Re: STP and Time Change

2011-11-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:17:43 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am 
(12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by 
this application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.
 
Did you survive?  How?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-11-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
 
 If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am
(12:59)
 and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by this
application.  The
 application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.
 
 Did you survive?  How?


We shut down the LPARs for one hour.  That way there was not a risk to the
production applications.

2 of our LPARs we allowed the STP to adjust the time and it worked fine.
And the system and Vendor applications had not problem with the STP did it.

IEA392I STP TIME OFFSET CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED.


So now all we have to tackle is the applications that may still be using
Local Time.


Lizette

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-11-06 Thread Ed Gould
 Gil,

At one place I worked we had a similar situation. The application was an online 
system. I was not involved with it other than we Were told that the application 
was written such that it would not tollerate the hour shift so every spring and 
fall the system would shut down for 1 hour. The systems staff had to baby sit 
the procedure. It was politics.
Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-11-01 Thread Hal Merritt
First, I'm a little confused. You guys never changed your clock in the past? If 
so, than how/why would NTP make a difference? 

Second, if the application is intolerant to the time change, then, well, it is 
intolerant. It's not so much that it will see 1 am twice, but it will also see 
1:01, 1:02, etc etc.  I don't see any option but for the application to be down 
for the full hour plus one minute (depending on the granularity used by the 
application).   

If local politics state that the LPAR must also be down, well, I guess then the 
LPAR has be down. Silly, but politics are well known for being silly at times. 
Maybe other users impacted by the full outage could bring some pressure on 
management for some changes. 

  


 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: STP and Time Change

We just implmeneted (it is only a couple of days old) the STP on our z10s.

We have an application dependent on LOCAL time.  So when the clock changes on 
Nov 6, we think this application will see 1am twice and have problems.

So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will adjust the 
mainframe at 2am to 1am?  In which case my bad application will see the 1am 
hour again.

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am 
(12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by this 
application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.

Anybody have any other thoughts or comments?

Thanks

Lizette
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, 
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or 
distribution 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-31 Thread Tom Marchant
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:57:33 -0700, Scott Ford wrote:

Yep, I know that I have never heard of STP, I dont use STP on z/OS , 
no real need. I have used the NTPD on various Unix platforms.

STP is Server Time Protocol.  It replaced the function of the 9037 
Sysplex Timer, and IIRC it became available on the z9.  There is a real 
need if you are running a parallel sysplex.  STP use SNTP to synchronize 
to an NTP server, but AFAIK, NTP does not provide sufficient resolution 
to synchronize the TOD clocks in a parallel sysplex.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-31 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:17:43 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:

We have an application dependent on LOCAL time.  So when 
the clock changes on Nov 6, we think this application will see 
1am twice and have problems.

If the application uses local time and will have problems during 
the second hour between 1:00 and 2:00, you will have to shut 
the application down for an hour.

So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will 
adjust the mainframe at 2am to 1am?  In which case my bad 
application will see the 1am hour again.

Yes, unless you schedule it to occur at another time, which 
might cause other problems.

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the 
LPARs at 1am (12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so 
that 1am is only seen once by this application.  The application 
itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.

If the only way you can shut down the badly behaving application 
is to shut down the LPARs and IPL, then I guess that is what you 
have to do, as silly as it sounds to me.

It does not have to be shut down at 1 AM.  Any time between 1 AM 
and 2 AM will do.  You could shut down the application at 1:30 and 
bring it back up an hour later at 1:30.

-- 
Tom Marchant

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-31 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:17:00 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:17:43 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the
LPARs at 1am (12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so
that 1am is only seen once by this application.  The application
itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.

If the only way you can shut down the badly behaving application
is to shut down the LPARs and IPL, then I guess that is what you
have to do, as silly as it sounds to me.
 
I can imagine an operating rule that deems that application so
critical that it can be shut down only when it is necessary to shut
down the LPARs for service, as silly as it sounds to me.  I suppose
this might even be enforced by autoops.

Security rule?  SLA?

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-31 Thread Mike Schwab
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:

 I can imagine an operating rule that deems that application so
 critical that it can be shut down only when it is necessary to shut
 down the LPARs for service, as silly as it sounds to me.  I suppose
 this might even be enforced by autoops.

 Security rule?  SLA?

 -- gil

If an application cannot afford the 1 hour downtime a year for the
Daylight Savings Time to change to Standard Time (Summer Time to
Winter Time), then the application needs to be written to handle this
overlap.

I. E., rename VSAM ESDS log dataset and start a new dataset at the
time change, etc, or run on Standard time year round, or run on GMT
year round.
-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-31 Thread Gerhard Postpischil

On 10/31/2011 8:17 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:

If the application uses local time and will have problems during
the second hour between 1:00 and 2:00, you will have to shut
the application down for an hour.


Unless the time requests are used for interval calculations, it 
should be possible to install a hook into the time processing, 
similar to what was popular prior to the Y2K debacle, to return 
a fake time (at 1 a.m. daylight time the intercept would return 
1 a.m., at 1:10 say 1:05, and at 2 a.m. normal time it would be 
synchronized again). If the application is mission critical, 
that might be preferable to a one hour shut down.


Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, VT

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-30 Thread Scott Ford
Yep, I know that I have never heard of STP, I dont use STP on z/OS , no real 
need.
I have used the NTPD on various Unix platforms.

Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
 



From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: STP and Time Change

In 1319835343.11223.yahoomail...@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com, on
10/28/2011
   at 01:55 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:

Your talking about NTP ...the daemon on Unix that provides the
correct time from Atomic clock sites ?

NTP is a protocol. I believe that the daemon is ntpd.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-29 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 1319835343.11223.yahoomail...@web65510.mail.ac4.yahoo.com, on
10/28/2011
   at 01:55 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:

Your talking about NTP ...the daemon on Unix that provides the
correct time from Atomic clock sites ?

NTP is a protocol. I believe that the daemon is ntpd.
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-28 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:17:43 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote:

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am 
(12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by 
this application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.
 
I'm considerably mystified how the application expects to continue running
while the LPARs are shut down.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-28 Thread Scott Ford
Lizette:
 
Your talking about NTP ...the daemon on Unix that provides the correct time 
from Atomic clock sites ?
If so, did you all write the app or is it some else's app?

Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com
 



From: Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 4:17 PM
Subject: STP and Time Change

We just implmeneted (it is only a couple of days old) the STP on our z10s.

We have an application dependent on LOCAL time.  So when the clock changes on 
Nov 6, we think this application will see 1am twice and have problems.

So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will adjust the 
mainframe at 2am to 1am?  In which case my bad application will see the 1am 
hour again.

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am 
(12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by this 
application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.

Anybody have any other thoughts or comments?

Thanks

Lizette
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-28 Thread Field, Alan C.
Lizette,

I'm curious how this was handled in the pre-STP days? 

Surely the same issue applied that in November the time appears to go
backward for an hour and the application had to do something.

Alan 

  

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 15:18 
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: STP and Time Change

We just implmeneted (it is only a couple of days old) the STP on our
z10s.

We have an application dependent on LOCAL time.  So when the clock
changes on Nov 6, we think this application will see 1am twice and have
problems.

So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will adjust
the mainframe at 2am to 1am?  In which case my bad application will see
the 1am hour again.

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at
1am (12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen
once by this application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1
hour. POLITICS.

Anybody have any other thoughts or comments?

Thanks

Lizette
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-28 Thread Neubert, Kevin
Regarding the time change behavior (automatic, immediate, scheduled, etc.) 
you’ll need to take a look at your equivalent of Defined CPCs  System 
(Sysplex) Time  Adjust Time Zone at the HMC.

Regards,

Kevin

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of 
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: STP and Time Change

We just implmeneted (it is only a couple of days old) the STP on our z10s.

We have an application dependent on LOCAL time.  So when the clock changes on 
Nov 6, we think this application will see 1am twice and have problems.

So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will adjust the 
mainframe at 2am to 1am?  In which case my bad application will see the 1am 
hour again.

If so, then I think our only option would be to shutdown the LPARs at 1am 
(12:59) and then when it is the time, IPL so that 1am is only seen once by this 
application.  The application itself cannot be down for 1 hour. POLITICS.

Anybody have any other thoughts or comments?

Thanks

Lizette
  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: STP and Time Change

2011-10-28 Thread George Kozakos
So, is this correct, that if we do not use an IPL the STP will adjust the
mainframe at 2am to 1am?
In which case my bad application will see the 1am hour again.

The DST change will happen at 2am if you select Automatically adjust on
the
Adjust Time Zone Offset panel (Timing Network - Adjust Time Zone button).
You could schedule the DST change to occur at a different time by selecting
Set daylight saving time and Schedule change on. The bottom section of
the Adjust Time Zone Offset panel will reflect when the DST change will
occur.

Regards,
George Kozakos
z/OS Software Service, Level 2 Supervisor

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html