Re: [OT] Veteran US Diplomat Questions Syria Storyline
El 11/02/12 16:22, Michael Madigan escribió: Not like the Argentinian President who says that the Brits have nukes near Argentina She said they have nuclear capable vessels and they refuse to confirm or deny if they have nukes on board. You with your pre-emptive strike theories should be able to do the math. BTW, never voted her, never will vote her, don't like their conception of democracy (fascistic). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f36e666.4000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Veteran US Diplomat Questions Syria Storyline
El 11/02/12 19:14, Michael Madigan escribió: She seems to want to provoke a needless war over a hunk of worthless rocks. Just like you did looking for WMDs in Saddam's bathroom? And If they are worthless, why do the Brits want them? - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 5:06 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Veteran US Diplomat Questions Syria Storyline El 11/02/12 16:22, Michael Madigan escribió: Not like the Argentinian President who says that the Brits have nukes near Argentina She said they have nuclear capable vessels and they refuse to confirm or deny if they have nukes on board. You with your pre-emptive strike theories should be able to do the math. BTW, never voted her, never will vote her, don't like their conception of democracy (fascistic). ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f36eb9f.7000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Very strong set of issues in Are You a Bad Programmer.
El 14/02/12 05:36, Alan Bourke escribió: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012, at 08:56 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: You can't concatenate anything containing to a string in VFP. That surprised me, frankly, but you can't. It won't work; you'll get Command contains unrecognized phrase/keyword: Hey, I didn't know that. It's there in the help as well. what about using chr(whatever)? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f3a2b51.3000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Oh, right . . .
El 16/02/12 12:29, Michael Oke, II escribió: Might depend on his definition of 'Americans'. People from the American continent? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f3d2544.7010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Oh, right . . .
El 16/02/12 16:25, Michael Madigan escribió: Michelle Obama is proof that Bigfoot exists. And this is proof that you are a reeeaaal gentleman. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f3da2f4.8090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Oh, right . . .
El 16/02/12 22:26, Michael Madigan escribió: http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/attachments/humor-forum/37121d1293685749-michelle-obama-female-dog-fuglyobama.jpg - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:44 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Oh, right . . . El 16/02/12 16:25, Michael Madigan escribió: Michelle Obama is proof that Bigfoot exists. And this is proof that you are a reeeaaal gentleman. Oh! So you mean to say that if there are others that behave worse than you do then you have a right? Like I said, you are a reeeaaal gentleman, no question about it. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f3db0d5.2040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Oh, right . . .
El 17/02/12 00:28, Michael Madigan escribió: Shouldn't you be getting ready to take back the Falklands? So when someone reprimands you, instead of explaining yourself, or apologizing, you just mock. You are such an upright man, your father must be so proud of you. - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Oh, right . . . El 16/02/12 22:26, Michael Madigan escribió: http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/attachments/humor-forum/37121d1293685749-michelle-obama-female-dog-fuglyobama.jpg - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:44 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Oh, right . . . El 16/02/12 16:25, Michael Madigan escribió: Michelle Obama is proof that Bigfoot exists. And this is proof that you are a reeeaaal gentleman. Oh! So you mean to say that if there are others that behave worse than you do then you have a right? Like I said, you are a reeeaaal gentleman, no question about it. [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f3dd77f.2080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Now David Brookes is talking
El 24/02/12 17:40, Stephen Russell escribió: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com wrote: Half of Americans don't pay any Federal income tax I have heard this chant a lot lately but I don't find enough supporting documentation for it. Some sites say that is the # 47% and I can find in some reports that same value. Only the value is just part of the entire picture that is not represented at all. 47% of the taxpayer class Single are not paying tax. Reasons sited were 1. Jobless, 2. Senior Citizen / elderly, 3. Students The other class was married with filing married or filing jointly. Past Fox news, or CBS, are there real facts to drive this probable fiction? I am sure there is a lot of bias in this news. Well actually, I can assure you that 100% of the taxpayer class are paying taxes. ... .. . Don't need any data, just by definition ;c) ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f48c594.9070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] I'm sure glad we have a president that is loved and respected all over the world
El 28/02/12 17:10, Michael Madigan escribió: http://moonbattery.com/obama-hanged-in-effigy.jpg Same way you respect Quran? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4e9ff3.2040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
If only you would keep your dirty hands on YOUR side of the frontier but alas, you think you have a right to meddle in other people's affairs. El 29/02/12 12:44, Michael Madigan escribió: Separated by oceans - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:43 AM Subject: Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . . I am glad you live there, too. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:25 AM Subject: RE: [OT] But he is Obama white . . . SOmetimes I despair of our choice of politicians and then I look at you americans then I am glad I live where I do... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ea069.7070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
El 29/02/12 21:35, Michael Madigan escribió: I wouldn't dream of meddling in the affair of you and your llama. __ B!! Llamas are way north from here, more than 1,000 miles north from here. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4eca15.5090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Breitbart dead of natural causes
El 01/03/12 16:03, Michael Madigan escribió: He was killed. He said he had video of Obama during college and was going to release it. I knew right then he'd better watch his back. Too bad Obama's people don't read this list. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ff1cb.3010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
El 01/03/12 12:21, Stephen Russell escribió: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: If only you would keep your dirty hands on YOUR side of the frontier but alas, you think you have a right to meddle in other people's affairs. --- Do you want to nuke Iran for trying to get in the nuke bomb business? Now forget you were born in the States. What right has the USA to have nukes that Iran has not? Yes, you'll say USA is the land of the free and similar bs. But why does that give you any rights other people don't have? So we'll finally get to the *real* reason. USA is exerting it's power so as to keep the nuke club small. You see, you can't really invade a country that may launch nukes, too risky for your troops. Now if power is the measure then what I see is Iran is using it's geopolitical situation to force a bully's hand. Good for them. I don't trust Iran with nukes. But then again, neither do I trust USA nor Israel, nor France, nor the UK with nukes. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ff353.20...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
El 01/03/12 13:21, john harvey escribió: Yes. So after this answer you won't complain and wail if they throw another couple of planes at you. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:21 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . . On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: If only you would keep your dirty hands on YOUR side of the frontier but alas, you think you have a right to meddle in other people's affairs. --- Do you want to nuke Iran for trying to get in the nuke bomb business? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ff38e.1060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What is irony?
El 01/03/12 17:58, Michael Madigan escribió: The plan is to get a super majority of Americans dependent on the Government. Once that happens, nobody will vote to end the gravy train. Really? And may I ask who'll be paying the piper? You yankees always believe in free meals. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ff411.9000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Breitbart dead of natural causes
El 01/03/12 19:11, Jerry Foote escribió: How do you know he doesn't Jerry Mikey is still alive :-( -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ricardo Araoz Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:02 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Breitbart dead of natural causes El 01/03/12 16:03, Michael Madigan escribió: He was killed. He said he had video of Obama during college and was going to release it. I knew right then he'd better watch his back. Too bad Obama's people don't read this list. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ffe07.5010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What is irony?
El 01/03/12 19:46, Michael Madigan escribió: Is it true that you gave your llama gonorrhea? No, that would be your mom. (sorry blokes, we are back to teen age stupidity now. Just erase the thread) From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [OT] What is irony? El 01/03/12 17:58, Michael Madigan escribió: The plan is to get a super majority of Americans dependent on the Government. Once that happens, nobody will vote to end the gravy train. Really? And may I ask who'll be paying the piper? You yankees always believe in free meals. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f4ffe66.3060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What is irony?
El 01/03/12 19:58, Michael Madigan escribió: You're the only third-world person I've ever heard use the word blokes. I can also use wanker, and bugger, etc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f500455.6070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What is irony?
El 02/03/12 01:56, Nicholas Geti escribió: Of course, that doesn't apply to Italy, Greece or Spain. Nor, you meant nor Spain, and maybe nor England too. Didn't you? But let's remember that all this crisis started with you people believing money grows in trees. So maybe you are a little bit worse off. - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [OT] What is irony? El 01/03/12 17:58, Michael Madigan escribió: The plan is to get a super majority of Americans dependent on the Government. Once that happens, nobody will vote to end the gravy train. Really? And may I ask who'll be paying the piper? You yankees always believe in free meals. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f509a07.60...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
El 02/03/12 01:55, Nicholas Geti escribió: When was the last time has Israel, France, or the US bullied the world into doing what we want? What are you smoking? ROTFLMAO You surely meant when was the last time you didn't. - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . . Now forget you were born in the States. What right has the USA to have nukes that Iran has not? Yes, you'll say USA is the land of the free and similar bs. But why does that give you any rights other people don't have? So we'll finally get to the *real* reason. USA is exerting it's power so as to keep the nuke club small. You see, you can't really invade a country that may launch nukes, too risky for your troops. Now if power is the measure then what I see is Iran is using it's geopolitical situation to force a bully's hand. Good for them. I don't trust Iran with nukes. But then again, neither do I trust USA nor Israel, nor France, nor the UK with nukes. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f509a73.9080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] But he is Obama white . . .
El 02/03/12 01:27, Stephen Russell escribió: On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: El 01/03/12 13:21, john harvey escribió: Yes. So after this answer you won't complain and wail if they throw another couple of planes at you. -- I don't think that the terrorists will strike the USA unless it is going to be super big. They will go after Israel instead.Just my WAG. Probably. But I was referring to the hypocritical behaviour of wailing for the poor (bankers, brokers, lawyers) people that died in the towers and immediately asking for a nuking that will kill not thousands but millions of innocent civilians. You know, the usual US wailing for our 3 boys and not noticing at all the thousand casualties on the other side. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f509bc5.7020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] why learn how a new M$ product could be better
El 02/03/12 11:38, Stephen Russell escribió: http://mediatapper.com/infographic-top-windows-8-features This isn't your XP world anymore. It has been my Linux world for years now. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f50ec84.1090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] What is irony?
El 02/03/12 12:35, Nicholas Geti escribió: Our economy is picking up quite well and much faster than any European So you have Obama to thank for that. Don't you? country most of which are still going down. Some of my stock accounts are hitting all time highs, thank you. For 20 years the Greeks thought money grew on trees, too. In that case trees were the socialistic politicians who were buying votes through legislation. In USA those trees would be the repub politicians then? - Original Message - From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 4:59 AM Subject: Re: [OT] What is irony? El 02/03/12 01:56, Nicholas Geti escribió: Of course, that doesn't apply to Italy, Greece or Spain. Nor, you meant nor Spain, and maybe nor England too. Didn't you? But let's remember that all this crisis started with you people believing money grows in trees. So maybe you are a little bit worse off. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f50ed2a.6090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] why learn how a new M$ product could be better
El 02/03/12 21:40, Ken Dibble escribió: Tiny keyboards suck for productivity. So do keyboards that don't provide tactile feedback that lets you know what keys you're on. And such devices also suck for blind users. These designers keep forgetting that there are millions of people in back offices typing stuff into computers all day long, and the majority of computers are used by them, not people at trade shows or traveling salespeople or whatever. True. I have this netbook. When I come home I connect it to a big display, a couple of speakers, a mouse, and a keyboard. But when I'm off I will be hapy to use the smaller included keyboard, the 10' screen and the pad. I guess that you might use these devices too from an ipad when you need better input devices. What about bluetooth mouse, keyboard and screen. Is that possible? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f516e33.5020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] why learn how a new M$ product could be better
El 02/03/12 22:12, Ed Leafe escribió: On Mar 2, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: I guess that you might use these devices too from an ipad when you need better input devices. What about bluetooth mouse, keyboard and screen. Is that possible? There are plenty of bluetooth mice, trackpads and keyboards to choose from. You can get an adaptor to connect the output to any typical monitor or projector. One of the cool Apple-only advantages is AirPlay, where you can direct the audio and/or video output to another device on the local network. I have an AppleTV device hooked up to my TV and stereo; I can play music and movies on my iPad and have them appear in full HD on the TV and full stereo on the sound system. It's great living in the future! LOL Yeah! As soon as they put some powerful processor a good amount of memory and a SS HD I'll switch to IPad. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f5175fa.7020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] why learn how a new M$ product could be better
El 05/03/12 02:34, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: On 3/3/2012 10:13 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Thierry Nivelettnive...@foxincloud.com wrote: Sorry if I sound a bit commercial, but I think FoxInCloud is a good candidate to fill the gap Jean mentions. The point Jean raises is fully valid: when building a web app to replace an existing desktop app, a lot of $ is put OMB mastering the technology at the expense of rebuilding the business user knowledge that was capitalized into the desktop app for years. At down the road application misses it's target of satisfying users needs, just because users don't want to accept / understand that a web app could deliver less than they previously got ... hey, you just changed to a browser, why should it be different? And, from a user's standpoint, that's undoubtedly a valid argument. We at FoxInCloud do view moving an app to the web as just adding another UI - web - to the application. There is no reason why all the accumulated user interaction and business competence should be lost because of a new user interface technology. Software is not reborn because web app have appeared in 2005. Web app should, IMHO, just be the successor, the latest evolution for what was built over the 25 past years. --- As one of those developers who have replaced desktop apps the users LIKE getting a clean slate and getting rid of that antiquated bloated monster for a new clean run at doing business. Instead of telling users how it will be you have to ask them. YMMV That assumes the old app was crap, and that the users didn't like it. Sure...new/replacement would surely be welcomed. And, we should remember that an app may be a disaster from a programmer's point of view, but the user sees it differently. We might know the app is hell to update or change, has ugly code, and will not escalate, but the end user couldn't care less. All he sees is the UI, and how responsive the app is. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f54870a.2010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Kill switch.
El 06/03/12 12:44, Alan Bourke escribió: Dvorak talking bollocks as normal, to drive a few page hits. Both Apple and Google can flip such a switch for apps distributed by the iOS App Store and Android Market, respectively. Okay, so the fact that Apple and Google do it doesn't make it a good thing by default, however it's only A VERY BAD THING in Microsoft's case, since: First of all, Microsoft is not known for designing anything secure. The company cannot do it. Still basing his opinions on Windows 95, I see. The more I read, the more I wonder how so many people can miss the real danger this poses to the average user. If only they knew! You fools! (truck full of alien pods disguised as watermelons trundles past). You are missing the point. That computer is MY computer. Ok, so MicroShit developed the software, but I spent thousands of hours of MY time setting it up the way I need it, I spent tens of thousands of hours loading data that's important to me, so MicroShit has no right to throw MY time to the garbage can. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f56930e.1000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] why learn how a new M$ product could be better
El 06/03/12 14:38, Stephen Russell escribió: I don't care if you code in php or java. Switching over from C/S to web is not easy. Toss in javascript, jQuery and now HTML5. The point is why would you want to switch?. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f569623.4080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Santorum scares me
El 06/03/12 18:16, Michael Madigan escribió: Not true. 14% of boys under 18 have been molested, 33% of girls have been molested. Since most child molesters are men, that means that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals 97 - 3, they only molest at a 33 -14 the rate, making homosexuals nearly 5 times more likely to molest than heterosexuals. Nick, Nick, Nick. Can't you get it? Mickey here was molested as a child, that's what his subconscious mind is screaming through his posts. And you saying gays are people shame on you! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f569794.3020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Day of the Triffids ?
El 08/03/12 09:34, Jean Laeremans escribió: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17295337 A+ jml Have we already developed those hideous plants? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f59313e.10...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Kill switch.
El 09/03/12 13:16, Charlie Coleman escribió: At 09:27 AM 3/7/2012 +, Alan Bourke wrote: On Tue, Mar 6, 2012, at 07:43 PM, Ricardo Araoz wrote: You are missing the point. That computer is MY computer. Nope, you're missing the point in your eagerness to get onto an anti-MS rant. Microsoft will be able to de-activate apps that were downloaded via their Windows 8 app stores. In Windows 8. Not 7, XP, or anything else. That's really all we know at the minute, and if that is the extent of it then they're no different from Apple and Google in that respect. So if it's a bad idea then fine, but please also include Google and Apple in your condemnation. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm Well, maybe both missed each other's points. I don't think I've seen the entire thread, but this is what I see: Ricardo is saying he doesn't want MS (or probably any company) to touch his apps/data on his PC without his permission. Alan is saying other companies currently can do a remote app (and data?) kills on phones and tablets (Google and Apple - although I'll have to look into the Android thing - I don't remember seeing that). I think the thread started specifically about Windows 8, which may be why Apple/Google wasn't a focus. Of course, they are clearly different platforms. Also, the number of companies that behave a certain way does not mean that way is ethical, good, or beneficial to consumers (the people that pay the money). I think Google/Apple were emboldened by MS's past license statements (i.e.they reserve the right to change stuff on your computer at any time). So Google/Apple put in their backdoors for remote control. And since they did it MS feels emboldened to do it for PCs. Mike B pointed out I predicted this (Windows remote-kill) a while back. Thanks for that memory-trip Mike :). One thing I didn't see or extrapolate was that other companies would embrace MS practices when they saw they got away with it over and over. We (computer/software professionals) have pretty much failed the world in this regard. Our laziness* and desire for the easy-buck** has led to this pitiful situation. So if any developer gets bit by some unexpected update, remote-kill, backdoor-hijack, bank account hack, or stolen identity, just remember: it's your own fault. Your silence and acquiescence to MS's progression down this path is what got us here. I include myself in this - while I haven't been an MS fan for the past decade or more, I have only had small victories (e.g. killed .Net projects where possible, got open source into the workplace, etc). I should have done much, much more. So when I work on Windows computers I have to expect failures, hacks, or corruptions. In personal life, I'm trying to help family/friends get off the MS wagon to atone for my decades-ago recommendation to go with MS software. -Charlie *-laziness: unwilling to research and embrace technologies outside the MS-bandwagon. Not actually understanding the science behind computer technology to be able to see through marketing hyperbole of any vendor. **-easy-buck: getting paid to do the same thing over and over because MS said do it a different way... over and over. And heck, I get paid by the company, not some end user. So why the hell should I care about what's best for them in the long run. Hear, hear! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f5a8086.8050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Forgiveness at what cost.
El 13/03/12 15:36, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: On 3/13/2012 10:04 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: Gospel Reading: Matthew 18:21-35 21 Then Peter came up and said to him, Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times? Can we forgive someone seven times in the velocity that is 2012? Could we take Jesus's reply to Peter? 22 Jesus said to him, I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven. I am trying to not get caught up in things like I use to. Readings like this remind me to stay on the better path. Lord, how often should we forgive M$ and come back for more? gdr LOL It's already been seventy times seven. So it's ok to move to Linux or Mac. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f5fcbfc.5080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Klass with a capital K
El 17/03/12 06:06, Michael Madigan escribió: It's nice to have a common low-life street thug as president. That offends me. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f6486ec.5090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Obama flag - no joke
El 17/03/12 06:06, Michael Madigan escribió: No respect for the flag So? You have showed time and again in this list no respect for intelligence and yet here you are. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f648736.3070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió: Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter? Un B Fucking Lievable!!! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f665af9.1080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand
El 18/03/12 19:04, Michael Madigan escribió: Obama's greatest speeches were written by someone else. He book, Dreams of My Father, was written by someone else. He's a fraud. From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 6:00 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Why the Bammer is so impossible to understand El 18/03/12 02:20, Michael Oke, II escribió: Sorry, not a great orator. He can read decently but take the TelePrompTer away from him and he is far below average. When the great speakers are counted, his name won't be on the list. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Does this mean GWB was that bad EVEN with a TelePrompter? Un B Fucking Lievable!!! Is it me? Are you *actually* answering my post? Or do you just go on with your rant regardless? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f6664c7.3030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 01:24, geoff escribió: it does you and anyone else no praise to compare the wife of a dictatorial terrorist and murderer to the wife of someone whose politics you dont like. It in fact discredits your opinions so much so as to make them almost worthless. That's not possible Geoff. I mean further discrediting his opinions and politics. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f6708df.8040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 02:10, Michael Madigan escribió: They both are using the people's money to have lavish vacations and shopping sprees. Yeah!!! And when my son stole those candies I sent him to Alcatraz. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f67094a.4080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 02:29, Michael Madigan escribió: Mugabe and Obama are very similar. Mugabe stole from the Whites to give to the Blacks, Obama steals from the Whites to give to the Blacks. I knew sooner or later it would come *down* to racist remarks. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f670970.9040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 03:36, geoff escribió: nor was stalin ever convicted of crimes. or Mao. is the extent of your understanding THAT limited? wow... your hatred of Obama has lowered your intelligence and integrity. And once again you are asking for impossibles Geof. ... .. . You've figured out by now I'm talking about lowering his intelligence and integrity. Now, have you? LOL ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f6709dc.2030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 03:47, Michael Madigan escribió: After you elect a Aborigine criminal President, then you can call us names. He is a first-class criminal thug. So you mean they are allowed a *criminal* president, so long as he is not aboriginal? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f670a18.5090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Grammar.
I was *sure* you'd feel touched by that phrase. El 19/03/12 12:01, Michael Madigan escribió: Bumper sticker on Steve Russel's car. - Original Message - From: Jean Laeremans laeremans.jeanma...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:56 AM Subject: [OT] Grammar. The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f685659.3080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Hypocrite in chief scolds our gas price disappointment
El 20/03/12 00:39, Michael Madigan escribió: He could have stopped the Fed from pumping a gazillion dollars into the money supply, destroying the dollar and increasing oil prices. He could have gotten behind the student uprising in Iran to drive out the current regime like he did with Egypt and Libya. Yeah! He should meddle in other people's affairs and get thousands killed under his responsibility so that you may sit on your fat ass on your wasteful car and pay less than you should for the privilege. Wow! I wonder why people resent you Yanks. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f6857f2.3040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 18:35, geoff escribió: you really DONT get the whole racial equality thing, do you? the term 'racist' is much over-used, but in your case absolutely spot-on. You are too stupid to even deny it. Well you know, it is a scientifically proven fact that *all* white people are stupid racists with huge arses and little weenies. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f685947.80...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 18:33, geoff escribió: garbage. you just love guns - that is all. in the meantime, our deal toll from guns per year is 100 while yours tops 50,000. funny, that! Well you know, he could no longer play with his own gun. So he had to go out and buy one. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f685a0d.1040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch?
El 19/03/12 20:29, Michael Madigan escribió: Typical uninformed Liberal. He's right, it's not because of guns. It's just that Yanks are shitty people that naturally kill each other. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 7:01 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Their first bitch is worse than our first bitch? IM not going to engage in a debate about guns. Australia is a safe place without guns. USA is a dangerous place because of guns. the fact you even link basic concepts of democracy to guns is silly. moving on... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f685b03.6060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Hypocrite in chief scolds our gas price disappointment
El 20/03/12 15:09, Michael Madigan escribió: The resent us so much they float here on rafts through shark-infested waters to get here Those go for your money and *still* resent you. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f691976.4020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Multiple cursors returned from Stored Procedure
El 25/03/12 10:38, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: On 3/25/2012 12:46 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: On 3/24/2012 12:04 PM, Rick Schummer wrote: My stored procedure returns 6 cursors. Can the Fox handle getting multiple cursors back? Absolutely, straight from the SQLEXEC() entry in the VFP Help file: H...so I'm wondering why this isn't working? Odd. Thanks. Must be a limitation with the ODBC driver for this MariaDB database. I'm doing this simple test: lcSQL = 'select * from table 1 limit 2;' ? sqlexec(giHandle,lcSQL) this works fine lcSQL = lcSQL + select * from table2 limit 3 ? sqlexec(giHandle,lcSQL) this fails Error dialogue box says Connectivity error: [MySQL][ODBC 5.1 Driver][mysqld-5.3.2-MariaDB] You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL version for the right syntax to use near 'select * from table2 limit3' at line 1 I know this works for SQL Server, but has anyone gotten the multiple results thingie working for non-SQL-Server backends? I'm sure but would enjoy the confirmation. Thanks. Works fine with SQLServer 2005. More than 10 cursors recieved at once. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f74fbcd.3040...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] My son's a criminal, but that's irrelevant
El 30/03/12 02:55, Nicholas Geti escribió: I got a broken nose when I was a kid. It didn't bleed but it sure did hurt. I have also bumped my head a few times and got a big lump but no blood. I've got tibia and fibula fractured while skiing, upper arm fracture playing rugby, forearm slash with an open artery and exposed tendons while fighting with my brothers.. you are a mummy's child, a sissy, never climbed a tree. LOL ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f75c274.2030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] My son's a criminal, but that's irrelevant
El 30/03/12 13:42, Nicholas Geti escribió: Oh, geez another irrelevant comment from the peanut gallery. I was objecting to the liberals being up-in-arms because there was no blood on Zimmerman and therefore he could not have been attacked by the kid. I think all of your old injuries have come back to addle your brain. Daddy, daddy, the Argie bully has made another irrelevant comment... bh. I want to go home! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7604a8.40...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Munich and Schwäbisch Hall dump winders
El 03/04/12 01:33, Christof Wollenhaupt escribió: http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/nine-german-cities-poised-adopt-linux-676 M$ chickens coming home to roost. That was nine years ago. A few years later these cities have stopped their plans to move everything over to Linux realizing that it would be to expensive to re-write the whole lot of custom software and also due to changes in Microsoft's licensing model. The idea is coming up every few years by different smaller cities until they realize that software license fees are only part of the TCO. Christof Would you really charge the cost of re-writing already existing software into TCO? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7b8f8c.30...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Munich and Schwäbisch Hall dump winders
El 03/04/12 02:20, Christof Wollenhaupt escribió: Munich is still happy: http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/public-sector/3348475/munich-mayor-says-switch-linux-is-much-cheaper-reduced-complaints/ Yes. Munich is also showing the scope of the switch. Despite being started almost a decade ago, it's only in the past two years that they are pushing out desktops to all employees. This has been made easier with the increase of web-based software and the broad adoption of Java in the enterprise world. I'm convinced that the model of the Windows based desktop is fading away into history. However, I don't buy the simplified Open source is free, closed source is expensive, therefore move everything to open source argument. Christof They meant free as in freedom, not as in beer. Open source is not gratis! But it will usually not lock you in, which is the main reason IMO to migrate. Of course, for home computing open source IS free as in beer mostly. So no reason not to use it. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7b9052.8050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Munich and Schwäbisch Hall dump winders
El 03/04/12 07:21, Alan Bourke escribió: Local gubmint adopting FOSS is great but they will hit the same hurdles as business hits - too much of the software they need doesn't exist on Linux. All the folks just doing word processing and email - great. Get the foot in the door with those people, but the planning department using AutoCAD, or the PR department using Photoshop et al won't be moving any time soon. Remember when people who needed to use graphics and images thought only a Mac could do it? Now extrapolate. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7b90a1.9020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] People don't want to work
El 03/04/12 18:27, Michael Madigan escribió: Unfortunately some businesses don't have the profit margins to increase salaries.If you own a hamburger franchise, you're locked in on the price you can charge, so you have to hire people under a certain wage. And you want people to starve so you can fill your dirty pockets? Tough! This is capitalism, if you don't have good profit margins then change to some other business instead of asking govt not to help people so as to help you. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7b9210.2060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Munich and Schwäbisch Hall dump winders
El 04/04/12 01:09, Christof Wollenhaupt escribió: Would you really charge the cost of re-writing already existing software into TCO? Would you really port my existing FoxPro applications to Linux for free? If so, please send me a private mail to discuss the details. Mit achtrich mus und aftarwunder im versoten bastonen miter. Ooops! Sorry, was talking my own german dialect (I invent it on the run). You know, like when you say TCO referring to state issues and really mean my own personal use case. But it will usually not lock you in, which is the main reason IMO to migrate. You car has electric wiring a few miles long. How exactly would having a printed electric schema help you personally (not someone else, you personally) help you with your car? Ich burstoten mit arstonen fur und achtarbichter. Or playing it naif : less weight to carry (the electric wiring) therefore less energy to move the car and I am saving gas. I'm happy, personally happy. Now think back to the last public servant you encountered, maybe a police officer, the lady from the US post office or the TSA guy on your last visit to the airport: How does it help them having the source code of Linux? Let's see, the state does not pay royalties for the OS, ergo less expenses, ergo less taxes, and voilà, they (and everyone else) likes it. Then, the state uses non proprietary file formats, then a) the citizen is not forced into some foreign company's formats and democracy is served, b) the citizen is not forced to pay for foreign company's programs and the exchange balance is served. The german police lady is a citizen so she is served. Then, the state uses an OS without back doors and state secrets and commercial secrets are better kept, everybody is happy. OTOH, a US company gets less revenue, so more US unemployment and the aforementioned (by you) US post office lady is NOT happy well, life's tough. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7c1869.8070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] People don't want to work
When are you people going to understand it. T H E R E I S N O F R E E M A R K E T ! ! ! ! ! ! Every market is regulated, if it is not regulated then it is not a market. There are always rules and those rules are enforced by govt. The only issue is *how much* regulation to have. Will there be anti trust laws? Will we punish using inside info to bet on the stock market? Will we regulate interest rate? etc. etc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7df3a3.4030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] People don't want to work
El 06/04/12 01:18, Nicholas Geti escribió: Another good one. Yup! But no arguments rebating my point. That is really satisfying. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [OT] People don't want to work Oh look, it's Gaucho Marx From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [OT] People don't want to work When are you people going to understand it. T H E R E I S N O F R E E M A R K E T ! ! ! ! ! ! Every market is regulated, if it is not regulated then it is not a market. There are always rules and those rules are enforced by govt. The only issue is *how much* regulation to have. Will there be anti trust laws? Will we punish using inside info to bet on the stock market? Will we regulate interest rate? etc. etc. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7ed524.5070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mac virus hits 555K users
El 06/04/12 19:17, Michael Madigan escribió: When I was contracting to the Government, one of the documentation weenies demanded that he have a Mac to work on, even though everybody else was using a PC. So they buy him the Mac, put it on his desk, and a few weeks later he proceeds to call a Colonel a liar in front of a large group of people. He was removed from the building and the Mac sat on his desk collecting dust. LOL Moral of the story... most Mac users are weenies. LOL Actually, none of the PC blokes had the guts to call a spade a spade. So come again, who were the weenies? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7f84b0.6060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] People don't want to work
El 06/04/12 17:19, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: On 4/5/2012 2:45 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: It is amazing how you attack conjecture on my part but ignore the conjecture that Obama said how much money the health care act would save. GM and Wall Street was only billions; the health care act would cost trillions. lol) I agree that there was some success but compared to the alternatives it was a bad investment. The management and unions made off with millions of dollars for their own pockets. Why should Detroit jobs be saved at the expense of the unemployed in Tennessee or any other state where automobile plants are located? Besides, the profit margins for these other companies is much higher than GM. This should be a good clue indicating GM was not that great of an investment. I read recently that it is going to be years before GM actually turns a profit. Their cash flow is good but that is not the same as earning a profit. The reason GM's cost is so much higher compared to Toyota is the union. Plain and simple. Of course, and if GM would only use slaves then the costs would really go down. Wouldn't them. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7f851f.5000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mac virus hits 555K users
El 06/04/12 22:48, Michael Oke, II escribió: So you are familiar with the situation in question? Are you? Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com wrote: El 06/04/12 19:17, Michael Madigan escribió: When I was contracting to the Government, one of the documentation weenies demanded that he have a Mac to work on, even though everybody else was using a PC. So they buy him the Mac, put it on his desk, and a few weeks later he proceeds to call a Colonel a liar in front of a large group of people. He was removed from the building and the Mac sat on his desk collecting dust. LOL Moral of the story... most Mac users are weenies. LOL Actually, none of the PC blokes had the guts to call a spade a spade. So come again, who were the weenies? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f7fb5bc.8010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mac virus hits 555K users
El 07/04/12 06:09, Michael Madigan escribió: You want so much to be a UK citizen, don't you? LOL ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f803535.3050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Mac virus hits 555K users
El 07/04/12 01:34, Michael Oke, II escribió: Nope but then again, I'm not commenting on it am I. Mickey, Mickey, Mickey. What's up? You shouldn't do this here. Should go to a drug store, get a teeth protector, then go to a bar and pick a good fight. Here it is so.. virtual. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f8035c7.6050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] People don't want to work
El 07/04/12 06:01, Michael Madigan escribió: No them wouldn't Of course, and if GM would only use slaves then the costs would really go down. Wouldn't them. Hahaha, thank you. My bad. OTOH, now I know some more English. I'm getting smarter. What about you? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f80362f.6060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: 2012 FoxPro Lifetime Achievement Award Committee
El 10/04/12 22:21, Ken Dibble escribió: A huge thank you from me goes out to him (Ed Leafe) anyway. +1 +1, again. +1 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f8554e8.9000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA vs. Apple the book publishers
El 11/04/12 14:50, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2012cv02826/394628/1/ for Conspiracy to fix prices for e-books And me thinking you had a free market and the state didn't meddle in private affairs. hehehe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f860563.3050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Problem with ProFox?
El 11/04/12 13:47, Ken Kixmoeller (ProFox) escribió: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dan Covill dcov...@san.rr.com wrote: There is not a single post from Pete Theisen titled [OT] Obama Is something wrong with the Server? Can it be fixed before my 'Delete' key gets rusty? I guess that shows that there may be a God after all. You mean god finally started fighting satan and killed the old bugger? Good! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f860790.60...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Problem with ProFox?
El 11/04/12 20:19, Michael Madigan escribió: You liberals are all the same, wishing someone to die that you don't agree with. Don't get me wrong. Has nothing to do with politics. It's personal. I just believe the world would be a better world if the wanker were to die, painfully would be better. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f863baf.5050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Chrome OS introduces Aura window manager
El 12/04/12 06:42, Michael Madigan escribió: It should be spelled, ciao. She thought she was so sophisticated, but she was just a moron. Ah! Bene. Arrivedere ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f86a55b.5070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] USA vs. Apple the book publishers
El 12/04/12 13:53, Michael Madigan escribió: I can understand using a kindle for storing reference books, or documents, but i don't understand why someone would want to read a book. You'll get to reading one sooner or later. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f88241f.2020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] America Least Racist Country
El 14/04/12 09:32, Stephen Russell escribió: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: Hi Everybody, Try telling that to the left: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/295611/still-least-racist-country-world-dennis-prager --- This coming from the most racist person of this list. So Mr. Dennis Prager's *opinion* is that. So what? Who the hell is Dennis Prager? OTOH notice that near the end of the note he clearly equates xenophobia with racism. And uses xenophobia to support his point. Only idiots would fall for this. The political aspect is this: The Democrats and the Left both recognize that if blacks cease viewing themselves as victims of racism, the Democratic party can no longer offer itself as black America's savior. And if only one out of three black Americans ceases to regard to himself as a victim of racism, and votes accordingly, it will be very difficult for Democrats to win any national election. He just takes the rep strategy of fear and looking for outside enemies and applies it to racism. Just stupid article addressed at stupid people. No wonder Petey reads this shit. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f897565.7020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Turns out Rosen is a homo
El 15/04/12 16:13, Michael Madigan escribió: It means she's a deviant and should have nothing to say on the subject of motherhood. So you as an asshole should have nothing to say on the subject of education? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f8b6d47.6000...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Turns out Rosen is a homo
El 15/04/12 21:54, Michael Madigan escribió: This coming from a man who was the love child of a llama and a donkey. Matey, you didn't have to rush and prove my point so fast. Thanks a lot anyway. From: Ricardo Araoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Turns out Rosen is a homo El 15/04/12 16:13, Michael Madigan escribió: It means she's a deviant and should have nothing to say on the subject of motherhood. So you as an asshole should have nothing to say on the subject of education? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f8b6e1c.8080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Judeo Christian Firing
El 20/04/12 13:36, Michael Madigan escribió: A secret service agent is never off duty. LOL He thinks SS agents should be wankers. HAHAHA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f921368.9050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Judeo Christian Firing
On 04/20/2012 01:01 PM, Arse Hole Theisen wrote: Hi Leland, Child prostitution is illegal in Colombia, but tolerated by CUSTOM. Is that what you mean? Hi AH, Sexual tourism (and soliciting of child prostitutes) is illegal in the USA, but tolerated by CUSTOM. So I guess it's ok if you go to Thailand and shag a couple of children. Is that what YOU mean? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f921475.8090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] kicking back listening to some old tunes
El 27/04/12 06:59, Allen escribió: Wow the government/state should never be allowed to get in the way of commerce. That's worse than cartels Al LOL Sure! For example it should never be allowed to tell commerce what to sell or not. Ergo drugs should be allowed. It should never be allowed to tell groups what to buy or not. So monopolies and cartels should be allowed, even though that would invalidate the free play of prices. Hospitals are also commerce. The state should never be allowed to regulate them. Food is also commerce. The state should never be allowed to mess with that market, or to say what may or may not be sold and in what way. Sod the cold chain, let the buyer beware. It should never be allowed to dictate what to import or export. So China would be able to export to USA whatever and as much as it wants. So would Cuba. It should never be allowed to dictate with which country to do business or visit. So USA citizens would be able to go to Cuba. I hate those US commies who forbade for decades commerce with Cuba! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f9a8ba4.8080...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] Program the car/truck computer for safety
El 30/04/12 11:24, Nicholas Geti escribió: Aren't you one of those who have railed against the government dictating the rules? Now, you want to implement a whole new set of rules to get around the current rules. LOL We agree on this! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f9ea21b.9060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] The End is Near
El 02/05/12 12:50, Kurt Wendt escribió: Or - maybe we can start connecting directly up to Brains! Maybe we can start experimenting w/Pete's - since he is so worried about The End being Near!!! Ptt Sorry, it fried. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa3cb95.7070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Help on joins please
Or you might use select pcode as Code, NVL(pemp.name, pempex.name) as 'name'; , NVL(pemp.gross, pempex.gross) as 'gross' etc... ; from palldets ; left join pemp ; on palldets.pcode=pemp.code ; left join pempex ; on palldets.pcode=pempex.code ; where cycle=mycycle ; order by pcode,date,cycle ; into table (myfile2) If there might be pemp records not found neither in pemp nor in pempex and you don't want them in your result set then you use a having pemp.code is not .NULL. or pempex.code is not .NULL. or you further filter the result set. El 04/05/12 07:14, Dave Crozier escribió: Sytze, Don't forget to make the Union a union all statement if you wish to get all records from the two selects, even though there may be duplicates. By itself union ignores duplicate records. Dave -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 04 May 2012 09:17 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: Help on joins please Sytze You need two select statements with a union like this Select . Union (Select .) The first select will refer to pemp and the second select refers to pempex Paul -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Sytze de Boer Sent: 04 May 2012 06:15 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Help on joins please In a routine of mine, I do the following and all is fine select pcode as Code, pemp.name, gross,tax,nontgross as Non_Taxables ,deductions from palldets ; join pemp on palldets.pcode=pemp.code ; where cycle=mycycle order by pcode,date,cycle into table (myfile2) But sometimes, the employee is in a file called pempex select pcode as Code, pemp.name, gross,tax,nontgross as Non_Taxables ,deductions from palldets ; join pemp on palldets.pcode=pemp.code ; join pempex on palldets.pcode=pempex.code; where cycle=mycycle order by pcode,date,cycle into table (myfile2) The 2nd join does not work 1 How do I make this work IF data needs to be found in pempex 2 How to make this work if in fact all the data is ONLY in pemp -- Regards Sytze de Boer --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa3cde4.6060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] You see what racists Aussies are?
El 01/05/12 23:17, Michael Madigan escribió: That's because you killed them all Geoff, if you killed so many aboriginals. Couldn't you have also killed Mickey and closet Petey? From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 8:09 PM Subject: RE: [OT] You see what racists Aussies are? ?que? do you know how many aboriginals there are in australia? 300,000 out of a population of 22million. Statistical probability answers your question on its own. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012 9:34 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: [OT] You see what racists Aussies are? Hi Everybody, Not a single Aborigine! http://video.foxnews.com/v/1615809361001/beauties-battle-to-be-miss-universe -australia/?playlist_id=87937intcmp=obnetwork ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa3cfba.10...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] You see what racists Aussies are?
El 02/05/12 21:06, Michael Madigan escribió: Now all of our Indians are wealthy casino owners. True, the whole 4 of them. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa3cffc.4030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] No wonder they can't find jobs
El 03/05/12 13:18, Michael Madigan escribió: For some reason America puts a high value on what deadbeats and losers think. If that were true then you'd be in Congress. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa3d0f4.9050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Looks like Chen is being thrown under the bus
El 04/05/12 14:49, Michael Madigan escribió: Ask General Custer what he thinks of that statement. I would have loved to help Sitting Bull ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa446db.3010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] She'll be dead soon...bet on it
El 04/05/12 17:16, MB Software Solutions, LLC escribió: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/04/alleged-prostitute-in-secret-service-scandal-calls-agents-fools/ Well the SS have their bad reputation since Germany/Poland/Russia in the 30's and 40's. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa44736.6010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Now France AND US have Socialist presidents.
El 07/05/12 00:57, Michael Madigan escribió: How soon before Germany invades France again? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17979913 Our friend here, the arsehole, thinks Hollande is the first socialist French president. Hahahaha! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa845f0.7090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Charity and politics
El 07/05/12 15:14, Adam Buckland escribió: A donation is a gift given by physical or legal persons, typically for charitable purposes and/or to benefit a cause. Biden makes by far the lowest of all the people named... they had to count back to 2009 and add it all together just to get to the same ballpark as Obama... Did you give 22% of your gross income to charity - It comes down to the marginal utility of income... it's easy to give say $1k when you earn $790K, not so easy on say $79K And it's easier to give other people's money than your own. Arseholes are s generous with OPM. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa84672.8010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Oz insurers as full-of-it as US insurers?
On 08/05/12 04:31, Jean Laeremans wrote: Geoff, Why bother reasoning with those morons ? They just manage to lower you to their standards or lack of them. LOL We say that if you fight a pig you may win or you may loose, but you'll certainly get dirty. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa8e885.6090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Started learning C# today
On 08/05/12 16:59, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:16 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 5/8/2012 3:08 PM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012, at 02:33 PM, MB Software Solutions,LLC
wrote:
But personally I'm not keen on this.
May I ask why not?
Maybe because to do that your class has to implement IEnumerable ?
So? What's the big deal? Teach me a lesson on this! lol
---
I use this for defining my data classes:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;Add a reference to your
project for this
namespace aCompnay.DataClasses
{
[DataContract(Name = poLine, Namespace =
http://schemas.aCompany.com/Tools/PO/v1.0;)]
public class POLine
{
[DataMember(Name = POID, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public Int32 poiD
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = POLinesID, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public Int32 poLinesID
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = LineNumber, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String lineNumber
{
get;
set;
}
//
[DataMember(Name = Quantity, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String quantity
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = UOM, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String uom
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = Price, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String poCurrency
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = CustomerItemNumber, Order = 1, IsRequired =
true)]
public String customerItemNumber
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = RingItemNumber, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String ringItemNumber
{
get;
set;
}
//
[DataMember(Name = Description, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String description
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = Warehouse, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String warehouse
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = BaseUnitCode, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String baseUnitCode
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = POShipments, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public ListPOShipment poShipments
{
get;
set;
}
[DataMember(Name = Price, Order = 1, IsRequired = true)]
public String price
{
get;
set;
}
}
}
In your other class that is getting data :
POline pol = new POLine();
pol.warehouse=ABC;
Loved to read your code. Made me love Python even more.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fa996b0.9010...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Last year it was flash mobs, now for Trayvon
True!!! I won't be getting out of bed in the foreseeable future. You pussy. On 09/05/12 05:27, Michael Madigan wrote: For every dirtbag you catch, there are 100 others lurking around. - Original Message - From: MB Software Solutions, LLC mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [OT] Last year it was flash mobs, now for Trayvon On 5/5/2012 2:13 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: I won't be going to Baltimore or Philadelphia in the foreseeable future. fyi -- They got the dirtbags who perpetrated the attack on that dude around St. Patrick's Day here in Baltimore. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4faa3b5c.4030...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bammer cartoon
On 09/05/12 09:34, Michael Madigan wrote: It is as offensive as watching someone piss in public. If watching is what offends you then don't watch. If, on the other hand, you have some brains and think urinating in public is a public health hazard then you would want to stop it. Have I explained Adam's sentence simply enough for you? Or should I try to simplify it further so that you can understand it? From: Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:27 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Bammer cartoon No, urinating in public is a public health hazard, getting married and making a commitment isn't. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 09 May 2012 13:26 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bammer cartoon That's like saying if you have a problem with someone urinating in public, the answer is not to look. From: Adam Buckland adam.buckl...@apac.co.uk To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:19 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Bammer cartoon Pete, The simple answer is that if you have a problem with same-sex marriage is not to get married to someone of the same sex. Seemples... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4faaeb25.4020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Last year it was flash mobs, now for Trayvon
On 09/05/12 14:22, Adam Buckland wrote: And another person who can't even be bothered to find out the definitions of third world He can only be bothered to find out something to eat in the fridge. Lard ass's only reason to move his fat arse. -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 09 May 2012 18:21 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Last year it was flash mobs, now for Trayvon It's not London yet, but we're getting close ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4faaec9b.8090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Last year it was flash mobs, now for Trayvon
On 09/05/12 20:56, Michael Madigan wrote: Your Mama likes my ass and she says I kiss better than you do. So there. Oooh! You mentioned my mother! That reeeaally hurts. And you finish it with so there you *really* are a pussy. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fab215a.3060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bammer cartoon
On 10/05/12 12:21, Jean Laeremans wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: back in Jesus' days. Back then the 1 - 2% were content to privately sodomize and infect each other without public endorsement. Not your strong point ancient history methinks... Not his strong point being a human being methinks... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fac377d.2060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bammer cartoon
On 10/05/12 12:35, Jean Laeremans wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: Jean Laeremans wrote: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Pete Theisen petethei...@verizon.net wrote: back in Jesus' days. Back then the 1 - 2% were content to privately sodomize and infect each other without public endorsement. Not your strong point ancient history methinks... Hi Jean, I have 24 credits in Theology back in the day when credits meant something. How many Theology credits do you have that you would be qualified to judge me? -- I meant history not fairy tales. LOL He's just an old choir boy that got abused by a priest, never able to accept his latent homosexuality though. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fac37d5.8010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Game of Thrones fans?
On 10/05/12 18:02, Eurico Chagas Filho wrote: I got four books, there is one missing, the last one. And I watched all episodes, some I downloaded... Big fan. Got all books, watched all episodes. Not liking this second year though. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fac3839.6070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Bammer cartoon
On 11/05/12 04:48, Michael Madigan wrote: All Limbaugh's wives were heterosexual women. Thanks! And me here thinking his wives were lesbian women with a twist for masochism. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4facf49f.10...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't lie well enough or fast enough
On 22/05/12 16:12, Michael Madigan wrote: Anybody who votes for Obama a second time is a MORON. And what's YOUR excuse? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fbc1412.1060...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Filthy Bill at it again
On 24/05/12 13:41, Kurt Wendt wrote: I think you're just JEALOUS Pete - as I'm sure you would LOVE To be between those 2 women like he is in that Pic! I sure would!!! He's not. He doesn't like women. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fbf9c58.8010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] - Fox News Viwers are less informed than those who watch no TV...
On 24/05/12 19:14, Michael Madigan wrote: I wouldn't let your average NPR listener wash my car. They might find out you are a puff? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fbf9d8c.7010...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] - Fox News Viwers are less informed than those who watch no TV...
On 24/05/12 18:50, Michael Madigan wrote: They're just suggesting that a study by a terrible university isn't worth much. He's just suggesting that they should question the study, not the university. Jsas! I'm getting tired of translating from English to Moron - Original Message - From: Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [OT] - Fox News Viwers are less informed than those who watch no TV... On May 24, 2012, at 2:58 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: Fox News responded by focusing on Fairleigh Dickinson's academic record Ah, the old ad hominem argument. Glad to see that they stay true to form! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fbf9de7.7090...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't lie well enough or fast enough
On 23/05/12 12:08, Kurt Wendt wrote: Excellent response there Ricardo - Touche! I actually changed my subscription to the list a few days back - so I can see the [OT] communications. However, so far I find it frustrating since it seems about the ONLY Topic on here is Obama Bashing - as well as Bashing of Dem's! Which is a really sad state of affairs. Its one of the reasons I hate to get involved with political discussions. It seems that EVERY DAMNED Time a Dem gets to be President - the ENTIRE Time the Rep's keep trying to Bash the Pres. The Peronistas do the same here. I think the behaviour characterizes people only concerned with power, not with what they might do with it. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4fbf9e48.7050...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
