[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 31-March-2003
Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 31-March-2003\n\n
begin 644 TESTS-TestSuites.txt
M@I*0F]SR!D86EL2!T97-T(')EW5L=',*E-534U!4ED*DYU;6)EB!O
M9B!T97-TR!R=6XZ( @,3$P,@H*+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T*E-U8V-E[EMAIL PROTECTED]5S=',Z( @( @
M,3 [EMAIL PROTECTED])R;W)S.B @( @( @( @( @( Q@I86EL=7)ESH@( @
M( @( @( @(#4*BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM@H*EMT:6UE(]F('1EW0Z(#(P,#,M,#,M,S$N,C,M
M,#(@1TU470I;:F%V82YV97)S:6]N.B Q+C0N,5\P,5T*6VIA=F$N=F5N9]R
M.B!!'!L92!#;VUP=71E[EMAIL PROTECTED]VEO;CH@,2XT
M+C%?,#$M,31=EMJ879A+G9M+FYA;64Z([EMAIL PROTECTED]]T4W!O=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M96YT(%9-70I;:F%V82YV;2YI;F9O.B!M:7AE9!M;V1E70I;;W,N;F%M93H@
M36%C($]3(%A=EMORYAF-H.B!P-=EMORYV97)S:6]N.B Q,XR+C1=
M@I3964@:'1T#HO+W5S97)S+FIB;W-S+F]R9R]^W1AFMS;2]F%N8VA?
M,U\P+S(P,#,M,#,M,S$N,C,M,#(*9F]R(1E=%I;',@;[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIR!T97-T
M+B *DY/5$4Z($EF('1H97)E(%R92!A;[EMAIL PROTECTED])R;W)S('-H;W=N(%B;W9E
M([EMAIL PROTECTED]AIR!M86EL(ES(]N;'D@:EG:QI9VAT:6YG( IT:5M(T@:70@
M:7,@3D]4(EN9EC871I;F@=AA=!T:5Y(%R92!B96EN9R!L;V]K960@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@86YY;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@:7,@87-S=6UE9!T:%T('=H;V5V97(@;6%K
M97,@8VAA;F=E*',I('1O(IB;W-S('1H870@F)R96%K('1H92!T97-T('=I
M;[EMAIL PROTECTED]@9FEX:6YG('1H92!T97-T(]R(IB;W-S+!AR!A'!R;W!R:6%T
M92$*BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM@H*D1%5$%)3%,@[EMAIL PROTECTED])23U)3@H*E-U:71E.B @( @(!87-E
M0V]N;F5C=EO;DUA;F%G97)5;FET55S=$-AV4*55S=#H@( @( @('1E
MW1:6QL5]-:6XH;W)G+FIB;W-S+G1EW0N:F-A+G1EW0N0F%S94-O;FYE
M8W1I;VY-86YA9V5R56YI=%1EW1#87-E*0I47!E.B @( @( @9F%I;'5R
M90I%-E'1I;VXZ( @:G5N:70N9G)A;65W;W)K+D%SV5R=EO;D9A:6QE
M9$5RF]RDUEW-A9V4Z( @(!7F]N9R!N=6UB97(@;[EMAIL PROTECTED];F5C=EO
M;G,@8V]U;G1E9#H@, HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2T*@H*4W5I=4Z( @( @($UIW-I;F=#;%SU5N:71497-T0V%S90I4
M97-T.B @( @( @=5S=$1EQO5-EG9I8V57:71H;W5T0VQAW,H;W)G
M+FIB;W-S+G1EW0N:FUX+G1EW0N36ESVEN9T-L87-S56YI=%1EW1#87-E
M*0I47!E.B @( @( @97)R;W(*17AC97!T:6]N.B @(]R9RYJ8F]SRYD
M97!L;WEM96YT+D1EQO6UE;G1%-E'1I;VX*365SV%G93H@( @(IB
M;W-S+G1EW0Z;F%M93UM:7-S:6YG8VQAW-T97-T(ES(YO=!R96=IW1E
M[EMAIL PROTECTED]@=AR;W=A8FQE.B H:[EMAIL PROTECTED];6%N86=E;65N=Y)
M;G-T86YC94YO=$9O=6YD17AC97!T:6]N.B!J8F]SRYT97-T.FYA;64];6ES
MVEN9V-L87-S=5S=!IR!N;W0@F5G:7-T97)E9XIBTM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0H*@I3=6ET93H@( @( @4V5C=7)I
M='E5;FET55S=$-AV4*55S=#H@( @( @('1EW1396-UF5(='1P26YV
M;VMEBAOFN:F)OW,N=5S=YN86UI;FN=5S=Y396-UFET55N:714
M97-T0V%S92D*5'EP93H@( @( @(9A:6QUF4*17AC97!T:6]N.B @(IU
M;FET+F9R86UE=V]R:RY!W-EG1I;VY86EL961%G)O@I-97-S86=E.B @
M( @4VAO=6QD(YO=!H879E()[EMAIL PROTECTED])L92!T;R!L;V]K=7 H:6YV;VME
MG,IBTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0H*@I3=6ET
M93H@( @( @4V5C=7)I='E5;FET55S=$-AV4*55S=#H@( @( @('1E
MW1396-UF5(='1P26YV;VMED9A:6QUF4H;W)G+FIB;W-S+G1EW0N;F%M
M:6YG+G1EW0N4V5C=7)I='E5;FET55S=$-AV4IE1Y4Z( @( @(!F
M86EL=7)ED5X8V5P=EO;CH@(!J=6YI=YFF%M97=OFLN07-S97)T:6]N
M1F%I;5D17)R;W(*365SV%G93H@( @(%-H;W5L9!N;W0@:%V92!B965N
M(%B;[EMAIL PROTECTED]\@;]O:W5P*EN=F]K97)S*0HM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2T*@H*4W5I=4Z( @( @($)E86Y3=')EW-497-T
M0V%S90I497-T.B @( @( @=5S=$1E861,;V-K1G)O;4-L:65N=AOFN
M:F)OW,N=5S=YD96%D;]C:RYT97-T+D)E86Y3=')EW-497-T0V%S92D*
M5'EP93H@( @( @(9A:6QUF4*17AC97!T:6]N.B @(IU;FET+F9R86UE
M=V]R:RY!W-EG1I;VY86EL961%G)O@I-97-S86=E.B @( @97AP96-T
[EMAIL PROTECTED];EE;[EMAIL PROTECTED]5A9[EMAIL
PROTECTED]($%($)!BTM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM
M+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+0H*@I3=6ET93H@( @( @25L;]#;'5S
M=5R961(='1P4W1R97-S55S=$-AV4*55S=#H@( @( @('1EW1#3D9%
M3V)J96-T*]R9RYJ8F]SRYT97-T+FAE;QO+G1EW0N25L;]#;'5S=5R
M961(='1P4W1R97-S55S=$-AV4IE1Y4Z( @( @(!F86EL=7)ED5X
M8V5P=EO;CH@(!J=6YI=YFF%M97=OFLN07-S97)T:6]N1F%I;5D17)R
M;W(*365SV%G93H@( @(%=AR!A8FQE('1O(EN=F]K92!R96UO=F4*+2TM
@+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM+2TM@H!
end
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-705542 ] Errorenous IllegalStateException on CMR-Collection
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 13:53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Errorenous IllegalStateException on CMR-Collection Initial Comment: We've been dealing with this bug since we started up our project with JBoss 3.0.0. Now we are using JBoss 3.0.2RC2 with Postgres 7.2 and we still get it. When we are using a Collection retrieved with a CMR-getter on a local interface the Collection sporadicly maybe 1 of 200 calls thinks it was created in another transaction that obviously isn't the case. We get a stacktrace like this: 12:21:38,121 ERROR [LogInterceptor] RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The iterator of a CMR collection may only be used within the transction in which it was created at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge.RelationSet$1.verif yIteratorIsValid(RelationSet.java:345) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge.RelationSet$1.has Next(RelationSet.java:298) at se.alleato.ejb.alexandria.server.facade.PersonFacadeBe an.getNodePersonRoles(PersonFacadeBean.java:318) ... This isn't isolated to any specific bean, instead it occurs on Collection retrieved by local CMP interfaces that are called often. It is obvious an errorenous behaviour that can be worked around by catching the exception and creating the Collection again by calling the getter again which works fine but clearly is anoying. -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-04-01 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 Please, try 3.2.0RC5 from CVS. It should be fixed now. Thanks, alex -- Comment By: Johan Granlund (johgr814) Date: 2003-04-01 10:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=509036 Yes I'm using pessimistic locking, never got any performance out of the optimistic. I pretty sure this is a duplicate bug #634910 and in that report there is test case. -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-03-28 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 Are you using pessimistic locking? I tried to reproduce it but couldn't. I have a Parent and 1000 of related Child instances. There are 100 concurrent threads that getting parent's children collection and iterate over it. This does not fail for me. If could you provide a testcase that fails even time to time that would be great. alex -- Comment By: Johan Granlund (johgr814) Date: 2003-03-28 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=509036 I'm using Required transaction setting. The error occurs no matter what commit option I'm using. I don't think any special use case is required to reproduce it, just specify two entity beans A 1-n B. Create one session bean that fetches the collection a.getBs() and iterate over it. With some load the error will occur. -- Comment By: Johan Granlund (johgr814) Date: 2003-03-28 12:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=509036 Sorry about that, 3.2.0RC2 it was, and now 3.2.0RC4. I can also add that the easiest way to reproduce the bug is to put load on the system, then you can be sure it will happen, in our case it starts around 15 simultanous users. To work around the problem I have patched the RelationSet class. In the constructor I copy the setHandle array to the member variable instead of assigning it. This makes everything work fine but clearly isn't the correct way. -- Comment By: Stephen Coy (scoy) Date: 2003-03-28 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=463096 Are you *really* using JBoss 3.0.2RC2? Or is it 3.2.0RC2? Either way, you need to provide more information wrt to the way you are specifying your transactions and your use cases. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=705542group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Ejb test client execute throw UndeclaredThrowableException problem
Hello, All! I just test a EJB component,I found one of the functions execute will throw UndeclaredThrowableException Exception,I have no idea about it .I checked my remote interface,and beans I found nothing wrong, and the deploying is well. I use log4j to record the return value of the function,there is no error,that's the Fucntion in the bean is well formed ,when I execute client test code,the error appears, on the server there is nothing erorr. I catch the UndeclaredThrowableException Exception and call the "getUndeclaredThrowable" function,the error is "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.EntityProxy (no se curity manager: RMI class loader disabled) " What's on earth? Help. (online wait) -- Initializing bean access. -- Succeeded initializing bean access. -- Execution time: 3204 ms. -- Calling create() -- Succeeded: create() -- Execution time: 261 ms. -- Return value from create(): QryServDetailByServIdSession:Stateless. java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.EntityProxy (no se curity manager: RMI class loader disabled) java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException at $Proxy1.QryServDetailByServId(Unknown Source) at com.cattsoft.web.test.QryServDetailByServIdSessionTestClient1.QryServ DetailByServId(QryServDetailByServIdSessionTestClient1.java:94) at com.cattsoft.web.test.QryServDetailByServIdSessionTestClient1.main(Qr yServDetailByServIdSessionTestClient1.java:127) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.ejb.plugins.local.EntityP roxy (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled) at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:368) at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:159) at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader$2.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:631) at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:257) at sun.rmi.server.MarshalInputStream.resolveClass(MarshalInputStream.jav a:200) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:151 3) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1435) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1 626) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1274) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:18 45) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1769) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1 646) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1274) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:324) at java.util.Hashtable.readObject(Hashtable.java:837) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl. java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:824 ) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1746) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1 646) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1274) at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:324) at java.rmi.MarshalledObject.get(MarshalledObject.java:135) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.interfaces.JRMPInvokerProxy.invoke(JRMPInvo kerProxy.java:139) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.jav a:108) at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor. java:77) at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:8 0) at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessi onInterceptor.java:111) at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:76) ... 3 more With best regards, zxc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_2 WonderLand) Testsuite Results: 1-April-2003
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 1206 Successful tests: 1195 Errors:11 Failures: 0 [time of test: 2003-04-01.07-58 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1_06] [java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.] [java.vm.version: 1.3.1_06-b01] [java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM] [java.vm.info: mixed mode] [os.name: Windows 2000] [os.arch: x86] [os.version: 5.0] Useful resources: - http://bliss.jboss.org/~starksm/Branch_3_2/2003-04-01.07-58 for the junit report of this test. NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone. It is assumed that whoever makes change(s) to jboss that break the test will be fixing the test or jboss, as appropriate! DETAILS OF ERRORS Suite: UnifiedLoaderUnitTestCase Test:testResource(org.jboss.test.classloader.test.UnifiedLoaderUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException Message: exception in init of file:/C:/cvs/JBoss3.2/jboss-3.2/testsuite/output/lib/loadingresource.ear; - nested throwable: (org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Invalid XML: file=META-INF/application.xml) - Suite: StatefulSessionUnitTestCase Test: testInVMSessionHandlePassivation(org.jboss.test.cts.test.StatefulSessionUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException Message: Could not activate; failed to restore state; CausedByException is: C:\cvs\JBoss3.2\jboss-3.2\build\output\jboss-3.2.0RC5\server\all\data\sessions\StatefulSessionBean-ddzl5pvn-4\ddzl5srd-b.ser (The system cannot find the file specified) - Suite: InvocationLayerStressTestCase Test: testOILMutliSessionOneConnection(org.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.InvocationLayerStressTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.lang.InternalError Message: Test timeout - Suite: JDBCStatementTestsConnectionUnitTestCase Test: testJDBCStatementTestsConnection(org.jboss.test.jca.test.JDBCStatementTestsConnectionUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.rmi.ServerException Message: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is: java.rmi.ServerException: RuntimeException; nested exception is: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null - Suite: JMXInvokerUnitTestCase Test:testGetSomething(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JMXInvokerUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException Message: - Suite: JMXInvokerUnitTestCase Test:testGetCustom(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JMXInvokerUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException Message: - Suite: JMXInvokerUnitTestCase Test:testSetCustom(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JMXInvokerUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: javax.management.MBeanException Message: Exception in MBean operation 'getValue(,javax.management.ObjectName,java.lang.String)' - Suite: JMXInvokerUnitTestCase Test:testServerFound(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.JMXInvokerUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException Message: exception in init of file:/C:/cvs/JBoss3.2/jboss-3.2/testsuite/output/lib/invoker-adaptor-test.ear; - nested throwable: (org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Invalid XML: file=META-INF/application.xml) - Suite: MissingClassUnitTestCase Test: testDeployServiceWithoutClass(org.jboss.test.jmx.test.MissingClassUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException Message: create operation failed for package file:/C:/cvs/JBoss3.2/jboss-3.2/testsuite/output/lib/missingclass-service.xml; - nested throwable: (javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException: jboss.test:name=missingclasstest is not registered.) - Suite: JSR77SpecUnitTestCase Test:testNavigation(org.jboss.test.management.test.JSR77SpecUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: javax.management.InstanceNotFoundException Message: jboss.management.local:J2EEApplication=cts-v1cmp.ear,J2EEServer=Local,j2eeType=EJBModule,name=cts-v1cmp.jar is not registered. - Suite: SRPUnitTestCase Test:testEchoArgs(org.jboss.test.security.test.SRPUnitTestCase) Type:error Exception: java.rmi.ServerError Message: Error occurred in server thread; nested exception is:
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-711346 ] Trying to return anTrying to return an unknown connection2!
Bugs item #711346, was opened at 2003-03-28 19:25 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711346group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shyam Sundar (shyamvs) Assigned to: David Jencks (d_jencks) Summary: Trying to return anTrying to return an unknown connection2! Initial Comment: Dear Team, The following exception occurs when i fetch objects from database. Regards, Shyam 2003-03-26 13:45:02,843 INFO [org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.TxConnectionManager$TxConnectionEventListener] throwable from unregister connection java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! [EMAIL PROTECTED] at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionManager.unregisterConnection(CachedConnectionManager.java:274) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.TxConnectionManager$TxConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(TxConnectionManager.java:551) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.closeHandle(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:280) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedConnection.close(WrappedConnection.java:127) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.RelationalObject.closeConnection(RelationalObject.java:184) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO$ForPersistableGet.getObject(PersistableRO.java:1679) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO$ForPersistableGet.getObjects(PersistableRO.java:1804) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO.getObjects(PersistableRO.java:689) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.DBPersistence.getObjects(DBPersistence.java:471) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.getMIsWithGlobalScope(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:676) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.addModuleOwnedGlobalCR(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:635) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.populateGlobalCR(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:597) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.getRecordId(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:139) at com.adventnet.cis.ejb.ConfigurationRecordBean.ejbCreate(ConfigurationRecordBean.java:94) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.BMPPersistenceManager.createEntity(BMPPersistenceManager.java:206) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.createEntity(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:270) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.createHome(EntityContainer.java:725) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityContainer.java:998) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java:199) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invokeHome(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:215) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:91) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityLockInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityLockInterceptor.java:61) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityCreationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityCreationInterceptor.java:28) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:88) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:273) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invokeHome(TxInterceptorCMT.java:74) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invokeHome(LogInterceptor.java:123) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.internalInvokeHome(EntityContainer.java:477) at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:698) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:101) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:88)
Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
This is what I want to do. All others things from JSP are not very
much usefull within nukes. I've been browsing old website JSP and
95% of the time % % tags are used.
julien
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular Java based web scripting.
mf JSP is clearly the way to go. We will fail if we reinvent the scripting
mf wheel. Let people port to JBoss with existing pages. All I hear from
mf Julien is lame-ass whining on the compiler and such... :) I will
mf personally work on him in Paris :)
mf marcf
mf ---
mf This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
mf Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
mf No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
mf http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
mf ___
mf Jboss-development mailing list
mf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mf https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713258 ] build all fails
Bugs item #713258, was opened at 2003-04-01 11:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713258group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Scharlau (scharlau) Assigned to: Jason Dillon (user57) Summary: build all fails Initial Comment: I checked out a fresh cvs of jboss-head this morning and did 'build' which did 'common' across the project. That worked fine. I did build clean, which worked fine. Then did 'build all' and got this error: BUILD FAILED file:D:/jboss-src/jboss- head/security/../tools/etc/buildfragments/targets.ent:318: D:\jboss-src\jboss-head\security\output\gen\classes not found. Total time: 22 minutes 44 seconds This was on Win XP using j2sdk 1.4.1_01. I've attached the full build log for more details. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713258group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
Ohhh, any other PHP aliens outa there?
bax
PS: no smiley at all, honestly.
This is what I want to do. All others things from JSP are not very
much usefull within nukes. I've been browsing old website JSP and
95% of the time % % tags are used.
julien
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular Java based web scripting.
mf JSP is clearly the way to go. We will fail if we reinvent the
scripting
mf wheel. Let people port to JBoss with existing pages. All I hear
from
mf Julien is lame-ass whining on the compiler and such... :) I will
mf personally work on him in Paris :)
mf marcf
mf ---
mf This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
mf Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
mf No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
server
mf http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
mf ___
mf Jboss-development mailing list
mf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mf https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
Ok, but what about JSTL?
tabletr
c:forEach var=i begin=0 end=4
tdc:out value=${i}//td
/c:forEach
/tr/table
Isn't such code a bit nicer?
And if you want to restrict users a little bit, you can
do it with Tag Library Validators (part of JSTL specs).
Pavel
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
PK Ok, but what about JSTL?
PK tabletr
PK c:forEach var=i begin=0 end=4
PK tdc:out value=${i}//td
PK /c:forEach
PK /tr/table
PK Isn't such code a bit nicer?
PK And if you want to restrict users a little bit, you can
PK do it with Tag Library Validators (part of JSTL specs).
PK Pavel
PK ---
PK This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
PK Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
PK No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
PK http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
PK ___
PK Jboss-development mailing list
PK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PK https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713352 ] BigDecimals lose fractional digits
Bugs item #713352, was opened at 2003-04-01 14:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713352group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Boocock (boocockp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BigDecimals lose fractional digits Initial Comment: BIgDecimal CMP fields may lose the digits after the decimal point when they are stored in the database. This was observed with: JBoss 3.0.6 Windows 2000 JDK1.4.1_02 Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise/11.9.2.1 Sybase jConnect 5.5 JDBC driver I believe this problem is caused by using the PreparedStatement.setObject method without the scale parameter, which assumes a scale of zero. I fixed it in my installation by patching org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCUtil to pass the scale of BigDecimals. Fixed version attached. I believe the relevant code in the CVS Head is still the same. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713352group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713356 ] link errors
Bugs item #713356, was opened at 2003-04-01 17:33 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713356group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lior Kanfi (kanfil) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: link errors Initial Comment: when using the new jboss website, i get the following errors: 1. selecting fourms-FAQ - lead to # link 2. selecting project gets an empty page with ad only -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713356group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
Julien, It is going to be hard enough to attract developers to Nukes, don't
make it harder by developing your own proprietary scripting language.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Pavel Kolesnikov
Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
PK Ok, but what about JSTL?
PK tabletr
PK c:forEach var=i begin=0 end=4
PK tdc:out value=${i}//td
PK /c:forEach
PK /tr/table
PK Isn't such code a bit nicer?
PK And if you want to restrict users a little bit, you can
PK do it with Tag Library Validators (part of JSTL specs).
PK Pavel
PK ---
PK This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
PK Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
PK No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
PK http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
PK ___
PK Jboss-development mailing list
PK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PK https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-711346 ] Trying to return anTrying to return an unknown connection2!
Bugs item #711346, was opened at 2003-03-28 13:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=711346group_id=22866 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Shyam Sundar (shyamvs) Assigned to: David Jencks (d_jencks) Summary: Trying to return anTrying to return an unknown connection2! Initial Comment: Dear Team, The following exception occurs when i fetch objects from database. Regards, Shyam 2003-03-26 13:45:02,843 INFO [org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.TxConnectionManager$TxConnectionEventListener] throwable from unregister connection java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! [EMAIL PROTECTED] at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionManager.unregisterConnection(CachedConnectionManager.java:274) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.TxConnectionManager$TxConnectionEventListener.connectionClosed(TxConnectionManager.java:551) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.closeHandle(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:280) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrappedConnection.close(WrappedConnection.java:127) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.RelationalObject.closeConnection(RelationalObject.java:184) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO$ForPersistableGet.getObject(PersistableRO.java:1679) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO$ForPersistableGet.getObjects(PersistableRO.java:1804) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.PersistableRO.getObjects(PersistableRO.java:689) at com.adventnet.db.persistence.DBPersistence.getObjects(DBPersistence.java:471) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.getMIsWithGlobalScope(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:676) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.addModuleOwnedGlobalCR(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:635) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.populateGlobalCR(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:597) at com.adventnet.cis.service.CISServiceAPIImpl.getRecordId(CISServiceAPIImpl.java:139) at com.adventnet.cis.ejb.ConfigurationRecordBean.ejbCreate(ConfigurationRecordBean.java:94) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.BMPPersistenceManager.createEntity(BMPPersistenceManager.java:206) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.createEntity(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:270) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.createHome(EntityContainer.java:725) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityContainer.java:998) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java:199) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invokeHome(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:215) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:91) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityLockInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityLockInterceptor.java:61) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityCreationInterceptor.invokeHome(EntityCreationInterceptor.java:28) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:88) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:273) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invokeHome(TxInterceptorCMT.java:74) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invokeHome(LogInterceptor.java:123) at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.internalInvokeHome(EntityContainer.java:477) at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:698) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:101) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:88)
Re[9]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've
already done that.
However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's why
I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore.
Now I think JSP are the best things ever done.
julien
BB Julien, It is going to be hard enough to attract developers to Nukes, don't
BB make it harder by developing your own proprietary scripting language.
BB Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Pavel Kolesnikov
Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
PK Ok, but what about JSTL?
PK tabletr
PK c:forEach var=i begin=0 end=4
PK tdc:out value=${i}//td
PK /c:forEach
PK /tr/table
PK Isn't such code a bit nicer?
PK And if you want to restrict users a little bit, you can
PK do it with Tag Library Validators (part of JSTL specs).
PK Pavel
PK ---
PK This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
PK Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
PK No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
PK http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
PK ___
PK Jboss-development mailing list
PK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PK https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
BB ---
BB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
BB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
BB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
BB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
BB ___
BB Jboss-development mailing list
BB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: Re[9]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've already done that. there you go then, However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore. Stop being such a choupette, it is anoying. Where is the can-do attitude? you need something done at the compiler with a massive classpath WE ALREADY SOLVED THAT PROBLEM FOR JETTY (Jules and Scott did). marcf --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
This is _not_ necessarily JSP. It could be the script lang of your
choice.
At absolutely least the 'jsp:' should be used to be XML compliant.
Any other approach should be treated with any respekt as (very fast ;-)
hacking.
bax
Am Dienstag, 01.04.03, um 18:23 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb Hunter
Hillegas:
Funny you mention this as your fave part cause most folks that do tons
of
JSP think this is one of the more evil parts of JSP...
From: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:39:33 +0200
To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
This is what I want to do. All others things from JSP are not very
much usefull within nukes. I've been browsing old website JSP and
95% of the time % % tags are used.
julien
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular Java based web scripting.
mf JSP is clearly the way to go. We will fail if we reinvent the
scripting
mf wheel. Let people port to JBoss with existing pages. All I hear
from
mf Julien is lame-ass whining on the compiler and such... :) I will
mf personally work on him in Paris :)
mf marcf
mf ---
mf This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
mf Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
mf No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
server
mf http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
mf ___
mf Jboss-development mailing list
mf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mf https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[9]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
Am Dienstag, 01.04.03, um 19:07 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb julien
viet:
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've
already done that.
However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's why
I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore.
Now I think JSP are the best things ever done.
.. until someone invented tag libs and JSTL. Unusable in the long run
without them.
bax
julien
BB Julien, It is going to be hard enough to attract developers to
Nukes, don't
BB make it harder by developing your own proprietary scripting
language.
BB Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
julien viet
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Pavel Kolesnikov
Subject: Re[7]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
for me no. I don't like jsp tags.
PK On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
PK Ok, but what about JSTL?
PK tabletr
PK c:forEach var=i begin=0 end=4
PK tdc:out value=${i}//td
PK /c:forEach
PK /tr/table
PK Isn't such code a bit nicer?
PK And if you want to restrict users a little bit, you can
PK do it with Tag Library Validators (part of JSTL specs).
PK Pavel
PK ---
PK This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
PK Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
PK No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
server
PK http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
PK ___
PK Jboss-development mailing list
PK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PK https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
BB ---
BB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
BB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
BB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
server
BB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
BB ___
BB Jboss-development mailing list
BB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re[11]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've already done that. mf there you go then, However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore. mf Stop being such a choupette, it is anoying. Where is the can-do mf attitude? you need something done at the compiler with a massive mf classpath WE ALREADY SOLVED THAT PROBLEM FOR JETTY (Jules and Scott mf did). yeah I saw the code one day. I am not whinning :-) You want JSP, I'll do it no problems. JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. julien mf marcf mf --- mf This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: mf Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! mf No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server mf http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ mf ___ mf Jboss-development mailing list mf [EMAIL PROTECTED] mf https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
julien viet wrote: I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've already done that. JSP compilation is now functional again in Tomcat 4.1.x. I recommend you deploy your production webapps (Nukes, etc) with that and explicit mappings for the JSPs in web.xml. You can see all the docs here: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jasper-howto.html Remy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming
julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. Two remarks: 1) have you looked at eclipse's JDT? it *might* be able to compile resources that are not on disk... not sure, I've never looked at it... 2) it seems that what you really want is a templating language like velocity... velocity is fastsimple. oh, and this might be interesting: http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/developer-guide.html#Configuring%20Resour ce%20Loaders $0.02 - Renaud --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[11]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[] view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBoss. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:37 AM Subject: Re[11]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes, I've already done that. mf there you go then, However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore. mf Stop being such a choupette, it is anoying. Where is the can-do mf attitude? you need something done at the compiler with a massive mf classpath WE ALREADY SOLVED THAT PROBLEM FOR JETTY (Jules and Scott mf did). yeah I saw the code one day. I am not whinning :-) You want JSP, I'll do it no problems. JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. julien --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] org.jboss.test.jca.test.JDBCStatementTestsConnectionUnitTestCase
The current 3.2 branch has a new failure in the JDBCStatementTestsConnectionUnitTestCase. The server side exception is: 10:52:20,421 INFO [MainDeployer] Deployed package: file:/C:/cvs/JBoss3.2/jboss-3.2/testsuite/output/lib/jbosstestdriver.jar 10:52:20,656 ERROR [LogInterceptor] RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionManager.unregisterConnection(CachedConnectionManager.java:275) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.NoTxConnectionManager$NoTxConnectionEventListener.connectionErrorOccurred(NoTxConnectionM anager.java:1 55) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.broadcastConnectionError(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:309) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.checkValid(BaseWrapperManagedConnection.java:255) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local.LocalManagedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnections(LocalManagedConnectionFactory.java :179) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.getConnection(InternalManagedConnectionPool.java:123) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.JBossManagedConnectionPool$OnePool.getConnection(JBossManagedConnectionPool.java:648) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.getManagedConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:412) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2.allocateConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.java:487) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.BaseConnectionManager2$ConnectionManagerProxy.allocateConnection(BaseConnectionManager2.j ava:780) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.WrapperDataSource.getConnection(WrapperDataSource.java:102) at org.jboss.test.jca.ejb.JDBCStatementTestsConnectionSessionBean.testConnectionObtainable(JDBCStatementTestsConnectionSessionBea n.java:68) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:629) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:186) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.java:72) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:84) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:243) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:104) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:117) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invoke(LogInterceptor.java:198) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.invoke(ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.java:122) at org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer.internalInvoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:322) at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:678) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker.invoke(JRMPInvoker.java:358) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:236) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:147) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:143) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:460) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:701) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) The junit client side view of this exception is: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is: java.rmi.ServerException: RuntimeException; nested exception is: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is: java.rmi.ServerException: RuntimeException; nested exception is: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null java.rmi.ServerException: RuntimeException; nested exception is: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null java.lang.IllegalStateException: Trying to return an unknown connection2! null at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:240) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:215) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:117) at
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming
oh the way is not so important after all, more important is how to map JSP to Nukes components. JSP is one method execution. . modules consist of several methods . theme also but method are well defined by an interface : header(), footer(), etc.. . block the same : renderBlock(), etc... we could map each module invocation to a JSP. theme method to a JSP etc... julien RB julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message RB news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. RB Two remarks: RB 1) have you looked at eclipse's JDT? it *might* be able to compile resources RB that are not on disk... RB not sure, I've never looked at it... RB 2) it seems that what you really want is a templating language like RB velocity... RB velocity is fastsimple. oh, and this might be interesting: RB http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/developer-guide.html#Configuring%20Resour RB ce%20Loaders RB $0.02 RB - Renaud RB --- RB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: RB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! RB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server RB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ RB ___ RB Jboss-development mailing list RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] RB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
Scott M Stark wrote: We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[] view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBoss. I don't see how you can do that. The problem is the Java compiler (there's already a JSR for that already, ETA is for Tiger). I recommed using JSP compilation to just get rid of the compilation crap at runtime. I think we should eventually recommend in the docs that people do that during the deployment process of the webapp. Remy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
So get another compiler. We don't need no stinking JSR. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming Scott M Stark wrote: We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[] view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBoss. I don't see how you can do that. The problem is the Java compiler (there's already a JSR for that already, ETA is for Tiger). I recommed using JSP compilation to just get rid of the compilation crap at runtime. I think we should eventually recommend in the docs that people do that during the deployment process of the webapp. Remy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming
Hmm.. Just throwing out my 2 coppers, but doesn't the beanshell mbean support allow this to happen easier? You could define the module methods needed and push it out to the deploy dir in a .bsh, jboss hot deploys it, and now its available. James -Original Message- From: julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:05 PM To: Renaud Bruyeron Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming oh the way is not so important after all, more important is how to map JSP to Nukes components. JSP is one method execution. . modules consist of several methods . theme also but method are well defined by an interface : header(), footer(), etc.. . block the same : renderBlock(), etc... we could map each module invocation to a JSP. theme method to a JSP etc... julien RB julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message RB news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. RB Two remarks: RB 1) have you looked at eclipse's JDT? it *might* be able to compile RB resources that are not on disk... not sure, I've never looked at RB it... RB 2) it seems that what you really want is a templating language like RB velocity... velocity is fastsimple. oh, and this might be RB interesting: RB http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/developer-guide.html#Config uring% RB 20Resour RB ce%20Loaders RB $0.02 RB - Renaud RB --- RB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: RB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! RB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server RB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ RB ___ RB Jboss-development mailing list RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] RB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 04:39 AM, julien viet wrote:
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
I love scriptlets also, because they make the page code to easy read
and understand. Even the most entry level html writer can write the
basic java code, and it sure beats the following
table
c:forEach var=product items=${products}
tr
tdc:out value=${product.name}//td
tdc:out value=${product.price}//td
/tr
/c:forEach
/table
See what I mean. Tags are just overhead when you can use scriptlets.
-dain
BTW, yes that was sarcasm.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I forwarded the contact info at the 2 java compiler projects onto Julien. Both support passing in a class loader from which classes will be obtained. One of the projects has a licensing issue (GPL), but they may be willing to change. The other project does not full implement the language spec, but may have enough for JSP. -dain On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 01:29 PM, Scott M Stark wrote: So get another compiler. We don't need no stinking JSR. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming Scott M Stark wrote: We really have not looked into tweaking the jsp compiler layer to see if the filesystem requirement can be replaced by an input stream or byte[] view of classes as far as I know. Its something to look into as another optimization/benefit of embedding the web container into JBoss. I don't see how you can do that. The problem is the Java compiler (there's already a JSR for that already, ETA is for Tiger). I recommed using JSP compilation to just get rid of the compilation crap at runtime. I think we should eventually recommend in the docs that people do that during the deployment process of the webapp. Remy --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I don't know what JDT is. It was not I who suggested it. The JDT page says: http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/index.html The JDT project provides the tool plug-ins that implement a Java IDE supporting the development of any Java application, including Eclipse plug-ins. It adds a Java project nature and Java perspective to the Eclipse Workbench as well as a number of views, editors, wizards, builders, and code merging and refactoring tools. The JDT project allows Eclipse to be a development environment for itself. Not obviously an in memory compiler, but maybe in there somewhere. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:45 AM Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming what is supposed to be eclipse JDT ? SMS So get another compiler. We don't need no stinking JSR. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming
already tried but beanshell is slow JH Hmm.. Just throwing out my 2 coppers, but doesn't the beanshell mbean JH support allow this to happen easier? You could define the module methods JH needed and push it out to the deploy dir in a .bsh, jboss hot deploys JH it, and now its available. JH James -Original Message- From: julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:05 PM To: Renaud Bruyeron Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[11]: php5 is coming oh the way is not so important after all, more important is how to map JSP to Nukes components. JSP is one method execution. . modules consist of several methods . theme also but method are well defined by an interface : header(), footer(), etc.. . block the same : renderBlock(), etc... we could map each module invocation to a JSP. theme method to a JSP etc... julien RB julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message RB news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JSP are files ** on the disk **, why because java compiler takes files on the disks. clearly nukes stores data in database. that's not incompatible I know. RB Two remarks: RB 1) have you looked at eclipse's JDT? it *might* be able to compile RB resources that are not on disk... not sure, I've never looked at RB it... RB 2) it seems that what you really want is a templating language like RB velocity... velocity is fastsimple. oh, and this might be RB interesting: RB http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/developer-guide.html#Config JH uring% RB 20Resour RB ce%20Loaders RB $0.02 RB - Renaud RB --- RB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: RB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! RB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated JH server RB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ RB ___ RB Jboss-development mailing list RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] RB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713613 ] Unable to use declarative security with HTTP clustering
Bugs item #713613, was opened at 2003-04-01 19:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713613group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Finn (mikefinn) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to use declarative security with HTTP clustering Initial Comment: Basic application w/ declarative security and HTTP session clustering enabled. When I post to j_security_check, I get the stack trace below. When j_security is invoked, I am getting the exception below. I have other applications (not using JAAS) which are working fine in the http session clustered environment. If it matters, I am using mod_jk2 in front as a load balancer. Anyway, I did some digging and a session attribute is being set of type JBossUserPrincipal (inner class to JBossUserRealm), which is in fact not serializable. I have started down the path to making things serializable, but am into stuff that I am not sure should be serializing (such as JaasSecurityManager). I'd be glad to do the fix, but may need some help from Scott/Jules/etc. I am assuming the principal should be in the distributed session. Also, I saw a post in forums that someone had the problem with 3.0.4. I can include an EAR if necessary. mike 14:18:29,541 WARN [jbossweb] WARNING: Exception for /opm/j_security_check java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: distributed attribute value must be Serializable,EJBObject,EJBHome,UserTransaction or Context: mjf860 at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.TypeCheckingInterceptor.setAt tribute(TypeCheckingInterceptor.java:76) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.StateInterceptor.setAttribute (StateInterceptor.java:78) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.AroundInterceptor.setAttribute (AroundInterceptor.java:198) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.StateAdaptor.setAttribute (StateAdaptor.java:249) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.FormAuthenticator.authenticate d(FormAuthenticator.java:118) at org.mortbay.http.SecurityConstraint.check (SecurityConstraint.java:401) at org.mortbay.http.HttpContext.checkSecurityConstraints (HttpContext.java:1456) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHttpContext.checkSecuri tyConstraints(ServletHttpContext.java:137) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.WebApplicationHandler.dispatc h(WebApplicationHandler.java:235) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle (ServletHandler.java:558) at org.mortbay.http.HttpContext.handle (HttpContext.java:1714) -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713613group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-666701 ] Incompatibility in run.sh (: not found)
Bugs item #666701, was opened at 2003-01-12 16:57 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=666701group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Arentz (sateh) Assigned to: Scott M Stark (starksm) Summary: Incompatibility in run.sh (: not found) Initial Comment: When starting Jboss on: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE Sun JDK 1.3.1 It starts with: : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found = === JBoss Bootstrap Environment JBOSS_HOME: /soze/home/stefan/Java/jboss-3.2.0B3 JAVA: /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/bin/java JAVA_OPTS: -Dprogram.name=run.sh CLASSPATH: /soze/home/stefan/Java/jboss- 3.2.0B3/bin/run.jar:/usr/local/jdk1.3.1/lib/tools.jar = === Other than that the server boots fine. Stefan Arentz -- Comment By: Matt Ray (mattray) Date: 2003-04-02 00:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=584977 The problem causing the : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found : not found is that this file has been checked in as a DOS file. flip -u run.conf or using dos2unix will fix it. You should be able to fix the file, then recheck it into CVS. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=666701group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713660 ] commons-httpclient needs to be upgraded
Bugs item #713660, was opened at 2003-04-01 18:08 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713660group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Luiz-Otavio Zorzella (zorzella) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: commons-httpclient needs to be upgraded Initial Comment: The commons-httpclient.jar library (used since 3.2.x) is old, and makes junit struts testing not possible (required newer lib). The newer jar can be found at: http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/ Zorzella -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713660group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-710396 ] Deployed .war unaccessible in Tomcat 4.1
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Assigned to: Scott M Stark (starksm) Summary: Deployed .war unaccessible in Tomcat 4.1 Initial Comment: Platform MacOSX 10.2.4, JDK 1.4.1, Jboss 3.2 latest CVS, Tomcat 4.1.24 (and 4.1.18). Some recent change broke tomcat deployment. Although there is no error during the deployment, the servlet can't be accessed. To reproduce try to access jmx-console. -- Comment By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Date: 2003-04-01 18:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=429729 i can't reproduce the problem with the latest CVS rev from today anymore. Closing. -- Comment By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Date: 2003-03-30 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175228 I have tried starting the container with the ecperf.ear and emulator.ear deployed with the jboss-3.2.0RC5_tomcat-4.1.24 bundle and I'm not seeing this exception. I'm just pointing the ECPerfDS to the embedded hypersonic database to test the deployment. I have tried this on both my WinXP box and OSX with the 10.2.4 release and the current final 1.4.1 JDK: 18:51:38,031 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.4.1_01,Apple Computer, Inc. 18:51:38,032 INFO [ServerInfo] Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.4.1_01-14,Apple Computer, Inc. 18:51:38,032 INFO [ServerInfo] OS-System: Mac OS X 10.2.4,ppc -- Comment By: Remy Maucherat (remm) Date: 2003-03-29 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=24140 Let's start with the first issue (the NPE). Since you can build the bundle, could you try using the new SAR based packaging ? If there's a path related problem, it could help (or makes things worse, but in any case, it needs testing). Use the bundle-express target to create the SAR based bundle. -- Comment By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Date: 2003-03-28 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=429729 Great, the attachment is too long for SF. You can also check out and build ecperf from the jboss cvs, which will give you the same files. -- Comment By: Stefan Reich (sreich) Date: 2003-03-28 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=429729 When I launch run.sh from the local directory I am able to access jmx-console. That's fine. However, when I deploy emulator.ear and ecperf.ear from ECperf the servlet can't find the java:comp context. This used to work about two weeks ago. I attached the jar files. To reproduce: untar the attachment in your deployment dir and start the container. Don't worry if you see SQLException exceptions during deployment, the exception below happens regardless if the database is up or not: javax.servlet.ServletException: comp not bound at com.sun.ecperf.supplier.web.SupplierDomainServlet.init(SupplierDomainServlet.java:94) at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:256) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:935) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:668) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:210) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline$StandardPipelineValveContext.invokeNext(StandardPipeline.java:643) [..] 14:26:20,012 ERROR [STDERR] javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: comp not bound 14:26:20,014 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:495) 14:26:20,014 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getBinding(NamingServer.java:503) 14:26:20,014 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.getObject(NamingServer.java:509) 14:26:20,015 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.server.NamingServer.lookup(NamingServer.java:253) 14:26:20,015 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:492) 14:26:20,015 ERROR [STDERR] at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:471) 14:26:20,016 ERROR [STDERR] at javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:347) 14:26:20,016 ERROR [STDERR] at com.sun.ecperf.supplier.web.SupplierDomainServlet.init(SupplierDomainServlet.java:86) 14:26:20,016 ERROR [STDERR] at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:256) 14:26:20,017 ERROR [STDERR] at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:935) 14:26:20,017 ERROR [STDERR] at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:668) 14:26:20,017 ERROR [STDERR] at
[JBoss-dev] Using postgreSQL 7.3.2 with JBoss 3.0.6
hi all, I am trying to using postgreSQL 7.3.2 with JBoss 3.0.6 on Win2K JDK1.4.1 b2 but I run into some problems: 1. create table failed. I have tried the code with the default Database setting and it works fine, when I switch to PostgreSQL, the problem pop up. 2003-04-02 12:30:58,796 WARN [org.jboss.system.ServiceController] Problem starting service jboss.j2ee:jndiName=Artist,service=EJBorg.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Error while creating table; - nested throwable: (java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: CREATE TABLE: attribute "artist_id" duplicated)at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand.createTable(JDBCStartCommand.java:175)at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand.execute(JDBCStartCommand.java:84)at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager.startStoreManager(JDBCStoreManager.java:457)at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager.start(JDBCStoreManager.java:369)at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.CMPPersistenceManager.start(CMPPersistenceManager.java:198)at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.start(EntityContainer.java:376)at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:756)at org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer.invoke(EntityContainer.java:1058)at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:517)at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:1003)at $Proxy4.start(Unknown Source)at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.start(ServiceController.java:413)at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor3.invoke(Unknown Source) Following is my configrations: //standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml jbosscmp-jdbc defaults datasourcejava:/DefaultDS/datasource datasource-mappingPostgreSQL/datasource-mapping === //postgres-services.xml attribute name="SecurityDomainJndiName"PostgresDbRealm/attribute depends optional-attribute-name="ManagedConnectionFactoryName" !--embedded mbean-- mbean code="org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.RARDeployment" name="jboss.jca:service=LocalTxDS,name=PostgresDS"!-- == Set the JndiName === -- attribute name="JndiName"DefaultDS/attribute attribute name="ManagedConnectionFactoryProperties" 2.How can I see the jboss generated sql statements ? I have studied some tutorials and have add the following lines to the log4j.xml but I still can't get detail informaion from the log or the console, anyone got any idea ? !-- | An example of enabling the custom TRACE level priority that is used | by the JBoss internals to diagnose low level details. This example | turns on TRACE level msgs for the org.jboss.ejb.plugins package and its | subpackages. This will produce A LOT of logging output. If you use replace the log4j 1.2 jar with a 1.1.3 jar you will need to change this from XLevel to XPriority. -- category name="org.jboss.system" priority value="TRACE" class="org.jboss.logging.XLevel"/ /categorycategory name="org.jboss.ejb.plugins" priority value="TRACE" class="org.jboss.logging.XLevel"/ /category regards
[JBoss-dev] Returned mail: see transcript for details
The original message was received at Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:16:49 +0900 from [210.83.65.184] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 Unknown local part jbradmooney in [EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 Unknown local part jbrazeau in [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to onfo.com.ph.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied 554 5.0.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable ... while talking to mx.mail.rcn.net.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Unknown local part jbradmooney in [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown ... while talking to smtp.primus.ca.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 Unknown local part jbrazeau in [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown Reporting-MTA: dns; ns.ibizi.net Received-From-MTA: DNS; [210.83.65.184] Arrival-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:16:49 +0900 Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; onfo.com.ph Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: Relay access denied Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:18 +0900 Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.mail.rcn.net Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Unknown local part jbradmooney in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:29 +0900 Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; smtp.primus.ca Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Unknown local part jbrazeau in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:17:34 +0900 ---BeginMessage--- 3+1 3+1 3+1 60,3+1 9.193+1 200349-411 RMB1680/31500 2 3+1 _ _ __ __ __ 0574-65763302 ---End Message---
[JBoss-dev] Subtle issue with passivation change in 3.2
In looking into why the testInVMSessionHandlePassivation was failing I see that the change to passivate in the invocation thread of control had the side affect of breaking the this testcase due to its use of a somewhat pathological MaxOne Stateful Session configuration that only allowed at most one active session. Because the testcase involved having one stateful session creat another, the original callee bean is forced out of the cache. This bean could not be passivated however, due to the outer call holding the session context lock. The simplification to the cache is worth not supporting this type of silly configuration, but its possible that other bizzare configuration/cache policies might see similar behavior so I'm mentioning it. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] How do I clean up these hsqldb shutdown exceptions?
There are still two annonying exception generated on shutdown of the server coming from the shutdown of the HypersonicDatabase service. Maybe this is a problem with the lifecycle implementation of this service, or dependency ordernig, but it needs to be cleaned up. There is also an NPE in here that most likely should not be occuring as well. 20:00:42,323 INFO [MainDeployer] Undeploying file:/C:/usr/JBoss3.2/jboss-3.2/build/output/jboss-3.2 .0RC5/server/default/deploy/hsqldb-ds.xml 20:00:42,323 INFO [HypersonicDatabase] Stopping 20:00:42,603 INFO [HypersonicDatabase] Database closed clean 20:00:42,603 INFO [HypersonicDatabase] Stopped 20:00:42,603 INFO [JBossManagedConnectionPool] Stopping 20:00:42,603 INFO [STDOUT] Tue Apr 01 20:00:42 PST 2003 SHUTDOWN : System.exit() was not called 20:00:42,603 INFO [JBossManagedConnectionPool] Exception destroying ManagedConnection org.jboss.resource.JBossResourceException: SQLException; - nested throwable: (java.sql.SQLException: The database is shutdown in statement [DISCONNECT]) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.checkException(BaseWrapperMa nagedConnection.java:445) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.destroy(BaseWrapperManagedCo nnection.java:229) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.doDestroy(InternalMana gedConnectionPool.java:374) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.flush(InternalManagedC onnectionPool.java:272) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.shutdown(InternalManag edConnectionPool.java:307) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.JBossManagedConnectionPool$OnePool.shutdown(JBossMan agedConnectionPool.java:675) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.JBossManagedConnectionPool.stopService(JBossManagedC onnectionPool.java:373) at org.jboss.system.ServiceMBeanSupport.stop(ServiceMBeanSupport.java:236) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284 ) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:966) at $Proxy11.stop(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.stop(ServiceController.java:464) at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.stop(ServiceController.java:456) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284 ) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:177) at $Proxy5.stop(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.stop(SARDeployer.java:389) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284 ) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.mx.util.JMXInvocationHandler.invoke(JMXInvocationHandler.java:177) at $Proxy16.stop(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.deployment.XSLSubDeployer.stop(XSLSubDeployer.java:225) at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.stop(MainDeployer.java:497) at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.undeploy(MainDeployer.java:480) at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.shutdown(MainDeployer.java:368) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method) at org.jboss.mx.capability.ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedMBeanDispatcher.java:284 ) at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:549) at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl$ShutdownHook.shutdownDeployments(ServerImpl.java:792) at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl$ShutdownHook.shutdown(ServerImpl.java:770) at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl$ShutdownHook.run(ServerImpl.java:758) + nested throwable: java.sql.SQLException: The database is shutdown in statement [DISCONNECT] at org.hsqldb.Trace.getError(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.Result.init(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.jdbcConnection.executeHSQL(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.jdbcConnection.execute(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.jdbcConnection.close(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection.destroy(BaseWrapperManagedCo nnection.java:225) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.doDestroy(InternalMana gedConnectionPool.java:374) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.InternalManagedConnectionPool.flush(InternalManagedC onnectionPool.java:272) at
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713613 ] Unable to use declarative security with HTTP clustering
Bugs item #713613, was opened at 2003-04-01 19:09 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713613group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Finn (mikefinn) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to use declarative security with HTTP clustering Initial Comment: Basic application w/ declarative security and HTTP session clustering enabled. When I post to j_security_check, I get the stack trace below. When j_security is invoked, I am getting the exception below. I have other applications (not using JAAS) which are working fine in the http session clustered environment. If it matters, I am using mod_jk2 in front as a load balancer. Anyway, I did some digging and a session attribute is being set of type JBossUserPrincipal (inner class to JBossUserRealm), which is in fact not serializable. I have started down the path to making things serializable, but am into stuff that I am not sure should be serializing (such as JaasSecurityManager). I'd be glad to do the fix, but may need some help from Scott/Jules/etc. I am assuming the principal should be in the distributed session. Also, I saw a post in forums that someone had the problem with 3.0.4. I can include an EAR if necessary. mike 14:18:29,541 WARN [jbossweb] WARNING: Exception for /opm/j_security_check java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: distributed attribute value must be Serializable,EJBObject,EJBHome,UserTransaction or Context: mjf860 at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.TypeCheckingInterceptor.setAt tribute(TypeCheckingInterceptor.java:76) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.StateInterceptor.setAttribute (StateInterceptor.java:78) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.AroundInterceptor.setAttribute (AroundInterceptor.java:198) at org.mortbay.j2ee.session.StateAdaptor.setAttribute (StateAdaptor.java:249) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.FormAuthenticator.authenticate d(FormAuthenticator.java:118) at org.mortbay.http.SecurityConstraint.check (SecurityConstraint.java:401) at org.mortbay.http.HttpContext.checkSecurityConstraints (HttpContext.java:1456) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHttpContext.checkSecuri tyConstraints(ServletHttpContext.java:137) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.WebApplicationHandler.dispatc h(WebApplicationHandler.java:235) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle (ServletHandler.java:558) at org.mortbay.http.HttpContext.handle (HttpContext.java:1714) -- Comment By: Mike Finn (mikefinn) Date: 2003-04-02 00:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=418562 Sorry - version is branch_3_2 as of this afternoon. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713613group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Anybody ever had problem with CMR when using PostgreSQL ?
I have 2 CMP entity beans that have one to many relationship. The "Many" side have a foreign key "user_id" that reference primary key in another table. If I declare the foreign key as both CMP and CMR fields, it works only with the default database, doesn't work with postgreSQL. postgresql will complain "duplicate field user_id" when create table or access table. if I declare the foreign key as CMR field only, it works with both database system. Is there a wayto make the postgresql work when I declare the field as both CMR and CMP ? regards
AW: [JBoss-dev] JDT compiler was: php5 is coming
Phil, others,
There is even a more official batch interface to the eclipse compiler in
the org.eclipse.jdt.core plugin which is much like the original Java
compiler:
package org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch;
public class Main implements ProblemSeverities {
public Main(PrintWriter outWriter, PrintWriter errWriter, boolean
systemExitWhenFinished) {
...
}
/*
* Low-level API performing the actual compilation
*/
public boolean compile(String[] argv) {
}
/*
* External API
*/
public static void main(String[] argv) {
}
}
I experimented with it and it seems like this is not dependent on any other
part of eclipse (jdtcore.jar is sufficient) and is working in 90% of the
cases just as javac.
But I also got a few additional warnings (import not used, etc - you know
these from the eclipse task bar) and errors which I do not yet know exactly
where they come from (Lacking -sourcepath? Other -target ?). So maybe this
is just an issue in our environment.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. April 2003 03:21
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [JBoss-dev] JDT compiler was: php5 is coming
JDT stands for Java Development Tools and is a subproject of the Eclipse
framework. I looked through the source a bit and it looks like the main
compiler class is org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.Compiler. I found the
source in my plugins directory of Eclipse (no additional download needed)
under the directory org.eclipse.jdt.source_2.1.0/src in the jdtcoresrc.zip.
The only problem is that this is an internal package which means that
there is neither binary nor api contracts between releases. The Eclipse
project committers seems to tend to try to open the API's to everyone once
they stabilize, so if someone puts a little pressure on them, they might be
willing to move this class out of the internal package.
There is a method in the Compiler class with the signature: public void
compile(ICompilationUnit[] sourceUnits)
This looks like the method that would be most useful. The ICompilationUnit
interface isn't the most basic interface in the world. There are quite a
few methods, but a look through the compiler code may give clues to which
methods are necessary. This interface doesn't really care where your java
code came from so it would definately meet the criteria for an in memory
compiler.
The other obstacle is the constructor to the Compiler class. It requires
quite a few interfaces to be fleshed out. The signature is: public
Compiler(INameEnvironment environment, IErrorHandlingPolicy policy, Map
settings, final ICompilerRequestor requestor, IProblemFactory
problemFactory)
It really doesn't look like this was meant to be used outside of the larger
JDT framework, but might be worth the trouble if other alternatives don't
look so good.
-Phil
Scott M Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
ceforge.net
04/01/03 02:04 PM
Please respond to
jboss-development
I don't know what JDT is. It was not I who suggested it. The JDT page says:
http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/index.html
The JDT project provides the tool plug-ins that implement a Java IDE
supporting the development of any Java application, including Eclipse
plug-ins. It adds a Java project nature and Java perspective to the Eclipse
Workbench as well as a number of views, editors, wizards, builders, and code
merging and refactoring tools. The JDT project allows Eclipse to be a
development environment for itself.
Not obviously an in memory compiler, but maybe in there somewhere.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
what is supposed to be eclipse JDT ?
SMS So get another compiler. We don't need no stinking JSR.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
###
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Re[2]: php5 is coming
it would smell hacks of the hacks again :-) RB In the core component of JDT is eclipse's incremental compiler: RB http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/jdt-core-home/main.h RB tml RB I can't find anything on the site about the API to it, but I know there was RB an experiment RB by the cocoon folks to use it instead of the pizza compiler. RB It can *at least* run command-line, since it provides an Ant adapter I've RB used with success. RB I just threw this in since the cocoon folks were looking into it, I am not RB actually familiar with RB its capabilities (except what you can see in eclipse). RB - Renaud RB Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message RB news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know what JDT is. It was not I who suggested it. The JDT page says: http://www.eclipse.org/jdt/index.html RB --- RB Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. RB Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). RB Version: 6.0.465 / Virus Database: 263 - Release Date: 25/03/2003 RB --- RB This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: RB Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! RB No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server RB http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ RB ___ RB Jboss-development mailing list RB [EMAIL PROTECTED] RB https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.0 Release
When its ready it will go out. There are a few issues that need to be addressed still. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Hunter Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JBoss Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:09 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.0 Release I saw some CVS activity on 3.2 and the release obviously isn't out yet... Just wondering is there is a plan for another RC or if it is still on the way to a final release in the near future. Cheers, Hunter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
Funny you mention this as your fave part cause most folks that do tons of
JSP think this is one of the more evil parts of JSP...
From: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:39:33 +0200
To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[6]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I dont't want to reinvent a scripting language, but JSP are
not adapted to nukes at all. I think the nicest feature of
JSP is the possibility to embed true java code whithin text :
TABLETR
% for (int i = 0;i 5;i++) { %
TD%= i %/TD
% } %
/TR
/TABLE
This is what I want to do. All others things from JSP are not very
much usefull within nukes. I've been browsing old website JSP and
95% of the time % % tags are used.
julien
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular Java based web scripting.
mf JSP is clearly the way to go. We will fail if we reinvent the scripting
mf wheel. Let people port to JBoss with existing pages. All I hear from
mf Julien is lame-ass whining on the compiler and such... :) I will
mf personally work on him in Paris :)
mf marcf
mf ---
mf This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
mf Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
mf No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
mf http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
mf ___
mf Jboss-development mailing list
mf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mf https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Best regards,
julienmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] 3.2.0 Release
I saw some CVS activity on 3.2 and the release obviously isn't out yet... Just wondering is there is a plan for another RC or if it is still on the way to a final release in the near future. Cheers, Hunter --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-713258 ] build all fails
Bugs item #713258, was opened at 2003-04-01 11:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713258group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Scharlau (scharlau) Assigned to: Jason Dillon (user57) Summary: build all fails Initial Comment: I checked out a fresh cvs of jboss-head this morning and did 'build' which did 'common' across the project. That worked fine. I did build clean, which worked fine. Then did 'build all' and got this error: BUILD FAILED file:D:/jboss-src/jboss- head/security/../tools/etc/buildfragments/targets.ent:318: D:\jboss-src\jboss-head\security\output\gen\classes not found. Total time: 22 minutes 44 seconds This was on Win XP using j2sdk 1.4.1_01. I've attached the full build log for more details. -- Comment By: Bruce Scharlau (scharlau) Date: 2003-04-01 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=606248 Upload of the file failed. It can be found here instead: http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~bscharla/build-error-01-04-03.txt -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=713258group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
