Which Laptop for FreeBSD
Hello all, i would like to buy a new Laptop in the very near future, and of course it has to run my favourite OS. I have never searched for a Laptop, and now that i did i am overwhelmed with the confusing variety of different Brands and Models. One of the big Questions i am having is; Should i look for a 64 bit Laptop or better not? I am just not sure wheter or not 64bit will come trough this year on Laptops, and how well is it (and will it be) supported by FreeBSD. I know that there are some Internet Sites which try to maintain some data about linux / unix on laptops, but i found them to be quite outdated. I am looking for a Workstation replacement kind of Laptop, and it must have a DVI out for my Monitor. I kind of would like to go with 64bit, since its supposedly the future, if this isnt quite the time for 64bit Laptops yet, please someone educate me. If there is anyone out there, that can recommend a new Laptop (Price is not an issue) that runs FreeBSD nicely, please let me know, i would most appreciate it. Thanks and best regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
font renderer already registered
Help! I got many warnings such as Warning: font renderer for .pcf already registered at priority 0 when I start X. there is my Xorg.0.log X Window System Version 6.9.0 Release Date: 21 December 2005 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.9 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.0 i386 [ELF] Current Operating System: FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 6.0-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p6 #1: Wed Apr 5 19:59:21 CST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/snnn i386 Build Date: 16 February 2006 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Thu Apr 6 14:09:58 2006 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf (==) ServerLayout Layout0 (**) |--Screen Screen0 (0) (**) | |--Monitor Monitor0 (**) | |--Device Card0 (**) |--Input Device Keyboard0 (**) Option XkbModel pc105 (**) Option XkbLayout us (**) XKB: layout: us (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |--Input Device Mouse0 (WW) The directory /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/ does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (==) FontPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/ (==) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb (==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 X.Org Video Driver: 0.8 X.Org XInput driver : 0.5 X.Org Server Extension : 0.2 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: bitmap (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.so (II) Module bitmap: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 6.9.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Font Renderer ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: pcidata (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 6.9.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8 (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) (--) using VT number 9 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 10de,01e0 card , rev c1 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:00:1: chip 10de,01eb card 10de,0c17 rev c1 class 05,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:00:2: chip 10de,01ee card 10de,0c17 rev c1 class 05,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:00:3: chip 10de,01ed card 10de,0c17 rev c1 class 05,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:00:4: chip 10de,01ec card 10de,0c17 rev c1 class 05,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:00:5: chip 10de,01ef card 10de,0c17 rev c1 class 05,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 10de,0060 card 10de,0c11 rev a4 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:01:1: chip 10de,0064 card 10de,0c11 rev a2 class 0c,05,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 10de,0067 card 10de,0c11 rev a4 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:02:1: chip 10de,0067 card 10de,0c11 rev a4 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:02:2: chip 10de,0068 card 10de,0c11 rev a4 class 0c,03,20 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:04:0: chip 10de,0066 card 10de,0c11 rev a1 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:06:0: chip 10de,006a card 10de,4144 rev a1 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:08:0: chip 10de,006c card , rev a3 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10de,0065 card 10de,05b2 rev a2 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 10de,01e8 card , rev c1 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 10de,0173 card , rev a3 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 02:07:0: chip 1073,000c card 1073,000c rev 03 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,2), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x1) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x - 0x (0x0) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:8:0), (0,2,2), BCTRL: 0x0002 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus 2 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xe400 - 0xe4ff (0x100) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:30:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x000a (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xe500 - 0xe6ff (0x200) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1
Is there a way of automatically including a CVS tag in a string substitution
I am looking for a way to do string substitution for CVS tags in the same fashion as the $Id$ method for the RCS version info etc... or the SCCS @(#) tagging syntax. Is there something dumb I have overlooked or does it take manual intervention to include the 'official' release tag into programs that can be viewed with ident or what. man ident man what cheers mjt Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction. --Albert Einstein Murray Taylor Bytecraft Systems P: +61 3 8710 2555 F: +61 3 8710 2599 D: +61 3 9238 4275 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please inform the sender and/or addressee immediately and delete the material. E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage caused by such matters. --- ***This Email has been scanned for Viruses by MailMarshal.*** ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FAX software ?
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 04:41:14PM +0200, simon butsana wrote: Hi, Try hylafax. mgetty+sendfax is much easier to tune. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Award BIOS Upgrade Fees - Slightly Offtopic
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:50:47PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: For a 3rd party BIOS, 39.95 is cheap. They can be much higher, close to $100. But for $50 it is possible to buy new not so bad motherboard. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: programmer questions - MMAP
#include sys/mman.h #include fcntl.h #include stdio.h #include unistd.h main() { int ff=open(test,O_RDWR|O_CREAT,0666); char *adr; lseek(ff,124,0); write(ff,,1); adr=mmap(0,124,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_NOCORE,ff,0); Try MAP_NOCORE|MAP_SHARED here. It's probably defaulting to a private mapping. WORKS!!! thank you. another question - do i need to create 16MB hole to be able to write directly up to 16MB data. it would be nice if mmap is able to extend the file as needed without lseek/write. is it possible? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which BSD - Flash Drive
I would like to run a BSD distribution off a 1GB USB Flash drive... What would be the most suitable - something like FreeSBIE? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-BSD---Flash-Drive-t1404225.html#a3779463 Sent from the freebsd-questions forum at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
Hi, I have a python program in freebsd, doing a heavey indexing job involving a mega size array. The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. Please refer to the below top's snapshots at different times. (A) is earlier than (B), and so on. Thanks for your help in advance. = (A) = last pid: 766; load averages: 0.66, 0.21, 0.11up 0+00:19:54 23:23:04 63 processes: 2 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 96.6% user, 0.0% nice, 3.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 341M Active, 35M Inact, 98M Wired, 704K Cache, 91M Buf, 522M Free Swap: 998M Total, 998M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1180 245M 244M RUN 0:59 96.57% python = (B) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.02, 0.70, 0.36up 0+00:24:20 23:27:30 62 processes: 2 running, 60 sleeping CPU states: 92.5% user, 0.0% nice, 6.0% system, 1.5% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 766M Active, 67M Inact, 115M Wired, 45M Cache, 109M Buf, 3636K Free Swap: 998M Total, 37M Used, 962M Free, 3% Inuse, 17M Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1280 744M 743M RUN 5:14 94.63% python = (C) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.06, 0.81, 0.43up 0+00:25:54 23:29:04 62 processes: 2 running, 60 sleeping CPU states: 95.5% user, 0.0% nice, 4.1% system, 0.4% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 849M Active, 2868K Inact, 115M Wired, 28M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 95M Used, 903M Free, 9% Inuse, 236K Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1280 848M 841M RUN 6:42 91.46% python = (D) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.15, 0.87, 0.47up 0+00:26:36 23:29:46 62 processes: 1 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 28.6% user, 0.0% nice, 18.8% system, 1.5% interrupt, 51.1%idle Mem: 843M Active, 5380K Inact, 116M Wired, 31M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 142M Used, 856M Free, 14% Inuse, 932K In, 56M Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 -200 878M 841M swread 7:14 79.05% python = (E) = last pid: 817; load averages: 0.06, 0.36, 0.36up 0+00:32:31 23:35:41 62 processes: 1 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 4.9% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 88.0%idle Mem: 803M Active, 76M Inact, 88M Wired, 28M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 234M Used, 765M Free, 23% Inuse, 3148K In, 2284K Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 -200 915M 756M swread 8:01 1.03% python ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:43:42PM +0800, Karl Ma wrote: Hi, I have a python program in freebsd, doing a heavey indexing job involving a mega size array. The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. swread means that the process is busy waiting for information to be read from (or possibly written to) the swap space. The process cannot use any actual CPU time until it has gotten that information from swap. It sounds like the process has entered that condition generally known as thrashing where it spends most of the time swapping instead of doing useful work. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. Apparently the algorithms Windows XP uses to manage swap are a better fit for this particular programs memory usage pattern than those of FreeBSD (or you might run fewer other programs in parallell of XP, leaving more free memory for this particular program.) It is quite likely that for some other programs you would see the reverse situation with XP being much slower. How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. That won't help. You need to add more RAM (or decrease the memory usage of the program, or remove any other memory-hungry programs running at the same time, or change the memory access pattern of the program so that it has greater reference locality so it does not need to swap as often.) Please refer to the below top's snapshots at different times. (A) is earlier than (B), and so on. Thanks for your help in advance. = (A) = last pid: 766; load averages: 0.66, 0.21, 0.11up 0+00:19:54 23:23:04 63 processes: 2 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 96.6% user, 0.0% nice, 3.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 341M Active, 35M Inact, 98M Wired, 704K Cache, 91M Buf, 522M Free Swap: 998M Total, 998M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1180 245M 244M RUN 0:59 96.57% python = (B) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.02, 0.70, 0.36up 0+00:24:20 23:27:30 62 processes: 2 running, 60 sleeping CPU states: 92.5% user, 0.0% nice, 6.0% system, 1.5% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 766M Active, 67M Inact, 115M Wired, 45M Cache, 109M Buf, 3636K Free Swap: 998M Total, 37M Used, 962M Free, 3% Inuse, 17M Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1280 744M 743M RUN 5:14 94.63% python = (C) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.06, 0.81, 0.43up 0+00:25:54 23:29:04 62 processes: 2 running, 60 sleeping CPU states: 95.5% user, 0.0% nice, 4.1% system, 0.4% interrupt, 0.0%idle Mem: 849M Active, 2868K Inact, 115M Wired, 28M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 95M Used, 903M Free, 9% Inuse, 236K Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 1280 848M 841M RUN 6:42 91.46% python = (D) = last pid: 792; load averages: 1.15, 0.87, 0.47up 0+00:26:36 23:29:46 62 processes: 1 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 28.6% user, 0.0% nice, 18.8% system, 1.5% interrupt, 51.1%idle Mem: 843M Active, 5380K Inact, 116M Wired, 31M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 142M Used, 856M Free, 14% Inuse, 932K In, 56M Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 -200 878M 841M swread 7:14 79.05% python = (E) = last pid: 817; load averages: 0.06, 0.36, 0.36up 0+00:32:31 23:35:41 62 processes: 1 running, 61 sleeping CPU states: 4.9% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 88.0%idle Mem: 803M Active, 76M Inact, 88M Wired, 28M Cache, 109M Buf, 1656K Free Swap: 998M Total, 234M Used, 765M Free, 23% Inuse, 3148K In, 2284K Out PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 751 root1 -200 915M 756M swread 8:01 1.03% python -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding ip:s with different gateway
I have currently ip:s from block ...125.192/26 on my freebsd server. with gateway ...125.193. added via rc.conf: defaultrouter=...125.193 ifconfig_rl0=inet ...125.194 netmask 255.255.255.192 ifconfig_rl0_alias0=inet ...125.195 netmask 255.255.255.255 ifconfig_rl0_alias1=inet ...125.196 netmask 255.255.255.255 ifconfig_rl0_alias2=inet ...125.197 netmask 255.255.255.255 and so on. Now I got new block from isp: ...122.192/26 with gw ...122.193. So question is how to add ip's from this block to same server? With ipconfig etc. tools and with rc.conf? -- kpn @ IRCnet ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BST instead of GMT
Hi all, I am looking for a way to get my FreeBSD 5.3 box to show my local time as BST (British Summer Time) as apposed to GMT. I have checked and double-checked the timezone and have set this to Europe/London. However I think I need to do something with the locale. Hunting around led me to the /etc/login.conf and the concept of classes but can't understand or follow the documentation to get it set up correctly. Any help or guidance would be appreciated. Many thanks. Regards Philip Radford. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESOLVED : Low perf of i386 6.0 on dell poweredge 1850 bi-Xeon2.8ghzDualCore
Hi, I'm comming back with solution to my problem. In fact solution was to disable any cache on perc4 controller. I do this at the beginning but with perc4 controller it doesn't seems to be effective unless you delete everything and put good configuration when creating the logical drive and on more time in configuration mode. Difference for high msql utilisation is server running near two time quickly. Still don't know why it was so more visible with smp. For information perc4 configuration is : On creation and on configuration : Write Policy -- Writethru Read Policy -- non-adaptive Eric. On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 04:19:15PM +0100, Eric D'HEM wrote: Mail NETvigieHi, I buy a new DELL PowerEdge 1850 with Bi-Xeon 2.8GHZ/2*2MB Dual Core 800FSB processor, 2Go DDR2 RAM, PERC4di RAID controller with 2 SCSI U320 15.000tpm 36Go hdd on RAID1. I install on it Freebsd 6.0, apache 2.2.0 and mysql 4.1.18 and compare performance with : OLD PowerEDge with only simple Bi-Xeon 3.0 GHZ and freebsd 4.11. Result is that web and local databases query are +- 4 times slower with freebsd 6.0 and dual-core. I try with and without smp and threaded kernel and results are same. I came back to Generic kernel to see if it come from my kernel configuration but result was same. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
I've just installed a new server with gmirror and I like it. I've got an identical server running on-board RAID currently. Can I split the array in the BIOS, install gmirror on disk 1, reboot, and add the second disk in? Or will there be any complications with FreeBSD being initially installed on an array? Ashley ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to handle 'local' ports/packages?
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 01:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to the +CONTENTS file for the package, but then portmanager complains that it is nonexistent and won't complete 'portmanager -s'. To make matters more awkward, this package is built from a closed-source binary distribution and thus can't be properly ported, so I can't set it up properly. A port does not have to be built from source, there are several (maybe many) closed-source packages in the ports-tree, for example: archivers/rar mail/mulberry x11/nvidia-driver Ok, that's fine, but how can I have a port on my system that isn't in the ports tree available to the world? I mean, won't anything I add to my local tree be deleted by cvsup'ing? joel -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
Hello, On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Ashley Moran wrote: I've just installed a new server with gmirror and I like it. I've got an identical server running on-board RAID currently. Can I split the array in the BIOS, install gmirror on disk 1, reboot, and add the second disk in? Or will there be any complications with FreeBSD being initially installed on an array? I recommend you to follow this rule: If it is not broken, then dont fix it. In your case I think you better leave all as is. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Ashley Moran wrote: I've just installed a new server with gmirror and I like it. I've got an identical server running on-board RAID currently. Can I split the array in the BIOS, install gmirror on disk 1, reboot, and add the second disk in? Or i think - just YES. no problem ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
running for more than a few hours. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I this will not speed up disk drive which already works at 100%. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BST instead of GMT
Philip Radford wrote: Hi all, I am looking for a way to get my FreeBSD 5.3 box to show my local time as BST (British Summer Time) as apposed to GMT. I have checked and double-checked the timezone and have set this to Europe/London. However I think I need to do something with the locale. Hunting around led me to the /etc/login.conf and the concept of classes but can't understand or follow the documentation to get it set up correctly. Check that /etc/localtime exists and is the same as the London timezone file: $ diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London should produce no output. Also check that you do not have a TZ variable set as that will affect what date shows you. I've never had to do anything login class related to make this work. There may be other things... --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 nets
Hello freebsd-questions, I have two nets: wireless and ethernet and i need make something for combine these into 1 net. How do this in freebsd? -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to handle 'local' ports/packages?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, that's fine, but how can I have a port on my system that isn't in the ports tree available to the world? I mean, won't anything I add to my local tree be deleted by cvsup'ing? cvsup won't delete things you add, but I believe portsnap does. I have a whole new port, and local patches for another in my /usr/ports tree and they just stay there. hth, --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:13:02PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Ashley Moran wrote: I've just installed a new server with gmirror and I like it. I've got an identical server running on-board RAID currently. Can I split the array in the BIOS, install gmirror on disk 1, reboot, and add the second disk in? Or i think - just YES. no problem Also, he need to tweak /etc/fstab before and after he goes to gmirror ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to handle 'local' ports/packages?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, that's fine, but how can I have a port on my system that isn't in the ports tree available to the world? I mean, won't anything I add to my local tree be deleted by cvsup'ing? Not with the default cvsup settings, no. cvsup will only delete things that were in the tree to begin with, and then removed. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:03, Igor Robul wrote: I recommend you to follow this rule: If it is not broken, then dont fix it. In your case I think you better leave all as is. Igor Actually one of the reasons is I get loads of out of memory errors (and a few others) during high load. Prob should have mentioned that in my original e-mail. I'm worried that the Postgres cluster will be corrupted at some point. There's no evidence it's happened yet but somehow I feel safer risking the transition than leaving it as it is. Ashley ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PCL interprefer for unix
anybody knows about program able to convert PCL printer code to postscript/PDF/bitmap/whatever - so it will be possible to view PCL prints on monitor and print it on non-PCL printers? thanks! Wojtek ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 nets
I have two nets: wireless and ethernet and i need make something for combine these into 1 net. How do this in freebsd? man 4 bridge -- Best regards, Playnet mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oneway mailing; does anything beat mailman??
Hi list I work for af company who recently has started sending out weekly newsletters for other companys. Somtimes over 10 mail. It is only needed to send the mail out. And the most important is the speed. Is there another listsoftware there is better for oneway maling ??? and how many mails, do you think can be sent per hour, with the ringt configuration??? -- Med venlig hilsen Jonas Jacobsen Lintoo I/S Buchwaldsgade 50 5000 Odense C kontor: 46935556 mobil: 61656618 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java JDK, JRE 1.5 Binaries for FreeBSD
Now we'll have a native JVM to FreeBSD It will be great...* *http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2006-April/001057.html http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=14248limit=nothreshold=-1 Best Regards, Rodrigo Souza Sao Paulo - Brazil* * ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to handle 'local' ports/packages?
Alex Zbyslaw said: cvsup won't delete things you add, but I believe portsnap does. Thanks, Alex. I'll have to experiment with portsnap. cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cvsup installworld process question
Bryan Curl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hopefully this is right place for my question and not to redundant. When in doubt, this (freebsd-questions) is always the right place for questions about FreeBSD. I have a new minimalist installation for use as a file server only (FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE) with a very small set of ports installed. Basically Samba, Cvsup,man files, ports, all the source and their dependencies. I am primarily interested in keeping the system up to date with security patches, system updates, and of course, the ports I run. I want to optimize the amount of disk space for the public shares so I don't want to arbitrarily install a lot of programs I don't need. Okay, although these days an extra few hundred megabytes on a file server shouldn't be a big deal. It's less than a dollar's worth of hard disk. My question is, 1.) If I CVSUP SRC-ALL, 'make buildworld', 'make installworld' etc, will that install the entire source tree to my machine and eat up disk space unnecessarily? In other words do I need to weed out all but the basic components I want before make installworld? The recommended approach is to update the whole base system at once. It's not actually necessary, but following the official upgrade procedure is highly recommended. Note that this has nothing to do with your ports. 2.) What branches of the source tree would I be required to keep up to date for my minimal installation? That would depend on your needs; but if you need to ask, I would strongly recommend against doing it. I realized in testing on an older system that portupgrade will only install ports I am using but don't know if make installworld will do the same. portupgrade will upgrade the ports you have installed, whether you have used them or not. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pkg_add problem
When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed --NO RECORD. My try to copy the file via ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/make-3.79.1.tbz was also a failure. Then I sifted all http://ftps mirrored in A2.FTP Sites and found out that no one of them contains'5.3-release'. How can I get make-3.79.1.tbz please? yours` serguey __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 nets
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:51:08PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: I have two nets: wireless and ethernet and i need make something for combine these into 1 net. How do this in freebsd? man 4 bridge or better man 4 if_bridge ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PCL interprefer for unix
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: anybody knows about program able to convert PCL printer code to postscript/PDF/bitmap/whatever - so it will be possible to view PCL prints on monitor and print it on non-PCL printers? Maybe http://www.t2-project.org/packages/afpl-ghostpcl.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: understanding of make.conf
Beat.Siegenthaler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, i try to build NTP from ports. As I have a new old trimble GPS i want to add the parse clock for trimble tsip. When i do a ./configure --enable-TRIMTSIP directly in the work folder i get checking Trimble GPS receiver/TSIP protocol... yes - looks good What is the equivalent in make.conf ? .if${.CURDIR:M*/net/ntp} TRIMTSIP=YES .endif and many other try's do not work. checking Trimble GPS receiver/TSIP protocol... no Did you have any reason to think that would work? I would expect the syntax to be more like CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-TRIMTSIP ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which Laptop for FreeBSD
This question was just covered in great detail last 2 weeks. Check the archives for subject What laptop do you recommend? Secondly, you should first search the archives for answers to your questions before posting to this list. http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ us this url to search archives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schulz Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:36 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Which Laptop for FreeBSD Hello all, i would like to buy a new Laptop in the very near future, and of course it has to run my favourite OS. I have never searched for a Laptop, and now that i did i am overwhelmed with the confusing variety of different Brands and Models. One of the big Questions i am having is; Should i look for a 64 bit Laptop or better not? I am just not sure wheter or not 64bit will come trough this year on Laptops, and how well is it (and will it be) supported by FreeBSD. I know that there are some Internet Sites which try to maintain some data about linux / unix on laptops, but i found them to be quite outdated. I am looking for a Workstation replacement kind of Laptop, and it must have a DVI out for my Monitor. I kind of would like to go with 64bit, since its supposedly the future, if this isnt quite the time for 64bit Laptops yet, please someone educate me. If there is anyone out there, that can recommend a new Laptop (Price is not an issue) that runs FreeBSD nicely, please let me know, i would most appreciate it. Thanks and best regards, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help for portdowngrade
Hi all. Could anyone please get me an outdated port called 'zh-CJK-4.6.0' through using portdowngrade zh-CJK-4.6.0 ? I am in a subnet and cannot connect the anonCVS directly. Any help would be very appreciate. Thanks in advance -- Best Regards Yuan Jue @ www.yuanjue.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which Laptop for FreeBSD
On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:35 AM, David Schulz wrote: If there is anyone out there, that can recommend a new Laptop (Price is not an issue) that runs FreeBSD nicely, please let me know, i would most appreciate it. Apple released Boot Camp for their Intel based machines yesterday. I don't doubt it will be long before someone tries to install FreeBSD on Apple's new hardware. Meanwhile with a MacBook Pro you'd have a commercially supported Unix also too. I'm rather impressed with my MacBook: [EMAIL PROTECTED] {39} uname -a Darwin Laptop.local 8.6.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.6.1: Tue Mar 7 16:55:45 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.9.22.obj~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Oneway mailing; does anything beat mailman??
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Jonas Jacobsen wrote: I work for af company who recently has started sending out weekly newsletters for other companys. Somtimes over 10 mail. It is only needed to send the mail out. And the most important is the speed. Is there another listsoftware there is better for oneway maling ??? Im in a similar position and I've been asking around on a few mailinglists and from what I understand there dosen't seem to exist any magic application for this. Basiclly, all answers I've got is: 'use this[1]-mailinglist-software'. Will follow this thread with great interest. [1] = Mailman, majordomo, mlmmj and so on. /e ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security logfile
I accidentally deleted my security log file - /var/log/security I used touch to recreate the file, but logging is no longer occurring. I'm not sure why. It doesn't appear to be a permissions issue.I tried chmod 755 (I won't leave it that way) just to confirm that it wasn't a matter of permissions, but logging is still not occurring. Any ideas? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. Just my $.02. -- Bill Moran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
Karl Ma wrote: The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). What did you lower, exactly? If you reduce the max resident datasize needlessly, you're going to make your program swap more and run much slower. However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. Yes, because the task isn't using much CPU, it's entirely I/O bound. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. Won't help. Add more RAM, or adjust the program to be more clever about the use of memory, possibly by using Numeric/numarray. The size of your python process is surprising to me, python tends to run relatively lightweight process sizes even when handling large data sets (ie, 1GB of data per day)... -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Postfix + saslauthd + Courier-IMAP
Hi, I was using FreeBSD long time ago, and now I am trying to move back to FreeBSD from Linux. In doing so, I got a question on how to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 with Postfix + saslauthd (sasl2) + IMAP. I installed the necessary package from the ports, but I am not so clear how to set it up, and how to run it. Thanks for your comments, Soo-Hyun ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
Karl Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a python program in freebsd, doing a heavey indexing job involving a mega size array. The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). Why would you do this? I dare you to lower the per-process limitation on Window XP and see how the run times compare. If you lower the amount of resources, of course the process will perform badly. Any time a process has to swap, performance will suffer _greatly_. Either invest in more RAM or optimize the process to be more RAM efficient. However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. Yes. That is the system automatically doing what you are asking how to do. Since the process is spending so much time waiting for data to swap in/out, the kernel lowers the priority (lower priority # on Unix systems means the process has a higher priority) so the process will be the first into the run queue when it has it's data. However, it can't run when it doesn't have the data it needs, and swapping takes time. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. Did you lower the per-process limit on XP to match what you did on FreeBSD? If not, then why are you trying to compare apples to elephants? How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? If you want to change the priority of the paging task, you'll need to hack the kernel. How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. nice is the correct command to allocate more CPU attention to the process. However, the process can't use the CPU if it doesn't have it's data in memory. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Security logfile
On 04/06/06 15:52, Jim Csoka wrote: I accidentally deleted my security log file - /var/log/security I used touch to recreate the file, but logging is no longer occurring. I'm not sure why. It doesn't appear to be a permissions issue. I tried chmod 755 (I won't leave it that way) just to confirm that it wasn't a matter of permissions, but logging is still not occurring. Any ideas? Try restarting your syslog daemon. Also, you can check default file permission in /etc/newsyslog.conf. HTH, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski freebsd at orchid dot homeunix dot org OpenPGP: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: adding ip:s with different gateway
Perttu Laine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have currently ip:s from block ...125.192/26 on my freebsd server. with gateway ...125.193. added via rc.conf: defaultrouter=...125.193 ifconfig_rl0=inet ...125.194 netmask 255.255.255.192 ifconfig_rl0_alias0=inet ...125.195 netmask 255.255.255.255 ifconfig_rl0_alias1=inet ...125.196 netmask 255.255.255.255 ifconfig_rl0_alias2=inet ...125.197 netmask 255.255.255.255 and so on. Now I got new block from isp: ...122.192/26 with gw ...122.193. So question is how to add ip's from this block to same server? With ipconfig etc. tools and with rc.conf? It's not possible to have 2 default gateways. That's not a FreeBSD thing, it's a violation of the routing system. If you want failover between two different gateways, you'll need to set up BGP of some other routing control system to automatically adjust routes as needed. An explanation of BGP or any similar routing protocol is beyond the scope of an email explanation - if that's what you need, I suggest you look to amazon.com or similar for research materials. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Postfix + saslauthd + Courier-IMAP
I was using FreeBSD long time ago, and now I am trying to move back to FreeBSD from Linux. In doing so, I got a question on how to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 with Postfix + saslauthd (sasl2) + IMAP. I installed the necessary package from the ports, but I am not so clear how to set it up, and how to run it. Hi Try here: http://www.flakshack.com/anti-spam/wiki/index.php and here: http://genco.gen.tc/postfix_virtual.php ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Oneway mailing; does anything beat mailman??
Jonas Jacobsen wrote: Somtimes over 10 mail. It is only needed to send the mail out. And the most important is the speed. Hmm. We are talking about opt-in lists, right? Is there another listsoftware there is better for oneway maling ??? Mailman is a fine mailing list manager, and I think it has more functionality and a better security track record than some of the other systems. and how many mails, do you think can be sent per hour, with the ringt configuration??? This depends entirely upon the SMTP server Mailman is talking to, the size of your messages, and the size of your outbound pipe. You can deliver on the order of a million messages a day @ 15K/message using a Pentium-200-grade box [1] and a T1 line, and depending on how well your recipients are batched at the same destination SMTP server, you might do significantly better than that. -- -Chuck [1]: Fast disks and adequate RAM are far more important to this than CPU. And bandwidth, of course. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos Yes, I agree. Although I had the luxury of having two machines, the other being a mac, so I could play with unix on that. I also dumped windows on my pc and decided on freeBSD. At first, I had trouble installing and configuring it. But with some time and this list I am up and running and get more and more comfortable with it each day. So if you have a spare pc lying around, try it out on this first till you get comfortable, and then go for it. Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
Hello, i am just wondering myself: this has nothing to with copy on write? or does that not exist on neither platform? regards, usleep On 4/6/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Karl Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a python program in freebsd, doing a heavey indexing job involving a mega size array. The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). Why would you do this? I dare you to lower the per-process limitation on Window XP and see how the run times compare. If you lower the amount of resources, of course the process will perform badly. Any time a process has to swap, performance will suffer _greatly_. Either invest in more RAM or optimize the process to be more RAM efficient. However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. Yes. That is the system automatically doing what you are asking how to do. Since the process is spending so much time waiting for data to swap in/out, the kernel lowers the priority (lower priority # on Unix systems means the process has a higher priority) so the process will be the first into the run queue when it has it's data. However, it can't run when it doesn't have the data it needs, and swapping takes time. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. Did you lower the per-process limit on XP to match what you did on FreeBSD? If not, then why are you trying to compare apples to elephants? How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? If you want to change the priority of the paging task, you'll need to hack the kernel. How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. nice is the correct command to allocate more CPU attention to the process. However, the process can't use the CPU if it doesn't have it's data in memory. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Postfix + saslauthd + Courier-IMAP
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: In doing so, I got a question on how to set up a FreeBSD 6.0 with Postfix + saslauthd (sasl2) + IMAP. I installed the necessary package from the ports, but I am not so clear how to set it up, and how to run it. http://postfixwiki.org/ - will probably be helpful. /e ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with Maxtor external USB hard drive - 6.1-PRERELEASE
I am trying to use a Maxtor 3200 300GB external USB drive. When I connect the drive I get the following message: uhub0: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 2 You'll also see this in the dmseg that follows from when the drive was plugged in at bootup. There is nothing wrong with the drive (it works fine plugged into my laptop running XP). As per the umass manpage I have usb, ohci, da and scbus enabled in the kernel. Can anyone give me some pointers as to what the above error might indicate? Thanks. dmesg as follows: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Mar 15 23:26:18 CST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FERGIE ACPI APIC Table: RCCGCLE Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 1.80GHz (1794.19-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf24 Stepping = 4 Features=0x3febfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073676288 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041702912 (993 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 2 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 3 ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DEB_] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [MLIB] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [IO__] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [DATA] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SIO_] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SB__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ICNT] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [ACPI] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [IORG] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SB__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [SIO_] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [PM__] had invalid type (String) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [BIOS] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [CMOS] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [KBC_] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) ACPI-0698: *** Warning: Type override - [OEM_] had invalid type (Integer) for Scope operator, changed to (Scope) MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 Version 1.1 irqs 0-15 on motherboard ioapic1 Version 1.1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard ioapic2 Version 1.1 irqs 32-47 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: math processor on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: RCC GCLE on motherboard Timecounter ACPI-safe frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: 32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz port 0x508-0x50b on acpi0 cpu0: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu1: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu2: ACPI CPU on acpi0 cpu3: ACPI CPU on acpi0 pcib0: ACPI Host-PCI bridge port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: ACPI PCI bus on pcib0 pci0: display, VGA at device 14.0 (no driver attached) isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: ISA bus on isab0 atapci0: ServerWorks CSB5 UDMA100 controller port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xffa0-0xffaf at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0 ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0 ohci0: OHCI (generic) USB controller mem 0xfe7fe000-0xfe7fefff irq 10 at device 15.2 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: OHCI (generic) USB controller on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib1: ACPI Host-PCI bridge on acpi0 pci1: ACPI PCI bus on pcib1 pcib2: ACPI Host-PCI bridge on acpi0 pci2: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 pcib3: ACPI Host-PCI bridge on acpi0 pci3: ACPI PCI bus on pcib3 amr0: LSILogic MegaRAID 1.53 mem
linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
how about one of the LiveCDs? or don't they work like knoppix/ubuntu auto configuring the most important hardware ( inputdevices, audio, video ) ? regards, usleep On 4/6/06, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos Yes, I agree. Although I had the luxury of having two machines, the other being a mac, so I could play with unix on that. I also dumped windows on my pc and decided on freeBSD. At first, I had trouble installing and configuring it. But with some time and this list I am up and running and get more and more comfortable with it each day. So if you have a spare pc lying around, try it out on this first till you get comfortable, and then go for it. Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which BSD - Flash Drive
orange_ wrote: I would like to run a BSD distribution off a 1GB USB Flash drive... What would be the most suitable - something like FreeSBIE? That's possible. You do understand that flash drives only have very limited # of write cycles before they fail, and should be operated in read-only mode most of the time? If you're planning to use this for a dedicated appliance-type role, ie, router, firewall, this is fine. If you want to do development or general-purpose interactive use, USB flash drives aren't a good choice. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, i am just wondering myself: this has nothing to with copy on write? or does that not exist on neither platform? COW is only relevent when a process forks and the OS can make decisions about whether memory can be shared between the two processes. He hasn't stated enough about the application to know whether that's relevent or not. On 4/6/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Karl Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a python program in freebsd, doing a heavey indexing job involving a mega size array. The process is so memory-hungry that it starts swap after the physical RAM max out. (To be exact, I've lowered the per-process limitation to make this possible). Why would you do this? I dare you to lower the per-process limitation on Window XP and see how the run times compare. If you lower the amount of resources, of course the process will perform badly. Any time a process has to swap, performance will suffer _greatly_. Either invest in more RAM or optimize the process to be more RAM efficient. However, when I use top to monitor the status, the STATE of the process started to stay as swread for most of the time (instead of RUN before using swap) and its priority has dropped to -20; and the corresponding WCPU drops to around 1% only. And the CPU consumption time in total (for the whole job) would only increase a minute or two even the process has been running for more than a few hours. Yes. That is the system automatically doing what you are asking how to do. Since the process is spending so much time waiting for data to swap in/out, the kernel lowers the priority (lower priority # on Unix systems means the process has a higher priority) so the process will be the first into the run queue when it has it's data. However, it can't run when it doesn't have the data it needs, and swapping takes time. In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it takes more than 30 mins. Did you lower the per-process limit on XP to match what you did on FreeBSD? If not, then why are you trying to compare apples to elephants? How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? If you want to change the priority of the paging task, you'll need to hack the kernel. How can I allocate more CPU attention to this process? I've tried using nice but it does not help. nice is the correct command to allocate more CPU attention to the process. However, the process can't use the CPU if it doesn't have it's data in memory. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message scanned by the Collaborative Fusion, Inc. PineApp. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how about one of the LiveCDs? or don't they work like knoppix/ubuntu auto configuring the most important hardware ( inputdevices, audio, video ) ? This sidesteps the point. If he doesn't have time to deal with hardware issues, does he have time to deal with software issues and a learnig curve? I'm not disagreeing with you. Live CDs are a great way to get ones feet wet with a new OS, and I highly recommend FreeSBIE as a way to introduce yourself to FreeBSD without making any commitment. You still need time to experiment, however. On 4/6/06, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos Yes, I agree. Although I had the luxury of having two machines, the other being a mac, so I could play with unix on that. I also dumped windows on my pc and decided on freeBSD. At first, I had trouble installing and configuring it. But with some time and this list I am up and running and get more and more comfortable with it each day. So if you have a spare pc lying around, try it out on this first till you get comfortable, and then go for it. Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message scanned by the Collaborative Fusion, Inc. PineApp. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
i guess you are right. i just wanted to bring it up, it should be mentioned in my opinion. maybe it saves a soul. regards, usleep On 4/6/06, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how about one of the LiveCDs? or don't they work like knoppix/ubuntu auto configuring the most important hardware ( inputdevices, audio, video ) ? This sidesteps the point. If he doesn't have time to deal with hardware issues, does he have time to deal with software issues and a learnig curve? I'm not disagreeing with you. Live CDs are a great way to get ones feet wet with a new OS, and I highly recommend FreeSBIE as a way to introduce yourself to FreeBSD without making any commitment. You still need time to experiment, however. On 4/6/06, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos Yes, I agree. Although I had the luxury of having two machines, the other being a mac, so I could play with unix on that. I also dumped windows on my pc and decided on freeBSD. At first, I had trouble installing and configuring it. But with some time and this list I am up and running and get more and more comfortable with it each day. So if you have a spare pc lying around, try it out on this first till you get comfortable, and then go for it. Eoghan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message scanned by the Collaborative Fusion, Inc. PineApp. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
Bill Moran wrote: Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. I'm going to second that. The biggest shock of moving to Unix is when you realize there isn't any GUI until you set one up. (That's not so true on many of the Linuxes anymore.) If you're serious about moving to Unix but you don't have the patience and time to learn, download Knoppix and use it for a while. Once you're more familiar with how things work, then you can dive in to the details. In the Windows world you're used to things like Flash and Java and Media Player just working in your browser, printing just working, etc., etc.. Not true in FreeBSD. Even the GUI itself doesn't just work. You have to be able to troubleshoot and determine the causes of problems, and sometimes that can take a while If you have the patience and the time, then by all means, jump right in, but don't expect to be surfing the web on your first day. -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: FreeBSD hangs at boot
Daniel, the only thing i can think of at the moment is go on removing hardware. remove the cd, the slave-hd etc. i can understand if you are not happy about it, it is your decision. regards, usleep On 4/6/06, Daniel A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I am trying to get FreeBSD 6.0 running on my desktop machine, but with no luck. When I boot in anything but Safe Mode, FreeBSD will hang at boot and refuse to go further. I've tried to let have a go at it for 30 minutes, but the boot process didnt get any further. When I try to boot the machine normally, it freezes at the following point: [...] ad0: 76319MB Seagate ST380021A 3.19 at ata0-master PIO4 ad1: 76319MB Seagate ST380021A 3.19 at ata0-slave PIO4 acd0: DVDR PLEXTOR DVDR PX-740A/1.01 at ata1-master PIO4 ad8: 114473MB Seagate ST3120022A 3.06 at ata4-master PIO4 The ad8 device is attached to my onboard Promise PDC20376 SATA150 controller, but even if I disable that device in BIOS, the system then freezes after displaying: acd0: DVDR PLEXTOR DVDR PX-740A/1.01 at ata1-master PIO4 Attached is the dmesg.boot I get when the SATA RAID controller is enabled and I boot in safe mode. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD hangs at boot
Giorgios, i did it again! sorry! regards, usleep ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! FreeBSD is a good choice. For information on hardware that runs FreeBSD, go to the FreeBSD web site and look under release information or latest releases. You will find a short (currently 2) list of currently supported releases. Under each you will find a link to hardware notes. Choose this and then choose the type of system - probably i386 - and you will see a list of hardware known to work on that version. As far as 'approved' goes, since this is a volunteer created and supported system and the copyrights allow people to do pretty much what they want with it, there is no formal approval process. The support process consists of trying what hardware that is available out and if it runs, then it is considered supported. There is a suit of things that is run on the hardware that is available to the developers to make sure it runs OK. Of course, the volunteer developers and the very large user community actually use it as their own systems as well, so together they give it a broad and rigorous workout. As far as step by step installation, the handbook is your friend. It does take things pretty much step by step. But, it is not as straightforward as click on install and come back in two hours. One of the best advantages of FreeBSD (after functionality, reliability, and security) is that you really can make it how you want it. But that comes with the requirement that you have to make a number of decisions about how to configure things. Some of those are how to divide the disk (and even if you want to have both FreeBSD and some other OS - yes, including possibly MSxxx - on the same machine), which services you wish to run, such as web server, compilers, interpreters, data base utilities, Email, proxies, etc, what sort of desktop environment you want and how tightly or loosly to secure the system, even which games you want on the system. Because those choices are completely open to you, installation requires some hands on work and that requires some pre-installation study and thought and preparation. Actually, after you have used FreeBSD a while and have a reasonable handle on your own needs and preferences, these choices become rather routine and you can run right through an installation. But the first couple of times will take some thought, work and patience as well as learning about a new type of environment and set of commands. The handbook, along with the man pages and some online publications such as Onlamp.com and others are very good in leading you through these things. There are several published books available they tend to follow the handbook as far as the technical information goes and add some more general background. They also tend to add the authors own preferences and prejudices as to what choices to make. That is very good background and frame of reference information, and is worth the price of the books, but you should keep in mind that it is generally not the final word as far as what you want your machine to be. The most controversial choices (those that get the most heated support for personal choices) seem often to be: how to divide the disk, which desktop to use and which Email MTA to use. People seem to be willing to fight to the death over their choices, but the truth is that each of the choices works well for some and not for others. I have posted my disk layouts with my reasons several times. I would suggest you start with Sendmail since it is the default and only change if and when you find you need something else. My desktop is simple. I just use AfterStep because I don't like or need all the extra junk that comes with some of the fancier ones. I also think mostly starting with defaults and/or the simpler ways and only moving on when you discover the need is the most useful path to system management enlightenment. So, good luck and welcome to FreeBSD, jerry Thank You Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___
Re: Linksys EG1032 support
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:43, Benjamin Lutz wrote: Hello Ashley, On Wednesday 05 April 2006 17:08, Ashley Moran wrote: I've tested the 6.1-BETA4 CD and that supports the card. I forgot my desktop actually runs a very old 6-STABLE, so the Linksys card v3 support must have been added a few weeks after 6.0 was released. I'll just run the onboard ethernet until 6.1 comes out - whenever that may be Yes, the EG1032 v3 cards are pretty new. And Linksys changed the card completely without changing it's name. I've had the same issue a few months ago. If you want to run 6.0 for now, this will probably help you: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-currentm=112851499907268w=2 Cheers Benjamin Cheers thanks for pointing me to that. I just rebuilt a new server with the patch and it's working fine. I wish the bloody manufacturers wouldn't go branding different products with identical names!!! Ashley ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote: i think - just YES. no problem Wojciech You were right to have faith! It went perfectly and the server is now up on gmirror. Only took 90 mins or so to rebuilt a 200GB disk too. I've got to say this gmirror thing is scarily easy to set up. I just hope when/if one of the disks die it will carry on running! Ashley ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: understanding of make.conf
Lowell Gilbert wrote: Did you have any reason to think that would work? I would expect the syntax to be more like CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-TRIMTSIP makes sense, I think this could really work... Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cron question
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 01:32, Kevin Kinsey wrote: And furthermore, you edited /etc/crontab or something similar instead of using crontab(1) to edit /var/cron/tabs/root. Nitpicky, to be sure, but the cause of many a heartache: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/admin.html#ROOT-NOT-FOUND-CRON-ERRO RS The FAQ entry is about the mistake of using the crontab utility to install the system crontab (or a copy) as root's user crontab ( This is not helped by the fact that /etc/crontab refers to itself as root's crontab ). There is no such problem with simply editing /etc/crontab - it's the more straightforward approach. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FAX software ?
Hi Igor, Hi, Try hylafax. mgetty+sendfax is much easier to tune. exactly what needs tuning? ( if you are not in the mass-faxing-business ) regards, usleep ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pkg_add problem
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 06:22:17AM -0700, serguey ogoltsoff wrote: When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed --NO RECORD. My try to copy the file via ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/make-3.79.1.tbz was also a failure. Then I sifted all http://ftps mirrored in A2.FTP Sites and found out that no one of them contains'5.3-release'. How can I get make-3.79.1.tbz please? You will have to either 1a) Use a mirror that still carries old packages (see http://mirrorlist.freebsd.org for a start), and 1b) Use the correct filename (it's not called make) 2) build the port yourself (gmake is quick to compile) 3) Update to 6.1 which will carry packages on all mirrors for quite a while. Kris pgpp5g6gcek8L.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Peter wrote: Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). If you don't mind the security vulnerabilities specified, then comment out the forbidden tag from the makefile. Kris pgpLJEbkWNC4P.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RESOLVED : Low perf of i386 6.0 on dell poweredge 1850 bi-Xeon2.8ghzDualCore
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:29:33PM +0200, Eric wrote: Hi, I'm comming back with solution to my problem. In fact solution was to disable any cache on perc4 controller. I do this at the beginning but with perc4 controller it doesn't seems to be effective unless you delete everything and put good configuration when creating the logical drive and on more time in configuration mode. Difference for high msql utilisation is server running near two time quickly. Still don't know why it was so more visible with smp. For information perc4 configuration is : On creation and on configuration : Write Policy -- Writethru Read Policy -- non-adaptive Weird, but glad to hear you got it resolved. Kris pgp7zZqxasruX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pkg_add problem
On Thursday 06 April 2006 06:22, serguey ogoltsoff wrote: When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed --NO RECORD. My try to copy the file via ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Lat est/make-3.79.1.tbz was also a failure. Then I sifted all http://ftps mirrored in A2.FTP Sites and found out that no one of them contains'5.3-release'. How can I get make-3.79.1.tbz please? Add to your .cshrc for root setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/Latest/ That is all one line but kmail is folding it. Also, the 5.5-release is at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.5-release/Latest/ I didn't check to see which set of packages are more recent. I leave that to you to do. It is the kind of process you need to be aware of and use the most recent set of builds. Once the 5.5-release is finished, the stable set will provide the set closest to what you will find after cvsuping ports-all. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://www.soyandina.com/ I am Andean project. http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using javavmwrapper
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:28:26PM -0500, Jeff Cross wrote: Can anyone give me some guidance in using javavmwrapper? I have searched high and low (I know someone will post the link I have overlooked) but can't seem to find any detailed information on how to use it. I understand that there are some environment variables I can use to choose between different VMs (linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2, jdk-1.4.2, and jdk-1.5.0) but I can't seem to locate anything. Try 'man javavm'. Also, does it only help when compiling ports that use Java or will it work to run an application with a different VM? Its primary purpose is to run applications with different VMs. -- Greg Lewis Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jdk15 on 6.0
After several failed attempts at the package route, this was certainly a welcome surprise: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml Thanks to everyone for their help and suggestions! -james On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:55 PM, james g. wrote: Thanks everyone for the tips. I'm going to give the package route a shot, as the additional swap space just isn't cutting it. Cheers, James On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Jon Brisbin wrote: Anish Mistry wrote: You could always just to do a make package on another machine with 6.0 and then just pkg_add on your older system. This is what I did when I installed JDK 1.5 on our BSD boxes. It sounds like, with so little physical RAM, that the JVM is only allocating a very small percentage of that to the JVM that starts up when the build gets bootstrapped. The jvmg probably needs to be manually set using an -Xms/-Xmx value that will give it enough room to work with. To the JVM, swap space isn't the same as physical RAM. I have had problems running java applications that have to swap. With Java, physical RAM is crucial. If you could even put at least 512MB in that box just for the build, then take it out to run it, you would probably succeed. Barring that, you're next best bet is probably going to be building it on another box, then doing a pkg_add. -- Thanks! Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw and ssh
On Thursday 06 April 2006 02:50, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote: Hello everyone, Allow me to preface my problem by saying that I am very ignorant when it comes to networking. I do apologize if this is trivial. In any event, I enabled the client ifpw firewall located in /etc/ rc.firewall. This appears to work well for my needs... except for one additional item. I need someone outside of my network to have SSH access to my machine. I know his/her IP address. So, I have added some additional items to rc.firewall for this. Here is what I added. # Allow person SSH access mip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ${fwcmd} allow tcp from any to any 22 out setup keep-state ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${mip} to me 22 setup limit src- addr 2 The client script is setup to handle tcp by static rules. If you want to mix static and dynamic tcp rules (ie limits) you will need to add a check-state line before the comment: Allow TCP through if setup succeeded otherwise your dynamic rules will never see any established traffic and will timeout. Also there is a static rule already to allow all outgoing tcp connections, so you don't need a stateful one for port 22. However, none of the above should prevent an ssh login. If I were you I'd start with just: ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any ssh setup and work from there. You need to be methodical when troubleshooting firewalls. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help? (unix as windoze replacement)
At 09:49 AM 4/6/2006, you wrote: Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: Unpopular, perhaps. But good advice. If you're looking for a nearly effortless desktop unix, you might try Mepis Linux http://www.mepis.org/ It's designed to be what you seem to be looking for (a turn-key graphic desktop OS.) Runs or loads directly from CD; comes with browser, email, printing, OpenOffice, etc. -Wayne ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Peter wrote: Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). If you don't mind the security vulnerabilities specified, then comment out the forbidden tag from the makefile. Well I decided to install linux-flashplugin7 and I followed the instructions inside linuxpluginwrapper (install a patch) and I got an error: # patch patch-rtld.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |--- libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.orig Fri Sep 24 08:04:52 2004 |+++ libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.cSun Oct 17 03:37:44 2004 -- Patching file libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 129. Hunk #2 failed at 178. Hunk #3 failed at 1738. 3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej done Any ideas? p.s. Why is installing Flash so hard? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw and ssh
On Thursday 06 April 2006 03:27, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote: What is the easiest way of making changes to the firewall rules and applying them so I do not have to reboot each time? I assume a kldunload ipfw.ko and then a kldload ipfw.ko should do it, but I don't want to risk doing something incorrect while I am trying to debug my current problem. /etc/rc.d/ipfw restart and watch out for any error messages ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT, VPN and other SOHO router advice
Dear all, I'm currently in the process of jiggling around my SOHO router and a FreeBSD box that I'd like to make more of a router. As it stands currently, the setup is something like this (I hope you've reading this in monospace or it's gonna be a like reading a circuit diagram on a rollercoaster) ( ... ) (( Ye bigge badde interweb )) ( ... ) || || ++ | Vigor 2600 | [10.0.0.2] ++ | | +--+ | | ** | | rl1 | +---| S |-... +-+ | W | | F | | I |-... | B | | T |-... The LAN! | S | rl0 | C | [10.0.0.0/24] | D |---| H |-... | | | | | | | |-... +-+ +--+ [10.0.0.1] Now, the more experiencef of you will immediately notice something is wrong ... yes, that's right, the cable marked with the ** shouldn't really be there. In fact, my syslog really wants me to know that something's wrong: Apr 6 19:04:22 phoenix kernel: arp: 10.0.0.2 is on rl0 but got reply from 00:53:7f:74:f4:f3 on rl1 Now, I'm well aware of why that's happening, and I mostly know how to fix it, but I need a little help with a few remaining issues. First, NAT'ing. Currently the Vigor router (10.0.0.2) is the default router for the network, as specified by the FBSD box's DHCP server. If I disconnect the cable I want to disconnect, however, obviously the FBSD box will have to be the router. Now, I've recompiled my kernel with all the relevant options, and I've got an extensive firewall script (ipfw). I've also got the following in my rc.conf: firewall_enable=YES firewall_script=/etc/ipfw.rules firewall_logging=YES natd_enable=YES natd_interface=rl1 gateway_enable=YES rl1, by the way, has a public IP block on it, and the vigor router has one of these, let's call it xx.yy.zz.201. On the FBSD box (in rc.conf) we have: defaultrouter=xx.yy.zz.201 ifconfig_rl0=inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_rl1=inet xx.yy.zz.202 netmask 255.255.255.248 ifconfig_rl1_alias0=xx.yy.zz.203/29 ... So, really, the question for this bit of the email is .. what else do I need to get my FBSD box acting as a router for the machines on the LAN? .. I assume I'd need an IPFW divert rule to set up all the NATing, but I'm unsure what that should be, and whether it would come before or after all the protective stuff in the firewall script etc etc. -- The second part of the question is perhaps slightly more complex. The Vigor router has set up on it a LAN-to-LAN PPTP VPN (enough acronyms for you?) to an office elsewhere. As it stands currently, machines on the LAN can access (ping/SMB shares) a class C subnet, 192.168.1.0/24 via this VPN connecion on the Vigor router. Also, machines at the other end of the VPN, in the office, can access machines at this end of the VPN, on the LAN (the other class C: 10.0.0.0/24) The question is, what IPFW divert rules and other whizbangery do I need to set up so that I can disconnect that cable marked ** and have all the VPN stuff keep working. If at all possible, I'd rather not move the management of the VPN onto the FBSD box. -- OK. So that's that. I appreciate any and all responses, and if anyone needs any more information I will be happy to provide it ... so long as it's not my root password ... actually, come to think of it, that wouldn't help unless you were sitting next to me, but nevermind... Regards, Nick Stenning ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
run_rc_command and redirect stdout
Hi, what are the alternatives to redirect stdout from a process started using run_rc_command, only 21 /tmp/xxx ? --- miguel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:10:52PM -0400, Peter wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Peter wrote: Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). If you don't mind the security vulnerabilities specified, then comment out the forbidden tag from the makefile. Well I decided to install linux-flashplugin7 and I followed the instructions inside linuxpluginwrapper (install a patch) and I got an error: Talk to the maintainer. # patch patch-rtld.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |--- libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.orig Fri Sep 24 08:04:52 2004 |+++ libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.cSun Oct 17 03:37:44 2004 -- Patching file libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 129. Hunk #2 failed at 178. Hunk #3 failed at 1738. 3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c.rej done Any ideas? p.s. Why is installing Flash so hard? Because the authors do not support FreeBSD, so you have to jump through many hoops to make it work. Kris pgpCjF3ckaMTp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
Ashley Moran wrote: On Thursday 06 April 2006 12:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote: i think - just YES. no problem Wojciech You were right to have faith! It went perfectly and the server is now up on gmirror. Only took 90 mins or so to rebuilt a 200GB disk too. I've got to say this gmirror thing is scarily easy to set up. I just hope when/if one of the disks die it will carry on running! Ashley Hi Ashley, I'm glad things worked well for you. Faith got you this far but how long do you want to depend upon it? A long time ago I was tasked with the administration of some HP-UX boxes running on K-series hardware. I didn't setup the hardware and I didn't do the system install but I was expected, as the systems consultant, to give reasonable assurances that in the case of system failure the recovery procedures would work. As it turns out I had to also write those procedures. After I did so I insisted that a failure be simulated and that it be determined whether or not we could recover our operation starting from scratch with just our backups and system tapes. After all, there is no one easier to fire than a consultant and it's always the consultant's fault :) So my recommendation is that you simulate a disk going bad now before it happens for real. For instance, what happens if you unplug the disk from the controller, or remove its power connection, etc? Just my $0.02 -- Duane Whitty ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCO OPENSERVER
I just had a really quick question, the company I work for uses a software that runs on SCO Openserver 5, or later, I have read that Freebsd is compatible with software written for SCO OpenServer, I just wanted some specs as to how compatible you are, the software vendor is being shitty and won't say if there software will run on freebsd, they want us to get sco openserver(i wonder why), freebsd is far superior, and not to mention CHEAPER. Thanks Fabian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Switch from SATA-RAID to gmirror?
On Apr 06, 2006, at 5:35 pm, Duane Whitty wrote: Hi Ashley, I'm glad things worked well for you. Faith got you this far but how long do you want to depend upon it? A long time ago I was tasked with the administration of some HP-UX boxes running on K-series hardware. I didn't setup the hardware and I didn't do the system install but I was expected, as the systems consultant, to give reasonable assurances that in the case of system failure the recovery procedures would work. As it turns out I had to also write those procedures. After I did so I insisted that a failure be simulated and that it be determined whether or not we could recover our operation starting from scratch with just our backups and system tapes. After all, there is no one easier to fire than a consultant and it's always the consultant's fault :) So my recommendation is that you simulate a disk going bad now before it happens for real. For instance, what happens if you unplug the disk from the controller, or remove its power connection, etc? Just my $0.02 Duane, Your $0.02 is probably worth a lot more than that... I'm not in a hurry to put things to the test but I will eventually. Fortunately, we've just bought redundant servers for everything (apart from a Win2k3 server running SQL Server, which cost us more in licensing than hardware, and which we are unfortunately stuck with for the foreseeable future). This server is one of them - so even if the whole array fails, we will have another machine to fall back on. But when it's settled down, I'll pull the plug on the primary drive and see if it will reboot. We have two more servers on the way destined to run Postgres. We've bought them with Areca RAID 6 cards, and I will definitely enjoy pulling two of the drives just to see what it does. Our new policy is redundant EVERYTHING in the live environment. Mainly this is not for the reduced protection from failure, but for the freedom to take servers offline for upgrades or testing. Currently we're in a situation where a guy's whole business depends on a single-disk webserver running Postgres (because it was the only BSD machine we had at the time), which desperately needs upgrading for performance tuning, but which we just can't do. Ashley ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SCO OPENSERVER
In the last episode (Apr 06), American Eye Center said: I just had a really quick question, the company I work for uses a software that runs on SCO Openserver 5, or later, I have read that Freebsd is compatible with software written for SCO OpenServer, I just wanted some specs as to how compatible you are, the software vendor is being shitty and won't say if there software will run on freebsd, they want us to get sco openserver(i wonder why), freebsd is far superior, and not to mention CHEAPER. Thanks FreeBSD's ibcs emulator was actually compatible with SCO 3.2v4.2, not OSR 5, and has since bit-rotted due to other kernel changes such that it no longer works. Since there is less than one request a year about SCO emulation, it's unlikely to get enough developer attention to ever get better :) I'm surprised there is any software only available for SCO anymore. If you can get your hands on a Linux binary, FreeBSD will run that just fine. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/6/06, eoghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2006-04-06 09:49, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am just looking at Free BSD as a Windows alternative. I have a home workgroup that I am out growing and wanting to do more with, but don't want to give MS any more Hundreds of hard earned dollars. My first question is where can I find a site that will list all approved or thoroughly checked out hardware to build a box (motherboards, and the like). I don't have the time, or patience to get into major software conflicts or bugs. I want to follow a A to B to C box build and software setup. Is there someone (or more) to guide me through the process? Is there a website with complete and accurate information on it? Is there a BSD for idiots instruction book that's current? Is there a BSD project team working with manufactures and touting their successes? Help! Don't use FreeBSD. I know this will be an unpopular post on this list, but you've said a number of things that tell me that you will be unsuccessful with FreeBSD: 1) You don't seem to have any Unix experience 2) You're coming from a Windows world 3) You don't have time or patience #3 is particularly important, given #1 and #2. FreeBSD _will_ take you some time to understand. It _will_ take some time and effort to get it working the way you want. Since you are totally new to it, it _will_ require patience. If you don't have time or patience to learn right now, you're setting yourself up for failure. When you do have some time and patience, we'll be happy to help you through your learning curve. If you're looking for a fast, easy fix, you're not going to find it by switching operating systems to something you know nothing about. I've seen a number of people bash Linux and the BSDs because they wanted a simple, cheap solution to Windows and did not have the time or patience to work through the learning curve. Unless I've misinterpreted your email and you do have some Unix experience, this is not a good time to make the switch. No, this post shouldn't be unpopular on this list. * It was written in a clear, non-confrontational, civilized tone. * It explains why making the switch to FreeBSD may turn out badly. * It also makes it very clear that time and effort _is_ required. Tom, please read carefully what Bill Moran has written. Even if I tried, I would probably fail to put it all in better words. Then, if you decide that you _have_ the patience and time to switch, feel free to ask any question about FreeBSD here :) - Giorgos Yes, I agree. Although I had the luxury of having two machines, the other being a mac, so I could play with unix on that. I also dumped windows on my pc and decided on freeBSD. At first, I had trouble installing and configuring it. But with some time and this list I am up and running and get more and more comfortable with it each day. So if you have a spare pc lying around, try it out on this first till you get comfortable, and then go for it. Eoghan usleep said: ] how about one of the LiveCDs? or don't they work like knoppix/ubuntu ] auto configuring the most important hardware ( inputdevices, audio, ] video ) ? That *could* be a good idea. FreesBIE's live CD would, if it would give him a GUI mode, give him an idea of whether or not it might work with his hardware. Last I checked, the ISO was based on FreeBSD 5.4, but I think a new one is on the way based on FBSD 6.x. If everything worked on a box he currently has Windows on, he could attempt to buy duplicate hardware for a BSD box. And then there are the desktop-oriented projects: PCBSD, DesktopBSD. They would provide a more Windows like experience; however, it's still not clear if the OP has the patience and correct goal-orientation to advise him to try much of the above. If he had a means to burn ISO images with his current equipment, and had spare equipment lying around, then I'd suggest booting up with a Freesbie CD to play around with it; however, it's not clear that he even has spare hardware available, but instead wants some kind of logo testing like guarantee that whatever he buys would be appropriate. AFAIK, this doesn't exist, per se. It's clear from a perusal of various web resources that by and large FreeBSD runs quite well on a vast array of commodity x86 hardware, and a few other platforms, but no one has an all-encompassing list of suitable parts. The cost for any person or entity to do thsi would be enormous. AFAIK, not even MSFT has such a list. At this point, we might point him to any of a number of vendors that support FreeBSD. My company (heh-shameless, apology, argument's sake) could provide a box. ixsystems.com specializes in BSD servers. There are lots of people on the commercial consultant pages at the freebsd.org site that could do this. My BSD experience, coming straight
Access ip local
Dear Sir, Iam a beginner with freebsd. Iam using vers 4.11 fo gateway with dedicated internet. If i want to access one of comp client (ip local) from internet ,how can i do??? Example : ip client : 192.168.1.25 port 80, 4500,4600 Is it possible to using ipfw??? Thankyou for your help. Best Regards, Yuda ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:10:52PM -0400, Peter wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Peter wrote: Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). If you don't mind the security vulnerabilities specified, then comment out the forbidden tag from the makefile. Well I decided to install linux-flashplugin7 and I followed the instructions inside linuxpluginwrapper (install a patch) and I got an error: Talk to the maintainer. That patch installed fine on my i386/6.0 SECURITY box. I think his is 5.4. Maybe there's something different about the rtld.c file on that distro -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Access ip local
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, EDPSB wrote: Dear Sir, Iam a beginner with freebsd. Iam using vers 4.11 fo gateway with dedicated internet. If i want to access one of comp client (ip local) from internet ,how can i do??? Example : ip client : 192.168.1.25 port 80, 4500,4600 Is it possible to using ipfw??? Hello Yuda, If I understand you correctly, you would like to configure your FreeBSD machine in such a way that it allows clients on the private network to get access to the Internet. You can definitely do this (it is what I do at home), and FreeBSD is a wonderful system to use for such a purpose. Along with ipfw, you will also need to use natd. The relevant selections from the handbook that you will want to read are: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-routing.html and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html Good luck, -Andy Reitz. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT, VPN and other SOHO router advice
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Nick Stenning wrote: [snip] First, NAT'ing. Currently the Vigor router (10.0.0.2) is the default router for the network, as specified by the FBSD box's DHCP server. If I disconnect the cable I want to disconnect, however, obviously the FBSD box will have to be the router. Now, I've recompiled my kernel with all the relevant options, and I've got an extensive firewall script (ipfw). I've also got the following in my rc.conf: firewall_enable=YES firewall_script=/etc/ipfw.rules firewall_logging=YES natd_enable=YES natd_interface=rl1 gateway_enable=YES rl1, by the way, has a public IP block on it, and the vigor router has one of these, let's call it xx.yy.zz.201. On the FBSD box (in rc.conf) we have: defaultrouter=xx.yy.zz.201 ifconfig_rl0=inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig_rl1=inet xx.yy.zz.202 netmask 255.255.255.248 ifconfig_rl1_alias0=xx.yy.zz.203/29 ... So, really, the question for this bit of the email is .. what else do I need to get my FBSD box acting as a router for the machines on the LAN? .. I assume I'd need an IPFW divert rule to set up all the NATing, but I'm unsure what that should be, and whether it would come before or after all the protective stuff in the firewall script etc etc. Hi Nick, It looks to me like you are on the right track. The only other option that I have in my rc.conf is: natd_flags=-config /etc/natd.conf This forces natd to read my configuration file. I think in normal operations, natd will pretty-much do the right thing, but you might want to customize yours like I have mine. Here are some statements that I have in my natd.conf: dynamic yes use_sockets yes same_ports yes log no log_denied yes log_ipfw_denied yes In terms of the divert rule, mine looks like this: /sbin/ipfw add 50 divert natd all from any to any via fxp0 You'll want to replace 'fxp0' with your external interface, in this case, 'rl1'. On FreeBSD 6, the /etc/rc.firewall script will automatically add the proper divert rule if you set the firewall_type to be either open or client in rc.conf. Good luck, -Andy Reitz. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web server attack
Posted this at 11am and now its 5:30pm and still have not seen this post return from the list mailer. So posting it again. In my httpd-access.log I have started receiving a lot of these. Looks like some kind of attack to me. This first showed up in my log on April fools day 4/1/06 and get 4 per hour since then. The IP address changes every time I add it to firewall rules to block. Does anyone know what this is and what I can do to stop it besides adding the ip address to my firewall block rules? 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:25 -0400] \x04\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] \x05\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] CONNECT 4.79.181.15:25 HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:46 -0400] GET http://www.ebay.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.00; Windows 98) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD stickers
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Ashley Moran wrote: and 10 Linux Inside badges for our less-enlightened network admin :) For superior enlightenment, attach with a nail to the forehead :-) Wow, nice Tom Waits reference :^) -- Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** [ Busy Expunging | ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT, VPN and other SOHO router advice
Nick Stenning wrote: [ ... ] The second part of the question is perhaps slightly more complex. The Vigor router has set up on it a LAN-to-LAN PPTP VPN (enough acronyms for you?) to an office elsewhere. As it stands currently, machines on the LAN can access (ping/SMB shares) a class C subnet, 192.168.1.0/24 via this VPN connecion on the Vigor router. Also, machines at the other end of the VPN, in the office, can access machines at this end of the VPN, on the LAN (the other class C: 10.0.0.0/24) The question is, what IPFW divert rules and other whizbangery do I need to set up so that I can disconnect that cable marked ** and have all the VPN stuff keep working. If at all possible, I'd rather not move the management of the VPN onto the FBSD box. Given what you've said, you should set up the FreeBSD machine as a bridge rather than a router. It's possible to do other things, such as changing the NAT address range used by rl1 and your Vigor 2600, yet also set up NAT on the FreeBSD machine, including GRE passthrough and PPTP in /etc/natd.conf, but that would be evil, hard to debug, and otherwise tempting the fates. :-) # NATD configuration options dynamic yes interface rl1 #log yes log_denied yes use_sockets yes same_ports yes unregistered_only yes #punch_fw 1:100 redirect_proto gre 10.1.1.2 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:500 500 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:4500 4500 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:62515 62515 redirect_port tcp 10.1.1.2:1 1 redirect_port tcp 10.1.1.2:pptp pptp # The above rules allow passthrough for the Cisco VPN software, and should also work with SonicWall's VPN client. OpenVPN uses just a single UDP port, and would be very easy to set up on FreeBSD if you liked. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: web server attack
fbsd_user wrote: [ ... ] Does anyone know what this is and what I can do to stop it besides adding the ip address to my firewall block rules? I suppose that someone is trying to exploit mod_proxy to connect to an SMTP server (that's the CONNECT 4.79.181.15:25 part), or at least get HTTP replies back. Make sure you don't have mod_proxy enabled in Apache 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:25 -0400] \x04\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] \x05\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] CONNECT 4.79.181.15:25 HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:46 -0400] GET http://www.ebay.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.00; Windows 98) -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NAT, VPN and other SOHO router advice
On 4/6/06, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given what you've said, you should set up the FreeBSD machine as a bridge rather than a router. It's possible to do other things, such as changing the NAT address range used by rl1 and your Vigor 2600, yet also set up NAT on the FreeBSD machine, including GRE passthrough and PPTP in /etc/natd.conf, but that would be evil, hard to debug, and otherwise tempting the fates. :-) # NATD configuration options dynamic yes interface rl1 #log yes log_denied yes use_sockets yes same_ports yes unregistered_only yes #punch_fw 1:100 redirect_proto gre 10.1.1.2 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:500 500 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:4500 4500 redirect_port udp 10.1.1.2:62515 62515 redirect_port tcp 10.1.1.2:1 1 redirect_port tcp 10.1.1.2:pptp pptp # The above rules allow passthrough for the Cisco VPN software, and should also work with SonicWall's VPN client. OpenVPN uses just a single UDP port, and would be very easy to set up on FreeBSD if you liked. -- -Chuck Thanks to both of you for all your input .. its a great help! Chuck -- since you appear to have given me the config options for something that's evil, hard to debug, and otherwise tempting the fates, would you mind explaining how to set up the FBSD box as a bridge? Or perhaps I'm missing something ... is that what that config is for? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ipfw and ssh
Okay Anthony, Here is a bit more detail on your IPFW setup. Here is the section of rc.firewall that is relevant what we've discussed. View this in HTML mode if you can. I've highlighted changes in red and my own comments in blue. I also noticed that you use a Netgear router in your setup. You need to make sure that you pass port 22 inbound connections through your netgear router to your Freebsd system. That would be a setup on your netgear system. # set these to your network and netmask and ip net=192.0.2.0 # This should be set to your internal network's address # Most home firewalls and routers use 192.168.1.0 mask=255.255.255.0# This should be your internal network's netmask. # Most home firewalls and routers use 255.255.255.0 ip=192.0.2.1 # This should be your local machines IP address. # If you are using DHCP to assign an address to your system, this will not work as written. Fortunately, IPFW now supports the meta-address 'me', which resolves to all your local addresses. setup_loopback # Allow any traffic to or from my own net. This allows all computers on your network to talk to your computer without any restrictions. ${fwcmd} add pass all from ${ip} to ${net}:${mask} ${fwcmd} add pass all from ${net}:${mask} to ${ip} # Allow TCP through if setup succeeded. This allows any existing TCP connections to work. This way you only need one rule (setup) for each inbound service you want. ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any established # Allow IP fragments to pass through ${fwcmd} add pass all from any to any frag # Allow setup of incoming email. This one allows outside systems to send e-mail to your system. If you aren't running a mail server you may want to remove this line. This is also the line we are going to copy to allow your ssh server to work. ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} 25 setup # Allow inbound connections to my ssh server. This will allow anyone access to my system through SSH provided they can authenticate. ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to ${ip} 22 setup # Allow setup of outgoing TCP connections only. This is what lets you initiate sessions with other systems (like http, and ssh) ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${ip} to any setup # Disallow setup of all other TCP connections. If you put any TCP stuff after this it won't work because this line prevents all further TCP rules from being applied. ${fwcmd} add deny tcp from any to any setup # Allow DNS queries out in the world ${fwcmd} add pass udp from ${ip} to any 53 keep-state # Allow NTP queries out in the world ${fwcmd} add pass udp from ${ip} to any 123 keep-state # Everything else is denied by default, unless the # IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT option is set in your kernel # config file. On Wednesday 05 April 2006 22:27, Anthony M. Agelastos wrote: Thank you for your very prompt reply. I tried your suggestion and it didn't work. I do not know why. Is the location where I place this in the client profile important? I have also tried the person's actual IP address as well as the IP address of the router (just in case it is not doing something weird) to no avail. What is the easiest way of making changes to the firewall rules and applying them so I do not have to reboot each time? I assume a kldunload ipfw.ko and then a kldload ipfw.ko should do it, but I don't want to risk doing something incorrect while I am trying to debug my current problem. On Apr 5, 2006, at 10:08 PM, Ean Kingston wrote: You neglected to include the 'add' in your first fwcmd. You may want to try something simple to start with. I haven't used ipfw in a while so hopefully my syntax is still good. Here is a simple starting point: # Allow person SSH access mip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx # IP Address of person ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from ${mip} to me 22 in # allow connection to ssh ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from me 22 to ${mip} out # allow me to respond I think all you really need is this: # Allow setup of incoming ssh ${fwcmd} add pass tcp from ${mip} to ${ip} 22 setup Since the rest of it should be taken care of by the rest of the 'client' ipfw setup. On Wednesday 05 April 2006 21:50, Anthony M.Agelastos wrote: Hello everyone, Allow me to preface my problem by saying that I am very ignorant when it comes to networking. I do apologize if this is trivial. In any event, I enabled the client ifpw firewall located in /etc/ rc.firewall. This appears to work well for my needs... except for one additional item. I need someone outside of my network to have SSH access to my machine. I know his/her IP address. So, I have added some additional items to rc.firewall for this.
Re: linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden
--- Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 01:10:52PM -0400, Peter wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:20:12AM -0400, Peter wrote: Anyone know how to install flash6 on FreeBSD 5.4? This is what I get when I try to install the port: - === linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is forbidden: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/83421018-b3ef-11da-a32d-000c6ec775d9.html. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin6. - The URL suggests to install flash7 or flash8 but I heard that these versions are unstable and frequently crash firefox (I'm using 1.5.0.1). If you don't mind the security vulnerabilities specified, then comment out the forbidden tag from the makefile. Well I decided to install linux-flashplugin7 and I followed the instructions inside linuxpluginwrapper (install a patch) and I got an error: Talk to the maintainer. That patch installed fine on my i386/6.0 SECURITY box. I think his is 5.4. Maybe there's something different about the rtld.c file on that distro Paul. Yes, I am on 5.4. I thought I stated that in an earlier post but I could be wrong. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using Macromedia flash with native firefox
Thanks sort of. As your previous post mentioned, you were trying to do this with firefox 1.0.7 and you couldn't get it to work with firefox 1.5. Well, I went through it anyway and still couldn't get it to work but, oddly, when I started putting the flash stuff back into /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins, I no longer needed to mess with the flash6.so files. So, at least it's a bit cleaner now. I think all I had to do was to link two files so that they appear in /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins: flashplayer.xpt - ../linux-flashplugin6/flashplayer.xpt libflashplayer.so - ../linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so On Thursday 06 April 2006 01:24, Chandan Haldar wrote: This mail in the freebsd list archives describes what I did to get firefox 1.0.7 and flash 6 working: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=660877+665553+/usr/local/www/db /text/2006/freebsd-questions/20060305.freebsd-questions Look at how I had to change MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH (towards the end). Perhaps this will do the trick for you too. Good luck. Chandan Ean Kingston wrote: I've been trying to get Macromedia Flash 6 (linux-flashplayer6) to work with native firefox (1.5) on FreeBSD 6.0 and running into some annoying problems. I know I needed linuxpluginwrapper to get this to work and so installed it along with the linux flash plugin port. I tried several times, reviewed the port build notes, looked for readmes, and searched some with Google. I found several detailed installation instructions but none of them worked for me. In order to get it to work, I copied flashplayer.xpt and libflashplayer.so from the linux-flashplayer6 installation directory into the browser_plugins directory. I took this from instructions for getting an older flashplayer5 to work. This at least got me to an error message (about not being able to locate libpthreads.so. That is one of the things that linuxpluginwrapper is supposed to take care of. After several more attempts at trying to resolve this, I resorted to a brute force method. I copied the flash6.so library that came with linuxpluginwrapper to the browser_plugins directory as libpthreads.so. This is a very bad solution but I got flash working. So, my question is how do I get this to work properly? For any who might be able to help, here is some relevant info: Installed: firefox-1.5.0.1,1 linuxpluginwrapper-20051113 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 messy file copies: flashplayer.xpt - ../linux-flashplugin6/flashplayer.xpt libdl.so.2 - /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper/flash6.so libflashplayer.so - ../linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so libpthread.so.0 - /usr/local/lib/pluginwrapper/flash6.so So, how do I get this to work without the messy file copy? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ean Kingston, BSc, CISSP, ARO ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: web server attack
Chuck Swiger wrote: fbsd_user wrote: [ ... ] Does anyone know what this is and what I can do to stop it besides adding the ip address to my firewall block rules? I suppose that someone is trying to exploit mod_proxy to connect to an SMTP server (that's the CONNECT 4.79.181.15:25 part), or at least get HTTP replies back. Make sure you don't have mod_proxy enabled in Apache 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:25 -0400] \x04\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] \x05\x01 200 0 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:45 -0400] CONNECT 4.79.181.15:25 HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - - 218-166-163-180.dynamic.hinet.net - - [06/Apr/2006:10:11:46 -0400] GET http://www.ebay.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 7014 - Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.00; Windows 98) Setup mod_security to block that type of request. Any chance you can capture some packets and send a link? I'd like to take a look at it. -Frank ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pkg_add problem
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:13:20AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: On Thursday 06 April 2006 06:22, serguey ogoltsoff wrote: When I tried to pkg_add make-3.79.1 the attempt failed --NO RECORD. My try to copy the file via ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Lat est/make-3.79.1.tbz was also a failure. Then I sifted all http://ftps mirrored in A2.FTP Sites and found out that no one of them contains'5.3-release'. How can I get make-3.79.1.tbz please? Add to your .cshrc for root setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/Latest/ That is all one line but kmail is folding it. Also, the 5.5-release is at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.5-release/Latest/ I didn't check to see which set of packages are more recent. I leave that to you to do. It is the kind of process you need to be aware of and use the most recent set of builds. Once the 5.5-release is finished, the stable set will provide the set closest to what you will find after cvsuping ports-all. May not run on 5.3, I don't remember if there were library changes after then. Kris pgpXDdguS1GUn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: jdk15 on 6.0
james g. escribió: After several failed attempts at the package route, this was certainly a welcome surprise: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml I have downloaded diablo-jre-freebsd6-1.5.0.06.00.tbz from the link above, ha, by the way i have a FreeBSD 6.1 box, when i try to install it i got this messages: pkg_add diablo-jre-freebsd6-1.5.0.06.00.tbz pkg_add: could not find package xorg-libraries-6.8.2 ! pkg_add: could not find package javavmwrapper-2.0_5 ! I dont want to install xorg- related libreries :( what are the steps to install java whitout X? Does anybody know where i can find a how to? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help?
So, Bill is basically (fully? !!) right. Anyone who's looking for a BSD for Idiots guide doesn't yet have the temperament established to give BSD a fair shake. BSD for idiots is an anachronism*, though I do have a copy, somewhere, of UNIX for Dummies, which apparently never made the Best Seller lists Relativity. BSD For Idiots could imply that either a: The target audience has a past in Linux or other unices b: The book contains a lot of explanations of why how when and who. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]