Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Mitch Haley
Donald Snook wrote:

 What are you talking about with Reagan?

In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the manufacture of 
machine guns for the
civilian market and banning the transfer and possession of machine guns not 
lawfully possessed
before May 19, 1986. These firearms, if used heavily, tend to wear out pretty 
quickly, so you can
actually get rid of them this way, except for a few collector's items that are 
never fired. You're
apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants are different from 
Demonrats. Reagan and
GWB have done more to grow government and shrink individual liberties than FDR, 
LBJ, and WJC put
together.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Jim Cathey
 You're apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants
 are different from Demonrats. Reagan and GWB have done more to
 grow government and shrink individual liberties than FDR, LBJ,
 and WJC put together.

Together both parties have run a pretty impressive good cop,
bad cop scam for years.  All anyone really does is argue about
which party is which cop.  Doesn't change the game any.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Mitch Haley
Jim Cathey wrote:
 
 Together both parties have run a pretty impressive good cop,
 bad cop scam for years.  All anyone really does is argue about
 which party is which cop.  Doesn't change the game any.

I'm beginning to think the real scam is in convincing us that there are two 
different
parties involved. 

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Donald Snook
Mitch wrote: In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the 
manufacture of machine guns for the civilian market and banning the transfer 
and possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed before May 19, 1986. 
You're apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants are different 
from Demonrats. Reagan and GWB have done more to grow government and shrink 
individual liberties than FDR, LBJ, and WJC put together.

You are apparently too old to know that the machine gun ban was proposed (and 
forced through the legislation at night literally under cover of darkness) by 
William Hughes a democrat from New Jersey.  President Reagan signed FOPA into 
law because he believed that the act offered more protections than it took 
away.  IN ADDITION, the act was supported by the NRA.  In fact, the NRA lobbied 
on behalf of its passage.  This act is one of those that President Reagan 
referenced as a reason he wanted a line-item veto.  If he had it, he could have 
take out the Hughes amendment.

Donald H. Snook




___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Mitch Haley
Donald Snook wrote:
 In fact, the NRA lobbied on behalf of its passage.

Just one of many reasons that NRA stands for Negotiates Rights Away.
An alternative meaning is National Republican Association. 

The NRA supports gun control much the same as the NAACP supports racial strife.
In both cases, they claim to be fighting against something that ensures their
continued funding.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Gary Hurst
yeah, but realize that mitch also believes the nra is anti-gun as well.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Mitch wrote: In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the
 manufacture of machine guns for the civilian market and banning the transfer
 and possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed before May 19, 1986.
 You're apparently still young enough to believe that Repugnants are
 different from Demonrats. Reagan and GWB have done more to grow government
 and shrink individual liberties than FDR, LBJ, and WJC put together.

 You are apparently too old to know that the machine gun ban was proposed
 (and forced through the legislation at night literally under cover of
 darkness) by William Hughes a democrat from New Jersey.  President Reagan
 signed FOPA into law because he believed that the act offered more
 protections than it took away.  IN ADDITION, the act was supported by the
 NRA.  In fact, the NRA lobbied on behalf of its passage.  This act is one of
 those that President Reagan referenced as a reason he wanted a line-item
 veto.  If he had it, he could have take out the Hughes amendment.

 Donald H. Snook




 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-16 Thread Mitch Haley
Gary Hurst wrote:
 
 yeah, but realize that mitch also believes the nra is anti-gun as well.

That pretty much sums up my opinion. They lobbied for NFA '34  GCA '68, they 
wrote the provisions
for the National Instant Check System (AKA prior restraint on civil rights), 
they helped Carolyn
McCarthy
write and pass an anti gun owner bill last year, thereby giving that despicable 
woman the appearance
of respect that she had long needed...

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944) (Rich Thomas)

2008-06-15 Thread ned kleinhenz
Sorry guys, I don't understand some of this stuff.
How can Mercedes owners disparage about  BMW owners?
My little secret confession - I own an old MBZ diesel for comfort and
utility.
And I own an old BMW .. for fun.
The first time I drove one of those nimble little rockets, I decided that
some day I gotta git one a doze.
But people who drive any other brand of car seem quick to assume a jerk off
attitude by anyone who drives a BMW.
It is the ultimate of ludicrous to read it on a Mercedes list.  Like - isn't
everyone that drives a Mercedes a prestige driven snob?
Oh well, back to wrench turning to keep this old German stuff on the road.

Ned Kleinhenz
E300D
Z3 2.8
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944) (Rich Thomas)

2008-06-15 Thread Rich Thomas
Reason is that around here all the yuppie poseurs (and their wives or 
girlfriends) buy one, usually a 3 series, when they get a bit of money 
and then proceed to drive them like jerks, aux lights on all the time, 
yapping on their cell phones, and generally annoying me (and I presume 
lots of other people too).

So, my analysis, all BMW owners are jerks is probably wrong, but there 
are enough anecdotal examples to draw a conclusion that a lot of them are.

The other, all jerks are BMW owners, is probably incorrect too, as it is 
mostly jerks with enough money.

But I have several friends and neighbors who have 3-series BMWs, and 
they are not usually jerks, but I have caught them driving with their 
aux lights on, and when I tell them about it and how annoying it is, 
they seem to understand and alter their behavior accordingly to be good 
citizens.

And besides all that, I think it is just a necessity that if you are a 
Benz owner, you have to trash talk BMW owners, even if you are both, you 
can still do it when you drive one car or the other, and you get double 
the fun!

And don't even get me going on them Porsh owners...

--R

ned kleinhenz wrote:
 Sorry guys, I don't understand some of this stuff.
 How can Mercedes owners disparage about  BMW owners?
 My little secret confession - I own an old MBZ diesel for comfort and
 utility.
 And I own an old BMW .. for fun.
 The first time I drove one of those nimble little rockets, I decided that
 some day I gotta git one a doze.
 But people who drive any other brand of car seem quick to assume a jerk off
 attitude by anyone who drives a BMW.
 It is the ultimate of ludicrous to read it on a Mercedes list.  Like - isn't
 everyone that drives a Mercedes a prestige driven snob?
 Oh well, back to wrench turning to keep this old German stuff on the road.

 Ned Kleinhenz
 E300D
 Z3 2.8
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


   

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944) (Rich Thomas)

2008-06-15 Thread E M
Oh come on, tell us about those porsh owners???  lol. ;-)

Ed
300E

2008/6/15 Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Reason is that around here all the yuppie poseurs (and their wives or
 girlfriends) buy one, usually a 3 series, when they get a bit of money
 and then proceed to drive them like jerks, aux lights on all the time,
 yapping on their cell phones, and generally annoying me (and I presume
 lots of other people too).

 So, my analysis, all BMW owners are jerks is probably wrong, but there
 are enough anecdotal examples to draw a conclusion that a lot of them are.

 The other, all jerks are BMW owners, is probably incorrect too, as it is
 mostly jerks with enough money.

 But I have several friends and neighbors who have 3-series BMWs, and
 they are not usually jerks, but I have caught them driving with their
 aux lights on, and when I tell them about it and how annoying it is,
 they seem to understand and alter their behavior accordingly to be good
 citizens.

 And besides all that, I think it is just a necessity that if you are a
 Benz owner, you have to trash talk BMW owners, even if you are both, you
 can still do it when you drive one car or the other, and you get double
 the fun!

 And don't even get me going on them Porsh owners...

 --R

 ned kleinhenz wrote:
  Sorry guys, I don't understand some of this stuff.
  How can Mercedes owners disparage about  BMW owners?
  My little secret confession - I own an old MBZ diesel for comfort and
  utility.
  And I own an old BMW .. for fun.
  The first time I drove one of those nimble little rockets, I decided that
  some day I gotta git one a doze.
  But people who drive any other brand of car seem quick to assume a jerk
 off
  attitude by anyone who drives a BMW.
  It is the ultimate of ludicrous to read it on a Mercedes list.  Like -
 isn't
  everyone that drives a Mercedes a prestige driven snob?
  Oh well, back to wrench turning to keep this old German stuff on the
 road.
 
  Ned Kleinhenz
  E300D
  Z3 2.8
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 
 

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-15 Thread Donald Snook
Mitch wrote: And how do you place (thanks, Ron Reagan) a total ban on the 
licensing of constitutionally guaranteed property that wasn't previously 
licensed and taxed?

What are you talking about with Reagan?

Donald H. Snook

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944) (Rich Thomas)

2008-06-15 Thread Hendrik Fay
It's like the rivalry between GM and Fraud, each thinks the other are a 
bunch of wallys.
Obviously I am biased but generally money waster drivers tend to be 
worse drivers, displaying a lot of bad habits.
I don't think so much prestige driven (specially not with bargain bin 
Mercs) but more the desire for quality and a car that is worth putting 
money and effort into.

Hendrik
who is off to the country club for a round of golf and then may take the 
yacht for a spin, perhaps I'll have time to fire up the private jet for 
quick trip

ned kleinhenz wrote:
 Sorry guys, I don't understand some of this stuff.
 How can Mercedes owners disparage about  BMW owners?
 My little secret confession - I own an old MBZ diesel for comfort and
 utility.
 And I own an old BMW .. for fun.
 The first time I drove one of those nimble little rockets, I decided that
 some day I gotta git one a doze.
 But people who drive any other brand of car seem quick to assume a jerk off
 attitude by anyone who drives a BMW.
 It is the ultimate of ludicrous to read it on a Mercedes list.  Like - isn't
 everyone that drives a Mercedes a prestige driven snob?
 Oh well, back to wrench turning to keep this old German stuff on the road.

 Ned Kleinhenz
 E300D
 Z3 2.8


   

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-14 Thread LarryT
Life's just no fun.  ;-)

Personally, I always wanted a pair of the most powerful Cibie's driving 
lights possible mounted so when ever someone was driving 55 in the passing 
lane - I could turn on those Big Momma driving lights and melts the rear end 
of their car until it exploded in flame.  Then they'd turn off that dam 
left-turn signal and pull over!

Or the absolte worst (even worse than Left lane bandits) are those 
that pull onto the on ramp then must STOP and turn around slowly to watch 
the traffic zoom past while everyone behind them slams on the brakes to 
avoid the moron - yep, light 'em up until he explodes then  push his a$$ out 
of the way.   See?  I'm non-violent!

Course, some wise you know what will get on his cell and tell them 
something about a driver with illegal equipment...  then all the fun is 
over - along with the buzz ---

;-)

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 You are such a buzz killer.

 --R

 LarryT wrote:
 You can probably mount one - and it'll be ok until you use it *once* as 
 the
 police will hunt you down like a dog and charge you with attempted murder 
 or
 at least assault with a deadly weapon.!  Then the problem will be gone. 
 And
 Rich will be getting to know his new cellmate.  Can you say hide the 
 soap?
 ;-)  see - these things are self limiting.

 But sure, you can have one (IMHO)  ;-)

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message - 
 From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:10 AM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)



 I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or
 three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track,
 voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires
 of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.
 And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and
 rear hatches.  And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

 Where can I get me one a them?  Do I need a permit?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:

 For those who missed it:

 If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
 protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of
 the
 people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
 possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, 
 for
 they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard 
 to
 imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet
 few,
 if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
 unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
 governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
 Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking
 about
 whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather
 what
 constitutes a reasonable restriction.

 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU 
 and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do 
 is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man
 out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people
 but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the
 Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)




 LarryT wrote:


 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.


 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-14 Thread LarryT
Hey Mitch,
You're right - but we, being peons are supposed to be grateful for the 
little crumbs the 536 morons inside the beltway see fit to give us.

Even though I and you and at least 30 million more like us believe 
strongly in the 2nd Amendment I can see the time when we could lose them 
completely a piece at a time.  Granted, it would bring this country closer 
to a revolution than anything else I can think of -  but unless something 
dramatic happens the 2nd A will continue to be weakened and watered down 
until it;s meaningless.

It's encouraging to see Shall Issue laws being passed in 40 states 
IIRC, but they still hold onto control pretty tightly.  Just like everything 
else.  We're nice little servents and freedom is only an illusion.

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)



 LarryT wrote:
 Ya'll probably know there are people who own awesome fully auto weapons
 already - all needed is a license which comes with a background check and
 fee.

 But how do you license and tax a constitutionally guaranteed civil right? 
 Is it OK if I make you
 pass a background check and pay a $200 tax every time you go to church?

 And how do you place (thanks, Ron Reagan) a total ban on the licensing of 
 constitutionally
 guaranteed property that wasn't previously licensed and taxed? Those 
 awesome full autos you mention
 might be $500-2000 new, but you haven't been able to buy a new one since 
 1986, the old ones are
 either not being used or wearing out, and if they are in good condition 
 they start at about $5000
 for a Uzi and I think a M16 is more like $20,000.

 Mitch.

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-14 Thread Rich Thomas
I put a pair of 100W Dick Cepek off-road pencil beams (you get a mile or 
so of reach on the beach, like daylight) on my old Blazer, had them 
aimed right into the windshield of that oncoming BMW that always has its 
aux driving lights on, and aimed right at my eyes.  Blink the brights a 
few times, BMW driver blinks his to show s/he does not have the 
high-beams on, then hit the eye-burners (hey look at my way cool aux 
driving lights, why, they're just like yours, sorta!).  Of course the 
geniuses driving the BMWs never understand, but there is some other 
factor at work there I think.  The same behavior has spread to most of 
the drivers of lux-cars that have the aux lights, and of course big-ass 
SUVs that have them higher off the road but still aimed right in your 
eyes for some reason.  I guess they think it looks cool or something to 
drive around the wilds of street-lighted urbia with their extra lights on. 

I have pointed out to various dimwits occasionally that their lights are 
inappropriate and offensive when pointed at another driver, I usually 
get told to FO or something similar by the good citizens.  I have quit 
doing that as I do not want to get shot by someone who feels his manhood 
has been impugned, though most BMW drivers probably would not be packing 
anything but a cell phone.

--R

LarryT wrote:
 Life's just no fun.  ;-)

 Personally, I always wanted a pair of the most powerful Cibie's driving 
 lights possible mounted so when ever someone was driving 55 in the passing 
 lane - I could turn on those Big Momma driving lights and melts the rear end 
 of their car until it exploded in flame.  Then they'd turn off that dam 
 left-turn signal and pull over!
   


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-14 Thread Mitch Haley
Rich Thomas wrote:
 I have pointed out to various dimwits occasionally that their lights are
 inappropriate and offensive when pointed at another driver, I usually
 get told to FO or something similar by the good citizens. 

That's why I always carry a pocket knife. Copper wire cuts easy, unless
it's encased in steel conduit. (OTOH, most of these morons are using 
factory installed lights without exposed wiring)

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread andrew strasfogel
For those who missed it:

If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of the
people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet few,
if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking about
whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather what
constitutes a reasonable restriction.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


  LarryT wrote:
  Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
  those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
  Amendment.
 
  http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread Rich Thomas
I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or 
three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track, 
voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires 
of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.  
And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and 
rear hatches.  And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

Where can I get me one a them?  Do I need a permit?

--R

andrew strasfogel wrote:
 For those who missed it:

 If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
 protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of the
 people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
 possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
 they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
 imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet few,
 if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
 unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
 governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
 Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking about
 whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather what
 constitutes a reasonable restriction.

 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   
 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 
 LarryT wrote:
   
 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.
 
 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
   
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


   
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread andrew strasfogel
My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rich Thomas 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or
 three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track,
 voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires
 of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.
 And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and
 rear hatches.  And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

 Where can I get me one a them?  Do I need a permit?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:
  For those who missed it:
 
  If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
  protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of
 the
  people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
  possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
  they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
  imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet
 few,
  if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
  unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
  governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
  Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking
 about
  whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather
 what
  constitutes a reasonable restriction.
 
  On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
  gun
  control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
  inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
  read
  what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man
 out
  to
  be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people
 but
  in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the
 Supremes
  never said it was a collective right.
 
  Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
  www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
  Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
  PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
  800-583-8601
  Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
 
 
 
  LarryT wrote:
 
  Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
  those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
  Amendment.
 
  http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread Mitch Haley
andrew strasfogel wrote:
 
 My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...

Didn't somebody on this list suggest dart guns, and if a car has two darts on
it the cops get to pull him over and write him a ticket?

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread LWB250
I had a buddy who had this little spring loaded gun that fired darts with a 
suction cup on them.  They also had a little flag that was rolled around the 
stem, which would unroll after being fired.
   
  In the interest of not offending fellow listmembers, I won't repeat the text 
that was on the flags, but it was not complimentary in any way and usually 
reflected an opinion of the offending driver's driving abilities (or lack 
thereof.)
   
  Dan

andrew strasfogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Rich Thomas 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or
 three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track,
 voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires
 of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.
 And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and
 rear hatches. And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

 Where can I get me one a them? Do I need a permit?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:
  For those who missed it:
 
  If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
  protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of
 the
  people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
  possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
  they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
  imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet
 few,
  if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
  unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
  governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
  Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking
 about
  whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather
 what
  constitutes a reasonable restriction.
 
  On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT wrote:
 
 
  I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
  gun
  control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
  inaccuracies. As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
  read
  what the framers said about gun ownership. i.e., they feel every man
 out
  to
  be armed. As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people
 but
  in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right. BTW, the
 Supremes
  never said it was a collective right.
 
  Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
  www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
  Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
  PORSCHE POSTERS! youroil.net
  800-583-8601
  Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: John Robbins 
  To: Mercedes Discussion List 
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)
 
 
 
  LarryT wrote:
 
  Speaking of the ACLU - They fight for all
  those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
  Amendment.
 
  http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


   
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread Bill R
Good idea, but you would have to limit the number of darts available to any
one driver.  Some folks do go overboard and/or have a short fuse.
BillR

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mitch Haley
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:42 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

andrew strasfogel wrote:
 
 My s.o. using suggested paintball on these traffic anarchists...

Didn't somebody on this list suggest dart guns, and if a car has two darts
on
it the cops get to pull him over and write him a ticket?

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread LarryT
prev comments private ownership of
 field pieces and ship's cannon

I've struggled with this as well.  I finally came to the conclusion that 
people who have led a good life and never ran afoul of the law *should* be 
allowed to own whatever they want.  After all, the cost to maintain, buy 
ammo  fire will make ownership self limiting.   Tanks can be pretty 
expensive - but they're legal to own already - millionaires have a few as do 
restoration specialists.

Ya'll probably know there are people who own awesome fully auto weapons 
already - all needed is a license which comes with a background check and 
fee.  There's a guy who made a bunch of money making reloading supplies. 
Once or twice a year he invites other people with auto weapons to his 
property - several thousand acres next to the White Sands Proving Grounds 
where he flies helicopters with machine guns mounted and shoots up old cars. 
All the other guys with shoulder fired weapons and tripod mounted machine 
guys line up on a range and blast away.  Night shooting with tracers is 
especially exciting.  I'll bet there's a clip of it on whatchamacallit. 
AFter several hours of shooting the reloading company is set to make *big* 
buckets of money!  50 cal machne gun rounds rn about $5.00 *each* and  even 
they had a quad 50 (4 - 50 cal machine guns mounted on a common mount ) - 
which went thru approx 2000 rounds in about 20 seconds. (IIRC)  Fun stuff - 
and loud!  Sarah Brady would have a heart attack if she saw it.  ;-)

There's also a yearly full-auto shooting event in Ky. with the same stuff 
showing up.

He has some rocket propelled weapons there also but I'm not sure what kind.

The problem is not with people like these - who jump thru the hoops to get 
licenses - they will not do anything to jeopardize their license.  The 
problem is when bad guys buy them or steal them -- stealing is more likely 
as they are very expensive, but even that is unlikely as the people who can 
afford to own these guns can afford the security to keep them safe.  The 50 
cal rifles congress was so excited about a while back cost over $6000 *each* 
and weight nearly 40 #s (IIRC)  - not the kind of thing a thug wants to hold 
up the corner liquor store.  Additionally they've never been used in a 
crime.  True, they have the potential to cause great harm - but so does a 
hammer if it's thrown into a jet engine.

That's the short version -


Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 John Robbins wrote:
 I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last paragraph?

 The historical definition of arms in the 2A would best be described as
 all the terrible implements of the soldier. Although private ownership 
 of
 field pieces and ship's cannon was commonplace at the time, and there was 
 no
 intent to take them away from us, it's less certain that they intended the
 2A to guarantee a pre-existing right to keep and bear artillery. What is 
 certain
 is that all hand carried, shoulder fired weapons were included. This would 
 necessarily
 include RPGs and shoulder fired anti tank weapons. There was no intent to 
 arm agents
 of government above and beyond whatever the people held. Thomas Jefferson, 
 George Mason,
 et al, would be aghast at the standing army possessed by my county 
 government, and
 they would certainly think that if my county sheriff had an APC, then I 
 should have a LAW,
 otherwise I would be helpless before them.

 Mitch.

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread LarryT
I believe that oif there was a true revolution in the US some of the 
military would join in.  So there would be tanks, F15s, baxzookas etc 
involved and at that point they'd be considered in private hands

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: andrew strasfogel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 For those who missed it:

 If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
 protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of 
 the
 people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
 possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
 they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
 imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet few,
 if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
 unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
 governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
 Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking 
 about
 whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather what
 constitutes a reasonable restriction.

 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people 
 but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


  LarryT wrote:
  Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
  those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
  Amendment.
 
  http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
  For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread LarryT
You can probably mount one - and it'll be ok until you use it *once* as the 
police will hunt you down like a dog and charge you with attempted murder or 
at least assault with a deadly weapon.!  Then the problem will be gone.  And 
Rich will be getting to know his new cellmate.  Can you say hide the soap? 
;-)  see - these things are self limiting.

But sure, you can have one (IMHO)  ;-)

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or
 three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track,
 voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires
 of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.
 And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and
 rear hatches.  And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

 Where can I get me one a them?  Do I need a permit?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:
 For those who missed it:

 If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
 protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of 
 the
 people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
 possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
 they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
 imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet 
 few,
 if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
 unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
 governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
 Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking 
 about
 whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather 
 what
 constitutes a reasonable restriction.

 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man 
 out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people 
 but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the 
 Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)



 LarryT wrote:

 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.

 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread Rich Thomas
You are such a buzz killer.

--R

LarryT wrote:
 You can probably mount one - and it'll be ok until you use it *once* as the 
 police will hunt you down like a dog and charge you with attempted murder or 
 at least assault with a deadly weapon.!  Then the problem will be gone.  And 
 Rich will be getting to know his new cellmate.  Can you say hide the soap? 
 ;-)  see - these things are self limiting.

 But sure, you can have one (IMHO)  ;-)

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message - 
 From: Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:10 AM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


   
 I would like a high-powered UV laser to mount on my truck, a kilowatt or
 three should be sufficient, adaptive optics, gimballed lock and track,
 voice-controlled automatic target ID and firing, so I can fry the tires
 of the idiots who cut in front me on the freeway without using signals.
 And maybe to etch little love notes in the paint of their trunks and
 rear hatches.  And to repel foreign and domestic threats too.

 Where can I get me one a them?  Do I need a permit?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:
 
 For those who missed it:

 If indeed the Second Amendment provides an absolute, constitutional
 protection for the right to bear arms in order to preserve the power of 
 the
 people to resist government tyranny, then it must allow individuals to
 possess bazookas, torpedoes, SCUD missiles and even nuclear warheads, for
 they, like handguns, rifles and M-16s, are arms. Moreover, it is hard to
 imagine any serious resistance to the military without such arms. Yet 
 few,
 if any, would argue that the Second Amendment gives individuals the
 unlimited right to own any weapons they please. But as soon as we allow
 governmental regulation of any weapons, we have broken the dam of
 Constitutional protection. Once that dam is broken, we are not talking 
 about
 whether the government can constitutionally restrict arms, but rather 
 what
 constitutes a reasonable restriction.

 On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:49 PM, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


   
 I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and
 gun
 control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of
 inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is
 read
 what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man 
 out
 to
 be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people 
 but
 in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the 
 Supremes
 never said it was a collective right.

 Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
 www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
 Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
 PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
 800-583-8601
 Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



 - Original Message -
 From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)



 
 LarryT wrote:

   
 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.

 
 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

   
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



   
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 
 


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-13 Thread Mitch Haley

LarryT wrote:
 Ya'll probably know there are people who own awesome fully auto weapons
 already - all needed is a license which comes with a background check and
 fee.

But how do you license and tax a constitutionally guaranteed civil right? Is it 
OK if I make you
pass a background check and pay a $200 tax every time you go to church?

And how do you place (thanks, Ron Reagan) a total ban on the licensing of 
constitutionally
guaranteed property that wasn't previously licensed and taxed? Those awesome 
full autos you mention
might be $500-2000 new, but you haven't been able to buy a new one since 1986, 
the old ones are
either not being used or wearing out, and if they are in good condition they 
start at about $5000
for a Uzi and I think a M16 is more like $20,000. 

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread LarryT
Hi Bill.,
;-)  Trust me, given a little time I could crank out 2000 words on the 
assault on religion in this country - from the strangly interpreted 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or 
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; to the presently accepted view of 
Complete Seperation of church and state which is being intrepreted as a 
complete divestiture of any mention of God or religion when it comes to 
govt.  I (who knew) have a different viewpoint -  that being the framers of 
the Constitution meant exactly what they wrote!

And of course, we must wonder why is it acceptable to teach school children 
about the muslim culture but teaching the same about Christian culture would 
bring down the wrath of the ACLU.  It used to be college freshmen entered 
college as Christians and graduated as atheists after their professors' 
skewed agenda to make them question all values of their parents and 
religion.  Since Christianity is based on *faith* it's not difficult to 
change someone who may be susceptible to change and make them question that 
faith because there is no proof when it comes to faith.

If God were to appear in the sky one day and say, Look at me - I'm here  
I'm real, and you'd better be good if you want everlasting life! we would 
lose all free will - we would have to believe - no more freedom of choice 
would exist.  God expects more of us - and of course, we're capable of more.

But I'm sure no one wants another lengthy dissertation from me --

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: Bill R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Mercedes Discussion List' mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 and even got a soapbox moment
 regarding religion.

 Many good issues raised, but I'll let more qualified folk address them. I
 couldn't help but notice your religion section was conspicuously
 circumscribed in speaking of what was banned and more than a bit short on
 why.  .
 BillR, been going to church since I was a kid... and who gets irritated 
 when
 religion is used as a club.

 Amazing...
 On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
 apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system 

I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system.
 Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic
 education and spend more time collecting signatures on petitions, doing
 environmental awareness programs and field trips  generally becoming
 little
 activists rather than students.  And of course, many of their teachers 
 are
 young having just completed their education by socialists and marxist
 professors - and haven't had time to regain their core values if there
 were
 any.

Also, religion has been steadily changing and some advocate updating
 things like the Ten Commandments to make them more current.  Then there's
 the problem with the Bible flatly stating being homosexual is morally
 wrong
 and of course many, such as the ACLU dislike that little problem.
 Speaking
 of the ACLU - formed by a devout marxist who only wish is to tear the
 country down - they fight for things like burning the flag, calling $hit
 on
 canvas Art, defending Nambla (N.American Men-Boy Love Assoc) which
 openly
 advocates sex between adults and children and even provides instructions
 in
 abduction.  They fight for all those absurdities but will not get 
 involved
 in protecting the 2nd Amendment.

Back to the education system - at some point the basics of reading was
 changed - from phonics which always works perfectly to another systm 
 which
 teaching reading my memorizing words - so new words are unrecognized and
 students become poorer and poorer readers the older they get and the more
 complex their reading became.  I witnessed this 1st hand as I went thru
 grades 6-12 in Va.  I had been taught to read in SC using phonics and 
 read
 well by soundingout unfamiliar words and understanding their meaning by
 their context.  Around 80% of the kids around me in Grades 6-12 were
 terrible readers - I'm talking about being in High School and reading at 
 a
 2nd grade level!  And this inability follows them their whole life -
 making
 any education a huge chore for them.  I still remember them struggling
 through simple paragraphs when forced to read aloud during class - each
 word
 was a challenge - *unless* it was one they recognized.  And naturally 
 this
 handicap followed them into every future activity they might choose.

Another attack comes in the huge increase on the dependence on various
 govt departments for income and/or support of various kinds.  The number
 of
 people who

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread LarryT
John noted You even managed to rant about gun ownership 
Well, ya know, John, I gotta try and touch all the hot buttons!  Whait till 
I get my Blog organized!
;-)

Actually, I think I left a lot out!

More to come ??

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: John Freer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 Geez Larry,
 You even managed to rant about gun ownership in your dissertation
 about our education system thread and even got a soapbox moment
 regarding religion.

 Amazing...
 On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
 apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system 

I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system.
 Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic
 education and spend more time collecting signatures on petitions, doing
 environmental awareness programs and field trips  generally becoming 
 little
 activists rather than students.  And of course, many of their teachers 
 are
 young having just completed their education by socialists and marxist
 professors - and haven't had time to regain their core values if there 
 were
 any.

Also, religion has been steadily changing and some advocate updating
 things like the Ten Commandments to make them more current.  Then there's
 the problem with the Bible flatly stating being homosexual is morally 
 wrong
 and of course many, such as the ACLU dislike that little problem. 
 Speaking
 of the ACLU - formed by a devout marxist who only wish is to tear the
 country down - they fight for things like burning the flag, calling $hit 
 on
 canvas Art, defending Nambla (N.American Men-Boy Love Assoc) which 
 openly
 advocates sex between adults and children and even provides instructions 
 in
 abduction.  They fight for all those absurdities but will not get 
 involved
 in protecting the 2nd Amendment.

Back to the education system - at some point the basics of reading was
 changed - from phonics which always works perfectly to another systm 
 which
 teaching reading my memorizing words - so new words are unrecognized and
 students become poorer and poorer readers the older they get and the more
 complex their reading became.  I witnessed this 1st hand as I went thru
 grades 6-12 in Va.  I had been taught to read in SC using phonics and 
 read
 well by soundingout unfamiliar words and understanding their meaning by
 their context.  Around 80% of the kids around me in Grades 6-12 were
 terrible readers - I'm talking about being in High School and reading at 
 a
 2nd grade level!  And this inability follows them their whole life - 
 making
 any education a huge chore for them.  I still remember them struggling
 through simple paragraphs when forced to read aloud during class - each 
 word
 was a challenge - *unless* it was one they recognized.  And naturally 
 this
 handicap followed them into every future activity they might choose.

Another attack comes in the huge increase on the dependence on various
 govt departments for income and/or support of various kinds.  The number 
 of
 people who get paid by the govt has exceeded 50% - this creates a 
 continuous
 dependence on govt for finances.

Also there is an effort by the MSM to create an environment where
 self-dependance is frowned upon.  It is very evident in UK already where
 anything that might be used for defense against criminals are outlawed.
 People are not expected to defend themselves and by extension should not 
 be
 self sufficient in other areas of life.  Depend on the govt for finances,
 defense of self and property (dial 911) and place all other needs in the
 hands of the govt.

Finally (probably not - I'm surely forgetting something) there's the
 environmenal movement.  What started as a noble thing has become a thorn 
 in
 the side of American economics.  As more animals, fish, flowers, etc and
 their habitate become protected the more land we lose to use as we wish.
 Even homeowners are prevented from developing their property as they want
 due to govt environmentally driven regulations (think wetlands - which we
 used to call swamps).  This is a huge topic as it potentially puts a 
 weight
 around the neck of so many capitalist activities forcing a slow-down in 
 our
 economic system which in-turn reduces our standard of living, and on and 
 on.
 The environmental movement has even taken their agenda into darkest 
 Africa.
 Developers wanted to build a power plant so people could have running 
 water
 in their homes (or huts, whatever) because power is needed to power well
 pumps.  Without

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread John Robbins
LarryT wrote:
 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.

http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread Mitch Haley
John Robbins wrote:
 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html

Yep, it's absurd. The ACLU believes that in all the BOR, people means you and 
I, except for
the 2A, in which people means standing army.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread John Robbins
Mitch Haley wrote:
 John Robbins wrote:
 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html
 
 Yep, it's absurd. The ACLU believes that in all the BOR, people means you 
 and I, except for
 the 2A, in which people means standing army.

I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last paragraph?

John


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread Mitch Haley
John Robbins wrote:
 I didn't much care for that either, but what about the last paragraph?

The historical definition of arms in the 2A would best be described as
all the terrible implements of the soldier. Although private ownership of
field pieces and ship's cannon was commonplace at the time, and there was no
intent to take them away from us, it's less certain that they intended the
2A to guarantee a pre-existing right to keep and bear artillery. What is certain
is that all hand carried, shoulder fired weapons were included. This would 
necessarily
include RPGs and shoulder fired anti tank weapons. There was no intent to arm 
agents
of government above and beyond whatever the people held. Thomas Jefferson, 
George Mason,
et al, would be aghast at the standing army possessed by my county government, 
and
they would certainly think that if my county sheriff had an APC, then I should 
have a LAW,
otherwise I would be helpless before them. 

Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-12 Thread LarryT
I know no one wants me to write a few thoudsand words about the ACLU and gun 
control - but the stuff they say on the link provided contain a lot of 
inaccuracies.  As far as it being a collective right all one need do is read 
what the framers said about gun ownership.  i.e., they feel every man out to 
be armed.  As Mitch said, in all amendment the people means the people but 
in the 2ndA the people means the militia, yeah, right.  BTW, the Supremes 
never said it was a collective right.

Larry T (66 MGB, 74 911, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!  youroil.net
800-583-8601
Weber Carb Info http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs



- Original Message - 
From: John Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)


 LarryT wrote:
 Speaking of the ACLU - snip lots of nasty cases They fight for all
 those absurdities but will not get involved in protecting the 2nd
 Amendment.

 http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14523res20020304.html






 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-11 Thread LarryT
Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system 

I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system. 
Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic 
education and spend more time collecting signatures on petitions, doing 
environmental awareness programs and field trips  generally becoming little 
activists rather than students.  And of course, many of their teachers are 
young having just completed their education by socialists and marxist 
professors - and haven't had time to regain their core values if there were 
any.

Also, religion has been steadily changing and some advocate updating 
things like the Ten Commandments to make them more current.  Then there's 
the problem with the Bible flatly stating being homosexual is morally wrong 
and of course many, such as the ACLU dislike that little problem.  Speaking 
of the ACLU - formed by a devout marxist who only wish is to tear the 
country down - they fight for things like burning the flag, calling $hit on 
canvas Art, defending Nambla (N.American Men-Boy Love Assoc) which openly 
advocates sex between adults and children and even provides instructions in 
abduction.  They fight for all those absurdities but will not get involved 
in protecting the 2nd Amendment.

Back to the education system - at some point the basics of reading was 
changed - from phonics which always works perfectly to another systm which 
teaching reading my memorizing words - so new words are unrecognized and 
students become poorer and poorer readers the older they get and the more 
complex their reading became.  I witnessed this 1st hand as I went thru 
grades 6-12 in Va.  I had been taught to read in SC using phonics and read 
well by soundingout unfamiliar words and understanding their meaning by 
their context.  Around 80% of the kids around me in Grades 6-12 were 
terrible readers - I'm talking about being in High School and reading at a 
2nd grade level!  And this inability follows them their whole life - making 
any education a huge chore for them.  I still remember them struggling 
through simple paragraphs when forced to read aloud during class - each word 
was a challenge - *unless* it was one they recognized.  And naturally this 
handicap followed them into every future activity they might choose.

Another attack comes in the huge increase on the dependence on various 
govt departments for income and/or support of various kinds.  The number of 
people who get paid by the govt has exceeded 50% - this creates a continuous 
dependence on govt for finances.

Also there is an effort by the MSM to create an environment where 
self-dependance is frowned upon.  It is very evident in UK already where 
anything that might be used for defense against criminals are outlawed. 
People are not expected to defend themselves and by extension should not be 
self sufficient in other areas of life.  Depend on the govt for finances, 
defense of self and property (dial 911) and place all other needs in the 
hands of the govt.

Finally (probably not - I'm surely forgetting something) there's the 
environmenal movement.  What started as a noble thing has become a thorn in 
the side of American economics.  As more animals, fish, flowers, etc and 
their habitate become protected the more land we lose to use as we wish. 
Even homeowners are prevented from developing their property as they want 
due to govt environmentally driven regulations (think wetlands - which we 
used to call swamps).  This is a huge topic as it potentially puts a weight 
around the neck of so many capitalist activities forcing a slow-down in our 
economic system which in-turn reduces our standard of living, and on and on. 
The environmental movement has even taken their agenda into darkest Africa. 
Developers wanted to build a power plant so people could have running water 
in their homes (or huts, whatever) because power is needed to power well 
pumps.  Without power the people are forced to go to the public well or 
local river - which has its own dangers - hippo's and crocs still kill many 
people there and the water is not always clean and may be used as a cistern 
and washing machine by others peoples upstream.  The villagers wanted the 
power plant, the developers wanted it but the environmental group claimed it 
would exploit the people living there (by giving them jobs, money and clean, 
running water).   I suspect this thinking started with DDT being banned - 
which ended up killing millions of people in 3rd world countries when the 
availability of inexpensive poison to control mosquitoes disappeared.  Think 
about that figure - millions die of malaria and other mosquito borne disease 
every year.

Meanwhile, the environmentalists have managed to keep oil exploration from 
drilling new wells for years particularily off the Atlantic and Pacific 
coasts as well as Anwar.  Meanwhile, a 

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-11 Thread John Freer
Geez Larry,
You even managed to rant about gun ownership in your dissertation
about our education system thread and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.

Amazing...
On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
 apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system 

I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system.
 Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic
 education and spend more time collecting signatures on petitions, doing
 environmental awareness programs and field trips  generally becoming little
 activists rather than students.  And of course, many of their teachers are
 young having just completed their education by socialists and marxist
 professors - and haven't had time to regain their core values if there were
 any.

Also, religion has been steadily changing and some advocate updating
 things like the Ten Commandments to make them more current.  Then there's
 the problem with the Bible flatly stating being homosexual is morally wrong
 and of course many, such as the ACLU dislike that little problem.  Speaking
 of the ACLU - formed by a devout marxist who only wish is to tear the
 country down - they fight for things like burning the flag, calling $hit on
 canvas Art, defending Nambla (N.American Men-Boy Love Assoc) which openly
 advocates sex between adults and children and even provides instructions in
 abduction.  They fight for all those absurdities but will not get involved
 in protecting the 2nd Amendment.

Back to the education system - at some point the basics of reading was
 changed - from phonics which always works perfectly to another systm which
 teaching reading my memorizing words - so new words are unrecognized and
 students become poorer and poorer readers the older they get and the more
 complex their reading became.  I witnessed this 1st hand as I went thru
 grades 6-12 in Va.  I had been taught to read in SC using phonics and read
 well by soundingout unfamiliar words and understanding their meaning by
 their context.  Around 80% of the kids around me in Grades 6-12 were
 terrible readers - I'm talking about being in High School and reading at a
 2nd grade level!  And this inability follows them their whole life - making
 any education a huge chore for them.  I still remember them struggling
 through simple paragraphs when forced to read aloud during class - each word
 was a challenge - *unless* it was one they recognized.  And naturally this
 handicap followed them into every future activity they might choose.

Another attack comes in the huge increase on the dependence on various
 govt departments for income and/or support of various kinds.  The number of
 people who get paid by the govt has exceeded 50% - this creates a continuous
 dependence on govt for finances.

Also there is an effort by the MSM to create an environment where
 self-dependance is frowned upon.  It is very evident in UK already where
 anything that might be used for defense against criminals are outlawed.
 People are not expected to defend themselves and by extension should not be
 self sufficient in other areas of life.  Depend on the govt for finances,
 defense of self and property (dial 911) and place all other needs in the
 hands of the govt.

Finally (probably not - I'm surely forgetting something) there's the
 environmenal movement.  What started as a noble thing has become a thorn in
 the side of American economics.  As more animals, fish, flowers, etc and
 their habitate become protected the more land we lose to use as we wish.
 Even homeowners are prevented from developing their property as they want
 due to govt environmentally driven regulations (think wetlands - which we
 used to call swamps).  This is a huge topic as it potentially puts a weight
 around the neck of so many capitalist activities forcing a slow-down in our
 economic system which in-turn reduces our standard of living, and on and on.
 The environmental movement has even taken their agenda into darkest Africa.
 Developers wanted to build a power plant so people could have running water
 in their homes (or huts, whatever) because power is needed to power well
 pumps.  Without power the people are forced to go to the public well or
 local river - which has its own dangers - hippo's and crocs still kill many
 people there and the water is not always clean and may be used as a cistern
 and washing machine by others peoples upstream.  The villagers wanted the
 power plant, the developers wanted it but the environmental group claimed it
 would exploit the people living there (by giving them jobs, money and clean,
 running water).   I suspect this thinking started with DDT being banned -
 which ended up killing millions of people in 3rd world countries when the
 availability of inexpensive poison to control mosquitoes disappeared.  Think
 about that figure - millions die of malaria 

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-11 Thread Bill R
and even got a soapbox moment
regarding religion.

Many good issues raised, but I'll let more qualified folk address them. I
couldn't help but notice your religion section was conspicuously
circumscribed in speaking of what was banned and more than a bit short on
why.  . 
BillR, been going to church since I was a kid... and who gets irritated when
religion is used as a club.

Amazing...
On 6/11/08, LarryT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Mitch wrote I don't know who/what to blame for the
 apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system 

I believe there is a multi-pronged attack on the capitalist system.
 Education is high on the list as our youth are moved away from basic
 education and spend more time collecting signatures on petitions, doing
 environmental awareness programs and field trips  generally becoming
little
 activists rather than students.  And of course, many of their teachers are
 young having just completed their education by socialists and marxist
 professors - and haven't had time to regain their core values if there
were
 any.

Also, religion has been steadily changing and some advocate updating
 things like the Ten Commandments to make them more current.  Then there's
 the problem with the Bible flatly stating being homosexual is morally
wrong
 and of course many, such as the ACLU dislike that little problem.
Speaking
 of the ACLU - formed by a devout marxist who only wish is to tear the
 country down - they fight for things like burning the flag, calling $hit
on
 canvas Art, defending Nambla (N.American Men-Boy Love Assoc) which
openly
 advocates sex between adults and children and even provides instructions
in
 abduction.  They fight for all those absurdities but will not get involved
 in protecting the 2nd Amendment.

Back to the education system - at some point the basics of reading was
 changed - from phonics which always works perfectly to another systm which
 teaching reading my memorizing words - so new words are unrecognized and
 students become poorer and poorer readers the older they get and the more
 complex their reading became.  I witnessed this 1st hand as I went thru
 grades 6-12 in Va.  I had been taught to read in SC using phonics and read
 well by soundingout unfamiliar words and understanding their meaning by
 their context.  Around 80% of the kids around me in Grades 6-12 were
 terrible readers - I'm talking about being in High School and reading at a
 2nd grade level!  And this inability follows them their whole life -
making
 any education a huge chore for them.  I still remember them struggling
 through simple paragraphs when forced to read aloud during class - each
word
 was a challenge - *unless* it was one they recognized.  And naturally this
 handicap followed them into every future activity they might choose.

Another attack comes in the huge increase on the dependence on various
 govt departments for income and/or support of various kinds.  The number
of
 people who get paid by the govt has exceeded 50% - this creates a
continuous
 dependence on govt for finances.

Also there is an effort by the MSM to create an environment where
 self-dependance is frowned upon.  It is very evident in UK already where
 anything that might be used for defense against criminals are outlawed.
 People are not expected to defend themselves and by extension should not
be
 self sufficient in other areas of life.  Depend on the govt for finances,
 defense of self and property (dial 911) and place all other needs in the
 hands of the govt.

Finally (probably not - I'm surely forgetting something) there's the
 environmenal movement.  What started as a noble thing has become a thorn
in
 the side of American economics.  As more animals, fish, flowers, etc and
 their habitate become protected the more land we lose to use as we wish.
 Even homeowners are prevented from developing their property as they want
 due to govt environmentally driven regulations (think wetlands - which we
 used to call swamps).  This is a huge topic as it potentially puts a
weight
 around the neck of so many capitalist activities forcing a slow-down in
our
 economic system which in-turn reduces our standard of living, and on and
on.
 The environmental movement has even taken their agenda into darkest
Africa.
 Developers wanted to build a power plant so people could have running
water
 in their homes (or huts, whatever) because power is needed to power well
 pumps.  Without power the people are forced to go to the public well or
 local river - which has its own dangers - hippo's and crocs still kill
many
 people there and the water is not always clean and may be used as a
cistern
 and washing machine by others peoples upstream.  The villagers wanted the
 power plant, the developers wanted it but the environmental group claimed
it
 would exploit the people living there (by giving them jobs, money and
clean,
 running water).   I suspect this thinking started with DDT 

Re: [MBZ] The New World Order (WAS june 4, 1944)

2008-06-11 Thread Curt Raymond
Larry,

I'm hip to alot of what you wrote but consider the other side of the equation.
Nearly all of the fresh surface water in the world is polluted.
More people have breathing disorders now than ever.
Don't even get me started on places like Centralia...
The religious right wants the theory of evolution considered an opinion and 
creationism treated as fact.
The religious right wants to be coddled and allowed freedom but wants to deny 
the same to homosexuals...

Capitalisim left unchecked WILL result in a world that is nothing but a gutted 
shell with all profit extracted, this has been shown over and over again. 
Flint, Michigan is a great example. In China they're going to try to shut down 
factories so the air quality might improve enough so olympians can 
participate...
Religion left unchecked WILL result in war between religions. Several crusades 
come to mind.

Yeah our system is screwed up but its only bad in comparison to some utopian 
ideal...

-Curt

Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:19:43 -0400
From: LarryT lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [MBZ] The New World Ordernbsp;nbsp;nbsp;(WAS june 4, 1944)
To: Mercedes Discussion List lt;mercedes@okiebenz.comgt;
Message-ID: lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; reply-type=original

Mitch wrote lt;lt;I don't know who/what to blame for the
apparent changes in our culture, but the public education system gt;gt;


  
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com