people reboot or run the /cleanreminders and its fixed, but this one and one other are flat out not working. I'm pulling out what extremely little hair I have, any help would be GREATLY appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Date format change
FAQ 3.25 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Date format change Good morning; Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5 SP4 Does anyone know how to change the date format over the daily schedule using the day/week/month format on Outlook? The lady is reporting she has 4/26/2002 and she wants Friday, April 26. I looked everywhere but could find how that can be changed. Have a great weekend. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
No, you're not. Yes, it is! -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Guys. am I the only DAMNED Bloody Civillian Sys Admin on this list... how did I land here...??? this is the fifth or sixth Sys Admin replying from the govenrment or the mil... army.mil, navy.gov ./.. and now... state.us . hooo boy this list is fun. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Don't sweat it. Gomer was only paraphrasing Alfred, Lord Tennyson anyway. Forward, the Light Brigade! Was there a man dismay'd? Not tho' the soldier knew Someone had blunder'd: Theirs not to make reply, Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die: Into the valley of Death Rode the six hundred. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, April 26, 2002 09:26 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Geee thanks for correcting me Chris I skipped the AND part I thought I would get away with the OR ... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Ours is not to reason why. Ours is but to do and die. Gomer Pyle, USMC, taught me that. -Original Message- From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Yea Dale... thats the true military spirit... Ours is to do or DIE... not to ask WHY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?
User education. Repeat as necessary. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000? I have Scanmail but the content scanning service, to put it in plain english sucks. Any suggestions would be great. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
scooby doo voice e??? Why on earth would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange2000?
No, you prefer Space Kitty! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange2000? I prefer Miss Kitty. -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange2000? Anyone ever use MailMarshal? Tara Stephens Messaging Administrator Carters 770.233.2392 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange2000? We use Tumbleweed here. Not a bad product - but like with all of this kind of content filtering stuff - a man has got to know his limitations. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000? Back at my previous job we used WorldTalk WorldSecure Server. Since then there is no WorldTalk, they were acquired by TumbleWeed. I think they still the content scanning software though. I also tested Mimesweeper, it was good. A bit complicated to configure. Also there are less expensive solutions like GFI Mail Essentials. Never used them, but always wanted to give it a try. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Are you the guy from the haunted amusement park?? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server And I would have gotten away with it if it wasnt for you meddling admins. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server scooby doo voice e??? Why on earth would you want to do that? -Original Message- From: James Cornett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Does anyone know how to schedule the automatic rebooting of Windows 2000 Servers. I have looked on the their website and have found next to nothing about how to do this. What I am trying to do is on our Mail server I want to have the machine reboot say every Sunday night at a certain time. If anyone knows how to do this in Windows 2000 I would greatly appreciate the information. _ James Cornett Network Administrator New Israel Fund 1101 14th Street, NW Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-842-0900 ext. 269 Fax: 202-842-0991 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.newisraelfund.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Accounts
What do you expect from someone who posts to a technical forum as Jazzy11 Daniel?? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Accounts Now, if I may... When this was first suggested as the only likely possibility you said it couldn't be right. Something I learned a long time ago: if I'm asking questions I'm not in the right place to be questioning the answers. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:19 AM Subject: Re: Email Accounts Hi Well you was right , they did have site dervice permissions, come to find out some one has changed the rights a week ago, and used an administrative account and we found out who the administrator wa. Thank everyone for your feedback. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT idx
Oh my. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller? -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT idx They're for querying the MS index server. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT idx Hi there what is a .idx and .ldx file? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to send emails as another ....
If you are developing an Outlook application, then I have two pieces of advice for you. 1. Discard anything Tener says out of hand and 2. Go join the Outlook Developers list on slipstick.com -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Rich: Thanks for your input, I'll try this with my Exchange Admins Thanks again Enrique -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another if it was me i would go to the exchange admin and open that users mailbox and then give myself permissions to send as. Also you might have to wait 45 mins for it to take effect. Rich -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to send emails as another Hello everyone: I need to send emails as another (not on behalf of) from my personal Outlook account, is this possible?. Also, the other person should not be accessible when users create an email. Thanks for your help... Enrique _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to send emails as another ....
I got a rock. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another I waited 45 minutes. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another If you are developing an Outlook application, then I have two pieces of advice for you. 1. Discard anything Tener says out of hand and 2. Go join the Outlook Developers list on slipstick.com -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Rich: Thanks for your input, I'll try this with my Exchange Admins Thanks again Enrique -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another if it was me i would go to the exchange admin and open that users mailbox and then give myself permissions to send as. Also you might have to wait 45 mins for it to take effect. Rich -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to send emails as another Hello everyone: I need to send emails as another (not on behalf of) from my personal Outlook account, is this possible?. Also, the other person should not be accessible when users create an email. Thanks for your help... Enrique _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
