Re: [qmailtoaster] admin-toaster incredibly slow after update
Well, it seems to be running correctly now. I noticed that I couldn't access the qmailtoaster.com web site for a while today. Is there something on this page that queries the qmailtoaster.com site (the updates at the bottom perhaps)? The apache error logs show a few different things. PHP Notice: Undefined index: file in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 5 PHP Notice: Undefined index: oldpasswd in /usr/share/toaster/htdocs/admin/index.php on line 81 PHP Notice: Undefined index: newpasswd in /usr/share/toaster/htdocs/admin/index.php on line 81 PHP Notice: Undefined index: newpasswd2 in /usr/share/toaster/htdocs/admin/index.php on line 81 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 10 PHP Notice: Undefined variable: html in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 93 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 137 PHP Notice: Undefined variable: html in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 138 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 137 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 137 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 137 PHP Notice: Use of undefined constant r - assumed 'r' in /usr/share/toaster/include/admin.inc.php on line 137 I'm going to try manually breaking my dns records for qmailtoaster.com on my internal network, and see if that makes any difference... On 6/6/07, Helmut Fritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jake - I think it might be the same issue I repoter a couple of days ago with the httpd scripts. Another reply incoming with a link to that. -Original Message- From: Jake Vickers [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:18 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] admin-toaster incredibly slow after update Jason P wrote: Hi all, I just updated my server (cnt40) to the latest non-development versions (every package was 1-2 releases old, not much imo), and now the http://server/admin-toaster/ page is incredibly slow. It takes up to 5 minutes of loading before it will finally show up. All other admin pages load fine. Both of my servers are doing this (one is 64bit and one is 32bit). Anybody have any ideas? All other non-qmail webpages load just fine. Do your apache logs show anything? I don't recall anyone else having this issue. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] IP Address Change
I've had to change toe IP address of our mail server (centos4.3_x64), and I cannot send or receive mail. I've modified all the firewall rules to reflect the new address, and all other services are working fine. I'm also seeing the following error in my SMTP logs: 2007-04-06 10:57:57.284074500 tcpserver: fatal: temporarily unable to figure out IP address for 0.0.0.0: file does not exist Does anyone have any ideas as to what happened? If I try to telnet to port 25, it acts like it is trying to connect, then just drops the connection. Thanks, Jason
RE: [qmailtoaster] IP Address Change
When I restart, it reverts back to the old IP address. _ From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:09 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] IP Address Change Jason P wrote: I've had to change toe IP address of our mail server (centos4.3_x64), and I cannot send or receive mail. I've modified all the firewall rules to reflect the new address, and all other services are working fine. I'm also seeing the following error in my SMTP logs: 2007-04-06 10:57:57.284074500 tcpserver: fatal: temporarily unable to figure out IP address for 0.0.0.0: file does not exist Does anyone have any ideas as to what happened? If I try to telnet to port 25, it acts like it is trying to connect, then just drops the connection. Did you just change the IP, or did you do a reboot as well? And where did you change the IP? (ie: config file edit, used netconfig, etc.)
[qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures
Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks. I've tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results. I cannot understand what is happening or why. Might there be a package domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly? I've upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records, and sent out various tests. Sometimes it works, and other times it doesn't. Does anyone have any clues? I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64. Thanks, Jason
RE: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures
Do these permissions look correct for qmail-dk? I'm just trying to think of something... -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 49216 Mar 6 12:36 qmail-dk Thanks. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures Jason P wrote: Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks. I've tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results. I cannot understand what is happening or why. Might there be a package domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly? I've upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records, and sent out various tests. Sometimes it works, and other times it doesn't. Does anyone have any clues? I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64. Thanks, Jason qmail-dk is broken in some cases. That's why we don't use the BG settings in DKVERIFY. Some keys (gmail in particular) don't verify correctly. I'm not aware of a problem with outgoing signatures though. You might want to set t=y in your _domainkey DNS record until Alexey (or someone) gets a chance to fix up qmail-dk. FWIW, gmail (google, who's the force behind DK and DKIM) runs DK with t=y. DKIM will be relacing DomainKeys anyway some time in the future. DKIM was recently approved as a standard, but there's no toaster (or qmail TTBOMK) implementation of it yet. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Disclaimer/Footer
I know this has been mentioned many times before, but since we use qmailtoaster as our primary corporate email server, I would like the option of adding a disclaimer/footer at the end of any outgoing emails. Is this possible with the current version? If not, could it be implemented into future versions? I believe this is something that is requested often enough to include in the toaster package. :)
RE: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures
I did the upgrades last night. No difference. :( -Original Message- From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:40 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures Ensure you are using the latest version of the qmail-toaster rpm from the devel site. It is very likely that at least some of the issues relating to qmail-dk may be caused by the missing bigdns patch which is now included. Erik On 3/7/07, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes. Jason P wrote: Do these permissions look correct for qmail-dk? I'm just trying to think of something... -rws--x--x 1 qmailq qmail 49216 Mar 6 12:36 qmail-dk Thanks. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:07 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures Jason P wrote: Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks. I've tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results. I cannot understand what is happening or why. Might there be a package domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly? I've upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records, and sent out various tests. Sometimes it works, and other times it doesn't. Does anyone have any clues? I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64. Thanks, Jason qmail-dk is broken in some cases. That's why we don't use the BG settings in DKVERIFY. Some keys (gmail in particular) don't verify correctly. I'm not aware of a problem with outgoing signatures though. You might want to set t=y in your _domainkey DNS record until Alexey (or someone) gets a chance to fix up qmail-dk. FWIW, gmail (google, who's the force behind DK and DKIM) runs DK with t=y. DKIM will be relacing DomainKeys anyway some time in the future. DKIM was recently approved as a standard, but there's no toaster (or qmail TTBOMK) implementation of it yet. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Using qmail tap
I only ever tried doing it that way once, a year or two ago, and the problem
was that it would start tapping the taps of the taps of the taps, creating
an endless loop of email logs. A few test messages managed to increase to
something like 35,000 after a few weeks (it was a non-production system, and
I hadn't been paying attention to it...). I never even looked into seeing
if there was a way to make that work, because a new (invalid)
logs.mydomain.com domain took care of the problem and was easy to set up.
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:44 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Using qmail tap
Jake Vickers wrote:
James F. Jarrett wrote:
Yeah,
I know that, but I still have to create a second domain (that we have to
own) and make sure the mail gets routed to it etc.
While not terribly difficult It adds a lot of mail handling, and seems
that it would be better just to dump it to a text file an forget about
it.
I don't think the domain has to physically exist in the real world;
create a fake one, and add it's entry in /etc/hosts just to be sure,
then just tap the messages to there. Then throw together quick script to
combine all the messages together into a text file at the end of the
night.
I personally do not use tap (no need, yet), so there may be a better way.
Couldn't you simply use an archive account in the existing domain?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then you could just leave them there. A cron job could delete them after a
period of time ('find' command works nice for this).
--
-Eric 'shubes'
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on all FC3-6 systems
I am also having trouble on a centos 4064 system (worked fine on cnt40 box)... #rpmbuild --rebuild --with cnt4064 libsrs2-toaster-*.src.rpm ...snip RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.so.* File not found: /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.a File not found: /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/lib64/libsrs2.la -Original Message- From: Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 10:24 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] libsrs2 build error on all FC3-6 systems So busy today, didnt have time to dig into it yet but the spec file in the dist (http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/libsrs2-1.0.18.tar.gz) wont work either on a FC system. Will check back later tonight Philip wrote: Of course I ment build error not compilation error it definatly doesnt work on FC3 FC4 FC5 FC6 (manual compilation works) all got the same error I listed below. On centos 4.4 it worked Philip wrote: Hello I was gonna install that new qt from the dev site I was wondering if any1 ran into problems building the libsrs2 rpm ? I have the problem on 2 different FC5 machines same build error any ideas ? Thx -P cut here --- Processing files: libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.1 Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.95317 + umask 022 + cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD + cd libsrs2-1.0.18 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1. 0.18 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + cp -pr ChangeLog INSTALL README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root/usr/share/doc/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18 + exit 0 Provides: libsrs2.so.0 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libnsl.so.1 libresolv.so.2 libsrs2.so.0 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libsrs2.so RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/libsrs2.so cut here - - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps
From what I can tell, taps is executed before the .qmail and/or .qmail-default files are executed and after clam spamassassin. Also, if you use a line such as: .*:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To tap an entire domain, it will create an endless loop, even if the messages are not sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What I've done is set up a faux domain to handle the taps, with a line such as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] While logs.my.domain.com doesn't exist, my.domain.com does. You would need to set one of these up for each individual domain, however they could all forward to the same account. Just make sure not to tap the logging domain, or you will get into another endless loop... Hope this makes sense. If anyone sees anything incorrect, please correct me. :) -Jason -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:02 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Questions about control/taps I'm guessing somewhere near the tail end of the delivery process, like qmail-local or maildrop. I don't know where/how maildrop hooks in, but that's where I'd look. Maybe 'tee' off a copy to a backup directory under the user's directory. Bill Kwok wrote: Hi Eric, If it is not too much trouble, would you give me more hint about which part I can tap to the system and get a copy of all emails? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill On 11/13/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps you could use the 'tee' command somewhere along the process to create a backup copy. I haven't thought this through, but I know that 'tee' can be handy for splitting off copies. Bill Kwok wrote: Actually, I've tried to use scripts to filter emails for a user after she's lost all her email in her computer. As I've mentioned before, if the user is in the bcc list, we may not be able to find any info of this user from the email header. My script has to go through the send log in order to find out which email the user should has received and who's the sender. Then by comparing the time stamp and the sender of emails, I can locate the email. My worry is that the possibility of getting wrong email is still high. For example, if a sender sent multiple emails, with different sizes, within short period of time, will the send log record emails in way which is different from the time stamp of the email files? Would anyone show me a better way to filter out the emails? Best regards, Bill On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I use the following line in taps to backup all incoming / outgoing emails of my.domain.com http://my.domain.com http://my.domain.com/: .*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] My questions are: 1. Will it create an endless loop if, by any means, someone sends email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Don't know, test it! 2. Can I specify a directory, instead of a email ID, as the destination, such as ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):/backup/$1 ? I think you can't but you can allways make a an email account and modify it's .qmail for putting all the mail on a specific maildir or whatever 3. If I need to restore emails (both incoming and outgoing) for a user, what's the best way to filter it out from the backup? Problem here is that emails were forwarded to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The information of recipient will be lost if he/she was only in the cc or bcc list. Tap is not thought exactly for backups and restores. Is for archiving (say, monitoring, legal obligations, limited backup of certain email etc) I'm certainly sure that you can allways make scripts for finding specific e-mails, anyway. 4. If I can't use taps to backup / rstore my users' email in that way, is there any utility that I can use? A plain old backup utility should work, tar for example. I use amanda
RE: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
I had been experiencing a similar problem, SMTP sessions time out when trying to send mail through my server. I narrowed the problems down to the RBL's as well. I am currently running only the following: -r relays.ordb.org -r opm.blitzed.org -r cbl.abuseat.org. Adding additional blacklists will sometimes dramatically slow down the beginning of the SMTP transaction. Telnet to your server on port 25 and watch how long it takes for the HELO message. Mine went from 15+ seconds down to 1. It also may be worth checking that your DNS configuration is correct. -Jason -Original Message- From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:31 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is: -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r relays.ordb.org -r dnsbl.antispam.or.id -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org I am wondering if any of these might be timing out or causing the issues - any recommendations on the best list to use to leverage good rbl filtering without causing resource hangups? If there is another place to look at the slowdowns, I can check too - my gut instinct is that it is in the network checks (I also have Pyzor and Razor2 enabled) -MA - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster
I removed sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org a few weeks ago when their legal troubles started; it was causing me SMTP timeout problems back then. I tried putting it back once about a week ago, and as soon as I did my SMTP connections started taking forever. I also removed the others because they either didn't respond to pings (not a big deal, many servers don't) or they didn't resolve to an IP address (I don't think that is good). I would try sticking just the servers that you know are good in there first, then add the others one at a time. -Jason -Original Message- From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:58 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster DNS is correct - running a local djbdns and it is screaming. I have heard such good things about sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org that I wanted to keep it. Did you strike it from your list or just not consider it? jason p wrote: I had been experiencing a similar problem, SMTP sessions time out when trying to send mail through my server. I narrowed the problems down to the RBL's as well. I am currently running only the following: -r relays.ordb.org -r opm.blitzed.org -r cbl.abuseat.org. Adding additional blacklists will sometimes dramatically slow down the beginning of the SMTP transaction. Telnet to your server on port 25 and watch how long it takes for the HELO message. Mine went from 15+ seconds down to 1. It also may be worth checking that your DNS configuration is correct. -Jason -Original Message- From: Michael Amster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:31 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Slow/hung smtpd with Qmailtoaster Hi: I run a relatively lightly loaded qmailtoaster - pretty current. I have noticed that after a while the qmail-smtpd process seems to get bogged down accepting incoming messages. I run rbl and my blacklists file is: -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r relays.ordb.org -r dnsbl.antispam.or.id -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org I am wondering if any of these might be timing out or causing the issues - any recommendations on the best list to use to leverage good rbl filtering without causing resource hangups? If there is another place to look at the slowdowns, I can check too - my gut instinct is that it is in the network checks (I also have Pyzor and Razor2 enabled) -MA - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch
This is exactly what I've done. My router is configured to only allow my mail server to send data out on port 25. I also have my tcprules.d file set up to check all internal mail for spam and viruses before it is sent. This should greatly reduce any chance of an infected client sending out spam/viruses from your network. -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:48 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch ashok, Are the virus programs using their own MTA or do they go through the qmail server? If they're bypassing the qmail server, I'd configure the firewall at the gateway to block SMTP traffic coming from the local network that isn't from the qmail server. If they're coming through qmail, we'll have to come up with some other remedy. BL, as always, is to get rid of the viruses. ashok wrote: Hi Jared,, Thanks you so much for the clear information .J Okai I now Im just using --- -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net alone. Only problem is with Blacklisting of my Gateway IP [Public IP] due to which My LAN users [Private Ips Nated ] will not be able to send mails. Everytime my IP blocked I put a request to unblock it . But now its happening frequently. This happens due to virus attack in LAN and those viruses start sending emails out from Private LAN - Nated to using gateway IP to Internet . Pls Suggest me a way to fix this . Thanks Regards ashok *From:* Jared Markell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:18 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch Well, the real solution would be for you to get your IP unblocked. And about the blacklists you put in your blacklists file, just a note to keep in mind, that for each of the addresses you add to that list, is another lookup the toaster has to check against before allowing the email into your system. If you have 10 addresses in your blacklists file, that's 10 lookups your server has to do for every email inbound. On medium to high volume servers, this can drastically clog your server to a very poor condition where incoming emails will get bounced just because the server has too many emails waiting to come in. Just something to keep in mind.. Is the line below the actual contents of your blacklist? -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk -r dnsbl.njabl.org -r relays.ordb.org -r d If so, you need to remove the last -r d. That is a bad typo. Heck, removing this could solve your problems all together. Taking into what I said before about having too many files in the blacklists file; The way I solved my spam issues was to use just the spamcop BL lookup, but also use Rules Du Jour spam assassin rules. Also, I lowered my spam ratings to 4 and 8. (4 to get marked as SPAM, 8 to get deleted). The default is 5 and 12. I think those are too lenient. **Jared** *From:* ashok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2006 8:36 AM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch Hello Frnds,, Even I was facing problem with SPAM .. which I use to get like Viagra , necklace watches , antrim etc.. And I enabled -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk -r dnsbl.njabl.org -r relays.ordb.org -r d Now the problem I faced is . My gateway IP address got Blacklisted ..when I check in www.dnsstuff.com http://www.dnsstuff.com/ [ SPAM Database ] due to this my LAN users are not able to send emails. Pls suggest me wat I need to do. Thanks in advance.. Regards ashok *From:* Marco Cordeiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2006 8:15 PM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch ok, I enable this feature too and so far so good ;-)) (I did the test describe in wiki page and seems to be working). thanks , Jake. *From:* Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:26 AM *To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com *Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch Marco Cordeiro wrote: I did this : -r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r bl.csma.biz -r
RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamhaus RBL might be going away
I had to remove the spamhaus rbl last week (or maybe two weeks ago), it was causing SMTP sessions to lag horribly, causing clients to timeout... Kind of a heads up if anyone else is experiencing problems. -Jason -Original Message- From: Michael Handiboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 10:47 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamhaus RBL might be going away Dave Rossbach wrote: All, looks like Spamhaus's RBL might be going away soon, I got the following links via a newsgroup. So, for us qmail admins, I guess we had better take out the -r spamhaus.org reference in /var/qmail/control/blacklists ? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] POP3 Problems
All of a sudden this morning, my POP3 services started acting all crazy. Ive been pouring through logs, looking everywhere I can, and all Ive found is the following (from pop3/current): 2006-09-13 12:17:06.371079500 tcpserver: status: 13/2002006-09-13 12:17:07.439473500 tcpserver: ok 3111 :192.168.50.8:110 :192.168.50.52::17812006-09-13 12:17:07.439702500 tcpserver: end 3111 status 2562006-09-13 12:17:07.439708500 tcpserver: status: 12/2002006-09-13 12:17:10.880808500 tcpserver: status: 13/2002006-09-13 12:17:10.880815500 tcpserver: pid 3156 from 192.168.50.1802006-09-13 12:17:15.955025500 tcpserver: ok 3128 :192.168.50.8:110 :192.168.50.54::26842006-09-13 12:17:15.955271500 tcpserver: end 3128 status 2562006-09-13 12:17:15.955277500 tcpserver: status: 12/2002006-09-13 12:17:17.933871500 tcpserver: status: 13/2002006-09-13 12:17:17.933878500 tcpserver: pid 3157 from 192.168.50.1202006-09-13 12:17:19.389942500 tcpserver: status: 14/2002006-09-13 12:17:19.391843500 tcpserver: pid 3158 from 192.168.50.1212006-09-13 12:17:42.266962500 tcpserver: status: 15/2002006-09-13 12:17:42.266969500 tcpserver: pid 3160 from 192.168.50.102 It is taking forever for the POP3 sessions to go through, longer than the client wants to wait. Ive tried reinstalling all the packages on my server and it still does the same thing The tcpserver: status: has never before been higher than 2 or 3 Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks Jason
RE: [qmailtoaster] POP3 Problems
The only zombies are in my head... (sorry, its been a long day already) I managed to get it working for now, something isn't quite right with my caching name server setup... The same FQDN resolves differently depending on if you are inside or outside the intranet. Inside it has the 192.168.50.8 IP. For some reason, all of a sudden, it started using the external IP address, which just doesn't work... Anyone happen to know real quick how I force djbdns to always report my mail server address as 192.168.50.8? Thanks, Jason -Original Message- From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:54 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] POP3 Problems jason p wrote: All of a sudden this morning, my POP3 services started acting all crazy. I've been pouring through logs, looking everywhere I can, and all I've found is the following (from pop3/current): 2006-09-13 12:17:06.371079500 tcpserver: status: 13/200 2006-09-13 12:17:07.439473500 tcpserver: ok 3111 :192.168.50.8:110 :192.168.50.52::1781 2006-09-13 12:17:07.439702500 tcpserver: end 3111 status 256 2006-09-13 12:17:07.439708500 tcpserver: status: 12/200 2006-09-13 12:17:10.880808500 tcpserver: status: 13/200 2006-09-13 12:17:10.880815500 tcpserver: pid 3156 from 192.168.50.180 2006-09-13 12:17:15.955025500 tcpserver: ok 3128 :192.168.50.8:110 :192.168.50.54::2684 2006-09-13 12:17:15.955271500 tcpserver: end 3128 status 256 2006-09-13 12:17:15.955277500 tcpserver: status: 12/200 2006-09-13 12:17:17.933871500 tcpserver: status: 13/200 2006-09-13 12:17:17.933878500 tcpserver: pid 3157 from 192.168.50.120 2006-09-13 12:17:19.389942500 tcpserver: status: 14/200 2006-09-13 12:17:19.391843500 tcpserver: pid 3158 from 192.168.50.121 2006-09-13 12:17:42.266962500 tcpserver: status: 15/200 2006-09-13 12:17:42.266969500 tcpserver: pid 3160 from 192.168.50.102 It is taking forever for the POP3 sessions to go through, longer than the client wants to wait. I've tried reinstalling all the packages on my server and it still does the same thing. The tcpserver: status: has never before been higher than 2 or 3. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Thanks Jason Are there any zombies? -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] FW: Returned mail: see transcript for details
I believe the problem is either with your DNS records, or the address of the account you are trying to send email from. If I do an MX record lookup on fw2.kmtconsult.com.br I get the following: How I am searching: Searching for fw2.kmtconsult.com.br MX record at a.root-servers.net [198.41.0.4]: Got referral to C.DNS.br. [took 5 ms] Searching for fw2.kmtconsult.com.br MX record at C.DNS.br. [200.130.31.5]: Got referral to gw.usphonebrasil.com.br. [took 170 ms] Searching for fw2.kmtconsult.com.br MX record at gw.usphonebrasil.com.br. [200.152.100.50]: Server failure! [took 142 ms]. Answer: Server failure. There's a problem with the DNS server for fw2.kmtconsult.com.br. Are you sure you want to send mail from fw2.kmtconsult.com.br or should it be sent from just kmtconsult.com.br ? -Original Message- From: Marco Cordeiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 3:51 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] FW: Returned mail: see transcript for details All , I try disable this feature but always I get this error below when I try send e-mail from another server mine. I put on my tcp.rules (CHKUSER_SENDER_MX=undefined) , reload using qmailctl cdb ... But still getting error... The strange thing is that message sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get error 511 ,but message sent from mailer-daemon Is delivered It's amazing ! I can not understanding what's happening ... Any help I really appreciate ;-)) Marco. -Original Message- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 3:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details The original message was received at Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:04:46 -0300 from fw2.kmtconsult.com.br [127.0.0.1] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser)) - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to ns1.kmtconsult.com.br.: MAIL From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=590 511 sorry, can't find a valid MX for sender domain (#5.1.1 - chkuser) 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail
You don't happen to be tapping this email address and sending the logs of their email back to them? I would think this would create an endless loop, but I'm just kinda throwing out a quick suggestion... Check your /var/qmail/control/taps file -Jason -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:37 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Duplicate Mail Hi all The Problem is still There only in one account in all mail accounts i recived duplicate copy of every mail with or without attachment regards Devendra I had the same issue but it might not be the same as yours, it happened after i upgraded to the newest qmail-toaster. to resolve i removed the .qmail file in the user's folder. /home/vpopmail/domain/user/Maildir/.qmail this is used for/by maildrop i think and maildrop is not supported from what i understand since it breaks quota or vice versa. We had this problem a while back, however, it only happened on attachments, and there were more that 1 duplicate. Turned out to be a bug maildrop. I believe the function was xfilter, since xfilter was 'C' code that did basically the same thing as a 'popen', I changed 'xfilter' to 'cc', the problem stopped. Probably a little more overhead with the 'cc' function in maildrop, but it fixed the problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i have a problem in my server. i received Duplicate mails in my mail box every mail has two copy this is not problem in all account only one account i facing this problem How i solve This problem Regards Devendra - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - .how soon not now becomes never. _martin luther - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Qmail upgrade - Domainkeys
Hi all, I havent upgraded my toaster to the most recent version, Im still a little confused with the domain keys. What Im wondering is, if I upgrade my toaster before my domain keys are published in my DNS records, will this cause problems? Or, if my domainkeys are published before I start using them with the new version, would that cause problems? Also, what should the first part of my domainkey in my dns record be? Ive seen: _domainkey.domain.tld private._domainkey.domain.tld mail._domainkey.domain.tld I thought it should be: _domainkey.domain.tld IN TXT k=rsa; p=MEww Is that right? I dont directly control my DNS records, and I have to tell those who do control them exactly what to put in the records Thanks in advance, Jason
[qmailtoaster] Domainkeys IN TXT records
Hi all, I am just hoping to confirm that I understand what my DNS records are supposed to be for my domainkeys before I get them in my DNS records. From following the http://www.qmailtoaster.com/qt-doc/QT-README.domainkeys document, after creating the private key with the dknewkey command, it returns: private._domainkey IN TXT k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQ... I should just change the private._domainkey to _domainkey.mydomain.tld and everything should be good? So it would look like this: _domainkey.mydomain.tld IN TXT k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQ... I have 5 domains running on my server, so I'm assuming that I need to do this for all of them, correct? Also, should I have my DNS records updated with the domainkey before I start using it, or afterwards? What I mean is, will my outgoing mail start causing problems if the domainkey exists in my DNS records, but my mail server isn't using it yet? Thanks, Jason - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] not marking spam as **SPAM**
I believe that you can add the users who don't want their email filtered with the WHITELIST_TO statement. It works the same way as WHITELIST_FROM. Make sure to run 'spamassassin -D --lint' after making the changes and restart spamassassin. Jason -Original Message- From: Erik Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:47 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] not marking spam as **SPAM** You can always remove spamassassin or add whitelist rules for known good spam. On 5/8/06, Shai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I want is for the user to not get the email tagged. Some mails, if not many, arrive tagged and they are not spam to them. This is annoying and they are bugging me to remove this. I don't care about spam much ... i do care about virii much more. Shai On 5/8/06, Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two things being discussed. 1) Spamassassin 2) Tagged spam redirected to Spam IMAP Folder The spamassassin has always been enabled on all users by default. This hasn't changed. As far as tagged spam being redirected to the Spam folder in IMAP, this feature has been removed. It was removed because this functionality conflicts with quota warnings. Nothing has changed with spamassassin, it is now as it was before :) Erik On 5/8/06, Brent Dacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erik Espinoza wrote: This feature has been removed. In addition, the spam filter rerouted e-mail into the Spam folder after the subject has been rewritten. It does NOT disable spam filtering. Not sure how you can disable spamassassin per domain. On 5/8/06, Thiago - TI - Realeza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can do this at qmailadmin. Go to proprierties of the mail account and check out the Spam Filter cheers Thiago - Original Message - From: Shai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: QmailToaster Mailing List qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:05 PM Subject: [qmailtoaster] not marking spam as **SPAM** Hi, One of my users does *not* wan't his spam to get marked. I can't find how to disable it for him. Please help me out :) Thanks, Shai - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] So the spam filter is just all on for everyone now? We dont have to do anything? Great Brent - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] IMAP Issues
I'm certainly no expert, but your hosts file doesn't look right to me. Here is what I have in my /etc/hosts file: 127.0.0.1 mail.fqdn.tld localhost.localdomain localhost 192.168.1.2mail.fqdn.tldlocalhost.localdomain localhost Obviously the second line starts with the ip address of my mail server, which you would change for your mail server, and the full domain name in mail.fqdn.com, which also needs changed. I don't think 0.0.0.0 is correct. jason -Original Message- From: Warner Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:26 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] IMAP Issues On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:38:34PM -0500, Erik Espinoza([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I have about the same number of users on one of the QmailToaster servers. We used to have most users on POP3, but have migrated most to IMAP-SSL. We noticed no load difference. It's very quirky, no question. Glad to hear things are working well for you. We're doing the same, this helped big time. I have a few questions: 1) Are you using the latest updates for your distsro? We typically don't blindly update production servers. Were it of impact, we generally will. It's by circumstance with production. 2) Can you e-mail a pic of your stats-toaster of the IMAP graphs? It may be easier once I contact you on IRC. 3) Can you paste a copy of `rpm -qa | grep toaster` daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.2.9 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.2.10 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.2.10 maildrop-toaster-1.8.1-1.2.10 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.5-1.2.13 simscan-toaster-1.1-1.2.6 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.2.9 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.2.10 courier-imap-toaster-3.0.8-1.2.9 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.2.8 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.2.10 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.2.8 maildrop-toaster-devel-1.8.1-1.2.10 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.2.12 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.0-1.2.10 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.10-1.2.10 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.2.8 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.2.11 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.2.9 clamav-toaster-0.87.1-1.2.10 4) What does your memory usage look like when your users are using imap big time? Usage is low, always. Currently, we're near peak staffing: total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem: 1034560 305212 729348 0 87436 42780 -/+ buffers/cache: 174996 859564 Swap: 2096472 682642028208 5) Does your hosts table have just localhost and the fqdn defined? That and an additional definition for a local server. Everything looks to be in order there: 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain localhost 0.0.0.0 mailserver mailserver.2checkout.com 6) What kind of delay do you see when you telnet, does it take a while for the IMAP banners to pop up? Yes, that is specifically what I was referring to before. 7) Have you migrated from an older version of QmailToaster (such as the old 1.0 branch w/ horde) No-- there have not been any major changes yet. 8) Are most of your users accessing the QmailToaster's IMAP through some sort of firewall? IE Users - PIX DMZ - QmailToaster Yes, they're routing through our iptables implementation for the office network. 9) Does it make a difference if you disable the iptables firewall (temporarily for testing of course) That would be difficult to do, as they are on different areas of the network. If it helps you any, when I telnet to localhost:143 on the mailserver, it has the same results. 10) Is your resolv.conf pointing to localhost or the machines static ip for your caching name server? It's pointing to the static. Sorry for the large number of questions. No problem, I appreciate the interest. If you have some time, maybe we can speak on IRC later. Certainly.. network/channel? Thanks again for the time! Best regards, -- Warner Moore Enterprise Services 2CheckOut.com - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] UNOFFICIAL UPDATE: clamav-toaster-0.88.1-1.2.12.src.rpm
Try replacing $DIST with your distro (I.E. cnt40 for centos 4.x). Also make sure that you are in the same directory as the rpm file. Jason -Original Message- From: jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 8:48 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] UNOFFICIAL UPDATE: clamav-toaster-0.88.1-1.2.12.src.rpm odd.. i get this error rpmbuild --rebuild --with $DIST clamav-toaster-0.88.1-1.2.12.src.rpm rpmbuild: no packages files given for rebuild any ideas? keep in mind im still on my first coffee so maybe im missign something. jer On Apr 7, 2006, at 1:28 AM, Erik Espinoza wrote: I have just released an unofficial update for the ClamAV package. As usual, this package is available at my QmailToaster page: http://www.kabewm.com/pages/projects/qmailtoaster.php This is a security fix, and it is recommended that you install it asap. Procedure: # rpmbuild --rebuild --with $DIST clamav- toaster-0.88.1-1.2.12.src.rpm # qmailctl stop # rpm -e clamav-toaster # rpm -Uhv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/$ARCH/clamav-toaster*.rpm # /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g # qmailctl start - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] rcpthosts
You're saying that mail coming in is getting rejected, right? Sounds like you need to put your domain(s) into the rcpthosts file (/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts). I, for example, have 8 domains hosted on my mail server, and all of these domains are listed in rcpthosts, each on a separate line. Jason -Original Message- From: Vesko Nedev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:10 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] rcpthosts Nurcahyo Santoso wrote: i already enable smtp-auth and now i can send to any domain i want, but when i send from other domain to my domain it's rejected with this message (does not like recipient. Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.5.3 - chkuser) ) sorry i'am very new -cahyo- All you need to do is tell your mail-client-software (Outlook, Thunderbird...) to authenticate when sending mail. */Erik Espinoza [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* menulis: No! That will mess up your toaster and turn you into an open relay. All you have to do is enable SMTP-AUTH (Outgoing requires authentication in Outlook) to send e-mail outside of your domain. Erik On 4/7/06, Nurcahyo Santoso wrote: hello.. can i pu *.com, *.co.id or something like that in rcpthosts. because it's too many for input user's contact domain there... or any other solution thanks Cahyo -- Vesko Nedev System Administrator Orbinet Ltd. Stara Zagora 113 Gen.Stoletov Str. Phone: +359 42 900400 - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
