Re: Could you please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display other language?
Hi Brant,
The LANGUAGE_CODE should be in the form: (It is also mentioned in
settings.py)
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.1.1
In your case, I think it should be:
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh-cn'
Try it, Good luck :)
- linpc
Brant於 2012年5月17日星期四UTC+8下午3時11分20秒寫道：
Could anyone please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
Could anyone please check my steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
It doesn't work.
Thank you in advanced.
Environment:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
python 2.7
ReviewBoard: 1.6.6
Installed by easy_install
English language show well.
System default locale: zh_CN.UTF-8
My steps to enable it to show zh_CN language:
1. Modify following places in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py:
(1) LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh_CN'
(2) USE_I18N = True
LANGUAGES = (
('zh', _('Chinese')),
)
2. Compile settings.py by a python script:
import py_compile
py_compile.compile(r'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py')
3. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
mkdir -p locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/
django-admin.py makemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.po.
4. Fill out locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.po with my Chinese
translation.
5. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
django-admin.py compilemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.mo.
6. Restart apatch2:
apachectl -k restart
7. Refresh ReviewBoard portal.
Unfortunately, Nothing happened :(
Question 1:
1. Could you please point me what should I do with above steps?
2. I tried copying /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Sphinx-1.1.3-
py2.7.egg/sphinx/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/sphinx.mo
to
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/
reviewboard/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo
Then restart apache, now it works partly
But after I refresh portal again, it went back to English
Do you know why?
Thank you very much ~~
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Do you have any plan for including localization file in your project?
I have replied in your post. 已回覆�o您了 :) -linpc Brant於 2012年5月19日星期六UTC+8下午11�r03分22秒��道： Hi Lin, 我遇到一个设置ReviewBoard显示中文的问题，您能帮我看一下吗？ 具体的描述是这里： https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard/pXLe06MW5eU/discussion 没有人帮我 谢谢您先:) Best Regards, Brant. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Could you please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display other language?
Oh,
I forgot that ``LANGUAGES'' item need also be modified to be the same with
your ``LANGUAGE_CODE'' setting
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh-cn'
USE_I18N = True
LANGUAGES = (
('zh-cn', _('Chinese')),
)
-linpc
Po-Chien Lin於 2012年5月21日星期一UTC+8下午3時45分35秒寫道：
Hi Brant,
The LANGUAGE_CODE should be in the form: (It is also mentioned in
settings.py)
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.1.1
In your case, I think it should be:
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh-cn'
Try it, Good luck :)
- linpc
Brant於 2012年5月17日星期四UTC+8下午3時11分20秒寫道：
Could anyone please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
Could anyone please check my steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
It doesn't work.
Thank you in advanced.
Environment:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
python 2.7
ReviewBoard: 1.6.6
Installed by easy_install
English language show well.
System default locale: zh_CN.UTF-8
My steps to enable it to show zh_CN language:
1. Modify following places in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py:
(1) LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh_CN'
(2) USE_I18N = True
LANGUAGES = (
('zh', _('Chinese')),
)
2. Compile settings.py by a python script:
import py_compile
py_compile.compile(r'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py')
3. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
mkdir -p locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/
django-admin.py makemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.po.
4. Fill out locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.po with my Chinese
translation.
5. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
django-admin.py compilemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.mo.
6. Restart apatch2:
apachectl -k restart
7. Refresh ReviewBoard portal.
Unfortunately, Nothing happened :(
Question 1:
1. Could you please point me what should I do with above steps?
2. I tried copying /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Sphinx-1.1.3-
py2.7.egg/sphinx/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/sphinx.mo
to
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/
reviewboard/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo
Then restart apache, now it works partly
But after I refresh portal again, it went back to English
Do you know why?
Thank you very much ~~
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Could you please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display other language?
Oh,
I forgot that ``LANGUAGES'' item need also be modified to be the same with
your ``LANGUAGE_CODE'' setting
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh-cn'
USE_I18N = True
LANGUAGES = (
('zh-cn', _('Chinese')),
)
But keep your django.po file under ``locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/'' as you
already did.
-linpc
Po-Chien Lin於 2012年5月21日星期一UTC+8下午3時45分35秒寫道：
Hi Brant,
The LANGUAGE_CODE should be in the form: (It is also mentioned in
settings.py)
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/dirlang.html#h-8.1.1
In your case, I think it should be:
LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh-cn'
Try it, Good luck :)
- linpc
Brant於 2012年5月17日星期四UTC+8下午3時11分20秒寫道：
Could anyone please check the steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
Could anyone please check my steps to enable reviewboard to display
other language?
It doesn't work.
Thank you in advanced.
Environment:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
python 2.7
ReviewBoard: 1.6.6
Installed by easy_install
English language show well.
System default locale: zh_CN.UTF-8
My steps to enable it to show zh_CN language:
1. Modify following places in /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py:
(1) LANGUAGE_CODE = 'zh_CN'
(2) USE_I18N = True
LANGUAGES = (
('zh', _('Chinese')),
)
2. Compile settings.py by a python script:
import py_compile
py_compile.compile(r'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/settings.py')
3. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
mkdir -p locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/
django-admin.py makemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.po.
4. Fill out locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.po with my Chinese
translation.
5. Under /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-
py2.7.egg/reviewboard ,run:
django-admin.py compilemessages -l zh_CN
Now we got django.mo.
6. Restart apatch2:
apachectl -k restart
7. Refresh ReviewBoard portal.
Unfortunately, Nothing happened :(
Question 1:
1. Could you please point me what should I do with above steps?
2. I tried copying /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Sphinx-1.1.3-
py2.7.egg/sphinx/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/sphinx.mo
to
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.7.egg/
reviewboard/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo
Then restart apache, now it works partly
But after I refresh portal again, it went back to English
Do you know why?
Thank you very much ~~
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Reviewboard upgrade database compatibility
Hi all, In the next few weeks I'll be migrating our company's Reviewboard installation. We're currently running RB 1.5.5 backed by MySQL (MyISAM), but I'd really like to install the current version of RB on our new server. Should this be a no-hassle database transition? As in, install Reviewboard 1.6.6, migrate the database, and that's it? On a related note, is the install process any easier for newer versions of Reviewboard? I know this is highly subjective and determined by a lot of factors, but getting 1.5.5 loaded up took a lot of time and effort for me, and I would be inclined to use the version with the easiest installation process. Thanks for all your hard work! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Reviewboard 1.6.5 problem
Hi, I created a diff (the current revision and some previous version), uploaded the diff while creating a new review request. Then, I committed my revision locally. Later after a review, i went ahead and updated the diff via the web ui, i.e. locally i did a git diff --full- index foo.diff. Uploading the diff succeeds but I get the cryptic error below - what went wrong? Thanks, Florian The patch to 'installer' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file / tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y-new.rej Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 151, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1072, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.6.16- py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1071, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting)), File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 553, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 375, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 243, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'installer' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/ reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y-new.rej -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard upgrade database compatibility
Hi, The upgrade should go pretty smoothly. I of course recommend backing up the site directory and database first, but it should just be a matter of upgrading the ReviewBoard package, running 'rb-site upgrade' on the site directory, and restarting the server. How hard RB is to install depends greatly on the OS/distro, and greatly on what packages are shipped with it. Review Board *itself* is easy to install, but the dependencies make it hard. Aside from providing our own package repositories for every version of every distro people use with every dependency we require, there's unfortunately not a lot we can do about this :( Generally, I recommend installing on Ubuntu or a modern Fedora, as these are the easiest to get going on. Installing on these distros in a VM is popular option. That way, you'll have every dependency you need right there in the package repository, and in the case of Fedora, there's actually a ReviewBoard package you can use directly. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM, virtualAdmin mrcul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, In the next few weeks I'll be migrating our company's Reviewboard installation. We're currently running RB 1.5.5 backed by MySQL (MyISAM), but I'd really like to install the current version of RB on our new server. Should this be a no-hassle database transition? As in, install Reviewboard 1.6.6, migrate the database, and that's it? On a related note, is the install process any easier for newer versions of Reviewboard? I know this is highly subjective and determined by a lot of factors, but getting 1.5.5 loaded up took a lot of time and effort for me, and I would be inclined to use the version with the easiest installation process. Thanks for all your hard work! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard 1.6.5 problem
Hi Florian, After the review, I assume you made some changes that were either left in the index or committed to another commit, right? You must make sure that the diff is going to cover changes made since an upstream revision (such as origin/master..HEAD), rather than just what's in the index or in the latest commit or whatever. That's usually the cause of the error you're using. I recommend using the post-review tool, as it automates that for you. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Florian Leibert f...@leibert.de wrote: Hi, I created a diff (the current revision and some previous version), uploaded the diff while creating a new review request. Then, I committed my revision locally. Later after a review, i went ahead and updated the diff via the web ui, i.e. locally i did a git diff --full- index foo.diff. Uploading the diff succeeds but I get the cryptic error below - what went wrong? Thanks, Florian The patch to 'installer' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file / tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y-new.rej Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 151, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1072, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Djblets-0.6.16- py2.7.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 157, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 1071, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting)), File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 553, in get_chunks new = get_patched_file(old, filediff) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 375, in get_patched_file return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.5- py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 243, in patch (filename, tempdir, patch_output)) Exception: The patch to 'installer' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file /tmp/ reviewboard.S_QiA8/tmp0ffY9y-new.rej -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard upgrade database compatibility
Our new server will run RB in its own VM, so I'll probably use Fedora for that. Also, it's actually a completely new server, so what I was really asking was, can I install Reviewboard 1.6.6 fresh on a new OS, then immediately import my Reviewboard database from the 1.5.5 install? Or do I need to, as you said, run 'rb-site upgrade' on the old installation, in order to make the database compatible with the new 1.6.6 software? On May 21, 3:36 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, The upgrade should go pretty smoothly. I of course recommend backing up the site directory and database first, but it should just be a matter of upgrading the ReviewBoard package, running 'rb-site upgrade' on the site directory, and restarting the server. How hard RB is to install depends greatly on the OS/distro, and greatly on what packages are shipped with it. Review Board *itself* is easy to install, but the dependencies make it hard. Aside from providing our own package repositories for every version of every distro people use with every dependency we require, there's unfortunately not a lot we can do about this :( Generally, I recommend installing on Ubuntu or a modern Fedora, as these are the easiest to get going on. Installing on these distros in a VM is popular option. That way, you'll have every dependency you need right there in the package repository, and in the case of Fedora, there's actually a ReviewBoard package you can use directly. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM, virtualAdmin mrcul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, In the next few weeks I'll be migrating our company's Reviewboard installation. We're currently running RB 1.5.5 backed by MySQL (MyISAM), but I'd really like to install the current version of RB on our new server. Should this be a no-hassle database transition? As in, install Reviewboard 1.6.6, migrate the database, and that's it? On a related note, is the install process any easier for newer versions of Reviewboard? I know this is highly subjective and determined by a lot of factors, but getting 1.5.5 loaded up took a lot of time and effort for me, and I would be inclined to use the version with the easiest installation process. Thanks for all your hard work! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Reviewboard upgrade database compatibility
You should be able to copy over the 1.5 database and site directory to the new server and then do the site upgrade. Just make sure you're copying over the database exactly, as in SQL dump/load or something. Don't create a new 1.6 database and then try to import the data. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, virtualAdmin mrcul...@gmail.com wrote: Our new server will run RB in its own VM, so I'll probably use Fedora for that. Also, it's actually a completely new server, so what I was really asking was, can I install Reviewboard 1.6.6 fresh on a new OS, then immediately import my Reviewboard database from the 1.5.5 install? Or do I need to, as you said, run 'rb-site upgrade' on the old installation, in order to make the database compatible with the new 1.6.6 software? On May 21, 3:36 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi, The upgrade should go pretty smoothly. I of course recommend backing up the site directory and database first, but it should just be a matter of upgrading the ReviewBoard package, running 'rb-site upgrade' on the site directory, and restarting the server. How hard RB is to install depends greatly on the OS/distro, and greatly on what packages are shipped with it. Review Board *itself* is easy to install, but the dependencies make it hard. Aside from providing our own package repositories for every version of every distro people use with every dependency we require, there's unfortunately not a lot we can do about this :( Generally, I recommend installing on Ubuntu or a modern Fedora, as these are the easiest to get going on. Installing on these distros in a VM is popular option. That way, you'll have every dependency you need right there in the package repository, and in the case of Fedora, there's actually a ReviewBoard package you can use directly. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM, virtualAdmin mrcul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, In the next few weeks I'll be migrating our company's Reviewboard installation. We're currently running RB 1.5.5 backed by MySQL (MyISAM), but I'd really like to install the current version of RB on our new server. Should this be a no-hassle database transition? As in, install Reviewboard 1.6.6, migrate the database, and that's it? On a related note, is the install process any easier for newer versions of Reviewboard? I know this is highly subjective and determined by a lot of factors, but getting 1.5.5 loaded up took a lot of time and effort for me, and I would be inclined to use the version with the easiest installation process. Thanks for all your hard work! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Windows installation: Creating a Review Board Site
Hello, I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a Windows machine for evaluation. After fighting my way through the Windows installation, which may or may not have been successful, I then moved through to the Creating a Review Board Site section (http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/ admin/installation/creating-sites/#creating-sites). When I try and run the rb-site install command (rb-site install / var/www/reviews.example.com), I get the following error: [!] Unable to create the /var/www/reviews.example.com directory. Make sure you're running as an administrator and that the directory does not contain any files. The directory does not exist and I am running the script as an administrator. Can anyone suggest a solution to this issue, please? Thanks for any assistance. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Windows installation: Creating a Review Board Site
Hi Mark, I generally recommend people do not try to install on Windows, as it's much more painful to get set up and maintained, and it's typically slower. If you're a Windows shop, I recommend using an Ubuntu or Fedora VM on something like VMware Workstation or some other product. That said, I don't have any real idea why you're hitting that specific error, except that that error is a direct response to us attempting to create and then remove a directory and hitting an error in doing so. One thing you could try doing is to edit the reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py file, look for the check_permissions function, and add some print debugging to figure out how far it's getting. Maybe change the: except OSError: to: except OSError, e: print e You may get more information as to which operation is failing. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz wrote: Hello, I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on a Windows machine for evaluation. After fighting my way through the Windows installation, which may or may not have been successful, I then moved through to the Creating a Review Board Site section (http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/ admin/installation/creating-sites/#creating-siteshttp://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/%0Aadmin/installation/creating-sites/#creating-sites ). When I try and run the rb-site install command (rb-site install / var/www/reviews.example.com), I get the following error: [!] Unable to create the /var/www/reviews.example.com directory. Make sure you're running as an administrator and that the directory does not contain any files. The directory does not exist and I am running the script as an administrator. Can anyone suggest a solution to this issue, please? Thanks for any assistance. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Windows installation: Creating a Review Board Site
Thanks for any assistance. I should add that I'm attempting to install version 1.6 on Windows via this link: http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.6/admin/installation/windows/ Thanks. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Windows installation: Creating a Review Board Site
You may get more information as to which operation is failing. The error is as follows: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: '\\var\\www\ \reviews.example.com' Thanks. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Issue 2606 in reviewboard: post-review can't get repository infomation.
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2606 by rajen...@gmail.com: post-review can't get repository infomation. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2606 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. * * If you need immediate support, please contact* * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com * What version are you running? - ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? - I had registered repository of clearcase in ReviewBoard. But Repository infomation don't be called. result of debug What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. To register repository of clearcase in site. 2. You input url. (http://site-name/api/repositories/1/ 3. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? - expected output : repository infomation. (xml file) But don't response infomation. What operating system are you using? What browser? - CentOS 6.2, Apache 2, mod_wsgi Please provide any additional information below. - Exception was occurred from Reviewboard/scmtool/clearcase.py -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2445 in reviewboard: Unable to 'View Diff' when using with RhodeCode for mercurial repositories
Comment #17 on issue 2445 by vairavan...@ciinow.com: Unable to 'View Diff' when using with RhodeCode for mercurial repositories http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2445 Awesome! Thank you so much Mike. I'm going to try your patch now! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2606 in reviewboard: post-review can't get repository infomation.
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2606 by trowb...@gmail.com: post-review can't get repository infomation. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2606 Please include the exception here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2606 in reviewboard: post-review can't get repository infomation.
Comment #2 on issue 2606 by rajen...@gmail.com: post-review can't get repository infomation. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2606 Exception is REPO_INFO_ERROR. Python can't call cleartool.exe from subprocess.popen(). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
