Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-13 Thread Mitch Mccluhan
 ...and IBM has multiple zCloud sites.  I've toured the one in Boulder, and it 
is amazing.
Mitch
 
 
-Original Message-
From: Bfishing 
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Mon, Dec 13, 2021 11:19 am
Subject: Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

IBM does offer this cloud service:
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/hyper-protect-virtual-servers

Only providing a reply to the question of zCloud offerings from IBM.


On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 9:51 PM Ed Jaffe 
wrote:

> On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote:
> > What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud".
> Not
> > aware of a real Z cloud offering?
>
> According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for
> years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product
> Management Leader".
>
> I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what
> some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"...
>
> --
> Phoenix Software International
> Edward E. Jaffe
> 831 Parkview Drive North
> El Segundo, CA 90245
> https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
>
>
>
> 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
> information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
> received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
> review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
> contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
> of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
> message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
> email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
> free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system
> into
> which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
> to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
> sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 

><º>`·.¸¸´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸>(((º>
.·´¯`·.><º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><º>

<>< Go fishing ><>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-13 Thread Bfishing
IBM does offer this cloud service:
https://www.ibm.com/cloud/hyper-protect-virtual-servers

Only providing a reply to the question of zCloud offerings from IBM.


On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 9:51 PM Ed Jaffe 
wrote:

> On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote:
> > What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud".
> Not
> > aware of a real Z cloud offering?
>
> According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for
> years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product
> Management Leader".
>
> I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what
> some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"...
>
> --
> Phoenix Software International
> Edward E. Jaffe
> 831 Parkview Drive North
> El Segundo, CA 90245
> https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
>
>
>
> 
> This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
> information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
> received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
> review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
> contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
> of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
> message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
> email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
> free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system
> into
> which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
> to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
> sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 

><º>`·.¸¸´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸>(((º>
.·´¯`·.><º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><º>

<>< Go fishing ><>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-11 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 12/11/2021 11:07 AM, zMan wrote:

What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". Not
aware of a real Z cloud offering?


According to LinkedIn, IBM's Scott Engleman, who did an amazing job for 
years as z/OS Offering Manager, is now the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud Product 
Management Leader".


I believe the "IBM Z Hybrid Cloud" offering to be the full name of what 
some folks refer to as "Z Cloud"...


--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/



This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-11 Thread zMan
What Z cloud offering? I see them categorizing CICS revenue as "cloud". Not
aware of a real Z cloud offering?

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 10:40 PM Clark Morris <
03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:55:08 -0800, Ed Jaffe
>  wrote:
>
> >On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote:
> >> I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us
> >> are missing.
> >> This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the
> >> (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete
> >> mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.
> >>
> >> So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of
> >> the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like
> >> these old, obsolete mainframes.
> >
> >Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has
> >*explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY:
>
> How reliable is IBM's z related cloud offering?
>
> How many of the mainframe shops are in practice old and obsolete due
> to management policy?  How many shops have COBOL coding standards last
> updated with either COBOL 68 (ANS COBOL) or COBOL 74 (COBOL VS)?
>
> In my opinion one of the greater risks of the cloud is that the
> appropriate national government may compel the provider be it AWS,
> IBM, Microsoft, etc. to give said government access to an
> organization's data without notifying the organization.  I think I
> read somewhere that the US Patriot act may authorize this and I
> believe that this is probably not unique to the United States.
> >
> >https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes
>
> Clark Morris
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>


-- 
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-11 Thread Bill Johnson
1 mic, 4 mics, 40 mics, 400 mics is all irrelevant to the original topic. AWS 
was down for hours, longer for some. Important transactions just can’t be 
unavailable for hours and that’s why banks, health care, insurance, airlines, 
big retail, and others will never leave the mainframe. 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 12:12 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

I've not seen 4 mics, maybe less than 100 But I've not done any serious 
looking. My numbers, 5 mills to 400 mics was a quick overview to grab averages. 
Once I saw the numbers I knew there would be performance gains since my 
workloads are mostly, I would like to think, of fairly normal profile, weighted 
more heavily on IO than the other resources. And I did see movement graphically 
with backup windows, for one, moving back in time but did not do any further 
discoveries.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  9:09 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Stated 
well-Original Message-From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 On Behalf Of Bill JohnsonSent: Wednesday, December 
8, 2021 7:59 PMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.** EXTERNAL 
EMAIL - USE CAUTION **“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what 
Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the 
very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to 
get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is 
more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s 
really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E 
expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Don't like to get into 
these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While 
I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but 
questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary 
positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've 
seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not 
know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When 
we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. 
To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time 
due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0:
 IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for M

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-11 Thread patrickfalcone7
I've not seen 4 mics, maybe less than 100 But I've not done any serious 
looking. My numbers, 5 mills to 400 mics was a quick overview to grab averages. 
Once I saw the numbers I knew there would be performance gains since my 
workloads are mostly, I would like to think, of fairly normal profile, weighted 
more heavily on IO than the other resources. And I did see movement graphically 
with backup windows, for one, moving back in time but did not do any further 
discoveries.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  9:09 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. Stated 
well-Original Message-From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 On Behalf Of Bill JohnsonSent: Wednesday, December 
8, 2021 7:59 PMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.** EXTERNAL 
EMAIL - USE CAUTION **“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what 
Metz said. He STATED that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the 
very start. It’s his MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to 
get facts, not play games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is 
more important than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s 
really pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E 
expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Don't like to get into 
these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you not to fan flames. While 
I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily state anything but 
questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you in any unnecessary 
positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state what metrics I've 
seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at how many might not 
know that it is possible to get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When 
we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. 
To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time 
due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0:
 IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s 

Re: RES: AWS is down.

2021-12-10 Thread Bill Johnson
Not sure if anyone saw that Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, during the investors 
earnings call yesterday, trolled AWS saying the Oracle cloud doesn’t go down. 
Oracle up almost 15% today on stellar earnings and guidance.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 11:59 PM, David Crayford  
wrote:

On 8/12/21 9:34 pm, Bodra - Pessoal wrote:
> Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR?


Of course they do. Cloud computing providers allow you to set 
availability zones on different data centeres and they replicate. Like 
most It outages I suspect human error just like Facebook a couple of 
months ago. You can build the most reliable
infrastructure in the world but if a human is involved you are always in 
danger of an outage.


>
> Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, 
> mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is 
> too expensive?
>
>
> Carlos Bodra
> IBM zEnterprise Certified
> São Paulo – SP – Brazil
>
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  Em nome de 
> kekronbekron
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26
> Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Assunto: Re: AWS is down.
>
> Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible 
> server/platform, in all of time.
> What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
> IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.
>
> - KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel 
>  wrote:
>
>> You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
>>
>> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."
>>
>> Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result
>>
>> of no mainframe.
>>
>> You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
>>
>> Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.
>>
>> I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller
>>
>> write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.
>>
>> The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques
>>
>> or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular
>>
>> telephones.
>>
>> There was no Internet as we know it today etc.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:
>>
>>> Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
>>>
>>> At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for 
>>> MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
>>>
>>> What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
>>>
>>> It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to 
>>> lead to their death... is what's being said.
>>>
>>> Sounds pretty privileged to me.
>>>
>>> It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
>>>
>>> Did the world not exist before 1960s?
>>>
>>> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
>>>
>>> Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
>>> detriment), etc.
>>>
>>> Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from 
>>> this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
>>>
>>> We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
>>> humanity.
>>>
>>> Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
>>> waste of time and people's efforts.
>>>
>>> Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.
>>>
>>> -  KB
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
>>> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>>>
>>>> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
>>>> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
>>>> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
>>>> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
>>>> had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. 
>>>> Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t avai

Re: RES: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread David Crayford

On 8/12/21 9:34 pm, Bodra - Pessoal wrote:

Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR?



Of course they do. Cloud computing providers allow you to set 
availability zones on different data centeres and they replicate. Like 
most It outages I suspect human error just like Facebook a couple of 
months ago. You can build the most reliable
infrastructure in the world but if a human is involved you are always in 
danger of an outage.





Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, mirror 
backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is too 
expensive?


Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP – Brazil


-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  Em nome de 
kekronbekron
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26
Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Assunto: Re: AWS is down.

Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible 
server/platform, in all of time.
What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel 
 wrote:


You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."

Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result

of no mainframe.

You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.

Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.

I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller

write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.

The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques

or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular

telephones.

There was no Internet as we know it today etc.

Regards,

David

On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:


Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.

Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

-   KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:


AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes 
I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going 
to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big 
retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in 
the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
because the computer system is down.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?

Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?

Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?

Is it wrong to fail sometimes?

Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?

What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

-   KB

 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:



Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo

-Original Message-

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown

Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **

Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainfra

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Mike Schwab
Moshix did an AWS instance for Hercules VM/370 MVS 3.8J.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuXi1DLq1Sw

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:43 AM Mark Regan  wrote:
>
> What is the overhead cost to run ZD&T on AWS; that is, how much do they
> charge you above what you pay for the IBM license for it. I wonder if IBM
> will be offering the Learners Edition through the IBM Cloud?
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
> CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
> years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
> Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant)
> Email:marktre...@gmail.com
> LinkedIn:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM Sebastian Welton  wrote:
>
> > I do this occasionally (and in Azure):
> >
> >
> > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Is the mainfrrame cloud more reliable? was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Clark Morris
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:55:08 -0800, Ed Jaffe
 wrote:

>On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote:
>> I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us 
>> are missing.
>> This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the 
>> (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete 
>> mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.
>>
>> So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of 
>> the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like 
>> these old, obsolete mainframes.
>
>Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has 
>*explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY:

How reliable is IBM's z related cloud offering? 

How many of the mainframe shops are in practice old and obsolete due
to management policy?  How many shops have COBOL coding standards last
updated with either COBOL 68 (ANS COBOL) or COBOL 74 (COBOL VS)?

In my opinion one of the greater risks of the cloud is that the
appropriate national government may compel the provider be it AWS,
IBM, Microsoft, etc. to give said government access to an
organization's data without notifying the organization.  I think I
read somewhere that the US Patriot act may authorize this and I
believe that this is probably not unique to the United States. 
>
>https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes

Clark Morris

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread kekronbekron
With IBM beefing up NFS support, I also expect DS8K to be available in AWS etc.
Only then will zD&T be more approachable as there's less data leaving & 
returning to the platform.
I really hope IBM knock it out of the park with the next storage.
Since they're also working with NVIDIA for integrating DGX/EGX or whatever into 
their Spectrum storage for analytics, it would be great if DS8K came with an 
attached DGX or some such.
z16's on-chip accelerator and zBX-like access to GPU nodes on the storage 
server, can keep a lot of stuff on Z from leaving.
I find it really, really annoying that mainframe logs are sent to Splunk, when 
those that look at Splunk usually have very, very little knowledge of SMF and 
how to play with it.
Of course, just slap on a line graph, a stacked area chart, and a pie chart, 
and you have a sophisticated dashboard that demands $.
What's worse is squirreling distributed tech into Z just so the platform can be 
Kooberneetus certified... rather than building for the Z, and not being 
completed taken in by the pull of the magic quadrants.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Friday, December 10th, 2021 at 6:28 AM, Sebastian Welton 
 wrote:

> I do this occasionally (and in Azure):
>
> https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/
>
> Sebastian
>
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Mark Regan
What is the overhead cost to run ZD&T on AWS; that is, how much do they
charge you above what you pay for the IBM license for it. I wonder if IBM
will be offering the Learners Edition through the IBM Cloud?

Regards,

Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant)
Email:marktre...@gmail.com
LinkedIn:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan


On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM Sebastian Welton  wrote:

> I do this occasionally (and in Azure):
>
>
> https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/
>
> Sebastian
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Sebastian Welton
I do this occasionally (and in Azure):

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/deploying-ibm-mainframe-z-os-on-aws-with-ibm-zd-and-t/

Sebastian

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Ed Jaffe

On 12/8/2021 5:40 AM, Doug wrote:
I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us 
are missing.
This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the 
(insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete 
mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.


So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of 
the universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like 
these old, obsolete mainframes.


Absolutely justifiable, especially when the platform being derided has 
*explicitly* positioned themselves as your MORTAL ENEMY:


https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/cloud/aws-out-kill-mainframes


--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/



This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Mark Regan
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3644370/aws-outage-hit-collaboration-vendors-highlights-risk-of-cloud-based-tools.html

Regards,

Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant)
Email:marktre...@gmail.com
LinkedIn:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan


On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 8:54 AM Radoslaw Skorupka 
wrote:

>  >You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
> > ..."
>
> Nobody died because of computer failure in the times before computers.
> Nobody died because of gun in the times before guns existed.
> Nobody died in airplane crash before aircrafts.
> etc.
>
> However nowadays we rely on many things, some of them are computers.
> Sadly, there are victims of ransomware attacks. Yes, people died.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [EXTERNAL] 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Pommier, Rex
Hi Clark,

It appears as though we actually are getting close to the 1 microsecond value.  
Of course I can't find it today but yesterday when I saw the *ahem* discussion 
between Seymour and Bill, I went searching because I didn't think the industry 
was anywhere near microsecond speeds.  An article I found from 2 years ago said 
that IBM had achieved about 5 microseconds using zHyperlink.  Today the closest 
I could find to that article was in an IBM blog stating the DS8900 arrays are 
delivering as low as 18 microsecond latency.  So we're a lot closer to the 
elusive microsecond than I had imagined.  Now, when this will make it to the 
real world is anybody's guess.  :-)

Rex

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Clark F. Morris
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz 
wrote:

>Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, 
>and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ 
>claimed, but we're not there yet.

When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many concurrent I-Os 
over how many paths are involved?

Clark Morris 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format. Thank you.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Radoslaw Skorupka

>You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? 
..."


Nobody died because of computer failure in the times before computers.
Nobody died because of gun in the times before guns existed.
Nobody died in airplane crash before aircrafts.
etc.

However nowadays we rely on many things, some of them are computers.
Sadly, there are victims of ransomware attacks. Yes, people died.

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Bill Johnson
 Keep in mind this thread is about AWS (the magnificent) having an outage, that 
if it happened in a mainframe shop, would be considered terrible and 
unacceptable. In fact, AWS (and Azure/Google clouds) are down fairly often. 
There are people on the internet who keep track of these things. Whereas the 
mainframes at large companies in which downtime can cost millions of dollars 
and yes even lives almost never goes down. But rest assured, the media would 
overemphasize the mainframe outage on the "legacy" platform as if people are 
still running mainframe technology from 50 years ago. Because heck, as we all 
know, only the new stuff gets investment dollars and is considered 21st century 
tech! (LOL) Now prepare yourself for a walk down memory lane. And, this is 
likely my last post on this thread. (hurray) Because I have actual work to do 
and more pleasurable and relaxing distractions. However, I do reserve the right 
to rescind my last statement should I deem fit.

On Thursday, December 9, 2021, 07:00:53 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:  
 
 Keep in mind that what IBM is discussing is throughput rather than the 
duration of a single I/O. A typical installation will be doing I/O to a lot of 
DASD volumes concurrently. When you have a lot of concurrent I/O requests on 
the same channel, the effect of, e.g., rotational delay, cache miss, is mostly 
on duration rather than on throughput.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
kekronbekron [02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Hey Patrick,

Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can.
I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on 
average.
With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average 
I/O seems pretty good.

The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with 
zHPF?
If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
> not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't 
> necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not 
> mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post 
> was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And 
> you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics 
> on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we 
> went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and 
> ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of 
> the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message From: Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM 
> (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, 
> I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
> iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
> I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
> have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer 
> array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
> smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
> sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
> Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a 
> microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
> Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
> Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
> December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is 
> down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
> microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why 
> there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have 
> pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 
> 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu 
> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is den

Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Seymour J Metz
Ever since the advent of the 2880, there has been significant overlap even on a 
single channel. I don't find 950K/s to be at all surprising.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Clark F. Morris [03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz 
wrote:

>Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, 
>and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ 
>claimed, but we're not there yet.

When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?

Clark Morris

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Cameron Conacher
And a very Merry Christmas to all.

Thanks,

…….Cameron


Vacation Alert: I will be OOO from December 9th 2021 though to January 4th 2022 
inclusive.




From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Joe 
Monk
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: AWS is down.

Gents, please. No body cares.


Joe

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 22:05 Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>>
 wrote:

> No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the
> IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing
> stuff is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t
> even part of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe
> is far more secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the
> cloud vendors any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my
> photos, for free. And I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s
> mainframe business will be around far longer than you and I will be alive.
> Making sure your financial information is secure and always available,
> making sure your health care and pharmaceutical information is HIPAA
> protected and available for any emergencies that arrive, making sure your
> insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, making air reservations less
> stressful than air travel itself, allowing major retailers the ability to
> process the billions of transactions they require daily. IBM fanboy? Hell
> yes.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz 
> mailto:sme...@gmu.edu>>
> wrote:
>
> You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long
> way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what
> I'm thinking.
>
> My MO is to act as if facts matter.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3<https://isolate.menlosecurity.com/1/3735928037/http:/mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3>
>
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>] on behalf
> of Bill Johnson 
> [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED
> that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his
> MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play
> games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important
> than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really
> pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E
> expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>>
>  wrote:
>
> Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask
> you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't
> necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not
> mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My
> post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years.
> And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to
> get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array
> upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is
> significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the
> significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy
> smartphone
>  Original message From: Bill Johnson <
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>>
>  Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM
> (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU<mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> 
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from
> Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM,
> patrickfalcone7 
> <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>>
> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under
> favorable condi

Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Seymour J Metz
How does that compare to the throughput for FCP?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Attila Fogarasi [fogar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using
multiple ports).  That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz 
> wrote:
>
> >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite
> significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the
> performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet.
>
> When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
> concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?
>
> Clark Morris
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Seymour J Metz
Keep in mind that what IBM is discussing is throughput rather than the duration 
of a single I/O. A typical installation will be doing I/O to a lot of DASD 
volumes concurrently. When you have a lot of concurrent I/O requests on the 
same channel, the effect of, e.g., rotational delay, cache miss, is mostly on 
duration rather than on throughput.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
kekronbekron [02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Hey Patrick,

Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can.
I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on 
average.
With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average 
I/O seems pretty good.

The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with 
zHPF?
If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
> not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't 
> necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not 
> mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post 
> was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And 
> you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics 
> on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we 
> went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and 
> ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of 
> the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message From: Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM 
> (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, 
> I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
> iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
> I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
> have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer 
> array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
> smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
> sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
> Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a 
> microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
> Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
> Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
> December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is 
> down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
> microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why 
> there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have 
> pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 
> 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu 
> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At 
> the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
> finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What 
> happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to 
> buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's 
> being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed 
> that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 
> 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have 
> MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, 
> apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, 
> but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means 
> that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and 
> people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me

Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-09 Thread Attila Fogarasi
zHPF has finally enabled FICON to catch up to the (high) performance of the
underlying fibre channel (which non-z uses), and still keep the benefits of
FICON -- which are substantial.  It isn't just performance.  For z15 IO is
ROI competitive with best of breed cloud servers, and beats them with the
other characteristics.  Sadly these studies haven't had wide publicity,
exposure on IBM-Main is hardly helpful.   Two decades of bad FICON is a
hard road to straighten.

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 3:01 PM kekronbekron <
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Found it:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6355789
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM_z15_FEx16SA_Performance_2020.pdf
>
> - KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:28 AM, kekronbekron <
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Hi Attila,
> >
> > For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful.
> >
> > Is it in TechDocs?
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi
> fogar...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published
> z15
> > >
> > > zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel
> (using
> > >
> > > multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
> > >
> > > 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite
> > > > >
> > > > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the
> > > > >
> > > > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet.
> > > >
> > > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
> > > >
> > > > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?
> > > >
> > > > Clark Morris
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > >
> > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Found it:

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6355789
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM_z15_FEx16SA_Performance_2020.pdf

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:28 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Hi Attila,
>
> For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful.
>
> Is it in TechDocs?
>
> -   KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi 
> fogar...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
> >
> > zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using
> >
> > multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
> >
> > 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite
> > > >
> > > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the
> > > >
> > > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet.
> > >
> > > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
> > >
> > > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?
> > >
> > > Clark Morris
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Hi Attila,

For the curious, a link to the study will be helpful.
Is it in TechDocs?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 9:05 AM, Attila Fogarasi 
 wrote:

> I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
>
> zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using
>
> multiple ports). That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
>
> 03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz sme...@gmu.edu
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite
> > >
> > > significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the
> > >
> > > performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet.
> >
> > When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
> >
> > concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?
> >
> > Clark Morris
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Hey Patrick,

Please share some info about what enables this, to the extent that you can.
I read in some storage blog that Infinidat for example does 30-40 mics on 
average.
With CFs being 2-10 mics, and zHyperLink being ~20 mics, 30-40 for the average 
I/O seems pretty good.

The 400-500 mics that you said, is that for a standard IBM/EMC storage box with 
zHPF?
If so, with any more tune-ups, or just the above?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Thursday, December 9th, 2021 at 6:47 AM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
> not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't 
> necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not 
> mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post 
> was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And 
> you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to get mics 
> on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we 
> went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and 
> ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the significance of 
> the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>  Original message From: Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu Date: 12/8/21 4:07 PM 
> (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, 
> I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
> iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
> I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
> have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer 
> array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
> smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
> sme...@gmu.edu Date: 12/8/21 9:05 AM (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU 
> Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a 
> microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
> Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
> IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
> Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
> December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is 
> down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
> microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why 
> there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have 
> pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 
> 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu 
> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At 
> the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
> finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?What 
> happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to 
> buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their death... is what's 
> being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed 
> that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not exist before 
> 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have 
> MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, 
> apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?We can all like MF, 
> but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of humanity.Again that means 
> that all technology that evolved since then is a complete waste of time and 
> people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs 
> are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 
> 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
> longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
> the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace 
> the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big 
> retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts 
> here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t 
> available. (One of the hits from today) pe

Re: 950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Attila Fogarasi
I don't know about that particular benchmark, but IBM has a published z15
zHPF benchmark which does 300k+ IO/sec over a SINGLE FEx16SA channel (using
multiple ports).  That was published almost 2 years ago (jan 2020).

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:18 PM Clark F. Morris <
03b2c618bdfc-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz 
> wrote:
>
> >Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite
> significant, and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the
> performance that BJ claimed, but we're not there yet.
>
> When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
> concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?
>
> Clark Morris
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Joe Monk
Gents, please. No body cares.


Joe

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 22:05 Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the
> IBM manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing
> stuff is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t
> even part of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe
> is far more secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the
> cloud vendors any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my
> photos, for free. And I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s
> mainframe business will be around far longer than you and I will be alive.
> Making sure your financial information is secure and always available,
> making sure your health care and pharmaceutical information is HIPAA
> protected and available for any emergencies that arrive, making sure your
> insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, making air reservations less
> stressful than air travel itself, allowing major retailers the ability to
> process the billions of transactions they require daily. IBM fanboy? Hell
> yes.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz 
> wrote:
>
> You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long
> way from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what
> I'm thinking.
>
> My MO is to act as if facts matter.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> 
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of Bill Johnson [00000047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> “Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED
> that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his
> MO. Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play
> games trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important
> than the nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really
> pretty simple. You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E
> expertise, Kurt Q is the oracle.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 <
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask
> you not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't
> necessarily state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not
> mean to put you in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My
> post was only to state what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years.
> And you'd be surprised at how many might not know that it is possible to
> get mics on average with even backleveled kits.When we did our last array
> upgrade we went from 4 mills to around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is
> significant and ended up being so. I saw workload shifts in time due to the
> significance of the array swap.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy
> smartphone
>  Original message From: Bill Johnson <
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM
> (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from
> Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM,
> patrickfalcone7 <012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under
> favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on
> avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my
> Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From:
> Seymour J Metz  Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To:
> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you
> complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://
> mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM
> Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill
> Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday,
> December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is
> down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a
>

950K IO max on Z15 LPAR was Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Clark F. Morris
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 02:21:28 +, Seymour J Metz 
wrote:

>Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, 
>and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ 
>claimed, but we're not there yet.

When it is claimed a Z15 LPA maxes out at 950K I-Os, how many
concurrent I-Os over how many paths are involved?

Clark Morris 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
No, I quoted IBM I/O claims. Of the mainframe. Even cut & pasted from the IBM 
manual. But, we all know you like to always think you’re right. Parsing stuff 
is your narcissist MO, looking for little things that really aren’t even part 
of the original reason for the thread. The fact is the mainframe is far more 
secure, way more available, faster, and unlikely to lose to the cloud vendors 
any of the real lucrative critical business. AWS holds my photos, for free. And 
I’m fine them not being available now & then. IBM’s mainframe business will be 
around far longer than you and I will be alive. Making sure your financial 
information is secure and always available, making sure your health care and 
pharmaceutical information is HIPAA protected and available for any emergencies 
that arrive, making sure your insurance claims are paid in a timely manner, 
making air reservations less stressful than air travel itself, allowing major 
retailers the ability to process the billions of transactions they require 
daily. IBM fanboy? Hell yes.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 9:18 PM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long way 
from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what I'm 
thinking.

My MO is to act as if facts matter.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED 
that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. 
Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games 
trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the 
nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. 
You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the 
oracle.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to con

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
Going from 5 milliseconds to one tenth of that is certainly quite significant, 
and I have no doubt that one day we will get to the performance that BJ 
claimed, but we're not there yet.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
patrickfalcone7 [012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the 
mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and 
insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t 
available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in 
particular:>> Do we have t

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
You started saying 1 microsecond and retreated to 4, which is still a long way 
from 500. And you're a falure as a telepath; you don't have a clue what I'm 
thinking.

My MO is to act as if facts matter.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 8:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED 
that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. 
Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games 
trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the 
nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. 
You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the 
oracle.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve wo

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Ronald Wells
Stated well

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **


“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED 
that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. 
Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games 
trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the 
nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. 
You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the 
oracle.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3From&data=04%7C01%7CRon.Wells%40OMF.COM%7C3e88328fb0594ed0916208d9bab78967%7C57c0053cb5f84a1e8bb6e8afa09f3b82%7C0%7C0%7C637746119718822367%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=B6bRQ6uTPkP4Rit3AO0LH5UKTf1TLq%2Bvukt6xw5hboc%3D&reserved=0:
 IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage toda

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
“Four microseconds is also nonsense”, is exactly what Metz said. He STATED 
that. I knew exactly what game he was playing from the very start. It’s his MO. 
Narcissism is what narcissists must do. I’m here to get facts, not play games 
trying to be friends. Knowing who the experts are is more important than the 
nonsense some people post or how often they post. It’s really pretty simple. 
You want zOS facts, Relson is the guy. You want SMP/E expertise, Kurt Q is the 
oracle. 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 8:18 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the 
mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and 
insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t 
available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread patrickfalcone7
Don't like to get into these but I have respect for Seymour and would ask you 
not to fan flames. While I understand Seymour's response he didn't necessarily 
state anything but questioned the possibility.Seymour I did not mean to put you 
in any unnecessary positions and apologize if I did. My post was only to state 
what metrics I've seen in the last couple of years. And you'd be surprised at 
how many might not know that it is possible to get mics on average with even 
backleveled kits.When we did our last array upgrade we went from 4 mills to 
around 400 to 500 mics. To me that is significant and ended up being so. I saw 
workload shifts in time due to the significance of the array swap.Sent from my 
Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Date: 12/8/21  4:07 PM  
(GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. LOLOLOLOL, I 
love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Hope you are well. FWIW 
I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable conditions. But lately 
have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. mills.with somewhat newer array 
technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
smartphone Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
 Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you 
complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the 
mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and 
insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t 
available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in 
particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an 
outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these 
decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which 
you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind 
you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in 
life?>> -  KB>>    ‐‐‐ Origi

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Mark Regan
https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/what-caused-the-amazon-internet-outage/507-94219aa6-f510-4e3d-a2b5-5c301a257152

"A problem with Amazon Web Services yesterday caused issues with services
such as Disney+ and Venmo for most of the day. Robotic vacuum cleaners
halted in their tracks
<https://www.10tv.com/article/news/nation-world/major-outage-amazon-web-services/507-cb381148-3576-4976-8638-98ee86292fa6>.
Doorbell cameras stopped watching for package thieves, though some of those
deliveries were canceled anyway. Netflix and Disney movies got interrupted
and The Associated Press <https://apnews.com/> had trouble publishing the
news."

Regards,

Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant)
Email:marktre...@gmail.com
LinkedIn:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan


On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:07 PM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 <
> 012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under
> favorable conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on
> avg. mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my
> Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>  Original message From: Seymour J Metz 
> Date: 12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject:
> Re: AWS is down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a
> microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metzhttp://
> mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: IBM
> Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill
> Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday,
> December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is
> down.I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a
> microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also
> why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have
> pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021,
> 1:33 AM, kekronbekron <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> wrote:Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At
> the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF
> to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue
> breathing?What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).It sounds as
> though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead to their
> death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty privileged to me.It also sounds
> like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?Did the world not
> exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die before 1960s because they
> didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to
> their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all information out
> there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to replace
> MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of
> humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a
> complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to
> me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message
> ‐‐‐On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger
> & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked
> on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to
> replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care,
> big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative
> posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix
> isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the
> drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is down.>>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM,
> kekronbekron 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not
> at anybody in particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because
> someone else had an outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on
> the mainframe itself went south?>> Has every site&#

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
LOLOLOLOL, I love when the so called “experts” are proven wrong.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 4:04 PM, patrickfalcone7 
<012526080649-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable 
conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. 
mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, 
Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Seymour J Metz  Date: 
12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is 
down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour 
J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the 
mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and 
insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t 
available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in 
particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an 
outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these 
decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which 
you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind 
you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in 
life?>> -  KB>>    ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐>>    On Wednesday, December 
8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> > Pretty pic/web pages 
make the $$ did you not get the memo> >> > -Original Message-> >> > 
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown> >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM> >> > To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.> >> > ** EXTERNAL 
EMAIL - USE CAUTION **> >> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace 
mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of 
course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the 
home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided 
to stop talking to my internet router.> >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill 
Johnson &

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread patrickfalcone7
Hope you are well. FWIW I've seem mics for sometime but mostly under favorable 
conditions. But lately have found mics on average from under 5 on avg. 
mills.with somewhat newer array technology on < z15 CPCs.Sent from my Verizon, 
Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Seymour J Metz  Date: 
12/8/21  9:05 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AWS is 
down. On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?--Shmuel (Seymour 
J.) 
Metzhttp://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3From: 
IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Bill 
Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]Sent: Wednesday, 
December 8, 2021 7:31 AMTo: ibm-m...@listserv.ua.EDUSubject: Re: AWS is down.I 
see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.Sent from Yahoo Mail 
for iPhoneOn Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:Critical infra in some 
places, sure, not everyone is denying that.At the moment of urgent need, do 
people really buy something and wait for MF to finish processing, for them to 
be then allowed to continue breathing?What happened to the interim stages 
(logstics etc).It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately 
is going to lead to their death... is what's being said.Sounds pretty 
privileged to me.It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 
years, no?Did the world not exist before 1960s?Did people automatically die 
before 1960s because they didn't have MF?Are people and organizations not 
allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), etc.Are we sure that 100% of all 
information out there is truth, apart from this announcement that AWS wants to 
replace MF?We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour 
of humanity.Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
complete waste of time and people's efforts.Sounds pretty delusional to me... 
just to convey that MFs are good servers.- KB‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐On 
Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> AWS had a larger & 
longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes I’ve worked on in 
the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going to replace the 
mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big retail, and 
insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t 
available because the computer system is down.>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for 
iPhone>> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> Not at anybody in 
particular:>> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an 
outage?>> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
south?>> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these 
decades?>> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?>> Is this the attitude with which 
you'd like to retire, holding onto precious remarks and burning the path behind 
you as you leave?>> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in 
life?>> -  KB>>    ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐>>    On Wednesday, December 
8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:>> > Pretty pic/web pages 
make the $$ did you not get the memo> >> > -Original Message-> >> > 
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown> >> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM> >> > To: 
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.> >> > ** EXTERNAL 
EMAIL - USE CAUTION **> >> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace 
mainframe. Well, maybe the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of 
course, for WFH, the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the 
home equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided 
to stop talking to my internet router.> >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill 
Johnson < 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:> >> > > Amazon 
Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t> > >> > > have 
our mainframe running there.> &g

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
You should know nonsense.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 3:00 PM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

Four microseconds is also nonsense.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds.

    On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Of course not.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

ObTheRaven On one channel?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

    On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
&g

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
Four microseconds is also nonsense.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Of course not.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

ObTheRaven On one channel?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
Or narcissists.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:38 PM, Charles Mills  
wrote:

Don't feed the trolls.

Charles

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Charles Mills
Don't feed the trolls.

Charles

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
 About as relevant as the thousands of posts you make. Sorry, 4 microseconds.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 12:11:24 PM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:  
 
 Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Of course not.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

ObTheRaven On one channel?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

    On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
>

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
It might be, but Puta has done similar things in the past.


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 11:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

The very same day Putin was warned about Ukraine. Coincidence?


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:33 AM, Lance D. Jackson 
 wrote:

Here’s more insight into the issue:



https://secure-web.cisco.com/18imue8hazEpdayHD0__hS9VnWTMxrPeca2DKv7KvdLJ3ipk2yvv_mYINw1q0o7lzIWqaJzFkT2oMK-XTVDunfSkEhie9M-K6tBIKMJuaAU91KNuPGtNUK6jk3Of-B2doT5c50CzfitBfkaEaEXtKBIl2oLIdVdRF4GGdhjdSjhpv5HQWq6Kqo9qkyKS1HDbxTsMbzkzy4vMQQgMaL1x4I5p-IiJ7Hz6oJt0UkHPat7bpeT8GR2MV-RxyZlRpJVghcZU-VezTm55JOGJ59CvIq3_2aYwQDPUvp3s_709pm4jTwLwMaBMjvFGnFoOVjFYwYjfxEHvPbY40AGu9Uq7Zq-n1_apxQ2qlNwxqgoZwkhWbPlSP82xsgcIrttPcwHlMQfWDCb709M_911_iMSkSYCtItgkHE1iTCUgzz8nsT1IvDozyGUGQ0bwIiPqnmR24OQZ_u__Bg3vdpeaBUQiOCg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datacenterdynamics.com%2Fen%2Fnews%2Freport-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source%2F





-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.



Of course not.





Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone





On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:



ObTheRaven On one channel?





--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3





From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.



Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.



On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:



On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?





--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3





From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.



I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.







Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone





On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < 
<mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:



Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.

Sounds pretty privileged to me.



It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?



Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?



We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.



- KB



‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐



On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < 
<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:



> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
Then how is it relevant to the alleged one microsecond I/O?


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  on behalf of 
Bill Johnson <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Of course not.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

ObTheRaven On one channel?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > **

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
The very same day Putin was warned about Ukraine. Coincidence?


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 11:33 AM, Lance D. Jackson 
 wrote:

Here’s more insight into the issue:

 

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source/

 

 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

Of course not.

 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 

 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

 

ObTheRaven On one channel? 

 

 

--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

 



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

 

    On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

 

On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?

 

 

--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

 



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.

 

 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 

 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < 
<mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

 

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.

Sounds pretty privileged to me.

 

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

 

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

 

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

 

- KB

 

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < 
<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

 

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.

> 

> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

> 

> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron  
> <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

> 

> Not at anybody in particular:

> 

> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?

> 

> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?

> 

> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?

> 

> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?

> 


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Lance D. Jackson
Here’s more insight into the issue:

 

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/report-aws-uncertain-about-true-cause-of-massive-outage-internal-note-warns-of-firewall-overwhelmed-by-unknown-source/

 

 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Bill Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:53
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

Of course not.

 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 

 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

 

ObTheRaven On one channel? 

 

 

--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

 



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz < 
<mailto:sme...@gmu.edu> sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

 

On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?

 

 

--

Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz

 <http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

 



From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]

Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM

To:  <mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.

 

 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 

 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron < 
<mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

 

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.

Sounds pretty privileged to me.

 

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

 

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

 

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

 

- KB

 

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson < 
<mailto:0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

 

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.

> 

> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

> 

> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron  
> <mailto:02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

> 

> Not at anybody in particular:

> 

> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?

> 

> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?

> 

> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?

> 

> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?

> 

> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?

> 

> What does

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
Of course not.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 10:38 AM, Seymour J Metz  wrote:

ObTheRaven On one channel? 


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

    On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just h

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
ObTheRaven On one channel? 


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:

 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
> > to my internet router.
> >
> > On 

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
I should say one thing though... your last statement makes me feel secure with 
my career lol.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:15 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> In 10 years, the mainframe will process some multiple of transactions it does 
> today. Likely a very high multiple.
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:42:26 AM EST, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> "...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on 
> those platforms."... yet.
>
> Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie.
>
> Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS.
>
> I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but 
> parts of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect.
>
> -   KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my 
> > pictures on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google 
> > cloud. But, I don't want my health care information or my financial data 
> > running on those platforms.
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom 
> > m...@hogstrom.org wrote:
> >
> > Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s 
> > finances on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where 
> > BASE is acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than 
> > the existing processes in many shops today.
> >
> > I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
> > criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
> > mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.
> >
> > Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad 
> > the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.
> >
> > > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some 
> > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical 
> > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, 
> > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve 
> > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits 
> > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
> > > because the computer system is down.
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Not at anybody in particular:
> > >
> > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> > >
> > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
> > > south?
> > >
> > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> > >
> > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> > >
> > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto 
> > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> > >
> > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> > >
> > > -   KB
> > >
> > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
> > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf 
> > > > Of John McKown
> > > >
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > > >
> > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > > >
> > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > > >
> > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > > >
> > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainfr

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
 In 10 years, the mainframe will process some multiple of transactions it does 
today. Likely a very high multiple.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:42:26 AM EST, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:  
 
 "...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on 
those platforms."... yet.

Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie.
Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS.
I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but parts 
of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures 
> on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I 
> don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those 
> platforms.
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom 
> m...@hogstrom.org wrote:
>
> Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
> on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
> acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
> existing processes in many shops today.
>
> I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
> criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
> mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.
>
> Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad 
> the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
> > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody 
> > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can 
> > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer 
> > system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -  KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > > John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > >
> > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > >
> > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop 
> > > talking to my internet router.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > > >
> > > > have our mainframe running there.
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
 JP Morgan/Chase has been around since 1799, well the Chase part. They aren't 
going to be replaced by some Fintech started by a guy/gal barely past puberty. 
And if any Fintech gets it right, I suspect Jamie Dimon will just purchased 
them and roll them into the bank. 

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:33:21 AM EST, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:  
 
 Speaking of finance... changing gears a bit.
What's everyone's thoughts on the FinTech developments, digital bank, etc. ?
Are they all still just relying on MF for actually doing the work, and just 
presenting a rosy image to customers and developers?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:56 PM, Matt Hogstrom  
wrote:

> Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
> on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
> acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
> existing processes in many shops today.
>
> I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
> criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
> mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.
>
> Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad 
> the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
> > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody 
> > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can 
> > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer 
> > system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -  KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > > John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > >
> > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > >
> > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop 
> > > talking to my internet router.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > > >
> > > > have our mainframe running there.
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > >
> > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > Email Disclaimer
> > >
> > > This E-mail contains confident

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
"...I don't want my health care information or my financial data running on 
those platforms."... yet.

Maybe not Goog or MS, but AWS will surely keep trying to eat IBM's pie.
Already, there's zPDT for dev/test-ing in AWS.
I mean, it's not real workload, there's still IBM licensing and all, but parts 
of the workload (not prod maybe) have started escaping, I suspect.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 8:06 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures 
> on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I 
> don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those 
> platforms.
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom 
> m...@hogstrom.org wrote:
>
> Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
> on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
> acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
> existing processes in many shops today.
>
> I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
> criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
> mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.
>
> Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad 
> the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
> > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody 
> > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can 
> > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer 
> > system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > > John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > >
> > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > >
> > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop 
> > > talking to my internet router.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > > >
> > > > have our mainframe running there.
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > >
> > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> > > email

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
 What I've been saying for years and catching flack for it. I have my pictures 
on AWS, and buy things that likely run on AWS, or Azure/Google cloud. But, I 
don't want my health care information or my financial data running on those 
platforms.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:26:17 AM EST, Matt Hogstrom 
 wrote:  
 
 Its all about the workload.  AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
existing processes in many shops today.  

I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.  

Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad the 
mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.

> On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> Not at anybody in particular:
> 
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> 
> - KB
> 
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> 
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> 
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
>> John McKown
>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>> 
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> 
>> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>> 
>> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>> 
>> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
>> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
>> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
>> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
>> to my internet router.
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
>> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
>>> 
>>> have our mainframe running there.
>>> 
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>> 
>>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
>> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> Email Disclaimer
>> 
>> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
>> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
>> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
>> copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
>> contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>> 
>> ---

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Speaking of finance... changing gears a bit.
What's everyone's thoughts on the FinTech developments, digital bank, etc. ?
Are they all still just relying on MF for actually doing the work, and just 
presenting a rosy image to customers and developers?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:56 PM, Matt Hogstrom  
wrote:

> Its all about the workload. AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
> on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
> acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
> existing processes in many shops today.
>
> I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
> criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
> mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.
>
> Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad 
> the mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.
>
> > On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
> > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody 
> > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can 
> > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer 
> > system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > > John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > >
> > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > >
> > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop 
> > > talking to my internet router.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > > >
> > > > have our mainframe running there.
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > >
> > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > Email Disclaimer
> > >
> > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, 
> > > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended 
> > > only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are 
> > > not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
> > > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> > 

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Its all about the workload.  AWS is not a platform to run the world’s finances 
on but storing someone’s pictures or having applications where BASE is 
acceptable and provides accelerated innovation makes it better than the 
existing processes in many shops today.  

I have a truck and a Honda Pilot … I use each for their purposes and don’t 
criticize the Pilot for not carrying a load of dirt and my truck for gas 
mileage that is the not as good as the Pilot.  

Sorry for Amazon as I suspect a number of people are impacted and I’m glad the 
mainframe was up to buy my morning coffee.

> On Dec 7, 2021, at 11:30 PM, Bill Johnson 
> <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> Not at anybody in particular:
> 
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> 
> - KB
> 
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> 
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> 
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
>> John McKown
>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>> 
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> 
>> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>> 
>> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>> 
>> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
>> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
>> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
>> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
>> to my internet router.
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
>> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
>>> 
>>> have our mainframe running there.
>>> 
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>> 
>>> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
>> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> Email Disclaimer
>> 
>> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
>> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
>> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
>> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
>> copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
>> contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>> 
>> -
>> 
>> F

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Of course, understandable.
Does IBM not care about the 'ye olde' image that IBM Z gets in the media.
In a recent zOSMF Guild discussion here, we saw a bit of 'trying to be 
cool/relevant' vibes instead.

What I often find myself saying is.. all this MF modernization talk is acting 
as if MF is as basic as a rock, and that automation was not possible at all.
And that only Python and Ansible has shown us the light. And containers of 
course.
What I would like to see is native Z flex, rather than plastered on distributed 
relevance.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:10 PM, Doug  wrote:

> I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are
>
> missing.
>
> This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the
>
> (insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete
>
> mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.
>
> So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of the
>
> universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like these
>
> old, obsolete mainframes.
>
> Proving once again the certainty of Murphy's Law (or one of the
>
> corollaries): "What can go wrong, will go wrong, and at the most
>
> inopportune time."
>
> Doug Fuerst
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> From: "kekronbekron" 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
>
> Sent: 08-Dec-21 8:32:48
>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> > True, I haven't worked in healthcare.
> >
> > I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement.
> >
> > I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however 
> > understandable it is.
> >
> > IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant.
> >
> > Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does.
> >
> > But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else.
> >
> > Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent 
> > as it has been?
> >
> > I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw 
> > on Z.
> >
> > On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc.
> >
> > What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the 
> > baggage of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that 
> > and therefore take the gains therein.
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
> > > processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
> > > microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also 
> > > why there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have 
> > > pharmacies.
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
> > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
> > >
> > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for 
> > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue 
> > > breathing?
> > >
> > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
> > >
> > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going 
> > > to lead to their death... is what's being said.
> > >
> > > Sounds pretty privileged to me.
> > >
> > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
> > >
> > > Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> > >
> > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
> > >
> > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> > > detriment), etc.
> > >
> > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from 
> > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
> > >
> > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
> > > humanity.
> > >
> > > Again that means that all technology that evolved sinc

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
 Z15. • Single zOS LPAR running on z15 saturates at about 950K IO/sec.

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 09:05:45 AM EST, Seymour J Metz 
 wrote:  
 
 On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>   ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>   On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
> > to my internet router.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > >
> > > have our mainframe running there.
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, se

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some 
> > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical 
> > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. 
> > > > Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
> > > > decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. 
> > > > (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they 
> > > > need aren’t available because the computer system is down.
> > > >
> > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not at anybody in particular:
> > > >
> > > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> > > >
> > > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
> > > > south?
> > > >
> > > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> > > >
> > > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> > > >
> > > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto 
> > > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> > > >
> > > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> > > >
> > > > -  KB
> > > >
> > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On 
> > > > > Behalf Of John McKown
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > > > >
> > > > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > > > >
> > > > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe 
> > > > > the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, 
> > > > > the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home 
> > > > > equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it 
> > > > > decided to stop talking to my internet router.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > > > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we 
> > > > > > don’t
> > > > > >
> > > > > > have our mainframe running there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > > > > >
> > > > > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
> > > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO 
> > > > > > IBM-MAIN
> > > > >
> > > > > Email Disclaimer
> > > > >
> > > > > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the 
> > > > > sender, which may be legally privileged information. This information 
> > > > > is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed 
> > > > > above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
> > > > > responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are 
> > > > > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the 
> > > > > taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the E-mail or 
> > > > > attached files is strictly prohibited.
> > > > >
> > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > >
> > > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > > >
> > > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > >
> > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > >
> > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > >
> > > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > .
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
On what machine do you complete I/O in a microsecond?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Bill Johnson [0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>    ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>    On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
> > to my internet router.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > >
> > > have our mainframe running there.
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > >
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff 

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Seymour J Metz
What's the difference between managing 100s of squatty boxes and managing 100s 
of virtual machines? What matters are the facilities available.

Lack of, e.g., RAS, matters, but not the number of boxen.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
Allan Staller [0387911dea17-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Classification: Confidential

Yes I remember those days. However, at may last job I went 9 years without an 
unscheduled service disruption.

I have said for many years,  that all other things being equal (which they 
still are not), would you rather manage 100's of squatty boxes or one mainframe?
The choice is yours


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf
> Of John McKown
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
> is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
> reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my 
> internet router.
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we
> > don’t
> >
> > have our mainframe running there.
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> Email Disclaimer
>
> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
> E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::

The contents of this e-mail and a

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Cameron Conacher
Perhaps it is a mainframe opportunity?

Thanks,

…….Cameron


Vacation Alert: I will be OOO from December 9th 2021 though to January 4th 2022 
inclusive.




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 11:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: AWS is down.

+1

Different strokes for different folks. AWS's failure is not a mainframe success.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

American Express made the following annotations

This e-mail was sent to you by a representative of Amex Bank of Canada, P.O. 
Box 3204, Station "F", Toronto, ON, M1W 3W7, www.americanexpress.ca. If you no 
longer wish to receive these e-mails, please notify the sender by reply e-mail.

This e-mail is solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential 
or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this 
e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
the sender by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail 
and any attachments. Thank you.

American Express a fait les remarques suivantes
Ce courriel vous a été envoyé par un représentant de la Banque Amex du Canada, 
C.P. 3204, succursale F, Toronto (Ontario) M1W 3W7, www.americanexpress.ca. Si, 
par la suite, vous ne souhaitez plus recevoir ces courriels, veuillez en aviser 
les expéditeurs par courriel.

Ce courriel est réservé au seul destinataire indiqué et peut renfermer des 
renseignements confidentiels et privilégiés. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire 
prévu, toute divulgation, duplication, utilisation ou distribution du courriel 
est interdite. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser 
l’expéditeur par courriel et détruire immédiatement le courriel et toute pièce 
jointe. Merci.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Doug
I have watched this thread, and there is simply one thing most of us are 
missing.
This is a MF forum. For years, we have been subjected to "oh using the 
(insert new technology) is so much better than these old obsolete 
mainframes." And we have universally warned not to drink the Kool-Aid.


So excuse us a bit of satisfaction when the one of these "master of the 
universe" technologies has a problem that renders it mortal, like these 
old, obsolete mainframes.


Proving once again the certainty of Murphy's Law (or one of the 
corollaries): "What can go wrong, will go wrong, and at the most 
inopportune time."


Doug Fuerst

-- Original Message --
From: "kekronbekron" <02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: 08-Dec-21 8:32:48
Subject: Re: AWS is down.


True, I haven't worked in healthcare.
I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement.
I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable 
it is.

IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant.
Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does.
But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else.
Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as 
it has been?
I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z.
On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc.
What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage 
of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore 
take the gains therein.

- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


 I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why 
there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.

 Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

 On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

 At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF 
to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

 What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

 It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to 
lead to their death... is what's being said.

 Sounds pretty privileged to me.

 It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

 Did the world not exist before 1960s?

 Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

 Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

 Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

 We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

 Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

 Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

 -   KB

 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

 > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS 
is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, 
big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here 
in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
because the computer system is down.
 >
 > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
 >
 > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
 >
 > Not at anybody in particular:
 >
 > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
 >
 > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
 >
 > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
 >
 > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
 >
 > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
 >
 > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
 >
 > -  KB
 >
 > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
 >
 > On Wednesday, Decemb

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread David Spiegel

Hi KB,
You goofed again. Your head must be in the clouds (pun intended).

You said: "... cut out all the baggage of backward compatibility ..."
Backward compatibility is a big part of customer loyalty. Customers 
expect that their applications will run when processors are upgraded.
For example, I have a customer that has a serious investment in 40 year 
old applications.


Regards,
David

On 2021-12-08 08:32, kekronbekron wrote:

True, I haven't worked in healthcare.
I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement.
I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable 
it is.

IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant.
Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does.
But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else.
Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as 
it has been?
I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z.
On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc.
What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage 
of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore 
take the gains therein.

- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.

At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?

What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).

It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.

Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?

Did the world not exist before 1960s?

Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.

Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.

Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.

Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

-   KB

 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:


AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes 
I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going 
to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big 
retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in 
the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
because the computer system is down.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?

Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?

Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?

Is it wrong to fail sometimes?

Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?

What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

-  KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:


Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo

-Original Message-

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown

Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **

Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
is the week point. An

Re: RES: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
I don't know, but it will be good to compare solutions like this; without any 
unnecessary sales flexing built into it.
Reckon it's very hard to find someone who knows enough about the major 
IaaS/PaaS ways that are out there to give us an objective view.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 7:04 PM, Bodra - Pessoal 
<02eda2bc565a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR?
>
> Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, 
> mirror backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is 
> too expensive?
>
> Carlos Bodra
>
> IBM zEnterprise Certified
>
> São Paulo – SP – Brazil
>
> -Mensagem original-
>
> De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Em nome de 
> kekronbekron
>
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26
>
> Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Assunto: Re: AWS is down.
>
> Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible 
> server/platform, in all of time.
>
> What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
>
> IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.
>
> -   KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel 
> dspiegel...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > You said: "... Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> >
> > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."
> >
> > Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result
> >
> > of no mainframe.
> >
> > You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
> >
> > Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.
> >
> > I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller
> >
> > write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.
> >
> > The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques
> >
> > or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular
> >
> > telephones.
> >
> > There was no Internet as we know it today etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:
> >
> > > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
> > >
> > > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for 
> > > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue 
> > > breathing?
> > >
> > > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
> > >
> > > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going 
> > > to lead to their death... is what's being said.
> > >
> > > Sounds pretty privileged to me.
> > >
> > > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
> > >
> > > Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> > >
> > > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
> > >
> > > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> > > detriment), etc.
> > >
> > > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from 
> > > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
> > >
> > > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
> > > humanity.
> > >
> > > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a 
> > > complete waste of time and people's efforts.
> > >
> > > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good 
> > > servers.
> > >
> > > -   KB
> > >
> > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> > > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some 
> > > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical 
> > > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. 
> > > > Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the 
> > > > decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. 
> > > > (One of

RES: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bodra - Pessoal
Just a very simple question: They know word CONTINGENCY and data MIRROR?

Most of mainframe installations that I know today has contingency plans, mirror 
backup links, backup power sources etc... Cloud haven´t this, or is too 
expensive?


Carlos Bodra
IBM zEnterprise Certified
São Paulo – SP – Brazil


-Mensagem original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  Em nome de 
kekronbekron
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 8 de dezembro de 2021 10:26
Para: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Assunto: Re: AWS is down.

Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible 
server/platform, in all of time.
What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel 
 wrote:

> You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
>
> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."
>
> Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result
>
> of no mainframe.
>
> You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
>
> Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.
>
> I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller
>
> write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.
>
> The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques
>
> or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular
>
> telephones.
>
> There was no Internet as we know it today etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
> On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:
>
> > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
> >
> > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for 
> > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
> >
> > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
> >
> > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to 
> > lead to their death... is what's being said.
> >
> > Sounds pretty privileged to me.
> >
> > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
> >
> > Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> >
> > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
> >
> > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> > detriment), etc.
> >
> > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from 
> > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
> >
> > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
> > humanity.
> >
> > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
> > waste of time and people's efforts.
> >
> > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some 
> > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical 
> > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, 
> > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve 
> > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits 
> > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
> > > because the computer system is down.
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Not at anybody in particular:
> > >
> > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> > >
> > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
> > > south?
> > >
> > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> > >
> > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> > >
> > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto 
> > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> > >
> > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlo

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
True, I haven't worked in healthcare.
I do apologize for being a bit dramatic in refuting the initial statement.
I just don't get the 'this way or no way' perspective, however understandable 
it is.

IBM's own quantum efforts may make MF irrelevant.
Tech will keep evolving, yes MF is excellent at what it does.
But why hold on to the favourite box and see nothing else.
Even if MF is around for 500 years, is it really going to stay as excellent as 
it has been?
I'm only seeing "hey! I can do it too" sort of implementations of "new" sw on Z.
On the hardware side, I can't wait for DS9K etc.
What would be excellent is if zOS v3 started afresh and cut out all the baggage 
of backward compatibility... for those who can afford to do that and therefore 
take the gains therein.

- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 6:01 PM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe 
> processes each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a 
> microsecond. Yes, people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why 
> there are plenty of pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have 
> pharmacies.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
>
> At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF 
> to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
>
> What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
>
> It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to 
> lead to their death... is what's being said.
>
> Sounds pretty privileged to me.
>
> It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
>
> Did the world not exist before 1960s?
>
> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
>
> Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> detriment), etc.
>
> Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
> announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
>
> We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
> humanity.
>
> Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
> waste of time and people's efforts.
>
> Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.
>
> -   KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> > think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> > banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has 
> > had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody 
> > dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can 
> > and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer 
> > system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> > remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -  KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > > John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread kekronbekron
Of course, agreed. Just saying that MF isn't the one and only, best possible 
server/platform, in all of time.
What's wrong with others trying, however futile it may or may not be.
IBM sure did try when they first created the MF.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 5:45 PM, David Spiegel 
 wrote:

> You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
>
> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."
>
> Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result
>
> of no mainframe.
>
> You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
>
> Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.
>
> I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller
>
> write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.
>
> The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques
>
> or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular
>
> telephones.
>
> There was no Internet as we know it today etc.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
> On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:
>
> > Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
> >
> > At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for 
> > MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
> >
> > What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
> >
> > It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to 
> > lead to their death... is what's being said.
> >
> > Sounds pretty privileged to me.
> >
> > It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
> >
> > Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> >
> > Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
> >
> > Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own 
> > detriment), etc.
> >
> > Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from 
> > this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
> >
> > We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
> > humanity.
> >
> > Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
> > waste of time and people's efforts.
> >
> > Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> > > mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some 
> > > here think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical 
> > > applications like banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, 
> > > the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve 
> > > been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits 
> > > from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
> > > because the computer system is down.
> > >
> > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> > > 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > > Not at anybody in particular:
> > >
> > > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> > >
> > > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went 
> > > south?
> > >
> > > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> > >
> > > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> > >
> > > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto 
> > > precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> > >
> > > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> > >
> > > -   KB
> > >
> > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> > > 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
> > > > From: IBM Main

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential

Yes I remember those days. However, at may last job I went 9 years without an 
unscheduled service disruption.

I have said for many years,  that all other things being equal (which they 
still are not), would you rather manage 100's of squatty boxes or one mainframe?
The choice is yours


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf
> Of John McKown
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
> is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
> reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my 
> internet router.
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we
> > don’t
> >
> > have our mainframe running there.
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> Email Disclaimer
>
> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
> E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> --
> ---
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. 
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore 
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or 
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
may not necessarily reflect t

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Bill Johnson
I see someone who has never worked in health care where the mainframe processes 
each drug prescribed and checks for drug interactions in a microsecond. Yes, 
people die if the mainframe isn’t available. It’s also why there are plenty of 
pharmacies open 24 hours and why hospitals have pharmacies.



Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, December 8, 2021, 1:33 AM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -  KB
>
>    ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
>    On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
>02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
> > to my internet router.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > >
> > > have our mainframe running there.
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > >
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
> > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > Email Disclaimer
> >
> > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, 
> > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended 
> > only for the use of the individual or en

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread David Spiegel

You said: "...  Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF? ..."

Yes, the world existed before the 1960s and, no, nobody died as a result 
of no mainframe.

You're forgetting that the world was a different place then.
Computer-based patient care was not invented until 1969.

I can remember going to my bank (in the 1960S) and having the teller 
write my transaction in my bankbook with a pen.
The credit card had just been invented. Most people still wrote cheques 
or paid in cash. There were no ATMs until 1969. There were no cellular 
telephones.

There was no Internet as we know it today etc.

Regards,
David

On 2021-12-08 01:33, kekronbekron wrote:

Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes 
I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is going 
to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health care, big 
retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative posts here in 
the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of 
the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available 
because the computer system is down.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?

Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?

Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?

Is it wrong to fail sometimes?

Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?

What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

-   KB

 ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

 On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:


Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo

-Original Message-

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown

Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **

Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet 
router.

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t

have our mainframe running there.

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Email Disclaimer

This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
E-mail or attached files i

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-08 Thread Mark Regan
 A 'The Register' article post last evening...
"AWS wobbles in US East region causing widespread outages'We have
identified the root cause and we are actively working towards recovery' -
which now appears almost complete"
The article was then updated this morning, with an updated status at the
end of the article.

https://www.theregister.com/2021/12/07/aws_wobbles_is_us_east/

Regards,

Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including two
years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software Consultant)
Email:marktre...@gmail.com
LinkedIn:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan


On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 1:33 AM kekronbekron <
02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
> At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for
> MF to finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
> What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
> It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to
> lead to their death... is what's being said.
> Sounds pretty privileged to me.
>
> It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
> Did the world not exist before 1960s?
> Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?
>
> Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own
> detriment), etc.
> Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from
> this announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?
>
> We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of
> humanity.
> Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete
> waste of time and people's efforts.
> Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.
>
> - KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson <
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe
> has had plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved.
> Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today)
> people can and do die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the
> computer system is down.
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > Not at anybody in particular:
> >
> > Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
> >
> > Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went
> south?
> >
> > Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
> >
> > Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
> >
> > Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto
> precious remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
> >
> > What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
> >
> > -   KB
> >
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells
> 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On
> Behalf Of John McKown
> > >
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> > >
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> > >
> > > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> > >
> > > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe
> the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the
> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I
> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking
> to my internet router.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson <
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we
> do

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread kekronbekron
Critical infra in some places, sure, not everyone is denying that.
At the moment of urgent need, do people really buy something and wait for MF to 
finish processing, for them to be then allowed to continue breathing?
What happened to the interim stages (logstics etc).
It sounds as though failure to buy/order something immediately is going to lead 
to their death... is what's being said.
Sounds pretty privileged to me.

It also sounds like it's assumed that mainframes will last 500 years, no?
Did the world not exist before 1960s?
Did people automatically die before 1960s because they didn't have MF?

Are people and organizations not allowed to be wrong (to their own detriment), 
etc.
Are we sure that 100% of all information out there is truth, apart from this 
announcement that AWS wants to replace MF?

We can all like MF, but don't need to act like it's the sole saviour of 
humanity.
Again that means that all technology that evolved since then is a complete 
waste of time and people's efforts.
Sounds pretty delusional to me... just to convey that MFs are good servers.

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 10:00 AM, Bill Johnson 
<0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the 
> mainframes I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here 
> think AWS is going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like 
> banking, health care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had 
> plenty of negative posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies 
> when Netflix isn’t available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do 
> die if the drugs they need aren’t available because the computer system is 
> down.
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
> On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
> 02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> Not at anybody in particular:
>
> Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
>
> Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
>
> Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
>
> Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
>
> Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
> remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
>
> What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?
>
> -   KB
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
> 02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
>
> > Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> > John McKown
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
> >
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> >
> > Subject: Re: AWS is down.
> >
> > ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
> >
> > Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> > processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the 
> > internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I 
> > just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking 
> > to my internet router.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> > 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> > >
> > > have our mainframe running there.
> > >
> > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > >
> > > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email 
> > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > Email Disclaimer
> >
> > This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, 
> > which may be legally privileged information. This information is intended 
> > only for the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are 
> > not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
> > delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> > disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance 
> > on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
>

Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Charles Mills
+1

Different strokes for different folks. AWS's failure is not a mainframe success.

Charles


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of kekronbekron
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Bill Johnson
AWS had a larger & longer outage today, than all the outages on the mainframes 
I’ve worked on in the last 30 years. Much worse. Yet, some here think AWS is 
going to replace the mainframe for critical applications like banking, health 
care, big retail, and insurance. Plus, the mainframe has had plenty of negative 
posts here in the decades I’ve been involved. Nobody dies when Netflix isn’t 
available. (One of the hits from today) people can and do die if the drugs they 
need aren’t available because the computer system is down.


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Tuesday, December 7, 2021, 11:01 PM, kekronbekron 
<02dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> John McKown
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
> is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
> reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my 
> internet router.
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> >
> > have our mainframe running there.
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> Email Disclaimer
>
> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
> E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>
> -
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Tom Brennan

+1

On 12/7/2021 8:01 PM, kekronbekron wrote:

Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo

-Original Message-

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of John 
McKown

Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU

Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **

Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet 
router.

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:


Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t

have our mainframe running there.

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send

email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Email Disclaimer

This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

-

For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,

send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
.



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread kekronbekron
Not at anybody in particular:

Do we have to make snide remarks because someone else had an outage?
Don't we remember the times when things on the mainframe itself went south?
Has every site's MF env. been 100% available through all these decades?
Is it wrong to fail sometimes?
Is this the attitude with which you'd like to retire, holding onto precious 
remarks and burning the path behind you as you leave?
What does that say about one's mentality and outlook in life?

- KB

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐

On Wednesday, December 8th, 2021 at 3:54 AM, Ronald Wells 
<02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU On Behalf Of 
> John McKown
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
> Subject: Re: AWS is down.
>
> ** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
>
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
> is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
> reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my 
> internet router.
>
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
> 0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> > Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> >
> > have our mainframe running there.
> >
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> >
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> Email Disclaimer
>
> This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
> may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
> the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
> E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.
>
> -
>
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Ronald Wells
Pretty pic/web pages make the $$ did you not get the memo

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **


Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the 
processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the internet 
is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I just had to 
reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking to my internet 
router.

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson < 
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> have our mainframe running there.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Email Disclaimer

This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Ronald Wells
Should have left SNA for business and IP for TikTok

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Pew, Curtis G
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AWS is down.

** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **


On Dec 7, 2021, at 2:56 PM, John McKown  wrote:
>
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe
> the processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH,
> the internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home
> equipment. I just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it
> decided to stop talking to my internet router.

AT&T have been upgrading fibre in my neighborhood and have knocked me off the 
internet three or four times.


--
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Email Disclaimer

This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which 
may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the 
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering it to 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the 
E-mail or attached files is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Dec 7, 2021, at 2:56 PM, John McKown  wrote:
> 
> Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the
> processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the
> internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I
> just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking
> to my internet router.

AT&T have been upgrading fibre in my neighborhood and have knocked me off the 
internet three or four times.


-- 
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread John McKown
Oh, but they advertise that they can replace mainframe. Well, maybe the
processing. But not the on site reliability. Of course, for WFH, the
internet is the week point. And, most likely, also the home equipment. I
just had to reboot my Windows PC at home because it decided to stop talking
to my internet router.

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, 12:49 Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t
> have our mainframe running there.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Rich Smrcina
Breaks my heart.



> On Dec 7, 2021, at 12:49 PM, Bill Johnson 
> <0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> 
> Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have 
> our mainframe running there.
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


AWS is down.

2021-12-07 Thread Bill Johnson
Amazon Web Services is down. I can’t get to my pictures. Glad we don’t have our 
mainframe running there.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN