Re: Barcelona assignment
Well done Gianfranco, Good one, Enjoy it and let us know how you get along... Ciao! --- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, I'm going to fly to my first *paid* assignment abroad, in Barcelona, starting from the 2nd of October. I'll have to take pictures of sociological importance (like local identities, urban poverty, gentrification and so on...) and probably I'll be accompanied by a Spanish student. Is any list member located in Barcelona or close? I recall at least Jaume should live there. I don't know how much spare time I'm going to have (I'll arrive at noon of the 2nd and I'll leave on the 7th, late morning). If someone is close enough and has the time it would be nice to meet you, have a drink and talk about photography (and Pentax, of course...). Ciao, Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe
Hi Stan, Monday, September 23, 2002, 12:36:05 AM, you wrote: Saturday sounds good to me. I've been walking around muttering to myself: 35mm or 645? Or both? One body? Two bodies? One each? Two each? What lens kit? I did a quick inventory this afternoon and found that I have a much larger stock of 120 and 220 film than of 135. So I am seriously considering a simple kit of one 645 body plus only 3 lenses: 45m, 75mm, and 150mm. The 35mm and the 120mm are crying out to me that they want to go along also, but I think I will resist. Though I may swap out the 45mm for the 35mm . . . One extension tube for macro work. Maybe even leave the tripod behind. I think you'd be well advised to travel light. For such a short trip and with such little time for photography anything more than the real basics would just be in the way, and is unlikely to be used. In London if you know your way around, or are with someone who does, you'll be doing a lot of walking, and nobody's going to carry it but it you. If you don't know your way around, chances are you'll be down the tube a lot, where there isn't much to photograph anyway, especially with a tripod and certainly not with a flash (flash photography is understandably prohibited). I think your 645 + 3 lenses kit would be fine. Are there any particular sights or aspects of London that you're especially keen to see? Have you been here before? --- Bob
Re: Professional Gear
In 35mm it is somewhat clouded by the fact that Pentax hasn't really marketed to the pro market. It would be safe to say that any of their * lenses (A*, FA*,etc) are pro oriented as would be most of their really long glass. All of their medium format lenses would be considered pro oriented but that is pretty consistent with most MF manufacturers. 35mm pro lenses are usually fast for their focal length, superior optical and usually build quality, and very expensive. Margo Ellen Gesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote; Now hears ANOTHER dumb question: I comprehend the difference between consumer and pro bodies. Could you good people enlighten me as to the difference between consumer and pro LENSES? And what series of Pentax lenses are pro? P.S. That's not a dumb question. BUTCH Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself Hermann Hesse (Demian)
RE: UK trip in October, maybe
I need to check with the boss and see if I am free and can get clearance. It now looks like the following weekend for PDMLUK ii is not going to be possible, but if I am free then the 12th should be fine (I think that is the date Bob Walkden prefers). It would be great and provided I am not committed elsewhere I will go along with whatever. The boat trip certainly sounds good! Rob Now going OT, I better fill out one of these: http://viral.lycos.co.uk/attachments/905/permission_.doc -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 September 2002 09:45 To: Pentax List Subject: Re: UK trip in October, maybe My possible trip to U.K. in October is now a go. I'll arrive Gatwick sometime early morning Friday 11 October. Return to the States early Saturday 19 October. At this point my plan is to spend my free weekend (11-13) in Sevenoaks, the locale of the meeting to which I am traveling. Suggestions? Cotty had mentioned a possible trip well north; I am not sure I am up for that much travel. I'm free that weekend. How about a meet up in town? Bob W, you up for that? Rob? Anyone? How about a boat trip up and down the Thames and then some lunch? Or Regent's Park Zoo? Or? Cotty Oh swipe me! He paints with light! http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at http://www.macads.co.uk/
Kodak's comeback
DCS Pro 14n, sporting a 13.8 MPixels CMOS, priced under $4000. http://www.democratandchronicle.com/biznews/0922story4_business.shtml Still nothing on our side... Servus, Alin
R: Barcelona assignment
- Original Message - From: MPozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:02 AM Subject: Re: Barcelona assignment Well done Gianfranco, Good one, Enjoy it and let us know how you get along... Ciao! --- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, I'm going to fly to my first *paid* assignment abroad, in Barcelona, starting from the 2nd of October. I'll have to take pictures of sociological importance (like local identities, urban poverty, gentrification and so on...) and probably I'll be accompanied by a Spanish student. Is any list member located in Barcelona or close? I recall at least Jaume should live there. I don't know how much spare time I'm going to have (I'll arrive at noon of the 2nd and I'll leave on the 7th, late morning). If someone is close enough and has the time it would be nice to meet you, have a drink and talk about photography (and Pentax, of course...). Ciao, Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: Barcelona assignment
MPozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well done Gianfranco, Good one, Enjoy it and let us know how you get along... Ciao! Ciao Michele! Grazie, ehm, thanks a lot! I'll let you all know for sure... Ciao, Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
OT:Where is Albano?
I have not seen any postings from our Argentina agent and poll master. I hope he is well. Bob
RE: Photokina watchers
Also look out here: http://www.press1.de/asp/km/pf/?messe=photokinatp=photokinaeformat=htm lbase=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.press1.de%2Fasp%2Fkm%2Fpf%2Fp1=alphanavp2=ptex tp2_text=p3=pfachp3_pfach=kmpk0102 http://www.photokina.de/servlet/PB/menu/1062991_l2/index.html And possibly http://213.155.72.24/users/CMC/photokina/index.htm (although I think this list is complete now and Pentax arent on it!) -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 September 2002 22:27 To: Pentax List Subject: Photokina watchers Keen Photokina watchers should note this page: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092200photokina2002preview.asp It is a dedicated page that will be updated with announcements pre the show itself. They are expecting most revelations the day before (this coming Tuesday) so keep those beady eyes peeled. Cotty Oh swipe me! He paints with light! http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at http://www.macads.co.uk/
Re: 28-80 v/s 28-105
Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HehehI'm glad I'm not the only vain one! :) I have the older FA 28-105mm 1:4-5.6 [IF]. I asked for comments on this before (mainly hoping for someone to tell me it sucks so I could justify buying the 24-90mm) I don't remember getting any. From my own limited experience it is a decent lens. The new version with the AL elements is no doubt better, lighter, and requires a smaller filter (dunno what size, but mine is 62mm) Hi Brad, You made me recall a test in Spotmatic magazine: they compared the FA 28-105 (the powerzoom version) to the 24-90. The 24-90 wins hand down, especially wrt flare resistance and overall sharpness. I don't know if it is available on the AOHC website, though. Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
RE: Photokina watchers
Sorry, that first link may be a little too long. You will have to cut and paste the whole lot into the address bar in your browser. -Original Message- From: Rob Brigham Sent: 23 September 2002 10:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Photokina watchers Also look out here: http://www.press1.de/asp/km/pf/?messe=photokinatp=photokinae; format=htm lbase=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.press1.de%2Fasp%2Fkm%2Fpf%2Fp1=alphan avp2=ptex tp2_text=p3=pfachp3_pfach=kmpk0102 http://www.photokina.de/servlet/PB/menu/1062991_l2/index.html And possibly http://213.155.72.24/users/CMC/photokina/index.htm (although I think this list is complete now and Pentax arent on it!) -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 September 2002 22:27 To: Pentax List Subject: Photokina watchers Keen Photokina watchers should note this page: http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092200photokina2002preview.asp It is a dedicated page that will be updated with announcements pre the show itself. They are expecting most revelations the day before (this coming Tuesday) so keep those beady eyes peeled. Cotty Oh swipe me! He paints with light! http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at http://www.macads.co.uk/
Re: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:45:29 +0100 Subject: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe Hi Stan, . . . Are there any particular sights or aspects of London that you're especially keen to see? Have you been here before? Bob, this will be my 8th or 9th trip to U.K. in the last 20 years. The last two visits were primarily in London. (All visits of one week or more). So I have seen a bit of the city. On my last visit, in early summer, 2000, I spent my free evenings and one afternoon hopscotching about the city: take the tube for a ways, pop above ground, wander the environs for a while, often walking to the next tube stop, then back down for a jaunt to another almost randomly chosen area. I enjoy interesting buildings, people, scenes . . . the texture and color and feel of a place. I couldn't say that there is any particular must see among the standard sites that I haven't seen at least in passing. But I also couldn't say that I have captured the essential photo of any one place. So, in short, I am happy to wander and to let my eye be guided by others who have seen the locale through different eyes. Its early morning, don't know if I am making sense . . . stan
Mike Johnston's Sunday
A few (minor) Pentax mentions again this week... http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-09-22.shtml
RE: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe
Have you done the London Eye? -Original Message- From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 11:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:45:29 +0100 Subject: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe Hi Stan, . . . Are there any particular sights or aspects of London that you're especially keen to see? Have you been here before? Bob, this will be my 8th or 9th trip to U.K. in the last 20 years. The last two visits were primarily in London. (All visits of one week or more). So I have seen a bit of the city. On my last visit, in early summer, 2000, I spent my free evenings and one afternoon hopscotching about the city: take the tube for a ways, pop above ground, wander the environs for a while, often walking to the next tube stop, then back down for a jaunt to another almost randomly chosen area. I enjoy interesting buildings, people, scenes . . . the texture and color and feel of a place. I couldn't say that there is any particular must see among the standard sites that I haven't seen at least in passing. But I also couldn't say that I have captured the essential photo of any one place. So, in short, I am happy to wander and to let my eye be guided by others who have seen the locale through different eyes. Its early morning, don't know if I am making sense . . . stan
Re: Mike Johnston's Sunday
Too bad he is spending so much time as the Sunday Morning Photographer that he has let the 37 frame slip! A winge, but I have not seen a issue in 6 months. Are you listening, Mike? Bob - Original Message - From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:38 PM Subject: Mike Johnston's Sunday A few (minor) Pentax mentions again this week... http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-09-22.shtml
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
JT Closed with no bids. No wonder. Who's mad enough to sink s in glass Pentax will no longer support in digital? I guess that soon after Photokina we'll see on ebay an avalanche of Pentax items at derisory prices. Not that it makes me happy... Servus, Alin
Re: SUCH A DEAL
Thanks to our recent and somewhat extensive palaaver on 135s, I can now tell immediately which build it is! Thank you all for that! Where DID this person get his prices? I've dropped him a line, suggesting he review some other sales, and think of reducing his price a bit! By maybe 2/3? ;^) I think the lens he's showing is indeed in fine shape, from what we can see in the photos, but that's a terrible price... I have one in that identical condition, and I got it for just a shade over $100, which was about right, according to all I've seen. keith whaley J. C. O'Connell wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1382043250 WHAT A BARGAIN, AND IT'S NOT EVEN THE GOOD ONE. JCO
Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
It definitely brings a smile to my face. Man, I hope they *don't* come with a dslr for another coupe of years... Mishka -Original Message- From: Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 I guess that soon after Photokina we'll see on ebay an avalanche of Pentax items at derisory prices. Not that it makes me happy... Servus, Alin
New NPH 400
http://home.fujifilm.com/photokina2002/data/pr_pdf/pr_1.pdf New Fujicolor PORTRAIT FILM NPH 400 Professional Now Boasts 4th Color Layer Technology for Enhanced Color Fidelity PHOTOKINA 2002, COLOGNE, GERMANY, September 25, 2002 - Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. is proud to announce the international debut of new Fujicolor PORTRAIT FILM NPH 400 incorporating Fujifilm's innovative 4th Color Layer Technology. Delivering excellent neutral skin tone reproduction, rich gradation, enhanced color fidelity and unbiased neutral gray balance, this new high-speed ISO 400 daylight-type fine grain color negative film offers not only wedding and portrait photographers, but also industrial and commercial photographers the versatility to fully exercise their creativity. New NPH 400 will be showcased at the Fujifilm PHOTOKINA 2002 booth. Building on the reputation and success of the original NPH 400, the addition of 4th Color Layer Technology delivers faithful color reproduction, even under fluorescent lights and other artificial light sources. By eliminating the need to use corrective filters under fluorescent lights, this film offers beautiful exposure, enhanced convenience and ease of use for working professionals. Fujifilm's enhanced NPH 400 incorporates a 4th Color Sensitive Layer in addition to three RGB-sensitive layers and, with its high speed ISO 400 rating, provides faithful reproduction of neutral grays with sharply improved fidelity over a wide exposure range, including under- and over-exposures, as seen by human eye. Providing unparalleled flexibility for professional portraiture, the new NPH 400 produces superb skin tones with continuously smooth gradation from highlights to shadows as well as reproduction of clearer colors in highlights subdued color saturation in shadows, and excellent three-dimensional appearance in such details as fabrics and other textures. New NPH 400 is designed to provide medium color saturation, and faithfully captures all the slightly different nuances of color that characterize an appealing portrait. New NPH is recommended for maximizing the effect of lighting indoors or photographing outdoors where varying conditions demand stable performance. New Fujicolor Portrait Film NPH 400 will be immediately available in markets worldwide.
Re: Photokina watchers
Rob Brigham wrote: Also look out here: http://www.press1.de/asp/km/pf/?messe=photokinatp=photokinaeformat=htm lbase=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.press1.de%2Fasp%2Fkm%2Fpf%2Fp1=alphanavp2=ptex tp2_text=p3=pfachp3_pfach=kmpk0102 http://www.photokina.de/servlet/PB/menu/1062991_l2/index.html And possibly http://213.155.72.24/users/CMC/photokina/index.htm (although I think this list is complete now and Pentax arent on it!) I did visit one of those lists, and entered 'Pentax' as an exhibitor. I got the following results: URL: www.pentax.de Hall: 01.2 Stand: F021 / G020 Products - Cameras (Photo-, Video-, Film, Imaging) - APS cameras - Digital cameras - Miniature cameras - Medium format cameras - Single lens reflex cameras - Single lens reflex cameras with autofocus - Viewfinder cameras with autofocus - Viewfinder cameras - Filters - Lens hoods - Converters, extenders - Macro lenses - Lenses for autofocus cameras - Lenses for large and medium format cameras - Lenses with fixed focal length - Lenses with variable focal length - Soft focus lenses - Underwater protective housing - Binoculars, telescopes - Prismatic glasses - Exposure meters and rangefinders - Electronic flash units and tubes Seems to be a pretty comprehensive display. Nothing said about new products... keith whaley
RE: Photokina watchers
The links were to Pentax press releases at Photokina and new product lists by exibitor. Pentax have not released anything yet, but this is where it will probably appear first!! http://www.photokina.de/servlet/PB/menu/1062991_l2/index.html Don't go to exhibitor list, go to 'Exhibitor's press releases' and click on 'I'm a journalist', or new products list/reports. Nothing there yet, but expected most exhibitors will release something the day before the show. -Original Message- From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I did visit one of those lists, and entered 'Pentax' as an exhibitor. I got the following results: Seems to be a pretty comprehensive display. Nothing said about new products... keith whaley
Re: LX (i know its not friday)
- Original Message - From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would consider a part trade towards a FA*28-70/2.8. Heh, wouldn't anyone? I'd give a left nut :) (sorry for the crudeness) :) Brad I notice you didn't say *MY* left nut... nice of you to offer someone else's uh... property in trade :))) Cory Waters was up late last night at the Falcons game
Re: Website update new address
At 07:55 22/9/02 -0400, you wrote: Some very nice work.I especially like the bark topic. Dave Thank you, Dave. Barks have been among my favorite subjects for about three to four years now. I am still often surprised by the variety of their shapes and textures. Yves -- Yves Caudano Photography website: http://www.yvescaudano.be Physics: http://www.scf.fundp.ac.be/~ycaudano/
Re: Mike Johnston's Sunday
Send a copy of this message to him at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was about to sign up for an annual subscription... Hmmm. keith whaley Bob Rapp wrote: Too bad he is spending so much time as the Sunday Morning Photographer that he has let the 37 frame slip! A winge, but I have not seen a issue in 6 months. Are you listening, Mike? Bob - Original Message - From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:38 PM Subject: Mike Johnston's Sunday A few (minor) Pentax mentions again this week... http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-09-22.shtml
Re: Really OT: Ireland
I don't recall the scene in the movie, but is is a great place for photographs, although it has been a bit overexposed in postcards, travel brochures, and books on Ireland. Cobh is a great place for photographs, if you have the proper Pentax equipment. 8). There are colorful buildings around the docks, a church on a cliff above the bay, ships, and interesting museums. Dan Scott wrote: Is the Cliff of Moher the location of The Cliffs of Insanity featuring in the movie, The Pincess Bride? If it is, that would afford some excellent photo opportunities. -- Daniel J. Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stanley, Powers Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Suite203, 1170 US Highway 22 East http://geocities.com/dmatyola/ Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (908)725-3322 fax: (908)707-0399
Re: Website update new address
At 13:36 22/9/02 +0100, you wrote: Thank you for your nice comments! I must say I enjoyed designing my site, even though it took me longer than expected... Why does your website wants to set cookies? I have rejected them, and it seems to work well without them. Frits J. Wüthrich As you may have noticed, it is possible to change the look of the site by clicking on the sun (kind of a night/day effect). The cookie is set simply to remember this state between different pages. Rejecting cookies does not prevent the site from working; without it, each page loads with the default presentation instead of the current one. This is only a temporary cookie that is automatically deleted at the end of the browser session. Until now, more people liked this feature, than disliked it (or they didn't dare to tell me :-). So I left it. Yves -- Yves Caudano, Namur, Belgium Photography website: http://www.yvescaudano.be Physics: http://www.scf.fundp.ac.be/~ycaudano/
Re: PUG deadline gone!
Nice suggestion. got my FIRST submission in and looking forward to it :D Darn! Missed the flamin submission for the PUG date again! Didn't even get as far as shooting anything, why do I forget every month? Can we have an auto-reminder posted to the list like 3 or 4 days in advance of the cut-off?
New Pentax Ads!
Last week I made that the statement that Pentax had no apparent marketing and ad plan, that they would go months without an ad placed in the major US photo mags and that I had never seen 1 ad for the MZ-S. This past weekend I was watching the Pikes Peak hill climb on ESPN ( for our non US brethren, ESPN is a 24 hour a day cable sports channel ) As each vehicle passed a certain point on the race track going up the mountain, the TV camera picked up a large Pentax red banner placed next to ESPN's banner. The next day I was watching ESPN Sport Center news. They were showing highlights of a Seattle Mariner-Oakland Athletic baseball game. The camera angle was from behind the pitcher toward home plate. The rolling advertising banners on the base of the wall behind home plate all of the sudden switched to 3 large red Pentax banners. In less than 24 hours I had seen more Pentax ad effort on TV than I had seen in months in the pages of my favorite photo magazines. The new Pentax ad campaign: Get the Pentax name in front of the TV camera as often as possible! DG
Re[2]: WARNING: U.S. Postal Service Ripoff
Stan, Yeah, I just got a 2nd day package in four days mailed in the same state by UPS. They routed it incorrectly. Not so much as a sorry or anything. I am happier with USPS. Bruce Monday, September 23, 2002, 9:26:09 AM, you wrote: SH on 9/5/02 21:43, Fred at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not to malign UPS, but the USPS has done much better by me. 2-3 days via USPS Priority Mail and cheap! My experience with USPS Priority Mail has been outstanding. Hundreds of shipments to and fro, and almost always within 3 days max, and never a lost shipment. Never. Fred SH Like he said. SH That is my experience also. Biggest pain with UPS vs USPS: USPS has a local SH location to go to (called, quaintly, a Post Office) if you can't arrange to SH accept delivery at home. UPS has one warehouse on the other side of town. SH And, USPS is cheaper. SH Just my not so humble opinion . . . SH Stan
Re: OT: Tokina 24mm 2.8?
Dave I have the Tokina 24 F2.8 and I think it's very good. I have the Pentax 24 2.8 as well so I am looking to sell the Tokina. If you're are interested I am sure we can work out a deal. I'm in Hamilton and I think you are in TO. I have to pick up the Pentax posters soon so maybe we can get together in Toronto... Vic
Re: (2): PUG deadline gone!
Did you get a not so fluffy shot,Brendan Dave Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Favourite Photo's
Hi All, Just for interest sake, as I'm new to this list, and probally will help me to understand each ones quirks a bit better: Ok, I'm gonna steal somebody's idea here. Its 2005, world warIII has been declared, everbody has nuke's, you are designated to create a time capsuble to be placed in a bunker for all prosperity. One of the items you have to choose is 3 photographs of the 20th century that you would consider unreplaceable. It need not be your favourite photograper, but the one you felt had the most impact, let me start: 1] The picture of a suspected VC spy being executed by the police during The Vietnam War 2] The picture of a common pepper by Ansel Adams 3] High heeled shoes in knickers by David Bailey. You can send them to me direct at [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIA Feroze
Re: (2): PUG deadline gone!
yup, but I think the red 29 will do better han a 25 --- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you get a not so fluffy shot,Brendan Dave Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
Hello PDML, here comes the SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Prime Lens Poll This time all members of the PDML are invited to choose 3 lenses among the SMC Pentax K-mount primes with focal length between 77mm and 105mm. Please imagine that you have no short telephoto prime lens for your k-mount camera. Also imagine that you have more than enough money and a good opportunity to buy k-mount SMC Pentax short prime lenses. What SMC Pentax k-mount lens would you like to get most (1st choice)? What lens would you pick as your 2nd choice, if your first choice was not available? What lens would you pick as your 3rd choice (if your 1st and 2nd choice were not available)? Please choose among the following lenses: FA77/f1.8 Limited A*85/f1.4 FA*85/f1.4 IF K85/f1.8 M85/f2 K85/f2.2 Soft F85/f2.8 Soft FA85/f2.8 Soft M100/f2.8 A100/f2.8 A100/f2.8 Macro F100/f2.8 Macro FA100/f2.8 Macro FA100/f3.5 Macro K100/f4 Macro M100/f4 Macro A100/f4 Macro K105/f2.8 Rules: 1.) Pick your 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice. You may choose less than 3 but not more than 3 choices. 2.) Please send your vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exception: Send your vote to the PDML if you have commented your choices, and you want the members of the PDML to know your comments. 3.) I will count all votes that are sent before Thursday, September 26th, 21:00 hours German time. Have fun with this poll, too, and thanks in advance for contributing. Arnold
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished, that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People who have a need for digital have, and will, find other solutions. I don't expect any major, or long term, effect on the Pentax used equipment market. BR From: Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Who's mad enough to sink s in glass Pentax will no longer support in digital? I guess that soon after Photokina we'll see on ebay an avalanche of Pentax items at derisory prices. Not that it makes me happy...
Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =) I've been using an SF-7 for a number of years that I bought secondhand as a camera that could do a reasonable job of point shoot yet would let me twiddle with everything. It did the job I asked it to do. Now I've bought myself an MZ-S, it's complete overkill really, but I intend to try and grow into it. However I have a quick question about the data imprinting. The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? -- So much style without substance So much stuff without style It's hard to recognise a real thing That comes along once in a while
Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe
I enjoy interesting buildings, people, scenes . . . the texture and color and feel of a place. I couldn't say that there is any particular must see among the standard sites that I haven't seen at least in passing. But I also couldn't say that I have captured the essential photo of any one place. So, in short, I am happy to wander and to let my eye be guided by others who have seen the locale through different eyes. Its early morning, don't know if I am making sense . . . I'm completely free as a bird and don't mind where we meet. The only places I know well are Soho (worked there in 1980/81...no jokes ;-) and the West End in general. I enjoyed the area around Brick Lane...all those curry houses Vbg. I also know the area around W11, Queensway and around the corner 'Khan's' where I ate several times a week with colleagues and friends all those years ago. I'll go with the flow. Never been to Greenwich - would love to see the Cutty Sark.. All I need is a time and a place...and I'm there. Cheers, Cotty Oh swipe me! He paints with light! http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at http://www.macads.co.uk/
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
FA77/f1.8 Limited A*85/f1.4 A100/f2.8 Macro --
RE: Re[2]: WARNING: U.S. Postal Service Ripoff
Give me USPS any day over UPS. UPS has bend over pricing and brokerage fees. I love USPS - and I live in Canada :) Cheers, Dave Original Message: - From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:35:51 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[2]: WARNING: U.S. Postal Service Ripoff Stan, Yeah, I just got a 2nd day package in four days mailed in the same state by UPS. They routed it incorrectly. Not so much as a sorry or anything. I am happier with USPS. Bruce Monday, September 23, 2002, 9:26:09 AM, you wrote: SH on 9/5/02 21:43, Fred at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not to malign UPS, but the USPS has done much better by me. 2-3 days via USPS Priority Mail and cheap! My experience with USPS Priority Mail has been outstanding. Hundreds of shipments to and fro, and almost always within 3 days max, and never a lost shipment. Never. Fred SH Like he said. SH That is my experience also. Biggest pain with UPS vs USPS: USPS has a local SH location to go to (called, quaintly, a Post Office) if you can't arrange to SH accept delivery at home. UPS has one warehouse on the other side of town. SH And, USPS is cheaper. SH Just my not so humble opinion . . . SH Stan mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
andre schrieb: FA77/f1.8 Limited A*85/f1.4 A100/f2.8 Macro Thanks! Arnold
Re: Favourite Photo's
1. Joe Rosenthal' s photo of the second flag raising at Iwo Jima. 2. Edgerton's shot of a bullet passing through an apple. 3. The NASA shot of Earthrise taken from the moon. Feroze Kistan wrote: Hi All, Just for interest sake, as I'm new to this list, and probally will help me to understand each ones quirks a bit better: Ok, I'm gonna steal somebody's idea here. Its 2005, world warIII has been declared, everbody has nuke's, you are designated to create a time capsuble to be placed in a bunker for all prosperity. One of the items you have to choose is 3 photographs of the 20th century that you would consider unreplaceable. It need not be your favourite photograper, but the one you felt had the most impact, let me start: 1] The picture of a suspected VC spy being executed by the police during The Vietnam War 2] The picture of a common pepper by Ansel Adams 3] High heeled shoes in knickers by David Bailey. You can send them to me direct at [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIA Feroze -- Daniel J. Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stanley, Powers Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Suite203, 1170 US Highway 22 East http://geocities.com/dmatyola/ Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (908)725-3322 fax: (908)707-0399
Re: Professional Gear
Bruce wrote: Your homework assignment is to find out how many current production lenses Pentax has that meets these criteria. Count all FA* and FA Limited lenses and the few odd A pro grade lenses still in production and you're all set. If you want to, you can count all Pentax MF lenses as well. No shortage of pro grade lenses. The situations is certanly far worse when coming to Pentax bodies. Pål
Used lens prices (WAS: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600)
Alin wrote: No wonder. Who's mad enough to sink s in glass Pentax will no longer support in digital? Will Pentax not support digital K-mount slr's? Have I been missing something? I guess that soon after Photokina we'll see on ebay an avalanche of Pentax items at derisory prices. Not that it makes me happy... Not only Pentax. Something is happening with the used market. Apart from the US and Japanese collector market, used prices has plummeted around here. The market is flowing over with used Canon EOS gear. Today, the guy in the camera shop asked me about the Canon EF 35-350 L lens he was about to perhaps buy. The fellow who was selling it was asking 1/3 of the new price and had tried for a long time to sell it. EOS 1 bodies goes for 1/4 of new prices. I advertized my FA645 45/2.8 lens in mid July. Today I finally sold it at 1/3 new price. Pål
Supply source for Pentax plug
Hi all, Do you know any supply source, which can provide me with a WINDER ME II remote plug ? This plug has 3 small holes and can be attached to the winder socket; its metal cap can then be screwed to the winder. I tried to do-it-myself by modifying a Drive A / four holes / PENTAX plug, with black resin and a lot of patience, but the result is full of short circuits. Many thanks in advance, C.MARION www.pentaxiste.org
Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
Hi Tim, on 23 Sep 02 you wrote in pentax.list: First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =) Welcome! The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? I actually don't own an MZ-S but I've downloaded the manual some time ago. It says that the imprint density may vary with different films. You can change the density with Pentax function 15 (should be explained on page 120 in your manual). Hope it helps. Regards, Heiko
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
Hi Arnold, on 23 Sep 02 you wrote in pentax.list: 1.: FA77/f1.8 Limited 2.: FA*85/f1.4 IF 3.: M100/f2.8 Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Heiko Hamann -- Heiko Hamann .Postanschrift: Postfach 1136 Vx 02363 56077 45702 Datteln Fx 02363 56078 D2 0172 8122535 Hausanschrift: Bruchstraße 9 45711 Datteln --
Pentax digital slr (WAS: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600)
Bruce wrote: I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished, that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People seriously thought so because Pentax have officially stated that they intend to manufacture K-mount digital slr's. I'll still think so until they state otherwise. Pål
Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
Tim wrote: The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? Mine does not have a halo. It's very easy to read. Try a different film to make sure. Pål
Re: Photokina watchers
Keith wrote: It's apparently a list of what they -- meaning Pentax Germany -- will be showing/displaying on their tables at the show. No mention of new products. New products wont be mentioned before the show. Pentax is notoriously late in having late embargo dates. There are two possible reasons as to why it's utterly quiet from Pentax. One is that they have nothing to show. The second is that whatever they have to show is under strict embargo. If you're among the pessimistic crowd the first explanation may seem most likely. I would have been among those if it weren't for the fact that no one had stated that Pentax will NOT show a digital slr at Photokina. What I try to say is that having nothing cannot be under embargo. Pål
Re: Barcelona assignment
Hey Gienfranco, I'm sure you can feel the waves of envy from there... Have fun in Barcelona! j On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote: Hi everybody, I'm going to fly to my first *paid* assignment abroad, in Barcelona, starting from the 2nd of October. I'll have to take pictures of sociological importance (like local identities, urban poverty, gentrification and so on...) and probably I'll be accompanied by a Spanish student. Is any list member located in Barcelona or close? I recall at least Jaume should live there. I don't know how much spare time I'm going to have (I'll arrive at noon of the 2nd and I'll leave on the 7th, late morning). If someone is close enough and has the time it would be nice to meet you, have a drink and talk about photography (and Pentax, of course...). Ciao, Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- -- -- Juan J. Buhler | Lead FX Animator PDI | Photos at http://www.jbuhler.com --
Sky, UV, Haze filters?
O Sages, speak to me... What the heck is the difference between Sky, UV, and Haze filters? Are they all the same thing? It sounds like they are to me, but manufacturers frequently offer two or all three side by side, so I can't be right. How are they different, and cirumstances would cause me to prefer this one or that one? Does a polarizing filter eliminate the use of the three? Dan Scott (in the land off big Sky, strong Haze and intense UV)
Re: Photokina watchers
I have discussed this with a couple of my regular photo stores in Toronto (Henry's and Downtown Camera). Downtown camera did confirm that they don't have a clue what Pentax is doing because even the Pentax Rep doesn't really say much. Apparently when those digibino binocular things were released, Downtown camera didn't know anything about them until their rep came in and plopped a demo unit on the counter and said digital binoculars and handed literature and then walked out the door. This was just after they were announced. So it wouldn't surprise me if Pentax did have something up their sleeves but seeing as how they're very tight lipped, I'm not holding my breath either. Cheers, Dave Original Message: - From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:09:24 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photokina watchers Keith wrote: It's apparently a list of what they -- meaning Pentax Germany -- will be showing/displaying on their tables at the show. No mention of new products. New products wont be mentioned before the show. Pentax is notoriously late in having late embargo dates. There are two possible reasons as to why it's utterly quiet from Pentax. One is that they have nothing to show. The second is that whatever they have to show is under strict embargo. If you're among the pessimistic crowd the first explanation may seem most likely. I would have been among those if it weren't for the fact that no one had stated that Pentax will NOT show a digital slr at Photokina. What I try to say is that having nothing cannot be under embargo. Pål mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
Re: Re: (2): PUG deadline gone!
Duly noted and recorded:) Dave Begin Original Message From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:00:49 -0400 (EDT) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (2): PUG deadline gone! yup, but I think the red 29 will do better han a 25 Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
? replacement for my Tokina 50-250
Hi. My Tokina 50-250 ATX 4-5.6 is giving significant flare/ghost images on long exposure (multisecond). First time it was the moon I overexposed (my fault ofcouse) and I got another 'moon' which was a reflection from the internal elements (I guess thats what a ghost image is). This time it was a couple of bright red 'lights' which werent there... another multisecond exposure of the night from my window. Yes, there was a bright neon light at the same level.. * What am I doing wrong? The rest of the picture was nice (laymen appreciated it) and maybe I havent overexposed. * Probably the lens is very much prone for flare, and that I need to think of a replacement? Thanks. -Sridhar
Re: LX (i know its not friday)
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 07:30 AM, CBWaters wrote: I notice you didn't say *MY* left nut... nice of you to offer someone else's uh... property in trade :))) Cory Waters was up late last night at the Falcons game (Psst...Cory. Did you SEE his self-portrait? He probably has a collection in a big pickle jar somewhere) Dan Scott dr
Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
Mine has that halo, but only on negative film; on transparency film it's perfectly sharp. -- Kristian On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 19:11 Europe/Dublin, Pål Jensen wrote: Tim wrote: The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? Mine does not have a halo. It's very easy to read. Try a different film to make sure. Pål
Re: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
You can change the density of the data imprinting with one of the Pentax Functions. I haven't changed mine, so I don't know if you'll get rid of the so-called 'halo'. As for me, I use a good loupe to view that data if need beit's easy with magnification, but definitely more difficult without it and especially without good light. Brad Dobo - Original Message - From: Tim Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:25 PM Subject: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =) I've been using an SF-7 for a number of years that I bought secondhand as a camera that could do a reasonable job of point shoot yet would let me twiddle with everything. It did the job I asked it to do. Now I've bought myself an MZ-S, it's complete overkill really, but I intend to try and grow into it. However I have a quick question about the data imprinting. The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? -- So much style without substance So much stuff without style It's hard to recognise a real thing That comes along once in a while
Taking the 67II out to Big Bend NP
Hi all, Just want to warn you, if you happen to visit the Big Bend NP on the border of Texas and Mexico in two weeks, you might run into a lunatic carrying arround a 67II with a few lenses and tripod. After doing some presentations on a computer show in Austin I will be driving and hiking for almost a week. Hope the temperature is a bit lower than the last time I was there (April 1989, with an MX :-) Regards, Jan van Wijk -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
Re: LX (i know its not friday)
I prefer using a freezer, not a pickle jar :) PsychoBrad :) - Original Message - From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:00 PM Subject: Re: LX (i know its not friday) On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 07:30 AM, CBWaters wrote: I notice you didn't say *MY* left nut... nice of you to offer someone else's uh... property in trade :))) Cory Waters was up late last night at the Falcons game (Psst...Cory. Did you SEE his self-portrait? He probably has a collection in a big pickle jar somewhere) Dan Scott dr
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
Hi all, I've been a lurker for going on two years for this group, have bought equipment from several of its members (thanks Boz!), and now have decided to come out with my fave rave telephotos. Since I'm mostly interested in portraiture, my picks would be: 1. FA77/f1.8 Limited (thank you, Peter, for the black version!): the single best combination of sharpness, three-dimensionality, bokeh, and non-intimidating size. 2. M85/f2 best street combo with my ME Super, it handles better than the 77LTD, and shows off faces to best effect (i.e. not *too* sharp) 3. A*85/f1.4, don't own it, would love to, but hesitate because of its front-element you're staring at a huge lens effect; I like low-key work with people. Still Tom Davis Associate Professor of Philosophy and Chair Department of Philosophy Whitman College From: Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 19:15:22 +0200 To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:23:36 -0400 Hello PDML, here comes the SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Prime Lens Poll This time all members of the PDML are invited to choose 3 lenses among the SMC Pentax K-mount primes with focal length between 77mm and 105mm. Please imagine that you have no short telephoto prime lens for your k-mount camera. Also imagine that you have more than enough money and a good opportunity to buy k-mount SMC Pentax short prime lenses. What SMC Pentax k-mount lens would you like to get most (1st choice)? What lens would you pick as your 2nd choice, if your first choice was not available? What lens would you pick as your 3rd choice (if your 1st and 2nd choice were not available)? Please choose among the following lenses: FA77/f1.8 Limited A*85/f1.4 FA*85/f1.4 IF K85/f1.8 M85/f2 K85/f2.2 Soft F85/f2.8 Soft FA85/f2.8 Soft M100/f2.8 A100/f2.8 A100/f2.8 Macro F100/f2.8 Macro FA100/f2.8 Macro FA100/f3.5 Macro K100/f4 Macro M100/f4 Macro A100/f4 Macro K105/f2.8 Rules: 1.) Pick your 1st, 2nd and 3rd choice. You may choose less than 3 but not more than 3 choices. 2.) Please send your vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exception: Send your vote to the PDML if you have commented your choices, and you want the members of the PDML to know your comments. 3.) I will count all votes that are sent before Thursday, September 26th, 21:00 hours German time. Have fun with this poll, too, and thanks in advance for contributing. Arnold
LX shutter speed question
Hello. When using the LX in manual mode, are the shutter speeds stepless? As always, thank you. Francis
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
Hello Tom Davis, I've been a lurker for going on two years for this group, have bought equipment from several of its members (thanks Boz!), and now have decided to come out with my fave rave telephotos. Welcome!!! And thanks for your vote!!! Arnold
Re: 28-80 v/s 28-105
Interesting, I didn't know there was a powerzoom model of itwould there be optical difference since mine is plain old manual zoom? Oh ya, and I know the 24-90 is better, just looking for a good excuse to buy it :) Brad Dobo - Original Message - From: Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:58 AM Subject: Re: 28-80 v/s 28-105 Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HehehI'm glad I'm not the only vain one! :) I have the older FA 28-105mm 1:4-5.6 [IF]. I asked for comments on this before (mainly hoping for someone to tell me it sucks so I could justify buying the 24-90mm) I don't remember getting any. From my own limited experience it is a decent lens. The new version with the AL elements is no doubt better, lighter, and requires a smaller filter (dunno what size, but mine is 62mm) Hi Brad, You made me recall a test in Spotmatic magazine: they compared the FA 28-105 (the powerzoom version) to the 24-90. The 24-90 wins hand down, especially wrt flare resistance and overall sharpness. I don't know if it is available on the AOHC website, though. Gianfranco = __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: Favourite Photo's
1. Berlin Wall coming down. 2. VJ day on the USS Missouri 3. Lenin's statue toppling
RE: Favourite Photo's
No pepper was ever made famous by having Ansel Adams take its picture. From: Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2] The picture of a common pepper by Ansel Adams
RE: Pentax digital slr (WAS: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600)
I think you left out the bit where they mumble, when the time is right. This is a code phrase for, three weeks after pigs fly. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] People seriously thought so because Pentax have officially stated that they intend to manufacture K-mount digital slr's. I'll still think so until they state otherwise.
Re: LX shutter speed question
Francis, I believe that only the automatically controlled shutter speeds (1/2000th second to 125 seconds) are stepless. The manual speeds are mechanically controlled from 1/2000th second to X (1/75th second) and electronically controlled from 1/60th second to 4 seconds. Regards, Jose R. Rodriguez From: Frank Knapik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/09/23 Mon PM 02:29:18 CDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LX shutter speed question Hello. When using the LX in manual mode, are the shutter speeds stepless? As always, thank you. Francis
vanity
I'm not vain Brad, (love e-mail, you can't see my face) I just find is soo hard to take a two tone camera seriously g mind you I also have a k1000 and an ericsson T20e in silver and purple, never had a pair of two tone shoes though, that's for old people I'm a graphic/clothing designer, colour is very important to me, right feroze
e-mail add
Hey at least you knew where I was talking about, and don't blame me the largest bigfoot I've seen in africa was made by ford and was used it to squash cars Wouldn't by any chance know Chris's e-mail or the shops contact details would ya? Thanks Feroze
Re: vanity
All semantics! :) Brad Dobo - Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:01 PM Subject: vanity I'm not vain Brad, (love e-mail, you can't see my face) I just find is soo hard to take a two tone camera seriously g mind you I also have a k1000 and an ericsson T20e in silver and purple, never had a pair of two tone shoes though, that's for old people I'm a graphic/clothing designer, colour is very important to me, right feroze
Re:OT:Where is Albano?
Here I am. Alive and kicking. Shooting few. Thanks for asking (and caring) Regards Albano
Re: Taking the 67II out to Big Bend NP
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 02:12 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote: Hi all, Just want to warn you, if you happen to visit the Big Bend NP on the border of Texas and Mexico in two weeks, you might run into a lunatic carrying arround a 67II with a few lenses and tripod. After doing some presentations on a computer show in Austin I will be driving and hiking for almost a week. Hope the temperature is a bit lower than the last time I was there (April 1989, with an MX :-) Regards, Jan van Wijk -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery Big Bend is a great park, I've been going there since I was 16. Have you been up on the Mesa de Anguila? It's the American side of Santa Elena Canyon/ Nice views out into an even more attractive section of Mexico. Stay away from it if you see any dark clouds, though (snap, crackle, pop). Hope you have a great time! Dan Scott
Re: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe
on 9/23/02 5:43, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you done the London Eye? -Original Message- From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 11:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:45:29 +0100 Subject: Re[4]: UK trip in October, maybe Hi Stan, . . . Are there any particular sights or aspects of London that you're especially keen to see? Have you been here before? Bob, this will be my 8th or 9th trip to U.K. in the last 20 years. The last two visits were primarily in London. (All visits of one week or more). So I have seen a bit of the city. On my last visit, in early summer, 2000, I spent my free evenings and one afternoon hopscotching about the city: take the tube for a ways, pop above ground, wander the environs for a while, often walking to the next tube stop, then back down for a jaunt to another almost randomly chosen area. I enjoy interesting buildings, people, scenes . . . the texture and color and feel of a place. I couldn't say that there is any particular must see among the standard sites that I haven't seen at least in passing. But I also couldn't say that I have captured the essential photo of any one place. So, in short, I am happy to wander and to let my eye be guided by others who have seen the locale through different eyes. Its early morning, don't know if I am making sense . . . stan I don't know it so must be I haven't. What/where is the eye? stan
Re: Favourite Photo's
Hi, Bob, Comments interspersed with your text: Bob Walkden wrote: Hi, if the criterion for inclusion is impact That was what I chose for one of the criteria. I don't think that everyone else has to, and I didn't mean to imply that others have to - just a personal choice is all. There were other criteria involved as well, I just didn't articulate them. , presumably meaning world-changing impact, I suppose we'd have to be thinking about things like Rosalind Franklin's photographs (are they photographs?) of the structure of DNA, Did that change anything, or did it record/confirm what experiments told us that DNA would look like? perhaps Mohammed Amin's photos of the 1984 famine in Ethiopia, Absolutely. Those photos mobilized the world to gather relief for those famine victims, and raised awareness of conditions in third world countries. the photos of the missile bases in Cuba in 1962, the Nazi concentration camps. I'm not sure that individual photographs change things very much. I think that in general change is the result of many photos and a great deal of writing, and TV and so on. True, but some photos have more impact than others. The photo of Kim Phuc is an example. Did it turn the tide of American or possibly world opinion against America's involvement in Vietnam? On it's own, no. But it was more powerful than many other images, and more influential than many others, I think. Photos of great events such as the Berlin Wall coming down didn't change anything, they are just memorable records of an event that was happening anyway. Agreed The same is probably true of some of the others listed here, such as the Kent State photo. It may have had a lot of impact in the USA, but it doesn't mean much outside. It had a great deal of impact in the US, to be sure. I chose it, not only because of it's impact, but because I think it's a great photo. The anguished cry coming from the girl over her fallen fellow student is heartwrenching, no matter what situation gave rise to it. In fact, it did provide the anti-war movement with a great deal of public sympathy (and I make no comment as to whether that was a good or bad thing - the fact is that it did happen that way). Capa's photos didn't really change anything on a global scale. No more or less than another photo of a death during a war, I suppose (speaking of the Spanish Civil War photo). As a photo (and I realize that there is some controversy as to whether the shot is real or staged), I think that (assuming it to be a genuine photograph of the moment of death), I can think of few other photos that capture the decisive moment as this one does. I suppose the fact that we're still fighting wars, and people are still dying speaks to the fact that it's impact is/was fleeting at best. I like the idea of including some of Bailey's photos, particularly of say Twiggy or Jean Shrimpton because they really did change things, despite their apparent superficiality. Which is why they should be in your three photos, I suppose. vbg regards, frank -- The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
Re: Pentax digital slr
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 05:04 PM, Cotty wrote: Bruce, You *do* realise that if Pentax announce the DSLR at Photokina, you will have to submit a photo to the PUG featuring youself and a pie? A very HUMBLE pie And EATING it ALL of it... ;-) Cotty Cotty, What are humbles and where are they located? The only hint I've ever seen was in a Discworld book, though I'm not sure if the hint was humorous, factual, both, or neither. And I hope for you guys that there will be a K-DSLR shown, but for me, I'm hoping the first one will be priced out of my means, followed in the next year or two by one I can afford. Dan Scott
Re: Favourite Photo's
1. Kevin Carter's 1994 Pulitzer Prize winner of a starving child in the Sudan with a vulture in the background. 2. Steve McCurry's Afghan girl 3. The photo of Buzz Aldrin made by Neil Armstrong on the moon. On Monday 23 September 2002 10:54, Feroze Kistan wrote: Hi All, Just for interest sake, as I'm new to this list, and probally will help me to understand each ones quirks a bit better: Ok, I'm gonna steal somebody's idea here. Its 2005, world warIII has been declared, everbody has nuke's, you are designated to create a time capsuble to be placed in a bunker for all prosperity. One of the items you have to choose is 3 photographs of the 20th century that you would consider unreplaceable. It need not be your favourite photograper, but the one you felt had the most impact, let me start: 1] The picture of a suspected VC spy being executed by the police during The Vietnam War 2] The picture of a common pepper by Ansel Adams 3] High heeled shoes in knickers by David Bailey. You can send them to me direct at [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIA Feroze
Re: [OT] need help from Domke F-2 users
Hi, Monday, September 23, 2002, 11:16:41 PM, you wrote: I'm considering buying this bag, and as usual I'd like to know your opinion. 1. What are you experiences with the F-2 (if any of course :) ? 2. Canvas or ballistic? 3. And the most important - how much gear do you fit in, and how comfotable/uncomfortable it is when it's full/almost full? I have a black canvas one which I bought in about 1996. It's been in various parts of Africa, India and Eastern Europe, Western Europe and the UK. They're very tough bags and worth having. They weather beautifully - mine has a strap that is still red with the dirt of Ethiopia, despite several times through the washing machine. They are also good in rainstorms - very protective. The rubber in the grippy strap wears after a few years, but it doesn't make a huge difference. The straps never twist or get rolled up, which is a good thing. When it's full it's too heavy to be comfortable for any length of time, but this would be true of any bag of that size. I've made modifications to the inserts of my bag to suit different needs. But I find it most useful for working from when I don't use the inserts at all. Instead I keep the rigid base in, and use one or 2 beanbags for keeping the cameras stable inside. I tend to keep 2 cameras (slrs) with lenses attached in the main compartment. In the side and end pockets I keep film, notebooks, pens, Leica table-top tripod and other bits and pieces. --- Bob I don't know much about Art, but I know what I hate Montgomery Burns, The Simpsons
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Shaun Canning wrote: From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon Sep 23, 2002 05:33:10 PM US/Central Why wouldn't you be able to use k-mount glass on a Pentax DSLR? If it uses the k-mount, the only change may be the increase in focal length associated with smaller than 35mm format sensor areas. (i.e. the 1.4x magnifying effect). For many this would be great, as it would extend the range of lenses for free. Shaun It doesn't really extend the range so much as it shifts it. And, for those of us who like to be at the wide view of things, it moves us smack out into the middle. I hope, that if Pentax pursues that path, they concurrently issue a set of really nice wide angles that fill the traditional niches (15-16, 18-20, 24, 28, 31, 35, etc.) Dan Scott
Re: Favourite Photo's
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 03:40 PM, frank theriault wrote: An impossible task, really. I know that three isn't enough, and that I'll think of dozens more once I send this one off, but here are the first three that pop into my head, and these aren't the ~real~ titles, I suspect: Migrant Worker Mother by Dorothea Lange Kim Phuc Running from Bombed Village by Tom Ut Concentration Camp Survivors by Margaret Bourke-White IMHO, not only are they amazing photos in their own right, but it can be said that their impact ignited outrage and/or social change. Following closely on their heels, for me (I'm sorry, three isn't enough): Death of a Spanish Civil War Soldier by Capa, D-Day Landing by Capa Screaming Girl At Kent State University Over Dead Body, I can't remember who it's by... Okay, I've already cheated enough. Wish I could go on, though! -frank That works for me, too. Well picked. Dan Scott
Re: Re[2]: Favourite Photo's
Bob, I'd have to agree with the direction you are going here. The only picture I think is a standout so far is Dan M.'s suggestion of the NASA picture of the earth rising from the moon. I believe the PICTURES themselves of our planet from space helped us visualize where we were and push the ecology movement. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, if the criterion for inclusion is impact, presumably meaning world-changing impact, I suppose we'd have to be thinking about things like Rosalind Franklin's photographs (are they photographs?) of the structure of DNA, perhaps Mohammed Amin's photos of the 1984 famine in Ethiopia, the photos of the missile bases in Cuba in 1962, the Nazi concentration camps. I'm not sure that individual photographs change things very much. I think that in general change is the result of many photos and a great deal of writing, and TV and so on. Photos of great events such as the Berlin Wall coming down didn't change anything, they are just memorable records of an event that was happening anyway. The same is probably true of some of the others listed here, such as the Kent State photo. It may have had a lot of impact in the USA, but it doesn't mean much outside. Capa's photos didn't really change anything on a global scale. I like the idea of including some of Bailey's photos, particularly of say Twiggy or Jean Shrimpton because they really did change things, despite their apparent superficiality.
Re: Favourite Photo's
It was Edward Weston: http://www.edward-weston.com/natural_studies.html From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] I haven't looked it up yet, but offhand, wasn't that Imogene Cunningham? I'll get back to ya later on that one...
Re: Supply source for Pentax plug
BH photo has this item in stock according to their web site. http://www02.bhphotovideo.com At 08:02 PM 9/23/2002 +0200, you wrote: Hi all, Do you know any supply source, which can provide me with a WINDER ME II remote plug ? This plug has 3 small holes and can be attached to the winder socket; its metal cap can then be screwed to the winder. I tried to do-it-myself by modifying a Drive A / four holes / PENTAX plug, with black resin and a lot of patience, but the result is full of short circuits. Many thanks in advance, C.MARION www.pentaxiste.org
RE: Pentax digital slr
It thought that it would be just the catalyst needed to get a PDML NYC group together. For those using AF cameras I promise to stand in bright light and eat slowly. BR From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce, You *do* realise that if Pentax announce the DSLR at Photokina, you will have to submit a photo to the PUG featuring youself and a pie? A very HUMBLE pie And EATING it ALL of it...
DLSR Lens Range: Was SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
Hi Dan, I'm sure that Pentax would have thought of that if indeed a DSLR were in the pipeline. Otherwise, there are some fine wide-angle zooms being produced by Sigma and Tokina that will do the job. For instance the 14mm, 17-35mm or even the new 15-30mm zooms. Plenty of wide angle range there for all who could need or want it. Cheers Shaun Canning PhD Student Department of Archaeology School of European and Historical Studies La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086. Phone: 0414-967644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Shaun Canning wrote: From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon Sep 23, 2002 05:33:10 PM US/Central Why wouldn't you be able to use k-mount glass on a Pentax DSLR? If it uses the k-mount, the only change may be the increase in focal length associated with smaller than 35mm format sensor areas. (i.e. the 1.4x magnifying effect). For many this would be great, as it would extend the range of lenses for free. Shaun It doesn't really extend the range so much as it shifts it. And, for those of us who like to be at the wide view of things, it moves us smack out into the middle. I hope, that if Pentax pursues that path, they concurrently issue a set of really nice wide angles that fill the traditional niches (15-16, 18-20, 24, 28, 31, 35, etc.) Dan Scott
Pentax, Heliopan or B+W filters?
Hi! Actually it is my very first question set here! I need to know your experience, knowledge or opinion about filters from Pentax, Heliopan and B+W. I think about polarizing, warming and yellow multicoated filters. I got impression that Heliopan and B+W are the best, but that best is actually without comparison to Pentax filters. I wonder about scratch resistance, easyness of cleaning, quality of mount, neutrality (in case of polarizer), flare or other image degradation, variety and ability to make mixed brand sets, say for different gradation of warming or darkening sky. Why brass is better than aluminum? I have very limited experience with filters. Once (and long ago) I had a Russian linear polarizer, buy it had marked greenish tint, so I could not use it for color slides. Thanks! Gleb Baida http://GlebBaida.photosight.ru (images are in 'common language':^) http://www.photocritique.net/cgi-bin/phtg?xx+GLEB+BAIDA _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
ZX7
Hi all - I am new to this forum and am a current owner of a Pentax ZX-7 with a Pentax 28-80mm F/3.5-5.6 lens that came with it. I use to be into photography many years ago (15+years) and am slowly getting back into it. Loved my ME Super when I used it back then and decided to stay with Pentax as I relearn photography. My questions to this forum are: 1) I believe this Pentax 28-80mm lens to be not of good quality. Is this the general census as well? 2) Thinking about replacing this slow lens with a Tokina AF 28-70mm AT-X-PRO II F/2.6-2.8. Is there any compatability problems? 3) Why is it that my local camera shops here in Northern California do not support the pentax brand as much as Nikon or Cannon? I've called all my local dealers to see if they carry Tokina lens for Pentax mount and none carry them. They only seem to carry 3rd party manufacturer stuff for Nikon and Cannon. Whats the deal here? Thanks in advance for all your help Susi
Re: DLSR Lens Range: Was SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
Shaun, While Sigma has a couple of very wide lenses, when you multiply the focal length of a 14/15mm lens by 1.5 you end up with a 21/23mm lens. Not all that wide. So for those who really love wide, be aware of this transition. Bruce Monday, September 23, 2002, 5:01:27 PM, you wrote: SC Hi Dan, SC I'm sure that Pentax would have thought of that if indeed a DSLR were in the SC pipeline. Otherwise, there are some fine wide-angle zooms being produced by SC Sigma and Tokina that will do the job. For instance the 14mm, 17-35mm or SC even the new 15-30mm zooms. Plenty of wide angle range there for all who SC could need or want it. SC Cheers SC Shaun Canning SC PhD Student SC Department of Archaeology SC School of European and Historical Studies SC La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086. SC Phone: 0414-967644 SC e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC -Original Message- SC From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] SC Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 8:50 AM SC To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SC Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 SC On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 05:33 PM, Shaun Canning wrote: From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon Sep 23, 2002 05:33:10 PM US/Central Why wouldn't you be able to use k-mount glass on a Pentax DSLR? If it uses the k-mount, the only change may be the increase in focal length associated with smaller than 35mm format sensor areas. (i.e. the 1.4x magnifying effect). For many this would be great, as it would extend the range of lenses for free. Shaun SC It doesn't really extend the range so much as it shifts it. And, for SC those of us who like to be at the wide view of things, it moves us smack SC out into the middle. I hope, that if Pentax pursues that path, they SC concurrently issue a set of really nice wide angles that fill the SC traditional niches (15-16, 18-20, 24, 28, 31, 35, etc.) SC Dan Scott
Re: 67 Questions
Hello, i'm a little late on this, but you can find some info about 6X7 projectors at: http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/bronslideproj.html and http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/proj_667.htm I bought an used Liesegang Diafant 6x7 on ebay two weeks ago (370 Euro) and i'm very satisfied with it, the projected image is far superior to 24mmx36mm, my screen is 2m x 2m. Info about it can be found at: http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/linhproj.htm The sharpness of the lens (2,8/150) is good, it resolves the grain at the blue sky right to the edges (Provia 100F). BTW has somebody experience with 6x7 glassless mounts (8,5x8,5 cm)? I don't like glass-mounts because of the risk of fungal growth and other moisture related problems, but i don't know, if it is possible to achieve a acceptable sharp picture across the whole frame with glassless mounts. Martin Albrecht
Re: ZX7
Susi, Welcome to the list. I am also located in Northern California just outside of Sacramento. As to the lens quality - you are basically correct. To some degree, you get what you pay for. Consumer 28-80 zooms from any manufacturer that cost so very little are all pretty mediocre. I used to have the Tokina 28-70 Pro II that you mentioned and found it to be very nice. The speed is great, as is the optical quality and build quality. Two downsides, however. First, it is pretty prone to flare compared to SMC glass. You should use the provided hood and be careful. Second, it is quite heavy and will be a bit nose heavy on your ZX-7. Another lens to consider is the Pentax 24-90/3.5-4.5. It answers the weaknesses of the Tokina, much better flare control, and lighter weight for balancing on the light ZX bodies. Optically it is suppposed to be quite good. It also has a better zoom range. It is not built as well and not as fast. Just a thought. As to availability of anything Pentax or for Pentax, you are going to have to get used to mail order. Pentax marketing has been quite lame for many years and they just haven't done much to penetrate the market. If you are near Sacramento, Action Camera in Roseville (my town) carries Pentax Medium Format and entry level 35mm along with a full Nikon offering. They are the only store around here that I have found to deal much at all with Pentax. Good luck and welcome aboard! Bruce Monday, September 23, 2002, 5:08:46 PM, you wrote: SB Hi all - SB I am new to this forum and am a current owner of a Pentax ZX-7 with a Pentax 28-80mm F/3.5-5.6 lens that came with it. I use to be into photography many years ago (15+years) and am slowly SB getting back into it. Loved my ME Super when I used it back then and decided to stay with Pentax as I relearn photography. My questions to this forum are: SB 1) I believe this Pentax 28-80mm lens to be not of good quality. Is this the general census as well? SB 2) Thinking about replacing this slow lens with a Tokina AF 28-70mm AT-X-PRO II F/2.6-2.8. Is there any compatability problems? SB 3) Why is it that my local camera shops here in Northern California do not support the pentax brand as much as Nikon or Cannon? I've called all my local dealers to see if they carry Tokina SB lens for Pentax mount and none carry them. They only seem to carry 3rd party manufacturer stuff for Nikon and Cannon. Whats the deal here? SB Thanks in advance for all your help SB Susi
Re: Favourite Photo's
Feroze Kistan wrote: Hi All, (snip) 2] The picture of a common pepper by Ansel Adams Um, perhaps you mean by Edward Weston? I'm not sure I'm up to playing this game in earnest just now, but for St. Ansel I'd take Moonrise Over Hernandez, New Mexico if he had to be included. annsan
Re: Favourite Photo's
frank theriault wrote: An impossible task, really. [making that 3 in a capsule choice] I know that three isn't enough,.. Kim Phuc Running from Bombed Village by Tom Ut Screaming Girl At Kent State University Over Dead Body, I can't remember who it's by... -frank - These horrific images will always linger with me, too - but this becomes a very intense and sad game. annsan
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
1. FA100/f2.8 Macro Excellent lens, true macro fast short telephoto all in one lens. -- David S. Nature and wildlife photography http://www.sheppardphotos.com
Re: SMC Pentax K-Mount Short Telephoto Lens Poll
On 23 Sep 2002 at 12:22, Tom Davis wrote: Hi all, I've been a lurker for going on two years for this group, have bought equipment from several of its members (thanks Boz!), and now have decided to come out with my fave rave telephotos. 3. A*85/f1.4, don't own it, would love to, but hesitate because of its front-element you're staring at a huge lens effect; I like low-key work with people. Still Hi Tom, It's great to see that you have de-lurked :-) The A*85/f1.4 is an amazing lens and whilst the front element is large it's not as bad as you might imagine especially if you couple it with a straight tubular Heliopan hood. It is invaluable for natural portraiture in low light, I particularly enjoy using it when shooting pub bands or similar subjects. The view through the LX with SE-60 is amazing :-) Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
On 23 Sep 2002 at 13:23, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote: I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished, that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People who have a need for digital have, and will, find other solutions. What about the users poor bloody Pentax users that simply don't want to have to slam a slab of cash out for an equivalent set of crap Nikon or Canon glass :-( Been there played with them, not impressed. Cheers, Rob Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
RE: Introduction and MZ-S data imprinting question
Welcome Tim - this can be a really good group, if a little intense at times! For your problem, set the data imprinting intensity, function 15, at a lower level - I have mine set to 3 at the moment, and for 400ASA film this is too high. Basically, the data imprinting led's are creating flare in the imprint, so reducing the intensity should help. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia On Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:25 AM, Tim Preston [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: First of all, being new here, I'd Just like to say hello =) SNIP Now I've bought myself an MZ-S, it's complete overkill really, but I intend to try and grow into it. However I have a quick question about the data imprinting. The imnprinting seems to be surrounded by a sort of 'halo' or smudge which tends to make it very difficult to read. Is this normal, or has my camera got some sort of fault in the imprinting device? SNIP
Re: LX shutter speed question
- Original Message - From: Frank Knapik Subject: LX shutter speed question Hello. When using the LX in manual mode, are the shutter speeds stepless? No. As always, thank you. Yer welcome. William Robb This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
- Original Message - From: Shaun Canning Subject: RE: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 Why wouldn't you be able to use k-mount glass on a Pentax DSLR? If it uses the k-mount, the only change may be the increase in focal length associated with smaller than 35mm format sensor areas. (i.e. the 1.4x magnifying effect). For many this would be great, as it would extend the range of lenses for free. You can get the same effect by printing the centre portion of a negative and cropping off the outside 30 or so percent. It's OK if you want telephoto, but crappy if like wide angles. William Robb This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax, Heliopan or B+W filters?
- Original Message - From: B G Subject: Pentax, Heliopan or B+W filters? Hi! Actually it is my very first question set here! I need to know your experience, knowledge or opinion about filters from Pentax, Heliopan and B+W. I think about polarizing, warming and yellow multicoated filters. I got impression that Heliopan and B+W are the best, but that best is actually without comparison to Pentax filters. I wonder about scratch resistance, easyness of cleaning, quality of mount, neutrality (in case of polarizer), flare or other image degradation, variety and ability to make mixed brand sets, say for different gradation of warming or darkening sky. Why brass is better than aluminum? I expect that the high end B+W (they do make some low end stuff as well), Heliopan or Pentax SMC are of similar optical quality. Brass was better than aluminium because older lenses often had aluminium bodies, and the like metal filters would electrostatically weld themselves onto the lens. In this new era of plastic garbage lens barrels, I doubt if it makes any difference. William Robb This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Sky, UV, Haze filters?
- Original Message - From: Dan Scott Subject: Sky, UV, Haze filters? O Sages, speak to me... What the heck is the difference between Sky, UV, and Haze filters? Are they all the same thing? It sounds like they are to me, but manufacturers frequently offer two or all three side by side, so I can't be right. How are they different, and cirumstances would cause me to prefer this one or that one? Does a polarizing filter eliminate the use of the three? UV filter is essentially a lens cap. They don't do anything that the glass in the lens already does. Sky and Haze are generally the same thing, and essentially subtract about 50ºK from the colour of the light being transmitted. The idea is that daylight is often too blue, so warming things up a bit is a good thing. You can get stronger filters, such as UVB and UVC that give a stronger effect. I tend to distrust the little buggers, as more glass is bad glass to my way of thinking, but I do have UV-C filters for my longer telephoto lenses, on the off chance that they actually do something useful. Polarizers are a different animal altogether. However, stacking filters is aways a gamble. William Robb This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
- Original Message - From: Rob Studdert Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 On 23 Sep 2002 at 13:23, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote: I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished, that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People who have a need for digital have, and will, find other solutions. What about the users poor bloody Pentax users that simply don't want to have to slam a slab of cash out for an equivalent set of crap Nikon or Canon glass :-( Perhaps they will be left in the same boat as the poor bloody Pentax users who were whinging for a new pro body (like as if there was ever a 35mm Pentax pro body, but I digress). I recall about 4 years ago, they were hoping an F5 killer would be introduced. They got the MZ-S. The pro end of the 35mm market is going digital. Pentax has no history of support to the pro 35mm user. Why anyone thinks they will introduce a digital K-Mount SLR is beyond me. I expect the best you can hope for is a non interchangeable lens SLR like the Olympus thingie. It is closer to the Pentax target market, which is anyone other than a working pro. William Robb This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
