net-snmp - Crazy figures for swap interrupts?
Hi, We've got a number of 9.x machines - just setup a new 9.1-RELEASE-p4 amd64 system, put net-snmp on it (net-snmp-5.7.2_3) - and we're getting 'weird' results for some stats, e.g. UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSysInterrupts.0 = INTEGER: 1145324516 interrupts/s UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSwapIn.0 = INTEGER: 1145324612 kB UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssSwapOut.0 = INTEGER: 1145324593 kB That's an insane number of interrupts/second (systat shows 200-300 total) - also ssSwapIn.0 is 'The average amount of memory swapped out to disk, calculated over the last minute.'. The machine isn't swapping - and had 784k swapped out (according to Top) - it's lightly loaded (LA 0.02) w/3Gb memory 'free' and 3Gb inactive. Any idea where net-snmp is getting those figures from, or why? - Or better - how to fix? Thanks, -Karl ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
DiffServ SNMP agent
Hello, I wonder people would know if there is diffserv SNMP agent implementation for FreeBSD that is available? Googled a bit, but was not too successful in finding. Thanks in advance! Alan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: snmp cpu
In the last episode (Nov 30): Hi, reading this: http://old.nabble.com/Measuring-CPU-usage-via-SNMP-td23392403.html So fetching the matching ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should always equal 100% cpu. but when I fetch cpurawidle it is about 100, system 25 totalling give me 125. What wrong I do? Hey! I recognize that post :) Note that ssCpuRawSystem is a synthetic value that net-snmp generates by adding ssCpuRawKernel and ssCpuRawInterrupt. If you are doing the totalling yourself, you should ignore it, or you'll be counting kernel time twice. In case anyone else reading is unclear: Totalling the raw values always gives 100% cpu, but the units aren't percent; they're ticks. You may get a different total on different machines, depending on Hz and the number of CPUs. If you want to graph the values as percentages, you'll need to record the previous values for each variable, then sum the differences to get the total number of ticks for your sampling period. Then divide each variable's difference by that total to get a percentage. Raw values on my machine using a ~ 5-second sampling period: User Nice IdleKernel Interrupt 14993233 67689938 1943767096 171721693 11277468 14993237 67690250 1943768892 17174 11277487 14993246 67690357 1943770991 171722649 11277495 Deltas: 4 312 179653119Total: 2662 9 107 20994258 Total: 2648 Percent: 0.2 11.7 67.519.9 0.7 0.3 4.0 79.316.0 0.3 -- Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
snmp cpu
Hi, reading this: http://old.nabble.com/Measuring-CPU-usage-via-SNMP-td23392403.html So fetching the matching ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should always equal 100% cpu. but when I fetch cpurawidle it is about 100, system 25 totalling give me 125. What wrong I do? -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
freeradius snmp support
Hi, I have read in this mailing list that snmp support of freeradius (radiusd) has some issues and it was removed. What is the current (as of 2.1.10) status of snmp support in radiusd? Regards. PS: I may have fully misunderstood this issue because it had been really very long time. I couldn't able to find the mail from archives so I wanted to ask it to this list. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
net-snmp 5.5 tcp wrappers broken
Has anyone one else this behaviour /etc/hosts.allow ALL : X : allow ALL : ALL : deny do an simple system snmp query from host x fails remove the deny all line and it starts working. trussing the process shows snmpd calling lib wrap and accessing the hosts.allow fine, just no joy. Earlier version on net-snmp 5.3 i upgraded from works fine. Ports and src tree csup'd very recently. ssh does have these issues with the same hosts.allow file. Hosts reverse and forward dns matches FreeBSD xx 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jun 9 10:52:17 BST 2010 x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DTRACE amd64 # ls /etc/host* /etc/host.conf/etc/hosts/etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.equiv/etc/hosts.lpd [root]# /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -v NET-SNMP version: 5.5 Web: http://www.net-snmp.org/ Email: net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net [root]# ls -l /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 28880 Jun 9 12:30 /usr/local/sbin/snmpd [root]# ldd /usr/local/sbin/snmpd /usr/local/sbin/snmpd: libnetsnmpagent.so.20 = /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmpagent.so.20 (0x80064c000) libnetsnmphelpers.so.20 = /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmphelpers.so.20 (0x800793000) libnetsnmpmibs.so.20 = /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so.20 (0x8008b7000) libwrap.so.6 = /usr/lib/libwrap.so.6 (0x800abe000) libperl.so = /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE/libperl.so (0x800bc6000) libcrypt.so.5 = /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x800dec000) libutil.so.8 = /lib/libutil.so.8 (0x800f05000) libnetsnmp.so.20 = /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmp.so.20 (0x801015000) libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x8011e3000) libkvm.so.5 = /lib/libkvm.so.5 (0x801302000) libdevstat.so.7 = /lib/libdevstat.so.7 (0x80140a000) libcrypto.so.6 = /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x80150f000) libelf.so.1 = /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x8017a7000) libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8018bf000) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net-snmp 5.5 tcp wrappers broken
On 06/09/10 17:12, krad wrote: Has anyone one else this behaviour Yep. /etc/hosts.allow ALL : X : allow ALL : ALL : deny snmpd: ALL : allow works. Googling around, it seems FreeBSD is not the only OS affected... bye av. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Can I tunnel TCP over SNMP?
In my hotel WiFi is supposed to work, but something is broken, and only SNMP can pass through. I have my host outside, that replies to SNMP (pings). Maybe this is a crazy question, but is is possible to tunnel TCP over SNMP? I know SNMP ping can carry payload back and forth. I could set up the squid under the tunnel on my outside host and HTTP forwarding here on my laptop. So is such tunneling possible? Yuri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can I tunnel TCP over SNMP?
I've heard of data leaks from bad dudes tunnelling data in DNS type traffic, so I'm sure it can be done. The level of effort is the question... - Original Message - From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Sat May 15 15:26:36 2010 Subject: Can I tunnel TCP over SNMP? In my hotel WiFi is supposed to work, but something is broken, and only SNMP can pass through. I have my host outside, that replies to SNMP (pings). Maybe this is a crazy question, but is is possible to tunnel TCP over SNMP? I know SNMP ping can carry payload back and forth. I could set up the squid under the tunnel on my outside host and HTTP forwarding here on my laptop. So is such tunneling possible? Yuri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can I tunnel TCP over SNMP?
Yuri == Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes: Yuri In my hotel WiFi is supposed to work, but something is broken, and Yuri only SNMP can pass through. I have my host outside, that replies Yuri to SNMP (pings). Are you confusing ICMP (ping) with SNMP (monitoring)? Your last statement makes no sense. Also, are you sure the ping is going all the way to your machine, and not just being reflected far earlier? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Can I tunnel TCP over SNMP?
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: In my hotel WiFi is supposed to work, but something is broken, and only SNMP can pass through. I have my host outside, that replies to SNMP (pings). Yuri If it's a semi-reputable hotel then they should fix it. I know some hotel's systems are setup that you have to authenticate through HTTP before you get access out of the firewall. Perhaps SNMP is managing to get through before you authenticate? Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
net-snmp pass scripts
Hi, I know this isn't the ideal, place but im not having much joy on the net-snmp users mailing list. Does anyone have any good guides for writing or examples of snmp pass scripts? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
SNMP of FreeBSD
I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. I have three ports installed: bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation I got a few errors after initial install. I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. I changed the name of the public community name. I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? What client(s) tools should I look at? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: SNMP of FreeBSD
Steven Friedrich wrote: I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. I have three ports installed: bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation I got a few errors after initial install. I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. I changed the name of the public community name. I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? What client(s) tools should I look at? What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? If for client only, what do you need to poll? Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: SNMP of FreeBSD
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 08:23:16 pm Steve Bertrand wrote: Steven Friedrich wrote: I'm running 8-Stable, and ports are current. I'm installing snmp support, mostly just to investigate it. I have three ports installed: bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation I got a few errors after initial install. I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. I changed the name of the public community name. I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? What client(s) tools should I look at? What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? If for client only, what do you need to poll? Steve I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding pertinent documentation. I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, swap, network in, network out, etc. I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: SNMP of FreeBSD
Steven Friedrich wrote: On Tuesday 26 January 2010 08:23:16 pm Steve Bertrand wrote: Steven Friedrich wrote: I have three ports installed: bsnmptools-0.0.20060818_2 Snmp client tools mbrowse-0.3.1_8 An SNMP MIB Browser for X net-snmp-5.4.2.1_6 An extendable SNMP implementation I got a few errors after initial install. I don't know what pieces of snmp I want. I used the sample snmp.config from the /usr/src tree. I changed the name of the public community name. I uncommented the netgraph and pf lines and maybe even others 8o) I got rid of the errors on the console, except for this Warning: WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Perhaps this is a bug in the example snmp.config I'm using? What client(s) tools should I look at? What is it exactly that you need/want SNMP for? If for client only, what do you need to poll? Steve I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding pertinent documentation. I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, swap, network in, network out, etc. I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... Personally, I use SNMP for read-only network gathering information. Depending on the device you are trying to poll, you can generally retrieve almost all information from a device. What you have described that you have already seems like SNMP. Can you give an example of a device that you want to 'test' against? Assuming that you have an SNMP v2 device available for polling, try this on your FreeBSD box: # pkg_add -r net-snmp # rehash # snmpwalk -v2c -c your_ro_community ip_or_name_of_device If you want specifics to test against, let me know off-list, and I'll give you a Cisco router to poll. Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: SNMP of FreeBSD
Steven Friedrich wrote: I want to find out what I can monitor with it. I don't know enough about it to know if it will be useful to me. I'm an old hardware guy and I've been Admin'ing my own systems for many years. I am having a hard time finding pertinent documentation. I know one of the ports allows you to monitor the cpu, memory, etc. I already have a Superkaramba theme that has a StarTrek gauge for cpu, memory, swap, network in, network out, etc. I just want to know if SNMP has anything to offer me... ...out of curiosity, are you simply trying to gain info on your local machine that you are working from? I use SNMP for network management, so I assumed that from the beginning. If what you are looking for is gathering stats from only the hardware that you are working on, that is a bit of a different story. With that said, I may be able to provide configs for that, too. Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Net-SNMP and ProPolice under 8.0-RELEASE
Matthew Seaman wrote: Trix Farrar wrote: The Net-SNMP port (net-mgmt/net-snmp) builds and appears to work just fine, but I cannot build the SNMP module for PHP (net-mgmt/php5-snmp). Time to warm up send-pr(1). ports/141238 if you want to add your report. There will be a number of such problems, because stack protection was enabled in parts of the base system, but it is not now adequately supported in Ports. See: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/140791 b. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Net-SNMP and ProPolice under 8.0-RELEASE
The Net-SNMP port (net-mgmt/net-snmp) builds and appears to work just fine, but I cannot build the SNMP module for PHP (net-mgmt/php5-snmp). Attempting to build php5-snmp fails during the configure stage. The error message says to check the config.log. In the /usr/ports/net-mgmt/php5-snmp/work/php-5.2.11/ext/snmp/config.log file I found: configure:5967: checking for snmp_parse_oid in -lnetsnmp configure:6002: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lcrypto -lssl -rpath=/usr/local/lib -lnetsnmp -lelf -lm -lkvm -ldevstat conftest.c -lnetsnmp 5 /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmp.so: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local' Google-ing around, I have found that the __stack_chk_fail_local symbol is a side effect of compiling with the '-fstack-protector' option for gcc -- which, I believe, is the default for 8.0-RELEASE. Searching /usr/src, I found that this function is referenced in /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c, but appears to be defined in /usr/src/contrib/gcclibs/libssp/ssp.c, which is part of GCC. I believe that this winds up in /lib/libssp.so.0 -- which also exists under 7.2-RELEASE. The copy of net-mgmt/net-snmp that I compiled under 7.2-RELEASE does not contain the __stack_chk_fail_local symbol. What am I missing? I tried adding '-lssp' to the --with-libs option included in CONFIGURE_ARGS in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile with no change in behavior. As it stands, I cannot build anything that relies on Net-SNMP. -- John D. Trix Farrar, CCNA __\\|//__ Basement.NET t...@basement.net (` o-o ') http://www.basement.net/ ---ooO-(_)-Ooo-- GPG Key Fprint: 525F DBA7 1A62 E4C4 E642 DF95 384B B851 3CEF C10A pgpLUk30gtgwW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Net-SNMP and ProPolice under 8.0-RELEASE
Trix Farrar wrote: The Net-SNMP port (net-mgmt/net-snmp) builds and appears to work just fine, but I cannot build the SNMP module for PHP (net-mgmt/php5-snmp). Attempting to build php5-snmp fails during the configure stage. The error message says to check the config.log. In the /usr/ports/net-mgmt/php5-snmp/work/php-5.2.11/ext/snmp/config.log file I found: configure:5967: checking for snmp_parse_oid in -lnetsnmp configure:6002: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lcrypto -lssl -rpath=/usr/local/lib -lnetsnmp -lelf -lm -lkvm -ldevstat conftest.c -lnetsnmp 5 /usr/local/lib/libnetsnmp.so: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local' Google-ing around, I have found that the __stack_chk_fail_local symbol is a side effect of compiling with the '-fstack-protector' option for gcc -- which, I believe, is the default for 8.0-RELEASE. Searching /usr/src, I found that this function is referenced in /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c, but appears to be defined in /usr/src/contrib/gcclibs/libssp/ssp.c, which is part of GCC. I believe that this winds up in /lib/libssp.so.0 -- which also exists under 7.2-RELEASE. The copy of net-mgmt/net-snmp that I compiled under 7.2-RELEASE does not contain the __stack_chk_fail_local symbol. What am I missing? I tried adding '-lssp' to the --with-libs option included in CONFIGURE_ARGS in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/Makefile with no change in behavior. As it stands, I cannot build anything that relies on Net-SNMP. Yes -- you're not alone. I've seen exactly the same thing, but only on one machine. It works perfectly on an amd64 box running 8.0-RELEASE-p1, but fails miserably on an i386 box running 8.0-STABLE. Time to warm up send-pr(1). Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Net-SNMP and ProPolice under 8.0-RELEASE
Matthew Seaman wrote: Trix Farrar wrote: The Net-SNMP port (net-mgmt/net-snmp) builds and appears to work just fine, but I cannot build the SNMP module for PHP (net-mgmt/php5-snmp). Time to warm up send-pr(1). ports/141238 if you want to add your report. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
problem with php5-snmp
Trying to update all ports since updating to 8.0.. already rebuilt all ports and did a yes | make delete-old-libs so none of that is the problem.. php5-snmp would not rebuild. Not sure where the problem is.. but below is tons of output.. below is the output of the build: r...@core [/usr/ports/net-mgmt/php5-snmp]# 16 make clean === Cleaning for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 r...@core [/usr/ports/net-mgmt/php5-snmp]# 17 make === Found saved configuration for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 === Extracting for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 = MD5 Checksum OK for php-5.2.11.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for php-5.2.11.tar.bz2. === Patching for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 === php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found === php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.62 - found === php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 depends on shared library: netsnmp.16 - found === PHPizing for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20041225 Zend Module Api No: 20060613 Zend Extension Api No: 220060519 configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_static_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1973: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1993: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:3542: AC_LIBTOOL_LINKER_OPTION is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5480: _LT_AC_LANG_C_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5479: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_C_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2959: AC_LIBTOOL_SETUP is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2939: _AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2902: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from... configure.in:158: the top level configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:3497: AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION is expanded from... aclocal.m4:7607: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC is expanded from... configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_CXX, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:5593: _LT_AC_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5592: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:4628: _LT_AC_TAGCONFIG is expanded from... configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_static_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1973: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1993: AC_CACHE_CHECK is expanded from... aclocal.m4:3542: AC_LIBTOOL_LINKER_OPTION is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5480: _LT_AC_LANG_C_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5479: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_C_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2959: AC_LIBTOOL_SETUP is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2939: _AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2902: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL is expanded from... configure.in:158: the top level configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:3497: AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION is expanded from... aclocal.m4:7607: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC is expanded from... configure.in:158: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_CXX, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:5593: _LT_AC_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5592: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:4628: _LT_AC_TAGCONFIG is expanded from... === Configuring for php5-snmp-5.2.11_1 checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for icc... no checking for suncc... no checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking for system library directory... lib checking if compiler supports -R... yes checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd8.0 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd8.0 checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd8.0 checking for PHP prefix... /usr/local checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/local/lib/php/20060613 checking for PHP installed headers prefix... /usr/local/include/php checking if debug is enabled... no checking if zts is enabled... no checking for re2c... no configure: WARNING: You will need re2c 0.13.4 or later if you want
Re: problem with php5-snmp
B. Cook wrote:
Trying to update all ports since updating to 8.0..
already rebuilt all ports and did a yes | make delete-old-libs so none
of that is the problem..
php5-snmp would not rebuild.
Not sure where the problem is..
but below is tons of output..
snip
checking for snmp_parse_oid in -lnetsnmp... no
checking for init_snmp in -lnetsnmp... no
configure: error: SNMP sanity check failed. Please check config.log for
more information.
So what does config.log say? It should be at
/usr/ports/net-mgmt/php5-snmp/work/{$PORTNAME}/config.log
and *might* have useful information.
HTH,
Kevin Kinsey
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem with php5-snmp
So what does config.log say? cat -n work/php-5.2.11/ext/snmp/config.log 1 This file contains any messages produced by compilers while 2 running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. 3 4 It was created by configure, which was 5 generated by GNU Autoconf 2.62. Invocation command line was 6 7 $ ./configure --with-snmp=/usr/local --with-openssl-dir=/usr --enable-ucd-snmp-hack --with-php-config=/usr/local/bin/php-config --prefix=/usr/local --mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/ --build=i386-portbld-freebsd8.0 8 9 ## - ## 10 ## Platform. ## 11 ## - ## 12 13 hostname = core.phs.pcsd 14 uname -m = i386 15 uname -r = 8.0-RELEASE 16 uname -s = FreeBSD 17 uname -v = FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Dec 1 14:05:04 EST 2009 r...@core.phs.pcsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERICplus 18 19 /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 20 /bin/uname -X = unknown 21 22 /bin/arch = unknown 23 /usr/bin/arch -k = unknown 24 /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown 25 /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown 26 /bin/machine = unknown 27 /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown 28 /bin/universe = unknown 29 30 PATH: /sbin 31 PATH: /bin 32 PATH: /usr/sbin 33 PATH: /usr/bin 34 PATH: /usr/games 35 PATH: /usr/local/sbin 36 PATH: /usr/local/bin 37 PATH: /root/bin 38 39 40 ## --- ## 41 ## Core tests. ## 42 ## --- ## 43 44 configure:1999: checking for grep that handles long lines and -e 45 configure:2059: result: /usr/bin/grep 46 configure:2064: checking for egrep 47 configure:2128: result: /usr/bin/grep -E 48 configure:2133: checking for a sed that does not truncate output 49 configure:2187: result: /usr/bin/sed 50 configure:2382: checking for C compiler version 51 configure:2390: cc --version 5 52 cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] 53 Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 54 This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO 55 warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 56 57 configure:2394: $? = 0 58 configure:2401: cc -v 5 59 Using built-in specs. 60 Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd 61 Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler 62 Thread model: posix 63 gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] 64 configure:2405: $? = 0 65 configure:2412: cc -V 5 66 cc: '-V' option must have argument 67 configure:2416: $? = 1 68 configure:2439: checking for C compiler default output file name 69 configure:2461: cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing -L/usr/lib -lcrypto -lssl -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib conftest.c 5 70 configure:2465: $? = 0 71 configure:2503: result: a.out 72 configure:2520: checking whether the C compiler works 73 configure:2530: ./a.out 74 configure:2534: $? = 0 75 configure:2551: result: yes 76 configure:2558: checking whether we are cross compiling 77 configure:2560: result: no 78 configure:2563: checking for suffix of executables 79 configure:2570: cc -o conftest -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing -L/usr/lib -lcrypto -lssl -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib conftest.c 5 80 configure:2574: $? = 0 81 configure:2598: result: 82 configure:2604: checking for suffix of object files 83 configure:2630: cc -c -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing conftest.c 5 84 configure:2634: $? = 0 85 configure:2657: result: o 86 configure:2661: checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler 87 configure:2690: cc -c -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing conftest.c 5 88 configure:2697: $? = 0 89 configure:2714: result: yes 90 configure:2723: checking whether cc accepts -g 91 configure:2753: cc -c -g conftest.c 5 92 configure:2760: $? = 0 93 configure:2861: result: yes 94 configure:2878: checking for cc option to accept ISO C89 95 configure:2952: cc -c -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -fno-strict-aliasing conftest.c 5 96 configure:2959: $? = 0 97 configure:2982: result: none needed 98 configure:3006: checking how to run the C preprocessor 99 configure:3046: cc -E conftest.c 100 configure:3053: $? = 0 101 configure:3084: cc -E conftest.c 102 conftest.c:8:28: error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory 103 configure:3091: $? = 1 104 configure: failed program was: 105 | /* confdefs.h. */ 106 | #define PACKAGE_NAME 107 | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME 108 | #define PACKAGE_VERSION 109 | #define PACKAGE_STRING 110 | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT 111 | /* end confdefs.h. */ 112 | #include ac_nonexistent.h
Error building net-snmp port
I've been building a new 7.2-RELEASE server, putting it into service on Friday. I did a portsnap updated all the ports to the latest version, but was unable to upgrade /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp - see below for output: === Building for net-snmp-5.4.2.1_5 making all in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/snmplib making all in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/agent making all in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/agent/helpers making all in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/agent/mibgroup /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -I../../include -I. -I../../agent -I../../agent/mibgroup -I../../snmplib -O -pipe -Ufreebsd7 -Dfreebsd7=freebsd7 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c -o mibII/tcpTable.lo mibII/tcpTable.c cc -I../../include -I. -I../../agent -I../../agent/mibgroup -I../../snmplib -O -pipe -Ufreebsd7 -Dfreebsd7=freebsd7 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c mibII/tcpTable.c -fPIC -DPIC -o mibII/.libs/tcpTable.o mibII/tcpTable.c: In function 'tcpTable_load': mibII/tcpTable.c:748: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type mibII/tcpTable.c:750: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type mibII/tcpTable.c:750: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct xinpgen' mibII/tcpTable.c:754: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type mibII/tcpTable.c:758: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type mibII/tcpTable.c:763: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/agent/mibgroup. *** Error code 1 I tried everything I could think of to fix it - removed CPUTYPE from /etc/make.conf, ran make config de-selected IPV6 support, did a make dist clean and let it fetch the source file again, did a make deinstall but it still stopped at the same point. It was installed as a dependency of nut. Any idea how to fix this? Cheers, Ian -- gpg key: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~imoore/no-spam.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
net-snmp and IPv6 MIB
Hi all, sorry in advance for my bad english. I think i have a problem with the MIB of IPv6. I have installed the last port of net-snmp. Can someone give the result of this request, it must be send to a computer with a smp daemon and at least one interface with an IPv6 address. snmpwalk -v 2c -c community_name IP_OF_SNMP_SERVER .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.34 On my FreeBSD 7.1, this command give me : IP-MIB::ipAddressTable = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID But if I execute this command on a Ubuntu with IPv6 addresses and net-snmpd running that return a lot of results, in particulary the list of IPv6 addresses linked to the machine ( it's what i'm looking for ). So i don't know if the problem come from my computer or from the port. Thanks in advance for those that will read/answer me. Aurélien ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net-snmp and IPv6 MIB
Aurélien Ansel wrote:
Hi all,
sorry in advance for my bad english.
I think i have a problem with the MIB of IPv6.
I have installed the last port of net-snmp.
Can someone give the result of this request, it must be send to a
computer with a smp daemon and at least one interface with an IPv6 address.
snmpwalk -v 2c -c community_name IP_OF_SNMP_SERVER
.1.3.6.1.2.1.4.34
On my FreeBSD 7.1, this command give me : IP-MIB::ipAddressTable = No
Such Object available on this agent at this OID
But if I execute this command on a Ubuntu with IPv6 addresses and
net-snmpd running that return a lot of results, in particulary the list
of IPv6 addresses linked to the machine ( it's what i'm looking for ).
So i don't know if the problem come from my computer or from the port.
It looks like it may be the port. None of my SNMP enabled boxes display
the IPv6 addresses of the interface either (I've never noticed, as I
don't use SNMP for that ;)
However, in the Makefile, I noticed this:
@${ECHO_MSG} WITH_INETADDRESS_HACK=yes builds with the inetaddress hack
Which I read somewhere by searching Google that it has something to do
with 'fixing' the IPv6 address issue. Put:
WITH_INETADDRESS_HACK=yes
in your /etc/make.conf file, and try rebuilding the port.
Let us know if that fixes it.
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Measuring CPU usage via SNMP
Hello all, Simple question - does the sum of differences in ssCpuRawIdle, ssCpuRawUser, ssCpuRawNice, ssCpuRawKernel, and ssCpuRawInterrupt OIDs on a FreeBSD 7.2 system give me total CPU allocation (i.e. is a constant)? I've configured a few scripts to read these values from bsnmpd, store them via rrdtool, and then generate a single graph with idle on the negative y axis and everything else stacked on top. I want to make sure that no other counter is missing from this ensemble and the ones listed do not overlap. If either of those conditions is not met, my usage percent calculation will not be accurate. The OIDs that I left out are: ssCpuRawSoftIRQ - documentation states that this is for Linux only, but FreeBSD 7.2 does provide a value for it ssCpuRawWait - always 0? ssCpuRawSystem - seems to be a sum of ssCpuRawKernel and ssCpuRawInterrupt As far as I can tell, these three do not factor into the equation. The only one I'm not sure about is ssCpuRawSystem. Is there ever a time when it will not equal to ssCpuRawKernel + ssCpuRawInterrupt? Thanks for your help, Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Measuring CPU usage via SNMP
In the last episode (May 05), Maxim Khitrov said: Simple question - does the sum of differences in ssCpuRawIdle, ssCpuRawUser, ssCpuRawNice, ssCpuRawKernel, and ssCpuRawInterrupt OIDs on a FreeBSD 7.2 system give me total CPU allocation (i.e. is a constant)? I've configured a few scripts to read these values from bsnmpd, store them via rrdtool, and then generate a single graph with idle on the negative y axis and everything else stacked on top. I want to make sure that no other counter is missing from this ensemble and the ones listed do not overlap. If either of those conditions is not met, my usage percent calculation will not be accurate. The OIDs that I left out are: ssCpuRawSoftIRQ - documentation states that this is for Linux only, but FreeBSD 7.2 does provide a value for it ssCpuRawWait - always 0? ssCpuRawSystem - seems to be a sum of ssCpuRawKernel and ssCpuRawInterrupt As far as I can tell, these three do not factor into the equation. The only one I'm not sure about is ssCpuRawSystem. Is there ever a time when it will not equal to ssCpuRawKernel + ssCpuRawInterrupt? The nice thing about open source software is you can read the source and see what's going on :) The FreeBSD kernel statclock() function: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/kern/kern_clock.c#L442 updates the cp_time[] array, and it increments one of CP_NICE, CP_USER, CP_INTR, CP_SYS, and CP_IDLE on each tick. The Net-SNMP var_extensible_vmstat() function: http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp/trunk/net-snmp/agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/vmstat_freebsd2.c?revision=HEADview=markup#l_165 fetches that array and maps those indexes to CPURAWNICE, CPURAWUSER, CPURAWINTR, CPURAWKERNEL, and CPURAWIDLE. So fetching the matching ssCpuRaw* oids and totaling them up should always equal 100% cpu. -- Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz li...@avioc.org wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov cit...@citrin.ru wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to MK use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base MK system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what MK are the basic differences? main difference is the set of supported MIBs. In general net-snmp supports more MIBs than bsnmpd. E. g. BEGEMOT-PF-MIB supported only by bsnmpd and useful for monitoring pf(4), UCD-SNMP-MIB supported only by net-snmp and useful for monitoring CPU load (ssCpuRaw* counters). Is there any other documentation to bsnmpd besides the one man page? I'm trying to figure how to configure the daemon (first task is stop it from listening on *:*), but besides the man page and few comments in /etc/snmpd.config there is no other information that I can find. - Max I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 Thanks, but I tried this already. It causes bsnmpd to listen on the given IP as well, but doesn't remove the *:* entry: r...@gw1 [/root]# sockstat -l4 USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root bsnmpd 61251 4 udp4 *:* *:* root bsnmpd 61251 5 udp4 127.0.0.1:161 *:* The author suggested using begemotSnmpdPortTable.0.0.0.0.161 = 1 and change the IP there, but this causes the following error: Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: unknown variable Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: in file /usr/local/etc/bsnmpd.conf line 20 Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: error in config file - Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz li...@avioc.org wrote: I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 Thanks, but I tried this already. It causes bsnmpd to listen on the given IP as well, but doesn't remove the *:* entry: r...@gw1 [/root]# sockstat -l4 USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root bsnmpd 61251 4 udp4 *:* *:* root bsnmpd 61251 5 udp4 127.0.0.1:161 *:* The author suggested using begemotSnmpdPortTable.0.0.0.0.161 = 1 and change the IP there, but this causes the following error: Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: unknown variable Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: in file /usr/local/etc/bsnmpd.conf line 20 Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: error in config file Here's how I limit to a single address: host := 208.70.106.1 # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.[$(host)].161 = 1 begemotSnmpdPortStatus.127.0.0.1.161 = 1 # netstat -na | grep 161 udp4 0 0 208.70.106.1.161 *.* udp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.161 *.* Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz li...@avioc.org wrote: I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 Thanks, but I tried this already. It causes bsnmpd to listen on the given IP as well, but doesn't remove the *:* entry: r...@gw1 [/root]# sockstat -l4 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root bsnmpd 61251 4 udp4 *:* *:* root bsnmpd 61251 5 udp4 127.0.0.1:161 *:* The author suggested using begemotSnmpdPortTable.0.0.0.0.161 = 1 and change the IP there, but this causes the following error: Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: unknown variable Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: in file /usr/local/etc/bsnmpd.conf line 20 Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: error in config file Here's how I limit to a single address: host := 208.70.106.1 # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.[$(host)].161 = 1 begemotSnmpdPortStatus.127.0.0.1.161 = 1 # netstat -na | grep 161 udp4 0 0 208.70.106.1.161 *.* udp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.161 *.* Doesn't work for me, the grep command removes *:* entry from the output: r...@gw1 [/root]# netstat -an Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) udp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.161 *.* udp4 0 0 *.**.* snip The 127.0.0.1 entry is added with begemotSnmpdPortStatus.127.0.0.1.161 = 1, but the other entry is always there. Turn the daemon on and off to verify that it's bsnmpd (or use sockstat). - Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Brandon Weisz li...@avioc.org wrote: I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 Thanks, but I tried this already. It causes bsnmpd to listen on the given IP as well, but doesn't remove the *:* entry: r...@gw1 [/root]# sockstat -l4 USER   COMMAND   PID  FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS     FOREIGN ADDRESS root   bsnmpd   61251 4  udp4  *:*          *:* root   bsnmpd   61251 5  udp4  127.0.0.1:161     *:* The author suggested using begemotSnmpdPortTable.0.0.0.0.161 = 1 and change the IP there, but this causes the following error: Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: unknown variable Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]:  in file /usr/local/etc/bsnmpd.conf line 20 Apr 30 08:59:59 gw1 snmpd[78798]: error in config file Here's how I limit to a single address: host := 208.70.106.1 # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.[$(host)].161 = 1 begemotSnmpdPortStatus.127.0.0.1.161 = 1 # netstat -na | grep 161 udp4    0    0  208.70.106.1.161    *.* udp4    0    0  127.0.0.1.161      *.* Doesn't work for me, the grep command removes *:* entry from the output: r...@gw1 [/root]# netstat -an Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) udp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.161 *.* udp4 0 0 *.**.* snip The 127.0.0.1 entry is added with begemotSnmpdPortStatus.127.0.0.1.161 = 1, but the other entry is always there. Turn the daemon on and off to verify that it's bsnmpd (or use sockstat). I see now what you are saying: # sockstat -l4 root bsnmpd 2857 5 udp4 *:* *:* root bsnmpd 2857 6 udp4 127.0.0.1:161 *:* root bsnmpd 2857 7 udp4 208.70.106.1:161 *:* I don't think I've ever seen a *.* in the local addr field before. Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: I see now what you are saying: # sockstat -l4 root bsnmpd 2857 5 udp4 *:* *:* root bsnmpd 2857 6 udp4 127.0.0.1:161 *:* root bsnmpd 2857 7 udp4 208.70.106.1:161 *:* I don't think I've ever seen a *.* in the local addr field before. Steve Received a reply from the author: I think this is the socket that the snmp_mibII module opens to communicate via ioctls with the network stack. It is unbound, so it cannot and does not receive traffic. This should be no problem. - Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Morgan Wesström wrote: So I have two questions: 1) Is --with-mib-modules=if-mib already covered in the Makefile? I can see the parameter but it refers to a variable I don't know the contents of. The variable seems to refer to the build option NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES which is mentioned at the beginning of the compile process but I don't know how to use it or its initial value. 2) Is there anyway to enable these two options during make without editing the Makefile? Regards Morgan 1. Yes, --with-mib-modules=if-mib is automatically appended to the list of mib modules when you set the WITH_MFD_REWRITES define. 2. The easiest way is to set the define upon running make [/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp]$ make -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES install clean ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
2) Is there anyway to enable these two options during make without editing the Makefile? 2. The easiest way is to set the define upon running make [/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp]$ make -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES install clean Thanks Steve, I actually tried that before posting but thought I made something wrong since I couldn't spot that command in the output. A vimdiff between that output and a regular make, shows significant differences though so I assume everything is alright. Thanks again for helping me solve this irritating problem I've had for so long. /Morgan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov cit...@citrin.ru wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to MK use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base MK system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what MK are the basic differences? main difference is the set of supported MIBs. In general net-snmp supports more MIBs than bsnmpd. E. g. BEGEMOT-PF-MIB supported only by bsnmpd and useful for monitoring pf(4), UCD-SNMP-MIB supported only by net-snmp and useful for monitoring CPU load (ssCpuRaw* counters). Is there any other documentation to bsnmpd besides the one man page? I'm trying to figure how to configure the daemon (first task is stop it from listening on *:*), but besides the man page and few comments in /etc/snmpd.config there is no other information that I can find. - Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
net-snmp has no problems providing 64-bit counters (interface and disk). You must build it with -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES (passes --with-mfd-rewrites to ./configure). I do not know why this is not the default. It works just fine. I also have a PR open to make this define a ports 'make config' option (therefore a persistent setting), but the maintainer has ignored this. This post caught my attention because I've had a 64 bit - 32 bit truncation error in my SNMP logs since I installed net-snmp on my AMD64 a year ago. I was unable to figure out how to add -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES to make so I ended up editing the Makefile and added --enable-mfd-rewrites (the compile told me --with-mfd-rewrites had been replace by --enable-mfd-rewrites). My error messages now seems to have disappeared so I'm extremely happy. I later found the following info in NEWS: Solaris, FreeBSD, OpenBSD: - Experimental support for 64bit interface counters (ifXTable). Enable via '--with-mib-modules=if-mib --enable-mfd-rewrites'. So I have two questions: 1) Is --with-mib-modules=if-mib already covered in the Makefile? I can see the parameter but it refers to a variable I don't know the contents of. The variable seems to refer to the build option NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES which is mentioned at the beginning of the compile process but I don't know how to use it or its initial value. 2) Is there anyway to enable these two options during make without editing the Makefile? Regards Morgan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Maxim Khitrov wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov cit...@citrin.ru wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to MK use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base MK system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what MK are the basic differences? main difference is the set of supported MIBs. In general net-snmp supports more MIBs than bsnmpd. E. g. BEGEMOT-PF-MIB supported only by bsnmpd and useful for monitoring pf(4), UCD-SNMP-MIB supported only by net-snmp and useful for monitoring CPU load (ssCpuRaw* counters). Is there any other documentation to bsnmpd besides the one man page? I'm trying to figure how to configure the daemon (first task is stop it from listening on *:*), but besides the man page and few comments in /etc/snmpd.config there is no other information that I can find. - Max I cant speak to the documentation, but this seems to limit it to listening on a single address: Example.. # open standard SNMP ports begemotSnmpdPortStatus.192.168.2.254.161 = 1 Regards, Brandon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Monday 27 April 2009 20:19:33 Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to MK use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base MK system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what MK are the basic differences? main difference is the set of supported MIBs. In general net-snmp supports more MIBs than bsnmpd. E. g. BEGEMOT-PF-MIB supported only by bsnmpd and useful for monitoring pf(4), UCD-SNMP-MIB supported only by net-snmp and useful for monitoring CPU load (ssCpuRaw* counters). There is the GoC 2008 project: % cat /usr/ports/net-mgmt/bsnmp-ucd/pkg-descr bsnmp-ucd is a module for bsnmpd which allows you to get memory, load average, cpu utilization and other system statistics. It implements parts of UCD-SNMP-MIB for this. WWW: http://bsnmp-ucd.googlecode.com/ Author: Mikolaj Golub to.my.troc...@gmail.com Maybe if more people started testing/using this, it could some day be in base. -- Mel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what are the basic differences? Thanks, Max ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Maxim Khitrov wrote: Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what are the basic differences? I use bsnmpd, because I couldn't measure 64-bit counters otherwise. Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:28:01 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: MK I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system MK parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious MK choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to MK generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to MK use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base MK system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what MK are the basic differences? main difference is the set of supported MIBs. In general net-snmp supports more MIBs than bsnmpd. E. g. BEGEMOT-PF-MIB supported only by bsnmpd and useful for monitoring pf(4), UCD-SNMP-MIB supported only by net-snmp and useful for monitoring CPU load (ssCpuRaw* counters). -- Anton Yuzhaninov ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Steve Bertrand wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what are the basic differences? I use bsnmpd, because I couldn't measure 64-bit counters otherwise. net-snmp has no problems providing 64-bit counters (interface and disk). You must build it with -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES (passes --with-mfd-rewrites to ./configure). I do not know why this is not the default. It works just fine. I also have a PR open to make this define a ports 'make config' option (therefore a persistent setting), but the maintainer has ignored this. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: bsnmpd vs net-snmp
Steve Polyack wrote: Steve Bertrand wrote: Maxim Khitrov wrote: Hello all, I'm setting up a firewall and would like to monitor certain system parameters like network, cpu, and memory usage. SNMP is an obvious choice to do the monitoring and I'm planning to set up rrdtool to generate graphs of captured data. The question is what SNMP agent to use. I found net-snmp and bsnmpd (which is included in the base system). Has anyone here used both implementations, and if so, what are the basic differences? I use bsnmpd, because I couldn't measure 64-bit counters otherwise. net-snmp has no problems providing 64-bit counters (interface and disk). You must build it with -DWITH_MFD_REWRITES (passes --with-mfd-rewrites to ./configure). I do not know why this is not the default. It works just fine. I also have a PR open to make this define a ports 'make config' option (therefore a persistent setting), but the maintainer has ignored this. I did not know this. Thanks for the heads-up! Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp (CURRENT) failes on make install
Hi, # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # cvs update ? work cvs update: Updating . cvs update: Updating files cvs update: Updating patches.aout # make install ... installing sysv.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system installing ultrix4.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system installing dragonfly.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system creating directory /usr/local/include/net-snmp/machine installing generic.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/machine making installlibs in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/snmplib /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile cc -I../include -I. -I../snmplib -DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Ufreebsd8 -Dfreebsd8=freebsd8 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c -o mib.lo mib.c cc -I../include -I. -I../snmplib -DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Ufreebsd8 -Dfreebsd8=freebsd8 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c mib.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mib.o ../include/net-snmp/library/data_list.h:75: error: nested function 'netsnmp_get_list_node' declared but never defined ../include/net-snmp/library/data_list.h:60: error: nested function 'netsnmp_create_data_list' declared but never defined *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/snmplib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. Any ideas? matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e matthias.ap...@oclc.org - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp (CURRENT) failes on make install
Hi, On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: Hi, # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # cvs update ? work cvs update: Updating . cvs update: Updating files cvs update: Updating patches.aout # make install ... installing sysv.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system installing ultrix4.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system installing dragonfly.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system creating directory /usr/local/include/net-snmp/machine installing generic.h in /usr/local/include/net-snmp/machine making installlibs in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/snmplib /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile cc -I../include -I. -I../snmplib -DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Ufreebsd8 -Dfreebsd8=freebsd8 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c -o mib.lo mib.c cc -I../include -I. -I../snmplib -DNETSNMP_ENABLE_IPV6 -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Ufreebsd8 -Dfreebsd8=freebsd8 -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach/CORE -c mib.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/mib.o ../include/net-snmp/library/data_list.h:75: error: nested function 'netsnmp_get_list_node' declared but never defined ../include/net-snmp/library/data_list.h:60: error: nested function 'netsnmp_create_data_list' declared but never defined *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1/snmplib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.4.2.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. Any ideas? I guess you are running 8.0-CURRENT, a fix was commited about this issue, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2009-March/006931.html Hope this helps matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e matthias.ap...@oclc.org - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Regards. -- There's this old saying: Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for life. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net-snmp port upgrade build error
R Dicaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi folks, After updating ports tree with portsnap fetch update, then running pkg_version -l '', pkg_version shows net-snmp is upgradable: pkg_version -l '' net-snmp pkg_replace net-snmp --- Replacing 'net-snmp-5.3.2_3' with 'net-snmp-5.3.2.3' --- Building '/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp53' You may use the following build options: WITH_INETADDRESS_HACK=yes builds with the inetaddress hack WITH_TKMIB=yes Install a graphical Perl/Tk/SNMP based mib browser WITHOUT_DUMMY_VALUES=yesProvide 'placeholder' dummy values where the necessary information is not available. WITHOUT_PERL=yesDo not install the perl modules along with the rest of the net-snmp toolkit. WITHOUT_IPV6=yesDisable IPv6. DEFAULT_SNMP_VERSION=3Default version of SNMP to use. NET_SNMP_SYS_CONTACT=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Default system contact. NET_SNMP_SYS_LOCATION=somewhere Default system location. NET_SNMP_LOGFILE=/var/log/snmpd.log Default log file location for snmpd. NET_SNMP_PERSISTENTDIR=/var/net-snmp Default directory for persistent data storage. NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES=host disman/event-mib smux mibII/mta_sendmail mibII/tcpTable ucd-snmp/diskio Optional mib modules that can be built into the agent === net-snmp-5.3.2.3 has known vulnerabilities: = net-snmp -- DoS for SNMP agent via crafted GETBULK request. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/daf045d7-b211-11dd-a987-000c29ca8953.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp53. ** Command failed (exit code 1): make UPGRADE_PKG=net-snmp-5.3.2_3 UPGRADE_PKG_VER=5.3.2_3 ** Fix the problem and try again. --- Processed 1: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped, 1 failed The port is trying to be upgraded with the same version as installed or? The version in ports is 5.4.2.1, and that's the one you want to have. I'm not sure why you didn't get it by using portsnap, but it's been in the tree for a couple of days already. Have you tried again? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net-snmp port upgrade build error
Hi folks, After updating ports tree with portsnap fetch update, then running pkg_version -l '', pkg_version shows net-snmp is upgradable: pkg_version -l '' net-snmp pkg_replace net-snmp --- Replacing 'net-snmp-5.3.2_3' with 'net-snmp-5.3.2.3' --- Building '/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp53' You may use the following build options: WITH_INETADDRESS_HACK=yes builds with the inetaddress hack WITH_TKMIB=yes Install a graphical Perl/Tk/SNMP based mib browser WITHOUT_DUMMY_VALUES=yesProvide 'placeholder' dummy values where the necessary information is not available. WITHOUT_PERL=yesDo not install the perl modules along with the rest of the net-snmp toolkit. WITHOUT_IPV6=yesDisable IPv6. DEFAULT_SNMP_VERSION=3Default version of SNMP to use. NET_SNMP_SYS_CONTACT=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Default system contact. NET_SNMP_SYS_LOCATION=somewhere Default system location. NET_SNMP_LOGFILE=/var/log/snmpd.log Default log file location for snmpd. NET_SNMP_PERSISTENTDIR=/var/net-snmp Default directory for persistent data storage. NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES=host disman/event-mib smux mibII/mta_sendmail mibII/tcpTable ucd-snmp/diskio Optional mib modules that can be built into the agent === net-snmp-5.3.2.3 has known vulnerabilities: = net-snmp -- DoS for SNMP agent via crafted GETBULK request. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/daf045d7-b211-11dd-a987-000c29ca8953.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp53. ** Command failed (exit code 1): make UPGRADE_PKG=net-snmp-5.3.2_3 UPGRADE_PKG_VER=5.3.2_3 ** Fix the problem and try again. --- Processed 1: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped, 1 failed The port is trying to be upgraded with the same version as installed or? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP
Anybody have docs on how to get ucd-snmp-4.2.7.1 working on FreeBSD? I used to have net-snmp working but had to switch over as FreeRadius only supported ucd-snmp. Advice? Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about SNMP
Hello, I want to learn more about using of SNMP functions. I saw files about SNMP and the functions in them, but I don't know how to use it. Is there any description about order of using of SNMP functions. Thank you Best Regards Milena Karaivanova ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about SNMP
Hello, I want to learn more about using of SNMP functions. I saw files about SNMP and the functions in them, but I don't know how to use it. Is there any description about order of using of SNMP functions. Thank you Best Regards Milena Karaivanova ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mrtg peak on reboot / snmp-issue?
Hello, Small but curious thing on my freebsd-based systems: when a server is rebooted, it generates a peak (or spike?) on the network mrtg for all interfaces (here just before 1 am): http://8304.ch/om/stuff/mrtg_localhost_1-day.png It happens with both net-snmp and ucd-snmp, with a quite standard mrtg installation (generated by cfgmaker). Do you have the same issue on your own servers? All I can add, is that there is not such a high traffic after a reboot, and that it doesn't happen on similar linux-based systems. Regards a nice week to you, Olivier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mrtg peak on reboot / snmp-issue?
Olivier Mueller wrote: Hello, Small but curious thing on my freebsd-based systems: when a server is rebooted, it generates a peak (or spike?) on the network mrtg for all interfaces (here just before 1 am): http://8304.ch/om/stuff/mrtg_localhost_1-day.png This could happen if either the daemon fails to correctly provide ifCounterDiscontinuityTime or mrtg fails to correctly interpret sysUpTime and/or ifCounterDiscontinuityTime. It happens with both net-snmp and ucd-snmp, with a quite standard mrtg installation (generated by cfgmaker). Do you have the same issue on your own servers? All I can add, is that there is not such a high traffic after a reboot, and that it doesn't happen on similar linux-based systems. harti ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mrtg peak on reboot / snmp-issue?
Sorry the blackberry is truncating your original mail, but yes I have noticed the same thing on my setup. In my case I am using a custom rrdtool perl script. While not a fix for the actual problem, my workaround has been to use a CDEF in my rrdgraph command to set the value to 0 if it exceeds a sane maximum. I'm not sure off hand if mrtg has a similar capability but you might be able to set a max value for the graph so at least it won't skew the graph and hide the rest of the data points. Another option is to use a custom script to collect the values by grabbing the data from snmp and then sanitizing them prior to outputting to the value. Regards, Josh On 6/15/08, Olivier Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Small but curious thing on my freebsd-based systems: when a server is rebooted, it generates a peak (or spike?) on the network mrtg for all interfaces (here just before 1 am): http://8304.ch/om/stuff/mrtg_localhost_1-day.png It happens with both net-snmp and ucd-snmp, with a quite standard mrtg installation (generated by cfgmaker). Do you have the same issue on your own servers? All I can add, is that there is not such a high traffic after a reboot, and that it doesn't happen on similar linux-based systems. Regards a nice week to you, Olivier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Net-snmp on SPARC64
G'day, I'm trying to upgrade Net-snmp package on FreeBSD 6.2 SPARC-64 machine but no matters if I'm trying port install or precompiled by using 'pkg_add -r' is not working. Let's start with precompiled package: Uninstall previous one (which by the way was net-snmp-5.1.3) Then: [EMAIL PROTECTED] net-snmp]# pkg_add -r net-snmp Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6.2-release/Latest/net-snmp.tbz... Done. pkg_add: warning: package 'net-snmp-5.2.3_3' requires 'perl-5.8.8', but 'perl-5.8.8_1' is installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] net-snmp]# cat /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf rocommunity public x.x.x.x [EMAIL PROTECTED] net-snmp]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd start Starting snmpd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] net-snmp]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# sockstat -4 |grep 161 root snmpd 39606 14 udp4 *:161 *:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# ps aux |grep snmpd root39606 0.0 0.7 23408 7160 ?? S 9:57PM 0:00.58 /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -c /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf -p /var/run/snmpd.pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# cat /etc/rc.conf |grep snmpd snmpd_enable=YES snmpd_conffile=/usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# ls /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 138 Jan 24 21:53 /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# tail -f /var/log/snmpd.log sysctl: physmem: Cannot allocate memory NET-SNMP version 5.2.3 Connection from UDP: [a.a.a.a]:57287 no storage for OID [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# uname -a FreeBSD dnscache1.ph.starcomms.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 23:30:59 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# sysctl -a |grep physmem hw.physmem: 1063469056 Needles to say that I have plenty of free memory on the server, more than 350MB reported as free by top. I've noticed that CPU insted is going high for snmpd process: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPU COMMAND 39879 root1 1320 51912K 31416K RUN 3:54 80.86% snmpd A snmpwalk from other machines is not returning anything. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public x.x.x.x Timeout: No Response from x.x.x.x Packets are reaching the server and appear also in snmpd.log file: [EMAIL PROTECTED] catalin]# tail -f /var/log/snmpd.log Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 No other error message in /var/log files except above one. Only strange thing is that warning for Perl, but I guess 5.8.8_1 should be fully compatible with 5.8.8 since it's only a patch issues by maintainers. Did anybody experienced issues with same? Any ideas what could be the reason? TIA for help. Best Regards, Catalin - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntop install error related to net-snmp
Hello all, I'm attempting to install Ntop 3.3_1 from ports and I'm hitting a snag during compilation. Here is the error: In file included from /usr/local/include/net-snmp/utilities.h:54, from /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-includes.h:78, from iface.c:766: /usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/container.h: In function 'CONTAINER_FREE': /usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/container.h:416: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment I've got the latest version of net-snmp installed - 5.3.2. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -- Jeffrey Lehman http://digitalguy.net GPG Key fingerprint = 3087 CED0 57F7 3BD3 14E7 969B EE14 BADA D619 8CF5 pgpqxmC92nUVw.pgp Description: PGP signature
bsnmp and UCD-SNMP-MIB
Is it possible to use the UCD-SNMP-MIB with bsnmp? If so how? If not, are there plans for this? I'd prefer to use bsnmp instead of installing net-snmp, but I need the UCD MIB. Thanks, Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP MIBs for HP Proliant?
Hy there! I've got a question about HP Proliant Servers. I'm using Nagios and I want to monitoring my servers with SNMP. I downloaded the MIB's from HP, but I can't really find out the right OID for example finding out the PhysicalDrive etc. Can you give me some advice or any help? Thanks ! Regards cnielsen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNMP MIBs for HP Proliant?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 06:45:58PM +0200, Christian Nielsen wrote: I've got a question about HP Proliant Servers. I'm using Nagios and I want to monitoring my servers with SNMP. I downloaded the MIB's from HP, but I can't really find out the right OID for example finding out the PhysicalDrive etc. Can you give me some advice or any help? Try net-mgmt/mbrowse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Net-snmp dying with an ld-elf error at start on brand new FreeBSD install
Philip B wrote: Starting snmpd. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/snmpd: Undefined symbol PL_markstack_ptr I've Googled on PL_markstack_ptr snmpd and got back only 5 hits, none which seem to explain this problem at runtime. I don't know even where to begin to dig. It's usually symptomatic of having stale or otherwise incompatible libraries dynamically linked to new programs. One example can be trying to run binaries built on 7.x on a 6.x system. I'd recommend rebuilding your application (snmpd) *and* all dependencies it has, e.g. portupgrade -R snmpd. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Net-snmp dying with an ld-elf error at start on brand new FreeBSD install
I've just set up my 1st FreeBSD box to use as a home router/firewall, replacing my recently departed Linksys all-in-one. I installed the latest FeeBSD release, version 6.2-RELEASE. I installed the Net-Snmp port, with the goal of eventually using it with RRDTool to graph monitor activity on the box. After configuring my snmpd.conf file, and enabling Snmp in rc.conf, I try to start the snmp daemon with /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd start Unfortunately, it doesn't launch and reports an error in my shell. Starting snmpd. /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/snmpd: Undefined symbol PL_markstack_ptr I've tailed /var/log/messages, but there's nothing reported. I've Googled on PL_markstack_ptr snmpd and got back only 5 hits, none which seem to explain this problem at runtime. I don't know even where to begin to dig. Any wise old folks in here lend a hand? Phil ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports throughNFS failed again and again
Yes, you were right! It was enough to rename .PL to .pl with Makefile.
So I guess the net-snmp port is broken, isn´t it ?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2007 03:41 AM
To: Daniel Dvořák
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports throughNFS
failed again and again
My guess is that that particular error message is a typo because usually
Perl scripts are prefixed like {blah}.pl, not {blah}.PL.
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports throughNFS failed again and again
Daniel Dvořák wrote:
Yes, you were right! It was enough to rename .PL to .pl with Makefile.
So I guess the net-snmp port is broken, isn´t it ?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2007 03:41 AM
To: Daniel Dvořák
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports throughNFS
failed again and again
My guess is that that particular error message is a typo because usually
Perl scripts are prefixed like {blah}.pl, not {blah}.PL.
-Garrett
Either that or a config file's goofed up. I tried to install some PM
from CPAN recently and all of the Makefiles were once with .PL, not .pl.
Hmmm...
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again
Hi all, I have a wrap PC Engine with CF card. I want do a upgrade of net-snmp-5.2.3_3 to latest version. Of cource I do not want to compile the whole port on CF card, so the directory /usr/ports/ is mounted through NFS. When I do portupgrade net-snmp or make install clean, it always fails with the same error, see below. What may I do to compile it through NFS successfully ? SERVER site: # /etc/rc.d/nfsd status nfsd is running as pid 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258. # /etc/rc.d/mountd status mountd is running as pid 1245. # /etc/rc.d/rpcbind status rpcbind is running as pid 1210. # /etc/rc.d/nfslocking status If it is with or without, it does not influence the error. statd is running as pid 1264. lockd is running as pid 1269 1275. Thanks Dan # mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) 10.X.Y.Z:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs) # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # make install clean === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found === Configuring for net-snmp-5.3.1_3 autom4te259: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Operation not supported *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. # ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:49:32 +0200 Daniel Dvořák [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have a wrap PC Engine with CF card. I want do a upgrade of net-snmp-5.2.3_3 to latest version. Of cource I do not want to compile the whole port on CF card, so the directory /usr/ports/ is mounted through NFS. When I do portupgrade net-snmp or make install clean, it always fails with the same error, see below. What may I do to compile it through NFS successfully ? SERVER site: # /etc/rc.d/nfsd status nfsd is running as pid 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258. # /etc/rc.d/mountd status mountd is running as pid 1245. # /etc/rc.d/rpcbind status rpcbind is running as pid 1210. # /etc/rc.d/nfslocking status If it is with or without, it does not influence the error. statd is running as pid 1264. lockd is running as pid 1269 1275. Thanks Dan # mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) 10.X.Y.Z:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs) # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # make install clean === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found === Configuring for net-snmp-5.3.1_3 autom4te259: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Operation not supported *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. # ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you need to specify a different place for your workdirs to go, by adding a line like this to /etc/make.conf: WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/tmp cheers, jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again
I've worked around this before with -L to mount_nfs. The whole conundrum of compiling/updating something as huge as Net-SNMP on a compact flash hardware platform is one of goals that my bsd-appliance project hopes to provide convenient work-around for. ~BAS On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 08:09 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:49:32 +0200 Daniel Dvořák [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have a wrap PC Engine with CF card. I want do a upgrade of net-snmp-5.2.3_3 to latest version. Of cource I do not want to compile the whole port on CF card, so the directory /usr/ports/ is mounted through NFS. When I do portupgrade net-snmp or make install clean, it always fails with the same error, see below. What may I do to compile it through NFS successfully ? SERVER site: # /etc/rc.d/nfsd status nfsd is running as pid 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258. # /etc/rc.d/mountd status mountd is running as pid 1245. # /etc/rc.d/rpcbind status rpcbind is running as pid 1210. # /etc/rc.d/nfslocking status If it is with or without, it does not influence the error. statd is running as pid 1264. lockd is running as pid 1269 1275. Thanks Dan # mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) 10.X.Y.Z:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs) # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # make install clean === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found === Configuring for net-snmp-5.3.1_3 autom4te259: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Operation not supported *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. # ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you need to specify a different place for your workdirs to go, by adding a line like this to /etc/make.conf: WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/tmp cheers, jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again
Ok thanks for your quick reply. It helped me ... for a while. I did what you advised me and it worked, but after some comilling time this new error appeared: Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/Config.pm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/config.h Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile... make -f Makefile.old clean /dev/null 21 /usr/local/bin/perl Makefile.PL ERROR from evaluation of /usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1/perl/default_store/Makefile.PL: You need to install net-snmp first (I can't find net-snmp-config) at ./Makefile.PL line 83. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1/perl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. I have compilled net-snmp for many times on many platforms even this wpra pc engine, but always with success. What is wrong with this net-snmp version 5.3.X ? Dan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 3:10 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:49:32 +0200 Daniel Dvořák [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have a wrap PC Engine with CF card. I want do a upgrade of net-snmp-5.2.3_3 to latest version. Of cource I do not want to compile the whole port on CF card, so the directory /usr/ports/ is mounted through NFS. When I do portupgrade net-snmp or make install clean, it always fails with the same error, see below. What may I do to compile it through NFS successfully ? SERVER site: # /etc/rc.d/nfsd status nfsd is running as pid 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258. # /etc/rc.d/mountd status mountd is running as pid 1245. # /etc/rc.d/rpcbind status rpcbind is running as pid 1210. # /etc/rc.d/nfslocking status If it is with or without, it does not influence the error. statd is running as pid 1264. lockd is running as pid 1269 1275. Thanks Dan # mount /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) 10.X.Y.Z:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs) # cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp # make install clean === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found === net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found === Configuring for net-snmp-5.3.1_3 autom4te259: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Operation not supported *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp. # ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] you need to specify a different place for your workdirs to go, by adding a line like this to /etc/make.conf: WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/tmp cheers, jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS failed again and again
Daniel Dvořák wrote:
Ok thanks for your quick reply. It helped me ... for a while.
I did what you advised me and it worked, but after some comilling time this new
error appeared:
Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/Config.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/config.h
Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile...
make -f Makefile.old clean /dev/null 21
/usr/local/bin/perl Makefile.PL
ERROR from evaluation of
/usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1/perl/default_store/Makefile.PL:
You need to install net-snmp first (I can't find net-snmp-config) at
./Makefile.PL line 83.
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1/perl.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/tmp/usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp/work/net-snmp-5.3.1.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp.
I have compilled net-snmp for many times on many platforms even this wpra pc
engine, but always with success. What is wrong with this net-snmp version 5.3.X
?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 3:10 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net-snmp: portupgrade or clean instalation from ports through NFS
failed again and again
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:49:32 +0200
Daniel Dvořák [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a wrap PC Engine with CF card.
I want do a upgrade of net-snmp-5.2.3_3 to latest version.
Of cource I do not want to compile the whole port on CF card,
so the directory /usr/ports/ is mounted through NFS.
When I do portupgrade net-snmp or make install clean, it always fails with the
same error, see below.
What may I do to compile it through NFS successfully ?
SERVER site:
# /etc/rc.d/nfsd status
nfsd is running as pid 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258.
# /etc/rc.d/mountd status
mountd is running as pid 1245.
# /etc/rc.d/rpcbind status
rpcbind is running as pid 1210.
# /etc/rc.d/nfslocking status
If it is with or without, it does not influence the error.
statd is running as pid 1264.
lockd is running as pid 1269 1275.
Thanks
Dan
# mount
/dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
10.X.Y.Z:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs)
# cd /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp
# make install clean
=== net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found
=== net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found
=== net-snmp-5.3.1_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found
=== Configuring for net-snmp-5.3.1_3
autom4te259: cannot lock autom4te.cache/requests with mode 2 (perhaps you are
running make -j on a lame NFS client?): Operation not supported
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp.
#
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you need to specify a different place for your workdirs to go, by adding a line
like this to /etc/make.conf:
WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/tmp
cheers,
jonathan
My guess is that that particular error message is a typo because usually
Perl scripts are prefixed like {blah}.pl, not {blah}.PL.
-Garrett
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1
thanks. i didn't recall that i activated any snmp but there is a bsnmpd running though: root snmpd 414 13 tcp4 *:199 *:* root snmpd 414 14 udp4 *:161 *:* root snmptrapd 408 10 udp4 *:162 *:* how could i remove it? in rc.conf? or else? thanks --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is no smnp daemon running by default. Maybe you accidentally allready started it ? You might check it with sockstat -4 | grep 161 -- -Frank Staals Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net-snmp and 6.1
hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1
thanks. it definitely helped...-:) really i can't recall i ever activate the bsnmpd. best --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: thanks. i didn't recall that i activated any snmp but there is a bsnmpd running though: root snmpd 414 13 tcp4 *:199 *:* root snmpd 414 14 udp4 *:161 *:* root snmptrapd 408 10 udp4 *:162 *:* how could i remove it? in rc.conf? or else? thanks --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is no smnp daemon running by default. Maybe you accidentally allready started it ? You might check it with sockstat -4 | grep 161 -- -Frank Staals Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Hmm apparantly there IS a bsndmp running. Didn't see that one on my server, anyway on my laptop it wasn't running as I apparantly disabled it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /etc/rc.conf | grep snmpd bsnmpd_enable=NO that might help I guess -- -Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1
gahn wrote: hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is no smnp daemon running by default. Maybe you accidentally allready started it ? You might check it with sockstat -4 | grep 161 -- -Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1 (confusion)
the entry bsnmpd_enable=NO does works and the result from sockstat showed there is no snmpd running. then i added following entries in rc.conf: snmpd_enable=YES snmpd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmpd.pid snmptrapd_enable=YES snmptrapd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmptrapd.pid snmpd_conffile=/usr/local/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf well, they started snmpd alright, but i am not sure which one: bsnmpd or net-snmpd since i still have error messages in snmpd.log: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 any ideas? --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: thanks. i didn't recall that i activated any snmp but there is a bsnmpd running though: root snmpd 414 13 tcp4 *:199 *:* root snmpd 414 14 udp4 *:161 *:* root snmptrapd 408 10 udp4 *:162 *:* how could i remove it? in rc.conf? or else? thanks --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is no smnp daemon running by default. Maybe you accidentally allready started it ? You might check it with sockstat -4 | grep 161 -- -Frank Staals Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Hmm apparantly there IS a bsndmp running. Didn't see that one on my server, anyway on my laptop it wasn't running as I apparantly disabled it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /etc/rc.conf | grep snmpd bsnmpd_enable=NO that might help I guess -- -Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1 (confusion)
In response to gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the entry bsnmpd_enable=NO does works and the result from sockstat showed there is no snmpd running. then i added following entries in rc.conf: snmpd_enable=YES snmpd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmpd.pid snmptrapd_enable=YES snmptrapd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmptrapd.pid snmpd_conffile=/usr/local/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf well, they started snmpd alright, but i am not sure which one: bsnmpd or net-snmpd since i still have error messages in snmpd.log: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 Are you sure those messages aren't old, from before you disabled bsnmpd? sockstat -4 should show you what is listening on that port. net-snmpd starts a process called snmpd, so you should be able to tell which one is running by the process name. If bsnmpd is still running, a killall should shut it down. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1 (confusion)
thanks bill: no, i did cat /var/log/snmpd.log every time i restarted the server. here is the error message after i disabled snmpd in rc.conf (with entry bsnmpd=NO): [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] TERM or STOP signal... shutting down... here is the result of sockstat -4l: root sshd 440 4 tcp4 *:22 *:* root httpd 350 3 tcp46 *:80 *:* root httpd 350 4 tcp4 *:* *:* root syslogd290 7 udp4 *:514 *:* --- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In response to gahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]: the entry bsnmpd_enable=NO does works and the result from sockstat showed there is no snmpd running. then i added following entries in rc.conf: snmpd_enable=YES snmpd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmpd.pid snmptrapd_enable=YES snmptrapd_flags=-a -p /var/run/snmptrapd.pid snmpd_conffile=/usr/local/etc/snmp/snmpd.conf well, they started snmpd alright, but i am not sure which one: bsnmpd or net-snmpd since i still have error messages in snmpd.log: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 Are you sure those messages aren't old, from before you disabled bsnmpd? sockstat -4 should show you what is listening on that port. net-snmpd starts a process called snmpd, so you should be able to tell which one is running by the process name. If bsnmpd is still running, a killall should shut it down. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net-snmp and 6.1
gahn wrote: thanks. i didn't recall that i activated any snmp but there is a bsnmpd running though: root snmpd 414 13 tcp4 *:199 *:* root snmpd 414 14 udp4 *:161 *:* root snmptrapd 408 10 udp4 *:162 *:* how could i remove it? in rc.conf? or else? thanks --- Frank Staals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gahn wrote: hi: is a generic snmp running with 6.1? i installed net-snmp on 6.1 and it seems to have conflict with some another snmp process: [init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use Error opening specified endpoint udp:161 Server Exiting with code 1 i have no anothe snmp application running except the net-snmp. any ideas? Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe there is no smnp daemon running by default. Maybe you accidentally allready started it ? You might check it with sockstat -4 | grep 161 -- -Frank Staals Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com Hmm apparantly there IS a bsndmp running. Didn't see that one on my server, anyway on my laptop it wasn't running as I apparantly disabled it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /etc/rc.conf | grep snmpd bsnmpd_enable=NO that might help I guess -- -Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ntop + SNMP
You don't. If you wish to use SNMP to monitor traffic voumes, etc., you'll need to use something like mrtg, cacti or nagios. ntop doesn't know or care about SNMP, any more than does, say, tcpdump or WireShark. Kurt Then why does it have support//plugin for SNMP if it wont/cant monitor it to ask the obvious ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ntop + SNMP
In the last episode (Oct 08), Warren Liddell said: You don't. If you wish to use SNMP to monitor traffic voumes, etc., you'll need to use something like mrtg, cacti or nagios. ntop doesn't know or care about SNMP, any more than does, say, tcpdump or WireShark. Kurt Then why does it have support//plugin for SNMP if it wont/cant monitor it to ask the obvious ? I think it's more for allowing ntop to provide status via SNMP (i.e. as an agent) than using snmp to collect info from remote machines. There's really no way to use SNMP to gather the info ntop needs. All you can get from snmp is network utilization, where ntop wants to see raw packets (or at minimum, ip+port+size data per flow). -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntop + SNMP
Running FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE and im wanting some info on how to get Ntop to use SNMP to monitor traffic as all traffic goes through my router/modem which has SNMP support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ntop + SNMP
On 10/7/06, Warren Liddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE and im wanting some info on how to get Ntop to use SNMP to monitor traffic as all traffic goes through my router/modem which has SNMP support. You don't. If you wish to use SNMP to monitor traffic voumes, etc., you'll need to use something like mrtg, cacti or nagios. ntop doesn't know or care about SNMP, any more than does, say, tcpdump or WireShark. Kurt ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP mib elements are zero on 6.1
Howdy! I am upgrading a server farm from FreeBSD 4.10 to FreeBSD 6.1. I am running net-snmp and if I query a fbsd 6.1 machine I get zero values for many MIB entries. eg for a 6.1 machine I get many bogus entries. (but some good like laLoad.1 is ok) snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 6.1server enterprises [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 1877672 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 0 [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuUser.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuSystem.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuIdle.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawKernel.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawInterrupt.0 = Counter32: 0 [snip] but for for a 4.10 machine I get good values snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 4.10server enterprises [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 854392 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 1664 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 47936 [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuUser.0 = INTEGER: 25 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuSystem.0 = INTEGER: 27 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuIdle.0 = INTEGER: 46 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 241897859 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 225612717 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle.0 = Counter32: 765671208 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawKernel.0 = Counter32: 157494473 [snip] Ideas? Is a bug in 6.1? or net-snmp or am I missing something? thanx - steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNMP mib elements are zero on 6.1
Howdy! I am upgrading a server farm from FreeBSD 4.10 to FreeBSD 6.1. I am running net-snmp and if I query a fbsd 6.1 machine I get zero values for many MIB entries. Ooops. running snmpd as non-root causes this. Will investigate. Works ok on 4.10 as non-root -steve eg for a 6.1 machine I get many bogus entries. (but some good like laLoad.1 is ok) snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 6.1server enterprises [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 1877672 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwapTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailRealTXT.0 = INTEGER: -1 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 0 [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuUser.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuSystem.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuIdle.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawKernel.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawInterrupt.0 = Counter32: 0 [snip] but for for a 4.10 machine I get good values snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 4.10server enterprises [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailSwap.0 = INTEGER: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalReal.0 = INTEGER: 854392 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memAvailReal.0 = INTEGER: 1664 UCD-SNMP-MIB::memTotalFree.0 = INTEGER: 47936 [snip] UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuUser.0 = INTEGER: 25 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuSystem.0 = INTEGER: 27 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuIdle.0 = INTEGER: 46 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0 = Counter32: 241897859 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawNice.0 = Counter32: 0 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawSystem.0 = Counter32: 225612717 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawIdle.0 = Counter32: 765671208 UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawKernel.0 = Counter32: 157494473 [snip] Ideas? Is a bug in 6.1? or net-snmp or am I missing something? thanx - steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ports net-snmp to support 64-bit snmp counter
Hi All
I am running freebsd 4.11 release and want to have
net-snmp to support 64 bit counter
I deinstall the net-snmp but don't know how to
re-complie the port to support
--enable-mfd-rewrites
I changed the Makefile and recomplied it and it
doesn't work
snmpwalk -v 2c -c x localhost ifHighSpeed
IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed = No Such Object available on this
agent at this OID
Thank you for your help
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-shared --enable-internal-md5
\
--enable-mfd-rewrites \
--with-mib-modules=${_NET_SNMP_MIB_MODULES} \
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports net-snmp to support 64-bit snmp counter
In the last episode (May 03), adrian kok said: I am running freebsd 4.11 release and want to have net-snmp to support 64 bit counter FreeBSD's internal network counters are 32-bit, so it won't help you. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports net-snmp to support 64-bit snmp counter
Dear Nelson Thank you for your mail Do you know and have experience how to solve this Gigabit speed, net-snmp, and overflows issue? http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/mrtg/msg30587.html Thank you again --- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the last episode (May 03), adrian kok said: I am running freebsd 4.11 release and want to have net-snmp to support 64 bit counter FreeBSD's internal network counters are 32-bit, so it won't help you. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports net-snmp to support 64-bit snmp counter
In the last episode (May 04), adrian kok said: Dear Nelson Thank you for your mail Do you know and have experience how to solve this Gigabit speed, net-snmp, and overflows issue? http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/mrtg/msg30587.html What I do instead of querying the servers directly, is query the switch ports they are plugged into. I use Cisco and HP switches and they have supported 64-bit SNMP counters for years. For servers attached to unmanaged switches, I poll their 32-bit counters every minute and accept that I can't graph very high traffic rates. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support for IPv6 SNMP and IPv6 SYSLOG
Hi, I've looked through the release notes for the latest version of FreeBSD and it is not clear whether it supports SNMPv6 and SYSLOGv6.Can you confirm IPv6 support for these protocols? Thanks, Jay ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Support for IPv6 SNMP and IPv6 SYSLOG
Hi, Update, specifically does FreeBSD ucd-snmp patch function as a SNMP Server? _ From: McGuerty, Jay S. Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:15 AM To: 'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org' Subject: Support for IPv6 SNMP and IPv6 SYSLOG Hi, I've looked through the release notes for the latest version of FreeBSD and it is not clear whether it supports SNMPv6 and SYSLOGv6.Can you confirm IPv6 support for these protocols? Thanks, Jay ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems installing SNMP from ports
I just installed SNMPD from ports not an hour ago on a system I built yesterday. No problems. Now I try and install SNMP on another system that is running a non-PAE kernel, which I built a month ago, but on which almost everything is on the same version as the previous box. When I try and install net-snmp4 I get this: +--( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )-(Fri, Feb 03 10:41 AM)-- +-( /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp4 ):# make install You may use the following build option(s): WITHOUT_SSL=yes Disable the OpenSSL support. === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found = ucd-snmp-4.2.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch from http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/net-snmp/. ucd-snmp-4.2.6.tar.gz 100% of 1677 kB 297 kBps === Extracting for ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 = MD5 Checksum OK for ucd-snmp-4.2.6.tar.gz. = No SHA256 checksum recorded for ucd-snmp-4.2.6.tar.gz. === ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.6 - found === Patching for ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 === ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.6 - found === Applying FreeBSD patches for ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 === ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.6 - found === Configuring for ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 === Building for ucd-snmp-4.2.6_3 make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp4. I have WITHOUT_SSL=yes set in make.conf because I had seen another ML discussion from 2003 that mentioned there might be a problem there. I just cvsup'd my ports tree immediately before running this command. I'm as up-to-date as one can possibly get :-) Any help you can give here would be greatly appreciated. I'm trying to get this development box added into the monitors for this management software I'm trying out... ( http://manageengine.adventnet.com/products/applications_manager/ ) My production box is already done, but I'd like to have development in there too. Thanks! Jon Brisbin Webmaster NPC International, Inc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NAT+NET-SNMP Problem+FreeBSD-4.10
Hi, This is just a follow-up on my previous posting on my problem with snmp. My setup involves 1 DSL interface and 1 LAN interface in a FreeBSD-4.10 which is configured as gateway and NAT router. I haven't been able to query any SNMP data from this machine which acts as my DSL router. Was it a problem with NAT? -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: NAT+NET-SNMP Problem+FreeBSD-4.10
Applications that work with identified devices, or that actually identify devices (such as the *Simple Network Management Protocol* [SNMP] and DNS) require very careful configuration when operating an a NAT environment. - Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/ac123/ac147/archived_issues/ipj_7-3/anatomy.html Am I really right to assume that my SNMP problem was a missing configuration in NAT? -- Forwarded message -- From: Edwin D. Vinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Oct 23, 2005 8:26 AM Subject: NAT+NET-SNMP Problem+FreeBSD-4.10 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hi, This is just a follow-up on my previous posting on my problem with snmp. My setup involves 1 DSL interface and 1 LAN interface in a FreeBSD-4.10 which is configured as gateway and NAT router. I haven't been able to query any SNMP data from this machine which acts as my DSL router. Was it a problem with NAT? -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP problem in FreeBSD-4.10 has been solved
If you are having some problems with net-snmp in FreeBSD-4.10: - Don't use latest net-snmp from sourceforge. - Use the /usr/ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp4/ which is the original UCD-SNMP package. - Use also the mrtg package which comes with ports. Now, I can already monitor my DSL link! -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SNMP in FreeBSD server
Hi, I'm running a FreeBSD server on a DSL and I wan't to monitor the link utilization of it using MRTG and NET-SNMP. I installed net-snmp using ports but when I tried running snmpd and querying simple snmpwalk and cfgmaker, I got an error as shown below. I also tried installing net-snmp from source from sourceforge but still snmp is not responding. Please help me on this. Thanks in advance. -Edwin NOTE: - My snmpd.conf is in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I am running snmpd as plain 'snmpd'. I also tried 'snmpd -c snmpd.conf' but no effect. - ERROR IN CFGMAKER: --base: Get Device Info on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SNMP Error: no response received SNMPv1_Session (remote host: 192.168.1.1 http://192.168.1.1 [192.168.1.1http://192.168.1.1 ].161) community: public request ID: -1724402833 PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes timeout: 2s retries: 5 backoff: 1) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/SNMP_util.pm line 627 SNMPWALK Problem for 1.3.6.1.2.1.1 on [EMAIL PROTECTED]::v4only at /usr/local/bin/cfgmaker line 858 WARNING: Skipping [EMAIL PROTECTED]: as no info could be retrieved # Created by # /usr/local/bin/cfgmaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNMP in FreeBSD server
Edwin D. Vinas wrote: Hi, I'm running a FreeBSD server on a DSL and I wan't to monitor the link utilization of it using MRTG and NET-SNMP. I installed net-snmp using ports but when I tried running snmpd and querying simple snmpwalk and cfgmaker, I got an error as shown below. I also tried installing net-snmp from source from sourceforge but still snmp is not responding. Please help me on this. Thanks in advance. -Edwin NOTE: - My snmpd.conf is in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf I am running snmpd as plain 'snmpd'. I also tried 'snmpd -c snmpd.conf' but no effect. - ERROR IN CFGMAKER: --base: Get Device Info on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SNMP Error: no response received SNMPv1_Session (remote host: 192.168.1.1 http://192.168.1.1 [192.168.1.1http://192.168.1.1 ].161) community: public request ID: -1724402833 PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes timeout: 2s retries: 5 backoff: 1) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/SNMP_util.pm line 627 SNMPWALK Problem for 1.3.6.1.2.1.1 on [EMAIL PROTECTED]::v4only at /usr/local/bin/cfgmaker line 858 WARNING: Skipping [EMAIL PROTECTED]: as no info could be retrieved # Created by # /usr/local/bin/cfgmaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Edwin D. Viñas http://www.geocities.com/edwin_vinas/ IN THE WORLD OF SCIENCE, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE. -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm running mrtg myself, and I remember having some problem with snmpd when I installed it. you should have a config file in /usr/local/etc/ named snmpd.conf and it should look something like this: http://fstaals.net/junk/snmpd.conf . I can't remember anymore if I had to change anything else, but I think that should be it. Good Luck -- -Frank Staals ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
semi OT: problems with mrtg(+snmp??)
Is there anyone out there willing to help troubleshoot some mrtg(/snmp?) issues privately? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: /dev/mem /dev/kmem jails and using netstat -r and snmp
Ruben Bloemgarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I seem to be a bit stuck here. I seem to need access to /dev/mem and /dev/kmem from inside a jail . Specifically to be able to use netstat r and snmp in jailed environments. Im running FBSD 5.4-RELEASE. Could anyone help me shed some light on this problem ? Thanks. Making kmem available in a jail seems like it can't be the right answer to anything. Kind of contradicts the point, I would think. I don't see an easy way around this. Furthermore, there are different approaches depending on why you are trying to do this. If you want system statistics inside of a jail for remote monitoring, consider whether that is the best approach; after all, network management *is* a fundamentally privileged operation. One way to do it would be to feed the statistics into the jail from outside of it; this way, the privileged operation is separated from the network-accessible code, and not dependent on it in any way. Good luck. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: /dev/mem /dev/kmem jails and using netstat -r and snmp
Hi Lowell, I absolutely agree with you in regards to jail security, this would effectively break jail security. My main reason for using jails is not security however, but manageability and expandability. By now I've figured out how to make mem and kmem available to a specicic jail. As with all *nix related problems it was painfully simple once understood. I have managed to enable most NMS functionality I want from inside the jail without having to resort to this ruleset. I did want to have the option available for development and testing reasons to be able to differentiate between what I'm doing wrong and what is just an inherent restriction of properly deployed jails. For a fully functional NMS solution running from inside a jail, using very anal access restrictions from the firewall on the mainhost, I'm not sure yet whether or not I'm actually troubled by the security NoNo access to privileged devices generates. Anyway, thanks for your insight. Sometimes all we need is just someone to talk to. By the way I am very interested in what everyone's thoughts are in regards to jail functionality, as in security vs. the VirtualServer aspect and in which scenario one outweighs the other. Regards, Ruben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert Sent: September 10, 2005 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/mem /dev/kmem jails and using netstat -r and snmp Ruben Bloemgarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I seem to be a bit stuck here. I seem to need access to /dev/mem and /dev/kmem from inside a jail . Specifically to be able to use netstat ?r and snmp in jailed environments. I?m running FBSD 5.4-RELEASE. Could anyone help me shed some light on this problem ? Thanks. Making kmem available in a jail seems like it can't be the right answer to anything. Kind of contradicts the point, I would think. I don't see an easy way around this. Furthermore, there are different approaches depending on why you are trying to do this. If you want system statistics inside of a jail for remote monitoring, consider whether that is the best approach; after all, network management *is* a fundamentally privileged operation. One way to do it would be to feed the statistics into the jail from outside of it; this way, the privileged operation is separated from the network-accessible code, and not dependent on it in any way. Good luck. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.20/95 - Release Date: 09/09/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.20/95 - Release Date: 09/09/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.20/95 - Release Date: 09/09/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/mem /dev/kmem jails and using netstat -r and snmp
Hi all, I seem to be a bit stuck here. I seem to need access to /dev/mem and /dev/kmem from inside a jail . Specifically to be able to use netstat –r and snmp in jailed environments. I’m running FBSD 5.4-RELEASE. Could anyone help me shed some light on this problem ? Thanks. Regards, Ruben -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.19/93 - Release Date: 09/08/2005 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What OID for this? SNMP issue.
Hi, On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:36:44PM -0700, Sean Hafeez wrote: Target[merlot-cpusum]:ssCpuRawUser.0ssCpuRawUser.0:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + ssCpuRawSystem.0ssCpuRawSystem.0:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + ssCpuRawNice. 0ssCpuRawNice.0:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MaxBytes[merlot-cpusum]: 100 Title[merlot-cpusum]: merlot.beastproject.org - active cpu utilization PageTop[merlot-cpusum]: H1merlot.beastproject.org - active cpu utilization/H1 Unscaled[merlot-cpusum]: ymwd ^^^ ... For a long time I observe the strange issue. Marked string is commented out if my MRTG-config file. And it is possible that values drawn on the graph can be greater than 100%! Can anybody explain how raw counters (ssCpuRawSystem, ssCpuRawUser etc.) are calculated? And why graph even for one of them (not for sum) can grow over 100%? Thanks. -- Kind Regards, Alexander Shikoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mob.: +380 67 946 31 49 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
