[expert] How might I get ACPI to work with mdk9.1?

2003-06-17 Thread Matt Osborne
Hi-- I've read through the mailing lists and searched for two days now
for a solution to my laptops power management. I went into lilo.conf and
set acpi=yes and rebooted, but I'm not quite sure what to do from here.
Do I need to apply the patch found on Sourceforge or was bamboo's kernel
already patched? Any help _very_very_ appreciated!

Regards,
Matt Osborne
Electrical/Computer Engineering
Christian Brothers University
Memphis, Tennessee

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread David Hlacik
Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to create too
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Extracting a URL from a Java applet

2003-06-17 Thread Praedor Atrebates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:12 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
 The scenario is that I would like to pass a url to mplayer from a
 Javascript applet, so I can play a WMA soundstream.  Manually; like with
 copy and paste, straight to the command line.  However it's like pulling
 eyeteeth to get a source URL out of a java applet.  Does anybody have a
 way to do this?  Seems like Miark posted a similar solution a while back
 using Lynx, but I can't remember if that was relevant or not.

Could you use a sniffer to watch the packets and get the source that way?  Try 
running ethereal or, for some simplicity, etherape.  I have never really 
tracked a java applet or script before so I am not sure that this would be 
useful.

praedor

- -- 
The First Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible
dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is 
essential to the welfare of the public.
- --Justice Hugo Black

GnuPG fingerprint:
D170 2A02 B426 6AA0 5E68  3EDC 68AA FDB0 961E 4F18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+7vXuaKr9sJYeTxgRAreRAJ0RWg/Tio4jZObF7JrspSE7xURV/ACguvgm
9CpREq9GcTPz2+QrVw0u+nc=
=jtTn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How might I get ACPI to work with mdk9.1?

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 02:51 am, Matt Osborne wrote:
 Hi-- I've read through the mailing lists and searched for two days now
 for a solution to my laptops power management. I went into lilo.conf and
 set acpi=yes and rebooted, but I'm not quite sure what to do from here.
 Do I need to apply the patch found on Sourceforge or was bamboo's kernel
 already patched? Any help _very_very_ appreciated!

It's already in there.  You shouls just have to configure the userspace tools.

-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread JM5379
if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation


--- Original Message ---
From: David Hlacik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] create fat32 file system

Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to
create too
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] scanning and faxing

2003-06-17 Thread Jonathan Dlouhy
Hello all. I'm trying to find a scan and fax solution so I can dump Windoze for good! 
The hardware is fine, sane is installed and working. I'd like to be able to use 
something like Staroffice and scan the document in then fax it from there. The 
staroffice help file explains a way to set this up, but I can't get their idea to fly. 
So, anything you can offer would be great. Aim me in the right direction, whatever.

Thanks,
--
Jonathan Dlouhy
Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:20:55 AM
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Energizer Bunny arrested - charged with battery.






---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.490 / Virus Database: 289 - Release Date: 6/16/2003

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] scanning and faxing

2003-06-17 Thread Jonathan Dlouhy

Hello all. I'm trying to scan a document and then fax it. My scanner and fax 
setup work fine individually, so it's not a hardware problem. I mainly tried 
using Staroffice/openoffice to set this up, but no go. There's supposed to be 
a way to set this up in Staroffice according to the help file but I can't get 
it to fly.
Any help would be great, aim me in the right direction or whatever.

Thanks,
Jon

-- 
Jonathan Dlouhy
Monday, June 16, 2003 06:43 PM

I.R.S.: We've got what it takes to take what you've got!

Registered Linux user #264482 Powered by Mandrake 9.0





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How might I get ACPI to work with mdk9.1?

2003-06-17 Thread Nisco
Il mar, 2003-06-17 alle 08:51, Matt Osborne ha scritto:
 Hi-- I've read through the mailing lists and searched for two days now
 for a solution to my laptops power management. I went into lilo.conf and
 set acpi=yes and rebooted, but I'm not quite sure what to do from here.
 Do I need to apply the patch found on Sourceforge or was bamboo's kernel
 already patched? Any help _very_very_ appreciated!

I know your feeling... I had the same problem :)

Well, try to set  acpi=on instead of acpi=yes first.

You also have to install 2 mandrake packets is you did not do so, they
are:

acpi-0.6-5mdk
acipid-1.0.1-3mdk

Reboot(to append the right acpi=on string on the kernel)

once you did so you try

]# cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state

and it should give something like this

present: yes
capacity state:  ok
charging state:  discharging
present rate:unknown
remaining capacity:  4011 mAh
present voltage: 9600 mV

Here you can reamaining capacity in milliampere

another useful command is

]#acpi -V

which gives you other informations:

  Thermal 1: ok, 70.0 degrees C
  AC Adapter 1: off-line

Once acpi is up and running you could use Klaptop to have an userfrienly
interface for your battery monitoring.

Good luck! I have an Acer Aspire 1300XC and what I tould you above works
for my laptop... give a try :)

Cesare




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread Timothy Brown
Not anymore it may have had to begin with but I am typing this on a 40gb 
fat32 partition

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation

--- Original Message ---
From: David Hlacik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] create fat32 file system
 

Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to
   

create too
 

large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik

   



 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 



--
-
Timothy R. Brown
Webmaster
The Daily Star
102 Chestnut St.
Oneonta, NY 13820
Phone: (607)441-7242
Fax: (607)432-5847
-
http://www.thedailystar.com
http://www.coopercrier.com
http://www.thecollegianonline.com
http://www.cityofthehills.com
http://www.theheartlandofnewyork.com
-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Extracting a URL from a Java applet

2003-06-17 Thread Miark
My solution for normal HTML was to use:

  lynx --dump http://url-here.com

which would spit out the URL yer looking for. I'm not sure about
Java applets, though.

Miark


On 17 Jun 2003 01:12:12 -0400 Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The scenario is that I would like to pass a url to mplayer from a
 Javascript applet, so I can play a WMA soundstream.  Manually; like with
 copy and paste, straight to the command line.  However it's like pulling
 eyeteeth to get a source URL out of a java applet.  Does anybody have a
 way to do this?  Seems like Miark posted a similar solution a while back
 using Lynx, but I can't remember if that was relevant or not.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mailing List mis-management?

2003-06-17 Thread Pierre Fortin
On 16 Jun 2003 20:18:23 -0700 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 12:45, Pierre Fortin wrote:
  Anne, 
  
  This is an *ancient* problem...  I pointed it out about 2 years ago
  IIRC-- when there were all sorts of other mail issues...  it wasn't
  fixed then and probably won't be fixed now...  the solution is simple
  -- don't cross post...  send 2 messages...  
 
 Pierre,
  I wonder if this bug isn't intentional ... by taking the first
 address in a cross posted e-mail only, it's a great way to prevent
 cross posts and spam related cross posts. ...
 
 James

How does that old saying go...?  Something about not attributing foresight
to an unexpected [side-]effect...  If this was intentional, then that
intention missed the mark of reducing traffic by not ignoring the extra
addresses and simply using the first one N times...  

For historical perspective, see below for a discussion on my analysis
(sent Dec 19,2000 -- 2 1/2 years ago...) about the list problems...

Re-reading that old post, I have to wonder if those who don't see their
posts are actually hitting a possible fix for Cause 3a...  i.e., do
those posts contain the list name 2+ times in the To: field?

I suppose it's true that history repeats...


  On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:14:54 +0100 Anne Wilson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Earlier today I sent a post to the newbie list and the expert list, 
   saying that we should get started on a hardward compatibility list
   on the TWiki site.  Cross-posted, you understand (not a thing I
   normally do, but it seemed justified at the time).
   
   I received my two copies, which my filters put both into the newbie 
   folder - or so I thought.   However, Eric then mailed me about this.

   You may remember that he has brought up this subject before.  I
   think that it was generally thought that he was mistaken (I admit I
   thought so too), but when he raised the question I checked the full
   headers for the posts.  *Both* of them said 
   
   Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   I had thought it strange that no-one from the expert list had 
   answered, but it seems Eric is right - it never got there.
   
   An hour or two later, Greg posted to the newbie list that he had 
   started the page.  I forwarded his post to the expert list, for 
   information.  That was perhaps 5 hours ago.  I has not shown up.
   
   We seem to have serious problems here.
   
   Anne

[There may be better data from the archives; but this was the first
message I found in mine...]
- From Dec 19,2000
Rusty,

Since you have the most complete set of questions...  :^)

Rusty Carruth wrote:

 Pierre Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have analyzed just over 250 messages from Cooker and Expert lists. 
  Of those, there were 20 duplicated and 3 triplicated messages.

 I'm impressed!  I quit after 2 or 4  ;-)

I just finally got tired to seeing all the why am I getting
duplicates...?
posts; asking the same question over and over does not solve the
problem... you
gotta dig deep[er]...  :

  From my short sampling, these are the causes of message replication I
  came up with...

 Did you happen to attach a count to each of these causes?  That might be
 very enlightening.

I didn't feel the count mattered 'cuz a computer can make the same mistake
forever without complaining; fix the cause and it'll behave regardless of
counts...

  CAUSE 1:  user 500@yavin.mandrax.org:

 I am of the opinion that user 500 is the 'expert list'
 expander/forwarder/whatever_ you_want_to_call_it.

Yes; just pointing out that it was at the core of the issues.

  CAUSE 2a:  sender is using M$ Outlook Express configured to send an
  Envelope-To: header. ...
 
  CAUSE 2b:  sender is using Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) with
  aReply-To: header.  See cause 2a for solution.

 But aren't these just triggers to the problem in user 500?  Unless I've
 missed something, it seems that the right solution is to fix whatever
 user 500 is doing...

Correct; though if we can reduce the problems in the meantime...  However,
the
following ones require a smarter set of rules...

  CAUSE 3a:  sending to more than one addressee.
  Examples:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], self, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], self, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 So [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED], eh?  Wow, learn
 something new every day ;-)   Does the 'self' entry seem to have
 anything to do with it?

self was just to indicate that the sender was mailing a copy back to
themselves to push a copy of their posts through their filters for filing.

  CAUSE 3b:  sending to both To: and Cc:

This is where my post got caught...  though in my case, I sent:
  To: cooker...
  Cc: expert...

Which means that when you think you are cross-posting, the list server
simply
sends both copies to the To: list; I missed this variation in my
original
post.

  CAUSE 3c:  sending with BCC: which is not detectable from the messages
  we get.

[expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
Well, it looks like I found the device that was sending out the martians 
headers.  It is the Netgear print server I picked up el cheapo at CompUSA.  
It sets up an smb share for my HP1100A so I don't require that a particular 
machine is on in order to use it.

I discovered this by unplugging the network cable for awhile and seeing the 
martian headers messages stop hitting my logs.

Now to figure out how to either get my machine to ignore them, or get the 
print server to stop sending them.
-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Mark Watts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


 Well, it looks like I found the device that was sending out the martians
 headers.  It is the Netgear print server I picked up el cheapo at CompUSA.
 It sets up an smb share for my HP1100A so I don't require that a particular
 machine is on in order to use it.

 I discovered this by unplugging the network cable for awhile and seeing the
 martian headers messages stop hitting my logs.

 Now to figure out how to either get my machine to ignore them, or get the
 print server to stop sending them.

echo enable_log_strange_packets(no)  /etc/security/msec/level.local  
/etc/cron.hourly/msec

Mark.

- -- 
Mark Watts
Senior Systems Engineer
QinetiQ TIM
St Andrews Road, Malvern
GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+7xhUBn4EFUVUIO0RAqlqAJ9wIWgcxS4vp+DODuojUNP1Ni4fNQCdFziF
SjTwyRwHZxJ9trSNe4LIydQ=
=GxJH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Mailing List mis-management?

2003-06-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 1:48 pm, Pierre Fortin wrote:
 On 16 Jun 2003 20:18:23 -0700 James Sparenberg
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 wrote:
  On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 12:45, Pierre Fortin wrote:
 How does that old saying go...?  Something about not attributing
 foresight to an unexpected [side-]effect...  If this was
 intentional, then that intention missed the mark of reducing
 traffic by not ignoring the extra addresses and simply using the
 first one N times...

 For historical perspective, see below for a discussion on my
 analysis (sent Dec 19,2000 -- 2 1/2 years ago...) about the list
 problems...

It does make interesting reading.

 Re-reading that old post, I have to wonder if those who don't see
 their posts are actually hitting a possible fix for Cause 3a...
  i.e., do those posts contain the list name 2+ times in the To:
 field?

For the record, this was mine:

To: newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   CAUSE 1:  user 500@yavin.mandrax.org:
 
  I am of the opinion that user 500 is the 'expert list'
  expander/forwarder/whatever_ you_want_to_call_it.

 Yes; just pointing out that it was at the core of the issues.

Received: by yavin.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 680C480393; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:17:54 -0700 (PDT)

   CAUSE 2a:  sender is using M$ Outlook Express configured to
   send an Envelope-To: header. ...
  
Nope

   CAUSE 2b:  sender is using Internet Mail Service
   (5.5.2650.21) with aReply-To: header.  See cause 2a for
   solution.
 
Nope

  But aren't these just triggers to the problem in user 500? 
  Unless I've missed something, it seems that the right solution is
  to fix whatever user 500 is doing...

 Correct; though if we can reduce the problems in the meantime... 
 However, the
 following ones require a smarter set of rules...

   CAUSE 3a:  sending to more than one addressee.
   Examples:
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], self, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], self, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Two addresses, but not the same, newbie and expert lists

  So [EMAIL PROTECTED] == [EMAIL PROTECTED], eh?  Wow, learn
  something new every day ;-)   Does the 'self' entry seem to
  have anything to do with it?

 self was just to indicate that the sender was mailing a copy back
 to themselves to push a copy of their posts through their filters
 for filing.

   CAUSE 3b:  sending to both To: and Cc:

 This is where my post got caught...  though in my case, I sent:
   To: cooker...
   Cc: expert...

 Which means that when you think you are cross-posting, the list
 server simply
 sends both copies to the To: list; I missed this variation in my
 original
 post.

This seems to be acting the same way.

   CAUSE 3c:  sending with BCC: which is not detectable from the
   messages we get.
 
  Actually, I have another theory.

Nope

 Hopefully we can
 get to the bottom of this RSN (real soon now)...

Yes, well, he did say 'hopefully'

Little has change, heh?  Well, thanks for the info.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread David Hlacik
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation

no it is not true.

David Hlacik

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Additional Notes:
The list I am talking about has been in existence long
before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC. 
DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

With our list, questions are posted as long as the
problem exists. When problem is solved, everyone is
quiet. So one never knows if the problem was resolved
or not. And if resolved, which of the 10+ responses
solved the issue? That is always a mistery. As a
result, same question will come up again perhaps two
days down the road from a different user! 

Sample entry of the usefulness of posting questions
then SUMMARY only, everything else being offline.

* SAMPLE ENTRY ***
Thanks to all those who replied - all your advice was
helpful!

The problem turned out to be that the dsf database is
not backwards 
compatible between releases or patchkits.
One of the patches in the 5.1B patch kit 2 introduced
an 
incompatibility with the previous version.

I solved the problem by running (still in single user
mode):

  # dn_setup -init 
  # dsfmgr -K

Then I rebooted and the OS installation concluded
successfully.

Dr Blinn also suggested to execute

  set bootdef_dev 

from the SRM console before reinstalling - this
supposedly also clears 
the problem before a fresh installation.
Unfortunately I have not verified that yet myself, but
it is apparently 
also mentioned in connection with the guilty patch.

Lesson learned - next time I shall be more careful to
read up on the 
patches and not just go ahead installing all of them.
Fortunately this was just a test system...

Kind regards,

  Michael


=== original mail follows ===


Hi managers,

I have a strange problem installing Tru64 5.1B on a
DS-10.

I am in the process of adapting an installation
procedure based on the 
clone installation feature to the version 5.1B, and so
far I had 
performed MANY such installations of 5.1B on this
particular machine as well 
as others.

However, yesterday I downloaded the aggregate patch
kit 0002 for 5.1B 
(which was released on 14 May 2003), and installed it
on that particular 
machine (ALL patches).

Things were apparently fine - the patches installed OK
and the machine 
rebooted OK. 

Then later shut it down to begin a fresh installation
for testing. The 
installation went through the post-OS-install
configuration stage, and 
the subsequent reboot. Then it failed to single user
mode with the 
following messages while trying to mount the
filesystems (I type them 
below, they may not be 100% exact but maybe it is
sufficient for someone to 
identify the cause):
(for information, a is root partition, g is /usr, d is
/usr/users, e is 
private /locrec partition)
**End of Sample Entry*** 

Here is an example 






Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Additional Notes:
The list I am talking about has been in existence long
before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC. 
DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

With our list, questions are posted as long as the
problem exists. When problem is solved, everyone is
quiet. So one never knows if the problem was resolved
or not. And if resolved, which of the 10+ responses
solved the issue? That is always a mistery. As a
result, same question will come up again perhaps two
days down the road from a different user! 

Sample entry of the usefulness of posting questions
then SUMMARY only, everything else being offline.

* SAMPLE ENTRY ***
Thanks to all those who replied - all your advice was
helpful!

The problem turned out to be that the dsf database is
not backwards 
compatible between releases or patchkits.
One of the patches in the 5.1B patch kit 2 introduced
an 
incompatibility with the previous version.

I solved the problem by running (still in single user
mode):

  # dn_setup -init 
  # dsfmgr -K

Then I rebooted and the OS installation concluded
successfully.

Dr Blinn also suggested to execute

  set bootdef_dev 

from the SRM console before reinstalling - this
supposedly also clears 
the problem before a fresh installation.
Unfortunately I have not verified that yet myself, but
it is apparently 
also mentioned in connection with the guilty patch.

Lesson learned - next time I shall be more careful to
read up on the 
patches and not just go ahead installing all of them.
Fortunately this was just a test system...

Kind regards,

  Michael


=== original mail follows ===


Hi managers,

I have a strange problem installing Tru64 5.1B on a
DS-10.

I am in the process of adapting an installation
procedure based on the 
clone installation feature to the version 5.1B, and so
far I had 
performed MANY such installations of 5.1B on this
particular machine as well 
as others.

However, yesterday I downloaded the aggregate patch
kit 0002 for 5.1B 
(which was released on 14 May 2003), and installed it
on that particular 
machine (ALL patches).

Things were apparently fine - the patches installed OK
and the machine 
rebooted OK. 

Then later shut it down to begin a fresh installation
for testing. The 
installation went through the post-OS-install
configuration stage, and 
the subsequent reboot. Then it failed to single user
mode with the 
following messages while trying to mount the
filesystems (I type them 
below, they may not be 100% exact but maybe it is
sufficient for someone to 
identify the cause):
(for information, a is root partition, g is /usr, d is
/usr/users, e is 
private /locrec partition)
**End of Sample Entry*** 

Here is an example 






Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Additional Notes:
The list I am talking about has been in existence long
before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC. 
DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

With our list, questions are posted as long as the
problem exists. When problem is solved, everyone is
quiet. So one never knows if the problem was resolved
or not. And if resolved, which of the 10+ responses
solved the issue? That is always a mistery. As a
result, same question will come up again perhaps two
days down the road from a different user! 

Sample entry of the usefulness of posting questions
then SUMMARY only, everything else being offline.

* SAMPLE ENTRY ***
Thanks to all those who replied - all your advice was
helpful!

The problem turned out to be that the dsf database is
not backwards 
compatible between releases or patchkits.
One of the patches in the 5.1B patch kit 2 introduced
an 
incompatibility with the previous version.

I solved the problem by running (still in single user
mode):

  # dn_setup -init 
  # dsfmgr -K

Then I rebooted and the OS installation concluded
successfully.

Dr Blinn also suggested to execute

  set bootdef_dev 

from the SRM console before reinstalling - this
supposedly also clears 
the problem before a fresh installation.
Unfortunately I have not verified that yet myself, but
it is apparently 
also mentioned in connection with the guilty patch.

Lesson learned - next time I shall be more careful to
read up on the 
patches and not just go ahead installing all of them.
Fortunately this was just a test system...

Kind regards,

  Michael


=== original mail follows ===


Hi managers,

I have a strange problem installing Tru64 5.1B on a
DS-10.

I am in the process of adapting an installation
procedure based on the 
clone installation feature to the version 5.1B, and so
far I had 
performed MANY such installations of 5.1B on this
particular machine as well 
as others.

However, yesterday I downloaded the aggregate patch
kit 0002 for 5.1B 
(which was released on 14 May 2003), and installed it
on that particular 
machine (ALL patches).

Things were apparently fine - the patches installed OK
and the machine 
rebooted OK. 

Then later shut it down to begin a fresh installation
for testing. The 
installation went through the post-OS-install
configuration stage, and 
the subsequent reboot. Then it failed to single user
mode with the 
following messages while trying to mount the
filesystems (I type them 
below, they may not be 100% exact but maybe it is
sufficient for someone to 
identify the cause):
(for information, a is root partition, g is /usr, d is
/usr/users, e is 
private /locrec partition)
**End of Sample Entry*** 

Here is an example 






Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
Additional Notes:
The list I am talking about has been in existence long
before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC. 
DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

With our list, questions are posted as long as the
problem exists. When problem is solved, everyone is
quiet. So one never knows if the problem was resolved
or not. And if resolved, which of the 10+ responses
solved the issue? That is always a mistery. As a
result, same question will come up again perhaps two
days down the road from a different user! 

Sample entry of the usefulness of posting questions
then SUMMARY only, everything else being offline.

* SAMPLE ENTRY ***
Thanks to all those who replied - all your advice was
helpful!

The problem turned out to be that the dsf database is
not backwards 
compatible between releases or patchkits.
One of the patches in the 5.1B patch kit 2 introduced
an 
incompatibility with the previous version.

I solved the problem by running (still in single user
mode):

  # dn_setup -init 
  # dsfmgr -K

Then I rebooted and the OS installation concluded
successfully.

Dr Blinn also suggested to execute

  set bootdef_dev 

from the SRM console before reinstalling - this
supposedly also clears 
the problem before a fresh installation.
Unfortunately I have not verified that yet myself, but
it is apparently 
also mentioned in connection with the guilty patch.

Lesson learned - next time I shall be more careful to
read up on the 
patches and not just go ahead installing all of them.
Fortunately this was just a test system...

Kind regards,

  Michael


=== original mail follows ===


Hi managers,

I have a strange problem installing Tru64 5.1B on a
DS-10.

I am in the process of adapting an installation
procedure based on the 
clone installation feature to the version 5.1B, and so
far I had 
performed MANY such installations of 5.1B on this
particular machine as well 
as others.

However, yesterday I downloaded the aggregate patch
kit 0002 for 5.1B 
(which was released on 14 May 2003), and installed it
on that particular 
machine (ALL patches).

Things were apparently fine - the patches installed OK
and the machine 
rebooted OK. 

Then later shut it down to begin a fresh installation
for testing. The 
installation went through the post-OS-install
configuration stage, and 
the subsequent reboot. Then it failed to single user
mode with the 
following messages while trying to mount the
filesystems (I type them 
below, they may not be 100% exact but maybe it is
sufficient for someone to 
identify the cause):
(for information, a is root partition, g is /usr, d is
/usr/users, e is 
private /locrec partition)
**End of Sample Entry*** 

Here is an example 






Hi All,

The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
one might be really relevant, the rest personal
emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
that only includes the one entry that correctly
resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
would rather have one post --then--its solution.

Again, its just an idea Different folks, Different
Strokes 

Richard

--- Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:39, charlie wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 01:23 am, Tru64 User had this
 to contribute :-
   Let me know what you guys think.
  
  _Thanks
  
  Richard Mollel
  
  Sort of defeats the purpose of the list. It is the
 think tank element of 
  everyone throwing something in that makes this
 list a valuable learning 
  experience IMHO.
  
  I wonder how long the list that uses the rules you
 mention has been running? 
  It might also be relevant to know what it is
 dealing with I suppose? I 
  certainly can't identify such an environment as
 allowing maximum discovery.
  
  Not quite 2 cents worth I know.
  
  Charlie.
 
 I agree and add that this is hardly a busy list that
 borders on being
 too much too handle. You can always hit delete
 on the topics your
 not interested in.
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Mini-Internet Provider

2003-06-17 Thread João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho



 Hello,


 I'm currently sharing my ADSL internet 
with my sister. But she uses much less internet than I do, and she dont want to 
pay half of the ADSL costs for that. So I will charge her for hour or give her a 
hour/mounth quote. She will connect on my Mini Internet Provider by LAN 
withWindows. I need to know which services I can use for that problem. I 
would like to limit the bandwith too (I got 300kbps, and like to give her max 
150).

 Can anyone lead me soI can 
google for the configure informations?

Thanks all

Milasch


[expert] disk check

2003-06-17 Thread David Hlacik

how can i check disk partition in fat32 for errors? and how can i repair
it.

David Hlacik

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:32 am, Mark Watts wrote:
  Now to figure out how to either get my machine to ignore them, or get the
  print server to stop sending them.

 echo enable_log_strange_packets(no)  /etc/security/msec/level.local 
 /etc/cron.hourly/msec

Thanks Mark.  You just saved me some time and trouble.
-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Brian Parish
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 23:43, Tru64 User wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
 one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
 subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
 yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
 that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
 For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
 learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!
 
I think we get the idea, but you need to accept that the people here on
this list like the way it is.  I haven't read all the messages in this
thread, but those I've seen were pretty negative to the idea.

It may be tough to find relevant hits in the archives sometimes, but
it's damn easy to get help when you need it here (or at least sympathy
;-)

Gossip corner forever!

Brian


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] disk check

2003-06-17 Thread Brian Parish
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 00:01, David Hlacik wrote:
 how can i check disk partition in fat32 for errors? and how can i repair
 it.
 
 David Hlacik
 
David,

I presume that you have a fat32 partition because you have W$ on the
machine.  So, the short answer would be scandisk or chkdsk under W$,
there being no fsck.vfat AFAIK.  If you don't have W$, then I can only
guess that using fat32 is a result of severe personality problems and
refuse to talk to you any more ;-)

Brian



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Linus Torvalds leaves Transmeta

2003-06-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir

OSDL scores bigtime.


---
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/31245.html

Torvalds leaves Transmeta
By Tony Smith
Posted: 17/06/2003 at 10:47 GMT

Linux creator Linus Torvalds is to quit Transmeta after six years to
work full time on the open source operating system's kernel.

In an email posted on the Linux Kernel Mailing List, Torvalds announces
the long-awaited 2.5.72 kernel release.

But tucked down toward the bottom, he says: The other big news - well,
for me personally, anyway - is that I've decided to take a
leave-of-absence after six+ years at Transmeta to actually work
full-time on the kernel.

To be fair, it seems that's largely what he's been doing at Transmeta.
The chip company always said, when his appointment was announced back in
early 1998, that he would be granted time to continue his work on the
kernel. Indeed, the man himself admits that Transmeta has always been
very good at letting me spend even an inordinate amount of time on
Linux and I do not expect a huge amount of change as a result,
testament to just how freely Transmeta has let me do Linux work.

As a result, I've been feeling a little guilty about how little 'real
work' I've been doing lately, Linus admits.

Is he being political? Did he jump or was he pushed? Linus is a pretty
self-effacing fellow, and his BS quotient seems pretty low, so it's
worth taking the email at face value.

So from 1 July, Linus will be working for the non-profits Open Source
Development Lab, whose own sponsors are listed here. Larry Augustin, CEO
of VA Software, an OSDL sponsor, said:I'm very pleased that we were
able to create a place where Linus will be able to work full time on the
kernel. 

Oddly enough, we looked at the ODSL situations vacant column but there
was no sign of a 'Full-time Open Source Deity, must be non-smoker'
listed among the Wanted ads. Clearly the vacancy has been filled...

Whatever, Linus is finally being paid to do what he loves doing most,
and you can't fault him for that. ®



--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] How might I get ACPI to work with mdk9.1?

2003-06-17 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 08:42 am, Nisco wrote:

 Reboot(to append the right acpi=on string on the kernel)

If thats /etc/lilo.conf that he's appending that to, then he'll need to run 
(as root):

/sbin/lilo

or the changes won't be recognized, no matter how many times you reboot.

:-)

-- 

 /\
   DarkLord
 \/

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:17, Brian Parish wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 23:43, Tru64 User wrote:
  Hi All,
  
  The list I am refering to is for tru64 Unix 
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  
  IMHO, that list serves much better purpose than this
  one. Searching their archives, its almost 100% hit on
  subjects that have been discussed before. And, better
  yet, one always goes for the SUMMARY/Resolution. Isnt
  that what we all want? Or is this a Gossip corner??
  For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
  learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!
  
 I think we get the idea, but you need to accept that the people here on
 this list like the way it is.  I haven't read all the messages in this
 thread, but those I've seen were pretty negative to the idea.
 
 It may be tough to find relevant hits in the archives sometimes, but
 it's damn easy to get help when you need it here (or at least sympathy
 ;-)
 
 Gossip corner forever!
 
 Brian
 

Heh.  ;)

--LX

-- 

Kernel 2.4.21-0.13mdk   Linux Mandrake 9.1
Enlightenment-0.16.5-12mdk  Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk
Linux User #268899 http://counter.li.org/



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva
I'm getting martians on my box :

martian source 255.255.255.255 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth0

my ifconfig is:

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:E0:18:E5:70:46
  inet addr:xxx.xxx.76.138  Bcast:xxx.xxx.76.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
  EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:65280/232
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1862164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:827069 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:429430
  collisions:0
  RX bytes:1516624543 (1446.3 Mb)  TX bytes:232470269 (221.7 Mb)

eth0:1Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:E0:18:E5:70:46
  inet addr:192.168.0.10  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:179265 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:179265 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0
  RX bytes:176217972 (168.0 Mb)  TX bytes:176217972 (168.0 Mb)

I cannot find /etc/security/msec/level.local !

Any help?!

TIA
Cheers,


On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:

 On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:32 am, Mark Watts wrote:
   Now to figure out how to either get my machine to ignore them, or get the
   print server to stop sending them.
 
  echo enable_log_strange_packets(no)  /etc/security/msec/level.local 
  /etc/cron.hourly/msec

 Thanks Mark.  You just saved me some time and trouble.


-- 
---
Alan Wilter S. da Silva
---
 Laboratório de Física Biológica
  Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho
   Universidade do Brasil/UFRJ
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
** Tru64 User (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 15:43)

 For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
 learning and solving of problems, we need solutions!

You just named one of the reasons I'm reading this list and why I'd like 
to have it like it is: Learning!

My background in Linux is only a couple of years, starting with some 
distros (DLD, Slackware, Caldera, SuSE, Red Hat) and finally settled on 
Mandrake (5.3). Since this list was brought to life I am reading it and 
I have lots of messages stored away for further reading or applying the 
contents.

While it may be nice to ask a question and receive an answer with the 
solution it's also interesting to read the in-betweens.

A to list: I have this question Q.

B to A: Answer 1
C to A: Answer 2
D to A: Answer 3

A to D: Answer 3 is good but B wrote quote
D to B: Yes, but B is wrong

A to B: D said you're wrong
B to A:  No, I'm not!

A to C: I did what you advised but my foo did not compile
C to A: Why not?
A to C: I got this error.

A to B: C advised to do  and I did it but my foo did not compile 
and I have this error
B to A: It could be this and that.

A to C: B said it could be this and that.
C to A: Oh! Then it must be the harddrive. Do a blahblah and re-login.

A to list: Referring question Q. The solution is: Do a blahblah and 
re-login.

Is that what you have in mind?

If the whole thing had been gone public it would have been faster, 
easier for A and a learning experience for some of the lurkers who 
learned that foo would not compile in this condition and  was not a 
solution as well as Answer 3 wasn't either.


 While there might be 10 replies to one posting, only
 one might be really relevant, the rest personal
 emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a summary
 that only includes the one entry that correctly
 resolved the problem? I would. So instead of reading
 25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
 would rather have one post --then--its solution.

OK, then go for an expert system, not a mailing list. A mailinglist - as 
far as I know them by some years - is mostly a forum for people 
interested in a topic or software or any issue. They don't want to post 
a question and get the solution and nothing else. They want to learn, 
give their opinions and even gather some self-esteem by answering other 
people's questions as soon as they have learned enough.

The magic word is: Discussion.
 
My $200,000.00

Life must be hard for people who regard their opinion not worthier than 
$0.02.

wobo
-- 
Public GnuPG key available at http://www.wolf-b.de/misc



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:11 am, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
 I'm getting martians on my box :

 martian source 255.255.255.255 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth0

 my ifconfig is:

I found this in my /etc/sysconfig/networking/ifcfg-lo file
# If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a martian,
# you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255, for example)

Perhaps this helps.

-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation


--- Original Message ---
From: David Hlacik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] create fat32 file system

  
  
Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to

  
  create too
  
  
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik


  
  

It has a 4GB file limit.

-- 
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)





Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread Larry Sword
David,

Have you tried it with the  -F switch?

mkfs.vfat -F 32

Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to create too
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.
Thanks

David Hlacik

 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Re: Running updatedb crashes my comp!

2003-06-17 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ronald J. Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Friday 13 June 2003 07:51 pm, Lorne wrote:

  I wonder if it is a bad hard drive, and or controller. No errors during
  install? For it to die like that it just seems/smells hardware based.
Are
  you running hdparm and doing anything to soup up to UDMA or anything?
What
  about when you install. regular or expert install? Do you click the
option
  on hard drives that activates LBA or UDMA or something. I'm sorry I
can't
  remember what that option is.

 It would seem hardware wouldn't it? Yet sitting here from my end, I
hesitate.
 Everything is less than 6 months old, and its mostly quality stuff (I
know -
 anything can go bad). Basic setup is:

 Soyo Dragon Plus MB
 AMD XP2100 cpu
 512 megs DDR ram (Corsair brand)
 Maxtor 80 gig HD
 Nvidia Ti4200 video card.
 Toshiba DVD
 Plextor CDRW
 350 watt AMD approved PS

 So I dunno...you'd think this little system would rock.


Hmmm...
The Via ide chipset support has been somewhat changing from time to time...
Some times it works perfect, other times not...
And it works for some, and fails for others...
A few things comes to mind...

1. Did you run the bonnie++ test?
2. Is your system overclocked?
3. Have you tried to boot with mem=nopentium?
4. Have you tried the latest update kernel (18mdk)?
5. Have you checked /var/log/messages for complaints about /dev/hda or ide0?
6. Is your harddisk alone on the primary bus?
- If not... does it help to make it that way?
   (keep your DVD and CDRW on the secondary controller)

Best Regards

Thomas Backlund




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


SUMMARY:: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Tru64 User
OK, well said ppl. We (mandrake experts) don't want
changes!. Got it.

How about encouraging people to post final summaries
then? At least we will know what solved their
problems. In many cases,  i read arguments but at
the end never knows what resolved the issue.

For example, as far as this thread goes, the initiator
(me) is satisfied with the # of answers, thus I am
posting the summary, with the inputs I received, which
is, a SUMMARY of what all others said. NOT an entry of
all what was SAID.

_Thanks All for reading..

Richard.

--- Wolfgang Bornath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 ** Tru64 User (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 15:43)
 
  For a Gossip corner, we are OKbut for true
  learning and solving of problems, we need
 solutions!
 
 You just named one of the reasons I'm reading this
 list and why I'd like 
 to have it like it is: Learning!
 
 My background in Linux is only a couple of years,
 starting with some 
 distros (DLD, Slackware, Caldera, SuSE, Red Hat) and
 finally settled on 
 Mandrake (5.3). Since this list was brought to life
 I am reading it and 
 I have lots of messages stored away for further
 reading or applying the 
 contents.
 
 While it may be nice to ask a question and receive
 an answer with the 
 solution it's also interesting to read the
 in-betweens.
 
 A to list: I have this question Q.
 
 B to A: Answer 1
 C to A: Answer 2
 D to A: Answer 3
 
 A to D: Answer 3 is good but B wrote quote
 D to B: Yes, but B is wrong
 
 A to B: D said you're wrong
 B to A:  No, I'm not!
 
 A to C: I did what you advised but my foo did not
 compile
 C to A: Why not?
 A to C: I got this error.
 
 A to B: C advised to do  and I did it but my
 foo did not compile 
 and I have this error
 B to A: It could be this and that.
 
 A to C: B said it could be this and that.
 C to A: Oh! Then it must be the harddrive. Do a
 blahblah and re-login.
 
 A to list: Referring question Q. The solution is:
 Do a blahblah and 
 re-login.
 
 Is that what you have in mind?
 
 If the whole thing had been gone public it would
 have been faster, 
 easier for A and a learning experience for some of
 the lurkers who 
 learned that foo would not compile in this condition
 and  was not a 
 solution as well as Answer 3 wasn't either.
 
 
  While there might be 10 replies to one posting,
 only
  one might be really relevant, the rest personal
  emotions and such. Wouldn't you rather see a
 summary
  that only includes the one entry that correctly
  resolved the problem? I would. So instead of
 reading
  25 back-and-forth entries to find one solution, i
  would rather have one post --then--its solution.
 
 OK, then go for an expert system, not a mailing
 list. A mailinglist - as 
 far as I know them by some years - is mostly a forum
 for people 
 interested in a topic or software or any issue. They
 don't want to post 
 a question and get the solution and nothing else.
 They want to learn, 
 give their opinions and even gather some self-esteem
 by answering other 
 people's questions as soon as they have learned
 enough.
 
 The magic word is: Discussion.
  
 My $200,000.00
 
 Life must be hard for people who regard their
 opinion not worthier than 
 $0.02.
 
 wobo
 -- 
 Public GnuPG key available at
 http://www.wolf-b.de/misc
 
 
 
  Want to buy your Pack or Services from
MandrakeSoft?
 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 


=


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho



fat32 has 32 bits of adressing, thats the same as 2gb os adressing range. 
but the adressing is on sector/cylinter/etc, so, it seams to me that it can have 
more than 1Tb. Im not sure of that, so please do not be angry. I se that it has 
more than 4gb because i have a 26gbHDD fat32 formated.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brant Fitzsimmons 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:49 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [expert] create fat32 file 
  system
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation


--- Original Message ---
From: David Hlacik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] create fat32 file system

  
Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to
create too
  
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik

It has a 4GB file limit.-- 
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)



Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons




Joo Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote:

  
  
  
  
  fat32 has 32 bits of adressing, thats the same as 2gb os
adressing range. but the adressing is on sector/cylinter/etc, so, it
seams to me that it can have more than 1Tb. Im not sure of that, so
please do not be angry. I se that it has more than 4gb because i have
a 26gbHDD fat32 formated.
  
-
Original Message - 
From: Brant Fitzsimmons 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:
Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:49   PM
Subject:
Re: [expert] create fat32 file   system


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation


--- Original Message ---
From: David Hlacik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] create fat32 file system

  
  
Hi, when i type mkfs.vfat /dev/hdb1 it says ..Attempting to

  
  create too
  
  
large file system. Why? /dev/hdb1 is 20GB large.

Thanks

David Hlacik


  
  

It has a 4GB file limit.

  

4GB individual file limit to be precise. I know that from running into
it time and time again doing video editing.

Here are the limits:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url="">

-- 
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)





Re: [expert] How might I get ACPI to work with mdk9.1?

2003-06-17 Thread Matt Osborne
Thanks, I'm getting a little closer to fixing this. Made sure acpi=yes in
lilo then ran /sbin/lilo as root, installed the packages and then
rebooted. acpi was working somewhat, it could tell when I had the AC
plugged in and when it was on battery,  but it could not read the battery
charge level and when I ran the following it did not seem to detect the
battery

]# cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/state
present: no

After this I found someone with the same laptop Dell Inspiron 1100
who had success with Debian and 2.5 kernel. He had stated and Sourceforge
that I needed to patch my DSDT for this Dell system so I tried but now
I'm again looking at the battery with a red x through it on Klaptop and
now /proc/acpi/battery/ is empty, no BAT1 directory

The DSDT patch that I downloaded was against linux-2.4.21-rc1
acpi2003-4-24, anyone think I need to update the acpi version or kernel
that bamboo comes with?

Regards,
Matt Osborne
Electrical/Computer Engineering
Christian Brothers University
Memphis, Tennessee

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Nisco wrote:

 Il mar, 2003-06-17 alle 08:51, Matt Osborne ha scritto:
  Hi-- I've read through the mailing lists and searched for two days now
  for a solution to my laptops power management. I went into lilo.conf and
  set acpi=yes and rebooted, but I'm not quite sure what to do from here.
  Do I need to apply the patch found on Sourceforge or was bamboo's kernel
  already patched? Any help _very_very_ appreciated!

 I know your feeling... I had the same problem :)

 Well, try to set  acpi=on instead of acpi=yes first.

 You also have to install 2 mandrake packets is you did not do so, they
 are:

 acpi-0.6-5mdk
 acipid-1.0.1-3mdk

 Reboot(to append the right acpi=on string on the kernel)

 once you did so you try

 ]# cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state

 and it should give something like this

 present: yes
 capacity state:  ok
 charging state:  discharging
 present rate:unknown
 remaining capacity:  4011 mAh
 present voltage: 9600 mV

 Here you can reamaining capacity in milliampere

 another useful command is

 ]#acpi -V

 which gives you other informations:

   Thermal 1: ok, 70.0 degrees C
   AC Adapter 1: off-line

 Once acpi is up and running you could use Klaptop to have an userfrienly
 interface for your battery monitoring.

 Good luck! I have an Acer Aspire 1300XC and what I tould you above works
 for my laptop... give a try :)

 Cesare

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: SUMMARY:: [expert] Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
** Tru64 User (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 18:06)
 OK, well said ppl. We (mandrake experts) don't want
 changes!. Got it.

Could you pls rephrase this into We don't want changes we regard as bad 
or not partable to our list.?

 How about encouraging people to post final summaries
 then? At least we will know what solved their
 problems. In many cases,  i read arguments but at
 the end never knows what resolved the issue.

It's always good behaviour to post a final solution of a problem which 
was discussed on the list. This is standard policy but I must admit 
that it is sometimes not followed.

 For example, as far as this thread goes, the initiator
 (me) is satisfied with the # of answers, thus I am
 posting the summary, with the inputs I received, which
 is, a SUMMARY of what all others said. NOT an entry of
 all what was SAID.

This is the difference of this public list to a list of your preferance. 
We already know the summary because we all read the varous postings. 
Reading the postings also told us the opinions of the various posters 
which will give us a picture of one or the other.

A summary like you propose is sometimes not the same as the varous 
postings. Example: Your sentence about us not liking changes. That's 
not what the posters wrote. They don't like YOUR proposed changes.

A SOLUTION is different and should be posted. We cannot know what the 
asking user did in the and after having received some advices here on 
the list. It also could be that the solution was something derived from 
several postings. So the user HAS to post a solution-posting.

A SUMMARY is different.

 _Thanks All for reading..

No problem. IMHO it's a Good Thing(TM) to have propositions, discussions 
and summaries about this list. It's a democratic thing.

wobo
-- 
Public GnuPG key available at http://www.wolf-b.de/misc



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 2:45 pm, David Hlacik wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation

 no it is not true.

 David Hlacik

fat16, I think.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 2:54 pm, Tru64 User wrote:
 Additional Notes:
 The list I am talking about has been in existence long
 before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
 Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC.
 DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

This is getting tiresome.  No doubt your *other* list has its 
purposes.  Part of the purpose of this list is so that we can all 
learn, which we do from reading the whole troubleshooting process.  
We *do* encourage solutions to be posted.  If you have given up 
reading by then you will miss them, but if the subject's interesting 
to you, you will learn much.

As I have said before, give me an answer and it will solve my problem 
- this time.  Next time I meet it I will have to ask again.  Teach me 
to troubleshoot that problem and I have learned something valuable.  
That's what I get from both the newbie and the expert list.

And, BTW, your over-long quotes are a PITA to those why pay by the 
minute.

Anne


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 4:47 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
 On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:11 am, Alan Wilter Sousa da Silva wrote:
  I'm getting martians on my box :
 
  martian source 255.255.255.255 from 127.0.0.1, on dev eth0
 
  my ifconfig is:

 I found this in my /etc/sysconfig/networking/ifcfg-lo file
 # If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a
 martian, # you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255,
 for example)

 Perhaps this helps.

When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could someone 
explain to me about martians?

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho
Fat16 has suport to 4gb, but its not recommended to driver greater than
512mb, i think

- Original Message - 
From: Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] create fat32 file system


 On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 2:45 pm, David Hlacik wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   if i remember correctly, fat32 has a 4gb limitation
 
  no it is not true.
 
  David Hlacik

 fat16, I think.

 Anne








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] irc client

2003-06-17 Thread David Hlacik
Hi, i am looking for some good irc client with dcc support and /ctcp
support.

David Hlacik

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] irc client

2003-06-17 Thread Jack Coates
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 11:25, David Hlacik wrote:
 Hi, i am looking for some good irc client with dcc support and /ctcp
 support.
 
 David Hlacik

xchat rocks. BitchX is good if you take a little time to configure it.

-- 
Jack Coates
Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture...
http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 6:47 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
 On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:48 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could
  someone explain to me about martians?

 Sure Anne, they are little green men that come from the planet Mars
 :-D.

:-P

 Seriously though, my understanding is that they are tcp packets
 that appear to have no sender.  In other words, they have come from
 nowhere, yet they are everywhere.  Some device sends out a packet
 with an improperly configured header which does not identify the
 source.

Ah - that makes sense.  Thank you

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] create fat32 file system

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 09:20, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
 João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote:
  fat32 has 32 bits of adressing, thats the same as 2gb os adressing
  range. but the adressing is on sector/cylinter/etc, so, it seams to
  me that it can have more than 1Tb. Im not sure of that, so please do
  not be angry. I se that it has more than 4gb because i have a
  26gbHDD fat32 formated.


The real question as I see it is not the limit of fat32 but the limit of
mkdosfs ... this might be exceeded.  Other possibility. the
partition doesn't match the drive correctly.. in this case the error of
creating too large a file system means that it is too large for the
drive (for example the partition table goes past the last cylinder of
the physical drive.)



James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] disk check

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:22, Brian Parish wrote:
 On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 00:01, David Hlacik wrote:
  how can i check disk partition in fat32 for errors? and how can i repair
  it.
  
  David Hlacik
  
 David,
 
 I presume that you have a fat32 partition because you have W$ on the
 machine.  So, the short answer would be scandisk or chkdsk under W$,
 there being no fsck.vfat AFAIK.  If you don't have W$, then I can only
 guess that using fat32 is a result of severe personality problems and
 refuse to talk to you any more ;-)
 
 Brian
 
I can think of a 3rd scenario,  He is using a Linux bootable CD to
repair hosed winders installs. (usually easier than trying to do it
under winders.) 

James

 
 
 
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] irc client

2003-06-17 Thread David Hlacik
Hi, i am looking for some good irc client with dcc support and /ctcp
support.

David Hlacik

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Daemons needed.

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
All,

   In mtools there is a daemon called floppyd this allows you to create
a listener that allows for writing to a floppy from any location (or
reading) on the net on the fly by IP number and port.  Useful but
floppies are kind of small.  Unlike doing NFS or Samba mounting it's
less susceptible to things like boxes hanging if something goes down
etc.  It also allows for doing things like accessing multiple locations
on the fly.  

   Now for the question does anyone know of a similar kind of daemon for
other devices (cdrom usb etc etc.)

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Wireless internet advertisment

2003-06-17 Thread Francisco Alcaraz
¡Eureka!,

The University of Murcia is testing a wireless system with 22 Km of radious 
:-);

It is the moment to participate in the test; my house is 5 Km from the emiting 
point and I would like to use my desktop computer and my laptop. But I must 
recognized I have not idea about wireless internet conection, wireless cards 
runing under Mandrake 9.1 and so on.

So I am looking for help. Is anyone has this runing with our prefered 
distributions please, help me! or give some urls to look for information 
about this subject.

Thanks a lot in advance; 


Regards

-- 
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Murcia, España (Spain)


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Daemons needed.

2003-06-17 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na James Sparenberg ha escrit:

   Now for the question does anyone know of a similar kind of daemon for
other devices (cdrom usb etc etc.)
There's documentation on how to do that at the ltsp site:

http://ltsp.org/contrib/LTSP_FLOPPY.html
http://ltsp.org/contrib/generic_rmedia.html
Bye
--
Que les importa a las viudas, a los huérfanos, a los desvalidos
si las masacres se hacen en nombre del totalitarismo o en el
sagrado nombre de la libertad y la democracia.
Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948)


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] Linux equivalent to Windows Domain

2003-06-17 Thread Theo Brinkman
I've got a few machines at home that I'd like to set up to share users 
so I don't have to keep files  passwords in sync across multiple boxes.

I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.  Fact is, as an admin, 
I'm a newbie, and I don't even know where to start looking for info on 
how to do this.

I have read that you can make samba act as a windows domain controller, 
which would do the trick if necessary, but I pretty much only use Linux 
at home (no current windows boxes).

I had thought that LDAP might be a route to handle this, but I can't 
even find a source on configuring LDAP that I can understand.  (I'm a 
bit sleep deprived right now, so that probably isn't helping.)

Can anybody help me out or point me in the right direction?  Thansk.

   - Theo


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Vox
On September 1993 plus 3576 days Greg Meyer wrote:

 On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:48 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could someone
 explain to me about martians?

 Sure Anne, they are little green men that come from the planet Mars :-D.

 Seriously though, my understanding is that they are tcp packets that appear to 
 have no sender.  In other words, they have come from nowhere, yet they are 
 everywhere.  Some device sends out a packet with an improperly configured 
 header which does not identify the source.

  Actually, that's only part of the whole thing :) A martian packet is
  one that comes from a network that shouldn't be sending packets to
  that interface. If you get a packet from 192.168.1.54 on your public
  (ie. internet) interface, it'll get marked as martian because a
  packet from a private interface shouldn't come to the public
  interface. Same happens with improper headers without identifying
  source...they get marked as martians because the interface can't
  confirm it comes from a valid source.

  Vox

-- 
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else.   -- Donald B. Marti Jr.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [expert] 2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1 - IRQ Balancing still not fixed...

2003-06-17 Thread Juan Quintela
 vincent == Vincent Danen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

vincent On Mon Jun 16, 2003 at 12:58:58PM +0100, Mark Watts wrote:
 My original email included the paste from 2.4.21-0.18mdkenterprise.
 I'll include it again here:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a
 Linux mail1 2.4.21-0.18mdkenterprise #1 SMP Wed Jun 4 11:44:12 MDT 2003 i686
 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/interrupts
 CPU0   CPU1
 0:  46423  0IO-APIC-edge  timer
 1:  2  0IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
 2:  0  0  XT-PIC  cascade
 5:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  usb-ohci
 8:  1  0IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 14:  6  0IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 16: 16  0   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 17: 16  0   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 28:   5206  0   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 29:   4179  0   IO-APIC-level  eth1
 30:  11562  0   IO-APIC-level  aacraid
 NMI:  0  0
 LOC:  46328  46283
 ERR:  0
 MIS:  0

vincent I'm really not sure why you're getting this... on my end it looks fine with
vincent my dual Athlon.  I'm cc'ing this to Juan so he can see what's going on and
vincent maybe he has some ideas.

it works for me(tm) without any problem, that very same kernel:

Linux deus.mitica 2.4.21-0.18mdksmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 20:25:42 CEST 2003 i686 unknown 
unknown GNU/Linux
quintela$ cat /proc/interrupts 
   CPU0   CPU1   
  0:17962871925337IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:  2  0IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
  2:  0  0  XT-PIC  cascade
  4:195240IO-APIC-edge  serial
  8:  1  0IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 14:   7472   8162IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 15: 17 11IO-APIC-edge  ide1
 16:  34576  34687   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 17:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  AMD 768
NMI:  0  0 
LOC:37215143721509 
ERR:  0
MIS:  0
quintela$ 


Installing enterprise, but shouldn't bmake a difference.


-- 
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they 
are different -- Larry McVoy

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Linux equivalent to Windows Domain

2003-06-17 Thread Guillaume Marcais
One way is NIS + NFS. I believe Mandrake has some tools to configure
both (never done it though).

Guillaume.

On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 18:29, Theo Brinkman wrote:
 I've got a few machines at home that I'd like to set up to share users 
 so I don't have to keep files  passwords in sync across multiple boxes.
 
 I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.  Fact is, as an admin, 
 I'm a newbie, and I don't even know where to start looking for info on 
 how to do this.
 
 I have read that you can make samba act as a windows domain controller, 
 which would do the trick if necessary, but I pretty much only use Linux 
 at home (no current windows boxes).
 
 I had thought that LDAP might be a route to handle this, but I can't 
 even find a source on configuring LDAP that I can understand.  (I'm a 
 bit sleep deprived right now, so that probably isn't helping.)
 
 Can anybody help me out or point me in the right direction?  Thansk.
 
 - Theo
 
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Linux equivalent to Windows Domain

2003-06-17 Thread Jim C
What  you are talking about is generally reffered to as single signon 
(i.e. one signon for all machines).  Difference is that you are looking 
for a cross-platform deal.
There are 3 primary systems for doing this, one for Windows called 
Active Directory, one for Linux which is a combination of NIS and NFS 
and lastly there is the Samba-LDAP + NFS arrangement which I use to do 
it in a cross-platform manner.

First thing you have to do is figure out how to run NFS to share out the 
/home directory.

For the rest, try the last 3 articles on OpenLDAP at 
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/

They are on the right hand side under Recent MandrakeSecure Documents


I've got a few machines at home that I'd like to set up to share users 
so I don't have to keep files  passwords in sync across multiple boxes.

I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.  Fact is, as an admin, 
I'm a newbie, and I don't even know where to start looking for info on 
how to do this.

I have read that you can make samba act as a windows domain 
controller, which would do the trick if necessary, but I pretty much 
only use Linux at home (no current windows boxes).

I had thought that LDAP might be a route to handle this, but I can't 
even find a source on configuring LDAP that I can understand.  (I'm a 
bit sleep deprived right now, so that probably isn't helping.)

Can anybody help me out or point me in the right direction?  Thansk.

   - Theo



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] disk check

2003-06-17 Thread Jim C


David,

I presume that you have a fat32 partition because you have W$ on the
machine.  So, the short answer would be scandisk or chkdsk under W$,
there being no fsck.vfat AFAIK.  If you don't have W$, then I can only
guess that using fat32 is a result of severe personality problems and
refuse to talk to you any more ;-)
Brian
   

Well what about haveing a writeable (from Linux )  W$ partition?  Or 
perhaps I am mistakeing and there is now NTFS writeability from Linux 
out there somewhere?
Damn I miss being able to write between the two OS's.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:52:17 -0500, Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On September 1993 plus 3576 days Greg Meyer wrote:
 
  On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:48 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could someone
  explain to me about martians?
 
  Sure Anne, they are little green men that come from the planet Mars :-D.
 
  Seriously though, my understanding is that they are tcp packets that appear
  to have no sender.  In other words, they have come from nowhere, yet they
  are everywhere.  Some device sends out a packet with an improperly
  configured header which does not identify the source.
 
   Actually, that's only part of the whole thing :) A martian packet is
   one that comes from a network that shouldn't be sending packets to
   that interface. If you get a packet from 192.168.1.54 on your public
   (ie. internet) interface, it'll get marked as martian because a
   packet from a private interface shouldn't come to the public
   interface. Same happens with improper headers without identifying
   source...they get marked as martians because the interface can't
   confirm it comes from a valid source.
 
   Vox

I had an experience with martians recently. I was getting connection attempts
from 192.168.100.1. I initially told my firewall to block all invalid addresses,
but a day later I discovered that it was my cable modem (Motorola Surfboard
SB3100). The device had a full Web configuration interface and its own DHCP
server, and I only discovered this three years after buying it!

I'm not slow, I'm just fashionably late! :)


-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan  [Yama | http://www.pclinuxonline.com/]
  {PGP/GnuPG: http://dhanapalan.com/yama.asc
   049D38B4 | A7A9 8A02 78CB AB1B FCE4 EEC6 2DD9 249B 049D 38B4}

And I have to say that I absolutely despise the BSD people...
Oh, well. Not everybody can be as goodlooking as me. It's a curse.
-- Linus Torvalds


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Rodrigo
Hi All ...
  I have downloaded the kernel updates for mdk91, but the
  rpm -Fvh kernel    etc doesn't work ...
  Does exist a special way to update the kernel  ?

rodrigo
dgfuch


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Craig
Have a look here,

http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/magic.php

This will outline how to update your kernel, it is not difficult.


On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:49, Rodrigo wrote:
 Hi All ...
I have downloaded the kernel updates for mdk91, but the
rpm -Fvh kernel    etc doesn't work ...

Does exist a special way to update the kernel  ?


 rodrigo
 dgfuch

-- 
Cheers,
Craig.

Mandrake Linux 9.1
Kernel version: 2.4.21-0.18mdk
Current Linux Uptime: 2 days 15 hours 34 minutes.
Registered Linux User: 228534

Avoid the Gates of Hell.  Use Linux.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Linux equivalent to Windows Domain

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:29, Theo Brinkman wrote:
 I've got a few machines at home that I'd like to set up to share users 
 so I don't have to keep files  passwords in sync across multiple boxes.
 
 I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.  Fact is, as an admin, 
 I'm a newbie, and I don't even know where to start looking for info on 
 how to do this.

There are two documents that may or may not be on your box yet but are
as close as urpmi 

SAG (System Admins Guide)
NAG (Network Admins Guide)

just do 

urpmi nag sag 

and you can get them.




 
 I have read that you can make samba act as a windows domain controller, 
 which would do the trick if necessary, but I pretty much only use Linux 
 at home (no current windows boxes).
 
 I had thought that LDAP might be a route to handle this, but I can't 
 even find a source on configuring LDAP that I can understand.  (I'm a 
 bit sleep deprived right now, so that probably isn't helping.)
 
 Can anybody help me out or point me in the right direction?  Thansk.
 
 - Theo
 
 
 
 __
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:19, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
 On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:52:17 -0500, Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On September 1993 plus 3576 days Greg Meyer wrote:
  
   On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:48 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
   When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could someone
   explain to me about martians?
  
   Sure Anne, they are little green men that come from the planet Mars :-D.
  
   Seriously though, my understanding is that they are tcp packets that appear
   to have no sender.  In other words, they have come from nowhere, yet they
   are everywhere.  Some device sends out a packet with an improperly
   configured header which does not identify the source.
  
Actually, that's only part of the whole thing :) A martian packet is
one that comes from a network that shouldn't be sending packets to
that interface. If you get a packet from 192.168.1.54 on your public
(ie. internet) interface, it'll get marked as martian because a
packet from a private interface shouldn't come to the public
interface. Same happens with improper headers without identifying
source...they get marked as martians because the interface can't
confirm it comes from a valid source.
  
Vox
 
 I had an experience with martians recently. I was getting connection attempts
 from 192.168.100.1. I initially told my firewall to block all invalid addresses,
 but a day later I discovered that it was my cable modem (Motorola Surfboard
 SB3100). The device had a full Web configuration interface and its own DHCP
 server, and I only discovered this three years after buying it!
 
 I'm not slow, I'm just fashionably late! :)


   Reason number 512 on we at least looking at the instructions might be
worthwhile *large evil grin* 

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:46 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 2:54 pm, Tru64 User wrote:
  Additional Notes:
  The list I am talking about has been in existence long
  before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
  Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC.
  DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.

 This is getting tiresome.  No doubt your *other* list has its
 purposes.  Part of the purpose of this list is so that we can all
 learn, which we do from reading the whole troubleshooting process.
 We *do* encourage solutions to be posted.  If you have given up
 reading by then you will miss them, but if the subject's interesting
 to you, you will learn much.

 As I have said before, give me an answer and it will solve my problem
 - this time.  Next time I meet it I will have to ask again.  Teach me
 to troubleshoot that problem and I have learned something valuable.
 That's what I get from both the newbie and the expert list.

 And, BTW, your over-long quotes are a PITA to those why pay by the
 minute.

 Anne

Just an add-on: I can see where a list whose membership consisted entirely of 
sysadmins and similar types would work under the rules proposed by the OP. 
However, the membership here is much more heterogeneous any way you slice it 
-- experience, knowledge, usage, whatever. I heartily endorse the idea of a 
Summary response (here it's usually done by adding [SOLVED] to the original 
subject), particularly when the thread has been a long one. Doing so brings 
closure to the thread, greatly simplifies searching the archives, and it has 
the additional benefit of thanking those who contributed to the solution.
-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Solved Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List EmailTraffic

2003-06-17 Thread James Sparenberg
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 19:01, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:46 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
  On Tuesday 17 Jun 2003 2:54 pm, Tru64 User wrote:
   Additional Notes:
   The list I am talking about has been in existence long
   before Linux mandrake was popular. Before HPQ bought
   Compaq, and b4 Compaq bought DEC.
   DEC Alpha -Tru64 Unix List.
 
  This is getting tiresome.  No doubt your *other* list has its
  purposes.  Part of the purpose of this list is so that we can all
  learn, which we do from reading the whole troubleshooting process.
  We *do* encourage solutions to be posted.  If you have given up
  reading by then you will miss them, but if the subject's interesting
  to you, you will learn much.
 
  As I have said before, give me an answer and it will solve my problem
  - this time.  Next time I meet it I will have to ask again.  Teach me
  to troubleshoot that problem and I have learned something valuable.
  That's what I get from both the newbie and the expert list.
 
  And, BTW, your over-long quotes are a PITA to those why pay by the
  minute.
 
  Anne
 
 Just an add-on: I can see where a list whose membership consisted entirely of 
 sysadmins and similar types would work under the rules proposed by the OP. 
 However, the membership here is much more heterogeneous any way you slice it 
 -- experience, knowledge, usage, whatever. I heartily endorse the idea of a 
 Summary response (here it's usually done by adding [SOLVED] to the original 
 subject), particularly when the thread has been a long one. Doing so brings 
 closure to the thread, greatly simplifies searching the archives, and it has 
 the additional benefit of thanking those who contributed to the solution.
 -- cmg


Can this then end this thread *grin*!

James



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 12:49 am, Rodrigo wrote:
 Hi All ...
I have downloaded the kernel updates for mdk91, but the
rpm -Fvh kernel    etc doesn't work ...

Does exist a special way to update the kernel  ?

You can not upgrade the kernel that way, you have to install it in parallel 
with -ivh.  Once you have successfully booted to the new kernel, you can 
safely rpm -e the old kernel package.

-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] disk check

2003-06-17 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 02:55 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 07:22, Brian Parish wrote:
  On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 00:01, David Hlacik wrote:
   how can i check disk partition in fat32 for errors? and how can i
   repair it.
  
   David Hlacik
 
  David,
 
  I presume that you have a fat32 partition because you have W$ on the
  machine.  So, the short answer would be scandisk or chkdsk under W$,
  there being no fsck.vfat AFAIK.  If you don't have W$, then I can only
  guess that using fat32 is a result of severe personality problems and
  refuse to talk to you any more ;-)
 
  Brian

 I can think of a 3rd scenario,  He is using a Linux bootable CD to
 repair hosed winders installs. (usually easier than trying to do it
 under winders.)

 James

James:
Or he could have a FAT32 partition so that he can easily move data between 
Linux and Windows. That way all of his porn files can be kept in one place.

My attitude has always been to use MS tools to fiddle with MS partitioning and 
formatting, and Linux tools for the Linux side. Am I being overly cautious? 
-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] I Found my Martians [OT]

2003-06-17 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:48 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
 When the important problem-solving is over - (whisper) could someone
 explain to me about martians?

 Anne

It's what happens to those who don't wear tinfoil hats.
-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[expert] Shared Raw file systems

2003-06-17 Thread Dave Seff
I know how to create raw filesystems with mdk (8.2) and LVM, but now I
got ahold of a SCSI disk array and have connected to machones running
mdk 8.2 to them. 

How can I make the LVM partitions and the /dev/raw/raw* identical on
both machines to I can play with clustered applications like Oracle 9i
and others?


-- 
Dave Seff [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread eric huff
Is this still true (the article is a few years old)?
It says you can't update a kernel with software manager.  I did last week 
(since i didn;t know any better), and it worked fine.

I can't actually check what they said about lilo because
i have since reinstalled.  (no, not cuz of the kernel :)

eric

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 06:05 pm, Craig wrote:
 Have a look here,

 http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/magic.php

 This will outline how to update your kernel, it is not difficult.

 On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:49, Rodrigo wrote:
  Hi All ...
 I have downloaded the kernel updates for mdk91, but the
 rpm -Fvh kernel    etc doesn't work ...
 
 Does exist a special way to update the kernel  ?
 
 
  rodrigo
  dgfuch


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Rolf Pedersen
eric huff wrote:
Is this still true (the article is a few years old)?
It says you can't update a kernel with software manager.  I did last week 
(since i didn;t know any better), and it worked fine.

I can't actually check what they said about lilo because
i have since reinstalled.  (no, not cuz of the kernel :)
eric

On Tuesday 17 June 2003 06:05 pm, Craig wrote:

Have a look here,

http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/magic.php

This will outline how to update your kernel, it is not difficult.

Rpmdrake has been modified since to only install kernels:

$ cat /etc/urpmi/inst.list
# Here you can specify packages that need to be installed instead
# of being upgraded (typically kernel packages).
kernel
kernel-smp
kernel-secure
kernel-enterprise
kernel-linus2.2
kernel-linus2.4
kernel22
kernel22-secure
kernel22-smp
hackkernel
Rolf


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] Linux equivalent to Windows Domain

2003-06-17 Thread Michael Noble
If all machines are Linux then NIS and NFS will do exactly what you 
want and is very easy to setup.
If you are wanting to share files with Micro*$) then you will want
to add Samba to the list.  Samba is also very easy to setup with
Mandrake.  At least all these work very well under 9.0.  
If you want to keep Linux and Samba passwords in sync you will want to 
make your NIS Master and the Samba Server the same machine so that 
Samba can sync the passwords.  You also want to put Samba on the File
server.

I belive LDAP is a bit more than you want for just a few machines.


Mike

On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:29, Theo Brinkman wrote:
 I've got a few machines at home that I'd like to set up to share users 
 so I don't have to keep files  passwords in sync across multiple boxes.
 
 I'm having trouble figuring out how to do this.  Fact is, as an admin, 
 I'm a newbie, and I don't even know where to start looking for info on 
 how to do this.
 
 I have read that you can make samba act as a windows domain controller, 
 which would do the trick if necessary, but I pretty much only use Linux 
 at home (no current windows boxes).
 
 I had thought that LDAP might be a route to handle this, but I can't 
 even find a source on configuring LDAP that I can understand.  (I'm a 
 bit sleep deprived right now, so that probably isn't helping.)
 
 Can anybody help me out or point me in the right direction?  Thansk.
 
 - Theo
 
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
Michael Noble
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:57 pm, eric huff wrote:
 Is this still true (the article is a few years old)?
 It says you can't update a kernel with software manager.  I did last week
 (since i didn;t know any better), and it worked fine.

 I can't actually check what they said about lilo because
 i have since reinstalled.  (no, not cuz of the kernel :)

It is true.  The software installer (rpmdrake) has been modified to install 
the new kernel in parallel to the old rather than update.  See the  
/etc/urpmi/inst.list file.

-- 
Greg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread PlugHead
[Re-directed to the list, after replying to Rodrigo...]

IIRC, you should *always* use rpm -i (install) for kernel rpms, not -F
(freshen, i.e. update.)

Doing so could (will?) result in a non-bootable system (because update will
try to delete your current kernel and--even if it succeeds--the new one might
not work.)

I believe that the package naming is deliberately 'broken', so you can't do
this accidentally...

Once you've installed the new kernel, you should check /etc/lilo.conf (man
lilo.conf to learn more) and make sure it's right.  Then run lilo--this
can't hurt, and it will warn  you if anything is missing, etc.

Finally, I'll assume that this is your first kernel install, in which case:
keep a rescue disk handy.

HTH,
-Jason

On Wednesday 18 June 2003 12:49 am, Rodrigo wrote:
 Hi All ...
I have downloaded the kernel updates for mdk91, but the
rpm -Fvh kernel    etc doesn't work ...

Does exist a special way to update the kernel  ?


 rodrigo
 dgfuch

--

=
If it wasn't for the fun and money, I really don't know why I'd bother.
(alt.fan.pratchett)

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: Solved Re: [expert](2) Suggestions to help Minimize List Email Traffic

2003-06-17 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:18 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 19:01, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
  cmg

 Can this then end this thread *grin*!

 James

Uh huh.
-- cmg


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Robert Crawford
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 00:13, PlugHead wrote:
 [Re-directed to the list, after replying to Rodrigo...]

 IIRC, you should *always* use rpm -i (install) for kernel rpms, not -F
 (freshen, i.e. update.)

 Doing so could (will?) result in a non-bootable system (because update will
 try to delete your current kernel and--even if it succeeds--the new one
 might not work.)


Here's a concise sure-fire manual way to upgrade the Mandrake kernels with the 
new rpm versions Mandrake issues. Upgrading with vanilla kernel.org sources 
with any extra patches differs, and is a little more complicated, but for 
Mandrake rpms, the steps below are all that's needed.

1. Download the new kernel and kernel source rpms to their own directory you 
create in /home (two rpms).

2.Open a console, su to root, and cd to that directory.

3. Type:

rpm -ivh *.rpm

4. After they install, check the following locations:

1. /etc/lilo.conf. You should now see the new stanza for the new kernel at the 
bottom.

2. /boot.   You should now see items for the new kernel there.

3. /usr/src. There should be a new directory there for the new kernel.

4. /lib/modules. There should be a new kernel modules directory there.

If all that checks out, you have done it, and can reboot, and choose the new 
kernel in the lilo boot screen. The old kernel will still be listed, and 
available.

That's all there is to it with the Mandrake rpm kernel updates, as all copying 
and editing is done automatically.

Robert Crawford 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [expert] kernels updates !!??

2003-06-17 Thread Larry Sword
Robert Crawford wrote:

On Wednesday 18 June 2003 00:13, PlugHead wrote:
 

[Re-directed to the list, after replying to Rodrigo...]

IIRC, you should *always* use rpm -i (install) for kernel rpms, not -F
(freshen, i.e. update.)
Doing so could (will?) result in a non-bootable system (because update will
try to delete your current kernel and--even if it succeeds--the new one
might not work.)
   

Here's a concise sure-fire manual way to upgrade the Mandrake kernels with the 
new rpm versions Mandrake issues. Upgrading with vanilla kernel.org sources 
with any extra patches differs, and is a little more complicated, but for 
Mandrake rpms, the steps below are all that's needed.

1. Download the new kernel and kernel source rpms to their own directory you 
create in /home (two rpms).

2.Open a console, su to root, and cd to that directory.

3. Type:

rpm -ivh *.rpm

4. After they install, check the following locations:

1. /etc/lilo.conf. You should now see the new stanza for the new kernel at the 
bottom.

2. /boot.   You should now see items for the new kernel there.

3. /usr/src. There should be a new directory there for the new kernel.

4. /lib/modules. There should be a new kernel modules directory there.

If all that checks out, you have done it, and can reboot, and choose the new 
kernel in the lilo boot screen. The old kernel will still be listed, and 
available.

That's all there is to it with the Mandrake rpm kernel updates, as all copying 
and editing is done automatically.

Robert Crawford 

 

Yep this is the way it's done.. but it sure is questionable why 
in the Mandrake notice on the kernel, *MandrakeSoft Security Advisory 
MDKSA-2003:066 : kernel
the have the following:
*

To upgrade automatically, use *MandrakeUpdate*.

If you want to upgrade manually, download the updated package(s) from 
one of our FTP server mirrors http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/ftp.php 
and upgrade with rpm -Fvh *.rpm.

:-P

Larry

*
*



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com