Re: mysqld_multi missing after mysql50-server install
Hello again, Did some more research. I have a system running FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p12 with an earlier version on mysql (mysql-server-5.0.41). Same thing, the mysqld_multi and mysqlmanager is missing. Once again do i miss something? If yes what is it? And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld instances on one server please let me know. thank you and a great day, v On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Valentin Bud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello list, I have just installed mysql50-server from ports. I need to start 2 instances of mysqld. I have searched on dev.mysql.com how can I accomplish that and there are 2 methods either using mysqld_multi or mysqlmanager. After reading a little on mysql.com i decided i want to go on mysqld_multi way because mysqlmanager will be removed in 6.0 and i want to use this 2 instances quite some time from now on. The only problem is that i couldn't find neither of them (mysqld_multi or mysqlmanager) after installing mysql50-server. My system is FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p5 amd64. I did some digging and extracted the sources chnage dir to the sources dir and ./configure --help to see the available options. Found an options name --with-mysqlmanager. Went back to add this option to the Makefile (CONFIGURE_ARGS section) reinstalled mysql50-server but again the mysqlmanager program/script is missing. Am i missing something? And i found in /usr/local/share/mysql a script called mysqld_multi.server which doesn't run saying: Can't execute /usr/local/mysql/bin/mysqld_multi from dir /usr/local/mysql. Check to see if there is a dir called /usr/local/mysql but there isn't one. I even did a find / -name mysqld_multi without no success. So can someone point me in the right direction please. thanks and a great day, v ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
question regarding portsnap
Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0 The OS was downloaded from freebsd.org two months ago. When I am trying to upgrade ports by using portsnap, portsnap doesn't work. # portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching public key from portsnap1.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. Fetching public key from portsnap2.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. Fetching public key from portsnap4.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Why the key is incorrect and what can be done to resolve this issue? Please answer ASAP. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
These applications have predefined ports they use to start up the bi-directional packet conversation. But them unsolicited packeted come in from other pc nodes to share data using a wide range of high port numbers. IPFW, IPF, and PF don't seem to have a rule option to allow packs in/out based on program name that started the conversation. I thought i read in openbsd pf manual that pf state processing will allow applications like limewire to function normally by accepting the inbound high number port to pass through the firewall. I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are blocked by design. How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mysqld_multi missing after mysql50-server install
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Ott Köstner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Valentin Bud wrote: And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld instances on one server please let me know. There is no limit, how many instances of mysqld you can run. Just specify different database directories and sockets for each instance. Something like that: $ mysqld --datadir=your sql instance dada dir --socket=/tmp/your socket ... I get it. It's like making my own mysqld_multi. I can make multiple /etc/my.cnf and specify on the command line the default data dir, config file, etc and it just works. I will try it and get back with the results. I am thinking of making rc.d files to start the daemons at boot. There is no need to run mysqld as root (and better not do that). Just any regular user is OK for mysqld. I am running mysql from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server and it runs as user mysql. Thanks anyway for the heads up :). have a great day, v Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
Quoting Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software? I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not getting KDE4. Hi Andrew, if you're into LaTeX, then prosper (http://sourceforge.net/projects/prosper/) might be an option. If you're into XML and don't need no fancy effects, then DocBook Slides (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/slides/3.4.0/RELEASE-NOTES.html) may come in handy. Also, if you don't need any effects or transitions you may consider any tool that creates multi-page PDF files. Adobe Reader has a full-screen option which turns it into a presentation viewer. hth Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with mhoenicka) http://www.mhoenicka.de ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question regarding portsnap
my /var/db/portsnap/pub.ssh file (i use 7.1-PRERELEASE): -BEGIN PUBLIC KEY- MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA0FgDRCCYpEOiTHwtjtDI rz/OLIOhjNZKa9OEtcbyHS24GMpMYp+lAb1uCxCyyJUQ7F08phNNud39cdpBBtjg ZFSisdJARYu2IhgEvxJqN+1EKVw6psLCOwlosIJlALPohf0LzTQ2eMkrDNk1xXru 37nIF5Qn6qcX9GjAJYc51yGga98TOL1/jJZkEY+nbHIhF8vKIvjsv8uZ6p2z2UMJ CquypOeOQIG2qYlMhDE0E1+Grh7QWBOopSyuq4K+tBLa+pNXUbWpWCvapSurFwR5 5LJyBN2mp4Dl6YzrmLktF8et39ipwxl/xXj9iqEO3+xMEcQbJ+FsU4P4oFK4UeFg 9wIDAQAB -END PUBLIC KEY- do you have the same or different? if different - it's strange at least. i can't answer You why. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mysqld_multi missing after mysql50-server install
Valentin Bud wrote: And of course if there are other possibilities to run 2 mysqld instances on one server please let me know. There is no limit, how many instances of mysqld you can run. Just specify different database directories and sockets for each instance. Something like that: $ mysqld --datadir=your sql instance dada dir --socket=/tmp/your socket ... There is no need to run mysqld as root (and better not do that). Just any regular user is OK for mysqld. Greetings, O.K. -- Testi oma Interneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed: http://speedtest.zzz.ee/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: These applications have predefined ports they use to start up the bi-directional packet conversation. But them unsolicited packeted come in from other pc nodes to share data using a wide range of high port numbers. IPFW, IPF, and PF don't seem to have a rule option to allow packs in/out based on program name that started the conversation. I thought i read in openbsd pf manual that pf state processing will allow applications like limewire to function normally by accepting the inbound high number port to pass through the firewall. I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are blocked by design. How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work? Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and others without causing strange secondary problems. Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm forgetting something important. ed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
On 11/26/08, Markus Hoenicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software? I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not getting KDE4. Hi Andrew, if you're into LaTeX, then prosper (http://sourceforge.net/projects/prosper/) might be an option. If you're into XML and don't need no fancy effects, then DocBook Slides (http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/slides/3.4.0/RELEASE-NOTES.html) may come in handy. Also, if you don't need any effects or transitions you may consider any tool that creates multi-page PDF files. Adobe Reader has a full-screen option which turns it into a presentation viewer. xpdf also support full-screen option and is much lighter than Adobe Reader, and doesnt depends on linux stuff. evince can be of use if you already have it installed, because it supports fullscreen and presentation mode. -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question regarding portsnap
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:57:20 +0300 __ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0 The OS was downloaded from freebsd.org two months ago. When I am trying to upgrade ports by using portsnap, portsnap doesn't work. # portsnap fetch Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching public key from portsnap1.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. Fetching public key from portsnap2.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. Fetching public key from portsnap4.freebsd.org... key has incorrect hash. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Why the key is incorrect and what can be done to resolve this issue? Check /etc/portsnap.conf to see if the hash is correct there. Mine says: KEYPRINT=9b5feee6d69f170e3dd0a2c8e469ddbd64f13f978f2f3aede40c98633216c330 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
Quoting Paul B. Mahol [EMAIL PROTECTED]: xpdf also support full-screen option and is much lighter than Adobe Reader, and doesnt depends on linux stuff. evince can be of use if you already have it installed, because it supports fullscreen and presentation mode. Yes, this is correct. I was thinking about the systems which are available when you present your talk (you're not always allowed to plug in your own box). Whenever I give a talk I have to deal with Windows systems. That's why I suggested Adobe Reader. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with mhoenicka) http://www.mhoenicka.de ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software? I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not getting KDE4. Thanks, Andrew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800 Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are blocked by design. How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work? I don't use limewire, but for other p2p I define pf macros that list the udp and tcp ports and and explicity allow incoming connections. If you want to know what ports an application is listening on try sockstat -l. I wouldn't expose them without tracking down what they do though in case they are http, telnet, etc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles
You received this message by consenting to receive e-mail from Consumer-PromotionCenter on 11/24/2008 12:00:00 AM. To be sure you don't miss any special offers, please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to your address book. Consumer-PromotionCenter [UB6LZEULE2JY2.gif] [1]Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles with iQ SkinTensive. * Product is free to try for 30 days. Pay only a small shipping handling fee. Customer is responsible for return postage. Consumer-PromotionCenter 22647 Ventura Blvd · Suite 258 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 [2]Privacy Policy · [3]Unsubscribe References Visible links 1. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/J5OCCVB7UFCDS/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 2. http://members.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/ 3. http://www.consumer-promotioncenter.com/u.cgi?config=3813 Hidden links: 4. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/67Y4BGSRYS5BG/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 5. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/YPF7TVGIR2DR6/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 6. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/I5XCZWVRXAL3A/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 7. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/E3GFQNOAPQRCW/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 8. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/OTQDB4WCPQCNA/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 9. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/3YFB55FDSMDX6/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 10. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/S3LZ44RUQDAHQ/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 11. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/REJ7TC6STA4X6/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 12. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/3GPU6PFNETJO2/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 13. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/VGFC655BTT6NG/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 14. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/HDJNFP7TGDDMO/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html 15. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/ITNMKKBQ4AZFO/UB6LZEULE2JY2.html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
You might want to have a look at http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/ Works in a browser ;) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and others without causing strange secondary problems. Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm forgetting something important. ed I share your pain, Ed. I've had to perform 3 complete re-installations of computers in my household in the last year. Each time, I found a .limewire file in a user's application folder. The boys are now banned from my wife's computer. When the last culprit get's his computer back, he will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire. The next time, he'll get it back without a network card. Andrew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update a package
Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles
Wow can you believe that we consented to receiving this. Amazing. This has to be legit right... ... Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ConsumerPromotionCenter Sent: November-26-08 10:04 AM To: Subject: Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles You received this message by consenting to receive e-mail from Consumer-PromotionCenter on 11/24/2008 12:00:00 AM. To be sure you don't miss any special offers, please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to your address book. Consumer-PromotionCenter [UB6LZEULE2JY2.gif] [1]Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles with iQ SkinTensive. * Product is free to try for 30 days. Pay only a small shipping handling fee. Customer is responsible for return postage. Consumer-PromotionCenter 22647 Ventura Blvd . Suite 258 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 [2]Privacy Policy . [3]Unsubscribe References Visible links 1. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/J5OCCVB7UFCDS/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 2. http://members.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/ 3. http://www.consumer-promotioncenter.com/u.cgi?config=3813 Hidden links: 4. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/67Y4BGSRYS5BG/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 5. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/YPF7TVGIR2DR6/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 6. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/I5XCZWVRXAL3A/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 7. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/E3GFQNOAPQRCW/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 8. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/OTQDB4WCPQCNA/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 9. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/3YFB55FDSMDX6/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 10. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/S3LZ44RUQDAHQ/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 11. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/REJ7TC6STA4X6/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 12. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/3GPU6PFNETJO2/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 13. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/VGFC655BTT6NG/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 14. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/HDJNFP7TGDDMO/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html 15. http://site.emn-consumerpromotioncenter.com/l.m/ITNMKKBQ4AZFO/UB6LZEULE2JY2. html ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: presentation application (other than OpenOffice)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Andrew Gould wrote: | I'm browsing around for smaller office apps. Abiword and Gnumeric are | great. Does anyone have any recommendations for a presentation software? | I'd rather not compile OpenOffice; and I'm just not getting KDE4. I would suggest LaTeX's beamer class http://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/ | | Thanks, | | Andrew | ___ | freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEAREKAAYFAkktawoACgkQwMJqmJVx945+bwCg0srGQ3gOgjSEMc98q7XpwMsK oOoAn2MdIUSlpSD95Edel+BRpoNgMr9j =XP1+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KDM stopping
FreeBSD-7.0-RELEASE, with KDE as desktop environment and KDM as display manager. I have 2 users, say user1 and user2. Boot, KDM login as user1, OK. Then I do a close session. OK, KDM presents me again with the KDM login screen, login as user2, OK. Then again, close session. Now, the KDM login screen does not come back. I am stuck with a cursor blinking at the upper left corner. Ctrl-Alt-F1 brings me to the console, Ctrl-Alt-F7: no X, just a login:prompt If I reboot and do the same thing, but now first with user2, then user1 - exactly same behaviour (X dies at the second close session). So, it's not connected with user2. Anyone a idea what could be wrong? Below are some log details: The /var/log/kdm-log shows: -- ... X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD pclinwi74.cmi.ua.ac.be 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7. 0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Build Date: 13 February 2008 05:50:12PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Wed Nov 26 16:27:31 2008 (EE) Unable to locate/open config file New driver is i810 (==) Using default built-in configuration (55 lines) (EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0) (II) Module ddc already built-in (II) Module ramdac already built-in FreeFontPath: FPE /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ refcount is 2, should be 1; fixing. FreeFontPath: FPE /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ refcount is 2, should be 1; fixing. (EE) I810(0): V_BIOS address 0x0 out of range Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD pclinwi74.cmi.ua.ac.be 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7. 0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Build Date: 13 February 2008 05:50:12PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Wed Nov 26 16:43:42 2008 (EE) Unable to locate/open config file New driver is i810 (==) Using default built-in configuration (55 lines) (EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0) (EE) I810(0): V_BIOS address 0x0 out of range (EE) I810(0): VBE initialization failed. (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found --- /var/log/messages contains: -- .. Nov 26 16:29:03 pclinwi74 kernel: pid 853 (Xorg), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (c ore dumped) Nov 26 16:29:03 pclinwi74 kdm-bin[850]: X server for display :0 terminated unex pectedly Nov 26 16:29:03 pclinwi74 kdm-bin: :0[1137]: IO Error in XOpenDisplay Nov 26 16:29:03 pclinwi74 kdm-bin[850]: Display :0 cannot be opened Nov 26 16:29:03 pclinwi74 kdm-bin[850]: Unable to fire up local display :0; dis abling. Nov 26 16:29:30 pclinwi74 login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0 Nov 26 16:43:40 pclinwi74 shutdown: reboot by root: Nov 26 16:43:42 pclinwi74 kdm-bin[850]: X server for display :0 terminated unex pectedly Nov 26 16:43:42 pclinwi74 kdm-bin[850]: Unable to fire up local display :0; dis abling. Nov 26 16:43:42 pclinwi74 syslogd: exiting on signal 15 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
from /usr/ports/UPDATE, you need to rebuild all ports... AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU) AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.17, the shared library version of libintl has changed, so you will need to rebuild all ports that depend on gettext: # portupgrade -rf gettext # portmaster -r gettext\* Given the scope and sheer number of dependent ports, it may be more advisable to simply blow away all existing install ports (after keeping any local configuration changes), and rebuilding from scratch. good luck!! TFC On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Gary Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Update a package
So am I to understand the package tree is considered part of the ports, i've fetching the packages from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6-stable/All/ I don't have a local ports tree, since i'm tight on space ( only 20gig HDD ). Can ports be fetched remotely? Thanks Gary from /usr/ports/UPDATE, you need to rebuild all ports... AFFECTS: users of devel/gettext (i.e.: YOU) AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As a result of the upgrade to gettext-0.17, the shared library version of libintl has changed, so you will need to rebuild all ports that depend on gettext: # portupgrade -rf gettext # portmaster -r gettext\* Given the scope and sheer number of dependent ports, it may be more advisable to simply blow away all existing install ports (after keeping any local configuration changes), and rebuilding from scratch. good luck!! TFC On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Gary Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. Gary ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
From: Gary Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. Gary Personally, I would just insure that my ports tree was up-to-date and then use either 'portmanager' or 'portupgrade' to handle the chore. My preference is for 'portmanager'. -- Jerry ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:36:40 +0100, Gary Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. Gary man portupgrade ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
Gary Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So am I to understand the package tree is considered part of the ports, i've fetching the packages from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6-stable/All/ I don't have a local ports tree, since i'm tight on space ( only 20gig HDD ). Can ports be fetched remotely? Sure. pkg_add(1) has a '-r' option for fetching remotely, and portupgrade(1) has a '-P' option to specify using packages (it will fetch from FreeBSD servers if possible). -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
Gary Hartl wrote: Hi all; Ok uber noob question here. I have gettext-0.14.5 installed from the package tree, I want to update to gettext-0.17_1 Is there a ways to do that with the pkg_add or some other command? I google'ed it and only found ways to update local ports sources...(which means I either suck at google or fbsd or both) Thanks for understanding my noobness. #portsnap fetch extract or if you allready have a ports tree just: #portsnap fetch update #cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade #make install clean #rehash # portupgrade -Rf gettext And man portupgrade of course. :-) -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dell PERC 6 RAID Controller monitoring
Hello all. Quick question - is where is a way to monitoring Dell PERC 6 RAID Controller in FreeBSD 7.x ? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and others without causing strange secondary problems. Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm forgetting something important. ed I share your pain, Ed. I've had to perform 3 complete re-installations of computers in my household in the last year. Each time, I found a .limewire file in a user's application folder. The boys are now banned from my wife's computer. When the last culprit get's his computer back, he will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire. The next time, he'll get it back without a network card. Andrew :) I understand. Hopefully someone has a reasonably efficient pf or ipfw based solution. If it cuts some of the microsoft traffic that I am seeing much more of recently, I won't complain either. I have tried to control them by ip's and but domain names with limited success. Too many windows boxes at the office. have a great day, ed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipsec tunnel with racoon / phase1 failure with invalid length of payload
hello,
wonder people could shed some light how to debug more when configuring
ipsec tunnel with racoon that it seems to fail on the phase1
negotiation with racoon log info listed in the following. i tried aes
as encryption algorithm, but it failed the same way.
not sure the invalid length of payload is caused by what.
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: encryption(3des)
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: with key:
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG:
1239dfa9 caa1798f 212cd994 7802292b 3ef473f3 3188868a
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: decrypted payload by IV:
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG:
bbd836ac 319a1ebe
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: decrypted payload, but not trimed.
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG:
8450f134 99116727 73c7f68c 3f0a65c2 68a9afe6 2c0a6ce1 41708fbb 3f0c7511
c5fdeaad 804a2277
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: padding len=119
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: skip to trim padding.
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: decrypted.
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG:
d1d9962c 6004bf7b 0c317531 9c85bb06 05100201 0044 8450f134
99116727 73c7f68c 3f0a65c2 68a9afe6 2c0a6ce1 41708fbb 3f0c7511 c5fdeaad
804a2277
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: begin.
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: seen nptype=5(id)
2008-11-26 09:22:05: DEBUG: invalid length of payload
racoon.conf
path include /usr/local/etc/racoon;
path pre_shared_key /usr/local/etc/racoon/psk.txt;
log notify;
padding
{
maximum_length 20; # maximum padding length.
randomize off; # enable randomize length.
strict_check off; # enable strict check.
exclusive_tail off; # extract last one octet.
}
listen
{
#isakmp ::1 [7000];
#isakmp 202.249.11.124 [500];
#admin [7002]; # administrative port for racoonctl.
#strict_address;# requires that all addresses must be bound.
}
timer
{
# These value can be changed per remote node.
counter 5; # maximum trying count to send.
interval 20 sec;# maximum interval to resend.
persend 1; # the number of packets per send.
# maximum time to wait for completing each phase.
phase1 30 sec;
phase2 15 sec;
}
remote 192.168.0.101
{
exchange_mode main,aggressive;
nonce_size 16;
initial_contact on;
proposal_check strict; # obey, strict, or claim
proposal {
encryption_algorithm 3des;
hash_algorithm sha1;
authentication_method pre_shared_key;
dh_group 2;
}
}
sainfo anonymous
{
pfs_group 2;
encryption_algorithm 3des;
authentication_algorithm hmac_sha1;
compression_algorithm deflate;
}
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: large binary, why not strip ?
Matthew Seaman wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good project to get some familiarity with the ports tree. Would it be worthwhile to add a test and warning that all installed binaries have not been stripped to the 'security-check' target in bsd.port.mk? That's not really what that target was intended for (feeping creaturism alert!) but it's the obvious place to put such a test. Probably cleaner to create a whole new target, but that's going to duplicate some code. H... I shall work up some patches, probably over the weekend, so there's something substantive to talk about. Done: ports/129210 For the record, I also discovered that, contrary to what I said earlier, there is apparently one class of binary object that will not work correctly if stripped: kernel loadable modules. As others have commented, most shlibs installed from ports aren't stripped. The same applies to almost any sort of pluggable module (perl, PHP etc.) that I have been able to investigate. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are? My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. If I am incorrect in my technical assessment, I welcome a correction. When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never use Limewire, or anything like it. Andrew ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm. Isn't life interesting. I would like to know how to block them and others without causing strange secondary problems. Actually a default pf configuration will let them pass unless I'm forgetting something important. ed I share your pain, Ed. I've had to perform 3 complete re-installations of computers in my household in the last year. Each time, I found a .limewire file in a user's application folder. The boys are now banned from my wife's computer. When the last culprit get's his computer back, he will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire. The next time, he'll get it back without a network card. Andrew :) I understand. Hopefully someone has a reasonably efficient pf or ipfw based solution. If it cuts some of the microsoft traffic that I am seeing much more of recently, I won't complain either. I have tried to control them by ip's and but domain names with limited success. Too many windows boxes at the office. Regardless of what you do to control the unwanted applications, I'd monitoring the traffic on the network as well. I don't put many limits on what my kid can do on the network, but he knows I'm looking over his shoulder. Virtually speaking. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Update a package
* Lowell Gilbert [2008-11-26 11:17:25 -0500]: Sure. pkg_add(1) has a '-r' option for fetching remotely, and portupgrade(1) has a '-P' option to specify using packages (it will fetch from FreeBSD servers if possible). To expand on Lowell's answer, using portupgrade's -P option can avoid a lengthy compile. If no suitable package is available for download, portupgrade -P will fall back to compiling the port from sourcecode. To avoid this, use -PP. Very handy when dealing with big packages like koffice. :-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: large binary, why not strip ?
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Seaman wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good project to get some familiarity with the ports tree. Would it be worthwhile to add a test and warning that all installed binaries have not been stripped to the 'security-check' target in bsd.port.mk? That's not really what that target was intended for (feeping creaturism alert!) but it's the obvious place to put such a test. Probably cleaner to create a whole new target, but that's going to duplicate some code. H... I shall work up some patches, probably over the weekend, so there's something substantive to talk about. Done: ports/129210 For the record, I also discovered that, contrary to what I said earlier, there is apparently one class of binary object that will not work correctly if stripped: kernel loadable modules. Kernel loadable modules are already stripped (--strip-debug). -- Paul ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvsup: local
fire jotawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i did cvsup with supfile given in example, /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile, and set base to /var/db and prefix to /home/ncvs as suggested and then cvsup -g -L 2 -h HOST /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile where HOST is the one that run fastest in local area around my country. Okay, so you have the CVS tree on that tree. my real problem is that i can not do cvsup from any machine in my office. but there is no problem at home. so i simply bring my notebook home and do cvsup as above. later on at the office, i want my other machine get /usr/src from my notebook but i can not and that's my problem. Now I understand what you are trying to do. and frankly speaking my english is quite poor, i spend the whole week end to understand documents cited. Your written English is more than good enough for me to understand, so your skills are obviously much better than the way you describe yourself. Now that you have spent much time understanding some of the documents, you might be able to help others by working on the translations for whichever language you would prefer to read in. unfortunately, that bring me more problem and that's why i revert back to my instinct with cvs. Either way (cvs or cvsup) should work fine. The easiest way to use CVS directly would be to NFS-mount the CVS repository on the client, and then checking out directly. For example, if the repository were mounted on /ncvs, the checkout command might be something like (cd /usr/src ; cvs -d /ncvs co -r TAG src-all ) [I haven't tested this; I may have made an error, and I'm not sure what TAG you would want.] For using cvsup, you can install the cvsup-mirror port on the machine you want to use as the cvsup server. It will ask you a number of questions so that it can configure cvsupd properly, and you won't need to worry about it. Use whichever one you want; I don't see any reason to prefer one or the other. Good luck. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc cross-compiler for linux
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:31:10 +0100 Tijl Coosemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From that error message I'd say you probably need to populate /usr/local/i386-linux/include with glibc and linux kernel headers. How can I populate it with them? Manually installing them in this directory? May be the devel/cross-binutils port should do it? Is there any port that can populate it? Thanks Xavier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
need slight help in upgrading a 1998 c++ main file...
Any C++ hackers out there would can clue me in on getting a 10-year-old c++ program to build? I finished it--or about 95%, then gave up when I decided the whole project was impractical. Need help on the iostream.h stuff. thanks in advance, gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:40:03AM -0500, Gary Hartl wrote: Wow can you believe that we consented to receiving this. Amazing. This has to be legit right... ... Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ConsumerPromotionCenter Sent: November-26-08 10:04 AM To: Subject: Say Goodbye to Lines and Wrinkles You received this message by consenting to receive e-mail from ... . [[ Save the bandwidth ]] This is but one reason that my spamassassin just doesn't quite cut it. True, I'm down from billion and billion of spams, but can I add others to my sendmail.cf or sendmail.whatever?? THAT is the question. What, and How? tia, gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600 Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are? My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. Is this your FreeBSD POV or more windows oriented? The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. I have never needed a block on limewire. Firstly, all main conmputers run solaris and therefore also limewire on solaris and secondly, all windows machines are virtual. So -IF- one of them is infected I just put a recent snapshot ;-) If I am incorrect in my technical assessment, I welcome a correction. Personally I'm not infected on windows machines recently by any limewire connections. But ymmv. When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never use Limewire, or anything like it. You can also say: use them but don't connect them to the net. I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad! -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv101 ++ + All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:54:43 -0600 Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry for asking but what are this limewire programs are? My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It's a Gnutella client written in Java. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. There's nothing remarkable about that, no p2p filesharing application uses fixed ports. Some have default ports, but they are widely ignored because historically ISPs used those ports for throttling. When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never use Limewire, or anything like it. They are as dangerous as you want to make them, I've been using bittorrent and eD2k for years and have never seem a single virus, trojan etc. I've seen a few on USENET but they've always been laughably obvious. People that end-up with that kind of thing are normally actively seeking executables. If anyone wants to discuss p2p blocking I'd suggest you start a new thread. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
dick hoogendijk wrote: I know, I'm cynical here, but limewire is not all bad! ...and, BTW, Limewire port is readily available for FreeBSD: http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-p2p/limewire LimeWire is a fast, easy-to-use file sharing program that contains no spyware, adware or other bundled software. Compatible with all major platforms and running over the Gnutella network, LimeWire's open source code http://www.limewire.org/, is freely available to the public and developed in part by a devoted programmer community... http://www.limewire.com/about/ Greetings! O.K. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getpriority(2) and rtprio(2) implementation
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 05:50:21 Unga wrote:
I need to study the implementation of getpriority(2) and rtprio(2) system
calls. Appreciate if somebody could point me to where these system calls
are implemented in FreeBSD source tree, that is, in which file/s.
For future ref:
find /usr/src/sys -name '*.c' -exec grep kern_$name_of_syscall {} +
will catch 99% of the cases.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. that's my client's problem not mine ;) viruses don't work under FreeBSD. The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In as all my LANs uses nat, and i actually don't want to block it, i use natd with lots of redirect_port options. i give 3 ports to every user, most of that programs allows to specify what ports are 1:1 mapped to outside. at least bittorrent compatible things. torrent-compatible P2P programs are most usable of them. IMHO the only usable. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never use Limewire, or anything like it. just downloading/sharing files allows you to download viruses, but it's up to you to run them. well unless P2P program is really broken, or you are sharing executables. for sharing movies, pictures, music there is no danger. or maybe there are, i don't know windoze bugs, maybe it's movie/music players have bugs that allows to run code from somehow prepared mp3 ;) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usb port use causes kernel panic on boot. why?
can someone explain to me, please, why i get a kernel panic on boot w/ the latest 7.1 when i have something plugged into a usb port? thx. david coder network engineer emeritus verio/ntt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filesystem problems at boot and shutdown?
Rick Janssen wrote: I've been playing around with FreeBSD for some time now, still being unable to solve some problems. Let me explain. I'm trying to run a webserver on the machine. Just basic, nothing too fancy. Problem concerns the following: The website served is speedy as expected when accessed from local LAN, but when accessed from WAN via router, it's realy slow. So, to do some tests, this afternoon I requested some pages from an computer outside my LAN. Server was very slow again, even ssh slowed to a crawl. Suddenly, without reason I know off, everything sped up. I issued a reboot to check if the problem might have been 'solved'. This took a long time. Back home I checked the logs. It now appeared the long reboot-time was caused by a Syncing disk anomaly, which happens when the system prepares for shutting down. Nov 26 22:38:12 server kernel: Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 timed out Nov 26 22:38:12 server kernel: Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done Nov 26 22:38:12 server kernel: Syncing disks, buffers remaining... 184 185 186 1 185 185 185 185 184 184 185 185 185 184 184 185 1 184 184 184 184 185 185 185 1 184 184 184 184 184 185 184 184 185 185 1 185 184 184 184 184 184 184 1 185 184 184 184 184 185 184 184 185 1 185 184 184 184 184 184 184 185 1 184 184 185 184 184 184 184 185 184 184 185 1 185 185 184 184 184 185 184 184 184 185 1 184 184 185 184 184 185 184 184 185 185 184 184 184 184 184 1 184 184 184 1 184 184 185 1 185 184 184 1 184 185 184 184 185 185 184 184 ... etc etc... Nov 26 22:38:12 server kernel: Final sync complete So I figured, might as well run fschk -y in single user mode to fix potential problems. Now I got some new errors: Nov 26 20:48:11 server kernel: ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=1364750271 Nov 26 20:48:11 server kernel: ad4: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51READY,DSC,ERROR error=4ABORTED LBA=1364750271 Nov 26 20:48:11 server kernel: g_vfs_done():ad4s1g[WRITE(offset=682932174848, length=131072)]error = 5 So far, nothing serious has followed from these errors I know off. They only happen sporadically, during reboots. Are these to problems even related, or am I just unlucky? Anyone has some suggestions to fix them? Regards, Rick Unless there is some incompatibility between FreeBSD - Your disk controller - Your disk, my best guess is you have a failing disk. I would also suggest you check cables, connections (I guess this is an ATA disk so you may wish the check whether the flat cable is the 80-conductor type and is plugged in correctly). Hopefully, if you are just playing with the system, you don't have any critical data in there, otherwise I would suggest you back up immediately. Do you have a spare disk to try and see what happens? Whether your other problem depends on this: It could be, since your webserver might be trying to read from a faulty area and keep retrying. Or indeed there is some incompatibility and the disk is constantly under-performing. You did not mention the speed of you WAN connection, but FWIW I am running a webserver behind a 1Mbps/256Kbps ADSL line and response is good enough. SSH is definitely good enough to use in long vi sessions, with lengthy documents. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
dick hoogendijk wrote: My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. Is this your FreeBSD POV or more windows oriented? The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. I have never needed a block on limewire. Firstly, all main conmputers run solaris and therefore also limewire on solaris and secondly, all windows machines are virtual. So -IF- one of them is infected I just put a recent snapshot ;-) Limewire is a windows only application. So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:28:49 -0600
Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the last culprit get's his computer back, he
will find it running an operating system that is not supported by Limewire.
DOS 6.0 ? :P it's java...
The next time, he'll get it back without a network card.
ouch, that's evil :D
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Unix gives you just enough rope to hang yourself --
and then a couple of more feet, just to be sure.
Eric Allman
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:52:16 +
RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..]
It is one of the
fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc.
The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to
block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security
measures from the inside.
There's nothing remarkable about that, no p2p filesharing application
uses fixed ports. Some have default ports, but they are widely ignored
because historically ISPs used those ports for throttling.
+1 . skype does the same thing. and it's p2p too , although a lot less so
than limewire.
When people ask my advice about computers, I always include: Never
use Limewire, or anything like it.
They are as dangerous as you want to make them, I've been using
bittorrent and eD2k for years and have never seem a single virus,
trojan etc. I've seen a few on USENET but they've always been laughably
obvious. People that end-up with that kind of thing are normally
actively seeking executables.
+1 - just the usual job of keeping an ear out for security holes ( including
those in your users' behaviour :P )
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Always do right. This will gratify some and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
Fbsd1 wrote: [snip] Limewire is a windows only application. So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix? Limewire is a Java program. It will run on any platform which has a working Java run time environment installed. It is definitely not Windows only. -Jason ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
update unix freebsd 6.1 to freebsd 6.3 or wtherever other version
Hi friends. I have some years of experience in unix and linux red hat, but I never ca'nt update from one version to other version, and now I wanna update my unix 6.1 to 6.3 or 7.0 without start over again. somebody here could help me with thath, please. thanks sincerely TOMAS __ Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:40:27 +0800
Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have inclusive firewall rule set which means only packets matching
the rules are passed through. The inbound hight port numbers are
blocked by design.
How do other firewall users code rules to allow limewire to work?
Hi,
i think there are a few interesting posts in this thread (and several
corrections about p2p 'evilness', which is good :P ).
A thread that may be of interest was started on net@ earlier in the year - look
for :
From: Mike Makonnen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Application layer classifier for ipfw
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:02:29 +0300
- it refers to ipfw, not pf.
- I think there was at least another thread following up on this with working
code,etc.
of course, DPI-style checks won't work (at all, or in a scalable fashion) as
soon as users start encrypting their packets :P
b
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of
it.
Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installing FreeBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Sir/Madam: Pleasant day! First of all, sorry if this enquiry shouldn’t be directed to you, please help me direct to the right person. Few months ago I’ve purchase a FreeBSD book which includes an installation DVD for FreeBSD 6.1. I tried to install it in my Toshiba Satellite, Intel Centrino with current Windows XP SP3 OS after doing some partition. But, I’m stock with boot error; sorry I’m very new to this system; I tried to search for an answer but no to avail. Here is the last part of the error: . Pci6: ACPI PCI bus on pcib2 Pci6: network at device 2.0 (no driver attached) Cbb0: PCI-CArdBus Bridge eme 0x8007000-0xb8007fff irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci6 Cardbus0: CardBus bus on cbb0 Pccard0: 16-bit PCCard on cbb0 Fwohci0: 1394 Open Host Controller Interface mem 0xb8008000-0xb80087ff,0xb80-0xb8003fff irq 18 at device 4.2 on pci6 Fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0) Fwohci0: No. Of Isochronous channels is 4. Fwohci0: EUI64 00:02:3f:58:69:40:a5:e6 NMI ISA b0, EISA ff RAM parity error, likely hardware failure. Fatal trap 19: non-maskable interrupt trap while in kernel mode Instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0528586 Stack pointer = 0x28:0xc10209c4 Frame pointer = 0x28:0xc10209d8 Code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Processor eflags = interrupt enable, IOPL = 0 Current process = 0 (swapper) Trap number = 19 Panic: non-maskable interrupt trap Uptime: 1s Automatic reboot in 15 seconds – press a key on the console to abort Hope you can enlighten me on this matter. Thank you and more power! Best Regards, RommelTan --- The information contained in this Internet message is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity identified. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of the information contained in this Internet message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) immediately. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: update unix freebsd 6.1 to freebsd 6.3 or wtherever other version
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Tomás Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi friends. I have some years of experience in unix and linux red hat, but I never ca'nt update from one version to other version, and now I wanna update my unix 6.1 to 6.3 or 7.0 without start over again. somebody here could help me with thath, please. thanks sincerely TOMAS sorry for my bad english, you need to read this article: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-freebsdupdate.html -- Linux is for people who hate Windows, BSD is for people who love UNIX. Social Engineer - Because there is no patch for human stupidity The Unix Guru's View of Sex unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep. Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD on a Mac Mini Intel?
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Tom Marchand wrote: snip Ian, You could always test it using VMWare Fusionand then let us know Er, Gee thanks. I'll just have a word with the VMware guys about fully abastracting the mini in software... back in a jiffy ;-) Actually VMWare has a Mac Version which is what the poster was probably referring to. ___ FreeBSD 6.x installs and runs well as far as I can tell on VM-Ware Fusion. This I Have done but I don't recall any specifics. I'm pretty sure I tried 6.1 and 6.3 but I forget which processor (amd64 vs i386). However personal preference: I'd rather run the box native FreeBSD and not have to bother with Mac OS X. I was actually musing that this (VM) might be a nice way to pre-install a complete custom system. Install, configure, add packages, tweak your fav kernel stuff, etc then dump/restore to a real disk and pop in to a physical system. I used to so something like this with NeXT systems. Twerked good. It all sounds promising enough to buy a new toy. I'll let you all know real soon now if/how I get it running. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dick hoogendijk wrote: My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. Is this your FreeBSD POV or more windows oriented? The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. I have never needed a block on limewire. Firstly, all main conmputers run solaris and therefore also limewire on solaris and secondly, all windows machines are virtual. So -IF- one of them is infected I just put a recent snapshot ;-) Limewire is a windows only application. So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix? The Limewire website says it has versions for Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and others, including OS/2 and Solaris. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make release of current
will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: firewall rules for bitlord, yahoo, limewire
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Andrew Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Fbsd1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dick hoogendijk wrote: My unofficial take on it is that limewire is a peer-to-peer sharing application used by Windows, Mac OS X and Linux users to share files, usually music, often copyrighted, over the internet. It is one of the fastest, most effective ways to spread viruses, trojans, spyware, etc. Is this your FreeBSD POV or more windows oriented? The program does not use fixed ports, so the services are hard to block. In essence, the program gets the user to bypass security measures from the inside. I have never needed a block on limewire. Firstly, all main conmputers run solaris and therefore also limewire on solaris and secondly, all windows machines are virtual. So -IF- one of them is infected I just put a recent snapshot ;-) Limewire is a windows only application. So how can you say it runs on solaris which is a flavor Unix? The Limewire website says it has versions for Windows, Mac OS X, Linux and others, including OS/2 and Solaris. Yeah. Limewire is written in Java (iirc), which makes it extremely easy to port it to any system that can run java. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make release of current
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:40:21 michael wrote: will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines. Yes, but read all the docs completely there are a number of options you need, like telling it to use your source tree instead of CVS and if you want to build packages etc. Beech ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: large binary, why not strip ?
Paul B. Mahol wrote: On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthew Seaman wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good project to get some familiarity with the ports tree. Would it be worthwhile to add a test and warning that all installed binaries have not been stripped to the 'security-check' target in bsd.port.mk? That's not really what that target was intended for (feeping creaturism alert!) but it's the obvious place to put such a test. Probably cleaner to create a whole new target, but that's going to duplicate some code. H... I shall work up some patches, probably over the weekend, so there's something substantive to talk about. Done: ports/129210 For the record, I also discovered that, contrary to what I said earlier, there is apparently one class of binary object that will not work correctly if stripped: kernel loadable modules. Kernel loadable modules are already stripped (--strip-debug). KLDs aren't stripped in a way that file(1) recognises: happy-idiot-talk:/boot/kernel:% file if_em.ko if_em.ko: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, not stripped Unfortunately file(1) seems to be about the only tool available to test a priori whether a binary object is stripped or not. It's possible that objdump(1) or readelf(1) could do a similar thing, but I can't work it out from those man pages. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
CUPS: cannot see printer from various program
The printer is Epson Stylus Photo R265. I'm using gutenprint 5 and CUPS. The test page prints well from CUPS. I can also print images and web pages from firefox, because the CUPS/R265 printer can be selected in the print dialog of firefox. However, when I open an image from eog (eye of gnome), the only printer destination I can choose is LPR. Which is bad, because this is a printer server with diskless clients, and the users must be able to select print options from the GUI. The system is FreeBSD 7.0. My girlfriend had the same problem with Ubuntu before, but not with kiwi, so it might not be related to FreeBSD. Thanks, Laci ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make release of current
Hello Beech, Could you be more specific on what documentation to read. thank you and a great day, v On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 26 November 2008 20:40:21 michael wrote: will make release work for current? i've built a nice working system that i would like to be able to install on several identical machines. Yes, but read all the docs completely there are a number of options you need, like telling it to use your source tree instead of CVS and if you want to build packages etc. Beech ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gd-2.0.35 won't install on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE
Hello, GD-2.0.35 fails to install on my production server saying that GD_FONTS not found. How can I solve this problem? Regards, Victor. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
