Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:03 +1100, Scott Hamilton wrote: On a final note, I did a 'make distclean' and ./configure for both SimGear and FlightGear and now the change in frame rate is acceptable, it goes from 30 fps to around 22 - 24 fps once 3D clouds are turned on. S. > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:18 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > > Scott Hamilton wrote: > > >On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: > > > > > >>>Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance > > >>> decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? > > >> > > >> yep, from 30fps to 2fps... > > > > OK, I hope this reproducer scenario helps; > > 1. don't turn on 3D clouds from command line, don't specify any > weather (manual metar), default; scattered at 4000ft and cirrus at > 19500 > 25-31fps > > 2. go into rendering options, turn on 3D clouds > 2-3fps > > 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear > 2-6fps > > 4. change 4000 from scattered to few > remains 2-6 fps > > 5. change 4000 from few to clear > 20-24fps > > 6. turn OFF 3D clouds (so there is no 3D or 2D clouds) > 23-26fps > > I last built fgfs 2009-10-03 19:23 (Sydney time) > I've now done a cvs update and 'make clean' on SimGear and FlightGear > and updated data/Shaders/ > > 1. same as a above. The cmd line is; bin/fgfs --enable-sound > --enable-hud --aircraft=A380 --airport=YSSY --runway=34L > --timeofday=afternoon > 28-32fps > > 2. go into rendering options, turn ON 3D clouds > 7 fps > > 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear > remains 7fps > > 4. change 4000 from scattered to few > 10-11fps > > 5. change 4000 from few to clear > 23-27fps > > 6. turn OFF 3D clouds > remains 23-27fps > > > Operating System: openSuSE 11.1 (kernel2.6.27.29-0.1-default ) > Model: "nVidia Quadro FX 580" > > I'm assuming shaders need some OpenGL help; > > # glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: Yes > server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation > server glx version string: 1.4 > server glx extensions: > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_NV_swap_group, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage > client glx vendor string: NVIDIA > Corporation > client glx version string: > 1.4 > client glx > extensions: > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_EXT_visual_info, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, > GLX_SGI_video_sync, > GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_NV_video_out, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, > GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, > GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_EXT_fbconfig_packed_float, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_present_video, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage > GLX > extensions: > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, > GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, > GLX_SGI_swap_control, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_NV_swap_group, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage, > > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address > OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA > Corporation > OpenGL renderer string: Quadro FX > 580/PCI/SSE2 > OpenGL version string: 3.0.0 NVIDIA 180.44 > > > > I hope something here helps, as they do look good, but I can't get off > the ground to see them :) > > > cheers > S. > > > > > > > > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. > > However, there is a possible explanation. > > > > The code falls back to a 2D cloud layer if a 3D cloud isn't defined for a > > specific cloud type (st, ac etc.). IIRC > > previously we didn't define a 3D stratus layer, so we'd get a 2D layer > > instead. > > > > The updated 3D clouds include stratus layers (which look rather nice IMO), > > but require quite a larger number > > of sprites - something like 40 per cloud. I've seen a small perf hit from > > the new stratus layers, but nothing like > > what you have reported. > > > > I suspect what you are seeing if the difference between a 2D and 3D cloud. > > > > What performance change are you seei
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Scott Hamilton wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: >> >> Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? >>> yep, from 30fps to 2fps... >>> > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. However, > there is a possible explanation. > > The code falls back to a 2D cloud layer if a 3D cloud isn't defined for a > specific cloud type (st, ac etc.). IIRC > previously we didn't define a 3D stratus layer, so we'd get a 2D layer > instead. > > The updated 3D clouds include stratus layers (which look rather nice IMO), > but require quite a larger number > of sprites - something like 40 per cloud. I've seen a small perf hit from the > new stratus layers, but nothing like > what you have reported. > > I suspect what you are seeing if the difference between a 2D and 3D cloud. > > What performance change are you seeing with, say, cumulus clouds, which > haven't changed much? > > BTW - I've updated Docs/Readme.3Dclouds with information on the new format, > if anyone is interested in enhancing > the clouds. > > -Stuart > What I have seen (airplane-ufo, altitude - 2000ft, cloud layer 0 = 4000ft, overcast, cloud layer 1 = 19500ft, cirrus): 1. 3D clouds OFF from command line: FPS=70, memory usage 360M, layer 0 - visible. 2. 3D clouds ON from command line: memory usage from 800M up to 1.2G - pitch =0 deg : FPS=10-12 - pitch =90 deg : FPS=70 - pitch =-90 deg : FPS=70 3. 3D clouds ON from command line, than switch OFF from menu : FPS = 60-70, memory usage 700-800M 4. 3D clouds ON from command line, start at lat,lon = 0, 0 (no scenery loaded) : NO clouds in layer 0, both 3D and 2D. If switch 3D clouds OFF from menu then 2D clouds appears. With respect, Alex -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:17:55PM +, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Unfortunately the 3D cloud performance seems to be very > graphics-card specific. My card is a couple of years old, but > doesn't seem to have the same problems. I am curious as to what your graphics card is. It would be nice if we could get an idea of which cards work well - and those that that have problems so they could be addressed. -- James Treacy tre...@debian.org -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On 7 Oct 2009, at 22:21, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Unfortunately, last time I tried it, the OSG Impostor implimentation > was very > broken, and I didn't have the skills to fix it. As a general point, if impostors worked well in OSG, there's many other things we could be using them for - up to, and including, complete scenery tiles. This would enable the view distance to be pushed up quite high, without impacting framerate the way it currently does. I agree, though, that fixing it 'properly' requires some OGS skills - but then I'm surprised more people in the OSG community aren't also needed decent impostors. James -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Heiko Schulz wrote:aeitsch...@yahoo.de> > I coulden't try the new cloud patch yet- I'm waiting that someone makes a > binary > snapshot for win32-users ;-) > > So much I understood, there is a certain level of sprites numbers needed, so > that the single clouds is correctly shaded. > But as transpareny is one of the strongest factor which slows down, it is no > wonder that the fps might decreases... > > As our technic is very similar to the one of X-Plane and MSFS, it is quite > interesting how they got managed to have a bit better perfomance: I think a big difference is that MSFS uses Impostors. These effectively pre-render a set of sprites onto a texture, and use the resulting texture until the view angle changes significantly. This saves a lot of transparency rendering. Unfortunately, last time I tried it, the OSG Impostor implimentation was very broken, and I didn't have the skills to fix it. I may have another look to see if it has been improved in recent OSG releases. -Stuart -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Durk Talsma wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2009 11:18:07 am Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. > > However, there is a possible explanation. > > > > FWIW, I've run into one situation where the new cloud code significantly > slowed down my system. I found that reducing the range setting from 20km to > approximately 11-12 kilometers gave me back decent performance, without too > mach sacrificing of detail. It seemed to be a rather sharp transition, so I'm > wondering whether texture memory use has something to do with it. > > Just thinking out loud, Would it be feasable to impement some sort of LOD > scheme, where sprites are dynamically added as they are getting closer? That > way, it might be possible to have clouds across a much larger area with as > much of an impact on performance. That's a very interesting idea - I'll add it to my list of things to investigate. Unfortunately the 3D cloud performance seems to be very graphics-card specific. My card is a couple of years old, but doesn't seem to have the same problems. -Stuart -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Hi, > I also noticed a huge frame rate drop when I was in or > close to being in the cloud layer, so that the clouds > consumed the greatest percentage of the screen real estate > ... that is when the frame rates were the worst. If we are > drawing zillions of transparent quads and suddenly they are > sized to cover nearly the whole screen, then we are > basically rendering the whole screen (or most of the screen) > for each cloud quad, or enough of them that are near by to > pull the frame rates down to very low levels. > > > Curt. I coulden't try the new cloud patch yet- I'm waiting that someone makes a binary snapshot for win32-users ;-) So much I understood, there is a certain level of sprites numbers needed, so that the single clouds is correctly shaded. But as transpareny is one of the strongest factor which slows down, it is no wonder that the fps might decreases... As our technic is very similar to the one of X-Plane and MSFS, it is quite interesting how they got managed to have a bit better perfomance: X-Plane: they use one sprite for one single cloud- that looks sometimes funny viewed from above (rotation of the clouds), but seems to give a good perfomance. But they don't give this realistic shading from white to grey as we can see on the real clouds in the sky or here in FGFS... MSFS: depending if default or Add-on. The recent Add-On called REX looks really good, but also seems to use only sprite per single cloud. The default clouds tried in the demo once a time uses some more sprites. Their clouds system shows a quite nice shading similar to our. I prefer our shading from white to grey of the clouds, as it looks really realistic, but as I understood Stuart it only works good and without any errors with a certain number of sprites. I wonder if it would be possible to have this shading from white to grey from top to bottom without many sprites. This would help a lot, and we already can define the number of sprites uisng the slider in the rendering menu. Correct me if I'm wrong in any points here Regards HHS -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Durk Talsma wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2009 11:18:07 am Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. > > However, there is a possible explanation. > > > > FWIW, I've run into one situation where the new cloud code significantly > slowed down my system. I found that reducing the range setting from 20km to > approximately 11-12 kilometers gave me back decent performance, without too > mach sacrificing of detail. It seemed to be a rather sharp transition, so > I'm > wondering whether texture memory use has something to do with it. > > Just thinking out loud, Would it be feasable to impement some sort of LOD > scheme, where sprites are dynamically added as they are getting closer? > That > way, it might be possible to have clouds across a much larger area with as > much of an impact on performance. > I also noticed a huge frame rate drop when I was in or close to being in the cloud layer, so that the clouds consumed the greatest percentage of the screen real estate ... that is when the frame rates were the worst. If we are drawing zillions of transparent quads and suddenly they are sized to cover nearly the whole screen, then we are basically rendering the whole screen (or most of the screen) for each cloud quad, or enough of them that are near by to pull the frame rates down to very low levels. Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 11:18:07 am Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. > However, there is a possible explanation. > FWIW, I've run into one situation where the new cloud code significantly slowed down my system. I found that reducing the range setting from 20km to approximately 11-12 kilometers gave me back decent performance, without too mach sacrificing of detail. It seemed to be a rather sharp transition, so I'm wondering whether texture memory use has something to do with it. Just thinking out loud, Would it be feasable to impement some sort of LOD scheme, where sprites are dynamically added as they are getting closer? That way, it might be possible to have clouds across a much larger area with as much of an impact on performance. Cheers, Durk -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Hi Scott, Something else to try would be to turn off the other shaders (water reflection/ground cover). When I get all of these + clouds + rain/snow, my performance really goes in the toilet too. The snow/elevation shader seems to be especially hard on frame rates, but I notice the farm field shader has a big affect too if there is a lot of farm fields in the view. I don't quite get the farm field shader purpose. Can we not do pretty much the same thing with a basic texture? I see what the terrain elevation/slope shader is doing and that's interesting, but it's a huge frame rate hit for what it offers. Regards, Curt. On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Scott Hamilton wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:18 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > > Scott Hamilton wrote: > >On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: > > > >>>Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance > >>> decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? > >> > >> yep, from 30fps to 2fps... > > > > OK, I hope this reproducer scenario helps; > > 1. don't turn on 3D clouds from command line, don't specify any weather > (manual metar), default; scattered at 4000ft and cirrus at 19500 > 25-31fps > > 2. go into rendering options, turn on 3D clouds > 2-3fps > > 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear > 2-6fps > > 4. change 4000 from scattered to few > remains 2-6 fps > > 5. change 4000 from few to clear > 20-24fps > > 6. turn OFF 3D clouds (so there is no 3D or 2D clouds) > 23-26fps > > I last built fgfs 2009-10-03 19:23 (Sydney time) > I've now done a cvs update and 'make clean' on SimGear and FlightGear and > updated data/Shaders/ > > 1. same as a above. The cmd line is; bin/fgfs --enable-sound --enable-hud > --aircraft=A380 --airport=YSSY --runway=34L --timeofday=afternoon > 28-32fps > > 2. go into rendering options, turn ON 3D clouds > 7 fps > > 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear > remains 7fps > > 4. change 4000 from scattered to few > 10-11fps > > 5. change 4000 from few to clear > 23-27fps > > 6. turn OFF 3D clouds > remains 23-27fps > > > Operating System: openSuSE 11.1 (kernel2.6.27.29-0.1-default ) > Model: "nVidia Quadro FX 580" > > I'm assuming shaders need some OpenGL help; > > # glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: Yes > server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation > server glx version string: 1.4 > server glx extensions: > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_NV_swap_group, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage > client glx vendor string: NVIDIA > Corporation > client glx version string: > 1.4 > client glx > extensions: > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_EXT_visual_info, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, > GLX_SGI_video_sync, > GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_NV_video_out, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, > GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, > GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_EXT_fbconfig_packed_float, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_present_video, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage > GLX > extensions: > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, > GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, > GLX_SGI_swap_control, > GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, > GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, > GLX_NV_swap_group, > GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, > GLX_NV_multisample_coverage, > > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address > OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA > Corporation > OpenGL renderer string: Quadro FX > 580/PCI/SSE2 > OpenGL version string: 3.0.0 NVIDIA 180.44 > > > > I hope something here helps, as they do look good, but I can't get off the > ground to see them :) > > > cheers > S. > > > > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. However, > there is a possible explanation. > > The code falls back to a 2D cloud layer if a 3D cloud isn't defined for a > specific cloud type (st, ac etc.). IIRC > previously we didn't define a 3D stratus layer, so we'd get a 2D layer > instead. > > The updated 3D clouds include stratus layers (which look rather nice IMO), > but require quite a larger number > of sprites - something like 40 per cloud. I've seen a small perf hit from the > new stratus layers, but nothing like > what you have reported. > > I suspect what you are seeing if the difference between a 2D and 3D cloud. > > What performance change are you seeing with, say, cumulus clouds, which > haven't changed much? > > BTW - I've updated Docs/Readme.3Dclouds with information on the new format, > if anyone is interested in enhancing > the clouds. > > -Stuart > > > > >
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:18 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Scott Hamilton wrote: > >On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: > > > >>>Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance > >>> decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? > >> > >> yep, from 30fps to 2fps... OK, I hope this reproducer scenario helps; 1. don't turn on 3D clouds from command line, don't specify any weather (manual metar), default; scattered at 4000ft and cirrus at 19500 25-31fps 2. go into rendering options, turn on 3D clouds 2-3fps 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear 2-6fps 4. change 4000 from scattered to few remains 2-6 fps 5. change 4000 from few to clear 20-24fps 6. turn OFF 3D clouds (so there is no 3D or 2D clouds) 23-26fps I last built fgfs 2009-10-03 19:23 (Sydney time) I've now done a cvs update and 'make clean' on SimGear and FlightGear and updated data/Shaders/ 1. same as a above. The cmd line is; bin/fgfs --enable-sound --enable-hud --aircraft=A380 --airport=YSSY --runway=34L --timeofday=afternoon 28-32fps 2. go into rendering options, turn ON 3D clouds 7 fps 3. change 19500 from cirrus to clear remains 7fps 4. change 4000 from scattered to few 10-11fps 5. change 4000 from few to clear 23-27fps 6. turn OFF 3D clouds remains 23-27fps Operating System: openSuSE 11.1 (kernel2.6.27.29-0.1-default ) Model: "nVidia Quadro FX 580" I'm assuming shaders need some OpenGL help; # glxinfo name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: Yes server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation server glx version string: 1.4 server glx extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, GLX_NV_multisample_coverage client glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation client glx version string: 1.4 client glx extensions: GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_NV_video_out, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_ARB_create_context, GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, GLX_EXT_fbconfig_packed_float, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, GLX_NV_present_video, GLX_NV_multisample_coverage GLX extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_create_context, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, GLX_NV_swap_group, GLX_EXT_framebuffer_sRGB, GLX_NV_multisample_coverage, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: Quadro FX 580/PCI/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 3.0.0 NVIDIA 180.44 I hope something here helps, as they do look good, but I can't get off the ground to see them :) cheers S. > > I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. However, > there is a possible explanation. > > The code falls back to a 2D cloud layer if a 3D cloud isn't defined for a > specific cloud type (st, ac etc.). IIRC > previously we didn't define a 3D stratus layer, so we'd get a 2D layer > instead. > > The updated 3D clouds include stratus layers (which look rather nice IMO), > but require quite a larger number > of sprites - something like 40 per cloud. I've seen a small perf hit from the > new stratus layers, but nothing like > what you have reported. > > I suspect what you are seeing if the difference between a 2D and 3D cloud. > > What performance change are you seeing with, say, cumulus clouds, which > haven't changed much? > > BTW - I've updated Docs/Readme.3Dclouds with information on the new format, > if anyone is interested in enhancing > the clouds. > > -Stuart > > > > > -- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009.
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Scott Hamilton wrote: >On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: > >>>Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance >>> decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? >> >> yep, from 30fps to 2fps... I'm very surprised that performance has decreased so significantly. However, there is a possible explanation. The code falls back to a 2D cloud layer if a 3D cloud isn't defined for a specific cloud type (st, ac etc.). IIRC previously we didn't define a 3D stratus layer, so we'd get a 2D layer instead. The updated 3D clouds include stratus layers (which look rather nice IMO), but require quite a larger number of sprites - something like 40 per cloud. I've seen a small perf hit from the new stratus layers, but nothing like what you have reported. I suspect what you are seeing if the difference between a 2D and 3D cloud. What performance change are you seeing with, say, cumulus clouds, which haven't changed much? BTW - I've updated Docs/Readme.3Dclouds with information on the new format, if anyone is interested in enhancing the clouds. -Stuart -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Same here too. And I don't even have a good graphics card! ;) -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Nope, same fps... But clouds look much better; thanks Stuart! -- --- WBR, Vadym. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:06 -0400, William Harrison wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance > decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? yep, from 30fps to 2fps... S. > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Durk Talsma > wrote: > > On Thursday 01 October 2009 06:22:15 am Durk Talsma wrote: > > Hi Stuart, > > > > Unless somebody else beats me to it, I'll try to commit this > patch this > > weekend. > > > > Once it is applied, I'll update the appropriate README > documentation > > > myself. > > > > > > > > Okay done. Have fun with the documentation :-) > > Cheers, > Durk > > > -- > > > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference > in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. > Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to > market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > > > > -- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel ** This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain privileged information or confidential information or both. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. ** -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Maybe it's just me, but has anyone noticed a dramatic performance decrease with 3d clouds after this patch? On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Durk Talsma wrote: > On Thursday 01 October 2009 06:22:15 am Durk Talsma wrote: > > Hi Stuart, > > > > Unless somebody else beats me to it, I'll try to commit this patch this > > weekend. > > > Once it is applied, I'll update the appropriate README documentation > > > myself. > > > > > > Okay done. Have fun with the documentation :-) > > Cheers, > Durk > > > -- > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
On Thursday 01 October 2009 06:22:15 am Durk Talsma wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > Unless somebody else beats me to it, I'll try to commit this patch this > weekend. > > Once it is applied, I'll update the appropriate README documentation > > myself. > > Okay done. Have fun with the documentation :-) Cheers, Durk -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Hi Stuart, Unless somebody else beats me to it, I'll try to commit this patch this weekend. Thanks for this fine contribution, Cheers, Durk On Wednesday 30 September 2009 11:15:21 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been doing some work to improve the 3D clouds. > > As well as a variety of bug fixes, improvements include:- > - A new XML format > - Texture indexing based on the position of the sprite in the cloud-mass, > allowing more control over the texture set. - Improved fog and shading > - Better sprite distribution > - A more natural distribution of clouds, so no more obvious grids. > > Most of the improvements can be seen in the Cu and Ac cloud types, but the > stratus clouds have been improved as well. > > A patch is available here: > http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/clouds.tar.gz > > Once it is applied, I'll update the appropriate README documentation > myself. > > Comments are welcome as always. > > -Stuart > > > > > > --- >--- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] 3D Clouds update
Hi All, I've been doing some work to improve the 3D clouds. As well as a variety of bug fixes, improvements include:- - A new XML format - Texture indexing based on the position of the sprite in the cloud-mass, allowing more control over the texture set. - Improved fog and shading - Better sprite distribution - A more natural distribution of clouds, so no more obvious grids. Most of the improvements can be seen in the Cu and Ac cloud types, but the stratus clouds have been improved as well. A patch is available here: http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/clouds.tar.gz Once it is applied, I'll update the appropriate README documentation myself. Comments are welcome as always. -Stuart -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
