RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-04 Thread William Lefkovics

um... 21.6KBps.

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I'm connected from home at a 21,600KBps dial up right now, connected to an
exchange server 3800km away.

The mailboxes are not moving through your connection at home.  I would
assume the exchange servers that you move the mailboxes between are on the
LAN together.

William

I also don't watch basketball.  I was, however, watching play-by-play online
of Mario winning the Milan-San Remo.  



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


You live in the USA, I live in Italy.  You have a fast connection from home,
I do not.

You watch basketball, I watch soccer.  :-)

You do it your way, I do it mine!

Your mailboxes take little time to move (it seems), mine would take in
excess of 1 day.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home 
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-04 Thread CHRIS H

Thats exactly what I did; worked like a charm! Especially the play-wrestle
with my wife!

You cannot create experience. You must undergo it.
 Albert Camus (1913-1960); French writer and philosopher


- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:38 AM
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Overtime?

 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected over
the
 VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes and select move mailbox
 and return to the NCAA basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you
 select the next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for awhile.  Select
the
 next block, and it's dinnertime.



 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly
 move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over
several
 days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the
 job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, and
 if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  Actually my method is
the
 off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore.


  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
  them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to
  the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a
  weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out,
  would be much less risky.
 
  Tris
 
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
  organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a
  small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before
  users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move
  users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some
  time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each
  and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of
   minutes.
  
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
Over 500.
   
Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the
 latter easier.

  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-04 Thread Scott Lounder

I moved 650+ mailboxes in a weekend.  Our limit is 75MB per mailbox, and
most people hover between 50MB and 70MB.  I just dialed in, started a remote
session to one server, selected 100 mailboxes started the move and closed
the session.  About once an hour I would dial back in and check on it.

I watched the entire 4th Season of the X-Files the entire time :)

! Scott Lounder  !
Systems Engineering/1801 Main/3d Floor/Renaissance Tower
Direct 713-232-6201   Cell 281-541-6061
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I just finished doing the exact same thing and the only thing I didnt like
about the forklift method of moving my mailboxes is that I was bringing my
old database along for the ride. I did the move mailbox procedure, for about
250 mailboxes and it took me 3 Sundays. I just terminal servered into the
server at 12 midnight Saturday and let it chug along until Midnight Sunday.
Worked great.

You cannot create experience. You must undergo it.
 Albert Camus (1913-1960); French writer and philosopher


- Original Message -
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:52 AM
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
 opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
 between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of
time
 to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.
Try
 moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
 it takes longer than a backup and restore.

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around
  30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would
  likely be only a matter of minutes.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Over 500.
  
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
  
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
   
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the
latter easier.
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.

 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of
 steps to doing it the right way.

 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA


  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange
  Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
  Information Store and Directory Store.
 
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
   watch out for?
 
  Thanks in advance for you help.
 
  Regards

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-04 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

By the way, when moving a mailbox, do any of you ever check first to see
whether the user is logged in ??  I always do (which greatly slows the
moving of mailboxes) because in the past I've noticed that users that get
moved, while being logged in, leave bad records in the database so that they
then appear in the information store of both servers!  It doesn't seem to
create any problems, but it makes me uneasy to see a mailbox appear that
way.

I agree that the forklift method does take your garbage along with you.  If
I have a database with minor corruptions, then I would definitely go for the
move mailbox.

 -Original Message-
 From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 04 April 2002 20:59
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I just finished doing the exact same thing and the only thing 
 I didnt like about the forklift method of moving my 
 mailboxes is that I was bringing my old database along for 
 the ride. I did the move mailbox procedure, for about 250 
 mailboxes and it took me 3 Sundays. I just terminal servered 
 into the server at 12 midnight Saturday and let it chug along 
 until Midnight Sunday. Worked great.
 
 You cannot create experience. You must undergo it.
  Albert Camus (1913-1960); French writer and philosopher
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:52 AM
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and 
  so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
  mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That 
 does not give 
  a lot of
 time
  to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
  time.
 Try
  moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I 
 think you'll 
  find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a 
 Friday and 
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
  
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
Over 500.
   
Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move 
 method and it works fine, but the downside is that it 
 can take 
 months to move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of 
 them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.

  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
  Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well 
 developed set 
  of steps to doing it the right way.
 
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Peregrine Systems
  Atlanta, GA
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
   hardware.  I am
   restoring from an online backup and will 
 basically install 
   everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
Exchange

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly
move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several
days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the
job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, and
if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  Actually my method is the
off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore.


 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move 
 them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
 the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
 weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
 would be much less risky.
 
 Tris
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server 
 Move method 
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take 
 months to 
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well 
 developed set of
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange
  Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
  Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
   watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  
   _
  List posting FAQ

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Tristan Gayford

Maybe different outlook on things - in my site while the workers are here
9-5, access to mail is from off site as well and the thought of
disconnecting them for a day, even at weekends, would be unacceptable. In
your situation, it obviously is acceptable.

-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 09:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly
move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several
days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the
job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, and
if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  Actually my method is the
off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore.


 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
 them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
 the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
 weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
 would be much less risky.
 
 Tris
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
 months to
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well
 developed set of
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

Correct!  We don't have any problems scheduling downtime for week-ends on an
occasional basis, especially if the outcome for the users concerned is a
faster server afterwards!

 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:31
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Maybe different outlook on things - in my site while the 
 workers are here 9-5, access to mail is from off site as well 
 and the thought of disconnecting them for a day, even at 
 weekends, would be unacceptable. In your situation, it 
 obviously is acceptable.
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 09:23
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching 
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move 
 them, a bit 
  of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. 
 Plus with 
  only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no 
 impact to the 
  end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and 
  so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
  mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That 
 does not give 
  a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 
 100 MB can 
  take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
  each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
  restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a 
 Friday and 
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
  
  Read the FAQ (Link

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread William Lefkovics

Overtime?

You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected over the
VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes and select move mailbox
and return to the NCAA basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you
select the next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then
select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for awhile.  Select the
next block, and it's dinnertime.



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes slowly
move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of overtime, over several
days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the
job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, and
if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  Actually my method is the
off-line copy and quicker still than doing a backup and restore.


 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move 
 them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
 the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
 weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
 would be much less risky.
 
 Tris
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server 
 Move method 
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take 
 months to 
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Mark Harford

And get paid for it.  Result!

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home 
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching 
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
  them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
  the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
  weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
  would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
  organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
  small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
  users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
  users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
  time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
  and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a 
 Friday and
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Tristan Gayford

Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife

-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe



-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


And get paid for it.  Result!

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move them, a bit 
  of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus 
  with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no impact 
  to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization 
  and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
  mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not 
  give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 
  MB can take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 
  30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
  restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Robert Moir

Who wins, you or Claire?

 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 And get paid for it.  Result!
 
  -Original Message-
  From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Overtime?
  
  You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected 
  over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes 
 and select 
  move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or 
 whatever.  An 
  hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog 
 for a walk.  
  Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle 
 with the wife 
  for awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes 
  slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of 
 overtime, 
  over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if 
  I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore 
  method which is quicker, and if you know what you are 
 doing, it is not 
  risky.
  Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
  than doing a backup and restore.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move 
 them, a bit
   of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus 
   with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with 
 no impact 
   to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.
   
   Tris
   
   -
   Tristan Gayford
   Deputy Systems  Network Manager
   Cranfield University at Silsoe
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization
   and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small 
 window in the 
   mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not 
   give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox 
 of, say, 100 
   MB can take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an 
 average of 
   30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a 
 backup and 
   restore.
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and
Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on 
 a LAN and 
actual impact to any single user would likely be only a 
 matter of 
minutes.

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Over 500.
 
 Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
effective, I would
  not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
the whole
  move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
   Move method
  and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
   months to
  move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
they are big.
  As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
had great

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Tristan Gayford

manly voice

Me, of course

/manly voice


-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe



-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 11:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Who wins, you or Claire?

 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 And get paid for it.  Result!
 
  -Original Message-
  From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Overtime?
  
  You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected
  over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes 
 and select
  move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or
 whatever.  An
  hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog
 for a walk.
  Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle
 with the wife
  for awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes
  slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of 
 overtime,
  over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day.  And if
  I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore 
  method which is quicker, and if you know what you are 
 doing, it is not
  risky.
  Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still
  than doing a backup and restore.
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
 them, a bit
   of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus
   with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with 
 no impact
   to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.
   
   Tris
   
   -
   Tristan Gayford
   Deputy Systems  Network Manager
   Cranfield University at Silsoe
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization 
   and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small
 window in the
   mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not
   give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox 
 of, say, 100
   MB can take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an
 average of
   30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a
 backup and
   restore.
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and
Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on
 a LAN and
actual impact to any single user would likely be only a
 matter of
minutes.

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Over 500.
 
 Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
effective, I would
  not discount the backup and restore method, where you do

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Robert Moir

Of Course!

 -Original Message-
 From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:20
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 manly voice
 
 Me, of course
 
 /manly voice
 
 
 -
 Tristan Gayford
 Deputy Systems  Network Manager
 Cranfield University at Silsoe
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:10
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Who wins, you or Claire?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  And get paid for it.  Result!
  
   -Original Message-
   From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Overtime?
   
   You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home 
 connected 
   over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes
  and select
   move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or
  whatever.  An
   hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog
  for a walk.
   Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle
  with the wife
   for awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes 
   slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing a lot of
  overtime,
   over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one 
 day.  And if 
   I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup  restore 
   method which is quicker, and if you know what you are
  doing, it is not
   risky.
   Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing 
   a backup and restore.
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
  them, a bit
of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the 
 users. Plus 
with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with
  no impact
to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.

Tris

-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization
and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small
  window in the
mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  
 That does not 
give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox
  of, say, 100
MB can take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an
  average of
30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a
  backup and
restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
   Friday and
 Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on
  a LAN and
 actual impact to any single user would likely be only a
  matter of
 minutes.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Over 500.
  
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Ray Zorz

8 to 5 in IT?  What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around
 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would
 likely be only a matter of minutes.

  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Over 500.
 
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
 effective, I would
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
 the whole
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
 they are big.
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
 had great
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
 back out of
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the
   latter easier.
  
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
   
Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of
steps to doing it the right way.
   
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
   
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
 hardware.  I am
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
 Information Store and Directory Store.

 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
  watch out for?

 Thanks in advance for you help.

 Regards,
 Didy


  _
 List posting FAQ:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
   
 _
List posting FAQ:
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   --
   
   The information contained in this email message is privileged and
   confidential information intended only for the use of the
 individual
   or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Mellott, Bill

Or you could do the Ed' method which work most excellent for me...Thx Ed 
others...
You could say move a few in the early morning..some late afternoon.
Maybe even..hold your breath...remote connect Late evening/early morning and
tell it to
move a whole lot...

Like I could Citrix in to my company then remote to my exch svr...select a
few to too many mailboxs ..say move...disconnect then come back later and
check it.

but thats just me... I like to have the dog crab the mouse and run with it
at home...and watch everything get really screwed up...
But then most of the time the dog is smarter then I am damn cleaver
dog...pretends to sleep to get out of doing things...
bill

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


8 to 5 in IT?  What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around
 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would
 likely be only a matter of minutes.

  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Over 500.
 
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
 effective, I would
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
 the whole
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
 they are big.
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
 had great
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
 back out of
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the
   latter easier.
  
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
   
Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of
steps to doing it the right way.
   
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
   
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
 hardware.  I am
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
 Information Store and Directory Store.

 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
  watch out for?

 Thanks in advance for you help.

 Regards,
 Didy


  _
 List posting FAQ:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

Exactly. VPN in, start the mailbox move, go to bed.
Wake up, coffee, crap, check mailbox move, party all day.

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Or you could do the Ed' method which work most excellent for me...Thx Ed 
others... You could say move a few in the early morning..some late
afternoon. Maybe even..hold your breath...remote connect Late
evening/early morning and tell it to move a whole lot...

Like I could Citrix in to my company then remote to my exch svr...select a
few to too many mailboxs ..say move...disconnect then come back later and
check it.

but thats just me... I like to have the dog crab the mouse and run with it
at home...and watch everything get really screwed up... But then most of the
time the dog is smarter then I am damn cleaver dog...pretends to sleep
to get out of doing things... bill

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


8 to 5 in IT?  What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
 Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
 actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
 minutes.

  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Over 500.
 
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
 effective, I would
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
 the whole
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method 
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to 
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
 they are big.
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
 had great
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
 back out of
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
   latter easier.
  
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
   
Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of 
steps to doing it the right way.
   
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
   
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
 hardware.  I am
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
 Information Store and Directory Store.

 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
  watch out for?

 Thanks in advance for you help.

 Regards,
 Didy

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Chris Scharff

I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server
5:01 PM: Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL
5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and select destination server
5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 
  30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would 
  likely be only a matter of minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server 
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take 
 months to 
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if 
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to 
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well 
 developed set of 
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange
  Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
  Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
   watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  
   _
  List posting FAQ:   
   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   
   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Andy David

5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server
5:01 PM: Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL
5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and select destination server
5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 
  30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would 
  likely be only a matter of minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server 
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take 
 months to 
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if 
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to 
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well 
 developed set of 
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange
  Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
  Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
   watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  
   _
  List posting FAQ:   
   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   
   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Akerlund, Scott

5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside. hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.  However;
I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the ECMSM.  I
don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server
5:01 PM: Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL
5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and select destination server
5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
  Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 
  30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would 
  likely be only a matter of minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server 
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take 
 months to 
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if 
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to 
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well 
 developed set of 
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

5:10PM: Get beaten up by other admins on team for buying Coors Light.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
 months to
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well
 developed set of
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
  hardware.  I am
  restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
   Exchange
  Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
  Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
   watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  
   _
  List posting FAQ:   
   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   
   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
 organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
 small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
 users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
 users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
 time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
 and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
 months to
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well
 developed set of
 steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield

The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and 
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
 Move method
and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
 months to
move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
  they are big.
As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
  had great
success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
  back out of
it.
There are also two types of move, i) using one-line

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues.
Now days I always manually kill services before shutting down. IIS, SQL,
Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
  effective, I would
not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
  the whole
move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Andy David

Which is easy since they are all on one box.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues.
Now days I always manually kill services before shutting down. IIS, SQL,
Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

One PC...

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Which is easy since they are all on one box.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues. Now days I always manually kill services before shutting
down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and 
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield

True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have had situations
whereby a server 'hangs' on shutdown and continues to respond to a ping
indefinately, but refuses to allow me to connect in any other way

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues. Now days I always manually kill services before shutting
down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and 
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Mood, Steve

If it's a WAN/LAN connection and you do indeed still receive a ping
response, I have found that the BORK tool, shutdown.exe will sometimes
recover from this situation.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have had situations
whereby a server 'hangs' on shutdown and continues to respond to a ping
indefinately, but refuses to allow me to connect in any other way

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues. Now days I always manually kill services before shutting
down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and 
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Martin Blackstone

EXACTLY

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have had situations
whereby a server 'hangs' on shutdown and continues to respond to a ping
indefinately, but refuses to allow me to connect in any other way

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back up that gets
me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since that is whrer I have always
had my issues. Now days I always manually kill services before shutting
down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc.

-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k VPN server set up
for me and some Directors to connect up with our home ADSL accounts, and I
can Dameware into the NT4 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although
nothing was required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at
home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work

However, this method of operating servers from home creates some tense
moments. Whilst working on servers located in far off places locked away in
cupboards late at night, I always get a little anxious during a reboot
watching the request timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering
whether I left a floppy in the drive

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!

-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move
it. 
5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside.
hehe

Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling.
However; I did have several accounts that did the above last time I did the
ECMSM.  I don't think you can set it and forget it, some baby sitting is
required.



-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using the ECMSM and
when measuring the amount of my time that it took to complete the move vs.
doing a backup and restore there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands
down.

5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 5:01 PM:
Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose Tools | Move Mailbox and
select destination server 5:03 PM Close door to server room on way out.

-- 
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244

When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
--Tao Te Ching 

 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and
 so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
 mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give 
 a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can 
 take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
 each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
 restore.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and 
  Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
  actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
  minutes.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Over 500.
   
   Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
   
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)

Myself, I take the cleaver away from the dog.  Never know when the little
mutt is going to sneak up on you in the middle of the night and have a whack
at your neck, for forgetting to fill his dish before you went to bed!

Jim Blunt

-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Or you could do the Ed' method which work most excellent for me...Thx Ed 
others...
You could say move a few in the early morning..some late afternoon.
Maybe even..hold your breath...remote connect Late evening/early morning and
tell it to
move a whole lot...

Like I could Citrix in to my company then remote to my exch svr...select a
few to too many mailboxs ..say move...disconnect then come back later and
check it.

but thats just me... I like to have the dog crab the mouse and run with it
at home...and watch everything get really screwed up...
But then most of the time the dog is smarter then I am damn cleaver
dog...pretends to sleep to get out of doing things...
bill

-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


8 to 5 in IT?  What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around
 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would
 likely be only a matter of minutes.

  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
  Over 500.
 
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
 effective, I would
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
 the whole
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
 they are big.
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
 had great
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
 back out of
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the
   latter easier.
  
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
   
Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of
steps to doing it the right way.
   
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
   
   
 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
 hardware.  I am
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
 Information Store and Directory Store.

 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

You live in the USA, I live in Italy.  You have a fast connection from home,
I do not.

You watch basketball, I watch soccer.  :-)

You do it your way, I do it mine!

Your mailboxes take little time to move (it seems), mine would take in
excess of 1 day.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home 
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching 
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
  them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
  the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
  weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
  would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my
  organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a 
  small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before 
  users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time to move 
  users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some 
  time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each 
  and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a 
 Friday and
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and 
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
 wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to
   back out of
 it.
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread William Lefkovics

I'm connected from home at a 21,600KBps dial up right now, connected to an
exchange server 3800km away.

The mailboxes are not moving through your connection at home.  I would
assume the exchange servers that you move the mailboxes between are on the
LAN together.

William

I also don't watch basketball.  I was, however, watching play-by-play online
of Mario winning the Milan-San Remo.  



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


You live in the USA, I live in Italy.  You have a fast connection from home,
I do not.

You watch basketball, I watch soccer.  :-)

You do it your way, I do it mine!

Your mailboxes take little time to move (it seems), mine would take in
excess of 1 day.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home 
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching 
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move
  them, a bit of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to 
  the users. Plus with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a 
  weekend with no impact to the end users and as you point out, 
  would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Niki Blowfield

I have found that a 56k connection is ample for terminal services (pc
anywhere/dameware/win2k)

The frustration of watching the screen refresh is far outweighed by the
benefits or being able to carry out these tasks remotely



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 April 2002 07:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


You live in the USA, I live in Italy.  You have a fast connection from home,
I do not.

You watch basketball, I watch soccer.  :-)

You do it your way, I do it mine!

Your mailboxes take little time to move (it seems), mine would take in
excess of 1 day.

 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 03 April 2002 11:39
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Overtime?
 
 You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home
 connected over the VPN or TS session and select a block of 
 mailboxes and select move mailbox and return to the NCAA 
 basketball game or whatever.  An hour later, you select the 
 next block, then take the dog for a walk.  Return home, then 
 select the next block and play-wrestle with the wife for 
 awhile.  Select the next block, and it's dinnertime.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching
 mailboxes slowly move between servers.  So rather than doing 
 a lot of overtime, over several days, I prefer to do the 
 whole job in one day.  And if I'm going to do the job in one 
 day, I prefer the backup  restore method which is quicker, 
 and if you know what you are doing, it is not risky.  
 Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still 
 than doing a backup and restore.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move them, a bit 
  of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus 
  with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no impact 
  to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky.
  
  Tris
  
  -
  Tristan Gayford
  Deputy Systems  Network Manager
  Cranfield University at Silsoe
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization 
  and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
  mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not 
  give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 
  MB can take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 
  30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
  restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and
   Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and
   actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of 
   minutes.
   
-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
   effective, I would
 not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
   the whole
 move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server
  Move method
 and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take
  months to
 move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if
   they are big.
 As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
   had great
 success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
 wouldn't say it's that risky

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-03 Thread Mark Harford

Not if you have invested in Remote Management cards.  For Compaq servers
this would be the following
:-http://www.compaq.com/manage/remote-lightsout.html.

It does bump the cost per server up a little, but compare this to the
over-time costs of having to pay someone else to baby-sit your servers over
the weekend or overnight. You can even re-build the server to a new OS - all
from the comfort of home.

Mark

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 18:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 EXACTLY
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:38 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 True, that's advice I will definitely take on board. I have 
 had situations whereby a server 'hangs' on shutdown and 
 continues to respond to a ping indefinately, but refuses to 
 allow me to connect in any other way
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 17:27
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I do the same thing. However it isn't will the box come back 
 up that gets me. Its will the box cleanly shut down, since 
 that is whrer I have always had my issues. Now days I always 
 manually kill services before shutting down. IIS, SQL, Exch, etc.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:27 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 The ECMSM worked great for me, luckily I have a lone Win2k 
 VPN server set up for me and some Directors to connect up 
 with our home ADSL accounts, and I can Dameware into the NT4 
 Exchange server to do some 'babysitting' although nothing was 
 required. Set it and forget it indeed. I can have a lager at 
 home too, which always tends to draw strange looks at work
 
 However, this method of operating servers from home creates 
 some tense moments. Whilst working on servers located in far 
 off places locked away in cupboards late at night, I always 
 get a little anxious during a reboot watching the request 
 timed out from the ping 192.168.2.25 -t wondering whether 
 I left a floppy in the drive
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 03 April 2002 17:10
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 All together: JUST SET IT.AND FORGET IT!!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:09 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 5:15pm:  Break in because problem account crashed IS when it 
 tried to move it. 
 5:04pm:  You do the above because you remember the key is 
 locked inside. hehe
 
 Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less 
 filling. However; I did have several accounts that did the 
 above last time I did the ECMSM.  I don't think you can set 
 it and forget it, some baby sitting is required.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:58 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 5:04 PM: Remember you left server room door key inside server room.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:54 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I've moved 1800 users from one server to another before using 
 the ECMSM and when measuring the amount of my time that it 
 took to complete the move vs. doing a backup and restore 
 there is no comparison.. The ECMSM wins hands down.
 
 5:00 PM: Fire up the Exchange Admin on the destination server 
 5:01 PM: Select 500 mailboxes from the GAL 5:02 PM Choose 
 Tools | Move Mailbox and select destination server 5:03 PM 
 Close door to server room on way out.
 
 -- 
 Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
 MessageOne
 512-652-4500 x244
 
 When the country falls into chaos, patriotism is born.
 --Tao Te Ching 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:52 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my 
 organization and 
  so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the 
  mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That 
 does not give 
  a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 
 100 MB can 
  take some time.  Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB 
  each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and 
  restore.
  
   -Original Message-
   From

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-02 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a 
 Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 
 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would 
 likely be only a matter of minutes.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Over 500.
  
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very 
 effective, I would 
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do 
 the whole 
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method 
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to 
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if 
 they are big.  
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and 
 had great 
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I 
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to 
 back out of 
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
   latter easier.
   
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.

Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of
steps to doing it the right way.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new 
 hardware.  I am 
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the
 Information Store and Directory Store.
 
 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
  watch out for?
 
 Thanks in advance for you help.
 
 Regards,
 Didy
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   --
   
   The information contained in this email message is privileged and 
   confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual 
   or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this 
 message is 
   not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
   dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly 
   prohibited.  If you have received

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-04-02 Thread Tristan Gayford

Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move them, a bit of
overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus with only
15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with no impact to the end users
and as you point out, would be much less risky.

Tris

-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so
opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings
between 7am and 8am, before users arrive.  That does not give a lot of time
to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time.  Try
moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find
it takes longer than a backup and restore.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a
 Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 
 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would 
 likely be only a matter of minutes.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  Over 500.
  
  Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very
 effective, I would
   not discount the backup and restore method, where you do
 the whole
   move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method
   and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to 
   move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if 
 they are big.
   As a result, recently I used the server move method, and
 had great
   success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I
   wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to 
 back out of
   it.
   There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
   restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
   latter easier.
   
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.

Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of 
steps to doing it the right way.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new
 hardware.  I am
 restoring from an online backup and will basically install
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5,
  Exchange
 Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
 Information Store and Directory Store.
 
 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to
  watch out for?
 
 Thanks in advance for you help.
 
 Regards,
 Didy
 
 
  _
 List posting FAQ:   
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
List posting FAQ:   
 http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   
 http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-28 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I 
 would not discount the backup and restore method, where you 
 do the whole move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley 
 Server Move method and it works fine, but the downside is 
 that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a 
 lot of them, and if they are big.  As a result, recently I 
 used the server move method, and had great success, it was 
 finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I wouldn't say 
 it's that risky, as long as you know how to back out of it.  
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
  
  Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set
  of steps to doing it the right way.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Peregrine Systems
  Atlanta, GA
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am 
   restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
   everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange 
   Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
   Information Store and Directory Store.
   
   Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
   
   Thanks in advance for you help.
   
   Regards,
   Didy
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 
 The information contained in this email message is privileged 
 and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
 of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
 notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
 message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
 email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
 email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-28 Thread Kevin Miller

Did you read the method Written By Darcy Adams in the FAQ?

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rowell, John
(AFIT)
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


Over 500.

Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I
 would not discount the backup and restore method, where you 
 do the whole move within one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley 
 Server Move method and it works fine, but the downside is 
 that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a 
 lot of them, and if they are big.  As a result, recently I 
 used the server move method, and had great success, it was 
 finished in one day and was much cleaner.  I wouldn't say 
 it's that risky, as long as you know how to back out of it.  
 There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup  
 restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the 
 latter easier.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
  
  Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of 
  steps to doing it the right way.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Peregrine Systems
  Atlanta, GA
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
   
   
   I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am
   restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
   everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange 
   Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the 
   Information Store and Directory Store.
   
   Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
   
   Thanks in advance for you help.
   
   Regards,
   Didy
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 
 The information contained in this email message is privileged
 and confidential information intended only for the use of the 
 individual or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader 
 of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
 notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
 message is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
 email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler 
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
 email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 ==
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-28 Thread Webb, Andy

Months? I don't think you did it right.

All told it should take perhaps a couple weeks:
1 day planning, making sure everything is prepared
1 day new server HW/OS/SP/HF installation
1 day Exchange installation, PF rehome, System Folders rehome, connector
rehome
1-3 days for mailbox moves assuming large number of users and off-hours
moves
1 week for user profiles to automatically adjust
1 hour to bring down old server and serve beer.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
-- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 --
=== 


-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not
discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within
one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but
the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a
lot of them, and if they are big.  As a result, recently I used the server
move method, and had great success, it was finished in one day and was much
cleaner.  I wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to back
out of it.  There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set 
 of steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I
  am restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, 
  Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to 
  restore the Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-26 Thread Rowell, John (AFIT)

While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not
discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within
one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but
the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a
lot of them, and if they are big.  As a result, recently I used the server
move method, and had great success, it was finished in one day and was much
cleaner.  I wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to back
out of it.  There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set 
 of steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I
  am restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, 
  Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to 
  restore the Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-26 Thread Andy David

Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here?



-Original Message-
From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not
discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within
one day.  I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but
the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a
lot of them, and if they are big.  As a result, recently I used the server
move method, and had great success, it was finished in one day and was much
cleaner.  I wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to back
out of it.  There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup 
restore, ii) using off-line backup  restore, and I found the latter easier.

 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.
 
 Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set 
 of steps to doing it the right way.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
  
  
  I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I
  am restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
  everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, 
  Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to 
  restore the Information Store and Directory Store.
  
  Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
  
  Thanks in advance for you help.
  
  Regards,
  Didy
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please immediately 
notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or 
email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

==


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-25 Thread Johnson, Richard (NY Int)

Check the FAQ! Great info.

-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am restoring
from an online backup and will basically install everything from CD - NT4,
Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato
backup to restore the Information Store and Directory Store.

Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?

Thanks in advance for you help.

Regards,
Didy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-25 Thread Louis Joyce

Watch out for people sneaking up behind you whilst installing...

Regards

Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions


-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 March 2002 09:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am restoring
from an online backup and will basically install everything from CD - NT4,
Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato
backup to restore the Information Store and Directory Store.

Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?

Thanks in advance for you help.

Regards,
Didy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-25 Thread missy koslosky

uh...  the FAQ covers every single step of this.  is there something you
feel it misses?
- Original Message -
From: Sebastian, Didy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:20 AM
Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am restoring
from an online backup and will basically install everything from CD -
NT4,
Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my
Legato
backup to restore the Information Store and Directory Store.

Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?

Thanks in advance for you help.

Regards,
Didy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-25 Thread Mellott, Bill

Following the Ed's server move method in the FAQ
made my move simple

-Original Message-
From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware


I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I am restoring
from an online backup and will basically install everything from CD - NT4,
Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato
backup to restore the Information Store and Directory Store.

Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?

Thanks in advance for you help.

Regards,
Didy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware

2002-03-25 Thread Roger Seielstad

I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up.

Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of steps to
doing it the right way.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
 
 
 I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware.  I 
 am restoring from an online backup and will basically install 
 everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, 
 Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to 
 restore the Information Store and Directory Store.
 
 Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for?
 
 Thanks in advance for you help.
 
 Regards,
 Didy
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]