Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:57:05PM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:
> 
> > configure: == summary =
> > configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> > configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
> >
>   Ah. Here is where things diverge:
> 
> configure:9400: == summary =
> configure:9402: build GTK GUI: yes
> configure:9404: build GIMP plug-in: no
> 
> because:
> configure:5646: checking for gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0
> configure:5653: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0"
> Package gimpui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> 
>   Apparently the configure script wants the 2.0 version of gimpui to be
> at least 2.2. The version in the system is 2.0.50.
>   It would seem I am SOL on this one.
> 
That sounds extremely odd - looking at mine, 0.42 followed that test
with tests for 2.4.0 and 2.9.0.

The version in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gimpui.pc should match the version
of gimp.

If you installed 2.8.22 yourself, in a non-standard prefix (that
probably also includes /usr/lib64) export the prefix at the start of
PKG_CONFIG_PATH, followed by whatever else is in PKG_CONFIG_PATH.

Retrack: I was reading what you posted, but I think the problem may
be slightly different - it says it did not find gimpui-2.0.pc at
all (package not found, rather than a failed version test).

Check what you have in PKG_CONFIG_PATH when trying to rebuild
nufraw, and of course check where your different versions of
gimpui-2.0.pc live.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[James Moe via gimp-user-list]

On 09/13/2018 12:39 PM, Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list wrote:

> configure: == summary =
> configure: build GTK GUI: yes
> configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
>
  Ah. Here is where things diverge:

configure:9400: == summary =
configure:9402: build GTK GUI: yes
configure:9404: build GIMP plug-in: no

because:
configure:5646: checking for gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0
configure:5653: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "gimpui-2.0 >= 2.2.0"
Package gimpui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.

  Apparently the configure script wants the 2.0 version of gimpui to be
at least 2.2. The version in the system is 2.0.50.
  It would seem I am SOL on this one.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:39:37PM +0200, Helmut Jarausch via gimp-user-list 
wrote:
> On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> > On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > 
> > > install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> > > and make it active with
> > > Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
> > >
> >   There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import anywhere.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I didn't mention I'm running Gimp-2.10.7 (GIT) - it might be that the
> Edit -> Preference menu looks different in older versions of Gimp.
> 
> Edit -> Preference has  the items
> 
> System Resources
> Debugging
> Color Management
> Image Import & Export   <
> Tool Options
> 
> 
> Helmut

I had to go to the box where I had installed nufraw with 2.8, so I
fired up that old system.  I cannot see any obvious way to edit how
a raw image should be opened in 2.8.  But nufraw is working there,
so I looked in ~/.gimp-2.8 and the only reference to nufraw is in
pluginrc, which has the opening lines:

# GIMP pluginrc
# 
# This file can safely be removed and will be automatically regenerated by
# querying the installed plugins.

So provided that nufraw-gimp is in /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/ (or
lib64 if your distro uses that), I would move the old ufraw plugin
out of there, rename pluginrc to pluginrc.bak in case things go
wrong, and restart gimp.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[Ken Moffat via gimp-user-list]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:52:51AM -0700, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> > I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
> >   ./autogen.sh;
> >   ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
> >   make;
> >   make install
> > 
>   Okay.
> 
> > As far as I can see, 0.42 was working with 2.8.22.
> >
>   Any idea how to use it with 2.8?
> 
>   There are no instructions at the nufraw docs (such as they are). Gimp
> Help mentions using gimptool to install a plugin; except there is no
> gimptool app in the repository. There is no "Image Import" option in the
> 2.8 Preferences.
> 

For me, exactly the same instructions as for 2.10.  Needs an old
version of something (gtkimageview, perhaps), but that is exactly
the same as for ufraw.

Looking at my logs, it seems I was actually using 0.41 with 2.8.22
(from memory, 0.41 needed patching for gimp-dev).  Extracts from the
log:

configure: == summary =
configure: build GTK GUI: yes
configure: build GIMP plug-in: yes
configure: EXIF support using exiv2: yes
configure: JPEG support: yes
configure: JPEG2000 (libjasper) support: no
configure: TIFF support: yes
configure: PNG support: yes
configure: FITS support: no
configure: gzip compressed raw support: yes
configure: bzip2 compressed raw support: yes
configure: lens defects correction support using lensfun: no

and during the install:

make[2]: Entering directory '/scratch/working/nufraw-0.41'
 /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins'

And then to use it, from within the gimp just open the raw file in
the normal way.  Possibly you will need to change one of the
settings to tell it to use nufraw instead of ufraw.

Oh, and apologies to the list for sending that original reply to
James - I seem to find it very easy on this list to send to the
poster.

ĸen
-- 
Tout est bien, tout va bien, tout va pour le mieux qu'il soit possible
   -- Candide, de Voltaire
   (Everything is for the best, in the best of all possible worlds)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[James Moe via gimp-user-list]

On 09/10/2018 06:28 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:

> I'm using nufraw-0.42 with 2.10.6
>   ./autogen.sh;
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-contrast;
>   make;
>   make install
> 
  Okay.

> As far as I can see, 0.42 was working with 2.8.22.
>
  Any idea how to use it with 2.8?

  There are no instructions at the nufraw docs (such as they are). Gimp
Help mentions using gimptool to install a plugin; except there is no
gimptool app in the repository. There is no "Image Import" option in the
2.8 Preferences.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[Helmut Jarausch via gimp-user-list]

On 09/12/2018 08:43:26 PM, James Moe via gimp-user-list wrote:

On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

> install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
  There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import  
anywhere.




Sorry, I didn't mention I'm running Gimp-2.10.7 (GIT) - it might be  
that the

Edit -> Preference menu looks different in older versions of Gimp.

Edit -> Preference has  the items

System Resources
Debugging
Color Management
Image Import & Export   <
Tool Options


Helmut
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw and GIMP

[James Moe via gimp-user-list]

On 09/11/2018 02:14 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

> install  nufraw (http://nufraw.sourceforge.net)
> and make it active with
> Edit -> Preferences -> Image Import & Export
>
  There is no "Image" option. And Help does not mention Import anywhere.

-- 
James Moe
moe dot james at sohnen-moe dot com
520.743.3936
Think.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

[Gary Aitken]

On 03/14/18 12:51, Rick Strong wrote:


If you are talking about photographs, altering the curve is not the
same as boosting the exposure.

Generally speaking, boosting the exposure makes the whole picture
brighter, while playing with the curve alters areas--shadows,
mid-range, highlights--of the photograph. But, you may play around
with one to end up with a result very similar to the other. This is
best done in raw.


I understand altering different parts of the curve affects different
aspects of the image, e.g. highlights vs midtones vs shadows.  What
I'm asking is if modifications to exposure and the base curve are applied
to the same thing at the same place in the pipeline.

For example, I am looking at an image where with 0 exposure and the
default linear (45 deg lower left to upper right) base curve,
the rightmost 3/8 of the histogram is empty.  It takes an increase in
exposure of about 1.33 to bring the curve to the far right.  I can
get what appears to be the same effect by grabbing the upper right
anchor of the line and dragging it left until it is about 3/8 of the
way from the vertical left axis, essentially just making the slope of
the line a lot steeper and leaving the origin at the lower left.

Are those equivalent operations, or are they doing something subtly
different in terms of what processing is done to the image?  They
appear to be equivalent.  But that may not be the case.  For
example, does boosting the exposure affect noise or bayer decoding
artifacts more than adjusting the curve?

Alterations to the base curve in ufraw are applied at one point in
the pipeline and alterations to the secondary curve (under "Correct
luminosity, saturation") tab are applied at a different point.
Changes to the secondary curve affect the image in a different
manner than the exposure and the base curve.

Thanks,

Gary

Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I 
figured a number of users here might be able to answer.  Please 
redirect me if this is inappropriate.


Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the base
curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure?  I'm wondering in terms of
where in the processing pipeline the change takes place. i.e. If I
could manipulate the base curve to make the image look exactly the
same (to my eye, I know it's not perfect) as boosting the exposure,
is there fundamentally a difference in the result?

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

[Rick Strong]

Hi Gary,

If you are talking about photographs, altering the curve is not the same as 
boosting the exposure.


Generally speaking, boosting the exposure makes the whole picture brighter, 
while playing with the curve alters areas--shadows, mid-range, 
highlights--of the photograph. But, you may play around with one to end up 
with a result very similar to the other. This is best done in raw.


Rick S.

-Original Message- 
From: Gary Aitken

Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 1:45 AM
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-user] ufraw -- exposure vs base curve

Hi Folks,

Not sure where to ask this as I couldn't find a ufraw forum, but I
figured a number of users here might be able to answer.  Please
redirect me if this is inappropriate.

Can anyone explain to me the difference between manipulating the
base curve in ufraw and boosting the exposure?  I'm wondering in
terms of where in the processing pipeline the change takes place.
i.e. If I could manipulate the base curve to make the image look
exactly the same (to my eye, I know it's not perfect) as boosting
the exposure, is there fundamentally a difference in the result?

Thanks,

Gary
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list 


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

[Partha Bagchi]

On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Maurizio Loreti 
wrote:

>
> > On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist  wrote:
> >
> > Pat—
> >
> > thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a
> hard nut
> > to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw
> in the
> > previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to  use.
>
> Hello -
> I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the
> post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by
> Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx .  This distribution comes with
> a pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled
> in this way.  However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and
> ufraw-batch.  Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and
> ufraw-batch from the source code; however this is not completely described
> in the ufraw documentation.  Here is what I did.
>
> For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free)
> and the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of
> places, Google will help.
>
> For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports
> projects:
>
>   +--+--+-+
>   |  | Package  | Version |
>   +--+--+-+
>   | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 |
>   | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25|
>   | JPEG | jpeg | 9b  |
>   | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2   |
>   | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7   |
>   | PNG  | libpng   | 1.6.28  |
>   | ZIP  | zip  | 3.00|
>   | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6   |
>   | LENSFUN  | lensfun  | 0.3.2   |
>   | CFITSIO  | cfitsio  | 3.390   |
>   | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4   |
>   +--+--+-+
>
> How to install them is described in the Macports home page,
> http://www.macports.org .
>
> The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++
> compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files
> linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so,
> if you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change
> the default compilers.  So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and
> installed ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands:
>
> tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz
> cd ufraw-0.22/
> CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \
> LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22
> make
> sudo make install
> sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch
> ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1
>
> Notes:
> - Macports include files are in /opt/local/include .
> - Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib .
> - I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory
> soft-linked to /opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will
>   come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in
> /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link.
> - The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications,
> where OS X expects to find user executables.
> - I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there
> ufraw.1, in order to have the output of "man ufraw".
>
> HTH
>
> --
> Maurizio Loreti  --  maurizio.lor...@gmail.com
>
>
> Or install my Mac builds McGimp which comes with a pre-compiled NUFRaw
which is the continuation of the UFRaw development. My build also comes
with G'MIC.

I don't think UFRaw is being maintained now. NUFRaw is currently at version
0.38.

I'd also recommend preprocessing with RawTherapee which I am also providing
either from my website or RT discussion site hosted by Pat.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

[Maurizio Loreti]

> On 30 Mar 2017, at 21:57, Chuanist  wrote:
> 
> Pat—
> 
> thanks for the suggestion. It makes me think that, indeed, Ufraw is a hard nut
> to crack. It's kind of too bad, because the bundled and installed Ufraw in the
> previous version of GIMP was very seamless and convenient to  use.

Hello -
I am a satisfied Mac user and an avid photographer; I use for the 
post-production of my pictures GIMP, namely the distribution (released by 
Simone Karin Lehmann) "GIMP on OS X", available under the URL 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx .  This distribution comes with a 
pre-compiled gimp-ufraw plugin; loading a RAW picture in GIMP is handled in 
this way.  However "GIMP on OS X" lacks a standalone ufraw and ufraw-batch.  
Needing for my RAW pictures ufraw-batch, I compiled ufraw and ufraw-batch from 
the source code; however this is not completely described in the ufraw 
documentation.  Here is what I did.

For the compiler, you need to install Xcode (from the Apple Store, free) and 
the Xcode command line tools; how to do that is described in a lot of places, 
Google will help.

For the libraries, I have installed the ones supplied by the Macports projects:

  +--+--+-+
  |  | Package  | Version |
  +--+--+-+
  | LCMS | lcms2| 2.8 |
  | EXIV2| exiv2| 0.25|
  | JPEG | jpeg | 9b  |
  | JPEG2000 | openjpeg | 2.1.2   |
  | TIFF | tiff | 4.0.7   |
  | PNG  | libpng   | 1.6.28  |
  | ZIP  | zip  | 3.00|
  | BZIP2| bzip2| 1.0.6   |
  | LENSFUN  | lensfun  | 0.3.2   |
  | CFITSIO  | cfitsio  | 3.390   |
  | GTKIMAGEVIEW | gtkimageview | 1.6.4   |
  +--+--+-+

How to install them is described in the Macports home page, 
http://www.macports.org .

The Macports libraries are compiled with clang and clang++ as C and C++ 
compilers; while clang and gcc are fully compatible, and their object files 
linkable together, clang++ and g++ use different name mangling schemes; so, if 
you want e.g. exiv2 support (exiv2 is a C++ package) you need to change the 
default compilers.  So, finally, I unpacked, configured, compiled and installed 
ufraw/ufraw-batch with the following commands:

tar xzf ufraw-0.22.tar.gz
cd ufraw-0.22/
CC=clang CXX=clang++ CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/local/include \
LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib \
./configure --prefix=/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22
make
sudo make install
sudo ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 /opt/local/share/ufraw
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw ~/Applications/ufraw
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/bin/ufraw-batch ~/Applications/ufraw-batch
ln -s /opt/local/share/ufraw/share/man/man1/ufraw.1 ~/man/man1/ufraw.1

Notes:
- Macports include files are in /opt/local/include .
- Macports libraries are in /opt/local/lib .
- I installed ufraw in /opt/local/share/ufraw-0.22 , a directory soft-linked to 
/opt/local/share/ufraw ; when a new release will
  come, say 0.xy, it will be enough to install it in 
/opt/local/share/ufraw-0.xy and, then, change the soft link.
- The executables ufraw and ufraw-batch are soft-linked to ~/Applications, 
where OS X expects to find user executables.
- I have created ~/man/... for personal man files, and linked there ufraw.1, in 
order to have the output of "man ufraw".

HTH

-- 
Maurizio Loreti  --  maurizio.lor...@gmail.com




___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] Ufraw Install on Mac?

[Pat David]

It may be easier (or make more sense) to use one of the newer raw
processing softwares available?  They are a little more actively developed
and will likely support newer cameras better.  There's:

darktable: https://www.darktable.org
RawTherapee: http://www.rawtherapee.com

Each of these will let you develop your raw files, and then export them for
further modification in GIMP if desired!

pat

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:26 PM Chuanist  wrote:

> Dear GIMP-ers—
>
> I am running GIMP 2.8.20 on a Mac with Mavericks (Mac OS 10.9.5).
>
> The previous version, 2.4, automatically included Ufraw and would open the
> .RW2
> files from my Panasonic Lumix camera. (I was really impressed that it did.)
>
> I now must install Ufraw for the newest GIMP, but for my life I cannot
> discover
> how to do it. I have downloaded Ufraw .22, unzipped it, and there it sits
> in its
> folder. It seems that all of the components are present, but when I put it
> in
> either plug-in's or modules folders, at the root level of GIMP or in the
> 2.8
> folder, the program does not open .RW2 files.
>
> Is there a set of instructions for installing Ufraw? I see several
> references to
> MacPorts and the command line, but have to say they don't give me the info
> needed to make Ufraw work.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Glen
>
> --
> Chuanist (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

-- 
https://patdavid.net
GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D  18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

[Patrick Shanahan]

* Alex Vergara Gil  [04-22-16 14:10]:
> UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems
> 
> Regards
> 
> 2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
> >
> > UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> > but this is normally an add-on.
> >
> > On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
> >> I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
> >> documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF
> >> (nikon)
> >> raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.
> >>
> >> any idea what I'm missing?
> >>
> >> tnx
> >>
> >
> > ___
> > gimp-user-list mailing list
> > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> > List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
> >
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

ufraw is not a gimp program, it was originally produced by Udi Fuchs.  If
you have found a problem with it, you should report it on sourceforge
where it is hosted.  You should find it, google..., and follow the
instruction for windows as provided.  It works on my wife's w10.  I have
to problem with it as I do not run *any* version of windows.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

[Alex Vergara Gil]

UFRaw is not currently working in any 64 bit windows systems

Regards

2016-04-19 8:08 GMT-04:00, Ofnuts :
>
> UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw,
> but this is normally an add-on.
>
> On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:
>> I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
>> documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF
>> (nikon)
>> raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.
>>
>> any idea what I'm missing?
>>
>> tnx
>>
>
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
>
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRAW - what am i missing?

[Ofnuts]

UFRaw is not preinstalled. Some builds (by Partha) may include UFRaw, 
but this is normally an add-on.


On 15/04/16 16:16, sjemmett wrote:

I've just upgraded from 2.8.14 to 2.8.16.  As i recall reading in the
documentation, 2.8.16 has ufraw preinstalled.  I've tried to edit a .NEF (nikon)
raw file with no joy.  I can edit the same .NEF file in 2.8.14.

any idea what I'm missing?

tnx



___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw

[Patrick Shanahan]

* Daniel Glueck  [04-10-16 15:07]:
> I want to load photos from my Canon.  They are already on the Mac in CR2 
> format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
> 
> How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download? How 
> do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the 
> program says ANYTHING about plug-ins.
> 
> I’m not one of you techno-weenies, I don’t want to “build”, or compile 
> anything. I just want to play with my photographs.

I would suggest you get darktable, there is a mac build.
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw

[Pat David]

Could you tell us exactly what the error says?

What happens if you go to file -> open, and choose one of the raw files,
but choose CR2 from the file type list?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM Daniel Glueck  wrote:

> I want to load photos from my Canon.  They are already on the Mac in CR2
> format. When I try to open one I get a bunch of errors about tiff’s. Huh?
>
> How to enable/load/whatever AFRAW. Is it really bundled with my download?
> How do I know this? What menu to go to? Nothing in Help or anything in the
> program says ANYTHING about plug-ins.
>
> I’m not one of you techno-weenies, I don’t want to “build”, or compile
> anything. I just want to play with my photographs.
>
>
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

-- 
Pat David
https://pixls.us
http://blog.patdavid.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Patrick Shanahan]

* Maurizio Loreti maurizio.lor...@gmail.com [07-10-14 04:37]:
 [...]
 I have problems with the lensfun corrections to my photo pictures; I
 am not sure if this is related to GIMP itself, or to the Mac port I am
 using.
 
 What happens is:
 
 if I open a Canon RAW image (a CR2 file), GIMP recalls the ufraw
 plugin window; in the third tab (Lens Correction), ufraw does not know
 my camera Canon 6D, nor my other camera Canon Powershot G15, nor my lens
 Canon 24-70 EF L II (note the II), nor other lenses I have.
 If I open a Canon JPG image, the plugin GIMP-Lensfun v0.2.3 (Filters -
 Enhance - GIMP-Lensfun, inserted I think in the distribution by skl)
 does not know the same cameras and objectives.
 
 The lensfun correction files are shipped by skl in the directory
 /Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resources/share/lensfun/ , and are named
 compact-canon.xml and slr-canon.xml.
 
 I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun
 distribution, now hosted on sourceforge; under the URL
 http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are
 three files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and
 mil-canon.xml.  Just copying the first two files, or all three, on my
 GIMP tree, makes GIMP choke on the format of these files - both for RAW
 images and for JPG images; probably the xml file format has changed with
 the time.
 
 QUESTION: how can I upgrade GIMP so that it will use modern and complete
 lensfun files?

You don't have to, just replace the compact-canon.xml and/or
slr-canon.xml files with the one that contains the information you need. 
Or just edit the current files adding the relevant information.  I use
darktable rather than gimp for raw processing and had to do that when I
upgraded my D200 to D7100.  And there is still missing lenses in the
lensfun database.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Maurizio Loreti]

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
wrote:

 You don't have to, just replace the compact-canon.xml and/or
 slr-canon.xml files with the one that contains the information you need.


*As I said*, replacing these files don't work; their xml format is
different.

If I replace the files, there will be no diagnostic in the terminal where I
start GIMP; but there will be NO Canon cameras and NO Canon objectives at
all available for ufraw into GIMP.

Copying the same new files in the ufraw tree makes ufraw barf with the
diagnostic /opt/local/share/lensfun/compact-canon.xml:22:61: Unknown
element html! and several others similar.  Yes, I could edit the
current files adding the relevant information, but if the lensfun file
format has changed this 1) requires actions from the ufraw and the GIMP
team; and 2) for me, merging the information from the new files into the
old ones, if they obey a different syntax, could be a nightmare.

-- 
(@_  |
//\  | Maurizio Loreti - Retired physicist, happy grandfather
V_/_ | of two grandsons, wanderer and amateur photographer...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Patrick Shanahan]

* Maurizio Loreti maurizio.lor...@gmail.com [07-10-14 09:32]:
 On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  You don't have to, just replace the compact-canon.xml and/or
  slr-canon.xml files with the one that contains the information you need.
 
 
 *As I said*, replacing these files don't work; their xml format is
 different.
 
 If I replace the files, there will be no diagnostic in the terminal where I
 start GIMP; but there will be NO Canon cameras and NO Canon objectives at
 all available for ufraw into GIMP.
 
 Copying the same new files in the ufraw tree makes ufraw barf with the
 diagnostic /opt/local/share/lensfun/compact-canon.xml:22:61: Unknown
 element html! and several others similar.  Yes, I could edit the
 current files adding the relevant information, but if the lensfun file
 format has changed this 1) requires actions from the ufraw and the GIMP
 team; and 2) for me, merging the information from the new files into the
 old ones, if they obey a different syntax, could be a nightmare.

err, xml = xml, but editing by hand should be no big thing.  

AND, the barf you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
there is no element html! in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no html appearing in
*any* xml file.

*As I said*
-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Maurizio Loreti]

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
wrote:

 AND, the barf you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
 there is no element html! in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
 grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no html appearing in
 *any* xml file.


About that you are right; I got the files using a wget
http://URL/slr-canon.xml; and wget got all the data of the code frame.  My
fault.

HOWEVER, downloading the files correctly, GIMP and ufraw both barf again;
the first line reads lensdatabase version=1 and is not accepted: the
old files begin with a plain lensdatabase.  See, when you say

 err, xml = xm

you are not right: the _format_ of the xml file has changed, indeed, as I
said.  But the change now is straightforward.

-- 
(@_  |
//\  | Maurizio Loreti - Fisico in pensione, nonno felice di
V_/_ | due nipotini, vagabondo e fotografo a tempo perso...
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Akkana Peck]

Maurizio Loreti writes:
 I have tried do download the last versions from the lensfun distribution, now 
 hosted on sourceforge; under the URL 
 http://sourceforge.net/p/lensfun/code/ci/master/tree/data/db/ there are three 
 files canon-related, named compact-canon.xml, slr-canon.xml and mil-canon.xml.

Patrick Shanahan writes:
 AND, the barf you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
 there is no element html! in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
 grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no html appearing in
 *any* xml file.

Could this be because of Sourceforge's charming habit of giving you
an HTML download page when you click on Download for a file, instead
of taking you straight to the file you asked for? I've downloaded
HTML files more than once, because I chose Save link as instead of
remembering that with sourceforge, you have to click, view the
download page and only then can you Save as. Always check files
after you download them to make sure you got the file you thought
you were getting.

...Akkana
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw/lensfun

[Patrick Shanahan]

* Maurizio Loreti maurizio.lor...@gmail.com [07-10-14 12:58]:
 On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  AND, the barf you see is because you have not copied xml files.  afaik,
  there is no element html! in any of the lensfun xml files.  I just
  grepped my entire lensfun install and there is no html appearing in
  *any* xml file.
 
 
 About that you are right; I got the files using a wget
 http://URL/slr-canon.xml; and wget got all the data of the code frame.  My
 fault.
 
 HOWEVER, downloading the files correctly, GIMP and ufraw both barf again;
 the first line reads lensdatabase version=1 and is not accepted: the
 old files begin with a plain lensdatabase.  See, when you say
 
  err, xml = xm
 
 you are not right: the _format_ of the xml file has changed, indeed, as I
 said.  But the change now is straightforward.

That is possible, but in this case I believe not.

Why don't you edit the version line and make it what you believe
gimp/ufraw desire and try again?  You do want it to work???

And a grep for version of my lensfun-data-0.2.8-9.1.noarch install
reveals nill.  I believe 2.8 is the latest from sf and 2.8-9.1 is the
latest on openSUSE which I run.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

[scl]

Hi,

without knowing more about the GIMP version, the operating system,
your camera model and and the UFRaw version you use it's hard to give
an advice.
At least the Ufraw GIMP plug-in is known to be troublesome mostly on
Windows, see http://registry.gimp.org/node/31 and
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;order=Last%20Changed;short_desc=ufraw;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr;classification=Other;product=GIMP

Kind regards,

Sven


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

[Liam R E Quin]

On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
 I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to open...Please
 help :(

Is this on the Mac? on Linux? (which distribution exactly?) on Microsoft
Windows (which version? XP? 7?) Which version of gimp exactly? Where did
you get it?

How did you install ufraw? How did you install gimp?

Your gimp crashes when you attempt to open what exactly? A raw image? Or
when you try to start gimp? Are there any messages if you run gimp from
a terminal?

What happened when you uninstalled ufraw?

There are literally tens of thousands of possible reasons why you might
be having problems, so rather than list them all we need some help in
narrowing down and reducing the range of possibilities.

Best,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] ufraw causing gimp to crash

[Partha Bagchi]

Or get my build (Windows or Mac). UFRaw is integrated into it.

Hope this helps.
Partha



On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:

 On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 17:51 +0100, EGoldman wrote:
  I have installed Ufraw and now my gimp crashes when I attempt to
 open...Please
  help :(

 Is this on the Mac? on Linux? (which distribution exactly?) on Microsoft
 Windows (which version? XP? 7?) Which version of gimp exactly? Where did
 you get it?

 How did you install ufraw? How did you install gimp?

 Your gimp crashes when you attempt to open what exactly? A raw image? Or
 when you try to start gimp? Are there any messages if you run gimp from
 a terminal?

 What happened when you uninstalled ufraw?

 There are literally tens of thousands of possible reasons why you might
 be having problems, so rather than list them all we need some help in
 narrowing down and reducing the range of possibilities.

 Best,

 Liam

 --
 Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
 Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
 Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

 ___
 gimp-user-list mailing list
 List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
 List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
 List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

[Boris Kukushkin]

Maybe I'll seem a bit stupid as I'm not sure whether I got it right, but as far 
as I understand, the advice was to copy the images to your hard drive instead 
of trying to process them right on the card (or in your camera). Just create a 
folder and copy via right-click menu, or select the files and hit Ctrl+C (this 
is a global hot-key for copying), change to the folder on your HDD where you 
want the files and hit Ctrl+V, or open two explorer windows next to each other 
and drag-n-drop. Try to open the files and see if the problem is still there. 

If this really fixes the problem, then it might be a good idea to try and 
replace the card -- it can be faulty. 

Hope that this will help and sorry if I told some obvious things.

Good luck!
Boris

On 30 ноября 2012 09:05:16 Ebizjoey wrote:
 Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
 before working on them.
 
 You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
 camera connections somtimes.
 
 Liam
 
 
 Thanks Liam, how would one do that? I see the card in computer (vista) but 
 if
 I hit copy off a right click nothing happens, if you have time please advice
 (older and new to computers) and let me thank you now as it is late here in
 Cleveland OH and I am going to get some sleep now - so thank you much.
 

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw cutting file

[Liam R E Quin]

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 07:47 +0100, Ebizjoey wrote:
 [...] it is intermittent, like yesterday it was doing it and
 today it is not, same files.

Copy files off a memory card or out of your camera onto your computer
before working on them.

You may find that helps. I've seen problems with slow cards or faulty
camera connections somtimes.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

[Bettina]

of course I was searching. but I couldn't find any entry
with that problem.
but anyway, thank you for your hint.


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
Organisation: Ptilopteri in Pandemonium
Datum: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:10:46 -0400
An: gimp-users gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Betreff: Re: [Gimp-user] UFRaw

* Bettina li...@newhouse.at [03-14-12 05:09]:
 I know, it's an ufraw-problem, but maybe anyone despite that can help:
 
 since I installed gimp 2.7.x I can't open raw-files anymore.
 windows 7
 
 Error message:
 The program can't start because libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dell is missing.
 Reinstall ufraw to solve the problem
 
 I reinstalled without success.

I have seen several posts related to your condition recently.  A search of
the recent archives will provide you a solution.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
http://en.opensuse.org   openSUSE Community Member
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list


___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list