Re: AD Settings in RB
Hi, I was hoping someone else would respond to this. AD is a contributor-supplied feature, which I have little personal knowledge of. We make use of the Python ldap and DNS modules in order to handle authentication. I don't know what is needed to support multiple security groups, whether we need to modify code to allow for it or what. I'd love to give you a better answer, but this is just outside my area of expertise. I'd be fine with providing such support in our ActiveDirectory backend if someone with the ability to test this could provide a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please replay as soon as possible? On Apr 27, 5:42 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: We have RB 1.0.5.1 installed. We have configured AD settings so all the users can login easily. Now, the issue is that we want to restrict users to only few departments in our company. So, we have created new windows security groups which has nested multiple department names in it. After doing this, the users of this departments can not access RB. If we put one department group then it works. But nesting of departments does not work. Does the RB 1.0.5.1 has ability to put multiple windows security groups for access/authentication? Is nesting possible? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: ereviewboard plugin for Eclipse
On 03/24/2010 05:23 PM, Stodge wrote: Ah! I'm definitely using the right username so maybe it doesn't support accessing an RB site using Apache's basic auth. Thanks for the update! The newest version should support this. Please update. If it still doesn't work feel free to raise an issue on the github issue tracker. Sorry for the late answer, I don't read this list every day... Best regards, Markus -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Install ReviewBoard 1.5. Stucked when create site
Hi, How did you install Review Board? You never installed another version of it? Did you manually install Django Evolution? I've never seen this problem before. It almost looks like it's trying to use an older version of Review Board's model sets at some point in the installation. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:49 AM, Le lostinheaven@gmail.com wrote: This is my first time install Reveiw Board. My install environment: Windows XP SP2 Apache 2.2.11 MySQL 5.0.51b I installed followed dependencies python-2.5.4.msi setuptools-0.6c11.win32-py2.5.exe ( Python Setuptools Installer) patch-2.5.9-7-setup.exe (GNU patch) memcached-1.2.6-win32-bin.zip (and python-memcached binding also) PIL-1.1.7.win32-py2.5.exe pycrypto-2.1.0.win32-py2.5.exe MySQL-python-1.2.2.win32-py2.5.exe py25-pysvn-svn161-1.7.0-1177.exe mod_python-3.3.1.win32-py2.5-Apache2.2.exe after first few times failed, I install those two RBTools simplejson when i run the command to create the site ( rb-site install D:/tools/ reviewboardsite), to the last step, it always shows followed waring, * Installing the site... Building site directories ... OK Building site configuration files ... OK Creating database ... Project signature has changed - an evolution is required OK Performing migrations ... The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all mo del changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model reviews.DefaultReviewer: Field 'repository' has been deleted In model scmtools.Repository: Field 'visible' has been deleted Field 'raw_file_url' has been deleted In model diffviewer.DiffSet: Field 'basedir' has been deleted _ Does any one have the same experiences? Any one knows how to fix it ? Thanks Tracy -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: AD Settings in RB
You might be able to do it by setting the group name or a custom search root in the settings but I'm not real familiar with the AD scheme. Currently I'm just using the Find DC from DNS option. The other thing to remember is that a user is not created in reviewboard until after the user logs in once. This makes assigning privileges kind of difficult. On Apr 29, 2:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping someone else would respond to this. AD is a contributor-supplied feature, which I have little personal knowledge of. We make use of the Python ldap and DNS modules in order to handle authentication. I don't know what is needed to support multiple security groups, whether we need to modify code to allow for it or what. I'd love to give you a better answer, but this is just outside my area of expertise. I'd be fine with providing such support in our ActiveDirectory backend if someone with the ability to test this could provide a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please replay as soon as possible? On Apr 27, 5:42 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: We have RB 1.0.5.1 installed. We have configured AD settings so all the users can login easily. Now, the issue is that we want to restrict users to only few departments in our company. So, we have created new windows security groups which has nested multiple department names in it. After doing this, the users of this departments can not access RB. If we put one department group then it works. But nesting of departments does not work. Does the RB 1.0.5.1 has ability to put multiple windows security groups for access/authentication? Is nesting possible? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: HTTPS support
What I found is that if I do not change post-review.py script at all,
I can post the review but I can not post the diff.
kapar...@ltsdo-kaparikh ~
$ post-review.cygwin 275221 -d
This tool looks at the given Pending-CL# posts it for review.
[Version: 200911
13_1141]
Repository info 'Path: pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668, Base path: None, Sup
ports changesets: True'
Generating diff for changenum 275221
P4CLIENT is LTSDO-KAPARIKH
status is pending
Lines are: ['//depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/
ccb_cq_analysis.pl#5 - edit change 275221 (text) by kapar...@ltsdo-
KAPARIKH\r\n'
]
Client LTSDO-KAPARIKH depot path //depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scri
pts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/ccb_cq_analysis.pl
Writing //depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/ccb_
cq_analysis.pl#5 to /cygdrive/c/Temp/tmpE2AEBQ
Old file: /cygdrive/c/Temp/tmpE2AEBQ New file c:/Perforce/sysrel_scripts/CCB
_CQ_Analysis/ccb_cq_analysis.pl
Attempting to create review request for 275221
repository path pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668
HTTP POSTing to http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/n
ew/: {'repository_path': 'pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668',
'changenum': '275221
'}
Review request created
--- c:\Perforce\sysrel_scripts\CCB_CQ_Analysis\ccb_cq_analysis.pl //depot/
Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/
ccb_cq_analysis.pl#5
+++ c:\Perforce\sysrel_scripts\CCB_CQ_Analysis
\ccb_cq_analysis.pl 2010-04-
29 09:57:09
@@ -13,7 +13,16 @@ use Win32::OLE::Const 'Microsoft Excel';
$Win32::OLE::Warn = 3; # die on errors...
use Tie::File;
###
-#All Variables declaration
Uploading diff
HTTP POSTing to http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/5
4/diff/new/: {}
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
On Apr 28, 5:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
It should work with https fine. I use it with https every day. Can you paste
the output when using --debug with post-review?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the scenairo happening.
We are using post-review.py file to post review.
We close down HTTP port and open up HTTPS port.
Now, when I post the review, I can not post review at all !!
What I ovserve that in post-review.py, there are HTTP post methods are
used and
methonds like: self.http_post, http_get etc. are used.
Do we have post-review.py which supports HTTPS?
Thanks
Kunjal
On Apr 27, 10:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Review Board doesn't know or care anything about http vs. https. If
you're
having issues with post-review, I suspect it's due to your existing
configuration referencing the http URL, which presumably doesn't work
now. I
don't know how you have it configured, so it may be post-review.py, or a
.reviewboardrc, or a property on the repository.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris,
Changes to Apache installation is done and we have moved our RB
website to HTTPS.
However, now when I post the review now, I can not post the diff.
Does the HTTPS interact the way diff is done ?
Do I need to update post-review.py script to update the url field to
point to https?
Thanks a lot.
Kunjal
On Apr 27, 10:45 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Do you mean the Apache installation? That should work fine. Review
Board
doesn't really care whether it's being used with https or http. It's
a
matter of configuring your Apache installation and updating your
.reviewboardrc files (or whatever mechanism you're using for
post-review
support) to point to the https URL instead of the http URL.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com
wrote:
We have RB 1.0.5.1 in production and it is http now.
We want to move it to https.
So, we did apache server settings and move RB to https.
But now I can post the review but I can not post the diff.
It gives me error.
Is HTTTPS supported in 1.0.5.1?
Because I see that in the roadmap of RB 1.5, it says ...
SSH and HTTPS support -- commited.
Thanks
Kunjal
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Re: AD Settings in RB
Thanks. Is this feature will get supported in near future? On Apr 29, 4:52 am, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: You might be able to do it by setting the group name or a custom search root in the settings but I'm not real familiar with the AD scheme. Currently I'm just using the Find DC from DNS option. The other thing to remember is that a user is not created in reviewboard until after the user logs in once. This makes assigning privileges kind of difficult. On Apr 29, 2:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping someone else would respond to this. AD is a contributor-supplied feature, which I have little personal knowledge of. We make use of the Python ldap and DNS modules in order to handle authentication. I don't know what is needed to support multiple security groups, whether we need to modify code to allow for it or what. I'd love to give you a better answer, but this is just outside my area of expertise. I'd be fine with providing such support in our ActiveDirectory backend if someone with the ability to test this could provide a patch. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone please replay as soon as possible? On Apr 27, 5:42 pm, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote: We have RB 1.0.5.1 installed. We have configured AD settings so all the users can login easily. Now, the issue is that we want to restrict users to only few departments in our company. So, we have created new windows security groups which has nested multiple department names in it. After doing this, the users of this departments can not access RB. If we put one department group then it works. But nesting of departments does not work. Does the RB 1.0.5.1 has ability to put multiple windows security groups for access/authentication? Is nesting possible? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp:// www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegr oups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today athttp://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: No new line at end of file crash diffviewer
Christian Hammond wrote: What version of patch are you guys running? I'm running Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS - I have patch 2.5.9 ing...@reviews:~$ cat /etc/*elease* DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS ing...@reviews:~$ patch -v patch 2.5.9 Copyright (C) 1988 Larry Wall Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. You may redistribute copies of this program under the terms of the GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING. written by Larry Wall and Paul Eggert And do the diffs have any indication at the end saying that there's no newline at the end? Yes and no ;-) For me it depends on the diff tool used. E.g. some diff tools dump: \ No newline at end of file at the point the newline is missing to stdout, for a single file diff this is at the end. For multiple file diffs this could be in the middle of the diff. Some diff tools (e.g. Solaris) dump that information to stderr, if you redirect both stdout and stderr the position of that message can vary wildly. Some diff tools do nothing. Which means that multi-file diffs with the bad file in the middle look corrupted as the next file starts on the last line of the previous files diff. Also, what SCM? I'm using p2 which has the option to use the platform provided diff (so sort of a lottery on the newline detection) OR perform diffs server side (which gives consistent output). The default diff format that is used for p2 is the default diff output (i.e. not a unified diff). I'm not sure the SCM relevant, I think the issue is the diff and patch tools. Chris -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
.reviewboardrc on windows
Hi Folks, The docs (http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/users/tools/post-review/) are incorrect when specifying the location of .reviewboardrc on windows. It should be: %USERPROFILE%\Application Data instead of $USERPROFILE\LocalSettings\Application Data Great product, keep up the good work! Thank you, -Noah -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Using Reviewboard with Mercurial
Hi. I have a few questions for the reviewboard gurus. I'm interested in using reviewboard with Mercurial. 1. Does the --parent option work with Mercurial? It's documented as only working with Git. If so, is there a workaround for usage with Mercurial or a suggestion on how to review changesets whose parents are not in the repository that Reviewboard is pointing to? 2. Often we will have a developer work on a series of changesets on a branch. Is it possible with Reviewboard to automatically create review requests for a series of consecutive changesets, but tag them so that they are all linked in some manner? Thanks. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: HTTPS support
Ah so you are running a custom one. It looks like it's hard-coded to use the
http:// path. You need to make it set to use https:// for your Review Board
URL.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
What I found is that if I do not change post-review.py script at all,
I can post the review but I can not post the diff.
kapar...@ltsdo-kaparikh ~
$ post-review.cygwin 275221 -d
This tool looks at the given Pending-CL# posts it for review.
[Version: 200911
13_1141]
Repository info 'Path: pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668, Base path:
None, Sup
ports changesets: True'
Generating diff for changenum 275221
P4CLIENT is LTSDO-KAPARIKH
status is pending
Lines are:
['//depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/
ccb_cq_analysis.pl#5 - edit change 275221 (text) by kapar...@ltsdo-
KAPARIKH\r\n'
]
Client LTSDO-KAPARIKH depot path
//depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scri
pts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/ccb_cq_analysis.pl
Writing
//depot/Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/ccb_
cq_analysis.pl#5 to /cygdrive/c/Temp/tmpE2AEBQ
Old file: /cygdrive/c/Temp/tmpE2AEBQ New file
c:/Perforce/sysrel_scripts/CCB
_CQ_Analysis/ccb_cq_analysis.pl
Attempting to create review request for 275221
repository path pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668
HTTP POSTing to
http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/n
ew/ http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/n%0Aew/:
{'repository_path': 'pf-sj1-mob.sj.broadcom.com:1668',
'changenum': '275221
'}
Review request created
--- c:\Perforce\sysrel_scripts\CCB_CQ_Analysis\ccb_cq_analysis.pl
//depot/
Sources/Integration/Automation_Scripts/CCB_CQ_Analysis/
ccb_cq_analysis.pl#5
+++ c:\Perforce\sysrel_scripts\CCB_CQ_Analysis
\ccb_cq_analysis.pl 2010-04-
29 09:57:09
@@ -13,7 +13,16 @@ use Win32::OLE::Const 'Microsoft Excel';
$Win32::OLE::Warn = 3; # die on errors...
use Tie::File;
###
-#All Variables declaration
Uploading diff
HTTP POSTing to
http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/5
4/diff/new/http://mob-rb-test.sj.broadcom.com/api/json/reviewrequests/5%0A4/diff/new/:
{}
Error uploading diff: One or more fields had errors (105)
Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
On Apr 28, 5:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
It should work with https fine. I use it with https every day. Can you
paste
the output when using --debug with post-review?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the scenairo happening.
We are using post-review.py file to post review.
We close down HTTP port and open up HTTPS port.
Now, when I post the review, I can not post review at all !!
What I ovserve that in post-review.py, there are HTTP post methods are
used and
methonds like: self.http_post, http_get etc. are used.
Do we have post-review.py which supports HTTPS?
Thanks
Kunjal
On Apr 27, 10:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Review Board doesn't know or care anything about http vs. https. If
you're
having issues with post-review, I suspect it's due to your existing
configuration referencing the http URL, which presumably doesn't work
now. I
don't know how you have it configured, so it may be post-review.py,
or a
.reviewboardrc, or a property on the repository.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Kunjal kunjal.par...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris,
Changes to Apache installation is done and we have moved our RB
website to HTTPS.
However, now when I post the review now, I can not post the diff.
Does the HTTPS interact the way diff is done ?
Do I need to update post-review.py script to update the url field
to
point to https?
Thanks a lot.
Kunjal
On Apr 27, 10:45 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
wrote:
Do you mean the Apache installation? That should work fine.
Review
Board
doesn't really care whether it's being used with https or http.
It's
a
matter of configuring your Apache installation and updating your
.reviewboardrc files (or whatever mechanism you're using for
post-review
support) to point to the https URL instead of the http URL.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware,
Issue 1632 in reviewboard: Alphabetial sorting of review requests should not be case sensitive
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1632 by yodan.ta...@gmail.com: Alphabetial sorting of review requests should not be case sensitive http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1632 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.0.6 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? It's on the intranet, so it probably won't help much. http://[review-board-host]/reviews/r/?page=4sort=submitter What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Go to a list of review requests, e.g. All review requests 2. Sort the list by the submitter name (click on Submitter title) What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I can see the requests sorted by the submitter names in this order (note the capitalization): Alexey, Jenia, Lev, alex, boris, dan... They should obviously be sorted this way: alex, Alexey, boris, dan, Jenia, Lev... What operating system are you using? What browser? Client: Firefox 3.6.3 on Windows XP 64bit Server: Apache/2.2.12 (Ubuntu) Server -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1444 in reviewboard: DLL load failed on trying to create SVN repository
Comment #5 on issue 1444 by evan.leonard: DLL load failed on trying to create SVN repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1444 Dang... ran through a whole annoying installation on windows and then finally hit this. Would you atleast add a prominent notice that SVN on Windows Server 2003 isn't working due to pysvn? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 1634 in reviewboard: New group request for replication team
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1634 by itisashu: New group request for replication team http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1634 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ What version are you running? What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. It will be useful to create a new group specific for replication team. It will enable use to send review request to only replication team. What operating system are you using? What browser? Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1437 in reviewboard: ReviewBoard Installation failed on Windows XP SP2 VMWare.
Comment #6 on issue 1437 by vera1171: ReviewBoard Installation failed on Windows XP SP2 VMWare. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1437 I encounter the same problem.Is there anybody install reviewboard manually in LAN without usting setuptool? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
