Re: nfs error: No route to host when starting apache ...
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: Since rpc.lockd and rpc.statd expect to be able to do IP broadcast (same goes for rpcbind), I suspect that might be a problem w.r.t. jails, although I know nothing about how jails work? Oh, and you can use the nolock mount option to avoid use of rpc.lockd and rpc.statd. based on the mount_nfs man page, as well as trying it just in case, this option no longer appears to be availalble in the 7.x nfs code ... :( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
nfs error: No route to host when starting apache ...
I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ... ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8 ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7 I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for when I try and startup Apache, I get: [Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't grab the accept mutex When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get: # newaliases postalias: fatal: lock /etc/aliases.db: No route to host Yet, for instance, both MySQL and PostgreSQL are running without any issues ... So, the mount is there, it is readable, it is working ... I can ssh into the jail, I can create files, etc ... I do have rpc.lockd and rpc.statd running on both client / server sides ... I'm not seeing anything in eithr the man page for mount_nfs *or* nfsd that might account / corect for something like this, but since I'm not sure what this is exactly, not sure exactl what I should be looking for :( Note that this behaviour happens at the *physical* server level as well, having tested with using postalias to generate the same 'lock' issue above ... Now, I do have mountd/nfsd started iwth the -h to bind them to 192.168.1.8 ... *but*, the servers themselves, although on same switch do have different default gateways ... I'm not seeing anything within the man page for, say, rpc.statd/rpc.lockd that allows me to bind it to the 192.168.1.0/24 IP, so is it binding to my public IP instead of my private? So nfsd / mount_nfs can talk find, as they go thorugh 192.168.1.0/24 as desired, but rpc.statd/rpc.lockd are the public IPs and not able to talk to each other? Thx ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: nfs error: No route to host when starting apache ...
I've succeedig in getting a bit further ... by the time I got to the bottom of my original, I started to think in terms of rpc more, and had overlooked lookign at thte rpcbind man page, which *does* have a -h option ... setting that fixes things perfectly *almost* ... The last issue I seem to be hitting *might* be a 6.x NFS client against a 7.x server issue ... ? Postfix generates: postfix/showq[65261]: fatal: select lock: Permission denied The only post I found about this was: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-April/215284.html But there didn't appear to be any responses ... so either all responses were private to Robert, or ... ? This is my last 6.x box, so it is not overly critical, but would be nice if I could get it to work properly ... On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I just setup an nfs mount between two servers ... ServerA, nfsd on 192.168.1.8 ServerB, nfs client on 192.168.1.7 I have a jail, ServerC, running on 192.168.1.7 ... most operations appear to work, but it looks like 'special files' of a sort aren't working, for when I try and startup Apache, I get: [Fri Apr 01 19:42:02 2011] [emerg] (65)No route to host: couldn't grab the accept mutex When I try and do a 'newaliases', I get: # newaliases postalias: fatal: lock /etc/aliases.db: No route to host Yet, for instance, both MySQL and PostgreSQL are running without any issues ... So, the mount is there, it is readable, it is working ... I can ssh into the jail, I can create files, etc ... I do have rpc.lockd and rpc.statd running on both client / server sides ... I'm not seeing anything in eithr the man page for mount_nfs *or* nfsd that might account / corect for something like this, but since I'm not sure what this is exactly, not sure exactl what I should be looking for :( Note that this behaviour happens at the *physical* server level as well, having tested with using postalias to generate the same 'lock' issue above ... Now, I do have mountd/nfsd started iwth the -h to bind them to 192.168.1.8 ... *but*, the servers themselves, although on same switch do have different default gateways ... I'm not seeing anything within the man page for, say, rpc.statd/rpc.lockd that allows me to bind it to the 192.168.1.0/24 IP, so is it binding to my public IP instead of my private? So nfsd / mount_nfs can talk find, as they go thorugh 192.168.1.0/24 as desired, but rpc.statd/rpc.lockd are the public IPs and not able to talk to each other? Thx ... ___ freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
fsync: Linux vs FreeBSD
Someone recently posted on one of the PostgreSQL Blogs concerning fsync on Linux/Windows/Mac OS X, but failed to make any comments on any of the BSDs ... the post has to do with how fsync works on the various OSs, and am curious as to whether or not this is something that also afflicts us: http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2010/10/wal-reliability.html From reading our man page, I see no warnings similar to what the other OSs have, specifically: Mac OS X: For applications that require tighter guarantees about the integrity of their data, Mac OS X provides the F_FULLFSYNC fcntl Linux: If the underlying hard disk has write caching enabled, then the data may not really be on permanent storage when fsync() / fdatasync() return. So, do we hide the fact, or are, in fact, not afflicted by this? Thanks ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsdstats problem?
Please try now, tested from here and works fine: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bsdstats.sh start Starting bsdstats. Posting monthly OS statistics to rpt.bsdstats.org # On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: Fbsd8 wrote: Anh Ky Huynh wrote: On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:28:52 +0100 Chris Whitehouse cwhi...@onetel.com wrote: Anyone else having problems with bsdstats? I have the same problems here. muji2# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bsdstats.sh start Starting bsdstats. fetch: http://rpt.bsdstats.org/scripts/enable_token.php?key=... No address record fetch: http://rpt.bsdstats.org/scripts/report_system.php?token... No address record Posting monthly OS statistics to rpt.bsdstats.org fetch: http://rpt.bsdstats.org/scripts/disable_token.php?key=... No address record ... The bsdstats server is off line. Maybe it's nolonger supported. Probably is, there was a push to get some things sorted out recently. I have cc'd the illustrious leader. Chris Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Is this information obtainable?
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Anh Ky Huynh wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:41:16 +0800 Aiza aiz...@comclark.com wrote: I trying to estimate the number of Freebsd computers. To gauge a rough range size. This may help: http://www.bsdstats.org/ :) BSDstats has a very long way to go before the numbers start to look rasonable ... for PCBSD, the #s are pretty reasonable, because they set it up so that its auto-enabled when you intall ... for FreeBSD, the numbers aren't even close, since ppl have to manually install it ... the numbers are growing ... since the start of May, I've seen the numbers jump by almost 2k new computers, so it is growing ... but ppl have to consciously install the software ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Is this information obtainable?
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Anh Ky Huynh wrote: the numbers are growing ... since the start of May, I've seen the numbers jump by almost 2k new computers, so it is growing ... but ppl have to consciously install the software ... I remember the days when I was using Linux with http://counter.li.org/ (my ID is 392115). Anonymousness is good but I think that I'll be proud of having a counter for my (Free)BSD box :) Why don't bsdstat support registration? one of the critical requirements that alot of ppl out there had at the start was anonymity ... not so much that they weren't proud to run *BSD, but for safety ... there is nothing in the database that can be traced back to the source, nor that can be spammed ... Also, easy of use was a big factor ... registration is just yet another step that ppl (myself included) generally just don't bother with ... it really doesn't give you much, and discourages alot of ppl from doing it ... ... and, in the case of PCBSD, would make it harder to have it auto-enabled, since it couldn't be enabled without the end user registering first, which most wouldn't do ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: How long do you go without upgrading FreeBSD to a newer release?
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: (i) install onto a new computer , test it , and if it is working very well transfer data onto new system , and keep old system for a new release/update cycle . This step is most suitable for production systems exposed to outer world . (ii) attach a new hard disk to the computer , copy all of the present files to the new system , update it , test it , if it is successful , use previous hard disk for a new release/update cycle , (iii) back-up all of the data , and try update . Testing suitability may take a long time . In steps (ii) and (iii) , do not load new data during tests , because at the end , all of them may be destroyed . ( No one of the above steps are suitable for a proprietary , activation based operating system because they are not allowing so many computer and/or hard disk changes . ) Therefore , the problem is a system analysis and design process . In my case, I have nagios setup to advise me when its been 60 days since last upgrade and perform an upgrade religiously when the alarm is sounded ... have had this policy for *years* now without regret ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
BSDStats: Status Report
News: Its been almost three weeks since we fixed a bug with the stats collector that was causing alot of reportings to get lumped under 'Panama', and our numbers are back up (or above) where they were before we effectively re-set the statistics. At the suggestion of one person, we have setup an internal mailing list that can be used for bug reports / future developments, so that we do not have to deal with a whole bunch of different mailing lists. To subscribe, please send an email to: general-subscr...@bsdstats.org In order to reduce the potential for spam, this is a closed list ... you have to be subscribed to post to it ... === Status: As of this posting, we are getting reports in from all the *BSD variants: PCBSD 4 872 FreeBSD1 627 DesktopBSD 154 NetBSD43 OpenBSD 15 DragonflyBSD 14 MidnightBSD3 MirBSD 3 Country wise, we are seeing reports from 102 countries, with the top 10 countries currently being: United States 1 421 (popular: PCBSD) Russian Federation 648 (popular: PCBSD) Germany 459 (popular: PCBSD) Panama 451 (popular: FreeBSD) Australia328 (popular: FreeBSD) Ukraine 307 (popular: PCBSD) Japan232 (popular: PCBSD) United Kingdom 190 (popular: PCBSD) Italy174 (popular: PCBSD) France 169 (popular: PCBSD) For more information on the project, please visit http://www.bsdstats.org The sites includes basic instructions for installing / running on the various *BSDs ... If you have any problems, please let me know ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
BSDStats: Project Status on May 13th, 2010
Status: Over the past two weeks, there has been alot of work performed on the backend, including fixing a few bugs that were recently reported. As a result of using HAProxy to load balance and help ensure uptime for reporting clients, someone recently reported that although their sent in their report, their country wasn't going up in the 'Countries' states. This bug has been fixed (HAProxy was reporting Proxy IP vs Client IP) and we reset the stats period to 1st of May, causing a sharp drop in #s that has slowly been climbing back up again. The result of the change is that now Panama isn't the largest distribution of PC-BSD anymore, but the USofA is back in that lead, with Russia quickly following. Stats Summary: As of May 13th, 2010 (based on reporting ~2 weeks of reporting period since fix) , the project has 3 733 hosts that have reported in, broken down as follows: PC-BSD2 357 hosts FreeBSD 1 243 hosts DesktopBSD 78 hosts NetBSD 34 hosts OpenBSD 12 hosts DragonFly 9 hosts MirBSD0 hosts MidnightBSD 0 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 0 hosts We currently have hosts being reported in from 88 countries, with the top 10 being: United States 752 Panama332 Russian Federation332 Australia 271 Germany 204 Ukraine 173 Japan 121 Canada101 Brazil 89 United Kingdom 89 Project URL: http://www.bsdstats.org Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. There is now a man page / document that has been created, that contains a full description of the project, as well as the steps we take to ensure the anonymity of those reporting while maintaining the individuality of the reporting machines. This can be found at: http://www.bsdstats.org/bsdstats-8.html Project Uptime: In the beginning, there were issues with accessibility of the servers, due to only having one reporting server. We have since moved to a distributed cluster using HAProxy to load balance between two physical servers, with a third one coming online soon. http://www.bsdstats.org isn't running on this new cluster yet, but work is underway to get that moved over as well, which we hope to have accomplished over the next couple of days. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Chad Perrin wrote: On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:56:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... Not all BSD Unix systems are servers. True, but, then again, few desktops users probably run web servers to display such an icon on :) But, that said, we're looking at something like either 'Member of' or 'Contributor to' instead ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: BSDstats website displaying data incorrectly
Just to elaborate on the issue ... it looks like both of those pages are using different QUERIES to the database ... in the former, it is using a system view that I was able to update after we fixed the issue with country reporting, such that it doesn't show records older then that date ... the latter page is pulling the data via a different method (which Bobby is looking into) so that its actually pulling in older date (ie. a two months average vs just the past 10 days or so) ... Both are accurate, just different time periods ... On Sun, 9 May 2010, Bobby Walker wrote: On May 9, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Aiza wrote: Bobby Walker wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: Why does this page show PCBSD has count of 387 http://www.bsdstats.org/bt/home.html?os= And this page shows PCBSD has count of 1307 http://www.bsdstats.org/bt/home.html?os=PC-BSD Why is this? I would think both should show the same value, or you better add explanation to the web page why the count is different. This was a database setup problem, and I've updated the code to pull out of the proper database. if anyone notices any other discrepancies please let me know. Thanks, Bobby___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Why does http://www.bsdstats.org/ and http://bsdstats.hub.org/bt/home.html?os=FreeBSD still show different counts if you fixed this problem? I made the correction on the development site and did not have any issues. In fact, I still don't have problems with it at all. On the live site, though, there's something amiss with the way the template system is interacting with the database. So, I'm trying to track down the problem. Here are my temporary hurdles, I'm still wading through the template system. The more familiar I get with the layout of that, the faster things seem to go. And I usually get an hour or so a day to work with it. But, I am plugging away at it. I'll post an update when I isolate the erroneous problems. Thanks for the heads up! -- Bobby ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote: I like that idea. On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe it could go in the monthly subscription list reminder. I think everyone agrees that bsdstats needs more visibility right from the virgin install. Since its not appropriate to include bsdstats in the sysinstall program. How about getting the RELEASE team to change the content of the default logon message of the day /etc/motd, to advocacy installing the bsdstats package. What do you think about this idea? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
I was just thinking about it, and one point that I don't know if I've ever made (or haven't made in awhile) is that BSDStats looks at who is *using* a *BSD variant, not who *was* ... it relies on being run *at least* once a month for a server to be counted ... if you run it once and never run it again, you only count for that *period*, but fall off the radar relatively quickly. Basically, if someone installed FreeBSD 2 years ago, installed the port and then switched to Linux a year later, even though they are still listed in the system, they are not part of the 'current' states, as they are no longer reporting ... That is why the initial install puts it into /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly, so that it hopefully gets run *at least* at the beginning of each month ... it can be run more often over the month, it will still count as *1* install, but it needs to be run *at least* once a month for a machine to continue to be counted ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote: I like that idea. On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe it could go in the monthly subscription list reminder. I think everyone agrees that bsdstats needs more visibility right from the virgin install. Since its not appropriate to include bsdstats in the sysinstall program. How about getting the RELEASE team to change the content of the default logon message of the day /etc/motd, to advocacy installing the bsdstats package. What do you think about this idea? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
Actually: Contributor to BSDStats sounds better / easier to understand On Fri, 7 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to bsdstats.org would help too ... On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote: I like that idea. On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe it could go in the monthly subscription list reminder. I think everyone agrees that bsdstats needs more visibility right from the virgin install. Since its not appropriate to include bsdstats in the sysinstall program. How about getting the RELEASE team to change the content of the default logon message of the day /etc/motd, to advocacy installing the bsdstats package. What do you think about this idea? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote: Chris Whitehouse writes: The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets forgotten and loses its effectiveness. What about a monthly (3 monthly, whatever) reminder saying what bsdstats is about and the reasons for installing it. Maybe it could go in the monthly list subscription reminder. As part of the installation process, offer to add a crontab entry? The problem, as I get from Randi, isn't adding the crontab entry (its not required anyway), but that since 300.statistics isn't in /etc/periodic/monthly by default, sysinstall would have to do a pkg_add of the port to get it installed first, *then* add the appropriate entries to both /etc/periodic.conf and /etc/rc.conf so that it runs ... The latter two are doable, but havin to do a pkg_add seems to be the part that is being frowned on ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Hardware vendor
iXSystems (http://www.ixsystems.com/) ... they are a BSD shop,period ... Been dealing iwth them a couple of years now for production servers, haven't been disappointed yet ... On Thu, 6 May 2010, Lonnie CasaDeCalvo wrote: Hi, Can you make a recomondation to a hardware supplier that will preinstall FreeBSD on there server hardware? I see some hardware vendors on the website but I am not finding one that will preinstall and support. Thanks, Lonnie CasaDeCalvo Graphic Systems, Inc. 2632 26th Ave So Minneapolis, MN 55406 612-721-6100 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: can you tell me two things: nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) so for a very long time I haven't installed it. Obviously I was wrong. So I've just installed from ports then run: muji2# /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay fetch: http://rpt.bsdstats.org/scripts/getid.php?key=: Connection refused Posting monthly OS statistics to rpt.bsdstats.org That one would be a result of the change(s) I made last night to deal with everything being recorded as 'Country == Panama' ... it waas a DNS change that took a bit to propogate out ... But www.bsdstats.org/bt/countries.html is still showing only 3 FreeBSD in UK. Will it right itself later? Can you send me your key? Its still showing just 3 FBSD, but that page has definitely been updating in #s, so not sure why it didnt jump to 4 ... I did narrow down the view in the database from 3 mos to 'just this month' so that the country numbers do look accurate, but will re-extend things as time goes on with the cleaned up #s ... BTW, I can't get the Ports Stats page on the website. I'm going to have to look at re-enabling that one ... that table is so huge that processing it was killer ... I've since moved things to a much larger server, so will run some tests and get that back online ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Hill wrote: Since we're on the topic, and in light of Fbsd1's recent adventure... Panama seems awfully high in the country stats. I understand what you said upthread about haproxy being in Panama, but it's a small country to be always at the top; maybe there's some way to differentiate between really in Panama and don't know? It also seems odd that I, personally, as a home user, should be responsible for about 3% of the bsdstats-reporting FreeBSD machines in the US. (3 hosts out of 101) You will see those numbers dropping over the course of the month ... if ppl out there are reading this and wish to help 'fix the numbers', just run: /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay to update their records with the right country vs Panama, and you'll see it change quickly ... you'll even notice that the overall numbers right now are quick low, as I narrowed down the view to just 'so far this month' to help bring down the Panama skew, so there is no overlap right now with last month ... The PC-BSD #s are the ones that really skew'd those numbers up though, since theirs is auto-installed and always up to date, so unlike alot of FBSD users that have old versions installed pointing directly to the physical server, the PC-BSD ones were pointing to the load balancer ... DNS will have to catch up for them Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but, unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge of sysinstall to add it, and nobody else has step'd forward that does ... the idea wasn't to auto-install/enable, but to make it more visible while you are installing ... Anyone out there able to do this ... ? so for a very long time I haven't installed it. Obviously I was wrong. So I've just installed from ports then run: muji2# /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay fetch: http://rpt.bsdstats.org/scripts/getid.php?key=: Connection refused Posting monthly OS statistics to rpt.bsdstats.org (Not sure if publishing the key is a security risk so replacing it with x's) A bit later muji2# /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay Posting monthly OS statistics to rpt.bsdstats.org But www.bsdstats.org/bt/countries.html is still showing only 3 FreeBSD in UK. Will it right itself later? BTW, I can't get the Ports Stats page on the website. Chris Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: BSDstats website displaying data incorrectly
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: Why does this page show PCBSD has count of 387 http://www.bsdstats.org/bt/home.html?os= And this page shows PCBSD has count of 1307 http://www.bsdstats.org/bt/home.html?os=PC-BSD Why is this? I would think both should show the same value, or you better add explanation to the web page why the count is different. As was explained earlier, normal operation looks at the past couple of months, to deal with cases, where, for instance, someone has it set to only report on reboot, but not monthly ... due to the countries issue that you pointed out, I made a slight change while things restabilize so that it is only showing this month's stats ... I will expand it again as the old data for countries fades away ... The descrepancy above is due to the sub-OS pages not using the same DB query as the upper one, and as I didn't do the web front end, and the person who did is no longer around, I have to figure out *how* the code he wrote works, especially for those sub pages (template system, as there is no /bt/ file system *on* the server ... As to the rest ... especially the comments about the web site itself ... feel like stepping into the breach on that one? I have no creative talent for doing a web page, which is why I recruited someone way back when ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Randi Harper wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote: I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but, unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge of sysinstall to add it, and nobody else has step'd forward that does ... the idea wasn't to auto-install/enable, but to make it more visible while you are installing ... Anyone out there able to do this ... ? I have not heard any talk about this up until this email. Its been brought up a few times over the past couple of years ... I wouldn't want to add an option to sysinstall for this unless bsdstats was part of base. Since it is just a script that was designed specifically so that it doesn't require any other ports to be installed, *in theory* it could just be dump'd into /etc/periodic/monthly without any issues ... But, if it were ... unlike PC-BSD, it would have to be opt-in, not opt-out ... based on all of the discussions in the past, and I agree, nobody would appreciate (and outcry would be heavy) if someone were to add an 'opt-out phone home script' that they didn't consciously enable ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
6-STABLE + quagga/zebra == Can't bind to stream socket
In order to deal with a lack of layer 3 switch, last week I installed Quagga/OSPF on all of my servers, and got it configured. Works *great* on my 7.x servers, but, using the same config (and port), my 6-STABLE boxes all generate the same error when I try and start up zebra: 2010/05/01 01:44:18 ZEBRA: Can't bind to stream socket: Can't assign requested address 2010/05/01 01:44:18 ZEBRA: zebra can't provice full functionality due to above error 2010/05/01 01:44:18 ZEBRA: Zebra 0.99.15 starting: v...@2601 So ospfd isn't able to announce / receive routes ... My zebra.conf file looks like: ! interface em0 no shutdown ip address 200.46.204.60/24 ! interface em1 ! interface lo0 ! ip route 0.0.0.0/0 200.46.208.1 ! ip forwarding ! line vty The top bit of ifconfig shows: ifconfig em0 | less em0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=1bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING inet 200.46.204.60 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 200.46.204.255 inet 200.46.208.60 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 200.46.208.255 inet 192.168.1.7 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet 200.46.204.183 netmask 0x broadcast 200.46.204.183 Other then appropriate interface/IP on the 7-STABLE boxes, the 7-STABLE boxes all work fine ... is there an issue with em/fxp devices and zebra on 6-STABLE/i386? Or am I overlooking something in my config? Thx ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
The backend to bsdstats.org is load balanced behind an haproxy backend, with only the IP of haproxy being passed back into it ... one of the key issues that was brought up from day one was security and anonymity(sp?) of those submitting, and we've taken that *very* seriously ... other then the tokens that are passed back to present individual systems, we do not record anything (or see anything) about the reporting servers ... On Tue, 4 May 2010, Steve Bertrand wrote: Marc, et-al, I wasn't originally going to post this to the list, but I thought that it would be useful to do so in order to try to solicit feedback. There's a suggestion that I have for the server-side of bsdstats. I would find it very useful if the server could track the % of the reporting connections that come in over IPv6, and include that on the website front page. Of course, this would require that rpt.bsdstats.org reside on a reliable IPv6 network, and code changes to the server-side software. (if the code is Perl, I'll gladly take a look at it ;) I'm not interested in the actual addresses of the sending hosts, just whether the address contains a '.' or ':'. Cheers, Steve Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... I am a retired American who is now living in the Philippines. All during RELEASE 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, and now 8.0 I have been running the bsdstats port on my single system. Yesterday I checked the http://bsdstats.org website by country and to my great surprise there are no Freebsd systems listed in the Philippines. Also the previous months reports are no longer shown on the website and the port stats don't show at all. This is not the results talked about on this list when the bsdstats project was trying to get Freebsd participation 3 years ago. Most odd ... what is in your /var/db/bsdstats file ... ? I've had no reports of problems in many months now ... What good is participation if there are no real-time results. The results are realtime ... generated directly out of the database ... I removed bsdstats from my system and the port should be removed from the ports system. I also emailed Marc G. Fournier scra...@hub.org the author and never received a reply. That is the best sign that bsdstats is dead. Huh? I don't recall any emails about issues that I've not answered :( Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: Most odd ... what is in your /var/db/bsdstats file ... ? I've had no reports of problems in many months now ... Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were coming in from Panama if they were running the newest code ... which means alot of ppl out there were running *old* code ... Basically, by setting up haproxy to load balance, all IPs hitting the backend were, as mentioned before, masquaraded ... but, of course, that means that when Geo::IP trying to determine country of origin, it always reports for the country of origin of the haproxy IP (Panama) ... I've fix this ... still not recording IP, but at least the PHP script determing country basis it on the proper IP, not the haproxy IP ... No changes required on the client side, as things will normalize over the course of the next month as ppl report in ... If anyone on FreeBSD wishes to 'force an update': /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay will push it through ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Gary Kline wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time. Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ... i see a golden opportunity here, marc. why not post the basic onlist now? i've been signed up for a long while and have never checked ... be nice to see the latest stats. Stats are updated real time ... just go to http://www.bsdstats.org ... The only stats that aren't working right now are the ports ones, not sure why we disabled that one, but suspect alot of it is size / load time related ... the database is *huge* for that ... I'm going to have to look into that one ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Addition to BSDstats
can you tell me two things: nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats the results should have showed up instantly on the web site ... but, just checking the database, I do find a connection from PH today at 2010-05-05 03:30:12.196478 ... and the country stats does show it: #47 PH Philippines 1 2 3 Even on the FreeBSD specific screen: #55 PH Philippines 1 0.03 % If you can send me the output of /var/db/bsdstats though,I can confirm that it is, in fact, your host that reported ... On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were coming in from Panama if they were running the newest code ... which means alot of ppl out there were running *old* code ... Basically, by setting up haproxy to load balance, all IPs hitting the backend were, as mentioned before, masquaraded ... but, of course, that means that when Geo::IP trying to determine country of origin, it always reports for the country of origin of the haproxy IP (Panama) ... I've fixed this ... still not recording IP, but at least the PHP script determing country basis it on the proper IP, not the haproxy IP ... No changes required on the client side, as things will normalize over the course of the next month as ppl report in ... If anyone on FreeBSD wishes to 'force an update': /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay will push it through ... Just did pkg_add -r bsdstats followed by /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics -nodelay Still don't see any Freebsd systems listed for the Philippines on the website. What is YOUR definition of REAL-TIME. Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
PHP5 + fastcgi + apache2.2 ... how to for FreeBSD?
Is there one somewhere? I'm finding *alot* of Debian ones dealing with their whole apget stuff, but would like to find something that speaks normally :) Thx ... Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappySkype: hub.orgICQ:7615664MSN:scra...@hub.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: No buffer space available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thiago ... What version of kernel did you end up going back to? - --On Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:15:48 -0300 Marc G. Fournier free...@hub.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm seeing the same effect (haven't tried older kernel, mind you) almost like clockwork, every 72 hours after reboot ... at least now I don't feel so crazy, knowing it isn't just me ... - --On Sunday, April 01, 2007 17:07:08 -0300 Thiago Esteves de Oliveira thi...@lamce.coppe.ufrj.edu.br wrote: I've tried to increase the kern.ipc.nmbclusters value but it worked only when I changed the kernel to an older one. netstat -m (Now it's working with the same values.) - 515/850/1365 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 512/390/902/65024 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 512/243 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/0/0/0 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/0 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1152K/992K/2145K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/0/0 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 2759 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 2982 calls to protocol drain routines Ethernet adapters - em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.0.5 port 0xec80-0xecbf m em 0xfebe-0xfebf irq 10 at device 4.0 on pci7 em0: Ethernet address: 00:04:23:c3:06:78 em0: [FAST] skc0: 3Com 3C940 Gigabit Ethernet port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebd8000-0xfebdbfff irq 15 at device 6.0 on pci7 skc0: 3Com Gigabit NIC (3C2000) rev. (0x1) sk0: Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. Yukon on skc0 sk0: Ethernet address: 00:0a:5e:65:ad:c3 miibus0: MII bus on sk0 e1000phy0: Marvell 88E1000 Gigabit PHY on miibus0 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto P.S.: I am using the FreeBSD/amd64. Brian A. Seklecki wrote: Show us netstat -m on the broken kernel? Show us your dmesg(8) for em(4). TIA, ~BAS On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 11:13 -0300, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira wrote: Hello, I've had a problem with one of my FreeBSD servers, the machine has stopped its network services and then sent these messages: -Mar 27 13:00:03 anubis dhcpd: send_packet: No buffer space available -Mar 27 13:00:26 anubis routed[431]: Send bcast sendto(em0, 146.164.92.255.520): No buffer space available The messages were repeated a lot of times before a temporary solution. I've changed the kernel(FreeBSD 6.2) to an older one(FreeBSD 6.1) and since then it's been working well. What happened? P.S.: I can give more informations if necessary. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGE6UE4QvfyHIvDvMRAlutAJ0WzVTYq99hmx1km2mdXE7pdUC8IgCgt4O1 eG6kXgqHveumXjkL0t+Q8Q8= =sieE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGE/ZC4QvfyHIvDvMRAsWoAJwJpD8nCtG0iv5U6LY8ISyyDKxgegCg1eti SezStun7CLDA9pgfrp8GloM= =UwSU -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsdstats not working in 7.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running it on 7-STABLE servers without any problem ... but notice that others responded that it appears you are on PC-BSD vs FreeBSD? As late as this answer is, are you still having an issue with it on your machine? - --On Sunday, March 01, 2009 19:20:21 +0800 Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: bsdstats is now in the base system. Have bsdstats_enable=YES is rc.conf Worked this way in 7.0. What am I missing here??? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpuZFIACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvPpMwCfUaNbQJojcXS3Ph5DnesNVH0H fTMAniGG92QBY+3aELFu+xQZTUMVgiva =eaWl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsdstats.org - fatal error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are you still seeing the error ... ? I just checked everything on server, and it appears to be processing fine ... - --On Monday, July 27, 2009 21:43:42 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: Connecting to bsdstats.org I get this error: Fatal error: Call to undefined function preg_replace() in /usr/local/www/bsdstats.org/www/bsdstats/sbin/uri.php on line 142 Is there a problem with this site? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpuY44ACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNOrgCgnT7DyPkETX/839deAN4KdiQm CckAn3IcvZ10sJinKNa/LqGHcWYY/gL+ =B2dp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Bind 9 (Was: bsdstats) - fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK(((pthread_mutex_destroy(((manager-lock))) == 0)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, July 27, 2009 14:07:44 -0800 Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote: On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:51 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On ia64 8.0-beta1 SMP, running bsdstats-5.4_2, I get this error: # /usr/local/etc/periodic/monthly/300.statistics /usr/src/lib/bind/isc/../../../contrib/bind9/lib/isc/task.c:1023: fatal error: RUNTIME_CHECK(((pthread_mutex_destroy(((manager-lock))) == 0) ? 0 : 34) == 0) failed That error from bind, [:1: unexpected operator Is not handled gracefully in the bsdstats script. Is there something I can do to improve the script to handle it better? - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpuY+UACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOquwCdGpyNjkbx2e/jt9TB48RX6JrD mJEAoL+l0a5UI3xCX/2/F+MJB5hPgIR/ =uH7U -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsdstats.org - fatal error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I did an upgrade to PHP and Apache, so suspect this was just befor I restart Apache with the new PHP :( Glad I don't have to do that often ... - --On Tuesday, July 28, 2009 00:23:59 -0400 Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Marc G. Fournierfree...@hub.org wrote: Are you still seeing the error ... ? Â I just checked everything on server, and it appears to be processing fine ... Marc, The site appears responsive now. I too was seeing errors. -- Glen Barber - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpugFsACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMPJgCgjr91HnpOaxCOtMXuWeS7wMPJ sfIAn1sok4Hp5TJSK/Q+iGEbUk1BS4fJ =UtLS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: vm.pmap.shpgperproc or vm.pmap.pv_entry_max
Thanks, that one helps ... On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Mel wrote: On Thursday 12 February 2009 06:50:58 Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm gettig an error on my console about 'Approaching the limit on PV entries', to which its giving me two choices as to how to deal with it ... Why would I use one over the other? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-October/184179.html -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
vm.pmap.shpgperproc or vm.pmap.pv_entry_max
I'm gettig an error on my console about 'Approaching the limit on PV entries', to which its giving me two choices as to how to deal with it ... Why would I use one over the other? Thx Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
xorg 7.4: button fonts unreadable ...
Have searched Google, but haven't been able to find anything that either worked, or was relevant ... I just cleaned out and reinstalled all of my ports ... when I load up an xterm (the one I'm working in right now), all the text in it is fine and readable ... but, the top of the xterm, where it has the 'xterm icon' and some writing to the right of it, the writing is unreadable ... If I load up firefox3, the web pages are viewable and readable, but stuff like the location bar are unreadable (I have to hope I type without making a mistake) ... I'm not sure what to look at ... have checked the output from starting X, and not seeing anything font related ... Help? Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xorg 7.4: button fonts unreadable ...
So, if I backtrack to 7.3.x, I should be fine? On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:28:58PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Have searched Google, but haven't been able to find anything that either worked, or was relevant ... I just cleaned out and reinstalled all of my ports ... when I load up an xterm (the one I'm working in right now), all the text in it is fine and readable ... but, the top of the xterm, where it has the 'xterm icon' and some writing to the right of it, the writing is unreadable ... Basically, the xorg hackers decided to improve your user experience by lobotomizing the fonts - I modified xterm to recover from that by falling back to fixed (I'm unsure why they left that intact). However, window titles are owned by your window manager. If I load up firefox3, the web pages are viewable and readable, but stuff like the location bar are unreadable (I have to hope I type without making a mistake) ... I'm not sure what to look at ... have checked the output from starting X, and not seeing anything font related ... Best advice is to locate the misc fonts (or whatever it's called in FreeBSD) and install those. That'll work until the next improvement to the X server's font handling. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
xorg 7-current ( kde || nvidia driver ) == desktop crash
Okay, I've exhausted every google search I can think of, and not getting anywhere, so now to ask ... Just upgraded my motherboard / CPU (old one fried out) ... picked up an ASUS P5Q with a Quad Core Intel CPU ... everything boots / runs fine, until I try and start up X ... If I use the 'nv' driver in my X conig file, and the twm window manager, everything starts up fine, I can load Firefox, etc, etc ... As soon as I switch from nv - nvidia and start, the screen goes blank and the machine reboots ... If I switch from nvidia - nv and use '/usr/local/kde4/bin/startkde', the screen goes blank, and the machine reboots ... I just installed icewm, and using that, everything loads up fine too ... So, I figure there is something that I'm either missing in my install, or that I've configured wrong that kde is trying to use, but I'm at a lose as to what ... Can anyone help? Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xorg 7-current ( kde || nvidia driver ) == desktop crash
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Marc G. Fournier scra...@hub.org wrote: Okay, I've exhausted every google search I can think of, and not getting anywhere, so now to ask ... Just upgraded my motherboard / CPU (old one fried out) ... picked up an ASUS P5Q with a Quad Core Intel CPU ... everything boots / runs fine, until I try and start up X ... If I use the 'nv' driver in my X conig file, and the twm window manager, everything starts up fine, I can load Firefox, etc, etc ... As soon as I switch from nv - nvidia and start, the screen goes blank and the machine reboots ... If I switch from nvidia - nv and use '/usr/local/kde4/bin/startkde', the screen goes blank, and the machine reboots ... I just installed icewm, and using that, everything loads up fine too ... So, I figure there is something that I'm either missing in my install, or that I've configured wrong that kde is trying to use, but I'm at a lose as to what ... Are you starting hald and dbus via rc.conf? Yes ... both mouse and keyboard have been working great ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xorg 7-current ( kde || nvidia driver ) == desktop crash
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Glen Barber wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Marc G. Fournier scra...@hub.org wrote: Are you starting hald and dbus via rc.conf? Yes ... both mouse and keyboard have been working great ... Well, that's good to hear. ;) Thought I'd as to be safe. Ya, that was the easiest problems to search on google and get fixed :) I'm going to try downgrading to xorg 7.3 ... I'm having headaches with fonts (Location bar in firefox3 is unreadable, although all pages are fine ... mail messagesin mulberry are unreadable, although the message index is *just* readable, etc) ... someone mentioned some changes in 7.4 concerning fonts, and I figure, my luck, this might be something that is trickling into other areas :( Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xorg 7-current ( kde || nvidia driver ) == desktop crash
Hi Deb ... was this vs compiling from source? On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Deb Heller-Evans wrote: Oops. Brain FART... I'm in a multi-OS environment... My answer was with respect to a different OS, but it might be applicable to FreeBSD. I don't have experience with nVidia on FreeBSD. Deb Heller-Evans Energy Science Network MS-50A-3101 Berkeley, CA 94720 510/495-2243 Deb Heller-Evans wrote: I ran into the same kind of issue. FWIW, I had better luck downloading the nVidia drivers from the website which includes modifying the kernel. I can now do all kinds of extra things, like spanning 2 monitors, etc (on workstations). I can dig up my notes if you intend to go this route at some point... d Deb Heller-Evans Energy Science Network MS-50A-3101 Berkeley, CA 94720 510/495-2243 Marc G. Fournier wrote: Okay, I've exhausted every google search I can think of, and not getting anywhere, so now to ask ... Just upgraded my motherboard / CPU (old one fried out) ... picked up an ASUS P5Q with a Quad Core Intel CPU ... everything boots / runs fine, until I try and start up X ... If I use the 'nv' driver in my X conig file, and the twm window manager, everything starts up fine, I can load Firefox, etc, etc ... As soon as I switch from nv - nvidia and start, the screen goes blank and the machine reboots ... If I switch from nvidia - nv and use '/usr/local/kde4/bin/startkde', the screen goes blank, and the machine reboots ... I just installed icewm, and using that, everything loads up fine too ... So, I figure there is something that I'm either missing in my install, or that I've configured wrong that kde is trying to use, but I'm at a lose as to what ... Can anyone help? Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: xorg 7.4: button fonts unreadable ...
Downgrading to 7.3 has made X usable again ... will try out nvidia driver tomorrow ... On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:58:12PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: So, if I backtrack to 7.3.x, I should be fine? that sounds like it (I don't keep track of the version numbers). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Load balancing multiple virtual hosts on 1 IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you for all the responses ... turns out the solution was simplier ... I tried the various solutions presented, and each of them did the same thing ... The setup I have, I'm using csync2 to maintain the file systems on each backend, and in order to simplify that, I'm using: VirtualHost *:80 instead of VirtualHost IP:80 which works fine ... *but*, something gets confused when you mix-n-match the above ... its either all of one or the other, but not both ... once I fixed my config files, the pages now load consistently ... Thank you all for the help on this, the pointers to the other software(s) provided proof that it wasn't the software, but my configuration ... - --On Saturday, January 31, 2009 13:55:08 + Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: Simple: is it possible? I have two VMs that contain the same content, on two different IPs .. I want to setup a third VM with something like haproxy on it that will take the URL (http://domain1) and pull the content from one or the other ... So far, all works well if I only have one virtual host, but as soon as I add a second one (http://domain2), when I try to go to http://domain2, it pulls up the content for domain1 also, as if I was going to http://IP instead. Is there a way to set this up (with haproxy, or some other software), that it will actually pass the URL through to the backend apache server and load up the right content? Or is this a limitation in the protocol itself?/ This is certainly possible -- most of the world's big web sites work in exactly this way, although they would tend to use dedicated hardware LB if they were of any appreciable size. I think what's going wrong for you is that you are using a front-end proxy, and it's rewriting the requests with the host names of the real servers, which will certainly screw up name based virtual hosts. Instead of ha-proxy, look into relayd -- in conjunction with a pf(4) firewall this will do exactly what you want. It can operate purely at the IP level or even at layer 2 if you want to implement DSR. Another alternative to consider is varnish, although I'm not sure that has much in the way of health-checking the back-end servers behind it. varnish is a reverse-proxy / web accelerator so can give you some performance boost as well. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmGd6IACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOlzwCfT5CpD8LdE4MlMD4ugmjP8tTC Z0YAoOl6F83j4t4WqTFqfQVutKLMQUj1 =fEn7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Load balancing multiple virtual hosts on 1 IP
Simple: is it possible? I have two VMs that contain the same content, on two different IPs .. I want to setup a third VM with something like haproxy on it that will take the URL (http://domain1) and pull the content from one or the other ... So far, all works well if I only have one virtual host, but as soon as I add a second one (http://domain2), when I try to go to http://domain2, it pulls up the content for domain1 also, as if I was going to http://IP instead. Is there a way to set this up (with haproxy, or some other software), that it will actually pass the URL through to the backend apache server and load up the right content? Or is this a limitation in the protocol itself?/ Thx Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scra...@hub.org MSN . scra...@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: QEMU: increase image size with FreeBSD partitions ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:15:45 +0100 Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: I have FreeBSD 7 running in a QEMU VM ... works like a charm, but I'm wondering if there is some way of *increasing* the size of the image beyond what I configured it for? I'm only finding stuff pertaining to NTFS/FAT32, but nothing about Unix in general, or FreeBSD specifically ... Is there any way of doing this, or do I have to build a new, larger img, and copy the data from diskA - diskB, and reboot on diskB? Doable, but time consuming ... I don't think there's anything automatic but you can grow the virtual disk, then modify the last partition size by hand, then use growfs. 'k, that is what I figured, but how do I grow the virtual disk? I've checked the qemu-img man page, and there doesn't appear to be a method of doing this ... - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkk/KvoACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOEfQCghv9LtctUGSuagAlFbcEoNrWu udMAnixLBpCcfwOTUVkhjep/2dQSzNaD =YjqB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
auto-addm new tap device to existing bridge ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is this possible? I'm using qemu, and when I start it up, it auto-create a tap device if one isn't available ... but, having that tap device not attached to the bridge that does exist doesn't help much ... if there some flag I can set, or sysctl value, that will have the new tap device attach itself to an existing bridge device? thanks ... - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkko6HoACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNBngCg7ZiDOaRCDGUuE+hbaNCsjMd1 WV8An1os19WO7nQJeBvUIot/rtxYI0/M =no2/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, andrew clarke wrote: On Mon 2008-11-03 18:33:57 UTC-0400, Marc G. Fournier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. I stopped using bsdstats after it caused my FreeBSD router to take too long to boot up after a reboot. If I recall correctly, I had bsdstats_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf and after the reboot bsdstats was called before ppp was able to start, so it couldn't connect to the bsdstats server. On the other hand this was a while ago and I am going by memory, so I may be wrong about what happened or it was just a coincidence. At the time I was more interested in getting the router running so I didn't really care for debugging what was going on. I realise this is a bit of a vague bug report, so feel free to ignore it. There is an optional flag for 'reporting on reboot' ... the original script only did reporting monthly, out of periodic, but some ppl (ie. using laptops) suggesting an optional flag so that when they rebooted, they would be counted also ... And you are correct, just change: bsdstats_enable=YES to bsdstats_enable=NO And 'on reboot' will eb disabled, and only periodic will be used ... at a minimum, you just need: monthly_statistics_enable=YES in /etc/periodic.conf, wich will only report OS/version and skip the devices/ports reports ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:25:39 -0500 Gabriel Lavoie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When are the stats updated on bsdstats.org? real-time ... and they aren't for all time, the #s are based on systems reporting in over the past 60 days, so you will periodically see a bit of back tracking, depending on when in the cycle hosts reported in ... if I reload the page a few times, I may see it go from 25 013 - 25 103 - 25 143 - 25 140 ... but the overall is an upward increase in numbers ... Thanks Gabriel 2008/11/4 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, andrew clarke wrote: On Mon 2008-11-03 18:33:57 UTC-0400, Marc G. Fournier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. I stopped using bsdstats after it caused my FreeBSD router to take too long to boot up after a reboot. If I recall correctly, I had bsdstats_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf and after the reboot bsdstats was called before ppp was able to start, so it couldn't connect to the bsdstats server. On the other hand this was a while ago and I am going by memory, so I may be wrong about what happened or it was just a coincidence. At the time I was more interested in getting the router running so I didn't really care for debugging what was going on. I realise this is a bit of a vague bug report, so feel free to ignore it. There is an optional flag for 'reporting on reboot' ... the original script only did reporting monthly, out of periodic, but some ppl (ie. using laptops) suggesting an optional flag so that when they rebooted, they would be counted also ... And you are correct, just change: bsdstats_enable=YES to bsdstats_enable=NO And 'on reboot' will eb disabled, and only periodic will be used ... at a minimum, you just need: monthly_statistics_enable=YES in /etc/periodic.conf, wich will only report OS/version and skip the devices/ports reports ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org ) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gabriel Lavoie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkRHfcACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMP1gCfWcuWqCGNWSR5HuGSO4vgRwLb Y0EAn3+Pi3/1+eM/mxmKFrF7AFTMQBbv =yRDb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
copying 'holey' files ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a disk img for qemu that is 4G, but disk usage is only 650M ... due to how the image is created, it will grow to 4G, but only uses as much as it needs ... but, if I run a simple 'cp' on the file, it goes from: image: debian.img file format: raw virtual size: 4.0G (4294967296 bytes) disk size: 652M to: image: dtc.img file format: raw virtual size: 4.0G (4294967296 bytes) disk size: 4.0G Is there a way of moving things around such that it *maintains* the holes, instead of fills them in? Thx - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPKWEACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNJIwCeOTgfxMEf/g/7bnFehXlDZAva dCwAoJL8sNsCD+h3PnJAAzebAQFsHhfa =fcAm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: copying 'holey' files ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sweet, never even thought about doing that ... thank you ... - --On Monday, November 03, 2008 11:04:22 -0600 Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have a disk img for qemu that is 4G, but disk usage is only 650M ... due to how the image is created, it will grow to 4G, but only uses as much as it needs ... but, if I run a simple 'cp' on the file, it goes from: image: debian.img file format: raw virtual size: 4.0G (4294967296 bytes) disk size: 652M to: image: dtc.img file format: raw virtual size: 4.0G (4294967296 bytes) disk size: 4.0G Is there a way of moving things around such that it *maintains* the holes, instead of fills them in? The qemu-img program using the convert command should do what you want it to. I've used it to make copies of qcow-format disks without having them grow to their max-size. Matt - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPMP4ACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOvRACgyVOSp3nqJgqFQE7Ilm4IXbUZ d+YAnj2lddYnGcLMBzSkXjbk0onRfnZY =+Ft+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
As of November 3rd, 2008, the project has hit a new milestone of 25 000+ hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: PC-BSD 17 454 hosts FreeBSD 5 526 hosts DesktopBSD1 919 hosts NetBSD 86 hosts MirBSD 21 hosts OpenBSD 55 hosts DragonFly26 hosts MidnightBSD 26 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 2 hosts We currently have hosts being reported in from 135 countries, with the top 10 being: United States 6 082 Russian Federation 1 836 Germany 1 586 Australia 1 341 Ukraine 997 France930 Japan 898 United Kingdom791 Canada767 Brazil729 Project URL: http://www.bsdstats.org Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... If you have any questions, please feel free to email me ... -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Its a voluntary reporting ... I know with both PC-BSD, reporting is on by default .. with FreeBSD, its a simple 'make install' in ports ... with NetBSD/OpenBSD, I suspect its purely manual, so a bit more work involved ... Both NetBSD / OpenBSD #s have been increasing though, just not as fast as the others ... - --On Monday, November 03, 2008 15:12:46 -0800 Don Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is very cool. What is up with NetBSD and OpenBSD. Are these numbers accurate? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 2:34 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorsten Glaser; Gonzalo Martinez - Sanjuan Sanchez; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In As of November 3rd, 2008, the project has hit a new milestone of 25 000+ hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: PC-BSD 17 454 hosts FreeBSD 5 526 hosts DesktopBSD1 919 hosts NetBSD 86 hosts MirBSD 21 hosts OpenBSD 55 hosts DragonFly26 hosts MidnightBSD 26 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 2 hosts We currently have hosts being reported in from 135 countries, with the top 10 being: United States 6 082 Russian Federation 1 836 Germany 1 586 Australia 1 341 Ukraine 997 France930 Japan 898 United Kingdom791 Canada767 Brazil729 Project URL: http://www.bsdstats.org Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... If you have any questions, please feel free to email me ... -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPoWYACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNjvACeJvROm9YrnENUroh5EF1BsGKw 0YsAoMIQoRnBnkFwGTcZG2cv/4KlkDmF =blyH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, November 04, 2008 01:10:02 +0100 Bernt Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc G. Fournier skrev: As of November 3rd, 2008, the project has hit a new milestone of 25 000+ hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: There are errors on your homepage 6,072 is a lot less then 500. Pardon? I don't see either # on the home page .. *puzzled look* - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPo3EACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvP3CwCeOE++67wohEqs0ahwWyMtFPpo UgAAn2vgaNlYDqSba42ztrSg8CtSyc8/ =s18z -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: New High Water Mark: 25 000+ Hosts Reporting In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, November 03, 2008 16:01:41 -1000 Al Plant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aloha, I have 10 FreeBSD servers and desktops in use here in Hawaii. These are not on the list as I only have 4 servers that are up 24/7 and they are fire walled off with pf. The 6 others are on a lan behind a Linux Freesco Firewall. Only 2 on 24/7 the rest are on an as used boot up basis. How can I get them Listed? Using FreeBSD as a reference point, the port, when it installs, allows you to enable two methods of reporting: monthly (out of periodic) and on reboot ... so that covers the 4 that aren't up 24/7 ... Next, the reporting is not based on your IP ... in fact, to try and address security concerns, we do not store any information such as IP or hostname ... when you run the stats the first time, it generates a distinct key that is used for reporting and is stored on your host for future reporting to identify you ... Finally, for those dealing with firewalls, the script was written to make use of a PROXY server for reporting, so that no holes have to be opened up for an individual host to connect to the rver ... - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkPtZsACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvNo4wCeJ3diXiZkazxtM1t9wLTb5tc7 uvgAoIxbMIEG2w3V6uvQBMW+dY7i7nn5 =MUtC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto blacklist ssh connections ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone know of a utility that I can use with sshd to auto-block by IP if
there are more then N failed attempts in a row?
ie:
# grep Invalid user /var/log/auth.log| awk '{print $10}' | sort | uniq -c |
sort -nr
5268 140.113.210.174
4863 72.52.225.116
3586 116.14.255.141
2918 193.205.186.67
2033 219.76.75.6
1308 216.14.127.67
1059 61.72.106.71
983 93.123.14.9
691 202.75.221.197
649 59.77.33.139
381 201.80.15.207
269 190.10.255.73
212 81.252.254.189
181 123.151.32.12
150 211.21.47.50
139 196.219.63.3
128 200.111.64.171
This is for one day ... I'd like to be able to throttle so that after X Invalid
user attempts, the IP gets blocked ...
Possible?
- --
Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjRj6EACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOsYQCgyaB3MhvHJk9qShRlovwSAXxx
3oQAn2NQ8zLFVO82Udp+mZaojwbfoKmw
=SuAI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grid computing under FreeBSD using jails ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is it possible to run software on two different jails that would load balance processes between two or more VPSs? - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjDGtIACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvO5wQCfUEIKNMAsmCzxskRZUPK7QZYp UkQAoIeUz9B+rkQ62JSh5uGL2bIq/7t/ =8zSO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cPanel or Plesk in jail ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simple enough, has anyone been able to get either to run successfully in a jail? - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAki8L/8ACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvO5lACg7UEk8CkUvD4DIu2LI/bVs+65 E5YAn0BmZHgRoqg76S5lzRa+nK2uZoIu =sZXQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats: May Statistics - 23 998 Hosts Reported In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As of June 5th, 2008, the project is seeing 23 998 hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: PC-BSD 14 715 hosts FreeBSD 6 331 hosts DesktopBSD2 662 hosts NetBSD 108 hosts MirBSD 68 hosts OpenBSD 59 hosts DragonFly27 hosts MidnightBSD 22 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 6 hosts We currently have hosts being reported in from 121 countries, with the top 10 being: United States 5 639 Russian Federation 1 653 Germany 1 489 Australia 1 314 Brazil 1 242 Japan 1 004 France823 United Kingdom822 Ukraine 790 Canada747 Project URL: http://www.bsdstats.org Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... Thanks to the folks at PC-BSD, we have a new PHP programmer that will be working with Antony Mawer towards cleaning up / finishing some of the outstanding areas of the web site, so expect to see some improvements in statistics reporting over the next few weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me ... - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhHeiAACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvN9RACcCcuRMnTeEhOz4XlJMcVRBm7U X1cAoOGk6ZvG3ab5DVpjKeIEokSEwlYY =cC+C -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: May Statistics - 23 998 Hosts Reported In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, June 05, 2008 16:31:30 +0300 Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway, I am surprised at how fast PC-BSD is picking up. I know that during installation, it prompts the installer to enable the submission of stats. Could this explain why there are more PC-BSD that there are FreeBSD? For FreeBSD, the owner must know about the stats and configure them to be submitted. That is why we're working on both improving the site itself (fixing issues with the sub-release areas), as well as trying to a more regular monthly notice up ... I find a jump in stats each time I do so as more ppl find out about it ... Report I did a few months back shows only 85 Countries reporting in, so although its just one host here and there, adding 40 new countries is cool ... - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkhITOwACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvO/yACg7Ph15XYty0J1tP+jXNs4Fzp3 CFwAoI/AgvbWotWJAUZJZ23aAhiyK993 =9QMv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD based router ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ability to route several C-class networks through multiple incoming fiber connections using BGP4, including VLAN support ... we're trying to keep the DC as 'FreeBSD centric' as we can, which is why the interest in someone like Juniper vs going with Cisco ... - --On Wednesday, May 28, 2008 09:55:07 +0200 Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of FreeBSD? define what enterprise level router is - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkg8u+cACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMF8wCg25K5IaX4/DIHk8KFIAfKXe/b decAoOqllLM7c6ty7wwXcwuPlEk/xSo6 =O+GR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkg/WWEACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvONuACgwwegEBBMKq0oXsySdz4cjSX/ V5IAoJXia1wjfxgFgztnJ8WRTQzv/B8l =ZBFL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD based router ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone know of anyone make an enterprise level router based off of FreeBSD? - -- Marc G. FournierHub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkg8u+cACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvMF8wCg25K5IaX4/DIHk8KFIAfKXe/b decAoOqllLM7c6ty7wwXcwuPlEk/xSo6 =O+GR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: February Statistics - 18 494 Hosts Reported In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Go under the individual OS ... the site needs a bunch of work as far as the sub-pages are concerned :( - --On Saturday, March 08, 2008 04:36:55 -0800 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Marc, These links don't work. Drivers/HW Stats CPU Stats Port Stats Do you know why? Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ - Original Message From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gonzalo Martinez - Sanjuan Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2008 6:43:11 AM Subject: BSDstats: February Statistics - 18 494 Hosts Reported In -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As of March 7th, 2008, the project is seeing 18 494 hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: DesktopBSD 3 242 hosts DragonFly 27 hosts FreeBSD 6 260 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 5 hosts MidnightBSD 6 hosts MirBSD 14 hosts NetBSD 109 hosts OpenBSD 56 hosts PC-BSD 8 775 hosts Top 10 Countries reporting in (out of 85 Countries total): United States 23.5% Russian Federation 7.4% Australia 6.4% Brazil 6.3% Germany6.2% France 3.4% Ukraine3.2% Japan 3.2% United Kingdom 3.0% Canada 2.7% Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH0gtP4QvfyHIvDvMRAm1PAJ0XjcSfic/7909xzOLwQu0/3gty5wCeJU6A aDhVlpvMy9flKZYl3Cyysi0= =kmn9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ ___ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH0pLi4QvfyHIvDvMRAuY3AJ43f2ZGevI95d1sZpLVnmxaFWJ7mQCguENc Py6KYxhLKWz62flZ4RlRH2Q= =Vw0j -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats: February Statistics - 18 494 Hosts Reported In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As of March 7th, 2008, the project is seeing 18 494 hosts reporting in, with a break down as follows: DesktopBSD 3 242 hosts DragonFly 27 hosts FreeBSD 6 260 hosts GNU/kFreeBSD 5 hosts MidnightBSD 6 hosts MirBSD 14 hosts NetBSD 109 hosts OpenBSD 56 hosts PC-BSD 8 775 hosts Top 10 Countries reporting in (out of 85 Countries total): United States 23.5% Russian Federation 7.4% Australia 6.4% Brazil 6.3% Germany6.2% France 3.4% Ukraine3.2% Japan 3.2% United Kingdom 3.0% Canada 2.7% Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH0gtP4QvfyHIvDvMRAm1PAJ0XjcSfic/7909xzOLwQu0/3gty5wCeJU6A aDhVlpvMy9flKZYl3Cyysi0= =kmn9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Start of a FreeBSD Setup Guide for AFS (Server and Client)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been meaning to get this started for awhile now, but time never is what one would like it to be: endless. http://wiki.freebsd.org/AFS_using_OpenAFS_%2B_Arla Is a *very* basic start ... right now, its just a pointer to Arla (client) and OpenAFS (server) ports for FreeBSD created by Alex Koss, and a link to some NetBSD specific setup instructions. I'm going to work on FreeBSD specific ones, using that as a base, that will be on the Wiki itself ... If anyone else does start working through the NetBSD instructions and wants to submit stuff, just email me and I'll gladly add it .. kerberos, at least, is something that I've *never* setup, so I'm starting from complete ground zero on this .. - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHtO1q4QvfyHIvDvMRAjhqAKCvz5FqgcDl/pwb3Sj0faY+kSgZbwCdHYAq +d3oV/GmYens4pm/D02XhxU= =3u+o -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High thread usage ... where ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, January 30, 2008 19:42:57 -0500 Glen Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 30 January 2008 05:55:35 pm Hub Support wrote: Is there some way of find out what process is using up all the CPU? This may seem obvious, but I have to ask: Did you try 'top' ? Actually, figured out that top does show threads, but killed off all the processes using 1 thread, and the thread process continued to run a % of CPU ... so was hoping there was something else that I might try ... thanks though, I had tried top, but it wasn't until after I sent this that I noticed the 'THR' column ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHoTqk4QvfyHIvDvMRAiBWAJ9PAMcAXEBi/tY4ywqEhvQYJYK8TwCg0SN7 iSpUQaTSHo5TPnUej5EUw4M= =gnaI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AFS ... or equivalent ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ... I recently started working for a company that is using AFS to mirror their data between various data centers, in the US, Asia and the EU ... the idea is that the several thousand servers that are being run have access to identical information .. Now, depressingly enough, it looks like OpenAFS works on everything *but* BSD ... :( IBM AFS for AIX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Digital Unix, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for HP-UX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Linux, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for SGI IRIX, Version 3.6 IBM AFS for Solaris, Version 3.6 Does anyone know if there is any serious work being done to get AFS working under FreeBSD? I have a large project that I'm working on that AFS (or something equivalent) would be *very* useful for, but we're trying to keep it as FreeBSD-pure as possible ... Thoughts? Pointers? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHiuZQ4QvfyHIvDvMRAlRMAJ9mcK6kOCdkudVlTFzzoPuAqgMOWQCfTY9k QRN/4A2GvUni6jNsDX8Du/U= =Mtrv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[BSDStats] Slight change in summary reporting ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've just modified the code so that it reports on distinct hosts over the past 60 days, vs just this past month ... for those that *may* have reported several times but have changed their OS (in theory, the only way that could happen is *if* they save/copy their /var/db/bsdstats file across a re-build, mind you), their last reported operating system is what will show up ... This should make the statistics a bit more 'static', since we aren't reporting 'from zero' at the start of each month ... To view the current statistics, check out: http://www.bsdstats.org ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHgHVO4QvfyHIvDvMRAtSiAKDk32zdiiNCBU3dv3+Dr6aGzZLGRgCghhMe mmvlJX5MbYOXxwhoJyadeSE= =4inG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple postgresql servers in multiple jails?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Talk about 'old email', but better then 'use different ports', which means you have to modify your clients for this ... after you install postgresql within the jail, vipw the password file and change the uid of the pgsql user (and chown the appropriate files) ... then you can run all instances on port 5432, which clients will expect, but without overrunning shared memory ... - --On Tuesday, October 23, 2007 20:07:19 +0200 Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody have a running system with more than one jail hosting more than one postgres server? I can only have one pgsql database on one host at all. I already tried to increase the shared memory off my machine with additional kernel [1] and sysctl parameters [2] and I also tried to change the numeric UID directly in the jails into a seperate one. Same errors. Of course I already have defined jail_sysvipc_allow=YES in rc.conf. I have this issue on 6.2-RELEASE-p8 and 8.0-CURRENT with postgresql-server-8.2.5_1. % psql psql: FATAL: semctl(458753, 15, SETVAL, 0) failed: Invalid argument Or some fun with perl/DBD Out of memory during request for 108 bytes, total sbrk() is 534585344 bytes! Out of memory during request for 288 bytes, total sbrk() is 534585344 bytes! Out of memory during request for 288 bytes, total sbrk() is 534585344 bytes! [1] options SYSVSHM options SYSVSEM options SYSVMSG options SHMMAXPGS=65536 options SEMMNI=40 options SEMMNS=240 options SEMUME=40 options SEMMNU=120 [2] http://www.freebsddiary.org/jail-multiple.php -- Oliver PETER, eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174 Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave. - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHgTgi4QvfyHIvDvMRArJ8AJ983aj4+QqbEbs/cFM6UIrby1DUJwCgwZfz rg+dUi5ExXey99rpL/NLb/I= =Z3xL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nagios + 6.3-RELEASE == Hung Process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, January 02, 2008 22:54:33 + Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure if this is related at all but out of the 3 nagios deployments we have here I have only ever seen it on one (It currently has 2 nagios threads spinning CPU time atm). The differences on that server are: * It is amd64 compared to i386 I never tried on i386, but in my case it was an amd64 system as well ... not sure if that is relevant or not ... has anyone seen this problem *with* i386? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHfB0s4QvfyHIvDvMRAudqAKCuiXkAYPL5goXbmlvJjylpMlqUIwCgiRfM m15NQlmqpRtO/MtEXR7m+RU= =utJ9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nagios + 6.3-RELEASE == Hung Process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, January 03, 2008 11:05:16 +1030 Jarrod Sayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's actually good to know, as you're now (unless I am mistaken) the first user to contact me about this problem on non-i386 systems. One user, plus myself, have also seen the issue under Nagios 3.x, both on i386 systems though. I also have a net-mgmt/ndoutils port in the works (less the database support for now) which also has the same issue so using broker modules doesn't seem to affect the outcome. My gut feeling is that it's not an architecture issue but more an interoperability issue between the Nagios threading code and the libpthread() threading library. As noted in my original report, this isn't a nagios issue per se ... my first experience with this issue was with Azureus/java ... so its a 'threading issue in general' ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHfDm94QvfyHIvDvMRAtZkAKCf4z6csc+YaXBS1/UMurQ3NIqXDgCeLCif jplg0JQzX4xKQEgJsVy/nGY= =dA7G -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nagios + 6.3-RELEASE == Hung Process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 G'day ... Yesterday, I setup nagios to do some system monitoring ... installed the latest version from ports into a jail, so that I could easily move it around between machines as I upgrade, without losing data ... after about 30 minutes running, I get a second nagios process running (fork?) that takes up ch CPU time as is available, and just hangs there until I kill -9 it ... Figuring that it might be a problem with the jail (trying to access somethign that isn't available to the process in a jail), I moved it to the physical server level ... but, again, after ~30 minutes, its doing the same thing: # ps aux | grep nagios nagios 32065 73.2 0.1 10948 3516 ?? R11:15AM 7:40.77 /usr/local/bin/nagios -d /usr/local/etc/nagios/nagios.cfg nagios 82120 0.0 0.1 10948 3580 ?? Ss 10:47AM 0:01.18 /usr/local/bin/nagios -d /usr/local/etc/nagios/nagios.cfg So, definitely not jail related ... I've tried to do a 'truss -p 32065', it just hangs. And: ktrace -f /tmp/output -p 32065 ... produces nothing: # kdump -f /tmp/output 32065 nagios PSIG SIGKILL SIG_DFL Once I kill -9 the process, a bunch of 'check_ping' processes start up and then things go back to normal ... My last kernel / world build on that box is: Mon Nov 12 06:43:30 AST 2007 After searching the 'Net a bit, came across this thread: http://www.nagiosexchange.org/nagios-users.34.0.html?tx_maillisttofaq_pi1%5Bmode%5D=1tx_maillisttofaq_pi1%5BshowUid%5D=7694 That recommends modifying libmap.conf with: [/usr/local/bin/nagios] libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 libpthread.so libthr.so This seems to fix the problem on the physical server, and am currently testing it in the jail itself to make sure it fixes it there too ... Should this be something that is more prominently documented somewhere? Maybe in the port itself? azureus has similar problems that are fixed with entries in libmap.conf, so its not just a nagios issue ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHemsH4QvfyHIvDvMRApUOAKCLRDnmRba6ho4St8qZ6U19V8yJ+wCghMBp Xph3ac9d7QsMjeKBMtmgkuw= =mXxF -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Future development of Jail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You mean like: http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits and: http://docs.freevps.com/doku.php?id=freebsd:index - --On Monday, December 31, 2007 19:10:51 -0800 Karl Triebes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 5:51 PM, Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I have a pile of money laying around I could throw at it, but the thing I wish for most from FreeBSD is a more mature and robust jail implementation. Specifically, the ability to implement per-jail quotas and resource limitations on disk, memory, network and cpu. I'd really love a seperate network stack for each jail...that's critical for a plethora of reasons. I'd be curious what sort of commitment (in $) that would require. I would like to see per-jail quotas such as the ones Andy mentions, and would like to hear if anyone would be interested in doing it for the right price. You may contact me via this list or in private. Cheers, and, a happy New Year. Karl. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHeraV4QvfyHIvDvMRApXeAJ9K+cwH1U8DKc7BbPOZKEOS8QwwQQCg4jbB HgqqfQWVKfMmM73Wj7+FN44= =WYax -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSS Virtualization options ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, December 20, 2007 14:57:41 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, what do you need to virtualize and what your requirements are? As mentioned in my original, we provide VPS hosting, so we're virtualizating the whole virtual machine ... I think the question about virtualization is far too broad. For example, you mentioned quotas. I think you can bypass storage control problems, using seperate devices for each client filesystem. Just create n vnode md(4) devices for your n jails. This has another advantage besides partitioning storage. Since UFS supports sparse files, only used blocks will occupy storage space, thus you don't have to preallocate all storage. Again, as mentioned in the original, the problem isn't quotaing the whole VPS, the problem is software (in this case, plesk) that seems to have a requirement to set a hard quota *within* the VPS itself, which isn't supported, currently, by jails ... In the past, for quotaing 'the whole VPS', I had tried the whole md(4) device idea, but found that insufficent inodes were being created for to do much, and no matter what I tried with newfs, couldn't seem to get more to be created, as if, due to the small size of the device, a 'max ratio' was being hit ... but, this was way back on 4.x when I tried that ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHanSx4QvfyHIvDvMRAsSMAJ0XEYjZI5ELwFeilPGMrr7LXvFGrACeMF4V 4zmuT2vbGDIOdjGQwbSLjk4= =EGiy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSS Virtualization options ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Thursday, December 20, 2007 16:37:19 +0200 Nikos Vassiliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: UFS2 does not initialize inodes at newfs time as UFS did. So, things are much better now! root:0:~# truncate -s 10G jail.00 root:0:~# mdconfig -at vnode -f jail.00 md0 root:0:~# newfs md0 /dev/md0: 10240.0MB (20971520 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 56 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 160, 376512, 752864, 1129216, 1505568, ... root:0:~# ls -ls jail.00 4592 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10737418240 Dec 20 16:21 jail.00 4.5MB for a 10GB filesystems is fine, isn't it? 'k, but that still doesn't address the problem ... being able to setquota's on directories within a jail environment ... or does it? Note that I'm not looking to quota the VPS itself, only allow software *in* the VPS to set quotas ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHawZW4QvfyHIvDvMRAljqAKDFNe1n3SwNtpoBI00NClVmjXNOJgCfffDk SvamRIK3q+tqUBsp2AarpQ4= =OnvR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSS Virtualization options ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ... Right now, I'm using jail to provide VPS solutions, but have found some situations where jail just doesn't work (recently, tried Plesk and due to it trying to 'set hard quota', found that jail+plesk doesn't work too well) ... So, I'm trying to figure out what is available out there that would allow running multiple FreeBSD (or other OS) environments on the same physical server ... I just took a quick look at qemu, which appears easy enough to use, but my feel from a quick scan of: http://people.freebsd.org/~maho/qemu/qemu.html is that running multiple networked images night not be particularly easy (or even doable) due to the bridging ... has anyone else tried this? Is there something else that might prove a better solution? Thank you ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHagwU4QvfyHIvDvMRAqZyAJ93U/uRP01gKNk0IZV2Dm2ssL1xiQCdG3wf GdS+wefDk0ZJpOg0saRuSMo= =DIMn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plesk in a FreeBSD Jail: My Experiences
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First, thanks to all those that have provided some useful pointers on this ... I was finally able to get a working install in place using 8.2.1 ... The main issue I found was that one of the components in the install seems to be calling in Apache 2.2, while Plesk uses Apache 2.0 ... so, somehow its able to get *both* installed at the same time, but when the installer goes to install the 'swsoft/psa' port, it fails because of a conflict ... So, what I ended up doing is reducing the components to install to the 'bare minimal', and then manually added components from /usr/ports/swsoft afterwards ... Everything started up fine ... and *appears* to work ... The one problem that I've not been able to figure out how to surmount is when you actually try and add a domain ... even if the client is set to have no limits on their resources (ie. disk space), adding a domain tries to set (or just check, not 100% certain there) the hardquota on the directory, which, in a jail, of course fails ... With the error being: ERROR: PleskFatalException Create ShortcutCreate Shortcut Up LevelUp Level Unable to get hardquota state: usermng failed: usermng: No entry found for path /usr/local/www/vhosts in mounted System error 25: Inappropriate ioctl for device 0: /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/class.PHostingManager.php:1399 PHostingForm-assign(object of type PHostingManager, boolean true, boolean true, boolean true, boolean true, boolean true, boolean false) 1: /usr/local/psa/admin/htdocs/domains/hosting/phosting_setup.php:296 Has anyone else tried this in a jail and notice this and/or found a word around? The .php file itself looks to be compiled php, so no way to just comment out code :( - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHWFs24QvfyHIvDvMRAn/CAJ4yaEmO1SBwgv6BPKXIsTbP950CUwCfdMDJ 3Hr7jyrUR4pX02L/jyDdaaY= =anLk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: Stand up and be counted! -- November Statistics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, December 05, 2007 21:22:29 +0100 Tore Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Percentage Change in November from October: Overall - 2.5% Broken down as: DesktopBSD + 31.8% ( 737 hosts) DragonFly+ 9.5% ( 23 hosts) FreeBSD + 8.4% (5008 hosts) GNU/kFreeBSD -100.0% ( 0 hosts) MidnightBSD +133.3% ( 14 hosts) MirBSD - 28.6% ( 5 hosts) NetBSD + 7.2% ( 119 hosts) OpenBSD + 11.3% ( 79 hosts) PC-BSD - 13.5% (6551 hosts) When I go to www.bsdstats.org, I see these figures: Systems This MonthPercentage FreeBSD 5,041 67.5 % PC-BSD1,997 26.7 % DesktopBSD241 3.2 % NetBSD99 1.3 % OpenBSD 56 0.7 % DragonFly 24 0.3 % MidnightBSD 12 0.2 % So, what's happening here? Is it too early in December for some BSD varieties to report yet? Whatever the answer, PC-BSD has hardly lost more than 2/3 of its users since November, so something is fishy here. The above stats are the # of hosts that have reported in so far this month ... we get about 40% or so that report in on the 1st of each month, and the rest report in through the month to the end ... If you look at: http://bsdstats.org/os_report.php You can see what the totals were like at the end of last month, as well as how things compare against this month so far ... We hope to have some trends graphs put up on the site shortly, to show a better idea of month-to-month ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHV2DB4QvfyHIvDvMRAi6yAJ9c/TV1oKHmgCJOB3CUG0OXs2FczQCeNdJ4 /AmCVsJULEHeP8QZ1cpRVL8= =W2q8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: Stand up and be counted! -- November Statistics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, December 05, 2007 23:40:07 +0100 Tore Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Moran wrote: Huh? The figure for PC-BSD in November was 6551. When I checked earlier this evening, it was 1997. I suppose this does NOT mean that 4554 PC-BSD users have kicked the bucket. Probably, it means that many PC-BSD systems have not YET reported to bsdstats in December. I think this way of doing it does not serve the following purpose: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. For the fulfillment of this noble mission, it would be better to display statistics for the last complete month to casual visitors. If people want to see running counters, this could be done on a different page. Actually, what we should do is put a 'History' page off that main one that expands that chart to include the previous two or three months, as well as this one ... would be easier/faster to implement then a graph too ... Antony? Have a couple of minutes to whip that together? Maybe do it similar to the countries page, but instead of listing countries, list month/year? maybe go back 6 months? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHV2Iw4QvfyHIvDvMRAscwAKDCKGAHyKk4hrJvxZ8oRNYyVpqpawCeO7NF s4J+XrhOYJom22oW47yzsvA= =wG2c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BSDstats: Stand up and be counted! -- November Statistics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, December 04, 2007 18:18:21 + Pollywog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 04 December 2007 05:55:17 Marc G. Fournier wrote: For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. Is it recommended to do this on more than one home machine running FreeBSD, or just one of them? All of them ... the code was written so that when you connect the first time, your machine will get a unique id to anonymously identify it for future transactions, which also ensure that multiple machines behind a NAT or proxy server will be reported individually ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHVbEG4QvfyHIvDvMRAvxXAKCCXp+tFqPAUrWvBTa5l6+pD4AhOgCggiCl KpXg6uNw9t+XDp3KcExpbkM= =VXgX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats: Stand up and be counted! -- November Statistics
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Percentage Change in November from October: Overall - 2.5% Broken down as: DesktopBSD + 31.8% ( 737 hosts) DragonFly+ 9.5% ( 23 hosts) FreeBSD + 8.4% (5008 hosts) GNU/kFreeBSD -100.0% ( 0 hosts) MidnightBSD +133.3% ( 14 hosts) MirBSD - 28.6% ( 5 hosts) NetBSD + 7.2% ( 119 hosts) OpenBSD + 11.3% ( 79 hosts) PC-BSD - 13.5% (6551 hosts) Top 10 Countries reporting in (out of 85 Countries total): United States 19.0% Australia 13.0% Russian Federation 7.7% Germany6.0% Ukraine5.3% Brazil 4.1% Panama 3.9% Japan 3.7% France 2.6% United Kingdom 2.3% Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHVOvF4QvfyHIvDvMRArAWAKCvci/GKs8GLM1ksTeEtCx7xcCovACfeGdH 31y5PAE7KFdxzlUYMsBy96k= =9dDO -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone running Plesk ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi ... I run a web hosting company, and one of the most often asked question is whether we have a control panel, to which we generally say no ... recently, a new client signed up and looked to install Plesk on his VPS, but has been unable to get it to work ... Being curious myself, I've downloaded both 8.2.1 and 8.1.1, and find that neither of them appear to install properly, but I can't seem to find any reasons *why* ... for instance, 8.1.1 just finished installing with: Installation done. Notice: make.conf was restored from previous autoinstaller's backup. But there is no /usr/local/etc/rc.d/psa.sh to stop / start the server, and no psa-* related ports installed ... as if it installed all the dependencies, but not the components themselves ... If I try and go into /usr/ports/swsoft/psa and do 'make install', it fails as the installer installed both apache2.0 and apache2.2, causing a conflict ... I have tried both 8.2.1 and 8.1.1, and get the same results ... One response I got on the -isp list was to pay Plesk to install it, so I figured I'd range out a bit onto -questions and see if anyone has been able to successfully install Plesk *without* deferring it to SWSoft themselves to do it ... ? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHUzsr4QvfyHIvDvMRAl30AJ9WxvB5ie5A2UJkUUaO1J1kvVUV/gCdGCHw GSXLJh+3Kaz/0L+kGI+elhY= =Scmh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Beastie 3D-rendered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, November 11, 2007 20:55:18 + Tino Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Look what happened to Beastie: http://www.tilolit.de/images/tb/wallpapers/teufel.jpg Reminds me of a character from one of my kids tv shows ... cute :) - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHN7Wz4QvfyHIvDvMRAuihAJ9qxZEQWwhIIQ9XUK8PImh/mLGYaACgplTG xg3prmyWjmN1vUq27wLWh7Y= =+H8d -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netcraft do not display uptime graph, why?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That URL states that we 'default to 1000Hz' ... is it lowerable, and what are the ramifications of doing so? My first thought is that 1000Hz is giving us higher timer granularity (1000 cycles per sec vs 100 cycles per sec) ... is this correct? Thx - --On Friday, September 21, 2007 12:36:24 -0400 Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In response to Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi there, My machine is FreeBSD 6.x currently. But Netcraft do not display of my machine's uptime graph. When I used FreeBSD 4.x, actually I could see the uptime graph in Netcraft. What happened? http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/accuracy.html#hz1000 -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHBo5Z4QvfyHIvDvMRAjxKAJ9UKlOnb7A61yPA7p7OTmAO7gK/2gCgvq4K Av0c/f0kq1JaRepAhnWofgo= =La6B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats Statistics for Sept, 2007 ... 12 769 Hosts Reported In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Percentage Change in September from August: Overall +12.8% Broken down as: DesktopBSD-12.4% ( 542 hosts) DragonFly 0.0% ( 20 hosts) FreeBSD - 7.4% (5008 hosts) GNU/kFreeBSD -20.0% ( 4 hosts) MidnightBSD +50.0% ( 3 hosts) MirBSD-55.2% ( 13 hosts) NetBSD+21.2% ( 126 hosts) OpenBSD -15.5% ( 71 hosts) PC-BSD+38.3% (6980 hosts) Project Objective: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. Since we don't have any 'trend reports' on the site yet, please feel free to visit http://bsdstats.org/os_report.php?lastmonth to see changes from July - August ... If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHBGAL4QvfyHIvDvMRAhfyAJ433XfF7O4GaYcA1BfJ5w64WgZYuQCghU7G E8gV6yda7KvgWfc9/iLuitM= =kyS9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BSDstats Statistics for Aug, 2007 ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Although I should send this out more often then I do, last month was a particularly good month, with *everyone* except for NetBSD going up in numbers ... First off all, for those that aren't aware: The mission of this site is to compile semi-accurate numbers for advocacy and marketing of the *BSD operating systems. Through interaction with several system administrators out there, from a security / anonymity perspective, we have tried to design things such that we save nothing in the database that could be used to compromise your servers ... no hostname, no IP ... The stats have also been designed to allow for multiple reporting by the same host each month (ie. rebooting your desktop), so it doesn't have to be run just on the first of the month. The web site, although it looks good, is incomplete at this time ... Anthony, our 'webmaster' has been a wee bit pre-occupied the past little while, but hopes to be able to dive back in again by the end of the month, and clean up some of the reports. To date, we have the following *BSD distributions reporting in: DesktopBSD DragonFly FreeBSD GNU/kFreeBSD MidnightBSD MirBSD NetBSD OpenBSD PC-BSD PC-BSD, to the best of our knowledge, is the only one that defaults to enabled, while the rest have to be enabled manually. For FreeBSD users, you just need to install /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdstats to set things up. And that's the sales pitch ... over the past few months, we've broken the 11,000k host mark ... Since we don't have any 'trend reports' on the site yet, please feel free to visit http://bsdstats.org/os_report.php?lastmonth to see changes from July - August ... But, overall for August: DesktopBSD+152.7% DragonFly + 5.3% FreeBSD + 2.7% GNU/kFreeBSD +150.0% MidnightBSD +100.0% MirBSD+190.0% NetBSD- 5.5% OpenBSD + 13.5% PC-BSD+ 0.2% === + 5.1% If you aren't participating, we very much encourage you to start ... the report script is a shell script, so you can scan it to figure out what, exactly, is being sent in .. and there is only one level of reporting that is required, and that is Operating System + Version ... Device and Ports reporting are 100% optional ... For those that are participating ... once more, thank you ... and spread the word, we need more reporters :) - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFG23x04QvfyHIvDvMRAg6zAJsFKf1PBwnid5Y2PHOmYDBA87ksuACeMrpt MGfVhInjKFbuYfi4c6GPbcA= =mzYj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
multi head X firefox ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just got multi-head X working on my machine without using xinerama (didn't like the way it looked, rather two distinct screens vs one big one) ... everything works great, but ... how do I get firefox onto the second screen? When I try and open it, it, of cource, tells me its already running (it is, on the first screen) ... Is this not possible, or am I missing something? Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGwmsM4QvfyHIvDvMRAv7aAJ9RQm6IehWeo52qNZxNb8ZKxHnaBwCg7TXH ivY07dgV85K12NFKrDx9jus= =xOsC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mulberry mail crashes when using PGP under AMD64 ... ?
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ... gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ... Anyone running Mulberry + 6-STABLE + AMD64 kernel successfully? Thanks ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mulberry mail crashes when using PGP under AMD64 ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 17:13:51 -0500 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On July 21, 2007 6:53:23 PM -0300 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ... gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ... Anyone running Mulberry + 6-STABLE + AMD64 kernel successfully? Mark, that's a none problem being discussed on the mullberry lists right now. It's not just amd64. Which list? :( I'm on mulberry-discuss ... Hopefully now that he's puttin gout the source code, we can get a FreeBSD Native version in ports ... :) The funny thing is that I'm now running same version off of an i386 box (my old machine) and its running fine *sigh* Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGoqB74QvfyHIvDvMRAgDHAJ4s/BWQdaKMb2yUEAwacxRaTpeY1wCglqSL jR+fB2XoaNdyEPZhJVQKcKU= =evCl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 11:55:39 -0500 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the last episode (Jul 21), Tim Daneliuk said: I asked this question a while back, but needed to do more digging to make sure I had latest sources etc. I have an Intel motherboard that shows this for a SATA controller: atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af mem 0x90204000-0x902043ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 But the hard drive - a SATA 300 device - shows up like this: ad4: 238475MB WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 10.02E02 at ata2-master SATA150 ^^^ Using dd, I have confirmed that the drive is running nowhere near SATA-III speeds, at least on reads: 968470075 bytes transferred in 7.132891 secs (135775249 bytes/sec) What was your dd commandline? If you've got more than 1GB of RAM and tested by reading a file and not the raw device itself, you just tested FreeBSD buffer cache. According to http://www.wdc.com/en/products/productspecs.asp?driveid=135 , that drive's maximum sustained speed is only 93.5 MB/sec, so it doesn't really matter if your interface is running at SATA150 or SATA300 unless you plan on reading exclusively from its 8MB buffer :) 'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive: http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254 Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50: atapci0: JMicron JMB361 SATA300 controller port 0xbf00-0xbf07,0xbe00-0xbe03,0xbd00-0xbd07,0xbc00-0xbc03,0xbb00-0xbb0f mem 0xfdbfe000-0xfdbf irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 atapci1: Intel ICH8 SATA300 controller port 0xfa00-0xfa07,0xf900-0xf903,0xf800-0xf807,0xf700-0xf703,0xf600-0xf60f,0xf500-0xf50f irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci2: Intel ICH8 SATA300 controller port 0xf300-0xf307,0xf200-0xf203,0xf100-0xf107,0xf000-0xf003,0xef00-0xef0f,0xee00-0xee0f irq 19 at device 31.5 on pci0 ad8: 152627MB WDC WD1600AAJS-08PSA0 05.06H05 at ata4-master SATA150 Latest 6.x STABLE ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGosqU4QvfyHIvDvMRAhENAKDhq0K+IDbZvD9Lcm51aLTwzjhz9ACgnFZz b3iDMLhANYWByT3a7Vu3utQ= =ZnlY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mulberry mail crashes when using PGP under AMD64 ... ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 22:58:40 -0500 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Including GPG? Yes, been using Mulberry for months now *because* of the GPG support, actually ... it was what finally get me off of Pine ... but, again, only on the i386 box ... In fact, on amd64, encrypt or sign causes it to crash ... and notice that this message is sign'd, on my i386 box ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGouo24QvfyHIvDvMRAhhpAKChonjgyqJBzq2n91HTM8ly5c5fTwCginby kPnJn9PXJCnj/IkfygZ7ZoY= =0p4v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GUI Mail Reader for FreeBSD ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone know of a good mail reader that does: PGP, unicode *and* shows inline html I'm tired of getting email from my family, for instance, that has inline images and having to look at each attachment seperately ... and have a friend that sends me email that has simplified chinese characters in it ... and others that send me PGP encrypted email ... Mulberry is good, but doesn't do two of the three ... sylpheed does PGP and Unicode, but unless I'm missing a setting) doesn't do inline html ... and kmail doesn't do the unicode or inline images ... So, is there anything that is good that actually does it all? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGmU9c4QvfyHIvDvMRAvU4AKCvBMFdj2aYVTvWQm8IwNHUT3/UxwCgqmkp vmAsJotYb4qpkL4oYCs4Jv0= =7Np1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wine users ... unite! (Wine, as in Windows Emulation, of course)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Over the past few weeks, a group of have been plugging away in relative obscurity to fix the world .. or, at least, the world as revolves around WINE. We have a few kernel hackers involved, some members of the wine group, some members of PC-BSD, and at least one DragonflyBSD developer ... a truly rounded group. In order to avoid having this all mixed in, and lost, with other software discussions, the work is happening on a private list, but if anyone feels that they can contribute *programming knowledge* to the effort, email me and I'll add you to the list ... we aren't looking for testers on this list, see below about that ... To the real reason for this post, we have been slowly making headway ... If you go to: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine You will find several patches, both against FreeBSD and wine, that get the latest wine working under both 7.x and 6.x ... under 6.x, the only 'gotcha' is don't apply the signal patch yet, as it does break things ... For testing, Tijl is running 7.x and I am running 6.x ... in my case, with all patches applied, except the signal patch, I can get Freecell running ... in his case, with all patches applied, he can get MT4 running (MT4 is an online financial trading piece of software) ... For those that are interested in Wine, and are going to test the above patches, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... it will also let us gauge how big/small the 'wine users' population happens to be ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGgnEP4QvfyHIvDvMRAp1rAJ9rJqQQs+8NtWis2g/YzpNSpWDPTwCgiSRZ tRIk8JJPJdkSUG4fVLbhqZ0= =rM6G -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wine users ... unite! (Wine, as in Windows Emulation, of course)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Wednesday, June 27, 2007 16:34:04 +0100 Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wasn't aware there was such a big problem with Wine + FreeBSD - is it just chance that I've experienced absolutely no errors at all running Lotus Notes R5 with wine from ports? Very much so ... one of the biggest problems that we've been addressing is that FreeBSD's threading doesn't allow for cross process signally of threads ... we have a 'thr_kill()' function, but it only allows signalling a thread within the same process ... Wine uses a two process model (not sure when they changed to it) where there is a 'master' (ie. NT kernel) with chid processes that get started up for the applications ... current FreeBSD model has no way for the master to signal the children ... Tijl has created a patch for both FreeBSD and wine that adds a 'thr_kill2()' function that takes process id as an argument, allowing wineserver to talk to the application processes themselves ... Now, I'm not 100% certain in which cases this is needed ... Tijl would be able to explain better ... There are several other problems we've been able to address ... check out the URL I posted, Tijl explains what we've been able to accomplish so far ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGgpkc4QvfyHIvDvMRAlDsAJ9vavgk/5TFKLinSGrTYsKR4avR9ACg1Dw8 sNx+k7P/Nng3TP835CV2CA0= =9/bt -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg's dummy driver ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been reading on http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/#faq-xvfb about it being faster (performance wise) to use xorg's dummy video driver, then to use xvfb ... problem is, I can't seem to find a 'sample xorg.conf' for setting it up ... I tried uploading my xorg.conf from my working desktop, and changing Driver to dummy, but that didn't seem to work (altho the above FAQ seems to indicate it should) .. Has anyone succeeded in setting this up / running it, that would be willing to share their xorg.conf file? Thanks ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFGfgcs4QvfyHIvDvMRAjMAAJ9WJfLUteKTffzYPTVUjnaLSwL97ACXVfjn uW21eO/qaFjq7HSvMDQDOg== =AqZr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iLO or DRAC like interface ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone know of anything non-HP / Dell that would give me the same functionality as iLO/DRAC? I don't want something sticking out the back, either a card (or motherboard?) that has an ethernet slot in it that would give me full remote console / bios / etc access to the machine ... thanks .. - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGb39A4QvfyHIvDvMRAlHAAKCK/44nMULGQs1qV9VFcMgz0WXNPACg5Td5 m+6WX0dBYkudLjh+i8FpQtQ= =/QlK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wine on freebsd ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to get wine to run an application under FreeBSD that I've been told works great using wine under Linux ... the more I'm trying to dig into this, the more stuck in mud I'm feeling ... the latest release of wine won't even run on FreeBSD without crashing ... According to the Wine folks, its a problem in FreeBSD ... the problem is that I don't know enough about it to know if that's just a cop-out, or is Wine really too linux-y to run under FreeBSD? One of the bug reports on their web site: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5732 talks about: This problem is caused by FreeBSD itself: - - 2/2 GB memory split - - Use of lover addresses for system libraries. Neither of this is fixable in Wine. Wine tries to reserve most of the lover 2GB with wine-preloader. But that doesn't work if glibc friends are already there. I've tried to run this application with wine on both 6-STABLE and 7-CURRENT, and both seem to have the same issue, so it doesn't appear to be something with just 6.x ... I'm just not sure how to attack this one, when the app developer themselves are saying its an OS issue ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFGYRSz4QvfyHIvDvMRAldhAJwMoRS2uAAJ5Q6wjkFYXPjZH0SdBQCY7NAk WvqAYGU97ZM356EzBGeBCw== =YVew -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating all ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - --On Saturday, May 19, 2007 23:51:35 -0500 Jack Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For /usr/ports I sync to just '.' (dot). Is that what I want? (I want just 'stable' ports, nothing bleeding edge). for /usr/src I sync to: RELENG_6 But my question, is there a way to go though and say let's rebuild any port that is newer (via sync) then one I current have? For example, if I build and install application FooBar-1.0.0 from the /usr/ports and the next week FooBar-1.0.7 is there a way to say yea, let's rebuild this instead of manually building it? Or at the very least, give me a list of changes on which applications need to be manually built. Install /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade ... - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGT97n4QvfyHIvDvMRArgeAKDrbrgHfAQ5YNeky3kB2sn2d0TYjQCg4SQL +Cwq8SvFjLs1EHN7dD5UXDM= =nyhg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NO_* options in /etc/make.conf ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a document that describes what is available, and what each one does? As an example, I took a peak at the nanoBSD documentation, and they have one that is 'NO_BIND' listed ... does that mean nslookup won't work, or you just can't run a named server? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGTdfF4QvfyHIvDvMRAl+zAKDd+Dg+aei/ynmszmTOTvgIc+Y9egCdE0v9 DCWd5jHkEauSMNig1N/EJ4U= =Lj3h -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NO_* options in /etc/make.conf ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Never even thought about man ... perfect, thank you :) - --On Friday, May 18, 2007 13:44:39 -0400 Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/18/07, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a document that describes what is available, and what each one does? As an example, I took a peak at the nanoBSD documentation, and they have one that is 'NO_BIND' listed ... does that mean nslookup won't work, or you just can't run a named server? - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGTdfF4QvfyHIvDvMRAl+zAKDd+Dg+aei/ynmszmTOTvgIc+Y9egCdE0v9 DCWd5jHkEauSMNig1N/EJ4U= =Lj3h -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] make make.conf Or, if you want a web interface, type in make.conf at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi - Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGTelB4QvfyHIvDvMRAs/UAJ9Sowl8EIR1XY3IRmHAO7OOQ2k7YgCfVwk2 p7sLuS22yNaA74Dq2lhlx0A= =KfRw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
