RE: Exchange Event service will not start
There's also a registry setting that you can pump up for event service debugging which I used when I had similar problems in 55. I don't recall exactly what it but technet will tell you. leeann -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of M Sent: Sunday, 11 January 2004 2:54 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Event service will not start That surprises me because it's a new server and the public folder store is on this new server and I haven't changed any permissions. I will definitely check though. The question I guess would be, what account would need permission to what? Exchsvc? Servername$? Exch Admins? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue
Are you moving it from the Excchange 5.5 admin or the ESM? Doesn't work from 5.5 Admin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Schwarz Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 2:56 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 To 2000 Move Mailbox Issue Hi everyone. I have a 2 server Exchange 5.5 site that I am trying to get over to a single 2000 server. Corp.domain.com Win2k Exchange 2k location.corp.domain.com 2X Win2k 2X Exchange 5.5 The new server in the corp.domain.com is part of the rest of the exchange site. ADC has been running and all looks ok there as well. When attempting to move a mailbox from 5.5 to 2000 the following message appears, and I can't seem to find any Microsoft articles that are pertinent. There are some that mention this error ID, but none that are an exact match to this issue. I am thinking it is a permissions issue somewhere, perhaps with the system attendant? Error: Connecting to destination server. cn=,,CN=,DC=,DC=com The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange Server computer has failed. The MAPI provider failed. Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store ID no: 8004011d-0512- Any help is appreciated. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move E2K servers between AD containers?
We've moved all ours to different OU's. No problems at all other than having to restart the services. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MS Exchange List Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 9:05 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move E2K servers between AD containers? Hello, E2K: 2 Servers, same site/group, SP3+September'03 Rollup+recent critical security patch, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP4 + all critical fixes , native The powers that be would like to move all the Servers into a new OU Servers container in AD. They're trying to deploy some policies against the default Computers container the Exchange servers currently exist in, so want the Exchange Servers out of it. It seemed to work OK in the lab after moving and rebooting. I know some of the Exchange Groups can't be moved out of the Default Users container. Any problem moving Exchange Servers between containers? They are not DCs. Thank you, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
You could throw an OWA front end server in the DMZ, put certificate on as Ed suggests, and then wrap everything up in an IPSEC packet that goes between the front end and backend. Between the client on the net and the front end, you would use SSL, so just open 443. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2003 11:29 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Ed, I'm a little confused. You're recommending that I put in a front end server, but not in the DMZ? It seems to me that I might have to open a bunch of ports, but if the front end server is in the LAN, all ports are by default open. Just to clarify, I have one Exchange server which lives on my LAN, and there is an SMTP server in my DMZ that relays messages to the Exchange server. At the moment, I don't have any other Exchange servers running. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA front end server - licensing and security Instal a certificate on the front-end server and open port 443 to the front-end server. Putting a front-end server in a DMZ requires you to open lots of dangerous ports through the internal firewall to the Exchange servers, DCs and GCs. Ed --- Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm setting up OWA in my organization, and I have two choices. I can set up Exchange on the web server (in the DMZ), and specify it as a front end server, or I can open port 80 to the primary Exchange server. From a security standpoint, I really like the first option, but I'm thinking that I need a second Exchange Enterprise license. Am I correct in this? Am I being too paranoid about opening port 80 through to the internal Exchange server? I've never liked the idea of raw traffic entering my LAN Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailMarshal
In Mail Marshals defense I would have to say their support is excellent, their product even better and we are one happy customer. We have never had any issues downloading software, patches or updates whatsover. Rgds, -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2003 8:33 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MailMarshal Has anyone been able to get help or even download MailMarshal's latest updates since they were bought by NetIQ? It seems that they never answer any calls and have become as bad as GFI. Trend Micro is sounding better and better every day. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 defrag
Best option is to let Exchange do it itself, unless you have a pile of white space and need the disk. event logs will tell you how much you have. -Original Message- From: charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 4:25 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 defrag What is the best option to use when defragmenting the database? eseutil /d. The database is about 17Gb, should the temp option be used since the db is that big? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder
Replicate all folders to your new exchange server, rehome and then remove from all old servers. no implications, assuming you have ade3qute bandwidth for replication to occur and sufficient space on exhcange 4 other than redundancy of course. -Original Message- From: Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2003 4:36 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder Hi Ed, I have three exchange servers (exchg01 , exchg02, exchg03) They are all part of the same organization and within the same site. There are public folders created on each of them. Public folder 1 and 2 = home server exchg01 Public folder 3 to 5= home server exchg02 Public folder 6 = home server exchg03 I have now installed a new exchange server, (exchg04) and would like to re-home all the public folders (public folder 1 to 6) to exchg04. In doing this, I hope to free up processing power resources on exchg01, exchg02 exchg03. Does the re-homing actually help, and what implications are involved? Thanks, Prakash -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public folder I do not understand; please explain your question in better detail. Are there three public folder trees, or just three servers with different content? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Prakash Sundaramoorthy - IT (XCHG-PKG) Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello All, In my organization we have 3 public folder servers where each represents its own home servers. Is there a way to collect information from one dedicated public folder server. I don't want it to be distributed. Thank you for your help Prakash Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer Note : This e-mail is intended only for the person addressed. It may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Check out Star Cruises' website at http://www.starcruises.com for more information. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Notice: This e-mail message is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz # _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remote sites
I know this is probably a dumb question. In fact, I KNOW this is a dumb question for a Friday. I've set up a test nt4, 5.5 environment by doing a couple of restores (both IS and DS) from 2 sites in our live environment. (Several reasons for this incl. recovering a few public folders, testing our DR procedures, and preparing for a 2K upgrade) Our live environment is actually 5 sites, however I was wondering if it is possible to somehow remove the 3 sites from the Directory that I don't intend to restore. I have tried removing the connectors (x400 and DRC) from the gateway server, but there is no server in the site to contact to delete. I'm thinking I need to somehow remove these 3 orphan sites, and perhaps running admin in raw state, but this is just Friday theorising. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5
I haven't had to do it, but I would probably do a full backup, shut down the server, add the additional drive, and then use Exchange Optimiser to move the databases to the new drive. Once all services back up and running, disconnect the old drive. -Original Message- From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 9:49 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5 Our drive that contains information store is near capacity. We will like to replace it with a larger drive. Will the following scenario work? 1. After shutting down the server, add the larger drive and bring back the server with all Exchange services stopped. 2. Copy the MDBData folder to the new drive. 3. Rename the new drive same as the old drive (E: in this case) in Disk Manager. 4. Start the Exchange services after running isinteg -patch. 5. If everything goes well, shutdown the server and remove the old drive and boot up. Is there any flaw in this thinking? Please comment. Thanks. - Jay Jay Kulsh --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.463 / Virus Database: 262 - Release Date: 3/17/2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CA's in test environment
I'm doing some testing with Recipient Connection Agreements in a test environment which does not have Exchange 2000 installed but has had the ADC, forestprep and domainprep all run. Our AD design has users being created in a different OU from the, so I have created a primary 2-way CA which will replicate from a 5.5 container into an OU which is not the default Users container. But each time a mailbox is created in the Exchange container, an AD user is created in the default Users container and NOT the one I've specified in my Connection Agreement. Any ideas on what I've missed? Thanks Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K and E2K RC1
I was reading an article by Tony Redmond http://www.exchangeadmin.com/articles/print.cfm?articleID=8743 which seems to indicate that is was possible to move servers between Administrative Groups in RC1, yet according to everything else I've read, including Ed, this is no longer possible in E2K SP3. Anyone know why this was taken out? I don't think I'm going to enjoy my migration as much as I had hoped. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and E2K RC1
Info I've seen says that regardless of whether you are in native or mixed, you still cannot move E2K servers betwixt AG's. You can however, move mailboxes between AG's in native. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2003 3:08 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and E2K RC1 Trying to remember. But I think it has to do with if your in Ad Native mode or not and or in a mixed Exchange environment or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 9:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions I was reading an article by Tony Redmond http://www.exchangeadmin.com/articles/print.cfm?articleID=8743 which seems to indicate that is was possible to move servers between Administrative Groups in RC1, yet according to everything else I've read, including Ed, this is no longer possible in E2K SP3. Anyone know why this was taken out? I don't think I'm going to enjoy my migration as much as I had hoped. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K and E2K RC1
Thanks Jim, We do want to collapse all our sites into one AG, but we can only achieve this by using a 2-hop method as Ed has mentioned in a previous post a few weeks back. Install E2K in each site, remove 5.5, switch to native, install E2K into desired AG and move mailboxes from original site. I started questioning it again when I re-read Tony's article, AND after a discussion I had with Microsoft last week who also indicated that I could simply install my E2K servers in each site, and then 'collapse them' in a single hop. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2003 5:50 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K and E2K RC1 Moving servers between admin groups was something they attempted in the betas but coul dnot make work. Even with Exchange 2000 in native mode, all objects have a legacyExchangeDN associated with them. If I remember correctly, this was the reason that the decided it was going to be too difficult to get working. Like Tony, I don't remember the exact reason, but I'm thinking that was it. I remember doing it a few times in Beta 3 and causing myself a lot of headaches (stores would not mount). If you are hoping to re-architect your organization, once you are in native mode you CAN move mailboxes between servers in different admin groups. If this is what you want to accomplish, then perhaps this is the best approach. HTH, Jim -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, March 10, 2003 4:02 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K and E2K RC1 Subject: E2K and E2K RC1 I was reading an article by Tony Redmond http://www.exchangeadmin.com/articles/print.cfm?articleID=8743 which seems to indicate that is was possible to move servers between Administrative Groups in RC1, yet according to everything else I've read, including Ed, this is no longer possible in E2K SP3. Anyone know why this was taken out? I don't think I'm going to enjoy my migration as much as I had hoped. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRS and E2K Migration questions
I'm struggling to understand the concepts of SRS and migration to a single AG and haven't found too much info either in Technet or other resources, altho' I did find a good article on the Exchange Admin site. I haven't moved to a test environment yet as I just want to understand the concepts first. We have 5 sites each with 1 x 5.5 server in a hub and spoke topology. We plan to migrate site at a time reusing hardware from the previous site. (mixed mode AD currently in place, single domain) 1. As we migrate to E2K in a mixed environment, each site will become an AG in it's own right. Correct? 2. This means that I can only reach my ideal model of a single AG when we have migrated completely and switched to native mode. Yes? 3. Can I do this in a single hop method...ie install my E2K server in the 5.5 site, move my 5.5 mbxs etc, and then follow Q284148 to remove the 5.5 server completely from the Site/AG before moving on to the next site, or do I need another temp server and move users twice. Once from 5.5 into Same Site/AG but on E2K server, and then onto a different E2K server in the final AG? 4. Do I need an SRS server in each AG while I have 5.5 servers in the Org? Any help or pointers very much appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Thanks piles Ed, So...a key point I've taken is this: Even when in Native Mode with 5 legacy Sites/AG's, I cannot move Servers between Administration Groups; But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for each Site/AG to move to the final AG. Is that what your suggesting? i.e. for each 5.5 site: 5.5 -- move mbx to new h/w -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:08 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions 1. Yes, taking the old site's display name. 2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users. 3. You'll have to move to an E2K server in the original site, then, once in native mode, from the original administrative group to the final one. But you only need to bring up one intermediate server, the new E2K server in the original administrative group. 4. The SRS gets created automatically on the first Exchange 2000 server you bring up in a mixed site. Don't worry about it; there is nothing you need to do with it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SRS and E2K Migration questions I'm struggling to understand the concepts of SRS and migration to a single AG and haven't found too much info either in Technet or other resources, altho' I did find a good article on the Exchange Admin site. I haven't moved to a test environment yet as I just want to understand the concepts first. We have 5 sites each with 1 x 5.5 server in a hub and spoke topology. We plan to migrate site at a time reusing hardware from the previous site. (mixed mode AD currently in place, single domain) 1. As we migrate to E2K in a mixed environment, each site will become an AG in it's own right. Correct? 2. This means that I can only reach my ideal model of a single AG when we have migrated completely and switched to native mode. Yes? 3. Can I do this in a single hop method...ie install my E2K server in the 5.5 site, move my 5.5 mbxs etc, and then follow Q284148 to remove the 5.5 server completely from the Site/AG before moving on to the next site, or do I need another temp server and move users twice. Once from 5.5 into Same Site/AG but on E2K server, and then onto a different E2K server in the final AG? 4. Do I need an SRS server in each AG while I have 5.5 servers in the Org? Any help or pointers very much appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
You could have a look at MailMarshal Secure which is an email encryption and decryption gateway. It's an add-on to MailMarshal which provides content filtering, virus checking etc. Are you looking specifically at e-mail encryption or would something like transport layer encryption be sufficient? What does your security policy say? Leeann -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange server level encryption
It could happen at the client's gateway if they use a mm server or compatible gateway which can communiate with CAs or remote LDAP server. Your client still needs access to your public keys regardless of whether you get the gateway or the client to do it. Have you looked at PGP at all? Mail marshal site is http://www.marshalsoftware.com if of any interest. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:34 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption Well, basically, any information transmitted outside of our company through a public channel (internet included) has to be encrypted. Neither the specific type of, nor level of is explicitly stated. What I basically want to do is this. If anyone sends email outside of our company, I want it to be grabbed and encrypted. Decryption I would guess would have to happen at the client on the other side. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange server level encryption You could have a look at MailMarshal Secure which is an email encryption and decryption gateway. It's an add-on to MailMarshal which provides content filtering, virus checking etc. Are you looking specifically at e-mail encryption or would something like transport layer encryption be sufficient? What does your security policy say? Leeann -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:25 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange server level encryption Ok, my eyes are going crossed. I have been trying to figure out a decent way to encrypt all outbound email from our company. This is for compliance with HIPAA. Does anyone happen to have any ideas? I have googled and haven't found a product that looks right. I have searched for exchange 2000 encryption, email encryption, etc. Help? TIA Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for each Site/AG to move to the final AG. Is that what your suggesting? i.e. for each 5.5 site: 5.5 -- move mbx to new h/w -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG I don't see why the second step, move mbx to new h/w, is required. I didn't think that I could move Exchange 5.5 users from SiteA to a new E2K server in a different AG in one hop. I don't know why I thought that. Brain fart praps, PMS, I dunno. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 9:08 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions 1. Yes, taking the old site's display name. 2. Yes, and even then you can't move servers, just users. 3. You'll have to move to an E2K server in the original site, then, once in native mode, from the original administrative group to the final one. But you only need to bring up one intermediate server, the new E2K server in the original administrative group. 4. The SRS gets created automatically on the first Exchange 2000 server you bring up in a mixed site. Don't worry about it; there is nothing you need to do with it. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SRS and E2K Migration questions I'm struggling to understand the concepts of SRS and migration to a single AG and haven't found too much info either in Technet or other resources, altho' I did find a good article on the Exchange Admin site. I haven't moved to a test environment yet as I just want to understand the concepts first. We have 5 sites each with 1 x 5.5 server in a hub and spoke topology. We plan to migrate site at a time reusing hardware from the previous site. (mixed mode AD currently in place, single domain) 1. As we migrate to E2K in a mixed environment, each site will become an AG in it's own right. Correct? 2. This means that I can only reach my ideal model of a single AG when we have migrated completely and switched to native mode. Yes? 3. Can I do this in a single hop method...ie install my E2K server in the 5.5 site, move my 5.5 mbxs etc, and then follow Q284148 to remove the 5.5 server completely from the Site/AG before moving on to the next site, or do I need another temp server and move users twice. Once from 5.5 into Same Site/AG but on E2K server, and then onto a different E2K server in the final AG? 4. Do I need an SRS server in each AG while I have 5.5 servers in the Org? Any help or pointers very much appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
I think we are saying the same thing aren't we? It's still 2 user moves. First - Move users from E55 server to E2K in old site Second - Move users from E2K server in old site to E2K server in new AG. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 11:51 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions Why not: 5.5 -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG ? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for each Site/AG to move to the final AG. Is that what your suggesting? i.e. for each 5.5 site: 5.5 -- move mbx to new h/w -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG I don't see why the second step, move mbx to new h/w, is required. I didn't think that I could move Exchange 5.5 users from SiteA to a new E2K server in a different AG in one hop. I don't know why I thought that. Brain fart praps, PMS, I dunno. NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions
Right. Shheess. What a pain in the butt. Thanks. I guess that means I need to follow that Q instruction twice for each site. I'll be expert after 10 moves. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 1:25 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions Right. Two moves, but only one intermediate server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions I think we are saying the same thing aren't we? It's still 2 user moves. First - Move users from E55 server to E2K in old site Second - Move users from E2K server in old site to E2K server in new AG. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2003 11:51 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions Why not: 5.5 -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG ? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SRS and E2K Migration questions But still some confusion on 3. If I can't move servers between AG's in mixed or native mode, I would still need a 2nd intermediate server for each Site/AG to move to the final AG. Is that what your suggesting? i.e. for each 5.5 site: 5.5 -- move mbx to new h/w -- E2K in old site -- move mbx to new h/w in new AG I don't see why the second step, move mbx to new h/w, is required. I didn't think that I could move Exchange 5.5 users from SiteA to a new E2K server in a different AG in one hop. I don't know why I thought that. Brain fart praps, PMS, I dunno. NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folders
Set the Is Not Visible Attribute on each of the 2477 public folders, or set on all, and unset on the 23? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 10:05 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folders Hello All Is there a way to set in Exchange 5.5 to not see the public folders which are not set to replicate between different sites. We have three sites with a total of 2500 public folders (do not ask me why) but only 23 of them are set to replicate to each site. Is it possible not see the other 2477 public folders in Outlook? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5.
yes. If you want to rebuild your exchange server. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 10 October 2002 1:08 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. Hi Can the .dat files in the MTA folder be deleted? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5.
yes, apologies, you are correct, asnd there is nothing wrong with practising disaster recovery on your live system. done it myself. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 10 October 2002 3:45 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. Actually Leann, the correct answer would be yes, provided he wanted to practice disaster recovery. ;o) -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. yes. If you want to rebuild your exchange server. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 10 October 2002 1:08 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. Hi Can the .dat files in the MTA folder be deleted? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange
Used it on 5 or 6 servers a couple of years ago to move them from being a BDC in a different domain to become members in a consolidated domain. Worked great, and no probs since. Servers still up and active. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2002 9:51 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Demoting BDC to member server running exchange I'm in the process of changing our exchange server (Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT 4 SP6a) which also happens to be a BDC to a stand alone server. I want to minimize downtime and was wondering if any of had used UPromote from Algin Technology? To either demote or promote a BDC to a member server. Also what the recommendations are to this regard, should I just re-install NT and exchange or trust UPromote? Thanks Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: do not send before
There was a bug in sp2 or 3 I think where the date passed with the message still sitting in the mta. There is a perf counter where you can check the number of messages waiting as well. Pre-outlook puts it directly in the mta I think and outlook 2k leaves it in the outbox till time expires. -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:51 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: do not send before How does the do not send before option work. I put in a date and time and the message just sits in my outbox. It never sends. Even if I click the send and receive button after the time has passed it still doesn't send. What am I missing? Outlook2K TIA, Brett _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gota read Q article
Q314917 should be included as a must read along with Disaster Recovery dox. I've been looking for something like this for ages. Rgds, NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Gota read Q article
Yeah, perhaps. Guess it depends on how much you want to understand the DR process. To me, it clarifies exactly the difference between isinteg and eseutil rather than just typing in a couple of commands 'cos the DR doc says to. Anyway, it's filed in my read once a month folder. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 4 March 2002 11:23 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Gota read Q article That is a very good Q, but not I would recommend to the same person who needs to see the DR white paper, as that is normally a beginners document. And this a bit more advanced. But very good Q non the less. Thanks for sharing. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Gota read Q article Q314917 should be included as a must read along with Disaster Recovery dox. I've been looking for something like this for ages. Rgds, NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Burning PST files.
No. You need to copy it back to h/d because the pst expects to be able written to even if only reading messages. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2002 10:57 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Burning PST files. Is it possible to burn PST files to a CD and still use them? We have some users with very large PST files that are gobbling up server space. We tried burning a PST file to a CD, but we were then unable to access it. Even after copying the file back to their home drive and trying to take ownership of it. Has anybody had any success with this? Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6. Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another
I recently had 6 domains which I consolidated into 1 with no probs whatsoever. Didn't take too long per server, I used a 3rd party tool which I don't' think is generally recommended, but hey...it worked for me and my mgmt were happy with the timeframe it provided. Just make sure you're backups are good in case the thing sux a kumera. -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2002 5:00 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move EXCH 5.5 from one NT domain to another I need to move my Exchange 5.5 sp4 server to another NT domain and need to know if it is as easy and changing domain membership. It is a member server in a Win 2K domain now and needs to be moved out to our NT4 domain. Nothing else needs to change on it. Same name, same IP address, same DNS domain. I'm hoping that it's not tied in any way to the netbios domain name, as it is to the computer name. FYI, I need to do this due to a failed W2K rollout that I NOTHING to do with. Given the current status of the project (scrap it and start over) that may not have been a bad thing. If it's not that easy then I'll probably opt for the server move method. Suggestions?? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Network Administrator Sabic Americas, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Calendar Problems
Perhaps try running outlook with /cleanfreebusy switch. Also, is the user running an OST? -Original Message- From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 3:01 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Calendar Problems These are recurring meeting occurrences. The assistant prints off a copy the night before And then the next morning the meeting is gone. Libi Maniace Database Administrator BEI Precision Sensors Space Div 1100 Murphy Drive Maumelle, AR 72113 (501) 851-4000 -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 07:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Outlook Calendar Problems Maybe somebody is marking some meetings 'Private'. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Libi Maniace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Calendar Problems I have a user who shares her calendar with the General Managers Direct Reports. Each user can view the calendar for meetings and such. But now sometimes meetings just disappear off the calendar. Can someone help me as to what would be causing this? Thanks Libi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM Deletion
But with Q224493, it suggests you run ISSCAN to scan for text/attachments that are already in the IS. If you've been spammed and have messages from xxx to breakfast in your MTA that suggests that they haven't yet reached your IS, so wouldn't it be more appropriate to try and remove them before they hit they do? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 8:06 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Isn't Q224493 simpler? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: SPAM Deletion Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion OK thanks. Simple is good. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion In essence yes. It may be basic but it works! PBB -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, are you saying to stop the MTA, open up one of the DAT files to find a particular string, and then run Find File against the MTADATA directory in order to search against that string? Harold -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Ouch! Had a similar issue over xmas but you can add another 0 to that item count CR went nutty on a full hotmail account. Best way I found was to use find files to search for a unique line in the spam and keep on deleting them as they list up in the FF dialogue. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM Deletion Also, we're Exchange 5.5 SP4 -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM Deletion We've been hit with a repeating message, whether accidentally or purposely, that we are currently deleting from our MTA queue. There are approximately 25,000 of these messages, interspersed with legitimate messages. Are there any tools that will let me stop the MTA and go after messages based upon author or subject to delete them from the queues. Otherwise, it will be a pretty long morning cleaning this up. In the meantime, we've been able to stop further messages at our TrendMicro gateway. Thanks, Harold Waisel FleetBoston _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backing up the Information Store
You need an exchange aware backup solution. Plenty around. -Original Message- From: Richard S Kahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backing up the Information Store Hi, I hope someone can help me with this. I am using the MS Backup Utility with SBS2000/Windows Server 2000. Despite ticking the storage group and the exchsvr folder in the program files folder, the report informs me that the priv1 and pub1.edb and .stm files (and a number of other .log files) are skipped as they are unable to be opened. Consequently there are no entries to be found in the Information store. I am using Administrator priviledges. I am probably doing something stupidly wrong, what is it? Many thanks, Richard S Kahan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: address generators
William is suggesting Configuration - Site Addressing - Site Addressing, not what you have selected. -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 18 January 2002 9:47 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: address generators I already did that but new accounts still have a cc:mail address generated. I am trying to delete from the admin: Configuration--Addressing--E-Mail Address Generators Bill -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: address generators Exchange Admin Configuration--SiteAddressing--SiteAddressing Deselect cc: mail William -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: address generators How can I remove the cc:Mail address generator from exchange 5.5? Bill Klosa SC Electric Company Chicago,IL. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE?
Have a look in the mailbox resources, under the IS. I think you can save the contents of this from the filemenu. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 7:57 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE? Good afternoon, I am interested in determining the amount of space users are user per mailbox. Does anyone know of any program that can extract this data so I can put it to a spreadsheet? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE?
It is cool. Exchange is cool -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:05 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE? Thank you very much... how cool is that. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE? Have a look in the mailbox resources, under the IS. I think you can save the contents of this from the filemenu. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 7:57 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: hEADER pROGRAM PARAMETER AVAILABLE? Good afternoon, I am interested in determining the amount of space users are user per mailbox. Does anyone know of any program that can extract this data so I can put it to a spreadsheet? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sharing calenders failing after move to new server
Why are you using Eudora for scheduling? Why not just use Exchange the way it was meant to be used? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:51 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sharing calenders failing after move to new server Had Outlook 2000 users with Internet Mail accounts sharing calender info. and they were hooked to an Eudora Server. Everything was OK. We then switched over to the new E2K server. Mail flowed OK. When sending appointments to other users the Accept button did not appear on new mail. I change the message format for pop3 and Imap to send both plain text and embedded html. Same negative result. Changed pop3 to send in rich text format. The users then could see the button but the appointments would not transfer. Question. Do I need to load the Exchange Server Service piece on the 2000 client or is there something else I can set on the server? _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
In which case, I am an outstanding admin. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:02 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files A paranoid admin is a good admin. S. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1]. Especially since when perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to the database anyways. But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order. I don't recommend deleting the logfiles until a good backup [2]. S. [1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant move the logfiles he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP* -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
Assume you mean the global 'they'. The worse thing is paranoia seems to grow exponentially with how much you learn about a system which does little to reduce stress, and therefore bad habits associated with the reduction of stress. sigh. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:05 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files You're only paranoid if they're not out to get you. We all know , of course, that they're all out to get you. ; ) Tom. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Good point. I forgot about perfwiz. Call me paranoid, but I'd still do a full backup before running perfwiz. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:42 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files If you use perfwiz to move them, it will be ok [1]. Especially since when perfwiz shuts down Exchange services to run, all logs will be committed to the database anyways. But yes, a backup ASAP is in good order. I don't recommend deleting the logfiles until a good backup [2]. S. [1] I give Skip enough credit to assume that when he meant move the logfiles he was indeed talking about PerfWiz. [2] Unless Skip is using circular logging [3], in which case it doesn't really matter. [3] *GASP* -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I wouldn't move them. Exchange expects to find them in the place they are. Get a full backup done asap. Do it now -Original Message- From: Taylor, Skip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:30 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I do a full backup every night but had a bad tape so the log files did not get deleted and the server came to a halt. I only have a 2gb partition for these files. I'll see about moving them to a different partition. I just did not know what was considered normal. Thanks to all who replied, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files 5-10 minutes? That's terrible! It should be every 12 minutes! Those are transaction logs. They are created as email traffic is created. Someone sends that 100MB mpeg of Scharff in a pink dress (you know the one!) then the transaction logs will be created a little faster than that... William -Original Message- From: Skip Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MDBDATA Log Files How often should Exchange be writing MDBDATA log files? Our Exchange server appears to write a new 5mb log file every 5 to 10 minutes. I searched the FAQs and Archives but did find an answer. Here's our system. Single Server Exchange 5.5 SP 3 NT 4.0 SP 5 550 users Is this normal? Is this a Mail Loop? If so how can I find it? Is some one relaying mail off my server? If so how can I stop it? Thanks, Skip Taylor, MCSE Network Administrator Jordan, Jones, Goulding _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I prefer to be a nazi bitch and crank down mailbox sizes or block messages for people that piss me off. But your idea is probably more career enhancing. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:17 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files The best way to deal with stress is to daydream about your coworkers and baseball bats. S. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Assume you mean the global 'they'. The worse thing is paranoia seems to grow exponentially with how much you learn about a system which does little to reduce stress, and therefore bad habits associated with the reduction of stress. sigh. - NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
I must be paranoid and ignorant. What on earth is BOFH? I can think of several acronyms, but I couldn't kiss my mother if I repeated them. -Original Message- From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 10:10 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Somebody has been reading to much BOFH lately. :) Nathan -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I prefer to be a nazi bitch and crank down mailbox sizes or block messages for people that piss me off. But your idea is probably more career enhancing. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:17 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files The best way to deal with stress is to daydream about your coworkers and baseball bats. S. NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MDBDATA Log Files
Aw shit, you guys have too much spare time. Get back to work and leave me alone in my curled up fetal position rocking backwards and forwards whilst I contemplate BOFH. -Original Message- From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 10:26 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files B[ad] Operator from H-E-double-toothpick ( is that politically correct?) The Register hosts a bunch of stories... http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html Nathan -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Nathan! Quick quick! Explain BOFH! Nobody wants to agitate a nazi bitch! :-) -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I must be paranoid and ignorant. What on earth is BOFH? I can think of several acronyms, but I couldn't kiss my mother if I repeated them. -Original Message- From: Black, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 10:10 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files Somebody has been reading to much BOFH lately. :) Nathan -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files I prefer to be a nazi bitch and crank down mailbox sizes or block messages for people that piss me off. But your idea is probably more career enhancing. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:17 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MDBDATA Log Files The best way to deal with stress is to daydream about your coworkers and baseball bats. S. NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help
What about delegates assuming you mean permissions on the calendar via folder? Tools, options, calendar, somewhere. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 8:27 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help Hey all... Having a little problem with a userA having access to userB's calendar. I went to userB's outlook and removed all permissions that userA had. UserA started to receive meeting request for userB. I killed userA's email account and now everyone else that sends userB a meeting request is getting Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Updated: Review 2002 Budget Sent: 1/16/02 8:29 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: *userA* on 1/16/02 8:29 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=XX;l=XXX0-020116162846Z-25335 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:MyDomain:My Exchange I check userB's account again, I do not see any rules or anything else of that nature. NT4sp6a Exch5.5sp3 Outlook2000 Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wrong reply address on outbound mail
What does control panel, mail, and the delivery tab say about the order of delivery? -Original Message- From: Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:17 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Wrong reply address on outbound mail I have a workstation running Outlook 2000 set up to use Echange 5.5 (SP4). This user needed to set up an Internet Email account as well, which was done. Now, all of his outgoing mail shows his reply address as the Internet account address instead of the address associated with his Exchange mailbox. Even deleting the Internet Email service doesn't stop this from happening. Why is this happening ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly)
Don't worrymy time gets abused continuously. Don't be so hard on yourself. -Original Message- From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 11:44 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly) smack That was my head hitting the desk in shame. This is a fine example that you shouldn't trust your Jr. Admins notes until you check it yourself. Sorry for abusing your time in such a manner. Maybe next time I'll have an intelligent question to ask this group. I got lazy, but I've done the work for you now. Tools, Options,Delegates, uncheck the meeting thingy there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 9:18 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help rev2 (still not able to post correctly) Hey all... Having a little problem with a userA having access to userB's calendar. I went to userB's outlook and removed all permissions that userA had. UserA started to receive meeting request for userB. I killed userA's email account and now everyone else that sends userB a meeting request is getting Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Updated: Review 2002 Budget Sent: 1/16/02 8:29 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: *userA* on 1/16/02 8:29 AM The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=XX;l=XXX0-020116162846Z-25335 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:MyDomain:My Exchange I check userB's account again, I do not see any rules or anything else of that nature. NT4sp6a Exch5.5sp3 Outlook2000 Thanks for the help... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forward to an external pop account
Create a custom receipient and add it to your delivery tab on that user. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward to an external pop account Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how to do the following: All mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the best way to do this. I want all mail sent from the outside world and internally to go to the outside pop account. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forward to an external pop account
pinch IMS, Internet mail, advanced options, uncheck the appropriate option. Others can probably tell you why this isn't a good idea. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:52 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account You may need to go into your IMS, general I think,domains and check you are able to forward mail out. I forget what the syntax is 'cos I'm sleepy. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:53 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account OK, I did the following and it didn't work...: 1) created [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) created a mailbox with custom recipient of [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3) went into the email addresses tab and entered an smtp address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried to send a message from exchange and got this answer: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: testuser on 1/16/2002 3:48 PM The message was undeliverable because the recipient specified has changed address permanently and forwarding was not applicable I'd like the global address list to show [EMAIL PROTECTED] , but quietly in the background forward all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What did I do wrong? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account Create a custom receipient and add it to your delivery tab on that user. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward to an external pop account Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how to do the following: All mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the best way to do this. I want all mail sent from the outside world and internally to go to the outside pop account. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Forward to an external pop account
Oh,sorry...not sure where you'd find it then. I haven't delved into the exciting world of 2k yet. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 1:03 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account Forgive me, I'm at a loss for where to find IMS? I'm using Exchange 2000 in mixed mode. Is it in Exchange Manager or somewhere else? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account pinch IMS, Internet mail, advanced options, uncheck the appropriate option. Others can probably tell you why this isn't a good idea. -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:52 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account You may need to go into your IMS, general I think,domains and check you are able to forward mail out. I forget what the syntax is 'cos I'm sleepy. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:53 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account OK, I did the following and it didn't work...: 1) created [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) created a mailbox with custom recipient of [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3) went into the email addresses tab and entered an smtp address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried to send a message from exchange and got this answer: The following recipient(s) could not be reached: testuser on 1/16/2002 3:48 PM The message was undeliverable because the recipient specified has changed address permanently and forwarding was not applicable I'd like the global address list to show [EMAIL PROTECTED] , but quietly in the background forward all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What did I do wrong? Thanks, Fred -Original Message- From: Leeann McCallum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forward to an external pop account Create a custom receipient and add it to your delivery tab on that user. -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 12:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forward to an external pop account Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how to do the following: All mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the best way to do this. I want all mail sent from the outside world and internally to go to the outside pop account. Thanks in Advance, Fred Fred Macondray Systems Administrator Virtual Purchase Card, Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.virtualpurchasecard.com - Guaranteed B2B Purchases _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: Public folder limits
Properties on public folders and then limits? -Original Message- From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 1:31 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folder limits Hi all, Is there a way to limit size of Public Folders in Exchange 5.5 SP4 and how does it work ?. Thanks in advance. Jaspal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Problem
Check Recreate profiles Check OWA - this will log an indication of incorrect password, user etc. Are servers in same site Event logs Anything limiting number of connections a user can make? Are both server1 and 2 configured the same (SP's, protocols etc) Domain - trusts Force a domain replication? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 10:58 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I just did what you guys suggested. I went to each BDC and stopped and restarted the NetLogon service. Then tried to access my mailbox on the 1st server that works and I still get the message that my logon credentials are incorrect and try again. Ok we have 2 servers that house mailboxes. One of them works fine when trying to access the mailboxes on that server. On the second server you are unable to access any mailboxes using your logon credentials. What we have are users (for some reason) logging onto their laptops locally and opening their Outlook and it prompts you for your credentials. Once the apply their credentials they get the message that I stated earlier. I hope that clears it up. Let me know. Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Explain exactly what you are doing and what is happening and when. There has not been much step-by-step in this thread. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well, I stopped and restarted all the Netlogon services, still with the same results. Any other suggestions? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem I had that happen once! In fact that was the issue and reboot cleared it up. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Make sure you do not have a BDC with a stalled netlogon service Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Well the two jackasses who are calling in this problem today aren't. But for some reason it works for one server and not the other. That is strange. I tested my account on the 2nd server and it works fine. If I move my mailbox over to the 1st server, after i put my credentials in it comes back telling me my credentials are wrong. Which is incorrect because it worked from the 2nd serverWhat a pain. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Normally? Are some not doing this? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem The server is in the same domain. So there is no trust relationship between them. Well, it works for users on the 2nd mail server that houses mailboxes. But it doesn't work for the first. Normally, we have users loggin in under the domain account profile. But for some reason it works for some and not others. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Problem Is the other server in another domain? Is there a trust relationship between the two? If not, this is what I would expect to see on the client. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Problem All, I'm having a strange problem. We have 2 Exchange 5.5 servers that houses mailboxes. When users are logged into their local computer and they try to access their Outlook they get prompted for their credentials and once they put that in, it comes back with an error stating that the
RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question)
Firewall can be software as well. We use checkpoint firewall software solution, with their VPN clients. Firewall is great, but our users have varying successes with secure remote/client. I wouldn't say our reliability is 99.999, but that is something we are working thru' at the moment. running proxy/isa as a firewall wouldn't allow me to sleep at night I'm afraid. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2002 11:56 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Hello, I am replying specifically to this post - when you say Firewall vendor, are you making the assumption that our firewall is a hardware based solution? I simply ask, because we are using Microsoft ISA Server for our solution - and was curious if there is an add-on for that product. I will check the website for more details - but would still like to know other people's opinions of doing it this way - and particularly with ISA Server. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter Szabo Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Check with your firewall vendor if they have a vpn add-on. Most do. /Peter - Original Message - From: Michael Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:18 PM Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Greetings All, If this is getting OT, I am sure you will let me know real fast. Regarding this VPN stuff - I understand completely, the concepts behind it - now I need to implement it. This doesn't necessarily need to be hardware related does it? Can't I simply install some software on the Clients and the Server that allows them to login to the server, and begin an encrypted session? This is getting a little beyond my expertise. What kind of products are you all using to accomplish this complicated task? I remember in the past when PPTP came out from Microsoft, but have not heard much about it lately. Thanks again everyone, you are all lifesavers! Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Anderson Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) AWESOME! - That's precisely the answer I was looking for. This list is awesome :) Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe Pochedley Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) We have 60+ salesmen and engineers who connect via 56K modem dial up while on the road to access their email with Outlook/Exchange through a VPN... Everything works well, though a bit slowly at times, but not so slow as to be unusable or unbearable. You can do away with IMAP completely if you like... Outlook allows you to create an Offline Folder file, which is a local copy of the information stored on the Exchange server... With the offline folder file, users can continue to work with Outlook and maintain full functionality whether they're connected or not and will automatically synchronize (send, receive mail, update calendar, contacts, tasks, etc) whenever they are connected... Look in the help files for Outlook for help setting up Offline Access... There's also plenty of info at Microsoft and other sites that explain how to set this up and use it (it's pretty simple) Joe Pochedley I like deadlines, cartoonist Scott Adams once said. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by. -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Need advice from the Gurus (mobile users question) Okay - I like the VPN route - and use Outlook 2000 as it was intended. BUT, what kind of Network Overhead is involved - when connecting remotely over a potentially slow connection? Will it take forever for folders to come up, especially if they are unusually large? Also, if the client cannot connect for some reason (which has been happening A LOT lately - due to massive service problems), what is the best solution to still have your old e-mail inside of Outlook? I was thinking this would be where IMAP really comes into it's own - because you can still keep your mail local, and on the server too - and when the connection comes back up, you just resynchronize everything - and you are good to go. Thanks for your continued responses, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
RE: Locking down default location for saving attachment in mail
I seem to recall a registry setting in the archives that allowed you to change the default attachment directory. Mebbe have a quick look yourself. -Original Message- From: Khoi Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 4:12 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Locking down default location for saving attachment in mail Sensitivity: Private Hi all, I have a quick question. Is there a way (if possible) to lock down the default location for saving attachment in mail (like in home-directory in w2k environment) beside my document??. I have a user who ask this a while back, and I have looked at MS site, Exchange list FAQ and could not find a solution. TIA -- Khoi _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuration question
I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuration question
Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: configuration question
So it's just happening to 1 recipient? If so, does the receipient actually exist, ie have a mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:20 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only
RE: configuration question
So, do the receipients exist or not? Are you pulling them from an old pab or contacts list and their e-mail addresses have changed? I think a bug with 5.5 SP3 when sending to a group that had a deleted user in it used to come back with something like that also. 5.5 or 2k? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:28 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question it's actually happening to 3 people out of the 5 and it open happens periodically. Sometimes you can send them mail and sometimes you get that Reply??? The owner of the company set it up the server first and it was all jacked up I've ironed out most of the wrinkles except this. Like I said I'm very new to the exchange game. Finding it very fun though! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question So it's just happening to 1 recipient? If so, does the receipient actually exist, ie have a mailbox? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:20 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain
RE: configuration question
I'm gone. Good luck Jennifer -:) -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:28 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do. An mail user on your exchange server? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:00 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?help! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim McGrath Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: configuration question Hey could anyone tell me how to check the target address attribute on a enabled mail user where I would create the following objects..User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim McGrath mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: configuration question
In your directory. GAL. -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:56 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?? where would I look for that -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Do you have a contact and user object for this person? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Jen I seen that article but I really don't understand the steps to take and where to go to even start with that resolution I am by no means an exchange expert and I really appreciate any time you take with this! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I am guessing you saw this and your issue is you want to know how to fix it: Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question this is what is sent back to a user that is trying to e-mail any one in my organization This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address if you are forwarding a users mail externally. The article below reads a mail look to me however. Clarify: Are you sending to a client running exchange that is not part of your exchange organisation? What does the NDR say? What happens when you try sending not to the client's mailbox, but there supposed alternate recipient address? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 5:10 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question yes I have a client with a small business server running exchange. I'm new to exchange and I'm having some problems. When you try and send them e-mail you get an NDR. I found an article with the fix for it but I'm not sure how to configure it here is the fix from the article Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company
RE: configuration question
Women don't tease. They merely take advantage of the weak nature, so often exhibited by men, by lulling them into a sense of playful curiosity purely for their own amusement. -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2002 6:42 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Don't know yet I'll find out tomorrow when I try it out! I like to tease!!! Learned it from all you women!! hahahahaha! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Did you fix it? What a tease. -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question thanks Jen and leeann it's greatly apprectiated!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Start run dsa.msc ok action find -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question ?? where would I look for that -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Do you have a contact and user object for this person? -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Jen I seen that article but I really don't understand the steps to take and where to go to even start with that resolution I am by no means an exchange expert and I really appreciate any time you take with this! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I am guessing you saw this and your issue is you want to know how to fix it: Numerical Code: 5.4.6 Possible Cause: Categorizer forward loop detected. targetAddress attribute is set on a mailbox-enabled user. Hosting Pack: This is a common hosting configuration problem when someone creates a contact in OU1 and creates a user in OU2 with the same e-mail address via user provisioning tool. Troubleshooting: This happens when contactA has an alternate recipient that points to contactB which then has an alternate recipient that points back to contactA . Check the contact's alternate recipient. Check and remove targetAddress attribute from mailbox-enabled users. For hosting where you want to send mail from one user in one company (OU) to another company (OU), you should configure the following two related objects: User: SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: targetAddress: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SMTP proxy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question this is what is sent back to a user that is trying to e-mail any one in my organization This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporting-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Received-From-MTA: dns;server1.mgi Arrival-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:00:38 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Post the entire error. Smtp codes would help: Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question I've been int he business for about four years this is the first with exchange sorry if I'm not giving enough. I'm using a pop3 connector. What is actually happening is when people out side the company send e-mail they receive this: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 11:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: configuration question Sounds like the custom receipient address is wrong. Look for the globe thingy in your address book and check that's it's valid address
RE: SCHEDULES and MEETINGS
(1) resource scheduling in Outlook (outlook or autoscript) (2) public folders. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 14 January 2002 1:51 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCHEDULES and MEETINGS HI In Exchange 5.5., can i create schedules and meetings for users to accesss via of Outlook 2000, or were can i find more information about it. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Perhaps Someone could post a link explaining how to prevent y our
IMS, Advanced Options, Disable Out of Office responses to the Internet -Original Message- From: Ken Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2001 9:29 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Perhaps Someone could post a link explaining how to prevent your out of office replys from being broadcast to the internet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Only Admins can access OWA??
log on locally rights set? -Original Message- From: Rich Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2001 7:11 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Only Admins can access OWA?? I have OWA(Ex5.5\SP4) running on a IIS 4 machine inside a DMZ using NAT. The only people who can access it are Domain and Exchange admins. Everyone else gets prompted for their NT credentials and then gets a blank screen. Nothing in the IIS permissions explicitly mentions Exhange or domain admins groups. I have found nothing that describes this particular issue in the KB. Has anyone seen this?? Thank You, Rich Gomes GTECH Messaging Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: moving scripts from one server to another
Yep, we had to do exactly the same thing. A real pain in the butt, but the only way we could get it to work properly. Technet article confirms this too. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 30 October 2001 8:46 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: moving scripts from one server to another Aah the pain. I assume this is Exchange 5.5? Technet and PSS both say that the only way to safely move scripts is to login to each mailbox, save the script, delete the script, move the mailbox and then reinstall the script. We recently did this for 85 mailboxes. S. -Original Message- From: stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: moving scripts from one server to another Hi Does anybody know of a tool that I can use to move all our scripts from one server to another? We have about 250 scripts running against a server that needs to be decommisioned. I'm trying to find a way to move them all without having to log into each mailbox and doing it individually. many thanks Steve Harrington _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail Enabled Public Folder
mailbox full? disabled? -Original Message- From: Saul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 9:21 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Enabled Public Folder I have a Mail Enabled Public folder that was working until recently. I am now receiving the following message; I checked Microsoft's knowledgebase and found Q273363, but that is for a user. I tried to find that folder in ADSI but to no avail. Does any know where it is or can anyone help me? Thanks Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test123 Sent: 10/25/2001 12:31 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Help Desk on 10/25/2001 12:31 PM The message reached the recipient's e-mail system, but delivery was refused. Attempt to resend the message. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. abc.domain.com #5.2.1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mail count for a domain in exchg 5.5
mail reporting utility. promodag have a good one. mail filtering utility of which there are plenty around -Original Message- From: sai rajesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 4 October 2001 8:21 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mail count for a domain in exchg 5.5 hi all, i have a exchange server 5.5 on win 2k. there are about 3 mail domains which are configured to this server. I am trying to find out if there is a way to know how many mails each of the domains are receiving, total size of mail etc... thanks in advance mailsai _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
We run Exchange 5.5 in a Netware 5 environment and there haven't really been any issues other than password changing. We did look at Groupwise a few years back, but at that point the client interface for GW provided too much of a learning curve for our users who were already using the MS Client for MS-Mail. Anyhow, the upshot was we got Exchange, and implemented it side by side to Netware. I guess the biggest issue would be the extra investment for hardware for both platforms. We are looking at migrating to Exchange 2000, and once we have an AD structure in place, Exchange 2k rolled out, then we will more than likely be moving completely from Netware to Microsoft, and this is probably more a business reason than technical, as I still believe that Novell's file/print and Directory Services are far superior to Microsoft's. But as our information changes form, we have to look at products outside the Netware arena. -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 12:55 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folders based help desk?
Microsoft have a sample Helpdesk Application based on Public Folders. Haven't looked at it myself, but may be a good place to start. -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 12:42 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public folders based help desk? Good day... I was wondering if anyone has seen some software for running a help desk through public folders on exchange 5.5? (and hopefully 2000 - for when we upgrade). I know I could just make a simple form, and set it to be posted, but I was looking for something a little more advanced Thanks. Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
It also comes back to security, which was important to us. As I said earlier, we had password changing issues, where Netware has a different encryption method than MS, so if your NDS password expired, you weren't able to change your MS one unless you were also logging into the domain. Of course there are ways around this, (i) escape past the 32-bit client login, (ii) use both domain and NDS authentication, or (iii) use 3rd party utils like Netvisions' Synchronicity for NT or Novell's NDS for NT. We went down the Synchronicity route, but could never get it working properly which went down like a cup of cold sick with some people. Looking back tho', I'm with Rocky, Netware environment should have a Netware solution...altho' in saying that the only issues we have had is the password problem and additional investment in hardware. Rgds, Leeann -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 4:25 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Sorry about the brain burn on the Novell topic. Mine is smoking now too. Trying to build a case for recommending them into MS territory but it is hard; being that the price of the software is not too much an issue when they are academic and the cost is minimal when it comes to their discounts. It is mainly consulting time for deployment and ease of administering. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goldmine
Anyone used Goldmine against an Exchange Server? A group of mgrs here are evaluating it and asked me to check the Exchange connectivity. Their support site appears to be down at the moment and I can't find too much info on it. I don't have a copy to install myself at this point until later in the week as the CD is off-site. any info would be appreciated. Rgds, Leeann NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move exchange Server to New BDC with New Name and IP
Why does the server have to have a different name? -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 7:08 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move exchange Server to New BDC with New Name and IP Hi all, I am new to the list and am after any suggestions to move our current Exchange server to a new BDC server. The new server will have different IP and Name, and I am looking for a way to make this change invisible to clients... I do not want to have to visit 200 odd PC's to make changes.. Thanks All Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move exchange Server to New BDC with New Name and IP
Why don't you just follow the Ed Crowley move server method? Easiest, very little downtime, transparent to users. I've just finished a whole bunch of upgrades using this method. Server name is irrelevant, IP is irrelevant unless it's on a different subnet. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 7:08 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move exchange Server to New BDC with New Name and IP Hi all, I am new to the list and am after any suggestions to move our current Exchange server to a new BDC server. The new server will have different IP and Name, and I am looking for a way to make this change invisible to clients... I do not want to have to visit 200 odd PC's to make changes.. Thanks All Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Rules
You can set up Rules on Public Folders if you have permissions. Go into Properties, Administration tab and choose Folder Assistant. Lee -Original Message- From: Tim John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 12:44 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Rules Hi all, I have configured a Public Folder to receive email directly (through its SMTP address). This works fine for most of the incoming mail but some - with specific words in the subject - need to go into another folder. Originally, the mail used to be delivered to a users mailbox and a client rule applied to split the mail up and forward to two public folders. Is there a way of creating a similar rule but just for the Public Folder ? Any ideas appreciated. Thanks, Tim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need KB DB Integration Too
Technet? MS Portal Server? -Original Message- From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 8:36 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need KB DB Integration Too Greetings all, THE PROBLEM Today we receive many great articles, tips, suggestions, and best practices from a variety of sources, in a variety of formats that are applicable for a variety of OSs and applications. Some of these apply to only one OS or app. Some apply to several. Currently these articles are stored in several different places: Exchange Server PFs, NT/W2K Server folders, IE favorites. I'm looking for a tool that will provide a single repository for all KB info regardless of its original source. If anyone knows of a tool that comes close to the below requirements, please let me know. THE SOLUTION (I hope) Ideally, it would provide the following: 1. A single DB in which to store all KB information that is pertinent to our organization 2. Easily add new articles from any source: a. EMail from Internet lists like this one Newsgroups b. URLs of manufacturer's KB article c. Manual entries based on our own experience d. Other? 3. Fields for tracking Applicable OSs, Source, Date, application 4. A way to assign multiple categories to a given article 5. Fields for tracking which clients and machines are involved (if appropriate) 6. A query/search interface that can be based on more than just text --- includes the fields referenced above. 7. A web interface so that we can get to this (at least the query/search part) from anywhere The key is that it must be easy to use. It should automate as much of the data entry as possible. TIA. Best Regards, JMU Jim Underwood Apollo Information Systems, Inc. Houston, TX 77058 EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e-mail. For further information on the Beca Group of Companies, visit our web page http://www.beca.co.nz _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
