Re: Replacing HSM exits

2012-12-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
Are you doing this in TSO like HRECALL type commands or is it through the F
HSM,RECALL type commands?

Maybe if you are testing under TSO you need to add a STEPLIB to your LOGON
PROC?  That is just a guess.

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
 Of Miklos Szigetvari
 Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:54 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Replacing HSM exits
 
 In the DFSMS exits book, there is a sentence:
 Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST
concatenation
 (job or step libraries).
 , but seems to me STEPLIB  is ignored somehow.
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Replacing HSM exits

2012-12-12 Thread Miklos Szigetvari

Hi

This are the standard HSM exits as (ARCMMEXT, ARCMDEXT ARCRDEXT) they 
are called by the HSM address space,
Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored,  and the DFSMS exits 
book have a mysterious sentence:


Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST

concatenation (job or step libraries).


P.S:
Where are you Lizette ?

On 12.12.2012 11:16, Lizette Koehler wrote:

Are you doing this in TSO like HRECALL type commands or is it through the F
HSM,RECALL type commands?

Maybe if you are testing under TSO you need to add a STEPLIB to your LOGON
PROC?  That is just a guess.

Lizette



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On

Behalf

Of Miklos Szigetvari
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Replacing HSM exits

In the DFSMS exits book, there is a sentence:
Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST

concatenation

(job or step libraries).
, but seems to me STEPLIB  is ignored somehow.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

to

lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread ibmmain
I managed to break it. :-(

Whenever someone tries to ftp into our 1.13 adcd system, we get (after typing 
in the password):

ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED. 
BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON) 
PROCESSING. 
CSV042I REQUESTED MODULE DFSMRCL0 NOT ACCESSED. THE MODULE IS NOT   
PROGRAM CONTROLLED  
CSV028I ABEND306-42  JOBNAME=FTPD2 STEPNAME=*OMVSEX 

I took a dump, and yes, there is an entry for DFSMRCL0 (IMS task/asid 
termination resource manager?, installed via usermod into ieavtrml) in the JPA. 
Never mind that IMS is NOT running. Apparently this module resides in 
IM1110.sdreslib, which is neither in LPA nor in linklist, so I don't see that 
the system can even access it. No, it isn't program controled.

FTPD*.* should be assigned userid omvsus2 via class  started, but I don't see 
any IRR812 message telling me so, so I guess that profile isn't even used.
OMVSUS2 has alter to BPX.DAEMON in class FACILITY (as does my own userid that I 
use for ftp).
These libraries are covered under the * profile in class PROGRAM:
PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN2   
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALOAD 
PROGRAM  SYS1.SIEALNKE  
PROGRAM  SYS1.CSSLIB
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALPA  
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALINK 
PROGRAM  SYS1.LINKLIB   
PROGRAM  CBC.SCLBDLL
PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN
PROGRAM  SYS1.SCEERUN   

I tested changing the bpx.daemon profile (facility) to warning, same result.

What do I need to define to allow ftp login? Or to turn off program control, if 
that is even possible, so I can migrate to 1.13 as scheduled? At his point, I 
am afraid to IPL the system, for fear of not coming back up.

Help

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Replacing HSM exits

2012-12-12 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:

Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored,  and the DFSMS exits book 
have a mysterious sentence:

Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST 
concatenation (job or step libraries).

Not mysterious. It is WAD.

Did you do ALL these steps?:

SETSYS EXITOFF, do above link-edit step (and as AC(1)), F LLA,REFRESH and then 
SETSYS EXITON

Did you also considered the other special considerations for these exits?

Otherwise, please show IBM-MAIN your link-edit attempts and any DFHSM 
message(s).

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Replacing HSM exits

2012-12-12 Thread Miklos Szigetvari

Hi

I tried all I think, the intention would be to take from STEPLIB, but 
EXITOFF EXITON has no effect, it takes from the LNKLST



On 12.12.2012 12:10, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:

Miklos Szigetvari wrote:


Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored,  and the DFSMS exits book 
have a mysterious sentence:
Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST 
concatenation (job or step libraries).

Not mysterious. It is WAD.

Did you do ALL these steps?:

SETSYS EXITOFF, do above link-edit step (and as AC(1)), F LLA,REFRESH and then 
SETSYS EXITON

Did you also considered the other special considerations for these exits?

Otherwise, please show IBM-MAIN your link-edit attempts and any DFHSM 
message(s).

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AW: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread Uwe Oswald
What happens if you define DFSMRCL0 as program controlled although it is not 
loadable at all? I had the same problem in another ADCD system from a 
customer and solved this issue with a RACF definition as far as I can remember.

Gruß
Uwe

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] Im Auftrag 
von ibmmain
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2012 12:01
An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Betreff: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

I managed to break it. :-(

Whenever someone tries to ftp into our 1.13 adcd system, we get (after typing 
in the password):

ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED. 
BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON) 
PROCESSING. 
CSV042I REQUESTED MODULE DFSMRCL0 NOT ACCESSED. THE MODULE IS NOT   
PROGRAM CONTROLLED  
CSV028I ABEND306-42  JOBNAME=FTPD2 STEPNAME=*OMVSEX 

I took a dump, and yes, there is an entry for DFSMRCL0 (IMS task/asid 
termination resource manager?, installed via usermod into ieavtrml) in the JPA. 
Never mind that IMS is NOT running. Apparently this module resides in 
IM1110.sdreslib, which is neither in LPA nor in linklist, so I don't see that 
the system can even access it. No, it isn't program controled.

FTPD*.* should be assigned userid omvsus2 via class  started, but I don't see 
any IRR812 message telling me so, so I guess that profile isn't even used.
OMVSUS2 has alter to BPX.DAEMON in class FACILITY (as does my own userid that I 
use for ftp).
These libraries are covered under the * profile in class PROGRAM:
PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN2   
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALOAD
PROGRAM  SYS1.SIEALNKE  
PROGRAM  SYS1.CSSLIB
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALPA
PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALINK 
PROGRAM  SYS1.LINKLIB   
PROGRAM  CBC.SCLBDLL
PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN
PROGRAM  SYS1.SCEERUN   

I tested changing the bpx.daemon profile (facility) to warning, same result.

What do I need to define to allow ftp login? Or to turn off program control, if 
that is even possible, so I can migrate to 1.13 as scheduled? At his point, I 
am afraid to IPL the system, for fear of not coming back up.

Help

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Parked Processors

2012-12-12 Thread Evren O Baran
Gadi, planning considerations for HiperDispatch mode white paper is a good 
start... www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP101229

Oz 

Evren Ozan Baran
IBM LCST/e zPET Base Team Leader

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Parked Processors

2012-12-12 Thread van der Grijn, Bart (B)
Note that IBM suggests there are circumstances where you should consider 
disabling it: 
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD105930

Bart

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Peter Relson
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Parked Processors

...

But don't turn off hiperdispatch unless you have a real reason too -- such 
as you don't like to get as much work done as you could.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread ibmmain
And now I have managed to make it work again: I deleted the BPX.DAEMON profile, 
which makes the need for a program controlled environment go away. I think. Did 
I mention that I hate USS?

Now, if anyone has any insight what I missed defining while still having the 
bpx.daemon profile - I would very much appreciate that insight. At least now I 
can migrate. And yes, I know that this means less security than with the 
BPX.DAEMON profile. I am pretty sure that it is something completely unrelated 
that made things break.

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread McKown, John
What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0? We don't have IMS, so I don't know. But 
you basically do:

RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)

Pretty much any time you see that message, find the load library containing the 
module (usually on the LNKLST), and do the above. Or simply do the above on 
every DSN in the LNKLST.

I usually use ** instead of *, but six-of-one on that, IMO.

If you want to be really strict, then do:

RALTER PROGRAM DFSMRCL0 ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)

to only program control DFSMRCL0 and nothing else in ims-loadlib. Personally, 
I rarely bother since all these libraries are under RACF control so only 
sysprogs can update them.

-- 
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of ibmmain
 Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:01 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: I broke it - programcontrolled programs
 
 I managed to break it. :-(
 
 Whenever someone tries to ftp into our 1.13 adcd system, we get (after
 typing in the password):
 
 ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED.
 BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON)
 PROCESSING.
 CSV042I REQUESTED MODULE DFSMRCL0 NOT ACCESSED. THE MODULE IS NOT
 PROGRAM CONTROLLED
 CSV028I ABEND306-42  JOBNAME=FTPD2 STEPNAME=*OMVSEX
 
 I took a dump, and yes, there is an entry for DFSMRCL0 (IMS task/asid
 termination resource manager?, installed via usermod into ieavtrml) in
 the JPA. Never mind that IMS is NOT running. Apparently this module
 resides in IM1110.sdreslib, which is neither in LPA nor in linklist, so
 I don't see that the system can even access it. No, it isn't program
 controled.
 
 FTPD*.* should be assigned userid omvsus2 via class  started, but I
 don't see any IRR812 message telling me so, so I guess that profile
 isn't even used.
 OMVSUS2 has alter to BPX.DAEMON in class FACILITY (as does my own
 userid that I use for ftp).
 These libraries are covered under the * profile in class PROGRAM:
 PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN2
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALOAD
 PROGRAM  SYS1.SIEALNKE
 PROGRAM  SYS1.CSSLIB
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALPA
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALINK
 PROGRAM  SYS1.LINKLIB
 PROGRAM  CBC.SCLBDLL
 PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN
 PROGRAM  SYS1.SCEERUN
 
 I tested changing the bpx.daemon profile (facility) to warning, same
 result.
 
 What do I need to define to allow ftp login? Or to turn off program
 control, if that is even possible, so I can migrate to 1.13 as
 scheduled? At his point, I am afraid to IPL the system, for fear of not
 coming back up.
 
 Help
 
 Barbara
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
 What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.

 RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library is not 
anywhere in LPA or linklist. As far as I can see, the usermod that puts it into 
ieavtrml does not name a library where it should be loaded from. 

Unfortunately, I had not tested ftp before doing my RACF cleanup. All I can say 
is that on a vanilla ADCD RACF database ftp works (for other customers). But 
that vanilla RACF database has only a very passing resemblance to mine after 
cleanup. I am trying to find the definition that broke it, and I assume that it 
doesn't have anything to do with that module.

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
Barbara,

What version of IMS are you running?  AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
Version 9 or later.

Second, this might be better posted on the RACF or IMS Newsgroups.

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
 Of ibmmain
 Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 4:01 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: I broke it - programcontrolled programs
 
 I managed to break it. :-(
 
 Whenever someone tries to ftp into our 1.13 adcd system, we get (after
typing in the
 password):
 
 ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED.
 BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON)
 PROCESSING.
 CSV042I REQUESTED MODULE DFSMRCL0 NOT ACCESSED. THE MODULE IS NOT
 PROGRAM CONTROLLED
 CSV028I ABEND306-42  JOBNAME=FTPD2 STEPNAME=*OMVSEX
 
 I took a dump, and yes, there is an entry for DFSMRCL0 (IMS task/asid
termination
 resource manager?, installed via usermod into ieavtrml) in the JPA. Never
mind that
 IMS is NOT running. Apparently this module resides in IM1110.sdreslib,
which is neither
 in LPA nor in linklist, so I don't see that the system can even access it.
No, it isn't
 program controled.
 
 FTPD*.* should be assigned userid omvsus2 via class  started, but I don't
see any
 IRR812 message telling me so, so I guess that profile isn't even used.
 OMVSUS2 has alter to BPX.DAEMON in class FACILITY (as does my own userid
that I
 use for ftp).
 These libraries are covered under the * profile in class PROGRAM:
 PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN2
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALOAD
 PROGRAM  SYS1.SIEALNKE
 PROGRAM  SYS1.CSSLIB
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALPA
 PROGRAM  TCPIP.SEZALINK
 PROGRAM  SYS1.LINKLIB
 PROGRAM  CBC.SCLBDLL
 PROGRAM  CEE.SCEERUN
 PROGRAM  SYS1.SCEERUN
 
 I tested changing the bpx.daemon profile (facility) to warning, same
result.
 
 What do I need to define to allow ftp login? Or to turn off program
control, if that is
 even possible, so I can migrate to 1.13 as scheduled? At his point, I am
afraid to IPL
 the system, for fear of not coming back up.
 
 Help
 
 Barbara
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to
 lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread McKown, John
Ah, you don't refresh the PROGRAM class by doing a refresh of the PROGRAM 
class. You do it with

SETROPTS WHEN(PROGRAM) REFRESH

What? You wanted consistency?

Everything must be loaded from a library. If none is specified, then it is 
implicitly on the LNKLST or in the LPALST. If it is in the LNKLST, then program 
management still knows the name of the DSN from which it was loaded and uses it 
in its RACF check. At least, as I understand it. I am always capable of error.

-- 
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
 On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
 Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:26 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs
 
  What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
 IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.
 
  RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
 I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library
 is not anywhere in LPA or linklist. As far as I can see, the usermod
 that puts it into ieavtrml does not name a library where it should be
 loaded from.
 
 Unfortunately, I had not tested ftp before doing my RACF cleanup. All I
 can say is that on a vanilla ADCD RACF database ftp works (for other
 customers). But that vanilla RACF database has only a very passing
 resemblance to mine after cleanup. I am trying to find the definition
 that broke it, and I assume that it doesn't have anything to do with
 that module.
 
 Barbara
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
 email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:26:08 +0100, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:

 What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.

 RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library is not 
anywhere in LPA or linklist. As far as I can see, the usermod that puts it 
into ieavtrml does not name a library where it should be loaded from.


Hi Barbara,

That makes no sense.  Try using ISRDDN to see if it is somewhere you
don't expect it. If it is in the table and doesn't exist in LPA/LNKLST you 
would be seeing
some nasty abends. BTW, Mr. Clean hasn't been required to be defined
in IEAVTRML  since IMS V9 since it uses RESMGR.However,  you still need it 
or you will orphan CSA (it is just loaded dynamically now).  If you
still have BNJMTERM (Netview) in there that can be removed 
also (since OS/390 1.2) 


Unfortunately, I had not tested ftp before doing my RACF cleanup. All I can 
say is that on a vanilla ADCD RACF database ftp works (for other customers). 
But that vanilla RACF database has only a very passing resemblance to mine 
after cleanup. I am trying to find the definition that broke it, and I assume 
that it doesn't have anything to do with that module.



Besides fixing up pads, here are some of the permissions on my system 
to BPX.DAEMON I see that should apply to your system when you try to add
it back, there are others here that wouldn't apply to a generic system. 

USER  ACCESS
  --
FTP   READ  
IMWEBSRV  READ  
OMVSKERN  READ  
REXEC READ  
RSHD  READ  
OREXECD   READ  
BPXOINIT  READ  
LDAPSRV   READ  
stc_grpREAD  (this is a group that all STCs are connected to)


Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS   
mailto:m...@mzelden.com
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread nitz-...@gmx.net
Lizette,

 What version of IMS are you running?  AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
 Version 9 or later.
Well, then someone should have told that to the people who deliver the ADCD 
system. We are NOT running any IMS version, and that module name most probably 
comes from IEAVTRML, that the ADCD deliverer put a usermod on naming this as a 
resource manager.

 Second, this might be better posted on the RACF or IMS Newsgroups.
No. Most probably it should be posted to a USS newsgroup. The BPX.DAEMON class 
is best understood by the USS people. And the definitions listed in the IP 
config guide were either there or not necessary at all (because the classes 
aren't active), according to the book(s).

Barbara

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Common Data Space Basics

2012-12-12 Thread Donald Likens
I am sorry but I just don't understand why the Extended Addressability Guide 
does not discuss the usage of IARST64. This looks to be what I want to use but 
do I need to issue IARV64 first to get the memory object or the IARV64 
SHAREMEMOBJ to access these cells from other address spaces?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Common Data Space Basics

2012-12-12 Thread John Gilmore
Read the prologue, the comments prefixed to the IARST64 macro
definition itself.  Doing so will, I suspect, answer most or all of
your questions.

Try to get into the habit of reading these prologues.   They treat
topics in a more advanced fashion and they assume more
knowledgeability than do some of the manuals, which are preoccupied
with brevity; but they are more current and reliable.

I should guess---an outsider can never be sure---that there is now
more internal IBM attention being given to keeping them comprehensive
and current than there once was.

John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread Tim Brown
What ICKDSF command can overwrite an entire volume. We want to make sure that
disks that are being replaced are wiped.

Thanks,

Tim Brown
Supervisor Computer Operations
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.commailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended 
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and 
deleting all copies and attachments.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
The following is suitable for a 3390 MOD-3.

TRKFMT UNIT(10FF) VFY(OL10FF) ERASE CYL(11,3339) CYCLES(1)

-Original Message-
From: Tim Brown [mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: dsf to write over entire volume

What ICKDSF command can overwrite an entire volume. We want to make sure that 
disks that are being replaced are wiped.

Thanks,

Tim Brown
Supervisor Computer Operations
Central Hudson Gas  Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.commailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255


This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended 
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and 
deleting all copies and attachments.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS 1.13 Coexistence Maint. and PDISC (Was: ... and DLSW)

2012-12-12 Thread Meehan, Cheryl
APAR OA32369 fixed our issue, and we were able to apply our co-existence 
maintenance.  

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Meehan, Cheryl
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.13 Coexistence Maint. and PDISC (Was: ... and DLSW)

Chris-

Thank you for sending your response.  We should be in a position tomorrow 
evening to test to see if this APAR fixes our issue.  I'll post when we have 
completed testing.

Cheryl

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Chris Mason
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 3:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.13 Coexistence Maint. and PDISC (Was: ... and DLSW)

Cheryl

 Has anyone else seen this problem?

Yes - based on my having found two APAR documents which fit your description - 
once it has been degaussed!

1. OA32797: ACTPU FOR SWITCHED PU REMAINS IN PDISC STATE, FAILS TO ACTIVATE 
WITH IST380I ACTPU REQUEST ERROR MESSAGE AND SENSE 0801

2. OA32369: ACTPU FOR SWITCHED PU REMAINS IN PDISC STATE, FAILS TO ACTIVATE 
WITH IST380I ACTPU REQUEST ERROR MESSAGE AND SENSE 0801

Without checking in detail, these two look identical except for the APAR 
numbers!

How did I find these APAR documents? Well, I used the following tokens in the 
IBM web site main page search function:

APAR PDISC VTAM

This produced HIPER Fix List for VTAM in the z/OS Communications Server which 
listed the two APARs. QED!

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21316934

I guess you should examine the maintenance package and take the matter up with 
your IBM support.

Incidentally, the fact that backing off the maintenance package restored the 
configuration back to a working status helped in knowing to check for possible 
APARs, don't you think?

-

Why did your post need degaussing?

The primary reason is that you did not assign one of your local VTAM 
specialists to present the problem. From the way you presented the problem it 
is clear you are not such a specialist. For example, you set great store by the 
fact that your distributed SNA nodes are supported by DLSw - which is 
irrelevant.[1] I expect you would have insisted on DLSw being one of your 
search tokens - and this does not yield any actual APARs.

-

 The DLSW Controllers are at various locations across the country.

There is no such thing as a DLSw controller. I imagine what you really mean - 
but have got into the habit as describing as these fictitious DLSw 
controllers between you and your colleagues in your installation - are SNA 
controllers, workstations of some sort, more precisely implemented as SNA 
type 2.1 nodes[2].

 They the SNA Controllers connect using DLSW Peering over a Cisco Network to 
 one of our OSA3 assumed OSA-Express3 features using Ethernet 
 adapters[3] at our Data Center.

The above is an improved description.

 When the coexistence maintenance was put on the system, ALL SNA controllers 
 came up with a PDISC status, and the controllers failed to connect with an 
 0801 sense code.

One small change might have permitted you to find APARs describing the problem.

Incidentally, I'm guessing that the coexistence maintenance introduced the 
problem as maybe a faulty APAR not - as far I could see - admitted in the text 
of the APARs I found.

 I displayed the Subchannel address for the Switched major node, ...

A switched major node does not have a subchannel address!

Here's the sample output from the z/OS Communications Server SNA Operations 
manual:

quote

 d net,id=a04smnc,scope=all
 IST097I DISPLAY ACCEPTED
 IST075I NAME = A04SMNC, TYPE = SW SNA MAJ NODE
 IST486I STATUS= ACTIV , DESIRED STATE= ACTIV
 IST1656I VTAMTOPO = REPORT, NODE REPORTED - YES
 IST084I NETWORK NODES:
 IST089I A04P882  TYPE = PU_T2, ACTIV--L--
 IST089I A04P883  TYPE = PU_T2, ACTIV--L--
 IST089I A04D8831 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST089I A04D8832 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST089I A04D8833 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACT/S
 IST089I A04D8834 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST089I A04D8835 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST089I A04D8836 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACT/S
 IST089I A04D8837 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACT/S
 IST089I A04P885  TYPE = PU_T2, ACTIV--L--
 IST089I A04P886  TYPE = PU_T2, ACTIV--L--
 IST089I A04D8861 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACT/S
 IST089I A04D8862 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACT/S
 IST089I A04D8863 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST089I A04D8864 TYPE = LOGICAL UNIT , ACTIV
 IST314I END

/quote

I expect you mean the XCA major node. Note that an XCA major node is a bit 
special in that it is permitted to contain only one PORT statement. Other major 
nodes tend not to be sensitive to how many of the only or top 

Re: SMP/E Panels and Mixed Case

2012-12-12 Thread Skip Robinson
I would expect this problem to be APARable. Open an SR. 
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com



From:   Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU, 
Date:   12/11/2012 11:09 PM
Subject:SMP/E Panels and Mixed Case
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU



(Does this belong in ISPF-L or IBM-MAIN?)

I have some CSECTS with mixed case names, so declared
in ++ MOD CSECT() parameters.  I notice that in the ISPF SMP/E
panels their names are converted to UPPER CASE.  I'm trying
to track down a problem where RESTORE is not generating
REPLACE statements for such CSECTs.  Such behavior adds to
the confusion.  I'll next try a batch listing to see what it tells me.

But needlessly modifying data in such manner is a disservice to
the customer; the days of upper-case only output devices are
deservedly past.

-- gil



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SMP/E Panels and Mixed Case

2012-12-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:14:14 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:

I would expect this problem to be APARable. Open an SR.
.
Thanks for your concurrence.  But SMP/E nowadays is extremely
permissive about what characters may appear in a CSECT()
parameter of a ++MOD MCS.  Some of these may reasonably
be expected to be nondisplayable on typical terminals (but
lower case alphabetics should not be deemed nondisplayable;
at worst they are Katakana in some code pages).  But what
should be done with seriously nondisplayable characters?  Is
it the application's responsibility or ISPF's to filter or translate
them?  Which component is aware of terminal capabilities.

SR is a good suggestion, but I got bigger fish to fry.  Stay
tuned.

Thanks,
gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SMP/E RESTORE Misbehavior

2012-12-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
I'm assisting in developing a PTF which for a certain load module
(LMOD) replaces 45 MOD elements and adds one.  One of the
replacing MODs contains a new external reference to the added
MOD.  The PTF appears to APPLY fine and generate the LMOD
with RC=0.  (I haven't tried a power-on test; that's my colleague's
responsibility.)

Now I try a RESTORE.  SMP/E generates Binder commands:

  REPLACE csect1
  REPLACE csect2
  REPLACE csect3  * for the 3 CSECTs in the added MOD element.
  INCLUDE syslmod(LMOD)
  NAME LMOD(R)

... but no INCLUDEs for the DLIB versions of the 45 MOD elements
replaced by the PTF.  Binder now gets RC=8 because of the dangling
external reference from the MOD that should have been reverted to
the MOD that was (properly) removed by the REPLACE commands.

Has anyone seen anything like this?  I don't know how to trim this
to a reasonable example to report.  Should I AMATERSE my entire
CSI and data sets and attach to the SR?

SMP/E 3.5, if it matters.

Thanks,
gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Using SyncSort to deblock records in a file

2012-12-12 Thread Kirk Talman
Those of us who received unlabeled tapes in the good old days lived by 
this technique.  The only down side was when there were one or more blocks 
not a multiple of the override LRECL.  Then things got interesting.

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on 
12/11/2012 04:08:42 PM:

 From: Bill Ashton bill00ash...@gmail.com

 Gerhard, I just tried this - what a hoot! I never would have thought of
 it...Thanks for such a simple suggestion - I will keep this JCL around!

 Billy

 On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Gerhard Postpischil 
 gerh...@valley.netwrote:

  On 12/11/2012 3:44 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:

  I've never used it, but this seems to be a basic function of 
IEBGENER(and
  therefore SYNC/ICE GENER)
  .8.2.5 RECORD Statement

  All this is overkill. A simple gener will do:

  // EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
  //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
  //SYSIN DD DUMMY
  //SYSUT1 DD DSN=old.ds,DISP=SHR,
  //  DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=82)
  //SYSUT2 DD DSN=new.ds,DISP=(,CATLG)...**etc.
  //  DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=82,**BLKSIZE=0)

  Gerhard Postpischil
  Bradford, Vermont


-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential and is intended solely for the
personal and confidential use of the individual or entity to whom
it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
communication in error and that any review, dissemination, copying,
or unauthorized use of this information, or the taking of any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
message. Thank you 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread Mary Anne Matyaz
Lizette is correct. The module affectionately known as Mr. Clean, is no longer 
needed after V9. 

MA

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/eiic/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.ims9.doc.iiv%2Fip0i13901003254.htm

Uninstalling DFSMRCL0

When you have completely migrated to IMS™ Version 9 or later and there is no 
possibility of running an earlier release of IMS (both IMS control and IMS 
batch jobs), you can remove DFSMRCL0 from the host z/OS® system by performing 
the following steps:

Remove the name DFSMRCL0 from the IEAVTRML CSECT of module IGC0001C in 
SYS1.LPALIB. Removing this name prevents the operating system from installing 
DFSMRCL0 as a Static Resource Cleanup routine at the next IPL.
Remove module DFSMRCL0 from SYS1.LPALIB or the MLPA library where DFSMRCL0 
was bound.
Start of changeRestart with CLPA to enable these changes.End of change


On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:58:46 +0100, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:

Lizette,

 What version of IMS are you running?  AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
 Version 9 or later.
Well, then someone should have told that to the people who deliver the ADCD 
system. We are NOT running any IMS version, and that module name most probably 
comes from IEAVTRML, that the ADCD deliverer put a usermod on naming this as a 
resource manager.

 Second, this might be better posted on the RACF or IMS Newsgroups.
No. Most probably it should be posted to a USS newsgroup. The BPX.DAEMON class 
is best understood by the USS people. And the definitions listed in the IP 
config guide were either there or not necessary at all (because the classes 
aren't active), according to the book(s).

Barbara


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread Mike Schwab
TRKFMT ERASEDATA HEADRANGE(0,15) CYCLES(1) UNIT(380F) VERIFY(*NONE*)
Works for any 3390.

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:03 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
 The following is suitable for a 3390 MOD-3.

 TRKFMT UNIT(10FF) VFY(OL10FF) ERASE CYL(11,3339) CYCLES(1)

-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: I broke it - programcontrolled programs

2012-12-12 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:41:19 -0600, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com 
wrote:

Lizette is correct. The module affectionately known as Mr. Clean, is no longer 
needed after V9. 

(nit pick   at V9, not after V9 or after migration to V9)

MA

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/eiic/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.ims9.doc.iiv%2Fip0i13901003254.htm

Uninstalling DFSMRCL0

When you have completely migrated to IMS™ Version 9 or later and there is no 
possibility of running an earlier release of IMS (both IMS control and IMS 
batch jobs), you can remove DFSMRCL0 from the host z/OS® system by performing 
the following steps:

Remove the name DFSMRCL0 from the IEAVTRML CSECT of module IGC0001C in 
 SYS1.LPALIB. Removing this name prevents the operating system from installing 
 DFSMRCL0 as a Static Resource Cleanup routine at the next IPL.
Remove module DFSMRCL0 from SYS1.LPALIB or the MLPA library where DFSMRCL0 
 was bound.
Start of changeRestart with CLPA to enable these changes.End of change



After looking at the link Mary Anne posted (thanks) and an install manual, I 
have to 
correct a couple of things I wrote earlier.   The dynamic cleanup module (at 
least in
IMS V9) is DFSMRC20.  So Mr. Clean can go away forever provided you remove the
entry from IEAVTRML.  The other thing I have to correct is the nasty abends 
statement.  It had been so long since I ran into this that I forgot that the 
consequences
were much worse:

If you do not remove the name DFSMRCL0 from IEAVTRML before you delete
  module DFSMRCL0 from SYS1.LPALIB, your z/OS system will not start.

So that tells me for sure it is somewhere in Barbara's system search
order or she is not using the IGC0001C/IEAVTRML she thought she was
using. 

--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS   
mailto:m...@mzelden.com
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread R.S.

W dniu 2012-12-12 18:04, Don Williams pisze:

ICKDSF is not intended to erase volumes.

But it can erase the volumes, can't it?


Now days, DASD volumes tend to be virtual.


Virtual volume still contain real data. Excluding passing away 
structured log file technology (RVA, SVA), when you erase the logical 
(virtual) volume, you overwrite the real data.



Only the DASD controller may know on which real hard drives your
logical volumes are actually located and spread across.


Not only controller. Sometimes smart folks also know that. I'm not so 
smart, but I can tell you what is the relationship between physical 
discs and logical volumes in my array. I have it documented, and it can 
be checked/confirmed.




To be sure that your data is actually erased, you may need to consult with the 
vendor or other
expert of your particular type of DASD.


It need not to be an expert. Last but not least: when you are going to 
dispose whole array, the choice is obvious: erase all logical volumes, 
isn't it?



If the DASD is encrypted, you may be able to erase the encryption keys making 
the DASD effectively unreadable.
Good assumption, unfortunately bad implementation. There are errors in 
secure erase implementation, at least for some disks, AFAIK. There 
nothing worse than false certainty in such area.


My €0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive. 


BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax 
+48 (22) 829 00 33, www.brebank.pl, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2012 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.410.984 zotych.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Adding SCRATCH tapes to DFRMM

2012-12-12 Thread Mike Wojtukiewicz
I am going batsh*t crazy trying to add tapes to the RMM scratch tape list. I 
use the panel to add a scratch tape and it shows in INIT status.
I can't change it to scratch status cause the panels work against me. Is there 
a STRAIGHFORWARD way to just add VOLSERS that are immediately ready to be 
SCRATCH status. I'm no CA fanboy but boy was it easy to add scratches to TMS. 
Thanks in advance

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Adding SCRATCH tapes to DFRMM

2012-12-12 Thread Thomas Conley

On 12/12/2012 7:52 PM, Mike Wojtukiewicz wrote:

I am going batsh*t crazy trying to add tapes to the RMM scratch tape list. I 
use the panel to add a scratch tape and it shows in INIT status.
I can't change it to scratch status cause the panels work against me. Is there 
a STRAIGHFORWARD way to just add VOLSERS that are immediately ready to be 
SCRATCH status. I'm no CA fanboy but boy was it easy to add scratches to TMS. 
Thanks in advance

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



Mike,

At the bottom of the panel is a field for Initialize.  The default is 
YES, so go Nancy Reagan.


Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


OOCoD Question

2012-12-12 Thread Alan Field
If I turn on Capacity on Demand (i.e. make our 507 look like a 509 say) 
will our software that looks at CPU model recognise the change?

I seem to recall that in a past life it didn't, unless you IPL while CoD 
is turned on.

Thanks

Alan Field
Technical Engineer Principal
BCBS Minnesota

Phone: 651.662.3546  Mobile:  651.428.8826


The information contained in this communication may be confidential, and is 
intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its 
contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in 
error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original 
message and any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions 
concerning this message, please contact the sender.

Unencrypted, unauthenticated Internet e-mail is inherently insecure. Internet 
messages may be corrupted or incomplete, or may incorrectly identify the sender.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread Don Williams
I mostly agree. I've been in shops with 10+ year old DASD, so they might still 
customers using structured log file DASD. You need to how your DASD works, in 
order to develop a reliable erasure plan.

However, I had a teammate delete the virtual volumes on old shark prior to 
erasing the data. Would simply reallocating the volumes (assuming it would put 
them back in the same spot) and erasing them, reliably remove all of the data? 
I'm not smart enough to know for sure. Then you have to know how the DASD 
handles bad tracks/sectors. There could be residual data in bad tracks/sectors 
that have been replaced. How do you erase the no longer used bad tracks? I know 
that most DASD has spare sectors on each track, so erasing the track probably 
erases the bad sectors as well. But I'm not smart enough to know for sure.

Whether or not you consult an expert depends on how sure you need to be that 
the every last bit of your data has been completely and throughly erased or 
made unreadable.

Where I currently work, I don't have to worry about erasing DASD. They require 
that all of the old DASD be crushed and shreaded.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dsf to write over entire volume

W dniu 2012-12-12 18:04, Don Williams pisze:
 ICKDSF is not intended to erase volumes.
But it can erase the volumes, can't it?

 Now days, DASD volumes tend to be virtual.

Virtual volume still contain real data. Excluding passing away structured log 
file technology (RVA, SVA), when you erase the logical
(virtual) volume, you overwrite the real data.

 Only the DASD controller may know on which real hard drives your 
 logical volumes are actually located and spread across.

Not only controller. Sometimes smart folks also know that. I'm not so smart, 
but I can tell you what is the relationship between physical discs and logical 
volumes in my array. I have it documented, and it can be checked/confirmed.


 To be sure that your data is actually erased, you may need to consult 
 with the vendor or other expert of your particular type of DASD.

It need not to be an expert. Last but not least: when you are going to dispose 
whole array, the choice is obvious: erase all logical volumes, isn't it?

 If the DASD is encrypted, you may be able to erase the encryption keys 
 making the DASD effectively unreadable.
Good assumption, unfortunately bad implementation. There are errors in secure 
erase implementation, at least for some disks, AFAIK. There nothing worse than 
false certainty in such area.

My €0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive. 

BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax 
+48 (22) 829 00 33, www.brebank.pl, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2012 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci 
wpacony) wynosi 168.410.984 zotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread Don Williams
Yes, ICKDSF can erase volumes, but I don't think IBM guarantees that it is a 
secure erase function. There might be situation where residual data is still 
readable. 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dsf to write over entire volume

W dniu 2012-12-12 18:04, Don Williams pisze:
 ICKDSF is not intended to erase volumes.
But it can erase the volumes, can't it?

 Now days, DASD volumes tend to be virtual.

Virtual volume still contain real data. Excluding passing away structured log 
file technology (RVA, SVA), when you erase the logical
(virtual) volume, you overwrite the real data.

 Only the DASD controller may know on which real hard drives your 
 logical volumes are actually located and spread across.

Not only controller. Sometimes smart folks also know that. I'm not so smart, 
but I can tell you what is the relationship between physical discs and logical 
volumes in my array. I have it documented, and it can be checked/confirmed.


 To be sure that your data is actually erased, you may need to consult 
 with the vendor or other expert of your particular type of DASD.

It need not to be an expert. Last but not least: when you are going to dispose 
whole array, the choice is obvious: erase all logical volumes, isn't it?

 If the DASD is encrypted, you may be able to erase the encryption keys 
 making the DASD effectively unreadable.
Good assumption, unfortunately bad implementation. There are errors in secure 
erase implementation, at least for some disks, AFAIK. There nothing worse than 
false certainty in such area.

My €0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland






--
Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku 
przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie 
jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem 
niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania 
adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie 
lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by 
karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie 
zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo 
wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku.

This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is 
intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be 
received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you 
are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to 
forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, 
distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be 
punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender 
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete 
permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to 
hard drive. 

BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax 
+48 (22) 829 00 33, www.brebank.pl, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru 
Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. 
Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2012 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci 
wpacony) wynosi 168.410.984 zotych.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: dsf to write over entire volume

2012-12-12 Thread Stephen Mednick
I think what is being overlooked in this discussion is what is the corporate 
policy regarding the erasing of disk media.

In planning to erase disk media it's important to seek the advice of the 
corporate IT Security advisor or IT auditor and get sign-off as to what is the 
approved methodology for erasing disk media.

For a government entity there is more than likely to be a much more stringent 
requirement than a straight forward ICKDSF volume erase.


Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia

Asia/Pacific representatives for:
Innovation Data Processing, Inc.



-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Don Williams
Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2012 4:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dsf to write over entire volume

Yes, ICKDSF can erase volumes, but I don't think IBM guarantees that it is a 
secure erase function. There might be situation where residual data is still 
readable. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: OOCoD Question

2012-12-12 Thread Edward Jaffe

On 12/12/2012 5:58 PM, Alan Field wrote:

If I turn on Capacity on Demand (i.e. make our 507 look like a 509 say)
will our software that looks at CPU model recognise the change?


Software will obtain the configuration information on its own schedule. Some 
will get your configuration at startup. Some will listen for ENFs to detect 
increases and decreases and get your configuration dynamically. Some will check 
periodically or when someone uses the product interactively. All should see 
current model=509, permanent model=507, and temporary model=509 but only 
enlightened software will care about or do anything with the second two 
values. For example, (E)JES compares your license against your permanent model 
only, so you get to run temporarily upgraded mode with no warnings, messages, 
or other encumbrances and best of all--for free.


--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN