Outlook XP, error sending SMTP oddity
A clients laptop with a dialup account LAN account on T1 line. Mail is hosting in both cases by others (earthlink T1 provider). When they send/receive it will be fine, click again - times out with an SMTP error 0x800cc0b saying relaying prohibited by [EMAIL PROTECTED] This domain is only a site visited by the client, and is not setup in their outlook profile anywhere. No email stuck in outbox, but this error oddly shows up often. I have run spybot and system is clean. Mail does go out, but client says mail is not coming in. I need to verify that...but strange that someone's email address is showing in the send/rec error list when no mail was ever sent there. BTW, system is running NAV2003Pro and appears clean in that respect. My thought was a lone SMTP trojan in there - but spybot nor ad aware found any. Any thoughts? Regards, Ron Jameson Hamlin Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dumb question - why OWA cannot get to public folder contacts?
Ever since the early days - I always thought at some point, MS would make the OWA get to all the public folders like outlook (be able to send email by picking a public folder contact list) but alas, Ex2k3 still has no access to a public folder contact list. Grr. I know OWA is meant to be quick, simple and trim - but is this too much to ask? My workaround is to try the RPC over HTTP featurebut still need to roll out Office 2003 first at our client sites. Regards, Ron Jameson IT Division Manager Hamlin Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Antigen
We have recently installed Antigen on our Exchange 2k server. I'm just wondering are most using ESE or VSAPI modes? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
THat is the direction I'd prefer to go. However: We are migrating from a mainframe mail system that has a Bulletin Board feature. They want me to duplicate the feature. When you subscribe to their BB, you get any new messages to the BBs that you subscribed to. I'm trying to figure out how I can manipulate exchange and or outlook (through forms) to interact with Active Directory. I envision this: A user opens a subscription form. They choose the BB they want to subscribe to and enter their username. The form adds that username to a distribution list. That distribution list is set as the Forward recipient for that BB (Public Folder) When someone posts to the BB, everyone in the Dist list gets a copy. Sound OK? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating an automated Bulletin Board System HELP
I need to create an automated bulletin board system using Exchange 2000 and Outlook 2000. It needs to be fairly automated with people being able to subscribe and unsubscribe. ANY direction would be appreciated. Thank you Ron PS: Users are in a W2K domain. No outside access. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing License key.
Is it possible to change the license key from evaluation to fully supported or do you have to do a complete re-install? Is it the same for upgrading from Standard server to enterprise? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV/Spam scanning services
I'm considering going with an outside SPAM/AV company. However, my manager feels that we don't need to put AV on our Exchange server if we do...so I am considering going just with AV/SPAM on our Exchange server and keeping everything in house. I was considering using MX Logic Defense Level 3 and using Antigen on Exchange server. I can't convince him that both would be the way to go...both meaning SPAM/AV outside and AV on Exchange. Now, I am considering just Antigen with the SPAM agent added to it. Anyone got any good points about having both SPAM/AV outside and AV on Exchange that I can bring up to my boss so he can see the added value? His points were...you mean they won't be able to do it as well as we can...then we need to not use them! Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Michael Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services I see the outsourced AV as another layer that gives me greater defense in depth (I have Trend on every platform). Also their use of multiple and different AV scan engines gives me another (admittedly small) edge. I'll take whatever edge I can get, having been hosed by Iluv you and Funlove. One of my concerns about using this type of service is latency. How much longer does it take a message to get through? Are any of the vendors better or worse in this regard? Michael -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services My point is that you're spending money on an internal AV product for mail (i.e. ScanMail or Antigen) plus the second layer at the gateway - either internal or external. My caution is geared towards those who think that they ONLY need the outsourcer for AV. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: AV/Spam scanning services It's not necessarily about saving money though right? Scanning at the gateway (in-house or outsourced) can be a valid additional level of protection. A significant number of our customers use some form of gateway scanner[1] in addition to their server and desktop based AV solutions. [1] MessageLabs, MailSweeper, Trend's Instercan, et al. From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 07:10:22 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AV/Spam scanning services There are some discussions of a few of them in the archives. Personally, I'm not a fan of outsourced anti-spam, but that's in part because we're a heavily email dependent company and so we can justify the expense of in house measures to combat those issues. As a side note - outsourced antivirus doesn't save money - you still need to have an inhouse AV product for email, because scanning at the gateway isn't enough. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MECC 2003 Venue
I won an Xbox game by filling out a survey at MEC. Also, I won an Xbox at TechED one year. :D Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Hopefully we all noted that on the wonderful evaluation forms (my evil coworker got cash for doing one of those things, I've been each year since 97 and on his first trip he gets money). I will be the bad guy, I am very pleased that they have joined MEC and Tech-Ed together, working for a government agency I am not able to swing 2 big conferences a year. I was getting ready to start swapping each year, now I don't have to. While the rooms were packed I thought the content was very good, how did it compare to the content of the past MEC's. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue All of the Exchange sessions were in the teensy tiny rooms in the back ass end of the basement of the conference center. Seating for 50. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue What was it? Like 70% IT and 30% dev, but the classes were the exact opposite. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MECC 2003 Venue I'd prefer a rolled taco with MEC separate again. Oh well. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue They rolled MEC and TechEd into one conference. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue Does this mean that Exchange is out of favor? -Original Message- From: Lalor, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MECC 2003 Venue MEC is no more... :-( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ault Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MECC 2003 Venue Anyone know which city will host MECC this year? Traditionally, the event is located where TechEd was presented earlier in the year--in this case, San Diego. Have I thus answered my own question? I see nuthin on MS' site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode
Sync multiple palms, outlook w/single login
I have a client who wants an open PC to be able to sync multiple palm pilots with multiple outlook profiles. Their exchange server is 5.0 on an NT4.0 server, while the new main server is Win2k. We setup a new domain, setup the trust to NT4 domain then changed the exchange mailbox accounts to the new Win2k accounts. I tried to setup a PC with a special generic user login, use the hot sync intellisync, and when they open outlook it prompts for a profile but I get the typical error saying don't have rights to open folders and cannot log in to outlook. I figured I would test with administrator login account, gave admin account rights on the exchange store from the new domain, gave delegate rights on a user to allow the admin to it but all failed. Can this be done - having one PC login to open a multitude of outlook profiles to be able to sync up the palm pilots? Or, is there no way to fool/tell exchange that this login ID can open any users outlook? On a side note - this whole network is terminal server based and I am testing this with a login on a fat PC. If anyone has any success in using methods like this on a thin network, I am interested. I have not tested the new digi USB network hub, but am interested if anyone has possibly used this in a thin setup to allow sync'ing on TS to a cradle. Ron Jameson Hamlin Technologies _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
None of your e-mail accounts could send to this recipient
Anyone ever seen this error? Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Sent: 7/24/2003 7:07 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Crumbaker, Ron on 7/24/2003 7:07 AM None of your e-mail accounts could send to this recipient. It happened on a Windows XP SP1, Office XP SP2, Exchange 2000 SP3. This was someone internally trying to send mail. All the outgoing mail got this error. He was able to receive mail fine, just not send mail. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Group
I'm needing to setup a support type mailbox that when email is sent to it, it will be delivered to a group of users here. I know I can setup a Group and have the address sent to those members. They would also like an auto-response sent to the sender stating that we have received their request and someone will get back to them within 48 hours. Is this possible? Exchange 2000 SP3 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company www.mpdinc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
email account does not...
Every once in a while we are getting the following message from our Exchange server stating that the following: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: email issue Sent: 12/31/2002 6:59 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Liemphetcharat, Jessie on 12/31/2002 6:59 AM The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address. exchange.Domain1.mpdinc.com #5.1.1 smtp;550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown This is on of our subsidiaries and they are using another ISP for there internet and email access. There ISP is stating that our Exchange server is the problem because it is bouncing back the above message. However, after we have made them aware of what we are experiencing...it mysteriously starts working again. I'm trying to explain to my NON-TECHNICAL CEO, BOSS, and to their ISP that its not our server. Can anyone suggest to me any help on describing what we are experiencing and why it's not our server? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client
I am waiting also to hear back from BS. Have a client in Atlanta with same problem. They can VPN into the server, connect fine, but cannot do anything else. Dialup works fine, DSL does not thru PPPoE. If you hear back, let the list know. Client has IBM TP with XP. Server end has a sonicwall soho10 passing pptp thru to the win2k vpn server. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: BellSouth DSL and MS VPN client Hi all. Does anyone here use BellSouth DSL service? I just got it installed and it is working great. However when I am on DSL, I can't connect to my corporate network with the MS VPN client. My setup at home is: Win ME or Win 2K Pro with MS VPN client BellSouth gave me Westell WireSpeed DSL modem I bought D-Link 614+ Wireless router. However my PC is wired. D-Link is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I have even tried to bypass D-Link and connected straight to the Westell modem. Still no luck. The Westell modem is actually a router with a firewall but as far as I can see it is not blocking any outgoing traffic. I can ping the external IP address of the VPN server. MS VPN client can see it too but it times out on Verifying username and password and gives error 650. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC2003
Teched 2003 Dallas. No more MEC Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC2003 Does anyone know the dates and location for MEC2003? Bill Klosa Network Analyst PH: 773-338-1000 x2782 FAX: 773-381-4810 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Electric Company Chicago, IL USA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments
In house exchange server is not being used for internet...only internal employee email exchange. OL2002 client has both exchange internet service runningeach user pulls from their own pop server thru the common dialup connection.. Hope that clears the confusion. Sending attachments from user to user via internal exchange is fine...just the internet is flaky. Have had senders send to different ISP email accounts that the client will pull mail from (i.e. netcom and compuserve) via POP3both ISP email servers when pulling the mail will have the same result so I am thinking something on the client PC... I am trying to get them on Exchange with a DSL to eliminate the POP3 pulling...but the client is not ready yet. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments OK. Now let's answer my question. Are attachments on the Exchange server fine? If they are and show up garbled on his machine when he connects remotely, then there's a potential issue. If they show up fine all the time, then the Exchange server is out of the game and we can focus entirely on the ISP. Once we categorize each failure, we can find the common points and proceed from there. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments Email attachments go fine to hotmail account so I know they leave the senders box fine. Some attachments work...some do notno pattern of what is good/bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments If you check his mailbox from a machine local to the server, do the attachments show up properly? If so, they're fine on the server and the issue may be with his dialup or local software. Do small attachments work going over to him? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook 2002 corrupt attachments I am looking for some help with a clients problem with OL2002 and attachments. All was fine for a long time but now they get attachments that are corrupt. Files of 500k at the sender, get received at a piece of that size (.exe or zip files)...or, jpg or graphic files come thru but only half the pic shows. Sending from the clients PC is fine and they are using a 56k dialup thru Earthlink on their 3com LAN modem. Sender can send HTML or plain text with same result. Client has Exchange 5.5 for internal use only and the Win2k client PC is using internet mode for getting ISP mail. Any thoughts to how attachments can all of a sudden be corrupt, truncated etc.? Nothing on the client systems have changed recently. Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 and exchange 2k
I'm trying to access my Exchange address through a POP3 client (HP Jornada) via RAS Connection into my Domain. I can get to my Exchange 2k test email account, but I can't get to my Real Exchange 2k email address. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 and exchange 2k I had the same problem yesterday with one of my POP3 accounts - it turns out the ISP had deactivated the account for non-usage as I was accessing it via a broadband connection through another ISP, and not using the email provider's dialup access. I reactivated my account via their webpages and all was fine. Does the ISP have webmail access - if so try this and ensure the account is active, and the password hasn't been changed Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2002 14:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 and exchange 2k I'm having a problem getting mail from my E2k box using POP3. I can't get mail using the account my Outlook accesses. For instance, my mail rdcrumbaker I can't get mail via a POP3 client, but I can setup another user (ron_test) and I can get mail via pop3. I get an error saying Logon Failure: Unknown user name or bad password. Any suggestions? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2k, cannot receive after backup w/veritas
I am looking for anyone who has ever encountered an Ex2k sp2 box fail to receive email after a backup using veritas BE8.6? Few weeks ago, we started a backup from the main server to the mail server, using the BE exchange agent and backing up the entire mail server and information store (not-BLB). The first backup went ok, but the second backup failed and showed a run time of the whole weekend and then the email cannot receive again. This first happened on the 4th/July holiday when the mail could not come in, but can be sent out. After review, the SMTP service was corrupt and we reinstalled exchange with MSPSS due to their documents for this scenario not being correct. Ended up reinstalling IIS, then full install of E2k and all worked well. Veritas backup bombed and now cannot receive a second time I am checking with Veritas to see what gives...did also notice system state of mail server failed at backup and several E2k open files. Anyone see this behavior? Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k, cannot receive after backup w/veritas
Nope. Avoided the M drive and only backed up the IS, C$, D$ and system state. I have now disabled the backup until I check further if BE can cause such an anomaly. I will test the backup of C$, D$ IS to see if the system state was hanging it upnot sure though how E2k can get affected by this. (stumped MS also) Ron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex2k, cannot receive after backup w/veritas Did you back up the M: drive? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k, cannot receive after backup w/veritas I am looking for anyone who has ever encountered an Ex2k sp2 box fail to receive email after a backup using veritas BE8.6? Few weeks ago, we started a backup from the main server to the mail server, using the BE exchange agent and backing up the entire mail server and information store (not-BLB). The first backup went ok, but the second backup failed and showed a run time of the whole weekend and then the email cannot receive again. This first happened on the 4th/July holiday when the mail could not come in, but can be sent out. After review, the SMTP service was corrupt and we reinstalled exchange with MSPSS due to their documents for this scenario not being correct. Ended up reinstalling IIS, then full install of E2k and all worked well. Veritas backup bombed and now cannot receive a second time I am checking with Veritas to see what gives...did also notice system state of mail server failed at backup and several E2k open files. Anyone see this behavior? Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Limits
OK, I need some help. I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k, and I can't seem to find it. I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person can send out to another single mailbox. What I am trying to do: My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of responses through emails to one mailbox. He is wanting to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he doesn't have to screen all the emails himself. However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20. I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox. Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for suggestions. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Email Limits
Its on USE Defaults. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Limits Use Users and Computers on your E2K Right click the user name select Properties Then use the Exchange General tab Click the Delivery Restrictions button chuck -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Limits OK, I need some help. I have been looking for a setting in Exchange 2k, and I can't seem to find it. I am looking for the setting that limits the number of mail one person can send out to another single mailbox. What I am trying to do: My HR Department posted a job online and have gotten a lot of responses through emails to one mailbox. He is wanting to forward 1/3 of the mail two other mailboxes so he doesn't have to screen all the emails himself. However, when I created a rule in Outlook to forward the mail to the other mailboxes, it is only sending out 20. I want to send out 200 from one mailbox to the other mailbox. Or, if you have another solution that will work for me, I am open for suggestions. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Help
I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA. When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New Mail. Then it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists the items in the contacts. HELP!! Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Help
OK. Why when I go to do a new mail message does it ask for Office STD CD? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Help OWA does not render the GAL. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Help I am having problems with my Exchange 2000 SP2 and OWA. When I am OWA, it wants the Office 2000 Standard CD, when I click on New Mail. Then it will NOT display the global address list, it only lists the items in the contacts. HELP!! Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP PC Systems Administrator MPD, Inc. - An Employee Owned Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
I have noticed a difference between Office 2000 and Office XP. XP is slow when retrieving mail from Exchange 2000 SP2 server. I feel your pain!! Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
OK, well...I'm running Office XP SP-1 also. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook XP
Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Outlook XP
10.3513.3501 not a - (sorry) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Outlook XP Version (10.3513-3501) SP-1 Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you
RE: Outlook XP
Mixed. (Just haven't pulled the plug) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Running Native for Windows, Mixed for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Are you both running in native mode Win2k and Ex2K ? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 14:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Yeah, we are running SP1. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Office XP SP1, not Exchange! -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP I'm running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have the issue. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP That issue was fixed in SP1, so hopefully he has already updated his install. -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Oops ... should read ... Mike :) -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian Sent: 03 May 2002 14:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Mark, Do you have Instant Messaging enabled ? Regards, Mylo -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Of course:-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Works fine here. Got Name Resolution? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
RE: Outlook XP
Not just attachments for me...new emails and stuff. When I switch from folders to folders, I get a delay. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening other users folders is slow even on same server. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
Plenty of beer there. Tech Ed this year they ran out. Pissed a lot of folks off. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP A beer at MEC will be fine. :) -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening other users folders is slow even on same server. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
Its about 75% faster. Every little bit helps. Still not as fast as OK2000 was on this XP box, but much better than what it was prior to the patch. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Win XP and Office XP Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Interesting: If you are running Windows(r)XP, you do not need this update. Im on XP here. What O/S are you using? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening other users folders is slow even on same server. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook XP
This one. http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2002/oxpauiu.aspx Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP which patch? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP OK, I applied that patch...all I can say.. YESMUCH BETTER. Thanks a $5 bill. (thats all I have) Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP Well it's pretty much all around slow. Slow opening attachments, slow selecting multiple messages, slow connecting to other mailboxes. Opening other users folders is slow even on same server. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP When you say slow connecting to the server, what do you mean? Is it slow connecting to the server on startup or is it slow opening attachments after OL is already up? If it's attachments, try Q300904. Tom. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook XP Has any one noticed that Outlook XP is so damn slow when connecting to the exchange server? 5.5 and 2k. Whats the deal? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox does not exist
Send a piece of mail to it. Then try again. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox does not exist I have user account that has been newly created, this user used to have an NT account and Exchange mailbox but those had been removed, now when I try to create a username and mailbox with the same username and try to setup the Outlook for this user I get an error stateing the username is invalid, and I have checked and the username is valid, HELP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
I do not use PAB except for the fact that according to info on slipstick.com, you need the PAB to accept an email address on a public folder if hidden in the GAL. I need to keep the email address hidden from the GAL. If there is a method otherwise, I am ears. I did try before I added the PAB and it still did not work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?. That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot
Ok, that worked now. But, is there a way to get the send address to look like the email address from the public folder and not where it says from me on behalf of the public folder email? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Excerpt from slipstick: If you want a user to send with a folder's address, the folder must not be hidden. ... Once the user has Send As permission, they can use View | From Field in Outlook to display the From box and either click From to choose from the Address Book or type in the name of the public folder or other mailbox. If the public folder is hidden from the GAL, the user should go to the folder's Properties page and add the folder's address to their own address book. Now, this is a little confusing. I did try it with both OAB and PAB, both SMTP and X.400 type addresses. It does not work with a hidden folder when you create the address manually. However, if you go through the steps in Q184545 to add the folder address to your personal address book, it works just fine. One more thing to note is, when I tried this I didn't have a PAB and it created a contact item in my Contacts folder instead, which works just fine. So you still don't need the PAB. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I do not use PAB except for the fact that according to info on slipstick.com, you need the PAB to accept an email address on a public folder if hidden in the GAL. I need to keep the email address hidden from the GAL. If there is a method otherwise, I am ears. I did try before I added the PAB and it still did not work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot Well, first off, sending as a public folder has nothing to do with your PAB. Remove the entry from your PAB and then ask yourself Why on earth am I still using this beast if I'm on Outlook 2000?. That settled, try unhiding the PF from the GAL. You should be able to send as that PF then. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send mail from Public Folder - cannot I have setup public folders with email addresses assigned to them. I wish to send mail as the public folder but when I try, it says cannot send due to send as rights. In exch. admin for 5.5sp4, I have set myself permissions to SendAs. On my outlook 2000 client, I have setup a PAB to accept the address used on the public folder (the folder email addresses are hidden from the GAL). When I go to properties on the public folder, I add address to my PAB (it does not do it) so I manually add the email address to the PAB but still no good. What the heck am I missing? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permission to send the message?
Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
That box is hidden from the Global Address list. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Fill in the From line with the name of the NDR mailbox. For example, when I forward mail it always comes from internet mail. You can also use postmaster or whatever. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
Is there a way to set it up, and leave the mailbox hidden? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Fill in the From line with the name of the NDR mailbox. For example, when I forward mail it always comes from internet mail. You can also use postmaster or whatever. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
Under the Default SMTP Virtual Server Properties, I set Send copy of Non-Delivery Report to: with the mailbox I wanted. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? I'm curious...How did you set it up to capture all undeliverable mail? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
I had it set up on Exchange 5.5, but I don't remember where. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Is that only available in exchange2000? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Permission to send the message? Under the Default SMTP Virtual Server Properties, I set Send copy of Non-Delivery Report to: with the mailbox I wanted. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? I'm curious...How did you set it up to capture all undeliverable mail? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
There is no other way other than Unhide this mailbox? I had it hidden, but the upper management didn't want it visible. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? So unhide it. If someone sends mail to it, delete it. Tell them to cut it out. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? That box is hidden from the Global Address list. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Fill in the From line with the name of the NDR mailbox. For example, when I forward mail it always comes from internet mail. You can also use postmaster or whatever. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission to send the message?
SMTP didn't work for me either. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Can you not use the SMTP address of the mailbox (which resolves even to hidden mailboxes)? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? To send as, I don't believe so. Why does management care what mailboxes your system uses to run itself anyway? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? There is no other way other than Unhide this mailbox? I had it hidden, but the upper management didn't want it visible. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? So unhide it. If someone sends mail to it, delete it. Tell them to cut it out. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? That box is hidden from the Global Address list. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Fill in the From line with the name of the NDR mailbox. For example, when I forward mail it always comes from internet mail. You can also use postmaster or whatever. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
RE: Permission to send the message?
That's just how my management is...lol Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? To send as, I don't believe so. Why does management care what mailboxes your system uses to run itself anyway? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? There is no other way other than Unhide this mailbox? I had it hidden, but the upper management didn't want it visible. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? So unhide it. If someone sends mail to it, delete it. Tell them to cut it out. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? That box is hidden from the Global Address list. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Fill in the From line with the name of the NDR mailbox. For example, when I forward mail it always comes from internet mail. You can also use postmaster or whatever. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Permission to send the message?
It would be great to be able to put the original address in the Resend field so that when the users do a reply the NDR Mailbox doesn't get the reply. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? Okay, ESM. SMTP virtual server. Properties Messages Copies of NDR to: Now open that mailbox in Outlook. You'll see all your undeliverables, showing as simply could not be reached. Preview pane doesn't show the message or anything. OPEN the message. You'll see a button that says send again. This will expose the message. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, February 07, 2002 09:45 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Permission to send the message? Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? OK, me and mis-communication...what I want is those pesky emails that someone tries to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which IS A BAD ADDRESS. I get the report, but in 5.5 I used to also get the email attached, but in E2K I don't, so I can't open it up and send it :) How do I go about getting those again? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? You mean E2k? Open 'em up in Outlook and hit send again. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, February 07, 2002 09:41 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Permission to send the message? Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? I haven't seen the option in W2K to actually capture emails that are undeliverable. Where might I find that option? I get the reports that say, Can't find user but not the actual email they were sending to that user. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? In 5.5, there's no option to capture all undeliverable mail, just to receive copies of NDRs. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission to send the message? I'm curious...How did you set it up to capture all undeliverable mail? -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Permission to send the message? Exchange 2000 SP1. Microsoft Outlook 2000 SR1a Clients. I have a hidden mailbox called NDR. This is where I send all undeliverable mail, ones that aren't address correctly and what nots. I have it set up so that I can access this mailbox and look that all the undeliverable mail. When I open the mail and do a Send again, it gives me the option to correct the email addressee, but if I try to put the address of the sender in the Resend From folder I get the following error: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the specified user. How can I get this taken changed, or where I can put from the NDR rather than, this message was was sent from my mailbox. I don't want to unhide the mailbox ndr unless I have to. If I do have to unhide that mailbox, can I set it so that no one can email to it without effecting the undeliverable? If so, what settings do I need to set. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: Backup
Question about backup : Each time you restore the IS to the recovery server, and pull the mail to a PST, does this make that mailbox unable to take advantage of the Single instance storage? Ron -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup No, it isn't. Read the FAQ's. Specifically, read the Ed Crowley Never Restore method. It is good advice for anyone and a sound practice as well. Combining Deleted Items Retention with hiding mailboxes for a set period of time will all but nullify the need to ever restore a mailbox. I have been with my company for over 2 years, and have not yet ever had to restore a mailbox. I keep a test server just in case, and I test restores every once in a while, but that is it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: WG: Backup You are right friends, I am doing a brick level backup. I also backup DS and IS. The key in here is that I have *not* an adequate test machine for recovering single mailboxes. So, correct me if I'm wrong or if I oversee something relevant, brick level backup is the only way for me, isn't it?! And, no unfortunately I won't get the bucks for a similar test machine ;- ((( Greetings Steffen -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Steck, Steffen M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2002 08:24 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: Backup Hi there, I am having probs with the backup of my XCNG 5.5 Sp4 on NT4Sp6. I have a priv.edb of approximately 23 GB size. Besides is only the OS and little more (antivirus etc) on the machine. The machine itself is a P3 Xeon with 500 Mhz and 512 MB RAM. It has an DLT 80 and uses backup software Veritas Backup Exec Multiserver 7.3. The problem: The backup of the Exchange Mailboxes lasts 12 hours, the whole filesystem (27 GB) is being taped in half an hour. Why does take so long to read out the mailboxes of the information store? Anybody seen this or any idea? Thx in advance Steffen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
In trying to fully understand I have a question: You said if 2 of the three were there, I can recover to pre-crash. Full backup and log files - I can see that. Database and log files - ok (im assuming it will replay the last good log file) But what about the Full backup and a good database volume? If my transaction logs are gone, I can only restore to my last good log file on the tape right? If so, my restore would not be up to the point of crash. Right? Wrong? I'm just trying to test what I THINK I know to be true. Straighten me out please. :) Ron -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As long as you have 2 of the 3 following items, you're 100% fine: -intact Database volume -intact log volume -intact copy of the last full Exchange aware backup With any 2 of those 3, you can recover your system to precrash considition with no committed data lost. Differentials are a waste of time for Exchange in 99% of all cases. SQL-esque databases are a different story, but that's another forum entirely Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of failure it is still possible to lose the entire server, isn't it? And if it is, the logs you are so fond of referring to will be about as useful as your sarcasm. If you ever have the misfortune to work for lawyers you will find that there are certain things you do and deal with and a full system daily backup which is as up-to-date as possible is an absolute requirement. That is the reason that I am asking and why I feel my use of differentials is warranted. If I am not mistaken, a tape of any sort is only going to be as useful as the last information written to it if that is the only source of data, is it not? Therefore, a full server crash in the late afternoon with only last night's full backup leaves you SOL for almost a full day's work. However, if I am incorrect in my assumption that a tape which contains a full backup along with differential backups will allow me to rebuild my server completely and restore it to the point of the last differential then I would honestly be interested in hearing why. Furthermore, if there is a way to restore and roll the logs should the server that the logs were on be completely dead using just a full backup from the night before than I retract all sarcasm on my part and look forward to hearing how that process would work. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/B ackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2k recovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so of crash time rather than the previous night. -Original Message- From: McGilligan, Sean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange David, First,I would read
RE: OT- info on automated reboot of server
I have a Citrix server that needs reboots each morning to be sure the clients can log in. I keep forgetting to reboot it, and they call cryin'! So, if I set it up to reboot automatically, I don't have to worry about it. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT- info on automated reboot of server I have to ask, why??? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT- info on automated reboot of server Had a off topic quickie for those who know: Where can I find info about getting, and setting up and automated reboot of a server? I know there are scheduling programs out there that do this. Is this the best bet for scheduling a server to reboot each morning at 5am? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: detecting an Exchange server on the Network
Thanks to everyone. I will forward y'alls info to him. I'm sure he can get what he needs from this. I told him to march over to that location in that city and see for himself! Then I told him he needed policies in place to keep this stuff from happening in the future when other remote sites connect to his network. We will see what he does. Thanks again, Ron -Original Message- From: Stewart Jump [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: detecting an Exchange server on the Network Why not look for the default shared directory's on all Exchange servers. Address seems to be there as a visible share on 5.5 and 2000 servers. As for how you limit your scan to just servers I'm not sure but a scan of all IP addresses on the suspect network shouldn't take to long. However what use is an email server if you refuse to accept connections from it and block all email to and from it (BOFH rules!) If you do this then they will have to talk to you before putting real users on this server. Regrds Stewart Jump -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 January 2002 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: detecting an Exchange server on the Network Is there a way to find out if there is an exchange Server on a network without knowing its name or IP? I have someone who wants to see if a user/admin at another location is setting up email without his knowledge. I was thinking maybe use RPC-ping, but having never used it, I'm not sure if that would work or not, since he doesn't know ip address or name. Anyone have a good way? Network sniffer, scanning for SMTP traffic? This might work..but I think he wants to catch the server before it gets to that stage. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
recover from crash
Scenario: You come in one morning, reboot the exchange server, and it never comes back up, blue screens or whatever. It crashes. Question: What do you do FIRST to try to bring it back up? What do you do Second if that doesn't work? At what point do you go for the recovery server, and your backup tape? I was looking through the disaster recovery paper and its great...but I didn't see what to do before the backup server plan. It has tons of switches and command line tools, but im looking for elementary type notes When it crashes, try ERD first and run repair, if that doesn't work try... Stuff like that. IF the server boots, I found lots of info on error messages and the likes to try to get the IS started etc..but nothing if its basically dead. I know, this is something I should have learned long ago, but point me to the site, or papers where I can get this and I can move past this embarrassment! Thanks! Ron Oh and I found this in the archives: When your Exchange server crashed, most likely you need restore it from the tape. It is time consuming. But, If you have a clean and working dir.edb stored somewhere else, you don't need to restore it from the tape, just copy it back! So when your Exchange server is in a good condition, copy the dir.edb file to a save location such as another server, or your SAN. Is it the dir.edb that causes the crash? And does this copy tip work most of the time? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hide recipient but allow access internally
I have an email account that is used as a deposit email account (resumes). This email box will be used by multiple people to view its contents and forward manually as needed. I do not want users internally to be able to see this in the GAL and yet I need to be able to open the inbox from other users. Can this be done? The exchange 5.5 hide from GAL will not allow users to open. Regards, Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCanmail and MTA
Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SCanmail and MTA
Yes, it does. I just unchecked it. The DL was our Global DL, that has all 600 employees in it. Probably gave scanmail a sucker punch. :) -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Does 3.52 have the option to disable the avapi? I could see the mapi scanning alone failing under DL load. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Well, that worked. I sent it through, and it blocked the extension .com. I renamed it to no extension, and it said it couldn't be cleaned, and moved it to my quarantine folder. Wonder if my server hiccupped during that huge DL email? Well, I learned about using eicar today...so I can go home now. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Exactly!! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Try sending through a copy of eicar.com. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ok, thanks. I'm confused as to how that Marker virus to go to our users. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA If you are using 3.52 then you are using the AVAPI, this would cause the message to be scanned as it is written to the store (in this case it would be as it is going into the outbox), so it would be scanned before being sent (so who the message is addressed to wouldn't matter). Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Ya..I called the tech line, and it said they were closed until Jan 2nd! *shrug* I have the 3.52 version, and its being sent as #1 described. Would that internal email be scanned? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SCanmail and MTA Trend is /closed/ for the holidays?! What version of ScanMail are you running and how is the message being sent?[1] [1] Via Outlook with the Exchange service? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SCanmail and MTA Quick question for you all, as Trend is closed for the holidays. Scan mail scans all emails coming from the IMC. What if a user inside the company sends a virus (marker-gen in this case) to a DL. Will/should scan mail pick up that virus when its used by the IS or MTA? Or will this only be detected by the client AV solution? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAV for Exchange 5.5
Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
It was twice. And I know...twice it too many as well. Both times, there was user error on my and the helpdesk end...so I can't blame it on scanmail. If I'm forced to go with NAV, then I will just have to grin and bear it. Who knows it might turn out to be a chicken fried steak with mashed taters and green beans for us. Time will tell. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 So your solution with a few outbreaks is better than NAV? We use NAV and have had none. Not even close. I just watch the stuff get ditched into the quarantine.Sounds like I'm eating well-prepared ground beef and you're eating wormy prime rib. I've never had a crashed server, never had a blue screen, etc. So far, you make a good case for moving off of your preferred solution. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:43 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Haha! no, everything is on a rack server now..mo gigage processor, and rammage! This server made all the difference in the world with my environment. I was giving scanmail a bike to run a car race back then. :) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 You're running W2K Adv. Server on a P-133??? I seriously doubt that! D Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Oops sorry! Great list Martin! :) I forgot about the first line of Don's email that gave you credit for it. The Martin Blackstone list of attachments to block... If it were a snake it would have bit me..ouch! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all would know best. Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
Normally, if the handshake to the cable guy has a 20 dollar bill attached to it, you will get your cable as a secret for freewait..oh,cabal not cable! Sorry! -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I think he meant the Secret Cabal handshake. Oh wait, there is no Secret Cabal. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 ::High Five:: -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 We ain't huggin! ;o) How about a secret handshake or something? D Incompetence: When you Earnestly Believe you can compensate for a lack of skill by doubling your efforts, there's no end to what you can't do. - - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Id give you a big hug if it wouldn't be all awkward, then would have to punch each other to maintain a manly appearance. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Sorry bud, but you're likely to make Martin mad since it's his list. Though everyone's should look about the same with varying differences here and there. D Saving the world from Brick Level Backups and PST's - Ed Crowley -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I am using that, and got file blocking really tricked out with Don Ely's list of attachments to block! Thanks for everyone's input. I will try to talk then into keeping scanmail, and using NAV for servers and clients as a compromise. If they don't go for it, I will hope for a trouble free system like Tom and James have(but will keep Scanmail handy just incase) Thanks! Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Using AVAPI and File Blocking? If not, you should be. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I have version 3.52 with 5.5 sp4 on a Win2k Advanced server SP2. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Ron, what version of Scanmail are you running and what SP is your Exch server on? -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 I feel the same way. I really researched for the best solution back then, and scanmail it has proven to be great...no crashed servers, no bluescreens etc. We did have a few outbreaks, but that was I think due to scanmail being on a P-133 and not being able to keep up with the influx. IF I can build a strong enough case against NAV for scanning...and just do the server/client side solution only, that would be great. I almost want to install it, and have things crash for them not asking me about this...but IM the one that has to recover the thing! :( Ron -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground round Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot down on this and fight it all the way to the top. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 Hi Folks, I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as I did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for Exchange? I couldn't really
RE: Does anyone know...
There are many lurkers in the Lake County burbs. :p Ron Jameson James Hamlin Consulting Libertyville -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of K. Triona Guidry Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know... A Lake Zurich lurker here... I didn't realize this list had a Lake County residency requirement. :) At 03:56 PM 12/12/2001 -0600, Hunter, Lori wrote: Deerfield, actually. We're neighbors! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Does anyone know... Then maybe the solution is to make the new Exchange server the Proxy server also and make it the exit point. That is do-able over a weekend. Lori, you're in Chicago, huh? I'm in Buffalo Grove. BTW, thanks for all this. Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server why, why me
Check your RAM. Had a same problem happening every night at various times. Replaced the RAM and all was back to normal. You can try to reseat the RAM also and that may help. Ron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server why, why me Came into work today and my exchange server 5.5 on windows nt sp6 was not responding. I dont know how this happened, the only thing that was on the desktop was the cursor and wallpaper no icons or start menu. I tried to press Ctrl alt del and nothing happened. Couldnt get the server to respond for some reason. The cusor would move when I moved the mouse and thats it so I pressed the big button. The server is up and running fine now and I check the event viewer and the only thing it gave me back was an unexpected shutdown occoured at 11:46pm. Did this ever happen to anyone before. All thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Header Only
The senders settings? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet Header Only Look at the headers. See this one? X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: and this one? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 Your user has a setting that is screwing things up. Regardless of what your IMS setting looks like, you ARE sending out RTF/TNEF. - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:11 PM Subject: RE: Internet Header Only It is set to Provide Message Body as Plain Text under Message Format and under Advanced it is Never use Rich-Text Exchange Format. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Internet Header Only You're sending out mail with RTF codes. This gets encoded into TNEF and very few (vanishingly few) 3rd-party mail clients can unravel it. The setting is in the IMC (forget the exact location). - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:07 AM Subject: Internet Header Only When sending mail to someone not on our Exchange server they are only getting The Internet Header. For Example: --- Internet Header Sender: Received: from [208.47.92.210] ([208.47.92.210]) by siaag2ad.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) with SMTP id LAA17265 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:02:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from no.name.available by [208.47.92.210] via smtpd (for siaag2ad.compuserve.com [149.174.40.134]) with SMTP; 21 Nov 2001 15:57:07 UT Return-Receipt-To: X XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com Subject: Test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:02:42 -0600 Disposition-Notification-To: X X mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Test Thread-Index: AcFypfH83gW8X95SEdWAPQgAWqZZjg== From: XX XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com To: XXX XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @compuserve.com Cc: Crumbaker, Ron mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] But it is only from one person. He can receive mail from other people. Any suggestions? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help to create a multipart (application/xml and text) message from ASP page
I need help in creating a multipart (application/xml and text) message using CDONTS in an ASP page. I need to generate a two part message which is created in VBScript inside the ASP page that I can then send through CDONTS.Session to a contact database. Can this be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Header Only
When sending mail to someone not on our Exchange server they are only getting The Internet Header. For Example: --- Internet Header Sender: Received: from [208.47.92.210] ([208.47.92.210]) by siaag2ad.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) with SMTP id LAA17265 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:02:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from no.name.available by [208.47.92.210] via smtpd (for siaag2ad.compuserve.com [149.174.40.134]) with SMTP; 21 Nov 2001 15:57:07 UT Return-Receipt-To: X XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com Subject: Test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:02:42 -0600 Disposition-Notification-To: X X mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Test Thread-Index: AcFypfH83gW8X95SEdWAPQgAWqZZjg== From: XX XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @mpdinc.com To: XXX XX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] @compuserve.com Cc: Crumbaker, Ron mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] But it is only from one person. He can receive mail from other people. Any suggestions? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LDAP for Address books?
Thanks! If this will work with Windows 2000 Advanced..This might be exactly what I need! -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: LDAP for Address books? Inter-org synch tool on BORK 2nd edition. Q198789 -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: LDAP for Address books? I have a sister company with their own Exchange server 5.5 sp4 on Win2k. They now want to connect to my exchange server, 5.5 on win2k to only share address books. What would be the best way to accomplish this? I was thinking LDAP, and have them search for names in my GAL, but you have to touch each Client to get this configured. What I am looking for is a way to add their GAL to my GAL and vise-versa, without doing a site connector or anything? When they click on address book, they have the option of choosing my GAL or their GAL to find a name. Is this possible, and if so, is there a good step by step place I can go for the info? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Block Mail from certain sites?
How do you block mail from @WhateverIwant.com? I am using E2k SP1 and I can't find the menu that allows me to accept or reject messages. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Pop mail Configuration guide
Where can I read about configuring a pop3 client for Exchange 2k? I also need to find out how to configure the Exchange 2000 server. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Typical Settings
What are the typical settings on MailBox rights for users and admins on E2k SP1. How can you remove Everyone from the list? Where can you change these setting? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Typical Settings
That is what I am trying to find out. I had someone point this out to me and now I see that Everyone is in there. However, when I try to remove it, it says it is inherited from the parent. I can't seem to remove it...if I remove it, will the users still have access to their mailboxes, or do I need to add them each to their own mailbox? Thank you, Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Typical Settings Everyone does not typically have allowed rights to mailboxes. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Typical Settings What are the typical settings on MailBox rights for users and admins on E2k SP1. How can you remove Everyone from the list? Where can you change these setting? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mdbdata files?
I am having this directory fill up with log files. Are these log files able to be deleted? The dates range from 8/12/2001 to 10/22/01 There are 6.9 Gig worth of log files. Is there anything I need to do to prevent this? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mdbdata files?
It's Exchange 2K. Forgot that part. Sorry. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mdbdata files? I am having this directory fill up with log files. Are these log files able to be deleted? The dates range from 8/12/2001 to 10/22/01 There are 6.9 Gig worth of log files. Is there anything I need to do to prevent this? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Setting ??
I am wanting to set up our Exchange 2000 server so that it will allow mail to come into it and then forward mail over to our AS/400 For example all mail that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] go to the AS/400 and then be delivered to the terminal. All mail that is [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] go to mailbox. How can I do this? Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange on a Netware network
I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
With sticking to GW Zen, if I remember correctly - doesn't Zen offer software deployment which would help in the GW client deployment to the Macs and Intel's? I am looking for a time slot to deploy the Zen Gw in their network. I am intimately familiar with exchange deployments but have not done a GW without consultants on contract. I am bidding on this particular project. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on a Netware network
Sorry about the brain burn on the Novell topic. Mine is smoking now too. Trying to build a case for recommending them into MS territory but it is hard; being that the price of the software is not too much an issue when they are academic and the cost is minimal when it comes to their discounts. It is mainly consulting time for deployment and ease of administering. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network You guys are hurting my brain, making me remember all this Netware stuff. Kevinm WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA ~~~ All spelling and Factual errors are the fault of Bob Barker ~~~ This space has been rented by: Http://www.tiggercam.co.uk For all your tigger needs You 2 can rent this space if you need it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network You don't even need Zenworks do automate the GroupWise install. They have an unattended install file which you can insert into the login script and you're done. Check the support knowledgebase at support.novell.com. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: October 1, 2001 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Zen 3 certainly does, Zen 2 does as well but we found it wasn't as reliable as 3. -Original Message- From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 2 October 2001 1:48 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network With sticking to GW Zen, if I remember correctly - doesn't Zen offer software deployment which would help in the GW client deployment to the Macs and Intel's? I am looking for a time slot to deploy the Zen Gw in their network. I am intimately familiar with exchange deployments but have not done a GW without consultants on contract. I am bidding on this particular project. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange on a Netware network Stay with GroupWise 6 and Zenworks not Managewise. Managewise functionality was rolled into Zenworks anyways. GroupWise integrates directly with NDS the way Exchange does with W2K. If they have Netware servers they should stick with GW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Jameson Sent: October 1, 2001 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange on a Netware network I have a client running Netware 5.1 with 250 win2k client pc's and 125 apple macs. We are recommending management software and email. I personally advise against Novell at this moment and wish to push the exchange 2000 in the NetWare network in addition to Intel LANDesk instead of Novell's manage wise. Has anyone had good success marrying exchange 2000 into a NetWare environment or even experience with Intel's LANDesk? Will exchange work at a member on it's own 2000 platform or must there also be the 2000 domain controller? It appears Tivoli or open view did not support the Apple Mac's but LANDesk did which is the reason for that choice. Unfortunately, if the client wishes to remain a Novell shop, they will probably opt for the second choice which is GroupWise and manage wise running both on NetWare. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE - This e-mail is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. You may not use any information contained in it. Legal privilege is not waived because you have read this e
What are these reports telling me?
I get these reports in my inbox and I want to just verify I understand what they are. Are these spam attempts that my exchange server is not relaying? Does everyone on this list get similar messages? I just want to be sure I don't have a problem that my ignorance isn't letting me see. I have relaying turned on for the GPEX server, but have entries set for Inbound only. Thanks! Ron Example 1- The following recipients did not receive the attached mail. Reasons are listed with each recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSEXCH:IMS:Republic Beverage Company:NORTH:GPEX 3902 (000B099C) Host Unknown The message that caused this notification was: Example 2- A mail message was not sent due to a protocol error. 550 REQUESTED ACTION NOT TAKEN: DNS FAILURE The message that caused this notification was: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
The force flows from within, you must concentrate on what surrounds you. Be mindful of the future, but not at the cost of the present. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Seriously...can someone be my tech buddy? And show me the true Exchange Jedi powers? :) John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Would you be my tech buddy? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I forgot who my tech buddy is -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Hey! Get off my Tech Buddy! Only I am allowed to harass him. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC The link to more information on the MEC can be found at either of my websites -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org -- - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:43 PM Subject: RE: MEC What is MEC?? -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard anything yet . . . - Original Message - From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM Subject: RE: MEC Yes. Still on. Here is what I got from them: September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world. Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible tragedy. As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy. The reopening of the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic activities of our nation. After long consideration, we have decided to move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th through October 4th as scheduled. Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we strongly believe that national and international air transportation, hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the MEC 2001 conference opens. All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions and special events will take place as scheduled. We are working closely with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security measure is in place. All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our lives full of pride in our values and our country. Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sincerely, The MEC 2001 Team Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
nimda virus changes on me
Well, I just put in a 24 hour shift to patch the ol' web, email, main and terminal servers in one form or another and clean up 30 workstations. Was a little too late in the blocking of all .exe files on the sybari but I think this one entered thru the front web door on a client PC hitting an infected web site. Odd - two of the PC's out of the 30 were REALLY infected so as I could not repair. I need to format these boxes. Has anyone seen this virus change or morph into other executables other that the noted ones (riched20.dll, readme.exe, load.exe, modified system.ini, plus several other windows programs)? Regards, Ron Jameson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Form not updating.
Had the same problem here (forms cache corruption). Ended up touching each workstation by deleting the forms cache folder on local pc, then opening up outlook contacts (do NOT open an actual contact yet), click on tools, forms, choose form (to apply to the current contact list database), organizational forms (or wherever your form is) and double click that. You will see the form download quickly to your PC and that does it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Yes it has been removed from my personal forms folder -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Have you removed it from your Personal Forms Library like Serdar mentioned? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. I followed the procedures for clearing my forms cache, but when I opened the form after again changing it. It was still the same as before the change. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Form not updating. Do a search on Technet for Forms Cache Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Form not updating. We have a form that resides in our Organizational Forms Library that we are constantly updating, but for some reason everytime I make a change and then subsequently re-publish the form, the next time I open up the form it is the same as before I made any changes. It has happened several times now, and there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason in which it would do this. Does anyone have any suggestions on why this would happen. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exmerge - Copying PST to Mailbox
Ok, done...but still no mailboxes show up in exmerge. Reason?: I do not think the old mailbox is deleted, or effected...so I think the message I sent went to the original mailbox. Possible? When doing this, once I get the PST, should I delete the original mailbox..THEN create a new one on the new server? I didn't do this because I want to be sure EXMERGE brought everything over before I delete the old box. -Original Message- From: Schuessler, Bob (Efdsouth) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exmerge - Copying PST to Mailbox Send a message to the new mailbox. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 03:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exmerge - Copying PST to Mailbox Hi Folks, I'm messing with EXMERGE,and have a question that I can seem to narrow down in my searches. I have a new W2K server with a fresh install of 5.5 on it. -I pulled my test mailbox from another site to a PST. All seems ok. - I created a mailbox of the same name on the new server. - Attempted to merge pst to new mailbox, but it show 0 mailboxes on the new server to merge to. Is this a replication issue? I did KCC, and dir replication, and still no mailbox. But under the new server in the rec container I see it.?. Any hints, tips, or links? (I read through Q265441 but it didn't go into the PST to mailbox steps). Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help
I have some people that we forward mail to their AOL account. They are receiving mail, but it is broken up into parts (winmail.dat format) How can I stop this? This was not the case with Exchange 5.5. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help
I've tried. However, they are high on the food chain and I can't make them budge. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help Stop them forwarding mail to AOL? Tell them to get real e-mail. That was easy. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help I have some people that we forward mail to their AOL account. They are receiving mail, but it is broken up into parts (winmail.dat format) How can I stop this? This was not the case with Exchange 5.5. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Question
Thanks Jason, That was what I needed. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Jason Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Question I believe this is in the System Manager -- Expand the Server -- then expand -- Protocols -- then expand SMTP -- then right click on Default SMTP virtual server and go to Properties and you can find the setting under Messages Jason -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Question I just moved everyone of my users to our new Exchange 2000 Server. How do you make Exchange send an email to the Exchange Administrator or some other mailbox for mail that was not addressed correctly. For example, if someone send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to be able to forward this mail to the correct person. In Exchange 5.5, I was able to do this, but I can't seem to find this setting in Exchange 2000. Clients are using Outlook 2000. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Question
I just moved everyone of my users to our new Exchange 2000 Server. How do you make Exchange send an email to the Exchange Administrator or some other mailbox for mail that was not addressed correctly. For example, if someone send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to be able to forward this mail to the correct person. In Exchange 5.5, I was able to do this, but I can't seem to find this setting in Exchange 2000. Clients are using Outlook 2000. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
blocking internet access (OT)
Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: blocking internet access (OT)
Haha...this is funny. I used the kid as an example but it is , in a way, to keep kids out of the net. Its in a youth area of our Church, and they want the Adults to be able to access the internet, but not the youth. And keep the lock down method simple for the Adults who are not that great on computers. That's it in a nutshell. The boot password would be good, but the youth need to use the apps on the Pc. I didn't think Zone alarm had passwords..but I might have missed it. (I will download it here at work and see). I like the script idea...But it would say GOD says no internet instead of Dad...hehe. I could change the DNS numbers, but I really don't want them going in and changing things like that when they need access. I got a tip that Norton Internet Security can do it, so I'm looking into that, and a current version of Zone alarm for passwords. Thanks for the OT help! Ron -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) No, removed from his will, the familial equivalent g -Original Message- From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) And if he does it again, does he get fired? LJ -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) I second that emotion. In this case a simple No should suffice. If it doesn't, a boot password on the machine should do the trick. -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Is it time yet for Ed to chime in with There are no technological solutions to behavioral problems? :-) -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Doesn't ZoneAlarm Pro have password protection for settings? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) Or you could compile a little VB app called IE.exe that pops up a GIANT dialog box saying Dad said NO Internet and drop it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access (OT) Subject: blocking internet access (OT) Thanks for those that read this even though its OT. It's a quickie... I need to block access to the internet from my pc, but be able to use it when *I* want to. ( Parent kid issue). Zone alarm would be perfect, but if I use it to do not allow IE to access the internet, all that needs to be done is open ZA, and click allow it. If ZA could be password protected it would be perfect. Anyone have a link or suggestion? Does Programs like Net nanny do this or just limit WHERE they can go? Thanks! Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000
Replicate is what I meant to say. Sorry. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: mike hagerty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi Ron. what do you mean by do a replace from within there replace what?? thanks Crumbaker, Ron wrote: Go into AD Services and Sites and Under one of your domain controllers, Click on the NTDS Settings. Then you should see the automatically generated for each of the Domain Controllers. Now Right Click on each of them and do a Replicate Now. Go into Exchange Manager and then do a Replace from within there. It should work. I just did this process this weekend. Good Luck. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mike Hagerty Prairie iNet www.prairieinet.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with Undeliverable
The new exchange server was installed in our domain. Our Exchange 5.5 server was OFF the network, in a closest. Never brought online during or since the installation of 2000. Our new Org Name is MPDINC on E2K. ForestPrep and DomainPrep was ran on the E2k machine. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable I really thought the comma was an invalid character for an E2K org name[1]... Did someone use your production AD for testing of E2K betas at any point? The only way I could see that not generating an error during Exchange setup would be if someone had run forestprep and/or domainprep with a version of E2K prior to RC2. Did this ever work? When and how was this new Exchange 2000 install completed exactly? [1]So I double checked, and it is... Q289671. -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable The comma was from the old 55 setup. Yes, it happens on all replies of anyone internal to our system. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with Undeliverable I didn't think a comma was a valid character for an org name in E2K Interesting. Is this a server added to an existing organization or a pristine E2K install? How was the original message addressed? Is this happening with all replies? * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 * -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help with Undeliverable I installed a New Exchange 2000 and now when someone replies to an internal email we are getting Undeliverable Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. The following recipients(s) could not reached: /0=MPD, Inc./OU=Domain1/CN=Recipients/CN=User_Name on 8/14/2001 The email address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again. exchange.ourdomainname.com #5.1.0 Any suggestions on how to add this in Exchange 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
