Re: [NF] Is there a script or program that will remove all known games on a pc?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: Is there a script or program that will remove all known games on a pc? I need to remove games that came with computers and/or were installed by users. Anyone know a program to do this automatically? I seriously doubt it - it would have to have a centralised, continually updated database of all games released by all studios, right down through indies to XNA stuff knocked up in someone's bedroom. What if they're playing arcade or Amiga games in an emulator? Or old DOS stuff under DosBox? Impossible task. Prevention rather than cure is the key here. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339573993.32328.140661088581513.59d11...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
Hi Everybody, http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/06/12/kkk-road-adoption-application-denied-in-georgia/?test=latestnews -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd86660.4000...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is cool
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk wrote: Negative Ghostrider the pattern is full... My nephew was onboard the ship for the filming of the movie. He has no respect for Tom Cruise yet held the other actors as nice guys. Cruise expected everyone to salute him because he was dressed as an officer, instead of being an officer. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYKMubwvcONyQBwNHMpv8h8_-ngVyHVX=n3ye0ecn2g...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Is there a script or program that will remove all known games on a pc?
There IS a solution : recovery, if you did a backup just before the good instant ! Another way is to have a strategy before installing any software : don't install directly, go through a script (even DOS made) able to trace what you are doing. And, you know, computer is no way for Alzheimer's consumers ... :o)) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9B84C27CF76241F0952E33AC504F149C@MuriellePC ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Everybody, --- Around here when you adopt a section of road you get your name on a sign telling the world how wonderful you are for doing so. The state of GA probably did the right thing to not allow them naming rights on the road. Would they do the same for the Panthers? Not sure. You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyl0p8hcnasqepgasavf_jjmvf5yyoeww155k4-aswm...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] This is cool
On 6/13/2012 11:08 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk wrote: Negative Ghostrider the pattern is full... My nephew was onboard the ship for the filming of the movie. He has no respect for Tom Cruise yet held the other actors as nice guys. Cruise expected everyone to salute him because he was dressed as an officer, instead of being an officer. I think Tom Cruise is a douche-bag as a person, but I enjoy his movies. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd8b15b.5040...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
On 6/13/2012 11:13 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? And yet for some reason, blacks are mostly linked (in favor of/to) the Democratic Party. Go figure. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd8b1c7.1070...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] These people have guts!
That video is CG. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:48 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] These people have guts! http://gizmodo.com/5918027/insanely-brazen-thieves-attempt-to-rob-a-moving- truck -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2E9C7FF842E44A51BB179624784B1A5C@jerryfootePC ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] These people have guts!
I wish I could watch the video for myself - but, here at work - all is blocked! I know that in the article they actually claimed that it almost looked CG - but, then go on to say its REAL! Oh well, who knows... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of jerry foote Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:11 PM That video is CG. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:48 PM http://gizmodo.com/5918027/insanely-brazen-thieves-attempt-to-rob-a-mov ing- truck -- Stephen Russell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:29 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? And yet for some reason, blacks are mostly linked (in favor of/to) the Democratic Party. Go figure. In the South, the Democrats were the primary racist party, as they still held a grudge against Lincoln, who was a Republican. Up until the 60s, southern blacks did not vote more for one party than the other (when they were allowed to vote at all). In the north, the Democrats were the party of the New Deal, voting rights, anti-segregation, etc., and northern blacks were overwhelmingly Democratic voters. Then along came the Southern Strategy, popularized in Nixon's campaign, which was designed to play upon racist fears following the Democrats' embracing of civil rights. This turned the white south solidly Republican, and the black south solidly Democratic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0cb2064d-9a74-4d30-b8ef-05ec93770...@leafe.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
On 6/13/2012 3:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:29 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? And yet for some reason, blacks are mostly linked (in favor of/to) the Democratic Party. Go figure. In the South, the Democrats were the primary racist party, as they still held a grudge against Lincoln, who was a Republican. Up until the 60s, southern blacks did not vote more for one party than the other (when they were allowed to vote at all). In the north, the Democrats were the party of the New Deal, voting rights, anti-segregation, etc., and northern blacks were overwhelmingly Democratic voters. Then along came the Southern Strategy, popularized in Nixon's campaign, which was designed to play upon racist fears following the Democrats' embracing of civil rights. This turned the white south solidly Republican, and the black south solidly Democratic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy Very interesting...thx! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd8f134.70...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
Agreed! Quite an eye opener Ed! -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails? On 6/13/2012 3:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:29 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? And yet for some reason, blacks are mostly linked (in favor of/to) the Democratic Party. Go figure. In the South, the Democrats were the primary racist party, as they still held a grudge against Lincoln, who was a Republican. Up until the 60s, southern blacks did not vote more for one party than the other (when they were allowed to vote at all). In the north, the Democrats were the party of the New Deal, voting rights, anti-segregation, etc., and northern blacks were overwhelmingly Democratic voters. Then along came the Southern Strategy, popularized in Nixon's campaign, which was designed to play upon racist fears following the Democrats' embracing of civil rights. This turned the white south solidly Republican, and the black south solidly Democratic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy Very interesting...thx! [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc
Hey Folks, I know this is a REALLY OLD Thread - going back to July 2010. But, I was searching in my archive here to find out how to obtain the current screen resolution - so I could set a form to full screen (without knowing what the User currently has their screen resolution set to). It doing a search on resolution - this is one of the few Threads I found that had Resolution in the Subject. I tried doing a search on Google for this GoApp API thing - but, wasn't sure I was actually finding the right thing! Maybe someone can point me in the right direction. Or - better yet - if something if VFP can already tell me the current screen resolution without using an external API - that would be even better! I was also looking around in the online VFP help - but, so far did NOT find what I needed... TIA, -K- -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of kamcgin...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:50 PM Thanks for the ideas. Here is what I ended up doing (a combination of ideas received) use the API to get the user's screen resolution: (this is well documented if you use google) goapp.nScreenHeight goapp.nScreenWidth Then put this in your form class init: * resolution new code * Local ; llVertical, ; llHorizontal If This.Height (goapp.nScreenHeight - 42) llVertical = .T. Endif If This.Width (goapp.nScreenWidth - 42) llHorizontal = .T. Endif Do Case Case llVertical And llHorizontal This.AutoCenter = .F. This.Height = goapp.nScreenHeight - 42 This.Width = goapp.nScreenWidth - 42 This.Top = 2 This.Left = 2 This.ScrollBars = 3 both vertical and horizontal Case llVertical This.AutoCenter = .F. This.Height = goapp.nScreenHeight - 42 This.Top = 2 This.Width = This.Width + 8 to allow for the vertical scroll bar This.ScrollBars = 2 vertical Case llHorizontal This.AutoCenter = .F. This.Left = 2 This.Width = goapp.nScreenWidth - 42 This.ScrollBars = 1 horizontal Endcase - Original Message - From: MB Software Solutions,LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 11:32 PM Subject: Re: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc Andrew Stirling wrote: Mike I have: Form Init this.nborderstyle = 3 this.ScrollBars= 3 *DODEFAULT() Form Activate IF this.Height + 100 _vfp.Height -100 this.Height this.Top = 3 this.Height = _vfp.Height-110 _screen.Height-40 ENDIF IF this.width + 60 _vfp.width -50 this.width this.Left = 3 this.width = _vfp.width-50 ENDIF This pops up a scroll bar if the form is bigger than the screen availability. Obviously best to put this in your default form class. Cool. I never designed scrolling forms; heard via here years ago that I thought they were problematic, so I avoided them. -- Mike Babcock, MCP ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc
Look at SYSMETRIC() in the VFP help. -- rk -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:49 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc Hey Folks, I know this is a REALLY OLD Thread - going back to July 2010. But, I was searching in my archive here to find out how to obtain the current screen resolution - so I could set a form to full screen (without knowing what the User currently has their screen resolution set to). It doing a search on resolution - this is one of the few Threads I found that had Resolution in the Subject. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD0441D54882BE0@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc
Thanks Richard - that pretty much did it! -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:55 PM Look at SYSMETRIC() in the VFP help. -- rk -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:49 PM Hey Folks, I know this is a REALLY OLD Thread - going back to July 2010. But, I was searching in my archive here to find out how to obtain the current screen resolution - so I could set a form to full screen (without knowing what the User currently has their screen resolution set to). It doing a search on resolution - this is one of the few Threads I found that had Resolution in the Subject. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/289ea162f5642645b5cf64d624c66a140e260...@us-ny-mail-002.waitex.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Legal keylogger
I have a client who has a labor-intensive computer business. We create reports every night to measure the performance of every person in the office. Every night my program counts the number of notes left on a case and the number of status changes. Most people work from 30-50 accounts per day. Yesterday one person worked 2 accounts the whole day. All the others had normal reports for yesterday, so I don't think it's an error on my part. I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. I am thinking about adding key loggers to all the systems and then placing warning stickers on each computer that says, Warning all computer activity is monitored. This way we can actually tell whether my program is accurately portraying her inactivity. Has anybody done this already, and if so, what are the legalities of doing it. Mike --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339621725.34694.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: Screen resolution, scroll bars, etc
Kurt Wendt wrote on 2012-06-13: Thanks Richard - that pretty much did it! -K- -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:55 PM Look at SYSMETRIC() in the VFP help. -- rk Kurt, If you have multiple monitors, and they are different resolutions, I believe Sysmetric() will return information from the primary monitor. It's been a while since I ran different resolutions on my monitors. Tracy Pearson PowerChurch Software ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/001901cd49a8$c03059e0$40910da0$@powerchurch.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Is there a script or program that will remove all known games on a pc?
This is more to prevent users from adding their own game. i try to remove the windows games when I set up a computer, but many times I forget to do it. From: Gérard Lochon g-loc...@wanadoo.fr To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [NF] Is there a script or program that will remove all known games on a pc? There IS a solution : recovery, if you did a backup just before the good instant ! Another way is to have a strategy before installing any software : don't install directly, go through a script (even DOS made) able to trace what you are doing. And, you know, computer is no way for Alzheimer's consumers ... :o)) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9B84C27CF76241F0952E33AC504F149C@MuriellePC ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339621827.38423.yahoomail...@web125601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Legal keylogger
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. Anyone who would fire someone simply because a computer said so is an idiot. Stuff happens, accounts get bothersome, etc etc etc. Any number of things can easily explain why she only worked 2 accounts. OTOH she could be sitting there filing her nails for all anybody knows... if it's a one off that's one thing; if it's systematic then they should deal with it. Does she otherwise make her numbers/quota? If so I wouldn't worry about it. If not - deal with it - that's what friggin managers are for... If you are (hopefully) using an application framework such that you can change behavior on all your forms, perhaps the Account Entry screen, that timestamps user/datetime each time it is opened. Or timestamps for edits done on accounts/notes etc. I've done this before for auditing purposes and it was easy peasy... If you add a keylogger, how are you gonna know the keylogger is working just as well or as poorly as your app? -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/capt54rbaunn3s1kv7_xwne-vnd4omgk4ybyeq8-do1w7u5c...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339626554.37378.yahoomail...@web125605.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Legal keylogger
It is legal but might not be how you want to proceed. I'd make sure that the software was not at fault. That it works on the rest of the workstations might be a giveaway. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a client who has a labor-intensive computer business. We create reports every night to measure the performance of every person in the office. Every night my program counts the number of notes left on a case and the number of status changes. Most people work from 30-50 accounts per day.Yesterday one person worked 2 accounts the whole day. All the others had normal reports for yesterday, so I don't think it's an error on my part. I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. I am thinking about adding key loggers to all the systems and then placing warning stickers on each computer that says, Warning all computer activity is monitored. This way we can actually tell whether my program is accurately portraying her inactivity. Has anybody done this already, and if so, what are the legalities of doing it. Mike --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/a95404cf-4222-4927-a8b3-c6acae370...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? As of about 3-4 years ago I've heard: a) good things about the unit/service and the job it does. People seem to love it. b) I don't want to start ugly rumors, but IIRC it's been said that Baracuda might be a little quick to black list domains, and oh guess what you have to go to their site to un-blacklist them. And they offer a paid service to get your domain off their list. Seemed a bit fishy... -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPT54rYwMpYjhxcxNswRFYJeh9u9W=h2gni-0+6yrn6u8pc...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
Thanks for your imput - Original Message - From: M Jarvis brewda...@gmail.com To: profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? As of about 3-4 years ago I've heard: a) good things about the unit/service and the job it does. People seem to love it. b) I don't want to start ugly rumors, but IIRC it's been said that Baracuda might be a little quick to black list domains, and oh guess what you have to go to their site to un-blacklist them. And they offer a paid service to get your domain off their list. Seemed a bit fishy... -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339632645.51992.yahoomail...@web125602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thumbs down from me. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyjmt_yckmor++xxhir55evdan6w-n4xzekkqawe1no...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
I hate barracuda. we do extensive email marketing and occasionally come across a barracuda block. it is way too quick to judgement and in some instances, companies using it have whitelists meaning you cannot send an email, period. Unless of course you pay barracuda money... I still say it is a scam. very expensive equipment that does nothing more than block almost everyone. complete crap. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 9:43 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thumbs down from me. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/003801cd49ca$d6225c90$826715b0$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
I agree - but, from an employee stand point at a co. that uses it - and, it blocks us from EVERYTHING. Its Insane. You go to a website - even an MSN forum for help with programming stuff - and you are blocked. Its blocks almost ALL Video stuff (or - again - it may just be the way that the place set it up at where I work) and - so many other things - can't go to Sports, or Cars, or Games related sites. Hell - you can Barely get to ANYTHING at where I work. So - from MY stand point - I hate it! But, again =- it could be the way that THEY set it up - on purpose to block us from all those things. But - at least I can get to GOOGLE - but, forget searching Images - BLOCKED!!! :-( -K- On 6/13/2012 9:12 PM, geoff wrote: I hate barracuda. we do extensive email marketing and occasionally come across a barracuda block. it is way too quick to judgement and in some instances, companies using it have whitelists meaning you cannot send an email, period. Unless of course you pay barracuda money... I still say it is a scam. very expensive equipment that does nothing more than block almost everyone. complete crap. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 9:43 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thumbs down from me. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd93db7.7000...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Legal keylogger
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a client who has a labor-intensive computer business. We create reports every night to measure the performance of every person in the office. Every night my program counts the number of notes left on a case and the number of status changes. Most people work from 30-50 accounts per day. Yesterday one person worked 2 accounts the whole day. All the others had normal reports for yesterday, so I don't think it's an error on my part. I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. I am thinking about adding key loggers to all the systems and then placing warning stickers on each computer that says, Warning all computer activity is monitored. This way we can actually tell whether my program is accurately portraying her inactivity. Has anybody done this already, and if so, what are the legalities of doing it. - You are asking for more problems here. You can track an IP in other ways. I'd focus on what progress they are making instead of what they are not doing. Showing results is harder vs here is a huge list that you have to do and you missed 3 points. Poof you are fired. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyj4xvmwukacpwtzxqx8fmtduepw+v1scmzhb3ejqed...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
most web filtering software is just as hopeless as email filtering. If it is to eliminate the spam and so on, it ends up eliminating real emails. Ive had people subscribe to our training website thru gmail because they know they will never get thru their company filter - often barracuda. Is it really going to harm you if you get 100 spam emails a day that go to your junk folder where you can quickly scan for real stuff? -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt @ VR-FX Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 10:56 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? I agree - but, from an employee stand point at a co. that uses it - and, it blocks us from EVERYTHING. Its Insane. You go to a website - even an MSN forum for help with programming stuff - and you are blocked. Its blocks almost ALL Video stuff (or - again - it may just be the way that the place set it up at where I work) and - so many other things - can't go to Sports, or Cars, or Games related sites. Hell - you can Barely get to ANYTHING at where I work. So - from MY stand point - I hate it! But, again =- it could be the way that THEY set it up - on purpose to block us from all those things. But - at least I can get to GOOGLE - but, forget searching Images - BLOCKED!!! :-( -K- On 6/13/2012 9:12 PM, geoff wrote: I hate barracuda. we do extensive email marketing and occasionally come across a barracuda block. it is way too quick to judgement and in some instances, companies using it have whitelists meaning you cannot send an email, period. Unless of course you pay barracuda money... I still say it is a scam. very expensive equipment that does nothing more than block almost everyone. complete crap. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 9:43 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thumbs down from me. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/01cd49d3$746781c0$5d368540$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
You're only supposed to be doing work-related stuff, not surf for sports or games. - Original Message - From: Kurt @ VR-FX v...@optonline.net To: profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:26 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? I agree - but, from an employee stand point at a co. that uses it - and, it blocks us from EVERYTHING. Its Insane. You go to a website - even an MSN forum for help with programming stuff - and you are blocked. Its blocks almost ALL Video stuff (or - again - it may just be the way that the place set it up at where I work) and - so many other things - can't go to Sports, or Cars, or Games related sites. Hell - you can Barely get to ANYTHING at where I work. So - from MY stand point - I hate it! But, again =- it could be the way that THEY set it up - on purpose to block us from all those things. But - at least I can get to GOOGLE - but, forget searching Images - BLOCKED!!! :-( -K- On 6/13/2012 9:12 PM, geoff wrote: I hate barracuda. we do extensive email marketing and occasionally come across a barracuda block. it is way too quick to judgement and in some instances, companies using it have whitelists meaning you cannot send an email, period. Unless of course you pay barracuda money... I still say it is a scam. very expensive equipment that does nothing more than block almost everyone. complete crap. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 9:43 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thumbs down from me. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd93db7.7000...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339647230.55493.yahoomail...@web125602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering?
I'm not worried about email since the users don't use email. I'm worried about blocking malware from coming in and preventing users from surfing non work-related sites. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:14 PM Subject: RE: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? most web filtering software is just as hopeless as email filtering. If it is to eliminate the spam and so on, it ends up eliminating real emails. Ive had people subscribe to our training website thru gmail because they know they will never get thru their company filter - often barracuda. Is it really going to harm you if you get 100 spam emails a day that go to your junk folder where you can quickly scan for real stuff? -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt @ VR-FX Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 10:56 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? I agree - but, from an employee stand point at a co. that uses it - and, it blocks us from EVERYTHING. Its Insane. You go to a website - even an MSN forum for help with programming stuff - and you are blocked. Its blocks almost ALL Video stuff (or - again - it may just be the way that the place set it up at where I work) and - so many other things - can't go to Sports, or Cars, or Games related sites. Hell - you can Barely get to ANYTHING at where I work. So - from MY stand point - I hate it! But, again =- it could be the way that THEY set it up - on purpose to block us from all those things. But - at least I can get to GOOGLE - but, forget searching Images - BLOCKED!!! :-( -K- On 6/13/2012 9:12 PM, geoff wrote: I hate barracuda. we do extensive email marketing and occasionally come across a barracuda block. it is way too quick to judgement and in some instances, companies using it have whitelists meaning you cannot send an email, period. Unless of course you pay barracuda money... I still say it is a scam. very expensive equipment that does nothing more than block almost everyone. complete crap. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, 14 June 2012 9:43 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] Anybody using Barracuda web filtering? On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Is anybody using Barracuda web filtering and if so, how do you like it? PITA lists like this or off of yahoo and google get caught up in it every day. Thu[excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339647320.17626.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Legal keylogger
The example I used is the difference between 30 accounts and 2 accounts. - Original Message - From: Stephen Russell srussell...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:32 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Legal keylogger On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a client who has a labor-intensive computer business. We create reports every night to measure the performance of every person in the office. Every night my program counts the number of notes left on a case and the number of status changes. Most people work from 30-50 accounts per day. Yesterday one person worked 2 accounts the whole day. All the others had normal reports for yesterday, so I don't think it's an error on my part. I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. I am thinking about adding key loggers to all the systems and then placing warning stickers on each computer that says, Warning all computer activity is monitored. This way we can actually tell whether my program is accurately portraying her inactivity. Has anybody done this already, and if so, what are the legalities of doing it. - You are asking for more problems here. You can track an IP in other ways. I'd focus on what progress they are making instead of what they are not doing. Showing results is harder vs here is a huge list that you have to do and you missed 3 points. Poof you are fired. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyj4xvmwukacpwtzxqx8fmtduepw+v1scmzhb3ejqed...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339647396.23831.yahoomail...@web125605.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Legal keylogger
I agree. It could also identify things we've never thought about. We've had these systems in for years and have never done a comprehensive removal of even the games that have come with the systems. Pretty sloppy on my part. - Original Message - From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [NF] Legal keylogger It is legal but might not be how you want to proceed. I'd make sure that the software was not at fault. That it works on the rest of the workstations might be a giveaway. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Jun 13, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: I have a client who has a labor-intensive computer business. We create reports every night to measure the performance of every person in the office. Every night my program counts the number of notes left on a case and the number of status changes. Most people work from 30-50 accounts per day. Yesterday one person worked 2 accounts the whole day. All the others had normal reports for yesterday, so I don't think it's an error on my part. I am paranoid that If I have a bug in my software and I don't catch it, then someone will be fired unfairly. I am thinking about adding key loggers to all the systems and then placing warning stickers on each computer that says, Warning all computer activity is monitored. This way we can actually tell whether my program is accurately portraying her inactivity. Has anybody done this already, and if so, what are the legalities of doing it. Mike --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1339649597.50482.yahoomail...@web125603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Clunker desktop now has new chip [NF]
On 06/14/2012 01:29 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: Sorry Everybody, Professor Pollock is next to Profox on the list. Fat cursor error. Hi Professor Pollock, I *finally* put that new chip in. I got it when I got the flash drive, a while ago. The occasion of my shutting down and opening the case is that there was a big Ubuntu update and it required a reboot. That, and I happened to notice a medium length #2 Phillips screwdriver on the floor. Generally the computer runs a little faster. It still maxes the CPU. Felt ever so odd to retire the 512 MB chip to accommodate the 1 GB one. When I bought the 512 9 or 10 years ago it was more memory than I had ever used. 5 years ago I gave it a 1 GB companion which was a big change. This time the software and graphics are so bloated that it doesn't make all that much difference. The cable was still attached to the optical drive. I guess it is shot. Sony, wouldn't you know. 48/24/48/18 DVD combo. Box still has 1.2 Floppy. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd979df@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Clunker desktop now has new chip [NF]
Guess that even Ubuntu can't save one from that. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:42 PM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: On 06/14/2012 01:29 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: Sorry Everybody, Professor Pollock is next to Profox on the list. Fat cursor error. Hi Professor Pollock, I *finally* put that new chip in. I got it when I got the flash drive, a while ago. The occasion of my shutting down and opening the case is that there was a big Ubuntu update and it required a reboot. That, and I happened to notice a medium length #2 Phillips screwdriver on the floor. Generally the computer runs a little faster. It still maxes the CPU. Felt ever so odd to retire the 512 MB chip to accommodate the 1 GB one. When I bought the 512 9 or 10 years ago it was more memory than I had ever used. 5 years ago I gave it a 1 GB companion which was a big change. This time the software and graphics are so bloated that it doesn't make all that much difference. The cable was still attached to the optical drive. I guess it is shot. Sony, wouldn't you know. 48/24/48/18 DVD combo. Box still has 1.2 Floppy. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/78148abf-6136-4992-a1bd-4dc4a9805...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Black Panther application would go through on rails?
On 06/13/2012 11:13 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Pete Theisenpetethei...@verizon.net wrote: Around here when you adopt a section of road you get your name on a sign telling the world how wonderful you are for doing so. The state of GA probably did the right thing to not allow them naming rights on the road. Would they do the same for the Panthers? Not sure. You know that the Kluxes were out of the Southern Democratic Party right? Hi Stephen, The Sarasota Ds publicized the fact that they had severed ties with the KKKs in 1971. *That* long ago . . . -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fd97cb8.50...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
