Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.
...and IBM has multiple zCloud sites. I've toured the one in Boulder, and it is amazing. Mitch -Original Message- From: Bfishing To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Sent: Mon, Dec 13, 2021 11:19 am Subject: Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down. IBM does offer this cloud service: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/hyper-protect-virtual-servers Only providing a reply to the question of zCloud offerings from IBM. On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 9:51 PM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote: > > What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". > Not > > aware of a real Z cloud offering? > > According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for > years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product > Management Leader". > > I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what > some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"... > > -- > Phoenix Software International > Edward E. Jaffe > 831 Parkview Drive North > El Segundo, CA 90245 > https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > > > > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the > information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise > received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, > review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information > contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies > of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email > message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this > email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be > free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system > into > which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient > to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the > sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ><º>`·.¸¸´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸>(((º> .·´¯`·.><º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><º> <>< Go fishing ><> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.
IBM does offer this cloud service: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/hyper-protect-virtual-servers Only providing a reply to the question of zCloud offerings from IBM. On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 9:51 PM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote: > > What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". > Not > > aware of a real Z cloud offering? > > According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for > years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product > Management Leader". > > I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what > some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"... > > -- > Phoenix Software International > Edward E. Jaffe > 831 Parkview Drive North > El Segundo, CA 90245 > https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > > > > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the > information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise > received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, > review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information > contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies > of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email > message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this > email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be > free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system > into > which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient > to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the > sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- ><º>`·.¸¸´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸>(((º> .·´¯`·.><º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><º> <>< Go fishing ><> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.
On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote: What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". Not aware of a real Z cloud offering? According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product Management Leader". I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"... -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.
What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". Not aware of a real Z cloud offering? On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:40 PM Clark Morris < 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:55:08 -0800, Ed Jaffe > wrote: > > >On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote: > >> I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us > >> are missing. > >> This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the > >> (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete > >> mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid. > >> > >> So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of > >> the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like > >> these old, obsolete mainframes. > > > >Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has > >*explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY: > > How reliable is IBM's z related cloud offering? > > How many of the mainframe shops are in practice old and obsolete due > to management policy? How many shops have COBOL coding standards last > updated with either COBOL 68 (ANS COBOL) or COBOL 74 (COBOL VS)? > > In my opinion one of the greater risks of the cloud is that the > appropriate national government may compel the provider be it AWS, > IBM, Microsoft, etc. to give said government access to an > organization's data without notifying the organization. I think I > read somewhere that the US Patriot act may authorize this and I > believe that this is probably not unique to the United States. > > > >https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes > > Clark Morris > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
1 mic, 4 mics, 40 mics, 400 mics is all irrelevant to the original topic. AWS was down for hours, longer for some. Important transactions just can’t be unavailable for hours and that’s why banks, health care, insurance, airlines, big retail, and others will never leave the mainframe. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 12:12 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: I've not seen 4 mics, maybe less than 100 But I've not done any serious looking. My numbers, 5 mills to 400 mics was a quick overview to grab averages. Once I saw the numbers I knew there would be performance gains since my workloads are mostly, I would like to think, of fairly normal profile, weighted more heavily on IO than the other resources. And I did see movement graphically with backup windows, for one, moving back in time but did not do any further discoveries.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 9:09 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Stated well-Original Message-From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill JohnsonSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:59 PMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for M
Re: AWS is down.
I've not seen 4 mics, maybe less than 100 But I've not done any serious looking. My numbers, 5 mills to 400 mics was a quick overview to grab averages. Once I saw the numbers I knew there would be performance gains since my workloads are mostly, I would like to think, of fairly normal profile, weighted more heavily on IO than the other resources. And I did see movement graphically with backup windows, for one, moving back in time but did not do any further discoveries.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 9:09 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Stated well-Original Message-From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill JohnsonSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:59 PMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s
Re: RES: AWS is down.
Not sure if anyone saw that Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, during the investors earnings call yesterday, trolled AWS saying the Oracle cloud doesn’t go down. Oracle up almost 15% today on stellar earnings and guidance. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 11:59 PM, David Crayford wrote: On 8/12/21 9:34 pm, Bodra - Pessoal wrote: > Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR? Of course they do. Cloud computing providers allow you to set availability zones on different data centeres and they replicate. Like most It outages I suspect human error just like Facebook a couple of months ago. You can build the most reliable infrastructure in the world but if a human is involved you are always in danger of an outage. > > Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, > mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is > too expensive? > > > Carlos Bodra > IBM zEnterprise Certified > São Paulo – SP – Brazil > > > -Mensagem original- > De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de > kekronbekron > Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26 > Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Assunto: Re: AWS is down. > > Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible > server/platform, in all of time. > What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be. > IBM sure did try when they first created the MF. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel > wrote: > >> You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? >> >> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." >> >> Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result >> >> of no mainframe. >> >> You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. >> >> Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. >> >> I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller >> >> write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. >> >> The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques >> >> or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular >> >> telephones. >> >> There was no Internet as we know it today etc. >> >> Regards, >> >> David >> >> On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: >> >>> Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. >>> >>> At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for >>> MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? >>> >>> What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). >>> >>> It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to >>> lead to their death... is what's being said. >>> >>> Sounds pretty privileged to me. >>> >>> It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? >>> >>> Did the world not exist before 1960s? >>> >>> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? >>> >>> Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own >>> detriment), etc. >>> >>> Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from >>> this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? >>> >>> We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of >>> humanity. >>> >>> Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete >>> waste of time and people's efforts. >>> >>> Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. >>> >>> - KB >>> >>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson >>> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: >>> >>>> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the >>>> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here >>>> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like >>>> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has >>>> had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. >>>> Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t avai
Re: RES: AWS is down.
On 8/12/21 9:34 pm, Bodra - Pessoal wrote: Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR? Of course they do. Cloud computing providers allow you to set availability zones on different data centeres and they replicate. Like most It outages I suspect human error just like Facebook a couple of months ago. You can build the most reliable infrastructure in the world but if a human is involved you are always in danger of an outage. Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is too expensive? Carlos Bodra IBM zEnterprise Certified São Paulo – SP – Brazil -Mensagem original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de kekronbekron Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26 Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Assunto: Re: AWS is down. Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible server/platform, in all of time. What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be. IBM sure did try when they first created the MF. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel wrote: You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result of no mainframe. You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular telephones. There was no Internet as we know it today etc. Regards, David On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainfra
Re: AWS is down.
Moshix did an AWS instance for Hercules VM/370 MVS 3.8J. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuXi1DLq1Sw On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:43 AM Mark Regan wrote: > > What is the overhead cost to run ZD&T on AWS; that is, how much do they > charge you above what you pay for the IBM license for it. I wonder if IBM > will be offering the Learners Edition through the IBM Cloud? > > Regards, > > Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg > CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two > years with the Ohio Air National Guard) > Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant) > Email:marktre...@gmail.com > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM Sebastian Welton wrote: > > > I do this occasionally (and in Azure): > > > > > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/ > > > > Sebastian > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:55:08 -0800, Ed Jaffe wrote: >On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote: >> I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us >> are missing. >> This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the >> (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete >> mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid. >> >> So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of >> the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like >> these old, obsolete mainframes. > >Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has >*explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY: How reliable is IBM's z related cloud offering? How many of the mainframe shops are in practice old and obsolete due to management policy? How many shops have COBOL coding standards last updated with either COBOL 68 (ANS COBOL) or COBOL 74 (COBOL VS)? In my opinion one of the greater risks of the cloud is that the appropriate national government may compel the provider be it AWS, IBM, Microsoft, etc. to give said government access to an organization's data without notifying the organization. I think I read somewhere that the US Patriot act may authorize this and I believe that this is probably not unique to the United States. > >https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes Clark Morris -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
With IBM beefing up NFS support, I also expect DS8K to be available in AWS etc. Only then will zD&T be more approachable as there's less data leaving & returning to the platform. I really hope IBM knock it out of the park with the next storage. Since they're also working with NVIDIA for integrating DGX/EGX or whatever into their Spectrum storage for analytics, it would be great if DS8K came with an attached DGX or some such. z16's on-chip accelerator and zBX-like access to GPU nodes on the storage server, can keep a lot of stuff on Z from leaving. I find it really, really annoying that mainframe logs are sent to Splunk, when those that look at Splunk usually have very, very little knowledge of SMF and how to play with it. Of course, just slap on a line graph, a stacked area chart, and a pie chart, and you have a sophisticated dashboard that demands $. What's worse is squirreling distributed tech into Z just so the platform can be Kooberneetus certified... rather than building for the Z, and not being completed taken in by the pull of the magic quadrants. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 10th, 2021 at 6:28 AM, Sebastian Welton wrote: > I do this occasionally (and in Azure): > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/ > > Sebastian > > --- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
What is the overhead cost to run ZD&T on AWS; that is, how much do they charge you above what you pay for the IBM license for it. I wonder if IBM will be offering the Learners Edition through the IBM Cloud? Regards, Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two years with the Ohio Air National Guard) Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant) Email:marktre...@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM Sebastian Welton wrote: > I do this occasionally (and in Azure): > > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/ > > Sebastian > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
I do this occasionally (and in Azure): https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/ Sebastian -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote: I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are missing. This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid. So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like these old, obsolete mainframes. Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has *explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY: https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes -- Phoenix Software International Edward E. Jaffe 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution, review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3644370/aws-outage-hit-collaboration-vendors-highlights-risk-of-cloud-based-tools.html Regards, Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two years with the Ohio Air National Guard) Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant) Email:marktre...@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 8:54 AM Radoslaw Skorupka wrote: > >You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > ..." > > Nobody died because of computer failure in the times before computers. > Nobody died because of gun in the times before guns existed. > Nobody died in airplane crash before aircrafts. > etc. > > However nowadays we rely on many things, some of them are computers. > Sadly, there are victims of ransomware attacks. Yes, people died. > > -- > Radoslaw Skorupka > Lodz, Poland > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [EXTERNAL] 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
Hi Clark, It appears as though we actually are getting close to the 1 microsecond value. Of course I can't find it today but yesterday when I saw the *ahem* discussion between Seymour and Bill, I went searching because I didn't think the industry was anywhere near microsecond speeds. An article I found from 2 years ago said that IBM had achieved about 5 microseconds using zHyperlink. Today the closest I could find to that article was in an IBM blog stating the DS8900 arrays are delivering as low as 18 microsecond latency. So we're a lot closer to the elusive microsecond than I had imagined. Now, when this will make it to the real world is anybody's guess. :-) Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark F. Morris Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down. On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, >and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ >claimed, but we're not there yet. When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? Clark Morris -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
>You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." Nobody died because of computer failure in the times before computers. Nobody died because of gun in the times before guns existed. Nobody died in airplane crash before aircrafts. etc. However nowadays we rely on many things, some of them are computers. Sadly, there are victims of ransomware attacks. Yes, people died. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Keep in mind this thread is about AWS (the magnificent) having an outage, that if it happened in a mainframe shop, would be considered terrible and unacceptable. In fact, AWS (and Azure/Google clouds) are down fairly often. There are people on the internet who keep track of these things. Whereas the mainframes at large companies in which downtime can cost millions of dollars and yes even lives almost never goes down. But rest assured, the media would overemphasize the mainframe outage on the "legacy" platform as if people are still running mainframe technology from 50 years ago. Because heck, as we all know, only the new stuff gets investment dollars and is considered 21st century tech! (LOL) Now prepare yourself for a walk down memory lane. And, this is likely my last post on this thread. (hurray) Because I have actual work to do and more pleasurable and relaxing distractions. However, I do reserve the right to rescind my last statement should I deem fit. On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 07:00:53 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: Keep in mind that what IBM is discussing is throughput rather than the duration of a single I/O. A typical installation will be doing I/O to a lot of DASD volumes concurrently. When you have a lot of concurrent I/O requests on the same channel, the effect of, e.g., rotational delay, cache miss, is mostly on duration rather than on throughput. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of kekronbekron [02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Hey Patrick, Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can. I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on average. With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average I/O seems pretty good. The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with zHPF? If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you > not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't > necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not > mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post > was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And > you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics > on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we > went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and > ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of > the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > Original message From: Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM > (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, > I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for > iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW > I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately > have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer > array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy > smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz > sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a > microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) > Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: > IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill > Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, > December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is > down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why > there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, > 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is den
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
Ever since the advent of the 2880, there has been significant overlap even on a single channel. I don't find 950K/s to be at all surprising. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Clark F. Morris [03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:18 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down. On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, >and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ >claimed, but we're not there yet. When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? Clark Morris -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
And a very Merry Christmas to all. Thanks, …….Cameron Vacation Alert: I will be OOO from December 9th 2021 though to January 4th 2022 inclusive. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe Monk Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: AWS is down. Gents, please. No body cares. Joe On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 22:05 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> wrote: > No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the > IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing > stuff is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t > even part of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe > is far more secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the > cloud vendors any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my > photos, for free. And I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s > mainframe business will be around far longer than you and I will be alive. > Making sure your financial information is secure and always available, > making sure your health care and pharmaceutical information is HIPAA > protected and available for any emergencies that arrive, making sure your > insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, making air reservations less > stressful than air travel itself, allowing major retailers the ability to > process the billions of transactions they require daily. IBM fanboy? Hell > yes. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz > mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>> > wrote: > > You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long > way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what > I'm thinking. > > My MO is to act as if facts matter. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3<https://isolate.menlosecurity.com/1/3735928037/http:/mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>] on behalf > of Bill Johnson > [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>] > Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED > that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his > MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play > games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important > than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really > pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E > expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 < > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> > wrote: > > Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask > you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't > necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not > mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My > post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. > And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to > get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array > upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is > significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the > significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy > smartphone > Original message From: Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> > Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM > (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from > Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, > patrickfalcone7 > <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>> > wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under > favorable condi
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
How does that compare to the throughput for FCP? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Attila Fogarasi [fogar...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down. I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15 zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020). On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris < 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz > wrote: > > >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? > > Clark Morris > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Keep in mind that what IBM is discussing is throughput rather than the duration of a single I/O. A typical installation will be doing I/O to a lot of DASD volumes concurrently. When you have a lot of concurrent I/O requests on the same channel, the effect of, e.g., rotational delay, cache miss, is mostly on duration rather than on throughput. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of kekronbekron [02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Hey Patrick, Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can. I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on average. With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average I/O seems pretty good. The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with zHPF? If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you > not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't > necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not > mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post > was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And > you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics > on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we > went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and > ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of > the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > Original message From: Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM > (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, > I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for > iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW > I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately > have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer > array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy > smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz > sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a > microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) > Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: > IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill > Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, > December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is > down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why > there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, > 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At > the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to > finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What > happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to > buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's > being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed > that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before > 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have > MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, > apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, > but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means > that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and > people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
zHPF has finally enabled FICON to catch up to the (high) performance of the underlying fibre channel (which non-z uses), and still keep the benefits of FICON -- which are substantial. It isn't just performance. For z15 IO is ROI competitive with best of breed cloud servers, and beats them with the other characteristics. Sadly these studies haven't had wide publicity, exposure on IBM-Main is hardly helpful. Two decades of bad FICON is a hard road to straighten. On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 3:01 PM kekronbekron < 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Found it: > > https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6355789 > > https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM_z15_FEx16SA_Performance_2020.pdf > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:28 AM, kekronbekron < > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Hi Attila, > > > > For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful. > > > > Is it in TechDocs? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi > fogar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published > z15 > > > > > > zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel > (using > > > > > > multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020). > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris < > > > > > > 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite > > > > > > > > > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the > > > > > > > > > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. > > > > > > > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many > > > > > > > > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? > > > > > > > > Clark Morris > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
Found it: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6355789 https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM_z15_FEx16SA_Performance_2020.pdf - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:28 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Hi Attila, > > For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful. > > Is it in TechDocs? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi > fogar...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15 > > > > zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using > > > > multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020). > > > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris < > > > > 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite > > > > > > > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the > > > > > > > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. > > > > > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many > > > > > > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? > > > > > > Clark Morris > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
Hi Attila, For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful. Is it in TechDocs? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi wrote: > I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15 > > zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using > > multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020). > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris < > > 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu > > > > wrote: > > > > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite > > > > > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the > > > > > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. > > > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many > > > > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? > > > > Clark Morris > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Hey Patrick, Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can. I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on average. With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average I/O seems pretty good. The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with zHPF? If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you > not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't > necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not > mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post > was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And > you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics > on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we > went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and > ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of > the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > Original message From: Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM > (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, > I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for > iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW > I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately > have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer > array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy > smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz > sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a > microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) > Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: > IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill > Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, > December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is > down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why > there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, > 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At > the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to > finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What > happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to > buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's > being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed > that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before > 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have > MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, > apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, > but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means > that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and > people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs > are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December > 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:> AWS had a larger & > longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in > the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace > the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big > retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts > here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t > available. (One of the hits from today) pe
Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15 zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020). On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris < 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz > wrote: > > >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? > > Clark Morris > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Gents, please. No body cares. Joe On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 22:05 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the > IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing > stuff is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t > even part of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe > is far more secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the > cloud vendors any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my > photos, for free. And I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s > mainframe business will be around far longer than you and I will be alive. > Making sure your financial information is secure and always available, > making sure your health care and pharmaceutical information is HIPAA > protected and available for any emergencies that arrive, making sure your > insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, making air reservations less > stressful than air travel itself, allowing major retailers the ability to > process the billions of transactions they require daily. IBM fanboy? Hell > yes. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz > wrote: > > You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long > way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what > I'm thinking. > > My MO is to act as if facts matter. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf > of Bill Johnson [00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED > that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his > MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play > games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important > than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really > pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E > expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 < > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask > you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't > necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not > mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My > post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. > And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to > get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array > upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is > significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the > significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy > smartphone > Original message From: Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM > (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. > LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from > Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, > patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under > favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on > avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my > Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: > Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: > IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you > complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp:// > mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM > Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill > Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, > December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is > down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a >
950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, >and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ >claimed, but we're not there yet. When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved? Clark Morris -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing stuff is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t even part of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe is far more secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the cloud vendors any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my photos, for free. And I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s mainframe business will be around far longer than you and I will be alive. Making sure your financial information is secure and always available, making sure your health care and pharmaceutical information is HIPAA protected and available for any emergencies that arrive, making sure your insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, making air reservations less stressful than air travel itself, allowing major retailers the ability to process the billions of transactions they require daily. IBM fanboy? Hell yes. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what I'm thinking. My MO is to act as if facts matter. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to con
Re: AWS is down.
Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of patrickfalcone7 [012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in particular:>> Do we have t
Re: AWS is down.
You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what I'm thinking. My MO is to act as if facts matter. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve wo
Re: AWS is down.
Stated well -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:59 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage toda
Re: AWS is down.
“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee
Re: AWS is down.
Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?>> - KB>> ‐‐‐ Origi
Re: AWS is down.
https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/what-caused-the-amazon-internet-outage/507-94219aa6-f510-4e3d-a2b5-5c301a257152 "A problem with Amazon Web Services yesterday caused issues with services such as Disney+ and Venmo for most of the day. Robotic vacuum cleaners halted in their tracks <https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/major-outage-amazon-web-services/507-cb381148-3576-4976-8638-98ee86292fa6>. Doorbell cameras stopped watching for package thieves, though some of those deliveries were canceled anyway. Netflix and Disney movies got interrupted and The Associated Press <https://apnews.com/> had trouble publishing the news." Regards, Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two years with the Ohio Air National Guard) Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant) Email:marktre...@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:07 PM Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 < > 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under > favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on > avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my > Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > Original message From: Seymour J Metz > Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: > Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a > microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp:// > mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM > Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill > Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, > December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is > down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also > why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, > 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At > the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF > to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue > breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as > though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their > death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds > like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not > exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they > didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to > their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out > there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace > MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a > complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to > me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message > ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger > & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked > on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to > replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, > big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative > posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix > isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the > drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, > kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not > at anybody in particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because > someone else had an outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on > the mainframe itself went south?>> Has every site
Re: AWS is down.
LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?>> - KB>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐>> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo> >> > -Original Message-> >> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown> >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM> >> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.> >> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **> >> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router.> >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson &
Re: AWS is down.
Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?>> - KB>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐>> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo> >> > -Original Message-> >> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown> >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM> >> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.> >> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **> >> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router.> >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> >> > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t> > >> > > have our mainframe running there.> &g
Re: AWS is down.
You should know nonsense. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 3:00 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote: Four microseconds is also nonsense. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > &g
Re: AWS is down.
Four microseconds is also nonsense. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-
Re: AWS is down.
Or narcissists. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:38 PM, Charles Mills wrote: Don't feed the trolls. Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Don't feed the trolls. Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > >
Re: AWS is down.
It might be, but Puta has done similar things in the past. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 11:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. The very same day Putin was warned about Ukraine. Coincidence? Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:33 AM, Lance D. Jackson wrote: Here’s more insight into the issue: https://secure-web.cisco.com/18imue8hazEpdayHD0__hS9VnWTMxrPeca2DKv7KvdLJ3ipk2yvv_mYINw1q0o7lzIWqaJzFkT2oMK-XTVDunfSkEhie9M-K6tBIKMJuaAU91KNuPGtNUK6jk3Of-B2doT5c50CzfitBfkaEaEXtKBIl2oLIdVdRF4GGdhjdSjhpv5HQWq6Kqo9qkyKS1HDbxTsMbzkzy4vMQQgMaL1x4I5p-IiJ7Hz6oJt0UkHPat7bpeT8GR2MV-RxyZlRpJVghcZU-VezTm55JOGJ59CvIq3_2aYwQDPUvp3s_709pm4jTwLwMaBMjvFGnFoOVjFYwYjfxEHvPbY40AGu9Uq7Zq-n1_apxQ2qlNwxqgoZwkhWbPlSP82xsgcIrttPcwHlMQfWDCb709M_911_iMSkSYCtItgkHE1iTCUgzz8nsT1IvDozyGUGQ0bwIiPqnmR24OQZ_u__Bg3vdpeaBUQiOCg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datacenterdynamics.com%2Fen%2Fnews%2Freport-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source%2F -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < <mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve
Re: AWS is down.
Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O? From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > **
Re: AWS is down.
The very same day Putin was warned about Ukraine. Coincidence? Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:33 AM, Lance D. Jackson wrote: Here’s more insight into the issue: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source/ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < <mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? >
Re: AWS is down.
Here’s more insight into the issue: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source/ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Johnson Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < <mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < <mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does
Re: AWS is down.
Of course not. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just h
Re: AWS is down.
ObTheRaven On one channel? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > > to my internet router. > > > > On
Re: AWS is down.
I should say one thing though... your last statement makes me feel secure with my career lol. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:15 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > In 10 years, the mainframe will process some multiple of transactions it does > today. Likely a very high multiple. > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:42:26 AM EST, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > "...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on > those platforms."... yet. > > Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie. > > Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS. > > I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but > parts of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my > > pictures on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google > > cloud. But, I don't want my health care information or my financial data > > running on those platforms. > > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom > > m...@hogstrom.org wrote: > > > > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s > > finances on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where > > BASE is acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than > > the existing processes in many shops today. > > > > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t > > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas > > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. > > > > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad > > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > > > > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, > > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve > > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits > > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available > > > because the computer system is down. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went > > > south? > > > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto > > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > > > - KB > > > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf > > > > Of John McKown > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainfr
Re: AWS is down.
In 10 years, the mainframe will process some multiple of transactions it does today. Likely a very high multiple. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:42:26 AM EST, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: "...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those platforms."... yet. Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie. Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS. I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but parts of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures > on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I > don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those > platforms. > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom > m...@hogstrom.org wrote: > > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances > on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is > acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the > existing processes in many shops today. > > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. > > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has > > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody > > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can > > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer > > system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > > John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop > > > talking to my internet router. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
Re: AWS is down.
JP Morgan/Chase has been around since 1799, well the Chase part. They aren't going to be replaced by some Fintech started by a guy/gal barely past puberty. And if any Fintech gets it right, I suspect Jamie Dimon will just purchased them and roll them into the bank. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:33:21 AM EST, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Speaking of finance... changing gears a bit. What's everyone's thoughts on the FinTech developments, digital bank, etc. ? Are they all still just relying on MF for actually doing the work, and just presenting a rosy image to customers and developers? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:56 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances > on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is > acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the > existing processes in many shops today. > > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. > > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has > > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody > > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can > > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer > > system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > > John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop > > > talking to my internet router. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > Email Disclaimer > > > > > > This E-mail contains confident
Re: AWS is down.
"...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those platforms."... yet. Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie. Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS. I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but parts of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures > on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I > don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those > platforms. > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom > m...@hogstrom.org wrote: > > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances > on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is > acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the > existing processes in many shops today. > > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. > > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has > > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody > > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can > > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer > > system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > > John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop > > > talking to my internet router. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > email
Re: AWS is down.
What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those platforms. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the existing processes in many shops today. I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of >> John McKown >> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM >> >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> >> Subject: Re: AWS is down. >> >> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** >> >> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the >> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the >> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I >> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking >> to my internet router. >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < >> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >>> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t >>> >>> have our mainframe running there. >>> >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >>> >>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email >> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> Email Disclaimer >> >> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which >> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for >> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the >> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to >> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, >> copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the >> contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. >> >> ---
Re: AWS is down.
Speaking of finance... changing gears a bit. What's everyone's thoughts on the FinTech developments, digital bank, etc. ? Are they all still just relying on MF for actually doing the work, and just presenting a rosy image to customers and developers? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:56 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances > on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is > acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the > existing processes in many shops today. > > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. > > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has > > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody > > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can > > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer > > system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > > John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop > > > talking to my internet router. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > Email Disclaimer > > > > > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, > > > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended > > > only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are > > > not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for > > > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > >
Re: AWS is down.
Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the existing processes in many shops today. I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot. Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee. > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > >> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of >> John McKown >> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM >> >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> >> Subject: Re: AWS is down. >> >> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** >> >> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the >> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the >> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I >> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking >> to my internet router. >> >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < >> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >>> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t >>> >>> have our mainframe running there. >>> >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >>> >>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email >> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> Email Disclaimer >> >> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which >> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for >> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the >> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to >> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, >> copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the >> contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. >> >> - >> >> F
Re: AWS is down.
Of course, understandable. Does IBM not care about the 'ye olde' image that IBM Z gets in the media. In a recent zOSMF Guild discussion here, we saw a bit of 'trying to be cool/relevant' vibes instead. What I often find myself saying is.. all this MF modernization talk is acting as if MF is as basic as a rock, and that automation was not possible at all. And that only Python and Ansible has shown us the light. And containers of course. What I would like to see is native Z flex, rather than plastered on distributed relevance. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:10 PM, Doug wrote: > I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are > > missing. > > This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the > > (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete > > mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid. > > So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of the > > universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like these > > old, obsolete mainframes. > > Proving once again the certainty of Murphy's Law (or one of the > > corollaries): "What can go wrong, will go wrong, and at the most > > inopportune time." > > Doug Fuerst > > -- Original Message -- > > From: "kekronbekron" 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu > > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu > > Sent: 08-Dec-21 8:32:48 > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > True, I haven't worked in healthcare. > > > > I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement. > > > > I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however > > understandable it is. > > > > IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant. > > > > Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does. > > > > But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else. > > > > Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent > > as it has been? > > > > I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw > > on Z. > > > > On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc. > > > > What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the > > baggage of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that > > and therefore take the gains therein. > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > > > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > > > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also > > > why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > > > pharmacies. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > > > > > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for > > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue > > > breathing? > > > > > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > > > > > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going > > > to lead to their death... is what's being said. > > > > > > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > > > > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > > > > > > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > > > > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > > > > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > > > detriment), etc. > > > > > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from > > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > > > > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > > > humanity. > > > > > > Again that means that all technology that evolved sinc
Re: AWS is down.
Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec. On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz wrote: On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > > to my internet router. > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, se
Re: AWS is down.
On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some > > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical > > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. > > > > Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the > > > > decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. > > > > (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they > > > > need aren’t available because the computer system is down. > > > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went > > > > south? > > > > > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto > > > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > > > > > - KB > > > > > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On > > > > > Behalf Of John McKown > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe > > > > > the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, > > > > > the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home > > > > > equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it > > > > > decided to stop talking to my internet router. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we > > > > > > don’t > > > > > > > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO > > > > > > IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > Email Disclaimer > > > > > > > > > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the > > > > > sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information > > > > > is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed > > > > > above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent > > > > > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are > > > > > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the > > > > > taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or > > > > > attached files is strictly prohibited. > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > . > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > > to my internet router. > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Re: AWS is down.
What's the difference between managing 100s of squatty boxes and managing 100s of virtual machines? What matters are the facilities available. Lack of, e.g., RAS, matters, but not the number of boxen. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Classification: Confidential Yes I remember those days. However, at may last job I went 9 years without an unscheduled service disruption. I have said for many years, that all other things being equal (which they still are not), would you rather manage 100's of squatty boxes or one mainframe? The choice is yours -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf > Of John McKown > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet > is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to > reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my > internet router. > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we > > don’t > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > Email Disclaimer > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which > may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for > the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the > intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the > E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. > > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > --- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and a
Re: AWS is down.
Perhaps it is a mainframe opportunity? Thanks, …….Cameron Vacation Alert: I will be OOO from December 9th 2021 though to January 4th 2022 inclusive. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 11:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: AWS is down. +1 Different strokes for different folks. AWS's failure is not a mainframe success. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN American Express made the following annotations This e-mail was sent to you by a representative of Amex Bank of Canada, P.O. Box 3204, Station "F", Toronto, ON, M1W 3W7, www.americanexpress.ca. If you no longer wish to receive these e-mails, please notify the sender by reply e-mail. This e-mail is solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments. Thank you. American Express a fait les remarques suivantes Ce courriel vous a été envoyé par un représentant de la Banque Amex du Canada, C.P. 3204, succursale F, Toronto (Ontario) M1W 3W7, www.americanexpress.ca. Si, par la suite, vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir ces courriels, veuillez en aviser les expéditeurs par courriel. Ce courriel est réservé au seul destinataire indiqué et peut renfermer des renseignements confidentiels et privilégiés. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, toute divulgation, duplication, utilisation ou distribution du courriel est interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l’expéditeur par courriel et détruire immédiatement le courriel et toute pièce jointe. Merci. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are missing. This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid. So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like these old, obsolete mainframes. Proving once again the certainty of Murphy's Law (or one of the corollaries): "What can go wrong, will go wrong, and at the most inopportune time." Doug Fuerst -- Original Message -- From: "kekronbekron" <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Sent: 08-Dec-21 8:32:48 Subject: Re: AWS is down. True, I haven't worked in healthcare. I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement. I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable it is. IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant. Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does. But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else. Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as it has been? I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z. On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc. What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore take the gains therein. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, Decemb
Re: AWS is down.
Hi KB, You goofed again. Your head must be in the clouds (pun intended). You said: "... cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility ..." Backward compatibility is a big part of customer loyalty. Customers expect that their applications will run when processors are upgraded. For example, I have a customer that has a serious investment in 40 year old applications. Regards, David On 2021-12-08 08:32, kekronbekron wrote: True, I haven't worked in healthcare. I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement. I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable it is. IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant. Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does. But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else. Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as it has been? I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z. On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc. What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore take the gains therein. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. An
Re: RES: AWS is down.
I don't know, but it will be good to compare solutions like this; without any unnecessary sales flexing built into it. Reckon it's very hard to find someone who knows enough about the major IaaS/PaaS ways that are out there to give us an objective view. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:04 PM, Bodra - Pessoal <02eda2bc565a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR? > > Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, > mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is > too expensive? > > Carlos Bodra > > IBM zEnterprise Certified > > São Paulo – SP – Brazil > > -Mensagem original- > > De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Em nome de > kekronbekron > > Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26 > > Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Assunto: Re: AWS is down. > > Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible > server/platform, in all of time. > > What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be. > > IBM sure did try when they first created the MF. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel > dspiegel...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." > > > > Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result > > > > of no mainframe. > > > > You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. > > > > Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. > > > > I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller > > > > write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. > > > > The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques > > > > or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular > > > > telephones. > > > > There was no Internet as we know it today etc. > > > > Regards, > > > > David > > > > On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: > > > > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > > > > > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for > > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue > > > breathing? > > > > > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > > > > > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going > > > to lead to their death... is what's being said. > > > > > > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > > > > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > > > > > > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > > > > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > > > > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > > > detriment), etc. > > > > > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from > > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > > > > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > > > humanity. > > > > > > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a > > > complete waste of time and people's efforts. > > > > > > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good > > > servers. > > > > > > - KB > > > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some > > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical > > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. > > > > Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the > > > > decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. > > > > (One of
RES: AWS is down.
Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR? Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is too expensive? Carlos Bodra IBM zEnterprise Certified São Paulo – SP – Brazil -Mensagem original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List Em nome de kekronbekron Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26 Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Assunto: Re: AWS is down. Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible server/platform, in all of time. What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be. IBM sure did try when they first created the MF. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel wrote: > You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." > > Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result > > of no mainframe. > > You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. > > Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. > > I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller > > write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. > > The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques > > or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular > > telephones. > > There was no Internet as we know it today etc. > > Regards, > > David > > On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: > > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > > > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? > > > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > > > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to > > lead to their death... is what's being said. > > > > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > > > > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > > detriment), etc. > > > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > > humanity. > > > > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete > > waste of time and people's efforts. > > > > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, > > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve > > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits > > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available > > > because the computer system is down. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went > > > south? > > > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto > > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlo
Re: AWS is down.
True, I haven't worked in healthcare. I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement. I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable it is. IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant. Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does. But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else. Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as it has been? I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z. On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc. What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore take the gains therein. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why > there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have > pharmacies. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF > to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to > lead to their death... is what's being said. > > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > detriment), etc. > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this > announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > humanity. > > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete > waste of time and people's efforts. > > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has > > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody > > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can > > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer > > system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > > John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > >
Re: AWS is down.
Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible server/platform, in all of time. What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be. IBM sure did try when they first created the MF. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel wrote: > You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." > > Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result > > of no mainframe. > > You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. > > Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. > > I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller > > write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. > > The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques > > or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular > > telephones. > > There was no Internet as we know it today etc. > > Regards, > > David > > On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: > > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > > > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? > > > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > > > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to > > lead to their death... is what's being said. > > > > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > > > > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > > > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > > detriment), etc. > > > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > > humanity. > > > > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete > > waste of time and people's efforts. > > > > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, > > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve > > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits > > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available > > > because the computer system is down. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went > > > south? > > > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto > > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > > > - KB > > > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > > > From: IBM Main
Re: AWS is down.
Classification: Confidential Yes I remember those days. However, at may last job I went 9 years without an unscheduled service disruption. I have said for many years, that all other things being equal (which they still are not), would you rather manage 100's of squatty boxes or one mainframe? The choice is yours -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. [CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.] Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf > Of John McKown > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet > is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to > reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my > internet router. > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we > > don’t > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > Email Disclaimer > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which > may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for > the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the > intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the > E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. > > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > -- > --- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect t
Re: AWS is down.
I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells >02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > > to my internet router. > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > Email Disclaimer > > > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, > > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended > > only for the use of the individual or en
Re: AWS is down.
You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..." Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result of no mainframe. You're forgetting that the world was a different place then. Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969. I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen. The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular telephones. There was no Internet as we know it today etc. Regards, David On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote: Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router. On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have our mainframe running there. For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files i
Re: AWS is down.
A 'The Register' article post last evening... "AWS wobbles in US East region causing widespread outages'We have identified the root cause and we are actively working towards recovery' - which now appears almost complete" The article was then updated this morning, with an updated status at the end of the article. https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/07/aws_wobbles_is_us_east/ Regards, Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two years with the Ohio Air National Guard) Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant) Email:marktre...@gmail.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 1:33 AM kekronbekron < 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to > lead to their death... is what's being said. > Sounds pretty privileged to me. > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? > Did the world not exist before 1960s? > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own > detriment), etc. > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of > humanity. > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete > waste of time and people's efforts. > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe > has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. > Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) > people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the > computer system is down. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > Not at anybody in particular: > > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went > south? > > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > > > - KB > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On > Behalf Of John McKown > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe > the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > to my internet router. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we > do
Re: AWS is down.
Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that. At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing? What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc). It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's being said. Sounds pretty privileged to me. It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no? Did the world not exist before 1960s? Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc. Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF? We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity. Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and people's efforts. Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers. - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had > plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies > when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do > die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is > down. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > Not at anybody in particular: > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes? > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? > > - KB > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote: > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > > John McKown > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > > to my internet router. > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > Email Disclaimer > > > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, > > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended > > only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are > > not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for > > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any > > disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance > > on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > >
Re: AWS is down.
+1 Different strokes for different folks. AWS's failure is not a mainframe success. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:01 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > John McKown > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet > is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to > reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my > internet router. > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > Email Disclaimer > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which > may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for > the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the > intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the > E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. > > - > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
+1 On 12/7/2021 8:01 PM, kekronbekron wrote: Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router. On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have our mainframe running there. For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN . -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Not at anybody in particular: Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage? Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south? Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades? Is it wrong to fail sometimes? Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave? What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life? - KB ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of > John McKown > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: AWS is down. > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet > is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to > reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my > internet router. > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > > > > have our mainframe running there. > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > Email Disclaimer > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which > may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for > the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the > intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the > E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. > > - > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router. On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > have our mainframe running there. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Should have left SNA for business and IP for TikTok -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 3:52 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION ** On Dec 7, 2021, at 2:56 PM, John McKown wrote: > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe > the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, > the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home > equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it > decided to stop talking to my internet router. AT&T have been upgrading fibre in my neighborhood and have knocked me off the internet three or four times. -- Pew, Curtis G curtis@austin.utexas.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Email Disclaimer This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
On Dec 7, 2021, at 2:56 PM, John McKown wrote: > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking > to my internet router. AT&T have been upgrading fibre in my neighborhood and have knocked me off the internet three or four times. -- Pew, Curtis G curtis@austin.utexas.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet router. On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t > have our mainframe running there. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: AWS is down.
Breaks my heart. > On Dec 7, 2021, at 12:49 PM, Bill Johnson > <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have > our mainframe running there. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
AWS is down.
Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have our mainframe running there. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN