Ligatures

2020-10-23 Thread Andreas Plihal
Hi Shay,

 

your advice helped me. Thanks a lot.

 

Cheers

Andreas
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-23 Thread Cuyahoga Falls
If you want to really get sucked in and obsessed, check our Robert 
Bringhurst's book, Elements of Typographic Style.


Virgil


On 10/23/2020 12:00 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Virgil Arrington wrote:


For what it's worth, Palatino was designed in such a way that it doesn't
need "f" ligatures. Ligatures are used because the "f" clashes with the
next letter. When Hermann Zapf designed Palatino, he designed the "f" in
such a way that it doesn't clash into following letters; hence the "f"
ligature isn't needed. This appears to be true as well of the various
Palatino clones out there, such as Tex Gyre Pagella, URW Palladio, Book
Antiqua, etc.


Virgil,

Thanks for the typography lesson. I read a couple of books on typography
about 25 years ago when I started using LaTeX/LyX for writing that leaves
the office. Palatino is my default typeface and I never noticed the 
lack of

"f" ligatures, only how attractive and easy to read it is.

Stay well,

Rich


--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-23 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020, Virgil Arrington wrote:


For what it's worth, Palatino was designed in such a way that it doesn't
need "f" ligatures. Ligatures are used because the "f" clashes with the
next letter. When Hermann Zapf designed Palatino, he designed the "f" in
such a way that it doesn't clash into following letters; hence the "f"
ligature isn't needed. This appears to be true as well of the various
Palatino clones out there, such as Tex Gyre Pagella, URW Palladio, Book
Antiqua, etc.


Virgil,

Thanks for the typography lesson. I read a couple of books on typography
about 25 years ago when I started using LaTeX/LyX for writing that leaves
the office. Palatino is my default typeface and I never noticed the lack of
"f" ligatures, only how attractive and easy to read it is.

Stay well,

Rich

--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-23 Thread Virgil Arrington
For what it's worth, Palatino was designed in such a way that it doesn't 
need "f" ligatures. Ligatures are used because the "f" clashes with the 
next letter. When Hermann Zapf designed Palatino, he designed the "f" in 
such a way that it doesn't clash into following letters; hence the "f" 
ligature isn't needed. This appears to be true as well of the various 
Palatino clones out there, such as Tex Gyre Pagella, URW Palladio, Book 
Antiqua, etc.


I know that may not be a satisfactory answer when you really want the 
ligatures. However, LyX and LaTeX provide beautiful ligatures with other 
typefaces. One of my favorites is Libertine. It has the same basic 
letter shapes as Times Roman but is not nearly as condensed making it 
much more readable and very usable for a wide range of applications. It 
also has true small caps and old style numbering and a companion sans 
serif font in Biolinum. Libertine doesn't seem to have as much character 
as Palatino, but then, that is another plus as readers aren't busy 
noticing the font.


There is also a version that works very well with LibreOffice known as 
Linux Libertine G. (Don't let the "Linux" in its name fool you; it works 
on Windows as well.)


http://www.numbertext.org/linux/

Virgil


On 10/23/20 2:33 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:

Andreas,

this is a (LaTeX) font issue.  The previewer used has nothing to do with
it.

And not even unknown :-)-O

http://google.com/search?q=latex+palatino+ligatures

So you may have to select another font.  As Kornel wrote, DejVu which I
don't have installed.  Interestingly Tex Gyre's Pagella also doesn't
have ligatures.

I like Noto and it has the ligatures :-)-O


The example, by the way is not a MWE, it had tons of Settings, Modules
and the like...

el




On 2020-10-22 19:47 , Andreas Plihal wrote:

Dear JMarc,

I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there
are no ligatures, no matter if I use


   * Adobe Acrobat Reader
   * GIMP
   * Firefox
   * Edge
   * Chrome
   * ...

Cheers
Andreas

[...]


--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-23 Thread Shay Riggs
Hi Andreas et al,

A possible workaround, should you be looking for one, is to choose “Use
non-TeX fonts (via XeTeX/LuaTeX)” in document settings, and choose your
particular Palatino font variant from the Roman menu.

The default compiler appears to be XeTeX, but you can choose either “PDF
(LuaTeX)” or “PDF (XeTeX)” from Document Settings > Formats section should
you have a preference.

Beware that you lose some speed as these engines can be a little slower if
you’re using OpenType fonts.

Also, even though I’m pretty sure that Koma works fine with modern engines,
beware that I haven’t tested this beyond your MWE so YMMV :-)

Cheers
Shay

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 07:33, Dr Eberhard W Lisse  wrote:

>
> Andreas,
>
> this is a (LaTeX) font issue.  The previewer used has nothing to do with
> it.
>
> And not even unknown :-)-O
>
> http://google.com/search?q=latex+palatino+ligatures
>
> So you may have to select another font.  As Kornel wrote, DejVu which I
> don't have installed.  Interestingly Tex Gyre's Pagella also doesn't
> have ligatures.
>
> I like Noto and it has the ligatures :-)-O
>
>
> The example, by the way is not a MWE, it had tons of Settings, Modules
> and the like...
>
> el
>
>
>
>
> On 2020-10-22 19:47 , Andreas Plihal wrote:
> > Dear JMarc,
> >
> > I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there
> > are no ligatures, no matter if I use
> >
> >
> >   * Adobe Acrobat Reader
> >   * GIMP
> >   * Firefox
> >   * Edge
> >   * Chrome
> >   * ...
> >
> > Cheers
> > Andreas
> [...]
>
> --
> lyx-users mailing list
> lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
>


Test_Ligaturen.lyx
Description: application/lyx
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-23 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse


Andreas,

this is a (LaTeX) font issue.  The previewer used has nothing to do with
it.

And not even unknown :-)-O

http://google.com/search?q=latex+palatino+ligatures

So you may have to select another font.  As Kornel wrote, DejVu which I
don't have installed.  Interestingly Tex Gyre's Pagella also doesn't
have ligatures.

I like Noto and it has the ligatures :-)-O


The example, by the way is not a MWE, it had tons of Settings, Modules
and the like...

el




On 2020-10-22 19:47 , Andreas Plihal wrote:
> Dear JMarc,
>
> I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there
> are no ligatures, no matter if I use
>
>
>   * Adobe Acrobat Reader
>   * GIMP
>   * Firefox
>   * Edge
>   * Chrome
>   * ...
>
> Cheers
> Andreas
[...]

-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-22 Thread Paul A. Rubin

On 10/22/20 1:59 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:

Am Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:47:41 +0200
schrieb Andreas Plihal :


Dear JMarc,
  
I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there are no

ligatures, no matter if I use
• Adobe Acrobat Reader
• GIMP
• Firefox
• Edge
• Chrome
• ...
Cheers
Andreas
  
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020 um 12:56 Uhr

Von: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" 
An: "Andreas Plihal" , lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Betreff: Re: Ligatures in the text
Le 21/10/2020 à 17:54, Andreas Plihal a écrit :

Dear community,
I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and
want create ligatures. The LyX-documentation says:

Dear Andreas,

If you are talking about the basic ff, fi, etc. ligatures, I am
surprised that you do not get them automatically. If so, could you send
a short example file that shows the issue?

For more complicated font-related, as Rich said, it is necessary to use
some explicit LaTeX commands.

JMarc


/It is a typesetting practice to contract certain letters and print them
like one. /
/These combinations are called ligatures. Since LaTeX knows ligatures,
your documents written with LyX will have them too. /
My document has it not!
/Here are the possible ligatures ... But sometimes you don't want
ligatures in a word .../
And then it is explained the contrary: how to prevent ligatures in the text.
Please, could you help me in that case?
Cheers
Andreas

  


Setting the font to DejaVu (instead of Palatino) shows the ligatures.

Kornel

Same with changing to "default" font. Apparently there is a problem with 
the way ligatures look in Palatino.


https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/94399/can-ligatures-be-enabled-for-palatino-and-pdflatex

Paul


--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:47:41 +0200
schrieb Andreas Plihal :

> Dear JMarc,
>  
> I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there are no
> ligatures, no matter if I use 
> • Adobe Acrobat Reader
> • GIMP
> • Firefox
> • Edge
> • Chrome
> • ...
> Cheers
> Andreas
>  
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020 um 12:56 Uhr
> Von: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" 
> An: "Andreas Plihal" , lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Betreff: Re: Ligatures in the text
> Le 21/10/2020 à 17:54, Andreas Plihal a écrit :
> > Dear community,
> > I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and
> > want create ligatures. The LyX-documentation says:
> 
> Dear Andreas,
> 
> If you are talking about the basic ff, fi, etc. ligatures, I am
> surprised that you do not get them automatically. If so, could you send
> a short example file that shows the issue?
> 
> For more complicated font-related, as Rich said, it is necessary to use
> some explicit LaTeX commands.
> 
> JMarc
> 
> > /It is a typesetting practice to contract certain letters and print them
> > like one. /
> > /These combinations are called ligatures. Since LaTeX knows ligatures,
> > your documents written with LyX will have them too. /
> > My document has it not!
> > /Here are the possible ligatures ... But sometimes you don't want
> > ligatures in a word .../
> > And then it is explained the contrary: how to prevent ligatures in the text.
> > Please, could you help me in that case?
> > Cheers
> > Andreas
> >
>  
> 

Setting the font to DejaVu (instead of Palatino) shows the ligatures.

Kornel


pgpqwlmbdwOre.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Aw: Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-22 Thread Andreas Plihal
Dear JMarc,

 


I was quite suprised too. I have enclosed this mail a MWE: I see there are no ligatures, no matter if I use

 


	Adobe Acrobat Reader
	GIMP
	Firefox
	Edge
	Chrome
	...


Cheers

Andreas
 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020 um 12:56 Uhr
Von: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" 
An: "Andreas Plihal" , lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Betreff: Re: Ligatures in the text

Le 21/10/2020 à 17:54, Andreas Plihal a écrit :
> Dear community,
> I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and
> want create ligatures. The LyX-documentation says:

Dear Andreas,

If you are talking about the basic ff, fi, etc. ligatures, I am
surprised that you do not get them automatically. If so, could you send
a short example file that shows the issue?

For more complicated font-related, as Rich said, it is necessary to use
some explicit LaTeX commands.

JMarc

> /It is a typesetting practice to contract certain letters and print them
> like one. /
> /These combinations are called ligatures. Since LaTeX knows ligatures,
> your documents written with LyX will have them too. /
> My document has it not!
> /Here are the possible ligatures ... But sometimes you don't want
> ligatures in a word .../
> And then it is explained the contrary: how to prevent ligatures in the text.
> Please, could you help me in that case?
> Cheers
> Andreas
>
 





Test_Ligaturen.lyx
Description: application/lyx


Test_Ligaturen.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Test_Ligaturen.tex
Description: TeX document
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-22 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:


If you are talking about the basic ff, fi, etc. ligatures, I am surprised
that you do not get them automatically. If so, could you send a short
example file that shows the issue?


JMarc,

The URL I posted mentions that automatic ligatures depend on the typeface
being used and one answer pointed to a method to check what's available.

I overlooked that point when I mentioned using LaTeX and didn't realize it
until I read my posted reply.

Stay well all,

Rich
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes

Le 21/10/2020 à 17:54, Andreas Plihal a écrit :

Dear community,
I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and 
want create ligatures. The LyX-documentation says:


Dear Andreas,

If you are talking about the basic ff, fi, etc. ligatures, I am 
surprised that you do not get them automatically. If so, could you send 
a short example file that shows the issue?


For more complicated font-related, as Rich said, it is necessary to use 
some explicit LaTeX commands.


JMarc

/It is a typesetting practice to contract certain letters and print them 
like one. /
/These combinations are called ligatures. Since LaTeX knows ligatures, 
your documents written with LyX will have them too. /

My document has it not!
/Here are the possible ligatures ... But sometimes you don't want 
ligatures in a word .../

And then it is explained the contrary: how to prevent ligatures in the text.
Please, could you help me in that case?
Cheers
Andreas



--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Ligatures in the text

2020-10-21 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020, Andreas Plihal wrote:


I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and want 
create ligatures.
The LyX-documentation says:

...  

My document has it not!


Andreas,
  
You need to add them yourself using LaTeX (i.e, the ERT box). There are
several threads on stackexchange about LaTeX ligatures. You can start here
<https://tinyurl.com/y6g47dwq> and follow the threads in which you're
interested.

HTH,

Rich
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Ligatures in the text

2020-10-21 Thread Andreas Plihal
Dear community,

 

I'm producing a KOMA-script-book with LyX (V 2.3.5.2, on Windows 10) and want create ligatures. The LyX-documentation says:

 

It is a typesetting practice to contract certain letters and print them like one. 

These combinations are called ligatures. Since LaTeX knows ligatures, your documents written with LyX will have them too. 

 

My document has it not!

 

Here are the possible ligatures ...  But sometimes you don't want ligatures in a word ...

 

And then it is explained the contrary: how to prevent ligatures in the text.

 

Please, could you help me in that case?

 

Cheers

Andreas
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users


Re: Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-11 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as  
Aldus or

Renaissance


As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.


Given that Aldus is a more book-friendly version of Palatino, it's odd  
that it isn't better known and more often used. I too cannot find a  
free clone of Aldus.




Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


URW Antigua, to my untrained eye, looks very little like Renaisssance.  
I'm afraid I don't know about any free clones of Renaissance.






-- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
postscript printer, like Palatino.


Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico


Another possibility would be Syntax, designed by Hans Eduard Meier.

http://new.myfonts.com/search/syntax/fonts/

but again, there may be no free clone.

My bible for all things typographic is

Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, now in its third  
edition.


Bruce



For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu




Re: Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-11 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as  
Aldus or

Renaissance


As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.


Given that Aldus is a more book-friendly version of Palatino, it's odd  
that it isn't better known and more often used. I too cannot find a  
free clone of Aldus.




Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


URW Antigua, to my untrained eye, looks very little like Renaisssance.  
I'm afraid I don't know about any free clones of Renaissance.






-- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
postscript printer, like Palatino.


Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico


Another possibility would be Syntax, designed by Hans Eduard Meier.

http://new.myfonts.com/search/syntax/fonts/

but again, there may be no free clone.

My bible for all things typographic is

Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, now in its third  
edition.


Bruce



For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu




Re: Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-11 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
 wrote:
Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as  
Aldus or

Renaissance


As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.


Given that Aldus is a more book-friendly version of Palatino, it's odd  
that it isn't better known and more often used. I too cannot find a  
free clone of Aldus.




Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


URW Antigua, to my untrained eye, looks very little like Renaisssance.  
I'm afraid I don't know about any free clones of Renaissance.






-- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
postscript printer, like Palatino.


Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico


Another possibility would be Syntax, designed by Hans Eduard Meier.

http://new.myfonts.com/search/syntax/fonts/

but again, there may be no free clone.

My bible for all things typographic is

Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, now in its third  
edition.


Bruce



For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
 Dear list members,

 I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
 noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
 in ff, fi, ...).

Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design. 

Looking at the URW Palladio font in my font-viewer (fontmatrix), I see that
there is no ff ligature and that the fi and fl ligatures are faked
(i.e. just two letters side by side).

Looking at the TeX Gyre Termes system font with fontmatrix, I see all T1
ligatures but with a clearly separated fi (also in ffi) while, in
contrast to URW Palladio, the ff has a common bar (also in ffi and ffl).

Looking at the Palatino font sample chart in the TeX Font Catalogue, I
see on page 2 the font table containing all ligatures required by the T1
font encoding -- but again faked (most probably via a virtual font).

IAW - Palatino does not have ligatures and whatever appears as such is
only a compatibility version filling the slot.


 However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
 these ligatures?

This are rather input conventions for \textendash and \textemdash (ab)using
the ligature mechanism in TeX's tfm files.

 What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
 I came across this message:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

 ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
 Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:

 ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

 Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
 Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

It does not supersede mathpazo:

* tgpagella is not a TeX standard package:

   I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

* tgpagella and mathpazo have different small caps versions. Opinions
  differ on which is better but seems to be biased towards the mathpazo
  ones.
  
* tgpagella does not set up math fonts (there is an experimental
  qpxmath package for this task).
  
OTOH, adding GUI support for TeX Gyre and other widely used fonts is on
the LyX feature-wish list since long...

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.


Guenter,

  Thank you. Back to reality: it really does not matter because 1) I suspect
that no one reading any document I produce with LyX will be looking for true
ligatures and 2) almost everyone else but us rebels here uses Wurd and the
only ligatures there are those placed by Microsoft on users and their
wallets.

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would  
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than  
Times, as the default typeface. Not only then would documents all  
around the world have a more beautiful face, but they'd be sprinkled  
with elegance


fi ffi fl

rather than littered with collisions

fi ffi fl

Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus  
or Renaissance -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of  
every postscript printer, like Palatino.


Bruce

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a 
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,


Bruce,

  They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.

  It has fascinated me how those in the Microsoft world stick with whatever
defaults are set by the OS and applications on it and never think to change
them.

  About 20 years ago I worked for a consulting company and we were quite
progressive: we all had PCs running DOS and WordPerfect on our desks. I
immediately changed the WP display from bright white on blue to grey on
black (much easier on my eyes). Others would walk by and comment, Wow!
How'd you do that? Of course, no one changed a darn thing on their
machines, but they sure specified exactly how a document had to be formatted
before it left the office.

  The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Rich


Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-08 Thread Liviu Andronic
Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
 Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
 Renaissance

As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.

Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


 -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
 postscript printer, like Palatino.

Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico

For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
 Dear list members,

 I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
 noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
 in ff, fi, ...).

Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design. 

Looking at the URW Palladio font in my font-viewer (fontmatrix), I see that
there is no ff ligature and that the fi and fl ligatures are faked
(i.e. just two letters side by side).

Looking at the TeX Gyre Termes system font with fontmatrix, I see all T1
ligatures but with a clearly separated fi (also in ffi) while, in
contrast to URW Palladio, the ff has a common bar (also in ffi and ffl).

Looking at the Palatino font sample chart in the TeX Font Catalogue, I
see on page 2 the font table containing all ligatures required by the T1
font encoding -- but again faked (most probably via a virtual font).

IAW - Palatino does not have ligatures and whatever appears as such is
only a compatibility version filling the slot.


 However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
 these ligatures?

This are rather input conventions for \textendash and \textemdash (ab)using
the ligature mechanism in TeX's tfm files.

 What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
 I came across this message:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

 ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
 Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:

 ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

 Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
 Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

It does not supersede mathpazo:

* tgpagella is not a TeX standard package:

   I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

* tgpagella and mathpazo have different small caps versions. Opinions
  differ on which is better but seems to be biased towards the mathpazo
  ones.
  
* tgpagella does not set up math fonts (there is an experimental
  qpxmath package for this task).
  
OTOH, adding GUI support for TeX Gyre and other widely used fonts is on
the LyX feature-wish list since long...

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.


Guenter,

  Thank you. Back to reality: it really does not matter because 1) I suspect
that no one reading any document I produce with LyX will be looking for true
ligatures and 2) almost everyone else but us rebels here uses Wurd and the
only ligatures there are those placed by Microsoft on users and their
wallets.

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would  
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than  
Times, as the default typeface. Not only then would documents all  
around the world have a more beautiful face, but they'd be sprinkled  
with elegance


fi ffi fl

rather than littered with collisions

fi ffi fl

Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus  
or Renaissance -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of  
every postscript printer, like Palatino.


Bruce

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a 
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,


Bruce,

  They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.

  It has fascinated me how those in the Microsoft world stick with whatever
defaults are set by the OS and applications on it and never think to change
them.

  About 20 years ago I worked for a consulting company and we were quite
progressive: we all had PCs running DOS and WordPerfect on our desks. I
immediately changed the WP display from bright white on blue to grey on
black (much easier on my eyes). Others would walk by and comment, Wow!
How'd you do that? Of course, no one changed a darn thing on their
machines, but they sure specified exactly how a document had to be formatted
before it left the office.

  The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Rich


Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-08 Thread Liviu Andronic
Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
bruce.h.pourc...@lawrence.edu wrote:
 Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
 Renaissance

As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.

Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


 -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
 postscript printer, like Palatino.

Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico

For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Dear list members,

> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).

Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design. 

Looking at the URW Palladio font in my font-viewer (fontmatrix), I see that
there is no ff ligature and that the fi and fl ligatures are "faked"
(i.e. just two letters side by side).

Looking at the TeX Gyre Termes system font with fontmatrix, I see all "T1
ligatures" but with a clearly separated fi (also in ffi) while, in
contrast to URW Palladio, the ff has a common bar (also in ffi and ffl).

Looking at the Palatino font sample chart in the TeX Font Catalogue, I
see on page 2 the font table containing all ligatures required by the T1
font encoding -- but again "faked" (most probably via a virtual font).

IAW - Palatino does not have ligatures and whatever appears as such is
only a compatibility version filling the slot.


> However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
> these "ligatures"?

This are rather input conventions for \textendash and \textemdash (ab)using
the ligature mechanism in TeX's tfm files.

> What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
> I came across this message:

> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

> ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2011-04-07, Daniel CLEMENT wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT  wrote:

> ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked "ff".

> Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
> Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

It does not supersede mathpazo:

* tgpagella is not a TeX standard package:

  > I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

* tgpagella and mathpazo have different small caps versions. Opinions
  differ on which is better but seems to be biased towards the mathpazo
  ones.
  
* tgpagella does not set up math fonts (there is an "experimental"
  qpxmath package for this task).
  
OTOH, adding GUI support for TeX Gyre and other widely used fonts is on
the LyX feature-wish list since long...

Günter



Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



There is not much change in the standard Postscript fonts. Especially,
considering the emphasis that TeX puts on consistent rendering of
unchanged documents, there will be no change without a new option to
the palatino/mathpazo packages.


Guenter,

  Thank you. Back to reality: it really does not matter because 1) I suspect
that no one reading any document I produce with LyX will be looking for true
ligatures and 2) almost everyone else but us rebels here uses Wurd and the
only ligatures there are those placed by Microsoft on users and their
wallets.

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Bruce Pourciau


On Apr 8, 2011, at 1:31 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:


Because there are no ligatures in Palatino -- by design.



This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would  
be a prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than  
Times, as the default typeface. Not only then would documents all  
around the world have a more beautiful face, but they'd be sprinkled  
with elegance


fi ffi fl

rather than littered with collisions

fi ffi fl

Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus  
or Renaissance -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of  
every postscript printer, like Palatino.


Bruce

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-08 Thread Rich Shepard

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Bruce Pourciau wrote:

This is one of the many, many reasons why the typographic world would be a 
prettier place if Word folks would use Palatino, rather than Times,


Bruce,

  They either use Times or the default san-serif face as a body text font.
Ugly and hard to read.

  It has fascinated me how those in the Microsoft world stick with whatever
defaults are set by the OS and applications on it and never think to change
them.

  About 20 years ago I worked for a consulting company and we were quite
progressive: we all had PCs running DOS and WordPerfect on our desks. I
immediately changed the WP display from bright white on blue to grey on
black (much easier on my eyes). Others would walk by and comment, "Wow!
How'd you do that?" Of course, no one changed a darn thing on their
machines, but they sure specified exactly how a document had to be formatted
before it left the office.

  The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Rich


Zapf typefaces in LaTeX (was: 'Re: No ligatures in Palatino?')

2011-04-08 Thread Liviu Andronic
Hey Bruce

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Bruce Pourciau
 wrote:
> Other faces designed by Herman Zapf would do as well -- such as Aldus or
> Renaissance
>
As far as I understand, Aldus is a book weight version of Palatino,
hence more readable. Do you know if URW++ or TeX Gyre (or anyone else)
provide a free clone? I searched all places that I could think of, but
couldn't find anything.

Also, could you please confirm if URW Antiqua [2] is _not_ a clone of
Zapf Renaissance Antiqua [5]? The former complements [4] URW Grotesque
[3]. If so, are you aware of a free clone of Renaissance?
[2] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/antiqua/
[3] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/grotesk/
[4] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/antiqua/?more
[5] http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/linotype/zapf-renaissance-antiqua/


> -- except that they aren't burned into the memory of every
> postscript printer, like Palatino.
>
Personally I like to use another Zapf design, Optima [1], as a sans
complement to Palatino.
[1] http://ctan.org/pkg/classico

For those interested, from the Zapf series freely available in LaTeX
there's also URW Chancery and TeX Gyre Chorus [6], both clones of Zapf
Chancery, a calligraphical font.
[6] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/tgchorus/

Regards
Liviu


No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Dear list members,

I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).

However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these ligatures?

What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
I came across this message:

http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT








Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Dear list members,

 I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
 noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
 in ff, fi, ...).

Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Regards
Liviu


 However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
 these ligatures?

 What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
 I came across this message:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

 ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

 I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT










-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


newfile4.lyx
Description: Binary data


newfile4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
First, thanks for your reply.

Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
  I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
  noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
  in ff, fi, ...).
 
 Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
 Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).

However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
ffi.

(I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)

Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
Evince)?

 
 Regards
 Liviu
 
 
 [...]
 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
 ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).

 However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
 ffi.

 (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)

Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.


 Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
 Evince)?

On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
ligature for 'fi'. Regards
Liviu



 Regards
 Liviu


 [...]

 Regards,
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Thanks, that did the trick.

I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
  Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
  ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
 
  However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
  ffi.
 
  (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
 
 Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.

... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

 
 
  Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
  Evince)?
 
 On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
 ligature for 'fi'. 

This probably makes sense, since the hook of the f is very short in
Palatino...

 Regards
 Liviu
 
[...]
 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Thanks, that did the trick.

 I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

 Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
  Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
  ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
 
  However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
  ffi.
 
  (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
 
 Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.

 ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

 Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
 Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?



  Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
  Evince)?
 
 On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
 ligature for 'fi'.

 This probably makes sense, since the hook of the f is very short in
 Palatino...

See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/

Liviu



 Regards
 Liviu

 [...]

 Regards,
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/


Liviu,

  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:

 See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
 [1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/

 Liviu,

  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
 in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
 standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).

Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you
will clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less
ligature pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black
line in the 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the
'fi' ligature, while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi'
symbol.

Cheers
Liviu
attachment: palatino-ligs.pngattachment: tgpagella-ligs.png

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.


Liviu,

  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.

  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.

Thanks,

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:

 Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
 clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
 pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
 while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.

 Liviu,

  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.

You can enlarge the bitmaps using Mirage. But if you're playing with
the PDF files, here in Evince even at 400% there's a (hardly, but)
noticeable white pixel in 'fi' for both Palladio and Pagella, and a
clear distance in the Palladio 'ff'. The Pagella 'ff' ligature is
clear-cut.

  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.

Have fun.
Liviu


 Thanks,

 Rich




-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Dear list members,

I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).

However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these ligatures?

What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
I came across this message:

http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT








Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Dear list members,

 I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
 noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
 in ff, fi, ...).

Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Regards
Liviu


 However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
 these ligatures?

 What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
 I came across this message:

 http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

 ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

 I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT










-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


newfile4.lyx
Description: Binary data


newfile4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
First, thanks for your reply.

Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
  I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
  noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
  in ff, fi, ...).
 
 Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
 Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).

However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
ffi.

(I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)

Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
Evince)?

 
 Regards
 Liviu
 
 
 [...]
 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
 ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).

 However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
 ffi.

 (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)

Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.


 Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
 Evince)?

On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
ligature for 'fi'. Regards
Liviu



 Regards
 Liviu


 [...]

 Regards,
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Thanks, that did the trick.

I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
  Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
  ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
 
  However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
  ffi.
 
  (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
 
 Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.

... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

 
 
  Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
  Evince)?
 
 On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
 ligature for 'fi'. 

This probably makes sense, since the hook of the f is very short in
Palatino...

 Regards
 Liviu
 
[...]
 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
 Thanks, that did the trick.

 I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

 Liviu Andronic wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT dcleme...@sfr.fr wrote:
  Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
  ff (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
 
  However, I don't see any ligature between f and i, either in fi or
  ffi.
 
  (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
 
 Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.

 ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked ff.

 Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
 Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?



  Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
  Evince)?
 
 On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
 ligature for 'fi'.

 This probably makes sense, since the hook of the f is very short in
 Palatino...

See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/

Liviu



 Regards
 Liviu

 [...]

 Regards,
 --
 Daniel CLEMENT






-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/


Liviu,

  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:

 See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
 [1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/

 Liviu,

  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
 in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
 standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).

Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you
will clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less
ligature pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black
line in the 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the
'fi' ligature, while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi'
symbol.

Cheers
Liviu
attachment: palatino-ligs.pngattachment: tgpagella-ligs.png

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.


Liviu,

  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.

  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.

Thanks,

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:

 Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
 clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less ligature
 pixels than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
 while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.

 Liviu,

  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.

You can enlarge the bitmaps using Mirage. But if you're playing with
the PDF files, here in Evince even at 400% there's a (hardly, but)
noticeable white pixel in 'fi' for both Palladio and Pagella, and a
clear distance in the Palladio 'ff'. The Pagella 'ff' ligature is
clear-cut.

  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.

Have fun.
Liviu


 Thanks,

 Rich




-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Dear list members,

I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
in ff, fi, ...).

However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
these "ligatures"?

What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
I came across this message:

http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html

...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.

I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT








Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Daniel CLEMENT <dcleme...@sfr.fr> wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> in ff, fi, ...).
>
Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Regards
Liviu


> However, the various dashes (--, ---) do get linked properly. Aren't
> these "ligatures"?
>
> What do you think of this? I searched the WiKi and the list archive, and
> I came across this message:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg45849.html
>
> ...but it's pretty old, and perhaps no longer relevant.
>
> I hope it's not a FAQ. Once again, thanks for your help.
> --
> Daniel CLEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


newfile4.lyx
Description: Binary data


newfile4.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
First, thanks for your reply.

Liviu Andronic wrote:
[...]
> > I have been using the palatino font for a while. But I only recently
> > noticed that, in documents using this font, no ligatures appeared (e.g.
> > in ff, fi, ...).
> >
> Not an expert, but they seem to appear when using TeX Gyre Pagella, a
> Palatino clone. See attached (docs created in RC2).

Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
"ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).

However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
"ffi".

(I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)

Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
Evince)?

> 
> Regards
> Liviu
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT  wrote:
> Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
>
> However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
> "ffi".
>
> (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
>
Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.


> Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
> Evince)?
>
On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
ligature for 'fi'. Regards
Liviu


>>
>> Regards
>> Liviu
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
> Regards,
> --
> Daniel CLEMENT
>
>
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Daniel CLEMENT
Thanks, that did the trick.

I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...

Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT  wrote:
> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
> > "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
> >
> > However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
> > "ffi".
> >
> > (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
> >
> Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.

... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked "ff".

Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?

> 
> 
> > Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
> > Evince)?
> >
> On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
> ligature for 'fi'. 

This probably makes sense, since the hook of the "f" is very short in
Palatino...

> Regards
> Liviu
> 
[...]
> 
Regards,
-- 
Daniel CLEMENT




Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Daniel CLEMENT <dcleme...@sfr.fr> wrote:
> Thanks, that did the trick.
>
> I had to install the tex-gyre package. Then...
>
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Daniel CLEMENT <dcleme...@sfr.fr> wrote:
>> > Hum... On the attached .PDF, I do see the ligature between the two
>> > "ff" (which I usually miss) and the dashes (which I have).
>> >
>> > However, I don't see any ligature between "f" and "i", either in "fi" or
>> > "ffi".
>> >
>> > (I am under 1.6.9 so I was unable to open the attached .LYX file.)
>> >
>> Open in a text file and see the lines in the preamble.
>
> ... the \usepackage{tgpagella} allowed me to get nicely linked "ff".
>
> Definitely an improvement. Maybe LyX could load _this_ package for
> Palatino fonts, if it just supersedes mathpazo?
>
>>
>>
>> > Could something be wrong/missing with my setup (1.6.9 / Ubuntu Lucid /
>> > Evince)?
>> >
>> On the same set-up I tried with acroread, and there too there's no
>> ligature for 'fi'.
>
> This probably makes sense, since the hook of the "f" is very short in
> Palatino...
>
See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/

Liviu



>> Regards
>> Liviu
>>
> [...]
>>
> Regards,
> --
> Daniel CLEMENT
>
>
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
[1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/


Liviu,

  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> See [1] for the list of expected ligatures.
>> [1] http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/palatino/
>
> Liviu,
>
>  Maybe it's my old eyeballs, but I don't see differences in the ligatures
> in the standard Palatino and the enhanced version. As a matter of fact, the
> standard ligatures seem more tighly connected (e.g., fi).
>
Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you
will clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less
"ligature pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black
line in the 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the
'fi' ligature, while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi'
symbol.

Cheers
Liviu
<><>

Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Rich Shepard

On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:


Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.


Liviu,

  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.

  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.

Thanks,

Rich


Re: No ligatures in Palatino?

2011-04-07 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Rich Shepard <rshep...@appl-ecosys.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately it's bitmap, but even so if you zoom to about 1000% you will
>> clearly notice that the Palladio ligatures have much less "ligature
>> pixels" than the Pagella. The latter features a solid black line in the
>> 'ff' ligature, and an almost 'continuous' line for the 'fi' ligature,
>> while Palladio features a completely discontinuous 'fi' symbol.
>
> Liviu,
>
>  Oh. xpdf goes only to 400x.
>
You can enlarge the bitmaps using Mirage. But if you're playing with
the PDF files, here in Evince even at 400% there's a (hardly, but)
noticeable white pixel in 'fi' for both Palladio and Pagella, and a
clear distance in the Palladio 'ff'. The Pagella 'ff' ligature is
clear-cut.

>  OK, this weekend I'll get the Pagella and install it.
>
Have fun.
Liviu


> Thanks,
>
> Rich
>



-- 
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail


ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.

Regards,

Tao
-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Helge Hafting

Tao Cumplido wrote:

Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.


Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?

Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.

Helge Hafting


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
I mean the output. So far I only see the three standard ligatures 'fi' 'ff' 
'fl' being printed. Maybe there are more but those I mentioned previously are 
definitely not used.
I have no idea though if Latex is set up correctly for the Libertine font.

Regards,

Tao

 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:04:50 +0200
 Von: Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no
 An: Tao Cumplido taocumpl...@gmx.net
 CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 Betreff: Re: ligatures

 Tao Cumplido wrote:
  Hello,
  
  is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th'
 'ft' etc.? I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the
 private use area.
  
 Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?
 
 Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
 LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.
 
 Helge Hafting

-- 
Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02


ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.

Regards,

Tao
-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Helge Hafting

Tao Cumplido wrote:

Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.


Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?

Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.

Helge Hafting


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
I mean the output. So far I only see the three standard ligatures 'fi' 'ff' 
'fl' being printed. Maybe there are more but those I mentioned previously are 
definitely not used.
I have no idea though if Latex is set up correctly for the Libertine font.

Regards,

Tao

 Original-Nachricht 
 Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:04:50 +0200
 Von: Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no
 An: Tao Cumplido taocumpl...@gmx.net
 CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
 Betreff: Re: ligatures

 Tao Cumplido wrote:
  Hello,
  
  is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th'
 'ft' etc.? I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the
 private use area.
  
 Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?
 
 Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
 LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.
 
 Helge Hafting

-- 
Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02


ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.

Regards,

Tao
-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Helge Hafting

Tao Cumplido wrote:

Hello,

is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th' 'ft' etc.? 
I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the private use 
area.


Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?

Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.

Helge Hafting


Re: ligatures

2009-07-21 Thread Tao Cumplido
I mean the output. So far I only see the three standard ligatures 'fi' 'ff' 
'fl' being printed. Maybe there are more but those I mentioned previously are 
definitely not used.
I have no idea though if Latex is set up correctly for the Libertine font.

Regards,

Tao

 Original-Nachricht 
> Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:04:50 +0200
> Von: Helge Hafting <helge.haft...@hist.no>
> An: Tao Cumplido <taocumpl...@gmx.net>
> CC: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Betreff: Re: ligatures

> Tao Cumplido wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > is it possible to make lyx display advanced ligatures like 'tt' 'Th'
> 'ft' etc.? I use the Linux Libertine font which has these ligatures in the
> private use area.
> > 
> Do you mean on the screen, or in printed output?
> 
> Printed output (or pdf output) should use all available ligatures, if
> LaTeX is correctly set up to support your font.
> 
> Helge Hafting

-- 
Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate
für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
 They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
 settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
 places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
 Umlauts will be wrong as well).

Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of the OS 
on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread G. Milde
On 30.05.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 G. Milde wrote:
  They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
  settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
  places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
  Umlauts will be wrong as well).

 Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of
 the OS on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

An intelligent PDF reader would convert the document encoding into
the encoding of the user's locale (or system encoding). 

Whether failing to do so is considered a bug or a wishlist item is not my
task to decide.

Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
 Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
 ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
 selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

Actually, it depends on the font.

* When using the default cm font, copying does not work.
* When using Latin Modern, the ligatures get copied (correctly) from the PDF 
  to LyX.
* When using Palatino and Times, the ligatures are resolved as single 
  characters on copying.

This is the case with xpdf, kpdf and acroread here.

 BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

Not even emacs? ;-)

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
Rich Shepard wrote:

 On Tue, 27 May 2008, David Hewitt wrote:
 
 I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
 ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is
 with Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).
 
This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be
the
 behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
 acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
 AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
 is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The application that puts the characters on the clipboard has to use an
encoding supported by the OS, and it has to specify the used encoding in
case the OS allows more than one. The details are different from OS to OS,
but the basic principle is the same.

This has not always been the case. AFAIK on unix the X selection was not
aware of the encoding originally, and many applications are still buggy in
this area, but today it is possible to transfer text through clipboards
without loss of information.
I don't know whether it works in emacs or pine, but I have no problems
pasting non-ASCII stuff into/from vim via the X selection, including
ligatures from kpdf. The ligatures are also transferred correctly to LyX.
They are not decomposed into single characters, and pdf creation still
works.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote:

 On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
 
 The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
 clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
 but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.
 
 They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
 settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
 places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
 Umlauts will be wrong as well).

No, they are wrong. It is the task of the PDF reader to convert from the T1
encoding to an encoding supported by the OS. If it does not do that, it is
either a bug of the PDF reader, or the PDF does not specify the encoding
correctly. The latter has been the case with pdfs created from TeX several
years ago (IIRC more than 5), but this is fixed with current versions.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
 They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
 settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
 places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
 Umlauts will be wrong as well).

Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of the OS 
on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread G. Milde
On 30.05.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
 G. Milde wrote:
  They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
  settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
  places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
  Umlauts will be wrong as well).

 Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of
 the OS on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

An intelligent PDF reader would convert the document encoding into
the encoding of the user's locale (or system encoding). 

Whether failing to do so is considered a bug or a wishlist item is not my
task to decide.

Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
 Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
 ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
 selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

Actually, it depends on the font.

* When using the default cm font, copying does not work.
* When using Latin Modern, the ligatures get copied (correctly) from the PDF 
  to LyX.
* When using Palatino and Times, the ligatures are resolved as single 
  characters on copying.

This is the case with xpdf, kpdf and acroread here.

 BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

Not even emacs? ;-)

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
Rich Shepard wrote:

 On Tue, 27 May 2008, David Hewitt wrote:
 
 I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
 ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is
 with Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).
 
This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be
the
 behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
 acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
 AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
 is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The application that puts the characters on the clipboard has to use an
encoding supported by the OS, and it has to specify the used encoding in
case the OS allows more than one. The details are different from OS to OS,
but the basic principle is the same.

This has not always been the case. AFAIK on unix the X selection was not
aware of the encoding originally, and many applications are still buggy in
this area, but today it is possible to transfer text through clipboards
without loss of information.
I don't know whether it works in emacs or pine, but I have no problems
pasting non-ASCII stuff into/from vim via the X selection, including
ligatures from kpdf. The ligatures are also transferred correctly to LyX.
They are not decomposed into single characters, and pdf creation still
works.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote:

 On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
 
 The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
 clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
 but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.
 
 They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
 settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
 places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
 Umlauts will be wrong as well).

No, they are wrong. It is the task of the PDF reader to convert from the T1
encoding to an encoding supported by the OS. If it does not do that, it is
either a bug of the PDF reader, or the PDF does not specify the encoding
correctly. The latter has been the case with pdfs created from TeX several
years ago (IIRC more than 5), but this is fixed with current versions.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
> They are not "wrong" but in a different encoding: witht the default
> settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
> places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
> Umlauts will be "wrong" as well).

Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of the OS 
on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread G. Milde
On 30.05.08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> > They are not "wrong" but in a different encoding: witht the default
> > settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
> > places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
> > Umlauts will be "wrong" as well).

> Well, I would expect that the PDF reader is able to use the encoding of
> the OS on copying. So to me it looks like a bug in the readers.

An "intelligent" PDF reader would convert the document encoding into
the encoding of the user's locale (or system encoding). 

Whether failing to do so is considered a bug or a wishlist item is not my
task to decide.

Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
G. Milde wrote:
> Actually, on my Debian system, the xpdf reader actually de-composes an ff
> ligature in a sample document and puts the two letters f+f in the
> selection instead -- i.e. it works as I would expect.

Actually, it depends on the font.

* When using the default cm font, copying does not work.
* When using Latin Modern, the ligatures get copied (correctly) from the PDF 
  to LyX.
* When using Palatino and Times, the ligatures are resolved as single 
  characters on copying.

This is the case with xpdf, kpdf and acroread here.

> BTW, I've never seen an OS using T1 encoding ;-)

Not even emacs? ;-)

Jürgen


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
Rich Shepard wrote:

> On Tue, 27 May 2008, David Hewitt wrote:
> 
>> I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
>> ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is
>> with Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).
> 
>This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be
>the
> behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
> acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
> AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
> is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The application that puts the characters on the clipboard has to use an
encoding supported by the OS, and it has to specify the used encoding in
case the OS allows more than one. The details are different from OS to OS,
but the basic principle is the same.

This has not always been the case. AFAIK on unix the X selection was not
aware of the encoding originally, and many applications are still buggy in
this area, but today it is possible to transfer text through clipboards
without loss of information.
I don't know whether it works in emacs or pine, but I have no problems
pasting non-ASCII stuff into/from vim via the X selection, including
ligatures from kpdf. The ligatures are also transferred correctly to LyX.
They are not decomposed into single characters, and pdf creation still
works.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-30 Thread Georg Baum
G. Milde wrote:

> On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> 
>> The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
>> clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
>> but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.
> 
> They are not "wrong" but in a different encoding: witht the default
> settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
> places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
> Umlauts will be "wrong" as well).

No, they are wrong. It is the task of the PDF reader to convert from the T1
encoding to an encoding supported by the OS. If it does not do that, it is
either a bug of the PDF reader, or the PDF does not specify the encoding
correctly. The latter has been the case with pdfs created from TeX several
years ago (IIRC more than 5), but this is fixed with current versions.


Georg



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Rich Shepard wrote:

 This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
 behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
 acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
 AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
 is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

Jürgen



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread G. Milde
On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
 Rich Shepard wrote:

  This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
  behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
  acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
  AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
  is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

 The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
 clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
 but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
Umlauts will be wrong as well).

A workaround would be to use a font without ligatures (try the standard
postscript fonts).

A solution would be to use XeTeX as engine, as XeTeX supports Unicode
font encoding.

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 28 May 2008, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:


The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.


Jürgen,

  Oh. OK. Now I understand.

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |  IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Rich Shepard wrote:

 This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
 behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
 acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
 AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
 is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

Jürgen



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread G. Milde
On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
 Rich Shepard wrote:

  This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
  behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
  acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
  AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
  is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

 The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
 clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
 but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

They are not wrong but in a different encoding: witht the default
settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
Umlauts will be wrong as well).

A workaround would be to use a font without ligatures (try the standard
postscript fonts).

A solution would be to use XeTeX as engine, as XeTeX supports Unicode
font encoding.

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 28 May 2008, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:


The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.


Jürgen,

  Oh. OK. Now I understand.

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |  IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Rich Shepard wrote:

> This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
> behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
> acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
> AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
> is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

Jürgen



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread G. Milde
On 28.05.08, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Rich Shepard wrote:

> > This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
> > behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf,
> > acroread, or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or
> > AbiWord? The first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How
> > is the clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

> The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
> clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
> but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.

They are not "wrong" but in a different encoding: witht the default
settings, this is most probably the T1 encoding where ligatures are on
places totally unrelated to the unicode points. (or even 0T1, where
Umlauts will be "wrong" as well).

A workaround would be to use a font without ligatures (try the standard
postscript fonts).

A solution would be to use XeTeX as engine, as XeTeX supports Unicode
font encoding.

GM


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-28 Thread Rich Shepard

On Wed, 28 May 2008, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:


The problem is that the copied characters are apparently wrong. The
clipboard should have the correct unicode code points for the ligatures,
but it has some completely different (and unrelated) chars.


Jürgen,

  Oh. OK. Now I understand.

Thanks,

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |  IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
<http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863

Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-27 Thread David Hewitt



 Actually, it looks like a problem outside of LyX. Both in Acroread and
 KPDF,
 if if copy the ff-ligature, it doesn't put the ligature into the
 clipboard,
 but rather the unicode character 0x001b (ESCAPE).
 

I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is with
Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).

-
David Hewitt
Research Fishery Biologist
USGS Klamath Falls Field Station (USA)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/OT--Ligatures-in-pdf-documents-to-be-used-in-LyX-tp17474987p17502518.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-27 Thread Rich Shepard

On Tue, 27 May 2008, David Hewitt wrote:


I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is with
Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).


  This is to be expected. It's perfectly normal behavior. What should be the
behavior if you block text in a pdf document (displayed with xpdf, acroread,
or another viewer) and copy that text into emacs, pine, or AbiWord? The
first two are text-mode applications, the last is a GUI. How is the
clipboard to know what to do with the characters in it?

  Personally, I think this is a non-issue. I've had to manually correct not
only copied ligatures, but also symbols (e.g,, copyright, trademark), and
other glyphs. If you need to take text from a pdf file on a regular basis,
or an extensive amount of text, run it through pdftotext (or pdf2ascii) then
use the output.

Rich

--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.   |  IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
http://www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517  Fax: 503-667-8863


Re: OT? Ligatures in pdf documents to be used in LyX

2008-05-27 Thread David Hewitt



 Actually, it looks like a problem outside of LyX. Both in Acroread and
 KPDF,
 if if copy the ff-ligature, it doesn't put the ligature into the
 clipboard,
 but rather the unicode character 0x001b (ESCAPE).
 

I get the same. If I try to copy from a PDF made with pdflatex, all the
ligatures show up as special characters and must be replaced. This is with
Computer Modern Roman font and standard classes (article, report).

-
David Hewitt
Research Fishery Biologist
USGS Klamath Falls Field Station (USA)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/OT--Ligatures-in-pdf-documents-to-be-used-in-LyX-tp17474987p17502518.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



  1   2   >