Re: [Gimp-user] Running Gimp 2.2.12 and 2.3.12 on Windows

2006-12-16 Thread Brendan
On Friday 15 December 2006 17:06, D. Jones wrote:
 I am trying to run both versions of the Gimp in
 Windows XP SP2.  The 2.2 version runs with no
 problems, but the the 2.3 version indicates upon
 running that it is unable to locate libgimp-2.0-0.dll
 or libgimpui-2.0-0.dll.  I set in environment

Same here.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Slowing things down

2006-12-16 Thread David Marrs
Lorraine Payette wrote:
 How do I move from getting every single posting to just a daily 
 digest?  Much as I love being able to access all this information, I 
 need space for other things.  Can someone help me stem the tide just a bit?
 
The trouble with digest is that it doesn't let you thread email,
so it's hard to follow a conversation (at least, I find it hard).
You might find you get the best of both worlds by creating a filter for
gimp-user and redirecting all mail for this list to its own folder.
That way, your inbox remains uncluttered but conversations remain listed
in a logical order.

I filter on [To or CC = [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,
David
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp-user Digest, Vol 51, Issue 25

2006-12-16 Thread Katie
.
Universidade Federal do Paran?
Depto. de Zoologia
Caixa Postal 19020
81531-990 Curitiba, Paran?, Brasil
=
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone/Fone/Tel?fono:   55 41 33611764
celular:   55 41 99870543
=
Zoologia na UFPR
http://zoo.bio.ufpr.br/zoologia/
Ecologia e Conserva??o na UFPR
http://www.bio.ufpr.br/ecologia/
-
http://jjroper.googlepages.com/home
Curr?culo Lattes
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2553295738925812




--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:17:22 -0800
From: Saul Goode 
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Language
To: James J. Roper PhD
 ,gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1



  So, my 
 question is, how can I make it speak English to me?

You merely have to create an environment variable and set its value to
en. 

If you are using Windows:

set lang=en
c:\Program Files\GIMP-2.0\bin\GIMP-2.2.exe


If you are using Linux, I will assume you know how to set an environment
variable for the terminal shell that you prefer. :)


It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do 
not care who gets the credit. -- Harry S. Truman



--

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:37:27 -0500
From: Lorraine Payette 
Subject: [Gimp-user] Slowing things down
To: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20061215/047961f2/attachment-0001.html 

--

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:43:56 -0600
From: Chris Mohler 
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Slowing things down
To: Lorraine Payette 
Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID:
 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

I think you need to go:
https://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Scroll down, click 'Unsubscribe or Edit Options', and then change to
digest mode.

Or, if you'd like I'll send you a gmail invite - it's pretty good with
lists, and you have almost 3 GB of space... (I don't work for google -
I just like gmail for lists)

Chris


--

Message: 7
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:19:19 +0100
From: julien 
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Language
Cc: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

http://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-concepts-running-language.html
 I am new to this, so please bear with me.

 I live in Brazil, and use Windows in Portuguese, but would prefer to 
 have the GIMP in English.  Of course, during installation, it opted for 
 Portuguese since that is the language of my operating system.  So, my 
 question is, how can I make it speak English to me?

 Thanks,

 Jim

   



--

Message: 8
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 02:27:36 -0500
From: Teddy Widhi 
Subject: [Gimp-user] how to compile gimp under windowsXP?
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi...

Bcoz i try to download the newest gimp 2.3.13 for windows still not yet in
the sourceforge. maybe somebody can help me how to compile gimp 2.3.13 by
myself? for linux i already installed from souce by my self. but in windows
version i dont know how to do it.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20061216/5853a239/attachment-0001.html 

--

Message: 9
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:06:46 -0500
From: Brendan 
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Running Gimp 2.2.12 and 2.3.12 on Windows
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=iso-8859-1

On Friday 15 December 2006 17:06, D. Jones wrote:
 I am trying to run both versions of the Gimp in
 Windows XP SP2.  The 2.2 version runs with no
 problems, but the the 2.3 version indicates upon
 running that it is unable to locate libgimp-2.0-0.dll
 or libgimpui-2.0-0.dll.  I set in environment

Same here.


--

Message: 10
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:54:06 +
From: David Marrs 
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Slowing things down
To: gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Lorraine Payette wrote:
 How do I move from getting every single posting to just a daily 
 digest?  Much as I love being able to access all this information, I 
 need space for other things.  Can someone help me stem the tide just a bit?
 
The trouble with digest is that it doesn't let you thread email,
so it's hard to follow a conversation (at least, I find it hard).
You might find you get the best of both worlds by creating a filter for
gimp-user and redirecting all mail for this list to its own folder.
That way, your inbox remains uncluttered

[Gimp-user] Gimp vs. Photoshop

2006-12-16 Thread John R. Culleton
ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of 
upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp 
as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much 
of which I am not technically competent to answer. I have never used 
Photoshop. Anyone else care to take a crack at one or more issues raised?
-
 I've checked out GIMP before.

 I was going to try to run it again to see if this comment held any

 water:
  There may be a feature or two that are unique to Photoshop but I'll
  bet you
  can live without them.

 …but X11 choked on my 34 activated fonts. From what I recall of
 version 2.1.x, it (and I) suffered from its aggravating GUI and
 inconsistent tools, and a general lack of features. That being said,
 if friends and family members are pining for some way to scan and
 modify old photos, I install GIMP for them and show them how to do it.

 GIMP works for casual use. I don't see it fitting into a professional
 workflow mainly because of the utter awkwardness of the GUI. Maybe if
 you're used to the Gnome UI standards or have the mindset of a
 programmer, it's less awkward. But that's another story. These are
 first year students I'm talking about here. They can barely get the
 OSX dock straight, let alone browsing for files in the GIMPs browser,
 which reveals the BSD underbelly of OSX, hidden folders and all.

 Update: I gave X11 some time (10 minutes on my hermetically
 maintained dual 1.25 G4 with 2 gigs of ram) and it finally loaded
 GIMP and also GIMPshop. While it seems that the feature sets have
 expanded quite a bit, there are still things that I use regularly in
 Photoshop missing. Here's a list.

 Adjustment layers: non-destructive editing. It can save you whole
 minutes if not dozens of them.
 CMYK Support: Come on!
 Wacom support- I'm sure you can get it working in linux, but we're
 not switching.
 Semi-automated extraction- a real time saver.
 Live filter previews- what's the point without them?
 Color profiles (again, come on- how is importing an image into
 Scribus just to apply a color profile a productive workflow?)
 Limited output options (a.k.a. mostly useless file types)
 Vanishing Point (it's actually useful)
 No typeface previews

 I could go on and on but I feel that I'm wasting breath, so to speak.
 Yeah, you can do a lot in the GIMP but it's just not enough. Beyond
 its limitations, it's difficult to use, doesn't play well with
 others, and would probably curl up in a ball and die if it tried to
 interact with our scanners on the intel machines. Photoshop saves
 time which saves money in the long run, and thus the software pays
 for itself. I'm not trying to say that GIMP isn't a great solution
 for Do-It-Yourselfers or Very-Small-Businesses, but if you're
 teaching students, there's a certain responsibility to focus on
 industry demands. I had a hard enough time getting them (the faculty)
 to give up Extensis Suitcase for Font Explorer X.

 -Matt
(My first response follows)

Interesting response. Let me answer those objections that I can.
1. Load time:  On a modest Linux system and using the stable verson 2.2.13 
load time 10 seconds.  Modest means a 768MHZ CPU and 512 MB ram.

2. Activated fonts. I estimate about 50 X11 fonts on my system. I got tired 
counting them onscreen. 

3. Scanner: I use an Intel machine and activating the scanner means copying 
the xsane  program to the Gimp plugins directory. Then on next reboot it 
shows up automatically on the Acquire menu. I scan all the time. 

4. GUI: I use KDE. Gimp adapts nicely to that. KDE resembles MSWin. I set my 
teeniebopper granchild down on my computer and she was able to use Mozilla 
which she had never seen before and Kword which she had never seen before and 
the KDE interface itself which she had never seen before without any 
instruction after I showed her where to access the programs on the menu. The 
dreadfulness of GUI shock is IMO much overrated.  I can go back and forth 
between KDE, Win 2000 and Win 98 without difficulty, though of course I 
prefer KDE.   

5. CMYK support. In fact what you see on any screen is RGB. The latest 
unstable Gimp will convert an image by reducing its gamut to one resembling 
CMYK.  You can even get cmyk separations. But for print work it is probably 
smart to do final checking in Scribus which does the whole CMYK bit, ICC 
profiles for monitor and printing etc.  Now I would much prefer a Gimp that 
worked natively in CMYK.  I have been pounding the drums for that for years.
---
John Culleton
Able Indexing and Typesetting
Precision typesetting (tm) at reasonable cost.
Satisfaction guaranteed. 
http://wexfordpress.com

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-user] Slowing things down

2006-12-16 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* David Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-16-06 05:56]:
 The trouble with digest is that it doesn't let you thread email, so
 it's hard to follow a conversation (at least, I find it hard). You
 might find you get the best of both worlds by creating a filter for
 gimp-user and redirecting all mail for this list to its own folder.
 That way, your inbox remains uncluttered but conversations remain
 listed in a logical order.

simple to break a digest into individual emails if you desire.  Use
procmail:
  formail -ds procmail  file.txt
  -s (split digest or xx), pipe a file back into system as if just rec'd
  -d Tell formail that the messages it is supposed to split need not be
 in strict mail-box format

formail is part of procmail.  
-- 
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org@ http://counter.li.org
HOG # US1244711 Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
OpenSUSE Linux http://en.opensuse.org/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp vs. Photoshop

2006-12-16 Thread Andrew Swinn
John R. Culleton wrote:
 ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of 
 upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp 
 as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much 
 of which I am not technically competent to answer. I have never used 
 Photoshop. Anyone else care to take a crack at one or more issues raised?
 -

As much as I love The Gimp (I think its the most awesome piece of open 
source software around), if this is a school that is specifically 
preparing students for digital design practices in the real world they 
are going to need photoshop one way or another. After all it is still 
the industry standard.

My suggestion for this type of situation is this. Go with Photoshop 
licences, but not quite so many. If you were teaching my child I would 
want him or her to see all the main alternatives, not just the 
commercial one.

At least if they have a few Gimp'd machines they can do some real long 
term testing. Maybe they can get the students trained in bug fixing and 
feature programming. I hear GEGL needs some help? ;)

Regards,

Andrew Swinn

___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp vs. Photoshop

2006-12-16 Thread Anthony Ettinger
On 12/16/06, Andrew Swinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John R. Culleton wrote:
  ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of
  upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp
  as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much
  of which I am not technically competent to answer. I have never used
  Photoshop. Anyone else care to take a crack at one or more issues raised?
  -

 As much as I love The Gimp (I think its the most awesome piece of open
 source software around), if this is a school that is specifically
 preparing students for digital design practices in the real world they
 are going to need photoshop one way or another. After all it is still
 the industry standard.

 My suggestion for this type of situation is this. Go with Photoshop
 licences, but not quite so many. If you were teaching my child I would
 want him or her to see all the main alternatives, not just the
 commercial one.

 At least if they have a few Gimp'd machines they can do some real long
 term testing. Maybe they can get the students trained in bug fixing and
 feature programming. I hear GEGL needs some help? ;)


My own 2 cents: If you're teaching a class, use Gimp. They can always
adapt what they learn in Gimp to Photoshop if their company requires
it.


-- 
Anthony Ettinger
phone: 408-656-2473
resume: http://chovy.dyndns.org/resume.html
Currently available for contract work
blog: http://www.chovy.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Gimp Advent Calendar

2006-12-16 Thread Anthony Ettinger
I've been reading the YAPAC (Yet Another Perl Advent Calendar),
http://perladvent.pm.org/
Would be cool to do something similar with Gimp.

-- 
Anthony Ettinger
phone: 408-656-2473
resume: http://chovy.dyndns.org/resume.html
Currently available for contract work
blog: http://www.chovy.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp vs. Photoshop

2006-12-16 Thread David Marrs
John R. Culleton wrote:
 ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of 
 upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp 
 as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much 
 of which I am not technically competent to answer. I have never used 
 Photoshop. Anyone else care to take a crack at one or more issues raised?

I never really saw PS as the world's premier example of ease-of-use, but 
regardless, this guy's done his homework and has come out in favour of PS for 
his students. Surely he knows best? It seems a sensible enough choice to me, 
given its position as the industry standard.

Since he's using Macs, he should probably put Seashore(1) on his watch list. 
It's a native fork of the Gimp, so it should help sooth his interface pains. I 
have no idea what the feature list is like though, or what their roadmap is. He 
may find it useful to look at in the future (as well as Gimp) if he's in this 
predicament again.

Anyway, Digg, Slashdot et al should provide you with enough comparisons to make 
you wish you'd never started this thread. :p

Regards,
David

(1) http://seashore.sourceforge.net/
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] how to compile gimp under windowsXP?

2006-12-16 Thread Jerry Baker
Never tried it, but I ran across this recently
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/article/Compiling-Gimp-2-3-x-For-Windows-8606.html
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user